Next Article in Journal
Molecular Mechanisms Related to Responses to Oxidative Stress and Antioxidative Therapies in COVID-19: A Systematic Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Antioxidant Potential of the Sweet Whey-Based Beverage Colada after the Digestive Process and Relationships with the Lipid and Protein Fractions
Previous Article in Journal
Oxidative and Inflammatory Imbalance in Placenta and Kidney of sFlt1-Induced Early-Onset Preeclampsia Rat Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Purification, Identification, and Properties of a Novel Carotenoid Produced by Arthrobacter sp. QL17 Isolated from Mount Qomolangma
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/antiox11081610
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Basic Cognition of Melatonin Regulation of Plant Growth under Salt Stress: A Meta-Analysis

by
Feiyu Yan
1,
Hongliang Zhao
1,
Longmei Wu
2,
Zhiwei Huang
1,
Yuan Niu
1,
Bo Qi
1,
Linqing Zhang
1,
Song Fan
1,
Yanfeng Ding
3,
Ganghua Li
3,* and
Guoliang Zhang
1,4,5,*
1
School of Life Sciences and Food Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai’an 223003, China
2
Rice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China
3
College of Agronomy, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210014, China
4
State Key Laboratory of Soil and Agricultural Sustainable Development, Nanjing 210008, China
5
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Attapulgite Clay Resource Utilization, Huai’an 223003, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2022, 11(8), 1610; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11081610
Submission received: 28 July 2022 / Revised: 15 August 2022 / Accepted: 18 August 2022 / Published: 19 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Advances in Antioxidant Ingredients from Natural Products)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Salt stress severely restricts the growth of plants and threatens the development of agriculture throughout the world. Worldwide studies have shown that exogenous melatonin (MT) can effectively improve the growth of plants under salt stress. Through a meta-analysis of 549 observations, this study first explored the effects of salt stress characteristics and MT application characteristics on MT regulated plant growth under salt stress. The results show that MT has a wide range of regulatory effects on plant growth indicators under salt stress, of which the regulatory effect on root indexes is the strongest, and this regulatory effect is not species-specific. The intensity of salt stress did not affect the positive effect of MT on plant growth, but the application effect of MT in soil was stronger than that in rooting medium. This meta-analysis also revealed that the foliar application of a concentration between 100–200 μM is the best condition for MT to enhance plant growth under salt stress. The results can inspire scientific research and practical production, while seeking the maximum improvement in plant salt tolerance under salt stress.

1. Introduction

Salt stress has seriously threatened the world’s agricultural production. Poor irrigation practices and excessive chemical fertilization have led to the occurrence of secondary salinization of cultivated land, which has seriously inhibited the growth and yield of crops [1,2]. Soil salinization affects about 10.00 × 109 hectares of land in the world, causing 7–8% productivity loss, becoming a key constraint to global crop production and a serious threat to food security [3]. Therefore, obtaining salt tolerance is very important for realizing the dual challenges of global food security and the sustainable development of modern agriculture [4,5]. Salt stress mainly affects plants through osmotic stress and ionic stress. Low water potential at the initial stage of plant stress leads to difficulty in water absorption by roots, resulting in water deficiency and osmotic stress similar to physiological drought. With the extension of stress duration, excessive sodium ions accumulate in cells, resulting in membrane rupture and cytoplasmic Na+/K+ ion imbalance [6]. These primary stresses will lead to secondary oxidative stresses, nutritional imbalance, and hormone imbalance. Secondary effects collectively lead to the overgeneration of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [7]. Although the production of ROS is a common phenomenon and a part of plant cell metabolism, environmental stress will lead to the excessive production of ROS. ROS are not only highly reactive, but also toxic in nature, and will damage lipids, proteins, carbohydrates and DNA [8]. Recent studies have shown that ROS plays a dual role in plants; whether they act as signaling molecules or as stressors depends on the critical balance between ROS production and clearance [9]. However, excessive ROS accumulation is always harmful to plants; through the combined action of primary stress and secondary stress, salt stress affects the physiological activities of plants, such as photosynthesis, carbon and nitrogen metabolism, respiration, and protein synthesis. The changes of plant physiological activities under salt stress lead to the slowdown of plant growth. Under the condition of salt stress, the ion-independent growth decreased in a few minutes to a few days, which mainly led to the inhibition of cell expansion in shoots. The accumulation of salt stress injury on plant physiological activities will further lead to the decline in growth parameters [10,11,12]. Salt treatment resulted in a significant decrease in plant height, root length and dry weight, the fresh and dry weight of cotton seedlings [13], and the seed germination rate of wheat varieties [14]. After salt stress, the growth inhibition of resistant varieties was significantly lower than that of sensitive varieties [15,16]. Taking rice as an example, under 100 mM NaCl stress, the dry weight of resistant varieties decreased by 19.23%, while that of sensitive varieties decreased by 49.38% [17]. Tomato and pepper plants grown under salt stress experienced a decline in dry weight and plant height [18,19]. In addition, germination of seeds faces serious limitations upon exposure to salt stress. Root growth is more susceptible to salt conditions than stem growth, but both are affected, which is a reasonable index of salt damage. Root and shoot lengths are two indicators of rice plant response to salt stress [20]. The change in plant growth parameters is the most intuitive expression of plant stress growth.
Plant hormones are signaling molecules that play a crucial role in plant growth and development [21]. Applying exogenous plant hormones to salt stressed plants can alleviate the negative effects of salt stress on physiological activities and growth. The use of plant hormones to improve plant salt tolerance has also received extensive attention [22]. Melatonin (MT) is a small molecule substance with multiple regulatory effects in plants and animals. It was first discovered in the hypothalamus of cattle in 1958 and also in plants in the 1990s [23]. Recently, the identification of the first putative plant MT receptor in Arabidopsis suggests that MT could be a plant hormone [24,25]. MT enhances plant tolerance to salt stress in two ways. One is through direct impact—the molecular structure of MT enables it to provide electrons to ROS. Unlike other traditional antioxidants, MT molecules can scavenge up to eight or more ROS through the free radical scavenging cascade [26]. MT can also indirectly scavenge ROS by activating antioxidant enzymes and the glutathione-ascorbate cycle, and increasing the expression of antioxidant enzyme genes under stress conditions [27]. The other is through indirect impact—by enhancing the activity of antioxidant enzymes, photosynthetic efficiency, and metabolite content, and by regulating stress-related transcription factors [28]. In addition, MT can affect plant performance by affecting gene expression. Other precursors and metabolites related to MT, such as tryptophan and 5-hydroxylas, can also improve the tolerance of plants to salt stress [29]. Salt stress results in the rapid accumulation of MT in plants [30]. Recent studies have shown that MT plays an important role in regulating plant reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen signals under salt stress [31,32].
In view of its excellent antioxidant capacity and the ability to regulate plant growth, exogenous MT has been widely reported to enable plants to cope with a variety of stresses [33,34]. However, there are still many basic points that have not been clarified, which leads to the fact that MT regulates plant salt tolerance in the laboratory, but it is difficult to evaluate the actual production. Studies have shown that MT has the ability to effectively alleviate salt stress in food crops [35], horticultural crops [36], and cash crops [37], but no study has reported whether there is species-specific regulation of plant salt tolerance by MT. Similarly, MT has been reported to widely regulate plant growth parameters under salt stress [38], including dry weight, fresh weight, plant height, root length, leaf area, and root surface area. However, it is not clear whether MT has a specific regulatory effect on growth parameters. MT plays an important role in the regulation of plant growth and development. At the same time, MT is also considered an important regulator for plants to cope with stress, and some studies have discussed the function of MT as a plant growth regulator or a plant stress stimulant [39], but did not clearly explain which of the above two functions MT focuses on. MT has been used to enable plants to cope with various levels of salt stress [40], but there is no report exploring whether the regulation effect of MT is affected by stress intensity. MT has been applied to plants through seed soaking, spraying, seed priming, and other methods [40,41], but there is no study on the effects of various application methods. Similarly, the optimal concentration of MT for regulating plant growth under salt stress has not been reported. Even for the same plant, the concentration difference of MT applied by different scholars can reach 200 times [42,43]. These problems make it difficult for MT to move from the laboratory to actual production.
Meta analysis is a quantitative statistical model which systematically analyzes the complex factors that affect related dependent variables [44]. Since these variables are conclusions drawn from published articles, meta-analysis improves the objectivity of the systematic evaluation of independent empirical research. Therefore, this study used meta-analysis methods to explore whether there is species specificity in MT regulating plant growth under salt stress, to explore the effects of salt stress characteristics on MT regulation of plant growth under salt stress, and to determine the best application method and concentration of MT to improve plant growth under salt stress. The results of this meta-analysis are of great significance to guide the regulation of plant salt tolerance by MT. At the same time, the results presented in this study highlight the areas that need further research.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Literature Survey and Selection

This is a meta-analysis study on melatonin regulating plant growth under salt stress. In this study, we followed the PRISMA 2020 statement [45]. On 15 March 2022, different scientific literature tools (Web of Science, Science Direct, Springer Link, and Pubmed) were used to search for various keywords (melatonin, phytomelatonin, salinity, salt stress, salt tolerance, plants), focusing on the regulation of exogenous MT on plant growth parameters under salt stress. The specific retrieval process is shown in Figure 1. The search yielded 1515 English articles. Articles were included or excluded according to a three-step procedure. In the first step, we first excluded duplicate articles through the literature management software (Endenote X9, Thomson ResearchSoft, Stanford, CA, USA), and then manually excluded duplicate articles, leaving 302 articles. After that, we deleted the non-original research papers, and determine whether the main body of the article included literature related to the MT regulation of plant growth under salt stress according to the title, abstract and key words, and screening parameters, retaining 115 papers. In the second step, the remaining articles were screened based on whether they met the following conditions: the degree of salt stress remained stable during the experiment, exogenous MT treatment was used, repetition was set in the experiment, data dispersion was reported, and the article provided any of the plant growth parameters after MT treatment, leaving 42 qualified articles (Table A1). In the third step, data related to growth parameters was extracted and analyzed. The literature survey and selection were conducted manually by two reviewers, working independently under the supervision and guidance of the lead author; no workflow management platform/software was used.

2.2. Data Extraction

In each article, the average value, error term (SD or SE), sample size (n), and replication of growth parameters of plants in the control group and exogenous MT treatment group were recorded in the database. For the data in text and tables, we directly extracted these. For the data in graphs, we used data extraction software (WebPlotDigitizer, version 4.5, https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer/, accessed on 1 May 2022) [46] to extract the digitized value, with an accuracy of ±1% relative to the actual value. For the measured values at different times of the same test, we only included the results of the last measurement. For the study of multiple MT concentration treatments and a common control, or different levels of salt stress set in the same study, we regarded these as statistically independent, and we extracted the data separately [47].
In addition, we also extracted the plant species in each study, the concentration of sodium chloride used to produce salt stress, the method of salt stress application, the concentration of exogenous MT, the method of exogenous MT application, and the type of growth parameter indicators used to evaluate plant salt tolerance. Based on the above extraction rules, we extracted 549 observations from 42 articles.

2.3. Meta-Analysis

2.3.1. Effect Sizes

The meta-analysis was performed using STATA 17 software (http://www.stata.com, accessed on 1 May 2022). In order to study the regulatory effect of exogenous MT on plant growth parameters under salt stress, a random effect meta-analysis was used. We used the natural log of the response ratio (LnR) as a measure of the effect size (ES) [48]:
lnR = ln(Xt/Xc) = lnXt − lnXc
where Xt and Xc are the measured values of plant growth parameters under MT treatment and MT-free treatment, respectively.
The variance (V) of the corresponding index effect value (lnR) was calculated as [49]:
V = St2/NtXt2 + St2/NtXt2
where St is the standard deviation of plant growth parameters with MT, Sc is the standard deviation of plant growth parameters without MT, Nt is the sample size of plant growth parameters with MT, and Nc is the sample size of plant growth parameters without MT.
Subsequently, the log response ratios were combined across the studies using a weighting procedure. The mean effect size (ln R ¯ ) was calculated as follows [50]:
ln R ¯ = ∑ i = 1 k W i ln R i / ∑ i = 1 k W i           W i = 1 / V i
where lnRi is the average effect size; Wi is the weight of i, that is the reciprocal of sample variance vi; LnRi is the logarithmic response ratio of i; and k is the number of statistical studies.

2.3.2. Heterogeneity Test

During meta-analysis, it is necessary to carry out a heterogeneity test (q test) on the collected relevant data to test whether there is heterogeneity in the sample data. If p > 0.05 (chi-squared distribution test), it indicates that there is no heterogeneity in the data, and the fixed effect model is selected; if p < 0.05 (chi-squared distribution test), it indicates that the data is heterogeneous; therefore, the random effect model should be used and subgroup analysis should be conducted to explore the source of heterogeneity [51].
In this study, the bias test was conducted on the collected yield data. The frequency distribution of the effect value of plant growth parameters was fitted to a Gaussian function. According to the K–S (Kolmogorov–Smirnov) test (Figure A1), the frequency distribution of the effect value of plant growth parameters did not obey the normal distribution (p < 0.01). Therefore, this paper uses the comprehensive effect value (ln R ¯ ) and 95% confidence interval generated by the nonparametric estimation method (bootstrapping) for data analysis.

2.3.3. Meta Subgroup Analysis

For better identifying the potential interactive effects, plant species were divided into 18 categories, and salt stress conditions were divided into salt stress and normal condition. We also grouped them according to the concentration of NaCl that produces salt stress. The application of salt stress was grouped into two types, exogenous MT concentrations were divided into nine groups, MT was treated in four ways, and the growth parameters were divided into four categories. See Table 1 for specific categories.
Through meta subgroup analysis, the explanatory variables of each group were studied. The results showed that, except for the presence or absence of salt and the type of growth parameters, other grouping methods significantly (p-value < 0.0001) affected the MT regulation of plant growth under salt stress (Table 2).

2.3.4. Publication Bias Test

To clarify the publication bias, the fail-safe numbers were presented. A fail-safe number N > 5n + 10 (N = 1,775,954.1, n = 549) indicated that the result had no publication bias [52]. At the same time, we also conducted Egger’s test (Table A2), and the result showed that p < 0.05, which indicates that there may be publication bias. Therefore, we carried out the nonparametric trim-and-fill analysis of publication bias, and the results showed that adding another 104 studies had no significant impact on the results (Figure A2, Table A3), indicating that the results of this meta-analysis were effective.

2.4. Statistics

The meta-analysis was performed using STATA 17 software (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas, USA). Graphics were drawn using STATA or Graphpad prism (Graphpad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Overall Response of Plant Growth to Exogenous MT

According to the collected studies, compared with no application of exogenous MT, the application of MT significantly improved the plant growth parameters, and the comprehensive effect size was 0.178 (95% CI: 0.154–0.202). According to the contour map, a low concentration of exogenous MT (0–50 μM) had a weak regulatory effect on growth parameters. The surface fitted with a quintic equation of all data also showed similar results: a high concentration of MT had a strong positive regulatory effect on growth parameters (Figure 2).

3.2. The Difference in Response of Growth Parameters to Exogenous MT

Exogenous MT significantly (p < 0.05) promoted other plant growth parameters, except for stem diameter, root diameter, and root surface. The effect value of the root dry weight group was the largest (0.305, CI: 0.228–0.382) (Figure 3A). MT had the strongest effect on root indexes (ES: 0.219, CI: 0.181–0.258) and the weakest effect on whole plant indexes (ES: 0.076, CI: −0.033–0.185) (Figure 3B).

3.3. The Response of Plant Species to Exogenous MT

Among all the plants included in the study, MT significantly (p < 0.05) promoted the growth parameters of 12 plants (Avena nuda (naked oat), Cucumis melon (melon), Cucumis sativus (cucumber), Dracocephalum kotschyi (Savannah obedient-plant), Gossypium hirsutum (cotton), Limonium bicolor (statice bicolor), Medicago sativa (alfalfa), Oryza sativa (rice), Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean), Solanum lycopersicum (tomato), Triticum aestivum (wheat), Zea mays (maize)), but not Avena sativa (oat), Brassica napus (rapeseed), Helianthus annuus (sunflower), Hordeum vulgare (barley), Malus hupehensis (tea crabapple) and Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni (candyleaf). Among these, MT had the strongest regulatory effect on the growth of Avena nuda (ES: 0.322, CI: 0.181–0.463) and the weakest regulatory effect on Gossypium hirsutum (ES: 0.114, CI: 0.06–0.0.167). The fluctuation range of effect value was small, and MT did not show specificity in regulating the growth of the plants included in the study (Figure 4).

3.4. The Effect of Salt Stress Intensity and Rooting Environment

The regulatory effect of MT on the growth of plants growing in soil is significantly stronger than that of plants growing in rooting medium (Figure 5A). Whether under salt stress or a normal environment, exogenous MT showed a significant promoting effect on plant growth, and there was no significant difference between the two environments. After grouping for salt stress, it was found that when the concentration of sodium chloride was 250 mM–300 mM, the promoting effect of MT on plant growth was significantly higher than that at other concentrations (Figure 5C). There was no significant difference between the effect values of other concentrations.

3.5. The Effect of MT Concentration and Application Method

When the concentration of MT was greater than 1 μM, MT showed a significant effect on the growth of plants under salt stress, and this effect increased with the increase in concentration. The effect value of the 300–400 μM group was the largest, which was 0.763 (CI: 0.371–1.154), but when the concentration reached 400–500 μM, the effect value showed a downward trend (Figure 6A). Under various application methods, MT showed significant effects on the regulation of plant growth under salt stress. The effect value of MT added to the culture medium by seed soaking and spraying was significantly higher than that of the seed priming group, and the effect value of the spraying group was the largest (0.252, CI: 0.217–0.288) (Figure 6B).

4. Discussion

4.1. Effect of MT on Plant Growth under Salt Stress

MT has a wide range of regulatory effects on the growth of different plants (Figure 4), and the content of endogenous MT in many plants is significantly increased after being treated with exogenous MT, which indicates that there is a common response mechanism of exogenous MT in plants [53,54]. Salt stress also increased the content of endogenous MT in plants. MT showed a significant positive regulatory effect on the growth parameters and germination indexes of plants under salt stress (Figure 2 and Figure 3).
However, the subgroup analysis showed that MT had the strongest regulatory effect on root indexes (Figure 3B). The root is the first plant organ that contacts, senses, and responds to soil salinity [55], playing an important role in plants’ response to salt stress. Compared with aboveground parts, the root system is less inhibited by salt [56]. Although moderate salt stress may stimulate the growth of roots, higher stress levels are usually related to the decline in root development. The developed root system is conducive to the absorption of water and nutrients, and sodium ions are mainly discharged through the root tip SOS pathway [57]. The developed root system is also conducive to the discharge of toxic sodium ions [58]. The results showed that salt tolerant olive varieties could maintain higher fine root biomass and increased water conductivity under salt stress [59]. Similarly, salt tolerant rice, wheat, and maize also have larger root biomass and surface area [60,61,62]. Extensive studies have shown that MT is a key molecule for root growth and development [63]; this is mainly because MT can reduce ionic toxicity, osmotic stress, and oxidative stress, thereby enhancing the antioxidant system, photosynthesis, and glucose metabolism [64].
Our previous research results showed that MT not only increased the biomass of rice roots, but also promoted the Na+ efflux and potassium ion internal flow in roots [65], and alleviated the oxidative damage of roots [66]. The results showed that the most abundant MT response genes in the root system of Phaseolus vulgaris under salt stress were mainly involved in transcription regulation, the redox process, transcription factor activity, and oxidoreductase activity [67]. MT regulates caspase-3-like activity and programmed cell death-related gene expression in alfalfa roots under salt stress [68]. Hydrogen sulfide can alleviate the inhibition of root growth caused by salt stress, which can be enhanced by MT because MT regulates hydrogen sulfide homeostasis and L-cysteine desulfurase activity [69]. The results of the subgroup analysis also showed that exogenous MT had a significant positive regulatory effect on germination indexes (Figure 3B). Seed germination is a key stage in the plant life cycle. At this stage, static seeds are transformed into highly active seedlings. Most plant species are sensitive to salt stress at the early stage of seed germination and seedling establishment [70]. The results showed that MT regulated the expression of abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellin (GA) genes in the plant signal transduction pathways, induced cotton seed radicle development and germination, and alleviated dormancy [13]. Similar results were obtained in the study of Limonium bicolor. The seeds pretreated with MT contained high levels of MT and GA, low levels of ABA, and high levels of amylase and α-amylase activity. MT also plays a regulatory role in GA and ABA biosynthesis-related genes [41]. The results showed that the activities of antioxidant enzymes, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD), in MT pretreated seeds significantly increased by about 1.3–5.0 fold, while the Cu-Zn SOD, Fe-Zn SOD, CAT, and POD increased by 1.4–2.0 fold [71]. In general, MT showed a wide range of regulatory effects on plant growth indicators under salt stress, but the results of this meta-analysis showed that MT had the strongest regulatory effect on root-related indicators.

4.2. Effects of Salt Stress Characteristics on MT Regulation of Plant Growth under Salt Stress

Various characteristics of salt stress significantly affect the salt tolerance of plants. For example, the higher the salt concentration, and the longer the exposure to salt stress, the worse the tolerance of plants, and the more serious the damage [72]. Similarly, salt characteristics can also affect the regulatory effects of exogenous hormones or regulators on plant stress tolerance. The results showed that under 50 mM salt stress, the shoot dry weight of pistachio plants treated with MT increased by 16.6% compared with that without MT treatment, but when the salt stress concentration increased to 150 mM, the increase rate was 32.8% [73]. In many plants, it has been observed that the absolute effect of MT on regulating growth changes with the increase in salt stress [40,74], but this phenomenon has not been systematically studied. The results of the subgroup analysis in this study show that the application mode of salt stress (soil or rooting medium) affects the effect of MT on regulating plant growth under salt stress. When MT is applied to plants planted in soil, its regulation effect is significantly greater than that applied to plants in rooting medium (Figure 5A). These observations may indicate that MT applied to field crops is more effective than MT applies to hydroponic crops in the factory, but so far, there is no relevant report regarding this issue. We infer that this may be due to more environmental stress factors in the field and the greater potential for crop growth improvement [75]. Factory hydroponics can precisely control the growth conditions of plants [76], and there is little room for plant growth to be improved. This hypothesis requiures further research to explore and confirm.
In the initial research, MT, an endogenous growth regulatory signal in crops, has attracted much attention [29]. With the deepening of research, some scholars have discussed the function of MT as a plant growth regulator and biological stimulant [24,39,77]. They have focused on the MT regulation of the growth of roots, shoots, and explants to activate seed germination and rooting. The antioxidation of MT partially explains the fact that it enhances the ability of plants to withstand abiotic stress [78], and scholars believe that MT is a candidate drug for the natural biological stimulation treatment of field crops [79]. In recent years, the discussion about MT has mainly focused on the fact that MT provides a wide range of stress regulation in plants and the perfection of the evidence of MT as a plant hormone [27,80,81]. Based on the results of this study, we believe that MT does not show stress specificity in the function of regulating plant growth; that is, the relative effect of MT on plant growth regulation is not affected by the presence of intensity of salt stress (Figure 5). This means that MT can be used to promote plant growth under normal growth conditions and improve plant tolerance under adverse conditions.
Extensive studies have also proved this view. Melatonin plays an active role in regulating plants to cope with oxidative stress [26], drought stress [82], and chilling stress [83]. However, the existing studies pay less attention to the practical application factors of MT, such as concentration and application methods, and have not formed a consistent opinion.

4.3. Suitable Concentration Range and Application Method of MT in Regulating Plant Growth under Salt Stress

The use of MT to regulate plant growth under salt stress has been widely studied. Different application methods and concentrations have been reported to effectively improve plant growth under salt stress, but the application characteristics of MT in different reports are quite different. For example, for the seedling stage of cotton, some studies reported that 0.1 μM [30] showed a significant growth promoting effect. However, some studies have shown that it still has the effect of promoting growth when the concentration is as high as 200 μM [84]. For different crops, the reported effective concentration difference is as high as hundreds of times that level. This large span of effective concentration indicates the universality of MT in regulating plant growth, but it also generates problems regarding the application of MT in actual production. The results of the subgroup analysis in this study showed that the effect value of MT regulation of plant growth under salt stress increased with the increase in MT concentration, and the maximum effect value appeared in the MT concentration of 300–400 μM, but when the MT concentration was greater than 100 μM, there was no significant difference between the effect values of each concentration (Figure 6A). In addition, high concentrations of plant hormones will inhibit growth. Considering the cost of MT application in actual production, we believe that the appropriate concentration of MT for regulating plant growth under salt stress is 100–200 μM; excessive concentration may lead to the occurrence of an inhibitory effect and also incur huge application costs.
The subgroup analysis showed that the effect value of the seed priming treatment group was the smallest (Figure 6B). However, seed priming is still a seed treatment technology worthy of promotion because seed priming with plant hormones can improve plant growth and yield and reduce the impact of environmental pressure [85]. However, this innovation has received little attention from farmers. MT priming has also been used to improve the salt tolerance of cotton [86], drought tolerance of rapeseed [82] and cold tolerance of maize [83]. However, MT concentration and start-up duration may vary from crop to crop. Excessive initiation of seeds for a longer time may lead to drying and decomposition of seeds, or inactivation of seeds due to bacterial infection [87]. Future studies need to further clarify the pathways and effects involved in priming duration and MT concentration.
Studies have shown that when MT is applied to improve the cold tolerance of rice, the effect of spraying is weaker than that provided by soaking seeds and immersing roots [88]. On the other hand, the subgroup analysis results of this study showed that the effect value of the spraying treatment group was the highest (Figure 6B), which indicated that spraying might be the best way to apply MT in actual production. However, future research needs to further study the absorption and transport mechanism of plant exogenous MT, which would be conducive to providing theoretical guidance for bringing MT from the laboratory into production. The research in this area is still blank at present. In general, the results of this study show that spraying MT at a concentration of 100–200 μM is the most effective way to improve plant growth under salt stress.

5. Conclusions

Based on 549 observations from 42 articles, this meta-analysis has shown that exogenous MT can effectively improve plant growth under salt stress. MT has a wide range of regulatory effects on plant growth indicators under salt stress, of which the regulatory effect on root indicators is the strongest, and this regulatory effect is not species-specific. The intensity of salt stress did not affect the positive effect of MT on plant growth, but the application effect of MT in soil was stronger than that in rooting medium. This meta-analysis also revealed that the foliar spraying application of a concentration between 100–200 μM is the best condition for MT to enhance plant growth under salt stress. These results are of great significance to promote the application of MT in practical production. The research results can inspire scientific research and practical production, while seeking the maximum improvement of plant salt tolerance under salt stress. However, most of the current studies focus on the direct regulation of plant growth by MT, and there are few studies on indirect regulation pathways, such as soil microorganisms. In addition, there are no reports on the economic benefits of the MT regulation of plant salt tolerance. The solution to these problems in the future would be conducive to regulating plant salt tolerance through moving MT treatment from the laboratory to production.

Author Contributions

G.Z. and G.L. conceived and designed the study; F.Y. performed the study and wrote the manuscript; H.Z., L.W., Z.H., Y.N., B.Q., L.Z., S.F. and Y.D. assisted in the entire study process. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31771736), the National Programs for Coordinated Promotion of Major Agricultural Technologies (Grant No. 2021-ZYXT-02-1), Key Projects of Key research and Development Programs of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BE2021323), the Jiangsu Overseas Visiting Scholar Program for University Prominent Young and Middle-aged Teachers (Grant No. 2017), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20201068), and the Rural Revitalization Project of Huai’an (Grant No. HAN202112).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Antioxidants 11 01610 g0a1 550
Figure A1. Frequency distribution (A) and QQ plot (B) of effect size of melatonin on plant growth under salt stress.
Figure A1. Frequency distribution (A) and QQ plot (B) of effect size of melatonin on plant growth under salt stress.
Antioxidants 11 01610 g0a1
Antioxidants 11 01610 g0a2 550
Figure A2. Funnel diagram generated (A) by Egger’s test and (B) funnel diagram after trim-and-fill.
Figure A2. Funnel diagram generated (A) by Egger’s test and (B) funnel diagram after trim-and-fill.
Antioxidants 11 01610 g0a2
Antioxidants 11 01610 g0a3 550
Figure A3. The surface graph formed by the effect size after five−dimensional fitting.
Figure A3. The surface graph formed by the effect size after five−dimensional fitting.
Antioxidants 11 01610 g0a3
Table
Table A1. Overview of the studies used for this meta-analysis.
Table A1. Overview of the studies used for this meta-analysis.
Study NumberPlant SpeciesPlant Sample Planting MediumSalt Stress
Concentration		Melatonin
Concentration		Melatonin
Treatment		Measurement
Index
1Avena nudaNutrition liquid0; 15050; 100Added to the rooting mediumPlant height; dry weight; fresh weight; stem diameter
2Avena sativaNutrition liquid0; 300100Added to the rooting mediumFresh weight; plant height; root length
3Brassica napusNutrition liquid12550Added to the rooting mediumPlant height; fresh weight
4Brassica napusNutrition liquid0; 2000.01; 0.1; 1; 10; 100Added to the rooting mediumRoot fresh weight; root length
5Brassica napusNutrition liquid12830; 45; 60; 75; 100Added to the rooting mediumShoot dry weight; root dry weight; shoot fresh weight; root fresh weight; plant height; root length; leaf area
6Cucumis melonNutrition liquid100100Added to the rooting mediumShoot dry weight; root dry weight; plant height
7Cucumis sativusNutrition liquid0; 200100Added to the rooting mediumPlant height; leaf area; dry weight; fresh weight
8Dracocephalum kotschyiSoil0; 30100; 200Added to the rooting mediumDry weight
9Gossypium hirsutumNutrition liquid15050; 100; 200; 500Foliar applicationShoot dry weight; root dry weight;
shoot fresh weight; root fresh weight
10Gossypium hirsutumNutrition liquid10025; 50; 75Seed primingRoot length; leaf area
11Gossypium hirsutumNutrition liquid0; 1000.1; 0.5; 1; 10; 50Added to the rooting mediumPlant height; root length; shoot fresh weight; root fresh weight
12Gossypium hirsutumNutrition liquid15020Added to the rooting mediumgermination percentage; plant height
13Gossypium hirsutumNutrition liquid15010; 20; 50; 100Seed priminggermination percentage
14Helianthus annuusNutrition liquid0; 1205; 15; 30; 45Added to the rooting mediumfresh weight
15Hordeum vulgareNutrition liquid0; 6020Seed soakingPlant height; fresh weight
16Limonium bicolorNutrition liquid0; 3005Added to the rooting mediumFresh weight; leaf area; number of blades; plant height; root length
17Limonium bicolorNutrition liquid0; 3005Added to the rooting mediumShoot dry weight
18Limonium bicolorNutrition liquid0; 100; 2001; 50; 100; 200; 300; 500Seed primingGermination percentage; germination potential
19Malus hupehensisNutrition liquid0; 2000.1Added to the rooting mediumPlant height; dry weight
20Medicago sativaNutrition liquid250150Added to the rooting mediumGermination percentage
21Medicago sativaNutrition liquid2001; 10; 50; 100; 500Added to the rooting mediumGermination percentage; fresh weight; root length
22Oryza sativaNutrition liquid15050; 100; 200Foliar applicationDry weight
23Oryza sativaNutrition liquid150200Foliar applicationShoot dry weight; root dry weight;
shoot fresh weight; root fresh weight
24Oryza sativaNutrition liquid50; 10025; 50; 100; 200; 300; 400Foliar applicationDry weight; plant height
25Oryza sativaNutrition liquid0; 15050; 100; 200Foliar applicationdry weight; fresh weight
26Oryza sativaNutrition liquid12010; 50; 100; 200; 500Added to the rooting mediumGermination potential; fresh weight
27Oryza sativaNutrition liquid1005Seed soakingGermination percentage
28Phaseolus vulgarisNutrition liquid0; 68.38100Seed soakingRoot length; root surface area
29Phaseolus vulgarisNutrition liquid0; 200150Added to the rooting mediumDry weight; fresh weight
30Solanum lycopersicumNutrition liquid1501; 50; 100; 150; 200Added to the rooting mediumShoot dry weight; root dry weight; shoot fresh weight; root fresh weight; plant height
31Solanum lycopersicumNutrition liquid0; 10020; 50Added to the rooting mediumShoot dry weight; root dry weight; shoot fresh weight; root fresh weight; plant height; leaf area; root length
32Solanum lycopersicumNutrition liquid0; 12030Added to the rooting mediumPlant height; root length
33Solanum lycopersicumNutrition liquid0; 150100Added to the rooting mediumShoot dry weight; root dry weight;
shoot fresh weight; root fresh weight; plant height
34Solanum lycopersicumNutrition liquid0; 1601Added to the rooting mediumShoot dry weight; root dry weight;
shoot fresh weight; root fresh weight; plant height; root length
35Stevia rebaudiana BertoniNutrition liquid255; 10; 20Added to the rooting mediumDry weight; fresh weight
36Triticum aestivumNutrition liquid0; 1001Added to the rooting mediumShoot dry weight; root dry weight
37Triticum aestivumSoil0; 60; 12070Foliar applicationShoot dry weight; root dry weight; plant height; root length; leaf area
38Zea maysNutrition liquid0; 100100Added to the rooting mediumPlant height; shoot dry weight; root dry weight;
shoot fresh weight; root fresh weight
39Zea maysNutrition liquid0; 1001; 2Added to the rooting mediumShoot dry weight; root dry weight; leaf area
40Zea maysNutrition liquid0; 1001Added to the rooting mediumShoot dry weight; root dry weight;
41Zea maysSoil0; 25; 50; 8050; 100; 200Seed soakingPlant height; shoot dry weight; root dry weight; shoot fresh weight; root fresh weight; root length; stem diameter
42Zea maysSoil0; 10530; 60; 90Added to the rooting mediumShoot dry weight; root dry weight; shoot fresh weight; root fresh weight; plant height; leaf area; root length; stem diameter; root diameter
Table
Table A2. Egger’s test results.
Table A2. Egger’s test results.
Std-EffCoefficientStd.Err.tP > |t|95% Conf. Intervall
Slope0.07281240.0120016.070.0000.04923280.096392
Bias3.4203670.083474994.100.0001.7806595.060074
Table
Table A3. Nonparametric trim-and-fill analysis for publication bias.
Table A3. Nonparametric trim-and-fill analysis for publication bias.
StudiesEffect Size95% Conf. Interval
Observed0.1780.1540.202
Observed + Imputed0.2550.2280.281
Linear model Poly55:
f(x,y) = p00 + p10 × x + p01 × y + p20 × x2 + p11 × x × y + p02 × y2 + p30 × x3 + p21 × x2 × y + p12 × x × y2 + p03 × y3 + p40 × x4 + p31 × x3 × y + p22 × x2 × y2 + p13 × x × y3 + p04 × y4 + p50 × x5 + p41 × x4 × y + p32 × x3 × y2 + p23 × x2 × y3 + p14 × x × y4 + p05 × y5
where x is normalized by mean 88.52 and std 76.3, and where y is normalized by mean 88.54 and std 98.56.
Coefficients (with 95% confidence bounds):
p00 = 0.193 (0.1358, 0.2502); p10 = −0.03685 (−0.1361, 0.06239); p01 = 0.09501 (−0.0166, 0.2066); p20 = 0.05238 (−0.1074, 0.2122); p11 = −0.1369 (−0.2966, 0.02283); p02 = −0.1603 (−0.2604, −0.06011); p30 = 0.02524 (−0.04704, 0.09751); p21 = 0.03613 (−0.04833, 0.1206); p12 = 0.00669 (−0.07622, 0.0896); p03 = 0.07909 (−0.03418, 0.1924); p40 = −0.0002036 (−0.09487, 0.09446); p31 = 0.09422 (−0.01554, 0.204); p22 = 0.01787 (−0.05472, 0.09045); p13 = 0.02057 (−0.05256, 0.0937); p04 = −0.003469 (−0.06876, 0.06182); p50 = −0.003801 (−0.03242, 0.02482); p41 = −0.02912 (−0.07291, 0.01467); p32 = −0.002656 (−0.03355, 0.02824); p23 = −0.007247 (−0.02388, 0.009385); p14 = −0.005197 (−0.01963, 0.009237); p05 = −0.001552 (−0.01112, 0.008012)
Goodness of fit:
SSE: 6.478; R-square: 0.1996; adjusted R-square: 0.1694; RMSE: 0.1106.

References

  1. Mukhopadhyay, R.; Sarkar, B.; Jat, H.S.; Sharma, P.C.; Bolan, N.S. Soil salinity under climate change: Challenges for sustainable agriculture and food security. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 280, 111736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Reddy, I.N.B.L.; Kim, B.-K.; Yoon, I.-S.; Kim, K.-H.; Kwon, T.-R. Salt Tolerance in Rice: Focus on Mechanisms and Approaches. Rice Sci. 2017, 24, 123–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ivushkin, K.; Bartholomeus, H.; Bregt, A.K.; Pulatov, A.; Kempen, B.; de Sousa, L. Global mapping of soil salinity change. Remote Sens. Environ. 2019, 231, 111260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zulfiqar, F.; Ashraf, M. Nanoparticles potentially mediate salt stress tolerance in plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 160, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhao, C.; Zhang, H.; Song, C.; Zhu, J.-K.; Shabala, S. Mechanisms of Plant Responses and Adaptation to Soil Salinity. Innovation 2020, 1, 100017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Munns, R.; Tester, M. Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 651–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hossain, M.S.; Dietz, K.-J. Tuning of Redox Regulatory Mechanisms, Reactive Oxygen Species and Redox Homeostasis under Salinity Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.B.; Anee, T.I.; Parvin, K.; Nahar, K.; Mahmud, J.A.; Fujita, M. Regulation of Ascorbate-Glutathione Pathway in Mitigating Oxidative Damage in Plants under Abiotic Stress. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mittler, R. ROS Are Good. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Munns, R.; James, R.A.; Lauchli, A. Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 1025–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Munns, R.; Day, D.A.; Fricke, W.; Watt, M.; Arsova, B.; Barkla, B.J.; Bose, J.; Byrt, C.S.; Chen, Z.H.; Foster, K.J.; et al. Energy costs of salt tolerance in crop plants. New Phytol. 2020, 225, 1072–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Munns, R.; Passioura, J.B.; Colmer, T.D.; Byrt, C.S. Osmotic adjustment and energy limitations to plant growth in saline soil. New Phytol. 2020, 225, 1091–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, L.; Lu, B.; Liu, L.T.; Duan, W.J.; Jiang, D.; Li, J.; Zhang, K.; Sun, H.C.; Zhang, Y.J.; Li, C.D.; et al. Melatonin promotes seed germination under salt stress by regulating ABA and GA3 in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 162, 506–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Khan, R.W.A.; Awan, F.S.; Iqbal, R.K. Evaluation and inditification of salt tolerance wheat through in vitro salinitu induction in seeds. Pak. J. Bot. 2022, 54, 1987–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nguyen, V.Q.; Sreewongchai, T.; Siangliw, M.; Roytrakul, S.; Yokthongwattana, C. Comparative proteomic analysis of chromosome segment substitution lines of Thai jasmine rice KDML105 under short-term salinity stress. Planta 2022, 256, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Luan, J.Y.; Dong, J.X.; Song, X.; Jiang, J.; Li, H.Y. Overexpression of Tamarix hispida ThTrx5 Confers Salt Tolerance to Arabidopsis by Activating Stress Response Signals. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huang, J.; Zhu, C.; Hussain, S.; Huang, J.; Liang, Q.; Zhu, L.; Cao, X.; Kong, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; et al. Effects of nitric oxide on nitrogen metabolism and the salt resistance of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings with different salt tolerances. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 155, 374–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zushi, K.; Higashijima, M. Correlation network analysis identified the key interactions of texture profiles with the sensory, physical, and organoleptic properties of cherry tomato cultivars grown under salt stress. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 293, 110754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Al Rubaye, O.A.M.; Yetisir, H.; Ulas, F.; Ulas, A. Enhancing Salt Stress Tolerance of Different Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Inbred Line Genotypes by Rootstock with Vigorous Root System. Gesunde Pflanz. 2021, 73, 375–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hussain, S.; Zhang, J.-H.; Zhong, C.; Zhu, L.-F.; Cao, X.-C.; Yu, S.-M.; Allen Bohr, J.; Hu, J.-J.; Jin, Q.-Y. Effects of salt stress on rice growth, development characteristics, and the regulating ways: A review. J. Integr. Agric. 2017, 16, 2357–2374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Waadt, R.; Seller, C.A.; Hsu, P.K.; Takahashi, Y.; Munemasa, S.; Schroeder, J.I. Plant hormone regulation of abiotic stress responses. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 4, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hu, C.H.; Zheng, Y.; Tong, C.L.; Zhang, D.J. Effects of exogenous melatonin on plant growth, root hormones and photosynthetic characteristics of trifoliate orange subjected to salt stress. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 97, 551–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Manchester, L.C.; Coto-Montes, A.; Boga, J.A.; Andersen, L.P.H.; Zhou, Z.; Galano, A.; Vriend, J.; Tan, D.X.; Reiter, R.J. Melatonin: An ancient molecule that makes oxygen metabolically tolerable. J. Pineal Res. 2015, 59, 403–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Arnao, M.B.; Hernandez-Ruiz, J. Melatonin: A New Plant Hormone and/or a Plant Master Regulator? Trends Plant Sci. 2019, 24, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Arnao, M.B.; Hernandez-Ruiz, J. Melatonin in flowering, fruit set and fruit ripening. Plant Reprod. 2020, 33, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. García, J.J.; López-Pingarrón, L.; Almeida-Souza, P.; Tres, A.; Escudero, P.; García-Gil, F.A.; Tan, D.-X.; Reiter, R.J.; Ramírez, J.M.; Bernal-Pérez, M. Protective effects of melatonin in reducing oxidative stress and in preserving the fluidity of biological membranes: A review. J. Pineal Res. 2014, 56, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Arnao, M.B.; Hernandez-Ruiz, J. Melatonin Against Environmental Plant Stressors: A Review. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2021, 22, 413–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, J.P.; Liu, J.; Zhu, T.T.; Zhao, C.; Li, L.Y.; Chen, M. The Role of Melatonin in Salt Stress Responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fan, J.B.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, Z.C.; Chen, L. Melatonin: A Multifunctional Factor in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shen, J.; Chen, D.D.; Zhang, X.P.; Song, L.R.; Dong, J.; Xu, Q.J.; Hu, M.J.; Cheng, Y.Y.; Shen, F.F.; Wang, W. Mitigation of salt stress response in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) by exogenous melatonin. J. Plant Res. 2021, 134, 857–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gu, Q.; Xiao, Q.Q.; Chen, Z.P.; Han, Y. Crosstalk between Melatonin and Reactive Oxygen Species in Plant Abiotic Stress Responses: An Update. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhu, Y.; Gao, H.; Lu, M.X.; Hao, C.Y.; Pu, Z.Q.; Guo, M.J.; Hou, D.R.; Chen, L.Y.; Huang, X. Melatonin-Nitric Oxide Crosstalk and Their Roles in the Redox Network in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 6200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zeng, W.; Mostafa, S.; Lu, Z.G.; Jin, B. Melatonin-Mediated Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 847175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Madigan, A.P.; Egidi, E.; Bedon, F.; Franks, A.E.; Plummer, K.M. Bacterial and Fungal Communities Are Differentially Modified by Melatonin in Agricultural Soils Under Abiotic Stress. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liang, C.Z.; Zheng, G.Y.; Li, W.Z.; Wang, Y.Q.; Hu, B.; Wang, H.R.; Wu, H.K.; Qian, Y.W.; Zhu, X.G.; Tan, D.X.; et al. Melatonin delays leaf senescence and enhances salt stress tolerance in rice. J. Pineal Res. 2015, 59, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, T.G.; Shi, Z.F.; Zhang, X.H.; Zheng, S.; Wang, J.; Mo, J.N. Alleviating effects of exogenous melatonin on salt stress in cucumber. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 262, 109070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhao, G.; Zhao, Y.Y.; Yu, X.L.; Kiprotich, F.; Han, H.; Guan, R.Z.; Wang, R.; Shen, W.B. Nitric Oxide Is Required for Melatonin-Enhanced Tolerance against Salinity Stress in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) Seedlings. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, N.; Sun, Q.Q.; Zhang, H.J.; Cao, Y.Y.; Weeda, S.; Ren, S.X.; Guo, Y.D. Roles of melatonin in abiotic stress resistance in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 647–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Arnao, M.B.; Hernandez-Ruiz, J. Melatonin: Plant growth regulator and/or biostimulator during stress? Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19, 789–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wei, L.; Zhao, H.Y.; Wang, B.X.; Wu, X.Y.; Lan, R.J.; Huang, X.; Chen, B.; Chen, G.; Jiang, C.Q.; Wang, J.L.; et al. Exogenous Melatonin Improves the Growth of Rice Seedlings by Regulating Redox Balance and Ion Homeostasis Under Salt Stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 41, 2108–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, J.P.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, M.J.; Yuan, F.; Chen, M. Exogenous melatonin improves seed germination in Limonium bicolor under salt stress. Plant Signal. Behav. 2019, 14, 1659705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhang, N.; Zhang, H.J.; Sun, Q.Q.; Cao, Y.Y.; Li, X.S.; Zhao, B.; Wu, P.; Guo, Y.D. Proteomic analysis reveals a role of melatonin in promoting cucumber seed germination under high salinity by regulating energy production. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, L.Y.; Liu, J.L.; Wang, W.X.; Sun, Y. Exogenous melatonin improves growth and photosynthetic capacity of cucumber under salinity-induced stress. Photosynthetica 2016, 54, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, L.Y.; Li, H.Y.; Zhu, S.H.; Gao, Y.; Zheng, X.Q.; Xu, Y. The response of agronomic characters and rice yield to organic fertilization in subtropical China: A three-level meta-analysis. Field Crops Res. 2021, 263, 108049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Burda, B.U.; O’Connor, E.A.; Webber, E.M.; Redmond, N.; Perdue, L.A. Estimating data from figures with a Web-based program: Considerations for a systematic review. Res Synth Methods 2017, 8, 258–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Agathokleous, E.; Zhou, B.; Xu, J.; Ioannou, A.; Feng, Z.; Saitanis, C.J.; Frei, M.; Calabrese, E.J.; Fotopoulos, V. Exogenous application of melatonin to plants, algae, and harvested products to sustain agricultural productivity and enhance nutritional and nutraceutical value: A meta-analysis. Environ. Res. 2021, 200, 111746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hedges, L.V.; Gurevitch, J.; Curtis, P.S. The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 1999, 80, 1150–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Eziz, A.; Yan, Z.; Tian, D.; Han, W.; Tang, Z.; Fang, J. Drought effect on plant biomass allocation: A meta-analysis. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 7, 11002–11010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, L.L.; Li, Q.; Coulter, J.A.; Xie, J.H.; Luo, Z.Z.; Zhang, R.Z.; Deng, X.P.; Li, L.L. Winter wheat yield and water use efficiency response to organic fertilization in northern China: A meta-analysis. Agric. Water Manag. 2020, 229, 105934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Muhammad, I.; Yang, L.; Ahmad, S.; Mosaad, I.S.M.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Abbasi, A.M.; Zhou, X.-B. Melatonin Application Alleviates Stress-Induced Photosynthetic Inhibition and Oxidative Damage by Regulating Antioxidant Defense System of Maize: A Meta-Analysis. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Xiang, Y.; Deng, Q.; Duan, H.; Guo, Y. Effects of biochar application on root traits: A meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy 2017, 9, 1563–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ke, Q.B.; Ye, J.; Wang, B.M.; Ren, J.H.; Yin, L.N.; Deng, X.P.; Wang, S.W. Melatonin Mitigates Salt Stress in Wheat Seedlings by Modulating Polyamine Metabolism. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hu, E.M.; Liu, M.; Zhou, R.; Jiang, F.L.; Sun, M.T.; Wen, J.Q.; Zhu, Z.H.; Wu, Z. Relationship between melatonin and abscisic acid in response to salt stress of tomato. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 285, 110176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhao, B.Q.; Liu, Q.Y.; Wang, B.S.; Yuan, F. Roles of Phytohormones and Their Signaling Pathways in Leaf Development and Stress Responses. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 3566–3584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Läuchli, A.; Epstein, E. Plant responses to saline and sodic conditions. In Agricultural Salinity Assessment and Management; Wallendar, W.W., Tanji, K.K., Eds.; American Society of Civil Engineers: New York, NY, USA, 1990; Volume 71, pp. 113–137. [Google Scholar]
  57. Chen, J.; Li, H.; Yang, K.; Wang, Y.Z.; Yang, L.F.; Hu, L.B.; Liu, R.X.; Shi, Z.Q. Melatonin facilitates lateral root development by coordinating PAO-derived hydrogen peroxide and Rboh-derived superoxide radical. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2019, 143, 534–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Altaf, M.A.; Shahid, R.; Ren, M.X.; Altaf, M.M.; Khan, L.U.; Shahid, S.; Jahan, M.S. Melatonin alleviates salt damage in tomato seedling: A root architecture system, photosynthetic capacity, ion homeostasis, and antioxidant enzymes analysis. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 285, 110145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rewald, B.; Rachmilevitch, S.; Ephrath, J.E. Salt Stress Effects on Root Systems of Two Mature Olive Cultivars. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Olive Irrigation and Oil Quality, Nazareth, Israel, 6–10 December 2009; pp. 109–118. [Google Scholar]
  60. Xu, C.; Ling, F.-L.; Xu, K.-Z.; Wu, Z.-H.; Liu, X.-L.; An, J.-H.; Zhao, L.-P. Effect of Salt Stress on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Physiological and Biochemical Traits of Different Rice Varieties. Chin. J. Rice Sci. 2013, 27, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nawaz, A.; Shahbaz, M.; Asadullah; Imran, A.; Marghoob, M.U.; Imtiaz, M.; Mubeen, F. Potential of Salt Tolerant PGPR in Growth and Yield Augmentation of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Under Saline Conditions. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hu, D.D.; Dong, S.T.; Zhang, J.W.; Zhao, B.; Ren, B.Z.; Liu, P. Endogenous hormones improve the salt tolerance of maize (Zea mays L.) by inducing root architecture and ion balance optimizations. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2022, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pelagio-Flores, R.; Munoz-Parra, E.; Ortiz-Castro, R.; Lopez-Bucio, J. Melatonin regulates Arabidopsis root system architecture likely acting independently of auxin signaling. J. Pineal Res. 2012, 53, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Jahan, M.S.; Shu, S.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Z.; He, M.; Tao, M.; Sun, J.; Guo, S. Melatonin alleviates heat-induced damage of tomato seedlings by balancing redox homeostasis and modulating polyamine and nitric oxide biosynthesis. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yan, F.Y.; Wei, H.M.; Li, W.W.; Liu, Z.H.; Tang, S.; Chen, L.; Ding, C.Q.; Jiang, Y.; Ding, Y.F.; Li, G.H. Melatonin improves K+ and Na+ homeostasis in rice under salt stress by mediated nitric oxide. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 206, 111358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Yan, F.; Wei, H.; Ding, Y.; Li, W.; Liu, Z.; Chen, L.; Tang, S.; Ding, C.; Jiang, Y.; Li, G. Melatonin regulates antioxidant strategy in response to continuous salt stress in rice seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 165, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Han, Y.Q.; Gao, Y.M.; Li, M.; Du, Y.L.; Zhang, Y.X.; Zhang, W.H.; Du, J.D. The molecular events underpinning cultivar differences in melatonin counteracting salt damage in Phaseolus vulgaris. Funct. Plant Biol. 2022, 49, 201–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Jalili, S.; Ehsanpour, A.A.; Javadirad, S.M. The role of melatonin on caspase-3-like activity and expression of the genes involved in programmed cell death (PCD) induced by in vitro salt stress in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) roots. Bot. Stud. 2022, 63, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mukherjee, S.; Bhatla, S.C. Exogenous Melatonin Modulates Endogenous H2S Homeostasis and L-Cysteine Desulfhydrase Activity in Salt-Stressed Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. var. cherry) Seedling Cotyledons. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 40, 2502–2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ashraf, M.; Foolad, M.R. Pre-sowing seed treatment—A shotgun approach to improve germination, plant growth, and crop yield under saline and non-saline conditions. Adv. Agron. 2005, 88, 223–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhang, H.-J.; Zhang, N.; Yang, R.-C.; Wang, L.; Sun, Q.-Q.; Li, D.-B.; Cao, Y.-Y.; Weeda, S.; Zhao, B.; Ren, S.; et al. Melatonin promotes seed germination under high salinity by regulating antioxidant systems, ABA and GA4 interaction in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). J. Pineal Res. 2014, 57, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. de Azevedo Neto, A.D.; da Silva, E.C. Physiology and Biochemistry of Salt Stress Tolerance in Plants. In Abiotic Stresses in Crop Plants; Chakraborty, U., Chakraborty, B., Eds.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2015; pp. 81–101. [Google Scholar]
  73. Kamiab, F. Exogenous melatonin mitigates the salinity damages and improves the growth of pistachio under salinity stress. J. Plant Nutr. 2020, 43, 1468–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zahedi, S.M.; Hosseini, M.S.; Abadia, J.; Marjani, M. Melatonin foliar sprays elicit salinity stress tolerance and enhance fruit yield and quality in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 149, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Dolferus, R. To grow or not to grow: A stressful decision for plants. Plant Sci. 2014, 229, 247–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Dsouza, A.; Price, G.W.; Dixon, M.; Graham, T. A Conceptual Framework for Incorporation of Composting in Closed-Loop Urban Controlled Environment Agriculture. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Moreno, J.E.; Campos, M.L. Waking up for defense! Melatonin as a regulator of stomatal immunity in plants. Plant Physiol. 2022, 188, 14–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Sharif, R.; Xie, C.; Zhang, H.Q.; Arnao, M.B.; Ali, M.; Ali, Q.; Muhammad, I.; Shalmani, A.; Nawaz, M.A.; Chen, P.; et al. Melatonin and Its Effects on Plant Systems. Molecules 2018, 23, 2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Park, W.J. Melatonin as an Endogenous Plant Regulatory Signal: Debates and Perspectives. J. Plant Biol. 2011, 54, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Debnath, B.; Islam, W.; Li, M.; Sun, Y.T.; Lu, X.C.; Mitra, S.; Hussain, M.; Liu, S.; Qiu, D.L. Melatonin Mediates Enhancement of Stress Tolerance in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rehaman, A.; Mishra, A.K.; Ferdose, A.; Per, T.S.; Hanief, M.; Jan, A.T.; Asgher, M. Melatonin in Plant Defense against Abiotic Stress. Forests 2021, 12, 1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Khan, M.N.; Zhang, J.; Luo, T.; Liu, J.H.; Rizwan, M.; Fahad, S.; Xu, Z.H.; Hu, L.Y. Seed priming with melatonin coping drought stress in rapeseed by regulating reactive oxygen species detoxification: Antioxidant defense system, osmotic adjustment, stomatal traits and chloroplast ultrastructure perseveration. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 140, 111597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kolodziejczyk, I.; Dzitko, K.; Szewczyk, R.; Posmyk, M.M. Exogenous melatonin improves corn (Zea mays L.) embryo proteome in seeds subjected to chilling stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 193, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Jiang, D.; Lu, B.; Liu, L.T.; Duan, W.J.; Chen, L.; Li, J.; Zhang, K.; Sun, H.C.; Zhang, Y.J.; Dong, H.Z.; et al. Exogenous melatonin improves salt stress adaptation of cotton seedlings by regulating active oxygen metabolism. PeerJ 2020, 8, e10486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Zulfiqar, F. Effect of seed priming on horticultural crops. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 286, 1101970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhang, Y.; Zhou, X.J.; Dong, Y.T.; Zhang, F.; He, Q.L.; Chen, J.H.; Zhu, S.J.; Zhao, T.L. Seed priming with melatonin improves salt tolerance in cotton through regulating photosynthesis, scavenging reactive oxygen species and coordinating with phytohormone signal pathways. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 169, 113671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Rajora, N.; Vats, S.; Raturi, G.; Thakral, V.; Kaur, S.; Rachappanavar, V.; Kumar, M.; Kesarwani, A.K.; Sonah, H.; Sharma, T.R.; et al. Seed priming with melatonin: A promising approach to combat abiotic stress in plants. Plant Stress 2022, 4, 100071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Han, Q.H.; Huang, B.; Ding, C.B.; Zhang, Z.W.; Chen, Y.E.; Hu, C.; Zhou, L.J.; Huang, Y.; Liao, J.Q.; Yuan, S.; et al. Effects of Melatonin on Anti-oxidative Systems and Photosystem II in Cold-Stressed Rice Seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antioxidants 11 01610 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow chart for selection of publications.
Figure 1. Flow chart for selection of publications.
Antioxidants 11 01610 g001
Antioxidants 11 01610 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of MT and salt stress on plant growth. (A) shows the surface without fitting, and (B) shows the contour map of (A). We also carried out quintic equation fitting on the data, and the fitted equation and surface diagram are shown in Figure A3.
Figure 2. Effects of MT and salt stress on plant growth. (A) shows the surface without fitting, and (B) shows the contour map of (A). We also carried out quintic equation fitting on the data, and the fitted equation and surface diagram are shown in Figure A3.
Antioxidants 11 01610 g002
Antioxidants 11 01610 g003 550
Figure 3. The difference in response of growth parameters. (A) Growth parameters; (B) classification of growth parameters. The symbol represents the effect size, and the bars show the 95% bootstrapped confidence intervals. The values in the parentheses show the number of observations.
Figure 3. The difference in response of growth parameters. (A) Growth parameters; (B) classification of growth parameters. The symbol represents the effect size, and the bars show the 95% bootstrapped confidence intervals. The values in the parentheses show the number of observations.
Antioxidants 11 01610 g003
Antioxidants 11 01610 g004 550
Figure 4. Effect of exogenous MT on plant growth under salt stress. The symbol represents the effect size, and the bars show the 95% bootstrapped confidence intervals. The values in the parentheses show the number of observations.
Figure 4. Effect of exogenous MT on plant growth under salt stress. The symbol represents the effect size, and the bars show the 95% bootstrapped confidence intervals. The values in the parentheses show the number of observations.
Antioxidants 11 01610 g004
Antioxidants 11 01610 g005 550
Figure 5. The effects of rooting environment (A), salt stress (B), and salt stress concentration (C) on MT regulation of plant growth under salt stress. The symbol represents the effect size, and the bars show the 95% bootstrapped confidence intervals. The values in the parentheses show the number of observations.
Figure 5. The effects of rooting environment (A), salt stress (B), and salt stress concentration (C) on MT regulation of plant growth under salt stress. The symbol represents the effect size, and the bars show the 95% bootstrapped confidence intervals. The values in the parentheses show the number of observations.
Antioxidants 11 01610 g005
Antioxidants 11 01610 g006 550
Figure 6. Effects of MT concentration (A) and application method (B) on the protective effects of MT in plants. The symbol represents the effect size, and the bars show the 95% bootstrapped confidence intervals. The values in the parentheses show the number of observations.
Figure 6. Effects of MT concentration (A) and application method (B) on the protective effects of MT in plants. The symbol represents the effect size, and the bars show the 95% bootstrapped confidence intervals. The values in the parentheses show the number of observations.
Antioxidants 11 01610 g006
Table
Table 1. Factors categorized as predictive variables in this meta-analysis.
Table 1. Factors categorized as predictive variables in this meta-analysis.
Influence Factors Classification of Subgroup
Plant propertiesPlant speciesAvena nuda (naked oat), Avena sativa (oat), Brassica napus (rapeseed), Cucumis melon (melon), Cucumis sativus (cucumber), Dracocephalum kotschyi (Savannah obedient-plant), Gossypium hirsutum (cotton), Helianthus annuus (sunflower), Hordeum vulgare (barley), Limonium bicolor (statice bicolor), Malus hupehensis (tea crabapple), Medicago sativa (alfalfa), Oryza sativa (rice), Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean), Solanum lycopersicum (tomato), Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni (candyleaf), Triticum aestivum (wheat), Zea mays (maize)
Growth parametersStem diameter, Root length, Root diameter, Root surface area, Root fresh weight, Root dry weight, Plant height, Number of blades, Leaf area, Shoot fresh weight, Shoot dry weight, Germination potential, Germination percentage, Fresh weight, Dry weight.
Types of growth parametersWhole plant index, Germination index, Stem index, Root index.
Salt stress propertiesSalt stress or notSalt stress, Normal condition
Salt stress (mM NaCl) concentration0 = NaCl, 0 < NaCl < 50, 50 ≤ NaCl < 100, 100 ≤ NaCl < 150, 150 ≤ NaCl < 200, 200 ≤ NaCl < 250, 250 ≤ NaCl < 300, 300 ≤ NaCl.
Ways of applying salt stress (rooting environment)Rooting medium, Soil.
Meltonin propertiesMT concentration (μM)MT ≤ 0.1, 0.1 < MT ≤ 1, 1 < MT ≤ 10, 0 < MT ≤ 50, 50 < MT ≤ 100, 100 < MT ≤ 200, 200 < MT ≤ 300, 300 < MT ≤ 400, 400 < MT ≤ 500.
Mode of exogenous applicationRooting medium, Foliar application, Seed priming, Seed soaking
Table
Table 2. Heterogeneity and p-value for the direct seeding effect size on growth across different categorical variables.
Table 2. Heterogeneity and p-value for the direct seeding effect size on growth across different categorical variables.
Categorical VariableQBdfp-Value
Plants54.83170.000
Salt stress or not0.4010.526
Type of rooting environment12.4810.000
Salt concentration72.6270.000
MT concentration335.0880.000
MT treatment type74.4230.000
Growth parameters56.00140.000
Types of growth parameters7.1530.067
QB = the statistic value of heterogeneity for explaining variance; df = the degree of freedom; p-value = the significant value of heterogeneity for explaining variance.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yan, F.; Zhao, H.; Wu, L.; Huang, Z.; Niu, Y.; Qi, B.; Zhang, L.; Fan, S.; Ding, Y.; Li, G.; et al. Basic Cognition of Melatonin Regulation of Plant Growth under Salt Stress: A Meta-Analysis. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1610. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11081610

AMA Style

Yan F, Zhao H, Wu L, Huang Z, Niu Y, Qi B, Zhang L, Fan S, Ding Y, Li G, et al. Basic Cognition of Melatonin Regulation of Plant Growth under Salt Stress: A Meta-Analysis. Antioxidants. 2022; 11(8):1610. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11081610

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yan, Feiyu, Hongliang Zhao, Longmei Wu, Zhiwei Huang, Yuan Niu, Bo Qi, Linqing Zhang, Song Fan, Yanfeng Ding, Ganghua Li, and et al. 2022. "Basic Cognition of Melatonin Regulation of Plant Growth under Salt Stress: A Meta-Analysis" Antioxidants 11, no. 8: 1610. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11081610

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop