Next Article in Journal
In-Situ Photo-Dissociation and Polymerization of Carbon Disulfide with Vacuum Ultraviolet Microplasma Flat Lamp for Organic Thin Films
Previous Article in Journal
In Vivo Positive Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Brain Cancer (U87MG) Using Folic Acid-Conjugated Polyacrylic Acid-Coated Ultrasmall Manganese Oxide Nanoparticles
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/app11062598
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biogenic Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterisation and Applications

by
Bilal Mughal
1,
Syed Zohaib Javaid Zaidi
2,
Xunli Zhang
1,3,* and
Sammer Ul Hassan
1,3,*
1
Mechanical Engineering, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
2
Institute of Chemical Engineering and Technology, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
3
Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(6), 2598; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062598
Submission received: 21 February 2021 / Revised: 9 March 2021 / Accepted: 11 March 2021 / Published: 15 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanotechnology and Biosensors)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Nanotechnology plays a big part in our modern daily lives, ranging from the biomedical sector to the energy sector. There are different physicochemical and biological methods to synthesise nanoparticles towards multiple applications. Biogenic production of nanoparticles through the utilisation of microorganisms provides great advantages over other techniques and is increasingly being explored. This review examines the process of the biogenic synthesis of nanoparticles mediated by microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi and algae, and their applications. Microorganisms offer a disparate environment for nanoparticle synthesis. Optimum production and minimum time to obtain the desired size and shape, to improve the stability of nanoparticles and to optimise specific microorganisms for specific applications are the challenges to address, however. Numerous applications of biogenic nanoparticles in medicine, environment, drug delivery and biochemical sensors are discussed.

1. Introduction

The advent of nanotechnology in the 1960s commenced a new era of materials science. The field has brought together many academic disciplines such as biology, chemistry, materials engineering, medicine and physics, with the aim of developing materials at the nanoscale. Nanoparticles include many types of materials comprised of dimensions less than 100 nm in size [1]. They are classified by the number of dimensions in which an electron can be confined to, i.e., 0-dimensional (0D), 1-dimensional (1D), etc. Some of the common geometries include spheres (0D), wires and rods (1D) and thin films (2D). The synthesis of nanoparticles is of great importance because of the unique properties they exhibit including electronic, magnetic, physiochemical features including control of size, increased surface area to volume ratio and functionalities [2]. The main reasons for these unique properties of nanoparticles are due to (i) confinement of electrons in such particles, (ii) particle size changes to modify bandgap energies and (iii) large surface to volume ratio [3].
These unique properties of nanoparticles, including biological, chemical, electrical, magnetic, optical and physical properties [4], differ greatly from the same materials in their bulk form. For examples, nanomaterials offer enhanced Raman and Rayleigh scattering properties in metal NPs (such as gold and silver), supermagnetic properties in magnetic materials and a quantum effect in semiconductors [5]. Such NPs form the next generation building blocks for biomedical [6], chemical, electronic and optical applications [7]. In recent years, nanoparticles have also found applications in the environmental [8,9], petroleum [10,11], food [12] and textile industries [13]. Whereas, in the past metal nanoparticles such as gold and silver were studied in great detail, the last decade has seen the rise in research of other metal nanoparticles such as copper [14], palladium [15], platinum [16] and various metal oxides.
There is a great need for the control of NP geometries that result in desired electronic, optoelectronic and physicochemical properties. Yet, it is challenging to synthesise monodispersed nanoparticles with control over crystallinity and geometry. Earlier studies have focused heavily on using chemical and physical methods, which are used extensively. However, the use of toxic chemicals for synthesis is still a major concern, along with high costs [17]. In addition, the toxic elements on the nanoparticle surface hinder their application in biomedical fields and are of concern for polluting the environment. As a result, non-toxic and environmentally safe nanoparticle synthesis methods must be developed. Despite being sustainable and environmentally friendly, biological synthesis methods often necessitate the time-consuming cultivation of microbes. The development rate of biologically synthesised nanoparticles is sluggish, and they are not monodispersed. These are some of the issues associated with biological synthesis; however, careful selection of microorganisms, optimization of control factors such as pH and temperature and concentration of precursors may allow the implementation of such methods in large-scale production. It is also hypothesised that microbes can be genetically engineered to synthesise nanoparticles with greater control over shape and size [18,19].
Although the exact mechanisms behind biogenic synthesis still have not been fully understood, ongoing studies are trying to improve the understanding of the biological processes behind nanoparticle synthesis and have unearthed new abilities of microorganisms with unprecedented potential for new types of applications. The discovery of microbes producing magnetite nanoparticles, for instance, offers the opportunity to synthesise nanoparticles with unique magnetic properties [19]. Metal nanoparticles, particularly gold and silver, have been studied extensively for biomedical and sensing applications. Some of the recent examples of nanoparticle applications include magnetic nanoparticles for imaging [20], silver nanoparticles for photodetectors [21], gold nanoparticles for light-induced magnetism [22], barium titanate nanoparticles for breast cancer treatment [23] and gold nanoparticles for detection of SARS-CoV-2, the COVID-19 virus at the centre of pandemic attention [24]. This article reviews the recent advances in biogenic synthesis of a range of nanoparticles using different microorganisms, their characterisation techniques and some exemplar applications.

2. Biogenic Synthesis of Nanoparticles

Microorganisms are capable of producing many unique nanostructures. This has led scientists to become more interested in utilising these microbes to synthesise nanostructures for various applications. Inorganic molecules can be generated by bacteria and fungi by biologically mediated and induced synthesis [25]. By controlling the biological synthesis, nanostructures of desired geometries and composition can be formed. Despite the accuracy of the nanoparticle physicochemical synthesis, biological synthesis of nanoparticles is still limited in terms of particle geometry controllability and process scalability [26]. Nevertheless, biologically induced synthesis has allowed scientists to synthesise inorganic nanoparticles using common metal precursors [27], while also offers a wide range of composition.
Microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi and algae are increasingly being used to create nanosized particles. There are a wide variety of microbes, which mostly react differently with metal precursors to produce nanoparticles. For example, bacteria and fungi are capable of intracellular and extracellular production, and both processes have different pathways in different microbes. Intracellular synthesis utilizes the cell wall to transport metal ions, where the ions with a positive charge interact with the negative charge wall. Enzymes in the cells reduce these ions to metal NPs. Figure 1 shows gold nanoparticle synthesis using bacteria Lactobacillus kimchicus [28]. Nucleation of HAuCl ions takes place at the beginning of the process, which leads to the creation of nanoclusters through an electrostatic interface. Afterwards, nanoclusters are gradually transferred across the microbe cell wall. The mechanism behind the extracellular synthesis of nanoparticles includes the aggregation of metal ions on the cell surface and the involvement of reducing ions via enzymes. Ameen et al. used Cupriavidas sp. for extracellular synthesis of silver NPs [29]. The study concluded that silver ions are trapped on the cell surface and nitrate reductase (an enzyme) reduces them to atomic silver NPs. Huge research efforts went into designing such techniques for generating a wide range of NPs (including gold, palladium, silver, titanium oxide, etc.).

2.1. Types of Nanoparticles

2.1.1. Silver

Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have been researched extensively for applications in different fields and have raised considerable interest in the biomedical field because of its antimicrobial properties and antioxidant potency [30]. Their antibacterial properties depend on size, with smaller particles being more effective against many pathogens. They have been shown to successfully counter Gram-negative and positive bacteria, and also have a variety of uses in wound dressings [31].

2.1.2. Gold

As another metal that has been studied extensively, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) have found numerous applications relating to cancer therapy, drug delivery and other biomedical applications such as antibacterial [32]. Studies have shown that nanobubbles containing gold nanoparticles can be targeted to a tumorous area and burst due to increased heat from a laser or infrared radiation source [33]. These nanoparticles enter the cancer cell, decreasing its growth rate. AuNPs are also being used for various applications such as Raman spectroscopy and imaging [34].

2.1.3. Metal Oxides

Studies on metal oxides have also been reported including include zinc oxide (ZnO), copper oxide (CuO), magnesium oxide (MgO), titanium dioxide (TiO2) and aluminium (Al2O3), iron oxide (Fe3O4) and many others. Iron oxide has been a recent and exciting nanomaterial due to its magnetic properties. Iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles are being used in different applications including biomedical, catalysis and environmental safety. The most common applications of such NPs include targeted drug delivery, biosensor, MRI, diagnosis of cancer and tissue engineering [35]. Tin oxide (SnO2) and tungsten (tri)oxide (WO3) have unique electrical properties that depend on the size of these nanoparticles, and these are used as gas sensors [36]. Titanium dioxide finds applications in the optical and solar energy sectors due to its electrical conductivity [37]. Magnesium oxide nanoparticles are used to reduce pollution in the air and also catalysts in organic reactions [38,39]. Copper oxide nanoparticles find applications in the catalysis field including oxidation and photothermal uses [40].

2.2. Bacteria

Bacteria are readily available from the environment, can be cultivated quickly and are able to adapt to different conditions, making them great candidates for nanoparticle synthesis. It is relatively easy to control bacterial culture conditions such as temperature and oxygenation. It is necessary to control such conditions as to be able to synthesise different sized nanoparticles for different applications [41].
Utilizing bacteria has proved a promising approach to produce metal nanoparticles. They are well known for synthesising gold, silver and other nanoparticles (see Table 1 for examples of nanoparticle synthesis using bacteria).
AuNPs (15–35 nm) were developed extracellularly using marine bacterium Paracoccus haeundaensis [49], they demonstrated non-toxicity to normal human cells and prevented the growth of cancerous cells A549 and AGS at differing concentrations.
In a study by Mathivanan et al. to produce silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) using Bacillus subtilis [44], they investigated the effects of crude and calcined (200 °C for 30 min) AgNPs on pathogenic bacteria such as Pseudomonas fluorescens MTCC 1749, Proteus mirabilis MTCC 425, Escherichia coli MTCC 1610, Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus MTCC 2940. The bacterium was isolated from samples of sediment and cultivated. AgNPs were produced by reduction of silver ion (Ag+) by enzymatic processes involving NADH dependent reductase. Silver ions presence is determined inside by detecting colour transition from yellow to brown. The extracellular development of AgNPs was determined from their change of colour. The antibacterial activities were studied using the well diffusion method. It was found that crude AgNPs improved the inhibition of bacteria compared to calcined AgNPs.
Biochemical mechanisms governing the microbial synthesis of for nanoparticle have partially been identified and they are presently still being studied for further understanding. The mechanisms employed by microbes for nanoparticle synthesis involve modifications in solubility and toxicity, bioadsorption, bioaccumulation, precipitation of metals and efflux systems [50]. These processes form the mechanisms of microbial resistance for cellular detoxification of inorganic particles by enzymes. The main type of enzymes involved is oxidoreductase, such as nitrate reductase and sulphite reductase, and cellular transporters.
Certain bacteria have showed the potential to synthesise nanoparticles of organic materials. Aerobic acetic bacteria such as Gluconacetobacter have been used to synthesise cellulose nanocomposites [51]. Bacterial cellulose is a 3-D network of cellulose nanofibrils with improved properties compared to nanocrystalline cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose. The main applications for bacterial produced nanocellulose are biomedically related, such as antimicrobial agent and drug delivery systems, and biosensors.
Microbes are also capable of synthesising nanomineral crystals, magnetic and oxide metals. Especially magnetotactic bacteria are adept at building magnetosomes, which are suitable for producing magnetic radicals [52]. It is possible to control the geometry and composition of nanoparticles. Magnetosomes are organic-coated nanocrystals of iron oxide and iron sulphide, biosynthesised by both magnetotactic and non-magnetotactic bacteria. The magnetic properties are determined by species of bacteria, and the organic layer is the result of the bacterial phospholipid bilayer membrane [53]. Applications of magnetosomes include cancer therapy, molecular imaging [54] and toxicity assessment biosensor [55].
Bacteria are capable of synthesizing nanoparticles extracellularly or intracellularly. However, there are limitations of bacterial synthesis of nanoparticles. The main issues are purification of nanoparticles and difficulty in controlling the geometry due to a lack of full understanding of mechanisms [56]. It is challenging to control the particle shape and size, produce monodispersed particles and large-scale capability. Therefore, these methods require further study to improve the understanding of the mechanisms before they can be considered for industrial uses.

2.3. Fungi

Nanoparticle synthesis using fungi offers certain advantages in comparison to bacteria; thus, research in this area has seen an increasing interest over the last decade. Some of the advantages of mycelium include easy to scale up and downstream the process, economically feasible and ecologically friendly so they can cover a large surface [57]. Fungi contain enzymes in the cytoplasm and cell wall, which transform metal ions into nanoparticles [58]. The metal ions have a positive charge, which is attracted by the fungi and triggers the biosynthesis. Certain proteins are also induced by metal ions, and these hydrolyse the ions. Fungi are able to secrete high amounts of protein, thus increase nanoparticle synthesis. See Table 2 for some of the recent studies conducted on nanoparticles synthesis using fungi.
There are an increased number of studies on silver nanoparticle synthesis using fungi, where their applications include antimicrobials, antioxidants, electronics and other biomedical applications. Despite the increased research into the microbial synthesis of gold nanoparticles, there are fewer studies on using fungi. Many of the studies have focused on silver and metal oxides. Joshi et al. synthesised gold nanoparticles using the fungus Cladosporium cladosporioides obtained from seaweed Sargassum wightii [65]. The study examined the mechanism of nanoparticle synthesis and concluded that the NADPH-dependent reductase enzymes and the phenolic compounds were responsible for the synthesis of nanoparticles.
There are several experiments on using Fusarium oxysporum fungus to synthesise nanoparticles in several experiments, including many studies on AgNPs. Srivastava et al. synthesised AgNPs (10–15 nm in size) using fungus Fusarium oxysporum [67], and demonstrated promising antibacterial effects on Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Other examples of nanoparticles produced using F. oxysporum include copper [68], gold [69] and magnesium oxide [70].
Like other microbes, fungi produce nanoparticles intra/extracellularly. Many of the nanoparticles produced within the organism are smaller than the ones that are created externally. The size limit is related to the nucleation of the particles within the species. Intracellular formation also offers many beneficial advantages. Depleted metals including platinum and copper must be eliminated from the environment to repair effects of environmental pollution. Fungi that produce intracellularly would be ideal to use because of the ease to extract the contamination from the sample [71].
Extracellular synthesis of NPs often has many applicable uses as the material is devoid of unwanted cellular constituents. Fungi are commonly known to be extracellular species since they secrete several secreted molecules to assist in the sequestration of nanoparticles. Extracellular synthesis provides greater simplicity and is relatively low cost. Manjunath and Joshi found that Cladosporium cladosporioides could be used in producing AgNPs in sizes ranging from 30 to 60 nm [61]. AgNPs showed uniform size and spherical form in FESEM images.
As well as metal nanoparticles, fungi are capable of synthesising metal oxide nanoparticles. Magnetite is a widespread iron oxide that exhibits magnetic properties. Fungi such as Aspergillus are capable of producing such nanoparticles [59]. Nanomaterials are being used to remove heavy metals and radioactive materials, due to their high (and fast) surface area to volume ratio [72]. Magnetite NPs are more efficient compared to other metal nanoparticles for this particular application because their superparamagnetic behaviour allows them easily to be separated from wastewater due to electrostatic and surface complexation.
Bionanocomposites of fungus-Fe3O4 for nuclear waste management have been reported [73]. Nano Fe3O4 particles were obtained from Penicillium Shijie, a fungus that grows on wood. SEM results revealed that the particles were uniformly decorated with a thin coating of Fe3O4 on the fungus’ surface. FTIR results revealed that the iron oxide particles being chemically bonded to the surface of the fungus. They found that in the case where ions were present, fungus-Fe3O4 sorption was not affected by ion strengths, implying that its surface complexion that was assumed to influence sorption.
Magnetite NPs have found wide uses in applications such as MRI [51], and for oscillation damping and position sensing [52], and recording machines. Like bacteria, using fungi also has a major drawback with regards to biosafety. Fungus like F. oxysporum is dangerous since they are mostly pathogenic and thus are a concern to health. However, there are several non-pathogenic fungi examined that are suitable to synthesise nanoparticles. Variations of the Trichoderma fungus are such examples that have been utilised in applications related to food [74], medicinal and paper industries.

2.4. Algae

Algae are part of the Protista kingdom and include autotrophic and aquatic photosynthetic organisms, being single or multicellular. They are eukaryotic organisms without the multicellular structures of the plant. Algae can vary greatly in size, from microscopic microalgae to giant macroalgae. They are known for producing oxygen and form the food source for most aquatic forms of life. Seaweed is a typical example of macroalgae, which has been the source of food containing vitamins, minerals and protein. Microalgae have been known to transform metals ions into malleable forms, and are considered green gateways to synthesise nanoparticles [75]. The ability of algae to synthesise nanoparticles is attributed to the inclusion of active compounds in cell walls. Examples of such compounds include alginate and laminarin, which contain reactive groups [76]. Stabilization and capping of nanoparticles are accomplished by polypeptides by their amino acids or cysteine amides.
A typical process of algae-assisted nanoparticle synthesis involves (1) preparation of algae extracts in solution at elevated temperature, (2) preparation of reagents and (3) gestation of algae and reagent solutions and then stirring for a specified period of time (Sharma et al., 2016). To initiate the reaction, the algal extract is mixed with the metal precursor. A change of colour shows the beginning of a reaction which illustrates nucleations, followed by the growth of NPs where the adjacent nucleonic particles join and form thermodynamically stable NPs of various geometries [77]. The extract biocompounds facilitate the synthesis of NPs, and pH, temperature, concentration and time are the driving factors involved.
Seaweeds such as Sargassum wightii and Fucus vesiculosus have been utilised to synthesise nanoparticles [78,79]. Numerous studies involving the synthesis of gold and silver using algae have been reported (see Table 3 for examples). Tetraselmis kochinensis has been shown to produce intracellular gold nanoparticles [79]. Besides seaweed, AuNPs and Au-silica bionanocomposites can be synthesised in microalgae like diatoms (N. atomus and D. gallica) [80]. Algae is just as essential in nanoparticle synthesis in comparison to other micro-organisms, such as bacteria and the fungus, and thus an ecofriendly approach has recently been studied for nanoparticles’ algae-mediated biosynthesis. Although algae offer green synthesis of nanoparticles, they still have limitations, which must be overcome before this method can be considered sustainable in the long run. The process of extract preparation is time-consuming and nanoparticles yield is less compared to physical and chemical methods [81]. Various control factors involved in the synthesis require detailed examination to improve future prospect of algal synthesis.

2.5. Characterisation of Nanoparticles

Nanoparticles have unique properties and features, which make them useful for numerous applications. It is crucial to assess them through extensive characterisation, particularly for biomedical applications, to be able to ensure them fit for purpose. This is achieved by using various techniques and equipment that can provide the required information. The most commonly used techniques include dynamic light scattering (DLS), atomic force microscopy (AFM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy (RS) and scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM/TEM). These techniques are used in studying nanoparticle size, shape, structure, surface properties and interactions with materials such as human tissues. Table 4 shows a summary of some of the methods used to characterise the physicochemical properties of nanoparticles. For a detailed review of nanoparticle characterisation techniques, it is suggested to read the following review paper by Mourdikoudis et al., “Characterisation techniques for nanoparticles: comparison and complementarity upon studying nanoparticle properties” [88].

2.5.1. Geometry

Size and shape determine the unique properties of nanoparticles to be effective for respective applications. At scales less than 100 nm, advanced equipment with excellent magnification and resolution are utilised to examine the size and shape of nanostructures. Two of the most widely used nanoscale imaging techniques are high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), and field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FeSEM), which can image and identify nanoparticle atomic composition. TEM uses a beam of electrons to illuminate the nanoparticles and can reveal scale, shape, aggregation state and morphology detail. An example Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image is shown in Figure 2, showing gold nanoparticles in an average size of 20.93 nm.

2.5.2. Surface Morphology

Common techniques used to characterise surface morphology are AFM, SEM and TEM. TEM is better capable of providing composition and morphology, allowing resolution of atomic scale. SEM uses a beam of electrons to image the surface of the sample, which means the sample must be conductive prior to analysis. SEM can examine the aggregation and morphology and in used frequently than TEM despite having a poorer resolution. AFM is another important technique that can analyse the topography, particle size and distribution of nanoparticles and can be operated under various conditions such as air, liquid and vacuum.

2.5.3. Magnetic Properties

Iron-based nanoparticles have gained popularity over recent years; therefore, the study of their magnetic properties is necessary. Some of the techniques include electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), vibrating-sample magnetometer (VSM) and superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID). EPR is used to detect and identify free radicals and paramagnetic centres in chemicals. It allows for the investigation of the physical properties of magnetic nanoparticles and the influence of the external magnetic field by means of interaction with electrons in a sample. For highly sensitive magnetic measurements, VSM and SQUID are employed, having sensitivities of 10−6 emu and 10−10 emu, respectively. SQUID is employed to characterise media such as powder, thin films and other solid and liquid samples.

3. Applications

3.1. Medical Applications

Advanced development in nanoparticles research has led to their increasing applications, in particular, recently in the biomedical sciences, including diagnostic, drug delivery systems, biosensing and bioimaging [6]. For example, different branches of medicine have taken an interest in nanoparticles as they can deliver the optimal dosage of drugs, result in improved efficiency and reduced side effects [89]. Based on their optical properties, NPs are selected in order to provide efficient contrast for biological and cell imaging applications, where the absorption and scattering properties and optical resonance wavelength of NPs such as Au and Ag can be calculated.
Recently, magnetic nanoparticles such as magnetite (Fe3O4) have also been employed for biomedical applications [90]. Super magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles with the right chemistry are used in research to improve MRI, drug delivery, cell separation and immunoassays. For these applications, NPs must be small with high magnetization, have dimensions of no more than 100 nm and have a uniform size distribution (Laurent et al., 2010). Labelling antibodies to carry out identification of tissues is achieved by using a variety of dyes, enzymes, radioactive compounds or AuNPs (Khlebtsov and Dykman, 2010b) [91].
Semiconductor and metal nanoparticles show enormous promise of cancer detection and therapy due to the light scattering and absorption properties. Gold nanoparticles can transform the absorbed electromagnetic energy from an electromagnetic field into heat and can be used to target specific cancerous tissues. In a study on Au-silica NPs for prostate cancer treatment [92], gold–silica nanoshells (GSNs) were combined with MRI-ultrasound imaging to selectively ablate prostate tumorous cells. These NPs absorbed NIR light, which caused an increase in temperature, in turn leading to hyperthermia and tumorous cell death.
Silver NPs have been extensively used in wound dressings, catheters and numerous domestic products because of its antimicrobial effect, particularly compared to traditional silver ion solutions. Antimicrobial agents are essential in water disinfection, medicinal applications, textile and food packaging. The NPs are functionalized with different groups with the purpose of overcoming the varied bacteria populations. Materials such as ZnO, TiO2, Cu- and Ni-based NPs, are being used for specific functions because of their ideal antibacterial activities.

3.2. Materials and Mechanical Applications

The properties of nanomaterials differ greatly from the respective material in bulk form, which make them useful functional materials. Thus, the advantages of nanoparticles depend upon the ability to be able to customise the geometries of materials at increasingly smaller dimensions to obtain the necessary properties, therefore adding to the growing scientific portfolio. It is possible to produce materials with defined characteristics that yield electrical, physical, optical and imaging properties that are suitable for particular applications [93].
Nanoparticles find applications in the textile industry, where they can be added to or used to treat fabric surfaces, which result in enhanced ballistic protection properties, and reduced wrinkling and bacterial growth. Nanomaterials are emerging to allow washable, resilient “smart fabrics” that are incorporated with nanoscale sensors and electronic components allowing functions such as health tracking, solar energy capture and energy harvesting by movement [94,95].
Nanoparticle based consumer products include new electronics and computers, health trackers and other miscellaneous home products. It is predicted that nanotechnology will eventually be the next breakthrough across several sectors, including food manufacturing and packaging. Resonant energy transfer (RET) systems incorporating noble metal nanoparticles are growing in fields of optics and material science. So that NPs can be used in future commercial products.
Nanoparticles possess excellent mechanical properties such as Young’s modulus, stress and strain; mechanically stronger nanodevices can be developed [3]. For mechanical industries, their applications could be useful for coatings and lubricants. They can be embedded in the metal and polymer matrices to enhance the tribological properties. That is because the rolling contact area between the lubricated nanoparticles and the substrate will be greatly reduced, resulting in very low surface friction and wear. Furthermore, NPs provide strong sliding and delamination properties, which could also enhance wear resistance and decrease friction [94].
Coatings can increase hardness and wear resistance by increasing a material’s resistance. Alumina, titania and carbon-based NPs have shown to be effective coating agents in enhancing mechanical properties [7].

3.3. Environmental Applications

The growing number of nanoparticle applications for industrial and domestic products can lead to their leakage into the environment [96]. Such applications lead to the direct release of harmful materials in the groundwater and soil, which are common environmental hazards to test ground pollution. Environmental risk of NPs is assessed by identifying their exposure pathways, persistence, reactivity, ecotoxicity and mobility. Nanotechnology advancements have opened new possibilities for improved environmental remediation.
Nanoparticles can help satisfy the demand for accessible, potable water by allowing for the fast and low-cost assessment and management of impurities in water. For example, Cu NPs in paper filters for water purification resulted in high bacteria reduction of E. coli and low levels of copper released in drinking water (1 ppm) [97].
Nanoparticles have also been developed to clean up oil spills. Fine carbon particles with engineered surface chemistry have been shown to stabilise oil-in-water emulsions [98]. Functionalised carbon black (CB) NPs showed non-toxic effects in brine shrimp, and also were shown to adsorb benzene. One research found that magnetic NPs coated with green hydrophobic biocomponents isolated from Anthemis pseudocotula improved their performance of heavy crude oil collection [99].
Heavy metals such as mercury, lead, thallium, cadmium and arsenic are dangerous to the environment and humans as they are environmentally undesirable and have harmful effects; it is vital to remove such metals to avoid harms. Carbon nanotubes, nano-zeolites and metal oxides have been used to environmental remediation. The most promising agent is nanoscale zerovalent iron (nZVI), as it is non-toxic, economical and easily produced [100]. Another alternative is the use of bimetallic nanoparticles, consisting of elemental iron or other metals in conjunction with metal catalysts such as silver, gold, nickel and palladium, to improve the rate of reduction.

3.4. Applications in Energy Technology

Fossil fuels cannot be relied upon for long-term energy generation, as they are scarce and non-renewable. Thus, it is critical to research and grow green technologies that are not only renewable but also affordable. Nanoparticles can be critical for energy technologies as they offer desired properties such as large surface area, and unique optical and catalytic properties. They can be especially useful in photocatalytic applications. Photoelectrochemical and electrochemical water splitting (or energy) splitting have been employed extensively to promote NP development [101].
There are several ways to split water using chemical precursors, such as electrolysis and thermal and thermolysis, or using the fuel byproduct, these technologies often include solar cells and piezoelectrics [102]. NPs are improving the efficiency of fuel production from raw petroleum materials through better catalysis, enabling reduced fuel consumption in vehicles and power plants through higher-efficiency combustion and decreased friction. Nanoparticles are used in energy storage applications [103]. Figure 3 shows some energy generating devices using NPs.
NPs can be used to make solar panels more energy-efficient, which promises to offer cheaper energy production in the future. NP based solar cells may be less expensive to produce and install since they can be manufactured in flexible rolls and use manufacturing techniques that are similar to those used to that are used in printers.

3.5. Applications in the Petroleum Industry

Nanoparticles are finding increasing applications in the oil and gas industry, some of the examples include drilling fluids [104], enhanced oil recovery [105] and well stimulations [106]. Nanoparticles have certain distinct characteristics, such as their small size and large volume to surface area ratio when compared to those of larger particles, which results in a higher degree of reactivity. The smaller the particles, the more readily they are able to pass into the small pore spaces of the formation. Due to the aforementioned properties, the use of nanoparticles in the petroleum industry is desirable.
A drilling fluid is a viscous mixture used to aid the drilling of boreholes. They have various functions such as removing cuttings, forcing, maintaining bore stability regulating forming pressure, etc. [107]. Different chemicals are usually employed to improve drilling fluids, such as the rheology and filtration. There are numerous features that must be considered when applying traditional additives, such as the temperature and the particulate size [107]. Thus, nanoparticles have found considerable attention for their potential benefits to surmount these issues. In a study by Al-Saba et al. aluminium, copper and magnesium oxide nanoparticles greatly enhanced the rheological properties of drilling fluid [108]. Such nanoparticles offer good potential for bore hole cleaning. Iron oxide nanoparticles were employed to improve the performance of a xanthan gum drilling fluid [109]. The addition of nanoparticles resulted in reduced friction and improved filtration properties. Various other nanoparticles have been studied to improve the lubrication, filtration, wellbore stability and other characteristics of drilling fluids. Some of these include silicon dioxide [110], titanium oxide [111] and zinc titanate [112].
Enhanced oil recovery applications of nanoparticles have also been studied extensively in recent years. Nanoparticles are generally employed to improve the tertial oil recovery techniques such as chemical, gas and thermal injection. Various nanoparticles have been used to for these applications including aluminium oxide for reduced oil viscosity [113], silicon dioxide for improved foam stability and mobility [114] and graphene oxide for improved oil recovery [115].

4. Discussion

Recently, the area of microbial synthesis of nanoparticles has seen considerable advancement. The above-mentioned synthesis methods of nanoparticles have many benefits, including being both cost-effective and environmentally friendly [116]. In comparison to physical and chemical methods, there are no harmful chemicals present in biogenically produced nanoparticles. Another advantage of the biogenic scheme of manufacturing is that such methods need not the addition of a stabilizing compounds on the nanoparticle surface in order to achieve long-term pharmacological activity [117]. Additionally, biogenic synthesis time is much shorter than using physicochemical processes as described in the following examples. Abdel-Raouf et al. demonstrated the synthesis of silver nanoparticles using red alga Laurencia catarinensis within 2 min [118]. Their results showed various shaped nanoparticles between 39 and 77 nm in size. Gold nanoparticles have been synthesised using the fungus Aspergillus flavus within 2 min [119]. Cadmium sulphide nanoparticles have been synthesised using bacteria in 10–20 min [120]. Various other studies have also shown rapid biogenic synthesis of nanoparticles [121,122,123,124,125].
Despite these advantages, biogenic synthesis faces challenges in controlling the nanoparticles size as polydispersity is an issue. Additionally, substantial effort is required to enhance the ability to regulate particle size and morphology, and to fine tune particle size distribution. For this reason, many biogenic studies have focused on developing methods that can result in monodisperse synthesis of nanoparticles [121]. The morphology of nanoparticles can be affected either by altering the process parameters to understand the optimal synthesis parameters. Parameters such as pH, temperature, reaction time and reagent concentrations equally affect the nucleation process and hence the nanoparticles formation [123]. Another challenge is the difficulty in identifying the best microbial candidates based on their inherent properties such as the growth rate, replicability and biochemical activities. There needs to be attention given to the yield and to the overall biosynthesis rate when attempting to convert the biogenic synthesis large-scale production. The synthesis of biosynthesised nanoparticles faces challenges at the large-scale, due to yields being much lower than chemical synthesis [25]. Additionally, the scale-up or commercial processes for nanoparticle synthesis differ greatly. Nevertheless, due to the vast amount, accessibility and strong growth of microbes, the total cost would be reduced. In addition, there are no organic solvents, thermal stabilisers or expensive techniques used in these methods, further reducing the cost.

5. Conclusions

Over the last decade, great progress has been made in the field of nanoparticle development by microorganisms and their applications. There is, however, a great deal of work required to improve synthesis performance, particle size control and morphology. Two major concerns in the assessment of nanoparticle synthesis are particle size and monodispersity [26]. Studies have shown that nanoparticles synthesised by microorganisms are less stable compared to those prepared through chemical methods [124]. Better understanding of the safety and stability of biodegradable nanoparticles, therefore, is needed. Based on the abundant biodiversity of the microbes, their ability for nanoparticle synthesis remains to be examined. Bacteria produce a much smaller volume of nanoparticles compared to fungi, and this is proportional to their lower protein production, which directly translates to their lower nanoparticle productivity. With the recent developments and continuing attempts to increase the nanoparticle synthesis performance and its industrial use in the field of medicine and health care, this technique and these methods are likely to be widely used in the future.

Author Contributions

B.M. and S.U.H. edited, revised and handled first version of the manuscript. B.M., S.U.H., S.Z.J.Z. and X.Z. revised all versions of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sharma, V.K.; Yngard, R.A.; Lin, Y. Silver nanoparticles: Green synthesis and their antimicrobial activities. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 145, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Iravani, S. Green synthesis of metal nanoparticles using plants. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 2638–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wu, Q.; Miao, W.S.; Gao, H.J.; Hui, D. Mechanical properties of nanomaterials: A review. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2020, 9, 259–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Daniel, M.C.; Astruc, D. Gold Nanoparticles: Assembly, Supramolecular Chemistry, Quantum-Size-Related Properties, and Applications Toward Biology, Catalysis, and Nanotechnology. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 293–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liang, A.; Liu, Q.; Wen, G.; Jiang, Z. The surface-plasmon-resonance effect of nanogold/silver and its analytical applications. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2012, 37, 32–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ramos, A.P.; Cruz, M.A.E.; Tovani, C.B.; Ciancaglini, P. Biomedical applications of nanotechnology. Biophys. Rev. 2017, 9, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Khan, I.; Saeed, K.; Khan, I. Nanoparticles: Properties, applications and toxicities. Arab. J. Chem. 2019, 12, 908–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zarei, V.; Mirzaasadi, M.; Davarpanah, A.; Nasiri, A.; Valizadeh, M.; Hosseini, M.J.S. Environmental Method for Synthesizing Amorphous Silica Oxide Nanoparticles from a Natural Material. Processes 2021, 9, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Valizadeh, K.; Davarpanah, A. Design and construction of a micro-photo bioreactor in order to dairy wastewater treatment by micro-algae: Parametric study. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2020, 42, 611–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pan, F.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Davarpanah, A. Impact of anionic and cationic surfactants interfacial tension on the oil recovery enhancement. Powder Technol. 2020, 373, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Davarpanah, A. Parametric Study of Polymer-Nanoparticles-Assisted Injectivity Performance for Axisymmetric Two-Phase Flow in EOR Processes. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Saravanakumar, K.; Sathiyaseelan, A.; Mariadoss, A.V.A.; Xiaowen, H.; Wang, M.-H. Physical and bioactivities of biopolymeric films incorporated with cellulose, sodium alginate and copper oxide nanoparticles for food packaging application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 153, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Abdelrahman, M.S.; Nassar, S.H.; Mashaly, H.; Mahmoud, S.; Maamoun, D.; El-Sakhawy, M.; Khattab, T.A.; Kamel, S. Studies of Polylactic Acid and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles-Based Composites for Multifunctional Textile Prints. Coatings 2020, 10, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Benassai, E.; Del Bubba, M.; Ancillotti, C.; Colzi, I.; Gonnelli, C.; Calisi, N.; Salvatici, M.C.; Casalone, E.; Ristori, S. Green and cost-effective synthesis of copper nanoparticles by extracts of non-edible and waste plant materials from Vaccinium species: Characterization and antimicrobial activity. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 119, 111453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Osonga, F.J.; Kalra, S.; Miller, R.M.; Isika, D.; Sadik, O.A. Synthesis, characterization and antifungal activities of eco-friendly palladium nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 5894–5904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jameel, M.S.; Aziz, A.A.; Dheyab, M.A. Green synthesis: Proposed mechanism and factors influencing the synthesis of platinum nanoparticles. Green Process. Synth. 2020, 9, 386–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dhand, C.; Dwivedi, N.; Loh, X.J.; Jie Ying, A.N.; Verma, N.K.; Beuerman, R.W.; Lakshminarayanan, R.; Ramakrishna, S. Methods and strategies for the synthesis of diverse nanoparticles and their applications: A comprehensive overview. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 105003–105037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Singh, J.; Dutta, T.; Kim, K.H.; Rawat, M.; Samddar, P.; Kumar, P. “Green” synthesis of metals and their oxide nanoparticles: Applications for environmental remediation. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 16, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mabey, T.; Andrea Cristaldi, D.; Oyston, P.; Lymer, K.P.; Stulz, E.; Wilks, S.; William Keevil, C.; Zhang, X. Bacteria and nanosilver: The quest for optimal production. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2019, 39, 272–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Prozorov, T. Magnetic microbes: Bacterial magnetite biomineralization. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2015, 46, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Paysen, H.; Loewa, N.; Stach, A.; Wells, J.; Kosch, O.; Twamley, S.; Makowski, M.R.; Schaeffter, T.; Ludwig, A.; Wiekhorst, F. Cellular uptake of magnetic nanoparticles imaged and quantified by magnetic particle imaging. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Heo, S.; Lee, J.; Lee, G.H.; Heo, C.J.; Kim, S.H.; Yun, D.J.; Park, J.B.; Kim, K.; Kim, Y.; Lee, D.; et al. Surface plasmon enhanced Organic color image sensor with Ag nanoparticles coated with silicon oxynitride. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cheng, O.H.C.; Son, D.H.; Sheldon, M. Light-induced magnetism in plasmonic gold nanoparticles. Nat. Photonics 2020, 14, 365–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Yoon, Y.N.; Lee, D.S.; Park, H.J.; Kim, J.S. Barium Titanate Nanoparticles Sensitise Treatment-Resistant Breast Cancer Cells to the Antitumor Action of Tumour-Treating Fields. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Moitra, P.; Alafeef, M.; Dighe, K.; Frieman, M.; Pan, D. Selective Naked-Eye Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Mediated by N Gene Targeted Antisense Oligonucleotide Capped Plasmonic Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 7617–7627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Fang, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, Z.; Dong, M. Microorganism assisted synthesized nanoparticles for catalytic applications. Energies 2019, 12, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Grasso, G.; Zane, D.; Dragone, R. Microbial nanotechnology: Challenges and prospects for green biocatalytic synthesis of nanoscale materials for sensoristic and biomedical applications. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Mathivanan, K.; Selva, R.; Chandirika, J.U.; Govindarajan, R.K.; Srinivasan, R.; Annadurai, G.; Duc, P.A. Biologically synthesized silver nanoparticles against pathogenic bacteria: Synthesis, calcination and characterization. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019, 22, 101373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Markus, J.; Mathiyalagan, R.; Kim, Y.J.; Abbai, R.; Singh, P.; Ahn, S.; Perez, Z.E.J.; Hurh, J.; Yang, D.C. Intracellular synthesis of gold nanoparticles with antioxidant activity by probiotic Lactobacillus kimchicus DCY51T isolated from Korean kimchi. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2016, 95, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ameen, F.; AlYahya, S.; Govarthanan, M.; ALjahdali, N.; Al-Enazi, N.; Alsamhary, K.; Alshehri, W.A.; Alwakeel, S.S.; Alharbi, S.A. Soil bacteria Cupriavidus sp. mediates the extracellular synthesis of antibacterial silver nanoparticles. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1202, 127233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hooda, H.; Singh, P.; Bajpai, S. Effect of quercitin impregnated silver nanoparticle on growth of some clinical pathogens. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 31, 625–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Deshmukh, S.P.; Patil, S.M.; Mullani, S.B.; Delekar, S.D. Silver nanoparticles as an effective disinfectant: A review. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 97, 954–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kalimuthu, K.; Cha, B.S.; Kim, S.; Park, K.S. Eco-friendly synthesis and biomedical applications of gold nanoparticles: A review. Microchem. J. 2020, 152, 104296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Siddiqi, K.S.; Husen, A. Recent advances in plant-mediated engineered gold nanoparticles and their application in biological system. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2017, 40, 10–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Moreira, A.F.; Rodrigues, C.F.; Reis, C.A.; Costa, E.C.; Correia, I.J. Gold-core silica shell nanoparticles application in imaging and therapy: A review. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2018, 270, 168–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, S.; Yu, B.; Wang, S.; Shen, Y.; Cong, H. Preparation, surface functionalization and application of Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 281, 102165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Franke, M.E.; Koplin, T.J.; Simon, U. Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles in Chemiresistors: Does the Nanoscale Matter? Small 2006, 2, 36–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Aboulouard, A.; Gultekin, B.; Can, M.; Erol, M.; Jouaiti, A.; Elhadadi, B.; Zafer, C.; Demic, S. Dye sensitized solar cells based on titanium dioxide nanoparticles synthesized by flame spray pyrolysis and hydrothermal sol-gel methods: A comparative study on photovoltaic performances. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 1569–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Javadi, S.M. Applications of ZnO and MgO Nanoparticles in Reducing Zinc Pollution Level in Rubber Manufacturing Processes: A Review. Curr. Biochem. Eng. 2020, 6, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mageshwari, K.; Mali, S.S.; Sathyamoorthy, R.; Patil, P.S. Template-free synthesis of MgO nanoparticles for effective photocatalytic applications. Powder Technol. 2013, 249, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Poreddy, R.; Engelbrekt, C.; Riisager, A. Copper oxide as efficient catalyst for oxidative dehydrogenation of alcohols with air. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 2467–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Pantidos, N. Biological Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles by Bacteria, Fungi and Plants. J. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. 2014, 5, 05. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Srinath, B.S.; Ravishankar Rai, V. Rapid biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles by Staphylococcus epidermidis: Its characterisation and catalytic activity. Mater. Lett. 2015, 146, 23–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Patil, M.P.; Kang, M.J.; Niyonizigiye, I.; Singh, A.; Kim, J.O.; Seo, Y.B.; Kim, G.D. Do Extracellular synthesis of gold nanoparticles using the marine bacterium Paracoccus haeundaensis BC74171T and evaluation of their antioxidant activity and antiproliferative effect on normal and cancer cell lines. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2019, 183, 110455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Dhandapani, P.; Prakash, A.A.; AlSalhi, M.S.; Maruthamuthu, S.; Devanesan, S.; Rajasekar, A. Ureolytic bacteria mediated synthesis of hairy ZnO nanostructure as photocatalyst for decolorization of dyes. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 243, 122619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rauf, M.A.; Owais, M.; Rajpoot, R.; Ahmad, F.; Khan, N.; Zubair, S. Biomimetically synthesized ZnO nanoparticles attain potent antibacterial activity against less susceptible: S. aureus skin infection in experimental animals. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 36361–36373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Bharathi, S.; Kumaran, S.; Suresh, G.; Ramesh, M.; Thangamani, V.; Pughazhventhan, S.R. Extracellular synthesis of nanoselenium from fresh water bacteria Bacillus sp., and its validation of antibacterial and cytotoxic potential. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 27, 101655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Martins, M.; Mourato, C.; Sanches, S.; Noronha, J.P.; Crespo, M.T.B.; Pereira, I.A.C. Biogenic platinum and palladium nanoparticles as new catalysts for the removal of pharmaceutical compounds. Water Res. 2017, 108, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bruins, M.R.; Kapil, S.; Oehme, F.W. Microbial resistance to metals in the environment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2000, 45, 198–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liu, K.; Catchmark, J.M. Enhanced mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose nanocomposites produced by co-culturing Gluconacetobacter hansenii and Escherichia coli under static conditions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 219, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Peigneux, A.; Valverde-Tercedor, C.; López-Moreno, R.; Pérez-González, T.; Fernández-Vivas, M.A.; Jiménez-López, C. Learning from magnetotactic bacteria: A review on the synthesis of biomimetic nanoparticles mediated by magnetosome-associated proteins. J. Struct. Biol. 2016, 196, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yan, L.; Da, H.; Zhang, S.; López, V.M.; Wang, W. Bacterial magnetosome and its potential application. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 203, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Boucher, M.; Geffroy, F.; Prévéral, S.; Bellanger, L.; Selingue, E.; Adryanczyk-Perrier, G.; Péan, M.; Lefèvre, C.T.; Pignol, D.; Ginet, N.; et al. Genetically tailored magnetosomes used as MRI probe for molecular imaging of brain tumor. Biomaterials 2017, 121, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Roda, A.; Cevenini, L.; Borg, S.; Michelini, E.; Calabretta, M.M.; Schüler, D. Bioengineered bioluminescent magnetotactic bacteria as a powerful tool for chip-based whole-cell biosensors. Lab Chip 2013, 13, 4881–4889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Tsekhmistrenko, S.I.; Bityutskyy, V.S.; Tsekhmistrenko, O.S.; Horalskyi, L.P.; Tymoshok, N.O.; Spivak, M.Y. Bacterial synthesis of nanoparticles: A green approach. Biosyst. Divers. 2020, 28, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Mukherjee, P.; Senapati, S.; Mandal, D.; Ahmad, A.; Khan, M.I.; Kumar, R.; Sastry, M. Extracellular synthesis of gold nanoparticles by the fungus Fusarium oxysporum. ChemBioChem 2002, 3, 461–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Syed, A.; Ahmad, A. Extracellular biosynthesis of platinum nanoparticles using the fungus Fusarium oxysporum. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2012, 97, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chatterjee, S.; Mahanty, S.; Das, P.; Chaudhuri, P.; Das, S. Biofabrication of iron oxide nanoparticles using manglicolous fungus Aspergillus niger BSC-1 and removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 385, 123790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kumari, R.M.; Kumar, V.; Kumar, M.; Agrawal, A.; Pareek, N.; Nimesh, S. Extracellular biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using Aspergillus terreus: Evaluation of its antibacterial and anticancer potential. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Manjunath Hulikere, M.; Joshi, C.G. Characterization, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of silver nanoparticles synthesized using marine endophytic fungus- Cladosporium cladosporioides. Process Biochem. 2019, 82, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, C.; Liu, J.; Li, H.; Qin, L.; Cao, F.; Zhang, W. A Fungal Based Synthesis Method for Copper Nanoparticles with the Determination of Anticancer, Antidiabetic and Antibacterial Activities Sadaf. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 261, 118224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, H.; Zhou, H.; Bai, J.; Li, Y.; Yang, J.; Ma, Q.; Qu, Y. Biosynthesis of selenium nanoparticles mediated by fungus Mariannaea sp. HJ and their characterization. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 571, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Vijayanandan, A.S.; Balakrishnan, R.M. Biosynthesis of cobalt oxide nanoparticles using endophytic fungus Aspergillus nidulans. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 218, 442–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Joshi, C.G.; Danagoudar, A.; Poyya, J.; Kudva, A.K.; Dhananjaya, B.L. Biogenic synthesis of gold nanoparticles by marine endophytic fungus-Cladosporium cladosporioides isolated from seaweed and evaluation of their antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. Process Biochem. 2017, 63, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bhargava, A.; Jain, N.; Khan, M.A.; Pareek, V.; Dilip, R.V.; Panwar, J. Utilizing metal tolerance potential of soil fungus for efficient synthesis of gold nanoparticles with superior catalytic activity for degradation of rhodamine B. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 183, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Srivastava, S.; Bhargava, A.; Pathak, N.; Srivastava, P. Production, characterization and antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles produced by Fusarium oxysporum and monitoring of protein-ligand interaction through in-silico approaches. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 129, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Pham, N.D.; Duong, M.M.; Le, M.V.; Hoang, H.A.; Pham, L.K.O. Preparation and characterization of antifungal colloidal copper nanoparticles and their antifungal activity against Fusarium oxysporum and Phytophthora capsici. C. R. Chim. 2019, 22, 786–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Naimi-Shamel, N.; Pourali, P.; Dolatabadi, S. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Fusarium oxysporum and antibacterial activity of its tetracycline conjugant. J. Mycol. Med. 2019, 29, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Abdel-Aziz, M.M.; Emam, T.M.; Elsherbiny, E.A. Bioactivity of magnesium oxide nanoparticles synthesized from cell filtrate of endobacterium Burkholderia rinojensis against Fusarium oxysporum. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 109, 110617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chhipa, H. Mycosynthesis of Nanoparticles for Smart Agricultural Practice: A Green and Eco-Friendly Approach; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; ISBN 9780081025796. [Google Scholar]
  71. Crane, R.A.; Dickinson, M.; Popescu, I.C.; Scott, T.B. Magnetite and zero-valent iron nanoparticles for the remediation of uranium contaminated environmental water. Water Res. 2011, 45, 2931–2942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ding, C.; Cheng, W.; Sun, Y.; Wang, X. Novel fungus-Fe3O4 bio-nanocomposites as high performance adsorbents for the removal of radionuclides. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 295, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Hu, D.; Yu, S.; Yu, D.; Liu, N.; Tang, Y.; Fan, Y.; Wang, C.; Wu, A. Biogenic Trichoderma harzianum-derived selenium nanoparticles with control functionalities originating from diverse recognition metabolites against phytopathogens and mycotoxins. Food Control 2019, 106, 106748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Fawcett, D.; Verduin, J.J.; Shah, M.; Sharma, S.B.; Poinern, G.E.J. A Review of Current Research into the Biogenic Synthesis of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles via Marine Algae and Seagrasses. J. Nanosci. 2017, 2017, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Venkatesan, J.; Manivasagan, P.; Kim, S.K.; Kirthi, A.V.; Marimuthu, S.; Rahuman, A.A. Marine algae-mediated synthesis of gold nanoparticles using a novel Ecklonia cava. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2014, 37, 1591–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Sharma, A.; Sharma, S.; Sharma, K.; Chetri, S.P.K.; Vashishtha, A.; Singh, P.; Kumar, R.; Rathi, B.; Agrawal, V. Algae as crucial organisms in advancing nanotechnology: A systematic review. J. Appl. Phycol. 2016, 28, 1759–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kumaresan, M.; Vijai Anand, K.; Govindaraju, K.; Tamilselvan, S.; Ganesh Kumar, V. Seaweed Sargassum wightii mediated preparation of zirconia (ZrO2) nanoparticles and their antibacterial activity against gram positive and gram negative bacteria. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 124, 311–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Asmathunisha, N.; Kathiresan, K. A review on biosynthesis of nanoparticles by marine organisms. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2013, 103, 283–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mubarak Ali, D.; Sasikala, M.; Gunasekaran, M.; Thajuddin, N. Biosynthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles using marine cyanobacterium, oscillatoria willei ntdm01. Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostruct. 2011, 6, 385–390. [Google Scholar]
  80. Jacob, J.M.; Ravindran, R.; Narayanan, M.; Samuel, S.M.; Pugazhendhi, A.; Kumar, G. Microalgae: A prospective low cost green alternative for nanoparticle synthesis. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 2020, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Fatima, R.; Priya, M.; Indurthi, L.; Radhakrishnan, V.; Sudhakaran, R. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using red algae Portieria hornemannii and its antibacterial activity against fish pathogens. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 138, 103780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Arya, A.; Mishra, V.; Chundawat, T.S. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles from green algae (Botryococcus braunii) and its catalytic behavior for the synthesis of benzimidazoles. Chem. Data Collect. 2019, 20, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Manikandakrishnan, M.; Palanisamy, S.; Vinosha, M.; Kalanjiaraja, B.; Mohandoss, S.; Manikandan, R.; Tabarsa, M.; You, S.G.; Prabhu, N.M. Facile green route synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Caulerpa racemosa for biomedical applications. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 101345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Salem, D.M.S.A.; Ismail, M.M.; Aly-Eldeen, M.A. Biogenic synthesis and antimicrobial potency of iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles using algae harvested from the Mediterranean Sea, Egypt. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2019, 45, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Colin, J.A.; Pech-Pech, I.E.; Oviedo, M.; Águila, S.A.; Romo-Herrera, J.M.; Contreras, O.E. Gold nanoparticles synthesis assisted by marine algae extract: Biomolecules shells from a green chemistry approach. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2018, 708, 210–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. González-Ballesteros, N.; Prado-López, S.; Rodríguez-González, J.B.; Lastra, M.; Rodríguez-Argüelles, M.C. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles using brown algae Cystoseira baccata: Its activity in colon cancer cells. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2017, 153, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Mourdikoudis, S.; Pallares, R.M.; Thanh, N.T.K. Characterization techniques for nanoparticles: Comparison and complementarity upon studying nanoparticle properties. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 12871–12934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Hasan, A.; Morshed, M.; Memic, A.; Hassan, S.; Webster, T.J.; Marei, H.E.S. Nanoparticles in tissue engineering: Applications, challenges and prospects. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018, 13, 5637–5655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Ali, A.; Zafar, H.; Zia, M.; ul Haq, I.; Phull, A.R.; Ali, J.S.; Hussain, A. Synthesis, characterization, applications, and challenges of iron oxide nanoparticles. Nanotechnol. Sci. Appl. 2016, 9, 49–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Khlebtsov, N.G.; Dykman, L.A. Optical properties and biomedical applications of plasmonic nanoparticles. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 2010, 111, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Rastinehad, A.R.; Anastos, H.; Wajswol, E.; Winoker, J.S.; Sfakianos, J.P.; Doppalapudi, S.K.; Carrick, M.R.; Knauer, C.J.; Taouli, B.; Lewis, S.C.; et al. Gold nanoshell-localized photothermal ablation of prostate tumors in a clinical pilot device study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 18590–18596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Todescato, F.; Fortunati, I.; Minotto, A.; Signorini, R.; Jasieniak, J.J.; Bozio, R. Engineering of semiconductor nanocrystals for light emitting applications. Materials 2016, 9, 672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Ayatullah, A.K.M.; Asif, H.; Hasan, M.Z. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology Application of Nanotechnology in Modern Textiles: A Review. Int. J. Curr. Eng. Technol. 2018, 8, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Shateri-Khalilabad, M.; Yazdanshenas, M.E.; Etemadifar, A. Fabricating multifunctional silver nanoparticles-coated cotton fabric. Arab. J. Chem. 2017, 10, S2355–S2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Guo, D.; Xie, G.; Luo, J. Mechanical properties of nanoparticles: Basics and applications. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2014, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Houtman, C.J. Emerging contaminants in surface waters and their relevance for the production of drinking water in Europe. J. Integr. Environ. Sci. 2010, 7, 271–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Dankovich, T.A.; Smith, J.A. Incorporation of copper nanoparticles into paper for point-of-use water purification. Water Res. 2014, 63, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Rodd, A.L.; Creighton, M.A.; Vaslet, C.A.; Rangel-Mendez, J.R.; Hurt, R.H.; Kane, A.B. Effects of surface-engineered nanoparticle-based dispersants for marine oil spills on the model organism Artemia franciscana. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 6419–6427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Abdullah, M.M.S.; Atta, A.M.; Allohedan, H.A.; Alkhathlan, H.Z.; Khan, M.; Ezzat, A.O. Green synthesis of hydrophobic magnetite nanoparticles coated with plant extract and their application as petroleum oil spill collectors. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Fu, F.; Dionysiou, D.D.; Liu, H. The use of zero-valent iron for groundwater remediation and wastewater treatment: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 267, 194–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Avasare, V.; Zhang, Z.; Avasare, D.; Ibrahim, K.; Qurashi, A. Room-temperature synthesis of TiO2 nanospheres and their solar driven photoelectrochemical hydrogen production. Int. J. Energy Res. 2015, 33, 23–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Li, D.; Baydoun, H.; Verani, C.N.; Brock, S.L. Efficient Water Oxidation Using CoMnP Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 4006–4009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Sagadevan, S. A review on application of nanofluids in solar energy. Am. J. Nano Res. Appl. 2015, 2, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ahmad, H.M.; Kamal, M.S.; Al-Harthi, M.A.; Elkatatny, S.M.; Murtaza, M.M. Synthesis and Experimental Investigation of Novel CNT-Polymer Nanocomposite to Enhance Borehole Stability at High Temperature Drilling Applications. In Proceedings of the SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition, Dammam, Saudi Arabia, 23–26 April 2018. [Google Scholar]
  105. Hogeweg, A.S.; Hincapie, R.E.; Foedisch, H.; Ganzer, L. Evaluation of Aluminium Oxide and Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles for EOR Applications. In Proceedings of the SPE Europec featured at 80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Copenhagen, Denmark, 11–14 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
  106. Fakoya, M.F.; Shah, S.N. Effect of Silica Nanoparticles on the Rheological Properties and Filtration Performance of Surfactant-Based and Polymeric Fracturing Fluids and Their Blends. SPE Drill. Complet. 2018, 33, 100–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Fakoya, M.F.; Shah, S.N. Emergence of nanotechnology in the oil and gas industry: Emphasis on the application of silica nanoparticles. Petroleum 2017, 3, 391–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Al-saba, M.T.; Al Fadhli, A.; Marafi, A.; Hussain, A.; Bander, F.; Al Dushaishi, M.F. Application of Nanoparticles in Improving Rheological Properties of Water Based Drilling Fluids. In Proceedings of the SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition, Dammam, Saudi Arabia, 23–26 April 2018. [Google Scholar]
  109. Alvi, M.A.; Belayneh, M.; Saasen, A.; Aadnøy, B.S. The Effect of Micro-Sized Boron Nitride BN and Iron Trioxide Fe2O3 Nanoparticles on the Properties of Laboratory Bentonite Drilling Fluid. In Proceedings of the SPE Norway One Day Seminar, Bergen, Norway, 18 April 2018. [Google Scholar]
  110. Gbadamosi, A.O.; Junin, R.; Oseh, J.O.; Agi, A.; Yekeen, N.; Abdalla, Y.; Ogiriki, S.O.; Yusuff, A.S. Improving Hole Cleaning Efficiency using Nanosilica in Water-Based Drilling Mud. In Proceedings of the SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition, Dammam, Saudi Arabia, 23–26 April 2018. [Google Scholar]
  111. Parizad, A.; Shahbazi, K.; Ayatizadeh Tanha, A. Enhancement of polymeric water-based drilling fluid properties using nanoparticles. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2018, 170, 813–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Perween, S.; Beg, M.; Shankar, R.; Sharma, S.; Ranjan, A. Effect of zinc titanate nanoparticles on rheological and filtration properties of water based drilling fluids. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2018, 170, 844–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Bashir Abdullahi, M.; Rajaei, K.; Junin, R.; Bayat, A.E. Appraising the impact of metal-oxide nanoparticles on rheological properties of HPAM in different electrolyte solutions for enhanced oil recovery. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2019, 172, 1057–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Farid Ibrahim, A.; Nasr-El-Din, H. An Experimental Study for the Using of Nanoparticle/VES Stabilized CO2 Foam to Improve the Sweep Efficiency in EOR Applications. In Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, TX, USA, 24–26 September 2018. [Google Scholar]
  115. Elshawaf, M. Consequence of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles on Heavy Oil Recovery. In Proceedings of the SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition, Dammam, Saudi Arabia, 23–26 April 2018; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  116. Yumei, L.; Yamei, L.; Qiang, L.; Jie, B. Rapid Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Based on Flocculation and Reduction of an Exopolysaccharide from Arthrobacter sp. B4: Its Antimicrobial Activity and Phytotoxicity. J. Nanomater. 2017, 2017, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Abdel-Raouf, N.; Alharbi, R.M.; Al-Enazi, N.M.; Alkhulaifi, M.M.; Ibraheem, I.B.M. Rapid biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using the marine red alga Laurencia catarinensis and their characterization. Beni Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2018, 7, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Abu-Tahon, M.A.; Ghareib, M.; Abdallah, W.E. Environmentally benign rapid biosynthesis of extracellular gold nanoparticles using Aspergillus flavus and their cytotoxic and catalytic activities. Process Biochem. 2020, 95, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Abd El-Raheem, R. El-Shanshoury Rapid biosynthesis of cadmium sulfide (CdS) nanoparticles using culture supernatants of Escherichia coli ATCC 8739, Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633 and Lactobacillus acidophilus DSMZ 20079T. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, Q.; Fan, X.; Gao, J.; Luo, Y. Rapid Biosynthesis of Gold Nanoparticles by the Extracellular Secretion of Bacillus niabensis 45: Characterization and Antibiofilm Activity. J. Chem. 2016, 2016, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Karunakaran, G.; Jagathambal, M.; Gusev, A.; Torres, J.A.L.; Kolesnikov, E.; Kuznetsov, D. Rapid Biosynthesis of AgNPs Using Soil Bacterium Azotobacter vinelandii With Promising Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities for Biomedical Applications. JOM 2017, 69, 1206–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Ahmad, N.; Bhatnagar, S.; Saxena, R.; Iqbal, D.; Ghosh, A.K.; Dutta, R. Biosynthesis and characterization of gold nanoparticles: Kinetics, in vitro and in vivo study. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 78, 553–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. El Domany, E.B.; Essam, T.M.; Ahmed, A.E.; Farghali, A.A. Biosynthesis Physico-Chemical Optimization of Gold Nanoparticles as Anti-Cancer and Synergetic Antimicrobial Activity Using Pleurotus ostreatus Fungus. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Singh, A.; Gautam, P.K.; Verma, A.; Singh, V.; Shivapriya, P.M.; Shivalkar, S.; Sahoo, A.K.; Samanta, S.K. Green synthesis of metallic nanoparticles as effective alternatives to treat antibiotics resistant bacterial infections: A review. Biotechnol. Rep. 2020, 25, e00427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Patil, S.; Chandrasekaran, R. Biogenic nanoparticles: A comprehensive perspective in synthesis, characterization, application and its challenges. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2020, 18, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Applsci 11 02598 g001 550
Figure 1. Mechanism of the intracellular-cell bound synthesis of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) using L. kimchicus DCY51T [28].
Figure 1. Mechanism of the intracellular-cell bound synthesis of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) using L. kimchicus DCY51T [28].
Applsci 11 02598 g001
Applsci 11 02598 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image showing bacterial synthesised AuNPs and (b) histogram showing particle size distribution with the average size being 20.93 ± 3.46 nm [43].
Figure 2. (a) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image showing bacterial synthesised AuNPs and (b) histogram showing particle size distribution with the average size being 20.93 ± 3.46 nm [43].
Applsci 11 02598 g002
Applsci 11 02598 g003 550
Figure 3. Energy generation approaches from (A) piezoelectrics actuators, (B) water splitting and (C) CO2 reduction [7].
Figure 3. Energy generation approaches from (A) piezoelectrics actuators, (B) water splitting and (C) CO2 reduction [7].
Applsci 11 02598 g003
Table
Table 1. Examples of recent studies on nanoparticle synthesis using bacteria.
Table 1. Examples of recent studies on nanoparticle synthesis using bacteria.
NanoparticleBacteriumApplicationIntra/ExtraReference
GoldLactobacillus kimchicusDrug delivery, cancer diagnosticIntra[28]
GoldStaphylococcus epidermidisCatalystsExtra[42]
GoldParacoccus haeundaensisAntioxidantsExtra[43]
SilverCupriavidus sp.Antibacterial Extra[29]
SilverBacillus subtilisAntibacterialExtra[44]
Zinc oxideBacillus subtillisSynthetic dyesExtra[45]
Zinc oxideStaphylococcus aureusAntibacterial Intra[46]
NanoseleniumBacillus sp.BiomedicalExtra[47]
Platinum and palladiumDesulfovibrio vulgarisCatalystsExtra[48]
Table
Table 2. Examples of recent studies on nanoparticle synthesis using fungi.
Table 2. Examples of recent studies on nanoparticle synthesis using fungi.
NanoparticleFungusApplicationIntra/ExtraReference
Iron oxideAspergillus niger BSC-1Wastewater treatmentExtra[59]
SilverAspergillus terreusAntibacterial, anticancerExtra[60]
SilverCladosporium cladosporioidesAntioxidant, antimicrobialExtra[61]
CopperAspergillus nigerAntidiabetic and AntibacterialExtra[62]
SeleniumMariannaea sp. HJ Medicinal and electronicsBoth[63]
Cobalt oxide Aspergillus nidulansEnergy storageExtra[64]
GoldCladosporium cladosporioidesAntioxidant, antimicrobialExtra[65]
GoldCladosporium oxysporumCatalysisExtra[66]
PlatinumFusarium oxysporumNano medicineExtra[58]
Table
Table 3. List of algae for nanoparticle production.
Table 3. List of algae for nanoparticle production.
NanoparticleAlgaeApplicationReference
SilverPortieria hornemanniiAntibacterial[82]
SilverBotryococcus brauniiCatalysis[83]
GoldCaulerpa racemosaBiomedical[84]
Iron oxideColpomenia sinuosa and Pterocladia capillaceaAntibacterial[85]
GoldEgregia sp.Biomedical[86]
GoldCystoseira baccataCancer[87]
Table
Table 4. List of techniques for characterisation of nanoparticles.
Table 4. List of techniques for characterisation of nanoparticles.
TechniquesCharacteristic
Atomic force microscopy (AFM)Geometry, structure, distribution
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)Thermal performance
Dynamic light scattering (DLS)Hydrodynamic size distribution
Fluorescence spectroscopyOptical properties
UV-VIS/Infrared spectroscopy Structure, Functional group analysis
Mass spectrometry (MS)Molecular weight, composition, surface
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)Structure, composition, purity
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)Aggregation, size and shape
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)Aggregation, size and shape
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)Elemental and chemical composition
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mughal, B.; Zaidi, S.Z.J.; Zhang, X.; Hassan, S.U. Biogenic Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterisation and Applications. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 2598. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062598

AMA Style

Mughal B, Zaidi SZJ, Zhang X, Hassan SU. Biogenic Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterisation and Applications. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(6):2598. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062598

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mughal, Bilal, Syed Zohaib Javaid Zaidi, Xunli Zhang, and Sammer Ul Hassan. 2021. "Biogenic Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterisation and Applications" Applied Sciences 11, no. 6: 2598. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062598

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop