Next Article in Journal
Biomimetic Liquid Crystal-Modified Mesoporous Silica−Based Composite Hydrogel for Soft Tissue Repair
Next Article in Special Issue
VEGF Detection via Impedance Spectroscopy on Surface Functionalized Interdigitated Biosensor
Previous Article in Journal
Reinforcement of Hydrogels with a 3D-Printed Polycaprolactone (PCL) Structure Enhances Cell Numbers and Cartilage ECM Production under Compression
Previous Article in Special Issue
Amperometric Miniaturised Portable Enzymatic Nanobiosensor for the Ultrasensitive Analysis of a Prostate Cancer Biomarker
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Peroxidase-like Nanocomposites as Hydrogen Peroxide-Sensitive Elements in Cholesterol Oxidase-Based Biosensors for Cholesterol Assay

1
Institute of Cell Biology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 79005 Lviv, Ukraine
2
Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene, Ecology and Law, Stepan Gzhytskyi National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies, 79000 Lviv, Ukraine
3
Institute of Physical Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, 01-224 Warsaw, Poland
4
Department of Electronics and Information Technology, Lviv Polytechnic National University, 79000 Lviv, Ukraine
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14(6), 315; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14060315
Submission received: 5 May 2023 / Revised: 31 May 2023 / Accepted: 5 June 2023 / Published: 7 June 2023

Abstract

:
Catalytically active nanomaterials, in particular, nanozymes, are promising candidates for applications in biosensors due to their excellent catalytic activity, stability and cost-effective preparation. Nanozymes with peroxidase-like activities are prospective candidates for applications in biosensors. The purpose of the current work is to develop cholesterol oxidase-based amperometric bionanosensors using novel nanocomposites as peroxidase (HRP) mimetics. To select the most electroactive chemosensor on hydrogen peroxide, a wide range of nanomaterials were synthesized and characterized using cyclic voltammetry (CV) and chronoamperometry. Pt NPs were deposited on the surface of a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) in order to improve the conductivity and sensitivity of the nanocomposites. The most HRP-like active bi-metallic CuFe nanoparticles (nCuFe) were placed on a previously nano-platinized electrode, followed by conjugation of cholesterol oxidase (ChOx) in a cross-linking film formed by cysteamine and glutaraldehyde. The constructed nanostructured bioelectrode ChOx/nCuFe/nPt/GCE was characterized by CV and chronoamperometry in the presence of cholesterol. The bionanosensor (ChOx/nCuFe/nPt/GCE) shows a high sensitivity (3960 A·M−1·m−2) for cholesterol, a wide linear range (2–50 µM) and good storage stability at a low working potential (−0.25 V vs. Ag/AgCl/3 M KCl). The constructed bionanosensor was tested on a real serum sample. A detailed comparative analysis of the bioanalytical characteristics of the developed cholesterol bionanosensor and the known analogs is presented.

1. Introduction

Cholesterol (cholest-5-en-3β-ol, CHOL) is a crucial lipid molecule that fulfills different biological functions. It is a bile acid precursor, promoting the synthesis of steroid hormones and some vitamins [1]. It plays a crucial role in maintaining the rigidity of cellular membranes and fluidity [2]. CHOL is a major component of the human brain and is necessary for signal transmission [1,2]. The increased cholesterol level in the blood serves as an important biomarker of cardiovascular disease [3]. According to the World Health Organization, an increase in CHOL levels over 6.2 mM resulted in millions of human deaths worldwide and shortened life expectancy by disability-adjusted years. It raises the mortal chance of several illnesses including diabetes, heart disease, lipid metabolism issues, cerebral thrombosis, brain thrombosis, arteriosclerosis and hypertension [3,4]. This is due to the possibility of CHOL accumulating in blood vessel walls and creating plaque, which can restrict blood flow and raise the risk. Therefore, CHOL assays are crucial for medical diagnostics and, respectively, global healthcare.
Different approaches including colorimetric [5,6], fluorometric [7,8], high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [9,10,11] and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [12] have been used to determine CHOL. However, most of these approaches are highly sophisticated, time-consuming and require a special technique for routine use. In recent years, the immunoassay method for CHOL detection is widely used in clinical laboratories due to its high sensitivity and specificity [13]. This is advantageous in clinical laboratories where efficiency and productivity are essential. Despite the immunoassay techniques of CHOL testing having their advantages, conventional methods such as biosensors approaches do not require specialized reagents and equipment [14]. Therefore, the development of biosensors for CHOL assay is of great interest.
Electrochemical sensors are one of the leading techniques for detecting many analytes in biological fluids with high accuracy. For the CHOL assay, highly selective enzymatic electrochemical sensors based on the high substrate-specific cholesterol oxidase (ChOx) and peroxidase (HRP) [15] or in combination with various nanomaterials [14,16] have been created.
ChOx is a FAD-containing enzyme which catalyzes the oxidation of CHOL to cholest-4-en-3-one with the reduction of oxygen to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) [17]. The detection of H2O2 could be an indirect quantification of CHOL levels. The level of CHOL can be determined by detecting the current produced from the transformation of the H2O2 generated during the enzymatic reaction of ChOx. However, this approach of indirect detection of CHOL requires a high applied working potential and, as a result, may lead to insufficient selectivity due to the impact of other interfering compounds in real samples [18,19,20]. To decrease the value of the applied working potential, there are generally used electron mediators such as Prussian Blue [21] or hydroxymethylferrocene [22]. Recently, amperometric biosensors for CHOL analysis based on direct electron transfer (DET) between ChOx and the electrode working at low potentials have been reported [14,19,20]. It is known that nanoparticles can provide new possibilities for the construction of biosensors with excellent analytical properties due to their unique properties such as excellent conductivity, high porosity and a large surface-to-volume ratio [14,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. It has been constructed ChOx-based biosensors where the Chox was immobilized on the surface of nanomaterials, namely, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [24], graphene [25], metallic nanoparticles (NPs) [26,27,28,29,30], transition metals nanomaterials [30,31], rare earth metal oxides nanomaterials [26,30], conductive polymers [23,32,33], quantum dots [34], hybrid combinations of them [29,35] and even with redox mediators (K4[Fe(CN)6], thionine, etc.) [19,21,26]. CNTs exhibit many attractive properties. However, the adsorption of small amounts of chemicals can lead to a dramatic change in CNT conductivity. To improve the properties of carbon materials, in particular, sensitivity, they should be functionalized with metal NPs such as Au and Pt [27,31,33,36,37]. Au NPs are often widely used in electrochemistry due to their ease of synthesis and chemical stability [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43].
To construct CHOL biosensors, different organic polymers in combinations with NPs have been also used, namely, AuNPs/CNTs/poly(allylamine hydrochloride) [44], polyaniline [45], AuNPs/Poly-(diallyldimethyl-ammonium chloride)/CNTs, polypyrrole/AuNPs/CNTs [45,46], PANi/CNC/IL/GLU, 4-(4H-dithienol[3,2-b: 2′,3′-d]pyrrole-4)aniline polymer [45] or poly(N[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]aniline] [47]. All proposed bioelectrodes facilitate DET to the electrode.
Among the metal NPs, Pt-Pd [29], Cu-Pt-Bi [35], AgNPs [38], PdNPs [39], CeO2-NR [40,48], AuNPs [28,35,38,39,44,46,47,48,49,50], TiO2 [16,26,29] and Cu2ONPs [26], hybrid nanocomposites are often used in biosensors for cholesterol detection.
Unlike natural enzymes, which are often unstable and can be easily denatured under harsh conditions, nanozymes (NZs) are highly stable and can maintain their catalytic activity under a wide range of conditions. It is known that NZs as stable cost-effective mimics of natural enzymes may be promising catalysts in food and environmental biotechnology, biosensorics, alternative energy and medicine. Enzyme-like NZs, including metallic nanocomposites, are promising catalysts for biosensing applications [51,52,53,54]. Artificial peroxidase being able to utilize as a substrate hydrogen peroxide, the final product of oxidase-catalyzed splitting of different practically important analytes, may be promising hydrogen peroxide-selective chemosensing membrane, coupled with a relevant oxidase in the biosensing layer. Recently, it has been proposed using a Prussian blue (PB) mediator that encourages electron transfer and plays a role as an ‘‘artificial peroxidase” that catalyzes the H2O2 reduction at low potential values [55]. Its low cost and selectivity to H2O2 reduction make PB promising candidates for the construction of biosensors.
In the current paper, we report the construction of an amperometric “bionanosensor” based on using natural ChOx and several new nanocomposites with HRP-like catalytic activity. The best prototype of such as a bionanosensor with an architecture of a bioselective layer as GhOx/nCuFe/Pt, located on a glassy carbon electrode (GCE), for CHOL assay on the model of human serum. The developed bionanosensor due to its sensitivity, validity, low cost and high selectivity will be prospective for application in clinical laboratories for CHOL assay in blood serum.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

All reagents and solvents used in this work were of analytical grade from Sigma–Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Cholesterol oxidase (ChOx), dipotassium hydrogen phosphate, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, cholesterol (CHOL), ascorbic acid (AA), uric acid (UA), salicylic acid (SA), glutathione (GN), glucose (GU), chloroplatinic (IV) acid, creatinine (CN), copper(II) sulfate, hydrogen tetrachloroaurate(III) trihydrate, cerium(III) chloride, o-dianisidine, hydrogen peroxide (30%), glutaraldehyde (25%), cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), cysteamine, isopropanol (98%) and Triton X-100 were from Sigma–Aldrich.

2.2. Synthesis of HRP-like NZs

All NPs were obtained by the chemical reduction method [56,57]. nCeAu were obtained by the following procedure: 5 mL 10 mM HAuCl4 and 5 mL 10 mM Ce(HCO3)4 were mixed with 0.1 mL 10 mM CTAB and 1.5 mL 50 mM ascorbic acid. The mixture was stirred for 10 min at 20 °C. The scheme of the synthesis of nAgCu was as follows: 2 mL 5 mM AgNO3 and 5 mL 1 mM CuSO4 were mixed with 0.1 mL 10 mM CTAB and 1 mL 100 mM ascorbic acid.
nCuFe were synthesized according to the following procedure: 4 mL 1 mM CuSO4 and 2 mL 10 mM FeCl3 were mixed with the following addition of mixture containing 0.1 mL 10 mM CTAB and 0.1 mL 20 mM NaBH4. The mixture was stirred for 15 min at 20 °C and centrifuged at 8000× g. All obtained NPs were dried at 80 °C for 24 h. The total concentration of NPs was determined gravimetrically.
The morphology and sizes of synthesized NPs were studied by the use of a scanning electron microscope (SEM) FEI Nova NanoSEM 450.

2.3. Evaluation of HRP-like Activity of the Synthesized NZs

To determine the HRP-like activity of the synthesized NZs in solution, the spectrophotometric method with o-dianisidine was applied [55]. The specific activity (U/mg) was calculated according to the formula [56]:
S p e c i f i c   a c t i v i t y = D 525 V t N 13.38 V N Z c t ,
where
D525—optical density of the test tube;
N—dilution of the tested sample before injection in reaction mixture;
Vt—total volume of reagents in test tube, mL;
13.38—millimolar extinction coefficient of the coloured product, mM−1∙cm−1;
VNZ—aliquot of added NZs, mL;
c—initial concentration of NZs, mg·mL−1;
t—time, min.

2.4. Construction of Amperometric Biosensors

The constructed sensors were characterized using amperometry in a three-electrode configuration with an Ag/AgCl/KCl (3 M) reference electrode, a Pt-wire counter electrode and a working GCE [56].

2.5. Study of H2O2-Sensing Ability of the Electrodes, Modified with Peroxidase-like NPs

The electrochemical properties of synthesized NZs were studied by CV and chronoamperometry and the profiles of amperometric outputs were compared. The most electroactive toward H2O2 NPs were taken for the construction of biosensor on CHOL.

2.6. Modification of GCE with nPt

Platinum NPs (nPt) were synthesized by the method of electrodeposition under potentiodynamic mode on a surface of GCE from the mixture containing 6 mM H2PtCl6 in 0.5 M sulfuric acid in the range from −0.5 to +1.00 V at 25 mV·min−1 during 6 cycles vs. Ag/AgCl/3 M KCl. The obtained platinized GCE was rinsed with 50 mM PB, pH 7.5 and kept till usage.

2.7. Construction and Characterization of Bionanoelectrodes

To construct nanostructured bioelectrodes, ChOx was immobilized as a film on HRP-like NZs and immobilized on GCE surface (intact or platinized (nPt/GCE) variants).
To immobilize NZs, an aliquot of NZs (0.002 mL, 0.2 mg/mL) was dropped on the GCE or nPt/GCE electrodes and dried at RT. Then, the aliquot of a mixture (0.002 mL) containing cysteamine (1 mM) and glutaraldehyde (1%) was added to the NPs layer and incubated up to film formation. Finally, the functionalized electrodes NZ/GCE or NZ/nPt/GCE were rinsed with 50 mM PB, pH 7.0 and used for ChOx immobilization using cross-linking reaction. For this purpose, an aliquot of ChOx solution (0.005 mL, 15 U·mL-1) was placed onto the NZ-modified electrode and dried. The fabricated bionanoelectrodes were stored at +4 °C until use.

2.8. Analysis of CHOL in Serum

As a standard CHOL solution, it was used 12.95 mM CHOL in 50 mM PBS, pH 7.5, containing 1% Triton-X100 and 20% isopropanol. The sample of serum was tested from a healthy volunteer (woman, 35 years old). Reference CHOL assay was performed using an enzymatic analytical kit “Chromocholesterol” [57].

2.9. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were carried out three times (n = 3) and measurements were performed in two parallels. The statistical parameters and all figures were calculated and built using Origin 8.5 Pro.
Sensitivity (A·M−1·m−2) was calculated as follows: Sensitivity = B/S, where B—the slope for the dependence of current on analyte concentration in linear range (A·M−1); S—the surface area of the working electrode (m2).
The limit of detection (LOD) was calculated by using the standard deviation (SD) of the blank current signals and the B value according to the formula: LOD = (3∗ SD/B).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of the Nanocomposites Most Sensitive to Hydrogen Peroxide

The aim of the current research was to construct novel NZs-based biosensors coupled with ChOx, promising for medical diagnostics with the usage of NZs as peroxidase mimetic catalysts. Thus, the obtained NPs were tested on their pseudo-peroxidase activity in the reaction with o-dianisidine. It was demonstrated that several NPs, especially nCeAu, nAuHCF, nCuFe and nCoHCF possessed the highest HRP-like activities among all others (Table S1). The most active in solution NZs, namely, nCeAu, nAuHCF, nCuFe and nCoHCF were taken for morphological characterization by SEM and X-ray microanalysis. SEM and XRM provided information on the size and shape of the studied samples (see Supplementary Materials, Figure S1). It was shown that the synthesized NZs, in particular, nCuFe and nCeAu have a shape close to spherical with a diameter of less than 30 nm. The XRM images (nCuFe and nCeAu) demonstrate the peaks for metals of the composites. The morphology of nAuHCF was presented in our earlier paper [56].
The obtained catalytically active NZs with a high activity in solution, namely, nCeAu, nAuHCF and nCuFe were chosen for further investigation.
To evaluate the possibility of using the synthesized NZs as peroxidase-like elements, sensitive to H2O2 generated in ChOx-based biosensor, the GCE electrodes, modified with different NZs (nCeAu, nAuHCF and nCuFe) were tested in model experiments with H2O2 as an analyte. The amperometric characteristics of several H2O2-sensitive chemosensors are presented in Figure 1. The comparison was made in relation to the biosensor analog, for which, instead of artificial “nanoperoxidase”, natural horseradish peroxidase (HRP) was exploited. The electrochemical behavior of NZs, immobilized on the surface of GCEs, was screened by CV and chronoamperometry (Figure 1). Cyclic voltammograms (Figure 1a) for all types of NZs-based chemoelectrodes demonstrated that a strong reduction peak caused by H2O2 decomposition occurred at potentials between −100 mV to −300 mV (vs. Ag/AgCl). For further experiments, including chronoamperometry, the potential of −200 mV was taken as the optimal potential. The amperometric characteristics of several H2O2-sensitive chemosensors are presented in Figure 1. The results of chronoamperometry analysis and correspondent calibration graphs at −200 mV are presented in Figure 1b,c, respectively. Thus, the obtained HRP-like NZs, in particular, nCeAu, nAuHCF and nCuFe are prospective artificial HRPs for the development of cholesterol oxidase-based biosensors.
The analytical characteristics of the developed chemosensor electrodes in comparison with the HRP-based bioelectrode under injected H2O2 are presented in Table 1. The linear ranges, limits of detection (LOD), Imax values (for an electrode area of 7.06 mm2) and sensitivities were calculated.
As shown, under reductive voltage (−200 mV), the nAuHCF/GCE and nCuFe/GCE have the highest sensitivity (1290 and 1232 A∙M−1∙m−2, respectively) and they were used in conjunction with cholesterol oxidase for further development of an amperometric biosensor for cholesterol assay.

3.2. Platinization of GCE for Construction of H2O2- and Cholesterol-Sensitive Sensors

The literature shows that the additional modification of the electrode surface with platinum leads to improved electroconductivity and catalytic properties of the modified electrodes [58,59,60,61,62,63]. For modification of the GCE surface, we have used the approach of electrodeposition of platinum in potentiodynamic mode. Morphological and structural properties of the electrodeposited Pt NPs were studied, including SEM micrographs and X-ray spectrograms (Figure 2). The distribution (Figure 2c) calculated from the SEM (Figure 2a) confirms that the formed Pt layer is nanosized with medium size of crystallites near 62 nm. The data of XRM of the Pt NPs demonstrates the characteristic peaks for Pt0, proving the generation of nPt (Figure 2b).
The electrochemical properties of nPt/GCE as a chemosensor for H2O2 were investigated (Figure 3).
The CV (Figure 3a) demonstrates the reduction peak that occurs at a potential between −100 mV and −300 mV under injected 0.05–5 mM H2O2 solutions, respectively. The chronamperometric outputs and calibration graph for H2O2 assay at −200 mV are shown in Figure 3 (b and c, respectively). The maximum current response of the nPt/GCE was 28.7 ± 0.8 µA (electrode surface is 7.06 mm2) with the apparent Michaelis–Menten constant (KMapp)—1.7 ± 0.2 mM.

3.3. Construction and Analytical Properties of ChOx/NZs-Based Bionanosensors

3.3.1. Construction of Unmodified ChOx/NZs-Based Bionanosensors

Selective to hydrogen peroxide HRP-like NZs, coupled with cholesterol oxidase, were taken for the development of amperometric biosensors on CHOL. The main principle of the biosensor functioning is based on the direct detection of H2O2, produced as a result of CHOL oxidation under ChOx digestion (Figure 4).
The calibration curves for the developed bionanosensors and the corresponding chronamperograms (inserts) are shown in Figure 5. The main bioanalytical characteristics of constructed biosensors are shown in Table S2.
The comparison of the constructed nanostructured bioelectrode with architecture ChOx/nCuFe/GCE with the analog based on natural peroxidase (GhOx/HRP/GCE) shows a significant increase (6.55-fold) in sensitivity (49 A·M−1·m−2 and 331 A·M−1·m−2, respectively). Possibly, it can be explained by a higher electron transfer rate between artificial nanoperoxidases and the electrode surface.

3.3.2. Construction and Bioanalytical Properties of Bionanosensors Based on ChOx and nCuFe Using Platinized GCE

It is known that platinized electrodes by NPs sufficiently increase their electroactivity [58], so we have studied a possible effect of “nanoplatinization” on the working GCE bioanalytical parameters of the derived bionanosensor ChOx/nCuFe/nPt/GCE. To choose the optimal working potential, CV was applied (Figure 6a). The CV profiles of the sensors were compared with GCE in the present and in the absence of CHOL in the electrochemical cell (Figure 6). An amperometric response on CHOL was tested for CHOL concentration from 5 µM to 5 mM. The linearity of the proposed biosensor is in the range between 5 µM and 50 µM. The maximal detected signal was 2060 ± 30 nA with KMapp for CHOL 0.45 ± 0.03 mM (Figure 6b). The sensitivity within the linear range was estimated as 3960 ± 35 M−1⋅m−2 (for electrode with a working area of 1.76 mm2), LOD was 0.2 µM, and a response time was 10 s.
As shown, the bionanosensor GhOx/nCuFe/nPt/GCE possesses the highest sensitivity to CHOL (3960 A·M−1·m−2) is explained by amplification catalytic effects of nanocomposites, namely, nCuFe and nPt, which cover the GCE. The proposed bionanosensor has a 12-fold higher sensitivity compared to GhOx/nCuFe/GCE without nPt-layer (331 A·M−1·m−2) (Figure 6). The Michaelis–Menten constant (KMapp) for the platinized nanostructured bioelectrodes is much lower, indicating the better substrate affinity of the sensing layer to cholesterol.
The sensitivity of the ChOx/nCuFe/nPt/GCE sensor has been compared with the literature data, as shown in Table 2. To date, a variety of materials such as CNTs, polymers, metal NPs and graphene are used for the construction of biosensors for CHOL detection [24,26,37,46,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63]. The developed bionanosensor ChOx/nCuFe/nPt/GCE has several advantages such as lower cost, high sensitivity and selectivity. Although, recently, there was described ChOx-based biosensor using MoS2-Au NZ with much better sensitivity (4460 μA mM−1 cm−2); however, high sensitivity is not always preferable, first of all, for metabolites which are present in human biological liquids in the mM range (glucose, lactate, cholesterol and others) because the very high sensitivity resulted in the necessity to dilute the tested samples before analysis.
It should be mentioned that most of the described biosensors exploit electron transfer mediators or operate at high potentials (+0.6 V) which can induce interference and reduce the accuracy of the measurements. So, the sensors developed in the current paper reveal good sensitivity, do not require free-diffusion mediators, have a fast response to the target analyte and the preparation of nanozymes is a simple and cost-effective procedure which is a great advantage compared to the described sensors.

3.4. Analytical Properties of the Constructed Bionanosensor

The test on the selectivity of the developed ChOx/nCuFe/nPt/GCE sensor was evaluated by analyzing responses on compounds, usually presented in biological liquids, namely, glucose (GU), urea (UR), ascorbic acid (AA), creatinine (CN), glutamine (Gln), glutamic acid (Glu), glutathione (GSH) and lysine (Lys) (Figure 7). The tested species were added individually in 0.5 mM concentration and amperometric outputs were evaluated. Only a low current response was observed for GU—8%, UR—8%, AA—4.2%, CN—10%, Gln—5.7%, Glu—7% and Lys—5% selectivity graph (Figure 7a).
The indicated compounds were also tested for their possible interfering effect in a mixture with CHOL (Figure 7b). The data clearly demonstrate a very small effect of the tested species on CHOL assay.
The reproducibility of the constructed biosensor was investigated by analyzing 0.50 mM CHOL seven times for one day. The relative standard deviation (RSD) is shown to be 4.3%, which is a permissible error for clinical analysis. The constructed bionanosensor ChOx/nCuFe/nPt/GCE was checked to run seven consecutive measurements in the 1.0 mM CHOL solution. The obtained sensor revealed an R.S.D. value of 1.8%, indicating good repeatability.
The responses of the independently prepared nanostructured bioelectrodes were tested for 0.5 mM CHOL using chronoamperometry to estimate the repeatability. The relative standard deviation was shown to be 2.7%.
Storage stability of ChOx/nCuFe/nPt/GCE sensor was also investigated by everyday monitoring of its response to 0.5 mM CHOL. The sensor retained 82% of the initial current after seven days of storage of the bionanoelectrode at room temperature, with a slight decrease in activity, indicating storage stability of the electrode.
To show the practical application of the developed bionanosensor, CHOL content was tested in human serum samples (Figure S2). The estimation of CHOL in a real serum sample was provided for two variants of the bionanoelectrode with and without nPt electrodeposition. The biosensors’ data were compared with the values enzymatic kit “Chromocholesterol” (Ukraine) (Table 3).
The results of tests on the accuracy of the developed bionanosensors for the determination of CHOL are shown to meet requirements for the permissible limits of 5.0%. The obtained results approve the possibility of application of the constructed amperometric bionanosensors for CHOL assay in human biological liquids.
To date, intensive research has been carried out to develop oxidase-based biosensors in combination with catalytic nanomaterials for the assay of natural metabolites—markers of human diseases or indicators of food quality. Although many peroxidase-like NZs had been proposed, some problems still need to be solved, in particular, finding out the mechanism of interaction of peroxidase-like NZs with hydrogen peroxide generated in the enzymatic reaction, and, secondly, the need in optimization of architecture structure of the sensing layer, improvement of storage stability of the enzyme–nanozyme electrodes and protocol settings for practical using such sensors for routine analyses. Moreover, many publications show that the additional modification of the working electrode surface with the metal nanoparticles resulted in the improvement of electroconductivity and catalytic properties of the modified electrodes. In our opinion, the application of peroxidase-like NZs coupled with nanoplatinum layer provided a good platform for the construction of highly sensitive oxidase-based biosensors, suitable for future application in clinical practice including for cholesterol assay.

4. Conclusions

The novelty of the presented work is related to the synthesis of new peroxidase-like metal-based nanocomposites and the evaluation of their functionality as “chemonanosensors” on hydrogen peroxide and as the sensing components in CHOL-based “bionanosensors” for the CHOL assay. The used bi-metallic CuFe nanoparticles were shown to have the best catalytic activity in the sensor’s layer, particularly when using nanoplatinized glassy carbon electrodes. The other advantage of the presented experimental approach for selecting the best peroxidase-like NZs is a combination of testing their intrinsic peroxidase activity in a solution (without applying electric potential) and monitoring their H2O2-sensing ability on the electrode. Such preliminary experiments make the construction of oxidase-based sensors more reasonable.
The constructed ChOx/nCuFe/nPt/GCE bionanosensor exhibits a high sensitivity (3960 A·M−1·m−2) for the target analyte, a broad linear range (2–50 µM), satisfactory storage stability and excellent selectivity. The substitution of HRP by nCuFe as HRP-nanozyme in the sensing layer and nanoplatinization of the working electrode resulted in a 12-fold sensitivity increase compared to the non-platinized GCE one. The practical applicability of the constructed bionanosensor was demonstrated by CHOL assay in a human serum sample. Because a high sensitivity of the sensor is not preferable for routine serum analysis (dilution is required), in the future, we plan to control sensitivity by using semi-permeable membranes, covering the outer surface of the bionanoelectrode and testing of such bionanosensor for assay CHOL in a massive lot of clinical samples.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jfb14060315/s1, Figure S1: Morphological characteristics of the synthesized NZs nCuFe (a, b) and nCeAu (c, d): SEM images (a, c) and XRM data (b, d); Figure S2. Graphical standard addition method for CHOL assay in the human serum by using sensors ChOx/nCuFe/nPt/GCE (a) and ChOx/nCuFe/GCE; (b) Table S1: HRP-like activities in the solution of the synthesized NZs; Table S2: Analytical characteristics of bionanosensors of architecture ChOx/NZ/GCE (electrode square of 7.06 mm2).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.G. and W.N.; methodology, O.D. and N.S.; investigation, O.D., N.S., B.V. and M.G.; writing—original draft preparation, N.S. and M.G.; writing—review and editing, N.S. and W.N.; visualization, N.G.; supervision, M.G. and W.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Ukraine (projects Nos. 2020.02/0100 and 2021.01/0010) by the National Science Centre, Poland (Grant 2016/23/B/ST4/02868) and the FEBS Ukrainian Short-Term Fellowship.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are included within the present article.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Oksana Zakalska (Institute of Cell Biology, Lviv, Ukraine) for providing an enzymatic kit “Chromocholesterol”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Luo, J.; Yang, H.; Song, B.L. Mechanisms and regulation of cholesterol homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 225–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ho, W.Y.; Hartmann, H.; Ling, S.C. Central nervous system cholesterol metabolism in health and disease. IUBMB Life 2022, 74, 826–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. World Health Organization. Report of the Formal Meeting of Member States to Conclude the Work on the Comprehensive Global Monitoring Framework, Including Indicators, and a Set of Voluntary Global Targets for the Prevention and Control of Communicable Diseases. 2012. Available online: http://apps.who.int/gb/NCDs/pdf/A_NCD_2-en (accessed on 4 June 2023).
  4. Jung, E.; Kong, S.Y.; Ro, Y.S.; Ryu, H.H.; Shin, S.D. Serum Cholesterol Levels and Risk of Cardiovascular Death: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 8272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, L.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Wu, J.; Wu, S.; Xie, L. Colorimetric Detection of Cholesterol Based on the Peroxidase-Like Activity of Metal-Organic Framework MIL-101 (Cr). ChemistrySelect 2021, 6, 7143–7149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rastogi, L.; Dash, K.; Sashidhar, R.B. Selective and sensitive detection of cholesterol using intrinsic peroxidase-like activity of biogenic palladium nanoparticles. Curr. Res. Biotechnol. 2021, 3, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.N.; Sun, X.T.; Chen, L.; Xu, Z.R. Boron nitride nanosheet/CuS nanocomposites as mimetic peroxidase for sensitive colorimetric detection of cholesterol. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 246, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Briones, M.; Busó-Rogero, C.; Catalán-Gómez, S.; García-Mendiola, T.; Pariente, F.; Redondo-Cubero, A.; Lorenzo, M.E. ZnO nanowire-based fluorometric enzymatic assays for lactate and cholesterol. Microchim. Acta 2020, 187, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ahmida, H.M.; Bertucci, P.; Franzò, L.; Massoud, R.; Cortese, C.; Lala, A.; Federici, G. Simultaneous determination of plasmatic phytosterols and cholesterol precursors using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) with selective ion monitoring (SIM). J. Chromatogr. B 2006, 842, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lütjohann, D.; Björkhem, I.; Friedrichs, S.; Kerksiek, A.; Lövgren-Sandblom, A.; Geilenkeuser, W.J.; Schött, H.F. First international descriptive and interventional survey for cholesterol and non-cholesterol sterol determination by gas-and liquid-chromatography–Urgent need for harmonisation of analytical methods. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 190, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hojo, K.; Hakamata, H.; Ito, A.; Kotani, A.; Furukawa, C.; Hosokawa, Y.Y.; Kusu, F. Determination of total cholesterol in serum by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1166, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lian, K.; Zhang, P.; Wang, W.; Dai, T.; Li, L. Determination of total cholesterol in serum by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Asian J. Chem. 2014, 26, 2646–2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Murakami, K.; Harada, A.; Toh, R.; Kubo, T.; Miwa, K.; Kim, J.; Kiriyama, M.; Iino, T.; Nishikawa, Y.; Uno, S.; et al. Fully automated immunoassay for cholesterol uptake capacity to assess high-density lipoprotein function and cardiovascular disease risk. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Narwal, V.; Deswal, R.; Batra, B.; Kalra, V.; Hooda, R.; Sharma, M.; Rana, J.S. Cholesterol biosensors: A review. Steroids 2019, 143, 6–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kumar, A.; Malhotra, R.; Malhotra, B.D.; Grover, S.K. Co-immobilization of cholesterol oxidase and horseradish peroxidase in a sol–gel film. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 414, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Batra, B.; Narwal, V.; Ahlawat, J.; Sharma, M. An amperometric cholesterol biosensor based on immobilization of cholesterol oxidase onto titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Sens. Int. 2021, 2, 100111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ahn, K.-W.; Sampson, N.S. Cholesterol oxidase senses subtle changes in lipid bilayer structure. Biochemistry 2004, 43, 827–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rahman, M.M.; Li, X.; Kim, J.; Lim, B.O.; Ahammad, A.J.S.; Lee, J.-J. A cholesterol biosensor based on a bi-enzyme immobilized on conducting poly(thionine) film. Sens. Actuators B 2014, 202, 536–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Giri, A.K.; Sinhamahapatra, A.; Prakash, S.; Chaudhari, J.; Shahi, V.K.; Panda, A.B. Porous ZnO microtubes with excellent cholesterol sensing and catalytic properties. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 814–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhao, C.; Wan, L.; Jiang, L.; Wang, Q.; Jiao, K. Highly sensitive and selective cholesterol biosensor based on direct electron transfer of hemoglobin. Anal. Biochem. 2008, 383, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, X.; Nan, Z.; Qiu, Y.; Zheng, L.; Lu, X. Hydrophobic ionic liquid immoblizing cholesterol oxidase on the electrodeposited Prussian blue on glassy carbon electrode for detection of cholesterol. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 90, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hooda, V.; Gahlaut, A. Amperometric cholesterol determination using HRP incorporated carbon paste electrode. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Asia 2020, 17, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pramanik, K.; Sarkar, P.; Bhattacharyay, D.; Majumdar, P. One step electrode fabrication for direct electron transfer cholesterol biosensor based on composite of polypyrrole, green reduced graphene oxide and cholesterol oxidase. Electroanalysis 2018, 30, 2719–2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kumari, A.; Rajeev, R.; Benny, L.; Sudhakar, Y.N.; Varghese, A.; Hegde, G. Recent advances in carbon nanotubes-based biocatalysts and their applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 297, 102542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Li, Z.; Xie, C.; Wang, J.; Meng, A.; Zhang, F. Direct electrochemistry of cholesterol oxidase immobilized on chitosan–graphene and cholesterol sensing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 208, 505–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yan, Q.; Wu, R.; Chen, H.; Wang, H.; Nan, W. Highly sensitive cholesterol biosensor based on electron mediator thionine and cubic-shaped Cu2O nanomaterials. Microchem. J. 2023, 185, 108201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Haritha, V.S.; Kumar, S.S.; Rakhi, R.B. Amperometric cholesterol biosensor based on cholesterol oxidase and Pt-Au/MWNTs modified glassy carbon electrode. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 50, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Aravind, S.S.J.; Baby, T.T.; Arockiadoss, T.; Rakhi, R.B.; Ramaprabhu, S. A cholesterol biosensor based on gold nanoparticles decorated functionalized graphene nanoplatelets. Thin Solid Film. 2011, 519, 5667–5672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cao, S.; Zhang, L.; Chai, Y.; Yuan, R. Electrochemistry of cholesterol biosensor based on a novel Pt–Pd bimetallic nanoparticle decorated graphene catalyst. Talanta 2013, 109, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Saxena, U.; Das, A.B. Nanomaterials towards fabrication of cholesterol biosensors: Key roles and design approaches. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 75, 196–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xu, L.; Zhang, M.; Hou, Y.; Huang, W.; Yao, C.; Wu, Q. An Au nanocomposite based biosensor for determination of cholesterol. Anal. Methods 2015, 7, 3480–3485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cevik, E.; Cerit, A.; Gazel, N.; Yildiz, H.B. Construction of an amperometric cholesterol biosensor based on DTP (aryl) aniline conducting polymer bound cholesterol oxidase. Electroanalysis 2018, 30, 2445–2453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Srivastava, M.; Srivastava, S.K.; Nirala, N.R.; Prakash, R. A chitosan-based polyaniline–Au nanocomposite biosensor for determination of cholesterol. Anal. Methods 2014, 6, 817–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Stewart, A.J.; O’Reilly, E.J.; Moriarty, R.D.; Bertoncello, P.; Keyes, T.E.; Forster, R.J.; Dennany, L. A cholesterol biosensor based on the NIR electrogenerated-chemiluminescence (ECL) of water-soluble CdSeTe/ZnS quantum dots. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 157, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Soorya, V.C.; Berchmans, S. Cu-Pt-Bi Nanocomposite modified glassy carbon electrode for dual mode H2O2 and cholesterol sensing. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017, 164, B435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Silva, D.P.; Miyazaki, C.M.; Mascagni, D.B.; Ferreira, M. Layer-by-layer films of gold nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes for improved amperometric detection of cholesterol. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2019, 19, 5483–5488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Alagappan, M.; Immanuel, S.; Sivasubramanian, R.; Kandaswamy, A. Development of cholesterol biosensor using Au nanoparticles decorated f-MWCNT covered with polypyrrole network. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 2001–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nantaphol, S.; Chailapakul, O.; Siangproh, W. Sensitive and selective electrochemical sensor using silver nanoparticles modified glassy carbon electrode for determination of cholesterol in bovine serum. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 207, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dey, R.S.; Raj, C.R. Enzyme-integrated cholesterol biosensing scaffold based on in situ synthesized reduced graphene oxide and dendritic Pd nanostructure. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 62, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Anh, T.T.N.; Tam, L.T.; Van Thu, V.; Le, A.T.; Hung, V.P.; Tam, P.D. Nano-rods structured cerium oxide platform for cholesterol biosensor. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2020, 30, 3886–3893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bonomi, R.; Cazzolaro, A.; Sansone, A.; Scrimin, P.; Prins, L.J. Detection of enzyme activity through catalytic signal amplification with functionalized gold nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2307–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xiao, Y.; Patolsky, F.; Katz, E.; Hainfeld, J.F.; Willner, I. “Plugging into Enzymes”: Nanowiring of redox enzymes by a gold nanoparticle. Science 2003, 299, 1877–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Rashidi, K.; Mahmoudi, M.; Mohammadi, G.; Zangeneh, M.M.; Korani, S.; Goicoechea, H.C.; Gu, H.W.; Jalalvand, A.R. Simultaneous co-immobilization of three enzymes onto a modified glassy carbon electrode to fabricate a high-performance amperometric biosensor for determination of total cholesterol. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 120, 587–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Eguílaz, M.; Villalonga, R.; Agüí, L.; Yáñez-Sedeño, P.; Pingarrón, J.M. Gold nanoparticles: Poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride)–carbon nanotubes composites as platforms for the preparation of electrochemical enzyme biosensors: Application to the determination of cholesterol. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2011, 661, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ruecha, N.; Rangkupan, R.; Rodthongkum, N.; Chailapakul, O. Novel paper-based cholesterol biosensor using graphene/polyvinylpyrrolidone/polyaniline nanocomposite. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 52, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Abdi, M.M.; Razalli, R.L.; Tahir, P.M.; Chaibakhsh, N.; Hassani, M.; Mir, M. Optimized fabrication of newly cholesterol biosensor based on nanocellulose. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 126, 1213–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Komathi, S.; Gopalan, A.I.; Kim, S.K.; Anand, G.S.; Lee, K.P. Fabrication of horseradish peroxidase immobilized poly(N-[3-(trimethoxy silyl)propyl]aniline) gold nanorods film modified electrode and electrochemical hydrogen peroxide sensing. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 92, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Anh, T.T.N.; Van Thu, V.; Dang, H.S.; Pham, V.H.; Tam, P.D. Cerium oxide/polypyrrole nanocomposite as the matrix for cholesterol biosensor. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2021, 2021, 6627645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gopalan, A.I.; Lee, K.P.; Ragupathy, D. Development of a stable cholesterol biosensor based on multi-walled carbon nanotubes–gold nanoparticles composite covered with a layer of chitosan–room-temperature ionic liquid network. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2009, 24, 2211–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cai, X.; Gao, X.; Wang, L.; Wu, Q.; Lin, X. A layer-by-layer assembled and carbon nanotubes/gold nanoparticles-based bienzyme biosensor for cholesterol detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 181, 575–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kaçar, C.; Erden, P.E.; Dalkiran, B.; Inal, E.K.; Kiliç, E. Amperometric biogenic amine biosensors based on Prussian blue, indium tin oxide nanoparticles and diamine oxidase– or monoamine oxidase–modified electrodes. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2020, 412, 1933–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kurup, C.P.; Ahmed, M.U. Nanozymes towards Personalized Diagnostics: A Recent Progress in Biosensing. Biosensors 2023, 13, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Jerez-Masaquiza, M.D.; Fernández, L.; González, G.; Montero-Jiménez, M.; Espinoza-Montero, P.J. Electrochemical sensor based on prussian blue electrochemically deposited at ZrO2 doped carbon nanotubes glassy carbon modified electrode. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Karyakin, A.A.; Karyakina, E.E.; Gorton, L. Amperometric biosensor for glutamate using prussian blue-based “artificial peroxidase” as a transducer for hydrogen peroxide. Anal Chem. 2000, 72, 1720–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Stasyuk, N.; Demkiv, O.; Gayda, G.; Zakalskiy, A.; Klepach, H.; Bisko, N.; Gonchar, M.; Nisnevitch, M. Highly porous 3D gold enhances sensitivity of amperometric biosensors based on oxidases and CuCe nanoparticles. Biosensors 2022, 12, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Demkiv, O.; Gayda, G.; Stasyuk, N.; Brahinetz, O.; Gonchar, M.; Nisnevitch, M. Nanomaterials as redox mediators in laccase-based amperometric biosensors for catechol assay. Biosensors 2022, 12, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sibirnyj, W.; Grabek-Lejko, D.; Gonchar, M. The use of enzymes for ethanol, methanol and formaldehyde determination in food products. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2021, 2021, 393–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Liu, J.; Cheng, H.; Xie, H.; Luo, G.; Niu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Sun, W. Platinum nanoparticles decorating a biomass porous carbon nanocomposite-modified electrode for the electrocatalytic sensing of luteolin and application. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 33607–33616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Lin, X.; Ni, Y.; Kokot, S. Electrochemical cholesterol sensor based on cholesterol oxidase and MoS2-AuNPs modified glassy carbon electrode. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 233, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ahmadalinezhad, A.; Chen, A. High-performance electrochemical biosensor for the detection of total cholesterol. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 26, 4508–4513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Doaga, R.; McCormac, T.; Dempsey, E. Functionalized magnetic nanomaterials for electrochemical biosensing of cholesterol and cholesteryl palmitate. Microchim. Acta 2020, 187, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sharma, D.; Lee, J.; Seo, J.; Shin, H. Development of a sensitive electrochemical enzymatic reaction-based cholesterol biosensor using nano-sized carbon interdigitated electrodes decorated with gold nanoparticles. Sensors 2017, 17, 2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Eom, K.S.; Lee, Y.J.; Seo, H.W.; Kang, J.Y.; Shim, J.S.; Lee, S.H. Sensitive and non-invasive cholesterol determination in saliva via optimization of enzyme loading and platinum nano-cluster composition. Analyst 2020, 145, 908–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Shi, R.; Chen, J.; Wan, X.; Tian, J. Direct Electrochemistry of Cholesterol Oxidase Immobilized on PEDOT Functionalized Screen-Printed Electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2023, 170, 027510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Li, X.R.; Xu, J.J.; Chen, H.Y. Potassium-doped carbon nanotubes toward the direct electrochemistry of cholesterol oxidase and its application in highly sensitive cholesterol biosensor. Electrochim. Acta 2011, 56, 9378–9385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Demkiv, O.; Stasyuk, N.; Serkiz, R.; Gayda, G.; Nisnevitch, M.; Gonchar, M. Peroxidase-Like Metal-Based Nanozymes: Synthesis, Catalytic Properties, and Analytical Application. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Huang, Y.; Cui, L.; Xue, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhu, N.; Liang, J.; Li, G. Ultrasensitive cholesterol biosensor based on enzymatic silver deposition on gold nanoparticles modified screen-printed carbon electrode. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 77, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Amperometric characteristics of nCuFe/GCE, nAuHCF/GCE and nCeAu/GCE: (a,d,g)—CV under increased concentrations of H2O2: (1)—0 mM; (2)—2.5 mM; (3)—5.0 mM at 20 mV·s−1; (b,e,h)—dependences of current outputs on the concentration of H2O2 and chronoamperometric current responses (the insert) upon H2O2; (c,f,i)—calibration graphs for subsequent additions of H2O2 (an electrode area of 7.06 mm2).
Figure 1. Amperometric characteristics of nCuFe/GCE, nAuHCF/GCE and nCeAu/GCE: (a,d,g)—CV under increased concentrations of H2O2: (1)—0 mM; (2)—2.5 mM; (3)—5.0 mM at 20 mV·s−1; (b,e,h)—dependences of current outputs on the concentration of H2O2 and chronoamperometric current responses (the insert) upon H2O2; (c,f,i)—calibration graphs for subsequent additions of H2O2 (an electrode area of 7.06 mm2).
Jfb 14 00315 g001aJfb 14 00315 g001b
Figure 2. Morphological properties of electrodeposited Pt NPs formed on the surface of GCE: (a) SEM image, (b) X-ray spectral microanalysis of nPt and (c) the size distribution for the Pt particles electrodeposited on GCE.
Figure 2. Morphological properties of electrodeposited Pt NPs formed on the surface of GCE: (a) SEM image, (b) X-ray spectral microanalysis of nPt and (c) the size distribution for the Pt particles electrodeposited on GCE.
Jfb 14 00315 g002
Figure 3. Analytical characteristics of the chemosensor nPt/GCE: (a) CV responses at various H2O2 concentrations: (1)—0 mM, (2)—2.5 mM and (3)—5.0 mM; (b,c) chronoamperograms (inserted) and calibration curves for H2O2 determination at working potential −200 mV (an electrode area of 7.06 mm2).
Figure 3. Analytical characteristics of the chemosensor nPt/GCE: (a) CV responses at various H2O2 concentrations: (1)—0 mM, (2)—2.5 mM and (3)—5.0 mM; (b,c) chronoamperograms (inserted) and calibration curves for H2O2 determination at working potential −200 mV (an electrode area of 7.06 mm2).
Jfb 14 00315 g003
Figure 4. Principal scheme of the functionality of the ChOx-based biosensor.
Figure 4. Principal scheme of the functionality of the ChOx-based biosensor.
Jfb 14 00315 g004
Figure 5. Bioanalytical characteristics of the constructed bionanosensors GhOx/nCeAu/GCE (a,b), GhOx/nAuHCF/GCE (c,d), GhOx/nCuFe/GCE (e,f) and GhOx/HRP/GCE (g,h) at −250 mV: chronamperometric current responses (a,c,e) and corresponding calibration curves (b,d,f) upon additions of CHOL (an electrode area of 7.06 mm2).
Figure 5. Bioanalytical characteristics of the constructed bionanosensors GhOx/nCeAu/GCE (a,b), GhOx/nAuHCF/GCE (c,d), GhOx/nCuFe/GCE (e,f) and GhOx/HRP/GCE (g,h) at −250 mV: chronamperometric current responses (a,c,e) and corresponding calibration curves (b,d,f) upon additions of CHOL (an electrode area of 7.06 mm2).
Jfb 14 00315 g005aJfb 14 00315 g005b
Figure 6. Analytical characteristics of the bionanosensor GhOx/nCuFe/nPt/GCE: (a) CV responses at various CHOL concentrations: (1)—0 mM, (2)—1.5 mM, (3)—3.0 mM, (4) —4.5 mM; (b,c) chronoamperograms (inserted) and calibration curves for CHOL determination at working potential–250 mV (an electrode area of 1.76 mm2).
Figure 6. Analytical characteristics of the bionanosensor GhOx/nCuFe/nPt/GCE: (a) CV responses at various CHOL concentrations: (1)—0 mM, (2)—1.5 mM, (3)—3.0 mM, (4) —4.5 mM; (b,c) chronoamperograms (inserted) and calibration curves for CHOL determination at working potential–250 mV (an electrode area of 1.76 mm2).
Jfb 14 00315 g006
Figure 7. The investigation of the selectivity (a) and possible interference effect (b) of constructed ChOx/nCuFe/nPt/GCE at various compounds without and with the addition of 0.5 mM CHOL. Glucose (GU), urea (UR), ascorbic acid (AA), creatinine (CN) glutamine (Gln) glutamic acid (Glu), glutathione (GSH), lysine (Lys) and cholesterol (CHOL). The analytical signal under the working potential—250 V is presented in relative units (%) related to the maximal current signal on CHOL (100%).
Figure 7. The investigation of the selectivity (a) and possible interference effect (b) of constructed ChOx/nCuFe/nPt/GCE at various compounds without and with the addition of 0.5 mM CHOL. Glucose (GU), urea (UR), ascorbic acid (AA), creatinine (CN) glutamine (Gln) glutamic acid (Glu), glutathione (GSH), lysine (Lys) and cholesterol (CHOL). The analytical signal under the working potential—250 V is presented in relative units (%) related to the maximal current signal on CHOL (100%).
Jfb 14 00315 g007
Table 1. Analytical parameters of the constructed chemosensors for H2O2.
Table 1. Analytical parameters of the constructed chemosensors for H2O2.
NH2O2-Selective
Layer
Sensitivity,
A·M−1·m−2
Linear Range, up to mMImax, µAKMapp, mM
1nAuHCF/GCE1232 ± 400.02–3.041.4 ± 3.22.4 ± 0.3
2nCuFe/GCE1290 ± 7.10.02–1.430.3 ± 2.22.2 ± 0.3
3nCeAu/GCE666 ± 7.00.02–1.612.5 ± 1.23.3 ± 0.3
4HRP/GCE351 ± 200.05–0.24.8 ± 0.25.9 ± 1.1
Table 2. Comparison of analytical properties of the current NZ-based CHOL bionanosensors with known analogs.
Table 2. Comparison of analytical properties of the current NZ-based CHOL bionanosensors with known analogs.
BiosensorsSensitivity, A·M−1·m−2LOD
µM
Linear Range, mMKMapp, mMPotential,
V
Redox AgentReference
GlOx/nCeAu/GCE33 ± 240.051.1−0.25nCeAu NZsThis work
GlOx/nAuHCF/GCE63 ± 440.180.2−0.25nAuHCF NZsThis work
ChOx/nCuFe/GCE321 ± 122.80.003–0.10.85−0.25nCuFe NZsThis work
GlOx/nPt/GCE305 ± 141.70.02–0.42.46−0.25nPt NZsThis work
ChOx/nCuFe/nPt/GCE3960 ± 200.20.002–0.050.41−0.25nCuFe/nPt NZsThis work
Ti/NPAu/ChOx–HRP–ChE29.330.010.97–7.800.64-HRP[60]
Au-f-MWCNT-PPy-ChOx/GCE101.2-2–81.660.6K4[Fe(CN)6][37]
ChOx/Graphene/PVP/PANI347.7-0.05–0.10-0.6PANI[45]
SPE/PANi/CNC/IL/GLU/ChOx351.9-1–12-0.6PANI[46]
ChOx/CS/ZnO@ZnS/GCE526.7200.4–3-0.3K4[Fe(CN)6][19]
ChOx/TH/Cu2O/GCE7020.00180.01–10.025-Thionine[26]
ChOx/Fe3O4@PAMAM739-0.1–1.5-0.6K4[Fe(CN)6][64]
ChOx/Fe3O4@APTES1019-0.1–1-0.6K4[Fe(CN)6][64]
ChOx/AuNP/carbon IDE120324.61–10-0.6K4[Fe(CN)6][62]
Pt-NC/enzyme/Nafion132020.02–0.48-0.6Pt-NC[63]
ChOx/MoS2-AuNP/GCE44,600
(4460 μA mM−1 cm−2)
0.0260.05–0.0480.325-MoS2-AuNPs[56]
SPE-PEDOT-ChOx-nafion1.34 μA·mM−1-0.05–0.80.24–0.51PEDOT[51]
ChOx/KMWNTs/GCE2 μA·mM−1-0.005–0.016-0.6KMWNTs[65]
ChOx/CeO2-NR8586801–6.50.681.25CeO2[48]
Ag/ChOx/ChE/Au NPs/SPE3360.0090.01–15--Ag[66,67]
ChOx—cholesterol oxidase; HRP—horseradish peroxidase; ChE—cholesterol esterase; TH–thionine; APTES—3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane; PAMAM—polyamidoamine dendrimer; PANi—polyaniline; CNC—Crystalline nanocellulose; NPAu—gold nanoparticle; Pt NC—nano-cluster; GLU—glutaraldehyde; NR—nanorods; KMWNTs—potassium-doped multi-walled carbon nanotubes; PVP—polyvinylpyrrolidone; PPy—polypyrrole; PEDOT—poly-3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene; GCE—glassy carbon electrode.
Table 3. Detection of CHOL level (mM) in human serum.
Table 3. Detection of CHOL level (mM) in human serum.
Biosensor MethodEnzymatic Method
ChOx/nCuFe/nPt/GCEChOx/nCuFe/GCE
2.25 ± 0.352.23 ± 0.152.3 ± 0.2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Demkiv, O.; Nogala, W.; Stasyuk, N.; Grynchyshyn, N.; Vus, B.; Gonchar, M. The Peroxidase-like Nanocomposites as Hydrogen Peroxide-Sensitive Elements in Cholesterol Oxidase-Based Biosensors for Cholesterol Assay. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14060315

AMA Style

Demkiv O, Nogala W, Stasyuk N, Grynchyshyn N, Vus B, Gonchar M. The Peroxidase-like Nanocomposites as Hydrogen Peroxide-Sensitive Elements in Cholesterol Oxidase-Based Biosensors for Cholesterol Assay. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2023; 14(6):315. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14060315

Chicago/Turabian Style

Demkiv, Olha, Wojciech Nogala, Nataliya Stasyuk, Nadiya Grynchyshyn, Bohdan Vus, and Mykhailo Gonchar. 2023. "The Peroxidase-like Nanocomposites as Hydrogen Peroxide-Sensitive Elements in Cholesterol Oxidase-Based Biosensors for Cholesterol Assay" Journal of Functional Biomaterials 14, no. 6: 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14060315

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop