Next Article in Journal
Mutual and Opposing Responses of Carabid Beetles and Predatory Wasps to Local and Landscape Factors in Vineyards
Next Article in Special Issue
Is Orius sauteri Poppius a Promising Biological Control Agent for Walnut Aphids? An Assessment from the Laboratory to Field
Previous Article in Journal
How Effective Is Conservation Biological Control in Regulating Insect Pest Populations in Organic Crop Production Systems?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biological Control Potential and Drawbacks of Three Zoophytophagous Mirid Predators against Bemisia tabaci in the United States
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biological Control: A Major Component of the Pest Management Program for the Invasive Coconut Scale Insect, Aspidiotus rigidus Reyne, in the Philippines

1
Biology Department, College of Science, De La Salle University, Taft Avenue, Manila 1004, Philippines
2
Biological Control Research Unit, Center for Natural Science and Environmental Research, De La Salle University, Taft Avenue, Manila 1004, Philippines
3
National Crop Protection Center, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Los Baños, Laguna 4031, Philippines
4
Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, United States Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Tallahassee, FL 32308, USA
5
Center for Marine Environmental Studies, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8577, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2020, 11(11), 745; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11110745
Submission received: 7 August 2020 / Revised: 19 October 2020 / Accepted: 21 October 2020 / Published: 30 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Improving IPM of Specialty Crop Pests and Global Food Security)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Major outbreaks of the coconut scale insect (CSI), Aspidiotus rigidus, occurred in the Philippines, between 2010 and 2016 in the Southern Tagalog region of Luzon Island, and from 2017 to 2020 in the Zamboanga Peninsula, Mindanao Island. Contribution of parasitization by Comperiella calauanica to the management of the outbreaks needed quantification. Our assessments found very high percent parasitization by C. calauanica, which occurred naturally in Southern Tagalog. Findings were similar in the Zamboanga Peninsula, where mass-reared C. calauanica from Southern Tagalog were released for biological control. Significant decreases in the population of CSI were recorded in 1- to 2-year periods, 2014 to 2016 in Southern Tagalog, and 2018 to 2020 in the Zamboanga Peninsula, with parallel findings of recovery by infested coconut palms. Compared to the integrated pest management (IPM) program in Southern Tagalog, that in the Zamboanga Peninsula relied less on chemical control, and no major climatic disturbance was recorded in the region. Our findings strongly suggest that biological control has been a very important factor in the management of A. rigidus. Rearing facilities for C. calauanica as biological control agent should be established and maintained, especially in the different regions, to enable quick response to new areas of CSI invasion in the country.

Abstract

The coconut scale insect, Aspidiotus rigidus Reyne, caused a major pest outbreak in coconut plantations and stands in the Southern Tagalog region of Luzon Island in the Philippines between 2010 and 2015. To determine if parasitism by Comperiella calauanica Barrion, Almarinez and Amalin, a native encyrtid, could have been a factor in the eventual management of the outbreak by 2015, we estimated and assessed its parasitization levels on A. rigidus colonies on field-collected samples from selected points in three provinces in the Southern Tagalog Region across three sampling periods. We observed that C. calauanica consistently occurred only in areas where A. rigidus populations occurred, with high parasitization levels in the Southern Tagalog sites from 2014 to 2015. Results of correlation and regression of total scale count against parasitized scale count suggest putative host density-dependent parasitism by C. calauanica in the field. A marked decrease in the abundance of A. rigidus was recorded concurrently with visually observable recovery of coconut trees from the third quarter of 2014 up to the second quarter of 2016. Similar results of significant reduction in A. rigidus populations concurrent with high percent parasitization by mass-reared and released C. calauanica were found in the Zamboanga Peninsula from 2018 to 2020. Our findings and observations altogether suggest that host-specific parasitization by C. calauanica effected biological control, which may have contributed to the eventual management of the A. rigidus outbreak in the Southern Tagalog Region, and also in the Zamboanga Peninsula where similar recovery of coconut trees were observed within a year after inoculative releases of C. calauanica.

1. Introduction

The coconut palm, Cocos nucifera L., is one of the top agricultural commodities in the Philippines. Coconut, together with banana, pineapple, and coffee, leads other locally produced crops in terms of export value [1]. Coconut plantations cover more than 3 million hectares of land area in the country, which has been recognized as among the top producers of coconut in the world [2].
Infestation of an armored scale insect (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) on coconut trees was first observed in 2009 in the province of Batangas on Luzon Island, and had reached devastating outbreak levels in the following years from 2010 to 2014. This diaspidid, known locally as “cocolisap”, was previously recognized by local authorities as Aspidiotus destructor Signoret until a more detailed study revealed its correct species identity as Aspidiotus rigidus Reyne [3]. A. rigidus was first reported as a subspecies of A. destructor by Reyne [4] in Sangi Island in Northern Sulawesi, Indonesia. This insect feeds on the lower surfaces of the leaflets of coconut fronds, consequently impairing photosynthesis and transpiration, and possibly leading to death of the tree in 6 months or less [3]. The outbreak that spread from Batangas to other parts of Southern Luzon led to the well-documented devastation in coconut plantations, recognized only sometime in mid-2014 as a national emergency by the Philippine government. Trunk injection of a systemic pesticide, the neonicotinoid dinotefuran, was carried out as a principal part of emergency control measures implemented to address the outbreak. By the end of 2014, the A. rigidus infestation in Southern Luzon was declared to have declined to a non-outbreak level by the Philippine Coconut Authority (PCA) after observation of recovery of coconut trees subjected to the control measures. The recovery was attributed to the effects of Typhoon Rammasun and chemical control by trunk injection of dinotefuran [5]. Effective insecticides may reduce A. rigidus populations in the field, but it is important to select appropriate chemical agents, and observe proper timing and application methods to protect beneficial insects. Prior to the A. rigidus outbreak in the Philippines, concerns over the use of dinotefuran and other neonicotinoids have already been raised internationally due to their high toxicity to bees and pollinators [6,7].
Biological control refers to the use of natural enemies to manage or suppress populations of a pest, through conservation of natural enemies, or augmentation by release of mass-reared natural enemies [8]. A high degree of host specificity, which implies minimal risk of non-target effects, is preferred for natural enemies being considered as candidate agents for biological control of a pest [9,10]. For an invasive pest species, classical biological control is considered to be among the most important control measures [11]. Parasitoids, when compared to predators, tend to have a stronger effect on pest mortality when used as biological control agents [10]. Hymenopteran parasitoids have been considered the most important group of insects as far as biological control is concerned [12]. Parasitic wasps most frequently employed in biological control usually belong to the families Braconidae, Ichneumonidae, Eulophidae, Pteromalidae, Encyrtidae, and Aphelinidae, while dipteran parasitoids belong to Tachinidae, Phoridae, or Cryptochetidae [10]. The use of biological control agents, particularly parasitic Hymenoptera, has been reported to be important in the control of scale insect pests. For instance, the coconut scale insect, Aspidiotus destructor, in the Philippines is controlled by the hymenopteran parasitoid, Aphytis lingnanensis Compere (Aphelinidae) [3]. In Pakistan, A. destructor, is also reported to be attacked by two parasitoids, Aphytis melinus DeBach and Anagyrus sp. (Encyrtidae) [13]. For the closely related diaspidid species, A. rigidus, Comperiella unifasciata Ishii (Encyrtidae) was among the reported natural enemies in Indonesia [4,14].
The genus Comperiella, with type species C. bifasciata, consists of species of dark colored, tiny wasps that are parasitic on a variety of diaspidids [15]. Females of Comperiella spp. insert their eggs in the covered bodies of the host at varying host life stages depending on species. The larvae, upon emerging from the eggs, feed inside the host while developing in a holometabolous manner, effectively killing the host prior to emergence of the adult parasitoid. In 1927, C. unifasciata was released in Sangi Island, Indonesia to control the outbreak of A. rigidus [4]. However, it did not control the outbreak due to low mean parasitization rate that was recorded only at 12% [4,14]. In the Philippines, C. bifasciata was reported to have been introduced in 1935 from Japan for the biological control of the citrus pest, Aonidiella aurantii Maskell [16]. No native species of Comperiella had been identified in the country until 2014 [17,18]. This Comperiella sp. has been described as a new species, and named C. calauanica by Barrion et al. [19]. C. calauanica has also been confirmed in field and laboratory observations as being highly parasitic to A. rigidus, with initial records showing up to 80% parasitization, suggesting the potential of this encyrtid as a biological control agent against A. rigidus [18].
The direct association of C. calauanica on A. rigidus was confirmed from the initial field survey of natural enemies of A. rigidus [18]. In the current study, we describe the parasitism efficiency of C. calauanica on A. rigidus based on field assessment of parasitization and host abundance, and visual observation of recovery of scale-infested coconut trees in the field. Additionally, the host density-dependence of C. calauanica is assessed. Findings from our data and observations suggest the putative role of the encyrtid in the control of the diaspidid pest in important coconut-planting areas in the Philippines, particularly in the islands of Luzon and Mindanao.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Field Survey and Sample Collection

Field surveys were done on separate dates from 2014 to 2016 for Southern Tagalog, Luzon Island, and from 2018 to 2020 for Zamboanga Peninsula, Mindanao Island. The survey dates were based on the reported occurrence of the coconut scale insects in the areas. The sample collection method for Southern Tagalog was developed by the research team. However, for Zamboanga Peninsula the Rapid Ground Assessment (RGA) method developed by the Philippine Coconut Authority (PCA) (2018, unpublished), an attached agency of the Philippine Department of Agriculture, was followed to be in line with the government protocol. Details of both methods are described in the following section for the estimation of the parasitization levels.
Field surveys in Southern Tagalog, Luzon Island were conducted on five different dates, August 2014, December 2014, January 2015, June 2015, and June 2016 covering Aspidiotus rigidus-affected towns in the Southern Tagalog provinces of Cavite (Silang and Tagaytay), Batangas (Santo Tomas, Talisay, and Tanauan), Laguna (Cavinti, Liliw, Luisiana, Nagcarlan, Pagsanjan, San Pablo, and Sta. Cruz), and Quezon (Candelaria, Lucban, Sariaya, Tayabas, and Tiaong) that were accessible to the trail along the following thoroughfares: Sta. Rosa–Tagaytay Road, Ligaya Drive, Tanauan–Talisay National Road, the Daang Maharlika Highway, and Nagcarlan–Calumpang Road (Figure 1A). In each site (with the exception of Alaminos, Calauan, Los Baños and Rizal in Laguna, and Candelaria in Quezon province where records of occurrences were based on visual observations and reports, and not on actual sampling), a scale-infested coconut tree that had no indication of having been treated with dinotefuran (i.e., coded markings by the PCA, and trunk injection lesions) was selected for periodic sample collection. Leaflet samples from lower fronds were randomly collected from the selected coconut trees that were confirmed to be scale-infested. Samples were collected from the same tree during each sampling period, except when the infested tree had been cut without our notice prior to our field visit. Presence of adult Comperiella calauanica in the samples was also recorded.
In the Zamboanga Peninsula, field surveys were conducted in September 2018, January 2019, and January 2020. The survey areas included Zamboanga City, Zamboanga Sibugay, and Isabela City in Basilan Island (which is geopolitically considered part of Zamboanga Peninsula) (Figure 1B). Following the RGA method, two to five trees, regardless of scale infestation status, were randomly selected per sampling point in a survey area.
Mass-reared C. calauanica were released initially by the research team in Zamboanga City in November 2016 and January 2017 (average of 22 adult parasitoids in 4 sites situated more than 200 m apart), and subsequently by the PCA in different periods from 2017 to 2018 (100 parasitoids per hectare, per unpublished report) for biological control of A. rigidus in all of the survey sites in the Zamboanga Peninsula. These were inoculative releases, as no occurrence of the parasitoid was observed when an infestation of A. rigidus was confirmed by preliminary surveys in November 2016 and 2017 in Zamboanga City. In Southern Tagalog, no release of mass reared C. calauanica was done because of the observed natural occurrence of the parasitoid during preliminary surveys in April 2014 [18].

2.2. Estimation of Field Parasitization Levels

Four samples of A. rigidus-infested leaflets collected from the survey areas in Southern Tagalog were assessed per sampling point per sampling period. For standardized and more efficient counting, each sample was subdivided into three subsamples, each being a 10 cm-long leaflet segment. The lower surface of each leaflet segment was then examined under a dissecting microscope for insect counting. The number of live, encrusted A. rigidus third instar and mature females with or without indications of parasitization by immature stages (larva and pupa) of C. calauanica as well as that of dead scales with exit holes were counted and recorded. Among the parasitization marks noted on live nymphs or mature scales were the presence of a distinctive accumulation of a white powdery residue at the ventral surface of the scale’s pygidium (Figure 2A), the marginal darkening due to the meconial deposition by the parasitoid larva (Figure 2B), and visually detectable manifestation of a late-stage larva or pupa (Figure 2B,C). Destructive counting was done not only to avoid double counting of scales but also to confirm the presence of early-stage larvae which are not readily detectable by simple external inspection of the host even with its scale cover removed.
For the samples from the Zamboanga Peninsula areas which were collected and processed following the RGA method, a 15.24 cm segment was obtained from one random leaflet each from the basal, middle, and apical portions of each of two opposite fronds from a sampled tree, for a total of twelve subsamples per tree. Five trees per site were sampled when possible, for three sampling periods representing the years 2018, 2019, and 2020. A two-dimensional image of the lower surface of each leaflet segment was captured using a high resolution flatbed scanner (Canon 9000F Mark II) (Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan) for ex-situ insect counting with the aid of ImageJ. In each sample image, the number of presumably live, encrusted A. rigidus third instar and mature females with or without marks of parasitization by C. calauanica, and the number of dead scales with exit holes were counted.
Percent parasitization was computed using the following formula:
% P a r a s i t i z a t i o n = n P n P + n N P   × 100 %
where nP = number of parasitized scales and nNP = number of non-parasitized scales. For Southern Tagalog, each sample was represented by the average percent parasitization obtained from the three subsamples. For the Zamboanga Peninsula areas of Zamboanga Sibugay, Zamboanga City, and Isabela City, the average percent parasitization for a sample was obtained from twelve subsamples. Table 1 shows the number of leaflet segment samples collected in the A. rigidus infestation sites across pertinent sampling periods.

2.3. Data Analysis

For each sampling period, the mean percent parasitization values were compared across points by single-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA), with post-hoc Tukey HSD test when necessary. Correlation with linear regression was performed on the log-transformed number of parasitized scales against the log-transformed total number of scales to determine possible host density dependence of parasitization by C. calauanica on A. rigidus in Southern Tagalog.

3. Results

3.1. Distribution of A. rigidus and C. calauanica in Southern Tagalog Region Survey Sites

Occurrence data in Southern Tagalog, Luzon Island of C. calauanica and A. rigidus (Table 2) further support their direct relationship, as live C. calauanica adults were always found in samples with colonies of A. rigidus in all survey sites. Oviposition by adult female parasitoids was also observed during sample processing in the laboratory (Figure 3).

3.2. Field Parasitism of C. calauanica on A. rigidus in Selected Sites in Southern Tagalog Region, Luzon Island and in the Zamboanga Peninsula, Mindanao Island

Figure 4A shows the percent parasitization of A. rigidus by C. calauanica across three different sampling periods: namely, August 2014, December 2014 to January 2015, and June 2015 (Figure 4A). Survey results in August 2014 showed average percent parasitization with means that ranged from 44.93 ± 4.06% in Site A in San Pablo, Laguna (San Pablo A) to 92.38 ± 2.82% in Santo Tomas, Batangas. With the exception of San Pablo A, all the survey points had percent parasitization values higher than 50%. During the period from December 2014 to January 2015, mean average percent parasitization across points ranged from 56.99 ± 2.52% in San Pablo A to 92.60 ± 1.44% in Tanauan, Batangas. A marked increasing trend in the average percent parasitization values in San Pablo A across three sampling periods was recorded, with significant increases between two successive sampling periods until the mean value reached 96.54% in June 2015. Colonies of A. rigidus could no longer be found in any of the areas that were sampled by the time of the final surveillance in June 2016. For the same period (December 2014 to January 2015) in Silang, only one set of coconut leaf samples exhibited A. rigidus infestation. The rest of the leaflet samples had A. destructor and thus, were not included in the analysis. A. rigidus seemed to have been displaced by a population of A. destructor together with its predator Telsimia nitida Chapin (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). In June 2015, only two among the eight sampling points still had A. rigidus colonies on which C. calauanica parasitism could be assessed, namely Santo Tomas, with mean percent parasitization of 89.01 ± 2.17%, and San Pablo A with 96.54 ± 0.62%.
For Zamboanga Peninsula provinces, while counting of parasitized and non-parasitized insects was done differently using high resolution scans of leaflet segments instead of actual specimens, percent parasitization was computed similarly to Southern Tagalog. Average percent parasitization values recorded in Isabela City, Zamboanga City, Zamboanga Del Norte, Zamboanga Del Sur, and Zamboanga Sibugay from 2018, 2019, and 2020 are shown in Figure 4B. In 2018, we were able to collect samples from Zamboanga Sibugay only, with an over-all percent parasitization of 68.75 ± 10.49% in all survey points. In 2019, percent parasitization was found to be significantly lower (p = 0.0000) in Isabela City (44.22 ± 14.37%) compared to the other provinces (93.21 ± 1.63% in Zamboanga City, 91.79 ± 2.82% in Zamboanga Del Norte, and 100.00 ± 0.00% both in Zamboanga Del Sur and Zamboanga Sibugay). In 2020, percent parasitization was found to be comparable (p = 0.1250) for Isabela City (100.00 ± 0.00%), Zamboanga City (77.28 ± 7.42%), and Zamboanga Sibugay (88.47 ± 5.14%). No percent parasitization was obtained for Zamboanga Del Sur, as collected samples either no longer had A. rigidus or were infested by A. destructor and/or other hemipteran pests. A significant increase in percent parasitization was noted in Isabela City (p = 0.0269), and while percent parasitization appears to have decreased between 2019 and 2020 in Zamboanga City and Zamboanga Sibugay, no significant difference was found in both provinces (p > 0.05).

3.3. Putative Host Density Dependence of Parasitism by C. calauanica Number

Putative dependence of C. calauanica parasitism on host density in the field was estimated by linear correlation and regression analyses of the number of parasitized A. rigidus (nP) against the total of scales (nT) as respective measures of parasitism and host density. Highly significant, nearly perfect positive correlations (p < 0.01) were found between nP and nT for August 2014 (r = 0.9764), December 2014 to January 2015 (r = 0.9764), and June 2015 (r = 0.9988) across the sampling points in Southern Tagalog (Figure 5). The best-fit line does not intersect the x-axis at 0, most observable particularly in the plots for August 2014 and December 2014 to January 2015. The putative host density dependence of parasitism by C. calauanica in the field was similarly observed in the Zamboanga Peninsula, particularly in Zamboanga City and in Zamboanga Sibugay, where a number of coconut trees were noted to retain very small patches of A. rigidus colonies on a few leaflets and with relatively low abundance of C. calauanica adults.

3.4. Impact of Parasitization by C. calauanica on A. rigidus Populations and Recovery of Coconut Trees

The abundance of A. rigidus in this study’s sampling points in Southern Tagalog was observed to have decreased down to zero, suggesting 100% reduction in population density, in a span of only a little more than two years, from the peak of infestation in 2014 up to 2016 (Figure 6A). Gradual recovery from A. rigidus infestation of the periodically sampled trees as well as other trees in the surrounding stands of coconut trees in Southern Tagalog was observed during the same duration.
In Zamboanga Sibugay, Mindanao Island, as high as 100% parasitization by C. calauanica was noted to have possibly contributed about 50% reduction of A. rigidus abundance from 2018 to 2020 (Figure 6B). Infestation by the diaspidid in this province was observed not to have reached outbreak levels as observed in Southern Tagalog and in the neighboring Zamboanga City. Higher reduction in population density of A. rigidus was observed in Zamboanga City at about 70% (Figure 6C) and in Isabela City with close to 100% (Figure 6D), in which scale colonies in both areas were determined to be highly parasitized by C. calauanica. Recovery from A. rigidus infestation of the monitored coconut trees was also observed between 2018 and 2020, parallel to the recorded reduction in scale population density.

4. Discussion

Results of this study showed the direct association between C. calauanica and A. rigidus. This is further confirmed by a series of host-range tests in the laboratory (choice and no choice tests), introducing C. calauanica to other related diaspidid species to determine their suitability as alternative hosts (unpublished data). No alternative host has been found so far in all of our subsequent field monitoring and surveys. Assessment of field parasitism of C. calauanica on A. rigidus in Southern Tagalog showed very high average percent parasitization values that were above 50 percent in all but one of the sampling sites and periods, which was San Pablo A in August 2014. In December 2014 to January 2015, San Pablo A was likewise found to have the lowest mean average percent parasitism of 56.99%, significantly lower compared to all other points. It was observed that the tree from which samples were periodically collected in this particular site was constantly subjected to smoke and dust from the combustion of coconut shells used as fuel for outdoor cooking. It is likely that the smoke and dust provided a disturbance that could have affected the rate of establishment of C. calauanica on the colonies of A. rigidus in the sampled tree. Dust has been described as an environmental disturbance that may cause disruptions in the activity of parasitic Hymenoptera, or even lead to population elimination [20]. High percent parasitization values were also recorded in the Zamboanga Peninsula sites from 2018 to 2019, the average of which were found to have reached up to 100% in Zamboanga Sibugay in 2019 and 100% in Isabela City in 2020. These results suggest that C. calauanica was able to establish in the areas surveyed at a considerably high degree.
It must be noted that the percent parasitization values obtained in this study could have underestimated the actual parasitism of C. calauanica across the sampling points, given the fact that we were unable to count as parasitized the scales that possibly already contained C. calauanica eggs. Nevertheless, the very high degree of parasitization levels, observed and quantitatively estimated, throughout the sampling points, and across sampling periods suggest the efficacy and efficiency of C. calauanica as natural enemy of A. rigidus. This endoparasitoid has been reported to be thelytokous [18,19], and its efficiency against A. rigidus could possibly be attributed to its mode of reproduction.
Results of correlation and regression analyses of data from Southern Tagalog suggest that the number of parasitized A. rigidus has a very high tendency to increase with the total number of scales in a nearly perfectly linear manner. By implication, parasitism by C. calauanica would also have a very high tendency to increase with host density. The scatterplots in Figure 5 shows regression lines that intersect with the x-axis (representing the total number of hosts) at non-zero values, suggesting a positively host density-dependent parasitism that requires the host, A. rigidus, to be present at a particular density before C. calauanica would parasitize. This would consequently imply that, barring other mortality factors, populations of A. rigidus at low densities may still remain in recovered coconut trees, with the parasitoid occurring in low abundance. A mathematical model by Palen et al. [21] assumed that the parasitoid may exhibit Holling type III functional response, in which parasitization on an alternate host is necessary for survival in the absence of the primary host. However, our studies in the field, including ones subsequent to the current, have yet to find such an alternate host for C. calauanica. Without an alternate host, it is likely that C. calauanica populations could be maintained with small patches of A. rigidus colonies in the field, as we have observed in a number of coconut palms in Pagbilao, Quezon in 2017, and in seedlings of mangosteen (a differential dicot host of A. rigidus) in Tiaong, Quezon in 2016 and 2017.
Host- or prey-density dependence of parasitism or predation could be observed less frequently in field studies than in laboratory studies due to the influence of environmental and biotic disturbances such as precipitation and natural enemies. This characteristic could possibly be common in native, monophagous, solitary species of parasitoids especially on sedentary hosts [22]. However, C. calauanica is not only a native, solitary, and highly host-specific parasitoid, but also has no effective natural enemy that has been observed or reported in the field. Marietta carnesi (Howard) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), was found in the current study in August 2014, with a single individual appearing among the pool of 96 leaflet segment samples from Southern Tagalog that were examined for insect counting. While the association of M. carnesi with C. calauanica was not actually established in this study, the former has been reported to be hyperparasitic to the latter [23]. M. carnesi has been reported as a secondary parasitoid in coccoids, and hyperparasitic on at least two species of Comperiella [17], although it seems that the almost negligible occurrence of this hyperparasitoid did not affect the very high levels of parasitization by C. calauanica and the high mortality of A. rigidus in Southern Tagalog. The levels of hyperparasitism of M. carnesi found in C. calauanica-parasitized colonies of A. rigidus in Orani, Bataan, Luzon Island in 2015 were found to be very low, and has been suggested not to have much effect on the biological control potential of C. calauanica [24]. Additionally, with the exception of typhoon Rammasun in July 2014, there was no episode of significant rainfall or other climatic disturbances in the Southern Tagalog region recorded from 2014 to 2015 when our field surveys and sample collections were done. It is likely due to these reasons that our findings appear to point to a putative host density-dependent parasitization by C. calauanica in the field. Parasitic Hymenoptera exhibiting density-dependent parasitism are effective as biological control agents against their hosts [20]. Once the population density of A. rigidus has decreased to below the economic injury level, C. calauanica can maintain such host density, barring other mortality factors. This is consistent with our observations of very small patches of A. rigidus colonies, with few C. calauanica adults and immatures, remaining on some leaflets in some of the coconut trees in Zamboanga City and Zamboanga Sibugay that had already completely recovered from what used to be severe infestation by the scale between 2018 and 2020.
Colonies of A. rigidus could no longer be found in the sampling points in Southern Tagalog by the time a final surveillance was conducted in June 2016, hence the absence of percent parasitization values for that period. In a span of only two years, from the peak of the outbreak in early 2014 to 2016, the abundance of A. rigidus was found in this study to have decreased dramatically down to zero, even without chemical control by trunk injection of dinotefuran. Visible recovery of the periodically sampled coconut trees, as evidenced by flowering, and the increase in the proportion of green, healthy fronds to sickly fronds with chlorotic leaflets, was observed parallel to the recorded decrease in the abundance of A. rigidus and the very high percent parasitization of scales by C. calauanica. These observations, together with findings of possible host density-dependent parasitism in the field, not only points to the potential of this C. calauanica as an effective biological control agent against A. rigidus, but also suggests the putative role of this encyrtid in the natural control of the scale insect outbreak in Southern Tagalog.
C. calauanica was not released, but was found naturally occurring in the Southern Tagalog region. Our findings of high degrees of parasitism of C. calauanica a few months after its discovery in 2014 [18], and throughout 2015 to 2016 towards the decline in the abundance of A. rigidus in the field, strongly point to the contribution of natural biological control in the eventual management of the pest outbreak. Although percent parasitism has been regarded as being inadequate to measure the effect of parasitoids on populations of their hosts [25,26], and that the impact of biological control agents is very difficult to assess on the population level [27], we believe that the recovery of the affected coconut trees from the infestation, concurrent to both the high parasitization levels in A. rigidus colonies and reduction in the population density of the pest suggests otherwise in the case of C. calauanica. A. rigidus populations have become very scarce in Southern Tagalog by 2016, and the reduction may have been caused by the consistently high parasitization by C. calauanica between 2014 and 2016. It has been suggested that parasitism rates of greater than 50%, when sustained over a wide spatial and temporal range, may reduce populations of affected hosts [28].
An outbreak of A. rigidus had been reported in Basilan Island during almost the same time as the outbreak in Southern Tagalog. The closely situated Zamboanga Peninsula was at a considerable risk of A. rigidus invasion and outbreak, especially given that the pest is generally believed to be dispersed by wind [3]. We were able to confirm the occurrence of the diaspidid in Zamboanga City in 2017, shortly after which an outbreak began. Inoculative releases of mass-reared C. calauanica from Southern Tagalog were carried out by our team and the Philippine Coconut Authority in 2017 as part of the IPM strategy in coconut plantations in the province.
In the province of Zamboanga Sibugay, an infestation buffer zone was identified due to its close vicinity to Zamboanga City. While A. rigidus was able to invade some areas in this province, the infestations were not able to reach the same outbreak levels observed in Zamboanga City. This is perhaps due to inoculative releases of C. calauanica in 2018 by the Philippine Coconut Authority, which could have maintained the population of A. rigidus at manageable levels as suggested by our findings. Recovery of A. rigidus-infested coconut trees in our study sites in the Zamboanga Peninsula was observed within a year from inoculative releases of mass-reared C. calauanica, without any chemical control measures being implemented, and without the occurrence of any severe weather disturbance in the region. Collectively, our current findings and observations strongly suggest C. calauanica parasitism as a major mortality factor that has contributed significantly to the control of A. rigidus in the field in the Philippines.
After the cases in Southern Tagalog and Zamboanga Peninsula, outbreaks of A. rigidus were reported in coconut plantations in Tablas Island, Romblon (located south of Southern Tagalog) in early 2018 [29,30], and in Albay, Bicol Region (southeast of Southern Tagalog) [29,31] in the same year. In both cases, C. calauanica were released for biological control, and the results were reported to be similar to those observed in Southern Tagalog and Zamboanga Peninsula [31]. Consequently, C. calauanica has been recognized and accepted in the country as the biological control agent for A. rigidus, and has become an important part of the Philippine Coconut Authority’s IPM program for A. rigidus [29]. At present, the main rearing facility for C. calauanica is in De La Salle University Laguna Campus, with at least two satellite rearing facilities being maintained by the Philippine Coconut Authority in Albay and in Zamboanga City, respectively. Additional satellite rearing facilities may need to be established for quick response to new areas of invasion by A. rigidus in the Philippines.

5. Conclusions

There has been much debate on the mortality factors that contributed to the management of the A. rigidus outbreak in the Southern Tagalog region of Luzon Island, Philippines. C. calauanica, which was discovered in the same region, has been found as a very effective, host-specific parasitoid of the diaspidid pest. Its high levels of field parasitism from 2014 to 2015 were found to parallel the decline in the population density of A. rigidus and recovery of affected coconut trees that were not treated with dinotefuran. Additionally, during the same period, our results from the region suggested putative host density-dependent parasitism by C. calauanica in the field. Release of mass-reared C. calauanica as part of the IPM strategy against A. rigidus in infested areas in the Zamboanga Peninsula yielded results from 2018 to 2020 similar to those from Southern Tagalog, even without the occurrence of a major climatic disturbance and use of dinotefuran. While our findings in Southern Tagalog may have only suggested the potential of the encyrtid as biological control agent against A. rigidus, our results in the Zamboanga Peninsula have validated our claims that parasitization by C. calauanica has been a very important mortality factor that contributed to the management of populations of the invasive A. rigidus in the Philippines, and that biological control using C. calauanica should be a major component of IPM for A. rigidus not only in the country but possibly also in other tropical countries where this pest may invade.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.M.A., B.J.M.A., A.T.B., and J.S.R.C.VI; methodology, D.M.A. and B.J.M.A.; field work, B.J.M.A., D.M.A., A.T.B., M.V.N., M.M.N., and B.F.C.; laboratory studies, B.J.M.A., D.M.A., M.V.N., and M.M.N.; validation, D.M.A., A.T.B., J.S.R.C.VI, J.C.L., and K.W.; formal analysis, B.J.M.A. and D.M.A.; data curation, B.J.M.A., M.V.N., M.M.N., and B.F.C.; writing—original draft preparation, B.J.M.A. and D.M.A.; writing—review and editing, B.J.M.A., D.M.A., A.T.B., J.C.L., and K.W.; visualization, B.J.M.A. and D.M.A.; supervision, D.M.A.; project administration, D.M.A., M.V.N., M.M.N., and B.F.C.; resources, D.M.A., B.J.M.A., J.S.R.C.VI, M.V.N., M.M.N., and B.F.C.; funding acquisition, D.M.A., B.J.M.A., and J.S.R.C.VI. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Government of the Philippines, through the Department of Science and Technology—Philippine Council for Agricultural, Aquatic, and Natural Resources Research and Development (DOST-PCAARRD). It was also funded in part by De La Salle University (DLSU), and by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Core-To-Core Program B—Asia-Africa Science Platforms.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the research assistants and laboratory technicians of the Biological Control Research Unit (BCRU), particularly Reynaldo Majaducon, and the research assistants and science research specialists of National Crop Protection Center for the manpower support in our field and laboratory studies. We also acknowledge the invaluable cooperation and support extended by the Philippine Coconut Authority—Zamboanga Research Center (PCA-ZRC) and PCA Region IX regional and provincial offices. We would like to specifically thank Ramon L. Rivera (former Center Manager, PCA-ZRC, and currently Acting Provincial Manager, PCA-Region IV), Richard Lasina (research staff, PCA-ZRC), Frigediano Arcamo (former Provincial Manager, PCA Zamboanga Sibugay), Ariel Tomong (Provincial Coconut Development Manager, PCA Zamboanga Sibugay), Charlita Angon (Provincial Manager, PCA Zamboanga Del Sur), Francis Fegarido (former Officer-in-Charge, PCA Region IX), and Efren Carba (former Regional Manager, PCA Region IX).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Namuco, L.O.; Protacio, C.M. Fruit and Plantation Crop Production in the Philippines; The University of the Philippines Press: Quezon City, Philippines, 2010; p. 186. [Google Scholar]
  2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Non-Forest Tree Plantations. Report Based on the Work of W. Killman, Forest Plantation Thematic Papers Working Paper 6. 2001. Available online: ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/006/ac126e/ac126e00.pdf (accessed on 20 January 2015).
  3. Watson, G.W.; Adalla, C.B.; Shepard, B.M.; Carner, G.R. Aspidiotus rigidus Reyne (Hemiptera: Diaspididae): A devastating pest of coconut in the Philippines. Agric. For. Entomol. 2015, 17, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Reyne, A. Notes on the biology of Comperiella unifasciata Ishii and its host Aspidiotus destructor rigidus nov. subspec. Tijdschr. Entomol. 1947, 88, 294–302. [Google Scholar]
  5. Philippine Coconut Authority (PCA). No More ‘Cocolisap’ Outbreak. 2015. Available online: http://pca.da.gov.ph/index.php/10-news/4-no-more-cocolisap-outbreak (accessed on 18 February 2017).
  6. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA). Pesticide Fact Sheet for Dinotefuran. 2004. Available online: https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/reg_actions/registration/fs_PC-044312_01-Sep-04.pdf (accessed on 3 January 2017).
  7. Japan Endocrine-disruptor Preventive Action (JEPA). The Threat of Neonicotinoid Pesticides on Honeybees, Ecosystems, and Humans. 2010. Available online: http://kokumin-kaigi.org/wp-content/uploads/Neonicotinoid_e.pdf (accessed on 3 January 2017).
  8. Van Driesche, R.; Hoddle, M.; Center, T. Control of Pests and Weeds by Natural Enemies: An Introduction to Biological Control; Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2008; p. 4. [Google Scholar]
  9. Stiling, P.; Cornelissen, T. What makes a successful biocontrol agent? A meta-analysis of biological control agent performance. Biol. Control 2005, 34, 236–246. [Google Scholar]
  10. Neumann, G.; Follett, P.A.; Hollingsworth, R.G.; de Leon, J.H. High host specificity in Encarsia diaspidicola (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), a biological control candidate against the white peach scale in Hawaii. Biol. Control 2010, 54, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kinawy, M.M.; Al-Waili, H.M.; Almandhari, A.M. Review of the successful biological control programs in Sultanate of Oman. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 2008, 18, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gordh, G.; Legner, E.F.; Caltagirone, L.E. Biology of parasitic Hymenoptera. In Handbook of Biological Control; Bellows, T.S., Fisher, T.W., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1999; pp. 355–381. [Google Scholar]
  13. Salahuddin, B.; ur Rahman, H.; Khan, I.; Daud, M.K. Incidence and management of coconut scale, Aspidiotus destructor Signoret (Hemiptera: Diaspididae), and its parasitoids on mango (Mangifera sp.). Crop Prot. 2015, 74, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Reyne, A. Studies on a serious outbreak of Aspidiotus destructor rigidus in the coconut-palms of Sangi (North Celebes). Tijdschr. Entomol. 1948, 89, 83–123. [Google Scholar]
  15. Howard, L.O. An interesting new genus and species of Encyrtidae. Entomol. News 1906, 17, 121–122. [Google Scholar]
  16. Baltazar, C.R. A catalogue of Philippine Hymenoptera (with a bibliography, 1758–1963). Pac. Insects Monogr. 1966, 8, 1–488. [Google Scholar]
  17. Noyes, J.S. Universal Chalcidoidea Database, Natural History Museum of London. 2015. Available online: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/chalcidoids (accessed on 20 January 2015).
  18. Almarinez, B.J.M.; Amalin, D.M.; Carandang, J.S.R.; Navasero, M.V.; Navasero, M.M. First Philippine record of the parasitoid, Comperiella sp. (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae): A potential biological control agent against Aspidiotus rigidus (Hemiptera: Diaspididae). J. Appl. Entomol. 2015, 139, 237–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Barrion, A.T.; Almarinez, B.J.M.; Amalin, D.M.; Carandang, J.S.R. Comperiella calauanica sp. n. (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), an endoparasitoid of the invasive coconut scale, Aspidiotus rigidus Reyne (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) on Luzon Island, Philippines. Asia Life Sci. 2016, 25, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  20. LaSalle, J. Parasitic Hymenoptera, biological control and diversity. In Hymenoptera and Biodiversity; La Salle, J., Gauld, I.D., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1993; pp. 197–215. [Google Scholar]
  21. Palen, D.I.; Almarinez, B.J.M.; Amalin, D.M.; Legaspi, J.C.; David, G. A host-parasitoid model for Aspidiotus rigidus (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) and Comperiella calauanica (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Environ. Entomol. 2019, 48, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Stiling, P.D. The frequency of density dependence in insect host-parasitoid systems. Ecology 1987, 68, 844–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Almarinez, B.J.M.; Amalin, D.M. Aphelinid Versus Encyrtid: First Record of Marietta carnesi (Howard) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) in the Philippines and Confirmation of Its Hyperparasitism in Comperiella calauanica Barrion, Almarinez & Amalin (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). In Proceedings of the 47th Pest Management Council of the Philippines Annual Scientific Convention, Naga City, Philippines, 9 March 2016. [Google Scholar]
  24. Almarinez, B.J.M.; Arce, S.N.S.; Busmente, E.A.B.; Labios, M.E.P.; Amalin, D.M. Field Hyperparasitism of Marietta carnesi (Howard) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) on Comperiella calauanica Barrion, Almarinez & Amalin (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) in Orani, Bataan, Philippines. In Proceedings of the 51st Pest Management Council of the Philippines Annual Scientific Convention, Coron, Palawan, Philippines, 4 July 2019. [Google Scholar]
  25. Van Driesche, R.G.; Bellows, T.S.; Elkinton, J.S.; Gould, J.R.; Ferro, D.N. The meaning of percentage parasitism revisited: Solutions to the problem of accurately estimating total losses from parasitism. Environ. Entomol. 1991, 20, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Barlow, N.D.; Barratt, B.I.P.; Ferguson, C.M.; Barron, M.C. Using models to estimate parasitoid impacts on nontarget host abundance. Environ. Entomol. 2004, 33, 941–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Baratt, B.I.P. Assessing safety of biological control introductions. CAB Rev. Perspect. Agri. Vet. Sci. Nutr. Nat. Resour. 2011, 6, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Van Driesche, R.; Hoddle, M. Non-target effects of insect biocontrol agents and trends in host specificity since 1985. CAB Rev. 2016, 11, 1–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Technical Advisory on the Management of the Coconut Scale Insect (Aspidiotus rigidus). Available online: https://pca.gov.ph/pdf/cocoTech/pestandDiseaseManagement/CoconutScaleInsect.pdf (accessed on 7 April 2020).
  30. Almarinez, B.J.M.; Fadri, M.J.A.; Amalin, D.M. Bioclimate-Based Maximum Entropy Model for Comperiella calauanica Barrion, Almarinez & Amalin (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) Predicted the Occurrence of Aspidiotus rigidus Reyne (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) in Zamboanga Peninsula and Romblon. In Proceedings of the 50th Pest Management Council of the Philippines Annual Scientific Convention, Iloilo City, Philippines, 11 May 2018. [Google Scholar]
  31. Imperial, M.L.R.; Pedrajita, L.B.; Manalo, G.G.; Cueto, C.A.; Almarinez, B.J.M.; Amalin, D.M. Updates on the Mass Rearing and Preliminary Field Release Evaluation of Comperiella calauanica Barrion, Almarinez & Amalin (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) for Biological Control of the Coconut Scale Insect, Aspidiotus rigidus Reyne (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) in the Bicol Region. In Proceedings of the 51st Pest Management Council of the Philippines Annual Scientific Convention, Coron, Palawan, Philippines, 3 July 2019. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Selected sites in the Philippines with confirmed occurrence of Aspidiotus rigidus and Comperiella calauanica: (A) Southern Tagalog and (B) Zamboanga Peninsula.
Figure 1. Selected sites in the Philippines with confirmed occurrence of Aspidiotus rigidus and Comperiella calauanica: (A) Southern Tagalog and (B) Zamboanga Peninsula.
Insects 11 00745 g001
Figure 2. Indicators of parasitization by Comperiella calauanica on Aspidiotus rigidus: (A) white, powdery residue (pointed to by arrow) occurring on ventral pygidium of an isolated scale parasitized by a C. calauanica third instar larva (location in the scale indicated by broken oval); (B) meconial deposits (pointed to by arrows) produced by the C. calauanica fourth instar larva visible in the middle of the isolated, mummified scale; (C) dark-colored, C. calauanica late pupa inside an intact, mummified scale (pointed to by arrow); and (D) exit holes (pointed to by arrows) produced by adult C. calauanica upon emergence from their mummified hosts. Scale bars represent 1 mm.
Figure 2. Indicators of parasitization by Comperiella calauanica on Aspidiotus rigidus: (A) white, powdery residue (pointed to by arrow) occurring on ventral pygidium of an isolated scale parasitized by a C. calauanica third instar larva (location in the scale indicated by broken oval); (B) meconial deposits (pointed to by arrows) produced by the C. calauanica fourth instar larva visible in the middle of the isolated, mummified scale; (C) dark-colored, C. calauanica late pupa inside an intact, mummified scale (pointed to by arrow); and (D) exit holes (pointed to by arrows) produced by adult C. calauanica upon emergence from their mummified hosts. Scale bars represent 1 mm.
Insects 11 00745 g002
Figure 3. Adult female Comperiella calauanica ovipositing on a third instar female Aspidiotus rigidus nymph.
Figure 3. Adult female Comperiella calauanica ovipositing on a third instar female Aspidiotus rigidus nymph.
Insects 11 00745 g003
Figure 4. Levels of parasitization (mean ± SEM) of Aspidiotus rigidus by Comperiella calauanica in the field across survey points in Southern Tagalog (A) and in provinces in the Zamboanga Peninsula (B) for three sampling periods.
Figure 4. Levels of parasitization (mean ± SEM) of Aspidiotus rigidus by Comperiella calauanica in the field across survey points in Southern Tagalog (A) and in provinces in the Zamboanga Peninsula (B) for three sampling periods.
Insects 11 00745 g004
Figure 5. Correlation and regression of the number of parasitized scales against the total number of scales across the three sampling periods: (A) August 2014 (r = 0.9764, r2 = 0.9534, p = 0.0000); (B) December 2014 to January 2015 (r = 0.9764, r2 = 0.9535, p = 0.0000); (C) June 2015 (r = 0.9988, r2 = 0.9976, p = 0.0000).
Figure 5. Correlation and regression of the number of parasitized scales against the total number of scales across the three sampling periods: (A) August 2014 (r = 0.9764, r2 = 0.9534, p = 0.0000); (B) December 2014 to January 2015 (r = 0.9764, r2 = 0.9535, p = 0.0000); (C) June 2015 (r = 0.9988, r2 = 0.9976, p = 0.0000).
Insects 11 00745 g005
Figure 6. Population density of Aspidiotus rigidus and percent parasitization by Comperiella calauanica over time in: (A) Southern Tagalog from August 2014 to June 2016; (B) Zamboanaga Sibugay from 2018 to 2020; (C) Zamboanga City, and (D) Isabela City from 2019 to 2020. Columns represent averages of pooled scale insect population counts from all the trees sampled for a particular period.
Figure 6. Population density of Aspidiotus rigidus and percent parasitization by Comperiella calauanica over time in: (A) Southern Tagalog from August 2014 to June 2016; (B) Zamboanaga Sibugay from 2018 to 2020; (C) Zamboanga City, and (D) Isabela City from 2019 to 2020. Columns represent averages of pooled scale insect population counts from all the trees sampled for a particular period.
Insects 11 00745 g006
Table 1. Distribution of leaflet segment samples collected in study sites with confirmed Aspidiotus rigidus infestations. Numbers in parentheses indicate the number of segments with A. rigidus colonies.
Table 1. Distribution of leaflet segment samples collected in study sites with confirmed Aspidiotus rigidus infestations. Numbers in parentheses indicate the number of segments with A. rigidus colonies.
SiteAugust 2014December 2014January 2015June 2015June 2016September 2018January 2019January 2020
Cavite
 Silang12 (12)12 (3) 12 (0)12 (0)
 Tagaytay12 (11)12 (12) 12 (0)12 (0)
Batangas
 Talisay12 (12)12 (12) 12 (0)12 (0)
 Tanauan12 (12)12 (12) 12 (0)12 (0)
 Santo Tomas12 (12) 12 (0)12 (0)
Laguna
 San Pablo A12 (12)12 (12) 12 (0)12 (0)
 San Pablo B12 (12)12 (12) 12 (0)
 Nagcarlan12 (12) 12 (12)12 (0)12 (0)
Zamboanga Peninsula
 Isabela City 12 (11)120 (6)
 Zamboanga City 120 (102)120 (18)
 Zamboanga Del Norte 120 (52)
 Zamboanga Del Sur 120 (33)72 (0)
 Zamboanga Sibugay 120 (41)60 (34)84 (6)
Table 2. Occurrence of Aspidiotus rigidus and Comperiella calauanica in select points in Southern Tagalog as observed across the three survey and sampling periods. Presence is indicated by +, while absence is indicated by −.
Table 2. Occurrence of Aspidiotus rigidus and Comperiella calauanica in select points in Southern Tagalog as observed across the three survey and sampling periods. Presence is indicated by +, while absence is indicated by −.
PointAspidiotus rigidusComperiella calauanica
Cavite
  Silang++
  Tagaytay++
Batangas
  Malvar++
  Talisay++
  Tanauan++
  Santo Tomas++
Quezon
  Tiaong
  Candelaria+ *+ *
  Sariaya
  Tayabas
  Lucban
Laguna
  Calauan++
  Alaminos++
  Los Baños++
  Rizal++
  San Pablo
  Luisiana
  Cavinti
  Pagsanjan
  Sta. Cruz
  Liliw
  Nagcarlan++
* Occurrence reported in mangosteen prior to August 28 survey.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Almarinez, B.J.M.; Barrion, A.T.; Navasero, M.V.; Navasero, M.M.; Cayabyab, B.F.; Carandang, J.S.R., VI; Legaspi, J.C.; Watanabe, K.; Amalin, D.M. Biological Control: A Major Component of the Pest Management Program for the Invasive Coconut Scale Insect, Aspidiotus rigidus Reyne, in the Philippines. Insects 2020, 11, 745. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11110745

AMA Style

Almarinez BJM, Barrion AT, Navasero MV, Navasero MM, Cayabyab BF, Carandang JSR VI, Legaspi JC, Watanabe K, Amalin DM. Biological Control: A Major Component of the Pest Management Program for the Invasive Coconut Scale Insect, Aspidiotus rigidus Reyne, in the Philippines. Insects. 2020; 11(11):745. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11110745

Chicago/Turabian Style

Almarinez, Billy Joel M., Alberto T. Barrion, Mario V. Navasero, Marcela M. Navasero, Bonifacio F. Cayabyab, Jose Santos R. Carandang, VI, Jesusa C. Legaspi, Kozo Watanabe, and Divina M. Amalin. 2020. "Biological Control: A Major Component of the Pest Management Program for the Invasive Coconut Scale Insect, Aspidiotus rigidus Reyne, in the Philippines" Insects 11, no. 11: 745. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11110745

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop