Next Article in Journal
No Boundaries for Toxicology in Clinical Medicine: One Health, One Society and One Planet for All of Us
Next Article in Special Issue
Longitudinal Internal Validity of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury: Response Shift and Responsiveness
Previous Article in Journal
Living-Donor Liver Transplant and Improved Post-Transplant Survival in Patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Challenges of the Effectiveness of Traumatic Brain Injuries Biomarkers in the Sports-Related Context
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 12
Issue 8
10.3390/jcm12082809
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Acute Haemostatic Depletion and Failure in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI): Pathophysiological and Clinical Considerations

by
Fabian Kockelmann
1,2 and
Marc Maegele
2,3,*
1
Department of Surgery, Klinikum Dortmund, University Hospital of the University Witten/Herdecke, Beurhausstr. 40, D-44137 Dortmund, Germany
2
Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), University Witten/Herdecke, Campus Cologne-Merheim, Ostmerheimerstr. 200, D-51109 Köln, Germany
3
Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Cologne-Merheim Medical Center (CMMC), University Witten/Herdecke, Campus Cologne-Merheim, Ostmerheimerstr. 200, D-51109 Köln, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(8), 2809; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082809
Submission received: 6 March 2023 / Revised: 30 March 2023 / Accepted: 7 April 2023 / Published: 11 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI): Recent Trends and Future Perspectives)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Because of the aging population, the number of low falls in elderly people with pre-existing anticoagulation is rising, often leading to traumatic brain injury (TBI) with a social and economic burden. Hemostatic disorders and disbalances seem to play a pivotal role in bleeding progression. Interrelationships between anticoagulatoric medication, coagulopathy, and bleeding progression seem to be a promising aim of therapy. Methods: We conducted a selective search of the literature in databases like Medline (Pubmed), Cochrane Library and current European treatment recommendations using relevant terms or their combination. Results: Patients with isolated TBI are at risk for developing coagulopathy in the clinical course. Pre-injury intake of anticoagulants is leading to a significant increase in coagulopathy, so every third patient with TBI in this population suffers from coagulopathy, leading to hemorrhagic progression and delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. In an assessment of coagulopathy, viscoelastic tests such as TEG or ROTEM seem to be more beneficial than conventional coagulation assays alone, especially because of their timely and more specific gain of information about coagulopathy. Furthermore, results of point-of-care diagnostic make rapid “goal-directed therapy” possible with promising results in subgroups of patients with TBI. Conclusions: The use of innovative technologies such as viscoelastic tests in the assessment of hemostatic disorders and implementation of treatment algorithms seem to be beneficial in patients with TBI, but further studies are needed to evaluate their impact on secondary brain injury and mortality.

1. Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a significant health problem of our times with high socioeconomic burden [1,2]. The primary injury is usually due to the physical impact on the brain itself with contusional injury and hemorrhagic lesions through cerebral blood vessel disruptions and/or blood-brain barrier (BBB) breakdown [3]. Further clinical courses may be deteriorated by either pre-existing or developing alterations in the sensitive balance between bleeding and thrombosis, resulting in overall impaired hemostasis, in the following referred to as coagulopathy, with significant deterioration of injuries sustained [3]. Over the recent years, TBI epidemiology has seen a shift towards older ages with low falls as the most common cause of injury in high-income countries and an increasing frequency of contusional injuries [4] along with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), including progression in more severe cases [5]. Figure 1 displays the current trimodal distribution of TBI in relation to age and the coincidence of haemostatic failure [6].

2. Frequency of Haemostatic Disorders after Isolated TBI upon Admission and the Role of Preinjury Anticoagulant and/or Antiplatelet Therapies

Recent observational data from the pan-European CENTER-TBI study on patients with isolated TBI have confirmed laboratory coagulopathy in 16 percent of patients with no intake of antiplatelet drugs and/or anticoagulants before trauma versus 34 percent of patients with pre-injury antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy upon hospital admission [8]. In general, there is an elevated incidence of coagulopathy in patients with increased severity of the injury and penetrating versus blunt trauma [9]. Preinjury intake of warfarin was linked to a two-fold increase in poor outcomes [10], while preinjury intake of antiplatelet drugs was associated with increased traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) to the same magnitude [11]. A recent propensity-matched cohort analysis, also from the CENTER-TBI study, has confirmed the relation of preinjury antithrombotic agents with greater expansion of extra-axial lesions, increased rates of hemorrhagic progression, and higher risk of delayed traumatic ICH [12]. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are currently superseding vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in the prevention of thromboembolic events, but their role in traumatic ICH still needs to be defined. In theory, these agents may be more secure in the brain because of the tissue factor-rich environment and retained function of factor VII, but this remains to be determined. To date, NOAC-related bleedings in trauma patients have been investigated in two prospective trials, but different results have been reported [13,14]. A mono-centric retrospective trial has assessed hematoma expansion in patients with traumatic ICH on NOACs versus vitamin K antagonists and reported a higher rate for NOACs. The overall hematoma expansion rate in this study across all patients was 36% [15]. Table 1 shows the prevalence of coagulopathy in isolated TBI.

3. The Clinical Pattern of Coagulopathy after TBI

In the first 24 h after admission to the hospital, we can observe a doubling in the prevalence of coagulopathy in patients with TBI [23], and a comparable number of patients may develop injury progression like hemorrhage or ICH with coagulopathy within 6 to 48 h [34]. Taken together [23,34], within the first 72 h after trauma, patients are at risk for developing coagulopathy after TBI [35]. A clinical example of a patient with isolated TBI and rapid evolvement of coagulopathy, including dramatic hemorrhagic progression within three hours of hospital admission, is shown in Figure 2. Retrospective evidence suggests an inverse relationship between the onset of coagulopathy and injury severity with persisting disruptions of the coagulation system until day three after injury or even longer [9,32]. In contrast, lesion progression in mild TBI usually stops within 24 h of injury [36]. While the pathophysiology behind these disruptions remains largely unexplained, there may be a coincidence of both hypo- and hypercoagulable states, with a predominance of the first during the acute phase and the latter during later stages [3,5]. A conceptual framework of the laboratory changes based upon conventional coagulation assays to reflect early coagulopathy after TBI for the first 72 h after injury is depicted in Figure 3 [37].

4. Coagulopathy as a Powerful Predictor for Prognosis

The occurrence of coagulopathy upon hospital admission has frequently been identified as a powerful predictor for prognosis after TBI [5]. Aggregated data from a series of clinical studies suggest increased mortality up to nine-fold and risk of poor outcomes up to thirty-fold [16]. Hemostatic disruptions based upon conventional coagulation assays were associated with progressive hemorrhagic injury (PHI) and ICH [38,39], while impaired clot formation observed in functional clotting assays was linked to a five times higher mortality from ICH progression [34]. Several independent risk factors for acute coagulopathy in isolated TBI could be identified, which include systolic hypotension, base excess, hypothermia, reduced Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) on presentation and hypoxia [8]. Low thrombocyte counts and/or impaired platelet function can further contribute to bleeding, but this is still a work in progress [29].

5. Potential Mechanisms of Hemorrhagic Progression and Coagulopathy after TBI

5.1. Hemorrhagic Progressions and New Lesions

In general, coagulopathy does not cause hemorrhage in the absenteeism of any (micro)vascular injury or failure, including blood-brain barrier (BBB) malfunction or breakdown. Experimental imaging studies have shown secondary bleeding from ruptured arterioles and venules localized to the periphery of existing hematomas and into congested areas of perihematoma tissues [40,41]. Alterations in histopathological blood clot morphology due to active or ongoing bleeding after ICH have also been associated with early hematoma growth [42]. It has been concluded from these findings that early hemorrhagic progression results primarily from bleeding into acutely formed congested tissue layers around the initial hematoma [43]. Factors that may contribute to these developments include local tissue pressure, local fibrinolysis, plasma protease induction and activation of secondary inflammatory mechanisms [44]. Noteworthy, hemorrhagic progression is not only limited to the growth of primary contusions but may also occur as delayed, non-contiguous hemorrhagic lesions at distant locations [45,46]. The latter has been linked to the activation of remote vessel-bound mechanosensitive receptors that trigger further downstream mechanisms to induce capillary fragmentation [45].

5.2. Coagulopathy after TBI

Direct injury to the blood vessel or defragmentation from microvascular failure triggers the release of tissue factor (TF) which promotes the extrinsic coagulation pathway [47] with consumption, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and further bleeding [48,49]. Further molecules were postulated to play a significant role in local and systemic coagulopathy in TBI, for example, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) [50]. Patients who developed DIC early after isolated TBI showed characteristic features, such as low platelet counts, signs of consumption coagulopathy and insufficient coagulation control by antithrombin [48]. The observation of high levels of fibrin degradation products (FDP) and D-dimer, together with increased FDP/D-dimer ratios, indicate that DIC may be considered a fibrinolytic phenotype. In addition, D-dimer levels reach their maximum three hours after trauma, when bleeding tendency is maximum as well [51]. The occurrence of DIC coincidences with clinical features of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), single- and multiorgan dysfunction and need for blood transfusion, in particular in the presence of hyperfibrinolysis, with overall worse outcomes. Tissue factor (TF) is available in its blood-borne soluble form and its free form, which is located on the surface of activated platelets and through microparticles. Both forms could promote continuous amplification. A recent study could confirm early enhanced activation, insufficient inhibition, exacerbation of thrombin generation and following fibrinolysis in patients with isolated TBI [33]. Thrombin has been identified as a strong inducer for the release of microparticles from various origins, such as thrombocyte and endothelial cells, thereby enlarging procoagulant surfaces and providing a pool for circulating TF [52]. Through its receptor PAR-1 on endothelial cells, thrombin may also contribute to vasoconstriction, which limits the bleeding process but can also worsen ischemia in TBI [53]. Figure 4 displays some potential interactions and pathways leading to coagulopathy after TBI.

5.3. Traumatic Brain Injury and Shock

Hypoperfusion and shock play a pivotal role in the development of hemostatic failure [8,31]. Shock and hypoperfusion trigger the activation of coagulation and complement systems with (i.) endothelial shedding, (ii.) activation of the protein C pathway with hyperfibrinolysis and the inhibition of coagulation factors FVa and FVIIIa, and (iii.) inflammation. Ischemia, as well as hypoperfusion, further aggravate coagulopathy and TBI in general through secondary mechanisms, which are known as vasoconstriction, endothelial dysfunction and swelling, systemic hypotension and microvascular occlusion by thrombocyte or leukocyte activation, adhesion or aggregation [38,54]. Contusional brain injuries may also liberate tissue-type (tPA) and urokinase-type plasminogen activators (uPA), thereby promoting local fibrinolysis [55]. The delicate “cross-talk” between the different systems activated during TBI, e.g., the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), coagulation, inflammation and complement, including time- and context-dependent amplification and inhibition, needs to be further investigated [56].

5.4. The Role of Platelets

The role of platelets in the context of TBI-associated coagulopathy remains poorly defined. It is understood that low platelet counts and platelet dysfunction contribute to hemostatic failure and disease progression [57,58]. While thrombocyte dysfunction, mostly associated with significant inhibition for arachidonic acid (AA) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP), has been observed with platelet counts within reference ranges or in the absence of antiplatelet medication [58], low platelet counts together with spontaneous platelet aggregation in non-bleeding TBI patients may also indicate at least partial or temporal hyperactivity. Experimental studies have demonstrated intravascular microthrombosis, resulting in reduced pericontusional blood flow. One explanation for this scenario is that brain-derived platelet-activating factor (PAF) promotes hypoxia-associated BBB breakdown. This process results in other brain-derived liberated pro-coagulative substances and additional PAF. The role of important platelet ligands, for example, Willebrand factor (vWF), which capture an additional number of thrombocytes to the perturbated endothelium or to the exposed subendothelial matrix resulting in local in-situ thrombosis and thromboembolism in the downstream microvasculature, still needs to be further investigated.

5.5. Experimental Models

In vivo and in vitro models are very useful in TBI research. Common in vivo models are weight drop, fluid percussion, controlled cortical impact injury, blast injury, penetrating ballistic-like brain injury and acceleration. In contrast to these, there are three usually used in vitro models called immortalized cell lines, dissociated primary cultures and organotypic cultures from different individuals [59]. The most widely used in vivo model is the fluid percussion model. The target animal, for example, mice, needs a craniectomy before the fluid pressure device applies an exact pressure pulse on the intact dura by using a system of fluid that transmits the mechanical energy [60]. There are two other approaches to applying controlled energy to the dura: In controlled cortical impact injury, energy is applied directly by a machine to the skull [61], whereas, in the weight drop model, a rod with a specific weight is dropped on the animal’s skull [62].
In contrast to in vivo models, in vitro models have better reproducibility but transfer from cell culture to clinical reality is difficult because of the complexity of TBI. Immortalized cell lines are useful for examining cellular proliferation, differentiation and molecular pathways in cells, and there are established cell lines for specific research fields [63]. Dissociated primary cultures are useful for gaining insights into the morphology and metabolism of specific cells in different environments after the cells have been isolated from a living organism and were cultivated for some time [59,64]. A disadvantage of this technique is the investigation of cells outside their formation. This fact is considered in organotypic models: A slice of brain tissue is cultivated, and different types of drugs or cell grafts can be added either in the growth medium or in the tissue slice with a needle [65]. The advantage of this method is that the in vivo environment of cells is received [65].

6. Novel Diagnostic Approaches to Coagulopathy

Functional hemostatic assays, for example, viscoelastic tests (ROTEM® and TEG®) with platelet function assays and thrombin generation tests, may have advantages over conventional coagulation assays (CCAs) in the early detection of hemostatic abnormalities after TBI and in monitoring and guiding subsequent therapies [3,25,66,67]. In thromboelastography (TEG®) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM®), shear forces are measured optically or electromechanically between a wire and a cup in whole blood samples when pro-coagulatory agents are added. Depending on the clotting process, information about platelet function, fibrin polymerization and fibrinolysis is provided within minutes. While CCAs only reflect the initiation process of coagulation and only a small part of thrombin generation, “point of care” viscoelastic assays provide timely and more detailed information on the overall hemostatic potential [25,66]. They characterize coagulopathy patterns in TBI patients, and abnormal profiles have been associated with poor outcomes [68]. In addition, specific viscoelastic subtests (ClotPro® Ecarin clotting time and Russel Viper venom/RVV clotting time) are sensitive to the detection of clinically-relevant NOAC plasma drug levels [69]. Viscoelastic assays can be used bedside, in the resuscitation room, the operation theatre and/or the intensive care unit, and results with readout after five minutes of test begin currently form the backbone of many clinical algorithms for “goal”-directed hemostatic therapies after TBI [3,66]. A clinical example of such an algorithm for the specific application in TBI patients is shown in Figure 5. A recent feasibility study in clinical centers initially naïve to the technology confirmed rapid adoption and adherence after short-term training to the technology and to a corresponding treatment algorithm [66]. “Point-of-care” platelet function tests can be helpful in detecting platelet dysfunction or therapeutic platelet inhibition. This seems to be useful because ADP inhibition has been shown to correlate with injury severity in TBI [70]. However, these tests require sufficient platelet numbers, and their routine availability outside the research setting is limited.

7. Treatment Approaches to Coagulopathy after TBI

7.1. Reversal of Iatrogenic Anticoagulation

Rapid therapy of hemostatic abnormalities in the acute phase after TBI has been independently associated with survival in TBI [71]. For the emergency reversal of preinjury medication with vitamin K-associated anticoagulants, e.g., warfarin, the early administration of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) is beneficial and recommended by current guidelines [72,73]. For the emergency reversal of NOACs in case of life-threatening bleeding, two specific antidotes have been approved: (i.) idarucizumab for the reversal of dabigatran, and (ii.) andexanet alfa for the reversal of apixaban and rivaroxaban [74]. In case of non-availability, nonspecific prohemostatic agents, including (activated) prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) and tranexamic acid (TXA), have been used off-label for NOAC reversal and thrombin generation. Table 2 gives advice for the management of acute reversal of preinjury anticoagulatoric medication in adults with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) along with TBI.
Whether the administration of platelet concentrates in TBI and moderate thrombocytopenia will be beneficial is still not clarified. The administration of platelet concentrates in TBI and moderate thrombocytopenia remains elusive. The use of platelet concentrates has not resulted in better outcomes to date [75]. In the subgroup of patients with spontaneous ICH under antiplatelet drugs, standard care was better [76]. A recent meta-analysis (although based on only small and observational studies) failed to show a mortality benefit in traumatic ICH while on antiplatelet therapy [77]. The administration of platelet concentrates in TBI patients on antiplatelet therapy appears plausible, but current evidence is still low, and possible side effects must be considered.

7.2. Conventional Blood Products

In everyday clinical practice, packed red blood cell concentrates (pRBCs) are the most transfused blood products, although evidence for transfusion threshold in patients with TBI is still missing [78]. Several randomized trials have been conducted, but neither maintaining hemoglobin levels > 10 g/dL nor the administration of erythropoietin could be linked to improved neurological outcomes at six months. A liberal transfusion regime with a target hemoglobin level of 10 g/dL versus 7 g/dL was associated with complications like hemorrhagic progression [79,80]. At present, red blood cell transfusions should be avoided as far as possible, and the transfusion threshold should be set low unless there is evidence of poor anemia tolerance [78].
Experimental resuscitation with fresh frozen plasma concentrates (FFP) in different models of TBI and hemorrhagic shock was associated with reduced lesion size, downregulation of inflammatory genes, and improved protein expression profiles for blood–brain barrier (BBB) integrity [81,82]. The latter could even be improved through the addition of valproic acid, most likely secondary to the activation of key pathways for endothelial function [82,83]. In this context, retrospective clinical data was able to confirm the beneficial effects of early FFP administration according to better in-hospital survival when FFPs are given within four hours of injury, and multifocal intracranial hemorrhage is observed [84]. Results from an exploratory sub-study of the prospective randomized PAMPer trial revealed an improved 30-day survival in patients with TBI and a prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score < 8 with two units of prehospital plasma even after adjustment for multiple confounders and injury severity [85]. In patients with severe TBI [86] or TBI in combination with moderate coagulopathy, transfusion of FFPs alone or in addition to pRBCs seems not to be beneficial because of adverse events and poorer functional outcomes [75].

7.3. Tranexamic Acid (TXA)

The pragmatic randomized controlled Clinical Randomisation of an Antifibrinolytic in Significant Haemorrhage (CRASH)-3 trial demonstrated, for the first time, an improvement in a pharmacological intervention for the least-specific TBI sub-groups [87]. A statistically significant reduction in the risk of head injury-related mortality was reported in patients with mild and moderate TBI when TXA was administered within three hours of TBI. The CRASH-2 IBS (Intracranial Bleeding Study) was a nested trial into CRASH-2, and the aim of the study was to determine the effect of a short course of TXA on intracranial hemorrhage and focal cerebral ischemia [88]. The focus of the study was to investigate the increase in the size of intracranial hemorrhage on CT scans between admission and follow-up at 24–48 h. The analysis of 123 patients suggested that admission of TXA was associated with fewer deaths, decreased hemorrhage growth and fewer focal ischaemic lesions, but with substantial uncertainties remaining. Risks and benefits of early TXA administration, even before hospital admission, were investigated in a prospective phase II trial in patients with expected moderate to severe TBI without shock but did not improve six-month neurologic outcomes (GOSE-E) as a primary outcome measure [89]. Interestingly, in patients in whom intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) was detected in the hospital, the 28-day mortality was 18% in those patients who had received TXA at 2 g bolus out-of-hospital, versus 26% in those who had received the classical CRASH-2 dosing regimen, versus 27% in the placebo group. Retrospective analysis of observational data from patients with only severe TBI showed increased mortality with 1 g TXA prehospital after controlling for confounders [90]. Taken together, the effect of TXA appears to differ in subgroups and depends on both the dose and severity of bleeding. In any case, the potential and dose-dependent risk for thromboembolic events with TXA needs to be considered.

7.4. Goal-Directed Therapies

Viscoelastic assays (ROTEM® and TEG®) have successfully been integrated into diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in high-risk patients with active hemorrhage and furthermore in patients with TBI [25,66,72,91]. Meanwhile, an increasing number of clinical guidelines support their use with considerable level of recommendation but this is against still existing low-quality evidence in this population [68,72,91,92]. Implementation of such algorithms, even in centers naïve to this approach, is timely and feasible with good adherence, reduced turnaround times for test results and accelerated clinical decision-making [66]. If specific recommendations provided by the algorithm were followed, viscoelastic test results improved significantly by the time when the second blood sample was drawn. A prespecified subgroup analysis of the recently published pragmatic iTACTIC-trial demonstrated that the use of viscoelastic tests and treatment according to specific trauma hemorrhage protocols were beneficial in two of three patients with severe TBI related to reduced mortality and massive transfusion at 24 h [93]. In the same study, 28-day mortality was significantly reduced with the viscoelastic-based intervention versus the conventional coagulation assay-guided intervention for acute hemostatic control (44% versus 74% mortality). Severe TBI patients in the treatment group guided by viscoelastic testing received more often fibrinogen and/or platelets in contrast to patients in the CCA-guided treatment group, an observation that may explain the difference in survival between the two study arms. In this trial, the potential for viscoelastic-guided interventions to improve mortality appeared to increase with injury severity [93]. Another subgroup analysis of severe TBI patients from another pragmatic randomized trial using a viscoelastic resuscitation strategy, but yielding only very small patient numbers, did not report reduced mortality [94]. This TBI subgroup was not specified a priori, so only nine TBI patients were included in the viscoelastic-based treatment arm resulting in too little statistical power for mortality. When data for severe TBI patients from both trials were aggregated into a meta-analysis, a significant 28-day mortality benefit in favor of the viscoelastic-guided approach was seen, but with a “very low” study quality assessment. In a prospective single-center and case-control study involving 134 patients with isolated TBI and need for craniotomy, viscoelastic testing was associated with more consistent coagulation management along with improved clot quality, reduced hemorrhagic progression and less neurosurgical reinterventions [95].

8. Limitations

This review is intended for clinical practitioners and provides an overview of current knowledge of pathophysiology and therapeutic strategies in TBI, given therapeutic strategies are based on data or clinical experience of their authors. Nevertheless, treatment options mentioned in this review need further research, and big cohort studies are missing, especially for new reversal drugs. Potential side effects from thromboembolic events to death have been reported. In everyday clinical practice, this review can give some advice for therapeutic considerations, but individual risk-benefit analyses are needed for every patient. This review does not relate to patients with pre-existing hemostatic disorders or children suffering from TBI.

9. Conclusions

The use of viscoelastic tests, in addition to conventional coagulation laboratory parameters, seems to be beneficial in patients with TBI and especially in patients with anticoagulatoric medication. Because of the aging population, more older patients with anticoagulatoric medication will suffer from TBI. Diagnostic and therapeutic approaches will be needed to improve survival and functional outcome. Point-of-Care diagnostic and Goal-directed-therapies seem to be promising fields of research. Further studies are needed to evaluate their impact on secondary brain injury and mortality and to define precise therapeutic thresholds.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to ethical approvals of contained studies.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created. Data analyse has taken place in Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), University Witten/Herdecke, Campus Cologne-Merheim, Ostmerheimerstr. 200, D-51109 Köln, Germany.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Maas, A.I.R.; Menon, D.K.; Adelson, P.D.; Andelic, N.; Bell, M.J.; Belli, A.; Bragge, P.; Brazinova, A.; Büki, A.; Chesnut, R.M.; et al. Traumatic Brain Injury: Integrated Approaches to Improve Prevention, Clinical Care, and Research. Lancet Neurol. 2017, 16, 987–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Dewan, M.C.; Rattani, A.; Gupta, S.; Baticulon, R.E.; Hung, Y.C.; Punchak, M.; Agrawal, A.; Adeleye, A.O.; Shrime, M.G.; Rubiano, A.M.; et al. Estimating the Global Incidence of Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Neurosurg. 2018, 130, 1080–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Maegele, M.; Schöchl, H.; Menovsky, T.; Maréchal, H.; Marklund, N.; Buki, A.; Stanworth, S. Coagulopathy and Haemorrhagic Progression in Traumatic Brain Injury: Advances in Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Management. Lancet Neurol. 2017, 16, 630–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Roozenbeek, B.; Maas, A.I.R.; Menon, D.K. Changing Patterns in the Epidemiology of Traumatic Brain Injury. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2013, 9, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lok, J.; Leung, W.; Murphy, S.; Butler, W.; Noviski, N.; Lo, E.H. Intracranial Hemorrhage: Mechanisms of Secondary Brain Injury. Acta Neurochir. Suppl. 2011, 111, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Maegele, M.; Lefering, R.; Sakowitz, O.; Kopp, M.A.; Schwab, J.M.; Steudel, W.I.; Unterberg, A.; Hoffmann, R.; Uhl, E.; Marzi, I. The Incidence and Management of Moderate to Severe Head Injury. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2019, 116, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Maegele, M. Coagulopathy and Progression of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurosurgery 2021, 89, 954–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Böhm, J.K.; Güting, H.; Thorn, S.; Schäfer, N.; Rambach, V.; Schöchl, H.; Grottke, O.; Rossaint, R.; Stanworth, S.; Curry, N.; et al. Global Characterisation of Coagulopathy in Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury (ITBI): A CENTER-TBI Analysis. Neurocritical Care 2021, 35, 184–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lustenberger, T.; Talving, P.; Kobayashi, L.; Inaba, K.; Lam, L.; Plurad, D.; Demetriades, D. Time Course of Coagulopathy in Isolated Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Injury 2010, 41, 924–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Batchelor, J.S.; Grayson, A. A Meta-Analysis to Determine the Effect of Anticoagulation on Mortality in Patients with Blunt Head Trauma*. Br. J. Neurosurg. 2012, 26, 525–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fabbri, A.; Servadei, F.; Marchesini, G.; Bronzoni, C.; Montesi, D.; Arietta, L. Antiplatelet Therapy and the Outcome of Subjects with Intracranial Injury: The Italian SIMEU Study. Crit. Care 2013, 17, R53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Mathieu, F.; Güting, H.; Gravesteijn, B.; Monteiro, M.; Glocker, B.; Kornaropoulos, E.N.; Kamnistas, K.; Robertson, C.S.; Levin, H.; Whitehouse, D.P.; et al. Impact of Antithrombotic Agents on Radiological Lesion Progression in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury: A CENTER-TBI Propensity-Matched Cohort Analysis. J. Neurotrauma 2020, 37, 2069–2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kobayashi, L.; Barmparas, G.; Bosarge, P.; Brown, C.V.; Bukur, M.; Carrick, M.M.; Catalano, R.D.; Holly-Nicolas, J.; Inaba, K.; Kaminski, S.; et al. Novel Oral Anticoagulants and Trauma: The Results of a Prospective American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-Institutional Trial. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017, 82, 827–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zeeshan, M.; Jehan, F.; O’Keeffe, T.; Khan, M.; Zakaria, E.R.; Hamidi, M.; Gries, L.; Kulvatunyou, N.; Joseph, B. The Novel Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) Have Worse Outcomes Compared with Warfarin in Patients with Intracranial Hemorrhage after TBI. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018, 85, 915–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Markou, M.; Pleger, B.; Grözinger, M.; Pintea, B.; Hamsen, U.; Könen, S.; Schildhauer, T.A.; Martínez, R.; Gousias, K. Intake of NOAC Is Associated with Hematoma Expansion of Intracerebral Hematomas after Traumatic Brain Injury. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2021, 47, 565–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Harhangi, B.S.; Kompanje, E.J.O.; Leebeek, F.W.G.; Maas, A.I.R. Coagulation Disorders after Traumatic Brain Injury. Acta Neurochir. 2008, 150, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Epstein, D.S.; Mitra, B.; O’Reilly, G.; Rosenfeld, J.V.; Cameron, P.A. Acute Traumatic Coagulopathy in the Setting of Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Injury 2014, 45, 819–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zehtabchi, S.; Soghoian, S.; Liu, Y.; Carmody, K.; Shah, L.; Whittaker, B.; Sinert, R. The Association of Coagulopathy and Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients with Isolated Head Injury. Resuscitation 2008, 76, 52–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Talving, P.; Benfield, R.; Hadjizacharia, P.; Inaba, K.; Chan, L.S.; Demetriades, D. Coagulopathy in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective Study. J. Trauma 2009, 66, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lustenberger, T.; Talving, P.; Kobayashi, L.; Barmparas, G.; Inaba, K.; Lam, L.; Branco, B.C.; Demetriades, D. Early Coagulopathy after Isolated Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Relationship with Hypoperfusion Challenged. J. Trauma 2010, 69, 1410–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wafaisade, A.; Lefering, R.; Tjardes, T.; Wutzler, S.; Simanski, C.; Paffrath, T.; Fischer, P.; Bouillon, B.; Maegele, M. Acute Coagulopathy in Isolated Blunt Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurocritical Care 2010, 12, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chhabra, G.; Rangarajan, K.; Subramanian, A.; Agrawal, D.; Sharma, S.; Mukhopadhayay, A.K. Hypofibrinogenemia in Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury in Indian Patients. Neurol. India 2010, 58, 756–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Greuters, S.; van den Berg, A.; Franschman, G.; Viersen, V.A.; Beishuizen, A.; Peerdeman, S.M.; Boer, C.; The ALARM-BLEEDING Investigators. Acute and Delayed Mild Coagulopathy Are Related to Outcome in Patients with Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury. Crit. Care 2011, 15, R2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Shehata, M.; Afify, M.; El-Shafie, M.; Khaled, M. Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Coagulopathy in Patients with Isolated Head Trauma. Med. J. Cairo Univ. 2011, 79, 131–137. [Google Scholar]
  25. Schöchl, H.; Solomon, C.; Traintinger, S.; Nienaber, U.; Tacacs-Tolnai, A.; Windhofer, C.; Bahrami, S.; Voelckel, W. Thromboelastometric (ROTEM) Findings in Patients Suffering from Isolated Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Neurotrauma 2011, 28, 2033–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Franschman, G.; Boer, C.; Andriessen, T.M.J.C.; van der Naalt, J.; Horn, J.; Haitsma, I.; Jacobs, B.; Vos, P.E. Multicenter Evaluation of the Course of Coagulopathy in Patients with Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury: Relation to CT Characteristics and Outcome. J. Neurotrauma 2012, 29, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Genét, G.F.; Johansson, P.I.; Meyer, M.A.S.; Sølbeck, S.; Sørensen, A.M.; Larsen, C.F.; Welling, K.L.; Windeløv, N.A.; Rasmussen, L.S.; Ostrowski, S.R. Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy: Standard Coagulation Tests, Biomarkers of Coagulopathy, and Endothelial Damage in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Neurotrauma 2013, 30, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Alexiou, G.A.; Lianos, G.; Fotakopoulos, G.; Michos, E.; Pachatouridis, D.; Voulgaris, S. Admission Glucose and Coagulopathy Occurrence in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain Inj. 2014, 28, 438–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Joseph, B.; Aziz, H.; Zangbar, B.; Kulvatunyou, N.; Pandit, V.; O’Keeffe, T.; Tang, A.; Wynne, J.; Friese, R.S.; Rhee, P. Acquired Coagulopathy of Traumatic Brain Injury Defined by Routine Laboratory Tests: Which Laboratory Values Matter? J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014, 76, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. de Oliveira Manoel, A.L.; Neto, A.C.; Veigas, P.V.; Rizoli, S. Traumatic Brain Injury Associated Coagulopathy. Neurocrit. Care 2015, 22, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dekker, S.E.; Duvekot, A.; de Vries, H.M.; Geeraedts, L.M.G.; Peerdeman, S.M.; de Waard, M.C.; Boer, C.; Schober, P. Relationship between Tissue Perfusion and Coagulopathy in Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Surg. Res. 2016, 205, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yuan, Q.; Yu, J.; Wu, X.; Sun, Y.R.; Li, Z.Q.; Du, Z.Y.; Wu, X.H.; Hu, J. Prognostic Value of Coagulation Tests for In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury. Scand. J. Trauma Resusc. Emerg. Med. 2018, 26, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Albert, V.; Arulselvi, S.; Agrawal, D.; Pati, H.P.; Pandey, R.M. Early Posttraumatic Changes in Coagulation and Fibrinolysis Systems in Isolated Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients and Its Influence on Immediate Outcome. Hematol. Oncol. Stem Cell Ther. 2019, 12, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rao, A.; Lin, A.; Hilliard, C.; Fu, R.; Lennox, T.; Barbosa, R.; Schreiber, M.; Rowell, S. The Utility of Thromboelastography for Predicting The Risk of Progression of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients. Neurosurgery 2017, 64, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. van Gent, J.A.N.; van Essen, T.A.; Bos, M.H.A.; Cannegieter, S.C.; van Dijck, J.T.J.M.; Peul, W.C. Coagulopathy after Hemorrhagic Traumatic Brain Injury, an Observational Study of the Incidence and Prognosis. Acta Neurochir. 2020, 162, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Homnick, A.; Sifri, Z.; Yonclas, P.; Mohr, A.; Livingston, D. The Temporal Course of Intracranial Haemorrhage Progression: How Long Is Observation Necessary? Injury 2012, 43, 2122–2125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fletcher-Sandersjöö, A.; Thelin, E.P.; Maegele, M.; Svensson, M.; Bellander, B.-M. Time Course of Hemostatic Disruptions After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Neurocrit. Care 2021, 34, 635–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Folkerson, L.E.; Sloan, D.; Cotton, B.A.; Holcomb, J.B.; Tomasek, J.S.; Wade, C.E. Predicting Progressive Hemorrhagic Injury from Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury and Coagulation. Surgery 2015, 158, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yuan, Q.; Sun, Y.R.; Wu, X.; Yu, J.; Li, Z.Q.; Du, Z.Y.; Wu, X.H.; Zhou, L.F.; Hu, J. Coagulopathy in Traumatic Brain Injury and Its Correlation with Progressive Hemorrhagic Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Neurotrauma 2016, 33, 1279–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mayer, S.A.; Lignelli, A.; Fink, M.E.; Kessler, D.B.; Thomas, C.E.; Swarup, R.; van Heertum, R.L. Perilesional Blood Flow and Edema Formation in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A SPECT Study. Stroke 1998, 29, 1791–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Fisher, C.M. Pathological Observations in Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 1971, 30, 536–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Fujii, Y.; Tanaka, R.; Takeuchi, S.; Koike, T.; Minakawa, T.; Sasaki, O. Hematoma Enlargement in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage. J. Neurosurg. 1994, 80, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Takasugi, S.; Ueda, S.; Matsumoto, K. Chronological Changes in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hematoma--an Experimental and Clinical Study. Stroke 1985, 16, 651–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Lim-Hing, K.; Rincon, F. Secondary Hematoma Expansion and Perihemorrhagic Edema after Intracerebral Hemorrhage: From Bench Work to Practical Aspects. Front. Neurol. 2017, 8, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Kurland, D.; Hong, C.; Aarabi, B.; Gerzanich, V.; Simard, J.M. Hemorrhagic Progression of a Contusion after Traumatic Brain Injury: A Review. J. Neurotrauma 2012, 29, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Simard, J.M.; Kilbourne, M.; Tsymbalyuk, O.; Tosun, C.; Caridi, J.; Ivanova, S.; Keledjian, K.; Bochicchio, G.; Gerzanich, V. Key Role of Sulfonylurea Receptor 1 in Progressive Secondary Hemorrhage after Brain Contusion. J. Neurotrauma 2009, 26, 2257–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Stein, S.C.; Smith, D.H. Coagulopathy in Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurocrit. Care 2004, 1, 479–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wada, T.; Gando, S.; Maekaw, K.; Katabami, K.; Sageshima, H.; Hayakawa, M.; Sawamura, A. Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation with Increased Fibrinolysis during the Early Phase of Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury. Crit. Care 2017, 21, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Keimowitz, R.M.; Annis, B.L. Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Associated with Massive Brain Injury. J. Neurosurg. 1973, 39, 178–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Herbert, J.P.; Guillotte, A.R.; Hammer, R.D.; Scott Litofsky, N. Coagulopathy in the Setting of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Truths and Consequences. Brain Sci. 2017, 7, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nakae, R.; Murai, Y.; Morita, A.; Yokobori, S. Coagulopathy and Traumatic Brain Injury: Overview of New Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies. Neurol. Med. Chirurgica. 2022, 62, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Morel, N.; Morel, O.; Petit, L.; Hugel, B.; Cochard, J.F.; Freyssinet, J.M.; Sztark, F.; Dabadie, P. Generation of Procoagulant Microparticles in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Peripheral Blood after Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Trauma 2008, 64, 698–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kai, Y.; Maeda, Y.; Sasaki, T.; Kanaide, H.; Hirano, K. Basic and Translational Research on Proteinase-Activated Receptors: The Role of Thrombin Receptor in Cerebral Vasospasm in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2008, 108, 426–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Zhang, J.; Zhang, F.; Dong, J.F. Coagulopathy Induced by Traumatic Brain Injury: Systemic Manifestation of a Localized Injury. Blood 2018, 131, 2001–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Hijazi, N.; Fanne, R.A.; Abramovitch, R.; Yarovoi, S.; Higazi, M.; Abdeen, S.; Basheer, M.; Maraga, E.; Cines, D.B.; Higazi, A.A.R. Endogenous Plasminogen Activators Mediate Progressive Intracerebral Hemorrhage after Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice. Blood 2015, 125, 2558–2567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Foley, J.H.; Conway, E.M. Cross Talk Pathways Between Coagulation and Inflammation. Circ. Res. 2016, 118, 1392–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nekludov, M.; Bellander, B.M.; Blombäck, M.; Wallen, H.N. Platelet Dysfunction in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Neurotrauma 2007, 24, 1699–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wohlauer, M.V.; Moore, E.E.; Thomas, S.; Sauaia, A.; Evans, E.; Harr, J.; Silliman, C.C.; Ploplis, V.; Castellino, F.J.; Walsh, M. Early Platelet Dysfunction: An Unrecognized Role in the Acute Coagulopathy of Trauma. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2012, 214, 739–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Estrada-Rojo, F.; Martínez-Tapia, R.J.; Estrada-Bernal, F.; Martínez-Vargas, M.; Perez-Arredondo, A.; Flores-Avalos, L.; Navarro, L. Models Used in the Study of Traumatic Brain Injury. Rev. Neurosci. 2018, 29, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Alder, J.; Fujioka, W.; Lifshitz, J.; Crockett, D.P.; Thakker-Varia, S. Lateral Fluid Percussion: Model of Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice. J. Vis. Exp. 2011, e3063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Acosta, S.A.; Tajiri, N.; Shinozuka, K.; Ishikawa, H.; Grimmig, B.; Diamond, D.; Sanberg, P.R.; Bickford, P.C.; Kaneko, Y.; Borlongan, C.V. Long-Term Upregulation of Inflammation and Suppression of Cell Proliferation in the Brain of Adult Rats Exposed to Traumatic Brain Injury Using the Controlled Cortical Impact Model. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e53376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Flierl, M.A.; Stahel, P.F.; Beauchamp, K.M.; Morgan, S.J.; Smith, W.R.; Shohami, E. Mouse Closed Head Injury Model Induced by a Weight-Drop Device. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 1328–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Maqsood, M.I.; Matin, M.M.; Bahrami, A.R.; Ghasroldasht, M.M. Immortality of Cell Lines: Challenges and Advantages of Establishment. Cell Biol. Int. 2013, 37, 1038–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Morrison, B.; Cater, H.L.; Benham, C.D.; Sundstrom, L.E. An in Vitro Model of Traumatic Brain Injury Utilising Two-Dimensional Stretch of Organotypic Hippocampal Slice Cultures. J. Neurosci. Methods 2006, 150, 192–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Daviaud, N.; Garbayo, E.; Schiller, P.C.; Perez-Pinzon, M.; Montero-Menei, C.N. Organotypic Cultures as Tools for Optimizing Central Nervous System Cell Therapies. Exp. Neurol. 2013, 248, 429–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Gratz, J.; Güting, H.; Thorn, S.; Brazinova, A.; Görlinger, K.; Schäfer, N.; Schöchl, H.; Stanworth, S.; Maegele, M. Protocolised Thromboelastometric-guided Haemostatic Management in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Pilot Study. Anaesthesia 2019, 74, 883–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bradbury, J.L.; Thomas, S.G.; Sorg, N.R.; Mjaess, N.; Berquist, M.R.; Brenner, T.J.; Langford, J.H.; Marsee, M.K.; Moody, A.N.; Bunch, C.M.; et al. Viscoelastic Testing and Coagulopathy of Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 5039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cannon, J.W.; Dias, J.D.; Kumar, M.A.; Walsh, M.; Thomas, S.G.; Cotton, B.A.; Schuster, J.M.; Evans, S.L.; Schreiber, M.A.; Adam, E.H.; et al. Use of Thromboelastography in the Evaluation and Management of Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Crit. Care Explor. 2021, 3, e0526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Oberladstätter, D.; Voelckel, W.; Schlimp, C.; Zipperle, J.; Ziegler, B.; Grottke, O.; Schöchl, H. A Prospective Observational Study of the Rapid Detection of Clinically-Relevant Plasma Direct Oral Anticoagulant Levels Following Acute Traumatic Injury. Anaesthesia 2021, 76, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Davis, P.K.; Musunuru, H.; Walsh, M.; Cassady, R.; Yount, R.; Losiniecki, A.; Moore, E.E.; Wohlauer, M.V.; Howard, J.; Ploplis, V.A.; et al. Platelet Dysfunction Is an Early Marker for Traumatic Brain Injury-Induced Coagulopathy. Neurocrit. Care 2013, 18, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Epstein, D.S.; Mitra, B.; Cameron, P.A.; Fitzgerald, M.; Rosenfeld, J.V. Normalization of Coagulopathy Is Associated with Improved Outcome after Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2016, 29, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Spahn, D.R.; Bouillon, B.; Cerny, V.; Duranteau, J.; Filipescu, D.; Hunt, B.J.; Komadina, R.; Maegele, M.; Nardi, G.; Riddez, L.; et al. The European Guideline on Management of Major Bleeding and Coagulopathy Following Trauma: Fifth Edition. Crit. Care 2019, 23, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Frontera, J.A.; Lewin, J.J.; Rabinstein, A.A.; Aisiku, I.P.; Alexandrov, A.W.; Cook, A.M.; del Zoppo, G.J.; Kumar, M.A.; Peerschke, E.I.B.; Stiefel, M.F.; et al. Guideline for Reversal of Antithrombotics in Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and Society of Critical Care Medicine. Neurocritical Care 2016, 24, 6–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Desai, N.R.; Cornutt, D. Reversal Agents for Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Considerations for Hospital Physicians and Intensivists. Hosp. Pract. 2019, 47, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Anglin, C.O.; Spence, J.S.; Warner, M.A.; Paliotta, C.; Harper, C.; Moore, C.; Sarode, R.; Madden, C.; Diaz-Arrastia, R. Effects of Platelet and Plasma Transfusion on Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients with Moderate Bleeding Diatheses. J. Neurosurg. 2013, 118, 676–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Baharoglu, M.I.; Cordonnier, C.; Salman, R.A.-S.; de Gans, K.; Koopman, M.M.; Brand, A.; Majoie, C.B.; Beenen, L.F.; Marquering, H.A.; Vermeulen, M.; et al. Platelet Transfusion versus Standard Care after Acute Stroke Due to Spontaneous Cerebral Haemorrhage Associated with Antiplatelet Therapy (PATCH): A Randomised, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial. Lancet 2016, 387, 2605–2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Thorn, S.; Güting, H.; Mathes, T.; Schäfer, N.; Maegele, M. The Effect of Platelet Transfusion in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury and Concomitant Antiplatelet Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Transfusion 2019, 59, 3536–3544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Lelubre, C.; Bouzat, P.; Crippa, I.A.; Taccone, F.S. Anemia Management after Acute Brain Injury. Crit. Care 2016, 20, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Robertson, C.S.; Hannay, H.J.; Yamal, J.M.; Gopinath, S.; Goodman, J.C.; Tilley, B.C.; Baldwin, A.; Lara, L.R.; Saucedo-Crespo, H.; Ahmed, O.; et al. Effect of Erythropoietin and Transfusion Threshold on Neurological Recovery after Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2014, 312, 36–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Vedantam, A.; Yamal, J.M.; Rubin, M.L.; Robertson, C.S.; Gopinath, S.P. Progressive Hemorrhagic Injury after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Effect of Hemoglobin Transfusion Thresholds. J. Neurosurg. 2016, 125, 1229–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Sillesen, M.; Bambakidis, T.; Dekker, S.E.; Li, Y.; Alam, H.B. Fresh Frozen Plasma Modulates Brain Gene Expression in a Swine Model of Traumatic Brain Injury and Shock: A Network Analysis. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2017, 224, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Nikolian, V.C.; Dekker, S.E.; Bambakidis, T.; Higgins, G.A.; Dennahy, I.S.; Georgoff, P.E.; Williams, A.M.; Andjelkovic, A.V.; Alam, H.B. Improvement of Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity in Traumatic Brain Injury and Hemorrhagic Shock Following Treatment with Valproic Acid and Fresh Frozen Plasma. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 46, e59–e66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Dekker, S.E.; Nikolian, V.C.; Sillesen, M.; Bambakidis, T.; Schober, P.; Alam, H.B. Different Resuscitation Strategies and Novel Pharmacologic Treatment with Valproic Acid in Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Neurosci. Res. 2018, 96, 711–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Chang, R.; Folkerson, L.E.; Sloan, D.; Tomasek, J.S.; Kitagawa, R.S.; Choi, H.A.; Wade, C.E.; Holcomb, J.B. Early Plasma Transfusion Is Associated with Improved Survival after Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients with Multifocal Intracranial Hemorrhage. Surgery 2017, 161, 538–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Gruen, D.S.; Guyette, F.X.; Brown, J.B.; Okonkwo, D.O.; Puccio, A.M.; Campwala, I.K.; Tessmer, M.T.; Daley, B.J.; Miller, R.S.; Harbrecht, B.G.; et al. Association of Prehospital Plasma with Survival in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Secondary Analysis of the PAMPer Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e2016869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Etemadrezaie, H.; Baharvahdat, H.; Shariati, Z.; Lari, S.M.; Shakeri, M.T.; Ganjeifar, B. The Effect of Fresh Frozen Plasma in Severe Closed Head Injury. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2007, 109, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Roberts, I.; Shakur-Still, H.; Aeron-Thomas, A.; Belli, A.; Brenner, A.; Chaudary, M.A.; Chaudhri, R.; Jamaluddin, S.F.B.; Frimley, L.; Javaid, K.; et al. Effects of Tranexamic Acid on Death, Disability, Vascular Occlusive Events and Other Morbidities in Patients with Acute Traumatic Brain Injury (CRASH-3): A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Lancet 2019, 394, 1713–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Perel, P.; Al-Shahi Salman, R.; Kawahara, T.; Morris, Z.; Prieto-Merino, D.; Roberts, I.; Sandercock, P.; Shakur, H.; Wardlaw, J. CRASH-2 (Clinical Randomisation of an Antifibrinolytic in Significant Haemorrhage) Intracranial Bleeding Study: The Effect of Tranexamic Acid in Traumatic Brain Injury--A Nested Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Health Technol. Assess. 2012, 16, 1–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Rowell, S.E.; Meier, E.N.; McKnight, B.; Kannas, D.; May, S.; Sheehan, K.; Bulger, E.M.; Idris, A.H.; Christenson, J.; Morrison, L.J.; et al. Effect of Out-of-Hospital Tranexamic Acid vs Placebo on 6-Month Functional Neurologic Outcomes in Patients With Moderate or Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. JAMA 2020, 324, 961–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Bossers, S.M.; Loer, S.A.; Bloemers, F.W.; den Hartog, D.; van Lieshout, E.M.M.; Hoogerwerf, N.; van der Naalt, J.; Absalom, A.R.; Peerdeman, S.M.; Schwarte, L.A.; et al. Association Between Prehospital Tranexamic Acid Administration and Outcomes of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. JAMA Neurol. 2021, 78, 328–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Inaba, K.; Rizoli, S.; Veigas, P.V.; Callum, J.; Davenport, R.; Hess, J.; Maegele, M. 2014 Consensus Conference on Viscoelastic Test-Based Transfusion Guidelines for Early Trauma Resuscitation: Report of the Panel. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015, 78, 1220–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Kozek-Langenecker, S.A.; Ahmed, A.B.; Afshari, A.; Albaladejo, P.; Aldecoa, C.; Barauskas, G.; de Robertis, E.; Faraoni, D.; Filipescu, D.C.; Fries, D.; et al. Management of Severe Perioperative Bleeding: Guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology: First Update 2016. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2017, 34, 332–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Baksaas-Aasen, K.; Gall, L.S.; Stensballe, J.; Juffermans, N.P.; Curry, N.; Maegele, M.; Brooks, A.; Rourke, C.; Gillespie, S.; Murphy, J.; et al. Viscoelastic Haemostatic Assay Augmented Protocols for Major Trauma Haemorrhage (ITACTIC): A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Intensive Care Med. 2021, 47, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Gonzalez, E.; Moore, E.E.; Moore, H.B.; Chapman, M.P.; Chin, T.L.; Ghasabyan, A.; Wohlauer, M.V.; Barnett, C.C.; Bensard, D.D.; Biffl, W.L.; et al. Goal-Directed Hemostatic Resuscitation of Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing a Viscoelastic Assay to Conventional Coagulation Assays. Ann. Surg. 2016, 263, 1051–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Rimaitis, M.; Bilskienė, D.; Tamošuitis, T.; Vilcinis, R.; Rimaitis, K.; Macas, A. Implementation of Thromboelastometry for Coagulation Management in Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Undergoing Craniotomy. Med. Sci. Monit. 2020, 26, e922879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 12 02809 g001 550
Figure 1. Trimodal age distribution of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury in men and women: 1. first peak: marked difference in incidence between the sexes, starting at puberty and rising until age 18 (driver’s license); “testosterone effect” > “young risk-takers”; male > female; 2. second peak: mid-fifties (“older risk-takers”; work accidents); 3. third peak: late seventies (incidence in the two sexes is now more nearly equal; mainly falls) and frequency of coagulopathy upon admission for three age groups according to the Berlin definition of coagulopathy, e.g., PTT ≥ 40 s and/or INR ≥ 1.4. First published by Maegele et al. [6], with permission from Deutscher Ärzteverlag GmbH; Reprinted from Maegele et al. [7], adapted with permission from Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc., Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands.
Figure 1. Trimodal age distribution of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury in men and women: 1. first peak: marked difference in incidence between the sexes, starting at puberty and rising until age 18 (driver’s license); “testosterone effect” > “young risk-takers”; male > female; 2. second peak: mid-fifties (“older risk-takers”; work accidents); 3. third peak: late seventies (incidence in the two sexes is now more nearly equal; mainly falls) and frequency of coagulopathy upon admission for three age groups according to the Berlin definition of coagulopathy, e.g., PTT ≥ 40 s and/or INR ≥ 1.4. First published by Maegele et al. [6], with permission from Deutscher Ärzteverlag GmbH; Reprinted from Maegele et al. [7], adapted with permission from Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc., Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands.
Jcm 12 02809 g001
Jcm 12 02809 g002 550
Figure 2. Clinical example of a patient with severe TBI and initial coagulopathy who developed complicating subsequent hypotensive (multifactorial) coagulopathy with deteriorating ICH within three hours of hospital admission. Shown are cranial computed tomographies of the brain (CCTs), results from viscoelastic (ROTEM®), and standard laboratory and conventional coagulation assays (CCAs) upon admission (A) and after three hours of admission (B). A normal reference condition is displayed for comparison (C). Viscoelastic assays after three hours of admission indicate delayed and insufficient clotting, as reflected by prolonged initiation times and reduced clot amplitudes. The flat line in the ROTEM® FIBTEM channel reflects the complete absence of fibrin polymerization. Results from standard laboratory assays and CCAs three hours after admission display signs of shock with deranged coagulation along with hypofibrinogenemia and thrombocytopenia. aPTT = activated Partial Thromboplastin Time; BE = base excess; PT = Prothrombin Time; PTr = Prothrombin ratio. First published by Maegele et al. [3], with permission from Elsevier; Reprinted from Maegele et al. [7], with permission from Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Figure 2. Clinical example of a patient with severe TBI and initial coagulopathy who developed complicating subsequent hypotensive (multifactorial) coagulopathy with deteriorating ICH within three hours of hospital admission. Shown are cranial computed tomographies of the brain (CCTs), results from viscoelastic (ROTEM®), and standard laboratory and conventional coagulation assays (CCAs) upon admission (A) and after three hours of admission (B). A normal reference condition is displayed for comparison (C). Viscoelastic assays after three hours of admission indicate delayed and insufficient clotting, as reflected by prolonged initiation times and reduced clot amplitudes. The flat line in the ROTEM® FIBTEM channel reflects the complete absence of fibrin polymerization. Results from standard laboratory assays and CCAs three hours after admission display signs of shock with deranged coagulation along with hypofibrinogenemia and thrombocytopenia. aPTT = activated Partial Thromboplastin Time; BE = base excess; PT = Prothrombin Time; PTr = Prothrombin ratio. First published by Maegele et al. [3], with permission from Elsevier; Reprinted from Maegele et al. [7], with permission from Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Jcm 12 02809 g002
Jcm 12 02809 g003 550
Figure 3. Conceptual timeline of hemostatic disruptions after TBI based upon changes in conventional coagulation assays (CCAs). Reprinted from Fletcher-Sandersjöö et al. [37], under CC BY-4.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (assessed on 3 January 2023).
Figure 3. Conceptual timeline of hemostatic disruptions after TBI based upon changes in conventional coagulation assays (CCAs). Reprinted from Fletcher-Sandersjöö et al. [37], under CC BY-4.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (assessed on 3 January 2023).
Jcm 12 02809 g003
Jcm 12 02809 g004 550
Figure 4. Summary of potential interactions and pathways involved in the development of hemostatic failure and coagulopathy after TBI. The exact nature of hemostatic disruptions observed after TBI remains elusive, but current evidence suggests the presence of both a hyper- and hypocoagulable state with possible overlap and lack of distinction between phases and states. Arrows indicate activation; bold circles inhibition. Reprinted from Maegele et al. [7], with permission from Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Figure 4. Summary of potential interactions and pathways involved in the development of hemostatic failure and coagulopathy after TBI. The exact nature of hemostatic disruptions observed after TBI remains elusive, but current evidence suggests the presence of both a hyper- and hypocoagulable state with possible overlap and lack of distinction between phases and states. Arrows indicate activation; bold circles inhibition. Reprinted from Maegele et al. [7], with permission from Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Jcm 12 02809 g004
Jcm 12 02809 g005 550
Figure 5. Exemplar algorithm to guide hemostatic therapies by the use of functional viscoelastic testing results (ROTEM®) successfully implemented at centers formerly naïve to this technology. Test results were available for clinical decision-making within a median of 15 min of blood sampling. When the algorithm recommended specific interventions and was followed, thromboelastometric test results improved significantly by the second blood sampling performed 30–60 min after decision-making and at least 10 min after the intervention (adapted from [66]). A10 = Clot amplitude after 5 and 10 min (in mm); CT = Clotting time (in seconds); Ex = ROTEM® EXTEM assay; FFP = Fresh Frozen Plasma; Fib = ROTEM® FIBTEM assay; g = gram; IU = International Units; ML = Maximum lysis (in percent); PCC = Prothrombin Complex Concentrate.
Figure 5. Exemplar algorithm to guide hemostatic therapies by the use of functional viscoelastic testing results (ROTEM®) successfully implemented at centers formerly naïve to this technology. Test results were available for clinical decision-making within a median of 15 min of blood sampling. When the algorithm recommended specific interventions and was followed, thromboelastometric test results improved significantly by the second blood sampling performed 30–60 min after decision-making and at least 10 min after the intervention (adapted from [66]). A10 = Clot amplitude after 5 and 10 min (in mm); CT = Clotting time (in seconds); Ex = ROTEM® EXTEM assay; FFP = Fresh Frozen Plasma; Fib = ROTEM® FIBTEM assay; g = gram; IU = International Units; ML = Maximum lysis (in percent); PCC = Prothrombin Complex Concentrate.
Jcm 12 02809 g005
Table
Table 1. Prevalences of coagulopathy in isolated traumatic brain injury (iTBI), including outcome in the presence of coagulopathy.
Table 1. Prevalences of coagulopathy in isolated traumatic brain injury (iTBI), including outcome in the presence of coagulopathy.
StudyNo. of PatientsDefinition of TBIDefinition of CoagulopathyPrevalence of Coagulopathy (%)Mortality with Coagulopathy (%)
Harhangi [16] *5357HeterogeneousHeterogeneous32.7 (10–97.5)51 (25–93)
Epstein [17] **7037HeterogeneousHeterogeneous35.2 (7–86.1)17–86
Zehtabchi [18]224AIShead > 2 and/or any intracranial hematoma on CTINR > 1.3 or PTT > 34 s17 (8–30)-
Talving [19]387AIShead ≥ 3 and extracranial AIS < 3Platelets < 100,000 mm3 or INR > 1.1 or aPTT > 36 s3434.7
Lustenberger [9]278AIShead ≥ 3 and extracranial AIS < 3Platelets < 100,000 mm3 and/or INR > 1.4 and/oraPTT > 36 s45.740.9
Lustenberger [20]132AIShead ≥ 3 and extracranial AIS < 3Platelets < 100,000 mm3 or INR > 1.2 or aPTT > 36 s36.432.5
Wafaisade [21]3114AIShead ≥ 3 and extracranial AIS < 3Quick (PTR) < 70% and/or platelets < 100,000/mL22.750.4
Chhabra [22]100GCS < 13Fibrinogen < 200 mg/dL7-
Greuters [23]107Brain tissue injury on CT and extracranial AIS < 3aPTT > 40 s and/or INR > 1.2 and/or platelets < 120 × 109/L24 (54 #)41
Shehata [24]101iTBI on admission brain CTINR ≥ 1.2, PT > 13 s, d-dimer positive, platelets < 100 × 103/CC6336
Schöchl [25]88AIShead ≥ 3 and extracranial AIS < 3Quick (PTR) < 70% and/or aPTT > 35 s and/or fibrinogen < 150 mg/Dl and/or platelets < 100 × 109/L15.850
Franschman [26]226iTBI on CT and extracranial AIS <3aPTT > 40 s and/or PT > 1.2 and/or platelets < 120 × 109/L25 (44 #)33
Genet [27]23AIShead ≥ 3 and extracranial AIS < 3aPTT > 35 sand/orINR > 1.21322
Alexiou [28]149iTBI with exclusion of multisystem traumaaPTT > 40 s and/or INR > 1.2 and/or platelets < 120 × 109/L14.8 (22.8 #)-
Joseph [29]591AIShead ≥ 3 and extracranial AIS < 3INR ≥ 1.5 and/or PTT ≥ 35 s and/or platelets ≤ 100 × 103/mL13.323
Epstein [17]1718AIShead ≥ 3 and extracranial AIS < 3INR ≥ 1.37.745.1
De Oliveira Manoel [30]48AIShead ≥ 3 and extracranial AIS < 3INR ≥ 1.5 and/or aPTT ≥ 60 s and/or platelets < 100 × 103/mm3 §12.566
Dekker [31]52AIShead ≥ 3INR ≥ 1.2 and/or aPTT ≥ 40 s and/or platelets < 120 × 109/L4245.5
Yuan [32]2319Intracranial injury on CT and extracranial AIS < 3INR > 1.25 and/or PT > 14 s and/or aPTT > 36 s and/or platelets < 100 × 109/L18.617.6
Albert [33]561iTBI on admission brain CTINR ≥ 1.27 and/or PT ≥ 16.7 s and/or aPTT > 28.8 s41.6%61.1%
Böhm [8]598iTBI on CT and no extracranial injuriesINR > 1.2 and/or aPTT > 35 s and/or fibrinogen < 150 mg/dL and/or platelets < 100 × 103/nL19.6-
AIS = Abbreviated Injury Scale; aPTT = activated partial thromboplastin time; CT = computed tomography; GCS = Glasgow Coma Scale; INR = International Normalized Ratio; PT = prothrombin time (PTR = prothrombin ratio/quick); TBI = traumatic brain injury; * Meta-analysis (1966–2007) with n = 34 studies included; ** Meta-analysis (1990–2013) with n = 22 studies included; # after 24 h; § additional abnormal coagulation tests: fibrinogen ≤ 1.0 g/L, any clotting factor < 0.5 (<50% activity) and abnormal viscoelastic test results. First published by Maegele et al. [3], with permission from Elsevier; Reprinted from Maegele et al. [7], with permission from Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Table
Table 2. Current options for the reversal of antithrombotic agents in adult patients with TBI and traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).
Table 2. Current options for the reversal of antithrombotic agents in adult patients with TBI and traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).
AntithromboticStrong Recommendation with Moderate-to-High Quality EvidenceConditional Recommendation with Low-to-Moderate Quality Evidence
Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs)Vitamin K for INR reversal in VKA-associated ICH as soon as possible or with other reversal agents
3- and 4-factor PCC iv be preferred to FFP in VKA-associated ICH and INR ≥ 1.4; dosing on weight, INR and type of PCC. Monitoring via repeated INR after PCC administration (15–60 min) and every 6–8 h for 24–48 h; subsequent treatment according to follow-up INR as repeated dosing may increase thrombotic and DIC risk (Good practice statement)
Treatment with vitamin K and FFP is recommended over no treatment!		If INR ≥ 1.4 vitamin K 10 mg iv with subsequent treatment according to follow-up INR; if repeated INR ≥ 1.4 within 24–48 h redosing with vitamin K 10 mg iv (Good practice statement) or if treated with PCC and repeated INR ≥ 1.4 within first 24–48 h further correction with FFP
Fresh frozen plasma/FFP (10–15 mL/kg iv) along with one dose of vitamin K 10 mg iv if PCC is not available/contraindicated
Direct factor Xa inhibitorsAndexanet alfa (400–800 mg as an initial bolus followed by 4–8 mg/min over 120 min (480–960 mg); approved for adults treated with direct factor Xa inhibitors apixaban and rivaroxaban if rapid reversal is indicated due to life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding!4-factor PCC or activated PCC (4-factor PCC 50 U/kg iv or aPCC (FEIBA) 50 U/kg iv) if ICH occurred within 3–5 terminal half-lives of drug exposure or in the context of liver failure
Activated charcoal (50 g) within 2 h of drug ingestion to intubated ICH patients with enteral access and/or low risk of aspiration
Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs)Idarucizumab (2 × 2.5 g/50 mL) to ICH associated with dabigatran when administered within 3–5 half-lives and no renal failure and in renal failure with continued drug exposure beyond normal 3–5 half-livesIf idarucizumab is not available or in case of overdose, consider hemodialysis; consider redosing idarucizumab and repeated hemodialysis in ongoing bleeding
4-factor PCC or activated PCC (4-factor PCC 50 U/kg iv or aPCC (FEIBA) 50 U/kg iv) if idarucizumab is not available or if ICH with DTIs other than dabigatran and if DTI was administered within 3–5 half-lives and absence of renal failure or in renal failure with continued drug exposure beyond normal 3–5 half-lives
Activated charcoal (50 g) within 2 h of drug ingestion to intubated ICH patients with enteral access and/or low risk of aspiration
Unfractionated heparinProtamine sulfate iv for heparin reversal with dosing according to heparin dose over the preceding 2–3 h; protamine sulfate 1 mg for every 100 U heparin given over the preceding 2–3 h with a maximum single dose of 50 mgIf aPTT remains elevated, repeated protamine sulfate at 0.5 mg per 100 U of heparin
Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWHs)Protamine sulfate slowly IV over 10 min in the following dosing, if (a.) enoxaparin was given within 8 h 1 mg protamine per 1 mg of enoxaparin administered (maximum single dose 50 mg), if (b.) enoxaparin was given within 8–12 h 0.5 mg protamine per 1 mg enoxaparin (maximum single dose 50 mg). The following dosing applies for dalteparin, nadroparin and tinzaparin: Protamine sulfate 1 mg per 100 anti Xa U of LMWH administered during the past 3–5 half-lives with maximum single dose 50 mg. Only minimal effect on reversal > 12 h from dosing!Redosing protamine sulfate (0.5 mg per 100 anti-Xa U of LMWH or per 1 mg of enoxaparin) if life-threatening bleeding continous or in renal insufficiency
Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa 90 μg/kg iv) if protamine is contraindicated Reversal of danaparoid with rFVIIa in the context of ICH
PentasaccharidesNo recommendationActivated PCC (aPCC (FEIBA) 20 U/kg iv) for pentasaccharide reversal
Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa 90 μg/kg iv) if aPCC is contraindicated/not available
Thrombolytic agents (Plasminogen activators)No recommendationCryoprecipitate (initial dose 10 U iv) in thrombolytic agent-associated symptomatic ICH if administered within the previous 24 h. If contraindicated/not available antifibrinolytic agent (tranexamic acid 10–15 mg/kg iv over 20 min or ε-aminocaproic acid 4–5 g iv). If fibrinogen levels < 150 mg/dL, administration of additional cryoprecipitate. Although substitution with fibrinogen concentrate, if available, may be reasonable, there is no recommendation at this time!
Antiplatelet agentsPlatelet function testing prior to platelet transfusion is recommended; if laboratory-documented platelet function is within normal ranges or documented platelet resistance. Recommendation against platelet transfusion!Desmopressin (0.4 μg/kg iv × 1) in ICH with aspirin/cyclooxygenase-1 or adenosine diphosphate (ADP) inhibitors
Platelet concentrates in aspirin- or ADP inhibitor-associated ICH in case of neurosurgical intervention. An initial dose of one single donor apheresis unit of platelets. Platelet testing is suggested prior to repeated platelet transfusion and repeated dosing only if persisting abnormalities!
Options and current recommendations for the reversal of antithrombotic agents in adult patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in the context of TBI. The recommendations are in agreement with the guidance document for novel oral anticoagulants from the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH). All antithrombotics (VKAs, Direct factor Xa inhibitors, DTIs, heparins (unfractionated and LMWHs), pentasaccharides, thrombolytics and antiplatelet agents) should be discontinued when ICH is present or suspected. ADP = Adenosine di-phosphate; DIC = Disseminated intravascular coagulation; DTI = Direct thrombin inhibitors; FFP = Fresh frozen plasma; ICH = Intracranial hemorrhage; INR = International Normalized Ratio; LMWH = Low molecular weight heparin; PCC = Prothrombin complex concentrate; rFVIIa = activated recombinant factor FVII; U = unit; VKA = Vitamin K antagonist. First published by Maegele et al. [3] with permission from Elsevier; modified from Maegele et al. [7], with permission from Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kockelmann, F.; Maegele, M. Acute Haemostatic Depletion and Failure in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI): Pathophysiological and Clinical Considerations. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 2809. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082809

AMA Style

Kockelmann F, Maegele M. Acute Haemostatic Depletion and Failure in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI): Pathophysiological and Clinical Considerations. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(8):2809. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082809

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kockelmann, Fabian, and Marc Maegele. 2023. "Acute Haemostatic Depletion and Failure in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI): Pathophysiological and Clinical Considerations" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 8: 2809. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082809

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop