Next Article in Journal
Photosensitive Yb-Doped Germanophosphosilicate Artificial Rayleigh Fibers as a Base of Random Lasers
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanical and Structural Characterization of Pineapple Leaf Fiber
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Critical Factors for Optimum Biodegradation of Bast Fiber’s Gums in Bacterial Retting

1
Biotechnology Research Institute, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, Kota Kinabalu 88400, Sabah, Malaysia
2
Bangladesh Jute Research Institute, Manik Mian Avenue, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fibers 2021, 9(8), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/fib9080052
Submission received: 7 April 2021 / Revised: 4 June 2021 / Accepted: 28 June 2021 / Published: 12 August 2021

Abstract

:
Bast fiber plants require a post-harvest process to yield useable natural cellulosic fibers, denoted as retting or degumming. It encompasses the degradation of the cell wall’s non-cellulosic gummy substances (NCGs), facilitating fibers separations, setting the fiber’s quality, and determining downstream usages. Due to the inconvenience of traditional retting practices, bacterial inoculum and enzyme applications for retting gained attention. Therefore, concurrent changes of agroclimatic and socioeconomic conditions, the conventional water retting confront multiple difficulties, bast industries become vulnerable, and bacterial agents mediated augmented bio-retting processes trying to adapt to sustainability. However, this process’s success demands a delicate balance among substrates and retting-related biotic and abiotic factors. These critical factors were coupled to degrade bast fibers NCGs in bacterial retting while holistically disregarded in basic research. In this study, a set of factors were defined that critically regulates the process and requires to be comprehended to achieve optimum retting without failure. This review presents the bacterial strain characteristics, enzyme potentials, specific bast plant cell wall’s structure, compositions, solvents, and interactions relating to the maximum NCGs removal. Among plants, associated factors pectin is the primary biding material that determines the process’s dynamics, while its degree of esterification has a proficient effect through bacterial enzymatic degradation. The accomplished bast plant cell wall’s structure, macerating solvents pH, and temperature greatly influence the bacterial retting process. This article also highlights the remediation process of water retting pollution in a biocompatible manner concerning the bast fiber industry’s endurance.

1. Introduction

Natural fibers as raw materials have gained momentum, attributed to their unique characteristics in numerous biocompatible commodities preparations. These fibers surmounted hazardous petroleum-based materials, requiring optimum fiber quality and those quality parameters inclined by growing conditions, retting, and other processing [1,2,3]. The raw fiber applications in numerous downstream uses differ concerning fiber quality consistency, i.e., chemical, or mechanical properties, mostly from retting [4,5].
It is the most intricate and obligatory process for producing natural cellulosic fiber from heterogeneous bast fiber plants. Along with the separation feasibility of cellulosic bast fibers from the intact binding of pants cell wall matrix through the elimination of non-cellulosic gummy substances (NCGs), increased favorable mechanical properties eventually validated the multiple value-added green commodities preparations. It improves the cellulose composition of fibers. Elimination of NCGs results in disaggregating the pectin–lignin matrix bounds the elementary fibers and produces fiber bundles. It enhances the wettability of fibers and their compatibility with the polar functional groups of the polymeric matrix, improving the adhesion to the polymer matrix, forming a more robust interface and therefore improved composite accomplishments [6]. The most prominent drawback of using natural cellulose fiber in biocomposites preparation is its inconsistent fiber quality, mostly inclined from the retting process. An effective bio-retting method encompasses the maximum elimination of NCGs within the least retting period. Subsequently, an effective degumming process could produce the desired cellulose fibers necessary to utilize fiber concerning economic aspects and fiber quality [7,8,9]. Unprocessed fibers carry admixtures of NCGs, which increased volumetrically thick fiber bundles. This fraction did not accept the loads transferred across the fiber–matrix interface uniformly cross section, thus determining a reduction in the effective fiber volume fraction [10]. Besides these, the targeted biocomposites preparations such as sound absorption insulation materials, automobile, and aeronautical interior decorative materials, virgin-grade packaging materials achieved after effective elimination of NCGs through the retting process [11,12].
Existing retting approaches confront inconsistent fiber quality, pollution, and input deficit issues, consequently driving to search for alternative retting processes. However, the proliferation of variable quality attributes from under retting and over retting leads to internal fiber rot with low strength and remains gummy substances unblemished, respectively [13,14]. More extended degumming periods (14–28 days) carry a risk of damaging cellulose and yield lower fiber mechanical properties. The dispersion of retting effluents such as galacturonic acid, butyric acid, acetic acid, lactic acid, Ca2+, Mg2+, bicarbonate content, and aquatic ecosystem alters the aquatic flora and fauna [15,16,17,18]. Because of worldwide climatic changes, low or lopsided precipitation crushes the accessibility of vast water sources. These disadvantages are unequivocally interlinking with the fiber quality, cultivator’s benefits, and generally, the bast fiber industry’s endurance.
Innovative retting approaches, such as chemical, mechanical, osmotic, ultrasound, and microwave, were attempting to yield fiber; notwithstanding, every alternative has its impediments concerning pollution and significant expense [19,20,21]. The microbial solutions, for example, commencement of expected bacterial agents, either live strains or enzymes in the retting cycle, have demonstrated a plausible procedure yet request some basic conditions for their ideal initiation. Among different retting components, for example, bast plants, bacteria, solvents, and related biotic and abiotic elements requires a fragile equilibrium to break up the intact binding of cell wall polysaccharides network for quality fiber recuperation. Choices of fitting bacterial strains dependent on their ideal enzymatic potentials, growth characteristics, gums qualities, and other related variables are examined here. The bacterial retting associated critical factors that are obligatorily required for attaining maximum biodegradation of bast fibers adhering NCGS were conferred here. Along with this typical bacterial augmented bio-retting process, its alternative practices of the process were also discussed. This finding may assist with finding appropriate elements for bast fiber bacterial retting measure.

2. Innovative Degumming Approaches

Several augmented approaches devoid of biological retting had opted eliminating the natural cellulose fibers adhering NCGs for desired quality fiber. The goals of simulated techniques are set to faster completion of the process, leveraging conventional retting disadvantages. To date, each augmented process has its limitation, and comparably sophisticated approaches require additional input cost and accomplished with chemical hazards, barely can tolerate the endurance of bast industries competing with synthetic materials. In addition, those techniques were not feasible to maintain the large volume of bast mass; consequently, at the grower’s level, they are still beyond reality. Some innovative techniques are presents in Table 1; those could be the alternative to retting. Besides these, specific target-oriented product manufacturing sectors use fiber surface modification techniques to make it compatible with other commodities such as silane treatment, maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene (MAPP) treatment; electron beam irradiation (EBI) technique, graft co-polymerization, and mercerization; and etherification are few to name.

3. Bacterial Retting Process

Utilizing bacterial retting agents is to inoculate specific bacterial strains or enzymes into the controlled or semi-controlled retting niches. Conversely, conventional retting happens by naturally developed microbiota in open field conditions. A schematic perspective on bacterial agents’ intervened retting measure is presented in Figure 1.
Macerating solvents, mainly water and bacterial extracellular enzymes combine to act on the insoluble plants’ surface. Bacterial enzymes initiate long-chain breaks in the cell wall gummy substances without the need to extricate these chains from their crystalline lattice. The significant strides of retting are water ingestion, an arrangement of calcium oxalate crystals; cortex expulsion; evacuation of gum in the center lamella and the fiber surfaces. The initial two cycles were finished under low enzyme activation, while the third cycle required maximum pectinase activity, and the last cycle commenced with higher pectinase and xylanase activities [32,33]. This retting process preserves the original carbohydrate structure in monomeric sugars, compared to the chemical destruction of the carbon, which possesses the upper limit of cellulose, however, a lesser lignin content [34].

4. Bast Fiber Cell Wall Structure Influencing Bacterial Retting

Cellulosic bast fibers originate from a particular gelatinous kind secondary cell wall of dicotyledonous plants. The key features of this sort of cell wall are their high substance of cellulose accomplishing (85%), existing and contrasted with the classic xylan type cell wall [35,36,37,38]. Usually, the bast fibers cell wall average width is 4 to 10 µm; therefore, with the help of macerating solvents, bacteria successfully can break the cell wall barrier to invade [39]. The elementary fibers are reinforced along with pectin’s and lignin outlining the following microstructure level, i.e., specialized technical fibers, with a distance across going from 50 to 100 μm [40]. The primary cell wall is just 0.02 micrometers thick and made of lignin and pectin, and is a haphazardly situated cellulosic fiber, though the secondary cell wall is dominated by cellulose attached together with lignin and hemicellulose (Figure 2).
The classical xylan-rich cell wall acts as the percussor of bast fibers gelatinous type cell wall [41]. Due to hygroscopic nature of xylan, this type of a cell wall tends to degrade faster than those made of crystalline cellulose fiber. The presence of Rhamnogalacturonans-I in the gelatinous-type secondary cell walls effectively retained by cellulose microfibrils with separate layers termed as S1, S2, and S3 according to the order of their deposition. During the quick growth cycle of plant production, the most invasive noticeable output of primary bast fibers occurs [42]. Fiber cell formations were categorized in two distinct phases: (a) expansion devoid of new stratum buildup called the primary cell wall and (b) step of cell wall setting designated as secondary walls [43].
Cellulose accomplishes its most important focus in the S2 layer, and lignin accumulates in the center lamella and organized gathering in groups, isolated by the cortex parenchyma cell with the pectin and hemicellulose rich cell wall [44]. Among three secondary cell wall layers, S2 is the more robust and determines the fiber properties. As cell wall structure and the bast fiber component’s orientation vary, the non-cellulosic gums in correlation with cellulosic fibers also vary in different positions. The outer, middle lamella is rich in pectic substances and lignin, which plays a crucial role in maceration and, subsequently, microbial invasion, and acts as an enzymatic epicenter. The organized fiber structure with crystalline compositions increases from the middle lamella to the secondary cell wall. Conversely, amorphous cell wall components were prevalent at outer, middle lamella and tended to decrease towards inner portions.
Different arrangement of crystalline in cellulose structure are brought about by intra and intermolecular hydrogen holding, which happened through hydroxyl bunches [45]. There are 90–100 ‘g’ crystalline cellulose (Iβ)/100 g cellulose observed in plant-based fibers [46]. Thus, the proportional orientation of bast components such as outer amorphous components degrade faster, and the inner crystalline cellulosic components take time to decompose. A proper level of retting within a minimum time is essential [47] which gave the protection to the crystalline cellulosic fiber rather than amorphous gums.

5. Bast Fibers Cell Walls Constituents Affecting Retting Process

Bast fibers chemical constituents are categorized as major and minor groups. The main constituents for which the plants are domesticated are natural cellulose fiber, along with hemicellulose and lignin. On the other hand, pectic substances, ash, proteins, pigments, different extractives, and mineral constituents such as Ca and Mg. However, pectic materials present in trace quantities but determine the adhesive, mechanical, and defensive functions of bast fiber plants. Consequently, the separation of individual fiber through the retting process from a fiber bundle depends on the degradation of these pectic substances. The cellulose and lignin together shared for more than 60% and, at times, up to 80% of the secondary cell walls which also contain hemicelluloses and relatively less pectin compares to primary cell walls [48,49]. Major constituents of commercially important bast fibers are shown in Table 2.
Cellulose is the repeating linear form of glucose unit composed of β-1, four linkages. Based on chemical composition, cellulose is the main component (50–99%) of all bast fibers. The percentage of cellulosic compositions differs from plant types and even varietal differences, determining the quality, and end use of fiber. Indication of retting reflects by removing its amorphous portions, which increases the crystallinity of that fiber. These single subunits together create a larger unit of microfibrils. The linkages throughout the microfibrils are closely interlinked, providing them with the excellent mechanical property. This hydrogen bond between the two cells with a mostly parallel cellulose layer is connected tightly and wrapped microfibrils. The microfibrils are then added to the crystalline cellulose fibers. Degradation of cellulosic components during retting destroys fibers. Crystalline cellulose portions could be beneficial for high-quality fiber; conversely, critical parts of cellulosic fragments gave lower fiber yield. Chemically, 17.5 percent of NaOH solutions are used to produce α-cellulose. The modern X-ray diffractometer technology determines the crystallinity of cellulosic fiber. Its proportion with other incrusted substances determines the fiber quality, mainly attributed to retting. The crystalline structure of cellulose protects it from degradation for a prolonged retting period.
The second abundant component of bast fiber is hemicellulose, which comprises complex branched groups of polysaccharide constituents with H-bonding to cellulose. These mixtures are sugar units such as xylan, xyloglucan, 4-methyl glucuronic acid, mannans, galacturonic acid, arabinogalactan, or other heteropolysaccharides residues. Galactoglucomamman is the major structural component of bast fibers hemicellulose. Differential characteristics of hemicellulose from cellulose include their degree of polymerization and lower weight. A higher proportion of hemicellulose conversely increases its water retention characteristics and made the fiber lower quality. The hemicellulosic cross-linking network considers the main structural constituent of the fiber cell. During the retting process, this fraction is not entirely removed by retting, and its proportion determines the crystallinity of cellulosic fiber. One of the significant functions of hemicellulase is to maintain the biodegradable characteristic of the fiber.
Pectin is the polymer of D-galacturonic acid residues originating from the middle lamella of the primary cell wall. Pectin is the chief incrusting material and the deciding factor for the retting, holding fiber bundles together with other cell wall components, ranging from 5 to 23 percent [51,52]. The middle lamella of bast fiber is the determinant hub of retting, where fiber cells are glued together with pectineus gums. This individual fiber makes the fiber bundles parallelly orientated to the stem’s longitudinal axis. Galactose composition is the typical gelatinous type of cell wall, also known as galactan and arabinogalactan. Pectin is one of nature’s most diverse biomacromolecules. In pectin structures, there are seventy different monosaccharide units, and seven different polysaccharides units observed. Pectineus substances differ from origins, which are inclined to esterified proportions (methylated) of total galacturonic unit contents. Its esterified variation demands specific pectinolytic enzymes to depolymerize [53,54].
Lignin consists of complex aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbon polymers, and it generates powerful cellulose and hemicellulose clusters in plant materials. Lignification of bast fibers increases with the plants’ age and differs from sources, becoming more condensed than the hardwood fiber lignin [55,56,57]. The hydrophobic lignin network distresses another network’s attributes so that it acts as a linking negotiator and surges the rigidity of the fiber to make composites materials [58]. The full removal of lignin from the bast fiber cellulose portions during retting is a difficult task. Lignification in bast materials increases with the plants’ age and makes the fiber hard and whitish color. Conversely, delignification improves its color and reduces pore sizes, which is ideal for biocomposites materials. Another positive aspect of delignification is the reduced compositions of a hemicellulose-oriented acetyl group [59].
A trace amount of wax, protein, soluble gums, and minerals components were also present on to cell walls of bast fibers, which could also play a role in the retting process. The most prominent roles play the cell walls calcium and magnesium minerals, combining with pectins forms Ca or Mg pectate. That pectate trapped the cellulose fiber on to the cell wall hard binding. Insoluble waxes are made of various alcohols and can extract with organic solutions.

6. Bacterial Strains Affecting Retting Process

All biological bast fiber retting processes are exclusively functions of microbial enzymatic activities. With the help of solvent maceration, bacteria penetrate the cell wall tissues through stomata by replacing intercellular air. The primary critical factors for choosing to ret potential bacteria depend on their optimal growth for specific nutrient requirements, temperature, pH, and O2 status. Spore-forming bacteria can survive in harsh environmental conditions and their extracellular enzymes are highly stable.
Plants endogenous bacterial mixture is non-selective, and their specific roles yet to be explored. In mixed microbial niche, some microbes secrete specific enzymes, and the rest of them areas non-producers, but all the microbes take nutrients from the sources for their metabolic activities. The non-enzyme producers are described as microbial cheaters and showed that higher costs of enzymes production favor cheaters and lower rate favored producers [60]. The co-existence of cheaters and producers is highly organized but releases intermediate-level enzymes. Therefore, competition from non-selective cheaters is believed to result in inefficient enzyme production. On the other hand, nutritional limitations can restrict the microbial fostering and enzymatic degradation of heterogeneous lignocellulosic materials in natural atmospheres. The concept of bacteria applications in the retting process arises because of the tumbling efficiency of existing practices. Bacterial inoculum, whether natural selections or genetically modified strains, should reach the grower’s level as safe, be user-friendly, and have the potential to be stored for an extended period. Infrastructure related to bacterial retting was accomplishing with an artificial retting tank made of the cemented permanent tank, plastic tank, or temporary soil digging tank wrapping with plastic. Experimental retting tanks for fiber plants gave satisfactory results, both sterile and non-sterile retting at a research-level. The digestion of the lignocellulosic material by bacterial means in a controlled fermentation niche is a proven technology, however, it is still at the beginning phase for retting purposes.
Inoculation of these bacterial agents may serve to control the microbial diversity in the retting niche. Aerobic bacterial flora begins the retting process and continues if there prevails enough O2 for these bacteria’s sustenance. After that, anaerobic bacterial strains actively operate the retting process to the end. Till now, there was no evidence to use anaerobic stains as a starter inoculum. Facultatively anoxic strain actively participated in the retting process in both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. It is still debatable that a single isolate could complete the retting process or not, as multiple enzymes require retting completion. Application of bacterial consortia gave influential retting performances comparing to inoculation of single strains. Another possible solution could be the initiation of numerous enzymatic potentials strains. A list of retting potentials bacterial strains presents in Table 3.
Inoculation of bacteria strains decreases the other bacterial richness and diversity. The inoculated strain led to replacing different non-retting potentials bacterial strains; dominant groups are all degumming enzyme producers and survive until completion of retting. Application of pectinolytic bacteria as consortia gave superior retting results compared to single strains due to multiple enzymes requirement to degrade cell wall gummy substances [32,82,83]. The main groups of bacteria that help to degrade lignin are Actinomycetes, Firmicutes, Bacteroides, and Proteobacteria [84,85,86]. In several studies it was observe that the formulation of bacterial consortia in retting gave influential outcome comparing with using single strain. A list of bacterial consortia are presents in Table 4.

7. Bacterial Retting Enzymes Affecting Retting Process

In the retting process, enzymes’ applications gave consistent fiber quality, restricted fiber damage, minimum or no fiber impurities, reduced odor, and retting pollution. Simultaneously, enzymatic breakdown of natural fibers matrix by pectinases, hemicellulase, and laccases is less invasive. Bast fiber biological retting is indeed the function of bacterial or fungal enzymes [87]. Besides utilization of available commercial enzymes in retting could modify fiber characteristics as demanded properties that benefit bast fiber processing and fabric finishing ecology. Enzymatic separation produces stronger fiber suitable for textile applications [88,89,90].
A group of diversified enzymes acts on pectin substances by cleaving the pectin chain’s 1,4-glycosidic bonds. So far, there have been records of 15 different types of pectinase. There have been several studies to investigate the effectiveness of pectinase on the bast fiber retting. As retting is the transformation of pectin [87,91], pectinases are the main retting enzyme. Based on its optimal pH activity, i.e., acid, and alkaline pectinases generally obtain from fungal and bacterial sources, respectively. Treating bast fibers with pectinase improves the mechanical characteristics of reinforced thermoplastic composites [92,93]. Alkaline pectinase has applications in the textile sector for bio-scouring and retting. Among alkali tolerant enzymes, polygalacturonase is the prime enzyme involved in the bast fiber retting process [61,94], including pectin lyase, pectate lyase, and esterase. When selecting pectinases, one should consider their esterification degree, as their polymerization and solubility depend on it. [95]. Pectinase applications modify other non-cellulose plants’ gums, such as 3% pectinase application at kenaf retting reduced around one-half of the syringyl and guaiacyl lignin [96]. Beyond this, the possible reason is pectin, and hemicellulase of bast materials restricts the same uronic acid content [97]. Depolymerization reaction of pectic substances hangs on their chosen substrates, degradation mechanisms either trans-elimination or hydrolysis, cleavage mechanism either random for endo-acting or terminal for exo-acting enzymes [98]. A list of retting pectinases and their mode of actins presents in Table 5.
The production and application of pectinase from recombinant microbial sources have increased many folds over the last decades. A single-cell prokaryotic production of enzymes from genetically manipulated bacteria is always preferential due to their known genetic configuration. Whereas fungal sources pectinases are acidic and mainly uses in food sectors. The recombinant alkaline pectinases from Bacillus clausi, Penicilliums sp. 0602, Bacillus halodurans, and Bacillus lichiniformis were reported by several authors in the E. coli expression system and observed their increased enzyme activity [78,99,100].
Bacillus species prominently produce pectinase because of their alkali tolerance, and their cheap fermentation process. Alkaline Bacillus species are salt-loving bacteria, such as B. subtilis gave maximum pectate lyase activity by using ammonium salt as nitrogen sources from [101]. Bacterial species belonging to the multiple enzymes encoding genes such as, polygalacturonase from Bacillus licheniformis stain number KIBGE-IB21 contain other auxiliary enzymes such as pectin lyase and pectin methyl esterase with trace amounts of cellulase [68].
Next to pectinases, hemicellulase is the second most important enzyme to contribute in the bast fiber retting process. Among different hemicellulases, xylanases are well characterized and act on the linear backbone of xylan. These hydrolytic enzymes degrade the lignocellulosic interphasic bast fibre xylan through retting process by cleaving β-1-4-D-xylosidic bond. A list of commercial enzymes use in bast fiber retting and processing shows in Table 6.
Bast fiber xylan properties identify as arabinose-4-O-methylglucuronoxylan which typically occurs in softwood fibre plants. Usually, the xylanases are in diversified as like their substrate and works on specific substrates. Cellulase-free and alkaline resistant xylanase enzymes favor the retting process. In contrast to fungal origins, bacterial xylanase is alkali-tolerant, which is convenient for bast fiber retting. Bacillus species are also well known for their alkali tolerant cellulase free xylanases [62]. Other bacterial sources of xylanase reported from Clostridium cellulovorans, Erwinia spp., Bacillus halodurans, Bacillus circulan.
In general, cellulases for retting purposes consider as detrimental for the primary cellulosic bast fiber. The two different forms of cellulose, i.e., crystalline and amorphous, are degraded by differential cellulases. However, complete degradation of cellulose requires multiple cellulase enzymes. Usually, cellulose is insoluble and crystalline. Therefore, it tends to be nondegradable at a certain retting period whereas endoglucanases act on amorphous regions of the cellulose to degrade its glycosidic linkages’; the amorphous portions are not desired into the cellulosic fiber. In contrast, exo-glucanase or cellobiohydrolases acts on the crystalline portions of cellulosic bast fiber and strongly prohibited for retting purposes. A combination of cellobiohydrolases and endoglucanases entirely degrades the crystalline portions of cellulose [102]. Scarification of this crystalline requires only a small mix of these enzymes. Among bacterial species, cellulase production is dominant in clostridium species with xylanase and or pectinases. Therefore, for retting purposes, cellulase-free xylanase and pectinase enzymes are preferential. A Clostridium strain C. cellulovorans genome study confirms its non-cellulolytic gene encoding hemicellulose and pectinase degrading enzymes [103].
Laccases including phenol oxidase, laccase, and peroxidases are lignin degrading enzymes. There are three peroxidases identified involved in lignin degradation: lignin peroxidase, manganese peroxidase, and flexible peroxidase. As phenolic hydroxyl groups linked together by ether bonds in lignin molecules, useful lignin biodegrades must be broken down this to degrade lignin. In comparison to other microbial lignin sources, bacterial lignin has a high temperature tolerance in salty, alkaline environments [104], which also favor pectin degradation. A new class of lignin peroxides known as dye-decolorizing peroxides was prominent in bacteria assumed have potentiality in the retting process. There are three classes of ligninolytic bacteria identified, i.e., actinobacteria, α-proteobacteria, and γ-proteobacteria, prevalently harbors in the aquatic ecosystem [105]. Laccases are oxidases with a wide range of aromatic compounds such as phenolic, amine hydroxy idols, and benzenethiols. Bacterial sources of Laccases are reported from Bacillus subtilis, Streptomyces lavendulae, and Sinorhizobium meliloti. Lignin peroxidase non-specifically degrades its polymers and is known as true laccase for its superior redox potentiality. The bacterial sources lignin peroxidases are abundant in actinobacteria and streptomyces. Manganese-dependent peroxidases were predominantly found in Bacillus and Panebacillilus species.

8. Interaction of Others Retting Factors

The bast plant’s age has a pivotal role in bacterial retting, as its composition changes at different growth stages. Over matured bast plants have gone through a coarse lignification process; therefore, lignin’s composition becomes denser. Comparing with the elongated portion, the base of the plants got more lignin than other parts. Physiochemical properties bast plants with ages have changed, such as fiber diameter increases with maturity, but primary cellulose content and moisture decrease. The other non-cellulosic components might be increases, and water reduction made it hard to swell up while enzymatic degradation [106]. The harvesting period of jute plants for optimum retting and fiber quality between 110 to 120 DAS; overmature plants take a more extended period and yield low-quality fiber [107]. Exposed to a long day photoperiod during growing season, bast fiber crops attain faster growth before flowering. Therefore, the green stem at vegetative maturity tends to ret faster and continues up to flower initiation. Harvest time toward the start of seed development prompted easier decortication with no recognizable effect on the fibers’ strength. [108]. Therefore, the critical harvest time for optimum bio-retting of bast plants at flowering or before flowering stages, long before the seed maturity [109,110,111]. Harvesting at this stage also beneficial for products damping characteristics, which happened due to increased lignin concentration [112]. The lignin and pectin content relies on their age and maturity, about half that of the cores of roots, and the same level as in the matured samples plants more than 50 days old plants fiber [113,114].
The biodegradation cycle of bast fiber gummy segments influenced by the temperature as it straightforwardly influences the microbial development and metabolic action of proteins. Most of the retting potentials bacteria are optimally grown in between 25 to 35 °C, which ideal for bacterial water retting helps to maintain fiber quality [115]. However, in temperate regions, the field retting process lingers more than two months due to a lack of optimal microbial growth conditions.
Uses of alkaliphiles in retting are advantageous due to their adaptive mechanisms and extracellular stable enzymes in harsh environmental conditions. They are incredibly functioning in these punitive retting environments by maintaining a cytoplasmic pH for their adaptions between the gradient of the medium. Interestingly, alkaliphiles’ intracellular enzymes are like non-alkaliphiles [116,117]. At the beginning, pH of the retting media decreases as low as 4.6–4.9; when the acid dispersion from the biochemical conversion of cell wall materials ended, the retting media again tended to increase the pH. This critical point indicates retting completion after that expects over retting [118]. Commercial enzymes and chelators mediated retting were unable to sequestering Ca from fiber parts at lower pH but higher pH confirm successful retting [119]. In bio retting calcium particles unequivocally hinder plant tissue mellowing at acid pH, yet not in the non-enzymatic acid hydrolysis [120].
Chelating agents are substances that respond with metal particles to shape a steady water-solvent complex. Cell wall minerals components such as Ca and Mg make their corresponding Ca or Mg pectate through the “egg box” structure. Therefore, applications of Ca sequestering agents such as EDTA, oxalic acid, phosphorus, and nitrogenous compounds as a chelator in the retting niche, advances the retting process. Cell wall’s minerals reacts with chelating agents such as EDTA, oxalic acid, phosphorous, and nitrogen and makes corresponding water-soluble complexes. Optimum activation of pectinase with 18 mM EDTA gave superior fiber quality comparing with no EDTA treatment [121]. Alkali tolerant pectinases play a crucial role in retting by preventing contamination, permits to adopt an open retting system [122,123,124].

9. Conclusions

The excellence and applicability of bast fibers rely upon its effective retting measures, and at present, most of the bast fiber production hubs faced difficulties in achieving it. However, chemicals and other augmented retting require an additional cost and engaged in adulteration. Application of bacterial agents, either live formulations or enzymes, could promote the bast industry numerous ways. This approach surmounted some prevalent difficulties that face the conventional retting processes. The incorporation of bacterial strains in the bio retting process is comparatively novice in practice, while its best patterns yet to be optimized for the demanded outcome. The optimum NCGs degradation required the controlled retting niches rather than steeping in natural aquatic habitats. However, maximizing its efficiency must be further investigated through the manipulations of its core components. Inoculation of multienzyme potentials recombinant strains might be the best choice. In this case, facultative alkaliphilic anaerobes prevented endogenous strains even at non-sterile conditions. Bast plant’s pectins are highly esterified (DE: ~50), while optimum NCGs degradations were positively correlated with least DE. Therefore, genetically modified low esterified plants could ease the retting difficulties. Though not comprehensively tested, alkaline pectinase with a higher temperature tolerance was worthy for the retting process, which could also be originated from plant sources while their specific roles for retting yet to be examined. However, the enzymatic retting has proven its potency for achieving desired quality fiber while its application is limited due to high cost. Macerating solvents are another critical component of the bio retting process; in recent years, the conventional retting process has been facing difficulties in the availability of freshwater solvents for steeping fiber plants due to changing agroclimatic conditions. Therefore, feasibility studies of alternative water solvents such as seawater and municipal wastewater as retting solvents could also be worthy of investigation. In addition, the desired retting within the minimum retting period was obligatory for quality bast fiber and applications of any triggering elements such as Ca sequestering chelating agents benevolent for the process.

Author Contributions

M.M.H. conceptualization, prepared the manuscript and rewriting, S.S. planning and proof reading, and V.K. editing the manuscript. All authors discussed the writing concept agreed to approve the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by National Agricultural Technology project 2, (Project ID: P149553) of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Authors thank to IFAD and World Bank-funded National Agricultural Technology project-2, of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh for financial support conducting research and Biotechnology Research Institute of Universiti Malaysia Sabah is providing all research facilities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have declared that there is no conflict of interest exist.

References

  1. Ramesh, M.; Palanikumar, K.; Reddy, K.H. Plant fibre-based bio-composites: Sustainable and renewable green materials. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 79, 558–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zimniewska, M.; Wladyka-Przybylak, M.; Mankowski, J. Cellulosic bast fibers, their structure and properties suitable for composite applications. In Cellulose Fibers: Bio- and Nano-Polymer Composites; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 97–119. [Google Scholar]
  3. Shekar, H.S.; Ramachandra, M. Green composites: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 2518–2526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sisti, L.; Totaro, G.; Vannini, M.; Celli, A. Retting process as a pretreatment of natural fibers for the development of polymer composites. In Smart Polymer Nanocomposites; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 97–135. [Google Scholar]
  5. Tezara, C.; Siregar, J.P.; Lim, H.; Fauzi, F.; Yazdi, M.H.; Moey, L.; Lim, J. Factors that affect the mechanical properties of kenaf fiber reinforced polymer: A review. J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2016, 10, 2159–2175. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sisti, L.; Totaro, G.; Vannini, M.; Fabbri, P.; Kalia, S.; Zatta, A.; Celli, A. Evaluation of the retting process as a pre-treatment of vegetable fibers for the preparation of high-performance polymer biocomposites. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2016, 81, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Han, G.; Jiang, W.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, M. Effect of steam pressure on chemical and structural properties of kenaf fibers during steam explosion process. BioResources 2016, 11, 6590–6599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Keller, A.; Leupin, M.; Mediavilla, V.; Wintermantel, E. Influence of the growth stage of industrial hemp on chemical and physical properties of the fibres. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2001, 13, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mediavilla, V.; Leupin, M.; Keller, A. Influence of the growth stage of industrial hemp on the yield formation in relation to certain fibre quality traits. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2001, 13, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mazzanti, V.; Pariante, R.; Bonanno, A.; de Ballesteros, O.R.; Mollica, F.; Filippone, G. Reinforcing mechanisms of natural fibers in green composites: Role of fibers morphology in a PLA/hemp model system. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2019, 180, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sánchez-Safont, E.L.; Aldureid, A.; Lagarón, J.M.; Gamez-Perez, J.; Cabedo, L. Biocomposites of different lignocellulosic wastes for sustainable food packaging applications. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 145, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Santoni, A.; Bonfiglio, P.; Fausti, P.; Marescotti, C.; Mazzanti, V.; Mollica, F.; Pompoli, F. Improving the sound absorption performance of sustainable thermal insulation materials: Natural hemp fibres. Appl. Acoust. 2019, 150, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fernando, D.; Thygesen, A.; Meyer, A.S.; Daniel, G. Elucidating field retting mechanisms of hemp fibres for biocomposites: Effects of microbial actions and interactions on the cellular micro-morphology and ultrastructure of hemp stems and bast fibres. BioResources 2019, 14, 4047–4084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ahmed, Z.; Nizam, S.A. Jute—Microbiological and biochemical research. Plant Tissue Cult. Biotechnol. 2008, 18, 197–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Majumdar, B.; Chattopadhyay, L.; Barai, S.; Saha, A.R.; Sarkar, S.; Mazumdar, S.P.; Saha, R.; Jha, S.K. Impact of conventional retting of jute (Corchorus spp.) on the environmental quality of water: A case study. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2019, 191, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Das, B.; Chakrabarti, K.; Ghosh, S.; Majumdar, B.; Tripathi, S.; Chakraborty, A. Effect of efficient pectinolytic bacterial isolates on retting and fibre quality of jute. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2012, 36, 415–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Paridah, M.T.; Basher, A.B.; SaifulAzry, S.; Ahmed, Z. Retting process of some bast plant fibres and its effect on fibre quality: A review. BioResources 2011, 6, 5260–5281. [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu, M.; Ale, M.T.; Kołaczkowski, B.; Fernando, D.; Daniel, G.; Meyer, A.S.; Thygesen, A. Comparison of traditional field retting and Phlebia radiata Cel 26 retting of hemp fibres for fibre-reinforced composites. AMB Express 2017, 7, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Kavuthodi, B.; Sebastian, D. Biotechnological valorization of pineapple stem for pectinase production by Bacillus subtilis BKDS1: Media formulation and statistical optimization for submerged fermentation. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 16, 715–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Das, S.; Majumdar, B.; Saha, A.R. Biodegradation of Plant Pectin and Hemicelluloses with Three Novel Bacillus pumilus Strains and Their Combined Application for Quality Jute Fibre Production. Agric. Res. 2015, 4, 354–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chauhan, S.; Sharma, A.K.; Jain, R.K. Enzymatic retting: A revolution in the handmade papermaking from Calotropis procera. In Biotechnology for Environmental Management and Resource Recovery; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 77–88. [Google Scholar]
  22. Song, Y.; Jiang, W.; Nie, K.; Zhang, Y.; Ben, H.; Han, G.; Ragauskas, A.J. An alkali-free method to manufacture ramie fiber. Text. Res. J. 2018, 89, 3653–3659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gao, S.; Han, G.; Jiang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X. Steam explosion and alkali-oxygen combined effect for degumming of kenaf fiber. BioResources 2015, 10, 5476–5488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Song, Y.; Jiang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Ben, H.; Han, G.; Ragauskas, A.J. Isolation and characterization of cellulosic fibers from kenaf bast using steam explosion and Fenton oxidation treatment. Cellulose 2018, 25, 4979–4992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Narkpiban, K.; Poonsawat, T. Optimizing cellulose extraction from kenaf (Hibiscus Cannabinus L.) fiber by selective retting and hydrothermal pretreatment. J. Nat. Fibers 2020, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Konczewicz, W.; Zimniewska, M.; Valera, M.A. The selection of a retting method for the extraction of bast fibers as response to challenges in composite reinforcement. Text. Res. J. 2017, 88, 2104–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Klein, J.M.; de Lima, V.S.; da Feira, J.M.C.; Camassola, M.; Brandalise, R.N.; Forte, M.M.D.C. Preparation of cashew gum-based flocculants by microwave- and ultrasound-assisted methods. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 107, 1550–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Guo, A.; Sun, Z.; Satyavolu, J. Impact of chemical treatment on the physiochemical and mechanical properties of kenaf fibers. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2019, 141, 111726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Munder, F.; Furll, C. Effective processing of bast fiber plants and mechanical properties of the fibers. In Proceedings of the 2004 ASAE Annual Meeting, Ottawa, OT, Canada, 1–4 August 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nie, K.; Liu, B.; Zhao, T.; Wang, H.; Song, Y.; Ben, H.; Ragauskas, A.J.; Han, G.; Jiang, W. A facile degumming method of kenaf fibers using deep eutectic solution. J. Nat. Fibers 2020, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, F.; Ma, Y.; Qian, Y.; Lv, L.; Zheng, L.; Zhao, Y. A novel ionic liquid degumming process for Apocynum venetum. J. Text. Inst. 2015, 107, 1450–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mao, K.; Chen, H.; Qi, H.; Qiu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, J. Visual degumming process of ramie fiber using a microbial consortium RAMCD407. Cellulose 2019, 26, 3513–3528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tamburini, E.; Leon, A.G.; Perito, B.; Mastromei, G. Characterization of bacterial pectinolytic strains involved in the water retting process. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 5, 730–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jankauskienė, Z.; Butkutė, B.; Gruzdevienė, E.; Ceseviciene, J.; Fernando, A.L. Chemical composition and physical properties of dew- and water-retted hemp fibers. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 75, 206–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gorshkova, T.A.; Gurjanov, O.P.; Mikshina, P.; Ibragimova, N.N.; Mokshina, N.E.; Salnikov, V.V.; Ageeva, M.V.; Amenitskii, S.I.; Chernova, T.E.; Chemikosova, S.B. Specific type of secondary cell wall formed by plant fibers. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2010, 57, 328–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hobson, N.; Roach, M.J.; Deyholos, M.K. Gene expression in tension wood and bast fibres. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2010, 57, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gurjanov, O.P.; Ibragimova, N.N.; Gnezdilov, O.; Gorshkova, T. Polysaccharides, tightly bound to cellulose in cell wall of flax bast fibre: Isolation and identification. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 72, 719–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, M.; Fernando, D.; Daniel, G.; Madsen, B.; Meyer, A.S.; Ale, M.T.; Thygesen, A. Effect of harvest time and field retting duration on the chemical composition, morphology and mechanical properties of hemp fibers. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 69, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Abbott, D.W.; Boraston, A.B. Structural biology of pectin degradation by enterobacteriaceae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2008, 72, 301–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Prasad, B.M.; Sain, M.M. Mechanical properties of thermally treated hemp fibers in inert atmosphere for potential composite reinforcement. Mater. Res. Innov. 2003, 7, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gorshkova, T.; Brutch, N.; Chabbert, B.; Deyholos, M.; Hayashi, T.; Lev-Yadun, S.; Mellerowicz, E.J.; Morvan, C.; Neutelings, G.; Pilate, G. Plant fiber formation: State of the art, recent and expected progress, and open questions. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2012, 31, 201–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mokshina, N.; Chernova, T.; Galinousky, D.; Gorshkov, O.; Gorshkova, T. Key stages of fiber development as determinants of bast fiber yield and quality. Fibers 2018, 6, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Meshram, J.H.; Palit, P. Biology of industrial bast fibers with reference to quality. J. Nat. Fibers 2013, 10, 176–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ouajai, S.; Shanks, R. Solvent and enzyme induced recrystallization of mechanically degraded hemp cellulose. Cellulose 2006, 13, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sheltami, R.M.; Abdullah, I.; Ahmad, I.; Dufresne, A.; Kargarzadeh, H. Extraction of cellulose nanocrystals from mengkuang leaves (Pandanus tectorius). Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 88, 772–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Thygesen, A.; Oddershede, J.; Lilholt, H.; Thomsen, A.B.; Ståhl, K. On the determination of crystallinity and cellulose content in plant fibres. Cellulose 2005, 12, 563–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Henriksson, G.; Akin, D.E.; Slomczynski, D.; Eriksson, K.-E.L. Production of highly efficient enzymes for flax retting by Rhizomucor pusillus. J. Biotechnol. 1999, 68, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Komuraiah, A.; Kumar, N.S.; Prasad, B.D. Chemical composition of natural fibers and its influence on their mechanical properties. Mech. Compos. Mater. 2014, 50, 359–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mellerowicz, E.J.; Sundberg, B. Wood cell walls: Biosynthesis, developmental dynamics and their implications for wood properties. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2008, 11, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vignon, M.; Dupeyre, D.; Garcia-Jaldon, C. Morphological characterization of steam-exploded hemp fibers and their utilization in polypropylene-based composites. Bioresour. Technol. 1996, 58, 203–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vignon, M.R.; Garcia-Jaldon, C. Structural features of the pectic polysaccharides isolated from retted hemp bast fibres. Carbohydr. Res. 1996, 296, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yu, H.; Yu, C. Influence of various retting methods on properties of kenaf fiber. J. Text. Inst. 2010, 101, 452–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Schols, H.; Coenen, G.; Voragen, A. Revealing Pectin’s Structure; Pectins and Pectinases: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 19–34. [Google Scholar]
  54. Aritkhodzhaev, K.A.; Arifkhodzhaev, A.O.; Yusupov, A.M. Pectin from green kenaf bast. Chem. Nat. Compd. 1995, 31, 159–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Day, A.; Ruel, K.; Neutelings, G.; Crônier, D.; David, H.; Hawkins, S.; Chabbert, B. Lignification in the flax stem: Evidence for an unusual lignin in bast fibers. Planta 2005, 222, 234–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Suzuki, H.; Macdonald, J.; Syed, K.; Salamov, A.; Hori, C.; Aerts, A.; Henrissat, B.; Wiebenga, A.; Vankuyk, P.A.; Barry, K.; et al. Comparative genomics of the white-rot fungi, Phanerochaete carnosa and P. chrysosporium, to elucidate the genetic basis of the distinct wood types they colonize. BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Ajith, S. Bacterial degradation of lignin: A prospective for lignocellulosic biofuels. Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. Technol. 2019, 4, 11. [Google Scholar]
  58. John, M.J.; Anandjiwala, R.D. Recent developments in chemical modification and characterization of natural fiber-reinforced composites. Polym. Compos. 2008, 29, 187–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. MacDonald, J.; Doering, M.; Canam, T.; Gong, Y.; Guttman, D.S.; Campbell, M.M.; Master, E.R. Transcriptomic responses of the softwood-degrading white-rot fungus Phanerochaete carnosa during growth on coniferous and deciduous wood. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 3211–3218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Allison, S.D. Cheaters, diffusion and nutrients constrain decomposition by microbial enzymes in spatially structured environments. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8, 626–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, J.; Henriksson, G.; Johansson, G. Polygalacturonase is the key component in enzymatic retting of flax. J. Biotechnol. 2000, 81, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Azeri, C.; Tamer, U.; Oskay, M. Thermoactive cellulase-free xylanase production from alkaliphilic Bacillus strains using various agro-residues and their potential in biobleaching of kraft pulp. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 1684–5315. [Google Scholar]
  63. Kapoor, M.; Beg, Q.K.; Bhushan, B.; Singh, K.; Dadhich, K.; Hoondal, G. Application of an alkaline and thermostable polygalacturonase from Bacillus sp. MG-cp-2 in degumming of ramie (Boehmeria nivea) and sunn hemp (Crotalaria juncea) bast fibres. Process. Biochem. 2001, 36, 803–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tepe, O.; Dursun, A.Y. Exo-pectinase production by Bacillus pumilus using different agricultural wastes and optimizing of medium components using response surface methodology. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 9911–9920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liang, C.; Gui, X.; Zhou, C.; Xue, Y.; Ma, Y.; Tang, S.-Y. Improving the thermoactivity and thermostability of pectate lyase from Bacillus pumilus for ramie degumming. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 99, 2673–2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Qureshi, A.S.; Bhutto, M.A.; Chisti, Y.; Khushk, I.; Dahot, M.U.; Bano, S. Production of pectinase by Bacillus subtilis EFRL 01 in a date syrup medium. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 12563–12570. [Google Scholar]
  67. Ge, J.; Yang, Z.; Du, R.; Zhang, L.; Ping, W.; Zhao, D. Production of pectinolytic enzymes by two Bacillus spp. strains and their application in flax degumming. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 2019, 25, 413–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rehman, H.U.; Aman, A.; Nawaz, M.A.; Qader, S.A.U. Characterization of pectin degrading polygalacturonase produced by Bacillus licheniformis KIBGE-IB21. Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 43, 819–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Embaby, A.M.; Masoud, A.A.; Marey, H.S.; Shaban, N.Z.; Ghonaim, T.M. Raw agro-industrial orange peel waste as a low cost effective inducer for alkaline polygalacturonase production from Bacillus licheniformis SHG10. SpringerPlus 2014, 3, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Remoroza, C.; Wagenknecht, M.; Buchholt, H.C.; Moerschbacher, B.M.; Gruppen, H.; Schols, H.A. Mode of action of Bacillus licheniformis pectin methylesterase on highly methylesterified and acetylated pectins. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 115, 540–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Zhao, D.; Liu, P.; Pan, C.; Du, R.; Ping, W.; Ge, J. Bacterial succession and metabolite changes during flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) retting with Bacillus cereus HDYM-02. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Torimiro, N.; Okonji, R. A comparative study of pectinolytic enzyme production by Bacillus species. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2013, 12, 6498–6503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Namasivayam, E.; Ravindar, J.; Mariappan, K.; Akhil, J.; Mukesh, K.; Jayaraj, R. Production of extracellular pectinase by Bacillus cereus isolated from market solid waste. J. Bioanal. Biomed. 2011, 3, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Mukhopadhyay, A.; Dutta, N.; Chattopadhyay, D.; Chakrabarti, K. Degumming of ramie fiber and the production of reducing sugars from waste peels using nanoparticle supplemented pectate lyase. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 137, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Liu, Y.; Chen, G.; Wang, J.; Hao, Y.; Li, M.; Li, Y.; Hu, B.; Lu, F. Efficient expression of an alkaline pectate lyase gene from Bacillus subtilis and the characterization of the recombinant protein. Biotechnol. Lett. 2011, 34, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhang, G.; Li, S.; Xu, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, F.; Xin, Y.; Shen, Z.; Zhang, H.; Ma, M.; Liu, H. Production of alkaline pectinase: A case study investigating the use of tobacco stalk with the newly isolated strain Bacillus tequilensis CAS-MEI-2-33. BMC Biotechnol. 2019, 19, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Chiliveri, S.R.; Linga, V.R. A novel thermostable, alkaline pectate lyase from Bacillus tequilensis SV11 with potential in textile industry. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 111, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Mei, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhai, R.; Liu, Y. Cloning, purification and biochemical properties of a thermostable pectinase from Bacillus halodurans M29. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2013, 94, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Ghazala, I.; Sayari, N.; Ben Romdhane, M.; Ellouz-Chaabouni, S.; Haddar, A. Assessment of pectinase production by Bacillus mojavensis I4 using an economical substrate and its potential application in oil sesame extraction. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 7710–7722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Duan, S.; Cheng, L.; Liu, Z.; Feng, X.; Zheng, K.; Peng, Y. Diversity and characteristics of kenaf bast degumming microbial resources. J. Nat. Fibers 2018, 15, 799–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. DeAngelis, K.M.; D’Haeseleer, P.; Chivian, D.; Fortney, J.L.; Khudyakov, J.; Simmons, B.; Woo, H.; Arkin, A.P.; Davenport, K.W.; Goodwin, L. Complete genome sequence of “Enterobacter lignolyticus” SCF1. Stand. Genom. Sci. 2011, 5, 69–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Hasan, R.; Aktar, N.; Kabir, S.M.T.; Honi, U.; Halim, A.; Islam, R.; Sarker, M.D.H.; Haque, S.; Alam, M.; Islam, S. Pectinolytic bacterial consortia reduce jute retting period and improve fibre quality. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Datta, S.; Saha, D.; Chattopadhyay, L.; Majumdar, B. Genome comparison identifies different Bacillus species in a bast fibre-retting bacterial consortium and provides insights into pectin degrading genes. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 8169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bugg, T.D.H.; Rahmanpour, R.; Rashid, G.M.M. Bacterial enzymes for lignin oxidation and conversion to renewable chemicals. In Production of Biofuels and Chemicals from Lignin; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 131–146. [Google Scholar]
  85. Wu, Y.-R.; He, J. Characterization of anaerobic consortia coupled lignin depolymerization with biomethane generation. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 139, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Chen, Y.; Chai, L.; Zhu, Y.; Yang, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, H. Biodegradation of kraft lignin by a bacterial strain Comamonas sp. B-9 isolated from eroded bamboo slips. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 112, 900–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lee, C.H.; Khalina, A.; Lee, S.H.; Liu, M. A Comprehensive review on bast fibre retting process for optimal performance in fibre-reinforced polymer composites. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 2020, 6074063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Antonov, V.; Marek, J.; Bjelkova, M.; Smirous, P.; Fischer, H. Easily available enzymes as natural retting agents. Biotechnol. J. 2007, 2, 342–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Dreyer, J.; Müssig, J.; Koschke, N.; Ibenthal, W.-D.; Harig, H. Comparison of enzymatically separated hemp and nettle fibre to chemically separated and steam exploded hemp fibre. J. Ind. Hemp 2002, 7, 43–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. De Prez, J.; Van Vuure, A.W.; Ivens, J.; Aerts, G.; Van De Voorde, I. Cost-efficient enzymatic extraction, and treatment of natural fibres for high quality composites. In Proceedings of the MultiHemp Fibre Quality Workshop, Villeneuve d’Ascq, France, 18 January 2018. [Google Scholar]
  91. Abdullah, S.; Zuhudi, N.; Anuar, N.; Isa, M. Mechanical and thermal characterization of alkali treated kenaf fibers. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Batu Ferringhi, Penang, Malaysia, 21–22 November 2017; p. 012048. [Google Scholar]
  92. Faruk, O.; Bledzki, A.K.; Fink, H.-P.; Sain, M. Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 1552–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Réquilé, S.; Le Duigou, A.; Bourmaud, A.; Baley, C. Peeling experiments for hemp retting characterization targeting biocomposites. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2018, 123, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Favela-Torres, E.; Volke-Sepúlveda, T.; Viniegra-González, G. Production of hydrolytic depolymerising pectinases. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2006, 44, 221–227. [Google Scholar]
  95. Ovodov, Y.S. Current views on pectin substances. Russ. J. Bioorganic Chem. 2009, 35, 269–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Song, K.H.; Obendorf, S.K. Chemical and biological retting of kenaf fibers. Text. Res. J. 2006, 76, 751–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Nacos, M.; Katapodis, P.; Pappas, C.; Daferera, D.; Tarantilis, P.; Christakopoulos, P.; Polissiou, M. Kenaf xylan—A source of biologically active acidic oligosaccharides. Carbohydr. Polym. 2006, 66, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kashyap, D.; Vohra, P.; Chopra, S.; Tewari, R. Applications of pectinases in the commercial sector: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2001, 77, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Yu, P.; Zhang, Y.; Gu, D. Production optimization of a heat-tolerant alkaline pectinase from Bacillus subtilis ZGL14 and its purification and characterization. Bioengineered 2017, 8, 613–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Li, X.; Wang, H.; Zhou, C.; Ma, Y.; Li, J.; Song, J. Cloning, expression and characterization of a pectate lyase from Paenibacillus sp. 0602 in recombinant Escherichia coli. BMC Biotechnol. 2014, 14, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Saha, M.; Rana, R.S.; Adhikary, B.; Mitra, S. Screening of bacterial strains for pectate lyase production and detection of optimal growth conditions for enhanced enzyme activity. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2017, 9, 370–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Boisset, C.; Chanzy, H.; Henrissat, B. Optimized mixtures of recombinantHumicola insolens cellulases for the biodegradation of crystalline cellulose. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2000, 72, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Tamaru, Y.; Miyake, H.; Kuroda, K.; Nakanishi, A.; Matsushima, C.; Doi, R.H.; Ueda, M. Comparison of the mesophilic cellulosome-producing Clostridium cellulovorans genome with other cellulosome-related clostridial genomes. Microb. Biotechnol. 2010, 4, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Xu, R.; Zhang, K.; Liu, P.; Han, H.; Zhao, S.; Kakade, A.; Khan, A.; Du, D.; Li, X. Lignin depolymerization and utilization by bacteria. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 269, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Huang, X.-F.; Santhanam, N.; Badri, D.V.; Hunter, W.J.; Manter, D.K.; Decker, S.R.; Vivanco, J.M.; Reardon, K.F. Isolation and characterization of lignin-degrading bacteria from rainforest soils. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013, 110, 1616–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Razali, N.; Salit, M.S.; Jawaid, M.; Ishak, M.R.; Lazim, Y. A study on chemical composition, physical, tensile, morphological, and thermal properties of roselle fibre: Effect of fibre maturity. BioResources 2014, 10, 1803–1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Das, B.; Chakrabarti, K.; Ghosh, S.; Chakraborty, A.; Saha, M.N. Assessment of changes in community level physiological profile and molecular diversity of bacterial communities in different stages of jute retting. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2013, 16, 1722–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Liu, X.; Kokare, C. Microbial enzymes of use in industry. In Biotechnology of Microbial Enzymes; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; pp. 267–298. [Google Scholar]
  109. Djemiel, C.; Grec, S.; Hawkins, S. Characterization of bacterial and fungal community dynamics by high-throughput sequencing (HTS) metabarcoding during flax dew-retting. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Majumdar, B.; Das, S.; Saha, A.; Chowdhury, H.; Maitra, D.; Saha, M. Improved Retting of Jute and Mesta with Microbial Formulation; ICAR-Central Research Institute for Jute and Allied Fibres: Kolkata, India, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  111. Kundu, A.; Chakraborty, A.; Alam Mandal, N.; Das, D.; Karmakar, P.G.; Singh, N.K.; Sarkar, D. A restriction-site-associated DNA (RAD) linkage map, comparative genomics and identification of QTL for histological fibre content coincident with those for retted bast fibre yield and its major components in jute (Corchorus olitorius L., Malvaceae s. l.). Mol. Breed. 2015, 35, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Waldron, D.; Harwood, J. A preliminary investigation into the influence of chemical composition on the dynamic mechanical properties of flax (Linum usitattisimum) straw. J. Nat. Fibers 2011, 8, 126–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Lam, T.B.T.; Hori, K.; Iiyama, K. Structural characteristics of cell walls of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) and fixation of carbon dioxide. J. Wood Sci. 2003, 49, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Niture, S. Comparative biochemical and structural characterizations of fungal polygalacturonases. Biologia 2008, 63, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Sadrmanesh, V.; Chen, Y. Bast fibres: Structure, processing, properties, and applications. Int. Mater. Rev. 2019, 64, 381–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Baker-Austin, C.; Dopson, M. Life in acid: pH homeostasis in acidophiles. Trends Microbiol. 2007, 15, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Preiss, L.; Hicks, D.B.; Suzuki, S.; Meier, T.; Krulwich, T.A. Alkaliphilic bacteria with impact on industrial applications, concepts of early life forms, and bioenergetics of ATP synthesis. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2015, 3, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Clark, J. Select the right fabric for liquid-solid separation. Chem. Eng. Prog. 1990, 86, 45–50. [Google Scholar]
  119. Adamsen, A.P.S.; Akin, D.E.; Rigsby, L.L. Chemical retting of flax straw under alkaline conditions. Text. Res. J. 2002, 72, 789–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Krall, S.M.; McFeeters, R.F. Pectin hydrolysis: Effect of temperature, degree of methylation, pH, and calcium on hydrolysis rates. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 1311–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Foulk, J.; Akin, D.; Dodd, R. Influence of pectinolytic enzymes on retting effectiveness and resultant fiber properties. BioResources 2008, 3, 155–169. [Google Scholar]
  122. Hoondal, G.; Tiwari, R.; Tewari, R.; Dahiya, N.; Beg, Q. Microbial alkaline pectinases and their industrial applications: A review. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 59, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Cao, J.; Zheng, L.; Chen, S. Screening of pectinase producer from alkalophilic bacteria and study on its potential application in degumming of ramie. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 1992, 14, 1013–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Zhang, L.; Zhu, R.; Chen, J.; Feng, X. Seawater-retting treatment of hemp and characterization of bacterial strains involved in the retting process. Process. Biochem. 2008, 43, 1195–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A possible scheme for incorporating bacterial bio-retting agents (enzymes + bacterial formulations) into non-sterile bast fiber retting niche. Inoculation of alkaline strains additionally surpasses the growth of unwanted endogenous bacteria. The establishment of a mechanized controlled retting niche could improve the retting process.
Figure 1. A possible scheme for incorporating bacterial bio-retting agents (enzymes + bacterial formulations) into non-sterile bast fiber retting niche. Inoculation of alkaline strains additionally surpasses the growth of unwanted endogenous bacteria. The establishment of a mechanized controlled retting niche could improve the retting process.
Fibers 09 00052 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of bast fiber plants cell walls and their compositions. Biodegradation of cell walls components at retting process is beneath their proportion of crystalline and amorphous structures and deposited gums concentrations such as degree of lignification and degree of pectins esterification.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of bast fiber plants cell walls and their compositions. Biodegradation of cell walls components at retting process is beneath their proportion of crystalline and amorphous structures and deposited gums concentrations such as degree of lignification and degree of pectins esterification.
Fibers 09 00052 g002
Table 1. Some innovative degumming approaches showed potential to be used as an alternative to the bio retting process.
Table 1. Some innovative degumming approaches showed potential to be used as an alternative to the bio retting process.
MethodsKey FeaturesRef.
Hydrothermal treatment The designed hydrothermal treatment usually involves the reaction of steam, device runs at a certain water temperature coupled with steam pressure. [7,22,23,24,25,26]
Ultrasonic treatmentUltrasonic treatment accomplished with vibrating sound at certain physiochemical conditions [27]
Chemical treatment Applications of acid or base solution for degumming generally uses HCl, H2SO4 as acid solvents and NaOH or KOH alkali solution. Along with this KMnO4, K2Cr2O7, H2O2, and NaClO2 were also proved potentiality as degumming agents. [22,28]
Mechanical eprocessing
and decortication
Complete machine line processing includes pick-up and cutting of plants mass, bales up to cleaning the final products, fibers, and shives processing of non-retted plants.[29]
Deep eutectic solvents (DESs)Utilization of DESs method coupled with microwave and alkaline-ultrasonic treatment.[30,31]
Table 2. Major cell wall compositions of commercially cultivated bast fiber plants (%).
Table 2. Major cell wall compositions of commercially cultivated bast fiber plants (%).
Bast FiberCelluloseHemicelluloseLigninPectinRef.
Jute59–7212–2012–132–4[42]
Kenaf53.1814.338.188.86[43]
Hemp60–7015–202–44[44]
Ramie69–8513–175–72[40]
Flax62–7217–212–52–3[50]
Table 3. List of potentials bacterial strains uses for bast fiber retting.
Table 3. List of potentials bacterial strains uses for bast fiber retting.
BacteriaStrainEnzymesOptimum pHOptimum Temp.Ref.
Bacillus sp.NT-39, 53, 76
MG-cp-2
PL, XL,
PG, Lac
1045 °C, 60 °C[61,62,63]
B. PumilusNRRL B-212,
ATCC 7061
Exo-pectinase--[64,65]
B. subtilisEFRL 01PG845 °C[66]
B. licheniformisHDYM-03
KIBGE IB-21, SHG10, DSM-13
PL, PG, PNL--[67,68,69,70]
B. CereusHDYM-02PG--[71,72,73]
B. megateriumHDYM-09
AK2
PNL--[67,74]
B. clausii - ---[75]
B. tequilensisSV11-UV37
CAS-MEI-2-33
PL, PG
P
1040 °C[76,77]
B. haloduransM29- -[78]
B. mojavensisM14,---[79]
Enterobacteriaceae Pectobacterium sp., Enterobacter lignolyticusDCE-01, SCF1P, MN, XL
Lac
-35 °C[80,81]
P = pectinase, PG = Polygalacturonase, PL = pectatelyase, PNL = Pectin lyase, XL = Xylanase, MN = mananase, Lac: Laccases ‘-’ = Not mentioned.
Table 4. Bacterial consortia made for promoting bast fiber retting.
Table 4. Bacterial consortia made for promoting bast fiber retting.
Bacterial ConsortiaCompositionEnzymatic PotentialsRef.
CRIJAF SONABacillus sp (PJRB1—Acc. No. MTCC 5573, PJRB2-MTCC 5574, and PJRB3-MTCC 5575)PG, PNL and Xylanase[83]
RAMCD407P. aeruginosa, Enterococcus sp., B. subtilis, Bacillus sp.Pectinase, xylanase and mananase[32]
C-51, C-67, and C-90B. megaterium, B. subtilis, B.s cereus, B. xiamenensis, B. koreensis, P. mirabilis, E. tabaci, K. oryzae, S. nematodiphila and Aeromonasjandaei. Pectinase and Xylanase[82]
MC1, MC2, MC3B. subtilis B.s pumilus IMAU80221, B. pumilus GVC11 and B. pumilus SYBC-WPectinase[16,20]
Table 5. List of bacterial enzymes involved in the biodegradation of non-cellulosic bast fibers gum in classical bacterial retting process.
Table 5. List of bacterial enzymes involved in the biodegradation of non-cellulosic bast fibers gum in classical bacterial retting process.
Name of EnzymesEnzyme TypesCommon NameE. C. Suggested
No.
SubstrateCleavage MechanismProduct
Pectinases (Depolymerizes)HydrolasesExo- polygalacturonases
(Exo-PG1 or PG
3.2.1.67PectateCatalyze the α-1,4 glycosidic linkagemono galacturonate
Exo- polygalacturonases
(Exo-PG2 or P.G.)
3.2.1.82PectateAct on end cleaving siteDi galacturonate’s
Lyases: (Polygalacturonate Lyase (PGL)Pectate lyases (Exo-PGL or P.L.)4.2.2.9PectinAct on end site bondsUnsaturated Di galacturonate’s
Lyases: Polymethyl galacturonate Lyase
(PMGL)
Pectin lyases
(Exo-PMGL or PNL)
4.2.2.10PectinRandom cleavageUnsaturated methyl oligo galacturonate
Pectinases
(De-esterifying)
EsterasePolymethyl galacturonate esterase (PMGE or PME)3.1.1.11PectinRandom modification of ester groupPectin acid and methanol
HemicelluloseHydrolasesXylanase3.1.1.8Xylan
Mannan
Cleavage β-1,4 glycosidic linkagexylose
CellulaseHydrolasesEndoglucanase3.2.1.4Amorphous
Cellulose
Nonreducing end of the cellulose chainglucose
LaccasePeroxidasesLaccase
Mn peroxidase
1.10.3.2
1.11.1.13
Lignin-p-quinone
Table 6. List of commercial enzymes use in bast fiber retting and processing.
Table 6. List of commercial enzymes use in bast fiber retting and processing.
ProductProducersActivities
ScourzymeLNovozymesPG, PL
Bioprep 3000LNovozymesP
Texazym BFEInotexP
Texazym SCW INOTEX Ltd.,InotexP, Xy, EG
Texazym DLGInotex.Xy, CeB, EG, LPO
Texazym SER-3InotexP, Xy, EG
Texazym SER-4inotexP, Xy, EG, CeB
Texazym SER-5inotexP, Xy, EG, CeB and Lip
Baylase EVOLanxessP
LyvelinLyvenP
P = pectinase, PG = polygalacturonase, PL = pectin lyase, Xy = xylanase, Eg = Endoglucanase, CeB = Cellobiohydrolases, Lip = Lignin peroxidase.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hossain, M.M.; Siddiquee, S.; Kumar, V. Critical Factors for Optimum Biodegradation of Bast Fiber’s Gums in Bacterial Retting. Fibers 2021, 9, 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib9080052

AMA Style

Hossain MM, Siddiquee S, Kumar V. Critical Factors for Optimum Biodegradation of Bast Fiber’s Gums in Bacterial Retting. Fibers. 2021; 9(8):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib9080052

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hossain, Mohammad Munir, Shafiquzzaman Siddiquee, and Vijay Kumar. 2021. "Critical Factors for Optimum Biodegradation of Bast Fiber’s Gums in Bacterial Retting" Fibers 9, no. 8: 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib9080052

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop