Next Article in Journal
Boron-Based Mildew Preventive and Ultraviolet Absorbent Modification of Waterborne Polyurethane Coatings on Laminated Bamboo
Next Article in Special Issue
An Experimental Study on Biochar/Polypyrrole Coating for Blade Anti-Icing of Wind Turbines
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Fluorocarbon Polymers on Hydrophobicity, Wear Resistance and Corrosion Resistance of Epoxy Resins
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preparation and Characterization of Stable Superhydrophobic Copper Foams Suitable for Treatment of Oily Wastewater
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Wind Tunnel Test of the Anti-Icing Properties of MoS2/ZnO Hydrophobic Nano-Coatings for Wind Turbine Blades

1
College of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
2
Key Laboratory of Icing and Anti/De-Icing, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China
3
College of Arts and Sciences, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2023, 13(4), 686; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13040686
Submission received: 16 February 2023 / Revised: 20 March 2023 / Accepted: 22 March 2023 / Published: 27 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Superhydrophobic and Icephobic Surfaces)

Abstract

:
Wind turbines operating in cold regions are prone to blade icing, which seriously affects their aerodynamic characteristics and safety performance. Coatings are one of the effective solutions to the icing problem on wind turbine blades. In this study, MoS2/ZnO/PDMS superhydrophobic nano-anti-icing coatings were prepared using the hydrothermal method and the liquid phase method. SEM revealed that the MoS2/ZnO coating was a typical superhydrophobic nanostructure with an ultra-thin sheet-like morphology of clusters and a hilly nano-rough structure, with contact angles (CA) of 152.1° and 4.7° with water droplets and the sliding angle (SA), respectively. The MoS2/ZnO/PDMS coating had an adhesion strength to ice of 78 kPa, which was 60.2% lower than an uncoated surface. The icing effects of the NACA0018 airfoil blade model with or without MoS2/ZnO coatings were studied at different ambient temperatures and wind speeds using the icing wind tunnel test. The results showed that, compared to uncoated blades, the level of icing was lower on the blade airfoil surface that was coated with MoS2/ZnO. At 10 m/s and −10 °C, the icing thickness and icing area of the leading edge of the blade airfoil were 13.7% and 28.3% lower, respectively. This study provides a valuable reference for the development of anti-icing coatings for wind turbine blades.

1. Introduction

With the depletion of fossil energy resources, the demand for renewable energy is increasing. Notably, wind energy has become a popular option globally because of its wide distribution, great developmental potential, and environmental friendliness [1,2,3,4]. Worldwide, high-quality wind energy resources are mainly distributed in high latitudes, and high-altitude cold regions of the Northern Hemisphere [5]. However, as global climate change has intensified and extreme climates have become more frequent, wind turbines in these regions are at risk of blade icing, which reduces their aerodynamic performance and power generation efficiency. Blade icing also affects the safe operation of the system and increases maintenance costs [6,7,8]. Therefore, preventing or reducing blade surface icing on wind turbines has become a serious challenge in many engineering fields.
At present, anti-icing and de-icing technologies for wind turbine blades are divided into active and passive methods [9,10]. Active methods, such as the mechanical de-icing method, the thermal de-icing method, and the ultrasonic vibration de-icing methods, are often costly, energy intensive, less efficient, and short-lived, and they often require special equipment, all of which makes them less practical for engineering applications [11,12,13,14]. As a result, scholars have gradually shifted their focus from active de-icing to passive anti-icing [15]. The passive method uses the hydrophobic properties of certain materials to reduce the adhesion between the water droplets and the coating surface. Owing to these superhydrophobic properties, water droplets easily roll off the coating surface under the action of external natural forces, greatly reducing the accumulation of liquid water on the surface of the structure and providing good waterproofing performance. This reduces the amount of ice on the surface of the material and achieves the anti-icing effect [16,17]. Due to the wettability of superhydrophobic materials, their applications in wind turbine anti-icing are very broad, and they have become a popular research topic in wind turbine anti-icing.
In recent years, with the development of nanotechnology, transition metal sulfides with layered structures have become a trend in research [18]. In particular, compared with bulk materials, nanoscale MoS2 exhibits unique characteristics, including reduced surface friction, making it a valuable nanomaterial for use in optics, electronics, new energy, and other fields [19]. For example, Zhang proposed a simple and feasible method for MoS2 modification [20]. The coating has excellent self-cleaning ability, chemical durability, wear resistance and corrosion resistance. At the same time, ZnO is a versatile inorganic semiconductor material with a simple preparation process and rich and varied morphology, and it produces micro-nano structures with low surface energy. It is widely used in gas sensing, energy storage devices, and antibacterial, photocatalytic, biomedical, and hydrophobic coatings. With the development of composite technology, ZnO particles are favored because of their ability to improve the properties of composite materials [21]. With the development of nanotechnology, the combination of two kinds of materials with their own advantages can often play a better synergistic role and show more excellent properties.
In this study, to prepare the MoS2/ZnO nanomaterial superhydrophobic coating, ZnO was loaded onto the surface of MoS2 nanosheets using the hydrothermal method and the liquid phase method. These methods have the advantages of simple processes, low production costs, and high yield, and they can produce crystals with complete grain, small grain size, and uniform grain structure, which is suitable for spraying on large blades in actual industrial production [22,23]. The hydrophobic and anti-icing properties of the synthesized MoS2/ZnO nanomaterials were investigated. Their chemical composition and microstructure were characterized using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The hydrophobicity and icing adhesion strength were measured using a contact angle (CA) measuring instrument and a static anti-icing test. Finally, the wind tunnel test was used to evaluate the anti-icing effect of the MoS2/ZnO nanomaterial superhydrophobic coating based on icing shape, icing area, and leading-edge icing thickness. The development of MoS2/ZnO nano-superhydrophobic materials in this study has an important reference value for research in blade anti-icing.

2. Test Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Preparation

The reagents required for the tests and corresponding manufacturers are shown in Table 1.
(1) Preparation of MoS2 nanomaterials
First, 2.47 g of ammonium molybdate and 4.56 g of thiourea were rapidly dissolved in 70 mL of distilled water and stirred for 30 min to obtain a uniform and transparent solution. The solution was then transferred to a high-pressure reactor at 180 °C for 24 h. The high-pressure reactor was cooled to room temperature to collect the precipitate, which was centrifuged at 5000 r/min for 3 min, washed with distilled water, treated with anhydrous ethanol to a neutral pH, and finally dried in a vacuum at 60 °C for 24 h. The dried powder was ground to obtain MoS2 nanosheets.
(2) Preparation of MoS2/ZnO nanomaterials
In this process, 7 g of zinc acetate was rapidly dispersed and reacted in 230 mL of anhydrous ethanol in a water bath at a constant temperature of 80 °C for 10 min. Subsequently, 2 g of lithium hydroxide was added and sonicated at room temperature until the mixture was completely dissolved. In addition, 0.15 g of MoS2 nanosheets were added to 20 mL of anhydrous ethanol, and the mixture was ultrasonically dispersed at room temperature until uniformly dispersed. This solution was then added to the first solution, ultrasonically dispersed for 20 min, and then stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The precipitate was centrifuged at 5500 r/min for 5 min at room temperature and washed twice with anhydrous ethanol. Finally, the solid mixture was dried in a vacuum at 40 °C for 24 h and ground to obtain MoS2/ZnO nanomaterials.

2.2. Preparation of Coating

A NACA0018 airfoil glass fiber-reinforced plastic blade (GFRP blade) with a chord length of 100 mm and a span height of 20 mm was selected as a test piece. The blade model schematic and physical diagram are shown in Figure 1. The GFRP blade was ultrasonically cleaned with anhydrous ethanol ultrasonic for 10 min, rinsed with deionized water, and allowed to dry. Meanwhile, the PDMS precursor was mixed with the PDMS curing agent at a ratio of 10:1 to obtain the PDMS adhesive [24,25]. Subsequently, 1 g of the PDMS mixture was added to 50 mL of n-hexane while stirring at room temperature for 10 min. An equivalent mass of MoS2/ZnO nanomaterials was added and stirred for 30 min to form a uniformly mixed suspension, which was then evenly sprayed on the blade surface using a spray gun held 15 cm away from the blade. The GFRP blade was then cured in an oven at 60 °C for 12 h to obtain the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nanomaterial superhydrophobic coated blade. The MoS2/PDMS nano-coating was prepared via a similar process.

2.3. Testing and Characterization

XPS analysis: The elemental composition and electronic energy state of the material surface were determined using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ESCALAB 250 Xi; ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA).
SEM analysis: The surface morphology of the prepared material was analyzed using a field emission scanning electron microscope (SU8010; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).
Wetting performance test: The water contact angle (CA) and sliding angle (SA) of the sample were measured using an optical contact angle measuring instrument (JCD2000D3M; Shanghai Zhongchen Digital Technology Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) with 5 μL deionized water.
Surface roughness test: The average surface roughness (Ra) of the coating was characterized by an atomic force microscope (AFM, Dimension Edge, Billerica, MA, USA).
Ice adhesion strength test: A bottomless cylindrical ice sample with a bottom diameter of 25 mm and a height of 20 mm was filled with deionized water and frozen at −20 °C for 12 h. The frozen icicle was pushed with a digital dynamometer (Figure 2), and the maximum force ( F m in N) required to detach the icicle from the coating surface was recorded to calculate the adhesion strength of the ice using the following formula [26]:
  τ ice = F m / A ice
where τ ice (kPa) is the adhesion strength of the ice, F m (N) is the maximum force required to detach the icicle from the coating surface, and A ice (m2) is the bottom area of the icicle.

2.4. Anti-Icing Test in the Icing Wind Tunnel

The anti-icing test in the icing wind tunnel was completed in a recirculating low-temperature icing wind tunnel at the wind energy research laboratory of Northeast Agricultural University. The ice wind tunnel test took place in October 2022. The recirculating icing wind tunnel test system consisted of a refrigeration system, a spray system, and an air duct (Figure 3). The size of the wind tunnel test section was 250 mm × 250 mm, and the nozzle was located at the center of the stable section of the air duct. A spray system pressurized the air to 4 MPa. The test blade sample was fixed on the fixed frame of the test section, with a blocking area ratio (blade to fixed frame) of about 1.8%. The specifications of the test section met the test requirements for the anti-icing test.
The liquid water content (LWC) of the icing wind tunnel test section was calibrated by the grid method. The LWC was calculated according to the icing condition of the grid combined with the LWC formula [27]:
L W C = ρ i c e × h i v
where ρ i c e is the ice density, h i is the ice thickness on the grid, and v is the ambient wind speed. The calibration results of LWC are shown in Figure 4. In the central area of the icing wind tunnel test section, the distribution of liquid water content was relatively uniform, and the scale of this area met the test requirements.

2.5. Test Scheme

To study the anti-icing effects of the MoS2/PDMS nano-coating and the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nano-coating on the surface of wind turbine blades, three temperature conditions (−5 °C, −10 °C, and −15 °C), three wind speeds (5 m/s, 10 m/s, and 15 m/s), and an icing time of 3 min were selected in this experiment. The anti-icing effects of the MoS2/PDMS nano-coating and the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS composite nano-coating were studied by examining the icing distribution on the surface of blades. The test scheme is shown in Table 2.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Analysis

To determine the surface chemical composition and valence state of the MoS2/ZnO nanomaterials, the MoS2 nanomaterials and MoS2/ZnO nanomaterials were analyzed using XPS. A high-resolution XPS diagram of the Mo3d orbital of the MoS2 nanosheets is shown in Figure 5a. Two peaks were obtained at 231.9 eV and 228.7 eV in the Mo3d orbital of the MoS2 nanosheets, which corresponded to Mo4+. A high-resolution XPS diagram of the Mo3d orbital of the MoS2/ZnO nanomaterials is shown in Figure 5c. The XPS results show that after the growth of ZnO nanoparticles, compared with pure MoS2 nanosheets, the two peaks of Mo4+ shifted to a higher binding energy of about 0.3 eV, indicating electron transfer from MoS2 to ZnO and proving the successful synthesis of the MoS2/ZnO nanomaterials. The results also show two peaks at 235.6 eV and 232.5 eV, corresponding to Mo6+, which suggests that there was oxidation of the surface of the MoS2 nanosheets. In addition, a peak can also observed at 226.0 eV, which corresponds to the 2s orbital of the S. In Figure 5b, two peaks of the MoS2 nanosheets can be observed at 161.6 eV and 162.9 eV, corresponding to the S 2p3/2 and S 2p1/2 orbitals, respectively, indicating that the S in the MoS2 nanosheets had a valence state of −2, which is consistent with the standard characteristic peak of S in the MoS2 reported in the literature. Similarly, as demonstrated in Figure 5d, the XPS results for the MoS2/ZnO nanomaterials were consistent with the results for MoS2 nanosheets. In Figure 5e, two peaks can be observed at 1021.9 eV and 1044.9 eV, corresponding to the 2p3/2 and 2p1/2 orbitals of Zn2 +. In Figure 5f, two peaks can be observed at 530.7 eV and 531.5 eV in the O 1s orbital, corresponding to the Zn-O and Mo-O bonds, respectively. According to the literature analysis, these peaks indicate the presence of Zn-O bonds and Mo-O bonds in the MoS2/ZnO nanomaterials [28,29,30,31].

3.2. Microstructure Characterization of the Coating Surface

The SEM images allowed for close observation and analysis of the morphology and surface state of the prepared samples. The SEM image of the nanomaterials prepared using the above experimental method is shown in Figure 6. As demonstrated in Figure 6a, the MoS2 was an ultra-thin and curly-layered nanosheet structure with a thickness of about 5 nm and a lateral length of about 190 nm. The nanosheets were uniform and closely arranged, with smooth surfaces and porous structures. The SEM image of the MoS2/ZnO nanomaterials is shown in Figure 6b. It shows that the MoS2 still exhibited nanosheet morphology after the ZnO nanoparticles were loaded. In addition, compared with the MoS2 nanosheets, the MoS2/ZnO nanomaterials exhibited little change in lateral size. The surface roughness test results showed that the average surface roughness of the uncoated blade, the MoS2 nano-coated blade, and the MoS2/ZnO nano-coated blade were 1.71 nm, 16.74 nm, and 39.34 nm, respectively. The surface of the MoS2/ZnO nanomaterials had a nano-rough structure, which resulted in the formation of a micro-nano rough structure in the coating surface, which is essential for constructing a superhydrophobic surface.

3.3. Coating Hydrophobicity Detection

The CA of the MoS2 nanomaterials was 138.6° (Figure 7a), and the CA of the MoS2/ZnO nanomaterials was 150.7° (Figure 7b). The uncoated GFRP blades had a CA of 62.3° (Figure 7c), and the CA of the GFRP blades coated with PDMS was 109.8° (Figure 7d), which is lower than the 140.8° for the GFRP coated with the MoS2/PDMS nanomaterial (Figure 7e), making it a hydrophobic material. When coated with the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nanomaterial, the CA and sliding angle (SA) of the coating surface and the water reached 152.1° (Figure 7f) and 4.7°, respectively, indicating that the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nano-coating contributed to a superhydrophobic state. The above results show that PDMS, as a binder, has certain hydrophobicity, and the surface hydrophobicity of the coating is mainly affected by the surface characteristics of the MoS2 and MoS2/ZnO nanomaterials. Since water droplets fell on the surface of the porous and rough MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nano-coating, air was trapped in the voids of the layered rough structure surface to form a solid-liquid-gas three-phase contact state. The resulting layer of air cushion between the liquid and the coating surface prevented water droplets from penetrating the porous coating surface. Hydrophobicity can be determined using the Cassie-Baxter wetting model [32]:
c o s   θ = f 1 ( c o s   θ 1 + 1 ) 1
where θ is the CA between the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nano-coating and the water droplets, θ 1 is the CA between the water droplets and the uncoated GFRP surface, and f 1 is the contact fraction of water droplets and MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nano-coating surface solids.
Using this formula, the solid contact fraction on the surface of the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nano-coating was 7.93%, which means that the contact of the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nano-coating with water droplets created a 92.07% air retention area. This shows that the surface of the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nano-coating had a superhydrophobic coating property with a layered rough structure surface, which is consistent with the SEM results. Therefore, the coating surface roughness provided by the micro-nano structure contributes significantly to superhydrophobicity.
Figure 7. The CA of (a) MoS2, (b) MoS2/ZnO, (c) no coating, (d) PDMS coating, (e) MoS2/PDMS coating, and (f) MoS2/ZnO/PDMS coating.
Figure 7. The CA of (a) MoS2, (b) MoS2/ZnO, (c) no coating, (d) PDMS coating, (e) MoS2/PDMS coating, and (f) MoS2/ZnO/PDMS coating.
Coatings 13 00686 g007
The CA of the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nanomaterial coatings was tested at different ambient temperatures, and the test results are shown in the Figure 8. As the figure demonstrates, the ambient temperature has an impact on the coating of MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nanomaterials. At low temperatures, the surface CA decreases, which affects the surface hydrophobicity of the coating.

3.4. Abrasion Resistance Test of Coating

The abrasion resistance of the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nano-coatings was tested by placing the coatings on 800 grit sandpaper, using a 100 g weight as a load, and pulling the substrate at a constant rate. In each wear cycle, a lateral movement of 10 cm and a longitudinal movement of 10 cm were guaranteed to ensure non-directional wear.
The wear resistance of the coating is shown in the Figure 9. After 7 wear cycles, the CA of the surface of the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nano-coating decreased to 147.3°. It may be that the nano particles on the surface of the coating were easily rubbed off in the early wear, and the rough structure was slightly damaged in the process of the coating wear. The CA of the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nanomaterial surface was stable at 145.5°, which indicates that the coating had formed a stable wear-resistant structure, and the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nanomaterial exhibited wear-resistant properties.

3.5. Icing Adhesion Strength of the Coating

As hydrophobic coating surfaces will still be frozen in environments with low temperatures and high humidity, the adhesion between the ice and the coating is the key to anti-icing. If the adhesion between the ice layer and the coating is low, the ice layer will easily be detached from the coating surface under external forces such as wind and gravity. As demonstrated in Figure 10, the adhesion strengths of ice on the surfaces of the MoS2/PDMS nano-coating and the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nano-coating were 103 kPa and 78 kPa, respectively, which were much lower than the 196 kPa on the uncoated surface. This is because the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nano-coating conferred superhydrophobicity. In addition, the micro-nano rough structure on the surface formed a stable Cassie-Baxter state air cushion at the contact interface of the water droplets. After icing, the contact area was smaller compared with the uncoated surface, resulting in less adhesion strength of the ice on the coating surface.

3.6. Chemical Reagent Stability

Superhydrophobic coatings may be exposed to various complex environments (such as acid rain) during practical outdoor applications, which degrades the hydrophobicity of the coatings. Therefore, the chemical stability of superhydrophobic coating was studied. The MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nano-coating was immersed in different pH solutions for 30 min, and the CA of the coating surface was measured. As demonstrated in Figure 11, the prepared MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nano-coating had acid and alkali stability. In comparison, the tolerance of the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nano-coating to acidic conditions was worse than that of alkaline conditions. The reason is that under acid conditions, the surface ZnO in the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nano-coating will react with acid via a metathesis reaction, destroying the original hydrophobic structure of the coating surface and, thereby, reducing the hydrophobic properties of the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nano-coating. The acid solution was measured by an atomic fluorescence photometer, which showed that there was Zn in the solution, which also verified that the ZnO reacted with the acid solution.

3.7. Icing Distribution on Blade Surface

The icing test results for the uncoated GFRP blade, the MoS2/PDMS nanomaterial-coated GFRP blade, and the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nanomaterial-coated GFRP blade at −10 °C, 5 m/s and −15 °C, 10 m/s for 3 min are shown in Figure 12.
A blade surface icing contour map was generated for each of the uncoated GFRP blade, the MoS2/PDMS nanomaterial-coated GFRP blade, and the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nanomaterial-coated GFRP blade to measure the blade surface icing shape at 3 min using digital processing. As demonstrated in Figure 13, icicles appeared on the lower surface of the leading edge of the blade in tests 1, 2, and 4. This change can be attributed to the difference in thermal conductivity between the ice layer and the GFRP blade. The thermal conductivity of the ice layer was 2.2 W/(m·K), while the thermal conductivity of the GFRP blade was 0.42 W/(m·K). As a result, when the supercooled water droplets were blown to the blade surface at high temperatures or low wind speeds, the time required for the supercooled water droplets to reach the thermal equilibrium between the supercooled water droplets and the blade increased, resulting in the freezing of the supercooled water droplets. Under the combined action of airflow and gravity, the unfrozen water droplets flowed downward and accumulated to form an ice column. In the other tests, when the ambient temperature as low or the wind speed was high, heat transfer was accelerated, and the time required to achieve a heat balance between supercooled water drops and the blade surface was reduced, the time required for freezing was reduced, and no icicle was generated at the leading edge of blade.

3.8. The Effect of Ambient Temperature on Icing Distribution

To explore the anti-icing properties of the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nanomaterial coating at the same wind speed and different temperatures, the uncoated GFRP blade, the MoS2/PDMS-coated GFRP blade, and the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS-coated GFRP blade were selected to explore the thickness of the ice layer at the leading edge of the blade and the icing area at the leading edge of the blade at −5 °C, −10 °C, and −15 °C ambient temperatures with wind speeds of 10 m/s.
The data shown in Figure 14a reveal that at the same wind speed, the ice thickness at the leading edge of the blade increased with the decrease in ambient temperature. At −5 °C, −10 °C, and −15 °C ambient temperatures and wind speeds of 10 m/s the icing thickness of the leading edge of the blades coated with MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nanomaterials decreased by 20.4%, 13.7%, and 18.5%, respectively. This is because, compared with the uncoated blade, the contact angle of the blade surface coated with the hydrophobic coating increased, the adhesion force of the water droplets on the blade surface decreased, and the water droplets slid down under the action of airflow and gravity, which reduced the freezing of water droplets on the leading edge of the blade. Therefore, the leading-edge icing thickness of the blade coated with MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nanomaterials was thinner than that of the blade coated with MoS2/PDMS nanomaterials and the uncoated blade.
Figure 14b shows the icing area of the leading edge of the blade at different ambient temperatures at wind speeds of 10 m/s. Notably, the icing area of the leading edge of the blade coated with the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nanomaterials was the smallest among the materials under the same conditions. At −5 °C, −10 °C, and −15 °C ambient temperatures and wind speeds of 10 m/s, the icing area of the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nanomaterial-coated blade decreased by 14.2%, 28.3%, and 16.9%, respectively, compared with the uncoated blade. At a wind speed of 10 m/s and a −5 °C environment, the ice column and surface icing area of the leading edge of the blade that was coated with MoS2/PDMS nanomaterial were larger than those of the uncoated blade and the blade coated with the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nanomaterial. This may be explained by the hydrophilic nature of the uncoated blade, the strong adhesion between water droplets and the blade, and the ease with which water droplets rolled off, whereas the MoS2/PDMS nanomaterial is a hydrophobic coating, and the water droplets flowed downward under the combined action of airflow and gravity but did not reach the superhydrophobic state. This made it difficult for water droplets to flow quickly, resulting in longer icicles at the leading edge of the blade.

3.9. Influence of Wind Speed on Icing Distribution

Figure 15 shows the ice thickness and icing area of the leading edge of the blade under the temperature of −10 °C and various wind speeds for 3 min. The results demonstrated that under the same conditions, the icing thickness and icing area of the leading edge of the blade without a hydrophobic coating were larger than those of the blade coated with the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nanomaterials. The icing thickness of the leading edge of the MoS2/PDMS nanomaterial-coated blade was increased at the wind speed of 5 m/s. This is because at a lower wind speed, the supercooled water droplets were not significantly affected by the airflow after hitting the blade surface, and the ice layer concentrated around the leading edge of the blade. Under the combined action of gravity and superhydrophobic properties, unfrozen water droplets began to flow downward to form icicles. The surface of the blade became irregular, the aerodynamic shape of the blade was damaged, and the thickness of the leading edge of the blade and the icing area of the leading edge increased.

4. Conclusions

(1)
In this study, MoS2/ZnO nano-superhydrophobic material with nano-rough structure on the surface was prepared using the hydrothermal method and the liquid phase method. The surface formed a micro-nano rough structure which was used to construct a superhydrophobic surface. The CA was 152.1°, and the SA was 4.7°.
(2)
The surface of the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nano-superhydrophobic coating was porous and rough and formed a layer of air cushion in contact with liquid, which reduced the adhesion between liquids and the coating surface, thereby reducing the adhesion strength between the coating and ice.
(3)
The icing wind tunnel test showed that the MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nanomaterial-coated blade had lower amounts of icing than the uncoated blade under the same conditions. The icing thickness of the leading edge of the blade was decreased by up to 20.4%, and the icing area was reduced by about 28.3%.
This study provides a reference for the design of wind turbine blade anti-icing coatings and contributes to improving anti-icing technology.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.L., Y.L. and F.F.; formal analysis, B.L., Y.L. and F.F.; funding acquisition, F.F.; investigation, B.L. and Z.L.; methodology, B.L. and Z.L.; supervision, Y.L. and F.F.; validation, Z.L. and Y.L.; writing—original draft, B.L.; writing—review and editing, Z.L., Y.L. and F.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by project grant No. 52076035 from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) and provided with project grant No. IADL20200405 from the Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Icing and Anti-/De-Icing, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, Y.; Shen, H.; Guo, W. Simulation and experimental study on the ultrasonic micro-vibration Deicing method for wind turbine blades. Energies 2021, 14, 8246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Guo, W.; Shen, H.; Li, Y.; Feng, F.; Tagawa, K. Wind tunnel tests of the rime icing characteristics of a straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbine. Renew. Energy 2021, 179, 116–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tong, G.; Li, Y.; Tagawa, K.; Feng, F. Effects of blade airfoil chord length and rotor diameter on aerodynamic performance of straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbines by numerical simulation. Energy 2023, 265, 126325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rashidi, M.M.; Mahariq, I.; Murshid, N.; Wongwises, S.; Mahian, O.; Nazari, M.A. Applying wind energy as a clean source for reverse osmosis desalination: A comprehensive review. Alex. Eng. J. 2022, 61, 12977–12989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zheng, C.W.; Li, C.Y.; Pan, J.; Liu, M.Y.; Xia, L.L. An overview of global ocean wind energy resource evaluations. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 53, 1240–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Caccia, F.; Guardone, A. Numerical simulation of ice accretion on wind turbine blades. Wind Energy Sci. Discuss. 2023, 8, 341–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guo, W.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Tagawa, K.; Zhao, B. A Wind Tunnel Experimental Study on the Icing Characteristics of a Cylinder Rotating around a Vertical Axis. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jiang, F.; Qiu, T. Research on the effect of icing on aerodynamic performance of airfoil and power generation performance of wind turbine. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1684, 012141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, J.; Luo, Z.; An, R.; Marklund, P.; Björling, M.; Shi, Y. Novel Intrinsic Self-Healing Poly-Silicone-Urea with Super-Low Ice Adhesion Strength. Small 2022, 18, 2200532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, Z.; Feng, F.; Li, Y.; Sun, Y.; Tagawa, K. A corncob biochar-based superhydrophobic photothermal coating with micro-nano-porous rough-structure for ice-phobic properties. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2023, 457, 129299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liao, C.; Yi, Y.; Chen, T.; Cai, C.; Deng, Z.; Song, X.; Lv, C. Detecting Broken Strands in Transmission Lines Based on Pulsed Eddy Current. Metals 2022, 12, 1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mu, Z.; Li, Y.; Guo, W.; Shen, H.; Tagawa, K. An Experimental Study on Adhesion Strength of Offshore Atmospheric Icing on a Wind Turbine Blade Airfoil. Coatings 2023, 13, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, L.; Liu, Y.; Tian, L.; Hu, H.; Hu, H.; Liu, X.; Hogate, I.; Kohli, A. An experimental study on a hot-air-based anti-/de-icing system for aero-engine inlet guide vanes. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2020, 167, 114778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, Y.; Shen, H.; Guo, W. Effect of ultrasonic vibration on the surface adhesive characteristic of iced Aluminum alloy plate. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. He, Z.; Xie, H.; Jamil, M.I.; Li, T.; Zhang, Q. Electro-/Photo-Thermal Promoted Anti-Icing Materials: A New Strategy Combined with Passive Anti-Icing and Active De-Icing. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 9, 2200275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Shao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, B. Preparation of a superhydrophobic coating based on polysiloxane modified SiO2 and study on its anti-icing performance. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2022, 437, 128359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rivero, P.J.; Rodriguez, R.J.; Larumbe, S.; Monteserín, M.; Martín, F.; García, A.; Acosta, C.; Clemente, M.J.; García, P.; Mora, J.; et al. Evaluation of functionalized coatings for the prevention of ice accretion by using icing wind tunnel tests. Coatings 2020, 10, 636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, L.; Chen, C.; Zhou, J.; Yang, G.; Wang, J.; Liu, D.; Chen, Z.; Lei, W. Solid phase exfoliation for producing dispersible transition metal dichalcogenides nanosheets. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2004139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, J.; Xiao, Q.; Lin, Z.; Li, Y.; Jia, X.; Song, H. Growth of ultra-dense MoS2 nanosheets on carbon fibers to improve the mechanical and tribological properties of polyimide composites. Friction 2021, 9, 1150–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, X.; Wang, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, Z.; Zhu, Y. A multifunctional super-hydrophobic coating based on PDA modified MoS2 with anti-corrosion and wear resistance. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 568, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Klingshirn, C. ZnO: Material, physics and applications. ChemPhysChem 2007, 8, 782–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Saiduzzaman, M.; Takei, T.; Kumada, N. Hydrothermal magic for the synthesis of new bismuth oxides. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2021, 8, 2918–2938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ma, X.; Zhuang, J.; Zhao, P.; Zhang, H.; Li, H.; Xie, J.; Rong, J.; Ding, Y.; Wang, G. Hydrothermal synthesis and electrical properties of Co–Mn–Fe–Zn–O NTC nanopowder materials. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021, 32, 25201–25213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, Y.; Yan, L.; Ling, Y.; Ge, Y.; Huang, C.; Zhou, S.; Xia, S.; Liang, M.; Zou, H. Enhanced mechanical and adhesive properties of PDMS coatings via in-situ formation of uniformly dispersed epoxy reinforcing phase. Prog. Org. Coat. 2023, 174, 107319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hong, S.; Wang, R.; Huang, X.; Liu, H. Facile one-step fabrication of PHC/PDMS anti-icing coatings with mechanical properties and good durability. Prog. Org. Coat. 2019, 135, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dhiman, V.; Kondal, N. MoS2–ZnO nanocomposites for photocatalytic energy conversion and solar applications. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2022, 628, 413569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shi, L.; Feng, F.; Guo, W.; Li, Y. Research and development of a small-scale icing wind tunnel test system for blade airfoil icing characteristics. Int. J. Rotating Mach. 2021, 2021, 5598859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Selvaraj, R.; Kalimuthu, K.R.; Kalimuthu, V. A type-II MoS2/ZnO heterostructure with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Mater. Lett. 2019, 243, 183–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Krishnan, U.; Kaur, M.; Kaur, G.; Singh, K.; Dogra, A.R.; Kumar, M.; Kumar, A. MoS2/ZnO nanocomposites for efficient photocatalytic degradation of industrial pollutants. Mater. Res. Bull. 2019, 111, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xu, X.; Wang, S.; Liu, W.; Chen, Y.; Ma, S.; Yun, P. An excellent triethylamine (TEA) sensor based on unique hierarchical MoS2/ZnO composites composed of porous microspheres and nanosheets. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 333, 129616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, H.Q.; Yao, C.B.; Jiang, C.H.; Wang, X. Preparation, modification and nonlinear optical properties of semiconducting MoS2 and MoS2/ZnO composite film. Opt. Laser Technol. 2021, 138, 106905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yan, W.; Sun, J.; Golsanami, N.; Li, M.; Cui, L.; Dong, H.; Sun, Y. Evaluation of wettabilities and pores in tight oil reservoirs by a new experimental design. Fuel 2019, 252, 272–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Test blade model with NACA0018 airfoil (a) schematic diagram and (b) photo.
Figure 1. Test blade model with NACA0018 airfoil (a) schematic diagram and (b) photo.
Coatings 13 00686 g001
Figure 2. Photo of the digital dynamometer.
Figure 2. Photo of the digital dynamometer.
Coatings 13 00686 g002
Figure 3. Icing wind tunnel test system (a) schematic diagram and (b) photo.
Figure 3. Icing wind tunnel test system (a) schematic diagram and (b) photo.
Coatings 13 00686 g003
Figure 4. The calibration results of LWC. (a) 5 m/s, (b) 10 m/s, (c) 15 m/s.
Figure 4. The calibration results of LWC. (a) 5 m/s, (b) 10 m/s, (c) 15 m/s.
Coatings 13 00686 g004
Figure 5. XPS spectra of the MoS2 nanomaterial: (a) Mo 3d and (b) S 2p; XPS spectra of the MoS2/ZnO nanomaterials: (c) Mo 3d, (d) S 2p, (e) Zn 2p, and (f) O 1s.
Figure 5. XPS spectra of the MoS2 nanomaterial: (a) Mo 3d and (b) S 2p; XPS spectra of the MoS2/ZnO nanomaterials: (c) Mo 3d, (d) S 2p, (e) Zn 2p, and (f) O 1s.
Coatings 13 00686 g005aCoatings 13 00686 g005b
Figure 6. SEM images of (a) MoS2 nanosheets and (b) MoS2/ZnO nanomaterials.
Figure 6. SEM images of (a) MoS2 nanosheets and (b) MoS2/ZnO nanomaterials.
Coatings 13 00686 g006
Figure 8. Different ambient temperature MoS2/ZnO/PDMS coating surface hydrophobic angles.
Figure 8. Different ambient temperature MoS2/ZnO/PDMS coating surface hydrophobic angles.
Coatings 13 00686 g008
Figure 9. Abrasion resistance coating test surface CAs.
Figure 9. Abrasion resistance coating test surface CAs.
Coatings 13 00686 g009
Figure 10. Adhesion strength of ice on GFRP, MoS2/PDMS, and MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nano-coating surfaces.
Figure 10. Adhesion strength of ice on GFRP, MoS2/PDMS, and MoS2/ZnO/PDMS nano-coating surfaces.
Coatings 13 00686 g010
Figure 11. The CA of coating surfaces soaked in different pH solution for 30 min.
Figure 11. The CA of coating surfaces soaked in different pH solution for 30 min.
Coatings 13 00686 g011
Figure 12. Icing wind tunnel test variables.
Figure 12. Icing wind tunnel test variables.
Coatings 13 00686 g012
Figure 13. Icing profiles of blade surface in different environments.
Figure 13. Icing profiles of blade surface in different environments.
Coatings 13 00686 g013aCoatings 13 00686 g013bCoatings 13 00686 g013c
Figure 14. Icing conditions of blade leading edges coated with different materials under various ambient temperatures and at wind speeds of 10 m/s: (a) icing thickness (b) icing area.
Figure 14. Icing conditions of blade leading edges coated with different materials under various ambient temperatures and at wind speeds of 10 m/s: (a) icing thickness (b) icing area.
Coatings 13 00686 g014
Figure 15. Icing conditions of blade leading edges coated with different materials at −10 °C ambient temperatures with various wind speeds: (a) icing thickness (b) icing area.
Figure 15. Icing conditions of blade leading edges coated with different materials at −10 °C ambient temperatures with various wind speeds: (a) icing thickness (b) icing area.
Coatings 13 00686 g015
Table 1. Test reagents and manufacturers.
Table 1. Test reagents and manufacturers.
Reagent NameGradeManufacturer
Ammonium molybdate
((NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O)
Analytical reagent (AR)Tianjin Hengxin Chemical Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China
Thiourea
(H2NCSNH2)
ARTianjin Tianli Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China
Zinc acetate
(Zn(CHCOO)2·2H2O)
ARTianjin Tianli Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.
Lithium hydroxide
(LiOH·H2O)
ARTianjin Fuchen Chemical Reagent Factory, Tianjin, China
Absolute alcohol
(CH3CH2OH)
ARTianjin Fuyu Fine Chemical Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China
Polydimethylsiloxane
(PDMS, Sylgard 184 base and curing agent)
ARAmerican Dow Corning Company, Midland, MI, USA
n-hexane
(C6H14)
ARTianjin Fuyu Fine Chemical Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China
Table 2. Icing wind tunnel test scheme.
Table 2. Icing wind tunnel test scheme.
Test ConditionsAmbient Temperature
(°C)
Liquid Water Content
(g/m3)
Water Droplet Diameter
(μm)
Wind Velocity
(m/s)
Time
(min)
1−50.5~150~7053
210
315
4−105
510
615
7−155
810
915
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, B.; Liu, Z.; Li, Y.; Feng, F. A Wind Tunnel Test of the Anti-Icing Properties of MoS2/ZnO Hydrophobic Nano-Coatings for Wind Turbine Blades. Coatings 2023, 13, 686. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13040686

AMA Style

Liu B, Liu Z, Li Y, Feng F. A Wind Tunnel Test of the Anti-Icing Properties of MoS2/ZnO Hydrophobic Nano-Coatings for Wind Turbine Blades. Coatings. 2023; 13(4):686. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13040686

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Bo, Zhiyuan Liu, Yan Li, and Fang Feng. 2023. "A Wind Tunnel Test of the Anti-Icing Properties of MoS2/ZnO Hydrophobic Nano-Coatings for Wind Turbine Blades" Coatings 13, no. 4: 686. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13040686

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop