Next Article in Journal
A Pilot Cross-Sectional Study on the Level of Depression and Physical Activity among Students in Poland and Portugal in the Second Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison between Fasting and Non-Fasting Cut-Off Values of Triglyceride in Diagnosing High Triglyceride in Chinese Hypertensive Outpatients
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 12
Issue 7
10.3390/jcm12072540
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Outcomes in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Underwent Transcatheter Closure of an Atrial Septal Defect

by
Jae-Hee Seol
1,2,†,
Se-Yong Jung
1,†,
Han-Byul Lee
3,
Ah-Young Kim
1,
Eun-Hwa Kim
4,
In-Kyung Min
4,
Nam-Kyun Kim
5,* and
Jae-Young Choi
1,*
1
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Congenital Heart Disease Center, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Pediatrics, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju 26426, Republic of Korea
3
Division of Pediatrics, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul 04401, Republic of Korea
4
Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
5
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(7), 2540; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072540
Submission received: 11 February 2023 / Revised: 26 March 2023 / Accepted: 27 March 2023 / Published: 28 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) related to an atrial septal defect (ASD) poses a challenge to transcatheter closure of an ASD (tcASD). We aimed to determine the predictors for remaining PAH (rPAH) post-tcASD. This retrospective study was conducted at a single tertiary university hospital. Adult patients with an ASD and PAH were divided into three groups according to pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). Normalization of pulmonary atrial systolic pressure (PASP) was defined as an estimated right ventricular systolic pressure < 40 mmHg and was determined using transthoracic echocardiography. Among 119 patients, 80% showed PAH normalization post-tcASD. Normalization of PAH post-tcASD was observed in 100%, 56.2%, and 28.6% of patients in mild, moderate, and severe PVR groups, respectively. The patients’ New York Heart Association functional class improved. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age and high PVR were significant risk factors for rPAH. A receiving operator curve analysis showed a PASP cutoff value > 67.5 mmHg to be predictive of rPAH post-tcASD, with an area under the curve value of 0.944 (sensitivity, 0.922; specificity 0.933). Most patients, including moderate-to-severe PAH patients, improved hemodynamically and clinically with tcASD. Since patients with severe PAH are at a risk of rPAH, tcASD should be performed by selecting the patient carefully based on pre-procedure medication, a vasoreactivity test, and a balloon occlusion test.

1. Introduction

Atrial septal defect (ASD), a commonly diagnosed structural heart lesion occurring in approximately 2 per 1000 live births [1], accounts for 25–30% of all adult congenital heart diseases [2]. In patients with untreated ASDs, chronic pulmonary over-circulation due to shunt flow can cause pulmonary vascular remodeling and increased pulmonary vascular resistance. These changes may result in atrial arrhythmias, right ventricular dilation, right heart failure, and pulmonary hypertension [3]. Zwijnenburg et al. reported that, in 30 studies published before March 2017, the prevalence of PAH ranged from 29% to 73% in adult patients with ASDs and from 5% to 50% post-ASD closure [4].
Transcatheter closure of ASD (tcASD) in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) improves PAH severity and cardiac functional capacity, and reduces atrial arrhythmias [5]. However, some patients show remaining PAH (rPAH) or aggravation of PAH post-ASD closure. PAH is a strong predictor of mortality in older patients who undergo ASD closure [6,7]. Hence, the decision to opt for ASD closure should be carefully considered in high-risk patients with PAH.
According to the European Society of Cardiology and the European Respiratory Society 2020 guidelines for adult congenital heart disease, ASD closure is indicated for adults with PAH who exhibit a pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVR) value < 3 WU/m2 but is contraindicated at a PVR > 5 WU/m2 [8]. Additionally, as per the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology 2018 guidelines, ASD with elevated pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) more than two-thirds systemic is considered to be a contraindication for closure [9]. However, it is difficult to determine the outcomes for ASD closure in patients with moderately-to-severely elevated PVR, as cut-off PAP or PVRi levels have not been established for these patients; several studies have reported that for the efficacy of PAH medication and subsequent transcatheter closure (treat and repair strategy) in patients with severe PAH, a cut-off PAP for tcASD after PAH medication remains unclear [10,11,12].
Several studies have reported a decrease in the prevalence of PAH post-tcASD; however, they have not identified risk factors for rPAH [13,14,15,16,17,18]. This study aimed to identify predictors of tcASD outcomes in patients with PAH.

2. Methods

2.1. Patient Selection

We retrospectively surveyed 1593 patients with ASD who had undergone ASD closure from May 2005 to December 2017 at the Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University Health System. Among them, 119 (74%) adult patients (>18 years old) had PAH (PAP, ≥25 mmHg) but no evidence of Eisenmenger syndrome. The patients were divided into three groups based on pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), using cardiac catheterization, as follows: mild (PVR, ≥3 and <5 WU), moderate (PVR, ≥5 and <7 WU), and severe (PVR, ≥7 WU) [19,20].

2.2. Personalized Treatment Strategies

The indication for closure of ASD included right-side heart enlargement and Qp:Qs > 1.5:1. In moderate-to-severe PAH patients, transient balloon occlusion test was performed. In the case of an increase in left atrial or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure to >10 mmHg, fenestrated device was used. Decline in cardiac output and/or desaturation by balloon occlusion test were considered contraindications for ASD closure [21,22]. Additionally, in some patients, a vasoreactivity test with high O2 (10 L/min through a mask) and/or aerosolized iloprost for 15 min was also performed [23]. For patients with persistent AFib post-closure, antiarrhythmic drugs were used according to our hospital strategy. Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) was performed for rapid ventricle rhythm refractory to medical therapy. If there was hemodynamic instability, direct-current (D/C) cardioversion was performed [24].

2.3. Follow-Up

Physical examination, 12-lead ECG, chest radiography, and echocardiography were performed at 1 week, at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and annually thereafter. Patients with moderate-to-severe PAH were regularly followed up every 3 to 6 months. Normalization of PAH was defined as an estimated PASP < 40 mmHg on echocardiography. Mild, moderate, and severe PAH were defined as an estimated PAH of 40~49 mmHg, 50~59 mmHg, and ≥60 mmHg at last follow-up, respectively. The occurrence of major cardiac events (MACEs) during the follow-up period was also investigated as an outcome of post tcASD. Death, stroke or hospital admission due to cardiac-associated disease were defined as MACEs.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

We used the ANOVA test and independent sample t-test for patient comparisons. We performed Kaplan–Meier survival analysis with a log-rank test to compare the time to normalization between the groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for rPAH. Finally, we calculated a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to determine a cut-off PAP value for PAH normalization. All statistical analyses were performed using the statistics program SPSS ® (Version 25, IBM, Chicago, IL, USA), and results with p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

2.5. Ethics Statement

The Institutional Review Board of Severance Hospital approved this study (study approval number: 4-2021-0925). The requirement for informed consent was waived due to the study’s retrospective nature.

3. Results

3.1. Ethics Statement

The study population included 119 consecutive adult patients with ASD and PAH who underwent successful tcASD, and for whom no major complications occurred during the follow-up period. Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Of 119 patients, the prevalence rates of PAH in patients with mild, moderate, and severe PAH were 61.3% (n = 73), 26.9% (n = 32), and 11.8% (n = 14), respectively.
The average age was relatively low in the severe group (p = 0.0049). Female patients outnumbered male patients, and the association between female sex and PAH was stronger than that between male sex and PAH (p = 0.0479). As the severity of PAH increased, the functional capacity (New York Heart Association Class (NYHA)) was limited (p < 0.0001). No significant differences were observed in ASD size and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) according to PAH severity. The Qp/Qs was lower in the severe PAH group.

3.2. Treatment Outcomes Post-tcASD

Treatment outcomes post-tcASD are shown in Figure 1. In patients with moderate-to-severe PAH, tcASD was performed if there was a response to the balloon occlusion test and/or vasoreactivity test. In all mild PAH patients, pulmonary pressure was normalized after tcASD. In the patients with moderate PAH, 18 (56.3%) patients were normalized. Among 14 (43.8%) patients with rPAH, 12 patients improved to mild PAH, and the other 2 had worse or similar PASP. In patients with severe PAH, only 4 (28.6%) patients were normalized, but 5 of 10 patients with rPAH showed a decrease in pulmonary pressure.
Hemodynamic and clinical changes post-tcASD are shown in Table 2. The median follow-up period was 53 months (interquartile range (IQR) 23.8–82.7), 12.1 months (IQR 29.8–66.1), and 51.4 months (IQR 40.7–76.5) for the mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. Based on the high degree of agreement between PASP and pre-procedural RVSP in our study (ICC, 0.8426), post-closure PASP was estimated by measuring RVSP using echocardiography. Normalization of PASP was seen in 100%, 56.2%, and 28.6% of the patients in the mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). The median time to normalization was 1.68 months (IQR 0.43–8.21), 11.04 months (IQR 5.29–26.51), and 39.79 months (IQR 25.49–76.70) in the mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively, and significantly longer in the severe group (p < 0.001). Patients with severe PAH were associated with late normalization. In the severe PAH group, 28.5% (n = 4) of the patients remained in severe PAH (p = 0.0015), with two having worsening PAH. The severity of PAH was associated with the development of MACEs during the follow-up period. (p < 0.0001) There was no significant difference in the incidence of post-procedural AFib according to the severity of PAH. However, 14 of 28 patients with AFib converted to normal sinus rhythm post-tcASD. Among them, two patients immediately post-tcASD, three patients after D/C cardioversion during the procedure, three patients after RFCA, and one patient were converted to normal sinus rhythm while using antiarrhythmic drugs (Figure S1). Most patients showed improvement in NYHA class. Overall, there was a decrease in the proportion of patients with NYHA class III–IV and an increase in NYHA class I, which was particularly significant in the severe group (Figure S2).
A treatment flow chart for patients with severe PAH is shown in Figure 2. Among patients in the severe group, five (35.7%) patients received selective pulmonary vasodilation pre-tcASD. Of these, three (21.4%) patients required a fenestrated device. After tcASD, severe PAH remained in two patients, and the other patient improved to moderate PAH. Two patients who did not require a fenestration device remained as severe PAH. Of the nine patients who started medication after direct device closure, four patients were normalized. The other five patients, including two patients who used the fenestrated device, improved to mild-to-moderate PAH. The pulmonary vasodilator was maintained except for those who were normalized. Information on post-tcASD medication and treatment outcomes in patients with severe PAH are summarized in Supplementary Table S1. Except for 1 patient who died of gastro-intestinal bleeding, 4 of 13 patients were able to stop taking the pulmonary vasodilator after normalization. Patients who improved with mild PAH were maintained on only a single medication. Dual medication was maintained for moderate PAH, and dual or triple medication was maintained for patients with severe PAH. Two of five patients with AFib returned to normal sinus rhythm after RFCA, and the other three patients were maintained on antiarrhythmic drugs to manage AFib. PASP was reduced after tcASD in most patients, except for one patient who experienced increased PASP (Figure S3A). Most patients had transient NT-proBNP elevations post-procedure, but the latest follow-up results showed a decreasing trend (Figure S3B). When clinical outcomes were compared, all 13 patients showed improvement in the 6 min walking distance test. However, in terms of NYHA class, while six patients improved, the rest worsened or remained similar to pre-procedure measurements (Figure S3C,D).
Figure 3 shows the Kaplan–Meier curves of the proportion of patients with normalization of PASP over time post-tcASD according to the severity of PAH. During the median follow-up period post-tcASD, patients with mild-to-moderate PAH showed normalization of PAH relatively earlier post-tcASD compared to patients with severe PAH (p < 0.0001 using log-rank analysis).

3.3. Factors Associated with PAP Normalization

A comparison of the baseline characteristics and hemodynamic data between the groups with normalized PASP and rPAH is shown in Table 3. Of the 119 patients, 95 (80%) patients were normalized, and the other 24 (20%) patients had rPAH. Among the hemodynamic variables, the independent factors associated with normalization were baseline PASP (p < 0.0001), mPAP (p < 0.0001), Qp/Qs (p = 0.0272), PVR (p < 0.0001), and NYHA class (p < 0.0001). Compared to the rPAH group, the normalized patients had higher Qp/Qs (2.19 vs. 2.46, p = 0.0005), lower PVR (6.45 vs. 3.4, p < 0.0001), and relatively low median PASP (45, (IQR 40–60 mmHg) vs. 70 (IQR 70–100) mmHg) at baseline. Another factor associated with rPAH was the NYHA class (p < 0.0001). Patients with NYHA class III or higher were more likely to remain as PAH. Patients with rPAH were more symptomatic pre- and post-tcASD (p < 0.0001). Baseline characteristics such as age, weight, body surface area (m2), and sex, were not significantly associated with rPAH. Moreover, TR, ASD size, and pre-and post-procedure Afib, which indicate the degree of heart disease, were not related to postoperative normalization. MACEs occurred more in rPAH patients.
Univariate analysis showed that higher PASP (p < 0.0001), lower Qp/QS (p = 0.0306), higher PVR (p < 0.0001), and a more severe grade of TR (p = 0.040) were correlated more closely with rPAH (Table 4). Further analysis was performed with stepwise selection. Multivariate analysis showed that for a 1-year increase in age, there was a 1.1-fold increase in the risk of rPAH (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.03–1.14, p < 0.0024). In addition, as the PVR increased by 1, rPAH risk increased 4.6-fold (OR 4.60, 95% CI 2.53–8.36, p < 0.0001) (Table 5).
ROC curve analysis showed that the best cut-off PASP value with which to predict rPAH post-tcASD was 67.5 mmHg, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.944 (sensitivity 0.922, specificity 0.933; Figure S4).

4. Discussion

Pulmonary hypertension can occur in the presence of ASD and can lead to increased mortality in cases of unrepaired ASD [25]. In ASD patients, PAH initially develops dependent on the left to right shunt, and as pulmonary vascular remodeling progresses gradually, after a certain point, the PAH is no longer dependent on only the shunt. Some patients may develop PAH post-tcASD with similar pathophysiology to idiopathic pulmonary hypertension. Although there are guidelines for ASD closure indication, in patients with ASD and moderate-to-severe PAH, it is difficult to predict the risk for rPAH before ASD closure as the guidelines for such patients are ambiguous. In a recent Nyboe et al. [26] cohort study and a Selai et al. [18] meta-analysis, ASD closure was found to improve clinical outcomes, including survival rate, pulmonary pressure, and right ventricular function in patients with PAH. In addition, there was a study that reported successful results of ASD closure through strategies using “treat and repair” [10] and “fenestrated device” [27] in patients with severe PAH. Appropriate intervention can reduce pulmonary pressure and improve quality of life for patients with PAH, even severe PAH, when it is possible to select patients who could benefit from ASD closure. While several studies have established the criteria for ASD closure in these patients, a consensus has not yet been reached.
This study aimed to present our experience of tcASD in patients with PAH and clarify the risk of rPAH post-tcASD by comparing outcomes following tcASD according to PAH severity. Most patients with mild-to-moderate PAH achieved normalization of PASP post-tcASD. In patients with severe PAH, although PASP decreased significantly post-tcASD, 28.6% of them remained as severe PAH, and 64% of them required a continuous selective pulmonary vasodilator. The strong factor predicting rPAH was high PVR before the procedure. In addition, our study indicated that patients with a PASP > 67.5 mmHg were likely to have rPAH post-tcASD based on the ROC curve. These findings were consistent with previous studies that analyzed PAH outcomes post-tcASD [13,20]. Our results also support the clinical effect of ASD closure in patients with moderate-to-severe PAH. As estimated using echocardiography, Doppler examination findings indicated a significant reduction in PASP at the time of the last patient follow-up post-tcASD. Moreover, we observed an improvement in NYHA class post-tcASD, even in patients with severe PAH. This improvement was due to a volume reduction in the right side of the heart and increasing the systolic volume of the left ventricle [28].
In the analysis of baseline characteristics, younger age and female sex were associated with PAH severity. Younger and/or female patients had higher PASP at baseline. This finding indicated that the duration of PAH may not affect PAH severity, as other studies have reported [6]. However, rPAH was associated with age in our results. As age increased by 1 year, the OR of rPAH was 1.1. There were two relatively young (in their 20 s and 30 s) patients without any comorbidities who experienced worsened PAH post-tcASD. Furthermore, our study showed a trend towards higher prevalence and severity of PAH in women. These findings suggest that other additional factors such as an underlying genetic predisposition or hormonal differences may be associated with PAH development. Further research involving more patients with severe PAH is needed.
Contrary to expectations, AFib and severe TR did not show a significant association with PAH severity and rPAH. Elevated PAP increases pressure in the right atrium and causes right atrial enlargement, which is a risk factor for atrial arrhythmias, such as AFib [26]. Our findings showed that pre and postprocedural AFib were not significantly associated with PAH severity and rPAH. TR, which often occurs secondary to pulmonary hypertension, can cause right ventricular remodeling and tricuspid annulus dilatation. Thus, TR progression is associated with severity of PAH and poor prognosis for PAH. However, in our study, TR severity was not related to PAH severity and rPAH.
This study shows the possibility of ASD closure in patients who were previously reluctant to undergo ASD closure due to severe PAH. Patients with severe PAH required a variety of treatment strategies. A “treat-and-repair” strategy could be an option. In addition, by observing changes in pulmonary pressure through the vasoreactivity test or balloon occlusion test during diagnostic catheterization, patients can be carefully selected for tcASD. Therefore, while device closure can be actively considered in patients with mild-to-moderate PAH, tcASD should be determined carefully for patients of old age and with severe PAH. In our study, balloon occlusion and pulmonary vasoreactivity tests were used to predict pulmonary pressure reversibility in patients with moderate-to-severe PAH; however, further studies are needed to develop a unified standard for patients with PAH.
In our study, eight patients underwent tcASD with a fenestrated device. All fenestration in device was spontaneously closed for about a month, indicating that the effect of fenestration was ambiguous. Further study should be performed to evaluate the specified effect of the fenestrated device.

5. Study Limitations

Our study has limitations that warrant consideration. First, our study was a retrospective study. We could not include all patients with ASD with PAH. The results may reflect a selection bias in that only patients who underwent tcASD were observed, excluding patients who underwent surgical closure and failed ASD closure. Second, the number of patients included in the study was small. Since all results of patients with ASD with PAH could not be represented, there were limitations in deriving results for predicting rPAH after tcASD. Third, we could not perform follow-up catheterization post-tcASD. In most cases, clinical symptoms improved after closure, so invasive evaluation such as catheterization was not performed in consideration of the risks and benefits. Since catheterization and follow-up PVR evaluation were performed in only a small number of patients, statistical comparison analysis could not be conducted. However, there is a limitation in evaluating rPAH only by echocardiogram after tcASD in that echocardiographic parameters are affected by TR and RV function.

6. Conclusions

In our study, risk factors for rPAH after procedure were age and high PVR. For ASD closure in patients with severe PAH, tcASD should be determined carefully and an approach through various treatment strategies is required. A “treat and repair strategy” might be an option. In addition, the patient should be carefully selected by the observation of PVR change through vasoreactivity and balloon occlusion tests, and then closure should be considered. For patients with a predictable poor prognosis, research on the risk assessment of ASD closure in patients with PAH will be needed for a more individualized treatment plan.
Our study showed that percutaneous suture ASD is feasible and may have substantial clinical benefits, even for patients with moderate-to-severe PAH. A prospective and randomized study is needed to clarify the indicators for ASD device closure indication in patients with increased risk.

7. Patients

Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design or conduct or reporting of this study.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm12072540/s1, Table S1. Summary of Patients on PAH treatment after device closure of atrial septal defects with severe PAH; Figure S1. Treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation; Figure S2. Clinical outcome after transcatheter closure for atrial septal defects; Figure S3. Treatment outcomes of severe pulmonary arterial hypertension patients; Figure S4. ROC curve analysis to predict rPAH post-tcASD closure.

Author Contributions

J.-Y.C. and N.-K.K. conceived and designed the study. E.-H.K. and I.-K.M. analyzed the data. All authors contributed to data interpretation. J.-H.S. and S.-Y.J. wrote the manuscript. J.-Y.C., N.-K.K., H.-B.L. and A.-Y.K. critically revised the manuscript, and all authors approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by a faculty research grant of Yonsei University College of Medicine (6-2018-0139), and by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (RS-2023-00212494).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Institutional Review Board of Severance Hospital approved this study (study approval number: 4-2021-0925). The requirement for informed consent was waived due to the study’s retrospective nature.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Van Der Linde, D.; Konings, E.E.; Slager, M.A.; Witsenburg, M.; Helbing, W.A.; Takkenberg, J.J.; Roos-Hesselink, J.W. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011, 58, 2241–2247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Vogel, M.; Berger, F.; Kramer, A.; Alexi-Meshkishvili, V.; Lange, P.E. Incidence of secondary pulmonary hypertension in adults with atrial septal or sinus venosus defects. Heart 1999, 82, 30–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Craig, R.J.; Selzer, A. Natural History and Prognosis of Atrial Septal Defect. Circulation 1968, 37, 805–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Zwijnenburg, R.D.; Baggen, V.J.; Geenen, L.W.; Voigt, K.R.; Roos-Hesselink, J.W.; Bosch, A.E.V.D. The prevalence of pulmonary arterial hypertension before and after atrial septal defect closure at adult age: A systematic review. Am. Heart J. 2018, 201, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Varma, C.; Benson, L.N.; Silversides, C.; Yip, J.; Warr, M.R.; Webb, G.; Siu, S.; McLaughlin, P.R. Outcomes and alternative techniques for device closure of the large secundum atrial septal defect. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2004, 61, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gabriels, C.; De Meester, P.; Pasquet, A.; De Backer, J.; Paelinck, B.P.; Morissens, M.; Van De Bruaene, A.; Delcroix, M.; Budts, W. A different view on predictors of pulmonary hypertension in secundum atrial septal defect. Int. J. Cardiol. 2014, 176, 833–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. D’Alto, M.; Mahadevan, V.S. Pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2012, 21, 328–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Baumgartner, H.; De Backer, J. The ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Adult Congenital Heart Disease 2020. Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 4153–4154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Stout, K.K.; Daniels, C.J.; Aboulhosn, J.A.; Bozkurt, B.; Broberg, C.S.; Colman, J.M.; .Crumb, S.R.; Dearani, J.A.; Fuller, S.; Gurvitz, M.; et al. 2018 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 73, e81–e192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Takaya, Y.; Akagi, T.; Sakamoto, I.; Kanazawa, H.; Nakazawa, G.; Murakami, T.; Yao, A.; Nanasato, M.; Saji, M.; Hirokami, M.; et al. Efficacy of treat-and-repair strategy for atrial septal defect with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Heart 2022, 108, 382–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Constantine, A.; Dimopoulos, K. Evaluating a strategy of PAH therapy pre-treatment in patients with atrial septal defects and pulmonary arterial hypertension to permit safe repair (“treat-and-repair”). Int. J. Cardiol. 2019, 291, 142–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kijima, Y.; Akagi, T.; Takaya, Y.; Akagi, S.; Nakagawa, K.; Kusano, K.; Sano, S.; Ito, H. Treat and Repair Strategy in Patients With Atrial Septal Defect and Significant Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Circ. J. 2016, 80, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Yong, G.; Khairy, P.; De Guise, P.; Dore, A.; Marcotte, F.; Mercier, L.A.; Noble, S.; Ibrahim, R. Pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients with transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects: A longitudinal study. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2009, 2, 455–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Veldtman, G.R.; Razack, V.; Siu, S.; El-Hajj, H.; Walker, F.; Webb, G.D.; Benson, L.N.; McLaughlin, P.R. Right ventricular form and function after percutaneous atrial septal defect device closure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2001, 37, 2108–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Monte, I.P.; Tropea, L.R.; Tamburino, C.; Deste, W.; Lavanco, V.; Mangiafico, S. Long-term results after percutaneous closure of atrial septal defect: Cardiac remodeling and quality of life. J. Cardiovasc. Echogr. 2013, 23, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Kefer, J.; Sluysmans, T.; Hermans, C.; El Khoury, R.; Lambert, C.; Van De Wyngaert, F.; Ovaert, C.; Pasquet, A. Percutaneous transcatheter closure of interatrial septal defect in adults: Procedural outcome and long-term results. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2012, 79, 322–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Altindag, T.; Roos-Hesselink, J.; Cuypers, J.; Van Domburg, R.; De Jaegere, P.; Meijboom, F.; Witsenburg, M. Transcatheter device closure of atrial septal defects in patients aged 40 years and older. Neth. Heart J. 2010, 18, 537–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Akseer, S.; Horlick, E.; Vishwanath, V.; Hobbes, B.; Huszti, E.; Mak, S.; Lee, D.S.; Abrahamyan, L. Prevalence and outcomes of pulmonary hypertension after percutaneous closure of atrial septal defect: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2020, 29, 200099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. McQuillan, B.M.; Picard, M.H.; Leavitt, M.; Weyman, A.E. Clinical Correlates and Reference Intervals for Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure Among Echocardiographically Normal Subjects. Circulation 2001, 104, 2797–2802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Balint, O.H.; Samman, A.; Haberer, K.; Tobe, L.; McLaughlin, P.; Siu, S.C.; Horlick, E.; Granton, J.; Silversides, C.K. Outcomes in patients with pulmonary hypertension undergoing percutaneous atrial septal defect closure. Heart 2008, 94, 1189–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schubert, S.; Peters, B.; Abdul-Khaliq, H.; Nagdyman, N.; Lange, P.; Ewert, P. Left ventricular conditioning in the elderly patient to prevent congestive heart failure after transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2005, 64, 333–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Al-Hindi, A.; Cao, Q.L.; Hijazi, Z.M. Transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defect in the elderly. J. Invasive Cardiol. 2009, 21, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Berner, M.; Beghetti, M.; Spahr-Schopfer, I.; Oberhansli, I.; Friedli, B. Inhaled nitric oxide to test the vasodilator capacity of the pulmonary vascular bed in children with long-standing pulmonary hypertension and congenital heart disease. Am. J. Cardiol. 1996, 77, 532–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Joung, B.; Lee, J.M.; Lee, K.H.; Kim, T.-H.; Choi, E.-K.; Lim, W.-H.; Kang, K.-W.; Shim, J.; Lim, H.E.; Park, J.; et al. 2018 Korean Guideline of Atrial Fibrillation Management. Korean Circ. J. 2018, 48, 1033–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Rudski, L.G.; Lai, W.W.; Afilalo, J.; Hua, L.; Handschumacher, M.D.; Chandrasekaran, K.; Solomon, S.D.; Louie, E.K.; Schiller, N.B. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: A report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2010, 23, 685–713. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Nyboe, C.; Karunanithi, Z.; Nielsen-Kudsk, J.E.; Hjortdal, V.E. Long-term mortality in patients with atrial septal defect: A nationwide cohort-study. Eur. Heart J. 2018, 39, 993–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wang, J.K.; Chiu, S.N.; Lin, M.T.; Chen, C.A.; Lu, C.W.; Wu, M.H. Transcatheter Closure of Atrial Septal Defect Associated With Pulmonary Artery Hypertension using Fenestrated Devices. Am. J. Cardiol. 2021, 147, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Satoh, A.; Katayama, K.; Hiro, T.; Yano, M.; Miura, T.; Kohno, M.; Fujii, T.; Matsuzaki, M. Effect of Right Ventricular Volume Overload on Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Patients With Atrial Septal Defect. Jpn. Circ. J. 1996, 60, 758–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Jcm 12 02540 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow chart of treatment and outcomes according to PAH severity in ASD patients. ASD, atrial septal defect; PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance; PASP pulmonary atrial systolic pressure.
Figure 1. Flow chart of treatment and outcomes according to PAH severity in ASD patients. ASD, atrial septal defect; PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance; PASP pulmonary atrial systolic pressure.
Jcm 12 02540 g001
Jcm 12 02540 g002 550
Figure 2. Treatment flow chart for patients with severe PAH. GI, gastrointestinal; PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Figure 2. Treatment flow chart for patients with severe PAH. GI, gastrointestinal; PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Jcm 12 02540 g002
Jcm 12 02540 g003 550
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier curves showing the cumulative rate of normalization of PAH according to pulmonary arterial systolic pressure. PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension; tcASD, transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect.
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier curves showing the cumulative rate of normalization of PAH according to pulmonary arterial systolic pressure. PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension; tcASD, transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect.
Jcm 12 02540 g003
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients with ASD according to the degree of PAH.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients with ASD according to the degree of PAH.
VariablesGroupp-Value
Mild
(N = 73)		Moderate
(N = 32)		Severe
(N = 14)		Overall
Age (years) at cath48.85 ± 13.0350.48 ± 17.7835.74 ± 13.470.0049 *
Wt (kg)61 (53, 70)54.5 (49.6, 63.0)51.5 (48.0, 57.0)0.0139 *
Ht (cm)161.68 ± 9.98159.14 ± 7.74160.50 ± 6.260.4159
BSA (m2)1.68 ± 0.201.59 ± 0.171.58 ± 0.140.0369 *
Sex 0.0479 *
  Male23 (31.5)8 (25.0)0 (0.0)
  Female50 (68.5)24 (75.0)14 (100.0)
Pre-procedural AFib13 (17.8)10 (31.3)5 (35.7)0.2360
ASD_size (mm)26.34 ± 6.3926.16 ± 6.7724.29 ± 7.030.5604
TR > GII10 (13.7)6 (19.4)2 (14.3)0.7596
MR > GI13 (17.8)7 (22.6)1 (7.1)0.4559
Pre-procedural
echo RVSP		43 (40, 52)59.5 (55.0, 67.0)89.5 (69.0, 110.0)<0.0001 *
PASP (mmHg)45 (40, 50)60.0 (51.0, 64.5)85.5 (74.0, 100.0)<0.0001 *
mPAP (mmHg)25 (25, 30)34 (30, 40)50 (42, 60)<0.0001 *
Qp/Qs2.54 (2.13, 3.29)2.40 (1.93, 2.83)1.67 (1.40, 2.28)0.0009 *
PVR (WU)3.32 (3.15, 3.48)5.56 (5.30, 6.21)8.45 (8.17, 9.12)<0.0001 *
NYHA <0.0001 *
  143 (58.9)6 (19.4)1 (7.1)
  225 (34.2)21 (67.7)7 (50.0)
  35 (6.8)4 (12.9)5 (35.7)
  40 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (7.1)
AFib, atrial fibrillation; ASD, atrial septal defect; BSA; body surface area; GI, grade I; GII, grade II; mPAP, mean pulmonary arterial pressure; MR, mitral regurgitation; NYHA, New York Heart Association functional class; PASP, pulmonary arterial systolic pressure; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance; Qp, pulmonary flow; Qs, systemic flow; RVSP, right ventricular systolic pressure; TR, tricuspid regurgitation. * p-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Table
Table 2. Hemodynamic and clinical outcomes post-tcASD.
Table 2. Hemodynamic and clinical outcomes post-tcASD.
Group p-Value
VariablesMild
(N = 73)		Moderate
(N = 32)		Severe
(N = 14)		Overall
Last follow-up RVSP32 (30, 33)36.0 (31.0, 40.5)50.5 (38.0, 69.0)<0.0001 *
Normalization 73 (100)18 (56.2)4 (28.6)<0.0001 *
Time to normalization (months)1.68 (0.43, 8.21)11.04 (5.29, 26.51)39.79 (25.49, 76.70)<0.0001 *
Persistent
severe PAH		2 (2.7)1 (3.2)3 (21.4)0.0274 *
Follow up months53.62 (23.77, 82.68)42.05 (29.84, 66.05)51.44 (40.70, 76.47)0.5870
MACEs †6 (8.2)12 (37.5)8 (57.1)<0.0001 *
Post-procedural AFib6 (8.2)5 (15.6)3 (21.4)0.2720
Last NYHA <0.0001 *
  157 (78.1)17 (54.8)6 (42.9)
  215 (20.5)13 (41.9)4 (28.6)
  31 (1.4)1 (3.2)4 (28.6)
Pul.vasodilator at last follow-up 0 (0.0)17 (53.1)10 (71.4)<0.0001 *
PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension; RVSP, right ventricular systolic pressure; tcASD, transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect. † Total MACEs 26 cases: 1 death, 1 stroke, 24 admissions (11 admissions for heart failure, 7 pulmonary. HTN aggravation, 6 arrhythmia). * p-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Table
Table 3. Comparison of baseline variables between groups with normalization and rPAH (normalization of PAH is defined as an estimated right ventricular systolic pressure < 40 mmHg).
Table 3. Comparison of baseline variables between groups with normalization and rPAH (normalization of PAH is defined as an estimated right ventricular systolic pressure < 40 mmHg).
VariablesNormalizationp-Value
No (n = 24)Yes (n = 95)
Age (years)58.66 (33.49, 69.41)47.64 (35.93, 57.82)0.1285
Weight (kg)52.05 (48.85, 61.70)59.00 (52.00, 69.00)0.0484 *
Height (cm)159.33 ± 8.06161.24 ± 9.290.3566
BSA (m2)1.55 (1.46, 1.64)1.62 (1.53, 1.80)0.0471 *
ASD-size (mm)24.95 ± 7.7026.33 ± 6.220.3623
Sex 0.5146
Male5 (20.8)26 (27.4)
Female19 (79.2)69 (72.6)
TR > GII7 (29.2)11 (11.7)0.0525
MR > G14 (16.7)17 (18.1)>0.999
PASP (mmHg)64.0 (54.5, 77.5)45.0 (40.0, 59.0)<0.0001 *
mPAP (mmHg)39 (29, 50)27 (25, 30)<0.0001 *
Qp/Qs2.19 (1.58, 2.74)2.46 (2.07, 3.13)0.0272 *
PVR (WU)6.45 (5.40, 8.45)3.40 (3.20, 4.85)<0.0001 *
Device_size28.0 (22.0, 32.5)30.0 (26.0, 34.0)0.2433
Pre-procedural AFib9 (37.5)19 (20.2)0.0980
AFib at last follow-up5 (20.0)9 (9.6)0.1500
MACEs 10 (40.0)16 (17.0)0.0130 *
NYHA <0.0001 *
  12 (8.3)48 (51.1)
  213 (54.2)40 (42.6)
  38 (33.3)6 (6.4)
  41 (4.2)0 (0.0)
Last NYHA <0.0001 *
  17 (29.2)73 (77.7)
  212 (50.0)20 (21.3)
  35 (20.8)1 (1.1)
AFib, atrial fibrillation; ASD, atrial septal defect; BSA, body surface area; MR, mitral regurgitation; NYHA, New York Heart Association functional class; MACEs, major adverse cardiovascular events; mPAP, mean pulmonary arterial systolic pressure; PASP, pulmonary arterial systolic pressure; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance; Qp, pulmonary flow; Qs, systemic flow; TR, tricuspid regurgitation; RVSP, right ventricular systolic pressure; tcASD, transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect. * p-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Table
Table 4. Univariate analysis for rPAH post-tcASD.
Table 4. Univariate analysis for rPAH post-tcASD.
VariablesOR95% CI Lower95% CI Upperp-Value
Age (years)1.0250.9941.0580.1149
Weight (kg)0.9840.9551.0130.2778
Height (cm)0.9760.9281.0270.3542
BSA (m2)0.0800.0061.1170.0604
Sex
1: Male1 (ref)
2: Female1.4320.4854.2300.5162
ASD_size0.9680.9041.0370.3599
Device_size0.9520.8901.0180.1485
PASP1.0741.0391.110<0.0001 *
Qp/Qs0.4750.2420.9330.0306 *
PVR (WU)2.6101.8113.760<0.0001 *
TR > GII3.1071.0539.1650.0400 *
MR > G10.9060.2742.9930.8712
pre-procedural AFib1.7680.8206.2330.1790
Post-procedural AFib1.3650.7504.270.2130
AFib, atrial fibrillation; ASD, atrial septal defect; BSA, body surface area; CI, confidence interval; MR, mitral regurgitation; NYHA, New York Heart Association functional class; OR, odds ratio; PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension; PASP, pulmonary arterial systolic pressure; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance; Qp, pulmonary flow; Qs, systemic flow; rPAH, remaining PAH; RVSP, right ventricular systolic pressure; TR, tricuspid regurgitation; tcASD, transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect. * p-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Table
Table 5. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of rPAH post-tcASD.
Table 5. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of rPAH post-tcASD.
VariablesOR95% CI Lower95% CI Upperp-Value
Age1.1141.0511.1800.0003 *
PVR4.6052.5488.323<0.0001 *
PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance. * p-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Seol, J.-H.; Jung, S.-Y.; Lee, H.-B.; Kim, A.-Y.; Kim, E.-H.; Min, I.-K.; Kim, N.-K.; Choi, J.-Y. Outcomes in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Underwent Transcatheter Closure of an Atrial Septal Defect. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 2540. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072540

AMA Style

Seol J-H, Jung S-Y, Lee H-B, Kim A-Y, Kim E-H, Min I-K, Kim N-K, Choi J-Y. Outcomes in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Underwent Transcatheter Closure of an Atrial Septal Defect. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(7):2540. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072540

Chicago/Turabian Style

Seol, Jae-Hee, Se-Yong Jung, Han-Byul Lee, Ah-Young Kim, Eun-Hwa Kim, In-Kyung Min, Nam-Kyun Kim, and Jae-Young Choi. 2023. "Outcomes in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Underwent Transcatheter Closure of an Atrial Septal Defect" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 7: 2540. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072540

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop