# Finite Fracture Mechanics Assessment in Moderate and Large Scale Yielding Regimes

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

_{c}(G

_{c}$\propto $ K

_{Ic}

^{2}, K

_{Ic}being the fracture toughness) or the tensile strength σ

_{u}, respectively. The crack advance l results to be a function of K

_{Ic}and σ

_{u}, and more in general it becomes a structural parameter in the case of coupled criteria, i.e., when the energy and stress conditions are coupled together [5,6]. It is worthwhile to mention that under the small scale yielding regime, the generalized stress intensity factor (GSIF, governing the asymptotic expansions of both the stress field and the SIF related to a virtual crack stemming from the notch tip providing the crack driving force) results to be the dominating failure parameter: Fracture can thus be supposed to take place when it reaches its critical value, also known as generalized (or notch) fracture toughness.

_{u}obtained by tensile testing hourglass-shape samples can be lower than the real one σ

_{0}. The ratio σ

_{0}/σ

_{u}can vary sensibly from material to material. Taylor [1] observed by fitting the value of σ

_{0}through the simple point stress criterion that the ratio σ

_{0}/σ

_{u}approaches the unit value for ceramics, it is comprised between one and two for polymers, and can be sensibly larger (even up to eight) for metals. Of course, in this latter case, it is difficult to refer to σ

_{0}as a tensile strength, and some attempts to provide a clear physical/mechanics were recently put forward [7]. It should be also mentioned that in order to avoid the problems raised when dealing with plain specimens, Seweryn [3,4] decided to test blunt notched samples where the root radius was large enough to provide a nearly constant stress field: The maximum tensile stress at the notch tip was estimated equal to σ

_{0.}

_{0}was estimated through a fitting procedure on the stress criterion, namely through the intersection point of the failure stress fields for a blunt and a sharp notched structure. Finally, it was concluded that prediction accuracy slightly increased by using a numerical elasto-plastic analysis, but not so much to justify the huge computational effort.

_{0}was evaluated through the Equivalent Material Concept (EMC) theory proposed by Torabi [15]. Once the fracture toughness K

_{Ic}is fixed, the EMC idea is to compare the behaviour of a ductile material with that of a virtual brittle material possessing a different tensile strength σ

_{0}. Its values are determined by considering identical values for the strain energy density (i.e., the area below the stress-strain curve) required by the ductile material under investigation and by the virtual brittle one. In formulae:

_{Y}is the yield strength, E is the Young’s modulus, K is the strain-hardening coefficient, n is the strain-hardening exponent, and ε

_{u}is the true plastic strain at maximum load. Thus, differently from the previous approaches where σ

_{0}was no more than a fitting parameter

_{,}according to EMC it recovers a precise physical meaning, and its value can be determined starting from the real experimental properties. More recently also the strain energy density (SED) criterion [2] has been exploited and applied to the experimental results as before [16,17].

## 2. FFM Criteria

_{I}(c) is the SIF related to a crack of length c stemming from the notch root (Figure 1). An analytical relationship for the function K

_{I}(c) was proposed by Sapora et al. [27]

_{y}(x) together with the material tensile strength σ

_{u}. It can be either a punctual requirement, ${\sigma}_{y}\left(x\right)\hspace{0.17em}\ge \hspace{0.17em}{\sigma}_{u}\hspace{0.17em}$ for $0\le x\le l\hspace{0.17em}$, which can be expressed as [5]

_{c}, and the apparent generalized fracture toughness ${K}_{Ic}^{V,\rho}$ (i.e., the failure load).

_{Ic}, σ

_{u}) and a given geometry (ω, ρ), the critical crack advancement ${l}_{\hspace{0.17em}c}$ can be evaluated from the former equation in (14). This value must then be inserted into the latter equation to obtain the apparent generalized fracture toughness ${K}_{Ic}^{V,\rho}$.

^{®}code is less than 5 s for each geometry, showing the potentiality of the present semi-analytical approach.

## 3. Comparison with Experimental Results

_{Ic}was derived experimentally, the tensile strength σ

_{u}was obtained through the EMC by means of Equation (1) (and thus the parameter is re-termed as σ

_{0}, Section 1): Table 2 reports the values implemented in the present analysis taken from [12,13]. The ratio σ

_{0}/σ

_{u}is equal to 3.16 for Al 7075-T6 and to 3.65 for Al 6061-T6, reflecting the fact failure of the samples made of Al 6061-T6 involved a larger amount of plasticity.

_{ch}≈ 0.73 mm for Al7075-T6, and l

_{ch}≈ 1.3 mm for Al6061-T6. It can be seen that the apparent generalized fracture toughness increases as the radius increases and/or the angle decreases. Thus, the cracked configuration is the most affected one by the presence of a radius ρ ≠ 0. As concerns the crack advance l

_{c}, it results a function of the material (through l

_{ch}) and of the radius, tending to 2/(π·1.12

^{2}) as ρ tends to infinite (smooth elements): From Figure 7 it can be seen that the values related to the crack case (ω = 0°) are the lowest ones for non-negligible radii. The analytical expressions for ${K}_{Ic}^{V}$ and l

_{c}when ρ = 0 (sharp case) can be found in [6].

## 4. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Taylor, D. The Theory of Critical Distances: A New Perspective in Fracture Mechanics; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Lazzarin, P.; Zambardi, R. A Finite-volume-energy based approach to predict the static and fatigue behaviour of components with sharp V-shaped notches. Int. J. Fract.
**2002**, 112, 275–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Seweryn, A.; Lukaszewicz, A. Verification of brittle fracture criteria for elements with V-shaped notches. Engng. Fract. Mech.
**2002**, 69, 1487–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Seweryn, A. Brittle fracture criterion for structures with sharp notches. Eng. Fract. Mech.
**1994**, 47, 673–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Leguillon, D. Strength or toughness? A criterion for crack onset at a notch. Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids
**2002**, 21, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Carpinteri, A.; Cornetti, P.; Pugno, N.; Sapora, A.; Taylor, D. Generalized fracture toughness for specimens with re-entrant corners: Experiments vs. theoretical predictions. Struct. Eng. Mech.
**2009**, 32, 609–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sapora, A.; Firrao, D. Finite fracture mechanics predictions on the apparent fracture toughness of as-quenched Charpy V-type AISI 4340 steel specimens. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct.
**2017**, 40, 949–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Susmel, L.; Taylor, D. On the use of the theory of critical distances to predict static failures in ductile metallic materials containing different geometrical features. Eng. Fract. Mech.
**2008**, 75, 4410–4421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Madrazo, V.; Cicero, S.; Carrascal, I.A. On the Point Method and the Line Method notch effect predictions in Al7075-T651. Eng. Fract. Mech.
**2012**, 79, 363–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cicero, S.; Fuentes, J.D.; Procopio, I.; Madrazo, V.; González, P. Critical distance default values for structural steels and a simple formulation to estimate the apparent fracture toughness in U-notched conditions. Metals
**2018**, 8, 871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Torabi, A.R.; Alaei, M. Mixed-mode ductile failure analysis of V-notched Al 7075-T6 thin sheets. Eng. Fract. Mech.
**2015**, 150, 70–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Torabi, A.R.; Habibi, R.; Hosseini, B.M. On the ability of the Equivalent Material Concept in predicting ductile failure of U-notches under moderate- and large-scale yielding conditions. Phys. Mesomech.
**2015**, 18, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Torabi, A.R.; Alaei, M. Application of the equivalent material concept to ductile failure prediction of blunt V-notches encountering moderate-scale yielding. Int. J. Damage Mech.
**2016**, 25, 853–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Torabi, A.R.; Keshavarzian, M. Tensile crack initiation from a blunt V-notch border in ductile plates in the presence of large plasticity at the notch vicinity. Int. J. Terraspace Sci. Eng.
**2016**, 8, 93–101. [Google Scholar] - Torabi, A.R. Estimation of tensile load-bearing capacity of ductile metallic materials weakened by a V-notch: The equivalent material concept. Mater. Sci. Eng. A
**2012**, 536, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Torabi, A.R.; Berto, F.; Campagnolo, A. Elastic-plastic fracture analysis of notched Al 7075-T6 plates by means of the local energy combined with the equivalent material concept. Phys. Mesomech.
**2016**, 19, 204–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fuentes, J.D.; Cicero, S.; Berto, F.; Torabi, A.R.; Madrazo, V.; Azizi, P. Estimation of Fracture Loads in AL7075-T651 Notched Specimens Using the Equivalent Material Concept Combined with the Strain Energy Density Criterion and with the Theory of Critical Distances. Metals
**2018**, 8, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Muñoz-Reja, M.; Távara, L.; Mantič, V.; Cornetti, P. Crack onset and propagation at fibre–matrix elastic interfaces under biaxial loading using finite fracture mechanics. Compos. Part. A
**2016**, 82, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cornetti, P.; Sapora, A.; Carpinteri, A. Short cracks and V-notches: Finite Fracture Mechanics vs. Cohesive Crack Model. Eng. Fract. Mech.
**2016**, 168, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cornetti, P.; Muñoz-Reja, M.; Sapora, A.; Carpinteri, A. Finite fracture mechanics and cohesive crack model: Weight functions vs. cohesive laws. Int. J. Solid Struct.
**2019**, 156–157, 126–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Doitrand, A.; Estevez, R.; Leguillon, D. Comparison between cohesive zone and coupled criterion modeling of crack initiation in rhombus hole specimens under quasi-static compression. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech.
**2019**, 99, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Felger, J.; Stein, N.; Becker, W. Mixed-mode fracture in open-hole composite plates of finite-width: An asymptotic coupled stress and energy approach. Int. J. Solid. Struct.
**2017**, 122–123, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sapora, A.; Cornetti, P. Crack onset and propagation stability from a circular hole under biaxial loading. Int. J. Fract.
**2019**, 214, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Doitrand, A.; Leguillon, D. 3D application of the coupled criterion to crack initiation prediction in epoxy/aluminum specimens under four point bending. Int. J. Solids Struct.
**2018**, 143, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Stein, N.; Weißgraeber, P.; Becker, W. A model for brittle failure in adhesive lap joints of arbitrary joint configuration. Compos. Struct.
**2015**, 133, 707–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Felger, J.; Rosendahl, P.L.; Leguillon, D.; Becker, W. Predicting crack patterns at bi-material junctions: A coupled stress and energy approach. Int. J. Solids Struct.
**2019**, 164, 191–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sapora, A.; Cornetti, P.; Carpinteri, A. Cracks at rounded V-notch tips: An analytical expression for the stress intensity factor. Int. J. Fract.
**2014**, 187, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Carpinteri, A.; Cornetti, P.; Sapora, A. Brittle failures at rounded V-notches: A finite fracture mechanics approach. Int. J. Fract.
**2011**, 172, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Filippi, S.; Lazzarin, P.; Tovo, R. Developments of some explicit formulas useful to describe elastic stress fields ahead of notches in plates. Int. J. Solid. Struct.
**2002**, 39, 4543–4565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 1.**Blunt V-notch geometry. The presence of a “virtual” crack of length c stemming from the notch tip is also depicted.

**Figure 2.**U-notched structures (ω = 0°), apparent fracture toughness: Predictions by punctual FFM (dashed line) and average FFM (continuous line) related to experimental data on Al 7075-T6 plates (circles) and on Al 6061-T6 plates (triangles).

**Figure 3.**Blunt V-notched structures (ω = 30°), apparent generalized fracture toughness: Predictions by punctual FFM (dashed line) and average FFM (continuous line) related to experimental data on Al 7075-T6 plates (circles) and on Al 6061-T6 plates (triangles).

**Figure 4.**Blunt V-notched structures (ω = 60°), apparent generalized fracture toughness: Predictions by punctual FFM (dashed line) and average FFM (continuous line) related to experimental data on Al 7075-T6 plates (circles) and on Al 6061-T6 plates (triangles).

**Figure 5.**Blunt V-notched structures (ω = 90°), apparent generalized fracture toughness: Predictions by punctual FFM (dashed line) and average FFM (continuous line) related to experimental data on Al 7075-T6 plates (circles) and on Al 6061-T6 plates (triangles).

**Figure 6.**Average FFM predictions: Percentage discrepancy with respect to experimental data referring to blunt V-notched structures made of Al 7075-T6 (circles), and made of Al 6061-T6 (triangles).

**Figure 7.**Average FFM: Dimensionless apparent generalized fracture toughness (

**a**) and dimensionless critical crack extension (

**b**) compared to dimensionless notch root radius.

ω | λ | β | η | μ | m |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

0° | 0.5000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | −0.5000 | 1.820 |

30° | 0.5015 | 1.005 | 1.034 | −0.4561 | 1.473 |

60° | 0.5122 | 1.017 | 0.9699 | −0.4057 | 1.338 |

90° | 0.5445 | 1.059 | 0.8101 | −0.3449 | 1.314 |

Material | Al 7075-T6 | Al 6061-T6 |
---|---|---|

K_{Ic} (MPa √m) | 50 | 38 |

σ_{0} (MPa) | 1845 | 1066 |

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Torabi, A.R.; Berto, F.; Sapora, A.
Finite Fracture Mechanics Assessment in Moderate and Large Scale Yielding Regimes. *Metals* **2019**, *9*, 602.
https://doi.org/10.3390/met9050602

**AMA Style**

Torabi AR, Berto F, Sapora A.
Finite Fracture Mechanics Assessment in Moderate and Large Scale Yielding Regimes. *Metals*. 2019; 9(5):602.
https://doi.org/10.3390/met9050602

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Torabi, Ali Reza, Filippo Berto, and Alberto Sapora.
2019. "Finite Fracture Mechanics Assessment in Moderate and Large Scale Yielding Regimes" *Metals* 9, no. 5: 602.
https://doi.org/10.3390/met9050602