Next Article in Journal
Survival-Larval Density Relationships in the Field and Their Implications for Control of Container-Dwelling Aedes Mosquitoes
Next Article in Special Issue
Mating Competitiveness of Male Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) Irradiated by X-rays
Previous Article in Journal
First Identification and Investigation of piRNAs in the Larval Gut of the Asian Honeybee, Apis cerana
Previous Article in Special Issue
Radiation Hormesis to Improve the Quality of Adult Spodoptera litura (Fabr.)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 14
Issue 1
10.3390/insects14010018
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mating Competitiveness of Irradiated Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Male-Only and Both Sex Release Strategies under Laboratory Cage Conditions

by
George Saour
*,
Ali Hashem
and
Iyad Jassem
Atomic Energy Commission of Syria, Damascus P.O. Box 6091, Syria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2023, 14(1), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010018
Submission received: 23 October 2022 / Revised: 14 December 2022 / Accepted: 19 December 2022 / Published: 23 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Improved Field Performance of Sterile Male Lepidoptera to Ensure Success in SIT Programmes)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The sterile insect technique/inherited sterility (SIT/IS) has been successfully implemented to suppress or eradicate pestiferous species of Lepidoptera. The SIT/IS involves the release of mass-reared and gamma-irradiated moths (partially sterile males and fully sterile females) to achieve matings with wild moths. The success of any SIT/IS project depends, inter alia, on the overflooding ratio of released sterile moths to wild moths and the efficiency of male-only versus bi-sex releases of irradiated moths. The current laboratory study aims to understand the efficacy of overflooding ratios and the use of male-only releases compared with bi-sex releases for SIT/IS against the European grapevine moth, Lobesia botrana (Denis and Schiffermüller).

Abstract

This laboratory study explored the concept of whether irradiated male-only releases are more or equally efficient as releases of both irradiated males and females in the context of using the sterile insect technique/inherited sterility (SIT/IS) for the management of the European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana. The current study examined the mating competitiveness of 150-Gy-treated L. botrana male and female moths or 150-Gy-treated male moths only, with untreated moths in laboratory cages. Our results showed that the release of both sexes significantly increased the competitiveness value (C) and the biological efficiency index (BE) as compared with male-only release, and this was independent of the male to untreated male ratio. Moreover, a single release of 150-Gy-treated and untreated males and females at a 1:1:10:10 ratio (untreated male:untreated female: treated male:treated female) significantly reduced egg hatch, and the number of first-generation offspring (F1) was small. The emergence of F2-moths per untreated F1 male and female moth was low, but these undesired fertile moths should be eliminated in order to achieve effective control. The results presented herein provide useful information on the impact of 150-Gy-treated male-only, versus releases of both treated males and females on untreated moths, which is essential to managing L. botrana populations with SIT/IS.

1. Introduction

Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) is an important cultural, economic, and ecological crop worldwide, with the largest acreage and the highest economic value among fruit crops [1]. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, grapes are cultivated on 75,866 square kilometers worldwide [2]. The European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana (Denis and Schiffermüller; Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) is among the most destructive insect pests of grapes, threatening vineyards in southern Europe, the Middle East, and South America [3]. Populations of L. botrana are to date mainly controlled using broad-spectrum insecticides, biological control agents, and mating disruption [4,5,6]. Although all of these techniques have achieved effective control of this pest [7], they also have some limitations, i.e., development of insecticide resistance in the moths, contamination of the environment, health risks of pesticides, consumer choices for organic foods, and the need for maintaining adequate pheromone coverage in orchards [8,9]. The sterile insect technique/inherited sterility (SIT/IS) as part of an area-wide integrated pest management (AW-IPM) approach has proven to be a robust and effective control tactic for the management of lepidopteran pests. In the SIT/IS technique, a sub-sterilizing gamma dose is used for the male moths that are destined for release to suppress the reproduction of a target species. Good examples are the suppression of the codling moth Cydia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in the Okanagan Valley of British Columbia, Canada, the eradication of the pink bollworm Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in the southern USA and northern Mexico, and the suppression of the false codling moth Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in South Africa. Therefore, this study is part of an assessment to examine whether the SIT/IS could be integrated in an AW-IPM approach for the suppression of populations of L. botrana [10,11,12].
Current programs using SIT/IS against lepidopteran pests rely on mass-rearing and releases of both male and female moths that have been treated with gamma irradiation [13]. There are currently no decisive data available to conclude whether the release of irradiated male moths only would provide significant economic gains (decreasing operational costs) or increase the efficiency of the SIT/IS in the field as compared with the release of both irradiated genders [14]. Genetic sexing strains that allowed the mass production and release of only males have been developed for the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae), and this has significantly increased the efficiency of the technique in the field and greatly reduced programme costs [15]. In contrast, data from field-cage experiments with the cactus moth Cactoblastis cactorum Berg (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and C. pomonella suggest that the presence of sterile females might have a positive impact on population suppression [16,17]. Van Steenwyk et al. [18] have shown that sterilized females of P. gossypiella were equal to or more competitive than normal females. Recently, Sengupta et al. [19] reported that the simultaneous release of sub-sterile male and sterile female moths of Spodoptera litura (Fabr.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) using the IS technique might improve its efficacy, leading to more effective pest suppression. Moreover, Ikegawa et al. [20] found in a mathematical model that the bi-sex release of sterile males and females can be a compatible measure to suppress and eventually eradicate wild pest populations. Thus, there is a need to obtain conclusive data from tests that would compare the efficiency of male-only versus both sex releases for the control of lepidopteran pests [21].
Efforts to develop efficient genetic sexing strains in Lepidoptera have been successful in two species: the silkworm Bombyx mori L. (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae) and the Mediterranean flour moth Ephestia kuehniella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) [22,23]. However, Marec et al. [24] pointed out that the developed system (a balanced lethal strain) is not practical for lepidopteran SIT/IS programs as it requires the maintenance of two colonies, the manual separation of sexes in both colonies, and crosses that produce male-only progeny. In addition, it requires the regular verification of the genetic structure of the balanced lethal strain. However, it is worth mentioning that there has been progress on transgenic/CRISPR to create male-only stains in several economically important Lepidoptera species [25]. While waiting for the production of transgenic L. botrana stain in any current program using the SIT/IS approach against L. botrana [12], the irradiated male and female moths are released.
The possibility of applying SIT/IS against L. botrana populations in the field has been previously reviewed, and it was found that 150-Gy-treated females were fully sterile when mated with untreated male moths [10,11]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has been conducted to examine the effects of releasing 150-Gy-treated L. botrana female moths on the mating competitiveness of 150-Gy-treated male moths and consequently on the suppression of L. botrana populations. In fact, if treated male and female moths are released together, the treated males may court the sterile females and consequently not seek out the wild females as effectively as if they had been released without sterile females. This interference effect of sterile females on treated males could have a significant impact on male mating effectiveness. On the positive side, sterile female moths could attract wild males and “distract” them from mating with wild females. Moreover, a synergistic benefit has been demonstrated where sterile eggs laid by irradiated females have been shown to enhance the numerical response of egg parasitoids [26,27].
The current laboratory study aimed to understand the efficacy of L. botrana male-only release compared with bi-sex release. This study also aimed to determine the effects of male: female sex ratios on the competitiveness of treated male and female moths on the suppression of L. botrana populations. Noting that competitiveness can be assessed in different ways [28], in the current study, the Fried test (C value) [29] was used to calculate mating competitiveness. Furthermore, a follow-up study in large cage experiments under laboratory conditions was performed to determine the effects of a single release of 150-Gy-treated and untreated moths on L. botrana F1 and F2 fertility.

2. Material and Methods

Moths used in the experiments were derived from a colony maintained in the laboratory for several years. The colony was renewed (up to 50%) each year with field collected L. botrana larvae from green (unripe) grapes. The larvae were reared on a semi-artificial diet as described by Thiéry and Moreau [30] and Saour [11]. All insect stages were kept at a constant temperature of 25 ± 1 °C and RH of 70 ± 5%, and a photoperiod of 16:8 h (light:dark) + 1 h of dusk.

2.1. Moth Irradiation

Newly emerged adult male and female L. botrana moths (<18-h old) were irradiated (at room temperature ≈ 23 °C) with a dose of 150 Gy in a Cobalt-60 gamma irradiator (Issledovatel Gamma Irradiator, Techsnabexport Co., Ltd., Moscow, Russia) at a dose rate of 9.8 Gy/min. Moths were placed individually into commercial grade small transparent plastic test tubes (12 × 75 mm) prior to the irradiation treatment. The dose uniformity ratio (max:min of the received dose) was about 1.14 (measured by the Fricke test), and the absorbed dose was calibrated using the conventional Fricke dosimetry.

2.2. Experiment 1 and 2: Effect of 150-Gy-Treated Male and Female Moths on Percentage Egg Hatch in Laboratory Cages at Different Sex Ratios

Wooden-framed, rectangular oviposition cages (65 × 45 × 45 cm) were used that had one side that could be opened and closed. The cages were covered with stainless steel woven mesh (0.5 mm), except for one side that was made of a removable transparent nylon sheet as a smooth oviposition support. In order to prevent gravid female moths from laying eggs on the cage’s wooden frame and induce them to lay eggs on the oviposition support, the bottom and wooden frame inside the cage were covered with commercial sandpaper sheets (p 180) as a rough surface material. The moths were provided with a 5% sucrose solution ad libitum through a soaked cotton wick. The oviposition cages were maintained under the abovementioned laboratory rearing conditions.
In a first experiment, males irradiated with 150 Gy were confined with untreated males and female moths at the following ratios: 1:1:1, 1:1:5, and 1:1:10 (untreated ♂:untreated ♀:150-Gy-treated ♂). Every ratio was replicated three times with a single release of 30, 75, and 90 treated males for 1:1, 1:5 and 1:10 untreated to treated male ratios, respectively.
In a second experiment, male and female moths that had been irradiated with 150 Gy were confined with untreated male and female moths at the following ratios: 1:1:1:1, 1:1:5:5, and 1:1:10:10 (untreated ♂:untreated ♀:150-Gy-treated ♂:150-Gy-treated ♀). Ratios of 1:1:0:0, 0:1:1:0, 1:0:0:1, and 0:0:1:1 were used as control groups. Every ratio was replicated three times with a single release of 60, 100, and 120 treated male and female moths for 1:1:1:1, 1:1:5:5, and 1:1:10:10 ratios, respectively.
Every 2 days, the oviposition sheet (a nylon sheet) was removed and replaced with a new sheet, and the deposited eggs were counted and incubated in closed transparent plastic boxes at 25 °C for 1 week before determining the percentage of egg hatch. The total number of eggs laid/females at each ratio and the total number of eggs hatched at each ratio/total number of eggs laid at each ratio) were calculated.
The percentage of expected egg hatch and male mating competitiveness (C value) in the case of releasing only 150-Gy-treated male moths was estimated by using Fried’s formula based on egg hatch data as follows [29]:
Expected egg hatch = Hn × [N/(N + T)] + Ht × [T/(N + T)] and
C = (Hn − He/He − Ht) × N/T
where Hn is the observed % egg hatch when untreated male and female moths were kept together; Ht is the observed % egg hatch when treated male and untreated female moths were kept together; He is the observed % egg hatch when treated males were combined with untreated male and female moths; N is the number of untreated male moths; and T is the number of treated male moths.
The percentage of expected egg hatch and C value in the case of releasing 150-Gy-treated male and female moths were calculated by using modified formulae from Fried’s test as follows:
Expected egg hatch = Hnn × [NN1/(NN1 + TT1)] + Htt × [TT1(NN1 + TT1)]
C = 1 − [(Hnn − Htt) × Htt − 1/(Hnn − He1) × (He1 + 1) − 1]
where Hnn is the observed % egg hatch when untreated male and female moths were kept together; Htt is the observed % egg hatch when treated male and female moths were kept together; NN1 is the number of untreated male and female moths; TT1 is the number of treated male and female moths; and He1 is the observed % egg hatch when treated male and female moths were combined with untreated male and female moths.
Moreover, the biological efficiency index (BE) [31,32] was used (as an additional calculation) to evaluate the effectiveness of using either 150-Gy-treated male moths or both 150-Gy-treated sexes. The following formula was used:
BE = 1 − (R/T) × 100%
where R is the total number of eggs hatched when treated moths (of one-sex or both-sex) were paired with untreated ones at each ratio; T is the total number of eggs hatched in the unirradiated control group (untreated male × untreated female).

2.3. Experiment 3: Effect of the Presence or Absence of 150-Gy-Treated Females on Egg Hatching

Metal commercially made oviposition cages of 1.1 m3 (1.0 m long × 1.0 m wide and 1.1 m high) were used for this experiment and consisted of a metal frame covered with a stainless steel woven mesh (0.5 mm). Similar to the wooden cage, one side of the cage had a rectangular opening of 40 × 80 cm and was covered with a transparent nylon sheet as an oviposition support. A hole of 10 cm diameter was also available on one side of the cage (in the middle of the left side of the clear nylon sheet) to be able to handle the moths inside the cage. The hole was covered with a piece of muslin cloth (a sleeve) fastened with a rubber band.
In this experiment, 150-Gy-treated males (n = 100) were confined with untreated male and female moths at a mating ratio of 1:1:10:0, or 150-Gy-treated males and females (n = 200) were confined with untreated male and female moths at a mating ratio of 1:1:10:10 (untreated ♂:untreated ♀:150-Gy-treated ♂:150-Gy-treated ♀). Mating ratios of 1:1:0:0, 0:1:1:0, 1:0:0:1, and 0:0:1:1 were used as control groups. As in previous experiments, the eggs were collected (oviposition sheet) every 2 days, counted and incubated for 1 week before determining the percentage of egg hatch. The cages were placed in a controlled room and maintained at the rearing conditions outlined above. The percentages of expected egg hatching, C, and BE were estimated by using the modified Formula (2). The experiment was replicated three times at each mating ratio.

2.4. Follow-Up Study on F1 and F2 Fertility

The experiment was designed to assess radiation-induced inherited effects on F1 and F2 progeny.

2.4.1. Parental Generation

Newly emerged (<18-h old) males and females were treated with 150-Gy and confined with untreated male and female moths at the ratio of 1:1:10:10 (untreated ♂:untreated ♀:150-Gy-treated ♂:150-Gy-treated ♀) in the 1.1 m3 oviposition cage (a single release of 10:10:100:100 treated and untreated male and female moths). Every 2 days, the oviposited eggs were collected (an oviposition sheet), counted, and incubated in closed, transparent plastic boxes for hatching. The newly hatched larvae were individually placed on small pieces of the semi-artificial diet using a fine camel’s-hair brush. Larvae were checked daily until pupation, and the sex ratio of the emerging moths was determined.

2.4.2. Fertility of F1

The newly emerged F1 male and female moths were collected and singly paired (in 9-cm-diameter and 1-cm-high transparent plastic Petri dishes) with virgin, untreated colony adults of the opposite sex. Each Petri dish was provided ad libitum with a 5% sucrose solution as a food source through a soaked cotton wick. The inner Petri dish surface served as the oviposition substrate. The females were kept for oviposition until death. The oviposited eggs from each pair were collected, counted, and left to determine the percentage of egg hatch. Based on previous findings, the fertility of L. botrana will vary from 20–25% for F1 moths from 150-Gy-treated male parents to 75–85% for untreated moths. Thus, each pair was considered partially sterile or fully fertile depending on the assessment of their percentage egg hatch. The experiment was replicated twice.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

In order to identify significant differences between the percentages in all mating competitiveness experiments (i.e., between observed and expected egg hatch), a normal approximation test (Z) at a 95% confidence interval (p ≤ 0.05) was performed where necessary for comparing two percentages using the Stat-View program [33].

3. Results

3.1. Experiments 1 and 2

In the first experiment, only 150-Gy-treated males were released, and a significant difference (i.e., Z = 4.2 for the 1:1:1 ratio; p ≤ 0.05) was found between the observed and expected egg hatch except when the 1:1:10 ratio was used. The C value augmented with the increased ratio of sterile males, i.e., from 0.19 with a ratio of 1:1:1, to 0.76 with a ratio of 1:1:10 (Table 1). Similarly, the BE improved by increasing the ratio of treated to untreated males, i.e., from 0.74 to 83.2, with ratios of 1:1:1 and 1:1:10, respectively.
In the second experiment, 150-Gy-treated males and females were released, and no significant difference was found between the percentage of expected and observed egg hatch at each used ratio (i.e., Z = 0.78 for the 1:1:1:1 ratio; p ˃ 0.05). However, fertility was reduced with an increased ratio of treated male and female moths (e.g., 35.4 and 7.9% for ratios of 1:1:1:1 and 1:1:10:10, respectively). Moreover, both C and BE values were increased when male and female moths were released at the 1:1:10:10 ratio as compared with the two other tested ratios (e.g., C values were 0.15 and 0.87 for ratios of 1:1:1:1 and 1:1:10:10, respectively) (Table 1).
More importantly, Table 1 shows that the C and BE values were higher when both sexes were released as compared with when only 150-Gy-treated males were considered (except for the C at a 1:1:1 ratio). For example, the C values were 0.40 and 0.74 and the BE values were 62.7 and 74.0, with ratios of 1:1:5 and 1:1:5:5, respectively.

3.2. Experiment 3

Releasing 150-Gy-treated males only with untreated males and females at the ratio of 1:1:10:0 resulted in a C value of 0.64 and a BE value of 78.7. While releasing treated males and treated females (ratio of 1:1:10:10), the C value increased significantly to 0.90 (Z = 4.56; p ≤ 0.05) and the BE index increased to 95.6 (Table 2). Moreover, no difference was found between the percentage observed and expected egg hatch (i.e., Z = 0.05 for a 1:1:10:10 ratio; p ˃ 0.05) at the used dose and mating ratios (Table 2).

3.3. Follow-Up Study on F1 and F2 Fertility

Data on the fertility of F1 male and female moths resulting from crosses at the mating ratio of 1:1:10:10 are provided in Table 3. Out of 1873 eggs oviposited, 101 eggs hatched (fertility of 5.4%), indicating that egg hatch resulted from the crosses between treated male × untreated female or untreated male × untreated female, whereas the majority of laid eggs (1722 eggs, 94.6%) are from treated females since any crosses with these females with will give zero percent egg hatch. For the F2 fertility follow-up study, 90 pairs were formed, based on the assessment of their observed fertility, the majority of which resulted from F1 males or females from treated male parent × untreated male or female moths. However, a small number of F2 adults (90/5, 5.5%) emerged from eggs of untreated females that had mated with untreated male moths.

4. Discussion

In the present study, a first attempt was made to assess the effect of 150-Gy-treated L. botrana male-only releases as compared with releases of both treated males and treated females in oviposition cages under laboratory conditions.
A C value that is equal to one indicates that the irradiated male moths are equally competitive with untreated males [34,35,36], while a higher BE is an indication of a more effective release method [31]. BE values will be equal to 100 at 1:0:0:1 and 0:0:1:1 ratios because the fertility of 150-Gy-treated females will result in zero egg hatch if they mate with either treated or untreated males.
The decrease in fertility observed in experiment 1 was not sufficient when treated males were released at 1:1:1 and 1:1:5 ratios because the male moths used in our experiments were partially sterile. By increasing the ratio of treated males to untreated males to 10 to 1, the C and BE values increased. Similar results were reported when higher ratios of partially sterile male moths of the potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea operculella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), were used [37].
The release of both treated male and female moths requires the availability of adequate mating indices to ascertain the relative importance of the competitiveness of each sex [28]. Therefore, Fried’s formulae (the percentage expected egg hatch and the C value) were modified to allow calculation of the effectiveness of both sex releases of treated male and female moths. Moreover, using the biological efficiency (BE) index in the current study is an appropriate index because eggs hatch only from untreated females (as treated females are completely sterile). Our results indicate that releasing both sexes reduced the observed egg hatch and improved BE values regardless of the mating ratio (Table 1). For example, comparing 1:1:5 with 1:1:5:5 ratios, the C and BE values increased by 45.9% and 16.2%, respectively, and this could solely be attributed to the presence of both fully sterile females and partially sterile males. A similar result has been reported when P. operculella male and female moths were released in 350 mL transparent plastic oviposition boxes [32].
The use of larger 1.1 m3 cages and higher numbers of adult moths (up to two hundred 150-Gy-treated and untreated adults) resulted in more precise and informative data in comparison with the data obtained from the experiments carried out in the wooden cages that used fewer treated and untreated moths. Releasing both treated male and female moths in the larger oviposition cage at the 1:1:10:10 ratio improved the C value and the BE index by 40.6 and 21.5%, respectively, as compared with the release of only treated male moths (1:1:10:0 ratio). The use of a larger oviposition cage increased the effectiveness of the bi-sex release versus releasing males only. Further studies in field cages and field conditions are needed to confirm our findings.
Our data are not in agreement with the results of earlier studies [38,39] reporting that the release of males only was more efficient than the release of both irradiated sexes of C. pomonella and P. operculella. However, it needs to be noted that the abovementioned studies were not specifically designed to evaluate factors and variables related to the competitiveness of irradiated females. It is likely that their findings could have been attributed to the deterioration of the female’s behaviour and physiology due to the application of the high irradiation doses of 400–450 Gy. In contrast, our results confirm Ikegawa et al.’s [20] data that sterile female moths can potentially contribute to more effective pest control using the SIT, particularly if sterile males have a lower sexual performance than wild males.
It is well documented that lower doses of radiation used to induce F1 sterility in lepidopteran species increase the quality and competitiveness of the released moths [40,41]. However, a limitation of a pest control program that has an SIT/IS component is the difficulty of distinguishing F1 progeny (resulting from the mating of a partially sterile released male with a wild female moth) from wild fertile moths. A cytological technique exists for several lepidopteran species to identify F1 males based on orcein and Giemsa staining of the sperm [40]. The method is, however, tedious and time-consuming. In our F1 follow-up study, the percentage of egg hatch was used as an indicator to distinguish between F2 progeny that resulted from untreated L. botrana females who had mated either with treated or untreated male moths.
The large cage study that followed the smaller cage studies suggests that a single release of treated and untreated male and female moths at a 1:1:10:10 overflooding ratio reduced egg hatch significantly and resulted in few F2 progeny. The F2 eggs from untreated F1 males/females × untreated males/females that possess the potential for inherited sterility represented about 95% of the formed pairs. Although the emergence of fertile F2-moths was low, the presence of these undesired moths needs to be avoided by increasing the ratio of treated male and female moths as compared with untreated moths.
The data of our study indicate that the efficiency of SIT/IS against the L. botrana population can be improved by releasing both 150-Gy-treated partially sterile males along with fully sterile female moths. The benefit of this release method might be perceived one generation after the release, when wild females mate with treated males. Given that the F1 progeny inherit the detrimental effects of exposing male moths to 150 Gy of γ-radiation (offspring with a high level of sterility), no egg hatch will occur when 150-Gy-treated females mate with wild male moths.
Even though this study is based on laboratory bioassays that do not reflect many conditions experienced upon release as well as other prevailing conditions that exist in vineyards, the encouraging findings should nevertheless enhance motivation for further investigations on the use of SIT/IS against L. botrana at an overflooding ratio of 1:1:10:10 in field cages and even open field experiments.

5. Conclusions

Over the past years, extensive research has provided valuable knowledge that paved the way for the use of the SIT/IS approach against lepidopteran pests. In any SIT/IS program to manage L. botrana, irradiated male and female moths are released together since the manual separation by sex of thousands of moths may not be feasible. The bisexual release, in laboratory oviposition cages, of irradiated L. botrana moths is more effective than male-only release. Moreover, an overflooding ratio of sterile:wild moths is needed to avoid the emergence of fertile F2- moths. Finally, carrying out the current experiments in semi-field or field cage conditions is essential in order to consolidate our findings.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.S.; methodology, G.S., A.H. and I.J.; formal analysis, G.S., A.H. and I.J.; writing—original draft preparation, G.S.; writing—review and editing, G.S.; funding acquisition, G.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was a part of the FAO/IAEA Coordinated Research Project (D41026) and financial support from the International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna-Austria (IAEA funded Research Project, contract no. 20449) is gratefully acknowledged.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request from the authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ibrahim Othman (General Director, Atomic Energy Commission of Syria) and N. Mirali for their help and support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ponti, L.; Gutierrez, A.P.; Boggia, A.; Neteler, M. Analysis of grape production in the face of climate change. Climate 2018, 6, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Khan, N.; Fahad, S.; Noushad, M.; Faisal, S. Grape production critical review in the world. SSRN Electron. J. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Delbac, L.; Thiéry, D. Damage to grape flowers and berries by Lobesia botrana larvae (Denis & Schiffernüller) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), and relation to larval age. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2016, 22, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vassiliou, V.A. Effectiveness of insecticides in controlling the first and second generations of the Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in table grapes. J. Econ. Entomol. 2011, 104, 580–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Altimira, F.; De La Barra, N.; Rebufe, P.; Soto, S.; Soto, R.; Estay, P.; Vitta, N.; Tapia, E. Potential biological control of the pupal stage of the European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana by the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria pseudobassiana in the winter season in Chile. BMC Res. Notes 2019, 12, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Gavara, A.; Vacas, S.; Navarro, I.; Primo, J.; Navarro-Llopis, V. Airborne pheromone quantification in treated vineyards with different mating disruption dispensers against Lobesia botrana. Insects 2020, 11, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gavara, A.; Navarro-Llopis, V.; Primo, J.; Vacas, S. Influence of weather conditions on Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) mating disruption dispensers’ emission rates and efficacy. Crop Prot. 2022, 155, 105926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Civolani, S.; Boselli, M.; Butturini, A.; Chicca, M.; Fanno, E.A.; Cassanelli, S. Assessment of insecticide resistance of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Emilia-Romagna region. J. Econ. Entomol. 2014, 107, 1245–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Frank, D.L.; Starcher, S.; Chandran, R.S. Comparison of mating disruption and insecticide application for control of peachtree borer and lesser peachtree borer (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) in peach. Insects 2020, 11, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Saour, G. Sterile insect technique and F1 sterility in the European grapevine moth, Lobesia botrana. J. Insect Sci. 2014, 14, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Saour, G. Flight ability and dispersal of European grapevine moth gamma-irradiated males (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Fla. Entomol. 2016, 99, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Simmons, G.S.; Sepulveda, M.C.S.; Barrios, E.A.F.; Villegas, M.I.; Jimenez, R.E.M.; Jerez, A.R.G.; Henderson, R.; Riffo, H.D. Development of sterile insect technique for control of the European grapevine moth, Lobesia botrana, in urban areas of Chile. Insects 2021, 12, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Simmons, G.S.; Suckling, D.M.; Carpenter, J.E.; Addison, M.F.; Dyck, V.A.; Vreysen, J.B. Improved quality management to enhance the efficacy of the sterile insect technique for lepidopteran pests. J. Appl. Entomol. 2010, 134, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Marec, F.; Neven, L.G.; Robinson, A.S.; Vreysen, M.; Goldsmith, M.R.; Nagaraju, J.; Franz, G. Development of genetic sexing strains in Lepidoptera: From traditional to transgenic approaches. J. Econ. Entomol. 2005, 98, 248–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rendón, P.; McInnes, D.; Lance, D.; Stewart, J. Medfly (Diptera: Tephritidae) genetic sexing: Large scale field comparison of males-only and bisexual sterile fly releases in Guatemala. J. Econ. Entomol. 2004, 97, 1547–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hight, S.D.; Carpenter, J.E.; Bloem, S.; Bloem, K.A. Developing a sterile insect release program for Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): Effective overflooding ratios and release-recapture field studies. Environ. Entomol. 2005, 34, 850–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Vreysen, M.J.B.; Carpenter, J.E.; Marec, F. Improvement of the sterile insect technique for codling moth Cydia pomonella (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) to facilitate expansion of field application. J. Appl. Entomol. 2010, 134, 165–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Van Steenwyk, R.A.; Hnneberry, T.J.; Ballmer, G.R.; Wolf, W.W.; Sevacherian, V. Mating competitiveness of laboratory-cultured and sterilized pink bollworm for use in a sterile moth release program. J. Econ. Entomol. 1979, 72, 502–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sengupta, M.; Vimal, N.; Angmo, N.; Seth, R.K. Effect of irradiation on reproduction of female Spodoptera litura (Fabr.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in relation to the inherited sterility technique. Insects 2022, 13, 898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ikegawa, Y.; Ito, K.; Himuro, C.; Honma, A. Sterile males and females can synergistically suppress wild pests targeted by sterile insect technique. J. Theor. Biol. 2021, 530, 110878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Marec, F.; Vreysen, M.J.B. Advances and challenges of using the sterile insect technique for the management of pest Lepidoptera. Insects 2019, 10, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Zhanga, Z.; Niuc, B.; Jic, D.; Lid, M.; Lib, K.; Jamese, A.A.; Tana, A.; Huanga, Y. Silkworm genetic sexing through W chromosome-linked, targeted gene integration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 8752–8756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Marec, F.; Mirchi, R. Genetic control of the pest Lepidoptera: Gamma-ray induction of translocations between sex chromosomes of Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 1990, 26, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Marec, F.; Kollárová, I.; Pavelka, J. Radiation-induced inherited sterility combined with a genetic sexing system in Ephestia kuehniella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1999, 92, 250–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, J.J.; Shi, Y.; Wu, J.N.; Li, H.; Smagghe, G.; Liu, T.X. CRISPR/Cas9 in lepidopteran insects: Progress, application and prospects. J. Insect Phsiol. 2021, 135, 104325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Saour, G. Effect of early oviposition experience on host acceptance in Trichogramma (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) and application of F1 sterility and T. principium to suppress the potato tuber moth (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2009, 19, 225–234. [Google Scholar]
  27. Simmons, G.S.; McKemey, A.R.; Morrison, N.I.; O’Connell, S.; Tabashnik, B.E.; Claus, J.; Fu, G.; Tang, G.; Sledge, M.; Walker, A.S.; et al. Field performance of a genetically engineered strain of pink bollworm. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e24110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Woods, B.; Mclnnis, D.; Steiner, E.; Soopaya, A.; Lindsey, J.; Lacey, I.; Virdi, A.; Fogliani, R. Developing field cage tests to measure mating competitiveness of sterile light brown apple moths (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Western Australia. Fla. Entomol. 2016, 99, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Fried, M. Determination of the sterile insect competitiveness. J. Econ. Entomol. 1971, 64, 869–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Thiéry, D.; Moreau, J. Relative performance of European grapevine moth (Lobesia botrana) on grapes and other hosts. Oecologia 2005, 143, 548–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Anisimov, A.I.; Shvedov, A.N. Mutant strains and computer models for genetic control of lepidopteran pests. In Proceedings of the Research Co-Ordination Meeting on Evaluation of Population Suppression by Irradiated Lepidoptera and Their Progeny, Jakarta, Indonesia, 24–28 April 1995. [Google Scholar]
  32. Makee, H.; Saour, G. Efficiency of inherited sterility technique against Phthorimaea operculella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) as affected by irradiation of females. J. Veg. Crop Prod. 2004, 10, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Abacus Concepts. StatView, version 4.02; Abacus Concepts: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  34. Bond, J.G.; Aguirre-Ibáñez, S.; Osorio, A.R.; Marina, C.F.; Gómez-Simuta, Y.; Tamayo-Escobar, R.; Dor, A.; Liedo, P.; Carvalho, D.O.; Williams, T. Sexual competitiveness and induced egg sterility by Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus gamma-irradiated males: A laboratory and field study in Mexico. Insects 2021, 12, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bassène, M.D.; Seck, M.T.; Pagabeleguem, S.; Fall, A.G.; Sall, B.; Vreysen, M.J.B.; Gimonneau, G.; Bouyer, J. Competitiveness and survival of two strains of Glossina palpalis gambiensis in an urban area of Senegal. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0006172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bouyer, J.; Vreysen, M.J.B. Yes, Irradiated sterile male mosquitoes can be sexually competitive! Trends Parasitol. 2020, 36, 877–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Saour, G.; Makee, H. Radiation induced sterility in male potato tuber moth Phthorimaea operculella Zeller (lep., Gelechiidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 2009, 121, 411–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Proverbs, M.D.; Newton, J.R. Some effects of gamma radiation on the reproduction potential of the codling moth Carpocapsa pomonella L. (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). Can. Entomol. 1962, 94, 1162–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rananavare, H.D.; Harwalkar, M.R.; Rahalkar, G.W. Relative efficacy of sterile adults in the control of potato tuberworm Phthorimaea operculella Zeller. J. Nucl. Agric. Biol. 1989, 18, 212–215. [Google Scholar]
  40. Carpenter, J.E.; Marti, O.G.; Wee, S.L.; Suckling, D.M. Cytological attributes of sperm bundles unique to F1 progeny of irradiated male Lepidoptera: Relevance to sterile insect technique programs. Fla. Entomol. 2009, 92, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wee, S.L.; Suckling, D.M.; Barrington, A.M. Feasibility study on cytological sperm bundle assessment of F1 progeny of irradiated male painted apple moth (Teia anartoides Walker; Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) for the sterile insect technique. Aust. J. Entomol. 2011, 50, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Percentages of observed and expected egg hatch, competitiveness value (C) and biological efficiency (BE) index when 150-Gy-treated L. botrana males and females were placed with untreated male and female moths in an oviposition cage (65 × 45 × 45 cm) at different mating ratios. (N = Untreated male; N1 = untreated female; T = 150-Gy-treated male; T1 = 150-Gy-treated female).
Table 1. Percentages of observed and expected egg hatch, competitiveness value (C) and biological efficiency (BE) index when 150-Gy-treated L. botrana males and females were placed with untreated male and female moths in an oviposition cage (65 × 45 × 45 cm) at different mating ratios. (N = Untreated male; N1 = untreated female; T = 150-Gy-treated male; T1 = 150-Gy-treated female).
Mating RatiosNo. of MothsObserved Egg Hatch (%)Expected Egg Hatch (%) Competitiveness Value (C)Biological Efficiency Index (BE)
(Males only)
N:N1:T
1:1:0 30:30:079.9 (2967/3714) ---
0:1:1 0:30:3040.3 (1415/3510) --52.3
1:1:1 30:30:3073.6 (2945/4001) a 60.1 b0.190.74
1:1:5 15:15:7553.5 (1107/2070) b 46.2 b0.4062.7
1:1:10 9:9:9044.9 (497/1107) a 43.8 a0.7683.2
(Males + Females)
N:N1:T:T1
1:1:0:0 30:30:0:080.9 (2767/3420)---
0:1:1:0 0:30:30:039.1 (1323/3386)--52.2
1:0:0:1 30:0:0:300 (0/2340)--100
0:0:1:1 0:0:30:300 (0/2098)--100
1:1:1:1 30:30:30:3035.4 (2067/5841) a 40.5 a0.1525.3
1:1:5:5 10:10:50:5014.8 (720/4860) a13.4 a0.7474.0
1:1:10:10 6:6:60:607.9 (386/4896) a7.4 a0.8786.0
Each ratio was repeated three times. Numbers between parentheses are hatched eggs/total laid eggs at each ratio. Percentages in row followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05, Z test).
Table
Table 2. Percentages of observed and expected egg hatch, competitiveness value, and biological efficiency index when 150-Gy-treated L. botrana males and females were placed with untreated male and female moths in a 1.1 m3 oviposition cage at 1:1:10:0 or 1:1:10:10 mating ratios. (N = untreated male; N1 = untreated female; T = 150-Gy-treated male; T1 = 150-Gy-treated female).
Table 2. Percentages of observed and expected egg hatch, competitiveness value, and biological efficiency index when 150-Gy-treated L. botrana males and females were placed with untreated male and female moths in a 1.1 m3 oviposition cage at 1:1:10:0 or 1:1:10:10 mating ratios. (N = untreated male; N1 = untreated female; T = 150-Gy-treated male; T1 = 150-Gy-treated female).
Mating Ratios N:N1:T:T1No. of MothsObserved Egg Hatch (%)Expected Egg Hatch (%)Competitiveness Value (C) Biological Efficiency Index (BE)
1:1:0:0 50:50:0:081.0 (3965/4895) ---
0:1:1:0 0:50:50:038.2 (1664/4359) --57.2
1:0:0:150:0:0:500 (0/650)--100
0:0:1:10:0:50:500 (0/598)--100
1:1:10:010:10:100:044.0 (846/1924) A 41.7 A0.64 b78.7
1:1:10:1010:10:100:1005.8 (173/2982) A 7.4 A0.90 a95.6
The treatment was repeated three times. Numbers between parenthesis are hatched eggs/total laid eggs. Percentages in rows followed by the same uppercase letter are not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05, Z test); Percentages in columns followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05, Z test).
Table
Table 3. Fertility of L. botrana F2 male and female moths resulting from 150 Gy-treated male mated to untreated female or untreated male mated with untreated female moths (parental generation) when released in a oviposition cage of 1.1 m3 at 1: 1: 10: 10 (untreated ♂: untreated ♀: 150 Gy-irradiated ♂: 150 Gy- irradiated ♀) mating ratio.
Table 3. Fertility of L. botrana F2 male and female moths resulting from 150 Gy-treated male mated to untreated female or untreated male mated with untreated female moths (parental generation) when released in a oviposition cage of 1.1 m3 at 1: 1: 10: 10 (untreated ♂: untreated ♀: 150 Gy-irradiated ♂: 150 Gy- irradiated ♀) mating ratio.
GenerationsCrossesType of EggsNo. of Laid EggsNo. of Hatched EggsNo. of Initial PairsNo. of Partially Sterile PairsNo. of Fertile PairsF2 Mean Egg Hatch (%)
Parental (P1)150 Gy-treated ♂ X Untreated ♀ Partially sterile eggs1873-----
150 Gy-treated ♂ X 150 Gy-treated ♀ Fully sterile eggs-----
Untreated ♂ X 150 Gy-treated ♀ Fully sterile eggs-----
Untreated ♂ X Untreated ♀Fertile eggs-----
F1F1 ♂ from treated male parent X Untreated ♀Partially sterile eggs-1016057-18.6 ± 4.9
F1 ♀ from treated male parent X Untreated ♂Partially sterile eggs-3028-24.2 ± 3.9
F1 ♂ from untreated parent X Untreated ♀Fertile eggs---382.6 ± 2.3
F1 ♀ from untreated parent X Untreated ♂Fertile eggs---279.3 ± 2.9
The treatment was repeated twice, and 220 male and female moths were released at each treatment.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Saour, G.; Hashem, A.; Jassem, I. Mating Competitiveness of Irradiated Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Male-Only and Both Sex Release Strategies under Laboratory Cage Conditions. Insects 2023, 14, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010018

AMA Style

Saour G, Hashem A, Jassem I. Mating Competitiveness of Irradiated Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Male-Only and Both Sex Release Strategies under Laboratory Cage Conditions. Insects. 2023; 14(1):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010018

Chicago/Turabian Style

Saour, George, Ali Hashem, and Iyad Jassem. 2023. "Mating Competitiveness of Irradiated Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Male-Only and Both Sex Release Strategies under Laboratory Cage Conditions" Insects 14, no. 1: 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010018

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop