# Analytical and Computational Modeling for Multi-Degree of Freedom Systems: Estimating the Likelihood of an FOWT Structural Failure

^{1}

^{2}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Theoretical Background

#### 2.1. Hydro-Servo-Aero-Elastic Analysis Using FAST

#### 2.2. Hydrodynamics

#### 2.3. Structural Dynamics

#### 2.4. Dynamics of Control System

#### 2.5. Aerodynamics

#### 2.6. Multibody Simulation Using SIMPACK

## 3. System Description

#### 3.1. DTU 10-MW RWT

#### 3.2. Drivetrain’s Design

#### 3.3. Drivetrain Layout

#### 3.4. OO-Star Semi-Submersible FWT Floater with Mooring System

#### 3.5. Load Cases and Environmental Conditions

_{10}) is the significant wave height (H

_{S}), and the peak-period is (T

_{p})

- U(z): Wind speed at the level z
- U
_{ref}: Wind speed at the reference height - Z
_{ref}: Reference height - α: Empirical wind–shear exponent

## 4. Novel Reliability Method

## 5. Failure Probability Estimation

## 6. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Institutional Review Board Statement

## Informed Consent Statement

## Data Availability Statement

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2020; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Veers, P.; Butterfield, S. Extreme load estimation for wind turbines-issues and opportunities for improved practice. In Proceedings of the 20th 2001 ASME Wind Energy Symposium, Reno, NV, USA, 11–14 January 2001; p. 44. [Google Scholar]
- Igba, J.; Alemzadeh, K.; Durugbo, C.; Henningsen, K. Performance assessment of wind turbine gearboxes using in-service data: Current approaches and future trends. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
**2015**, 50, 144–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). Renewable Energy Technologies: Cost Analysis Series. Wind Power; IRENA: Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Sheng, S. Wind Turbine Gearbox Condition Monitoring Round Robin Study-Vibration Analysis; No. NREL/TP-5000-54530; National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL): Golden, CO, USA, 2012.
- O’Kelly, B.C.; Arshad, M. Offshore wind turbine foundations—Analysis and design. In Offshore Wind Farms; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2016; pp. 589–610. [Google Scholar]
- Barooni, M.; Ashuri, T.; Velioglu Sogut, D.; Wood, S.; Ghaderpour Taleghani, S. Floating Offshore Wind Turbines: Current Status and Future Prospects. Energies
**2022**, 16, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Veers, P.S.; Winterstein, S.R. Application of measured loads to wind turbine fatigue and reliability analysis. J. Sol. Energy Eng.
**1998**, 120, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Dimitrov, N. Comparative analysis of methods for modelling the short-term probability distribution of extreme wind turbine loads. Wind Energy
**2016**, 19, 717–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Madsen, P.; Pierce, K.; Buhl, M. Predicting ultimate loads for wind turbine design. In Proceedings of the 37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA, 11–14 January 1999; p. 69. [Google Scholar]
- Ronold, K.O.; Wedel-Heinen, J.; Christensen, C.J. Reliability-based fatigue design of wind-turbine rotor blades. Eng. Struct.
**1999**, 21, 1101–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ronold, K.O.; Larsen, G.C. Reliability-based design of wind-turbine rotor blades against failure in ultimate loading. Eng. Struct.
**2000**, 22, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Manuel, L.; Veers, P.S.; Winterstein, S.R. Parametric models for estimating wind turbine fatigue loads for design. J. Sol. Energy Eng.
**2001**, 123, 346–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Fitzwater, L.M.; Cornell, A.C. Predicting the long term distribution of extreme loads from limited duration data: Comparing full integration and approximate methods. J. Sol. Energy Eng.
**2002**, 124, 378–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Moriarty, P.J.; Holley, W.E.; Butterfield, S. Effect of turbulence variation on extreme loads prediction for wind turbines. J. Sol. Energy Eng.
**2002**, 124, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Agarwal, P.; Manuel, L. Extreme loads for an offshore wind turbine using statistical extrapolation from limited field data. Wind. Energy Int. J. Prog. Appl. Wind Power Convers. Technol.
**2008**, 11, 673–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Barreto, D.; Karimirad, M.; Ortega, A. Effects of Simulation Length and Flexible Foundation on Long-Term Response Extrapolation of a Bottom-Fixed Offshore Wind Turbine. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
**2022**, 144, 032001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - McCluskey, C.J.; Guers, M.J.; Conlon, S.C. Minimum sample size for extreme value statistics of flow-induced response. Mar. Struct.
**2021**, 79, 103048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fogle, J.; Agarwal, P.; Manuel, L. Towards an improved understanding of statistical extrapolation for wind turbine extreme loads. Wind. Energy Int. J. Prog. Appl. Wind Power Convers. Technol.
**2008**, 11, 613–635. [Google Scholar] - Ernst, B.; Seume, J.R. Investigation of site-specific wind field parameters and their effect on loads of offshore wind turbines. Energies
**2012**, 5, 3835–3855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Graf, P.A.; Stewart, G.; Lackner, M.; Dykes, K.; Veers, P. High-throughput computation and the applicability of Monte Carlo integration in fatigue load estimation of floating offshore wind turbines. Wind Energy
**2016**, 19, 861–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fitzwater, L.M.; Winterstein, S.R. Predicting design wind turbine loads from limited data: Comparing random process and random peak models. J. Sol. Energy Eng.
**2001**, 123, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Moriarty, P.J.; Holley, W.E.; Butterfield, S.P. Extrapolation of Extreme and Fatigue Loads Using Probabilistic Methods; No. NREL/TP-500-34421; National Renewable Energy Laboartory (NREL): Golden, CO, USA, 2004.
- Freudenreich, K.; Argyriadis, K. The load level of modern wind turbines according to IEC 61400-1. J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
**2007**, 75, 012075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ragan, P.; Manuel, L. Statistical extrapolation methods for estimating wind turbine extreme loads. J. Sol. Energy Eng.
**2008**, 130, 031011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Peeringa, J.M. Comparison of Extreme Load Extrapolations Using Measured and Calculated Loads of a MW Wind Turbine; ECN: Petten, The Netherlands, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Abdallah, I. Assessment of Extreme Design Loads for Modern Wind Turbines Using the Probabilistic Approach. Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Stewart, G.M.; Lackner, M.A.; Arwade, S.R.; Hallowell, S.; Myers, A.T. Statistical Estimation of Extreme Loads for the Design of Offshore Wind Turbines During Non-Operational Conditions. Wind Eng.
**2015**, 39, 629–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaidai, O.; Wang, F.; Wu, Y.; Xing, Y.; Medina, A.; Wang, J. Offshore renewable energy site correlated wind-wave statistics. Probabilistic Eng. Mech.
**2022**, 68, 103207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaidai, O.; Storhaug, G.; Næss, A. Statistics of extreme hydroelastic response for large ships. Mar. Struct.
**2019**, 61, 142–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Xu, X.; Xing, Y.; Gaidai, O.; Wang, K.; Patel, K.; Dou, P.; Zhang, Z. A novel multi-dimensional reliability approach for floating wind turbines under power production conditions. Front. Mar. Sci.
**2022**, 9, 970081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaidai, O.; Xing, Y.; Balakrishna, R. Improving extreme response prediction of a subsea shuttle tanker hovering in ocean current using an alternative highly correlated response signal. Results Eng.
**2022**, 15, 100593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cheng, Y.; Gaidai, O.; Yurchenko, D.; Xu, X.; Gao, S. Study on the Dynamics of a Payload Influence in the Polar Ship. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Shanghai, China, 6–10 June 2022. Paper Number ISOPE-I-22-342. [Google Scholar]
- Available online: https://seklima.met.no/ (accessed on 1 January 2023).
- Gaidai, O.; Fu, S.; Xing, Y. Novel reliability method for multidimensional nonlinear dynamic systems. Mar. Struct.
**2022**, 86, 103278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaidai, O.; Yan, P.; Xing, Y. A novel method for prediction of extreme wind speeds across parts of Southern Norway. Front. Environ. Sci.
**2022**, 10, 997216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaidai, O.; Yan, P.; Xing, Y. Prediction of extreme cargo ship panel stresses by using deconvolution. Front. Mech. Eng.
**2022**, 8, 992177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Falzarano, J.; Su, Z.; Jamnongpipatkul, A. Application of stochastic dynamical system to nonlinear ship rolling problems. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on the Stability of Ships and Ocean Vehicles, Athens, Greece, 23–28 September 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Gaidai, O.; Xu, J.; Yan, P.; Xing, Y.; Zhang, F.; Wu, Y. Novel methods for wind speeds prediction across multiple locations. Sci. Rep.
**2022**, 12, 19614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaidai, O.; Xing, Y. Novel reliability method validation for offshore structural dynamic response. Ocean Eng.
**2022**, 266, 113016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaidai, O.; Wu, Y.; Yegorov, I.; Alevras, P.; Wang, J.; Yurchenko, D. Improving performance of a nonlinear absorber applied to a variable length pendulum using surrogate optimization. J. Vib. Control
**2022**, 10775463221142663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaidai, O.; Wang, K.; Wang, F.; Xing, Y.; Yan, P. Cargo ship aft panel stresses prediction by deconvolution. Mar. Struct.
**2022**, 88, 103359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaidai, O.; Xu, J.; Xing, Y.; Hu, Q.; Storhaug, G.; Xu, X.; Sun, J. Cargo vessel coupled deck panel stresses reliability study. Ocean Eng.
**2023**, 268, 113318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaidai, O.; Xing, Y. A Novel Multi Regional Reliability Method for COVID-19 Death Forecast. Eng. Sci.
**2022**, 21, 799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaidai, O.; Xing, Y. A novel bio-system reliability approach for multi-state COVID-19 epidemic forecast. Eng. Sci.
**2022**, 21, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaidai, O.; Yan, P.; Xing, Y. Future world cancer death rate prediction. Sci. Rep.
**2023**, 13, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Gaidai, O.; Xu, J.; Hu, Q.; Xing, Y.; Zhang, F. Offshore tethered platform springing response statistics. Sci. Rep.
**2022**, 12, 21182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaidai, O.; Xing, Y.; Xu, X. Novel methods for coupled prediction of extreme wind speeds and wave heights. Sci. Rep.
**2023**, 13, 1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaidai, O.; Cao, Y.; Xing, Y.; Wang, J. Piezoelectric Energy Harvester Response Statistics. Micromachines
**2023**, 14, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaidai, O.; Cao, Y.; Loginov, S. Global cardiovascular diseases death rate prediction. Curr. Probl. Cardiol.
**2023**, 48, 101622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaidai, O.; Cao, Y.; Xing, Y.; Balakrishna, R. Extreme springing response statistics of a tethered platform by deconvolution. Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng.
**2023**, 15, 100515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaidai, O.; Xing, Y.; Balakrishna, R.; Xu, J. Improving extreme offshore wind speed prediction by using deconvolution. Heliyon
**2023**, 9, e13533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaidai, O.; Xing, Y. Prediction of death rates for cardiovascular diseases and cancers. Cancer Innov.
**2023**, 2, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Xu, Y.; Øiseth, O.; Moan, T.; Naess, A. Prediction of long-term extreme load effects due to wave and wind actions for cable-supported bridges with floating pylons. Eng. Struct.
**2018**, 172, 321–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaspar, B.; Naess, A.; Leira, B.; Soares, C. System reliability analysis of a stiffened panel under combined uniaxial compression and lateral pressure loads. Struct. Saf.
**2012**, 39, 30–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Naess, A.; Stansberg, C.; Gaidai, O.; Baarholm, R. Statistics of extreme events in airgap measurements. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
**2009**, 131, 733–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Xu, X.; Gaidai, O.; Yakimov, V.; Xing, Y.; Wang, F. FPSO offloading operational safety study by a multidimensional reliability method. Ocean Eng.
**2023**, 281, 114652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaidai, O.; Xing, Y. COVID-19 Epidemic Forecast in Brazil. Bioinform. Biol. Insights
**2023**, 17, 11779322231161939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaidai, O.; Wang, F.; Xing, Y.; Balakrishna, R. Novel Reliability Method Validation for Floating Wind Turbines. Adv. Energy Sustain. Res.
**2023**, 2200177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaidai, O.; Hu, Q.; Xu, J.; Wang, F.; Cao, Y. Carbon Storage Tanker Lifetime Assessment. Glob. Chall.
**2023**, 2300011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Liu, Z.; Gaidai, O.; Xing, Y.; Sun, J. Deconvolution approach for floating wind turbines. Energy Sci. Eng.
**2023**, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaidai, O.; Yurchenko, D.; Ye, R.; Xu, X.; Wang, J. Offshore crane non-linear stochastic response: Novel design and extreme response by a path integration. Ships Offshore Struct.
**2022**, 17, 1294–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaidai, O.; Yan, P.; Xing, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhang, F.; Wu, Y. Oil tanker under ice loadings. Sci. Rep.
**2023**, 13, 8670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaidai, O.; Xing, Y.; Xu, J.; Balakrishna, R. Gaidai-Xing reliability method validation for 10-MW floating wind turbines. Sci. Rep.
**2023**, 13, 8691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Naess, A.; Gaidai, O.; Teigen, P. Extreme response prediction for nonlinear floating offshore structures by Monte Carlo simulation. Appl. Ocean. Res.
**2007**, 29, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 2.**(

**Up**): Four-point support FWT configuration gearbox. (

**Down**): 10-MW FWT drivetrain design in MBS software [32].

**Figure 3.**OO-Star FWT wind floater’s semi-10-MW concept [31].

**Figure 4.**Illustration on how two system component processes X and Y are combined into one new synthetic vector R. The red ellipse highlights a case of simultaneous maxima for different system components.

**Figure 6.**Extrapolation of ${p}_{k}\left(\lambda \right)$ (on the y-axis) towards the critical level (marked by star) and beyond, conditioning index $k=6$. Extrapolated 95% CI marked by dotted lines. Horizontal x-axis corresponds to the non-dimensional parameter $\lambda $.

**Table 1.**DTU-10-MW RWT design summary [13].

Description | Values |
---|---|

Rating | 10 MW |

Rotor orientation and its configuration | Upwind and 3 blades |

Rotor and hub diameters | 178.3 m, 5.6 m |

FWT hub height | 119 m |

Cut-in, rated, and cut-out wind-speed | 4.0 m/s, 11.4 m/s, 25.0 m/s |

Cut-in, rated rotor speed | 6.0 RPM, 9.6 RPM |

FWT-rated tip speed | 90 m/s |

Overhang, shaft tilt, pre-cone | 7.07 m, 5°, 2.5° |

Rotor mass | 229 tons (each blade ~41 tons) |

FWT nacelle mass | 446 tons |

Tower mass | 605 tons |

Parameters | Values |
---|---|

FWT gearbox ratio | 1:50 |

Minimum rotor speed (rpm) | 6.0 |

Rated rotor speed (rpm) | 9.6 |

Rated generator speed (rpm) | 480.0 |

Electrical generator efficiency | 94.0 |

Generator inertia about high-speed shaft (kg·m^{2}) | 1500.5 |

Free–free rigid shaft torsion mode natural frequency | 4.0 |

Free–fixed rigid shaft torsion mode natural frequency | 0.6 |

Load Cases | ${\mathit{U}}_{\mathit{w}}\text{}(\mathbf{m}/\mathbf{s})$ | ${\mathit{T}}_{\mathit{I}}$ | ${\mathit{H}}_{\mathit{s}}\text{}\left(\mathbf{m}\right)$ | ${\mathit{T}}_{\mathit{p}}\text{}(\mathbf{s})$ | Samples | Simulation Length (hours) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

LC1 | 8 | 0.1740 | 1.9 | 9.7 | 24 | 1 |

LC2 | 12 | 0.1460 | 2.5 | 10.1 | 24 | 1 |

LC3 | 16 | 0.1320 | 3.2 | 10.7 | 24 | 1 |

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |

© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Gaidai, O.; Xu, J.; Yakimov, V.; Wang, F.
Analytical and Computational Modeling for Multi-Degree of Freedom Systems: Estimating the Likelihood of an FOWT Structural Failure. *J. Mar. Sci. Eng.* **2023**, *11*, 1237.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11061237

**AMA Style**

Gaidai O, Xu J, Yakimov V, Wang F.
Analytical and Computational Modeling for Multi-Degree of Freedom Systems: Estimating the Likelihood of an FOWT Structural Failure. *Journal of Marine Science and Engineering*. 2023; 11(6):1237.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11061237

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Gaidai, Oleg, Jingxiang Xu, Vladimir Yakimov, and Fang Wang.
2023. "Analytical and Computational Modeling for Multi-Degree of Freedom Systems: Estimating the Likelihood of an FOWT Structural Failure" *Journal of Marine Science and Engineering* 11, no. 6: 1237.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11061237