Next Article in Journal
Phylogenetic Analysis of the Genus Planaphrodes Hamilton (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Aphrodinae) Based on Morphological Characteristics, with Revision of Species from China, Korea and Japan
Previous Article in Journal
Vertical Transmission of Zika Virus by Florida Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of the Chinese White Wax Scale Insect, Ericerus pela Chavannes (Hemiptera: Coccidae), with Novel Gene Arrangement and Truncated tRNA Genes

1
Institute of Highland Forest Science, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Kunming 650224, China
2
College of Biology and Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
3
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kunming University, Kunming 650214, China
4
Institute of Plant Protection, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
5
Key Laboratory of Breeding and Utilization of Resource Insects of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Kunming 650224, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2023, 14(3), 290; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030290
Submission received: 12 January 2023 / Revised: 13 March 2023 / Accepted: 14 March 2023 / Published: 16 March 2023

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Ericerus pela Chavannes (Hemiptera: Coccoidea) is one of the most economically valuable resource insects in China. Its mitochondrial genome provides essential information for the molecular identification and genetic study of this species. In this paper, we assembled the mitochondrial genome of E. pela. Gene rearrangement analysis showed that compared to other scale insects, E. pela’s atp6, atp8, and a few tRNAs were obviously rearranged. Moreover, there were nine tRNAs identified to have obvious truncated structures. Synteny analysis based on the whole mitochondrial genomes showed that a significant rearrangement of homologous blocks had occurred within this Coccoidea species. The results revealed great variations in the intergenic regions among Coccoidea species and novel gene arrangement and truncated tRNA genes in the mitochondrial genome of E. pela.

Abstract

The Chinese white wax scale insect, Ericerus pela Chavannes (Hemiptera: Coccidae), is one of the scale insects with great economic value and has been dispersed and reared in China for over one thousand years. Its mitochondrial genome provides essential information for the molecular identification and genetic study of this species. We assembled the complete mitochondrial genome of E. pela based on PacBio sequencing and analyzed its genomic features. The genome was 17,766 bp in length with 13 protein-coding genes, 22 tRNAs, and two rRNA genes. The analysis results showed E. pela had significant gene rearrangements involving tRNAs compared with other Coccoidea species. Furthermore, E. pela’s nine tRNAs were identified to have obvious truncated structures. The phylogenetic tree compiled of the species showed a long branch of the Coccoidea lineage, which indicated the high evolutionary rate in this group. Our study revealed the mitochondrial characteristics of E. pela and enriched the mitochondrial genetic information on Coccoidea species. It also determined the occurrence of gene rearrangement for the species in this superfamily.

1. Introduction

The scale insects from the superfamily Coccoidea of Hemiptera feed on plant sap with their piercing–sucking mouthparts [1,2]. As reflected in their common name, scale insects always possess a protective cover or a cuticle “scale” such as a waxy layer secreted during the insect’s lifecycle [3,4,5]. The superfamily Coccoidea comprises 36 families containing approximately 8000 species [6,7,8,9]. All of these species can be informally divided into the monophyletic neococcoids and the uncertain archaeococcoids [10].
Compared to the nuclear genome, the mitochondrial genome has been seen as an ideal research system due to its smaller genome size, comparably stable gene composition, and higher evolutionary rate [11]. Moreover, mitochondrial genomics has been applied in fields of study including biogeography, molecular evolution, hybridization, and especially, phylogenetics [11,12]. However, for the group of hemipteran insects containing more than 83,000 species, just hundreds of complete mitochondrial genomes have been reported [13]. As of May 2022, only ten nuclear genomes (eight were preliminary assemblies without annotations) and nine complete mitochondrial genomes (only three have complete gene annotations) of Coccoidea have been released on the NCBI [1,2,14]. Furthermore, for the Coccidae group (soft-scale insects), the complete mitochondrial genomes published on PubMed exist only for Ceroplastes japonicus [15] and Saissetia coffeae [16]. Clearly, more molecular information on scale insects is needed to understand the evolution of their mitochondrial genomes.
Most Coccoidea species are agriculture and forestry pests, except for very few species with a high economic value, such as the Chinese white wax scale insect Ericerus pela (Chavannes, 1848) [17]. Previous work has related to E. pela’s use in biological research, molecular research, and the popularization of relevant applications [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Regarding its breeding history, people initially started to collect white wax as early as approximately the 3rd century AD in China [26]. The wax produced by insects is an important commodity that has been widely applied in cosmetics, Chinese traditional medicine, the manufacturing industry (e.g., automotive and furniture manufacture), and the printing industry for more than one thousand years [27,28]. In addition, compared to other wax products, Chinese white wax has the highest content of long-chain alcohols (hexacosanol, tetracosanol, triacontanol, and policosanol), which have been widely applied in the pharmaceutical industry. For instance, tetracosanol is a raw pharmaceutical material used for treating hypercholesteremia, and policosanol is often used to lower cholesterol and triglyceride levels [29].
However, we still lacked molecular information on E. pela for the further detection of its phylogenetic affiliation. There has been an increasing trend in observing hemipteran species’ mitochondrial gene rearrangements, which has involved species belonging to Aleyrodoidea, Coccoidea, and Fulgoroidea [30,31]. Moreover, for the only two published mitochondrial genomes of the Coccidae family, both C. japonicus [15] and S. coffeae [16] have identified tRNAs with truncated secondary structures. Whether E. pela’s mitochondrial genome had these specific features still remained uncertain. Considering these unsolved scientific questions, it was suitable for us to comprehensively investigate E. pela’s mitochondrial genome to find out its genetic variations to not only other scale insect species but also outgroup insect species.
In this study, we assembled the complete mitochondrial genome of E. pela and conducted a phylogenetic analysis for related hemipteran insects. This study has great significance for determining E. pela’s phylogenetic position and revealing comprehensive genetic differences between scale insects and other insects.

2. Methods

2.1. Sample Preparation and DNA Extraction

We used male adults of E. pela reared at the Institute of Highland Forest Science in Kunming City (25°05′ N, 102°72′ E), Yunnan Province, for the mitochondrial genome sequencing. About 30 male adults were collected for DNA extraction.
The samples were first processed with double distilled water and liquid nitrogen. After preliminary lysis with lysis buffer (Tris-HCl, [EDTA]-2Na, guanidine hydrochloride, and NaCl), proteinase K, and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), the sample was incubated at 56 °C (for 45 min). Then, genomic DNA was extracted by isopropyl alcohol (Tris-phenol, chloroform, and isoamyl alcohol) precipitation by centrifugation at 4700 rpm (10 min). After transferring the supernatant into a new tube, the isolation step was repeated another time. Isopropyl alcohol was added to obtain a DNA precipitate. A concentration of 70% (v/v) ethanol was added to wash the obtained DNA precipitate. After removing the ethanol, the DNA precipitate was dissolved with Tris-EDTA. RNase A was used for RNA degradation. DNA concentration was determined using a Qubit fluorometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was used to detect DNA quality [19]. The samples were highly qualified for the next library construction.

2.2. Library Construction and Sequencing

The genomic DNA of E. pela was disrupted and fragments of 13–16 Kb were selected. The two ends of each fragment were ligated with a single string circle to form an SMRTbell. The PacBio HiFi library was constructed.
The library was sequenced on the PacBio platform. The obtained data were processed for the next genome assembly.

2.3. Genome Assembly

The PacBio sequencing data were trimmed as follows: (1) Remove adapter contamination; (2) remove low-quality reads; and (3) remove reads with a certain proportion of Ns (5% as default) [32]. Subreads were filtered to obtain circular consensus sequence reads. To assemble the mitochondrial genome of E. pela, four conserved mitochondrial gene fragments, which included three cytochrome c oxidase genes (cox1, cox2, cox3) and one cytochrome b reductase gene (cob), were used to filter the PacBio circular consensus sequence reads. Then, the filtered mitochondrial circular consensus sequence reads were used for mitochondrial genome assembly with Racon and Miniasm [33,34,35].

2.4. Mitochondrial Genome Annotation

Protein-coding genes (PCGs), rRNA, and tRNA genes were annotated by using the MFannot webserver (https://megasun.bch.umontreal.ca/apps/mfannot/, accessed on 20 April 2022) and the MITOS webserver (with the advanced setting of the protein prediction method used by Al Arab et al. [36]) (http://mitos2.bioinf.uni-leipzig.de/index.py, accessed on 20 April 2022). Intergenic spacer sequences and gene overlap were obtained through manual curation. The complete mitochondrial genome circular map was made by using the webserver Proksee (https://proksee.ca/, accessed on 20 April 2022).

2.5. Gene Component and Structural Analysis

The secondary structures of the 13 tRNA genes were predicted with the MITOS webserver. The remaining nine tRNA genes could be roughly predicted by the sequence alignment depicted by the RNA Folding Form V2.3 of the UNAFold webserver (http://www.unafold.org/mfold/applications/rna-folding-form-v2.php, accessed on 20 April 2022), since these tRNAs could not be depicted by either the MITOS webserver or the tRNAscan-SE search server. The relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) of the protein-coding genes of E. pela was analyzed by using the software CodonW (v1.4.2) (https://codonw.sourceforge.net/, accessed on 20 April 2022). The base composition skew was analyzed by manual calculation. The calculations were performed according to the formula GC skew = [G − C]/[G + C] and the formula AT skew = [A − T]/[A + T] [37].

2.6. Phylogenetic Analysis

The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the 13 mitochondrial PCGs’ amino acid sequences of 15 hemipteran species (Table 1). Among the 15 hemipteran species, fourteen species were all from Homoptera, which comprised four species chosen from within the superfamily Coccoidea, three species chosen from within the superfamily Psylloidea, three species chosen from within the superfamily Aphidoidea, three species chosen from within the superfamily Aleyrodoidea, and one species selected from the superfamily Cicadoidea. Moreover, except for the Cicadoidea species Magicicada tredecassini, which belongs to the suborder Auchenorrhyncha, the other 13 species were all from the suborder Sternorrhyncha. The heteropteran species Lethocerus deyrollei was selected as the outgroup. All the complete mitochondrial genomes of the species mentioned above were downloaded from the NCBI.
Amino acid sequence alignment was performed in MUSCLE [38] (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/muscle/, accessed on 20 April 2022) with the default parameters. The alignment results were manually converted to the FASTA format feasible for the construction of the phylogenetic tree and then imported into the IQ-TREE webserver [39] (http://iqtree.cibiv.univie.ac.at/, accessed on 20 April 2022). The model was calculated by the application “model selection” in IQ-TREE and the one with the lowest score of the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) was adopted in the study. The model applied in the interspecies phylogenetic analysis was “mtZOA+F+I+G4”. The phylogenetic test was performed using the bootstrap method after setting the number of bootstrap replications to be 1000. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood (ML) statistical method.

2.7. Gene Rearrangement Analysis

The annotated mitochondrial genomes of Didesmococcus koreanus (Hemiptera: Coccidae), Aclerda takahashii (Hemiptera: Aclerdidae), Saissetia coffeae (Hemiptera: Coccidae), E. pela (Hemiptera: Coccidae), Aphis glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae), and Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae) were selected for gene rearrangement analysis. The GenBank files of the selected species that contained information on the mitochondrial gene orders were downloaded from the NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 20 April 2022); the situation of the rearrangements that had taken place within the species was organized according to the GenBank files.

2.8. Synteny Analysis

Synteny analysis was carried out with E. pela and the nine Coccoidea species whose genomes had been released by the NCBI (Table 2). The mitochondrial genome data of the nine Coccoidea species were downloaded from the NCBI. After importing the sequences into the software in FASTA format, the analysis was performed at the nucleic acid level with Mauve (v2.1.1) (https://darlinglab.org/mauve/mauve.html, accessed on 20 April 2022) with the default parameters.

3. Results

3.1. General Genomic Features

The complete mitochondrial genome of E. pela assembled with PacBio reads was 17,766 bp in length (GenBank accession number: ON055488). The base composition was 38.78% A, 49.43% T, 4.00% C, and 7.79% G. It had an overall G+C content of 11.79%. From the annotation result, this complete mitochondrial genome contained 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 22 transfer RNA genes (tRNAs), two ribosomal RNA genes (rRNAs), and one control region (CR) (Figure 1).
The 13 annotated PCGs included the three cytochrome c oxidase (cox) genes cox1, cox2, and cox3, one cytochrome b reductase gene cob, two ATP synthase synthesis genes atp6 and atp8, and seven NADH dehydrogenase genes nad1, nad2, nad3, nad4, nad4L, nad5, and nad6.
In addition to the 13 PCGs, there were 24 essential genes without coding protein in the mitochondrial genome, which included 22 transfer RNA genes and two ribosomal RNA genes (rrnL and rrnS). Specifically, only 13 tRNA genes were identified and depicted by either the MITOS webserver or the tRNAscan-SE search server (Table 3).
There were six overlaps between 12 adjacent genes varying from 1 bp to 41 bp; the overlaps were 86 bp in total. Only one control region (CR) was located between trnM and atp8, which contained a possible intergenic spacer region.

3.2. Gene Rearrangement

According to the gene rearrangement analysis results, three (D. koreanus, S. coffeae, and A. takahashii) of the four scale insects had a general conserved gene order, except for some tRNAs between rrnS-nad6 and nad5-nad3. For the four Coccoidea species, we marked the three most conserved gene regions with black lines (nad1-nad2, nad6-nad5, and nad3-cox1) and the three most divergent regions of E. pela with red arrows (Figure 2). As the representative hemipteran species and the model species of insect, the gene orders of A. glycines and D. melanogaster were used to make a comparison. In general, the gene rearrangement of E. pela occurred in three regions: for the obvious insertions between rrnS-nad1; for the deletion between nad5-nad3; and between cox1-trnL1. Moreover, though E. pela had a generally conserved gene order of PCGs, atp8, which was dramatically moved to a position between trnY and trnL1, became the most significant difference among the six listed species, while in the other three Coccoidea species and even in A. glycines and D. melanogaster, atp8 and atp6 were adjacent genes. Furthermore, it was clear that the three generally conserved regions of Coccoidea insects were not available for A. glycines and D. melanogaster, which meant it was comparatively far away in phylogenetic distance between Coccoidea and Diptera. Additionally, even in the Hemiptera order, there already existed significant divergent within species.

3.3. Protein-Coding Genes and Codon Usage

The total length of the 13 PCGs was 10,686 bp, accounting for 60.15% of the whole genome. The A + T content of all PCGs was 87.92%. The A + T content and sequence length of each PCG varied distinctly, but the 13 PCGs all had an A + T content higher than 80%. The lowest A + T content value was found for the cox1 gene (81.57%) and the highest value was found for the nad6 gene (93.29%). Among these 13 PCGs, the atp8 gene was the shortest, at 192 bp in length, while the nad5 gene was the longest, at 1632 bp.
All the exons in the 13 PCGs of E. pela (except for stop codons) encoded a total of 3806 amino acids. There were two types of codons initiating transcription. The main one was ATN codons for all the PCGs (12 PCGs in total) except for atp8 and the other one was AGA, which initiated the atp8 gene.
Regarding the overall statistics of relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU), tyrosine (Tyr), isoleucine (Ile) and phenylalanine (Phe) could be the most common amino acids in the whole mitochondrial genome. Ile accounted for the largest proportion (17.87%), followed by Tyr (16.76%) and Phe (12.74%), while glutamine (Gln) accounted for the smallest proportion (0.3%). Representing all the codons, UAU of Tyr, AUU of Ile, and UUU of Phe were the codons with the highest frequencies (Figure 3).

3.4. rRNAs and tRNAs

The mitochondrial genome of E. pela had two adjacent ribosomal RNA genes, which included a small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (rrnS) and a large subunit ribosomal RNA gene (rrnL). The lengths of the two ribosomal genes were 599 bp and 733 bp, with A + T content for rrnS of 85.81% and for rrnL of 87.03%.
There were 22 tRNA genes in the whole mitochondrial genome, which comprised 13 tRNA genes identified by MITOS (http://mitos2.bioinf.uni-leipzig.de/index.py, accessed on 20 April 2022) and nine truncated tRNA genes recognized by aligning homologous sequences with E. pela’s mitochondrial genome through DNAMAN (v7.0) (https://www.lynnon.com/dnaman.html, accessed on 20 April 2022). In total, 20 standard amino acids were conveyed by all the 22 tRNAs. For the 13 identified genes, only four tRNAs (trnK, trnL2, trnM, and trnI) exhibited a typical cloverleaf secondary structure, which contained four arms and one loop. In addition to these four ordinary tRNAs, the remaining tRNAs all had irregular secondary structures that lacked specific arms (Figure 4).

3.5. Phylogenetic Analysis

In the phylogenetic analysis, the 13 species were clustered into four groups that exactly represented the four hemipteran superfamilies of the suborder Sternorrhyncha (Coccoidea, Aphidoidea, Aleyrodoidea, and Psylloidea). The Aphidoidea superfamily formed a sister group with the Coccoidea superfamily, which meant that the two superfamilies had a close genetic relationship. Compared with the other three hemipteran superfamilies, it was clear that the superfamily Psylloidea has a closer genetic relationship with the suborder Auchenorrhyncha, which also meant that the suborder Sternorrhyncha has a relatively more distant relationship with the suborder Heteroptera than the suborder Auchenorrhyncha (Figure 5). Obviously, the suborder Heteroptera represented by L. deyrollei had the farthest phylogenetic distance with the Coccoidea superfamily.

3.6. Synteny Analysis

The synteny analysis showed that the total number of homologous blocks in these 10 Coccoidea species varied from 3 (Drosicha corpulenta) to 13 (S. coffeae) (Figure 6). The homologous blocks of each species exhibited significant distinctions in both size and relative position. C. japonicus and C. rubens exhibited an entire synteny relationship regarding their homologous blocks, while the other species all showed a certain extent of rearrangement of homologous blocks. In particular, E. pela had six homologous blocks in all, among which four homologous blocks were in common with C. japonicus. Additionally, C. rubens and A. takahashii both had four homologous blocks in common with E. pela.

4. Discussion

4.1. High A + T Bias

For insect mitochondrial genomes, it is common to have a significant A−T bias in the entire nucleotide’s composition. According to this phenomenon, scientists have proposed that since A–T base pairs have a lower nitrogen requirement than C–G base pairs, this significant A−T bias of the scale insect could reflect a possible adaptation to the lack of nitrogen during long evolutionary processes [16]. Because the plant sap absorbed by the insect could be nitrogen-deficient, after a long evolutionary process, the scale insect could have formed an A:T pair bias. The nine previously Coccoidea mitochondrial genomes from the NCBI contained A + T contents ranging from 82.54% (D. koreanus NC_057479) to 87.52% (C. rubens MT677923) (Table 2). E. pela had an extremely biased A + T content of 88.21%, higher than all the other nine Coccoidea species, which indicated an adaptation to a significantly high requirement for nitrogen. This was in accordance with the existence of symbiotic fungi, which could also serve as a nitrogen provider in vivo E. pela [18].
In our study, both nad3 and nad6 had extremely high A + T contents (90.06% and 93.29%, respectively) (Table 3) and were originally missed by BLAST-p (they were successfully predicted by the Al Arab et al. method afterwards, which adopted hidden Markov models (HMMs) exhibiting greater phylogenetic awareness). Our study provided another successful precedent for predicting genes with high A + T contents [16,40,41].

4.2. tRNA

Significantly, only 13 tRNAs were successfully predicted in the annotation procedure while the other nine tRNAs were obtained through the multiple alignments with other homologous sequences. Most significantly, most tRNAs contained truncated sequences that would have resulted in their irregular secondary structures, without a regular dihydrouridine/ribothimidine arm (T/D-arm) or acceptor stem. Furthermore, this was not a specific event only observed in E. pela. The first two reports about Coccoidea species’ mitochondria found similar tRNA truncation in both C. japonicus and S. coffeae [15,16]. In fact, this tRNA truncation phenomenon was first illustrated in other metazoan species, such as arachnids, nematodes, and mites [42]. Although these tRNAs are truncated, their function could still be supported and complemented by cytoplasmic tRNAs and some transcription factors [43,44,45]. For example, a report about nematode mitochondria showed that an evolved extra elongation factor EF-Tu [46] could assist with the interaction between truncated tRNAs and conventional EF-Tu. Moreover, some studies have reported that the truncated tRNAs in the mitochondrial genome could work normally once their irregular structure was completed by hybridization with specific probes. Additionally, tRNAs encoded by the nuclear genome can enter the mitochondria to assist with certain functions. Therefore, although they contain incomplete tRNA structures or even have deficient tRNA components, the mitochondria of these species could still function normally. However, to this day it cannot be ascertained whether this phenomenon is universal to all Coccidae species. Therefore, more evidence regarding the mitochondrial genome in this group is still in desperate need.

4.3. Gene Rearrangement and Synteny Analysis

According to the analysis results of gene rearrangement, there was generally conserved gene content among the Coccoidea species and beyond this range [47,48]. Obviously, gene arrangements took place in E. pela, in accordance with what researchers mentioned in a report on S. coffeae [16]. Moreover, it was mostly tRNA variations that were involved in the rearrangement, while the regions involving PCGs were in the comparatively conserved position (except for E. pela’s atp8). Significantly, compared to the other three Coccoidea species, E. pela exhibited maximum rearrangement in gene order, which indicated the phylogenetic relationship among four selected Coccoidea species from another point of view. In general, the analysis results could also show the great distinction in gene orders between hemipteran insects and species of other categories (represented by D. melanogaster).
The results of the synteny analysis seemed to be somewhat contradictory to the conservation (e.g., PCGs) obtained from existing gene rearrangement analyses. We speculated that this was because the synteny analysis proceeded on the basis of the whole mitochondrial genome, including both genes and intergenic regions, whereas when analyzing the rearrangement of gene orders, we considered only PCGs, rRNA genes, and tRNA genes, excluding intergenic regions. Therefore, it might be the great extent of variation between intergenic regions that led to the nonsynteny among homologous blocks.

4.4. Phylogenetic Analysis

Coccidae were thought to have evolved more recently with aphids than whiteflies or plant lice. Previous research proved the existence of a phylogenetic relationship between Coccidae and other hemipteran insects based on fragments of mitochondrial genes [4,17]. In this study, our phylogenetic analysis based on the mitochondrial genome provided robust evidence to further support the phylogenetic relationships among these hemipteran insects.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we assembled the complete mitochondrial genome of E. pela and revealed its mitochondrial characteristics. Our analyses revealed the presence of novel gene arrangement and truncated tRNA genes. Our results also showed a high evolutionary rate in Coccoidea and will provide essential information for the genetic study of these species.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.Y.; methodology, P.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, J.-Q.A.; writing—review and editing, P.Y., J.-Q.A., S.-H.Y. and S.-J.W.; data curation, J.-Q.A., H.-P.Z., Y.-C.S., Q.-Y.Z. and Z.-Y.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Applied Basic Research Foundation of Yunnan Province (No. 202101AS070042), the Young and Middle-Aged Academic and Technical Leaders Reserve Talent Project of Yunnan Province (Grant No. 202105AC160031), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31572337).

Data Availability Statement

The genomic data in this study are available under the NCBI accession number: ON055488.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Normark, B.B.; Okusu, A.; Morse, G.E.; Peterson, D.A.; Itioka, T.; Schneider, S.A. Phylogeny and classification of armored scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha: Diaspididae). Zootaxa 2019, 4616, zootaxa.4616.1.1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ross, L.; Shuker, D.M. Scale insects. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19, R184–R186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Szklarzewicz, T. The ovaries of scale insects (Hemiptera, Coccinea). Morphology and phylogenetic conclusions. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 1998, 36, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Cook, L.G.; Gullan, P.J.; Trueman, H.E. A preliminary phylogeny of the scale insects (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea) based on nuclear small-subunit ribosomal DNA. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2002, 25, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gruwell, M.E.; Morse, G.E.; Normark, B.B. Phylogenetic congruence of armored scale insects (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) and their primary endosymbionts from the phylum Bacteroidetes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 44, 267–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ellenrieder, N.V.; Stocks, I.C. A new species of mealybug in the genus Paracoccus Ezzat & McConnell from North America (Insecta: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae). Zootaxa 2014, 3873, 25–36. [Google Scholar]
  7. Choi, J.; Soysouvanh, P.; Lee, S.; Hong, K.J. Review of the family Coccidae (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha) in Laos. Zootaxa 2018, 4460, 1–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hodgson, C.J.; Williams, D.J. Revision of the soft scale genus Paralecanium (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha: Coccidae) with the introduction of three new genera and twenty new species. Zootaxa 2018, 4443, 1–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mourad, A.K.; Mesbah, H.A.; Fata, A.A.; Moursi, K.S.; Abdel-Razak, S.I. Survey of scale insects of ornamental plants in Alexandria Governorate, Egypt. Meded. Rijksuniv. Gent. Fak. Landbouwkd. Toegep. Biol. Wet. 2001, 66, 571–580. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hodgson, C. A review of neococcid scale insects (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccomorpha) based on the morphology of the adult males. Zootaxa 2020, 4765, zootaxa.4765.1.1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Boore, J.L. Animal mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27, 1767–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Arnoldi, F.G.; Ogoh, K.; Ohmiya, Y.; Viviani, V.R. Mitochondrial genome sequence of the Brazilian luminescent click beetle Pyrophorus divergens (Coleoptera: Elateridae): Mitochondrial genes utility to investigate the evolutionary history of Coleoptera and its bioluminescence. Gene 2007, 405, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Roskov, Y.; Ower, G.; Orrell, T.; Nicolson, D.; Bailly, N.; Kirk, P.M.; Bourgoin, T.; DeWalt, R.E.; Decock, W.; van Nieukerken, E.; et al. Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life, 2019 Annual Checklist, Species 2000; Naturalis: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2019; ISSN 2405-884X. Available online: www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-checklist/2019 (accessed on 25 April 2022).
  14. Zarkani, A.; Apriyanto, D.; Turanli, F.; Ercan, C.; Kaydan, M.B. A checklist of Indonesian scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha). Zootaxa 2021, 5016, 151–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Deng, J.; Lu, C.; Huang, X. The first mitochondrial genome of scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccoidea). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2019, 4, 2094–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lu, C.; Huang, X.; Deng, J. The challenge of Coccidae (Hemiptera: Coccoidea) mitochondrial genomes: The case of Saissetia coffeae with novel truncated tRNAs and gene rearrangements. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 158, 854–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gullan, P.J.; Kosztarab, M. Adaptations in scale insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1997, 42, 23–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fu, Z.Y.; An, J.Q.; Liu, W.; Zhang, H.P.; Yang, P. Genomic Analyses of the Fungus Paraconiothyrium sp. Isolated from the Chinese White Wax Scale Insect Reveals Its Symbiotic Character. Genes 2022, 13, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, P.; Yu, S.; Hao, J.; Liu, W.; Zhao, Z.; Zhu, Z.; Sun, T.; Wang, X.; Song, Q. Genome sequence of the Chinese white wax scale insect Ericerus pela: The first draft genome for the Coccidae family of scale insects. GigaScience 2019, 8, giz113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Yang, P.; Zhu, J.Y.; Gong, Z.J.; Xu, D.L.; Chen, X.M.; Liu, W.W.; Lin, X.D.; Li, Y.F. Transcriptome analysis of the Chinese white wax scale Ericerus pela with focus on genes involved in wax biosynthesis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Sun, T.; Wang, X.Q.; Zhao, Z.L.; Yu, S.H.; Yang, P.; Chen, X.M. A Lethal Fungus Infects the Chinese White Wax Scale Insect and Causes Dramatic Changes in the Host Microbiota. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Yang, P.; Chen, X.M. Protein profiles of Chinese white wax scale, Ericerus pela, at the male pupal stage by high-throughput proteomics. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2014, 87, 214–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yu, S.H.; Yang, P.; Sun, T.; Qi, Q.; Wang, X.-Q.; Xu, D.-L.; Chen, X.-M. Identification and evaluation of reference genes in the Chinese white wax scale insect Ericerus pela. Springerplus 2016, 5, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Schneider, S.A.; Okusu, A.; Normark, B.B. Molecular phylogenetics of Aspidiotini armored scale insects (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) reveals rampant paraphyly, curious species radiations, and multiple origins of association with Melissotarsus ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2018, 129, 291–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yang, P.; Chen, X.M.; Liu, W.W.; Feng, Y.; Sun, T. Transcriptome analysis of sexually dimorphic Chinese white wax scale insects reveals key differences in developmental programs and transcription factor expression. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Zhang, H.-P.; Liu, W.; An, J.-Q.; Yang, P.; Guo, L.-H.; Li, Y.-Q.; Lv, J.; Yu, S.-H. Transcriptome analyses and weighted gene coexpression network analysis reveal key pathways and genes involved in the rapid cold resistance of the Chinese white wax scale insect. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2021, 107, e21781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lung, T.N. The Culturing of Ericerus pela (Chavannes) in China and the Transmission of Chinese Wax into Europe. Agric. Hist. China 2004, 4, 18–23. [Google Scholar]
  28. Yang, K. Reanalysis of the Origin of Cera Chinensis Utilization in China. Stud. Hist. Nat. Sci. 2020, 39, 2. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhao, J.J.; Deng, L.; Tan, T.W.; Wang, F. Wax esters synthesis from rapeseed oil by immobilized lipase. Chem. Ind. Eng. Prog. 2007, 26, 1311–1315. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Jiang, L.Y.; Qiao, G.X. Hemipteran mitochondrial genomes: Features, structures and implications for phylogeny. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 12382–12404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Thao, M.L.; Baumann, L.; Baumann, P. Organization of the mitochondrial genomes of whiteflies, aphids, and psyllids (Hemiptera, Sternorrhyncha). BMC Evol. Biol. 2004, 4, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Shi, C.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, S.; Li, Y.; Ye, J.; Yu, C.; Li, Z.; et al. SOAPnuke: A MapReduce acceleration-supported software for integrated quality control and preprocessing of high-throughput sequencing data. Gigascience 2018, 7, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Li, H. Minimap and miniasm: Fast mapping and de novo assembly for noisy long sequences. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 2103–2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Vaser, R.; Sović, I.; Nagarajan, N.; Šikić, M. Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads. Genome Res. 2017, 27, 737–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Al Arab, M.; Höner Zu Siederdissen, C.; Tout, K.; Sahyoun, A.H.; Stadler, P.F.; Bernt, M. Accurate annotation of protein-coding genes in mitochondrial genomes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2017, 106, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Perna, N.T.; Kocher, T.D. Patterns of nucleotide composition at fourfold degenerate sites of animal mitochondrial genomes. J. Mol. Evol. 1995, 41, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Trifinopoulos, J.; Nguyen, L.T.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. W-IQ-TREE: A fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W232–W235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Mohajeri, A.; Nobandegani, F.F. Detection and evaluation of hydrogen bond strength in nucleic acid base pairs. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 281–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Hamilton, W.L.; Claessens, A.; Otto, T.D.; Kekre, M.; Fairhurst, R.M.; Rayner, J.C.; Kwiatkowski, D. Extreme mutation bias and high AT content in Plasmodium falciparum. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, 1889–1901. [Google Scholar]
  42. Domes, K.; Maraun, M.; Scheu, S.; Cameron, S.L. The complete mitochondrial genome of the sexual oribatid mite Steganacarus magnus: Genome rearrangements and loss of tRNAs. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Okimoto, R.; Wolstenholme, D.R. A set of tRNAs that lack either the T psi C arm or the dihydrouridine arm: Towards a minimal tRNA adaptor. EMBO J. 1990, 9, 3405–3411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jühling, F.; Pütz, J.; Bernt, M.; Donath, A.; Middendorf, M.; Florentz, C.; Stadler, P.F. Improved systematic tRNA gene annotation allows new insights into the evolution of mitochondrial tRNA structures and into the mechanisms of mitochondrial genome rearrangements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 2833–2845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Lavrov, D.V.; Brown, W.M.; Boore, J.L. A novel type of RNA editing occurs in the mitochondrial tRNAs of the centipede Lithobius forficatus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 13738–13742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Watanabe, Y.; Suematsu, T.; Ohtsuki, T. Losing the stem-loop structure from metazoan mitochondrial tRNAs and co-evolution of interacting factors. Front. Genet. 2014, 5, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Tyagi, K.; Chakraborty, R.; Cameron, S.L.; Sweet, A.D.; Chandra, K.; Kumar, V. Rearrangement and evolution of mitochondrial genomes in Thysanoptera (Insecta). Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Liu, H.L.; Chen, Q.D.; Chen, S.; Pu, D.Q.; Chen, Z.T.; Liu, Y.Y.; Liu, X. The highly rearranged mitochondrial genomes of three economically important scale insects and the mitochondrial phylogeny of Coccoidea (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha). PeerJ 2020, 8, e9932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mitochondrial gene map of E. pela.
Figure 1. Mitochondrial gene map of E. pela.
Insects 14 00290 g001
Figure 2. Mitochondrial gene order of 4 scale insects (Coccoidea), Aphis glycines and Drosophila melanogaster. The genes on the H-strand (+) are shown above the line and the genes on the L-strand (−) are shown below the line. The black lines are used to show general conserved gene regions among the 4 Coccoidea species. The red arrows below E. pela represent the most significant distinctions.
Figure 2. Mitochondrial gene order of 4 scale insects (Coccoidea), Aphis glycines and Drosophila melanogaster. The genes on the H-strand (+) are shown above the line and the genes on the L-strand (−) are shown below the line. The black lines are used to show general conserved gene regions among the 4 Coccoidea species. The red arrows below E. pela represent the most significant distinctions.
Insects 14 00290 g002
Figure 3. Relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) of E. pela.
Figure 3. Relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) of E. pela.
Insects 14 00290 g003
Figure 4. Secondary structures of E. pela’s tRNAs. The specific gene name of each tRNA is stated above each secondary structure. Dashes between bases represent hydrogen bonds. (a) Secondary structures depicted by MITOS and (b) secondary structures depicted by RNA Folding Form V2.3.
Figure 4. Secondary structures of E. pela’s tRNAs. The specific gene name of each tRNA is stated above each secondary structure. Dashes between bases represent hydrogen bonds. (a) Secondary structures depicted by MITOS and (b) secondary structures depicted by RNA Folding Form V2.3.
Insects 14 00290 g004
Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree based on amino acid alignments of 13 PCGs using the ML method. Bootstrap support values indicating the credibility of branches are shown on the nodes above the branches. The length of each branch represents the mitochondrial genetic variability of each species. Branch lengths are shown below the branches.
Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree based on amino acid alignments of 13 PCGs using the ML method. Bootstrap support values indicating the credibility of branches are shown on the nodes above the branches. The length of each branch represents the mitochondrial genetic variability of each species. Branch lengths are shown below the branches.
Insects 14 00290 g005
Figure 6. Synteny analysis based on whole mitochondrial genomes of 10 Coccoidea species. The solid-colored rectangles represent the homologous blocks among the selected species.
Figure 6. Synteny analysis based on whole mitochondrial genomes of 10 Coccoidea species. The solid-colored rectangles represent the homologous blocks among the selected species.
Insects 14 00290 g006
Table 1. The species included in the phylogenetic analysis.
Table 1. The species included in the phylogenetic analysis.
SpeciesAccession NumberFamilySuborderOrder
Didesmococcus koreanusNC_057479CoccidaeSternorrhynchaHemiptera
Aclerda takahashiiMW839575AclerdidaeSternorrhynchaHemiptera
Ceroplastes japonicusMK847519CoccidaeSternorrhynchaHemiptera
Ericerus pelaON055488CoccidaeSternorrhynchaHemiptera
Cervaphis quercusNC_024926AphididaeSternorrhynchaHemiptera
Aphis glycinesMK111111AphididaeSternorrhynchaHemiptera
Brevicoryne brassicaeMT900510AphididaeSternorrhynchaHemiptera
Aleurocanthus camelliaeKU761949AleyrodidaeSternorrhynchaHemiptera
Bemisia aferKR819174AleyrodidaeSternorrhynchaHemiptera
Pealius machiliNC_060433AleyrodidaeSternorrhynchaHemiptera
Acizzia uncatoidesNC_038146PsyllidaeSternorrhynchaHemiptera
Cacopsylla burckhardtiOK574466PsyllidaeSternorrhynchaHemiptera
Cacopsylla coccineaNC_027087PsyllidaeSternorrhynchaHemiptera
Magicicada tredecassini MH937658CicadidaeAuchenorrhynchaHemiptera
Lethocerus deyrolleiKU237288BelostomatidaeHeteropteraHemiptera
Table 2. The species included in the synteny analysis and their A + T%.
Table 2. The species included in the synteny analysis and their A + T%.
SpeciesAccession NumberA + T%
Ceroplastes japonicusMK84751985.15%
Aclerda takahashiiMW83957584.51%
Didesmococcus koreanusNC_05747982.54%
Saissetia coffeaeMN86380384.72%
Unaspis yanonensisMT61152586.57%
Ceroplastes rubensMT67792387.52%
Drosicha corpulentaMK25106187.21%
Nipponaclerda biwakoensisMN19372281.3%
Planococcus citriMT61152682.77%
Ericerus pelaON05548888.21%
Table 3. Gene composition, Gene’s corresponding start/stop codons and AT skew.
Table 3. Gene composition, Gene’s corresponding start/stop codons and AT skew.
GeneStartStopLengthStart/Stop CodonsA + T%
nad4L191460270ATT/TAA88.52
nad446217571296ATA/TAA89.74
trnH1765182056
nad5178634171632ATA/TAA89.58
trnE3514354330
trnN3605366258
nad337794120342ATT/TAG90.06
trnG4118417659
cox342014956756ATG/TAA88.63
atp649645578615ATG/TAA88.94
trnD5716577156
trnK5767583569
cox257956484690ATG/TAA85.22
trnR6459651658
trnL26503657169
cox1658281171536ATA/TAA81.57
trnM8151821565
Control region8215111632949
trnV104911056373
trnY108851093854
atp81142811619192AGA/AAA85.94
trnL1117861184560
rrnS1191112509599 85.81
trnS1123801242546
trnA126421269453
trnC128621293675
rrnL1307613808733 87.03
trnW131101316051
nad11383014738909ATA/TAA87.68
trnS2147731482250
cob14822159011080ATG/TAA85.56
trnT159221597453
nad21611317018906ATT/TAA90.73
trnI170521711665
trnQ172371729559
trnP173671742559
trnF173961745055
nad617451146462ATA/TAA93.29
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

An, J.-Q.; Yu, S.-H.; Wei, S.-J.; Zhang, H.-P.; Shi, Y.-C.; Zhao, Q.-Y.; Fu, Z.-Y.; Yang, P. The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of the Chinese White Wax Scale Insect, Ericerus pela Chavannes (Hemiptera: Coccidae), with Novel Gene Arrangement and Truncated tRNA Genes. Insects 2023, 14, 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030290

AMA Style

An J-Q, Yu S-H, Wei S-J, Zhang H-P, Shi Y-C, Zhao Q-Y, Fu Z-Y, Yang P. The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of the Chinese White Wax Scale Insect, Ericerus pela Chavannes (Hemiptera: Coccidae), with Novel Gene Arrangement and Truncated tRNA Genes. Insects. 2023; 14(3):290. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030290

Chicago/Turabian Style

An, Jia-Qi, Shu-Hui Yu, Shu-Jun Wei, Hong-Ping Zhang, Yuan-Chong Shi, Qiu-Yu Zhao, Zuo-Yi Fu, and Pu Yang. 2023. "The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of the Chinese White Wax Scale Insect, Ericerus pela Chavannes (Hemiptera: Coccidae), with Novel Gene Arrangement and Truncated tRNA Genes" Insects 14, no. 3: 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030290

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop