Next Article in Journal
Ferroptosis and Its Emerging Role in Pre-Eclampsia
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Empagliflozin on Thioacetamide-Induced Liver Injury in Rats: Role of AMPK/SIRT-1/HIF-1α Pathway in Halting Liver Fibrosis
Previous Article in Journal
Seminal Plasma Antioxidants Are Related to Sperm Cryotolerance in the Horse
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Greater Improvement of Intrahepatic Fat Contents after 6 Months of Lifestyle Intervention Is Related to a Better Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Status in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 11
Issue 7
10.3390/antiox11071284
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Genetic Factors Associated with Response to Vitamin E Treatment in NAFLD

by
Mehtap Civelek
and
Maren C. Podszun
*
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Institute of Nutritional Medicine, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2022, 11(7), 1284; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11071284
Submission received: 18 May 2022 / Revised: 15 June 2022 / Accepted: 20 June 2022 / Published: 28 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oxidative Stress and Chronic Liver Diseases)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is becoming the predominant liver disease worldwide, and vitamin E has been clinically shown to improve histological parameters in a subset of patients. In this narrative review, we investigate whether genetic factors may help to explain why some patients show histological improvements upon high-dose alpha-tocopherol (αT) treatment while others do not. In summary, we identified two factors that are associated with treatment response, including genetic variations in haptoglobin as well as fatty acid desaturase 1/2 (FADS1/FADS2). Other genetic variants such as in alpha-tocopherol transfer protein (αTTP), tocopherol associated protein (TAP), transmembrane 6 superfamily 2 (TM6SF2), cluster of differentiation 36 (CD36), and proteins involved in lipoprotein metabolism may also play a role, but have not yet been investigated in a clinical context. We propose to further validate these associations in larger populations, to then use them as a clinical tool to identify the subset of patients that will benefit the most from vitamin E supplementation.

1. Introduction

The excessive accumulation of hepatic lipids is the hallmark feature of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which is becoming the most common liver disorder in Western nations. Estimates for the global prevalence of the disease are as high as 24%, with some countries—including Germany, Finland, and the USA—reaching 30% and more [1,2]. As NAFLD is most often only diagnosed in the late stages, the actual prevalence may be even higher. NAFLD predominantly manifests in patients with obesity, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia [3], although genetic factors, such as Patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3 (PNPLA3), play a role [2].
The diagnostic criteria for NAFLD are as follows: there must be evidence of steatosis either by imaging or histology as well as the absence of secondary causes of hepatic fat accumulation, such as alcohol consumption, steatogenic medication, genetic disorders, viral infections, autoimmune hepatitis, or hemochromatosis [4]. Histological evaluation of liver biopsies allows for the categorization of the disease as either non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). NAFL is defined as the presence of hepatic steatosis in equal to or more than 5% of hepatocytes without injury, in the form of hepatocyte ballooning [4]. In NASH, on the other hand, in addition to steatosis (≥5%), there is ballooning and inflammation, and there may or may not be fibrosis visible [4]. To evaluate treatment efficacy in clinical trials, the NAFLD activity score (NAS) was developed [1]. NAS is the unweighted sum of the histopathological scores for steatosis (0–3), lobular inflammation (0–3), and ballooning (0–2), yielding a total that ranges from 0 to 8 [1]. Clinical trials also often specify NASH resolution as an outcome. This is defined as the absence of ballooning and minimal lobular inflammation (grade 1) without worsening of the stage of fibrosis, while steatosis can be present at any grade [5].
The underlying mechanism for the progression from NAFL to NASH is still unclear [6], and about 40% of all NAFLD patients [7,8] progress to NASH. The resulting liver injury in NASH can be severe enough to require a liver transplantation, and it is predicted that NASH is becoming the leading cause for liver transplantations [9]. Currently there are no drugs approved for the treatment of NAFLD, and the best treatment option is a lifestyle intervention to improve nutrition and increase physical activity to reduce bodyweight [10].
Oxidative stress plays an important role in the pathogenesis of NAFLD. Patients with NAFLD and especially NASH show higher levels of oxidized linoleic metabolites in the blood [11] as well as higher hepatic lipid peroxidation products compared with healthy controls [12,13,14]. Treatment with the antioxidative vitamin E—or more precisely, its major congener RRR-alpha-tocopherol (αT)—has improved liver enzymes, lobular inflammation, hepatocellular ballooning, and steatosis in clinical trials [15,16], as well as hepatic oxidative stress [14]. Furthermore, αT treatment is also beneficial in NASH and is currently the only known intervention for improving transplant-free survival [17].
Vitamin E was discovered 100 years ago as a dietary factor necessary for sustaining rat pregnancy by Katherine J. Bishop and Herbert M. Evans [18]. Vitamin E is a family of eight congeners, with either a saturated alkyl side chain (for the tocopherols) or an unsaturated isoprenoid side chain (tocotrienols) as well as a different methylation pattern at the chromanol ring (α,β,γ,δ). Although all eight congeners are absorbed, only αT is retained and incorporated into VLDL [19]. Patients with NAFLD have significantly lower αT plasma concentrations [20] than controls, likely due to the accumulation within hepatic lipid droplets [21].
Although vitamin E has been shown to be clinically effective, it is not effective in everyone. For example, in the Pioglitazone, vitamin E, or placebo for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis trial (PIVENS), only about 50% of the patients within the vitamin E group showed an improvement in histological parameters such as steatosis, lobular inflammation, and hepatocyte ballooning [22]. While the PIVENS trial only included patients without diabetes, a study by Bril et al. later confirmed the clinical efficacy of vitamin E in patients with diabetes [16]. The percentage of patients achieving NASH resolution was similar to the ones observed in PIVENS (Table A1), although the effect for the individual histological scores was less pronounced, possibly due to the smaller numbers enrolled in the study. In the TONIC trial, the effect of vitamin E on NASH was investigated in children and adolescents [23]. Similarly to the above mentioned trials, TONIC also showed a significant effect of vitamin E on NASH resolution.
Upon closer inspection of Table 1, one can appreciate the high rate of improvement for the histological parameters in the placebo group. This is a tremendous problem for the design of clinical trials investigating NAFLD and NASH. Factors associated with the placebo response are thought to include lifestyle changes of patients upon enrollment in a clinical trial, an uneven distribution of genetic polymorphisms that influence disease severity, and sampling variability due to the histological endpoints [24]. However, even when taking into account all these variabilities, which will occur in the treatment group as well, the question still remains of what determines whether a patient will show histological improvement upon vitamin E treatment or not. This is especially important as there is still debate on whether or not high doses of αT are considered to be safe [25,26,27], and potential side effects include a higher tendency for bleeding [28,29] as well as an increased risk for the development of prostate cancer in men [30]. From a risk perspective, it would thus be ideal to only supplement those who will likely benefit from the treatment. Therefore, the scope of this narrative review is to discuss and summarize genetic factors that may influence the response to vitamin E treatment in NAFLD patients. We hope our review will provide the groundwork to further investigate who might benefit the most from vitamin E supplementation in NAFLD.

2. Genetic Factors Associated with Treatment Response

Plasma levels during vitamin E supplementation have been associated with NASH resolution and general histological improvement in both the PIVENS as well as the TONIC cohort [31]. Counterintuitively, lower plasma αT levels were associated with better histological improvements. Lower plasma levels might reflect lower absorption, an increase in vitamin E metabolism, higher intrahepatic levels, or increased usage of αT as an antioxidant. The relationship between hepatic and circulating vitamin E is likely dependent on multiple factors and does not follow a linear correlation [32]. Differences in plasma, hepatic, or even subcellular vitamin E could all play an important role in explaining the observed variation in response to αT treatment in NAFLD. In the following subsection, we will briefly highlight major genetic factors associated with disease development and then discuss genetic factors associated with vitamin E plasma and serum levels as well as factors that influence levels upon supplementation. We will further discuss in detail the few genetic associations with treatment response to vitamin E in NAFLD. Unfortunately, association of genetic factors with treatment response are severely limited by the sample size. The best data comes from PIVENS and TONIC, with a maximum of 368 patients [31], and even those numbers are relatively small for genetic association studies. The data, summarized in Table A2, should thus be treated as exploratory. Ideally, promising candidates should be evaluated in sufficiently powered studies to then allow identification of patients who will benefit the most from vitamin E supplementation prior to initiation of treatment.

2.1. Genetic Factors Influencing Vitamin E Levels

2.1.1. Genes Involved in Vitamin E Absorption and Hepatic Uptake

The intestinal uptake of vitamin E is mediated by scavenger receptor class B member 1 (SR-BI), cluster of differentiation 36 (CD36), and NPC1-like intracellular cholesterol transporter 1 (NPC1L1) [33,34,35]. Not surprisingly, SNPs in both SR-BI (rs11057830, “Exon-8”) as well as CD36 (rs1527479) have been associated with vitamin E levels. For SR-B1, as well as CD36, the minor alleles are associated with a decrease in vitamin E circulatory levels [36,37,38]. After enteral uptake, vitamin E is transported to the liver in chylomicrons, which are then taken up into the liver by LDL receptor-related proteins (LRP), which is a step that also involves hepatic lipase (LIPC) [39]. A SNP in LIPC (rs1800588) is associated with higher circulating vitamin E levels [40], which may be caused by a less efficient hepatic uptake of vitamin E from chylomicrons and a transfer of vitamin E from chylomicrons to other lipoproteins without hepatic involvement.

2.1.2. Genes Involved in Hepatic Transport

The alpha-tocopherol transfer protein (αTTP) is predominantly expressed in the liver [41] and is crucial for the distribution of αT to extrahepatic tissues. Mutations in this gene cause the inability to transfer αT from the liver to VLDL, resulting in the disease Ataxia with Vitamin E Deficiency (AVED) [42]. There is a common SNP (rs6994076) in the promoter region of TTPA which significantly reduces promoter activity in vitro [43]. The effect of this SNP on plasma levels has presented conflicting findings. The T/T genotype of rs6994076 has been associated with lower αT tocopherol levels in the ATBC (α-tocopherol and ß-carotene cancer prevention) trial at baseline (n = 847, adjusted for serum cholesterol) as well as after supplementation (n = 381) [44]. Conversely, another study in patients with or without glaucoma showed the opposite association, namely higher αT levels with the T/T genotype (n = 500, unadjusted) [45]. Whether differences may be explained by the different populations or the use of either adjusted or unadjusted αT values remains to be elucidated. Furthermore, it is unknown whether the reduced promoter activity would actually lead to clinically significant changes in the levels of hepatic αTTP expression and whether this would be either associated with changes in disease severity or treatment response. In general, little is known about the role of αTTP in NAFLD.
Besides αTTP, intracellular transport of αT is also facilitated by the tocopherol-associated protein (TAP) [46,47]. The distribution of αT within the cell might be a critical factor for the response to vitamin E. In vitro, de novo lipogenesis is inhibited by αT through a non-transcriptional mechanism involving SREBP-1 cleavage within the endoplasmic reticulum [48]. It might thus be feasible that response to αT in NAFLD is dependent on the correct subcellular distribution of αT within hepatocytes. rs2299826 is a SNP within the TAP intronic region, and having two copies of the minor allele is associated with an increase in circulating αT [44]. Whether this is associated with a decrease in hepatic αT, NAFLD severity, or response to treatment is currently unknown.

2.1.3. Genes Involved in Extrahepatic Transport

Hepatic export and systemic distribution of αT is mediated by VLDL. As previously mentioned, αT is intra-hepatically incorporated into nascent VLDL, likely through α-TTP. Factors influencing VLDL assembly or secretion can thus significantly alter plasma levels of αT. One such factor is APOA5, which is involved in VLDL secretion [49]. The minor allele of SNP rs662799 within ApoA5 is associated with significantly higher circulating triglycerides as well as vitamin E [50,51]. Not surprisingly, the association with vitamin E vanishes once αT is corrected for cholesterol or triglyceride levels. Similarly, an APOA4 SNP (rs675) was initially associated with αT, but the association did not remain statistically significant after adjusting for cholesterol [37]. Apo C-III S1/S2 genotype (SNP not referenced) is associated with increased cholesterol levels [52] as well as with circulating αT levels. In this case, the association remains significant even after adjustments for cholesterol, albeit only in women [53]. Alterations in lipoprotein metabolism and resulting changes in hepatic αT export may both alter local αT concentrations within the liver, although formal studies regarding response to αT treatment in NAFLD are lacking.

2.1.4. Genes Involved in vitamin E metabolism

Vitamin E metabolism is complex and involves multiple steps. The initial hydroxylation of the side chain is catabolized by the cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP3A4 and CYP4F2 [54]. The side chain is then successively shortened by omega and beta-oxidation within peroxisomes and mitochondria, resulting in the final degradation metabolites, carboxyethylhydroxychromanols (CEHC) [55]. While the human diet contains predominantly γT and less αT, αT is selectively retained in the body while other vitamin E forms are rapidly degraded to CEHC [56].
γ-CEHC was retrospectively determined in baseline plasma samples of the PIVENS trial, and lower baseline γ-CEHC levels—suggesting decreased CYP mediated metabolism—were associated with histological improvements in the liver upon treatment [57].
There is a common variant of CYP4F2 (rs2108622) that is associated with significantly higher αT plasma levels in patients with the T/T allele in clinical trials [31,36] and decreased metabolism of all tocopherols in vitro [58]. The association of rs2108622 with histological response to vitamin E treatment was retrospectively determined in the PIVENS and TONIC trial (n = 368) [31]. Neither trial showed an association of this SNP with histological improvement upon vitamin E treatment, although the effect on vitamin E metabolism was recapitulated. Patients with T/T genotype had significantly higher vitamin E levels during treatment in both the PIVENS and the TONIC trial at week 48 but not week 96 [31]. According to the authors, the declining effect with time may be an adaptive response of the body to prolonged high doses of αT. It is noteworthy that NASH resolution as well as general histological improvements in both PIVENS and TONIC were associated with lower αT levels. As mentioned above, CYP4F2 genotype was not associated with histological response. It cannot be ruled out that the association did not reach statistical significance due to the small sample size, and there is indeed an association of response with the investigated CYP4F2 SNP. Alternatively, patients with lower αT plasma levels upon treatment may have higher αT levels in the liver either due to their CYP4F2 genotype or other genetic factors involved in vitamin E metabolism, such as αTTP.
Overall, there is an association of CYP4F2 genotype (rs2108622) with vitamin E levels, but not with histological response to vitamin E treatment in NAFLD.

2.2. Genetic Factors Associated with NAFLD

Genetic factors play a prominent role in NAFLD pathogenesis and account at least partially for the variability of disease severity and progression [59]. Multiple Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified genetic variants that are associated with hepatic lipid accumulation, liver enzymes, NAFLD development, and disease severity. The most prominent example, which has been confirmed in multiple cohorts and ethnicities, is a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the gene patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing 3 (PNPLA3, rs738409) [60,61,62,63,64,65]. This SNP is associated with increased hepatocyte fat content and a greater predisposition to progressive forms of NAFLD [60,66]. The frequency distribution of the minor allele (G) in different ethnicities is 49% in Hispanics, 23% in Europeans and 17% in African Americans [60]. PNPLA3 encodes a protein known as adiponutrin (ADPN), with lipolytic as well as lipogenic properties [67]. The lipase activity in vitro is predominantly against triglycerides and retinyl esters in hepatic stellate cells [68]. However, the minor allele of rs738409 is associated with the loss of hydrolyzing function, resulting in accumulation of lipid droplets in the hepatocytes [66]. The PNPLA3 SNP is associated not only with liver fat content, but also with hepatic inflammation, hepatic steatohepatitis, fibrosis, and cirrhosis, indicating that it plays a key role in the development of NAFLD [69].
Studies assessing the relationship between vitamin E response and PNPLA3 are limited, and there is no data available from the PIVENS/TONIC trial. In a small exploratory study, 38 NAFLD patients received either 150, 300, or 600 mg vitamin E three times a day for one year [70]. Vitamin E was effective in lowering liver enzymes, non-invasive fibrosis scores (FIB-4 index and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet index (APRI)), and liver stiffness. Although the numbers are very small, there was no difference in response by PNPLA3 genotype (CC/CG n = 19; GG = n = 19). Furthermore, a retrospective analysis of αT plasma levels in the ATBC study according to PNPLA3 genotype revealed no significant differences [71]. The current data suggest that PNPLA3 is unrelated to response to treatment or vitamin E levels in NAFLD, although this needs to be confirmed in a larger study.
Another important SNP associated with NAFLD is in transmembrane 6 superfamily member 2 (TM6SF2, rs58542926) [63,64,65,72]. The function of TM6SF2 is currently unknown. Silencing the gene in hepatocytes in vitro is associated with an increase in intracellular triglycerides and a decrease in triglyceride rich lipoprotein secretion [73]. Similarly, knockdown of TM6SF2 in mice decreases very low-density secretion (VLDL) from the liver by about 50% [72], indicating a pivotal role in lipoprotein metabolism.
In humans, variants of TM6SF2 are associated with circulating triglyceride levels as well as NAFLD disease risk [72,73]. The minor allele of the TM6SF2 SNP (rs58542926) is associated with higher liver fat, higher liver injury markers ALT, and lower circulating levels of triglycerides as well as well as low-density (LDL) cholesterol [72]. Since TM6SF2 seems to play an important role in VLDL secretion from the liver, it is not surprising that vitamin E levels are associated with the rs58542926 SNP [74]. Because αT is exported from the liver by VLDL, carriers of the minor allele have lower plasma αT levels. Whether this translates to higher hepatic levels and a possible benefit in terms of response to vitamin E treatment in NAFLD has not yet been investigated.
SNPs in TM6SF2 (rs58542926), PNPLA3 (rs738409), and MBOAT7 (rs641738) were investigated together in NAFLD patients receiving multiple supplements, including vitamin E (606 mg silybin-phospholipids complex, 20 µg vitamin D, and 30 mg of vitamin) [75]. Having either a mutation in one or multiple SNPs was associated with no response to treatment. It remains to be seen whether any of the individual SNPs are associated with the response to vitamin E treatment in NAFLD.
The fatty acid desaturase 1 (FADS1) is one of the rate-limiting enzymes in the polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) desaturation pathway, and is specifically involved in catalyzing the conversion of dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid (DGLA) (20:3n-6) into arachidonic acid (AA) (20:4n-6) and eicosatetraenoic acid (20:4n-3) into eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) (20:5n-3) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) (22:6n-3) [75]. FADS1 has been previously associated with steatosis as well as NAFLD disease severity [76,77]. In a small, pediatric pilot analysis of children with the FADS/FADS2 rs174576 minor allele (CA/AA, n = 10), the so-called low-function allele, there was a greater reduction in steatosis, fibrosis, and NAFLD activity score after the combination treatment with DHA, choline, and vitamin E compared to children with the major allele (CC, n = 9) [78]. Even after adjusting for the common SNPs in PNPLA3 (rs738409) and TM6SF2 (rs58542926), the association remained significant. Whether FADS1 genotype plays a role in the response to vitamin E alone or this result is mainly driven by DHA, and whether or not this effect can be recapitulated in larger studies and adults, remains to be elucidated.
Besides SNPs, other genetic variations, such as copy number variations, are associated with NAFLD. An example is Haptoglobin (Hp), an acute phase protein which is highly expressed in the liver, especially during tissue damage, inflammation, infection, trauma, or malignant proliferation [79]. Hp binds to free hemoglobin in the plasma with a high affinity [80]. Free hemoglobin is toxic due to the iron in heme, which can promote the generation of reactive hydroxyl radicals in the presence of H2O2, resulting in DNA damage [81]. After formation of a strong noncovalent complex, the α2-glycoprotein enables the clearance and degradation of hemoglobin via CD163 cell-surface receptors on hepatocytes, Kupffer cells, and tissue macrophages [82]. Aside from its antioxidant activity, Hp also has immunomodulatory effects, including the inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis or the promotion of a strong Th1 cell response [82]. These effects are dependent on the Hp genotype. There are three major genotypes of Hp, namely Hp 1-1, Hp 2-1, and Hp 2-2, with a known distribution in the Western population of 16%, 48%, and 36%, respectively [83]. Hp-1 has one copy and Hp-2 two copies of exon 3 and 4 [84] Hp 1-1 genotype confers better protection against oxidative stress as well as a greater Th1 response compared with the Hp 2-2 genotype [82]. In NAFLD, patients with Hp 2-2 genotype have higher steatosis, lobular inflammation, ballooning, and NAFLD activity (NAS) scores than other genotypes. Hp 2-2 genotype has further independently been associated with fibrosis [85].
Since vitamin E is an antioxidant and Hp has antioxidative properties, it is suggested that the histological response to vitamin E may be closely associated with Hp genotype [86]. In other words, patients with the Hp 2 allele, who tend to have more severe NAFLD and less antioxidative benefit from Hp, might benefit more from supplementation of vitamin E. Studies examining the relationship between vitamin E response and Hp phenotype are rare and are mostly limited to initial large-scale intervention studies (PIVENS, TONIC). However, the limited data seems to support the notion that Hp genotype may play a role in determining the response to vitamin E treatment in NAFLD. A post hoc analysis of data from the PIVENS and TONIC showed that patients with Hp 2-2 had a significant improvement in histological markers, NAFLD Activity Score (NAS), and liver enzymes after vitamin E treatment [83]. Patients with the Hp 1-1 genotype showed no improvement in any of the parameters, whereas patients with the Hp 2-1 or Hp 2-2 genotype showed improved liver enzymes and histology. This association needs to be confirmed in further studies. There is currently a clinical trial underway in China that will investigate response to vitamin E treatment by Hp genotype [86]. In summary, the data suggests that NAFLD patients with the Hp 2 allele, which have an increase in oxidative stress, might benefit the most from vitamin E supplementation. This would be in accordance with the assumption that the beneficial effects of vitamin E in NAFLD are mediated mainly by the antioxidative effect of vitamin E [14,48].
Association of other important genetic factors of NAFLD (such as hydroxysteroid 17-beta dehydrogenase 13 (HSD17B13, rs6834314, rs13118664) [62,63,64] and glucokinase regulator (GCKR, rs13118664, rs1260326) [61,62,63]) with vitamin E plasma, serum levels, or treatment response in NAFLD have not been determined yet.

3. Conclusions

There are multiple genetic factors that could explain the variability in response to vitamin E treatment in NAFLD, but conclusions are severely limited by the small sample sizes of the current trials (Figure 1). NASH resolution as well as histological improvement are associated with lower plasma αT levels, which indicates metabolism as a possible cause for the diverse treatment response. Interestingly, a variant in one of the major players in vitamin E metabolism, CYP4F2, is associated with plasma levels of αT but not with treatment response in NAFLD [31]. Besides CYP4F2, other genetic factors could be responsible for the differences in plasma levels, including proteins involved in absorption (CD36), intracellular trafficking (αTTP, TAP), and lipoprotein metabolism. They are all associated with plasma αT, but have not yet been investigated in terms of treatment response in NAFLD. Further studies should investigate whether or not genetic factors involved in the absorption, distribution, and metabolism of αT may offer an explanation for the differences in treatment response.
To the best of our knowledge, there are only two SNPs that have been associated with vitamin E treatment response in NAFLD. One of them is in FADS1/FADS2 (rs174576), which is associated with treatment response in pediatric NAFLD [78]. However, this association is only from a small pilot study wherein αT was administered as part of a multi- compound regime including choline and DHA. Therefore, further studies need to address whether this association remains when αT is given as a mono therapy and if it can also be recapitulated in adults. The most promising candidate so far is the haptoglobin genotype. Data from the PIVENS and TONIC trials point to a benefit of αT in patients that have two copies of exon 3 and 4 [83]. From a mechanistic point of view, this would be in line with the powerful hepatic antioxidative effect of αT [14], as this Hp genotype is associated with increased oxidative stress [82]. The results of the ongoing trial in China [86] will hopefully offer insight about whether or not the association can be replicated and whether haptoglobin genotype might be a valuable predictor for the clinical response to αT treatment in NAFLD.
Ideally, the response to vitamin E by genotype in NAFLD should be investigated in large-scale, multi-centered trials. By identifying those who benefit the most from vitamin E, unnecessary treatment delay for those who do not would be avoided. Furthermore, patients that will not benefit from the treatment will not be exposed to potential risks associated with high-dose αT treatment.

Author Contributions

Data curation, M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.C.; writing—review and editing, M.C.P.; visualization, M.C.P.; supervision, M.C.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All of the data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table
Table A1. Changes in mean score or ALT value from baseline in the vitamin E treatment group. Statistical significance for the comparison vitamin E treatment to placebo: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, + graphically estimated.
Table A1. Changes in mean score or ALT value from baseline in the vitamin E treatment group. Statistical significance for the comparison vitamin E treatment to placebo: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, + graphically estimated.
NumbersDose/DurationPatient CharacteristicsALT
Change or % Reduction from Baseline		 SteatosisLobular InflammationBallooningNAS ScoreFibrosisRef
80 placebo, 80 vitamin E (PIVENS)800 IU/d 96 weeksAdults without diabetes, biopsy confirmed NASH (NAS score of at least 4, presence of ballooning)−37 **−0.7 ***−0.6 **−0.5 *−1.9 ***−0.3[22]
58 placebo, 58 vitamin E (TONIC)800 IU/d 96 weeksChildren (aged 8–17 years), biopsy confirmed NAFLD (>5% of hepatocytes showed macrovesicular fat)Week 48: −44.5% *;
Week 72: −44.2%;
Week 96: −48.3%		−0.8−0.4−0.5 **−1.8 *−0.3[23]
32 placebo/36 vitamin E800 IU/d 72 weeksAdults with diabetes, biopsy confirmed NASH (zone 3 macrovesicular steatosis with ballooning and lobular inflammation)−20 *+−1.0 *−0.4−0.5not listed−0.6[16]
20 placebo/20 DHA-VE-CHO250 mg of DHA, 39 UI of vitamin E, and 201 mg of choline; 48 weeksChildren (aged 4–16 years) with liver biopsy-proven NASH−18.2 *−0.8 *−0.15−0.75 **−1.7 ***0.17[87]
Table
Table A2. Genetic variations associated with α-tocopherol (αT) with and without supplementation as well as with treatment response in NAFLD. The minor allele frequency (MAF) given has been obtained from the ALFA project in the dbSNP database. Only variations with a MAF of at least 5% are included in this review. * indicates genes involved in splicing and not discussed in this review.
Table A2. Genetic variations associated with α-tocopherol (αT) with and without supplementation as well as with treatment response in NAFLD. The minor allele frequency (MAF) given has been obtained from the ALFA project in the dbSNP database. Only variations with a MAF of at least 5% are included in this review. * indicates genes involved in splicing and not discussed in this review.
MAF (Allele)Effect of MA on αT Plasma/Serum LevelsReferences
Polymorphisms associated with αT serum or plasma levels
APOA4rs6750.17 (A)A lower[37]
APOErs6627990.09 (C)T/T lower; T/C higher[50,51]
Apo C-IIIApoC-III S1/S20.2 (C)in women G/G lower[53]
α-TTPrs69940760.45 (A)A/A higher; A/A lower[44,45]
BUD13 *rs289276800.06 (G)not specified[40]
rs122929210.07 (A)A higher[36]
CD36rs15274790.49 (T)T/T lower[38]
CYP4F2rs21086220.29 (T)T/T higher[30,36]
LIPC rs18005880.22 (T)T higher[40]
PNPLA3rs7384090.21 (G)no association[72]
SR-BIrs110578300.15 (A)A/A lower[36]
SR-BIexon 80.13 (C)C/C higher[37]
SLC30A8rs132666340.29 (T)not specified[40]
SUGP1 *rs104019690.08 (C)not specified[75]
TAPrs22998260.11 (T)T/T higher[44]
TM6SF2rs585429260.07 (T)T lower[75]
ZPR1 *rs9641840.15 (G)G/G higher[36,75]
Polymorphisms associated with αT levels after supplementation
α-TTPrs69940760.45 (A)A/A higher on treatment[44]
CYP4F2rs21086220.29 (T)T/T higher on treatment[30,36]
Polymorphisms and copy number variations associated with treatment response in NAFLD
CYP4F2rs21086220.29 (T)no association with treatment response[30]
FADS1rs1745760.34 (A)A associated with treatment response[79]
HpCNV0.16 (1/1)Hp-2 allele associated with treatment response[84]

References

  1. Kleiner, D.E.; Brunt, E.M.; Van Natta, M.; Behling, C.; Contos, M.J.; Cummings, O.W.; Ferrell, L.D.; Liu, Y.-C.; Torbenson, M.S.; Unalp-Arida, A.; et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2005, 41, 1313–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Younossi, Z.; Anstee, Q.M.; Marietti, M.; Hardy, T.; Henry, L.; Eslam, M.; George, J.; Bugianesi, E. Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: Trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 15, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Younossi, Z.M.; Koenig, A.B.; Abdelatif, D.; Fazel, Y.; Henry, L.; Wymer, M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology 2016, 64, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Chalasani, N.; Younossi, Z.; LaVine, J.E.; Charlton, M.; Cusi, K.; Rinella, M.; Harrison, S.A.; Brunt, E.M.; Sanyal, A.J. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 2018, 67, 328–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rowe, I.A.; Wong, V.W.-S.; Loomba, R. Treatment Candidacy for Pharmacologic Therapies for NASH. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, 20, 1209–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Arab, J.P.; Arrese, M.; Trauner, M. Recent Insights into the Pathogenesis of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2018, 13, 321–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. McPherson, S.; Hardy, T.; Henderson, E.; Burt, A.D.; Day, C.P.; Anstee, Q.M. Evidence of NAFLD progression from steatosis to fibrosing-steatohepatitis using paired biopsies: Implications for prognosis and clinical management. J. Hepatol. 2015, 62, 1148–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kleiner, D.E.; Brunt, E.M.; Wilson, L.A.; Behling, C.; Guy, C.; Contos, M.; Cummings, O.; Yeh, M.; Gill, R.; Chalasani, N.; et al. Association of Histologic Disease Activity with Progression of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. JAMA Netw. Open 2019, 2, e1912565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Anstee, Q.M.; Targher, G.; Day, C.P. Progression of NAFLD to diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease or cirrhosis. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 10, 330–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Houttu, V.; Csader, S.; Nieuwdorp, M.; Holleboom, A.G.; Schwab, U. Dietary Interventions in Patients with Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 716783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Feldstein, A.E.; Lopez, R.; Tamimi, T.A.; Yerian, L.; Chung, Y.M.; Berk, M.; Zhang, R.; McIntyre, T.M.; Hazen, S.L. Mass spectrometric profiling of oxidized lipid products in human nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J. Lipid Res. 2010, 51, 3046–3054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kanuri, G.; Ladurner, R.; Skibovskaya, J.; Spruss, A.; Königsrainer, A.; Bischoff, S.C.; Bergheim, I. Expression of toll-like receptors 1-5 but not TLR 6-10 is elevated in livers of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Int. 2013, 35, 562–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Seki, S.; Kitada, T.; Yamada, T.; Sakaguchi, H.; Nakatani, K.; Wakasa, K. In situ detection of lipid peroxidation and oxidative DNA damage in non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases. J. Hepatol. 2002, 37, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Podszun, M.C.; Chung, J.-Y.; Ylaya, K.; Kleiner, D.E.; Hewitt, S.M.; Rotman, Y. 4-HNE Immunohistochemistry and Image Analysis for Detection of Lipid Peroxidation in Human Liver Samples Using Vitamin E Treatment in NAFLD as a Proof of Concept. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2020, 68, 635–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sato, K.; Gosho, M.; Yamamoto, T.; Kobayashi, Y.; Ishii, N.; Ohashi, T.; Nakade, Y.; Ito, K.; Fukuzawa, Y.; Yoneda, M. Vitamin E has a beneficial effect on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrition 2015, 31, 923–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bril, F.; Biernacki, D.M.; Kalavalapalli, S.; Lomonaco, R.; Subbarayan, S.K.; Lai, J.; Tio, F.; Suman, A.; Orsak, B.K.; Hecht, J.; et al. Role of Vitamin E for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care 2019, 42, 1481–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vilar-Gomez, E.; Vuppalanchi, R.; Gawrieh, S.; Ghabril, M.; Saxena, R.; Cummings, O.W.; Chalasani, N. Vitamin E Improves Transplant-Free Survival and Hepatic Decompensation Among Patients with Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis and Advanced Fibrosis. Hepatology 2018, 71, 495–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Evans, H.M.; Bishop, K.S. On the existence of a hitherto unrecognized dietary factor essential for reproduction. Science 1922, 56, 650–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Kayden, H.; Traber, M. Absorption, lipoprotein transport, and regulation of plasma concentrations of vitamin E in humans. J. Lipid Res. 1993, 34, 343–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Erhardt, A.; Stahl, W.; Sies, H.; Lirussi, F.; Donner, A.; Häussinger, D. Plasma levels of vitamin e and carotenoids are decreased in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (nash). Eur. J. Med Res. 2011, 16, 76–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Violet, P.; Traber, M.G.; Levine, M. Vitamin E Sequestration by Liver Fat in Humans. JCI Insight 2020, 5, e133309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sanyal, A.J.; Chalasani, N.; Kowdley, K.V.; McCullough, A.; Diehl, A.M.; Bass, N.M.; Neuschwander-Tetri, B.A.; Lavine, J.E.; Tonascia, J.; Unalp, A.; et al. Pioglitazone, Vitamin E, or Placebo for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 362, 1675–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Lavine, J.E.; Schwimmer, J.B.; Van Natta, M.L.; Molleston, J.P.; Murray, K.F.; Rosenthal, P.; Abrams, S.H.; Scheimann, A.O.; Sanyal, A.J.; Chalasani, N.; et al. Effect of Vitamin E or Metformin for Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Children and Adolescents: The TONIC randomized controlled trial. JAMA: J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2011, 305, 1659–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Noureddin, N.; Han, M.A.T.; Alkhouri, N.; Noureddin, M. Accounting for the Placebo Effect and Optimizing Outcomes in Clinical Trials of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH). Curr. Hepatol. Rep. 2020, 19, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Miller, E.R., III.; Pastor-Barriuso, R.; Dalal, D.; Riemersma, R.A.; Appel, L.J.; Guallar, E. Meta-Analysis: High-Dosage Vitamin E Supplementation May Increase All-Cause Mortality. Ann. Intern. Med. 2005, 142, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Sturm, R.; Cohen, D. Proximity to urban parks and mental health. J. Ment. Health Policy Econ. 2014, 17, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Köpcke, W. Vitamin E and Mortality: A Critical Perspective of the Conflicting Meta-analysis Outcomes. In Vitamin E in Human Health; Humana Press: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liede, K.E.; Haukka, J.K.; Saxén, L.M.; Heinonen, O.P. Increased tendency towards gingival bleeding caused by joint effect of α-tocopherol supplementation and acetylsalicylic acid. Ann. Med. 1998, 30, 542–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sesso, H.D.; Buring, J.E.; Christen, W.G.; Kurth, T.; Belanger, C.; MacFadyen, J.; Bubes, V.; Manson, J.E.; Glynn, R.J.; Gaziano, J.M. Vitamins E and C in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Men. JAMA 2008, 300, 2123–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Klein, E.A.; Thompson, I.; Tangen, C.M.; John, J.; Lucia, M.S.; Goodman, P.J.; Minasian, L.; Ford, G.; Parnes, H.L.; Gaziano, J.M.; et al. Vitamin E and the Risk of Prostate Cancer: Updated Results of The Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SE-LECT). J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2011, 306, 1549–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Athinarayanan, S.; Wei, R.; Zhang, M.; Bai, S.; Traber, M.G.; Yates, K.; Cummings, O.W.; Molleston, J.; Liu, W.; Chalasani, N. Genetic Polymorphism of Cytochrome P450 4F2, Vitamin E Level and Histological Response in Adults and Children with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Who Participated in PIVENS and TONIC Clinical Trials. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e95366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Nagita, A.; Ando, M. Assessment of hepatic vitamin E status in adult patients with liver disease. Hepatology 1997, 26, 392–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Reboul, E.; Klein, A.; Bietrix, F.; Gleize, B.; Malezet-Desmoulins, C.; Schneider, M.; Margotat, A.; Lagrost, L.; Collet, X.; Borel, P. Scavenger Receptor Class B Type I (SR-BI) Is Involved in Vitamin E Transport across the Enterocyte. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 4739–4745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Goncalves, A.; Roi, S.; Nowicki, M.; Niot, I.; Reboul, E. Cluster-determinant 36 (CD36) impacts on vitamin E postprandial response. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2014, 58, 2297–2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Narushima, K.; Takada, T.; Yamanashi, Y.; Suzuki, H. Niemann-Pick C1-Like 1 Mediates α-Tocopherol Transport. Mol. Pharmacol. 2008, 74, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Major, J.M.; Yu, K.; Wheeler, W.; Zhang, H.; Cornelis, M.C.; Wright, M.E.; Yeager, M.; Snyder, K.; Weinstein, S.J.; Mondul, A.; et al. Genome-wide association study identifies common variants associated with circulating vitamin E levels. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2011, 20, 3876–3883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Borel, P.; Moussa, M.; Reboul, E.; Lyan, B.; Defoort, C.; Vincent-Baudry, S.; Maillot, M.; Gastaldi, M.; Darmon, M.; Portugal, H.; et al. Human Plasma Levels of Vitamin E and Carotenoids Are Associated with Genetic Polymorphisms in Genes Involved in Lipid Metabolism. J. Nutr. 2007, 137, 2653–2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Lecompte, S.; de Edelenyi, F.S.; Goumidi, L.; Maiani, G.; Moschonis, G.; Widhalm, K.; Molnár, D.; Kafatos, A.; Spinneker, A.; Breidenassel, C.; et al. Polymorphisms in the CD36/FAT gene are associated with plasma vitamin E concentrations in humans. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 93, 644–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Krapp, A.; Ahle, S.; Kersting, S.; Hua, Y.; Kneser, K.; Nielsen, M.S.; Gliemann, J.; Beisiegel, U. Hepatic lipase mediates the uptake of chylomicrons and beta-VLDL into cells via the LDL receptor-related protein (LRP). J. Lipid Res. 1996, 37, 926–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hall, M.A.; Verma, A.; Brown-Gentry, K.D.; Goodloe, R.; Boston, J.; Wilson, S.; McClellan, B.; Sutcliffe, C.; Dilks, H.H.; Gillani, N.B.; et al. Detection of Pleiotropy through a Phenome-Wide Association Study (PheWAS) of Epidemiologic Data as Part of the Environmental Architecture for Genes Linked to Environment (EAGLE) Study. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Uhlén, M.; Fagerberg, L.; Hallström, B.M.; Lindskog, C.; Oksvold, P.; Mardinoglu, A.; Sivertsson, Å.; Kampf, C.; Sjöstedt, E.; Asplund, A.; et al. Tissue-Based Map of the Human Proteome. Science 2015, 347, 1260419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ouahchi, K.; Arita, M.; Kayden, H.; Hentati, F.; Hamida, M.B.; Sokol, R.; Arai, H.; Inoue, K.; Mandel, J.L.; Koenig, M. Ataxia with Isolated Vitamin E Protein. Nat. Genet. 1995, 9, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ulatowski, L.; Dreussi, C.; Noy, N.; Barnholtz-Sloan, J.; Klein, E.; Manor, D. Expression of the α-tocopherol transfer protein gene is regulated by oxidative stress and common single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2012, 53, 2318–2326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Wright, M.E.; Peters, U.; Gunter, M.J.; Moore, S.C.; Lawson, K.A.; Yeager, M.; Weinstein, S.J.; Snyder, K.; Virtamo, J.; Albanes, D. Association of Variants in Two Vitamin E Transport Genes with Circulating Vitamin E Concentrations and Prostate Cancer Risk. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 1429–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Zanon-Moreno, V.; Asensio-Marquez, E.M.; Ciancotti-Oliver, L.; Garcia-Medina, J.J.; Sanz, P.; Ortega-Azorin, C.; Pinazo-Duran, M.D.; Ordovás, J.M.; Corella, D. Effects of Polymorphisms in Vitamin E-, Vitamin C-, and Glutathione Perox-idase-Related Genes on Serum Biomarkers and Associations with Glaucoma. Mol. Vis. 2013, 19, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Yamauchi, J.; Iwamoto, T.; Kida, S.; Masushige, S.; Yamada, K.; Esashi, T. Tocopherol-Associated Protein Is a Ligand-Dependent Transcriptional Activator. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001, 285, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kempná, P.; Zingg, J.-M.; Ricciarelli, R.; Hierl, M.; Saxena, S.; Azzi, A. Cloning of novel human SEC14p-like proteins: Ligand binding and functional properties. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2003, 34, 1458–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Podszun, M.C.; Alawad, A.S.; Lingala, S.; Morris, N.; Huang, W.-C.A.; Yang, S.; Schoenfeld, M.; Rolt, A.; Ouwerkerk, R.; Valdez, K.; et al. Vitamin E treatment in NAFLD patients demonstrates that oxidative stress drives steatosis through upregulation of de-novo lipogenesis. Redox Biol. 2020, 37, 101710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Weinberg, R.B.; Cook, V.R.; Beckstead, J.A.; Martin, D.D.O.; Gallagher, J.W.; Shelness, G.S.; Ryan, R.O. Structure and Interfacial Properties of Human Apolipoprotein A-V. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 34438–34444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Girona, J.; Guardiola, M.; Cabré, A.; Manzanares, J.M.; Heras, M.; Ribalta, J.; Masana, L.; Masana, L. The apolipoprotein A5 gene –1131T→C polymorphism affects vitamin E plasma concentrations in type 2 diabetic patients. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2008, 46, 453–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sundl, I.; Guardiola, M.; Khoschsorur, G.; Solà, R.; Vallve, J.-C.; Godàs, G.; Masana, L.; Maritschnegg, M.; Meinitzer, A.; Cardinault, N.; et al. Increased concentrations of circulating vitamin E in carriers of the apolipoprotein A5 gene −1131T>C variant and associations with plasma lipids and lipid peroxidation. J. Lipid Res. 2007, 48, 2506–2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Shoulders, C.; Harry, P.; Lagrost, L.; White, S.; Shah, N.; North, J.; Gilligan, M.; Gambert, P.; Ball, M. Variation at the apo AI/CIII/A1V gene complex is associated with elevated plasma levels of apo CIII. Atherosclerosis 1991, 87, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Borel, P.; Moussa, M.; Reboul, E.; Lyan, B.; Defoort, C.; Vincent-Baudry, S.; Maillot, M.; Gastaldi, M.; Darmon, M.; Portugal, H.; et al. Human fasting plasma concentrations of vitamin E and carotenoids, and their association with genetic variants in apo C-III, cholesteryl ester transfer protein, hepatic lipase, intestinal fatty acid binding protein and microsomal triacylglycerol transfer protein. Br. J. Nutr. 2008, 101, 680–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Bardowell, S.A.; Ding, X.; Parker, R.S. Disruption of P450-mediated vitamin E hydroxylase activities alters vitamin E status in tocopherol supplemented mice and reveals extra-hepatic vitamin E metabolism. J. Lipid Res. 2012, 53, 2667–2676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Schmolz, L.; Birringer, M.; Lorkowski, S.; Wallert, M. Complexity of vitamin e metabolism. World J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 7, 14–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sontag, T.J.; Parker, R.S. Influence of major structural features of tocopherols and tocotrienols on their ω-oxidation by tocopherol-ω-hydroxylase. J. Lipid Res. 2007, 48, 1090–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Cheng, J.; Joyce, A.; Yates, K.; Aouizerat, B.; Sanyal, A.J. Metabolomic Profiling to Identify Predictors of Response to Vitamin E for Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH). PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e44106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bardowell, S.A.; Stec, D.E.; Parker, R.S. Common Variants of Cytochrome P450 4F2 Exhibit Altered Vitamin E-ω-Hydroxylase Specific Activity. J. Nutr. 2010, 140, 1901–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Anstee, Q.M.; Day, C.P. The genetics of NAFLD. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 10, 645–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Romeo, S.; Kozlitina, J.; Xing, C.; Pertsemlidis, A.; Cox, D.; Pennacchio, L.A.; Boerwinkle, E.; Cohen, J.C.; Hobbs, H.H. Genetic variation in PNPLA3 confers susceptibility to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40, 1461–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Lindgren, C.; Yerges-Armstrong, L.M.; Wu, J.; Hernaez, R.; Kim, L.J.; Palmer, L.; Gudnason, V.; Eiriksdottir, G.; Garcia, M.E.; Launer, L.J.; et al. Genome-Wide Association Analysis Identifies Variants Associated with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease That Have Distinct Effects on Metabolic Traits. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7, e1001324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chambers, J.C.; Alcohol Genome-wide Association (AlcGen) Consortium; Zhang, W.; Sehmi, J.; Li, X.; Wass, M.; Van Der Harst, P.; Holm, H.; Sanna, S.; Kavousi, M.; et al. Genome-wide association study identifies loci influencing concentrations of liver enzymes in plasma. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43, 1131–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Anstee, Q.M.; Darlay, R.; Cockell, S.; Meroni, M.; Govaere, O.; Tiniakos, D.; Burt, A.D.; Bedossa, P.; Palmer, J.; Liu, Y.-L.; et al. Genome-wide association study of non-alcoholic fatty liver and steatohepatitis in a histologically characterised cohort☆. J. Hepatol. 2020, 73, 505–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Wang, J.; Conti, D.V.; Bogumil, D.; Sheng, X.; Noureddin, M.; Wilkens, L.R.; Le Marchand, L.; Rosen, H.R.; Haiman, C.A.; Setiawan, V.W. Association of Genetic Risk Score with NAFLD in An Ethnically Diverse Cohort. Hepatol. Commun. 2021, 5, 1689–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Parisinos, C.A.; Wilman, H.R.; Thomas, E.L.; Kelly, M.; Nicholls, R.C.; McGonigle, J.; Neubauer, S.; Hingorani, A.D.; Patel, R.S.; Hemingway, H.; et al. Genome-wide and Mendelian randomisation studies of liver MRI yield insights into the pathogenesis of steatohepatitis. J. Hepatol. 2020, 73, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Targher, G.; Mantovani, A.; Alisi, A.; Mosca, A.; Panera, N.; Byrne, C.D.; Nobili, V. Relationship Between PNPLA3 rs738409 Polymorphism and Decreased Kidney Function in Children With NAFLD. Hepatology 2019, 70, 142–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Salari, N.; Darvishi, N.; Mansouri, K.; Ghasemi, H.; Hosseinian-Far, M.; Darvishi, F.; Mohammadi, M. Association between PNPLA3 rs738409 polymorphism and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2021, 21, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Trépo, E.; Romeo, S.; Zucman-Rossi, J.; Nahon, P. PNPLA3 gene in liver diseases. J. Hepatol. 2016, 65, 399–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Rotman, Y.; Koh, C.; Zmuda, J.M.; Kleiner, D.E.; Liang, T.J.; NASH CRN. The association of genetic variability in patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3 (PNPLA3) with histological severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2010, 52, 894–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Fukui, A.; Kawabe, N.; Hashimoto, S.; Murao, M.; Nakano, T.; Shimazaki, H.; Kan, T.; Nakaoka, K.; Ohki, M.; Takagawa, Y.; et al. Vitamin E reduces liver stiffness in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J. Hepatol. 2015, 7, 2749–2756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Mondul, A.; Mancina, R.M.; Merlo, A.; Dongiovanni, P.; Rametta, R.; Montalcini, T.; Valenti, L.; Albanes, D.; Romeo, S. PNPLA3 I148M Variant Influences Circulating Retinol in Adults with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease or Obesity. J. Nutr. 2015, 145, 1687–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Kozlitina, J.; Smagris, E.; Stender, S.; Nordestgaard, B.G.; Zhou, H.H.; Tybjærg-Hansen, A.; Vogt, T.F.; Hobbs, H.H.; Cohen, J.C. Exome-wide association study identifies a TM6SF2 variant that confers susceptibility to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 352–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Mahdessian, H.; Taxiarchis, A.; Popov, S.; Silveira, A.; Franco-Cereceda, A.; Hamsten, A.; Eriksson, P.; Hooft, F.V. TM6SF2 is a regulator of liver fat metabolism influencing triglyceride secretion and hepatic lipid droplet content. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 8913–8918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Wood, A.R.; Perry, J.R.B.; Tanaka, T.; Hernandez, D.G.; Zheng, H.-F.; Melzer, D.; Gibbs, J.R.; Nalls, M.A.; Weedon, M.N.; Spector, T.D.; et al. Imputation of Variants from the 1000 Genomes Project Modestly Improves Known Associations and Can Identify Low-frequency Variant-Phenotype Associations Undetected by HapMap Based Imputation. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Dallio, M.; Masarone, M.; Romeo, M.; Tuccillo, C.; Morisco, F.; Persico, M.; Loguercio, C.; Federico, A. PNPLA3, TM6SF2, and MBOAT7 Influence on Nutraceutical Therapy Response for Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 734847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Athinarayanan, S.; Fan, Y.; Wang, X.; Callaway, E.; Cai, D.; Chalasani, N.; Chapkin, R.S.; Liu, W. Fatty Acid Desaturase 1 Influences Hepatic Lipid Homeostasis by Modulating the PPARα-FGF21 Axis. Hepatol. Commun. 2020, 5, 461–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Mirkov, S.; Myers, J.L.; Ramírez, J.; Liu, W. SNPs affecting serum metabolomic traits may regulate gene transcription and lipid accumulation in the liver. Metabolism 2012, 61, 1523–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Nobili, V.; Alisi, A.; Liu, Z.; Liang, T.; Crudele, A.; Raponi, M.; Lin, J.; Chalasani, N.P.; Liu, W. In a pilot study, reduced fatty acid desaturase 1 function was associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and response to treatment in children. Pediatr. Res. 2018, 84, 696–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yang, F.; Ghio, A.J.; Herbert, D.C.; Weaker, F.J.; Walter, C.A.; Coalson, J.J. Pulmonary Expression of the Human Haptoglobin Gene. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2000, 23, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Cooper, C.E.; Schaer, M.J.; Buehler, P.W.; Wilson, M.T.; Reeder, B.J.; Silkstone, G.; Svistunenko, D.A.; Bülow, L.; Alayash, A.I. Haptoglobin Binding Stabilizes Hemoglobin Ferryl Iron and the Globin Radical on Tyrosine β145. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 18, 2264–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Galicia, G.; Ceuppens, J.L. Haptoglobin Function and Regulation in Autoimmune Diseases. In Acute Phase Proteins: Regulation and Functions of Acute Phase Proteins; Intechopen: London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. MacKellar, M.; Vigerust, D.J. Role of Haptoglobin in Health and Disease: A Focus on Diabetes. Clin. Diabetes 2016, 34, 148–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Banini, B.A.; Cazanave, S.C.; Yates, K.P.; Asgharpour, A.; Vincent, R.; Mirshahi, F.; Le, P.; Contos, M.J.; Tonascia, J.; Chalasani, N.P.; et al. Haptoglobin 2 Allele is Associated with Histologic Response to Vitamin E in Subjects with Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2019, 53, 750–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Boettger, L.M.; Salem, R.M.; Handsaker, R.E.; Peloso, G.M.; Kathiresan, S.; Hirschhorn, J.N.; McCarroll, S.A. Recurring exon deletions in the HP (haptoglobin) gene contribute to lower blood cholesterol levels. Nat. Genet. 2016, 48, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Zhou, J.; the Chinese NAFLD Clinical Research Network (CNAFLD CRN); Liu, J.; Sheng, H.; You, N.; Chen, J.; Mi, X.; Yang, W.; Zang, S.; Shi, J. Haptoglobin 2-2 Genotype is Associated with More Advanced Disease in Subjects with Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis: A Retrospective Study. Adv. Ther. 2019, 36, 880–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Zang, S.; On behalf of the Chinese NAFLD Clinical Research Network (CNAFLD CRN); Chen, J.; Song, Y.; Bai, L.; Chen, J.; Chi, X.; He, F.; Sheng, H.; Wang, J.; et al. Haptoglobin Genotype and Vitamin E Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Nondiabetic Patients with Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in China: A Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial Design. Adv. Ther. 2018, 35, 218–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Zöhrer, E.; Alisi, A.; Jahnel, J.; Mosca, A.; Della Corte, C.; Crudele, A.; Fauler, G.; Nobili, V. Efficacy of docosahexaenoic acid–choline–vitamin E in paediatric NASH: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2017, 42, 948–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antioxidants 11 01284 g001 550
Figure 1. Possible genetic factors associated with the response to vitamin E treatment in NAFLD. Factors for which clinical evidence is available and an association has been reported are marked with an *. αTTP—α-tocopherol transfer protein; TAP—tocopherol-associated protein; APOA4—apolipoprotein A4; APOE—apolipoprotein E; APOC-III—apolipoprotein C-III; LIPC—hepatic lipase; FADS1—fatty acid desaturase 1; CD36—cluster of differentiation 36; SR-B1—scavenger receptor class B member 1.
Figure 1. Possible genetic factors associated with the response to vitamin E treatment in NAFLD. Factors for which clinical evidence is available and an association has been reported are marked with an *. αTTP—α-tocopherol transfer protein; TAP—tocopherol-associated protein; APOA4—apolipoprotein A4; APOE—apolipoprotein E; APOC-III—apolipoprotein C-III; LIPC—hepatic lipase; FADS1—fatty acid desaturase 1; CD36—cluster of differentiation 36; SR-B1—scavenger receptor class B member 1.
Antioxidants 11 01284 g001
Table
Table 1. Percentage of patients (placebo vs. vitamin E) showing at least a one-point improvement in histological parameters. Statistical significance for the comparison vitamin E treatment to placebo: * p < 0.05.
Table 1. Percentage of patients (placebo vs. vitamin E) showing at least a one-point improvement in histological parameters. Statistical significance for the comparison vitamin E treatment to placebo: * p < 0.05.
% Patients: Placebo vs. Vitamin E
Improvement of Primary OutcomeSteatosisInflammationBallooningNASH ResolutionReference
PIVENS19 vs. 43 *31 vs. 54 *35 vs. 54 *29 vs. 50 *21 vs. 36[22]
TONIC 27 vs. 3120 vs. 2210 vs. 22 *28 vs. 58 *[23]
Bril et al. 46 vs. 6843 vs. 3635 vs. 5012 vs. 33 *[16]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Civelek, M.; Podszun, M.C. Genetic Factors Associated with Response to Vitamin E Treatment in NAFLD. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1284. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11071284

AMA Style

Civelek M, Podszun MC. Genetic Factors Associated with Response to Vitamin E Treatment in NAFLD. Antioxidants. 2022; 11(7):1284. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11071284

Chicago/Turabian Style

Civelek, Mehtap, and Maren C. Podszun. 2022. "Genetic Factors Associated with Response to Vitamin E Treatment in NAFLD" Antioxidants 11, no. 7: 1284. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11071284

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop