Design and Multi-Parameter Optimization of a Combined Chinese Milk Vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.) Seed Harvester
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. The Overall Structure and Technical Parameters
2.2. Working Principle
3. Design of Critical Components
3.1. Flexible Anti Pod-Dropping Seedling-Lifting Header
3.2. Longitudinal Rod-Teeth-Type Threshing Drum
3.3. Air-Sieve-Type Layered Impurity-Controlled Cleaning Device
3.3.1. Numerical Simulation of Internal Airflow Field in a Three-Duct Centrifugal Fan
3.3.2. Field Test Verification of Centrifugal Fan Air Flow
3.3.3. Layered Impurity-Controlled Cleaning Sieve
4. Field Experiment and Result Analysis
4.1. Experiment Conditions
4.2. Experiment Indexes
4.3. Experiment Scheme
4.4. Experiment Results and Analysis
4.4.1. Model Establishment and Significance Verification
4.4.2. Effect Analysis of Interaction Factors on Harvest Indexes
4.4.3. Parameter Optimization and Verification Test
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- A combined Chinese milk vetch seed harvester was designed, and both its structure composition and working principle were described. Parameter design and simulation analysis were carried out on the key components, such as the flexible anti pod-dropping seedling-lifting header, the longitudinal rod-teeth-type threshing device, the air-sieve-type layered impurity-controlled cleaning device, etc.
- (2)
- The optimization model of harvesting parameters of the Chinese milk vetch green manure seed harvester was established, and the multi-parameter optimization was obtained when seed loss rate, breakage rate and impurity rate were the smallest: machine forward speed was 3 km·h−1, the rotation speed of the threshing drum was 550 r·min−1, the rotation speed of the cleaning fan was 990 r·min−1 and the scale sieve’s opening was 35 mm. Under these parameter conditions, the field test was carried out, and results showed that the seed loss rate was 2.35%, the breakage rate was 0.22% and the impurity rate was 0.51%, which was better than the loss rate and breakage rate specified in the relevant standards, less than 5%, and the impurity rate, less than 3%.
- (3)
- The production efficiency of the developed Chinese milk vetch seed combine harvester can reach 0.53~0.87 hm2·h−1, and it can effectively solve the shortage problem of efficient seed harvest equipment in large-scale planting areas of Chinese milk vetch. At present, only one variety of Chinese milk vetch was tested in this study, but the research will help to carry out experiments on different varieties of Chinese milk vetch and other green manure varieties in paddy fields to further verify the operational performance and adaptability of the designed Chinese milk vetch seed combine harvester.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhou, G.P.; Xie, Z.J.; Cao, W.D.; Xu, C.X.; Bai, J.S.; Zeng, N.H.; Gao, S.J.; Yang, L. Co-incorporation of high rice stubble and Chinese milk vetch improving soil fertility and yield of rice. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2017, 33, 157–163. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, H.L.; Ki, D.P.; Ki, Y.J.; Muhammad, A.A.; Dokyoung, L.; Jessie, G.; Pil, J.K. Effect of Chinese milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.) as a green manure on rice productivity and methane emission in paddy soil. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2010, 138, 343–347. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Z.Q.; Li, S.J.; Liu, N.; Huang, G.Q.; Zhou, Q. Soil microbial community driven by soil moisture and nitrogen in milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.)-rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) intercropping. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toma, Y.; Sari, N.N.; Akamatsu, K.; Oomori, S.; Nagata, O.; Nishimura, S.; Purwanto, B.H.; Ueno, H. Effects of green manure application and prolonging mid-season drainage on greenhouse gas emission from paddy fields in ehime, southwestern Japan. Agriculture 2019, 9, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- You, Z.Y.; Wu, H.C.; Peng, B.L.; Gao, X.M.; Hu, Z.C.; Zhang, Y.L. Design of double disc ditching and sowing combined working machine of Astragalus smicus for machine-harvested rice stubble field. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2019, 35, 18–28. [Google Scholar]
- You, Z.Y.; Zhang, C.; Gao, X.M.; Gao, Y.; Peng, B.L.; Wu, H.C. Design and experiment of incisal-burying and ploughing combined machine for astragalus smicus. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2020, 51, 78–86. [Google Scholar]
- Liao, Y.L.; Lu, Y.H.; Nie, J.; Zhao, X.; Xie, J.; Yang, Z.P.; Wu, H.J. Effects of rice combine harvester application to harvesting Chinese milk vetch seed. Hunan Agric. Sci. 2014, 18, 12–14. [Google Scholar]
- You, Z.Y.; Gao, X.M.; Wu, H.C.; Peng, B.L.; Zhang, C.; Chen, Z.K. Calculation of the loss rate of machine-harvested during Chinese milk vetch seed harvesting. Seed 2019, 38, 140–143. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J.S.; Xiong, Y.S.; Xu, Z.W.; Ma, G.; Wang, Z.M.; Chen, D.J. Improved design and test of key components for longitudianl axial flow combine harvester. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2017, 33, 25–31. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, L.J.; Ma, Y.; Feng, X.; Song, L.L.; Chai, J. Design and experiment of segmented vibrating screen in cleaning device of maize grain harvester. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2020, 51, 89–99. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, M.; Jin, C.Q.; Liang, S.N.; Tang, Q.; Wu, C.Y. Parameter optimization and experiment on air-screen cleaning device of rapeseed combine harvester. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2015, 31, 8–15. [Google Scholar]
- Jin, C.Q.; Guo, F.Y.; Xu, J.S.; Li, Q.L.; Chen, M.; Li, J.J.; Yin, X. Optimization of working parameters of soybean combine harvester. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2019, 35, 10–22. [Google Scholar]
- Shi, R.J.; Dai, F.; Liu, X.L.; Zhao, W.Y.; Qu, J.F.; Zhang, F.W.; Qin, D.G. Design and experiments of crawler-type hilly and mountaineous flax combine harvester. Trans. CSAE 2021, 37, 59–67. [Google Scholar]
- Bruce, D.M.; Hobson, R.N.; Morgan, C.L.; Child, R.D. Threshability of shatter-resistant seed pods in oilseed rape. J. Agric. Engng. Res. 2001, 80, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mekonnen, G.G.; Josse, D.B.; Martine, B. Effect of a cross-flow opening on the performance of a centrifugal fan in a combine harvester: Computational and experimental study. Agriculture 2010, 105, 247–256. [Google Scholar]
- Shreekant, R.P.; Rameshwar, T.K.; Digvir, S.J.; Noel, D.G. Mechanical damage to soybean seed during processing. J. Stored. Pro. Res. 2002, 38, 385–394. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, N.; Xiong, Y.S.; Chen, D.J.; Xu, J.D.; Zhao, Y. Design and test on the coaxial differential-speed axial-flow threshing rotor of combine harvester. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2010, 41, 67–71. [Google Scholar]
- Chinese Academy of Agricultural Mechanization Sciences. Agricultural Machinery Design Manual (Volume II); China Agricultural Science and Technology Press: Beijing, China, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, L.Z.; Yu, L.J.; Li, Y.M.; Ma, Z.; Wang, C.H. Numerical simulation of internal flow field in centrifugal Fan with double outlet and multi-duct. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2014, 45, 78–86. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, L.Z.; Li, Y.; Li, Y.M.; Chai, X.Y.; Qiu, J. Research process on cleaning technology and device of grain combine harvester. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2019, 50, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Shao, W.; Li, Y.M.; Jia, L.H. Numerical simulation of internal flow in centrifugal Fan. Coal. Mine Mach. 2006, 27, 47–49. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.H.; Li, Y.M.; Xu, L.Z.; Huang, M.S.; Ma, Z. Simulation and experiment of air flow field in the cleaning device of ratooning rice combine harvesters. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2020, 36, 84–92. [Google Scholar]
- Xia, L.L.; Jin, Y.L.; Li, Y.M.; Tang, Z.F. Experimental study of air flow field of air-and-screen cleaning. J. Agric. Mech. Res. 2009, 31, 188–190. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Xu, L.Z.; Zhou, Y.; Si, Z.Y.; Li, Y.M. Effect of extractions feed-quantity on airflow field in multi-ducts cleaning device. Trans. CSAE 2017, 33, 48–55. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, P.; Jin, C.Q.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, G.Y.; Cai, Z.Y.; Kang, Y.; Yin, X. Optimization of field cleaning parameters of soybean combine harvester. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2020, 36, 35–45. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, C.Y.; Ding, W.M.; Zhang, M.; Shi, L.; Lu, Y.; Yu, S.S. Experiment on threshing and cleaning in two-stage harvesting for rapeseed. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2010, 41, 72–76. [Google Scholar]
- Hou, H.M.; Cui, Q.L.; Guo, Y.M.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Sun, D.; Lai, S.T.; Liu, J.L. Design and test of air-sweeping suspension velocity testing device for cleaning threshed materials of grain and oil crops. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2018, 34, 43–49. [Google Scholar]
Parameters | Design Values |
---|---|
Machine size (L × W × H)/(mm) | 5100 × 2890 × 2700 |
Overall weight/kg | 2800 |
Matched power/kW | 62 |
Operation width/mm | 2200 |
Maximum feeding quantity/(kg·s−1) | 5.0 |
Work efficiency/(hm2·h−1) | 0.53~0.87 |
Loss rate/% | ≤5 |
Breakage rate/% | ≤2 |
Impurity rate/% | ≤3 |
Y/mm | X/mm | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
125 | 275 | 425 | 575 | 725 | |
42 | 9.7 | 11.1 | 10.7 | 8.8 | 9.2 |
103 | 6.2 | 5.7 | 10.1 | 6.6 | 6.4 |
160 | 9.2 | 8.6 | 10.3 | 7.7 | 8.1 |
Parameters | Design Values |
---|---|
Upper shaking plate length/mm | 775 |
Upper shaking plate width/mm | 334 |
Upper shaking plate (spacing × height)/mm × mm | 28 × 6 |
Front finger sieve length/mm | 740 |
Front finger sieve width/mm | 225 |
Back finger sieve length/mm | 680 |
Back finger sieve width/mm | 224 |
Lower shaking plate length/mm | 775 |
Lower shaking plate width/mm | 203 |
Lower shaking plate (spacing × height)/mm × mm | 30 × 4.5 |
Scale sieve length/mm | 754 |
Scale sieve width/mm | 715 |
Saw-teeth sieve length/mm | 640 |
Saw-teeth sieve width/mm | 328 |
Round-hole sieve length/mm | 756 |
Round-hole sieve width/mm | 756 |
Diameter of round-hole sieve/mm | 6 |
Factors | Codes | ||
---|---|---|---|
−1 | 0 | 1 | |
Machine forward speed/(km·h−1) | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Rotation speed of threshing drum/(r·min−1) | 550 | 675 | 800 |
Rotation speed of cleaning fan/(r·min−1) | 900 | 1080 | 1260 |
Scale sieve’s opening/mm | 35 | 40 | 45 |
No. | Codes | Response Values | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | |
1 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10.32 | 1.35 | 1.13 |
2 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 1.23 | 1.87 | 2.93 |
3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 12.20 | 3.01 | 0.89 |
4 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 1.15 | 3.54 | 1.58 |
5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.16 | 1.72 | 1.36 |
6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 16.47 | 1.25 | 2.17 |
7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8.25 | 1.52 | 2.45 |
8 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 10.69 | 0.13 | 1.51 |
9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.93 | 2.78 | 1.32 |
10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 1.95 | 1.88 | 1.03 |
11 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 3.22 | 0.37 | 1.83 |
12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.04 | 2.09 | 1.39 |
13 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 7.36 | 0.26 | 2.65 |
14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.65 | 1.66 | 1.28 |
15 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 4.26 | 1.85 | 2.35 |
16 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 0.96 | 1.77 | 1.76 |
17 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 11.78 | 1.72 | 1.38 |
18 | 0 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 2.13 | 2.93 | 0.65 |
19 | 0 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 3.46 | 0.32 | 0.73 |
20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 8.91 | 1.5 | 0.65 |
21 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 3.88 | 0.29 | 1.57 |
22 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 3.57 | 0.19 | 1.38 |
23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.74 | 1.74 | 1.33 |
24 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8.38 | 1.38 | 1.97 |
25 | −1 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 2.62 | 1.71 | 0.43 |
26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.33 | 1.51 | 1.54 |
27 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5.49 | 2.52 | 0.93 |
28 | 0 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 0.43 | 1.96 | 0.78 |
29 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9.30 | 2.37 | 1.87 |
Indexes | Variance Source | Sum of Squares | F-Value | p-Value | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y1 | X1 | 2.72 | 2.08 | 0.1710 | |
X2 | 2.10 | 1.61 | 0.2252 | ||
X3 | 291.26 | 223.29 | <0.0001 | *** | |
X4 | 82.64 | 63.35 | <0.0001 | *** | |
Lack of fit | 16.78 | 4.52 | 0.0796 | ||
Pure error | 1.48 | ||||
Y2 | X1 | 0.10 | 2.40 | 0.1439 | |
X2 | 20.25 | 464.38 | <0.0001 | *** | |
X3 | 0.48 | 11.01 | 0.0051 | *** | |
X4 | 0.23 | 5.20 | 0.0387 | ** | |
Lack of fit | 0.43 | 0.94 | 0.5761 | ||
Pure error | 0.18 | ||||
Y3 | X1 | 0.52 | 27.05 | 0.0001 | *** |
X2 | 0.49 | 25.56 | 0.0002 | *** | |
X3 | 1.02 | 53.03 | <0.0001 | *** | |
X4 | 7.95 | 413.18 | <0.0001 | *** | |
Lack of fit | 0.23 | 2.39 | 0.2077 | ||
Pure error | 0.039 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
You, Z.; Gao, X.; Yan, J.; Wei, H.; Wu, H.; He, T.; Wu, J. Design and Multi-Parameter Optimization of a Combined Chinese Milk Vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.) Seed Harvester. Agriculture 2022, 12, 2074. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12122074
You Z, Gao X, Yan J, Wei H, Wu H, He T, Wu J. Design and Multi-Parameter Optimization of a Combined Chinese Milk Vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.) Seed Harvester. Agriculture. 2022; 12(12):2074. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12122074
Chicago/Turabian StyleYou, Zhaoyan, Xuemei Gao, Jianchun Yan, Hai Wei, Huichang Wu, Tieguang He, and Ji Wu. 2022. "Design and Multi-Parameter Optimization of a Combined Chinese Milk Vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.) Seed Harvester" Agriculture 12, no. 12: 2074. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12122074