Next Article in Journal
Molecular Detection of Tick-Borne Bacterial and Protozoan Pathogens in Haemaphysalis longicornis (Acari: Ixodidae) Ticks from Free-Ranging Domestic Sheep in Hebei Province, China
Next Article in Special Issue
The Global Spread Pattern of Rat Lungworm Based on Mitochondrial Genetics
Previous Article in Journal
Are Hamstring Grafts a Predisposing Factor to Infection in R-ACL Surgery? A Comparative In Vitro Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Antibody Isotype Response to Angiostrongylus cantonensis in Experimentally Infected Rats (Rattus norvegicus) Using Hawai’i 31 kDa Antigen in an Indirect ELISA
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Rapid Single-Step Immunochromatographic Assay for Angiostrongylus cantonensis Specific Antigen Detection

1
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
2
Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2023, 12(6), 762; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12060762
Submission received: 28 March 2023 / Revised: 3 May 2023 / Accepted: 18 May 2023 / Published: 25 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rat Lungworm Disease)

Abstract

:
Angiostrongylus cantonensis is the major etiological nematode parasite causing eosinophilic meningitis and/or eosinophilic meningoencephalitis in humans. The rapid global spread of Angiostrongylus cantonensis and the emerging occurrence of the infection have exposed the shortcomings of traditional/conventional diagnostics. This has spurred efforts to develop faster, simpler and more scalable platforms that can be decentralized for point-of-need laboratory testing. By far, the point-of-care immunoassays such as the lateral flow assay (LFA) are the best-placed. In this work, a LFA in the form of an immunochromatographic test device (designated AcAgQuickDx), based on the detection of a circulating Angiostrongylus cantonensis-derived antigen, was established using anti-31 kDa Angiostrongylus cantonensis antibody as the capture reagent and anti-Angiostrongylus cantonensis polyclonal antibody as the indicator reagent. The AcAgQuickDx was evaluated for its diagnostic potential with a total of 20 cerebrospinal fluids (CSF) and 105 serum samples from patients with angiostrongyliasis and other clinically related parasitic diseases, as well as serum samples from normal healthy subjects. Three of the ten CSF samples from serologically confirmed angiostrongyliasis cases and two of the five suspected cases with negative anti-Angiostrongylus cantonensis antibodies showed a positive AcAgQuickDx reaction. Likewise, the AcAgQuickDx was able to detect Angiostrongylus cantonensis specific antigens in four serum samples of the 27 serologically confirmed angiostrongyliasis cases. No positive reaction by AcAgQuickDx was observed in any of the CSF (n = 5) and serum (n = 43) samples with other parasitic infections, or the normal healthy controls (n = 35). The AcAgQuickDx enabled the rapid detection of active/acute Angiostrongylus cantonensis infection. It is easy to use, can be transported at room temperature and does not require refrigeration for long-term stability over a wide range of climate. It can supplement existing diagnostic tests for neuroangiostrongyliasis under clinical or field environments, particularly in remote and resource-poor areas.

1. Introduction

Angiostrongylus cantonensis, also known as rat lungworm, is an angiostrongylid nematode parasite that typically resides in the pulmonary arteries and right ventricle of rodents. It is the commonest etiological parasite causing eosinophilic meningitis and/or eosinophilic meningoencephalitis in humans [1,2]. This neurotropic parasite is of increasing public health importance as its geographic distribution now covers a wide part of the world, and new locality records continue to be reported [2,3,4,5,6].
Angiostrongylus cantonensis has a relatively simple heteroxenous life cycle, typically involving a definitive rodent host and a mollusk intermediate host, but it may also use various paratenic hosts [2,7]. Humans are an accidental host, acquiring the infection via the ingestion of raw or poorly cooked snail meat and a variety of paratenic hosts which harbor the third-stage larvae, or green vegetables contaminated with the infective larvae [1,2,3,6,8]. The most frequently reported symptoms are headache, neck stiffness, paresthesia, fever, visual disturbances, vomiting and nausea [1,2,3,4,5,9]. The migration of the larvae to the brain tissue causes serious central nervous system (CNS) damage, which can result in coma and death of the patient [10,11].
The definitive diagnosis for human neural angiostrongyliasis is based on the detection of immature worms in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or from the eye of infected patients, but such findings are of rare occurrence [9]. The disease is presumptively diagnosed based on presenting symptoms, medical histories, eosinophilic pleocytosis in the CSF, and immunological and/or molecular markers [2,3,4,12].
Antibody-based immunodiagnostic tests using purified antigens for neuroangiostrongyliasis have been available for decades. Most of the work has centered on the Angiostrongylus cantonensis 31-kDa glycoprotein antigen [13,14], 29-kDa antigen [15], and 32-kDa protein [16]. The 31-kDa glycoprotein antigen of Angiostrongylus cantonensis has mostly been used in traditional immunoblotting as a diagnostic marker for differential diagnosis in human angiostrongyliasis, with very high sensitivity and specificity [17,18,19]. On the other hand, the detection of circulating Angiostrongylus cantonensis antigens is an alternative immunodiagnostic test to identify the active/acute/early stages of neuroangiostrongyliasis, and it is very much required for the patient management/treatment.
Furthermore, a molecular approach that targets gene sequences of Angiostrongylus cantonensis can also assist in an early etiologic diagnosis. Various DNA-based diagnostic techniques that rely on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify and detect specific Angiostrongylus cantonensis DNA molecules have been successfully applied to detect Angiostrongylus cantonensis DNA in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)/clinical specimens [20,21,22].
Because parasitological/definitive diagnosis is rarely achieved, immunological and/or molecular diagnostic methods for the detection of Angiostrongylus cantonensis antibodies/antigens and/or nucleic acids have become widely accepted as the most appropriate diagnostic approach to support clinical diagnosis [2,12,23]. Nevertheless, the utilization of such tests is time-consuming, needs highly sophisticated, high-cost laboratory equipment and continuous electricity supply and is not suitable under clinical or field conditions in endemic regions [22].
The rapid global spread of Angiostrongylus cantonensis and the emerging occurrence of the infection have exposed the shortcomings of traditional/conventional diagnostics. This has spurred efforts to develop faster, simpler and more scalable platforms that can be decentralized for performing the on-site detection of Angiostrongylus cantonensis infection in order to allow prompt treatment decisions. At present, point-of-care immunoassays, such as the flow-through/lateral flow assay, are the best placed.
The LFA has recently attracted considerable interest because of its long shelf life and the fact that refrigeration is not required for storage. It is very well adapted for application in harsh field environments, and in remote regions. As such, an LFA in the form of an immunochromatographic test device (AcAgQuickDx) based on the detection of a circulating Angiostrongylus cantonensis-derived antigen was established, using an anti-31 kDa Angiostrongylus cantonensis antibody line on the membrane strip as the capture reagent and anti-Angiostrongylus cantonensis polyclonal antibody conjugated to colloidal gold as the indicator reagent. The AcAgQuickDx was initially evaluated for its diagnostic potential in this study.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Clinical Samples

A set of 20 individual CSF samples submitted to the Parasitology Laboratory, Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, for routine antibody testing (ELISA and/or immunoblot) of tissue-invading parasites, i.e., Gnathostoma spinigerum, Angiostrongylus cantonensis and Taenia solium metacestodes, were used for the present assessment. These CSF specimens were from clinically diagnosed cases with positive immunoblot tests for the presence of a 31-kDa band specific for Angiostrongylus cantonensis (n = 10; designated as CSF1–10) and clinically suspected cases with negative immunoblot tests for Angiostrongylus cantonensis infection (n = 5; CSF11–15), as well as CSF samples (representing other clinically related parasitic infections) with positive immunoblot tests showing a 24-kDa band specific for Gnathostoma spinigerum (n = 2; CSF16–17) and with ELISA-positive cases of Taenia solium neurocysticercosis (n = 3; CSF18–20). The CSF specimens were kept at −70 °C after the initial routine immunological investigations.
In addition, a total of 105 reference sera stock from the Parasitology Department of the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, were also used for evaluation testing. Twenty-seven samples were from clinically diagnosed patients with detectable Angiostrongylus cantonensis-specific antibody in immunoblotting. The remaining 43 serum samples were from patients with other parasitic diseases, i.e., gnathostomiasis (n = 13), toxocariasis (n = 2), trichinellosis (n = 2), hookworm infection (n = 4), filariasis (n = 5), cysticercosis (n = 9), paragonimiasis (n = 2), opisthorchiasis (n = 3) and malaria (n = 3). These infections had been diagnosed using parasitological or serological methods. Additionally, 35 serum samples from normal healthy subjects (whose stool samples were without any intestinal parasitic infection) were included for testing.
All the 105 patient sera and 20 cerebrospinal fluids were collected from the leftover clinical samples stored separately at −70 °C. The same sets of archived CSF (n = 20) and serum (n = 97) samples had been tested with AcDIGFAAg to detect the 31-kDa specific antigen of Angiostrongylus cantonensis [24]. Additionally, 8 serum specimens used in this study were from cases with positive anti-Angiostrongylus cantonensis antibodies detected using an immunoblot test. They were retrieved and re-tested using AcAgQuickDx to confirm the presence of a 31-kDa Angiostrongylus cantonensis antigen. The use of stored leftover clinical CSF or serum samples for this study was approved by the Director of Siriraj Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University.

2.2. Production and Purification of Polyclonal Antibodies

Procedures to produce rabbit immune sera against crude somatic extracts and purified 31-kDa glycoprotein of Angiostrongylus cantonensis were the methods previously described [24,25,26,27]. The rabbit antisera used in this study were those previously produced and stored in small aliquots at −70 °C. Anti-Angiostrongylus cantonensis and anti-31 kDa Angiostrongylus cantonensis immune sera collected 2 weeks after the last immunizing dose were used to establish the present AcAgQuickDx device. From the previous immunoblot analysis, the crude Angiostrongylus cantonensis extracts were recognized using anti-Angiostrongylus cantonensis polyclonal antibody as multiple protein bands, including the 31-kDa antigenic band, whereas the anti-31 kDa antibody recognized a broad band with an approximate molecular mass of 31 kDa. The antisera were retrieved and purified using the Melon IgG Spin Purification Kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After purification, the viability of the purified rabbit antibodies was confirmed to ensure the test performance. The purified anti-31 kDa Angiostrongylus cantonensis IgG was used as an antigen-capture antibody, while the purified anti-Angiostrongylus cantonensis IgG was used for colloidal gold-labelling as a detection agent.

2.3. Preparation of the Lateral Flow Test Device

The colloidal gold-labelled polyclonal antibody against Angiostrongylus cantonensis was prepared and the immunochromatographic test device (designated AcAgQuickDx) was then assembled as per the standard method by Serve Science Co., Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand. The lateral flow strip consisted of 4 components, i.e., the sample application pad, conjugate pad, antibody-immobilized nitrocellulose membrane and absorbent pad. In the detection zone/membrane, the purified anti-31 kDa Angiostrongylus cantonensis polyclonal antibody (1 mg/mL) was micro-sprayed (in a 1 mm wide line) at a flow rate of 0.1 µL per mm at the test line (T), and the goat anti-rabbit immunoglobublin-G (0.4 mg/mL) was sprayed at 0.1 µL per mm at the control line (C). The anti-Angiostrongylus cantonensis polyclonal antibody-coated colloidal gold probe was added to the conjugate pad as a detector reagent. The antibody-immobilized membrane and conjugate pad were dried overnight at 37 °C. The sample application pad, conjugate pad and absorbent pad were assembled with the antibody-immobilized nitrocellulose membrane on a laminated card by superposition/overlapping of the different pads, and was cut into strips (0.5 cm in width). Each test strip was housed in a protective plastic cassette, with a hole for sample application and a slot/window to display test results for interpretation, and then stored in a desiccated sealed aluminum foil-package at room temperature until used. The complete set of the AcAgQuickDx kit consisted of an immunochromatographic cassette and chromatographic/chasing buffer.

2.4. Procedure of Lateral Flow Test Device

The test procedure was performed at room temperature. In the testing process, 25 µL of the test CSF/serum was applied slowly into the sample hole. After being completely absorbed, one drop (approximately 50 µL) of chromatographic/chasing buffer was added and allowed to be absorbed through the membrane to wash the excess colloidal gold-conjugated antibody/IgG. The result was interpreted within 15 min. The appearance of a red-colored band at the test (T) line and a red-colored band at the control (C) line indicated a positive result, whereas the absence of a red-colored band at the test (T) line and appearance of a red-colored band at the control (C) line indicated a negative result. The test was invalid when no red-colored bands appeared at either the T and C lines, or only one red-colored band appeared at the T line. All the parasite-infected patient CSF/serum samples and healthy control sera were tested twice with the AcAgQuickDx device to confirm the reproducibility of the results.

3. Results

In this work, of the 10 CSF samples from patients showing clinical criteria of eosinophilic meningitis and positive results for a 31-kDa Angiostrongylus cantonensis-specific immunoblot band, three (CSF2, 3 and 7) had a positive AcAgQuickDx reaction, showing positive red bands (with different color intensities) at the test (T) region within 15 min. Likewise, two (CSF12 and CSF15) of the five CSF samples from cases with clinical features of infection, but which were negative for Angiostrongylus cantonensis-specific antibodies, also displayed a positive AcAgQuickDx test (Figure 1). Within the set of 27 patient sera with serologically confirmed Angiostrongylus cantonensis infection, four (Ac-7, Ac-15, Ac-22 and Ac-25) showed a positive reaction via AcAgQuickDx, with visible pink bands at the T region (Figure 2). No positive AcAgQuickDx reaction was observed in the other 23 sera with angiostrongyliasis. In cross-reactivity testing, all the 5 CSF samples and the 78 sera from gnathostomiasis (CSF = 2; serum = 13), toxocariasis (serum = 2), filariasis (serum = 5), trichinellosis (serum = 2), hookworm infection (serum = 4), cysticercosis (CSF = 3; serum = 9), paragonimiasis (serum = 2), opisthorchiasis (serum = 3), and malaria (serum = 3), as well as the 35 normal control sera from parasite-free individuals, were all negative for AcAgQuickDx.

4. Discussion

In clinical practice, the delayed diagnosis of Angiostrongylus eosinophilic meningitis due to its atypical symptoms is an important problem in many hospitals because it can cause fatal outcomes. Despite the recent introduction of a powerful and sensitive molecular diagnostic tool (metagenomic next-generation sequencing) for the specific identification of Angiostrongylus cantonensis DNA sequences in clinical specimens [28,29], the diagnosis of active/acute neuroangiostrongyliasis remains a challenge in resource-limited settings because of high operating costs and the requirement for laboratory infrastructure [29]. Other rapid and cost-effective assays for the point-of-need diagnosis are still required to meet the demand of appropriate tests for use in resource-poor settings or remote endemic regions.
In the early stages of infection, diagnosis based on antibody-based methods may lack sensitivity, especially during acute illness because seroconversion may take several weeks [30]. Alternatively, the detection of antigens has the advantage of detecting the presence of active Angiostrongylus cantonensis infection and the level of the infective burden. To date, only a few diagnostic tests have been reported for detecting specific Angiostrongylus cantonensis antigen in clinical samples. A rapid lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA), based on two monoclonal antibodies (12D5C12, 21B7B11) for detecting the specific antigens of Angiostrongylus cantonensis, revealed very high specificity (100%) and high sensitivity (91.1%) [31]. More recently, a rapid, non-enzymatic, dot immunogold filtration assay (AcDIGFAAg) based on flow-through immunoassay, using purified antibodies against specific 31-kDa Angiostrongylus cantonensis antigen to detect a corresponding (specific) Angiostrongylus cantonensis antigen in the cerebrospinal fluid and serum samples from angiostrongyliasis patients, showed a diagnostic specificity of 100% [24].
The specific 31-kDa glycoprotein antigen of Angiostrongylus cantonensis has been suggested to be a potential immunological marker of early infection since this 31-kDa antigen is a component of the Angiostrongylus cantonensis excretory/secretory products [32]. This antigen has shown considerable promise as an immunodiagnostic target in an assay protocol based on the flow through/vertical flow principle [24]. However, the additional gold detector reagent for the test assay still needs refrigeration; as such, it is not completely applicable in the harsh field environment. As the relatively high concentration of the circulating 31-kDa antigen of Angiostrongylus cantonensis facilitates the development of other test platforms, this specific antigen was selected for application in a more field-friendly lateral flow assay. In addition, the gold-based, lateral flow immunochromatography approach to detect a specific 31-kDa glycoprotein of Angiostrongylus cantonensis (AcAgQuickDx test) presented here was easily adapted from the previous method of AcDIGFAAg, used to detect the specific 31-kDa Angiostrongylus cantonensis antigen [24].
In this study, the evaluation of the diagnostic potential of the AcAgQuickDx, using a set of clinical samples from the reference stock, revealed 5 out of the 15 angiostrongyliasis CSF samples and 4 out of the 27 angiostrongyliasis serum samples to be positive, whereas none of the patient’s samples with other heterologous parasitic infections (n = 48) and normal controls (n = 35) gave positive reactions. The overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of AcAgQuickDx in detecting the 31-kDa antigens of Angiostrongylus cantonensis were 21.43% and 100%, respectively. The low sensitivity/positivity of the AcAgQuickDx test in this study could possibly relate to delays in the diagnosis of the suspected active angiostrongyliasis cases, as the sensitivity of the antigen test depends on the phase of the disease, and on the presence of circulating Angiostrongylus cantonensis specific antigens in the CSF and blood. In the chronic cases, the antibody levels are expected to be elevated due to the persistence of antigen stimulation. The formation of antigen–antibody complexes, by the circulating antigens and antibodies, may inhibit the detection of antigens in these clinical samples [33]. Additionally, in those patients with a low intensity of infection, the positive antigen levels may be very close to the cut-off value.
The same set of archived serum samples (n = 19) in the present study was tested earlier using AcQuickDx (specific antibody detection) with 100% sensitivity and 98.72% specificity [34]. In this study, only two out of the nineteen samples showed positive antigen results based on the examination/detection of the specific Angiostrongylus cantonensis antigen on the consecutive angiostrongyliasis serum samples using AcAgQuickDx. On the other hand, two of the five CSF samples from clinically suspected cases (criteria of eosinophilic meningitis) with a negative immunoblot antibody test for Angiostrongylus cantonensis infection had positive antigen results using the present AcAgQuickDx test. To overcome the limitations related to the early or late seroconversion phase of available clinical samples, the simultaneous use of both the rapid tests, AcQuickDx (antibody detection) and AcAgQuickDx (antigen detection), should be applied for accurate detection of neuroangiostrongyliasis.
In comparison to our present antigen-based immunochromatographic test, AcAgQuickDx, the earlier Angiostrongylus cantonensis-derived antigen detecting AcDIGFAAg test, with the identical pair of Angiostrongylus cantonensis-specific antibodies, revealed a slightly better sensitivity for the consecutive CSF sample tested (CSF1–15; Ac1-Ac19). One of six positive CSF samples tested with AcDIGFAAg (CSF5) was negative with AcAgQuickDx, whereas the two positive patient sera with AcDIGFAAg gave concordant positive results with AcAgQuickDx. This is likely that flow-through is an immunoconcentration assay and thus allows the detection of less abundant antigens in the samples.
Theoretically, in the antigen detection tests, monoclonal antibodies seem to be the better diagnostic reagents as they recognize a single epitope with high specificity. The AcAgQuickDx in the present study showed 100% diagnostic specificity when tested with CSF/serum samples from patients with other clinically related parasitic infections. This was comparable with the earlier-developed AcDIGFAAg, which also demonstrated a specificity of 100% [24]. Nevertheless, additional clinical samples from cases with heterologous parasitic infections, including other infectious diseases and cancers that may cause eosinophil abnormality in CSF and peripheral blood, need to be performed for a more rigorous evaluation of the specificity.
Furthermore, only patients from a single geographical region (Thailand) were included in this study, limiting the certainty that these data could apply to other endemic countries/regions with different geographical strains of Angiostrongylus cantonensis [35]. Whether the AcAgQuickDx will also perform equally well in other Angiostrongylus cantonensis endemic regions remains to be evaluated. In addition, the question of the AcAgQuickDx test yielding qualitative or semi-quantitative results needs to be addressed. The future goals for improving our AcAgQuickDx will be focused on identifying new signal amplification strategies as well as the quantitative system.

5. Conclusions

Overall, our AcAgQuickDx test based on the detection of a circulating 31-kDa Angiostrongylus cantonensis-derived antigen is a fast, portable and easy-to-use test device that meets the needs of laboratory testing in a variety of healthcare settings. The test allows the rapid immunological diagnosis of Angiostrongylus cantonensis infection to enable immediate clinical management decisions to be made at or near the site of patient care (at the point of care settings). It can also be a good alternative for use in the initial screening of neuroagiostrongyliasis in large-scale investigations in the field, where sophisticated equipment is lacking.

6. Limitations of the Work

There was a limitation to the current study because the immunological testing was carried out retrospectively, using stored frozen CSF and sera. It is possible that the use of fresh clinical samples may increase the test sensitivity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, project administration, methodology, investigation, data curation, formal analysis and writing—original draft preparation, P.E.; Conceptualization, methodology, resources and project administration, A.T.; Resources, methodology and reviewing, D.W.; Methodology, investigation and data curation, S.B.; Conceptualization, funding acquisition, supervision, writing—review and editing, H.-S.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by grants from the University of Malaya (H-5620009 and H-50001-00-A000025) to H.-S.Y.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University (approval number: Si 369/2015). The study came under the umbrella of “Research Developments in Emerging and Re-Emerging Infectious Diseases”, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital (program number: 815/2557_EC1).

Informed Consent Statement

This study used leftover clinical samples submitted to the Parasitology Laboratory, Siriraj Hospital (under the Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University) for routine immunological testing. An Informed Consent Statement is not needed. The leftover samples were stored separately at −70 °C without the patients’ names or HN numbers.

Data Availability Statement

All the data applicable to this investigation are presented in this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Director of the Siriraj Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, for permission to publish this research work. We also appreciate the assistance by Nuntiya Monkong and Suphaluck Wankhom for the retrieval of CSF/serum samples kept at the Department of Parasitology, Siriraj Hospital.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cross, J.H.; Chen, E.R. Angiostrogyliasis. In Food Borne Parasitic Zoonoses; Murrel, K.D., Fried, B., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 263–290. [Google Scholar]
  2. Eamsobhana, P. The Rat Lungworm Angiostrongylus cantonensis: Parasitology, Genetics and Molecular Phylogeny, Revised 2nd ed.; Aksorn Graphic and Design Publishing House: Bangkok, Thailand, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang, Q.P.; Lai, D.H.; Zhu, X.Q.; Chen, X.G.; Lun, Z.R. Human angiostrongyliasis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2008, 8, 621–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wang, Q.P.; Wu, Z.D.; Wei, J.; Owen, R.L.; Lun, Z.R. Human Angiostrongylus cantonensis: An update. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2012, 31, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Barratt, J.; Chan, D.; Sandaradura, I.; Malik, R.; Spielman, D.; Lee, R.; Marriott, D.; Harkness, J.; Ellis, J.; Stark, D. Angiostrongylus cantonensis: A review of its distribution, molecular biology and clinical significance as a human pathogen. Parasitology 2016, 143, 1087–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cowie, R.H.; Ansdell, V.; Dunavan, C.P.; Rollins, R.L. Neuroangiostrongyliasis: Global spread of an emerging tropical disease. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2022, 107, 1166–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bhaibulaya, M. Morphology and taxonomy of major Angiostrongylus species of Eastern Asia and Australia. In Studies on Angiostrongyliasis in Eastern Asia and Australia; Cross, J.H., Ed.; NAMRU-2-SP-44; U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit: Taipei, Taiwan, 1979; pp. 4–13. [Google Scholar]
  8. Turck, H.C.; Fox, M.T.; Cowie, R.H. Paratenic hosts of Angiostrongylus cantonensis and their relation to human neuroangiostrongyliasis globally. One Health 2022, 15, 100426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Punyagupta, S. Angiostrongyliasis: Clinical features and human pathology. In Studies on Angiostrongyliasis in Eastern Asia and Australia; Cross, J.H., Ed.; NAMRU-2-SP-44; U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit: Taipei, Taiwan, 1979; pp. 138–150. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chotmongkol, V.; Sawanyawisuth, K. Clinical manifestation and outcome of patients with severe eosinophilic meningoencephalitis presumably caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 2002, 33, 231–234. [Google Scholar]
  11. Graeff-Teixeira, C.; da Silva, A.C.A.; Yoshimura, K. Update on eosinophilic meningoencephalitis and its clinical relevance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 22, 322–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ansdell, V.; Kramer, K.J.; McMillan, J.K.; Gosnell, W.L.; Murphy, G.S.; Meyer, B.C.; Blalock, E.U.; Yates, J.; Lteif, L.; Smith, O.A.; et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of neuroangiostrongyliasis: Updated recommendations. Parasitology 2021, 148, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Eamsobhana, P.; Tungtrongchitr, A.; Wanachiwanawin, D.; Yong, H.S.; Mak, J.W. Characterization of a 31-kDa specific antigen from Parastrongylus cantonensis (Nematoda: Metastrongylidae). Int. Med. Res. J. 1998, 2, 9–12. [Google Scholar]
  14. Nuamtanong, S. The evaluation of the 29 and 31 kDa antigens in female Angiostrongylus cantonensis for serodiagnosis of human angiostrongyliasis. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 1996, 27, 291–296. [Google Scholar]
  15. Maleewong, W.; Sombatsawat, P.; Intapan, P.M.; Wongkham, C.; Chotmongkol, V. Immunoblot evaluation of the specificity of the 29-kDa antigen from young adult female worms Angiostrongylus cantonensis for immunodiagnosis of human angiostrongyliasis. Asian Pac. J. Allergy Immunol. 2001, 19, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Li, H.; Chen, X.G.; Shen, H.X.; Chen, D.X.; Qiu, Y.R.; Hu, X.J. Value of antigen with molecular mass of 32000 in immunodiagnosis of Angiostrongylus cantonensis. J. First. Mil. Med. Univ. 2005, 25, 380–383. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. Eamsobhana, P. Angiostrongyliasis in Thailand: Epidemiology and laboratory investigations. Hawaii J. Med. Public Health 2013, 72, 28–32. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Eamsobhana, P. Eosinophilic meningitis caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis—A neglected disease with escalating importance. Trop. Biomed. 2014, 31, 569–578. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Jarvi, S.I.; Eamsobhana, P.; Quarta, S.; Howe, K.; Jacquier, S.; Hanlon, A.; Snook, K.; McHugh, R.; Tman, Z.; Miyamura, J.; et al. Estimating human exposure to rat lungworm (Angiostrongylus cantonensis) on Hawai’i Island: A pilot study. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2020, 102, 69–77, accepted for publication. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Eamsobhana, P.; Wanachiwanawin, D.; Dechkum, N.; Parsartvit, A.; Yong, H.S. Molecular diagnosis of eosinophilic meningitis due to Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Nematoda: Metastrongyloidea) by polymerase chain reaction-DNA sequencing of cerebrospinal fluids of patients. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2013, 108, 116–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qvarnstrom, Y.; Xayavong, M.; da Silva, A.C.; Park, S.Y.; Whelen, A.C.; Calimlim, P.S.; Sciulli, R.H.; Honda, S.A.; Higa, K.; Kitsutani, P.; et al. Real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of Angiostrongylus cantonensis DNA in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with eosinophilic meningitis. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2016, 94, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Verweij, J.J.; Stensvold, C.R. Molecular testing for clinical diagnosis and epidemiological investigations of intestinal parasitic infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 27, 371–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Eamsobhana, P.; Yong, H.S. Immunological diagnosis of human angiostrongyliasis due to Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Nematoda: Angiostrongylidae). Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2009, 13, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Eamsobhana, P.; Tungtrongchitr, A.; Yong, H.S.; Prasartvit, A.; Wanachiwanawin, D.; Gan, X.X. Sandwich dot-immunogold filtration assay (DIGFA) for specific immunodiagnosis of active neuroangiostrongyliasis. Parasitology 2021, 148, 234–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Eamsobhana, P. Immunological studies on the rat lung-worm Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Nematoda: Metastrongylidae). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  26. Eamsobhana, P.; Yong, H.S.; Mak, J.W.; Wattanakulpanich, D. Detection of circulating antigens of Parastrongylus cantonensis in human sera by dot-blot ELISA and sandwich ELISA using monoclonal antibody. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 1997, 28, 624–628. [Google Scholar]
  27. Eamsobhana, P.; Yoolek, A.; Suvouttho, S.; Suvuttho, S. Purification of a specific immunodiagnostic Parastrongylus cantonensis antigen by electroelution from SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 2001, 32, 308–313. [Google Scholar]
  28. Fan, X.W.; Wang, Q.; Li, P.Q.; Ai, B.; Song, Y.L.; Peng, Q.Y.; Wang, H.L. The diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in Angiostrongylus cantonensis encephalitis/meningitis. J. Behav. Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 216–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, J.; Tao, J.; Chen, W.; Wang, T.; Chen, X.; Shen, M.; Ou, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Ding, Y.; Wu, J.; et al. The application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for Angiostrongylus eosinophilic meningitis in a pediatric patient: A case report. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 1003013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Slom, T.J.; Cortese, M.M.; Gerber, S.I.; Jones, R.C.; Holtz, T.H.; Lopez, A.S.; Zambrano, C.H.; Sufit, R.L.; Sakolvaree, Y.; Chaicumpa, W.; et al. An outbreak of eosinophilic meningitis caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis in travelers returning from the Caribbean. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 346, 668–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Chen, M.X.; Chen, J.X.; Chen, S.H.; Huang, D.N.; Ai, L.; Zhang, R.L. Development of lateral flow immunoassay for antigen detection in human Angiostrongylus cantonensis infection. Korean J. Parasitol. 2016, 54, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Eamsobhana, P.; Dechkum, N. Recognition of a diagnostic antigen from excretory/secretory products of adult Parastrongylus cantonensis by infected human sera. Trop. Biomed. 2000, 17, 103–108. [Google Scholar]
  33. Shih, H.H.; Chen, S.N. Immunodiagnosis of angiostrongyliasis with monoclonal antibodies recognizing a circulating antigen of mol. wt. 91,000 from Angiostrongylus cantonensis. Int. J. Parsitol. 1991, 21, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Eamsobhana, P.; Tungtrongchitr, A.; Wanachiwanawin, D.; Yong, H.S. Immunochromatographic test for rapid serological diagnosis of human angiostrongyliasis. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 73, 69–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cross, J.H. Experimental studies on Angiostrongylus species and strains in monkeys and laboratory animals. In Studies on Angiostrongyliasis in Eastern Asia and Australia; Cross, J.H., Ed.; NAMRU-2-SP-44; U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit: Taipei, Taiwan, 1979; pp. 118–137. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The AcAgQuickDx detection results of 20 CSF samples from clinically diagnosed cases with positive immunoblot (antibody) test for angiostrongyliasis (CSF1–10), clinically suspected cases with negative immunoblot test (CSF11–15), and CSF samples with positive immunoblot (antibody test) for gnathostomiasis (CSF16–17), and with ELISA-positive cases of Taenia solium neurocysticercosis (CSF18–20). The appearance of a red band at the T line and a red band at the C line indicates a positive sample for the detection of the specific 31-kDa Angiostrongylus cantonensis antigen (CSF2, 3, 7, 12 and 15), whereas the absence of a red band at the T line and appearance of a red band at the C line indicates a negative sample (CSF1, 4, 5, 6, 8–11 and 13–14 and 16–20).
Figure 1. The AcAgQuickDx detection results of 20 CSF samples from clinically diagnosed cases with positive immunoblot (antibody) test for angiostrongyliasis (CSF1–10), clinically suspected cases with negative immunoblot test (CSF11–15), and CSF samples with positive immunoblot (antibody test) for gnathostomiasis (CSF16–17), and with ELISA-positive cases of Taenia solium neurocysticercosis (CSF18–20). The appearance of a red band at the T line and a red band at the C line indicates a positive sample for the detection of the specific 31-kDa Angiostrongylus cantonensis antigen (CSF2, 3, 7, 12 and 15), whereas the absence of a red band at the T line and appearance of a red band at the C line indicates a negative sample (CSF1, 4, 5, 6, 8–11 and 13–14 and 16–20).
Pathogens 12 00762 g001
Figure 2. The AcAgQuickDx test results of 27 serum samples from clinically diagnosed cases of angiostrongyliasis with positive immunoblot (antibody) test (Ac1–27), and the representative images of AcAgQuickDx test evaluated using human sera with other heterologous parasitic infections (n = 43). Gs, gnathostomiasis; Tc, Taenia solium neurocysticercosis; Tox, toxocariasis; Tt, trichinellosis; Hw, hookworm infection; Fil, filariasis; Ph, paragonimiasis; Ov, opisthorchiasis; Mal, malaria; and N, normal healthy control (n = 35). The appearance of a red band at the T line and a red band at the C line indicates a positive result for detection of the specific 31-kDa antigen of Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Ac7, Ac15, Ac22 and Ac25). The absence of a red band at the T line and appearance of a red band at the C line indicates a negative test result (Ac1–6, Ac8–14, Ac16–21, Ac23–24, Ac26–27, Gs1–4, Tc, Tox, Tt, Hw, Fil, Ph, Ov, Mal and N).
Figure 2. The AcAgQuickDx test results of 27 serum samples from clinically diagnosed cases of angiostrongyliasis with positive immunoblot (antibody) test (Ac1–27), and the representative images of AcAgQuickDx test evaluated using human sera with other heterologous parasitic infections (n = 43). Gs, gnathostomiasis; Tc, Taenia solium neurocysticercosis; Tox, toxocariasis; Tt, trichinellosis; Hw, hookworm infection; Fil, filariasis; Ph, paragonimiasis; Ov, opisthorchiasis; Mal, malaria; and N, normal healthy control (n = 35). The appearance of a red band at the T line and a red band at the C line indicates a positive result for detection of the specific 31-kDa antigen of Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Ac7, Ac15, Ac22 and Ac25). The absence of a red band at the T line and appearance of a red band at the C line indicates a negative test result (Ac1–6, Ac8–14, Ac16–21, Ac23–24, Ac26–27, Gs1–4, Tc, Tox, Tt, Hw, Fil, Ph, Ov, Mal and N).
Pathogens 12 00762 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Eamsobhana, P.; Tungtrongchitr, A.; Wanachiwanawin, D.; Boonyong, S.; Yong, H.-S. Rapid Single-Step Immunochromatographic Assay for Angiostrongylus cantonensis Specific Antigen Detection. Pathogens 2023, 12, 762. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12060762

AMA Style

Eamsobhana P, Tungtrongchitr A, Wanachiwanawin D, Boonyong S, Yong H-S. Rapid Single-Step Immunochromatographic Assay for Angiostrongylus cantonensis Specific Antigen Detection. Pathogens. 2023; 12(6):762. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12060762

Chicago/Turabian Style

Eamsobhana, Praphathip, Anchalee Tungtrongchitr, Darawan Wanachiwanawin, Sudarat Boonyong, and Hoi-Sen Yong. 2023. "Rapid Single-Step Immunochromatographic Assay for Angiostrongylus cantonensis Specific Antigen Detection" Pathogens 12, no. 6: 762. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12060762

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop