Next Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Oxygen Electrocatalysts Based on Perovskite Oxides
Previous Article in Journal
Carvacrol Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles of Propylene Glycol Monopalmitate and Glyceryl Monostearate: Preparation, Characterization, and Synergistic Antimicrobial Activity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 9
Issue 8
10.3390/nano9081163
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Facile Synthesis of SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX Composite: Photocatalytic Activity and Gas Sensing Performance

by
Xi-Tao Yin
1,
Davoud Dastan
2,
Fa-Yu Wu
1,* and
Jing Li
1,*
1
The Key Laboratory of Chemical Metallurgy Engineering of Liaoning Province and School of Materials and Metallurgy, University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan 114051, China
2
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(8), 1163; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9081163
Submission received: 11 July 2019 / Revised: 5 August 2019 / Accepted: 9 August 2019 / Published: 14 August 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Here SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX composite was fabricated using a wet chemical method and was applied to pollutants degradation and gas sensing for the first time. The composite exhibits high performance for photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B (RhB) dye and selectivity sensing of various gases. On the basis of the completed experiments, the improved RhB degradation and selective gas sensing performance resulted from the extended optical absorption via N2 incorporated surface states and enhanced charge separation via coupling SnO2. Using the scavengers trapping experiments, the superoxide radical (O2•−) was investigated as the major scavenger involved in the degradation of RhB over SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX composite. In this paper, the probable reaction steps involved in the RhB dye degradation over SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX composite are proposed. This work will provide reasonable strategies to fabricate LaFeO3-based proficient and stable catalysts for environmental purification. In addition, the result of the selectivity of gas performance is also presented.

1. Introduction

The degradation of various toxic, organic pollutants via semiconducting nanomaterials with the assistance of solar energy offers a hygienic and environmentally friendly method [1]. However, the detection and monitoring of highly toxic and flammable exhaust gases such as NO2, SO2, H2, and CO are vital for environmental remediation [2,3,4]. Semiconductor photocatalysts and gas sensors are widely employed for various pollutants oxidation and gas sensing in domestic and industrial surroundings because semiconductor metal oxides are ideal photocatalysts and gas sensors [5,6,7]. The design of low-cost, robust, and low-power-consuming semiconductor photocatalysts and gas sensors have attracted increasing attention due to their wide range of applications [8,9]. Research has focused on finding appropriate semiconducting nanomaterials with vital surface and bulk properties for high activity, sensitivity, and selectivity [10,11]. Among various metal oxide semiconductors, perovskite-type oxides have been given tremendous attention owing to their prospective applications in advanced technologies like chemical sensors, catalysts, solid oxide fuel cells, and magnetic materials [12]. The Lanthanum Ferrite (LaFeO3) perovskite (Eg = 2.0–2.8 eV) has been widely utilized in photocatalysis and gas sensing [13,14]. Yet, the performance of bare LaFeO3 is not sufficient for efficient photocatalysis and gas sensing owing to the short lifetime of photo-induced charge carriers [15]. To improve its performance, doping elements and heterojunctions with other semiconductors are widely used [16,17]. SnO2 is widely accepted as the best choice for gas sensing and pollutants degradation. Doping elements can greatly alter the surface states of nanomaterials, and coupling metal oxides can enhance charge separation thereby enhancing its performance for photocatalytic and gas sensing applications [18]. Thus, the unique characteristics of heterojunctions can improve the photocatalytic and gas sensing performance by promoting the charge carrier’s separation and transfer. For example, Zhang et al. [19] reported the synthesis of novel A- or B-site substituted LaFeO3/silica fiber (SF) composite photocatalysts that showed improved photocatalytic performance for degradation of Methylene blue (MB) dye under visible light irradiation. This enhanced activity was attributed to the synergistic effect caused by the doping which introduced surface states and the coupled silica fiber. Recently, Xu et al. [20] reported LaFeO3/g-C3N4 heterojunctions that showed enhanced activities for H2 evolution and MB degradation under visible light irradiation; these features were attributed to the remarkably enhanced charge carriers separation and transfer by the synergetic effect at the interface of the two components system. According to Armstrong et al. [21], LaFeO3 exhibits high adsorption capacity for NOx surface conversion in comparison with the LaMnO3. This difference was ascribed to the different B-site cations (Fe3+) in LaFeO3 when compared with the LaMnO3 with Mn3+ and Mn4+ valence states. Toan et al. [22] demonstrated that LaFeO3 films exhibit high sensitivity for sensing of different concentrations of CO, CH4, and NO2 gases in air atmosphere at various temperatures.
It is significant to explore the role of surface active species such as electron (e−), hole (h+), hydroxyl radical (•OH), and the superoxide radical (O2•−) in semiconductor photocatalysis and gas sensing. Primary oxidants (•OH) have no selectivity to organic pollutants. However, the O2•− radical species generated in the conduction band of semiconductors by the interaction of electron with the adsorbed O2 can oxidize a variety of organic pollutants including dioxins, pesticides, and chlorinated pollutants. The mechanisms of pollutant degradation are strongly influenced by various catalysts and the model pollutants because the designed photocatalyst and the dominant active species decide the degradation mechanism [23,24]. However, the reaction mechanisms of pollutant degradation and gas sensing over a LaFeO3 semiconductor is not fully understood. Thus, it is necessary to develop a clear mechanism for pollutant degradation and gas sensing over a LaFeO3 semiconductor. To date, no works related to the fabrication of SnO2 coupled LaFeO3−XNX catalyst for RhB dye degradation and gas sensing have been reported.
Here, we report the fabrication SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX composite for high performance RhB dye degradation and gas sensing. On the basis of completed experiments, results indicate that the improved photocatalytic performance of SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX for RhB dye degradation and gas sensing is accredited to the extended visible-light absorption via doping N2 and superior charge carrier’s separation via coupling SnO2. Further, it is confirmed by scavenger tapping results that O2•− radical is the main oxidant species involved the degradation of RhB dye over SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX composite. This work will trigger the development of LaFeO3-based high performance photocatalysts and gas sensors for environmental remediation and will help the scientific community to understand the surface chemistry of these processes.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Synthesis of LaFeO3 Nanoparticles

LaFeO3 was fabricated via a sol–gel technique. In the given experiment, equimolar amount (i.e., 0.04 mol) of La(NO3)·6H2O and Fe(NO3)3·9H2O was dissolved into 25 mL mixture of ethylene glycol (EG) and water (1:1). The solution was magnetically stirred at room temperature for 4 h to obtain a gel. The gel was dried in oven at 100 °C overnight. Finally, the dry powder was kept in a ceramic crucible and annealed at 600 °C (heating rate = 5 °C min−1) in a muffle furnace for 2 h to obtain LaFeO3. All reagents were purchased from Aladdin Company. (Aladdin Reagent (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).

2.2. Synthesis of LaFeO3−XNX Oxynitride

To prepare LaFeO3−XNX oxynitride, 2 g of the fabricated LaFeO3 was taken in a ceramic boat and kept in a quartz reactor. Next, the quartz reactor was carefully sealed and N2 gas was allowed to pass through a saturated system concentrated with aqueous ammonia solution. The N2 was used as a carrier gas for transportation of ammonia vapor into the reactor. The ammonolysis reaction was carried out at 500 °C for 6 h. When room temperature attained, the LaFeO3−XNX oxynitride photocatalyst was collected.

2.3. Fabrication of SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX Nanocomposite

To fabricate SnO2 coupled LaFeO3−XNX oxynitride composite (SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX), 1 g of LaFeO3−XNX oxynitride catalyst was dispersed into a 50 mL of ethanol and water mixture (1:1). Subsequently, 5% by mass of SnO2 was added to it. After continuous stirring for 6 h, the mixture was dried in an oven at 80 °C overnight. The powder was finally annealed at 450 °C (N2 atmosphere) for 2 h to obtain SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX composite.

2.4. Characterization

The crystalline morphology of the photocatalysts was examined by an X-ray diffractometer (D8-Advance, Bruker Inc., Karlsruhe, Germany). The UV-visible, diffuse reflectance spectroscopy spectra (UV-vis DRS) were obtained with a Perkin Elmer UV/Vis spectrometer (Lambda-35, PerkinElmer Inc.). The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs and the energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) spectra were obtained with a scanning electron microscope (Geminisem-300-7112, Carl Zeiss Inc., Dresden, Germany). The elemental chemical composition was examined by the X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (AXIS-ULTRA DLD-600W, Shimadzu Inc., Kyoto, Japan). The photoluminescence (PL) and fluorescence (FL) spectra were obtained with a spectrofluoro-photometer (FP-6500, Spectroscopic Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) at 325 nm excitation wavelength.

2.5. Photoelectrochemical Measurements

For photoelectrochemical (PEC) experiments, the electrode films were prepared in advance by a doctor-blade procedure using a high temperature 3 m 2380 scotch tape as the spacer. In a typical procedure, 25 mg of each photocatalyst was dispersed in 1 mL of isopropyl alcohol and kept under ultrasonic treatment for 30 min followed by magnetic stirring for 30 min. Then, 25 mg of highly grinded Macrogol-6000 was added to the photocatalyst solution and the ultrasonic treatment was repeated with magnetic stirring for 30 min each. After that, acetylacetone (0.05 mL) was drop wise added to the solution and vigorously stirred for 48 h. Finally, the product was pasted on thoroughly washed, conductive, fluorine-doped, tin-oxide (FTO) glass substrates (10–15 ohm/sq, Xinyan Tech Ltd., Chengdu, China) and sintered at 450 °C (5 °C min−1) for 30 min. The FTO glass substrates were then cut in to 1.0 cm × 3.0 cm pieces containing the film surface area of 1 cm × 1 cm.

2.6. Photoactivity Evaluation

The experiments were performed in a 100 mL volume glass beaker. A 150 W Xe-lamp (GYZ220, CEAULIGHT. Inc., Beijing, China) with cut-off filter (420 nm) was used as the irradiation source. During photocatalytic process, 50 mg of the photocatalyst was taken into 40 mL of RhB-dye solution (10 mg/L) and continuously stirred for 10 min to reach the adsorption equilibrium. The solution was kept under visible-light irradiation for 2 h. After regular intervals of 30 min, an appropriate amount of RhB-dye solution was taken with a syringe and centrifuged to measure its concentration with a Perkin Elmer UV/Vis spectrometer (Lambda-35, PerkinElmer Inc.), at characteristic optical absorption of 553 nm.

2.7. Gas Sensing Evaluation

Sample preparation: A Pt interdigital electrode was coated on the alumina substrate by screen printing. After annealing at 800 °C, the Pt interdigitated electrode was firmly adhered to the alumina substrate. The photocatalyst powder was mixed with a small amount of organic binder. The binder was prepared by stirring terpineol and ethyl cellulose in a ratio of 1 g of ethyl cellulose to 10 mL of terpineol. Slurry of photocatalyst for preparing a thick film was obtained. The slurry was uniformly coated on an alumina ceramic sheet having a Pt electrode by a screen printing method to prepare a thick film, and the obtained thick film sheet was annealed at 550 °C for 3 h.
Gas Sensitivity Test: The test system consists of a multi-stage gas dilution system, an electric resistance furnace, and an electrochemical workstation (CHI660E, CH Instruments Inc, Shanghai, China). The sample was placed in an electric resistance furnace connected to two electrodes and an external gas sensing recorder. The experiments were performed at 400 °C. Three kinds of gases, H2, CO, and SO2, were chosen, and their concentration in air with exposure time was 500 mL/min. The test gas flow rate was 10 mL/min, and the exposure time was 300–600 s. The test system uses an electrochemical workstation with a set voltage of 4 V. To obtain the “I-t” curves of the material, the current-time relationship was used. To obtain an “R-t” curve, the resistance was calculated using Ohm’s law.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural Morphology and Chemical Composition

The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the photocatalysts are shown in Figure 1A. The XRD patterns of LaFeO3 can be assigned to the highly crystalline perovskite-type orthorhombic phase and indexed to the JCPDS No. 37-1493 [25]. The crystallite size were calculated at intense diffraction peak located at 32.19° (hkl = 121) using Debye Scherrer equation (Dsize = Kλ/βCosθ) [26]. The calculated crystallite size of LaFeO3, LaFeO3−XNX, and SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX were 100, 107, and 108 nm, respectively. Notably, the intense XRD signal of LaFeO3−XNX is slightly red shifted which is attributable to the partial substitution of oxygen anion (O2−, radius = 1.4 Å) with that of the nitrogen ones (N3−, radius = 1.5 Å). Accordingly, O2− has higher electro-negativity (3.5) than N3− (3.07). Thus the robust covalent metal-N2 bonding reduced the energy band gap of LaFeO3 and extended its optical absorption behavior [27]. When SnO2 was coupled with LaFeO3−XNX, the peaks related to SnO2 also appeared in the composite, suggesting the successful formation of heterojunction. In addition, SnO2 coupling did not affect the crystalline phase morphology of LaFeO3. The UV-Visible diffuse reflectance spectra (UV-Vis DRS) were measured to investigate the absorption behavior of the photocatalysts, as shown in Figure 1B. The energy band gaps of LaFeO3 and LaFeO3−XNX photocatalysts were estimated to be 2.0 and 1.84 eV, respectively, based on the energy band gap equation Eg = 1240/λ. Further, the SnO2 coupling did not affect the energy band gap of LaFeO3−XNX. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs were obtained to examine the morphology of the photocatalysts. Figure 2A reveals that LaFeO3 nanoparticles have an average crystallite size of about 100 nm and is in accordance with the XRD crystallite size. As seen in Figure 2B, after ammonolysis reaction for 6 h, the morphology of LaFeO3 was slightly changed and its particle size was enlarged. The SEM micrograph of SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX composite, as seen in Figure 2C, shows that the nano-size SnO2 particles are present on the surface of LaFeO3 photocatalyst. The energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) spectrum of SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX composite, as seen in Figure 2D, shows La, Fe, O, N, and Sn elements, which demonstrate that N was successfully integrated into the crystal lattice of LaFeO3, and SnO2 was coupled. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra were obtained to investigate the chemical composition of the photocatalysts. The binding energies were standardized for specimen charging using C1s as the reference (peak position = 285.0 eV) [28]. The XPS survey spectra of LaFeO3, LaFeO3−XNX, and SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX are shown in Figure 3A. From the high resolution XPS of La3d seen in Figure 3B, the binding energy peaks at 833.5 and 850.4 eV, respectively, corresponds to the La3d5/2 and La3d3/2 energy levels. Notably, both of the peaks exhibit a satellite peak at a distance of 4.0 eV and the spin-orbital splitting of La3d5/2 and La3d3/2 is about 16.9 eV. This reveals that La3d exists in +3 oxidation state. As seen in Figure 3C, the high resolution XPS spectra of Fe2p reveals the presence of Fe2p3/2 and Fe2p1/2 energy levels at 710 and 723.5 eV, respectively. This confirms the existence of Fe2p in +3 oxidation state [29]. As seen in Figure 3D, the high resolution XPS spectra of O1s shows binding energy peaks at 529.5 and 531.5 eV, respectively, for lattice oxygen (OL, La–O, and Fe–O bonds), and hydroxyl (OH) one [30]. As seen in Figure 3E, the high resolution N1s XPS spectra for LaFeO3−XNX, and SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalysts are broad and sited at binding energy of ~399 eV [31,32]. As seen in Figure 3F, the high resolution Sn3d XPS spectra display peaks at binding energies of 486.9 and 495.2 eV, respectively, that correspond to the Sn3d5/2 and Sn3d3/2 energy levels in pure SnO2 and SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalysts [33]. Thus, it is confirmed that N is successfully integrated into the matrix of LaFeO3 and SnO2 is coupled to it.

3.2. Photo-Induced Charge Properties

To inspect the photo-induced charge properties of LaFeO3, LaFeO3−XNX, and SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalysts, photoluminescence (PL) spectra were measured. The PL technique is highly sensitive and is used to explore the surface active sites of semiconductor nanomaterials. From PL spectroscopy, we can obtain knowledge regarding defects in semiconductor surfaces, oxygen vacancies, trapping, immigration, and transfer of charges, [34]. As seen in Figure 4A, LaFeO3 exhibits a strong PL response, which is related to the fast recombination rate of photo-generated charges. Notably, the PL intensity peak of LaFeO3−XNX is remarkably decreased and further decreased after coupling SnO2. This demonstrates that the charge carrier’s recombination in LaFeO3−XNX is considerably reduced. To further investigate the enhanced charge carrier’s separation, photoelectrochemical (PEC) I-V and I-t curves were measured, as shown in Figure 4B,C. LaFeO3 exhibits a low photo-current density signal. Notably, the photo-current density signal of LaFeO3−XNX photocatalyst is obviously improved and that of the SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalyst is significant. The •OH radical can also provide information about the photo-induced charge carrier’s separation during semiconductor photocatalysis [35]. The strong fluorescence (FL) signal reflects a large amount of the •OH radical and high charge carrier’s separation. Thus, we have detected the •OH amount by the coumarin fluorescent method. In this method, the coumarin react with •OH radical and produce 7-hydroxy-coumarin luminescent species. As shown in Figure 4D, LaFeO3 photocatalyst produced small amount of •OH radical. However, the amount of •OH radical produced over LaFeO3−XNX is remarkably increased and significant for the SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX nanocomposite. This is in agreement with the PL and PEC results, signifying that charge carrier’s separation is remarkably improved.

3.3. Photocatalytic and Gas Sensing Performance

The visible-light activity of the photocatalysts was performed for the RhB-dye degradation and the results are provided in Figure 5A. Notably, LaFeO3 photocatalyst degraded only 31% of RhB-dye beneath visible-light irradiation for 2 h. The degradation of RhB-dye over LaFeO3−XNX photocatalyst is considerably high (i.e., 55%). Interestingly, the degradation of RhB-dye over SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX composite is significant (i.e., 71%), higher than reported thus far under the same experimental conditions as depicted in Table 1. Notably, the improved photocatalytic activity of LaFeO3 photocatalyst for RhB-dye degradation is attributed to the extended optical absorption via doping N and to the enhanced charge carrier’s separation via coupling SnO2. Thus, the designed SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX nanocomposite is favorable in terms of the degradation of organic dye pollutants in comparison with the LaFeO3 and LaFeO3−XNX photocatalysts. To check the stability of SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalyst for RhB-dye degradation, we carried out photocatalytic stability and recyclability tests under visible-light irradiation for four consecutive recycles (each lasting 3 h). As seen in Figure 5B, the photocatalyst does not show any apparent loss in the activity even after a 12-hour irradiation period. This demonstrates that the SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalyst is very stable and does not photocorrode during the photocatalytic reaction. To confirm which radical species is involved in the reaction process, we carried out scavengers trapping experiments in the presence of Isopropyl-alcohol (IPA, •OH scavenger), Benzo-quinone (BQ, O2•− scavenger), and EDTA-2Na (h+, scavenger) [36]. Appropriate amounts of each scavenger (1 mM stock) was added to the RhB-dye solution before adding the catalyst and stirred for 15 min. After catalyst addition, the sample was illuminated under visible light for 2 h. Figure 5C shows that the degradation of RhB-dye over SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalyst is slightly suppressed in the presence of EDTA-2Na and IPA scavengers while sturdily inhibited in the presence of BQ scavenger. This reveals that the O2•− radical is the predominant active species involved in the degradation of RhB-dye over SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalyst, and the role of h+ and •OH is less significant.
For the gas sensing activity, the sensing mechanism of n-type metal oxide semiconductors is normally associated with the space charge region formation on the oxide surfaces, owing to the electron capture on the adsorbed oxygen species [37,38]. Whenever a sensor detects a reactive gas, the gas reacts with the surface oxygen species to release electrons, which are then trapped by the adsorbed oxygen species. As a result, the conductivity of metal oxide increases. The mechanism for p-type metal oxide semiconductors is opposite. Thus, on the basis of the sensing mechanism, the main disadvantage of this type of sensor is its poor selectivity to various gases having the similar (reducing or oxidizing) nature [39,40]. However, the SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX material has different sensing behaviors to the homogeneous gases CO, H2, and SO2, as shown in Figure 5D. The resistance of the sensor material will increase when detecting CO and H2, but decrease when detecting SO2. SO2 commonly presents similar gas sensing behavior with CO and H2 when adsorbed on the surface of metal oxide sensing materials. However, it presented an opposite behavior here, which may contribute to the corrosive effect of SO2. The SO2 adsorbed on the surface of the sensing materials to form the adsorption species SO3 [41], which may cause a change of composition of the sensing material surface. Thus, the sensing behavior and type conductivity may transfer from p-type to n-type dominated. This indicates that the SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX material may be a promising candidate for applications in solving the poor selectivity of these types of sensors to SO2.

3.4. Discussion

According to the above results, it has been demonstrated that the activity of LaFeO3 photocatalyst for RhB-dye degradation can be greatly improved by doping N and then coupling SnO2. This is a result of the newly formed surface states near the valence band top that effectively traps the photogenerated holes and allows the energetic electrons to transfer to the conduction band of SnO2. To understand the charge transfer mechanism in the fabricated SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX composite, we proposed an energy level diagram, as shown in Figure 6. As confirmed by the UV-Visible DRS spectra, the energy band gap of LaFeO3 photocatalyst is 2.0 eV, corresponding to the light absorption of λ ≤ 620 nm according to the energy band gap equation Eg = 1240/λ where “Eg” is the energy band gap (eV) and “λ” is the wavelength (nm) of absorbed photons. From the valence band XPS spectra, as seen in Figure 3E inset, the valence band level of LaFeO3 photocatalyst stands at 2.2 eV. After doping N, its band gap is reduced to 1.84 eV through a shift of the valence band upward to 2.04 eV which corresponds to the light absorption of approximately λ ≤ 674 nm. On the other hand, the energy band gap of SnO2 is 3.5 eV with its valence and conduction bands located at 3.54 and 0.04 eV, respectively. Thus, SnO2 can only be excited under UV-light (λ ≤ 354 nm). It is recommended that the photogenerated electrons of LaFeO3 and LaFeO3−XNX could be relaxed to their conduction band bottom in a small time scale with energy loss, resulting in the poor charge carrier’s separation and low photocatalytic performance. However, when a heterojunction is formed between SnO2 and LaFeO3−XNX photocatalysts and the composite is excited under visible-light, the generated highly energetic electrons of LaFeO3−XNX would transfer to the conduction band of SnO2, leaving the excited holes in its valence band. The electrons in the conduction band of SnO2 would probably react with the surface-adsorbed O2 to generate superoxide radicals (O2•−) that will continue the oxidation of RhB-dye pollutant. On the other hand, the holes left in the valence band of LaFeO3−XNX would react with the surface adsorbed water and/or OH− species to produce •OH radicals and then to evolve O2. Thus, the produced active intermediates would take part in the organic pollutants degradation. In this way, the photogenerated charge carrier’s separation will significantly improve. Via this phenomenon, it is simple to make the photocatalytic activity of composite photocatalysts more practical. The fabricated visible-light-responsive nanocomposite can be utilized for effective environmental remediation. The probable stepwise reactions involved in the photocatalytic degradation of RhB over SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX composite are described in Equations (1) to (5).
SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX + hν → SnO2 (No e−/h+ pairs)/LaFeO3−XNX (e− + h+)
SnO2 (No e−/h+ pairs)/LaFeO3−XNX (e− + h+) → SnO2 (e−)/LaFeO3−XNX (h+)
SnO2 (e− + O2) →O2•−
SnO2 (O2•− + RhB) → degradation products
LaFeO3−XNX (h+ + RhB) → degradation products

4. Conclusions

SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX nanocomposite was fabricated via a wet chemical route that exhibited superior visible-light activity for RhB-dye degradation in comparison with the LaFeO3−XNX and LaFeO3 photocatalysts. This is attributable to the extended optical absorption and enhanced photo-induced charge carrier’s separation via N-introduced surface states and the coupled SnO2. This work will trigger reasonable routes for the fabrication of highly efficient visible-light photocatalysts for effective environmental remediation. In addition, the SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX material would be a promising candidate for applications in solving the poor selectivity of this type of sensors.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.-Y.W. and J.L.; Data curation, X.-T.Y. and D.D.; Formal analysis, X.-T.Y., D.D. and F.-Y.W.; Funding acquisition, X.-T.Y., F.-Y.W. and J.L.; Investigation, F.-Y.W. and J.L.; Resources, J.L.; Supervision, J.L.; Visualization, F.-Y.W.; Writing—original draft, X.-T.Y.

Funding

The financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51774180, 51874169, 51634004), Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (Grant No. 20180550802) and Basic Scientific Research Project of colleges and universities in Liaoning Province (Grant No. 2017LNQN18).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gangu, K.K.; Maddila, S.; Jonnalagadda, S.B. A review on novel composites of MWCNTs mediated semiconducting materials as photocatalysts in water treatment. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 646, 1398–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yin, X.-T.; Zhou, W.-D.; Li, J.; Wang, Q.; Wu, F.-Y..; Dastan, D.; Wang, D.; Garmestani, H.; Wang, X.-M.; Talu, S. A highly sensitivity and selectivity Pt-SnO2 nanoparticles for sensing applications at extremely low level hydrogen gas detection. J. Alloy. Compd. 2019, 805, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dastan, D.; Chaure, N.; Kartha, M. Surfactants assisted solvothermal derived titania nanoparticles: Synthesis and simulation. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2017, 28, 7784–7796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yin, X.-T.; Tao, L. Fabrication and gas sensing properties of Au-loaded SnO2 composite nanoparticles for low concentration hydrogen. J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 727, 254–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Khan, M.M.; Adil, S.F.; Al-Mayouf, A. Metal oxides as photocatalysts. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2015, 19, 462–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Yin, X.-T.; Tao, L.; Wang, G.-C.; Zhou, Q.; He, W.; Wang, Q. Effects of oxygen and carbon monoxide species on the gas sensing properties of SnO2 nanoparticles. J. Nanoelectron. Optoelectron. 2017, 12, 748–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wei, K.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, W.; Zhong, X.; Li, T.; Cui, B.; Gao, S.; Wei, D.; Shen, Y. Controllable Synthesis of Zn-Doped α-Fe2O3 Nanowires for H2S Sensing. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ge, J.L.; Zhang, Y.F.; Heo, Y.J.; Park, S.J. Advanced design and synthesis of composite photocatalysts for the remediation of wastewater: A review. Catalysts 2019, 9, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhou, Q.; Xu, L.; Umar, A.; Chen, W.; Kumar, R. Highly sensitive carbon monoxide (CO) gas sensors based on Ni and Zn doped SnO2 nanomaterials. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 256, 656–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dastan, D. Effect of preparation methods on the properties of titania nanoparticles: Solvothermal versus sol-gel. Appl. Phys. A 2017, 123, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yin, X.-T.; Zhou, W.-D.; Li, J.; Lv, P.; Wang, Q.; Wang, D.; Wu, F.-Y.; Dastan, D.; Garmestani, H.; Shi, Z.-C.; et al. Tin dioxide nanoparticles with high sensitivity and selectivity for gas sensors at sub-ppm level of hydrogen gas detection. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nikolaou, P.; Vassilakopoulou, A.; Papadatos, D.; Topoglidis, E.; Koutselas, I. A chemical sensor for CBr4 based on quasi-2D and 3D hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites immobilized on TiO2 films. Mater. Chem. Front. 2018, 2, 730–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ismael, M.; Wark, M. Perovskite-type LaFeO3: Photoelectrochemical properties and photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants under visible light irradiation. Catalysts 2019, 9, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Peng, K.; Fu, L.J.; Yang, H.; Ouyang, J. Perovskite LaFeO3/montmorillonite nanocomposites: Synthesis, interface characteristics and enhanced photocatalytic activity. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, Y.; Wang, H.; Tu, W.G.; Liu, Y.; Tan, Y.Z.; Yuan, X.Z.; Chew, J.W. Quasi-polymeric construction of stable perovskite-type LaFeO3/g-C3N4 heterostructured photocatalyst for improved Z-scheme photocatalytic activity via solid p-n heterojunction interfacial effect. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 347, 412–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Díez-Garcia, M.I.; Gjmez, R. Metal doping to enhance the photoelectrochemical behavior of LaFeO3 photocathodes. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 2457–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shin, T.H.; Ida, S.; Ishihara, T. Doped CeO2–LaFeO3 composite oxide as an active anode for direct hydrocarbon-type solid oxide fuel cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 19399–19407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dacquin, J.P.; Lancelot, C.; Dujardin, C.; Cordier-Robert, C.; Granger, P. Support-induced effects of LaFeO3 perovskite on the catalytic performances of supported Pt catalysts in DeNOx applications. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 1911–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, L.; Xu, T.H.; Guo, Q.Y.; Ling, Z.; Zou, R.J.; Wu, Q. Enhanced photocatalytic efficiencies over A- or B-sites substituted LaFeO3/silica fiber composites. J. Phys. Chem. Sol. 2017, 110, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, K.; Feng, J. Superior photocatalytic performance of LaFeO3/g-C3N4 heterojunction nanocomposites under visible light irradiation. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 45369–45376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Armstrong, E.N.; Striker, T.; Ramaswamy, V.; Ruud, J.A.; Wachsman, E.D. NOx adsorption behavior of LaFeO3 and LaMnO3+δ and its influence on potentiometric sensor response. Sens. Actuators B 2011, 158, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Toan, N.N.; Saukko, S.; Lantto, V. Gas sensing with semiconducting perovskite oxide LaFeO3. Physica B 2003, 327, 279–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, Y.X.; Sun, H.Q.; Ang, H.M.; Tade, M.O.; Wang, S.B. 3D-hierarchically structured MnO2 for catalytic oxidation of phenol solutions by activation of peroxymonosulfate: Structure dependence and mechanism. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 164, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gao, X.M.; Shang, Y.Y.; Gao, K.L.; Fu, F. Plasmon sensitized heterojunction 2D ultrathin Ag/AgI-δ-Bi2O3 for enhanced photocatalytic nitrogen fixation. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, F.; Liu, Y.; Liu, R.; Sun, Z.; Zhao, D.; Kou, C. Preparation of Ca-doped LaFeO3 nanopowders in a reverse microemulsion and their visible light photocatalytic activity. Mater. Lett. 2010, 64, 223–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Saddat, M.; Kakhki, E.; Yavari, Z.; Saffari, J.; Ali, S.; Kakhki, E. Perovskite-type LaFeO3 and LaFeO3-CNTs nanocrystals as active anode for methanol oxidation in alkaline solutions. J. Electr. Eng. 2016, 4, 88–99. [Google Scholar]
  27. Pasinski, D.; Zych, E.; Sokolnicki, J. The effect of N3− substitution for O2− on optical properties of YAG:Ce3+ phosphor. J. Alloy. Compd. 2016, 668, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Velichkova, M.M.; Lazarova, T.; Tumbalev, V.; Ivanov, G.; Kovacheva, D.; Stefanov, P.A. Naydenov, Complete oxidation of hydrocarbons on YFeO3 and LaFeO3 catalysts. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 231, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Faye, J.; Baylet, A.; Trentesaux, M.; Royer, S.; Dumeignil, F.; Duprez, D.; Valange, S.; Tatibouet, J. Influence of lanthanum stoichiometry in La1−xFeO3−δ perovskites on their structure and catalytic performance in CH4 total oxidation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2012, 126, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Thirumalairajan, S.; Girija, K.; Mastelaro, V.R.; Ponpandian, N. Photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes under visible light irradiation by floral-like LaFeO3 nanostructures comprised of nanosheet petals. New J. Chem. 2014, 38, 5480–5490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sathish, M.; Viswanathan, B.; Viswanath, R.P.; Gopinath, C.S. Synthesis, Characterization, Electronic Structure, and Photocatalytic Activity of Nitrogen-Doped TiO2 Nanocatalyst. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 6349–6353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, X.; Burda, C. Photoelectron Spectroscopic Investigation of Nitrogen-Doped Titania Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 15446–15449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liang, Y.; Fang, B. Hydrothermal synthesis of SnO2 nanorods: Morphology dependence, growth mechanism and surface properties. Mater. Res. Bull. 2013, 48, 4118–4124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yang, J.; Hu, R.S.; Meng, W.W.; Du, Y.F. A novel p-LaFeO3/n-Ag3PO4 heterojunction photocatalyst for phenol degradation under visible light irradiation. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 2620–2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Attri, P.; Kim, Y.H.; Park, D.H.; Park, J.H.; Hong, Y.J.; Uhm, H.S.; Kim, K.-N.; Fridman, A.; Choi, E.H. Generation mechanism of hydroxyl radical species and its lifetime prediction during the plasma-initiated ultraviolet (UV) photolysis. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zheng, X.K.; Yuan, J.J.; Shen, J.; Liang, J.X.; Che, J.F.; Tang, B.; He, G.Y.; Chen, H.Q. A carnation-like rGO/Bi2O2CO3/BiOCl composite: Efficient photocatalyst for the degradation of ciprofloxacin. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 5986–5994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yin, X.-T.; Guo, X.-M. Sensitivity and selectivity of (Au, Pt, Pd)-loaded and (In, Fe)-doped SnO2 sensors for H2 and CO detection. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2014, 25, 4960–4966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhou, Q.; Xu, L.N.; Umar, A.; Chen, W.G.; Kumar, R. Pt nanoparticles decorated SnO2 nanoneedles for efficient CO gas Sensing Applications. Sens. Actuators B 2018, 256, 656–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Katsuki, A.; Fukui, K. H2 selective gas sensor based on SnO2. Sens. Actuators B 1998, 52, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yin, X.-T.; Lv, P.; Li, J. Study on simultaneous detection of CO and H2 with (Pd, Fe)-modified SnO2 and Pt-loaded SnO2 sensors. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 18935–18940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shimizu, Y.; Matsunaga, N.; Hyodo, T.; Egashira, M. Improvement of SO2 sensing properties of WO3 by noble metal loading. Sens. Actuators B 2001, 77, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shen, S.; Zhong, W.; Wang, Z.G.; Lin, Z.; Feng, S. β-FeSe nanorods composited g-C3N4 with enhanced photocatalytic efficiency. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2019, 6, 181886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Di, L.; Yang, H.; Xian, T.; Chen, X. Enhanced photocatalytic activity of NaBH4 reduced BiFeO3 nanoparticles for rhodamine B decolorization. Materials 2017, 10, 1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Qiu, L.; Zhou, Z.; Qiu, X.; Duo, S. Synthesis and photocatalytic degradation performance of g-C3N4/CQDs/SAPO-5 ternary composite. Key Eng. Mater. 2018, 768, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhou, D.; Yang, H.; Tu, Y.; Tian, Y.; Cai, Y.; Hu, Z.; Zhu, X. In situ fabrication of Bi2Ti2O7/TiO2 heterostructure submicron fibers for enhanced photocatalytic activity. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 09 01163 g001 550
Figure 1. XRD patterns (A) and UV-Visible diffuse reflectance spectra (B) of LaFeO3, LaFeO3−XNX, SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX, and SnO2 photocatalysts.
Figure 1. XRD patterns (A) and UV-Visible diffuse reflectance spectra (B) of LaFeO3, LaFeO3−XNX, SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX, and SnO2 photocatalysts.
Nanomaterials 09 01163 g001
Nanomaterials 09 01163 g002 550
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images (A–C) of LaFeO3, LaFeO3−XNX, and SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalysts, and Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrum (D) of SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalyst.
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images (A–C) of LaFeO3, LaFeO3−XNX, and SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalysts, and Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrum (D) of SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalyst.
Nanomaterials 09 01163 g002
Nanomaterials 09 01163 g003 550
Figure 3. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey spectra (A) of LaFeO3, LaFeO3−XNX, SnO2, and SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalysts, high resolution La3d XPS spectra (B) and Fe2p XPS spectra (C) of LaFeO3, LaFeO3−XNX, and SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalysts, O1s XPS spectra (D) of LaFeO3, LaFeO3−XNX, SnO2, and SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalysts, N1s XPS spectra with inset valence band XPS spectra of LaFeO3 and LaFeO3−XNX (E) and Sn3d XPS spectra (F) of LaFeO3−XNX and SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalysts.
Figure 3. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey spectra (A) of LaFeO3, LaFeO3−XNX, SnO2, and SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalysts, high resolution La3d XPS spectra (B) and Fe2p XPS spectra (C) of LaFeO3, LaFeO3−XNX, and SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalysts, O1s XPS spectra (D) of LaFeO3, LaFeO3−XNX, SnO2, and SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalysts, N1s XPS spectra with inset valence band XPS spectra of LaFeO3 and LaFeO3−XNX (E) and Sn3d XPS spectra (F) of LaFeO3−XNX and SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalysts.
Nanomaterials 09 01163 g003
Nanomaterials 09 01163 g004 550
Figure 4. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra (A), photoelectrochemical (PEC) I-V curves (B), PEC I-t curves (C) and fluorescence (FL) spectra (D) of LaFeO3, LaFeO3−XNX, and SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalysts.
Figure 4. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra (A), photoelectrochemical (PEC) I-V curves (B), PEC I-t curves (C) and fluorescence (FL) spectra (D) of LaFeO3, LaFeO3−XNX, and SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalysts.
Nanomaterials 09 01163 g004
Nanomaterials 09 01163 g005 550
Figure 5. Photocatalytic activities for RhB-dye degradation (A) of LaFeO3, LaFeO3−XNX and SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalysts. Photostability and recyclability test (B) and scavengers trapping experiments for RhB dye degradation (C) of SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalyst. Gas sensing performance of SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalyst for 200 ppm of H2, CO, and SO2 gases at 400 °C (D).
Figure 5. Photocatalytic activities for RhB-dye degradation (A) of LaFeO3, LaFeO3−XNX and SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalysts. Photostability and recyclability test (B) and scavengers trapping experiments for RhB dye degradation (C) of SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalyst. Gas sensing performance of SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalyst for 200 ppm of H2, CO, and SO2 gases at 400 °C (D).
Nanomaterials 09 01163 g005
Nanomaterials 09 01163 g006 550
Figure 6. Schematic of the energy band gaps, charge carrier’s transfer and separation, and the photocatalytic processes over SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalyst under visible-light irradiation.
Figure 6. Schematic of the energy band gaps, charge carrier’s transfer and separation, and the photocatalytic processes over SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX photocatalyst under visible-light irradiation.
Nanomaterials 09 01163 g006
Table
Table 1. Comparison of the RhB degradation activity of our photocatalyst with previous reports.
Table 1. Comparison of the RhB degradation activity of our photocatalyst with previous reports.
S. #PhotocatalystLight SourceRhB Degradation (%)References
1β-FeSe/g-C3N4300 W Xe-lamp45 % (3 h)[42]
2R40-BiFeO3−X300 W Xe-lamp60 % (6 h)[43]
3g-C3N4/ SAPO-5300 W Xe-lamp47.15 % (2.5 h)[44]
4Bi2Ti2O7/TiO2150 W Xe-lamp90 % (6 h)[45]
5SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX300 W Xe-lamp71 % (2 h)This work

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yin, X.-T.; Dastan, D.; Wu, F.-Y.; Li, J. Facile Synthesis of SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX Composite: Photocatalytic Activity and Gas Sensing Performance. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9081163

AMA Style

Yin X-T, Dastan D, Wu F-Y, Li J. Facile Synthesis of SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX Composite: Photocatalytic Activity and Gas Sensing Performance. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(8):1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9081163

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yin, Xi-Tao, Davoud Dastan, Fa-Yu Wu, and Jing Li. 2019. "Facile Synthesis of SnO2/LaFeO3−XNX Composite: Photocatalytic Activity and Gas Sensing Performance" Nanomaterials 9, no. 8: 1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9081163

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop