Next Article in Journal
The Structure of the Female Genital System of the Diving Beetle Scarodytes halensis (Fabricius, 1787) (Hydroporinae, Dytiscidae), and the Organization of the Spermatheca and the Spermathecal Gland Complex
Previous Article in Journal
Detection of Rice Pests Based on Self-Attention Mechanism and Multi-Scale Feature Fusion
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 14
Issue 3
10.3390/insects14030281
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Potato (Solanum tuberosum) as a New Host for Pentastiridius leporinus (Hemiptera: Cixiidae) and Candidatus Arsenophonus Phytopathogenicus

by
Sarah Christin Behrmann
1,
André Rinklef
2,
Christian Lang
3,
Andreas Vilcinskas
1,2 and
Kwang-Zin Lee
2,*
1
Institute for Insect Biotechnology, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
2
Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology, Ohlebergsweg 12, D-35394 Giessen, Germany
3
Association of Hessian-Palatinate Sugar Beet Growers e.V., Rathenaustrasse 10, D-67547 Worms, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2023, 14(3), 281; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030281
Submission received: 13 February 2023 / Revised: 8 March 2023 / Accepted: 10 March 2023 / Published: 13 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Pest and Vector Management)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Pentastiridius leporinus is a planthopper that transmits two bacterial pathogens to sugar beet plants: Arsenophonus and Stolbur. These bacteria cause an economically important disease known as syndrome basses richesses (SBR), characterized by deformed yellow leaves and low beet yields. Having observed potato fields in Germany infested with planthoppers and showing signs of leaf yellowing, we set out to identify the planthoppers and any transmitted pathogens. We identified P. leporinus by comparisons of COI and COII partial sequences and detected both bacterial pathogens in planthoppers, as well as in beet and potato plants. We found that P. leporinus nymphs and adults can transmit the bacteria and that long, warm summers allow two generations of planthoppers to breed, probably increasing the population size and threat of disease transmission in the following year. We conclude that the planthopper P. leporinus has expanded its host range to potato, and that further studies are needed, to facilitate the development of control strategies that minimize losses in sugar beet and potato crops.

Abstract

Pentastiridius leporinus is a planthopper (Hemiptera: Cixiidae) that vectors two phloem-restricted bacterial pathogens to sugar beet (Beta vulgaris (L.)): the γ-proteobacterium Candidatus Arsenophonus phytopathogenicus and the stolbur phytoplasma Candidatus Phytoplasma solani. These bacteria cause an economically important disease known as syndrome basses richesses (SBR), characterized by yellowing, deformed leaves and low beet yields. Having observed potato fields in Germany infested with cixiid planthoppers and showing signs of leaf yellowing, we used morphological criteria and COI and COII as molecular markers, to identify the planthoppers (adults and nymphs) primarily as P. leporinus. We analyzed planthoppers, potato tubers, and sugar beet roots and detected both pathogens in all sample types, confirming that P. leporinus adults and nymphs can transmit the bacteria. This is the first time that P. leporinus has been shown to transmit Arsenophonus to potato plants. We also found that two generations of P. leporinus were produced in the warm summer of 2022, which will probably increase the pest population size (and thus the prevalence of SBR) in 2023. We conclude that P. leporinus has expanded its host range to potato, and can now utilize both host plants during its developmental cycle, a finding that will facilitate the development of more efficient control strategies.

1. Introduction

The planthopper Pentastiridius leporinus (Linnaeus) belongs to the family Cixiidae (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha), and has been known to colonize sugar beet plants (Beta vulgaris L.) since the early 2000s [1,2,3]. Before this, the adults were known to feed on reed grass (Phragmites australis (Cav.)), in moist or wet sites along rivers or in ruderal and brackish ecosystems, but the host plant for the nymphs was unknown [4]. The recent host shift has enabled P. leporinus to complete its life cycle on sugar beet (adult feeding, oviposition, hatching, and nymphal feeding). After the harvesting of sugar beet in autumn, nymphs overwinter on subsequent crops, typically winter wheat (Triticum aestivum (L.)) or barley (Hordeum vulgare (L.)) [5]. The adult planthoppers begin to emerge the following May and show flight activity usually until August, and sometimes until September if the summer is hot and dry [6]. Oviposition takes place at the beginning of July. Laboratory assays showed that the time from the first larval stage until adult emergence, under controlled conditions, is >100 days, without an induced diapause [6].
Pentastiridius leporinus is the main insect vector of the bacterial disease of sugar beet known as syndrome basses richesses (SBR), in Germany and Switzerland [7,8,9]. Symptoms of SBR include the yellowing of older leaves, lancet-shaped leaf deformations, and necrosis of the vascular tissue, which reduces the sugar content of the beet roots [10]. The syndrome is associated with two different bacterial pathogens: the γ-proteobacterium Candidatus Arsenophonus phytopathogenicus (hereafter described as Arsenophonus) and the stolbur phytoplasma Candidatus Phytoplasma solani (hereafter described as stolbur) [10]. Arsenophonus has been more abundant in sugar beet over the last five years, based on monitoring activities in Germany [7,11].
Bacteria of the clade Arsenophonus typically associate with insects as mutualists or parasites, but they are also pathogens of sugar beet and strawberry, where they cause marginal chlorosis disease [5]. Arsenophonus is transmitted by both adults and nymphs of P. leporinus [10,12]. An inoculation access period (IAP) of three days was tested in adults, revealing that females lived longer and were better vectors than males, with 64% and 24% efficiency of transmission, respectively [10]. Nymphs were hosted for 30 days on sugar beet seedlings, and Arsenophonus transmission was successful in four of six replicates [12]. The bacteria were also vertically transmitted to the offspring [12]. Arsenophonus was abundant in most internal organs of P. leporinus, with the highest bacterial load in the salivary glands and gonads of adults [12].
Stolbur is responsible for rubbery tap root disease (RTD) in sugar beet in Southeast Europe [13], and was first observed in Serbia in the 1950s [14]. Stolbur is also known to cause bois noir in grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.) [15]. This is transmitted by Hyalesthes obsoletus (Signoret), another cixiid planthopper known for its ability to complete its life cycle on different host plants, such as the nettle Urtica dioica (L.) and bindweed Convolvus arvensis (L.) [16]. Several other crops are damaged by H. obsoletus, including celery, lavender, maize, and salvia [17,18,19,20]. Recently, we detected a high abundance of stolbur 16sR-XII in P. leporinus captured in sugar beet fields in Rhineland-Palatinate and South Hesse [6]. The same insects were also carrying Arsenophonus.
In potato (Solanum tuberosum (L.)), stolbur is known to cause diverse symptoms including reddening, aerial tubers, leaf discoloration, shortened internodes, and upward rolling of the top leaf, resulting in severe yield losses [21]. The identified main vector insect of stolbur in potato was Hyalesthes obsoletus [22]. P. leporinus had neither been found in potato nor transmitting stolbur. The detection of stolbur in sugar beet in 2020 and 2021 drew our attention to nearby potato fields, that started to show yellowing symptoms. The aim of this study was to identify the planthopper associated with wilting potato plants, and to characterize the pathogens responsible for this novel syndrome.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Field Collection of P. leporinus from Potato Tubers and Sugar Beet Roots

P. leporinus samples were collected from three locations (Table 1) on neighboring sugar beet and potato fields (<300 m apart), in September 2022. Adults were collected using a sweep net. Nymphs were collected by digging them out from between potato tubers, or by using a beet fork to collect them from along the beet roots. Field-collected nymphs were transferred individually to microcentrifuge tubes or Petri dishes for further analysis in the laboratory. Field-collected adults were transferred to a 2-week-old potted potato plant var. Jule (Solana, Windeby, Germany), for egg deposition and hatching of first-instar nymphs. Plants were kept in the greenhouse in single cages (Cavea PopUp size M net cage (Howitec, Bolsward, The Netherlands)). The temperature of the chamber was set to 22/16 °C day/night, with a 16 h photoperiod. Images of field-collected and freshly-hatched nymphs were captured using a VHX-5000 digital microscope (Keyence Deutschland, Neu-Isenburg, Germany), and measured using the VHX-5000 communication software.
Potato tubers expressing stolbur-like symptoms, characterized by the formation of side shoots, wilting, and rubbery tubers, were collected from the same locations. In the Eich and Ibersheim locations, we also collected 15 sugar beet samples with SBR symptoms, characterized by yellowing leaves, deformed young leaves, and necrosis of the vascular tissue and root tips.

2.2. Identification of Nymphs and Adults

To confirm the species, adults were morphologically examined [23] and DNA was extracted from nymphs and adults representing each location using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). A single fragment of the partial cytochrome oxidase subunit I and II (COI and COII) genes was amplified, as previously described [8], using primer pair C1J2441/C2N3661 [24]. The amplicons were purified with Exonuclease and SAP (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), followed by sequencing (Eurofins Genomics, Cologne, Germany). In total, seventeen adults were analyzed: for potato, four from Eich, seven from Lampertheim and five from Ibersheim; and for sugar beet, one from Ibersheim. As for the nymphs, nine were analyzed, one from potato in Eich, two from potato in Ibersheim, four from potato in Lampertheim, one from sugar beet in Eich, and one from sugar beet in Ibersheim. COI/COII sequences from three P. leporinus nymphs, collected from potato fields, one adult, collected from a sugar beet field, and reference sequences FN179288–FN179291 from P. leporinus and Hyalesthes obsoletus, were compared [8]. COI and COII sequences were trimmed to 972 bp and aligned using MUSCLE [25], and a phylogenetic tree was created using the neighbor-joining method and Geneious v10.2 (Biomatters, Auckland, New Zealand). Bootstrap analysis was conducted using 10,000 replications. The COI/COII sequences were submitted to Genbank, under accession numbers with sequential numbering from OQ420381 to OQ420405.

2.3. Abundance of P. leporinus in 2022

The abundance of P. leporinus was evaluated using transparent, sticky “cloak” traps (PAL, CSALAMON Group, Budapest, Hungary), 25 × 35 cm. The traps were set up at one location in Hesse (coordinates 49.758758, 8.577285). The site was a commercial sugar beet field, 13.2 km away from the examined potato field in Eich (Table 1). Three traps were placed at distances of 10, 30, and 50 m from the edge of the field, on a pole at a height of 10 cm above the sugar beet vegetation. The sampling period started in May and ended in September, after two continuous weeks without catches. The traps were replaced weekly and the number of adults was determined. To evaluate the ability of P. leporinus nymphs to develop on potato plants, the head capsule width and dorsal length of 100 field-collected nymphs were measured, using a VHX-5000 digital microscope.

2.4. Transmission Assays with Nymphs

The ability of P. leporinus nymphs to transmit Arsenophonus and stolbur to uninfected potato plants, was tested by releasing five field-collected nymphs (third to fifth instar) onto twelve potato plants and three sugar beet plants, followed by feeding for an IAP of 66 days. The control group consisted of three potato plants without nymphs. Field-collected P. leporinus nymphs were placed directly onto 3-week-old sugar beet plants (KWS Annarosa, Einbeck, Germany) and 5-day-old potato plants (Colomba HZPC, Joure, The Netherlands), growing in Göttinger 3 L pots (Lamprecht-Verpackungen, Göttingen, Germany), filled with Frühstorfer potting soil LD 80 (Heinrichs, Ingelheim, Germany) and covered with expanded clay (Floragard, Oldenburg, Germany). Plants were kept in single cage, in a Cavea PopUp size M net cage (Howitec, Bolsward, The Netherlands), and watered moderately twice weekly. The temperature in the greenhouse chamber was set to 22/16 °C day/night, with a 16 h photoperiod.
After 66 days, nymphs were collected from plants and pooled by plant origin for DNA extraction, as described above. Potato plants were divided into leaves, upper stem, midsection, lower stem, tubers, and roots. Sugar beet plants were divided into leaves, leaf stems, upper root, midsection of root, root tip, and tender roots. DNA extracts from plants were prepared from 0.1 g samples according to a modified CTAB procedure [26], followed by qRT-PCR (Section 2.6).

2.5. Comparison of Arsenophonus Isolated from Potato Tubers, Beet Roots, and P. leporinus

Nested PCR with primer pairs Fra5/rP1 and Alb1/Oliv1, was carried out to amplify the Arsenophonus 16S ITS sequence [3]. The products were separated by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and stained with 0.1 µL/ml SYBR-Safe (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), followed by visualization under UV light. The products were then cleaned up and sequenced as described above. Multiple sequences were aligned with MUSCLE, using Geneious v10.2, as described above. The Arsenophonus sequences were submitted to Genbank, under accession numbers with sequential numbering from OQ411083 to OQ411090.

2.6. Analysis of Arsenophonus and Stolbur Infections

Ninety-one individual insects, from three locations, were analyzed: thirty-six adults and thirty-six nymphs from potato fields, as well as nine adults and ten nymphs from sugar beet fields. Following DNA extraction, as described above, TaqMan qRT-PCR was performed using Luna Universal qRT-PCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs, Frankfurt, Germany), 25 ng of template DNA, and primer pairs KL437/438 and KL464/465, for the detection of Arsenophonus and stolbur, respectively [7]. The number of target copies was determined using absolute standard curves. Samples with a CT value > 35 were considered negative, which is equivalent to 22 copies for Arsenophonus and 14 copies for stolbur.
To assess the abundance of infected potato and sugar beet plants in two locations, 30 symptomatic sugar beet root samples and 45 symptomatic potato tuber samples were collected, from three locations, and tested for Arsenophonus and stolbur. DNA extracts were prepared from 0.1 g tuber or sugar beet root samples, using a modified CTAB method [26] followed by qRT-PCR, as described above.

3. Results

3.1. Identification and Morphometric Analysis of P. leporinus on Potato Plants

A recent increase in wilting syndromes in potato fields in Southwest Germany, was accompanied by the observation of hitherto unknown planthoppers in those affected fields. We identified the species as P. leporinus, based on morphological traits in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum var. Juventa). We found symptomatic potatoes colonized by nymphs, filamentous residues reminiscent of the characteristic wax structures of egg clutches, and hatching P. leporinus adults (Figure 1).
Morphometric analysis was carried out on 100 of the field-collected nymphs (Table S1).

3.2. Molecular Identification of P. leporinus

We analyzed 23 individual nymphs and adults from potato and sugar beet fields, all of which (except one nymph) were identified as P. leporinus. The one exception, collected from sugar beet, was identified as Cixius sp., another planthopper in the family Cixiidae. Evolutionary relationships among the planthoppers and some reference specimens from other years and locations, were checked on the basis of COI and COII sequence similarity, resulting in the phylogenic tree shown in Figure 2.
Based on COI and COII sequences, the planthoppers found in potato and sugar beet showed a closer genetic relationship to P. leporinus than the two known references from France and Russia. The nearest related species (P. beieri), as well as the more distantly related H. obsoletus and Cixius sp. specimens, showed clear sequence differences.

3.3. Second Generation of Adults in Bickenbach, 2022

In 2022, 1336 P. leporinus adults were caught in a sugar beet field in Bickenbach, Hesse using transparent, sticky traps (Figure 3). The flight period lasted from calendar week 20 (mid-May) until calendar week 39 (end of September). At this location, 92.4% of the captured individuals were males.
Surprisingly, two peaks of abundance were observed. The first occurred at the beginning of July (calendar week 27), followed by a decline until the end of July (calendar week 30), at which point the mean capture rate per trap fell to a low of 0.3 insects. Afterwards, the number of captured adults rose again, reaching a second peak at the end of August (calendar week 35). One insect was trapped at the end of September (calendar week 39).

3.4. Transmission Assay

The detection of Arsenophonus and stolbur in nymphs and plants, by qRT-PCR, is summarized in Table 2. All groups of nymphs tested positive for Arsenophonus, but only one of fifteen groups tested positive for stolbur. Three of twelve potato plants tested positive for Arsenophonus, whereas stolbur was not detected in any potato plants. In the first potato plant, Arsenophonus was detected in the tubers with 45 copies. In the second plant, 141 copies were found in the roots. The third potato plant was more severely infected, with 85,635 copies in the lower stem, 5341 in the roots, 172 copies in the leaves, and 93 in the tubers. Arsenophonus and stolbur were both detected in one of the three sugar beet plants, which contained 23 copies of Arsenophonus and 1416 copies of stolbur in the root tip. Neither pathogen was found in the control group.

3.5. Similarity of Arsenophonus in All Organisms

The Arsenophonus qRT-PCR results were verified by nested PCR followed by agarose gel electrophoresis [3]. Infected potato tubers showed the same characteristic banding pattern as infected sugar beet and planthopper samples (Figure S1). No bands were observed in the negative control. Two Arsenophonus amplicons from planthoppers, one from sugar beet, and four from potato plants were sequenced, revealing 100% identity with the Arsenophonus 16S ITS sequence DQ834353.1 (positions 80–419 bp) submitted by [3].

3.6. Prevalence of Arsenophonus and Stolbur in P. leporinus and Plant Material

We tested 91 P. leporinus adults and nymphs for Arsenophonus and stolbur, 69.2% of which were positive for Arsenophonus and 2.2% of which were positive for stolbur. Each adult positive for stolbur was also positive for Arsenophonus (Figure 4).
The prevalence of Arsenophonus in both plant species was high: 95% of the sugar beet roots and 100% of the potato tuber samples were positive for this species. In addition, stolbur was detected in 20% of the potato tubers and 45% of the beet root samples (Figure 5).
We analyzed forty-five potato tuber samples in total. Among the fifteen samples from Eich, all were positive only for Arsenophonus, except a single uninfected sample. Among the fifteen samples from Ibersheim, seven were positive only for Arsenophonus, seven were positive for both pathogens and one was positive only for stolbur. Among the fifteen samples from Lampertheim, fourteen were positive for Arsenophonus alone and one sample was positive for both pathogens. We analyzed thirty sugar beet samples in total, all of which were positive for Arsenophonus or a double infection. Among the fifteen samples from Eich, seven were positive for Arsenophonus and eight were positive for both pathogens. Among the fifteen samples from Ibersheim, nine were positive for Arsenophonus and six were positive for both pathogens.

4. Discussion

Several species of planthoppers and psyllids cause serious damage to potato crops by direct feeding and/or by transmitting pathogens, especially phytoplasmas, bacteria, and viruses [27]. Many planthopper species associated with potato fields belong to the family Cixiidae, including H. obsoletus, Reptalus quinquecostatus (Dufour) and R. panzeri (Löw) [22]. Our study presents the first molecular evidence that potato plants are colonized by P. leporinus. We also confirmed adult feeding, egg laying, hatching, and nymphal feeding on potato plants and tubers. Our data therefore suggest that P. leporinus can move between sugar beet and potato host plants, as represented in an updated life cycle diagram (Figure 6). To compare the suitability of sugar beet and potato as hosts, long-term life cycle trials are needed to understand the dynamics of P. leporinus developmental biology. To compare these host interactions, suitable protocols for some host plants under controlled conditions have already been established by [6].
The identification of species was not possible based on morphological characteristics alone during the nymphal stages, so we sequenced COI amplicons to provide species-dependent molecular markers. We found that the nymphs and adults on sugar beet and potato plants were 100% identical to the P. leporinus reference sequences, which differed from the H. obsoletus and Cixius sp. amplicons. However, further genomic analysis of planthoppers is necessary to identify potential differences between populations.
Cixiid species such as P. leporinus are typically univoltine—they produce a single generation per year [4]. However, the examination of sticky traps and soil samples provided convincing evidence that the hot and dry summer in 2022 enabled P. leporinus to produce a second generation of adults in September, which were able to lay eggs. Under field conditions in 2020 and 2021, there was no clear evidence of bivoltine development, whereas a second generation of adults was also evident, from the monitoring of sticky traps, in 2018 [28]. The ability to produce two generations in 2022 is likely to increase the number of adults in the region in 2023. This enhances the threat of economic damage caused by P. leporinus, in regions where potato and sugar beet are cultivated in the same rotation. Rising temperatures, caused by climate change, are predicted to reduce crop yields, by encouraging the growth of pest insect populations [29], and projections in staple cereals such as rice, maize, and wheat indicate a yield loss of up to 25% per degree Celsius increase. Our data show a real-time change in voltinism in P. leporinus, probably due to the increase in temperatures.
During our field study in September, we found one Cixius sp. nymph on sugar beet in Eich (Rhineland-Palatinate). Cixius wagneri (China) is known to transmit Candidatus Phlomobacter fragariae, which causes marginal chlorosis in strawberries [30]. In France, C. wagneri in heavily-infested sugar beets, were shown to carry and transmit Arsenophonus [10]. We found one Cixius sp. nymph on sugar beet, but no adults in the sticky traps. Further studies monitoring cixiid species in sugar beet and potato crops, should also include Cixius species as potential Arsenophonus vectors in Southwest Germany. The recent finding of stolbur in sugar beet [6], and the observed host shift of P. leporinus to potato, may also influence the disease pressure in this region. In Ibersheim, two H. obsoletus individuals were found on sticky traps in sugar beet crops (data not shown). Further studies are needed to clarify the population density of H. obsoletus and identity which bacteria are carried. Interactions between sugar beet, potato, and vine plants could lead to an outbreak of stolbur in Rhineland-Palatinate’s vineyards and should therefore be investigated in a timely manner [15].
We conducted transmission assays to determine whether P. leporinus can vector Arsenophonus and/or stolbur to potato plants. Transmission from adults to sugar beet seedlings was previously reported [10,12], and was possible within an IAP of 3 days and occurred over a period of 33 days. Transmission assays from nymphs to sugar beet seedlings were also conducted previously for an IAP of 30 days, revealing a transmission frequency of 60%, based on PCR detection [12]. We provided quantitative data confirming that P. leporinus nymphs were able to transmit Arsenophonus to the stem, tender roots, and tubers of potato plants, after 66 days, as well as the first evidence of stolbur transmission from P. leporinus nymphs to sugar beet. Stolbur depends on horizontal transmission via insect vectors [31,32]. H. obsoletus was previously used to confirm the transmission of stolbur to sugar beet seedlings, because no stolbur-infected specimens of P. leporinus were available at that time [10].
We detected Arsenophonus in P. leporinus, as well as sugar beet root tips and potato tubers from the field. We found that 90% of all potato and sugar beet samples tested positive for Arsenophonus. The qRT-PCR results were confirmed by endpoint PCR, using the primer pairs Fra5/rP1 and Alb1/Oliv1 [3]. All potato, sugar beet, and planthopper samples showed the same band pattern. Furthermore, Arsenophonus 16S ITS sequences from different samples were identical, showing that all isolated strains shared a close genetic relationship. Further sequencing of these strains should be carried out, to determine if there is a genetic basis for the host shift from sugar beet to potato.
In our study, only rubbery potato tubers and yellowing sugar beets were collected for analysis. Stolbur was detected in 20% of potato samples, significantly lower than the prevalence of Arsenophonus. The symptoms of Arsenophonus in sugar beet and strawberry plants are convergent with those of phytoplasmas [5]. We conclude that stolbur-like symptoms in potato can also be triggered by Arsenophonus, and 80% of the examined potato tubers were infected with Arsenophonus alone.
More studies examining the relationship between Arsenophonus, potato plants, and planthopper vectors are urgently needed, because we currently lack an in-depth characterization of symptoms and the quantification of damage caused by these pathogens, under controlled conditions. It is also unclear where, inside the plant, Arsenophonus localizes, accumulates, and propagates. The prevalence of both pathogens in different regions of Germany is still unknown and must be assessed to facilitate appropriate containment measures. Seed potatoes could potentially spread both diseases [33]. Potential control strategies could include population suppression in P. leporinus and the modification of crop rotations to avoid consecutive crops of potato and sugar beet.

5. Conclusions

Sugar beet and potato are important root crops, with a significant socioeconomic value in the Rhine Valley. In Rhineland-Palatinate, both crops together covered more than 23,000 ha (6.0% of total arable land) in 2022 [34]. In this study, we present evidence that the planthopper P. leporinus has expanded its host range to potato, which will help in the development of control strategies to prevent the loss of sugar beet and potato crops. Phylogenetic analysis suggested that the planthoppers found in potato and sugar beet from different locations in Southwest Germany had a common origin. Most of the potato plants with disease symptoms such as side shoots, wilting, and rubbery tubers were colonized by Arsenophonus, in the absence of stolbur. We confirmed the ability of P. leporinus nymphs to transmit Arsenophonus to potato and stolbur to sugar beet. Our field data also provide evidence that P. leporinus can produce a second generation per year, under favorable conditions.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects14030281/s1, Table S1: morphometric measurements; Figure S1: gel electrophoresis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.C.B. and K.-Z.L.; investigation, S.C.B. and A.R.; writing—original draft preparation, S.C.B., A.R. and K.-Z.L.; writing—review and editing, S.C.B., K.-Z.L., C.L. and A.V.; supervision, K.-Z.L., C.L. and A.V.; funding acquisition, A.V. and C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the excellence initiative of the Hessian Ministry of Higher Education, Research and the Arts (HMWK) 11:11 insects-14-00281, via the LOEWE Centre for Insect Biotechnology and Bioresources, and by the NIKIZ project, part of the development program EULLE with the participation of the European Union and the state of Rhineland-Palatinate, represented by the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Transport, Agriculture and Viticulture. S.C.B. was funded by the Foundation Southwest German Sugar Beet Cultivation (Stiftung Südwestdeutscher Zuckerrübenanbau).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Jana Thiel and Sardhar Ganesh Hukumathi Venkata for technical support and David Löffler, Helen Pfitzner, Johannes Knab, Manuela Schieler, and Anna Dettweiler for support with the field work. The authors thank Richard M Twyman for professional editing of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Gatineau, F.; Larrue, J.; Clair, D.; Lorton, F.; Richard-Molard, M.; Boudon-Padieu, E. A New Natural Planthopper Vector of Stolbur Phytoplasma in the Genus Pentastiridius (Hemiptera: Cixiidae). Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2001, 107, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gatineau, F.; Jacob, N.; Vautrin, S.; Larrue, J.; Lherminier, J.; Richard-Molard, M.; Boudon-Padieu, E. Association with the Syndrome “Basses Richesses” of Sugar Beet of a Phytoplasma and a Bacterium-Like Organism Transmitted by a Pentastiridius sp. Phytopathology 2002, 92, 384–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Sémétey, O.; Bressan, A.; Gatineau, F.; Boudon-Padieu, E. Development of a specific assay using RISA for detection of the bacterial agent of “basses richesses” syndrome of sugar beet and confirmation of a Pentastiridius sp. (Fulgoromopha, Cixiidae) as the economic vector. Plant Pathol. 2007, 56, 797–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Biedermann, R.; Niedringhaus, R. Die Zikaden Deutschlands: Bestimmungstafeln für alle Arten; Wissenschaftlich-Akademischer-Buchvertrieb: Scheeßel, Germany, 2004; ISBN 978-3-939202-00-4. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bressan, A. Emergence and evolution of Arsenophonus bacteria as insect-vectored plant pathogens. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2014, 22, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Behrmann, S.-C.; Witczak, N.; Lang, C.; Schieler, M.; Dettweiler, A.; Kleinhenz, B.; Schwind, M.; Vilcinskas, A.; Lee, K.-Z. Biology and Rearing of an Emerging Sugar Beet Pest: The Planthopper Pentastiridius leporinus. Insects 2022, 13, 656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Behrmann, S.-C.; Schwind, M.; Schieler, M.; Vilcinskas, A.; Martinez, O.; Lee, K.-Z.; Lang, C. Spread of bacterial and virus yellowing diseases of sugar beet in South and Central Germany from 2017–2020. Sugar Ind. 2021, 146, 476–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bressan, A.; Holzinger, W.-E.; Nusillard, B.; Sémétey, O.; Gatineau, F.; Simonato, M.; Boudon-Padieu, E. Identification and biological traits of a planthopper from the genus Pentastiridius (Hemiptera: Cixiidae) adapted to an annual cropping rotation. Eur. J. Entomol. 2009, 106, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Mahillon, M.; Groux, R.; Bussereau, F.; Brodard, J.; Debonneville, C.; Demal, S.; Kellenberger, I.; Peter, M.; Steinger, T.; Schumpp, O. Virus Yellows and Syndrome “Basses Richesses” in Western Switzerland: A Dramatic 2020 Season Calls for Urgent Control Measures. Pathogens 2022, 11, 885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bressan, A.; Sémétey, O.; Nusillard, B.; Clair, D.; Boudon-Padieu, E. Insect Vectors (Hemiptera: Cixiidae) and Pathogens Associated with the Disease Syndrome “Basses Richesses” of Sugar Beet in France. Plant Dis. 2008, 92, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Pfitzer, R.; Schrameyer, K.; Voegele, R.-T.; Maier, J.; Lang, C.; Varrelmann, M. Causes and effects of the occurrence of “Syndrome Basses Richesses” in German sugar beet growing areas. Sugar Ind. 2019, 145, 70–80. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bressan, A.; Sémétey, O.; Arneodo, J.; Lherminier, J.; Boudon-Padieu, E. Vector transmission of a plant-pathogenic bacterium in the Arsenophonus clade sharing ecological traits with facultative insect endosymbionts. Phytopathology 2009, 99, 1289–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Ćurčić, Ž.; Stepanović, J.; Zübert, C.; Taški-Ajduković, K.; Kosovac, A.; Rekanović, E.; Kube, M.; Duduk, B. Rubbery Taproot Disease of Sugar Beet in Serbia Associated with ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’. Plant Dis. 2021, 105, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Panjan, M. Reserches sur stolbur des Solanaceae et le mode de lutte. Plant Prot. 1950, 2, 49–58. [Google Scholar]
  15. Maixner, M.; Ahrens, U.; Seemüller, E. Detection of the German grapevine yellows (Vergilbungskrankheit) MLO in grapevine, alternative hosts and a vector by a specific PCR procedure. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 1995, 101, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Johannesen, J.; Lux, B.; Michel, K.; Seitz, A.; Maixner, M. Invasion biology and host specificity of the grapevine yellows disease vector Hyalesthes obsoletus in Europe. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2008, 126, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Carraro, L.; Ferrini, F.; Martini, M.; Ermacora, P.; Loi, N. A serious epidemic of stolbur on celery. J. Plant Pathol. 2008, 90, 131–135. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gaudin, J.; Sémétey, O.; Foissac, X.; Eveillard, S. Phytoplasma titer in diseased lavender is not correlated to lavender tolerance to stolbur phytoplasma. Bull. Insectology 2011, 64, 179–180. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mori, N.; Mitrović, J.; Smiljković, M.; Duduk, N.; Paltrinieri, S.; Bertaccini, A.; Duduk, B. Hyalesthes obsoletus in Serbia and its role in the epidemiology of corn reddening. Bull. Insectology 2013, 66, 245–250. [Google Scholar]
  20. Chuche, J.; Danet, J.-L.; Rivoal, J.-B.; Arricau-Bouvery, N.; Thiéry, D. Minor cultures as hosts for vectors of extensive crop diseases: Does Salvia sclarea act as a pathogen and vector reservoir for lavender decline? J. Pest Sci. 2018, 91, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jović, J.; Ember, I.; Mitrović, M.; Cvrković, T.; Krstić, O.; Krnjajić, S.; Acs, Z.; Kölber, M.; Toševski, I. Molecular detection of potato stolbur phytoplasma in Serbia. Bull. Insectology 2011, 64, 83–84. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mitrović, M.; Trivellone, V.; Jović, J.; Cvrković, T.; Jakovljevic, M.; Kosovac, A.; Krstić, O.; Toševski, I. Potential Hemipteran vectors of “stolbur” phytoplasma in potato fields in Serbia. Phyt. Moll. 2015, 5, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Holzinger, W.-E.; Kammerlander, I.; Nickel, H. The Auchenorrhyncha of Central Europe. Die Zikaden Mitteleuropas: Volume 1: Fulgoromorpha, Cicadomorpha excl. Cicadellidae; BRILL: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2003; ISBN 9789004128958. [Google Scholar]
  24. Simon, C.; Buckley, T.R.; Frati, F.; Stewart, J.-B.; Beckenbach, A.-T. Incorporating Molecular Evolution into Phylogenetic Analysis, and a New Compilation of Conserved Polymerase Chain Reaction Primers for Animal Mitochondrial DNA. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2006, 37, 545–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Doyle, J.J.; Doyle, J.L. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 1987, 19, 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  27. Munyaneza, J.-E.; Henne, D.-C. Leafhopper and psyllid pests of potato. In Insect Pests of Potato; San Diego, A.P., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 65–102. ISBN 9780123868954. [Google Scholar]
  28. Pfitzer, R. Untersuchung zur Verbreitung und Kontrolle von SBR in Zuckerrüben. Master’s Thesis, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany, 1 February 2019. [Google Scholar]
  29. Deutsch, C.A.; Tewksbury, J.J.; Tigchelaar, M.; Battisti, D.S.; Merrill, S.C.; Huey, R.B.; Naylor, R.L. Increase in crop losses to insect pests in a warming climate. Science 2018, 361, 916–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Danet, J.-L.; Foissac, X.; Zreik, L.; Salar, P.; Verdin, E.; Nourrisseau, J.-G.; Garnier, M. “Candidatus Phlomobacter fragariae” Is the Prevalent Agent of Marginal Chlorosis of Strawberry in French Production Fields and Is Transmitted by the Planthopper Cixius wagneri (China). Phytopathology 2003, 93, 644–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Weintraub, P.G.; Beanland, L. Insect vectors of phytoplasmas. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2006, 51, 91–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hogenhout, S.A.; Oshima, K.; Ammar, E.-D.; Kakizawa, S.; Kingdom, H.N.; Namba, S. Phytoplasmas: Bacteria that manipulate plants and insects. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2008, 9, 403–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Crosslin, J.-M.; Hamlin, L.-L.; Buchman, J.-L.; Munyaneza, J.-E. Transmission of Potato Purple Top Phytoplasma to Potato Tubers and Daughter Plants. Am. J. Potato Res. 2011, 88, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Statistical Office of the Federal State of Rhineland-Palatinate. Utilised Agricultural Area from 1960 until 2022 for Selected Crops. Available online: https://www.statistik.rlp.de/de/wirtschaftsbereiche/landwirtschaft/zeitreihen-land/tabelle-2/ (accessed on 5 February 2023).
Insects 14 00281 g001 550
Figure 1. Pentastiridius leporinus found on potato plants in Ibersheim, September 2022. (A) Subterranean colonization of roots and tubers by nymphs, characterized by white, waxy filamentous residues. (B) Nymphs on the potato tubers and roots. (C) Colony of nymphs at different developmental stages and residues of molting, hidden under potato tubers. (D) Adult P. leporinus found in the soil. Red arrows indicate nymphs (A–C) and adults (D).
Figure 1. Pentastiridius leporinus found on potato plants in Ibersheim, September 2022. (A) Subterranean colonization of roots and tubers by nymphs, characterized by white, waxy filamentous residues. (B) Nymphs on the potato tubers and roots. (C) Colony of nymphs at different developmental stages and residues of molting, hidden under potato tubers. (D) Adult P. leporinus found in the soil. Red arrows indicate nymphs (A–C) and adults (D).
Insects 14 00281 g001
Insects 14 00281 g002 550
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationship between cytochrome oxidase subunits I and II (COI and COII) sequences from collected Pentastiridius leporinus, Hyalesthes obsoletus, and Cixius sp. Specimens, and sequences of planthoppers from earlier studies (marked with *) [8]. The tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method, based on a MUSCLE alignment of COI and COII sequences. The bar indicates the number of substitutions per site. Bootstrap values (10,000 replications) are included as numbers at the branches. POT: found in potato, SB: found in sugar beet.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationship between cytochrome oxidase subunits I and II (COI and COII) sequences from collected Pentastiridius leporinus, Hyalesthes obsoletus, and Cixius sp. Specimens, and sequences of planthoppers from earlier studies (marked with *) [8]. The tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method, based on a MUSCLE alignment of COI and COII sequences. The bar indicates the number of substitutions per site. Bootstrap values (10,000 replications) are included as numbers at the branches. POT: found in potato, SB: found in sugar beet.
Insects 14 00281 g002
Insects 14 00281 g003 550
Figure 3. Abundance of adult Pentastiridius leporinus in Bickenbach, Hesse, 2022. The numbers represent means of three sticky traps per week.
Figure 3. Abundance of adult Pentastiridius leporinus in Bickenbach, Hesse, 2022. The numbers represent means of three sticky traps per week.
Insects 14 00281 g003
Insects 14 00281 g004 550
Figure 4. Prevalence of Candidatus Arsenophonus phytopathogenicus (Arsenophonus) and Candidatus Phytoplasma solani (stolbur) in Pentastiridius leporinus adults (n = 36) and nymphs (n = 36) on potato, and adults (n = 9) and nymphs (n = 10) on sugar beet plants, as determined by qRT-PCR. Nymphs and adults were collected in September 2022.
Figure 4. Prevalence of Candidatus Arsenophonus phytopathogenicus (Arsenophonus) and Candidatus Phytoplasma solani (stolbur) in Pentastiridius leporinus adults (n = 36) and nymphs (n = 36) on potato, and adults (n = 9) and nymphs (n = 10) on sugar beet plants, as determined by qRT-PCR. Nymphs and adults were collected in September 2022.
Insects 14 00281 g004
Insects 14 00281 g005 550
Figure 5. Prevalence of Candidatus Arsenophonus phytopathogenicus (Arsenophonus) and Candidatus Phytoplasma solani (stolbur) in symptomatic potato tubers (n = 45) and sugar beet roots (n = 30), in September 2022.
Figure 5. Prevalence of Candidatus Arsenophonus phytopathogenicus (Arsenophonus) and Candidatus Phytoplasma solani (stolbur) in symptomatic potato tubers (n = 45) and sugar beet roots (n = 30), in September 2022.
Insects 14 00281 g005
Insects 14 00281 g006 550
Figure 6. The life cycle of P. leporinus with two different host plants, including data [6]. (A) P. leporinus adults lay eggs, which give rise to nymphs, on sugar beet and potato plants between June and September. Under favorable conditions, a second generation of adults develops in the summer, depicted by red arrows. The blue arrow demonstrates the ability of adults to move between host plants. (B) Nymph distribution and temperature-dependent movement between October and March. After harvesting, the subsequent crop is usually winter wheat. (C) Nymph distribution and temperature-dependent movement between April and June. Thermometer symbols indicate minimum and maximum temperatures.
Figure 6. The life cycle of P. leporinus with two different host plants, including data [6]. (A) P. leporinus adults lay eggs, which give rise to nymphs, on sugar beet and potato plants between June and September. Under favorable conditions, a second generation of adults develops in the summer, depicted by red arrows. The blue arrow demonstrates the ability of adults to move between host plants. (B) Nymph distribution and temperature-dependent movement between October and March. After harvesting, the subsequent crop is usually winter wheat. (C) Nymph distribution and temperature-dependent movement between April and June. Thermometer symbols indicate minimum and maximum temperatures.
Insects 14 00281 g006
Table
Table 1. Sampling locations.
Table 1. Sampling locations.
LocationStateCropsCoordinates
EichRhineland-PalatinatePotato, sugar beet49.765428, 8.393707
IbersheimRhineland-PalatinatePotato, sugar beet49.726559, 8.393205
LampertheimHessePotato49.610846, 8.465391
BickenbachHesseSugar beet49.758758, 8.577285
Table
Table 2. Detection of Candidatus Arsenophonus phytopathogenicus (Arsenophonus) and Candidatus Phytoplasma solani (stolbur) in P. leporinus nymphs, as well as potato and sugar beet plants, after inoculation with field-collected third-to-fifth-instar nymphs for 66 days. Control were potato plants without nymphs.
Table 2. Detection of Candidatus Arsenophonus phytopathogenicus (Arsenophonus) and Candidatus Phytoplasma solani (stolbur) in P. leporinus nymphs, as well as potato and sugar beet plants, after inoculation with field-collected third-to-fifth-instar nymphs for 66 days. Control were potato plants without nymphs.
PlantsGroup of Nymphs
Plant SpeciesArsenophonusStolburArsenophonusStolbur
Potato3/120/1212/120/12
Sugar beet1/31/33/31/3
Potato (Control)0/30/3--
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Behrmann, S.C.; Rinklef, A.; Lang, C.; Vilcinskas, A.; Lee, K.-Z. Potato (Solanum tuberosum) as a New Host for Pentastiridius leporinus (Hemiptera: Cixiidae) and Candidatus Arsenophonus Phytopathogenicus. Insects 2023, 14, 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030281

AMA Style

Behrmann SC, Rinklef A, Lang C, Vilcinskas A, Lee K-Z. Potato (Solanum tuberosum) as a New Host for Pentastiridius leporinus (Hemiptera: Cixiidae) and Candidatus Arsenophonus Phytopathogenicus. Insects. 2023; 14(3):281. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030281

Chicago/Turabian Style

Behrmann, Sarah Christin, André Rinklef, Christian Lang, Andreas Vilcinskas, and Kwang-Zin Lee. 2023. "Potato (Solanum tuberosum) as a New Host for Pentastiridius leporinus (Hemiptera: Cixiidae) and Candidatus Arsenophonus Phytopathogenicus" Insects 14, no. 3: 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030281

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop