Next Article in Journal
Best Practices for Comprehensive Annotation of Neuropeptides of Gryllus bimaculatus
Next Article in Special Issue
Winners and Losers: Cordulegaster Species under the Pressure of Climate Change
Previous Article in Journal
Aphrophoridae as Potential Vectors of Xylella fastidiosa in Tunisia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Associations of 16-Year Population Dynamics in Range-Expanding Moths with Temperature and Years since Establishment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 14
Issue 2
10.3390/insects14020120
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Climatic Change on Potential Distribution of Spogostylum ocyale (Diptera: Bombyliidae) in the Middle East Using Maxent Modelling

by
Mustafa M. Soliman
1,*,
Areej A. Al-Khalaf
2 and
Magdi S. A. El-Hawagry
1
1
Department of Entomology, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt
2
Biology Department, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2023, 14(2), 120; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14020120
Submission received: 14 December 2022 / Revised: 19 January 2023 / Accepted: 21 January 2023 / Published: 24 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate Change and Insects)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Spogostylum ocyale (Wiedemann 1828) is a robust species of bee fly (family Bombyliidae), known to be a larval ectoparasitoid as well as an important flower pollinator. This species has disappeared from many of its historic habitats due to substantial changes in floral and faunal compositions in recent years. The current and future distributions of the parasitoid in the Middle East region was predicted using the Maximum entropy model (Maxent). The model performance was satisfactory and revealed a good potential distribution for S. ocyale featured by the selected factors. The results show that the distribution of S. ocyale is mainly affected by the temperature. Coastal regions, with warm summers and cold winters, were high to medium in suitability. Future scenarios predict a progressive decline in the extent of suitable habitats with global warming. These findings lead to robust conservation management measures in current or future conservation planning.

Abstract

Spogostylum ocyale (Wiedemann 1828) is a large robust species of bee fly (family Bombyliidae), known to be a larval ectoparasitoid as well as an important flower pollinator as an adult. This species has become extremely rare or has disappeared from many of its historic habitats due to substantial changes in floral and faunal compositions in recent years. Climate change and urbanisation, together with other anthropogenic activities, may be to blame for these changes. Distribution modelling based on environmental variables together with known occurrences is a powerful tool in analytical biology, with applications in ecology, evolution, conservation management, epidemiology and other fields. Based on climatological and topographic data, the current and future distributions of the parasitoid in the Middle East region was predicted using the maximum entropy model (Maxent). The model performance was satisfactory (AUC mean = 0.834; TSS mean = 0.606) and revealed a good potential distribution for S. ocyale featured by the selected factors. A set of seven predictors was chosen from 19 bioclimatic variables and one topographic variable. The results show that the distribution of S. ocyale is mainly affected by the maximum temperature of the warmest period (Bio5) and temperature annual range (Bio7). According to the habitat suitability map, coastal regions with warm summers and cold winters had high to medium suitability. However, future scenarios predict a progressive decline in the extent of suitable habitats with global climate warming. These findings lead to robust conservation management measures in current or future conservation planning.

1. Introduction

Spogostylum ocyale (Wiedemann 1828) is a large robust species of bee fly (family Bombyliidae), about 15 mm in length or slightly more [1]. Like all Spogostylum spp., adult S. ocyale are important flower pollinators [2], while as larvae they are ectoparasitoids on the immature stages of solitary bees and wasps, egg pods of Acrididae and pyralid cocoons [3,4]. The distribution of S. ocyale is primarily restricted to warm arid and semiarid habitats [5,6], where it is a prominent member of the flower-visiting insect fauna [7]. It has been recorded and seems to be well represented throughout most Middle Eastern countries, as well as a few neighbouring countries, in both the Palaearctic (Egypt, Iran, Israel, Jordan, Libya, Palestine (West Bank) and Saudi Arabia) and Afrotropics (Oman, Somalia, southwestern Saudi Arabia, Sudan, United Arab Emirates and Yemen) [8].
The distribution of a living organism is a necessary component of the study of its occupied ecological niche in the ecosystem [9]. The niche of a species is influenced by many environmental and biotic variables in its distributional range [10]. Each species has a unique combination of tolerances to various climatic factors, and any changes in these factors can cause potential changes in both the ecology and habitat of species and hence their geographical distribution [11,12]. Thus, we need to identify the potential effects of climate change in any area that is particularly vulnerable [13]. Rising temperatures are one of the most important climatic factors that can induce habitat shifts and/or population declines and are expected to become the primary threat to wildlife survival [14]. The average global temperature has increased by 0.74 °C in the last few decades and is expected to increase by another 1.4–5.8 °C in 2100 [15]. Consequently, almost 30% of plant and animal species are expected to be extinct by the end of this century [16].
Species distribution models (SDMs) are commonly used to determine conservation priorities by providing insights into the ecology and distributions of species [17] and by giving information for managing resources and habitats [11]. They have become crucial tools for determining how anthropogenic and natural environmental changes can affect species distributions. Biologists and managers can use SDMs to predict biological invasions and identify critical habitats, and they can decide where to translocate threatened species by anticipating their occurrence over time and space [18,19].
As with most agricultural insects (pests and pollinators), niche modelling studies of the family Bombyliidae, including Spogostylum ocyale, have received less attention than those devoted to insects of medicinal importance [20,21] or to other taxa, such as vertebrates [22]. To date and to our knowledge, only two studies [6,23] have been conducted on the distribution of bee flies in Egypt and the Middle East. The first analysed the distribution of all bee fly species based on their occurrence in the various ecological zones, while the second employed maximum entropy (Maxent) modelling to forecast the probable climatic niches of six threatened Anthrax species. The results showed that bee fly species richness was strongly correlated with plant diversity and that suitable habitats have vanished due to substantial changes in floral and faunal compositions over the last 50 years.
The present study is based on S. ocyale records mainly from Egypt and eight neighbouring Middle Eastern countries (Palestine, Israel, Jordan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Oman and Yemen). During the last 30 years, the third author has conducted a great number of collecting visits to various locations in Egypt and Saudi Arabia and has purposefully visited the same localities where bee flies, including S. ocyale, have been collected by prior authors. However, like many other bee flies, S. ocyale has become exceedingly rare or has disappeared from many of its historic habitats because of substantial changes in floral and faunal compositions in recent years, indicating that the species is endangered or vulnerable (at least in parts of its distribution range). Climate change, urbanisation and modern agricultural operations may be to blame for these changes, which have resulted in significant destruction of many animals’ native habitats.
Based on climatological and topographical data, the present study aims to develop environmental niche models and determine the areas with the best habitat appropriateness for the bee fly S. ocyale. In addition, we predict the effects of climate change on habitat suitability in 2071–2100 under two distinct climate change scenarios (SSP126 and SSP585) using five general circulation models (GCMs).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Research Area

This study was carried out in Egypt and eight neighbouring Middle Eastern countries, including Palestine (West Bank), Israel, Jordan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Oman and Yemen. The study covers approximately 4.5 million km2 of land.

2.2. Distribution Data for S. ocyale

A total of 88 S. ocyale records from nine countries were used in the study. These records were compiled using museum material and/or material collected by the third author through a series of collecting trips, primarily in Egypt and Saudi Arabia, between 1991 and 2020. Material from Efflatoun’s collection at Cairo University (EFC), the Entomological Society of Egypt’s collection (ESEC) and the third author’s personal collection were considered. For records from other countries, the following literature was used: Austen [24] for Palestine and Israel; Greathead [25] and Arabyat et al. [26] for Jordan; Zaitzev [27] for Iraq; Greathead [25] for the United Arab Emirates; Greathead [28] and Greathead [25] for Oman; and Greathead [25] for Yemen. In addition, Greathead [29,30] was the source for large numbers of records from around the Arabian Peninsula.

2.3. Environmental Data

Herein, 19 climatic variables and one topographical variable were downloaded from the WorldClim database (https://worldclim.org/, accessed on 20 July 2022) with a spatial resolution of 30 arc sec (~1 km) to assess current climatic conditions (Table 1). Environmental niche modelling for S. ocyale was performed according to the method described by Nasser et al. [6]. Briefly, the jackknifing function in Maxent was used to determine variables that showed any contribution to S. ocyale distribution. These variables were then subjected to the correlation test by SDMToolbox v2.5 (for ArcMap 10.7) to remove variables with high collinearity (Table S1) [6]. Consequentially, we used a set of seven most important bioclimatic layers that contribute to habitat suitability (Table 2). All these layers were clipped by ArcGIS software v10.7 to match the dimensions of the studied area and saved in ASCII grid format for use in Maxent.
Five general circulation models (GFDL-ESM4, IPSL-CM6A-LR, MPI-ESM1-2-HR, MRI-ESM2-0 and UKESM1-0-LL) for the year 2085 (2071–2100) were downloaded from the CHELSA (Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas) database (https://chelsa-climate.org/, accessed on 25 July 2022) with a high resolution of 30 arc sec (~ 1 km) [31]. We used these models to predict the effects of climate change on S. ocyale according to the emissions scenarios ssp126; SSP1-RCP2.6 and ssp585; SSP5-RCP8.5. The five models used in this study are the primary ISIMIP3b models that are used compulsorily by the ISIMIP impact modelling team. These models are good representatives of the whole CMIP6 ensemble in terms of climate sensitivity and are structurally independent in terms of their ocean and atmosphere model components, and their process representation is good (GFDL-ESM4, MRI-ESM2-0 and UKESM1-0-LL) to fair (IPSL-CM6A-LR and MPIESM1-2-HR) [32]. Details of these climate models are listed in Table 3.

2.4. Habitat Suitability Model

To predict the current and future distributions of S. ocyale, the maximum entropy modelling was used with the Maxent software version 3.4.4 [33]. Maxent performs well with presence-only information and relatively few occurrence records [34,35], and it is broadly used in projecting range shifts of species distribution under climate change [36]. This technique generates mathematical models that describe the relationships between the probability of predicting a species and predictor variables and translates these models into potential distribution maps, indicating the environmental suitability of S. ocyale. The suitability values for a species habitat vary from 0 (unsuitable) to 1 (highly suitable) [37,38]. For the model, 25% of the occurrence records were assigned as the test data, and tenfold cross-validation (10 replicates) was used to enhance the model performance. To evaluate the accuracy of the generated model, we used two metrics: the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve [39] and the true skill statistics (TSS) [40]. The closer the test value is to 1, the better the discrimination is, and the more precise and informative the model [39,40].

3. Results

3.1. Evaluations of the Model and Its Importance to Variables

The performance for S. ocyale was satisfactory (AUC mean = 0.834; TSS mean = 0.606, Figure 1a and Table S2) and revealed a good potential distribution for S. ocyale featured by the selected factors. The jackknife test indicates that the distribution of S. ocyale was mainly affected by the maximum temperature of the warmest period (Bio5) and the temperature annual range (Bio7), and these variables contributed 34.4% and 32.5% to the species habitat model, respectively (Figure 1b and Table 2). The Maxent model was also collectively influenced by four other layers of climatic variables of 21.0% and one topographic variable (Alt) of 12.1% (Figure 1b and Table 2). Considering the permutation importance, the temperature annual range (Bio7) had the highest influence on the habitat model with 63.3% contribution, while altitude (Alt) and annual mean temperature (Bio1) contributed 15.9% and 9.9%, respectively (Table 2). The species response curve represents the relation between variable layers (climatic and topographic) and the suitability of the species habitat [38]. Based on the obtained response curves, S. ocyale prefers the maximum temperature of the warmest period from 20 to 35 °C, temperature annual range from 10 to 25 °C, annual mean temperature from 2 to 20 °C, mean diurnal range (max temp−min temp) from 3 to 12 °C and altitude from − 800 to 0 m and above 3000 m (very low and very high elevations) (Figure S1).

3.2. Current Potential Distribution of Spogostylum ocyale

The distribution map of S. ocyale in Egypt and some Middle Eastern countries indicated 5.85%, 7.43% and 10.20% of the study localities, respectively, were identified as high, medium and general potential habitats (Figure 2). Generally, the predicted suitable habitats (high, medium and general) of S. ocyale were mainly situated at the coasts along the Mediterranean Sea, the coasts along the Red Sea, the Gulf of Suez coast, the Gulf of Aqaba coasts, the Gulf of Aden coasts, the Gulf of Oman coasts, and some areas in the coasts of Arabian Gulf. Apparently, the closer the locality is to the coastline, the higher the suitability is for this species. The average of the high-distribution areas was about 487 thousand km2 (5.85%), while the medium- and generally distributed areas were estimated at 618 (7.43%) and 848 (10.20%) thousand km2. In Egypt, the predicted distribution exhibited localities with high suitability for S. ocyale in the Coastal Strip, Nile Delta, North Sinai, and Red Sea coast (Figure 2).

3.3. Future Potential Distribution of Spogostylum ocyale

The predicted distribution map of S. ocyale for the five primary models under SSP126 and SSP585 scenarios exhibits a progressive decline in the extent of suitable habitats with global climate warming (Figure 3). The total area of suitable distribution (high, medium and general suitability) for S. ocyale is expected to decline from 1.9 million km2 (23.5%) in 1970–2000 to 23 thousand km2 (0.27 ± 0.06%) on average in 2071–2100 for the five models under the two scenarios (SSP126 and SSP585) except for the MPI-ESM1-2-HR and MRI-ESM2-0 models under the SSP126 scenario. Thus, the unsuitable habitats for S. ocyale in Egypt and other countries are expected to increase by 23.2% in 2071–2100 at the expense of suitable habitat loss. For the MPI-ESM1-2-HR and MRI-ESM2-0 models, the potentially suitable total areas (19.72 and 18.6%, respectively) would not change much under the SSP126 scenario, yet the area of general potential habitat (0.3–0.5 suitability grade) alone represents about 98.8 and 98.9% of the suitable total areas for both models, respectively. These estimates predict that the distribution of suitable habitats for S. ocyale will diminish in the future, and species habitat loss will be relatively larger in SSP585 than in SSP126 (Figure 3), indicating an inverse relationship between the distribution of S. ocyale and the greenhouse gas emissions.

4. Discussion

Distribution modelling based on the environmental variables of known occurrence sites is a powerful tool in analytical biology, with applications in ecology, evolution, invasive species management, epidemiology and other fields [41]. Furthermore, this technique is important in biogeographic research, and various SDMs have been presented to support conservation decision making at the regional and global levels [19,42]. Here, the present and future distributions for the parasitoid bee fly S. ocyale were predicted using the maximum entropy model (Maxent). This algorithm has been broadly implemented in species distribution studies [42]. The model predicts the spatial distribution based on the suitable climatic factors of the species; it is believed that under known climatic conditions, the distribution of the species approaches reality as the entropy of the distribution increases [43]. This allowed us to determine which variables are informative in explaining the distribution of species and how they behaved [42]. Temperature is well known to be a climate factor that influences the abundance and distribution of insects [44,45]. Based on our models, the maximum temperature of the warmest period (Bio5) and temperature annual range (Bio7) are predicted as the most important variables that affect the distribution of S. ocyale. These results are consistent with previous literature on different insects, e.g., [6,46,47,48]. Other variables are less important in shaping the distribution of S. ocyale. However, altitude is a significant factor impacting the distribution of species as well [6,49]. In our research, the response curves revealed an inverse correlation between temperature and species occurrence (Figure S1). In addition, it demonstrated that the parasitoid bee fly can be found in profiles of minimum temperatures that include both extremely low- and high-altitude sites (10–25 °C). Our finding of maximum temperature of the warmest period (Bio5) and temperature annual range (Bio7) as having the topmost relative contribution in the model implies that the distribution of S. ocyale is influenced mainly by temperature, especially considering that the climatic zones of the Middle Eastern countries range from arid and semiarid to temperate climatic zones, where precipitation is scarce throughout the year [50]. In comparison, variables related to precipitation or its variations were found to have a substantial influence on the predicted distribution of parasitoids in tropical regions, such as Comperiella calauanica in the Philippines [11].
Recent developments in ecological modelling have improved our capacity to predict and estimate the suitable localities of species with environmental variables and can fill in information gaps when determining the need for conservation [51]. In the present study, the Maxent model predicted suitable zones for the parasitoid bee fly in the Middle East region. According to the habitat distribution map (Figure 2), coastal regions, with a warm summer and cold winter, were high to medium suitable areas for the parasitoid. As a result, arid to semiarid regions (with temperatures above 35 °C) with very low humidity may not be the preferred habitats for S. ocyale (Figure S1). The potential distribution for this parasitoid in Egypt closely matches what has been documented by Nasser et al. [6] in an environmental niche modelling study on six bee fly species that are thought to be threatened. The results of this research showed different habitat suitability and different predictor (altitude, temperature and precipitation) contributions for each species. However, the predicted distributions of two (Anthrax chionanthrax and A. melanista) of these bee flies were largely dominated by temperature and showed areas with high suitability in the Sinai, Red Sea coast, Coastal Strip, some areas in the Western Desert and Eastern Desert, and Lower Nile Valley and Delta.
Several recent studies observed the ability to predict the distribution of the host species by the distribution model of its parasitic wasp, when the suitable localities for the parasitoid were consistent with localities of its hosts, e.g., [11,52,53]. Here, the parasitoid bee fly has several host species (immature stages of solitary bees and wasps, egg pods of Acrididae and pyralid cocoons) and is not highly host specific. Although climate is the primary factor influencing its distribution, more studies are required on this species to better understand its behaviour and relationship with its hosts in the field.
Biodiversity patterns and changes in the Earth’s climate are intimately intertwined [54]. In response to long-term climate change, the geographic distributions of species are shrinking, expanding, shifting or fragmenting [51]. Moreover, it is anticipated to result in species experiencing phenological inconsistency and facing new competition and community structures [54]. With ectotherms in particular, insects are most vulnerable as their biochemical and physiological processes are firmly controlled by ambient temperature [55,56]. Our analyses exhibit strong indications for a possible extensive reduction in distribution patterns for the parasitoid bee fly. Except for the MPI-ESM1-2-HR and MRI-ESM2-0 models under the SSP126 scenario (Figure 3: c1, d1), the parasitoid was predicted to lose about 98.7% of its range under both SSP scenarios, putting it on the brink of extinction. The future distribution maps almost show an agreement in predicted suitability of habitats among the five general circulation models under low (SSP126) and high (SSP585) emission scenarios (Figure 3). A closely related bee fly species (A. trifasciatus) exhibited a similar pattern of habitat degradation in the St. Catherine area for the year 2070 under two different future emission scenarios [6]. Given that the geographical distribution of A. trifasciatus in Egypt is limited only to the Sinai Peninsula, it can be classified as a potentially endangered species.
Despite the limitations of SDMs, the threats posed by climate change to species will certainly be compounded by the continued destruction of its remaining habitats. In Egypt, during the last 50 years, dramatic changes occurred in the floral and faunal assemblages in the parasitoid’s highly suitable areas (e.g., Delta and Coastal Strip). These changes may be accounted for by urbanisation together with other anthropogenic activities that cause severe reduction and degradation of the parasitoid’s habitats. However, there are some areas where urban sprawl has not yet reached, and they still maintain their natural fauna and flora. Sinai is one of these localities that can contribute significantly to the conservation of such rare species, especially because it has one of the most important natural reserves (St. Catherine protectorate) in Egypt. Therefore, implementing the appropriate conservation actions will be applicable.
The outcomes of climate change and species adaptation over hundreds of thousands of years are not comparable to the changes taking place within a century in terms of biodiversity [54]. The adaptation of the S. ocyale species may not be fast enough to keep pace with the rate of habitat loss and degradation predicted during this study by the year 2085. Furthermore, the implications might be worse than what we estimated here if humans are unable to reduce carbon emissions.
In addition to climate, which is thought to be the main predictor of species distribution at a wide landscape scale [57], biotic variables, such as biotic interactions, vegetation types and land use, should be taken into consideration to enhance model performance and to urge an improved understanding of the effects of global warming on species distributions [48,57]. Accordingly, the potential distribution of the parasitoid S. ocyale in the studied region represents its fundamental niche of actual environmental tolerances and not its realized niche as a result of biotic variables. Thus, conservation actions based solely on this distribution would be less restrictive and falsely optimistic.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we developed an SDM for the parasitoid bee fly S. ocyale in the Middle East based on climatic and topographical variables of known occurrence sites. Moreover, the results exhibit shrinkage in the future suitable habitats predicted for the parasitoid. Finally, we trust this is a potent evidence-based assumption that should be used to support conservation planning.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects14020120/s1, Table S1: Correlation test of variables that showed any contribution to Spogostylum ocyale distribution by SDMToolbox v2.5 in ArcMap 10.7 (Universal tool; Remove highly correlated variables). Table S2: Performance evaluation of the MaxEnt model using area under the ROC curve “AUC” and true skilled statistics (TSS). Figure S1: Spogostylum ocyale response curves in relation to bioclimatic predictors: values shown are average over ten replicate runs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M.S. and M.S.A.E.-H.; methodology, all authors; software, M.M.S.; validation, all authors; formal analysis, M.M.S.; investigation, all authors; resources, all authors; data curation, M.M.S. and M.S.A.E.-H.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.S.; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, M.M.S.; supervision, M.S.A.E.-H.; project administration, all authors; funding acquisition, A.A.A.-K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by University Researchers Supporting Project (No. PNURSP2023R37), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to James Nation (Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Florida, USA) and Francis Gilbert (Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK) for editing and revising the manuscript. This work was supported by University Researchers Supporting Project (No. PNURSP2023R37), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. El-Hawagry, M.S.; El-Moursy, A.A.; Gilbert, F.; Zalat, S. The tribe Anthracini Latreille (Bombyliidae, Diptera) from Egypt. Egypt. J. Biol. 2000, 2, 97–117. [Google Scholar]
  2. El-Moursy, A.; Gilbert, F.; Zalat, S.; El-Hawagry, M. Foraging behaviour of anthracine flies (Diptera: Bombyliidae) in southern Sinai, Egypt. Egypt. J. Biol. 1999, 1, 87–95. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yeates, D.K.; Greathead, D. The evolutionary pattern of host use in the Bombyliidae (Diptera): A diverse family of parasitoid flies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1997, 60, 149–185. [Google Scholar]
  4. El-Hawagry, M.S.; Dhafer, H. The family Bombyliidae in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Diptera: Brachycera: Asiloidea). Zootaxa 2019, 4590, 59. [Google Scholar]
  5. Greathead, D.J.; Evenhuis, N.L. Family Bombyliidae. In Manual of Palaearctic Diptera (with Special Reference to Flies of Economic Importance); Papp, L., Darvas, B. Eds.; Science Herald, Budapest Hungary: 1997; Volume 2, pp. 487–512.
  6. Nasser, M.; El-Hawagry, M.; Okely, M. Environmental niche modeling for some species of the genus Anthrax Scopoli (Diptera: Bombyliidae) in Egypt, with special notes on St. Catherine protected area as a suitable habitat. J. Insect Conserv. 2019, 23, 831–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Toft, C.A. Resource shifts in bee flies (Bombyliidae): Interactions among species determine choice of resources. Oikos 1984, 43, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. El-Hawagry, M.S. A new species and an updated checklist of the genus Spogostylum Macquart (Bombyliidae: Diptera) from Egypt. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control. 2018, 28, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Araújo, M.B.; New, M. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Thuiller, W.; Lavorel, S.; Araújo, M.B. Niche properties and geographical extent as predictors of species sensitivity to climate change. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2005, 14, 347–357. [Google Scholar]
  11. Almarinez, B.J.M.; Fadri, M.J.A.; Lasina, R.; Tavera, M.A.A.; Carvajal, T.M.; Watanabe, K.; Legaspi, J.C.; Amalin, D.M. A bioclimate-based maximum entropy model for Comperiella calauanica barrion, almarinez and amalin (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) in the Philippines. Insects 2021, 12, 26. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chhetri, B.; Badola, H.K.; Barat, S. Modelling climate change impacts on distribution of Himalayan pheasants. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 123, 107368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Stephenson, K.; Wilson, B.; Taylor, M.; McLaren, K.; van Veen, R.; Kunna, J.; Campbell, J. Modelling Climate Change Impacts on Tropical Dry Forest Fauna. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hoffmann, A.A.; Rymer, P.D.; Byrne, M.; Ruthrof, K.X.; Whinam, J.; McGeoch, M.; Bergstrom, D.M.; Guerin, G.R.; Sparrow, B.; Joseph, L. Impacts of recent climate change on terrestrial flora and fauna: Some emerging Australian examples. Austral Ecol. 2019, 44, 3–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Hotta, M.; Tsuyama, I.; Nakao, K.; Ozeki, M.; Higa, M.; Kominami, Y.; Hamada, T.; Matsui, T.; Yasuda, M.; Tanaka, N. Modeling future wildlife habitat suitability: Serious climate change impacts on the potential distribution of the Rock Ptarmigan Lagopus muta japonica in Japan’s northern Alps. BMC Ecol. 2019, 19, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. IPCC. Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  17. Rousseau, J.S.; Betts, M.G. Factors influencing transferability in species distribution models. Ecography 2022, 2022, e06060. [Google Scholar]
  18. Millar, C.I.; Stephenson, N.L.; Stephens, S.L. Climate change and forests of the future: Managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol. Appl. 2007, 17, 2145–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Guisan, A.; Tingley, R.; Baumgartner, J.B.; Naujokaitis-Lewis, I.; Sutcliffe, P.R.; Tulloch, A.I.; Regan, T.J.; Brotons, L.; McDonald-Madden, E.; Mantyka-Pringle, C. Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions. Ecol. Lett. 2013, 16, 1424–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sallam, M.F.; Al Ahmed, A.M.; Abdel-Dayem, M.S.; Abdullah, M.A. Ecological niche modeling and land cover risk areas for rift valley fever vector, culex tritaeniorhynchus giles in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e65786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Naeem, M.; Alahmed, A.; Kheir, S.; Sallam, M. Spatial distribution modeling of Stegomyia aegypti and Culex tritaeniorhynchus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Al-bahah Province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Trop Biomed 2016, 33, 295–310. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hochkirch, A. The insect crisis we can’t ignore. Nature 2016, 539, 141. [Google Scholar]
  23. El-Hawagry, M.; Gilbert, F. Zoogeographical affinities and faunal relationships of bee flies (Diptera: Bombyliidae) in Egypt. Zool. Middle East 2014, 60, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Austen, E.E. The Bombyliidae of Palestine; British Museum (Natural History): London, UK, 1937. [Google Scholar]
  25. Greathead, D.J. A sympatric species pair: Spogostylum ocyale (Wiedemann, 1828) and S. griseipenne Macquart, 1850 (Diptera: Bombyliidae). Zootaxa 2003, 274, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  26. Arabyat, S.; Katbeh-Bader, A.; Greathead, D. The bee flies (Diptera: Bombyliidae) of Jordan. Zootaxa 2004, 654, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zaitsev, V. On the fauna of bee flies (Diptera, Bombyliidae) of Iraq. Entomol. Obozr. 1976, 55, 691–697. [Google Scholar]
  28. Greathead, D. Bee flies (Bombyliidae: Diptera) from Oman. J. Oman Stud. Spec. Rep. 1980, 2, 233–250. [Google Scholar]
  29. Greathead, D. Insects of Saudi Arabia. Diptera: Fam. Bombyliidae. Fauna Saudi Arab. 1980, 2, 291–337. [Google Scholar]
  30. Greathead, D. Diptera: Fam. Bombyliidae of Saudi Arabia. Fauna Saudi Arab. 1988, 9, 90–113. [Google Scholar]
  31. Brun, P.; Zimmermann, N.E.; Hari, C.; Pellissier, L.; Karger, D.N. Global climate-related predictors at kilometre resolution for the past and future. Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. 2022, 2022, 1–44. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lange, S. Trend-preserving bias adjustment and statistical downscaling with ISIMIP3BASD (v1. 0). Geosci. Model Dev. 2019, 12, 3055–3070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Phillips, S.J.; Dudík, M.; Schapire, R.E. Maxent Software for Modeling Species Niches and Distributions (Version 3.4.4); 2022. Available online: http://biodiversityinformatics.amnh.org/open_source/maxent/ (accessed on 30 July 2022).
  34. Elith, J.H.; Graham, C.P.; Anderson, R.; Dudík, M.; Ferrier, S.; Guisan, A.J.; Hijmans, R.; Huettmann, F.R.; Leathwick, J.; Lehmann, A. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 2006, 29, 129–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Wang, Y.S.; Xie, B.Y.; Wan, F.H.; Xiao, Q.M.; Dai, L.Y. The potential geographic distribution of Radopholus similis in China. Agric. Sci. China 2007, 6, 1444–1449. [Google Scholar]
  36. Yan, H.; He, J.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, C.; Wu, D. Gentiana macrophylla response to climate change and vulnerability evaluation in China. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2020, 22, e00948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khanum, R.; Mumtaz, A.; Kumar, S. Predicting impacts of climate change on medicinal asclepiads of Pakistan using Maxent modeling. Acta Oecol. 2013, 49, 23–31. [Google Scholar]
  38. Gebrewahid, Y.; Abrehe, S.; Meresa, E.; Eyasu, G.; Abay, K.; Gebreab, G.; Kidanemariam, K.; Adissu, G.; Abreha, G.; Darcha, G. Current and future predicting potential areas of Oxytenanthera abyssinica (A. Richard) using MaxEnt model under climate change in Northern Ethiopia. Ecol. Process. 2020, 9, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  39. Phillips, S.J.; Anderson, R.P.; Schapire, R.E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 2006, 190, 231–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Allouche, O.; Tsoar, A.; Kadmon, R. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: Prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J. Appl. Ecol. 2006, 43, 1223–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ciss, M.; Biteye, B.; Fall, A.G.; Fall, M.; Gahn, M.C.B.; Leroux, L.; Apolloni, A. Ecological niche modelling to estimate the distribution of Culicoides, potential vectors of bluetongue virus in Senegal. BMC Ecol. 2019, 19, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  42. Valencia-Rodríguez, D.; Jiménez-Segura, L.; Rogéliz, C.A.; Parra, J.L. Ecological niche modeling as an effective tool to predict the distribution of freshwater organisms: The case of the Sabaleta Brycon henni (Eigenmann, 1913). PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247876. [Google Scholar]
  43. Li, Y.; Li, M.; Li, C.; Liu, Z. Optimized maxent model predictions of climate change impacts on the suitable distribution of Cunninghamia lanceolata in China. Forests 2020, 11, 302. [Google Scholar]
  44. El-Hady, R.M.; El-Hawagry, M.S.; Soliman, M.M. Diversity and temporal variations of the leafhopper fauna (Cicadellidae, Auchenorrhyncha, Hemiptera) in two ecological zones of Egypt. J. Nat. Hist. 2020, 54, 2869–2887. [Google Scholar]
  45. Soliman, M.M.; El-Hady, R.M.; El-Hawagry, M.S. Zoogeography and diversity patterns of the family Cicadellidae (Hemiptera) in Toshka Region, Egypt. J. Nat. Hist. 2022, 56, 1199–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wermelinger, B.; Seifert, M. Temperature-dependent reproduction of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus, and analysis of the potential population growth. Ecol. Entomol. 1999, 24, 103–110. [Google Scholar]
  47. Bale, J.S.; Masters, G.J.; Hodkinson, I.D.; Awmack, C.; Bezemer, T.M.; Brown, V.K.; Butterfield, J.; Buse, A.; Coulson, J.C.; Farrar, J. Herbivory in global climate change research: Direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivores. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2002, 8, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hof, A.R.; Svahlin, A. The potential effect of climate change on the geographical distribution of insect pest species in the Swedish boreal forest. Scand. J. For. Res. 2016, 31, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Urbani, F.; D’Alessandro, P.; Biondi, M. Using Maximum Entropy Modeling (MaxEnt) to predict future trends in the distribution of high altitude endemic insects in response to climate change. Bull. Insectol. 2017, 70, 189–200. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zittis, G.; Almazroui, M.; Alpert, P.; Ciais, P.; Cramer, W.; Dahdal, Y.; Fnais, M.; Francis, D.; Hadjinicolaou, P.; Howari, F. Climate change and weather extremes in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. Rev. Geophys. 2022, 60, e2021RG000762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Boys, W.A.; Adam, M. Predicting the distributions of regional endemic dragonflies using a combined model approach. Insect Conserv. Divers. 2021, 14, 52–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. McCoshum, S.M.; Andreoli, S.L.; Stenoien, C.M.; Oberhauser, K.S.; Baum, K.A. Species distribution models for natural enemies of monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) larvae and pupae: Distribution patterns and implications for conservation. J. Insect Conserv. 2016, 20, 223–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tavanpour, T.; Mehrnejad, M.R.; Sarafrazi, A.; Imani, S. Distribution modelling of four scelionid egg parasitoids of green stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Biologia 2017, 72, 53–61. [Google Scholar]
  54. Koot, E.M.; Morgan-Richards, M.; Trewick, S.A. Climate change and alpine-adapted insects: Modelling environmental envelopes of a grasshopper radiation. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2022, 9, 211596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Deutsch, C.A.; Tewksbury, J.J.; Huey, R.B.; Sheldon, K.S.; Ghalambor, C.K.; Haak, D.C.; Martin, P.R. Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 6668–6672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Soliman, M.; El-Hawagry, M. Impact of urbanisation and human activities on diversity and abundance of ulidiid flies (Diptera: Ulidiidae) in Wadi El-Natroun, Egypt. Afr. Entomol. 2020, 28, 415–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Titeux, N.; Maes, D.; Marmion, M.; Luoto, M.; Heikkinen, R.K. Inclusion of soil data improves the performance of bioclimatic envelope models for insect species distributions in temperate Europe. J. Biogeogr. 2009, 36, 1459–1473. [Google Scholar]
Insects 14 00120 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Reliability test of the distribution model created for Spogostylum ocyale (values shown are averages over ten replicate runs). (b) Jackknife test results for Spogostylum ocyale, showing the relative predictive power of environmental variables. (Without variable)—the importance of the other environmental variables when this variable is omitted; (With only variable)—the importance of the environmental variable when used in isolation; (With all variables)—the importance of all environmental variables.
Figure 1. (a) Reliability test of the distribution model created for Spogostylum ocyale (values shown are averages over ten replicate runs). (b) Jackknife test results for Spogostylum ocyale, showing the relative predictive power of environmental variables. (Without variable)—the importance of the other environmental variables when this variable is omitted; (With only variable)—the importance of the environmental variable when used in isolation; (With all variables)—the importance of all environmental variables.
Insects 14 00120 g001
Insects 14 00120 g002 550
Figure 2. Occurrence records and potentially suitable climatic distribution of Spogostylum ocyale in Egypt and some Middle Eastern countries.
Figure 2. Occurrence records and potentially suitable climatic distribution of Spogostylum ocyale in Egypt and some Middle Eastern countries.
Insects 14 00120 g002
Insects 14 00120 g003 550
Figure 3. Predicted future habitat suitability of Spogostylum ocyale in Egypt and some Middle Eastern countries for the year 2085 (2071–2100) by five general circulation models (GCMs): a GFDL-ESM4, b IPSL-CM6A-LR, c MPI-ESM1-2-HR, d MRI-ESM2-0 and e UKESM1-0-LL (according to ssp126; SSP1-RCP2.6 emission scenario (1) and ssp585; SSP5-RCP8.5 emission scenario (2)).
Figure 3. Predicted future habitat suitability of Spogostylum ocyale in Egypt and some Middle Eastern countries for the year 2085 (2071–2100) by five general circulation models (GCMs): a GFDL-ESM4, b IPSL-CM6A-LR, c MPI-ESM1-2-HR, d MRI-ESM2-0 and e UKESM1-0-LL (according to ssp126; SSP1-RCP2.6 emission scenario (1) and ssp585; SSP5-RCP8.5 emission scenario (2)).
Insects 14 00120 g003
Table
Table 1. Environmental and topographical variables used in the distribution modelling process of Spogostylum ocyale.
Table 1. Environmental and topographical variables used in the distribution modelling process of Spogostylum ocyale.
Variable CodeDescriptionUnit
Bio1Annual mean temperature°C
Bio2Mean diurnal range (max temp−min temp) (monthly average)°C
Bio3Isothermality (Bio1/Bio7) × 100°C
Bio4Temperature seasonality (coefficient of variation)°C
Bio5Max temperature of warmest period°C
Bio6Min temperature of the coldest period°C
Bio7Temperature annual range°C
Bio8Mean temperature of wettest quarter°C
Bio9Mean temperature of driest quarter°C
Bio10Mean temperature of warmest quarter°C
Bio11Mean temperature of coldest quarter°C
Bio12Annual precipitationmm
Bio13Precipitation of wettest periodmm
Bio14Precipitation of driest periodmm
Bio15Precipitation seasonality (coefficient of variation)mm
Bio16Precipitation of wettest quartermm
Bio17Precipitation of driest quartermm
Bio18Precipitation of warmest quartermm
Bio19Precipitation of coldest quartermm
AltAltitude in degreesm
Table
Table 2. Percent contributions of the bioclimatic and topographic variables in the Maxent models for Spogostylum ocyale (10 replicated runs).
Table 2. Percent contributions of the bioclimatic and topographic variables in the Maxent models for Spogostylum ocyale (10 replicated runs).
Variables% ContributionPermutation Importance
Bio534.40
Bio732.563.3
Bio214.34.1
Alt12.115.9
Bio86.16.8
Bio10.59.9
Bio90.10
Table
Table 3. Details of the primary five general circulation climate models used for the prediction of future habitat suitability of Spogostylum ocyale.
Table 3. Details of the primary five general circulation climate models used for the prediction of future habitat suitability of Spogostylum ocyale.
Model IDInstitutionNative
Resolution		Ensemble
Member		Priority a
GFDL-ESM4National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, Geophysical Fluid
Dynamics Laboratory, USA		288 × 180r1i1p1f11
IPSL-CM6A-LRInstitute Pierre Simon Laplace, France144 × 143r1i1p1f14
MPI-ESM1-2-HRMax Planck Institute for Meteorology, Germany384 × 192r1i1p1f13
MRI-ESM2-0Meteorological Research Institute, Japan320 × 160r1i1p1f15
UKESM1-0-LLMet Office Hadley Centre, UK192 × 144r1i1p1f22
a The priority of models follows the suggestions of the ISIMIP3b protocol.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Soliman, M.M.; Al-Khalaf, A.A.; El-Hawagry, M.S.A. Effects of Climatic Change on Potential Distribution of Spogostylum ocyale (Diptera: Bombyliidae) in the Middle East Using Maxent Modelling. Insects 2023, 14, 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14020120

AMA Style

Soliman MM, Al-Khalaf AA, El-Hawagry MSA. Effects of Climatic Change on Potential Distribution of Spogostylum ocyale (Diptera: Bombyliidae) in the Middle East Using Maxent Modelling. Insects. 2023; 14(2):120. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14020120

Chicago/Turabian Style

Soliman, Mustafa M., Areej A. Al-Khalaf, and Magdi S. A. El-Hawagry. 2023. "Effects of Climatic Change on Potential Distribution of Spogostylum ocyale (Diptera: Bombyliidae) in the Middle East Using Maxent Modelling" Insects 14, no. 2: 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14020120

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop