Next Article in Journal
MODI: A Structured Development Process of Mode-Based Control Algorithms in the Early Design Stage of Building Energy Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
Structural Performance of Cold-Formed Steel Face-to-Face Built-Up Channel Sections under Axial Compression at High Temperatures through Finite Element Modelling
Previous Article in Journal
The Inter/Transdisciplinary Framework for Urban Governance Intervention in the Egyptian Informal Settlements
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Global Slenderness and Sliding Pallets on Seismic Design of Steel Storage Racks: A Sensitivity Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

End-One-Flange Web Crippling Behavior of Cold-Formed High-Strength Steel Channels with Web Holes at Elevated Temperatures

1
School of Engineering, The University of Waikato, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
2
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
3
School of Engineering, Design and Built Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2023, 13(2), 266; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020266
Submission received: 29 November 2022 / Revised: 6 January 2023 / Accepted: 12 January 2023 / Published: 17 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural Performance of Cold-Formed Steel Structures)

Abstract

:
This paper investigates the web crippling strength of cold-formed high-strength steel (CHS) channels with centered web holes subjected to end-one-flange (EOF) loading at elevated temperatures, considering both flanges fastened and unfastened to load plates conditions. The stress-strain curve and material properties for CHS (S690QL steel grade) channels were adopted from the literature, where the temperatures ranged from 20 to 800 °C. The material characteristics were incorporated into finite element (FE) models using ABAQUS. The developed FE model was then validated against the published test results to evaluate the effects of various parameters including web hole diameter, bearing length, cross-section sizes, and flange fastening conditions of such channels at elevated temperatures, and a comprehensive parametric investigation including a total of 1710 validated finite element models was performed. From the parametric study results, it was found that the web crippling strength reduction factor is sensitive to the changes of the hole size and the bearing length, with the parameters of hole size having the largest effect on the web crippling reduction factor; however, the web crippling strength reduction factor remains stable when the temperature is changed from 20 to 800 °C. According to the FEA results, new reliable web crippling strength reduction factor equations for such CHS channels were proposed. In the comparison of proposed design strengths to the numerical failure load, the proposed design equations are suitable to predict the web crippling strength for CHS channels subject to EOF loading at ambient and elevated temperatures.

1. Introduction

Cold-formed high-strength steel (CHS) channel section is a common solution for steel structures requiring higher capacity than typical cold-formed steel sections. The superior quality of CHS channel enables the members to retain higher strength while weighing less than conventional hot-rolled steel. Due to these advantages, CHS channel members are often used in beams, columns, wall panels, and cladding systems. However, when CHS members are considered for building construction, localized web failure and fire safety are two major concerns. This study will investigate the effects of elevated temperatures on the web crippling strength of CHS channels with web holes under EOF loading.
Several studies focused on how cold-formed steel (CFS) structures react when exposed to high temperatures [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The mechanical characteristics of low and high-strength CFS sections at elevated temperatures were studied experimentally [1,2,3]. Javed et al. [4] have conducted a review study on the effects of fire loading on the CFS beams and columns, discussing the strength and failure mechanism of such members. In other studies, Fang et al. [5,6] performed numerical simulations on CFS members subjected to web crippling and axial compression. Gunalan et al. [7] studied the compressive behavior of lipped and unlipped CFS channels at high temperatures. However, none of the abovementioned research studies addressed the web crippling performance of cold-formed structural members, including CHS perforated channels at fire loading.
In the literature, Chan and Young [8] investigated the web crippling strength of CFS beams with stiffening lips at high temperatures. They compared the findings from FE modelling against the calculated capacities determined from the Direct Strength Method (DSM) and Effective Width Method (EWM). Gunalan et al. [9] conducted a numerical simulation on CFS column members under fire loading and studied their flexural-torsional buckling behavior. It was found that for moment released columns under flexural-torsional buckling, lower mechanical properties exhibited high agreement and consistency [9]. In addition, the results from FE models were compared against design guidelines from Australia/New Zealand Standard 4600 (AS/NZS) [10], BS 5950 Part 5 [11], Eurocode 3 Parts 1.2 [12] and 1.3 [13], and DSM [9]. In other research, Gunalan et al. [7] recently determined that using non-linear stress-strain parameters in the CFS might improve the accuracy level of proposed design recommendations in the available design standards.
Furthermore, Rokilan and Mahendran [14] conducted a research study to consider the impacts of material characteristics of the sections at elevated temperatures to further investigate the veracity of these findings. According to their findings, the design equations of EWM and DSM offered both conservative and unconservative estimations for determining the capacity of CFS members under various steel mechanical properties. In addition, they proposed a strength reduction factor for low and high steel sections exhibiting high temperatures up to 700 °C.
In terms of web crippling studies at room/ambient temperature, Uzzaman et al. [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22] used experimental and numerical simulation to study the web crippling strength of CFS perforated channel beams. Janarthanan et al. [23,24] studied the web crippling strength and failures of CFS channels, and they proposed modified coefficients to estimate the failure load. Gunalan and Mahendran [25] conducted experimental tests to study the web crippling strength of CFS channel sections and proposed design equations within the Direct Strength Method guidelines [10,26]. These studies investigated mainly the cold-formed low-strength steel channels. However, the web crippling strength of cold-formed structural members (e.g., CHS channels) under EOF loading at high temperatures was not taken into account.
Thus, this research aims to investigate the web crippling strength of CHS channels under EOF loading at elevated temperatures. The numerical study was conducted to investigate the impact of web hole size and high temperatures on the web crippling strength and behavior of CHS channels. In addition, the design standards were evaluated by comparing the values of design strengths to the web crippling strength of channels from this study. Using the FEA results, new reliable design equations were recommended to consider the web crippling strength reduction factor of CHS perforated channels at elevated temperatures.

2. Web Crippling Failure

The adoption of cold-formed structural elements in low to mid-rise structures incurs these members to concentrated loads introduced by transfer structures or irregular framing. Depending on the loading condition, these forces result in different failure modes. The most common failure modes are shear failure, buckling, bending, web crippling, or a combination of different modes [27]. As shown in Figure 1, a localised failure of the web beneath the bearing stress is presented as web crippling failure.

2.1. End-One-Flange Loading

The cold-formed beams are often subjected to various web crippling failures, depending on the location of the loads. Four types of failure load cases are available in Figure 2. Only the EOF load case was considered among these loadings in this study.

2.2. Experimental Investigation

Lian et al. [15] and Sundararajah et al. [28] conducted experiments on cold-formed structural members subjected to EOF loading. The size and position of web holes were altered to examine their effects on the web crippling strength of channel sections. The specimens were collected with the web holes centered and offset with respect to the bearing plates. Variables such as nominal thickness, web depth, flange width, and web slenderness (h/t) were evaluated on three distinct cross sections.

2.3. Current Design Codes

The AS/NZS [10] and AISI [26] both include the web crippling strength prediction equation. Equation (1) is provided to calculate the nominal web crippling strength per web (PAISI&AS/NZS) for a channel segment without web holes.
P AISI&AS / NZS = C t w 2 f y s i n ( θ ) ( 1 C r r i t w ) ( 1 + C l   N t w ) ( 1 C w h t w )
where, fy refers to yield stress of channel section; C refers to coefficient; ri is the inside bent radius; tw defines the thickness of web; θ is angle between the plane of the web and bearing surface planes, which is equal to 90°; Cr refers to coefficient of inside bent radius; Cl refers to coefficient of bearing; Cw refers to coefficient of web slenderness; N refers to actual bearing length; h is the depth of flat portion of the web; coefficients of C, Cr, Cl, and Cw, for fastened flanges and un-fastened flanges are given in Table 1.
A reduction factor (RAISI&AS/NZS) is provided to calculate the reduced web crippling strength of CFS channels with web openings. The reduction factor (R) for EOF loading, when the web openings are away from the bearing length, can be calculated using the following equation:
R AISI&AS / NZS = 1.01 0.325 a h + 0.083 x h 1
where a refers to web hole diameter; h refers to depth of web flat region; x refers to distance between bearing edge (nearest) and web opening.

3. Numerical Simulation

3.1. General

The non-linear FE models for unfastened and fastened CHS channels were developed using ABAQUS [29]. The centerline dimensions of the CHS channel section were considered. The model was developed using cross-sectional dimensions. As shown in Figure 3, four parts were defined to simulate the testing configuration, namely the channel section, the support bearing plates placed at both ends of the channel section, and the supporting block fastened at the back of the channel section using connectors. The section web crippling associated capacity was obtained by picking up the reaction forces through the support-bearing plates. Figure 4 summarizes the CHS channel symbol definitions, where the labelling of the specimen is shown in Figure 5. The detailed modelling technique is described below.

3.2. Material Property

The stress-strain curve for steel grade S690QL at ambient and elevated temperatures was taken from the study of Winful et al. [30]. It was then transformed to actual stress-plastic strain using Equations (3) and (4) [29]. The stress-strain material curves are shown in Figure 6 and the material properties of S690QL steel grade are summarised in Table 2.
σ t r u e = σ ( 1 + ε )
ε t r u e ( p l ) = l n ( 1 + ε ) σ t r u e E
where E refers to Young’s modulus, σ t r u e refers to the true stress, ε t r u e ( p l )   refers to the plastic strain, σ and ε are the engineering stress and strain, respectively.

3.3. Meshing and Element Type

For a modelling element type consistent with previous researchers [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,31,32,33,34], a quadrilateral shell SR4 element type with four nodes was used to model channels in ABAQUS, which is applicable for general shell purpose application and can capture finite membrane shell strains that are suitable for structural analysis. A mesh size (5 mm × 5 mm) was adopted for the channels, where a mesh convergence setting is ensured in the analysis acceptance criteria. The mesh size of 10 mm × 10 mm was adequate for the bearing plates. For validating the FE model, smaller mesh sizes were adopted at the inside bend corners and around the web openings. The mesh sizes for different parts are shown in Figure 7 for FE models.

3.4. Loading and Boundary Conditions

The Surface-to-Surface contact feature in the ABAQUS interaction library was adopted to simulate the contact between the support-loading plates and the CHS channels. A friction coefficient of 0.4 was employed between the channels and the support-bearing plates. The contact interfaces were constrained not to allow penetrating surfaces into each other. For models with fastened flange, connectors were used to generate the fastened condition for the support bearing plates on the channels. The bearing plates with a roller support condition shown in Figure 3 were modelled by restraining the nodes along the support bearing in translation. The reaction forces were collected using the same node set. The top bearing plate was unfastened in the vertical direction, while other directions were fastened to achieve load-displacement corresponding to the Y-direction in ABAQUS. Figure 8 shows the boundary conditions used in the FE model.
A displacement control method was adopted in this study by applying a vertical load to the top bearing plate attached to the channel section. The nodes of the top bearing plate were bound as a rigid body and connected to a reference point using this procedure. The displacement control was applied to the reference point and displaced vertically (Y-axis) to a predetermined value.

3.5. Validation of FE Model

In this study, the developed FE models of the channels under EOF loading were validated using the test data of Lian et al. [15] and Sundararajah et al. [28]. Due to the paucity of data for the perforated CHS channels, the validation study against Lian et al. [15] and Sundararajah et al. [28] experimental tests were limited to the CFS channels only. The results of a comparison between the FEA-obtained web crippling strength and the experimental test [28] are shown in Table 3. The mean and coefficient of variation (COV) of experimental to FEA results (PEXP/PFEA) are 1.02 and 0.07 for the unfastened channel and 1.03 and 0.04 for the fastened channel, showing adequate accuracy for the parametric study. The FE model can calculate the web crippling strength of CHS channels subjected to EOF loading at room temperature, as concluded.
In this study, it was assumed that the modelling procedure for CHS channels with and without web holes under EOF loading case at elevated temperature was the same as at ambient temperature, and the material properties were modified to account for the lower yield stress and other material properties at elevated temperature.
Using validated FE models, the FEA results from selected models (shown in Table 4) were compared to the predicted web crippling strength determined by AISI and AS/NZS standards [10,26]. Table 5 reveals that the FEA results closely matched to the calculation results determined by design standards.

4. Parametric Study

Using validated FE models, a comprehensive parametric investigation has been conducted to examine the effects of increasing temperature on the web crippling strength of CHS channels under EOF loading and associated strength reductions due to web holes. The objective of the parametric research is to determine the qualitative effect of parameter changes on the web crippling strength of CHS using the existing database. These parameters would be included into the proposed equation in the subsequent section. In total, there were 1710 FEA models generated and assessed. Web depth (bw) ranged from 100 to 300 mm; diameter of web opening to the height of web (a/h) ranged from 0.2 to 0.8; length of bearing plate to the height of web (N/h) ranged from 0.17 to 1.14; and section thickness (tw) ranged from 2, 4, and 6 mm. In addition, various bearing plate lengths (N) were employed including 50, 75, and 100 mm. The steel grade S690QL was employed with an elastic-perfectly plastic material description based on the material parameters from Table 2.
The strength of CHS channels under EOF loading case is affected by three ratios, namely: r/t, N/t and h/t which correspond to the interior radius to the section thickness, the ratio of bearing length to web thickness and the ratio of web height to its thickness, respectively. The web crippling strength of CHS channels is calibrated by the reduction factor (R). The parametric study only looked at the web crippling strength and behavior of CHS channels containing web holes under EOF loading at elevated temperatures.
The effects of each of these parameters at elevated temperatures are elaborated in the following sections with five temperature levels considered, 20 °C, 200 °C, 400 °C, 600 °C, and 800 °C.

4.1. Parametric Study

4.1.1. Effect of the r/t (Corner Radius/Section Thickness) Ratio on the Web Crippling Strength

The effect of the r/t ratio on the web crippling strength of CHS channels was investigated. As demonstrated in Figure 9, the negative influence of the r/t ratio on the web crippling strength can be observed. At ambient temperature, the average web crippling strength of CHS fastened and unfastened channels fell by 85.77% and 82.45%, respectively, from 0.5 to 1.5.

4.1.2. Effect of the N/t (Bearing Length/Section Thickness) Ratio on the Web Crippling Strength

Figure 10 shows that the web crippling strength decreases with higher values of N/t ratio from 8 to 50. The average reduced percentages for channel flanges (fastened and unfastened) at ambient temperature are 85.74% and 81.28%, respectively. Upon N/t reaching 37.5, the web crippling strength stabilises at ambient and elevated temperatures.

4.1.3. Effect of the h/t (Web Depth/Section Thickness) Ratio on the Web Crippling Strength

The ratio of the h/t ratio on the web crippling strength is explored as depicted in Figure 11. The rise in the ratio is associated with a reduction in the web crippling strength. The average ultimate web crippling strength of CHS unfastened and fastened channels with unfastened and fastened condition on flanges are lowered by 88.94 % and 86.85 %, respectively, when the h/t ratio is changed from 14.67 to 146.

4.1.4. Effect of Fastened Flanges on the Web Crippling Strength

From Figure 12, the average ultimate web crippling strength of CHS channels with fastened flange is 28.77 % more than that of CHS channels with unfastened flange. For CHS channels with web holes, the fastened flange condition may prevent the rotation of the flanges, which increases the web crippling strength of such channels under EOF loading.

4.1.5. Effect of Elevated Temperatures on the Web Crippling Strength

Figure 13 shows the web crippling strength of CHS channels response to a temperature gradient. The ultimate web crippling strength decreases as the temperature rises from 20 to 800 ℃. As shown in Table 6, the drop percentage in the web crippling strength for unfastened-flange channels is larger than that for fastened-flange channels. Figure 14 depicts some selected failure modes using the Von Mises stress criterion. From Figure 14, it is observed that the out-of-plane deformation of the webs occurs under EOF loading. The failure modes are similar for most of the sections at ambient and high temperatures. However, the stress distribution near the web holes increases as temperature increases (see Figure 14). Furthermore, it was found that the web crippling strength of CHS channels decreases with increasing temperatures.

4.2. Web Crippling Strength Reduction Factor (R)

Equation (5) provided the web crippling strength reduction factor (R) calculation formula:
R = P h o l e / P A 0
where Phole is the web crippling strength of section with centered web holes; PA0 is the web crippling strength of section without web holes.

4.2.1. Effect of the a/h (Hole Diameter/Web Depth) Ratio on R

Figure 15 and Table 7 illustrate the relationship between the a/h ratio and the web crippling strength reduction factor (R). Figure 15 depicts a decreasing trend in the R as a result of the increasing a/h ratio. When the a/h ratio grows from 0.2 to 0.6, CHS channels with fastened flanges see a modest variation in the reduction factor when exposed to various temperatures. In Table 7, the average R value for CHS unfastened channels reduces from 0.95 to 0.75, with an increase in a/h ratio. Similarly, the average R value for CHS fastened channels decreases from 0.99 to 0.73.

4.2.2. Effect of the N/h (Bearing Length/Web Depth) Ratio on R

The web crippling strength reduction factor (R) for CHS fastened channels has a significant influence with N/h ratio increases and an a/h ratio larger than 0.8. The factor R fluctuates between 1% and 30% when the N/h ratio rises from 0.17 to 1.14 for CHS unfastened channels, depending on the a/h ratio. A ratio of 0.8 a/h corresponds to the steepest decline.

4.2.3. Effect of Fastened Flanges on R

As seen in Figure 15, fastened sections behave more rigidly than unfastened sections when a/h varies between 0 and 0.8, with a little variance of around 4%.

5. Proposed Design Equations

Since existing design standards do not effectively predict the web crippling strength of CHS channels at elevated temperatures, the FEA parametric results were utilized to propose new equations to address this issue. Using SPSS analytical software [35], a statistical analysis was undertaken to propose a design equation including results from the parametric results of this study. The proposed equation has the following limits: r/t ≤ 1.5, N/t ≤ 50, h/t ≤ 146, a/h ≤ 0.8, N/h ≤ 1.14.
Equation (6) represents the design equation to determine the web crippling strength reduction factors (Rprop) of CHS channels with centered web holes:
R p r o p = α γ a h + λ N h
R = P w / P 0
where α, γ, and λ are coefficients, and α, γ, and λ values obtained with SPSS are given in Table 8. Pw is the web crippling strength of the perforated channel section, and P0 is the web crippling strength of the unperforated same channel section.
To quantify the accuracy of the proposed equations, a comparison was conducted between the results from the equations and the FEA results as well as between design codes. Using the FEA data, Equation (6) was utilised to calculate the reduction factors for EOF web crippling strength. Table 9 and Table 10 demonstrate that the recommended web crippling strength reduction factors (Rprop) estimate the reduction in ultimate failure strength of CHS channels with web holes under EOF loading with high accuracy. The average values of the proposed web crippling strength reduction factor R/Rprop ratio are less than the factors provided by the AISI and AS/NZS design standard (R/RAISI&AS/NZS) and have a smaller coefficient of variation (COVs) showing better accuracy and prediction. It also can be seen from Table 10 that the COVs derived from the proposed equations and AISI and AS/NZS [10,26] are comparable when compared to CHS fastened channels.

6. Conclusions

This paper presents a numerical study on the strength and behavior of EOF web crippling on CHS perforated channels with S690QL steel grade at elevated temperatures. The non-linear FE models of CHS channels with web holes under EOF loading were generated and validated against experimental test data at ambient temperatures. Then, a comprehensive parametric investigation was performed on the web crippling strength of CHS channels under EOF loading at high temperatures.
  • In total, 1710 FEA models were examined on the web crippling strength of CHS channels under EOF loading, including the various effects of a/h, N/h, flange type, and elevated temperatures.
  • Both the ratios of a/h and N/h influence the web crippling strength reduction factor, with the ratio of a/h having a significant impact on the factor. Besides, the web crippling strength reduction factor is unaffected by temperatures ranging from 20 to 800 °C.
  • Using FEA results, new design equations were created to account for the effects of cross-sectional geometry, bearing plate, flange type, and hole size on the EOF loading of CHS channels at elevated temperatures. The recommended design equations for CHS channels are limited to r/t ≤ 1.5, N/t ≤ 50, h/t ≤ 146, a/h ≤ 0.8, and N/h ≤ 1.14.
  • The proposed equations were compared to AISI and AS/NZS calculation techniques. In particular, for CHS channels with unfastened flanges, the proposed equations outperformed the AISI and AS/NZS equations, as shown by a comparison with experimental data from the literature.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.F., D.L.C. and K.R.; methodology, Z.F. and D.L.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.F.; writing—review and editing, K.R., A.Y. and Y.A.-R.; supervision, K.R. and J.B.P.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this paper has been properly cited.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to Franck Mahalatchimy and Hao Liang for their contributions to this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

aHole diameter
AeEffective sectional area
bfFlange width
blLip width
CCoefficient
CAEComputer-aided engineering
CHSCold-formed high-strength steel
CFS Cold-formed steel
ClCoefficient bearing length
COVCoefficient of variation
CrCoefficient of inside bent radius
CwCoefficient of web slenderness
dDepth of the web
dlLip downturn width
DSMDirect strength method
EYoung’s modulus
EOF End-One-Flange
EWMEffective width method;
FAISI&AS/NZSNominal axial capacity from AISI&AS/NZS specifications
FEFinite element
feLeast of elastic flexural, torsional, and flexural-torsional buckling stress
FEAFinite element analysis
FEMFinite element model
FEXPAxial capacity from experimental
FFEAAxial capacity from FEA
fnBuckling stress at critical load
FnAxial strength
fyYield stress
hDepth of the flat portion of the web
LLength of the section
LPFLoad proportionally factor
NBearing length
P0Web crippling strength of channel sections without web holes
PAISI&AS/NZSNominal web crippling strength per web from AISI&AS/NZS specifications
PEVConcentrated load in FE model
PEXPWeb crippling strength from experimental
PFEAWeb crippling strength from FEA
PnWeb crippling strength
PwWeb crippling strength of channel sections with web holes
RWeb crippling strength reduction factor from FEA
RpropProposed web crippling strength reduction factor
rInside bend radius
RAISI&AS/NZSWeb crippling strength reduction factor from AISI&AS/NZS specifications
S4R4-noded doubly curved linear shell elements
twWeb thickness
xNearest distance between the web hole and the edge of bearing
α, γ, λCoefficients from proposed equation
εEngineering strain
εtrue(pl)Plastic strain
εuStrain at ultimate tensile strength
λcNon-dimensional slenderness
σEngineering stress
σ0.20.2% proof stress
σ0.50.5% proof stress
σtrueTrue stress
σuUltimate tensile strength

References

  1. Kankanamge, N.D.; Mahendran, M. Mechanical properties of cold-formed steels at elevated temperatures. Thin-Walled Struct. 2011, 49, 26–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Yu, Y.; Lan, L.; Ding, F.; Wang, L. Mechanical properties of hot-rolled and cold-formed steels after exposure to elevated temperature: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 213, 360–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ranawaka, T.; Mahendran, M. Experimental study of the mechanical properties of light gauge cold-formed steels at elevated temperatures. Fire Saf. J. 2009, 44, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Javed, M.F.; Hafizah, N.; Memon, S.A.; Jameel, M.; Aslam, M. Recent research on cold-formed steel beams and columns subjected to elevated temperature: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 144, 686–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fang, Z.; Roy, K.; Liang, H.; Poologanathan, K.; Ghosh, K.; Mohamed, A.; Lim, J. Numerical Simulation and Design Recommendations for Web Crippling Strength of Cold-Formed Steel Channels with Web Holes under Interior-One-Flange Loading at Elevated Temperatures. Buildings 2021, 11, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fang, Z.; Roy, K.; Lakshmanan, D.; Pranomrum, P.; Li, F.; Lau, H.H.; Lim, J.B. Structural behaviour of back-to-back cold-formed steel channel sections with web openings under axial compression at elevated temperatures. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 54, 104512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gunalan, S.; Bandula Heva, Y.; Mahendran, M. Local buckling studies of cold-formed steel compression members at elevated temperatures. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2015, 108, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Chen, J.; Young, B. Cold-formed steel lipped channel columns at elevated temperatures. Eng. Struct. 2007, 29, 2445–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gunalan, S.; Heva, Y.B.; Mahendran, M. Flexural–torsional buckling behaviour and design of cold-formed steel compression members at elevated temperatures. Eng. Struct. 2014, 79, 149–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. AS/NZS 4600:2018; Cold-Formed Steel Structures. Australia/New Zealand Standard: Wellington, New Zealand, 2018.
  11. BS5950; Structural Use of Steelwork in Building—Formed Thin Gauge Sections Part 5: Code of Practice for Design of Cold. British Standard: London, UK, 1998.
  12. EN 1993-1-2 Eurocode 3; Design of Steel Structures: General Rules—Structural Fire Design. British Standards Institutions: London, UK, 2005.
  13. EN 1993-1-3 Eurocode 3; Design of Steel Structures: General Rules—Supplementary Rules for Cold-Formed Members and Sheeting. British Standards Institutions: London, UK, 2005.
  14. Rokilan, M.; Mahendran, M. Design of cold-formed steel columns subject to local buckling at elevated temperatures. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2021, 179, 106539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lian, Y.; Uzzaman, A.; Lim, J.B.; Abdelal, G.; Nash, D.; Young, B. Effect of web holes on web crippling strength of cold-formed steel channel sections under end-one-flange loading condition—Part I: Tests and finite element analysis. Thin-Walled Struct. 2016, 107, 443–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Uzzaman, A.; Lim, J.B.; Nash, D.; Rhodes, J.; Young, B. Cold-formed steel sections with web openings subjected to web crippling under two-flange loading conditions—Part I: Tests and finite element analysis. Thin-Walled Struct. 2012, 56, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Uzzaman, A.; Lim, J.B.; Nash, D.; Rhodes, J.; Young, B. Cold-formed steel sections with web openings subjected to web crippling under two-flange loading conditions—Part II: Parametric study and proposed design equations. Thin-Walled Struct. 2012, 56, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Uzzaman, A.; Lim, J.B.; Nash, D.; Rhodes, J.; Young, B. Web crippling behaviour of cold-formed steel channel sections with offset web holes subjected to interior-two-flange loading. Thin-Walled Struct. 2012, 50, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Uzzaman, A.; Lim, J.B.; Nash, D.; Young, B. Effects of edge-stiffened circular holes on the web crippling strength of cold-formed steel channel sections under one-flange loading conditions. Eng. Struct. 2017, 139, 96–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Uzzaman, A.; Lim, J.B.; Nash, D.; Roy, K. Cold-formed steel channel sections under end-two-flange loading condition: Design for edge-stiffened holes, unstiffened holes and plain webs. Thin-Walled Struct. 2020, 147, 106532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Uzzaman, A.; Lim, J.B.; Nash, D.; Roy, K. Web crippling behaviour of cold-formed steel channel sections with edge-stiffened and unstiffened circular holes under interior-two-flange loading condition. Thin-Walled Struct. 2020, 154, 106813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, B.; Roy, K.; Fang, Z.; Uzzaman, A.; Chi, Y.; Lim, J.B. Web crippling capacity of fastened cold-formed steel channels with edge-stiffened web holes, un-stiffened web holes and plain webs under two-flange loading. Thin-Walled Struct. 2021, 163, 107666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Janarthanan, B.; Mahendran, M.; Gunalan, S. Numerical modelling of web crippling failures in cold-formed steel unlipped channel sections. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2019, 158, 486–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Janarthanan, B.; Sundararajah, L.; Mahendran, M.; Keerthan, P.; Gunalan, S. Web crippling behaviour and design of cold-formed steel sections. Thin-Walled Struct. 2019, 140, 387–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gunalan, S.; Mahendran, M. Web crippling tests of cold-formed steel channels under two flange load cases. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2015, 110, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. AISI S100-16; North American Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members. American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI): Washington, DC, USA, 2016.
  27. Macdonald, M.; Heiyantuduwa, M. A design rule for web crippling of cold-formed steel lipped channel beams based on nonlinear FEA. Thin-Walled Struct. 2012, 53, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sudararajah, L.; Mahendran, M.; Keerthan, P. Web crippling experiments of high strength lipped channel beams under one-flange loading. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2017, 138, 851–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. ABAQUS. Analysis User’s Manual, Version 6.14-2; ABAQUS Inc.: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  30. Winful, D.A.; Cashell, K.A.; Afshan, S.; Barnes, A.M.; Pargeter, R.J. Elevated temperature material behaviour of high-strength steel. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.-Struct. Build. 2017, 170, 777–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Fang, Z.; Roy, K.; Ingham, J.M.; Lim, J.B. Assessment of end-two-flange web crippling strength of roll-formed aluminium alloy perforated channels by experimental testing, numerical simulation, and deep learning. Eng. Struct. 2022, 268, 114753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fang, Z.; Roy, K.; Chi, Y.; Chen, B. Finite element analysis and proposed design rules for cold-formed stainless steel channels with web holes under end-one-flange loading. Structures 2021, 34, 2876–2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fang, Z.; Roy, K.; Dai, Y.; Lim, J.B. Effect of web perforations on end-two-flange web crippling behaviour of roll-formed aluminium alloy unlipped channels through experimental test, numerical simulation and deep learning. Thin-Walled Struct. 2022, 179, 109489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kanthasamy, E.; Chandramohan, D.L.; Shanmuganathan, G.; Poologanathan, K.; Gatheeshgar, P.; Corradi, M.; Mcintosh, A. Web crippling behaviour of cold-formed high-strength steel unlipped channel beams under End-One-Flange load case. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 16, e01022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0; IBM Corp.: Armonk, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Web crippling failure at a reaction point.
Figure 1. Web crippling failure at a reaction point.
Buildings 13 00266 g001
Figure 2. Four loading cases for web crippling tests.
Figure 2. Four loading cases for web crippling tests.
Buildings 13 00266 g002
Figure 3. Test configuration.
Figure 3. Test configuration.
Buildings 13 00266 g003
Figure 4. Definition of symbols from the published experiments.
Figure 4. Definition of symbols from the published experiments.
Buildings 13 00266 g004
Figure 5. Specimen labelling.
Figure 5. Specimen labelling.
Buildings 13 00266 g005
Figure 6. Engineering stress-strain curves for steel S690QL from 20 to 800 °C from Winful et al. [30].
Figure 6. Engineering stress-strain curves for steel S690QL from 20 to 800 °C from Winful et al. [30].
Buildings 13 00266 g006
Figure 7. Meshing type in FE models.
Figure 7. Meshing type in FE models.
Buildings 13 00266 g007
Figure 8. Boundary conditions used in FE models.
Figure 8. Boundary conditions used in FE models.
Buildings 13 00266 g008
Figure 9. Ratio of r/t against web crippling strength.
Figure 9. Ratio of r/t against web crippling strength.
Buildings 13 00266 g009
Figure 10. Ratio of N/t against web crippling strength.
Figure 10. Ratio of N/t against web crippling strength.
Buildings 13 00266 g010
Figure 11. Ratio of h/t against web crippling strength.
Figure 11. Ratio of h/t against web crippling strength.
Buildings 13 00266 g011
Figure 12. Comparison of web crippling strength of unfastened and fastened flanges.
Figure 12. Comparison of web crippling strength of unfastened and fastened flanges.
Buildings 13 00266 g012
Figure 13. Web crippling strength against temperatures.
Figure 13. Web crippling strength against temperatures.
Buildings 13 00266 g013
Figure 14. Failure modes of specimen C150-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.4-FR under different temperatures.
Figure 14. Failure modes of specimen C150-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.4-FR under different temperatures.
Buildings 13 00266 g014
Figure 15. Strength reduction factor against a/h.
Figure 15. Strength reduction factor against a/h.
Buildings 13 00266 g015
Table 1. Coefficients for fastened and un-fastened channels under EOF load case [10].
Table 1. Coefficients for fastened and un-fastened channels under EOF load case [10].
CCrClCw
Un-fastened4.00.400.600.03
Fastened4.00.140.350.02
Table 2. Material properties of CFS S690QL steel grade [30].
Table 2. Material properties of CFS S690QL steel grade [30].
Temperature (°C)fy (MPa)E (MPa)
20739.3199,300
200702.335191,328
400687.549177,377
600487.938149,475
80081.32353,811
Table 3. Comparison of FEA results with the experimental investigations from Lian et al. [15] and Sundararajah et al. [28].
Table 3. Comparison of FEA results with the experimental investigations from Lian et al. [15] and Sundararajah et al. [28].
Specimen IDWebFlangeLipBend RadiusThicknessHole DiaBearing LengthYield StressExp.LoadFEA ResultPEXP/PFEA
dbfblrtaNfyPEXPPFEA
(mm)(mm)(mm)(mm)(mm)(mm)(mm)(MPa)(kN)(kN)
Sections with un-fastened flanges
110150.414.53.51.030255813.924.170.94
210151.115.641.520505409.6210.290.93
3151.461.319.64.51.520505318.758.980.97
4203.476.419.851.91010050612.3911.161.11
5203.877.72252.41010052620.0522.830.88
6142.759.7913.234.81.230100639.84.784.341.10
7142.0960.0713.344.81.250120639.85.414.771.13
8142.2260.0313.114.81.2355.17120639.84.664.321.08
9142.276013.264.81.2555.27120639.84.224.131.02
10142.1560.0613.274.81.240150639.85.565.031.11
11142.176013.164.81.2355.11150639.85.004.661.07
12202.0765.3714.8551.350120649.64.604.311.07
13202.0265.4214.7551.3579.34120649.63.894.230.92
14202.1365.414.7251.350150649.64.964.811.03
15202.0565.2214.8751.3579.4150649.64.374.331.01
16202.4165.2614.3151.3599.52150649.63.853.950.97
17303.4288.218.5651.90100670.67.927.501.06
18303.0488.1518.6751.9179.07100670.66.806.401.06
19302.3589.0818.6151.90120670.68.667.771.11
20303.6389.318.6251.989.58120670.68.629.490.91
21303.3788.8618.4551.90150670.68.818.101.09
22303.4789.7318.3851.9119.28150670.68.308.570.97
Average 1.02
Cov 0.07
Sections with fastened flanges
23142.1360.0613.174.81.270100639.87.076.981.01
24142.0660.0213.064.81.2755.27100639.86.796.641.02
25142.1860.1113.224.81.2555.18100639.85.686.180.92
26142.1760.1313.114.81.2455.29120639.87.086.811.04
27142.2759.9913.144.81.230150639.87.977.791.02
28142.2660.0913.214.81.2355.25150639.87.247.460.97
29202.0165.5714.5151.350100649.66.536.361.03
30202.0165.2214.8651.3579.34100649.66.396.021.06
31202.0265.3914.7151.350120649.67.116.741.05
3220265.4314.8451.3579.34120649.66.616.411.03
33201.665.4614.2451.3399.5120649.65.985.931.01
34202.0165.4514.7551.320150649.67.736.951.11
35202.0365.1814.7751.3379.37150649.67.126.731.06
36202.4365.4214.3651.3499.57150649.66.806.591.03
Average 1.03
Cov 0.04
Table 4. Geometric properties of FE models of channel sections with web openings.
Table 4. Geometric properties of FE models of channel sections with web openings.
Specimenh (mm)bf (mm)bl (mm)ri (mm)tw (mm)a (mm)N (mm)L (mm)
C100-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0-FR91.5502032.50.050474.5
C100-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.2-FR91.5502032.518.350474.5
C100-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.4-FR91.5502032.536.650474.5
C100-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.6-FR91.5502032.554.950474.5
C100-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.8-FR91.5502032.573.250474.5
C150-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0-FR141.5502032.50.050624.5
C150-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.2-FR141.5502032.528.350624.5
C150-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.4-FR141.5502032.556.650624.5
C150-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.6-FR141.5502032.584.950624.5
C150-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.8-FR141.5502032.5113.250624.5
C200-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0-FR191.5502032.50.050774.5
C200-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.2-FR191.5502032.538.350774.5
C200-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.4-FR191.5502032.576.650774.5
C200-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.6-FR191.5502032.5114.950774.5
C200-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.8-FR191.5502032.5153.250774.5
Table 5. Comparison of FEA results with current design standards.
Table 5. Comparison of FEA results with current design standards.
SpecimenUltimate Web Crippling Strength per Web (kN)Comparison
PFEAPASISI&AS/NZSPFEA/PAISI&AS/NZS
C100-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0-FR38.6131.301.22
C100-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.2-FR38.4930.461.26
C100-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.4-FR37.5029.301.22
C100-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.6-FR34.5927.001.25
C100-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.8-FR27.4824.711.11
C150-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0-FR29.8529.611.00
C150-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.2-FR29.1728.781.01
C150-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.4-FR27.2926.871.02
C150-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.6-FR24.8924.871.00
C150-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.8-FR23.4723.141.01
C200-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0-FR23.7328.200.84
C200-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.2-FR23.2027.490.84
C200-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.4-FR21.4325.570.83
C200-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.6-FR19.7424.030.82
C200-50-20-t2.5-N50-A0.8-FR16.5321.810.76
Average 1.01
COV 0.16
Table 6. Average strength reduction percentage (%) of investigated sections at elevated temperature against ambient temperature (T = 20 ℃).
Table 6. Average strength reduction percentage (%) of investigated sections at elevated temperature against ambient temperature (T = 20 ℃).
UnFastened FlangesFastened Flanges
TemperatureT = 20 ℃----
T = 200 ℃3.662.93
T = 400 ℃6.795.72
T = 600 ℃26.4922.46
T = 800 ℃83.1082.89
Table 7. Average strength reduction factor (R) of investigated sections.
Table 7. Average strength reduction factor (R) of investigated sections.
Unfastened FlangesFastened Flanges
a/h0.20.950.99
0.40.910.97
0.60.850.92
0.80.750.73
Table 8. Proposed equation coefficients for reduction factor (R).
Table 8. Proposed equation coefficients for reduction factor (R).
CoefficientFlanges Unfastened to SupportFlanges Fastened to Support
α0.9611.115
γ0.3170.411
λ0.120−0.017
Table 9. Comparison of proposed equations for strength reduction factor with other calculation methods for channel sections with unfastened flanges.
Table 9. Comparison of proposed equations for strength reduction factor with other calculation methods for channel sections with unfastened flanges.
SpecimenFailure Load without Web HolesReduction FactorsR/RAISI&AS/NZSR/Rprop
P0 (kN)R = Pw/P0RAISI&AS/NZSRprop
Channel sections at 20 °C
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.2-FR166.500.990.970.991.020.99
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.4-FR166.500.980.900.941.091.04
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.6-FR166.500.960.820.871.161.10
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.8-FR166.500.840.750.811.121.04
Average 1.101.04
COV 0.050.04
Channel sections at 200 °C
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.2-FR159.740.990.970.991.020.99
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.4-FR159.740.980.900.941.091.04
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.6-FR159.740.960.820.871.161.10
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.8-FR159.740.780.750.811.040.96
Average 1.081.02
COV 0.060.06
Channel sections at 400 °C
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.2-FR156.390.990.970.991.020.99
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.4-FR156.390.970.900.941.081.03
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.6-FR156.390.950.820.871.151.08
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.8-FR156.390.830.750.811.101.02
Average 1.091.03
COV 0.050.04
Channel sections at 600 °C
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.2-FR116.760.980.970.991.010.98
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.4-FR116.760.960.900.941.071.02
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.6-FR116.760.940.820.871.141.07
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.8-FR116.760.790.750.811.050.97
Average 1.071.01
COV 0.050.04
Channel sections at 800 °C
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.2-FR21.850.990.970.991.020.99
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.4-FR21.850.980.900.941.091.05
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.6-FR21.850.970.820.871.171.11
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.8-FR21.850.840.750.811.121.04
Average 1.11.05
COV 0.060.05
Table 10. Comparison of proposed equations for strength reduction factor (R) with other calculation methods for channel sections with fastened flanges.
Table 10. Comparison of proposed equations for strength reduction factor (R) with other calculation methods for channel sections with fastened flanges.
SpecimenFailure Load without Web HolesReduction FactorsR/RAISI&AS/NZSR/Rprop
P0 (kN)R = Pw/P0RAISI&AS/NZSRprop
Channel sections at 20 °C
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.2-FX216.100.980.970.991.010.96
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.4-FX216.100.980.900.941.091.05
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.6-FX216.100.950.820.851.151.11
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.8-FX216.100.730.750.770.970.95
Average 1.051.02
COV 0.070.07
Channel sections at 200 °C
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.2-FX209.140.980.970.991.010.96
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.4-FX209.140.980.900.941.091.05
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.6-FX209.140.950.820.851.151.11
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.8-FX209.140.720.750.770.960.93
Average 1.051.01
COV 0.080.08
Channel sections at 400 °C
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.2-FX204.900.980.970.991.010.96
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.4-FX204.900.980.900.941.091.05
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.6-FX204.900.950.820.851.151.11
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.8-FX204.900.720.750.770.960.93
Average 1.051.01
COV 0.080.08
Channel sections at 600 °C
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.2-FX158.900.980.970.991.010.96
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.4-FX158.900.980.900.941.091.05
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.6-FX158.900.950.820.851.151.11
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.8-FX158.900.690.750.770.920.89
Average 1.041.00
COV 0.090.09
Channel sections at 800 °C
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.2-FX32.270.970.970.990.990.95
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.4-FX32.270.960.900.941.071.02
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.6-FX32.270.890.820.851.081.04
C100-50-20-t6-N75-A0.8-FX32.270.610.750.770.810.79
Average 0.990.95
COV 0,130.11
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fang, Z.; Roy, K.; Chandramohan, D.L.; Yousefi, A.; Al-Radhi, Y.; Lim, J.B.P. End-One-Flange Web Crippling Behavior of Cold-Formed High-Strength Steel Channels with Web Holes at Elevated Temperatures. Buildings 2023, 13, 266. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020266

AMA Style

Fang Z, Roy K, Chandramohan DL, Yousefi A, Al-Radhi Y, Lim JBP. End-One-Flange Web Crippling Behavior of Cold-Formed High-Strength Steel Channels with Web Holes at Elevated Temperatures. Buildings. 2023; 13(2):266. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020266

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fang, Zhiyuan, Krishanu Roy, Dinesh Lakshmanan Chandramohan, Amirmohammad Yousefi, Yazeed Al-Radhi, and James B. P. Lim. 2023. "End-One-Flange Web Crippling Behavior of Cold-Formed High-Strength Steel Channels with Web Holes at Elevated Temperatures" Buildings 13, no. 2: 266. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020266

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop