Next Article in Journal
Psychosocial Factors Associated with Memory Complaints during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multi-Country Survey
Next Article in Special Issue
Editorial: Frontiers in Neuro Oncology and Neurosurgery
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Temporal Patterns of Dynamic Information Flow during Attention Network Test (ANT)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hemispheric Asymmetry of the Hand Motor Representations in Patients with Highly Malignant Brain Tumors: Implications for Surgery and Clinical Practice
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Histologic Definition of Enhancing Core and FLAIR Hyperintensity Region of Glioblastoma, IDH-Wild Type: A Clinico-Pathologic Study on a Single-Institution Series

1
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies “G. F. Ingrassia”, Anatomic Pathology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
2
Department of Neurological Surgery, Policlinico “G. Rodolico-S. Marco” University Hospital, 95123 Catania, Italy
3
Interdisciplinary Research Center on Brain Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
4
Department of Neuroscience “Rita Levi Montalcini”, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy
5
Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy
6
Pathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2023, 13(2), 248; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13020248
Submission received: 2 January 2023 / Revised: 27 January 2023 / Accepted: 30 January 2023 / Published: 31 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Frontiers in Neurooncology and Neurosurgery)

Abstract

:
The extent of resection beyond the enhancing core (EC) in glioblastoma IDH-wild type (GBM, IDHwt) is one of the most debated topics in neuro-oncology. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that local disease recurrence often arises in peritumoral areas and that radiologically-defined FLAIR hyperintensity areas of GBM IDHwt are often visible beyond the conventional EC. Therefore, the need to extend the surgical resection also to the FLAIR hyperintensity areas is a matter of debate. Since little is known about the histological composition of FLAIR hyperintensity regions, in this study we aimed to provide a comprehensive description of the histological features of EC and FLAIR hyperintensity regions sampled intraoperatively using neuronavigation and 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) fluorescence, in 33 patients with GBM, IDHwt. Assessing a total 109 histological samples, we found that FLAIR areas consisted in: (i) fragments of white matter focally to diffusely infiltrated by tumor cells in 76% of cases; (ii) a mixture of white matter with reactive astrogliosis and grey matter with perineuronal satellitosis in 15% and (iii) tumor tissue in 9%. A deeper knowledge of the histology of FLAIR hyperintensity areas in GBM, IDH-wt may serve to better guide neurosurgeons on the choice of the most appropriate surgical approach in patients with this neoplasm.

1. Introduction

Glioblastoma IDH-wild type (GBM, IDHwt) is the most frequent malignant primary tumor of the central nervous system (CNS) in adults [1,2]. In spite of the advances in neurosurgery, neuropathology and neuro-oncology, it exhibits a uniformly poor prognosis characterized by low survival rates and poor response to the currently available therapies including surgery and chemo/radiotherapy [1,2,3]. In the past, the main goal of surgical resection of GBM, IDHwt was the complete resection of the enhancing core (EC) of the tumor; however, the evidence that local recurrences often originate from the peritumoral zone suggests that “what was going on around the tumor” should also be considered [4,5,6,7,8,9]. On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), T2-weighted (T2w) sequences identify the different water contents of the cerebral parenchyma; in particular, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) T2wimages better point out pathological processes, suppressing the T2 signal from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [10,11]. Since FLAIR hyperintensity areas are often visible beyond the conventional EC of GBM, a debated issue is whether the surgical resection should also be extended to the FLAIR hyperintensity area, performing a so-called “FLAIRectomy”, and whether this surgical procedure could be of any benefit for the patient’s outcome [4,5,6,7,8,9]. The morphology and the molecular landscape of GBM, IDHwt have been extensively investigated [12,13]; however, little is known about the histological composition of the peritumoral area that corresponds to what is radiologically defined as the FLAIR hyperintensity zone. To the best of our knowledge, relatively few studies have correlated the MRI and histological features of the FLAIR hyperintensity zone [14,15,16]. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to histologically characterize the FLAIR hyperintensity zone, describing the different histological features of both ECs and FLAIR hyperintensity areas in a single-institution series of 33 patients. A deeper knowledge of the tissue composition of these areas could provide useful information to modify therapeutic strategies in these patients.

2. Materials and Methods

The present research was in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and obtained the approval of the local ethics committee, Catania 1 (CE 165/2015/PO). All the patients involved gave their written informed consent. Inclusion criteria were: (i) histologically proven GBM, IDH-wt; (ii) age > 18 years; (iii) intraoperative sampling of EC and FLAIR zone detected using neuronavigation and 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) fluorescence.
We prospectively collected tissue samples in different brain tumor regions at the Neurosurgical Unit of the University of Catania between January 2020 and December 2021. We then retrospectively retrieved all cases with a histopathologically- and molecularly-proven diagnosis of “de novo” WHO grade 4 GBM, IDHwt.
The pre-operative and surgical protocols used to selectively identify and sample the different tumor areas foresaw an intraoperative multimodal imaging approach that was previously described [4,17,18]. Particularly, the intraoperative fluorescence with 5-ALA was evaluated using a surgical microscope with 400 nm filter (Carl Zeiss; Kinevo 900, Oberkochen, Germany) by three trained neurosurgeons (G.M.V.B., F.C. and R.A.) during the resection or after the sampling in cases of frameless neuronavigated biopsy. Screenshots of neuronavigation were registered and collected in order to identify the sites of every sample.
Tissue specimens were formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, cut to 2–3 microns and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). A total of 109 histological samples (52 taken from ECs and 57 from FLAIR hyperintensity regions) were evaluated by three pathologists with expertise in neuropathology (G.B., G.M. and R.C.). The Fisher exact test was performed to evaluate the differences in the distribution of histological features between EC and FLAIR hyperintensity regions. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

3. Results

Of the 58 patients surgically treated for CNS neoplasms in that period, 33 (20 males and 13 females with a mean age at diagnosis of 56 years) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Tumors were located at the temporal lobe (n = 13), frontal lobe (n = 9), parietal lobe (n = 8), occipital lobe (n = 2) and corpus callosum (n = 1). Furthermore, 22 (66.6%) underwent resection, while 11 (33.3%) underwent biopsy. All the histologically examined samples exhibited 5-ALA fluorescence; the specimens from the EC showed a lava-like fluorescence, whereas those from the FLAIR hyperintensity zone had a faint fluorescence. In 29/33 (88%) cases, the samples from ECs exhibited classic GBM morphology, consisting of hypercellularity, increased mitotic activity, necrosis (Figure 1A) and/or microvascular proliferation (MVP) (Figure 1B). In 4/33 cases (12%), the specimens from the ECs showed hypercellular and mitotically-active high-grade diffuse astrocytic tumors, IDHwt, lacking both necrosis and MVP. In these cases, the diagnosis of GBM was based on molecular criteria: 3/4 tumors exhibited EGFR amplification, combined loss of chromosome 10 and gain of chromosome 7 (7+/10− phenotype) and TERT promoter mutation, while EGFR amplification and 7+/10− phenotype was found in the remaining case.
Figure 2 and Figure 3 show the MRI features, the gross findings and the histopathology of two cases from our series.
The histological examination of the specimens from FLAIR hyperintensity areas showed: (i) fragments of white matter focally to diffusely infiltrated by tumor cells, in the absence of necrosis and MVP, in 25/33 cases (76%) (Figure 4A); (ii) a mixture of white matter with reactive astrogliosis (Figure 4B) and grey matter exhibiting perineuronal satellitosis (Figure 4C), in 5/33 cases (15%) and (iii) viable tumor tissue with necrosis and MVP (Figure 4D) in 3/33 cases (9%). The Fisher exact test exhibited statistically significant differences in the histological composition between EC and FLAIR regions (p = 0.0000) (Table 1).

4. Discussion

Nowadays, a highly debated issue in neuro-oncology is whether surgical resection of GBM, IDHwt should be extended beyond the EC [4,5,6,7,8,9]. Our research group was the first to use the term “FLAIRectomy” to define the resection of the FLAIR hyperintensity area around the EC [4]. Li et al., instead, first focused on the peritumoral infiltrated FLAIR hyperintensity areas, showing that an extent of resection (EOR) >53% of this region was associated with a better prognosis [8], and their findings were confirmed by Pessina et al. [19]. By subdividing the patients into two groups based on the Volume FLAIR/Volume EC ratio (Volume FLAIR/Volume EC < 10 are defined as the “proliferation-dominant” subtype, Volume FLAIR/Volume EC > 10 are defined as “diffusion-dominant” subtypes), some researchers demonstrated that surgical resection of the FLAIR zone leads to survival improvement in patients with “proliferation-dominant” grade 4 astrocytomas, IDH-mutant [20]. However, a multicentric study demonstrated that supramarginal resection improved survival in patients with GBM, IDHwt of the “diffusion dominant” type [9,21]. Recently, Haddad et al. also stated that maximal safe resection of both EC and FLAIR regions provided a survival benefit to patients with GBM [7].
It is widely demonstrated that 5-ALA fluorescence is a useful tool to obtain a supramaximal resection; the intraoperative fluorescence generally overcomes the boundaries of the T1 nodule and it is also known that the range of fluorescence differs between EN and FLAIR areas but there is no clear evidence about the precise spatial correlation between neuroradiological and intraoperative data [18,22,23,24].
Clarifying the pathological features and the biological role of FLAIR hyperintensity zone might be useful to explain the observed survival improvement in GBM patients treated with “FLAIRectomy” [5,25]. Indeed, although it was supposed that FLAIR hyperintensity areas in GBM contain infiltrative tumor cells, there are relatively few literature evidence that systematically define these peritumoral regions from a histopathological point of view [13,14,15]. On an autoptic series, Yamahara et al. showed a significant amount of tumor cells several millimeters beyond the EC in MRI [14]; however, this study had several limitations, including the low number of brains examined (only seven), the comparison of a death brain with an imaging performed much earlier and the lack of consideration of FLAIR sequences. Barajas and colleagues overcame the limitation of the previous study, by examining 119 tissue samples taken during stereotactic biopsies [15]. They showed that tumor cells were present in more than 80% of non-enhancing tumor tissue, challenging the widely held concept that FLAIR hyperintense regions had limited malignant potential [15]. However, this paper was especially focused on the neuroradiological findings and there was no specific characterization of the histological features. Gill et al. evaluated the specimens taken from EC and FLAIR regions of 69 patients affected by GBM [16]. The two different areas were identified with the aid of neuronavigation alone. Pathological analysis showed that the cellular density was significantly different between the two zones (EC samples > FLAIR) [16]. In addition, ECs contained glomeruloid-type vascular proliferation and necrosis, whereas the FLAIR regions exhibited an overall morphology consistent with that of diffusely infiltrating gliomas [16]. We believe that the methods used in this study could determine a sampling bias.
The present study first provides readers with a histological “definition” of FLAIR hyperintensity areas, showing that these regions, which until now have represented a purely radiological concept, exhibit tumor cell infiltration or classical GBM features in 85% of cases. In addition, our research group recently demonstrated a similar amount of cancer stem cells in EC and FLAIR hyperintensity regions of GBM, IDHwt [18], emphasizing that GBM peritumoral zones actively contribute to the aggressive biological behavior of this neoplasm. Our results are partially in line with those from Barajas et al. who demonstrated that neoplastic cells could be found in more than 80% of non-enhancing GBM tissues from their cohort [15] but did not report further histological qualitative differences; we overcame these limitations demonstrating that, according to our data, FLAIR hyperintensity regions rarely (less than 10% of cases) exhibited viable tumor tissue with “conventional” GBM morphology (necrosis and/or MVP), while white matter tissue with at least focal tumor infiltration and absence of necrosis and MVP were seen in the majority (76%) of cases. In addition, the histology of FLAIR areas in which no tumor infiltration was found, consisted of reactive astrogliosis with gemistocytes and perineuronal satellitosis. In this regard, we believe that the histologic/biological concept of perineuronal satellitosis deserves a brief discussion. This histological feature, first described on unaffected peripheral nervous tissue by Santiago Ramón y Cajal in 1899 as “satellitosis” [26] and later renamed “perineuronal satellitosis” in 1930 [27], consists of small aggregates of glial cells surrounding the cell body and the dendrites of neurons [28]. Since its first description, perineuronal satellitosis has been widely reported both in aged and young brain tissue in non-pathological conditions and in different anatomical sites including the cerebral cortex, thalamus, basal ganglia and hippocampus [28]. In 1938, perineuronal satellitosis was first found on GBM tissue and considered as a form of “secondary structure” and also termed as “perineural growth” [29]. This histological finding, although not specific, has been frequently reported in diffuse gliomas and considered to be the result of the cross-talk existing between neurons and tumor cells [28]. However, since, even in the context of satellitosis associated with diffuse gliomas, it has not yet been clarified whether the glial cells are actually neoplastic in nature or not, we did not consider perineuronal satellitosis as a histological sign of tumor infiltration.
Since the 5th edition of the WHO classification of CNS tumors established some molecular criteria for GBM, IDHwt diagnosis [3,30], one limitation of our study is that molecular analyses were performed for diagnostic purposes only on those cases from our cohort that showed a morphology consistent with a high-grade astrocytic tumor, IDHwt, lacking necrosis and MVP, and in no FLAIR samples. The analysis of the molecular features of GBM IDHwt both in EC and the FLAIR hyperintensity region could be an additional interesting future perspective of this project, as we think that it may have an impact on the histological composition of the latter.
Finally, we believe that a deeper knowledge of the histological composition of the peritumoral area is essential to justify the need for a more or less aggressive surgical resection; accordingly, we encourage further studies with larger cohorts to reach a final agreement on this highly debated topic.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.B. and R.A.; methodology, R.A., F.C. and G.M.V.B.; formal analysis, V.B., M.Z. and A.P.; data curation, G.B.; writing—original draft preparation, G.B.; writing—review and editing, G.B., G.M. and R.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Catania 1 Ethics Committee, Santa Sofia 78 street, Catania, Italy (protocol code:166/2015/PO;17/12/2015).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data presented in this article are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ostrom, Q.T.; Cioffi, G.; Waite, K.; Kruchko, C.; Barnholtz-Sloan, J.S. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2014–2018. Neuro Oncol. 2021, 23 (Suppl. 2), iii1–iii105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ostrom, Q.T.; Cioffi, G.; Gittleman, H.; Patil, N.; Waite, K.; Kruchko, C.; Barnholtz-Sloan, J.S. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2012–2016. Neuro Oncol. 2019, 21 (Suppl. 5), v1–v100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Louis, D.N.; Perry, A.; Wesseling, P.; Brat, D.J.; Cree, I.A.; Figarella-Branger, D.; Hawkins, C.; Ng, H.K.; Pfister, S.M.; Reifenberger, G.; et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A summary. Neuro Oncol. 2021, 23, 1231–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Certo, F.; Altieri, R.; Maione, M.; Schonauer, C.; Sortino, G.; Fiumanò, G.; Tirrò, E.; Massimino, M.; Broggi, G.; Vigneri, P.; et al. FLAIRectomy in Supramarginal Resection of Glioblastoma Correlates with Clinical Outcome and Survival Analysis: A Prospective, Single Institution, Case Series. Oper. Neurosurg. 2021, 20, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Altieri, R.; Barbagallo, D.; Certo, F.; Broggi, G.; Ragusa, M.; Di Pietro, C.; Caltabiano, R.; Magro, G.; Peschillo, S.; Purrello, M.; et al. Peritumoral Microenvironment in High-Grade Gliomas: From FLAIRectomy to Microglia-Glioma Cross-Talk. Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Guerrini, F.; Roca, E.; Spena, G. Supramarginal Resection for Glioblastoma: It Is Time to Set Boundaries! A Critical Review on a Hot Topic. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Haddad, A.F.; Young, J.S.; Morshed, R.A.; Berger, M.S. FLAIRectomy: Resecting beyond the Contrast Margin for Glioblastoma. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Y.M.; Suki, D.; Hess, K.; Sawaya, R. The influence of maximum safe resection of glioblastoma on survival in 1229 patients: Can we do better than gross-total resection? J. Neurosurg. 2016, 124, 977–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Vivas-Buitrago, T.; Domingo, R.A.; Tripathi, S.; De Biase, G.; Brown, D.; Akinduro, O.O.; Ramos-Fresnedo, A.; Sabsevitz, D.S.; Bendok, B.R.; Sherman, W.; et al. Influence of supramarginal resection on survival outcomes after gross-total resection of IDH-wild-type glioblastoma. J. Neurosurg. 2021, 136, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nguyen, D.H.; Nguyen, D.M.; Nguyen, H.V.; Nguyen-Thi, V.A.; Nguyen-Thi, H.A.; Nguyen, T.X.; Nguyen, M.D. Discrimination between glioblastoma and solitary brain metastasis: A quantitative analysis based on FLAIR signal intensity. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2022, 26, 3577–3584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, M.; Huang, W.; Chen, H.; Jiang, H.; Yang, C.; Shen, S.; Cui, Y.; Dong, G.; Ren, X.; Lin, S. T2/FLAIR Abnormity Could be the Sign of Glioblastoma Dissemination. Front. Neurol. 2022, 13, 819216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Broggi, G.; Piombino, E.; Altieri, R.; Romano, C.; Certo, F.; Barbagallo, G.M.V.; Vigneri, P.; Condorelli, D.; Colarossi, L.; Colarossi, C.; et al. Glioblastoma, IDH-Wild Type with FGFR3-TACC3 Fusion: When Morphology May Reliably Predict the Molecular Profile of a Tumor. A Case Report and Literature Review. Front. Neurol. 2022, 13, 823015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Caltabiano, R.; Torrisi, A.; Condorelli, D.; Albanese, V.; Lanzafame, S. High levels of connexin 43 mRNA in high grade astrocytomas. Study of 32 cases with in situ hybridization. Acta Histochem. 2010, 112, 529–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yamahara, T.; Numa, Y.; Oishi, T.; Kawaguchi, T.; Seno, T.; Asai, A.; Kawamoto, K. Morphological and flow cytometric analysis of cell infiltration in glioblastoma: A comparison of autopsy brain and neuroimaging. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2010, 27, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Barajas, R.F., Jr.; Phillips, J.J.; Parvataneni, R.; Molinaro, A.; Essock-Burns, E.; Bourne, G.; Parsa, A.T.; Aghi, M.K.; McDermott, M.W.; Berger, M.S.; et al. Regional variation in histopathologic features of tumor specimens from treatment-naive glioblastoma correlates with anatomic and physiologic MR Imaging. Neuro Oncol. 2012, 14, 942–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Gill, B.J.; Pisapia, D.J.; Malone, H.R.; Goldstein, H.; Lei, L.; Sonabend, A.; Yun, J.; Samanamud, J.; Sims, J.S.; Banu, M.; et al. MRI-localized biopsies reveal subtype-specific differences in molecular and cellular composition at the margins of glioblastoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 12550–12555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Barbagallo, G.M.V.; Certo, F.; Di Gregorio, S.; Maione, M.; Garozzo, M.; Peschillo, S.; Altieri, R. Recurrent high-grade glioma surgery: A multimodal intraoperative protocol to safely increase extent of tumor resection and analysis of its impact on patient outcome. Neurosurg. Focus 2021, 50, E20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Altieri, R.; Broggi, G.; Certo, F.; Pacella, D.; Cammarata, G.; Maione, M.; Garozzo, M.; Barbagallo, D.; Purrello, M.; Caltabiano, R.; et al. Anatomical distribution of cancer stem cells between enhancing nodule and FLAIR hyperintensity in supratentorial glioblastoma: Time to recalibrate the surgical target? Neurosurg. Rev. 2022, 45, 3709–3716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pessina, F.; Navarria, P.; Cozzi, L.; Ascolese, A.M.; Simonelli, M.; Santoro, A.; Clerici, E.; Rossi, M.; Scorsetti, M.; Bello, L. Maximize surgical resection beyond contrast-enhancing boundaries in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: Is it useful and safe? A single institution retrospective experience. J. Neurooncol. 2017, 135, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jiang, H.; Cui, Y.; Liu, X.; Ren, X.; Li, M.; Lin, S. Proliferation-dominant high-grade astrocytoma: Survival benefit associated with extensive resection of FLAIR abnormality region. J. Neurosurg. 2019, 132, 998–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Tripathi, S.; Vivas-Buitrago, T.; Domingo, R.A.; Biase, G.; Brown, D.; Akinduro, O.O.; Ramos-Fresnedo, A.; Sherman, W.; Gupta, V.; Middlebrooks, E.H.; et al. IDH-wild-type glioblastoma cell density and infiltration distribution influence on supramarginal resection and its impact on overall survival: A mathematical model. J. Neurosurg. 2021, 136, 1567–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Certo, F.; Stummer, W.; Farah, J.O.; Freyschlag, C.; Visocchi, M.; Morrone, A.; Altieri, R.; Toccaceli, G.; Peschillo, S.; Thomè, C.; et al. Supramarginal resection of glioblastoma: 5-ALA fluorescence, combined intraoperative strategies and correlation with survival. J. Neurosurg. Sci. 2019, 63, 625–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Giantini-Larsen, A.M.; Kharas, N.; Pisapia, D.; Schwartz, T.H. Histology of high-grade glioma samples resected using 5-ALA fluorescent headlight and loupe combination. Acta Neurochir. 2023, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lau, D.; Hervey-Jumper, S.L.; Chang, S.; Molinaro, A.M.; McDermott, M.W.; Phillips, J.J.; Berger, M.S. A prospective Phase II clinical trial of 5-aminolevulinic acid to assess the correlation of intraoperative fluorescence intensity and degree of histologic cellularity during resection of high-grade gliomas. J. Neurosurg. 2016, 124, 1300–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. De Luca, C.; Virtuoso, A.; Papa, M.; Certo, F.; Barbagallo, G.M.V.; Altieri, R. Regional Development of Glioblastoma: The Anatomical Conundrum of Cancer Biology and Its Surgical Implication. Cells 2022, 11, 1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Brownson, R.H. Perineuronal satellite cells in the motor cortex of aging brains. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 1956, 15, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vijayan, V.K.; Zhou, S.-S.; Russell, M.J.; Geddes, J.; Ellis, W.; Cotman, C.W. Perineuronal satellitosis in the human hippocampal formation. Hippocampus 1993, 3, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Civita, P.; Valerio, O.; Naccarato, A.G.; Gumbleton, M.; Pilkington, G.J. Satellitosis, a Crosstalk between Neurons, Vascular Structures and Neoplastic Cells in Brain Tumours; Early Manifestation of Invasive Behaviour. Cancers 2020, 12, 3720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Scherer, H.J. Structural development in gliomas. Am. J. Cancer 1938, 34, 333–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tirrò, E.; Massimino, M.; Broggi, G.; Romano, C.; Minasi, S.; Gianno, F.; Antonelli, M.; Motta, G.; Certo, F.; Altieri, R.; et al. A Custom DNA-Based NGS Panel for the Molecular Characterization of Patients with Diffuse Gliomas: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 861078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Histopathology of EC. All surgical samples from the ECs exhibited the conventional morphological features of GBM, IDHwt, consisting of hypercellular astrocytic neoplasms with necrosis (A) and/or MVP (B) ((A,B) H&E; original magnifications 100×).
Figure 1. Histopathology of EC. All surgical samples from the ECs exhibited the conventional morphological features of GBM, IDHwt, consisting of hypercellular astrocytic neoplasms with necrosis (A) and/or MVP (B) ((A,B) H&E; original magnifications 100×).
Brainsci 13 00248 g001
Figure 2. Preoperative MRI from a 57-year-old man. (A) Axial section of a T1w sequence with gadolinium showing a left frontal tumor with necrotic core and ring enhancement. (B) FLAIR sequence showing a hyperintensity beyond the EC. (C,D) Gross image (C) and histologic low magnification (D) showing both EC and FLAIR region from the excised mass ((D) H&E; original magnification 25×).
Figure 2. Preoperative MRI from a 57-year-old man. (A) Axial section of a T1w sequence with gadolinium showing a left frontal tumor with necrotic core and ring enhancement. (B) FLAIR sequence showing a hyperintensity beyond the EC. (C,D) Gross image (C) and histologic low magnification (D) showing both EC and FLAIR region from the excised mass ((D) H&E; original magnification 25×).
Brainsci 13 00248 g002
Figure 3. Preoperative MRI from a 31-year-old woman. (A) Axial section of a T1-weighted sequence with gadolinium showing a rolandic tumor with necrotic core and ring enhancement. (B) FLAIR sequence showing a hyperintensity beyond the EC. (C,D) Gross image (C) and histological medium magnification (D) showing both EC and FLAIR region from the excised mass ((D) H&E; original magnification 50×).
Figure 3. Preoperative MRI from a 31-year-old woman. (A) Axial section of a T1-weighted sequence with gadolinium showing a rolandic tumor with necrotic core and ring enhancement. (B) FLAIR sequence showing a hyperintensity beyond the EC. (C,D) Gross image (C) and histological medium magnification (D) showing both EC and FLAIR region from the excised mass ((D) H&E; original magnification 50×).
Brainsci 13 00248 g003
Figure 4. Histopathology of FLAIR hyperintensity region. (A) Focal to diffuse infiltration of white matter by tumor cells is seen (H&E; original magnification 100×). (B) Reactive astrogliosis of the white matter with gemistocytic features is shown (H&E; original magnification 200×). (C) Grey matter exhibiting perineuronal satellitosis (H&E; original magnification 200×). (D) A minority of samples show GBM morphology with foci of MVP (H&E; original magnification 100×).
Figure 4. Histopathology of FLAIR hyperintensity region. (A) Focal to diffuse infiltration of white matter by tumor cells is seen (H&E; original magnification 100×). (B) Reactive astrogliosis of the white matter with gemistocytic features is shown (H&E; original magnification 200×). (C) Grey matter exhibiting perineuronal satellitosis (H&E; original magnification 200×). (D) A minority of samples show GBM morphology with foci of MVP (H&E; original magnification 100×).
Brainsci 13 00248 g004
Table 1. Differential distribution of the histological features between EC and FLAIR regions.
Table 1. Differential distribution of the histological features between EC and FLAIR regions.
ECFLAIR
Necrosis and/or MVP29/33 (88%)3/33 (9%)
High-grade astrocytic tumor lacking necrosis and MVP4/33 (12%)0/33 (0%)
White matter infiltration0/33 (0%)25/33 (76%)
Reactive astrogliosis and perineuronal satellitosis0/33 (0%)5/33 (15%)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Broggi, G.; Altieri, R.; Barresi, V.; Certo, F.; Barbagallo, G.M.V.; Zanelli, M.; Palicelli, A.; Magro, G.; Caltabiano, R. Histologic Definition of Enhancing Core and FLAIR Hyperintensity Region of Glioblastoma, IDH-Wild Type: A Clinico-Pathologic Study on a Single-Institution Series. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13020248

AMA Style

Broggi G, Altieri R, Barresi V, Certo F, Barbagallo GMV, Zanelli M, Palicelli A, Magro G, Caltabiano R. Histologic Definition of Enhancing Core and FLAIR Hyperintensity Region of Glioblastoma, IDH-Wild Type: A Clinico-Pathologic Study on a Single-Institution Series. Brain Sciences. 2023; 13(2):248. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13020248

Chicago/Turabian Style

Broggi, Giuseppe, Roberto Altieri, Valeria Barresi, Francesco Certo, Giuseppe Maria Vincenzo Barbagallo, Magda Zanelli, Andrea Palicelli, Gaetano Magro, and Rosario Caltabiano. 2023. "Histologic Definition of Enhancing Core and FLAIR Hyperintensity Region of Glioblastoma, IDH-Wild Type: A Clinico-Pathologic Study on a Single-Institution Series" Brain Sciences 13, no. 2: 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13020248

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop