Next Article in Journal
Study on Two-Phase Mixing Inside Flow Focusing/Blurring Nozzle by Gray Distribution Analysis Method
Next Article in Special Issue
Cultivation of Solanum lycopersicum under Glass Coated with Nanosized Upconversion Luminophore
Previous Article in Journal
Performance of Envelope Demodulation for Bearing Damage Detection on CWRU Accelerometric Data: Kurtogram and Traditional Indicators vs. Targeted a Posteriori Band Indicators
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Diversity of Synthetic Dyes from Textile Industries, Discharge Impacts and Treatment Methods

1
NextBiotech, Rue Ali Belhouane, No. 98, Agareb 3030, Tunisia
2
East Azarbaijan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Plant Protection Research Department, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tabriz 5355179854, Iran
3
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 516615731, Iran
4
The Public Authority for Applied Education and Training, Adailiyah 73101, Kuwait
5
Laboratory of Applied Microbiology, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Natural and Life Sciences, Ferhat Abbas of Setif University, Setif 19000, Algeria
6
Department of Forest Protection, Forest Research Institute, 05-090 Sekocin Stary, Poland
7
Department of Biology and Genetics, Institute of Biology, Zoology and Radiobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, 041 81 Kosice, Slovakia
8
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Toruń, Poland
9
Laboratory of Soil Biology, University of Neuchatel, 2000 Neuchatel, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(14), 6255; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146255
Submission received: 1 June 2021 / Revised: 1 July 2021 / Accepted: 3 July 2021 / Published: 6 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanomaterials to Monitor and Improve Environmental Quality)

Abstract

:
Natural dyes have been used from ancient times for multiple purposes, most importantly in the field of textile dying. The increasing demand and excessive costs of natural dye extraction engendered the discovery of synthetic dyes from petrochemical compounds. Nowadays, they are dominating the textile market, with nearly 8 × 105 tons produced per year due to their wide range of color pigments and consistent coloration. Textile industries consume huge amounts of water in the dyeing processes, making it hard to treat the enormous quantities of this hazardous wastewater. Thus, they have harmful impacts when discharged in non-treated or partially treated forms in the environment (air, soil, plants and water), causing several human diseases. In the present work we focused on synthetic dyes. We started by studying their classification which depended on the nature of the manufactured fiber (cellulose, protein and synthetic fiber dyes). Then, we mentioned the characteristics of synthetic dyes, however, we focused more on their negative impacts on the ecosystem (soil, plants, water and air) and on humans. Lastly, we discussed the applied physical, chemical and biological strategies solely or in combination for textile dye wastewater treatments. Additionally, we described the newly established nanotechnology which achieves complete discharge decontamination.

1. Introduction

The worldwide developmental process influenced all fields of life by providing rapidity, efficacy and comfort. However, it has also engendered side effects related to biosphere pollution coming from uncontrolled pollutant discharge from all sorts of industries, especially those manipulating harmful and recalcitrant compounds [1]. Particularly, the dye industries generate huge amounts of hazardous wastewater routinely [2]. Dyes are used for the coloration of several materials such as textile fibers, paper, cosmetics, tannery, leather, food, pharmaceutical products, etc., [3,4]. Before 1856, dyes were derived from natural sources only. The increasing demand and excessive costs of natural dye extraction engendered the discovery of the first synthetic dye aniline (mauveine) in 1856 by a chemist named Perkin [5]. This purple dye gave a stable and uniformly distributed color when applied to silk [6]. Dying industries depended on synthetic dyes ever since and started to expand globally, attaining nearly 8 × 105 tons of synthetic dyes produced per year [7,8]. Notably, the textile industry accounts for ~75% of the global dyestuff market and involves around ten thousand different dyes used for printing and/or coloring multiple types of fabrics [9,10]. Textile industries are mostly located in developing countries such as India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Vietnam, where they enhanced employment capacity, building the economy and foreign exchange earnings [11,12]. However, these countries do not fully respect effluent discharge norms because of their poor wastewater treatment systems. They often reject large quantities of untreated or partially treated dye effluents, eventually resulting in huge environmental pollution [13,14]. Thus, our study aims to give a comprehensive survey on textile synthetic dyes and the discharged effluents of textile industries. It focuses on introducing synthetic dyes and their classification in the first part. It delimits the impacts of these dyes on the ecosystem and human beings in the second part and discusses the available treatment methods of the released textile industry wastewater in the last part.

2. Classification of Dyes

Textile industries produce fibers to form yarn, which is converted to fabric [15]. They use dyes in different ways on textile fabric (Figure 1). For instance, dyeing is the process of coating the textile fiber with dyes uniformly. Printing is the application of dyes in a specific area of the fabric. Bleaching is the removal of dye color (decolorization) from textile fibers, and finishing comprises crosslinking, softening and waterproofing [7]. Dyes are classified depending on their origin into two main categories. Natural dyes, which have been known ever since ancient times, are derived mainly from plants; and synthetic dyes are artificially synthesized from chemical compounds. Synthetic dyes are divided into three groups based on the nature of the manufactured fiber. These are cellulose fiber dyes, protein fiber dyes and synthetic fibers dyes [4,16].

2.1. Cellulose Fiber Dyes

Cellulose fiber originates from plants such as linen, cotton, ramie, rayon, lyocell and hemp (Figure 1). These types of fabrics give perfect dyeing results with reactive dyes, direct dyes, indigo dyes and sulfur dyes [17].

2.1.1. Reactive Dyes

Reactive dyes constitute the major class of cellulose fiber dyes and work well with some protein fibers (Figure 1). They are known for their high pigmentation, permanent effect, facility of manipulation under a wide temperature range and versatility due to diverse reactive groups able to form covalent bonds with multiple fibers [10,14].

2.1.2. Direct Dyes

Direct dyes are very affordable, yet tend to remain in an aqueous form rather than binding to cellulose fibers (they can be used with certain synthetic fibers as well). Thereby, they are combined with inorganic electrolytes and anionic salts in the form of sodium sulfate (Na2SO4) or sodium chloride (NaCl) to enhance their fabric binding capacities (Figure 1). Thus, it is recommended to wash them in a cold cycle and with fabrics of the same color [18].

2.1.3. Indigo Dyes

The indigo or dark blue color belongs to the classification of vat dyes, which are originally not soluble in water but became soluble after an alkaline reduction (Figure 1). The textile dyeing process occurs with the water-soluble or leuco form of indigo, then this form oxidizes under air exposure and returns to its original insoluble or keto form to ensure a perfect bonding of the dye to the fabric. The indigo dyes are mostly used in blue denim dyeing, which explains their production in huge amounts around the world [19,20].

2.1.4. Sulfur Dyes

Sulfur dyes constitute a small, yet important class due to their excellent dyeing properties, ease of application and low cost (Figure 1). They have a complex structure with a disulfide (S–S) bridge. They belong to the vat dye classification; thus, they are reduced from the keto to the leuco form via sodium sulfide utilization. Leuco sulfur becomes soluble in water to achieve the dyeing purpose [21,22].

2.2. Protein Fiber Dyes

Protein fibers such as silk, cashmere, angora, mohair and wool originate from animal sources (Figure 1). They are susceptible to high pH levels; hence they are dyed using a water-soluble acid dyestuff to obtain a molecule of an insoluble dye on the fiber [23]. Acid dyes encompass azo dyes as the most important group followed by anthraquinone, triarylmethane and phtalocyanine dyes [24,25].

2.2.1. Azo Dyes

Azo dyes account for the largest category (60–70%) of the total synthetic dyes industry due to their versatility, cost-effectiveness, simplicity of utilization, high stability and high intensity of the color [26,27]. This dye has a prominent chromophore (-N = N-) structure, ensuring the solubility of the dyes in water and its attachment to the fiber [28,29]. Azo dyes are classified into three groups (mono, di and poly) depending on the number of azo groups in their structure (Figure 1). These groups are attached to an aromatic or heterocyclic compound on one side and an unsaturated heterocycle, carboxyl, sulphonyl, or aliphatic group on the other side [30,31].

2.2.2. Anthraquinone Dyes

The class of anthraquinone is extensively used in textile dyeing industries; the red dyestuff particularly has been used for a long time [32]. These dyes are known for their solubility in water, bright colors and excellent fastness properties (Figure 1). The antharaquinone structure could constitute junctions with azo dyes [33,34].

2.2.3. Triarylmethane Dyes

The triphenylmethane dyes are widely applied in the textile industry for either dyeing wool and silk protein fibers when formed of two groups of sulfonic acid (SO3H). They can be used as indicators if they contain only one sulfonic acid (SO3H) auxochrome in their chemical structure (Figure 1). These dyestuffs are known for their solubility in water and their wide and intense color range [17,35].

2.2.4. Phtalocyanine Dyes

The phtalocyanine family of dyes is synthesized by a reaction between the 1,4-Dicyanobenzene compound with a metallic atom (Nickel, Cobalt, Copper, etc.) to produce green and blue shades (Figure 1). They have multiple inherent properties such as good colorfastness to light, resistance to oxidation, solubility in water and chemical stability [36,37].

2.3. Synthetic Fiber Dyes

Synthesized fibers are composed of spandex, polyester, acrylic, polyamide, polyoacetate, polypropylene, ingeo and acetate fabrics (Figure 1). They are used in 60% of global fiber production due to their wide application range. These fibers are dyed using direct dyes, basic dyes and disperse dyes [38,39].

2.3.1. Disperse Dyes

Disperse dyes are the smallest molecules among all dyes. These dyes are insoluble in water but stable under high-temperature exposure (Figure 1). The high-temperature dyeing solution is a mixture between the dyestuff powder and the dispersing agent [40,41,42].

2.3.2. Basic Dyes

Basic dyes are also called cationic dyes because they transform into colorful cationic salts responsible for dyeing the anionic fiber textile [43]. These dyes are susceptible to light; thus, they are strictly used for dyeing paper nylon and modified polyesters. Their principal structures are cyanine, triarylmethane, anthraquinone, diarylmethane, diazahemicyanine, oxazine, hemicyanine, thiazine and hemicyanine [10] (Figure 1).

3. Characteristics and Impacts of Synthetic Dyes

Synthetic dyes are mostly derived from petrochemical compounds, they are commercialized in liquid, powder, pastes, or granule forms [16]. They are endowed with multiple potentialities such as fast and consistent coloration with different classes of fabrics as mentioned in the above section, a wide range of color pigments and shades, facility of manipulation, stability over several external factors and economical energy consumption [13]. Therefore, the majority of synthetic dyes cause harmful impacts when discharged in non-treated or partially treated forms in the environment [44,45]. Several reports have mentioned that up to 15% of applied dyes escape the textile fibers and are released into wastewater, and that the procedures of textile dyeing (dyeing, fixing, washing, etc.) consume a massive amount of water. Hence, a huge volume of improper discharge is rejected continuously [46,47]. Dye effluents contain high biological and chemical oxygen demand (BOD and COD) and they are very rich in organic and inorganic pollutants such as chlorinated compounds, heavy metals, sulfur, nitrates, naphtol, soaps, chromium compounds, formaldehyde, benzidine, sequestering agents and dyes and pigments [48,49]. Several toxic elements remain in the wastewater even after certain treatment processes [50,51]. Thereby, they cause multi-contamination effects on air, soil, plants and water resources, in addition to severe human diseases [52].

3.1. Harmful Impacts on Soil and Plants

Liquid and solid wastes discharged from textile industries contain dyes, plastic, polyester, fibers, yarns and other hazardous materials as mentioned in the above section (Figure 2). These polymeric compounds have been responsible for the pollution of local landfill habitats and agricultural fields, especially in developing countries. This soil pollution engenders plant growth inhibition by causing oxidative stress, lowering the protein content, photosynthesis and CO2 assimilating rates [7,53].

3.2. Harmful Impacts on Air

Textile dye industries release toxic gases like sulfur, formaldehyde, oxides of nitrogen, volatile compounds, particulate matter and dusts distinguished by an unpleasant smell (Figure 2). This air pollution could affect humans (workers and customers), animals, the final product and the environment [52,54,55].

3.3. Harmful Impacts on Water

The main damage caused by the industrial dye effluent effects the receiving water bodies (including seas, rivers, lakes, natural ponds and streams) and spreads over large distances causing damage to other forms of life [49]. The wastewater contains multiple toxic materials and its color result from the discharge of several dyes; it is noticeable and very recalcitrant even in low concentrations (>1 mg/L), yet the average concentration of textile effluent dye reaches about 300 mg/L [56]. The dark color and high turbidity of these effluents interfere with sunlight transmission through water, decrease the amount of dissolved oxygen and disturb the pH level (Figure 2). These factors lead to several ecological impacts on the aquatic system such as the inhibition of photosynthesis in aquatic plants, low biodegradability by aerobic microorganisms and harmful effects on the food chain [57,58]. Water is highly susceptible to pollution compared to the other areas, and it is also hard to determine the pollution level in aquatic systems. The water may appear clear even though the pollution may reside for long periods in sediments and fish [16,44].

3.4. Harmful Impacts on Humans

Dye products and by-products existing in wastewater discharge or the dust produced inside the textile industry pose serious damages and long-lasting health impacts to human beings (Figure 2). They affect several vital organs (brain, kidney, liver, heart) and systems (respiratory, immune, reproductive) of the human organism [59,60]. Diseases may occur either directly through inhalation such as respiratory problems, asthma, allergy, nausea, or skin and eye irritation and dermatitis, or indirectly through the food chain such as tuberculosis, cancer, hemorrhage, gene mutations, and heart disease [2,61].

4. Applied Strategies for Textile Dye Wastewater Treatment

Textile industries use huge amounts of water in the dyeing processes, making it hard to treat the enormous quantities of wastewater discharge (Figure 3). The latter is composed of various organic and inorganic pollutants as described in the previous section [45,62]. Therefore, several countries have imposed rules to reach a standard before the effluent is released into the ecosystem or is reused for other purposes. For this to happen, physical, chemical and biological technologies have been employed to protect the environment and human health from discharge problems. These strategies could be implemented solely or in combination to obtain effective results [13,30,63].

4.1. Physical Treatment Process

The physical treatment (Figure 3) of industrial wastewater involves conventional processes such as adsorption, filtration, ion exchange and oxidation [16].

4.1.1. Adsorption

This approach is an efficient and easy operation applied when the discharge effluent contains a large variety of dyes [56]. An appropriate adsorbent is selected depending on its affinity and ability of regeneration. Adsorbent materials are known to be pricy (e.g., activated carbon), which allowed scientific researchers to find alternative adsorbent materials such as bentonite clay, fly ash, wheat residue, date stones, nanoparticles, etc., (Figure 3). They are affordable and effective in wastewater treatment [64,65]. This treatment strategy is achieved through the attachment of the pollutants to the specific surface area of the adsorbent material [66,67]. The achievement of dyes decolorization by adsorption with activated carbon was extensively studied. For instance, malachite green was adsorbed with curcuma-based activated carbon [65], with tetraethylenepentamine activated carbon [66] and with carbon coated layered double hydroxide [64]. Rhodamine B was successfully adsorbed by ordered mesoporous carbon and commercial activated carbon and by treated rice-husk based activated carbon Acid red 4 adsorption occurred via the activated carbon. Other adsorption methods were applied to remove the Basic fuchsin by bottom ash and deoiled soya and with mussel shell biomass waste and Acid blue 25 with shrimp shells (Table 1).

4.1.2. Nanoparticle Utilization

Nanotechnology is the science of nanoscale materials (size ≤ 100 nm); it has attracted numerous researchers due to the great potentials of nanoparticles in removing textile dyes [68]. Nanoparticles have a wide range of classification [69], they are chemically stable, have a large surface area, can be prepared physically, chemically and biologically (microbes and plants), and are cheap and eco-friendly [70]. The shape, size, structure, purity and arrangement of nanomaterials matters in the process of decolorization [71]. Nanoparticles are mainly applied directly to wastewater to adsorb rejected dyes on their surface for further elimination [72]. They could also be used in filters, membranes and carbon nanotubes for further regeneration and reutilization in dye wastewater discharge cleaning [73]. This original methodology is taking place as a significant, large-scale solution for textile industries due to the speed of cleaning and reduction of certain pollutants to near-zero levels [74]. Nanomaterials could be synthesized based on plant extracts [75,76], metals and metal oxides [77,78], carbon [79] and nanocomposites [80]. However, it is important to know that the elimination of nanoparticles after water purification needs to be addressed [81]. Multiple scientific works covered dye degradation using nanocomposites including graphene oxide/zinc oxide (GO/ZnO) [111], polyaniline/SiO2 [121] and RGO-Ni [130]. Umar et al. [150] used Pd–Ni bimetallic nanoparticles to treat Acid orange 8 (Table 1).

4.1.3. Filtration

Filtration is a membrane-based separation process (Figure 3) that involves popular techniques such as reverse osmosis, ultrafiltration and nanofiltration, to allow the acquisition of reusable water and recycled dyes [82,83,84]. The concept of these procedures consists of transporting industrial wastewater throughout several membranes differing by mesh size and separation mechanisms to finally obtain clean water [85,86]. Dye waste water treatment by the membrane filtration method was reported by [154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177], he used nano-membrane filtration. Liang et al. [178] coupled electro-fenton reaction with membrane filtration to achieve better results. Liu et al. combined the membrane filtration method with iron nanoparticle reduction to remove various classes of dyes [179]. This technology proved to be prominent in dye removal, but it has some drawbacks such as permanent change to the membrane, the generation of foul odors and insoluble wastes, which implies further processing [87,88].

4.1.4. Ion-Exchange

Ion-exchange adsorbents are introduced in the wastewater in either solid or liquid form, they are used to bind harmful anions or cations of the opposite charge, and in turn, release an equivalent amount of non-harmful hydrogen ions [89,90]. The review paper of Hassan and Carr [180] addressed strategies for reactive dye removal by applying the ion-exchange method [180,181,182]. Cationic dyes were also removed from water throughout the ion-exchange method [183,184]. Raghu and Basha (2007) combined the ion-exchange with chemical or electrochemical methods to remove dyes from textile wastewater [185]. This technique is great for the elimination of toxic and soluble pollutants (Figure 3) from effluent water; however, its use has been limited because of its high cost [91].

4.1.5. Oxidation

Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have been extensively applied for textile dye degradation due to their powerful ability to oxidize a wide range of synthetic dyes and other complex pollutants existing in textile effluents [92,93]. They include catalytic oxidation, which is the process of active radical production (hydroxyl or sulfate radicals) on a particular catalyst surface [94,95]. In the Fenton reaction example, hydrogen peroxide is the oxidant and iron ions are the catalyst (Figure 3). This reaction occurs in an acid medium (pH ~ 3) to allow the decomposition of the hydrogen peroxide into hydroxyl free radicals acting as strong oxidants [96]. Other types of Fenton techniques are also applicable such as electro-Fenton, photo-Fenton and sono-Fenton, with the possibility of a combination of them [97]. Interestingly, the acid yellow 17 [79], Basic violet 3 [87] and Amido black 10B [118] dyes were treated by the Fenton oxidation process. Otherwise, Reactive orange 16 was treated by the ozone oxidation method [142], Reactive green was removed using UV/H2O2 AOP [98] and indigo carmine was subjected to the electrochemical oxidation [100]. The main drawbacks of the oxidation technique are the generation of hazardous by-products in cases of incomplete oxidation and the possibility of sludge formation [98,99].

4.2. Chemical Treatment Process

The most common chemical treatment processes (Figure 3) are coagulation, flocculation and ozonation [56]; they are utilized for contaminant elimination and in particular, those released in textile wastewater [100].

4.2.1. Coagulation/Flocculation

Coagulation and flocculation (Figure 3) are the simplest chemical methods for the pretreatment of textile dye effluent [101,102]. This technique enables the elimination of suspended insoluble materials by adding charged chemical colloids (Aluminium sulfate (Al2(SO4)3), Iron (III) chloride (FeCl3), Iron (II) sulfate (FeSO4), alum, lime, etc.) provoking coagulation and settling with oppositely charged particles in the polluted water [103]. It is worth noting that Crystal violet [75], Direct red 28 [122] and Acid yellow [80] dyes were removed throughout the electrocoagulation technique. Acid red 73 was treated by coagulation [109] and Acid blue 92 was removed by the coagulation/flocculation technique [131]. The provoked residues and the necessity to use subsequent treatments to ensure the elimination of the remaining soluble contaminants are the major limits of this technique [65,104].

4.2.2. Ozonation

This approach uses ozone as a strong oxidizer, its cleaning properties allow it to eliminate toxic textile effluent compounds such as azo dyes [105,106]. Other benefits of ozone, when used in the gaseous state (Figure 3), are no fluctuation of the volume of wastewater and no generation of sludge [107]. In this respect, the literature has multiple examples on the degradation of dyes including Reactive red 120 [95], Acid blue 92 [132], Rhodamine B [84] and Crystal violet [74] using the ozonation method. The main shortcomings of this process are that it is highly susceptible to many factors (pH, salts, temperature, etc.), it can release toxic compounds and its cost is elevated [103].

4.3. Biological Treatment Process

The process of biodegradation/bioremediation occurs naturally via a wide variety of adapted microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, algae and yeast existing within the wastewater and/or the polluted area [108,109]. This process could also be induced on a laboratory scale by isolating and screening appropriate microorganisms, succeeded by a scale up to allow for textile effluent treatment and decolorization [3,110,111]. The responsible microorganisms for biodegradation (Figure 3) use several techniques such as adsorption, biosorption, bioaccumulation, alleviation, elimination, or mineralization of the harmful wastewater molecules into non-harmful or even beneficial products [49,112]. This technique gained major attention for being environmentally friendly, safe, clean (no sludge), and economic, because it could be combined with other technologies [113,114]. Bacteria [115] and fungi [6] are the principal contributors to wastewater degradation due to their ability to produce degrading enzymes (oxidoreductases, hydrolases, oxygenases, ligninases, peroxidases and laccases) responsible for breaking down recalcitrant molecules [116,117,118,119]. It is noteworthy to cite the role of extracellular laccase produced by multiple fungi such as Neurospora crassa and Phanerochaete chrysosporium in the degradation of multiple dyes [186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206]. Al-Jawhari et al. [207] also mentioned the ability of few filamentous fungi in the treatment of crystal violet and methylene blue dyes [154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214]. Otherwise, Bacillus subtillis, Proteus sp. and Streptococcus sp. proved to be useful in azo dyes degradation [207,215]. Lysinibacillus sp. RGS proved to decolorize and detoxify the Remazol red dye [216,217,218,219]. Nonetheless, natural bioremediation is a time-consuming method, the induced biodegradation is not readily reproduced and elevated concentrations of toxic compounds may prevent the growth of existing or introduced microorganisms [8,102].

4.4. Combinatorial Treatments

All the above-mentioned treatments proved effective in alleviating textile wastewater toxicity (Figure 3). However, achieving complete decontamination is a major challenge. Thus, a multistep treatment process is needed to obtain the best possible results [50]. The example of three treatment steps was well explained by Ghaly et al. [17]. It combines several treatment methods, starting with chemical methods to allow for the elimination of solid contaminants [17,87,120]. The secondary treatment is achieved using microorganisms to reduce the COD and BOD rates, to remove turbidity and to convert the generated sludge from the primary treatment into non-harmful products [121]. In the tertiary treatment, physical methods are applied to ensure the total decontamination of the textile wastewater and its safe reuse or release in the environment [122] (Figure 3).

5. Conclusions

This study delimited the harmful impacts of synthetic dyes and other pollutants existing in textile effluents when discharged in non-treated or partially treated forms in the first section, and introduced physical, chemical and biological treatments and their efficiency when applied solo or combined to give rise to clean and reusable water, in another section. The future of textile dyeing industries promises wider expansion, which will see producers seeking more applications. This rapid development generates large pressures on governments, who have to be more aware of the consequences of the uncontrolled discharge of textile effluents on all sorts of life and to impose severe regulations on textile and synthetic dye industries (such as the use of environment-friendly dyes and fibers, developing employed treating techniques, and reducing water and energy consumption). Nanotechnology application in wastewater purification has a promising future due to the versatile properties of nanoparticles in reducing costs and time of wastewater cleanup operations. This strategy could be combined with any of the above-mentioned techniques to ensure the best possible results of textile dye decontamination and water reutilization for other purposes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.B.S., A.C.B., Z.P., A.S., P.G. and L.B.; methodology, H.C.-S. and L.L.; software, Z.P.; validation, T.O., H.B.S., F.N.A. and L.B.; formal analysis, A.C.B. and L.B.; investigation, H.B.S. and L.B.; resources, T.O. and P.G.; data curation, A.C.B., Z.P. and L.B.; writing—original draft preparation, H.B.S.; writing—review and editing, L.B.; visualization, H.C.-S., A.C.B., L.B., L.L., P.G. and T.O.; supervision, L.B.; project administration, L.B.; funding acquisition, T.O., P.G., F.N.A. and L.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bharagava, R.N.; Saxena, G.; Mulla, S.I. Introduction to industrial wastes containing organic and inorganic pollutants and bioremediation approaches for environmental management. In Bioremediation of Industrial Waste for Environmental Safety; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  2. Khan, S.; Malik, A. Toxicity Evaluation of Textile Effluents and Role of Native Soil Bacterium in Biodegradation of a Textile Dye. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 4446–4458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Celia, M.P.; Suruthi, S. Textile Dye Degradation Using Bacterial Strains Isolated from Textile Mill Effluent. Int. J. Appl. Res. 2016, 2, 337–341. [Google Scholar]
  4. Shindhal, T.; Rakholiya, P.; Varjani, S.; Pandey, A.; Ngo, H.H.; Guo, W.; Ng, H.Y.; Taherzadeh, M.J. A Critical Review on Advances in the Practices and Perspectives for the Treatment of Dye Industry Wastewater. Bioengineered 2021, 12, 70–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Druding, S.C. (Ed.) Dye History from 2600 BC to the 20th Century. 1982. Available online: http://www.straw.com/sig/dyehist.html (accessed on 1 June 2021).
  6. Singh, L.; Singh, V.P. Textile dyes degradation: A microbial approach for biodegradation of pollutants. In Microbial Degradation of Synthetic Dyes in Wastewaters; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 187–204. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bhatia, D.; Sharma, N.R.; Singh, J.; Kanwar, R.S. Biological Methods for Textile Dye Removal from Wastewater: A Review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 47, 1836–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jamee, R.; Siddique, R. Biodegradation of Synthetic Dyes of Textile Effluent by Microorganisms: An Environmentally and Economically Sustainable Approach. Eur. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 2019, 9, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Madhav, S.; Ahamad, A.; Singh, P.; Mishra, P.K. A Review of Textile Industry: Wet Processing, Environmental Impacts, and Effluent Treatment Methods. Environ. Qual. Manag. 2018, 27, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Thakur, S.; Chauhan, M.S. Treatment of Dye Wastewater from Textile Industry by Electrocoagulation and Fenton Oxidation: A Review. In Proceedings of the Water Quality Management; Singh, V.P., Yadav, S., Yadava, R.N., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 117–129. [Google Scholar]
  11. Desore, A.; Narula, S.A. An Overview on Corporate Response towards Sustainability Issues in Textile Industry. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2018, 20, 1439–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lellis, B.; Fávaro-Polonio, C.Z.; Pamphile, J.A.; Polonio, J.C. Effects of Textile Dyes on Health and the Environment and Bioremediation Potential of Living Organisms. Biotechnol. Res. Innov. 2019, 3, 275–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hossen, M.Z.; Hussain, M.E.; Hakim, A.; Islam, K.; Uddin, M.N.; Azad, A.K. Biodegradation of Reactive Textile Dye Novacron Super Black G by Free Cells of Newly Isolated Alcaligenes Faecalis AZ26 and Bacillus Spp Obtained from Textile Effluents. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Barathi, S.; Karthik, C.; Nadanasabapathi, S.; Padikasan, I.A. Biodegradation of Textile Dye Reactive Blue 160 by Bacillus Firmus (Bacillaceae: Bacillales) and Non-Target Toxicity Screening of Their Degraded Products. Toxicol. Rep. 2020, 7, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yaseen, D.A.; Scholz, M. Textile Dye Wastewater Characteristics and Constituents of Synthetic Effluents: A Critical Review. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 16, 1193–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Gita, S.; Hussan, A.; Choudhury, T.G. Impact of Textile Dyes Waste on Aquatic Environments and Its Treatment. Environ. Ecol. 2017, 35, 2349–2353. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ghaly, A.E.; Ananthashankar, R.; Alhattab, M.; Ramakrishnan, V.V. Production, Characterization and Treatment of Textile Effluents: A Critical Review. J. Chem. Eng. Process Technol. 2014, 5, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  18. Burkinshaw, S.M.; Salihu, G. The Role of Auxiliaries in the Immersion Dyeing of Textile Fibres: Part 5 Practical Aspects of the Role of Inorganic Electrolytes in Dyeing Cellulosic Fibres with Direct Dyes. Dyes Pigment. 2019, 161, 581–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Paz, A.; Carballo, J.; Pérez, M.J.; Domínguez, J.M. Biological Treatment of Model Dyes and Textile Wastewaters. Chemosphere 2017, 181, 168–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chowdhury, M.F.; Khandaker, S.; Sarker, F.; Islam, A.; Rahman, M.T.; Awual, M.R. Current Treatment Technologies and Mechanisms for Removal of Indigo Carmine Dyes from Wastewater: A Review. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 318, 114061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nguyen, T.A.; Juang, R.S. Treatment of Waters and Wastewaters Containing Sulfur Dyes: A Review. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 219, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Khattab, T.A.; Abdelrahman, M.S.; Rehan, M. Textile Dyeing Industry: Environmental Impacts and Remediation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 3803–3818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. dos Santos Pisoni, D.; de Abreu, M.P.; Petzhold, C.L.; Rodembusch, F.S.; Campo, L.F. Synthesis, Photophysical Study and BSA Association of Water-Insoluble Squaraine Dyes. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2013, 252, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wan, Z.; Li, D.; Jiao, Y.; Ouyang, X.; Chang, L.; Wang, X. Bifunctional MoS2 Coated Melamine-Formaldehyde Sponges for Efficient Oil–Water Separation and Water-Soluble Dye Removal. Appl. Mater. Today 2017, 9, 551–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Salem, M.Z.; Ibrahim, I.H.; Ali, H.M.; Helmy, H.M. Assessment of the Use of Natural Extracted Dyes and Pancreatin Enzyme for Dyeing of Four Natural Textiles: HPLC Analysis of Phytochemicals. Processes 2020, 8, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Li, W.; Mu, B.; Yang, Y. Feasibility of Industrial-Scale Treatment of Dye Wastewater via Bio-Adsorption Technology. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 277, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhang, L.; Shao, Q.; Xu, C. Enhanced Azo Dye Removal from Wastewater by Coupling Sulfidated Zero-Valent Iron with a Chelator. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 213, 753–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Singh, R.L.; Singh, P.K.; Singh, R.P. Enzymatic Decolorization and Degradation of Azo Dyes—A Review. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2015, 104, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Louati, I.; Elloumi-Mseddi, J.; Cheikhrouhou, W.; Hadrich, B.; Nasri, M.; Aifa, S.; Woodward, S.; Mechichi, T. Simultaneous Cleanup of Reactive Black 5 and Cadmium by a Desert Soil Bacterium. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 190, 110103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Al-Tohamy, R.; Sun, J.; Fareed, M.F.; Kenawy, E.R.; Ali, S.S. Ecofriendly Biodegradation of Reactive Black 5 by Newly Isolated Sterigmatomyces Halophilus SSA1575, Valued for Textile Azo Dye Wastewater Processing and Detoxification. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, S.H.; Tsai, S.L.; Guo, P.Y.; Lin, C.W. Inducing Laccase Activity in White Rot Fungi Using Copper Ions and Improving the Efficiency of Azo Dye Treatment with Electricity Generation Using Microbial Fuel Cells. Chemosphere 2020, 243, 125304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shahid, M.; Wertz, J.; Degano, I.; Aceto, M.; Khan, M.I.; Quye, A. Analytical Methods for Determination of Anthraquinone Dyes in Historical Textiles: A Review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2019, 1083, 58–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Novotnỳ, Č.; Dias, N.; Kapanen, A.; Malachová, K.; Vándrovcová, M.; Itävaara, M.; Lima, N. Comparative Use of Bacterial, Algal and Protozoan Tests to Study Toxicity of Azo-and Anthraquinone Dyes. Chemosphere 2006, 63, 1436–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Gürses, A.; Açıkyıldız, M.; Güneş, K.; Gürses, M.S. Classification of Dye and Pigments. In Dyes and Pigments; Gürses, A., Açıkyıldız, M., Güneş, K., Gürses, M.S., Eds.; Springer Briefs in Molecular Science; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 31–45. ISBN 978-3-319-33892-7. [Google Scholar]
  35. Cao, D.J.; Wang, J.J.; Zhang, Q.; Wen, Y.Z.; Dong, B.; Liu, R.J.; Yang, X.; Geng, G. Biodegradation of Triphenylmethane Dye Crystal Violet by Cedecea Davisae. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2019, 210, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Silva, M.C.; Corrêa, A.D.; Amorim, M.T.; Parpot, P.; Torres, J.A.; Chagas, P.M. Decolorization of the Phthalocyanine Dye Reactive Blue 21 by Turnip Peroxidase and Assessment of Its Oxidation Products. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2012, 77, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Dindaş, G.B.; Şahin, Z.; Cengiz Yatmaz, H.; İşci, Ü. Cobalt Phthalocyanine-TiO2 Nanocomposites for Photocatalytic Remediation of Textile Dyes under Visible Light Irradiation. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines 2019, 23, 561–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cesa, F.S.; Turra, A.; Baruque-Ramos, J. Synthetic Fibers as Microplastics in the Marine Environment: A Review from Textile Perspective with a Focus on Domestic Washings. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 598, 1116–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Almroth, B.M.; Åström, L.; Roslund, S.; Petersson, H.; Johansson, M.; Persson, N.K. Quantifying Shedding of Synthetic Fibers from Textiles; a Source of Microplastics Released into the Environment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 1191–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Meireles, G.; Daam, M.A.; Sanches, A.L.; Zanoni, M.V.; Soares, A.M.; Gravato, C.; de Oliveira, D.P. Red Disperse Dyes (DR 60, DR 73 and DR 78) at Environmentally Realistic Concentrations Impact Biochemical Profile of Early Life Stages of Zebrafish (Danio Rerio). Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2018, 292, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Al-Etaibi, A.M.; El-Apasery, M.A. Dyeing Performance of Disperse Dyes on Polyester Fabrics Using Eco-Friendly Carrier and Their Antioxidant and Anticancer Activities. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Bayramoglu, G.; Kunduzcu, G.; Arica, M.Y. Preparation and Characterization of Strong Cation Exchange Terpolymer Resin as Effective Adsorbent for Removal of Disperse Dyes. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2020, 60, 192–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Berradi, M.; Hsissou, R.; Khudhair, M.; Assouag, M.; Cherkaoui, O.; El Bachiri, A.; El Harfi, A. Textile Finishing Dyes and Their Impact on Aquatic Environs. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ito, T.; Adachi, Y.; Yamanashi, Y.; Shimada, Y. Long–Term Natural Remediation Process in Textile Dye–Polluted River Sediment Driven by Bacterial Community Changes. Water Res. 2016, 100, 458–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Singh, L. Biodegradation of Synthetic Dyes: A Mycoremediation Approach for Degradation/Decolourization of Textile Dyes and Effluents. J. Appl. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017, 3, 430–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Yang, C.; Li, L.; Shi, J.; Long, C.; Li, A. Advanced Treatment of Textile Dyeing Secondary Effluent Using Magnetic Anion Exchange Resin and Its Effect on Organic Fouling in Subsequent RO Membrane. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 284, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yaseen, D.A.; Scholz, M. Shallow Pond Systems Planted with Lemna Minor Treating Azo Dyes. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 94, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gürses, A.; Açıkyıldız, M.; Güneş, K.; Gürses, M.S. Colorants in health and environmental aspects. In Dyes and Pigments; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 69–83. [Google Scholar]
  49. Donkadokula, N.Y.; Kola, A.K.; Naz, I.; Saroj, D. A Review on Advanced Physico-Chemical and Biological Textile Dye Wastewater Treatment Techniques. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2020, 19, 543–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Khandare, R.V.; Govindwar, S.P. Phytoremediation of Textile Dyes and Effluents: Current Scenario and Future Prospects. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015, 33, 1697–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Tabish, T.A.; Memon, F.A.; Gomez, D.E.; Horsell, D.W.; Zhang, S. A Facile Synthesis of Porous Graphene for Efficient Water and Wastewater Treatment. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Aldalbahi, A.; El-Naggar, M.E.; El-Newehy, M.H.; Rahaman, M.; Hatshan, M.R.; Khattab, T.A. Effects of Technical Textiles and Synthetic Nanofibers on Environmental Pollution. Polymers 2021, 13, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Vikrant, K.; Giri, B.S.; Raza, N.; Roy, K.; Kim, K.H.; Rai, B.N.; Singh, R.S. Recent Advancements in Bioremediation of Dye: Current Status and Challenges. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 253, 355–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Park, M.; Lee, K.S.; Shim, J.; Liu, Y.; Lee, C.; Cho, H.; Kim, M.J.; Park, S.J.; Yun, Y.J.; Kim, H.Y.; et al. Environment Friendly, Transparent Nanofiber Textiles Consolidated with High Efficiency PLEDs for Wearable Electronics. Org. Electron. 2016, 36, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Muthu, S.S. Introduction. In Sustainability in the Textile Industry; Muthu, S.S., Ed.; Textile Science and Clothing Technology; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 1–8. ISBN 978-981-10-2639-3. [Google Scholar]
  56. Eslami, H.; Shariatifar, A.; Rafiee, E.; Shiranian, M.; Salehi, F.; Hosseini, S.S.; Eslami, G.; Ghanbari, R.; Ebrahimi, A.A. Decolorization and Biodegradation of Reactive Red 198 Azo Dye by a New Enterococcus Faecalis–Klebsiella Variicola Bacterial Consortium Isolated from Textile Wastewater Sludge. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 35, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Imran, M.; Crowley, D.E.; Khalid, A.; Hussain, S.; Mumtaz, M.W.; Arshad, M. Microbial Biotechnology for Decolorization of Textile Wastewaters. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2015, 14, 73–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sakib, A.A.; Masum, S.M.; Hoinkis, J.; Islam, R.; Molla, M.; Islam, A. Synthesis of CuO/ZnO Nanocomposites and Their Application in Photodegradation of Toxic Textile Dye. J. Compos. Sci. 2019, 3, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Kant, R. Textile Dyeing Industry an Environmental Hazard. Nat. Sci. 2011, 4, 17027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Rovira, J.; Domingo, J.L. Human Health Risks Due to Exposure to Inorganic and Organic Chemicals from Textiles: A Review. Environ. Res. 2019, 168, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Yadav, A.K.; Jain, C.K.; Malik, D.S. Toxic Characterization of Textile Dyes and Effluents in Relation to Human Health Hazards. J. Sustain. Environ. Res. 2014, 3, 95–102. [Google Scholar]
  62. Ahmad, M.; Yousaf, M.; Nasir, A.; Bhatti, I.A.; Mahmood, A.; Fang, X.; Jian, X.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Mahmood, N. Porous Eleocharis@MnPE Layered Hybrid for Synergistic Adsorption and Catalytic Biodegradation of Toxic Azo Dyes from Industrial Wastewater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 2161–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Dai, Q.; Zhang, S.; Liu, H.; Huang, J.; Li, L. Sulfide-Mediated Azo Dye Degradation and Microbial Community Analysis in a Single-Chamber Air Cathode Microbial Fuel Cell. Bioelectrochemistry 2020, 131, 107349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. George, G.; Saravanakumar, M.P. Facile Synthesis of Carbon-Coated Layered Double Hydroxide and Its Comparative Characterisation with Zn–Al LDH: Application on Crystal Violet and Malachite Green Dye Adsorption—Isotherm, Kinetics and Box-Behnken Design. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 30236–30254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Arora, C.; Kumar, P.; Soni, S.; Mittal, J.; Mittal, A.; Singh, B. Efficient Removal of Malachite Green Dye from Aqueous Solution Using Curcuma Caesia Based Activated Carbon. Desalination Water Treat. 2020, 195, 341–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ghasemi, M.; Mashhadi, S.; Asif, M.; Tyagi, I.; Agarwal, S.; Gupta, V.K. Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Tetraethylenepentamine Functionalized Activated Carbon with High Adsorption Capacity for Malachite Green Dye. J. Mol. Liq. 2016, 213, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Shedbalkar, U.; Jadhav, J.P. Detoxification of Malachite Green and Textile Industrial Effluent by Penicillium Ochrochloron. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2011, 16, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chen, C.Y.; Kuo, J.T.; Cheng, C.Y.; Huang, Y.T.; Ho, I.H.; Chung, Y.C. Biological Decolorization of Dye Solution Containing Malachite Green by Pandoraea Pulmonicola YC32 Using a Batch and Continuous System. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 172, 1439–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Mukherjee, T.; Das, M. Degradation of Malachite Green by Enterobacter Asburiae Strain XJUHX-4TM. CLEAN–Soil Air Water 2014, 42, 849–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Liu, Y.; Jin, J.H.; Zhou, Y.G.; Liu, H.C.; Liu, Z.P. Flavobacterium Caeni Sp. Nov., Isolated from a Sequencing Batch Reactor for the Treatment of Malachite Green Effluents. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 417–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Muthukumaran, C.; Sivakumar, V.M.; Thirumarimurugan, M. Adsorption Isotherms and Kinetic Studies of Crystal Violet Dye Removal from Aqueous Solution Using Surfactant Modified Magnetic Nanoadsorbent. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2016, 63, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Fabryanty, R.; Valencia, C.; Soetaredjo, F.E.; Putro, J.N.; Santoso, S.P.; Kurniawan, A.; Ju, Y.H.; Ismadji, S. Removal of Crystal Violet Dye by Adsorption Using Bentonite–Alginate Composite. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 5677–5687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Kumari, H.J.; Krishnamoorthy, P.; Arumugam, T.K.; Radhakrishnan, S.; Vasudevan, D. An Efficient Removal of Crystal Violet Dye from Waste Water by Adsorption onto TLAC/Chitosan Composite: A Novel Low Cost Adsorbent. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 96, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wu, J.; Gao, H.; Yao, S.; Chen, L.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, H. Degradation of Crystal Violet by Catalytic Ozonation Using Fe/Activated Carbon Catalyst. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 147, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mbacké, M.K.; Kane, C.; Diallo, N.O.; Diop, C.M.; Chauvet, F.; Comtat, M.; Tzedakis, T. Electrocoagulation Process Applied on Pollutants Treatment-Experimental Optimization and Fundamental Investigation of the Crystal Violet Dye Removal. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 4001–4011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Parshetti, G.K.; Parshetti, S.G.; Telke, A.A.; Kalyani, D.C.; Doong, R.A.; Govindwar, S.P. Biodegradation of Crystal Violet by Agrobacterium Radiobacter. J. Environ. Sci. 2011, 23, 1384–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Grassi, P.; Reis, C.; Drumm, F.C.; Georgin, J.; Tonato, D.; Escudero, L.B.; Kuhn, R.; Jahn, S.L.; Dotto, G.L. Biosorption of Crystal Violet Dye Using Inactive Biomass of the Fungus Diaporthe Schini. Water Sci. Technol. 2019, 79, 709–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Iqbal, J.; Wattoo, F.H.; Wattoo, M.H.; Malik, R.; Tirmizi, S.A.; Imran, M.; Ghangro, A.B. Adsorption of Acid Yellow Dye on Flakes of Chitosan Prepared from Fishery Wastes. Arab. J. Chem. 2011, 4, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Khan, J.; Sayed, M.; Ali, F.; Khan, H.M. Removal of Acid Yellow 17 Dye by Fenton Oxidation Process. Z. Phys. Chem. 2018, 232, 507–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kashefialasl, M.; Khosravi, M.; Marandi, R.; Seyyedi, K. Treatment of Dye Solution Containing Colored Index Acid Yellow 36 by Electrocoagulation Using Iron Electrodes. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 2, 365. [Google Scholar]
  81. Jedynak, K.; Wideł, D.; Rędzia, N. Removal of Rhodamine b (a Basic Dye) and Acid Yellow 17 (an Acidic Dye) from Aqueous Solutions by Ordered Mesoporous Carbon and Commercial Activated Carbon. Colloids Interfaces 2019, 3, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Lops, C.; Ancona, A.; Di Cesare, K.; Dumontel, B.; Garino, N.; Canavese, G.; Hérnandez, S.; Cauda, V. Sonophotocatalytic Degradation Mechanisms of Rhodamine B Dye via Radicals Generation by Micro-and Nano-Particles of ZnO. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 243, 629–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ding, L.; Zou, B.; Gao, W.; Liu, Q.; Wang, Z.; Guo, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y. Adsorption of Rhodamine-B from Aqueous Solution Using Treated Rice Husk-Based Activated Carbon. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2014, 446, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Machado, Ê.L.; de Sales Dambros, V.; Kist, L.T.; Lobo, E.A.; Tedesco, S.B.; Moro, C.C. Use of Ozonization for the Treatment of Dye Wastewaters Containing Rhodamine B in the Agate Industry. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012, 223, 1753–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Khan, S.S.; Arunarani, A.; Chandran, P. Biodegradation of Basic Violet 3 and Acid Blue 93 by Pseudomonas Putida. CLEAN–Soil Air Water 2015, 43, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Deivasigamani, C.; Das, N. Biodegradation of Basic Violet 3 by Candida Krusei Isolated from Textile Wastewater. Biodegradation 2011, 22, 1169–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Abubakar, A.; Gaya, U. Box-Behnken-Optimized Cu (I) Photo-Fenton-like Degradation of Basic Violet 3. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2019, 10, 15–21. [Google Scholar]
  88. Sorbiun, M.; Mehr, E.S.; Ramazani, A.; Fardood, S.T. Biosynthesis of Ag, ZnO and Bimetallic Ag/ZnO Alloy Nanoparticles by Aqueous Extract of Oak Fruit Hull (Jaft) and Investigation of Photocatalytic Activity of ZnO and Bimetallic Ag/ZnO for Degradation of Basic Violet 3 Dye. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 2806–2814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Satapanajaru, T.; Chompuchan, C.; Suntornchot, P.; Pengthamkeerati, P. Enhancing Decolorization of Reactive Black 5 and Reactive Red 198 during Nano Zerovalent Iron Treatment. Desalination 2011, 266, 218–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Nazari, P.; Setayesh, S.R. Effective Degradation of Reactive Red 195 via Heterogeneous Electro-Fenton Treatment: Theoretical Study and Optimization. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 16, 6329–6346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sonai, G.G.; de Souza, S.M.; de Oliveira, D.; de Souza, A.A. The Application of Textile Sludge Adsorbents for the Removal of Reactive Red 2 Dye. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 168, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kalyani, D.C.; Telke, A.A.; Dhanve, R.S.; Jadhav, J.P. Ecofriendly Biodegradation and Detoxification of Reactive Red 2 Textile Dye by Newly Isolated Pseudomonas Sp. SUK1. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 163, 735–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wang, H.; Su, J.Q.; Zheng, X.W.; Tian, Y.; Xiong, X.J.; Zheng, T.L. Bacterial Decolorization and Degradation of the Reactive Dye Reactive Red 180 by Citrobacter Sp. CK3. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2009, 63, 395–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Moussavi, G.; Mahmoudi, M. Degradation and Biodegradability Improvement of the Reactive Red 198 Azo Dye Using Catalytic Ozonation with MgO Nanocrystals. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 152, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhang, F.; Yediler, A.; Liang, X.; Kettrup, A. Effects of Dye Additives on the Ozonation Process and Oxidation By-Products: A Comparative Study Using Hydrolyzed CI Reactive Red 120. Dyes Pigments 2004, 60, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Saratale, R.G.; Saratale, G.D.; Chang, J.S.; Govindwar, S.P. Ecofriendly Degradation of Sulfonated Diazo Dye CI Reactive Green 19A Using Micrococcus Glutamicus NCIM-2168. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 3897–3905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Sari, A.A.; Tachibana, S.; Muryanto; Hadibarata, T. Development of Bioreactor Systems for Decolorization of Reactive Green 19 Using White Rot Fungus. Desalination Water Treat. 2016, 57, 7029–7039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zuorro, A.; Lavecchia, R. Evaluation of UV/H2O2 Advanced Oxidation Process (AOP) for the Degradation of Diazo Dye Reactive Green 19 in Aqueous Solution. Desalination Water Treat. 2014, 52, 1571–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Palma-Goyes, R.E.; Silva-Agredo, J.; Vazquez-Arenas, J.; Romero-Ibarra, I.; Torres-Palma, R.A. The Effect of Different Operational Parameters on the Electrooxidation of Indigo Carmine on Ti/IrO2-SnO2-Sb2O3. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 3010–3017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Labiadh, L.; Barbucci, A.; Carpanese, M.P.; Gadri, A.; Ammar, S.; Panizza, M. Direct and Indirect Electrochemical Oxidation of Indigo Carmine Using PbO2 and TiRuSnO2. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2017, 21, 2167–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ramesh, T.N.; Kirana, D.V.; Ashwini, A.; Manasa, T.R. Calcium Hydroxide as Low Cost Adsorbent for the Effective Removal of Indigo Carmine Dye in Water. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2017, 21, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Zapata-Castillo, P.; Villalonga-Santana, L.; Islas-Flores, I.; Rivera-Muñoz, G.; Ancona-Escalante, W.; Solís-Pereira, S. Synergistic Action of Laccases from Trametes Hirsuta Bm2 Improves Decolourization of Indigo Carmine. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 61, 252–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Li, H.; Zhang, R.; Tang, L.; Zhang, J.; Mao, Z. Manganese Peroxidase Production from Cassava Residue by Phanerochaete Chrysosporium in Solid State Fermentation and Its Decolorization of Indigo Carmine. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2015, 23, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Cho, E.A.; Seo, J.; Lee, D.W.; Pan, J.G. Decolorization of Indigo Carmine by Laccase Displayed on Bacillus Subtilis Spores. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2011, 49, 100–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Lu, R.; Ma, L.; He, F.; Yu, D.; Fan, R.; Zhang, Y.; Long, Z.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Y. White-Rot Fungus Ganoderma Sp. En3 Had a Strong Ability to Decolorize and Tolerate the Anthraquinone, Indigo and Triphenylmethane Dye with High Concentrations. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2016, 39, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Adnan, L.A.; Hadibarata, T.; Sathishkumar, P.; Mohd Yusoff, A.R. Biodegradation Pathway of Acid Red 27 by White-Rot Fungus Armillaria Sp. F022 and Phytotoxicity Evaluation. CLEAN–Soil Air Water 2016, 44, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Jocic, D.; Vílchez, S.; Topalovic, T.; Molina, R.; Navarro, A.; Jovancic, P.; Julià, M.R.; Erra, P. Effect of Low-Temperature Plasma and Chitosan Treatment on Wool Dyeing with Acid Red 27. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2005, 97, 2204–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Khandegar, V.; Saroha, A.K. Electrochemical Treatment of Textile Effluent Containing Acid Red 131 Dye. J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 2014, 18, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Jorfi, S.; Barzegar, G.; Ahmadi, M.; Soltani, R.D.; Takdastan, A.; Saeedi, R.; Abtahi, M. Enhanced Coagulation-Photocatalytic Treatment of Acid Red 73 Dye and Real Textile Wastewater Using UVA/Synthesized MgO Nanoparticles. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 177, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Bhole, B.D.; Ganguly, B.; Madhuram, A.; Deshpande, D.; Joshi, J. Biosorption of Methyl Violet, Basic Fuchsin and Their Mixture Using Dead Fungal Biomass. Curr. Sci. 2004, 86, 1641–1645. [Google Scholar]
  111. Durmus, Z.; Kurt, B.Z.; Durmus, A. Synthesis and Characterization of Graphene Oxide/Zinc Oxide (GO/ZnO) Nanocomposite and Its Utilization for Photocatalytic Degradation of Basic Fuchsin Dye. ChemistrySelect 2019, 4, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Gupta, V.K.; Mittal, A.; Gajbe, V.; Mittal, J. Adsorption of Basic Fuchsin Using Waste Materials—Bottom Ash and Deoiled Soya—As Adsorbents. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008, 319, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Zhao, Y.H.; Geng, J.T.; Cai, J.C.; Cai, Y.F.; Cao, C.Y. Adsorption Performance of Basic Fuchsin on Alkali-Activated Diatomite. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2020, 38, 151–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. El Haddad, M. Removal of Basic Fuchsin Dye from Water Using Mussel Shell Biomass Waste as an Adsorbent: Equilibrium, Kinetics, and Thermodynamics. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 2016, 10, 664–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Wang, L.; Wang, J.; Pan, H.; Zhao, M.; Chen, J. Kinetics and Removal Pathwayof Basic Fuchsin by Electrochemical Oxidization. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2021, 880, 114792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Senthilkumar, S.; Perumalsamy, M.; Prabhu, H.J. Decolourization Potential of White-Rot Fungus Phanerochaete Chrysosporium on Synthetic Dye Bath Effluent Containing Amido Black 10B. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2014, 18, 845–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Angelova, R.; Baldikova, E.; Pospiskova, K.; Safarikova, M.; Safarik, I. Magnetically Modified Sheaths of Leptothrix Sp. as an Adsorbent for Amido Black 10B Removal. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2017, 427, 314–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Sun, J.H.; Sun, S.P.; Wang, G.L.; Qiao, L.P. Degradation of Azo Dye Amido Black 10B in Aqueous Solution by Fenton Oxidation Process. Dyes Pigments 2007, 74, 647–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Garg, A.; Mainrai, M.; Bulasara, D.V.; Barman, S. Experimental Investigation on Adsorption of Amido Black 10b Dye Onto Zeolite Synthesized from Fly Ash. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2015, 202, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Ahmad, R.; Kumar, R. Conducting Polyaniline/Iron Oxide Composite: A Novel Adsorbent for the Removal of Amido Black 10B. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2010, 55, 3489–3493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Tanzifi, M.; Yaraki, M.T.; Kiadehi, A.D.; Hosseini, S.H.; Olazar, M.; Bharti, A.K.; Agarwal, S.; Gupta, V.K.; Kazemi, A. Adsorption of Amido Black 10B from Aqueous Solution Using Polyaniline/SiO2 Nanocomposite: Experimental Investigation and Artificial Neural Network Modeling. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 510, 246–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Aragaw, T.A. Utilizations of Electro-Coagulated Sludge from Wastewater Treatment Plant Data as an Adsorbent for Direct Red 28 Dye Removal. Data Brief 2020, 28, 104848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ay, F.; Catalkaya, E.C.; Kargi, F. A Statistical Experiment Design Approach for Advanced Oxidation of Direct Red Azo-Dye by Photo-Fenton Treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 162, 230–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Mokhtari-Shourijeh, Z.; Langari, S.; Montazerghaem, L.; Mahmoodi, N.M. Synthesis of Porous Aminated PAN/PVDF Composite Nanofibers by Electrospinning: Characterization and Direct Red 23 Removal. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Safa, Y.; Bhatti, H.N. Biosorption of Direct Red-31 and Direct Orange-26 Dyes by Rice Husk: Application of Factorial Design Analysis. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2011, 89, 2566–2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Guendouz, S.; Khellaf, N.; Zerdaoui, M.; Ouchefoun, M. Biosorption of Synthetic Dyes (Direct Red 89 and Reactive Green 12) as an Ecological Refining Step in Textile Effluent Treatment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013, 20, 3822–3829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Bayramoğlu, G.; Yakup Arıca, M. Biosorption of Benzidine Based Textile Dyes “Direct Blue 1 and Direct Red 128” Using Native and Heat-Treated Biomass of Trametes Versicolor. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 143, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Silambarasan, S.; Vangnai, A.S. Biodegradation of 4-Nitroaniline by Plant-Growth Promoting Acinetobacter Sp. AVLB2 and Toxicological Analysis of Its Biodegradation Metabolites. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 302, 426–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Silambarasan, S.; Vangnai, A.S. Plant-Growth Promoting Candida Sp. AVGB4 with Capability of 4-Nitroaniline Biodegradation under Drought Stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 139, 472–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Das, P.; Ghosh, S.; Sen, M.B. Heterogeneous Catalytic Reduction of 4-Nitroaniline by RGO-Ni Nanocomposite for Water Resource Management. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 19731–19737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Szyguła, A.; Guibal, E.; Palacín, M.A.; Ruiz, M.; Sastre, A.M. Removal of an Anionic Dye (Acid Blue 92) by Coagulation–Flocculation Using Chitosan. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 2979–2986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Parsa, J.B.; Negahdar, S.H. Treatment of Wastewater Containing Acid Blue 92 Dye by Advanced Ozone-Based Oxidation Methods. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 98, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Saravanan, M.; Sambhamurthy, N.P.; Sivarajan, M. Treatment of Acid Blue 113 Dye Solution Using Iron Electrocoagulation. CLEAN–Soil Air Water 2010, 38, 565–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Hairom, N.H.; Mohammad, A.W.; Kadhum, A.A. Effect of Various Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles in Membrane Photocatalytic Reactor for Congo Red Dye Treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 137, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Vimonses, V.; Lei, S.; Jin, B.; Chow, C.W.; Saint, C. Kinetic Study and Equilibrium Isotherm Analysis of Congo Red Adsorption by Clay Materials. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 148, 354–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Gharbani, P.; Tabatabaii, S.M.; Mehrizad, A. Removal of Congo Red from Textile Wastewater by Ozonation. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 5, 495–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Fu, Y.; Viraraghavan, T. Removal of Congo Red from an Aqueous Solution by Fungus Aspergillus Niger. Adv. Environ. Res. 2002, 7, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Kishor, R.; Purchase, D.; Saratale, G.D.; Ferreira, L.F.; Bilal, M.; Iqbal, H.M.; Bharagava, R.N. Environment Friendly Degradation and Detoxification of Congo Red Dye and Textile Industry Wastewater by a Newly Isolated Bacillus Cohnni (RKS9). Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 22, 101425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Sarayu, K.; Sandhya, S. Aerobic Biodegradation Pathway for Remazol Orange by Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010, 160, 1241–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Rahman, M.M.; Asiri, A.M.; Youssef, T.E.; Marwani, H.M. Photocatalytic Degradation of Remazol Brilliant Orange 3R Using Wet-Chemically Prepared CdO-ZnO Nanofibers for Environmental Remediation. Mater. Express 2016, 6, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Lin, J.; Zhang, X.; Li, Z.; Lei, L. Biodegradation of Reactive Blue 13 in a Two-Stage Anaerobic/Aerobic Fluidized Beds System with a Pseudomonas Sp. Isolate. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Tizaoui, C.; Grima, N. Kinetics of the Ozone Oxidation of Reactive Orange 16 Azo-Dye in Aqueous Solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 173, 463–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. KARAMAN, C.; Zümriye, A. Modelling of Remazol Black-B Adsorption on Chemically Modified Waste Orange Peel: PH Shifting Effect of Acidic Treatment. Sak. Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Derg. 2020, 24, 1127–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Jadhav, S.U.; Jadhav, M.U.; Kagalkar, A.N.; Govindwar, S.P. Decolorization of Brilliant Blue G Dye Mediated by Degradation of the Microbial Consortium of Galactomyces Geotrichum and Bacillus Sp. J. Chin. Inst. Chem. Eng. 2008, 39, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Mafra, M.R.; Igarashi-Mafra, L.; Zuim, D.R.; Vasques, E.C.; Ferreira, M.A. Adsorption of Remazol Brilliant Blue on an Orange Peel Adsorbent. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2013, 30, 657–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Lazim, Z.M.; Mazuin, E.; Hadibarata, T.; Yusop, Z. The Removal of Methylene Blue and Remazol Brilliant Blue R Dyes by Using Orange Peel and Spent Tea Leaves. J. Teknol. 2015, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Hamzeh, Y.; Ashori, A.; Azadeh, E.; Abdulkhani, A. Removal of Acid Orange 7 and Remazol Black 5 Reactive Dyes from Aqueous Solutions Using a Novel Biosorbent. Mater. Sci. and Eng. C 2012, 32, 1394–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Kousha, M.; Daneshvar, E.; Sohrabi, M.S.; Jokar, M.; Bhatnagar, A. Adsorption of Acid Orange II Dye by Raw and Chemically Modified Brown Macroalga Stoechospermum Marginatum. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 192, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Daneshvar, E.; Sohrabi, M.S.; Kousha, M.; Bhatnagar, A.; Aliakbarian, B.; Converti, A.; Norrström, A.C. Shrimp Shell as an Efficient Bioadsorbent for Acid Blue 25 Dye Removal from Aqueous Solution. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2014, 45, 2926–2934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Umar, A.; Khan, M.S.; Alam, S.; Zekker, I.; Burlakovs, J.; Bhowmick, G.D.; Kallistova, A.; Pimenov, N.; Zahoor, M. Synthesis and Characterization of Pd-Ni Bimetallic Nanoparticles as Efficient Adsorbent for the Removal of Acid Orange 8 Present in Wastewater. Water 2021, 13, 1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Alam, S.; Khan, M.S.; Umar, A.; Khattak, R.; Zekker, I.; Burlakovs, J.; Ghangrekar, M.M.; Bhowmick, G.D.; Kallistova, A.; Pimenov, N. Preparation of Pd–Ni Nanoparticles Supported on Activated Carbon for Efficient Removal of Basic Blue 3 from Water. Water 2021, 13, 1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Jabeen, S.; Sufaid Khan, M.; Khattak, R.; Zekker, I.; Burlakovs, J.; Ghangrekar, M.M.; Kallistova, A.; Pimenov, N.; Zahoor, M.; Khan, G.S. Palladium-Supported Zirconia-Based Catalytic Degradation of Rhodamine-B Dye from Wastewater. Water 2021, 13, 1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Alam, S.; Khan, M.S.; Bibi, W.; Zekker, I.; Burlakovs, J.; Ghangrekar, M.M.; Bhowmick, G.D.; Kallistova, A.; Pimenov, N.; Zahoor, M. Preparation of Activated Carbon from the Wood of Paulownia Tomentosa as an Efficient Adsorbent for the Removal of Acid Red 4 and Methylene Blue Present in Wastewater. Water 2021, 13, 1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Galán, J.; Rodríguez, A.; Gómez, J.M.; Allen, S.J.; Walker, G.M. Reactive Dye Adsorption onto a Novel Mesoporous Carbon. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 219, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Holkar, C.R.; Jadhav, A.J.; Pinjari, D.V.; Mahamuni, N.M.; Pandit, A.B. A Critical Review on Textile Wastewater Treatments: Possible Approaches. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 182, 351–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Rápó, E.; Aradi, L.E.; Szabó, Á.; Posta, K.; Szép, R.; Tonk, S. Adsorption of Remazol Brilliant Violet-5R Textile Dye from Aqueous Solutions by Using Eggshell Waste Biosorbent. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 8385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. El Malah, T.; Nour, H.F.; Radwan, E.K.; Abdel Mageid, R.E.; Khattab, T.A.; Olson, M.A. A Bipyridinium-Based Polyhydrazone Adsorbent That Exhibits Ultrahigh Adsorption Capacity for the Anionic Azo Dye, Direct Blue 71. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 409, 128195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Ruan, W.; Hu, J.; Qi, J.; Hou, Y.; Zhou, C.; Wei, X. Removal Of Dyes From Wastewater By Nanomaterials: A Review. Adv. Mater. Lett. 2019, 10, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Yogalakshmi, K.N.; Das, A.; Rani, G.; Jaswal, V.; Randhawa, J.S. Nano-bioremediation: A new age technology for the treatment of dyes in textile effluents. In Bioremediation of Industrial Waste for Environmental Safety; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 313–347. [Google Scholar]
  160. Dhand, C.; Dwivedi, N.; Loh, X.J.; Ying, A.N.; Verma, N.K.; Beuerman, R.W.; Lakshminarayanan, R.; Ramakrishna, S. Methods and Strategies for the Synthesis of Diverse Nanoparticles and Their Applications: A Comprehensive Overview. Rsc Adv. 2015, 5, 105003–105037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Krishnan, S.K.; Subbiah, K.; Kandasamy, S.; Subramaniam, K. Application of Metal Nanoparticles for Textile Dye Remediation. In Proceedings of the Sustainable Development in Energy and Environment; Sivasubramanian, V., Pugazhendhi, A., Moorthy, I.G., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 217–223. [Google Scholar]
  162. Tara, N.; Siddiqui, S.I.; Rathi, G.; Chaudhry, S.A.; Asiri, A.M. Nano-Engineered Adsorbent for the Removal of Dyes from Water: A Review. Curr. Anal. Chem. 2020, 16, 14–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Ali, Z.; Ahmad, R. Nanotechnology for Water Treatment. In Environmental Nanotechnology Volume 3; Dasgupta, N., Ranjan, S., Lichtfouse, E., Eds.; Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 143–163. ISBN 978-3-030-26672-1. [Google Scholar]
  164. Sadegh, H.; Ali, G.A.; Gupta, V.K.; Makhlouf, A.S.; Shahryari-Ghoshekandi, R.; Nadagouda, M.N.; Sillanpää, M.; Megiel, E. The Role of Nanomaterials as Effective Adsorbents and Their Applications in Wastewater Treatment. J. Nanostruct. Chem. 2017, 7, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  165. Wang, T.; Lin, J.; Chen, Z.; Megharaj, M.; Naidu, R. Green Synthesized Iron Nanoparticles by Green Tea and Eucalyptus Leaves Extracts Used for Removal of Nitrate in Aqueous Solution. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 83, 413–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Nagajyothi, P.C.; Vattikuti, S.V.; Devarayapalli, K.C.; Yoo, K.; Shim, J.; Sreekanth, T.V. Green Synthesis: Photocatalytic Degradation of Textile Dyes Using Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles-Latest Trends and Advancements. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 50, 2617–2723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Pal, U.; Sandoval, A.; Madrid, S.I.; Corro, G.; Sharma, V.; Mohanty, P. Mixed Titanium, Silicon, and Aluminum Oxide Nanostructures as Novel Adsorbent for Removal of Rhodamine 6G and Methylene Blue as Cationic Dyes from Aqueous Solution. Chemosphere 2016, 163, 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Kalia, A.; Singh, S. Myco-Decontamination of Azo Dyes: Nano-Augmentation Technologies. 3 Biotech 2020, 10, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Sahoo, T.; Sahu, J.R.; Panda, J.; Hembram, M.; Sahoo, S.K.; Sahu, R. Nanotechnology: An Efficient Technique of Contaminated Water Treatment. In Contaminants in Drinking and Wastewater Sources: Challenges and Reigning Technologies; Kumar, M., Snow, D.D., Honda, R., Mukherjee, S., Eds.; Springer Transactions in Civil and Environmental Engineering; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 251–270. ISBN 9789811545993. [Google Scholar]
  170. Gupta, M.K.; Tandon, P.K.; Shukla, N. Nanotechnology: Environmentally Sustainable Solutions for Water Treatment. In Nanostructured Materials for Treating Aquatic Pollution; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 225–242. [Google Scholar]
  171. Chu, T.P.; Nguyen, N.T.; Vu, T.L.; Dao, T.H.; Dinh, L.C.; Nguyen, H.L.; Hoang, T.H.; Le, T.S.; Pham, T.D. Synthesis, Characterization, and Modification of Alumina Nanoparticles for Cationic Dye Removal. Materials 2019, 12, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  172. Sahinkaya, E.; Sahin, A.; Yurtsever, A.; Kitis, M. Concentrate Minimization and Water Recovery Enhancement Using Pellet Precipitator in a Reverse Osmosis Process Treating Textile Wastewater. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 222, 420–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Long, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Qi, G.; Wang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Z.Q. Fabrication of Chitosan Nanofiltration Membranes by the Film Casting Strategy for Effective Removal of Dyes/Salts in Textile Wastewater. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 2512–2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Jin, P.; Zhu, J.; Yuan, S.; Zhang, G.; Volodine, A.; Tian, M.; Wang, J.; Luis, P.; Van der Bruggen, B. Erythritol-Based Polyester Loose Nanofiltration Membrane with Fast Water Transport for Efficient Dye/Salt Separation. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 406, 126796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Yin, H.; Qiu, P.; Qian, Y.; Kong, Z.; Zheng, X.; Tang, Z.; Guo, H. Textile Wastewater Treatment for Water Reuse: A Case Study. Processes 2019, 7, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  176. Ji, J.; Kulshreshtha, S.; Kakade, A.; Majeed, S.; Li, X.; Liu, P. Bioaugmentation of Membrane Bioreactor with Aeromonas Hydrophila LZ-MG14 for Enhanced Malachite Green and Hexavalent Chromium Removal in Textile Wastewater. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2020, 150, 104939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Rashidi, H.R.; Sulaiman, N.M.; Hashim, N.A.; Hassan, C.R.; Ramli, M.R. Synthetic Reactive Dye Wastewater Treatment by Using Nano-Membrane Filtration. Desalination Water Treat. 2015, 55, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Liang, P.; Rivallin, M.; Cerneaux, S.; Lacour, S.; Petit, E.; Cretin, M. Coupling Cathodic Electro-Fenton Reaction to Membrane Filtration for AO7 Dye Degradation: A Successful Feasibility Study. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 510, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Liu, H.; Zhang, J.; Lu, M.; Liang, L.; Zhang, H.; Wei, J. Biosynthesis Based Membrane Filtration Coupled with Iron Nanoparticles Reduction Process in Removal of Dyes. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 387, 124202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Hassan, M.M.; Carr, C.M. A Critical Review on Recent Advancements of the Removal of Reactive Dyes from Dyehouse Effluent by Ion-Exchange Adsorbents. Chemosphere 2018, 209, 201–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Yurtsever, A.; Basaran, E.; Uçar, D. Process Optimization and Filtration Performance of an Anaerobic Dynamic Membrane Bioreactor Treating Textile Wastewaters. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 273, 111114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Arslan, S.; Eyvaz, M.; Gürbulak, E.; Yüksel, E. A Review of State-of-the-Art Technologies in Dye-Containing Wastewater Treatment—The Textile Industry Case. Text. Wastewater Treat. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  183. Marin, N.M.; Pascu, L.F.; Demba, A.; Nita-Lazar, M.; Badea, I.A.; Aboul-Enein, H.Y. Removal of the Acid Orange 10 by Ion Exchange and Microbiological Methods. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 16, 6357–6366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Joseph, J.; Radhakrishnan, R.C.; Johnson, J.K.; Joy, S.P.; Thomas, J. Ion-Exchange Mediated Removal of Cationic Dye-Stuffs from Water Using Ammonium Phosphomolybdate. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 242, 122488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Raghu, S.; Basha, C.A. Chemical or Electrochemical Techniques, Followed by Ion Exchange, for Recycle of Textile Dye Wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 149, 324–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Cseri, L.; Topuz, F.; Abdulhamid, M.A.; Alammar, A.; Budd, P.M.; Szekely, G. Electrospun Adsorptive Nanofibrous Membranes from Ion Exchange Polymers to Snare Textile Dyes from Wastewater. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2021, 2000955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Babu, D.S.; Srivastava, V.; Nidheesh, P.V.; Kumar, M.S. Detoxification of Water and Wastewater by Advanced Oxidation Processes. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 696, 133961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Al-Sakkaf, B.M.; Nasreen, S.; Ejaz, N. Degradation Pattern of Textile Effluent by Using Bio and Sono Chemical Reactor. Available online: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jchem/2020/8965627/ (accessed on 10 February 2021).
  189. Nidheesh, P.V.; Rajan, R. Removal of Rhodamine B from a Water Medium Using Hydroxyl and Sulphate Radicals Generated by Iron Loaded Activated Carbon. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 5330–5340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Javaid, R.; Qazi, U.Y. Catalytic Oxidation Process for the Degradation of Synthetic Dyes: An Overview. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Zhang, L.P.; Liu, Z.; Faraj, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhuang, R.; Xie, R.; Ju, X.J.; Wang, W.; Chu, L.Y. High-Flux Efficient Catalytic Membranes Incorporated with Iron-Based Fenton-like Catalysts for Degradation of Organic Pollutants. J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 573, 493–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Lyu, L.; Han, M.; Cao, W.; Gao, Y.; Zeng, Q.; Yu, G.; Huang, X.; Hu, C. Efficient Fenton-like Process for Organic Pollutant Degradation on Cu-Doped Mesoporous Polyimide Nanocomposites. Environ. Sci. Nano 2019, 6, 798–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Ameta, R.; Chohadia, A.K.; Jain, A.; Punjabi, P.B. Chapter 3—Fenton and Photo-Fenton Processes. In Advanced Oxidation Processes for Waste Water Treatment; Ameta, S.C., Ameta, R., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 49–87. ISBN 978-0-12-810499-6. [Google Scholar]
  194. Tarkwa, J.B.; Oturan, N.; Acayanka, E.; Laminsi, S.; Oturan, M.A. Photo-Fenton Oxidation of Orange G Azo Dye: Process Optimization and Mineralization Mechanism. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2019, 17, 473–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Dotto, J.; Fagundes-Klen, M.R.; Veit, M.T.; Palácio, S.M.; Bergamasco, R. Performance of Different Coagulants in the Coagulation/Flocculation Process of Textile Wastewater. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 208, 656–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. GilPavas, E.; Dobrosz-Gómez, I.; Gómez-García, M.Á. Coagulation-Flocculation Sequential with Fenton or Photo-Fenton Processes as an Alternative for the Industrial Textile Wastewater Treatment. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 191, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Wang, J.; Chen, H.; Yuan, R.; Wang, F.; Ma, F.; Zhou, B. Intensified Degradation of Textile Wastewater Using a Novel Treatment of Hydrodynamic Cavitation with the Combination of Ozone. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Siddique, K.; Rizwan, M.; Shahid, M.J.; Ali, S.; Ahmad, R.; Rizvi, H. Textile Wastewater Treatment Options: A Critical Review. Enhancing Cleanup Environ. Pollut. 2017, 183–207. [Google Scholar]
  199. Su, Z.; Liu, T.; Yu, W.; Li, X.; Graham, N.J. Coagulation of Surface Water: Observations on the Significance of Biopolymers. Water Res. 2017, 126, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Miralles-Cuevas, S.; Oller, I.; Agüera, A.; Llorca, M.; Pérez, J.S.; Malato, S. Combination of Nanofiltration and Ozonation for the Remediation of Real Municipal Wastewater Effluents: Acute and Chronic Toxicity Assessment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 323, 442–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Yang, Y.C.; Zeng, S.S.; Ouyang, Y.; Sang, L.; Yang, S.Y.; Zhang, X.Q.; Huang, Y.Y.; Ye, J.; Xiao, M.T.; Zhang, N. An Intensified Ozonation System in a Tank Reactor with Foam Block Stirrer: Synthetic Textile Wastewater Treatment and Mass Transfer Modeling. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 257, 117909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Powar, A.; Perwuelz, A.; Behary, N.; Hoang, L.V.; Aussenac, T.; Loghin, C.; Maier, S.S.; Guan, J.; Chen, G. Environmental Profile Study of Ozone Decolorization of Reactive Dyed Cotton Textiles by Utilizing Life Cycle Assessment. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Kurade, M.B.; Waghmode, T.R.; Patil, S.M.; Jeon, B.H.; Govindwar, S.P. Monitoring the Gradual Biodegradation of Dyes in a Simulated Textile Effluent and Development of a Novel Triple Layered Fixed Bed Reactor Using a Bacterium-Yeast Consortium. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 307, 1026–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Song, L.; Shao, Y.; Ning, S.; Tan, L. Performance of a Newly Isolated Salt-Tolerant Yeast Strain Pichia Occidentalis G1 for Degrading and Detoxifying Azo Dyes. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 233, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Brahmbhatt, N.H.; Jasrai, R.T. The Role of Algae in Bioremediation of Textile Effluent. Methods 2016, 21, 28. [Google Scholar]
  206. Das, S.; Dash, H.R. Handbook of Metal-Microbe Interactions and Bioremediation; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  207. AI-Jawhari, I.F. Decolorization of Methylene Blue and Crystal Violet by Some Filamentous Fungi. Int. J. Environ. Bioremediat. Biodegrad. 2015, 3, 62–65. [Google Scholar]
  208. Kaushik, P.; Malik, A. Mycoremediation of Synthetic Dyes: An Insight into the Mechanism, Process Optimization and Reactor Design. In Microbial Degradation of Synthetic Dyes in Wastewaters; Singh, S.N., Ed.; Environmental Science and Engineering; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 1–25. ISBN 978-3-319-10942-8. [Google Scholar]
  209. Varjani, S.; Rakholiya, P.; Ng, H.Y.; You, S.; Teixeira, J.A. Microbial Degradation of Dyes: An Overview. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 314, 123728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Rekik, H.; Zaraî Jaouadi, N.; Bouacem, K.; Zenati, B.; Kourdali, S.; Badis, A.; Annane, R.; Bouanane-Darenfed, A.; Bejar, S.; Jaouadi, B. Physical and Enzymatic Properties of a New Manganese Peroxidase from the White-Rot Fungus Trametes Pubescens Strain I8 for Lignin Biodegradation and Textile-Dyes Biodecolorization. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 125, 514–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Srinivasan, S.; Sadasivam, S.K.; Gunalan, S.; Shanmugam, G.; Kothandan, G. Application of Docking and Active Site Analysis for Enzyme Linked Biodegradation of Textile Dyes. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 248, 599–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Giovanella, P.; Vieira, G.A.; Ramos Otero, I.V.; Pais Pellizzer, E.; de Jesus Fontes, B.; Sette, L.D. Metal and Organic Pollutants Bioremediation by Extremophile Microorganisms. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 382, 121024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Ji, D.; Xiao, C.; Zhao, J.; Chen, K.; Zhou, F.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, T.; Ling, H. Green Preparation of Polyvinylidene Fluoride Loose Nanofiltration Hollow Fiber Membranes with Multilayer Structure for Treating Textile Wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 754, 141848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Khan, R.; Bhawana, P.; Fulekar, M.H. Microbial Decolorization and Degradation of Synthetic Dyes: A Review. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2013, 12, 75–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Maharani, V.; Vijayalakshmi, S.; Balasubramanian, T. Degradation and Detoxification of Reactive Azo Dyes by Native Bacterial Communities. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2013, 7, 2274–2282. [Google Scholar]
  216. Saratale, R.G.; Gandhi, S.S.; Purankar, M.V.; Kurade, M.B.; Govindwar, S.P.; Oh, S.E.; Saratale, G.D. Decolorization and Detoxification of Sulfonated Azo Dye CI Remazol Red and Textile Effluent by Isolated Lysinibacillus Sp. RGS. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2013, 115, 658–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Abdulrazzaq, N.N.; Al-Sabbagh, B.H.; Shanshool, H.A. Coupling of Electrocoagulation and Microflotation for the Removal of Textile Dyes from Aqueous Solutions. J. Water Process Eng. 2021, 40, 101906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Logroño, W.; Pérez, M.; Urquizo, G.; Kadier, A.; Echeverría, M.; Recalde, C.; Rákhely, G. Single Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell (SCMFC) with a Cathodic Microalgal Biofilm: A Preliminary Assessment of the Generation of Bioelectricity and Biodegradation of Real Dye Textile Wastewater. Chemosphere 2017, 176, 378–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Chaturvedi, A.; Rai, B.N.; Singh, R.S.; Jaiswal, R.P. A Comprehensive Review on the Integration of Advanced Oxidation Processes with Biodegradation for the Treatment of Textile Wastewater Containing Azo Dyes. Rev. Chem. Eng. 2021, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic chart of synthetic dye classification.
Figure 1. Schematic chart of synthetic dye classification.
Applsci 11 06255 g001
Figure 2. Direct and indirect impacts of textile dyes on several substrates.
Figure 2. Direct and indirect impacts of textile dyes on several substrates.
Applsci 11 06255 g002
Figure 3. Treatment strategies of textile dyes discharges.
Figure 3. Treatment strategies of textile dyes discharges.
Applsci 11 06255 g003
Table 1. Examples of textile dyes and their treatment methods.
Table 1. Examples of textile dyes and their treatment methods.
Textile DyesTreatment MethodsType of the Treatment MethodsReferences
Malachite greenAdsorption with curcuma-based activated carbonPhysical[65]
Adsorption with tetraethylenepentamine functionalized activated carbon[66]
Penicillim ochrochloronBiological[67]
Pandoraea pulmonicola YC32[68]
Enterobacter asburiae XJUHX-4TM[69]
Flavobacterium caeni sp.[70]
Crystal violet and malachite greenAdsorption with carbon-coated layered double hydroxidePhysical[64]
Crystal violetSurfactant modified magnetic nanoadsorbentPhysical[71]
Adsorption with bentonite-alginate composite[72]
Adsorption onto TLAC/Chitosan composite[73]
OzonationChemical[74]
Electrociagulation[75]
Agrobacterium radiobacterBiological[76]
Diaporthe schini[77]
Acid yellowAdsorption on flakes of chitosanPhysical[78]
Fenton oxidation[79]
Electrocoagulation using iron electrolitesChemical[80]
Rhodamine B and Acid yellowAdsorption by ordered mesoporous carbon and commercial activated carbonPhysical[81]
Rhodamine BAdsorption by micro and nano-particles of ZnOPhysical[82]
Adsorption with treated rice husk-based activated carbon[83]
OzonationChemical[84]
Basic violet and Acid blue 93Pseudomonas putidaBiological[85]
Basic violet 3Candida kruseiBiological[86]
Fenton oxidationPhysical[87]
Ag, ZnO and bimetallic Ag/ZnO alloy nanoparticles[88]
Reactive Black 5 and Reactive redNano zerovalent iron treatmentPhysical[89]
Reactive red 195Electro-fentonPhysical[90]
Reactive red 2Adsorption sludgePhysical[91]
Pseudomonas sp. SUK1Biological[92]
Reactive red 180Citrobacter sp. CK3Biological[93]
Reactive red 198Catalytic ozonationChemical[94]
Reactive red 120OzonationChemical[95]
Reactive greenMicrococcus glutamicus NCIM-2168Biological[96]
White rot fungus[97]
UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation process (AOP)Physical[98]
Indigo carmineElectrooxidation on Ti/IrO2-SnO2-Sb2O3Physical[99]
Electrochemical oxidation[100]
Adsorption with calcium hydroxide[101]
Trametes hirsuta laccase productionBiological[102]
Phanerochaete chrysosporium manganese peroxidase production[103]
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens laccase production[93,104]
Anthraquinone, indigo and triphenylmethaneGanoderma sp. En3Biological[105]
Acid red 27Armillaria sp. F022Biological[106]
Chitosan adsorptionPhysical[107]
Acid red 131Eectrochemical coagulationChemical[108]
Acid red 73Coagulation[109]
Methyl violet, basic fuchsin and their mixtureBiosorption using fungal biomassBiological[110]
Basic fuchsinAdsorption by graphene oxide/zinc oxide (GO/ZnO) nanocompositePhysical[111]
Adsorption by bottom ash and deoiled soya[112]
Adsorption on alkali-activated diatomite[113]
Adsorption with mussel shell biomass waste[114]
Electrochemical oxidationChemical[115]
Amido black 10BPhanerochaete chrysosporiumBiological[116]
Leptothrix sp.[117]
Fenton oxidationPhysical[118]
Adsorption with zeolite[119]
Adsorption with polyaniline/iron oxide composite[120]
Adsorption usingpolyaniline/SiO2 nanocomposite[121]
Direct red 28Electrocoagulated sludgeChemical[122]
Direct redOxidation with photo-FentonPhysical[123]
Direct red 23Adsorption with PAN/PVDF composite ananofibers[124]
Direct red 31 and Direct orange 26Biosorption by rice huskPhysical[125]
Direct red 89 and Reactive green 12BiosorptionPhysical[126]
Direct Blue 1 and Direct Red 128Biosorption using Trametes versicolorBiological[127]
4-nitroanilineAcinetobacter sp. AVLB2Biological[128]
Candida sp. AVGB4[129]
RGO-Ni nanocompositePhysical[130]
Acid Blue 92Coagulation/FlocculationChemical[131]
Ozone based oxidationPhysical[132]
Acid Blue 113ElectrocoagulationChemical[133]
Congo redNanofiltrationPhysical[134]
Adsorption by clay materials[135]
OzonationChemical[136]
Aspergillus nigerBiological[137]
Congo redBacillus cohniiBiological[138]
Remazol orangePseudomonas aeruginosaBiological[139]
Remazol brilliant orange 3RCdO–ZnO nanofibersPhysical[140]
Reactive blue 13Pseudomonas sp.Biological[141]
Reactive orange 16Ozone oxidationPhysical[142]
Remazol Black-BAdsorption on waste orange peelPhysical[143]
Brilliant blue GGalactomyces geotrichum and Bacillus sp.Biological[144]
Remazol brilliant blue and orangePeel adsorptionPhysical[145]
Brilliant blue RAdsorption with orange peel and spent tea leavesPhysical[146]
Acid orange 7 and Remazol black 5BiosorptionPhysical[147]
Orange 2Adsorption by row and chemically modified brown macroalgaPhysical[148]
Acid blue 25Biosorption with shrimp shellsPhysical[149]
Acid orange 8Pd-Ni bimetallic nanoparticlesPhysical[150]
Basic blue 3Pd-Ni nanoparticles supported on activated carbonPhysical[151]
Rhodamine Bpalladium-supported zirconia-based catalytic degradation-[152]
Acid red 4Adsorption with activated carbonPhysical[153]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Slama, H.B.; Chenari Bouket, A.; Pourhassan, Z.; Alenezi, F.N.; Silini, A.; Cherif-Silini, H.; Oszako, T.; Luptakova, L.; Golińska, P.; Belbahri, L. Diversity of Synthetic Dyes from Textile Industries, Discharge Impacts and Treatment Methods. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6255. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146255

AMA Style

Slama HB, Chenari Bouket A, Pourhassan Z, Alenezi FN, Silini A, Cherif-Silini H, Oszako T, Luptakova L, Golińska P, Belbahri L. Diversity of Synthetic Dyes from Textile Industries, Discharge Impacts and Treatment Methods. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(14):6255. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146255

Chicago/Turabian Style

Slama, Houda Ben, Ali Chenari Bouket, Zeinab Pourhassan, Faizah N. Alenezi, Allaoua Silini, Hafsa Cherif-Silini, Tomasz Oszako, Lenka Luptakova, Patrycja Golińska, and Lassaad Belbahri. 2021. "Diversity of Synthetic Dyes from Textile Industries, Discharge Impacts and Treatment Methods" Applied Sciences 11, no. 14: 6255. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146255

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop