Next Article in Journal
KCS-FCnet: Kernel Cross-Spectral Functional Connectivity Network for EEG-Based Motor Imagery Classification
Next Article in Special Issue
Editorial on Special Issue “Medical Data Processing and Analysis”
Previous Article in Journal
A Deep Learning Framework for Cardiac MR Under-Sampled Image Reconstruction with a Hybrid Spatial and k-Space Loss Function
Previous Article in Special Issue
Accuracy Analysis of Deep Learning Methods in Breast Cancer Classification: A Structured Review
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Improvement of Time Forecasting Models Using Machine Learning for Future Pandemic Applications Based on COVID-19 Data 2020–2022

Diagnostics 2023, 13(6), 1121; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061121
by Abdul Aziz K Abdul Hamid 1,2, Wan Imanul Aisyah Wan Mohamad Nawi 1, Muhamad Safiih Lola 1,3,*, Wan Azani Mustafa 4,5,*, Siti Madhihah Abdul Malik 1, Syerrina Zakaria 1, Elayaraja Aruchunan 6, Nurul Hila Zainuddin 7, R.U. Gobithaasan 1,3 and Mohd Tajuddin Abdullah 8,9
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Diagnostics 2023, 13(6), 1121; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061121
Submission received: 22 January 2023 / Revised: 17 February 2023 / Accepted: 20 February 2023 / Published: 15 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Medical Data Processing and Analysis)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1. If possible, avoid acronyms in the abstract.

2. State clearly the list of contributions in the introduction.

3. Several relevant paper on this topic should be added to the background, especially the papers that propose hybrid machine learning - swarm intelligence solutions. Please include the following:

https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1680/11/8/410

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670720308842

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095741742201764X

4. Concerning that there are numerous publications about this exact topic, utilizing a variety of machine learning models and solutions to predict the number of COVID-19 cases, elaborate and justify in details the novelty of the approach and how it contributes to the field.

5. Make sure that all the parameters in all equations have been explained in the text.

6. Figures should be provided in higher quality (i.e. Fig. 1 is not clear enough, same applies for Fig. 2 and Fig. 6).

7. Please use scientific annotation (10^x) instead of exp (e^x), this is I believe a requirement from the MDPI.

8. In the figures with graphs, the legend is oddly placed, with lines going over the graphs. Was that intended - if not, please remove these lines.

9. Consider testing the model on the additional dataset, to validate the performance and establish confidence in the method. There are numerous available open datasets, for example, for influenza cases. You could then generalize the model to other diseases as well.

10. Summarize the experimental results briefly in the conclusion.

 

Author Response

Thank you very much for your evaluation and giving us an opportunity to ‘revise and resubmit’ the manuscript titled as, “Improvement of time forecasting models using machine learning for
future pandemic applications based on COVID-19 data 2020-2022”
with manuscript ID: diagnostics-2205707.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you very much for your evaluation and giving us an opportunity to ‘revise and resubmit’ the manuscript titled as, “Improvement of time forecasting models using machine learning for
future pandemic applications based on COVID-19 data 2020-2022”
with manuscript ID: diagnostics-2205707.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Authors have addressed all my concerns from the previous round, and the paper can be accepted in its present form.

Back to TopTop