Next Article in Journal
Research on Consumer Perception Regarding Wine Products and Wine Tourism in the Republic of Moldova
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of Fludioxonil Reduction Using Non-Thermal Atmospheric Plasma through Experimental Simulation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Feammox Bacterial Biofilms as an Alternative Biological Process for the Removal of Nitrogen from Agricultural Wastewater

1
Departamento de Química Inorgánica, Facultad de Química y de Farmacia, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avenida Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Santiago 7820436, Chile
2
Escuela de Biotecnología, Universidad Mayor, Camino La Pirámide 5750, Santiago 8580745, Chile
3
Departamento de Ingeniería Hidráulica y Ambiental, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avenida Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Santiago 7820436, Chile
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2023, 13(3), 728; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030728
Submission received: 4 January 2023 / Revised: 8 February 2023 / Accepted: 23 February 2023 / Published: 22 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Water Management)

Abstract

:
The excessive deposition of ammonium (reactive nitrogen) in the environment has led to losses of biodiversity and the eutrophication of ecosystems. Anthropogenic sources contribute twice the natural rate of terrestrial reactive nitrogen and provide about 45% of the total amount of it produced annually on Earth. Recently, a biological process that anaerobically metabolizes ammonium and facilitates iron reduction, termed Feammox, was discovered. The use of Feammox activity together with hollow fiber membrane bioreactors (HFMB), for which the latter are based on the formation of biofilms of bacterial communities, constitutes an efficient and sustainable method for the removal of ammonium from agriculturally derived wastewater. To implement the use of HFMB with Feammox activity, the formation of Feammox bacterial biofilms from wastewater sludge samples from a brewery was evaluated. The cultures were enriched with two different carbon sources, namely, sodium acetate and sodium bicarbonate; then, ferrous iron and ammonium concentrations, which were used as indicators of reactive nitrogen removal, were measured. The measurements revealed that the ammonium removal level reaches 20.4% when sodium acetate is used as carbon source. Moreover, an increase in the ferrous iron concentration of +Δ84.6 mg/L was observed, indicating that Feammox activity had been generated. Biofilm formation was observed under Feammox conditions on the hollow fibers. These results showed that Feammox bacteria can form biofilms and efficiently remove ammonium from wastewater, constituting an essential feature with which to scale up the process to HFMBs. Overall, these results contribute to a better understanding of the Feammox process that can be used to implement these processes in agriculture and thus progress towards a more sustainable industry.

1. Introduction

Nitrogen (N) is a key cellular component and an essential element for all forms of life [1]. The reactive nitrogen forms that are commonly found in ecosystems (mainly aquatic) are ammonium (NH4+), nitrite (NO2), and nitrate (NO3) [2]. However, N can also be present in the form of ammonia (NH3), nitrous oxide (N2O), and gaseous nitrogen (N2) incorporated into organic substances [3]. In recent decades, human activities, together with the growth of industrialization, have altered the N cycle and generated high levels of pollution via reactive nitrogen (Nr) in the form of NH4+ [4].
One of the main causes is the excessive use of nitrogen fertilizers in agriculture, mainly though the seeding of nitrogen-fixing crops (legumes) and the burning of fossil fuels, which have significantly increased the Earth’s Nr stock [5,6]. In 2010, it was estimated that anthropogenic sources contribute twice the natural rate of terrestrial Nr and provide about 45% of the total Nr produced annually on Earth [7]. Consequently, excessive Nr deposition in the environment has caused serious environmental problems, such as biodiversity loss, eutrophication, and soil acidification [8]. Biological N removal is one of the most widely used technologies for N removal due to its many advantages, including its easy operation, high efficiency and stability, and the use of environmentally friendly products [9]. N removal processes applied to wastewater are based on the use of activated sludge, which corresponds to a heterogeneous set of microorganisms that are dominated by a series of bacterial groups categorized as bacterial consortia (BC) [10]. Conventional nitrification–denitrification processes consume large quantities of organics and oxygen [4,11]. Most denitrifying bacteria are heterotrophic, requiring organic carbon sources that have an important effect on cell growth and nitrate reduction [12]. Meanwhile, nitrifying bacteria are autotrophic, which means that the carbon source required for their bacterial processes is inorganic [13]. In low C/N wastewater, nitrogen removal is limited by the availability of organic compounds, and external carbon sources are required to improve nitrogen removal efficiency [14]. Thus, fully autotrophic processes for treatment of low C/N wastewater have received considerable attention in recent years [15,16].
Recently, microorganisms capable of anaerobically metabolizing NH4+ by reducing iron III (Fe+3), a process known as Feammox, were discovered [17]. These were mainly identified in riverine sediments, tropical forest soils, and rice soils [6]. Since then, the Feammox process has been reported in many different environments, such as tropical rainforest soils [18], paddy soils [19], intertidal wetlands [6], river sediments [20], and marine environments [21], among others. Figure 1 shows the Feammox process and the chemical pathways that allow for the oxidation of NH4+ to N2, NO3, or NO2 coupled with the Fe (III) reduction [19]. Although the three Feammox pathways are thermodynamically favorable, the generation of dinitrogen yields more energy and remains energetically favorable over a wide pH range, while the generation of nitrite and nitrate, which occur only at a pH < 6.5, require more Fe+3 and yield less energy [18]. Recently, our research group found that the provision of iron chloride (FeCl3) as a source of Fe+3, pH 7, and room temperature (20 ± 2 °C) are optimal conditions for Feammox bacteria enrichment from sewage sludge in batch reactors [22]. However, it is necessary to evaluate whether these conditions are optimal for the growth of Feammox bacteria as biofilms, since this could favor their greater efficiency for N removal in scaled systems, thus reducing energy consumption and operating costs [18].
In wastewater treatment, compact and efficient bioreactor systems have been used for the separation of matter [23]. Within these systems are batch and membrane bioreactors (MRB). The MRBs integrate a selective membrane (used as a filter) and a biological treatment based on the formation of biofilms of bacterial communities [24]. Hollow fiber membrane bioreactors (HFMBs) have fibers that correspond to narrow filaments, which function as a surface for the permeate flow to circulate [25]. In this way, HFMBs allow for a high packing density and a large contact surface to obtain reclaimed water with high physicochemical and microbiological quality [26]. The growth of Feammox bacteria in HFMBs could have a significant impact on enhancing the autotrophic removal of nitrogen from wastewaters, improving removal efficiency, and reducing the energy costs (oxygen) and organic carbon requirements of conventional nitrification–denitrification processes. Even so, it is necessary to evaluate whether Feammox microorganisms form biofilms and the to ascertain the optimal conditions that maintain and facilitate their growth.
This study explores the formation of Feammox bacteria biofilms in an HFMB as an alternative method for NH4+ removal via the reduction of Fe+3 in wastewater. Ferrous iron (Fe+2) and NH4+ concentrations were quantified as indicators of Nr removal by Feammox. A sludge sample from a wastewater treatment plant was used as the initial inoculum for the selective enrichment of Feammox bacteria in a batch reactor. The biofilm formation of Feammox bacteria in the hollow fibers was verified and determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in order to explore future applications in wastewater treatment systems for N removal.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sludge Sample Collection

The anaerobic sludge sample was obtained from “AB-inbev”, a beer treatment plant (IC) (33°20′34,29″ S, 70°47′37.93″ W) located in Santiago, Chile. The sample was collected in 1L HDPE bottles and transported at 4 °C in the dark until chemical and molecular analysis and pre-incubation process were conducted.

2.2. Chemical Characterization of Sludge

Chemical analyses were performed to characterize the IC sludge sample used in the batch bioreactor experiments. The pH and NH4+ parameters were measured directly from the sludge using HACH probes (PHC301, ISENH4181, HACH, Loveland, CO, USA). Anions, iron species, chemical oxygen demand (COD), and soluble chemical oxygen demand (sCOD) were determined colorimetrically in a spectrophotometer (DR3900, HACH, Loveland, CO, USA). COD concentration was measured from a homogeneous sludge sample. Anions, iron species, and sCOD were determined from the filtered supernatant fraction (0.22 µm) obtained from the sludge centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 15 min (Hermle Z206A, Hermle Labortechnik GmbH, Wehingen, Germany). The results are described in Table 1.

2.3. Sludge Pre-Incubation

The IC sludge sample was anaerobically pre-incubated in the dark with 20 ± 2 °C set as the growth temperature and using carbon dioxide (CO2) as a purge gas to remove any pre-existing electron acceptors and to consume the organic carbon sources present. Preincubation was performed in a 100 mL culture flask for 24 h under static conditions. Then, the culture was centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 15 min (Hermle Z206A, Hermle Labortechnik GmbH, Wehingen, Germany), and the supernatant was used to measure sCOD and was replaced with distilled water. The procedure was repeated four times, and the resulting sludge was used as inoculum for experiments in the batch bioreactor.

2.4. Enrichment Culture in Batch Experiments

For Feammox pathway enrichment, base selective culture media were prepared in 1 L bottle with two different carbon sources: sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) and sodium acetate (C2H3NaO2). The culture media were composed of 208 mg/L of NH4Cl, 600 mg/L of KH2PO4, 112 mg/L of CaCl2·2H2O, 400 mg/L of MgCl2·6H2O, 4840.7 mg/L of FeCl3, 2520.21 mg/L of NaHCO3, or 2460.9 mg/L of C2H3NaO2. The pH was adjusted to 7.0 by dropwise addition of KOH or HCl. The culture media were autoclaved, and 1 mL of filtered water (0.22 µm) containing vitamins (1000×) and trace metals (1000×) were added under a laminar flow cabinet. Finally, the previously prepared sludge sample inoculum was added, and the media were incubated in the dark with 20 ± 2 °C set as growth temperature and purged with CO2 in a stainless-steel glove anaerobic chamber (model TMAX-GBV). The culture media were monitored every 7 days for a total of 28 days; the procedure is detailed in Figure 2. For the monitoring cultures, water samples were collected and measured to determine the concentration of ammonium, the pH (ISENH4181, PHC301 HACH, Loveland, CO, USA), and the concentration of ferrous iron (Fe+2) (DR3900, Hach, Loveland, CO, USA).

2.5. Biofilm Formation on Hollow Fibers

At this stage, 10 cm pieces of hollow fibers (0.4–2.6 mm diameter) were incubated with 20 mL of the culture media inoculated with the enriched culture (after 28 days of growth) in a petri dish, under anaerobic conditions, at a growth temperature of 20 ± 2 °C, and in a stainless-steel glove chamber (model TMAX-GBV) for 10 days.
To analyze biofilm formation, scanning electronic microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) were carried out. Specifically, the morphology of the biofilms growing on the hollow fibers and the analysis of the chemical composition of the surface were evaluated.
Prior to their observation, the samples were fixed, and critical point drying and shading were performed. For fixation, the samples were embedded in 2% glutaraldehyde solution in a sodium cacodylate buffer (0.2 M pH 7.2) for ~4 h. Subsequently, critical point drying was performed, for which the samples were de-hydrated stepwise in a series of water/ethanol solutions (50, 70, 80, and 100%). Afterwards, the samples were treated for 45 min with a critical-point dryer (Autosamdri-815; Tousimis, Rockville, MD, USA). Then, the already-dried samples were shaded with gold in a desktop sputterer (Desk V; Denton Vacuum, Moorestown, NJ, USA). Finally, the observation of the samples was performed using a scanning electron microscope (JSM-IT300LV; JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and considering several points of each sample for surface topography and compositional analysis (EDS).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Enrichment of Feammox and Ammonium Removal in Batch Reactors

The IC sludge sample was incubated in a selective medium to promote the Feammox process. The culture was performed in a batch reactor for 28 days, varying the carbon source for enrichment. Two samples were evaluated: (a) a combination of IC sludge, a Feammox selective medium, and NaHCO3 as carbon source, and (b) IC sludge, a Feammox selective medium, and C2H3NaO2 as carbon source. In both samples, [Fe+2] and [NH4+] concentrations and pH were measured.
Figure 3 shows the concentrations of Fe+2 (3A) and NH4+ (3B) of the sludge samples with NaHCO3 y C2H3NaO2. It can be observed that both samples begin enrichment with similar Fe+2 concentrations, but from day 7 onward their behavior differs. Sample b (IC mud + C2H3NaO2) shows an increase in the Fe2+ concentration, reaching a variation of +Δ84.6 mg/L of [Fe+2]. Conversely, the Fe+2 concentration increases less for sample a (IC mud + NaHCO3), and from day 14 to 28 it does not change significantly. Specifically, its increase was only +Δ20.4 mg/L of [Fe+2]. Interestingly, in Figure 3B, it is possible to note that the behavior of the two samples was opposite. Indeed, an increase in the concentration of NH4+ was observed for sample a, reaching 143 mg/L, with a +Δ21 mg/L increment in [NH4+]. While for sample (b), there is a decrease in the concentration of NH4+, reaching up to 129 mg/L, with a −Δ33 mg/L decrement in [NH4+].
The increase in the NH4+ concentration with NaHCO3 as a carbon source (Figure 3B) may be because the added Fe3+ was not sufficient to enable NH4+ oxidation, as it can be absorbed by bacteria to perform other processes [27,28]. Another reason may be the death of bacteria due to the conditions of the culture media employed, which causes the protein to hydrolyze in the sludge, resulting in the increase in the NH4+ concentration [29]. Additionally, denitrification could also have occurred in the system, altering the balance of nitrogen species and, consequently, the NH4+ concentrations. Li et al. [6] have shown that denitrification occurs in intertidal sediments after the Feammox process, a reaction in which nitrate (NO3) generated from Feammox may be being used as a substrate, thus shifting the equilibrium in the redox reaction that allows for the oxidation of NH4+.
The results of Figure 3 strongly suggest the influence of the Feammox pathway in the enrichment carried out with sample b, since a removal of 20.37% for NH4+ was observed, along with continuous Fe3+ reduction. Previous research indicated that the supply of organic carbon could influence the biological Nr removal process mediated by this new anammox-like process (Feammox), thereby promoting the transformation of crystalline iron oxide into amorphous iron oxide, which is more accessible to bacteria during electron transfer [30]. Yang et al. [30] indicate that the Feammox process is more practical and suitable for the in situ removal of high-concentration NH4+ compared to the common anammox process since it would only require a single anaerobic system. Particularly, this process may be relevant for the treatment of water bodies contaminated with high-concentration NH4+ released by diffuse pollution from agriculture; however, it is critical to achieve adequate Fe3+ regeneration because NOx is a non-dominant product during the Feammox process, and this pathway can be stopped when there is no Fe3+ to reduce. On the other hand, the degradation of C2H3NaO2 can release protons, thus reducing the pH of the medium, which implies a favorable environment for the Feammox reaction [31], which would explain the positive results obtained when C2H3NaO2 was used as a carbon source.

3.2. Effect of pH on Feammox Enrichment in a Batch Reactor

Ammonium removal processes are highly sensitive to pH, temperature, and toxic substances; for this reason, controlling the pH conditions in the Feammox process is of great relevance [32]. Initially, the selective enrichment media were prepared at pH 7, because, based on previous work carried out on Feammox pathways, it was experimentally proven that at this pH value, the bacterial consortia can react efficiently, thus increasing the Fe+2 concentration and decreasing the NH4+ concentration [22].
In Figure 4, it is possible to observe that the pH values remain stable between pH 6–7 (approximately). In the case of sample (a), where NaHCO3 was used as a carbon source, there is a greater variation in the pH values; however, these remain close to 7, which is logical given the pKa1 (6.3) of carbonic acid. In previous research, bicarbonate was shown to lead to a buffered environment for denitrifying bacteria, after NH4+ oxidation [33], providing a suitable environment to maintain the pH in the desirable range of 7–8.2 [34]. For the case of sample (b), where C2H3NaO2 was used as carbon source, it can be observed that there is an increase in the pH value, reaching 7 on day 28. Indeed, it has been shown that the pH considered optimal for most environmental strains of denitrifying bacteria, which are related to the Feammox process, is between 7 and 8 [34], which supports our results (Figure 3). In addition, these results suggest that the Feammox route that may be favored is the direct conversion of NH4+ to N2, which has been demonstrated as favorable at a neutral pH. Therefore, it is possible that both pathways are engaged by the consortia of bacteria that are selected with Feammox media, because it has been observed that the oxidation of ammonium to nitrate and/or nitrite by Feammox is followed by the denitrification process in an anoxic environment [35]. For this reason, a consensus has been reached that several routes of the nitrogen cycle will be favored at a neutral pH [36].
Sun et al. [36] indicated that there is a pH that favors the Feammox process, which is approximately 6.8, adding that Feammox has also been identified in intertidal areas with an alkaline pH. They also indicate that there are several potential Feammox microorganisms that have greater activity in neutral pH conditions, which supports our results. On the other hand, it has been observed that C2H3NaO2 is capable of releasing protons into a medium through its decomposition, which would stabilize the pH when it becomes very alkaline, thereby favoring the Feammox reaction at a neutral pH [31].
In the various studies conducted on ammonium removal, it has been theorized that carbon limitation may be the main reason for the dramatic decrease in the growth and activity of nitrifying bacteria below a neutral pH [37]. In addition, higher pH values were able to delay nitrite removal more severely than nitrate removal, which would indicate that nitrite accumulation is associated with a high pH [38], so variations in pH would imply deviations in the Feammox process and decrease its efficiency.

3.3. Biofilm Formation

To verify that the IC sludge samples, in the presence of bacterial consortia, could form biofilms on hollow fibers, for the subsequent implementation in an HFMB, the enriched sludge samples were incubated for 28 days, and the biofilms were visualized through SEM.
Figure 5 shows SEM images of cultures (a) and (b). The results show the formation of biofilm networks between the Feammox bacteria on hollow fibers using NaHCO3 (Figure 5A–D) and C2H3NaO2 (Figure 5E–H) as carbon sources. Figure 5B,F show that the level of biofilm formation was not homogeneous, which may be due to the formation of iron mineralization or cell detachment. This was observed for both carbon sources (NaHCO3 and C2H3NaO2). On the other hand, in Figure 5C,D,G,H, cell adhesion, cell aggregation, and EPS production can be observed, revealing a biofilm-like structural arrangement on the surface of the hollow fibers. Several microorganisms have been reported to be involved in the Feammox pathway, including Geobacteraceae spp., Shewanella spp., Exiguobacterium spp., Acidimicrobiaceae, Nitrososphaeraceae and Pseudomonas [39]. Acidimicrobiaceae sp. strain A6 (A6), from the phylum Actinobacteria, was recently identified as the only Feammox strain isolated that can carry out anaerobic NH4+ oxidation coupled with iron reduction [24]. However, there are few works that have studied the formation of biofilms by Feammox bacteria. Such a study may be key to scaling this process to a wastewater treatment system.
Compared to activated sludge (suspended growth reactors), working with biofilm formation is more convenient, since it allows for the acquirement of a higher biomass concentration, a denser sample structure, and greater resistance to shock loads [40]. In addition, the three-dimensional architecture of the biofilms provides bacteria embedded in the biofilm with the potential to alleviate temperature-generated stress [9]. Ruiz-Urigüen et al. [24] demonstrated the ability of Feammox bacteria to colonize electrodes previously used for bioelectricity production. Therefore, the biofilm-forming capacity of Feammox bacteria would allow for the stable and efficient operation of biofilm-based bioreactors for wastewater treatment.
It has been demonstrated that Feammox microorganisms are autotrophic, meaning that they obtain energy from the oxidation of ammonium to fix inorganic carbon, which is essential for their biological processes [41]. Therefore, inorganic carbon is essential for the growth and activity of Feammox microorganisms. However, several investigations have indicated that organic carbon, such as C2H3NaO2, could play an important role during the Feammox reaction, such as promoting the release of structural Fe in clay minerals and supporting the formation of amorphous Fe (III) oxide, thereby stimulating the Feammox reaction [35]. In the same way, organic carbon could be used as a carbon and energy source by some heterotrophic microorganisms that coexist and cooperate with Feammox bacteria, such as denitrifiers, iron-oxidizing bacteria, and iron-reducing bacteria, among others microbial groups [39]. Thus, although organic carbon is not directly required for the Feammox pathway, it could have an important role in mediating Feammox growth rates through its participation in associated metabolic pathways.
In Figure 6, it is possible to observe the results of the EDX analysis; in (A) (IC sludge + NaHCO3), the chemical characterization shows 20.1% of iron (Fe) atoms on the surface of the formed biofilm, while in (B) (IC sludge + C2H3NaO2), there are 32% Fe atoms. The similar values of the %Wt of Fe found in both samples strongly suggest that the differences in performance (Fe3+ reduction and NH4+ removal, Figure 3) are a consequence of the formation of specific biofilms and not the availability of Fe for the Feammox process.
These results suggests that Feammox bacteria can form biofilms despite the presence of high levels of Fe. Furthermore, the formation of biofilms could favor the treatment of water with high-concentration NH4+, thus constituting a potential alternative for the treatment and remediation of wastewater contaminated by nitrate or ammonium-based fertilizers.

4. Conclusions

Based on the research carried out on the enrichment of the IC sludge, it was possible to prove the formation of biofilms in the hollow fibers under Feammox conditions. This is an essential characteristic for the scaling up of the process to HFMBs and for the generation of a sustainable process for the removal of Nr from the environment. In addition, it was possible to evidence that there is a 20.37% removal of Nr when using an organic carbon source, showing an increase in Fe2+ concentration of +Δ84.6 mg/L and a decrease in NH4+ concentration of −Δ33 mg/L.
Regarding the performance of sodium acetate, it can be remarked that this compound represents the most effective carbon source for bacterial metabolism in the electron transfer process, corresponding to a source of organic carbon, which allows for the growth of heterotrophic bacteria that are closely related to the Feammox processes. Therefore, the present study can set a precedent for the efficiency of the Feammox process for its subsequent implementation in the treatment and remediation of water bodies polluted by the excessive use of nitrogen fertilizers.

Author Contributions

The manuscript was written by Á.C. and E.L., but all the authors contributed to its preparation and review. Experiments were performed by Á.C. and M.G.; data analyses were carried out by Á.C. and M.G. in discussion with J.S., C.R. and E.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by FONDECYT 11191154 (2019–2022).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Professor Robert Nerenberg for providing us with hollow fibers to prove biofilms formation. Our gratitude is also extended to the reviewers for their corrections and suggestions, which contributed significantly to the improvement of the quality of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Thamdrup, B. New pathways and processes in the global nitrogen cycle. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2012, 43, 407–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Prakash, A.; Khanam, S. Nitrogen Pollution Threat to Mariculture and Other Aquatic Ecosystems: An Overview. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2021, 9, 428–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Richardson, D.; Felgate, H.; Watmough, N.; Thomson, A.; Baggs, E. Mitigating release of the potent greenhouse gas N2O from the nitrogen cycle–could enzymic regulation hold the key? Trends Biotechnol. 2009, 27, 388–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Galloway, J.N.; Cowling, E.B. Reactive Nitrogen and The World: 200 Years of Change. AMBIO J. Hum. Environ. 2002, 31, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fowler, D.; Coyle, M.; Skiba, U.; Sutton, M.A.; Cape, J.N.; Reis, S.; Sheppard, L.J.; Jenkins, A.; Grizzetti, B.; Galloway, J.N.; et al. The global nitrogen cycle in the twenty-first century. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2013, 368, 20130164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Li, X.; Hou, L.; Liu, M.; Zheng, Y.; Yin, G.; Lin, X.; Hu, X. Evidence of nitrogen loss from anaerobic ammonium oxidation coupled with ferric iron reduction in an intertidal wetland. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 11560–11568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Canfield, D.E.; Glazer, A.N.; Falkowski, P.G. The evolution and future of Earth’s nitrogen cycle. Science 2010, 330, 192–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Gao, Y.; He, N.; Zhang, X. Effects of reactive nitrogen deposition on terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Ecol. Eng. 2014, 70, 312–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhou, H.; Xu, G. Integrated effects of temperature and COD/N on an up-flow anaerobic filter-biological aerated filter: Performance, biofilm characteristics and microbial community. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 293, 122004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, C.; Zhang, W.; Liu, R.; Li, Q.; Li, B.; Wang, S.; Mulchandani, A. Phylogenetic diversity and metabolic potential of activated sludge microbial communities in full-scale wastewater treatment plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 7408–7415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Y.; Wang, S.; Gu, S.; Zhang, L.; Dong, Y.; Jiang, L.; Fan, W.; Peng, Y. The combined effects of biomass and temperature on maximum specific ammonia oxidation rate in domestic wastewater treatment. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2021, 15, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xu, Z.; Dai, X.; Chai, X. Effect of different carbon sources on denitrification performance, microbial community structure and denitrification genes. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 634, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guisasola, A.; Petzet, S.; Baeza, J.A.; Carrera, J.; Lafuente, J. Inorganic carbon limitations on nitrification: Experimental assessment and modelling. Water Res. 2007, 41, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.C.; Cheng, Z.; Li, Y.; Tang, J. Effect of fermentation liquid from food waste as a carbon source for enhancing denitrification in wastewater treatment. Chemosphere 2016, 144, 689–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zekker, I.; Raudkivi, M.; Artemchuk, O.; Rikmann, E.; Priks, H.; Jaagura, M.; Tenno, T. Mainstream-sidestream wastewater switching promotes anammox nitrogen removal rate in organic-rich, low-temperature streams. Environ. Technol. 2021, 42, 3073–3082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Li, Y.; Ling, J.; Chen, P.; Chen, J.; Dai, R.; Liao, J.; Yu, J.; Xu, Y. Pseudomonas mendocina LYX: A novel aerobic bacterium with advantage of removing nitrate high effectively by assimilation and dissimilation simultaneously. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2021, 15, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Clément, J.C.; Shrestha, J.; Ehrenfeld, J.G.; Jaffé, P.R. Ammonium oxidation coupled to dissimilatory reduction of iron under anaerobic conditions in wetland soils. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 2005, 37, 2323–2328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, W.H.; Weber, K.A.; Silver, W.L. Nitrogen loss from soil through anaerobic ammonium oxidation coupled to iron reduction. Nat.Geosci. 2012, 5, 538–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Ding, L.J.; An, X.L.; Li, S.; Zhang, G.L.; Zhu, Y.G. Nitrogen loss through anaerobic ammonium oxidation coupled to iron reduction from paddy soils in a chronosequence. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 10641–10647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ding, L.; Mao, R.; Guo, X.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, C. Microplastics in surface waters and sediments of the Wei River, in the northwest of China. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 667, 427–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ríos-Del Toro, E.E.; Valenzuela, E.I.; López-Lozano, N.E.; Cortés-Martínez, M.G.; Sánchez-Rodríguez, M.A.; Calvario-Martínez, O.; Sánchez-Carrillo, S.; Cervantes, F.J. Anaerobic ammonium oxidation linked to sulfate and ferric iron reduction fuels nitrogen loss in marine sediments. Biodegradation 2018, 29, 429–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Rodríguez, C.; Cisternas, J.; Serrano, J.; Leiva, E. Nitrogen Removal by an Anaerobic Iron-Dependent Ammonium Oxidation (Feammox) Enrichment: Potential for Wastewater Treatment. Water 2021, 13, 3462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Visvanathan, C.; Aim, R.B.; Parameshwaran, K. Membrane separation bioreactors for wastewater treatment. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci.Technol. 2000, 30, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ruiz-Urigüen, M.; Shuai, W.; Jaffé, P.R. Electrode colonization by the Feammox bacterium Acidimicrobiaceae sp. strain A6. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e02029-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Razaviarani, V.; Ruiz-Urigüen, M.; Jaffé, P.R. Denitrification of nitric oxide using hollow fiber membrane bioreactor; effect of nitrate and nitric oxide loadings on the reactor performance and microbiology. Waste Biomass Valorization 2019, 10, 1989–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, W.; Zhang, X.; Qin, L.; Li, X.; Meng, Q.; Shen, C.; Zhang, G. Enhanced MPBR with polyvinylpyrrolidone-graphene oxide/PVDF hollow fiber membrane for efficient ammonia nitrogen wastewater treatment and high-density Chlorella cultivation. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 379, 122368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhao, H.; Peng, H. Nitrogen removal during anaerobic digestion of wasted activated sludge under supplementing Fe (III) compounds. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 332, 711–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhu, T.T.; Lai, W.X.; Zhang, Y.B.; Liu, Y.W. Feammox process driven anaerobic ammonium removal of wastewater treatment under supplementing Fe (III) compounds. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 804, 149965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, J.X.; Li, X.M.; Sun, G.X.; Cui, L.; Ding, L.J.; He, C.; Zhu, Y.G. Fate of labile organic carbon in paddy soil is regulated by microbial ferric iron reduction. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 8533–8542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, Y.; Xiao, C.; Lu, J.; Zhang, Y. Fe (III)/Fe (II) forwarding a new anammox-like process to remove high-concentration ammonium using nitrate as terminal electron acceptor. Water Res. 2020, 172, 115528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xia, Q.; Ai, Z.; Huang, W.; Yang, F.; Liu, F.; Lei, Z.; Huang, W. Recent progress in applications of Feammox technology for nitrogen removal from wastewaters: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 127868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Desireddy, S.; Sabumon, P.C.; Maliyekkal, S.M. Anoxic ammonia removal using granulated nanostructured Fe oxyhydroxides and the effect of pH, temperature and potential inhibitors on the process. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 33, 101066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yao, Z.; Wang, C.; Song, N.; Wang, C.; Jiang, H. Oxidation of ammonium in aerobic wastewater by anoxic ferric iron-dependent ammonium oxidation (Feammox) in a biofilm reactor. Desalin. Water Treat. 2020, 173, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ghafari, S.; Hasan, M.; Aroua, M.K. Effect of carbon dioxide and bicarbonate as inorganic carbon sources on growth and adaptation of autohydrogenotrophic denitrifying bacteria. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 162, 1507–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yao, Z.; Yang, L.; Song, N.; Wang, C.; Jiang, H. Effect of organic matter derived from algae and macrophyte on anaerobic ammonium oxidation coupled to ferric iron reduction in the sediment of a shallow freshwater lake. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 25899–25907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sun, S.; Zhang, M.; Gu, X.; Yan, P.; He, S.; Chachar, A. New insight and enhancement mechanisms for Feammox process by electron shuttles in wastewater treatment—A systematic review. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 128495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wett, B.; Rauch, W. The role of inorganic carbon limitation in biological nitrogen removal of extremely ammonia concentrated wastewater. Water Res. 2003, 37, 1100–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Glass, C.; Silverstein, J. Denitrification kinetics of high nitrate concentration water: pH effect on inhibition and nitrite accumulation. Water Res. 1998, 32, 831–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tan, X.; Xie, G.J.; Nie, W.B.; Xing, D.F.; Liu, B.F.; Ding, J.; Ren, N.Q. Fe (III)-mediated anaerobic ammonium oxidation: A novel microbial nitrogen cycle pathway and potential applications. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 52, 2962–2994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Miao, L.; Wang, C.; Hou, J.; Wang, P.; Ao, Y.; Li, Y.; Gu, Q. Response of wastewater biofilm to CuO nanoparticle exposure in terms of extracellular polymeric substances and microbial community structure. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 579, 588–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, X.; Yuan, Y.; Huang, Y. Enhancing the nitrogen removal efficiency of a new autotrophic biological nitrogen-removal process based on the iron cycle: Feasibility, progress, and existing problems. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 317, 128499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Illustrative diagram of the Feammox process. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 15 December 2022).
Figure 1. Illustrative diagram of the Feammox process. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 15 December 2022).
Agriculture 13 00728 g001
Figure 2. Batch reactor operating procedure. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 15 December 2022).
Figure 2. Batch reactor operating procedure. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 15 December 2022).
Agriculture 13 00728 g002
Figure 3. Concentration of Fe+2 (A) and NH4+ (B) during enrichment process with IC sludge sample and using inorganic (NaHCO3) and organic (C2H3NaO2) carbon sources.
Figure 3. Concentration of Fe+2 (A) and NH4+ (B) during enrichment process with IC sludge sample and using inorganic (NaHCO3) and organic (C2H3NaO2) carbon sources.
Agriculture 13 00728 g003
Figure 4. Evolution of the pH of the enriched sludge samples.
Figure 4. Evolution of the pH of the enriched sludge samples.
Agriculture 13 00728 g004
Figure 5. SEM images of hollow fibers incubated with enriched IC sludge samples. Sample (a) IC sludge with NaHCO3 (100×, 1000×, 6000× and 10,000×) (AD). Sample (b) IC sludge with C2H3NaO2 (60×, 2000×, 6000× and 10,000×) (EH).
Figure 5. SEM images of hollow fibers incubated with enriched IC sludge samples. Sample (a) IC sludge with NaHCO3 (100×, 1000×, 6000× and 10,000×) (AD). Sample (b) IC sludge with C2H3NaO2 (60×, 2000×, 6000× and 10,000×) (EH).
Agriculture 13 00728 g005
Figure 6. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectra (EDX) of hollow fibers incubated with enriched IC sludge samples. (A) Sample (a) IC sludge and NaHCO3. (B) Sample (b) IC sludge and C2H3NaO2. Magnification: 10,000×.
Figure 6. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectra (EDX) of hollow fibers incubated with enriched IC sludge samples. (A) Sample (a) IC sludge and NaHCO3. (B) Sample (b) IC sludge and C2H3NaO2. Magnification: 10,000×.
Agriculture 13 00728 g006
Table 1. Characterization of the IC anaerobic sludge.
Table 1. Characterization of the IC anaerobic sludge.
ParametersIC Sludge
AnionsNO3 [mg/L]
NO2 [mg/L]
16.8
0
Fe speciesTotal Fe [mg/L]1.46
Fe+2 [mg/L]0.36
COD [mg/L]14039
OthersCOD [mg/L]5649
pH7.35
NH4+ [mg/L]410.0
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cerda, Á.; González, M.; Rodríguez, C.; Serrano, J.; Leiva, E. Feammox Bacterial Biofilms as an Alternative Biological Process for the Removal of Nitrogen from Agricultural Wastewater. Agriculture 2023, 13, 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030728

AMA Style

Cerda Á, González M, Rodríguez C, Serrano J, Leiva E. Feammox Bacterial Biofilms as an Alternative Biological Process for the Removal of Nitrogen from Agricultural Wastewater. Agriculture. 2023; 13(3):728. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030728

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cerda, Ámbar, Macarena González, Carolina Rodríguez, Jennyfer Serrano, and Eduardo Leiva. 2023. "Feammox Bacterial Biofilms as an Alternative Biological Process for the Removal of Nitrogen from Agricultural Wastewater" Agriculture 13, no. 3: 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030728

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop