Next Article in Journal
Strategic Development of Dielectric Strength Prediction Protocol for Perfluorocarbon and Nonperfluorocarbon Compounds
Previous Article in Journal
Performance Predictions of Sci-Fi Films via Machine Learning
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Dynamic Response Analysis of RC Frame against Progressive Collapse Based on Orthogonal Test

Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(7), 4317; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13074317
by Changren Ke, Xianwei Li * and Junling Jiang
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(7), 4317; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13074317
Submission received: 2 March 2023 / Revised: 25 March 2023 / Accepted: 28 March 2023 / Published: 29 March 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

It is necessary to expand the list of references, as well as the review of the papers in the first part of the paper (Introduction).

It is extremely important to edit the text so that it is much more understandable to the readers and in the spirit of the English language, including the captions below Figures 2 and 3 which should be also corrected to make them more understandable to the readers.

The title of chapter 3.2.3 would be more suitable to be corrected to "Discussion of the results" or "Results discussion".

The conclusions should be expanded.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The research presented in the article entitled “Dynamic Response Analysis of RC Frame Against Progressive Collapse Based on Orthogonal Test” addresses to the degree of influence of different factors on the structural dynamic response. The article ensures very complex and useful data about an innovative material for using in a very different environment than usual. It is a very interesting study, with a high focus on the future possibilities.

 

The Abstract presents a clear and comprehensive statement of the study described in the paper.

The Introduction and the entire paper provide enough literature references about the article’s subject and for the analysis performing.

 

The materials and methods are in detail described. The results are in detail presented, clearly highlighted and discussed, and the conclusions summarize them properly.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Check the attached file please

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper has been significantly improved and I suggest that it should be published in the present form.

Reviewer 3 Report

No more comments

Back to TopTop