Next Article in Journal
Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation on Sediment Burial Parameters and Photo-Oxidative Response of the Intertidal Anemone Anthopleura hermaphroditica
Next Article in Special Issue
Air Pollution, Oxidative Stress, and the Risk of Development of Type 1 Diabetes
Previous Article in Journal
COX-2 Expression in Hepatocytes Improves Mitochondrial Function after Hepatic Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Genetic Variation in Antioxidant Response Modulates the Level of Oxidative Stress in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes and Poor Glycemic Control

Section of Pediatric Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics, and Gynecology, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani, 37126 Verona, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2022, 11(9), 1726; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11091726
Submission received: 25 July 2022 / Revised: 23 August 2022 / Accepted: 25 August 2022 / Published: 31 August 2022

Abstract

:
Background: The minor allele of the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs2364723 of NFE2L2, a gene encoding a master antioxidant transcription factor, has been associated with poor cardiovascular outcomes and with complications of type 2 diabetes. We assessed the association between rs2364723 of NFE2L2 and oxidative stress in children/adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods: In 384 children/adolescents with T1D (age 15.7 ± 3.2 years, 207 males), we assessed the oxidative stress by measuring the concentration of derivatives of reactive oxygen metabolites (d-ROMs) and we genotyped the rs2364723 SNP by real time polymerase chain reaction. Results: The concentration of d-ROMs was 372.8 ± 64.6 Carratelli units. The minor genotype (CC) of rs2364723 at NFE2L2 was associated with higher concentration of derivatives of d-ROMs in the subgroup with HbA1c ≥ 8% (B = 47.85, p for genotype ∗ HbA1c interaction = 0.019). Conclusions: The carriers of the minor genotype of rs2364723 may have increased oxidative stress compared to their counterparts with other genotypes, especially in case of poor glycemic control. This observation needs to be replicated and confirmed in larger independent cohorts of youth with T1D.

1. Introduction

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is characterized by micro- and macrovascular morbidity and mortality [1,2,3,4,5]. Oxidative stress, a well-known driver of inflammation/vascular damage and an accelerator of T1D complications in animal models, is increased in youth with T1D. Current and past glycemic control account for a limited portion of the interindividual variability of the oxidative stress of patients [6,7]. Improving our knowledge of what determines oxidative stress in T1D is of major importance since it would contribute to reveal the bases of the so-called “residual risk”, i.e., the vascular risk not accounted for by metabolic control and traditional risk factors. Therefore, novel knowledge about oxidative stress in T1D would provide novel potential therapeutic targets beyond glycemic control.
Genetic variation in the antioxidant response and its interaction with the glycemic control may explain part of the inter-individual variability of the oxidative stress of patients with T1D. Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2), encoded by NFE2L2, triggers a master first line response against oxidative stress because it enhances the transcription of tens of genes involved in the oxides neutralization, in response to a plethora of environmental or endogenous deviations in redox metabolism [8]. The suppression or activation of the NFR2 pathway has proved to favor or to inhibit the development of complications in animal models of T1D [6].
The genetic variation at NFE2L2 has been associated with vascular function (forearm blood flow), autonomic function (heart rate variability), major vascular events and type 2 diabetes complications in cohorts and case control sets of adults [9,10,11,12,13]. Especially, the minor allele of rs2364723, which is in complete linkage disequilibrium with the promoter SNP rs35652124, known to impede the NFE2L2 transcriptional activity, has been consistently associated with unfavorable outcomes [9,10,11,12,14,15]. We have previously observed that the concentration of serum derivatives of reactive oxygen metabolites (d-ROMs) is increased compared to healthy peers in a cohort of 412 children/adolescents with T1D [7]. Of these 412 patients, 384 were genotyped at the rs2364723 locus, and the minor genotype showed increased d-ROMs without statistical significance [7]. We have subsequently hypothesized that the genetic variation at NFE2L2 may influence the level of oxidative stress mainly when oxidative stressors are increased and the NFE2L2-triggered antioxidant response is required, like in the case of poor glycemic control. Therefore, we reanalyzed the variation in oxidative stress in relation to the NFE2L2 rs2364723 genotype, assessing if genotype and glycemic control interact in predicting the level of oxidative stress in children/adolescents with T1D.
To the best of our knowledge, no study has tested the interaction between NFE2L2 locus variation and glucose control as predictor of oxidative stress in people with T1D.
The aim of this brief communication is to report the results of the post hoc analysis we performed to assess if rs2364723 at the NFE2L2 locus and glycemic control interact in predicting oxidative stress in our cohort of children/adolescents with T1D.

2. Materials and Methods

We studied 384 children/adolescents with T1D (age 3.6–23.5 years) followed up at the Regional Center for Pediatric Diabetes of the University Hospital of Verona, Italy. The inclusion/exclusion criteria and the detailed study protocol have been previously reported [7]. All participants have had diabetes for at least two years and were out of partial remission, defined as insulin dose-adjusted glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (HbA1c% + 4 × insulin dose (U/kg/day) ≤ 9%) [16].
HbA1c was measured with Cobas b101 (Roche, Switzerland) by immunoturbidimetric assay. Derivatives of reactive oxygen metabolites (d-ROMs) concentration was measured with a commercial kit (Diacron, Italy). The derivative species were measured with a spectrophotometer giving a broad absorbance peak at ~505 nm. The color intensity obtained is directly proportional to the ROMs concentration in the sample. The measuring unit is the Carratelli unit (U-Carr) (1 U-Carr = 0.08 mg H2O2/dL). The genotype of rs2364723 was determined using pre-designed TaqMan probes (Applied Biosystem, Waltham, MA, USA), according to the manufacturers’ protocol, with QuantStudio TM 5 Real Time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (Applied Biosystem, Waltham, MA, USA. Assay identity: C___351878_10).
The day of d-ROMs and HbA1c measurements, all patients had a physical examination with the measurement of height and weight to determine the z-score of the body mass index (z-BMI) according to the World Health Organization (WHO) charts, and to exclude any acute illness [17].
All the parents/guardians of the participating children and adolescents and the participants above 18 years of age signed an informed consent to participate in the study which was approved by the Ethical Committee of the University Hospital of Verona.
According to their HbA1c, patients were divided into two groups: one under the value of 8% and the other with a value ≥8%, with 8% representing the median of the whole sample.
By general linear model, we determined if the rs2364723 genotype and the HbA1c category interact in predicting the concentration of d-ROMs, independently of gender, age and z-BMI. All the analyses were performed by IBM SPSS Statistics 24 package (IBM statistics).

3. Results

The concentration of d-ROMs was 372.8 ± 64.6 U-Carr. The rs2364723 genotypes were distributed as follows: GG: 210, G/C:147, CC: 27 in the total sample, GG: 116, G/C:87, CC: 15 in patients with HbA1c < 8% and GG: 94, G/C:60f, CC: 12 in patients with HbA1c ≥ 8%). The genotypes were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in the whole sample and in the HbA1c categories separately and the genotype distribution did not differ according to the genotype category (p = 0.76). Z-BMI (B = 11.29, p = 0.001) and being boys under 12 years of age (B for age ∗ gender interaction = 41.32, p = 0.018) predicted d-ROMs concentration, as previously reported [7]. The HbA1c category and rs2364723 were not associated with d-ROMs but their interaction was associated (Table 1 and Figure 1). In fact, patients who carried the rs2364723 CC genotype had a significantly higher concentration of d-ROMs compared to GG/GC carriers, in the subgroup with HbA1c ≥ 8% (B = 47.85, p = 0.019) (Table 1 and Figure 1).

4. Discussion and Conclusions

In our cohort of youth with T1D, the minor genotype of rs2364723 at the NFE2L2 locus increased the overall systemic oxidative stress by 47.85 U-carr, corresponding to 0.74 standard deviation among patients with poor glycemic control (HbA1c ≥ 8%). Despite this large effect size, it may be argued that the described interaction is not very relevant because the subgroup of patients with minor genotype and poor glycemic control included only 12 patients, corresponding to the 3.1% of the whole cohort. However, if confirmed in larger cohorts, the evidence of a deleterious effect of the minor genotype of rs2364723 on the oxidative stress of patients with poor glycemic control would have a significant relevance, especially in clinical contexts with a high prevalence of patients with poor glycemic control. The CC genotype of rs2364723 has been previously associated with major cardiovascular events and reduced heart rate variability [9,13]. Similar to our results, the minor allele of rs2364723 has been associated with the risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes of both Chinese and European ancestry [11,12]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study assessing the association between rs2364723 and any outcome in patients with T1D. It is plausible that a redox challenging condition like poor glycemic control amplifies the genetic inter-individual variability of any response induced by oxidative stress, like NRF2 cascade. The observed interaction is a proof of concept that genetic variability may significantly modulate the redox balance in patients with T1D, especially when glycemic control is poor. This implies that genetics, probably besides lifestyle variables, contributes to explain the slice of inter-patient variability in the oxidative stress that is not explained by glycemic control. Several NRF2 inducing drugs have been developed in recent years and have been tested with promising results in phase II and phase III trials against many chronic diseases accompanied by oxidative stress and against the complications of type 2 diabetes [8]. One of these molecules, dimethyl fumarate, has been approved by the Food and drug Administration for the treatment of multiple sclerosis and psoriasis [8]. As it has been established that NRF2 delays the progression of T1D complications in animal models, T1D is currently regarded as an ideal target for NFR2 enhancing therapies and it is expected that the number of clinical trials employing NFR2 inducing molecules in patients with T1D will rapidly multiply [6]. Once replicated in larger independent cohorts, the result of the present study would highlight that the patients carrying the minor genotype of rs2364723 represent a small subgroup that might mostly benefit from NFR2-inducing drugs, especially during periods of poor glycemic control.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M. and C.M.; methodology, A.M., M.C., C.Z. and S.C.; formal analysis, A.M.; investigation, A.M., C.P. and M.M.; data curation, A.M., C.P. and M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.; writing—review and editing, C.M. and C.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was funded by the University of Verona, Verona, Italy (grant name: FURMAFF).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of Verona (protocol code 13499, 2 March 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

All the parents or guardians of children and adolescents and all adult patients gave written informed consent to participate in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Silvia Orsi and Federica Emiliani for contributing to D-ROMs concentration measurement and NFE2L2 genotyping. We thank Giovanna Contreas, Alberto Sabbion, Elena Fornari and Francesca Olivieri for contributing to the dataset preparation. We thank Germana Mattivi, Chiara Bonomo, Francesca Perantoni and Sandra Mantovani for offering the best nursing care to patients and their families.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bebu, I.; Schade, D.; Braffett, B.; Kosiborod, M.; Lopes-Virella, M.; Soliman, E.Z.; Herman, W.H.; Bluemke, D.A.; Wallia, A.; DCCT/EDIC Research Group; et al. Risk Factors for First and Subsequent CVD Events in Type 1 Diabetes: The DCCT/EDIC Study. Diabetes Care 2020, 43, 867–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Miller, R.G.; Anderson, S.J.; Costacou, T.; Sekikawa, A.; Orchard, T. Hemoglobin A1c Level and Cardiovascular Disease Incidence in Persons with Type 1 Diabetes: An Application of Joint Modeling of Longitudinal and Time-to-Event Data in the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2018, 187, 1520–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Vistisen, D.; Andersen, G.S.; Hansen, C.S.; Hulman, A.; Henriksen, J.E.; Bech-Nielsen, H.; Jørgensen, M.E. Prediction of First Cardiovascular Disease Event in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: The Steno Type 1 Risk Engine. Circulation 2016, 133, 1058–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rawshani, A.; Rawshani, A.; Sattar, N.; Franzén, S.; McGuire, D.K.; Eliasson, B.; Svensson, A.-M.; Zethelius, B.; Miftaraj, M.; Rosengren, A.; et al. Range of Risk Factor Levels, Control, Mortality, and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Circulation 2017, 135, 1522–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gimeno Orna, J.A.; Ortez Toro, J.J.; Peteiro Miranda, C.M. Evaluation and management of residual cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes. Endocrinol. Diabetes Nutr. 2020, 67, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Negi, C.K.; Jena, G. Nrf2, a novel molecular target to reduce type 1 diabetes associated secondary complications: The basic considerations. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 843, 12–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Morandi, A.; Corradi, M.; Orsi, S.; Piona, C.; Zusi, C.; Costantini, S.; Marigliano, M.; Maffeis, C. Oxidative stress in youth with type 1 diabetes: Not only a matter of gender, age, and glycemic control. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2021, 179, 109007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Robledinos-Antón, N.; Fernández-Ginés, R.; Manda, G.; Cuadrado, A. Activators and Inhibitors of NRF2: A Review of Their Potential for Clinical Development. Oxid. Med. Cell Longevivity 2019, 2019, 9372182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zhang, Y.; Zheng, Q.; Chen, R.; Dai, X.; Zhu, Y.; Ma, L. Association of NFE2L2 Gene Polymorphisms with Risk and Clinical Characteristics of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection in Han Chinese Population. Oxid. Med. Cell Longevivity 2021, 2021, 5173190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Marczak, E.D.; Marzec, J.; Zeldin, D.C.; Kleeberger, S.R.; Brown, N.J.; Pretorius, M.; Lee, C.R. Polymorphisms in the transcription factor NRF2 and forearm vasodilator responses in humans. Pharm. Genom. 2012, 22, 620–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Xu, X.; Sun, J.; Chang, X.; Wang, J.; Luo, M.; Wintergerst, K.A.; Miao, L.; Cai, L. Genetic variants of nuclear factor erythroid-derived 2-like 2 associated with the complications in Han descents with type 2 diabetes mellitus of Northeast China. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2016, 20, 2078–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gómez-García, E.F.; Cortés-Sanabria, L.; Cueto-Manzano, A.M.; Vidal-Martínez, M.A.; Medina-Zavala, R.S.; López-Leal, J.; Rentería-Padilla, J.; Mendoza-Carrera, F. Association of Variants of the NFE2L2 Gene with Metabolic and Kidney Function Parameters in Patients with Diabetes and/or Hypertension. Genet. Test. Mol. Biomark. 2022. Online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Adam, M.; Imboden, M.; Schaffner, E.; Boes, E.; Kronenberg, F.; Pons, M.; Bettschart, R.; Barthelemy, J.-C.; Schindler, C.; Probst-Hensch, N. The adverse impact of obesity on heart rate variability is modified by a NFE2L2 gene variant: The SAPALDIA cohort. Int. J. Cardiol. 2017, 228, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Siedlinski, M.; Postma, D.S.; Boer, J.; van der Steege, G.; Schouten, J.P.; Smit, H.A.; Boezen, H.M. Level and course of FEV1 in relation to polymorphisms in NFE2L2 and KEAP1 in the general population. Respir Res. 2009, 10, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Marzec, J.M.; Christie, J.D.; Reddy, S.P.; Jedlicka, A.E.; Vuong, H.; Lanken, P.N.; Aplenc, R.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamamoto, M.; Cho, H.Y.; et al. Functional polymorphisms in the transcription factor NRF2 in humans increase the risk of acute lung injury. FASEB J. 2007, 21, 2237–2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mortensen, H.B.; Hougaard, P.; Swift, P.; Hansen, L.; Holl, R.W.; Hoey, H.; Bjoerndalen, H.; de Beaufort, C.; Chiarelli, F.; Danne, T.; et al. New Definition for the Partial Remission Period in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009, 32, 1384–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Onis, M.D.; Onyango, A.W.; Borghi, E.; Siyam, A.; Nishida, C.; Siekmann, J. Development of a WHO growth reference for school aged children and adolescents. Bull. World Health Organ. 2007, 85, 660–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Concentration of d-ROMs according to the category of glycemic control and to the rs2364723 genotype.
Figure 1. Concentration of d-ROMs according to the category of glycemic control and to the rs2364723 genotype.
Antioxidants 11 01726 g001
Table 1. Characteristics of the study participants according to their HbA1c category, their genotype at rs2364723.
Table 1. Characteristics of the study participants according to their HbA1c category, their genotype at rs2364723.
HbA1c < 8%HbA1c ≥ 8%P for HbA1c CategoryP for GenotypeP for HbA1c Categories + Genotype
Genotype at rs2364723Genotype at rs2364723
GG + GC (n = 203)CC (n = 15)Total (n = 218)GG+GC (n = 154)CC (n = 12)Total (n = 166)
d-ROMs (U-carr)368.3 (63.5)364.5 (43.6)368.1 (62.1)374.7 (65.7)421.1 (64.9)377.7 (66.5)0.120.150.019
Age (years)15.6 (3.7)15.8 (3.1)15.6 (3.7)15.8 (3.1)14.9 (4.0)15.7 (3.2)0.780.110.12
M/F115/8810/5125/9376/786/682/840.150.350.72
z-BMI0.38 (1.0)0.23 (0.7)0.37 (0.9)0.38 (0.9)0.49 (0.9)0.39 (0.9)0.610.910.40
Disease duration (years)8.2 (4.2)8.1 (3.6)8.2 (4.1)8.4 (3.8)8.0 (3.6)8.4 (3.8)0.270.760.89
HbA1c = Glycated A1c Hemoglobin; d-ROMs = derivatives of reactive oxygen metabolites; U-carr = Carratelli unit; M/F = males/females; z-BMI = z-score of body mass index.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Morandi, A.; Corradi, M.; Zusi, C.; Piona, C.; Costantini, S.; Marigliano, M.; Maffeis, C. Genetic Variation in Antioxidant Response Modulates the Level of Oxidative Stress in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes and Poor Glycemic Control. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1726. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11091726

AMA Style

Morandi A, Corradi M, Zusi C, Piona C, Costantini S, Marigliano M, Maffeis C. Genetic Variation in Antioxidant Response Modulates the Level of Oxidative Stress in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes and Poor Glycemic Control. Antioxidants. 2022; 11(9):1726. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11091726

Chicago/Turabian Style

Morandi, Anita, Massimiliano Corradi, Chiara Zusi, Claudia Piona, Silvia Costantini, Marco Marigliano, and Claudio Maffeis. 2022. "Genetic Variation in Antioxidant Response Modulates the Level of Oxidative Stress in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes and Poor Glycemic Control" Antioxidants 11, no. 9: 1726. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11091726

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop