Next Article in Journal
Stability Anomalies of Some Jacobian-Free Iterative Methods of High Order of Convergence
Next Article in Special Issue
Fixed Point Theorems through Modified ω-Distance and Application to Nontrivial Equations
Previous Article in Journal
Relation Theoretic Common Fixed Point Results for Generalized Weak Nonlinear Contractions with an Application
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Note on the Displacement Problem of Elastostatics with Singular Boundary Values
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Differential Equations for Classical and Non-Classical Polynomial Sets: A Survey †

by
Paolo Emilio Ricci
Section of Mathematics, International Telematic University UniNettuno, Corso Vittorio Emanuele II, 39, 00186 Roma, Italy
Dedicated to Prof. Dr. Hari M. Srivastava.
Axioms 2019, 8(2), 50; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms8020050
Submission received: 8 March 2019 / Revised: 19 April 2019 / Accepted: 20 April 2019 / Published: 25 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mathematical Analysis and Applications II)

Abstract

:
By using the monomiality principle and general results on Sheffer polynomial sets, the differential equation satisfied by several old and new polynomial sets is shown.

1. Introduction

In this survey article, a uniform method is presented for constructing the differential equations satisfied by several sets of classical and non classical polynomials. This has been done by starting from the basic elements of the relevant generating functions, using the monomiality principle by G. Dattoli [1] and a general result by Y. Ben Cheikh [2]. Of course, the polynomials considered in this paper are only examples for showing that the method works, but obviously this technique can be theoretically extended to every polynomial set.
This method has been recently applied in several articles (see [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]), which include works in collaboration with several authors. The most outstanding of them is Prof. Dr. Hari M. Srivastava, to whom this article is dedicated.
The derived differential equations are generally of infinite order, but they reduce to finite order when applied to polynomials.
It is worth noting that the differential equations for Sheffer polynomial sets have been studied even with different methods (see [10,11,12,13]), but here we use only elements directly connected with the theory of polynomials.
We start recalling, in Section 2, the definitions relevant to Sheffer polynomials, the G. Dattoli monomiality principle, and a general result by Y. Ben Cheikh.
The classical polynomial sets, considered in Section 3, are the Bernoulli, Euler, Genocchi and Mittag–Leffler polynomials. In Section 4, we show some new polynomial sets derived from non-classical generating functions.

2. Sheffer Polynomials

The Sheffer polynomials { s n ( x ) } are introduced [14] by means of the exponential generating function [15] of the type:
A ( t ) exp ( x H ( t ) ) = n = 0 s n ( x ) t n n ! ,
where
A ( t ) = n = 0 a n t n n ! , ( a 0 0 ) , H ( t ) = n = 0 h n t n n ! , ( h 0 = 0 ) .
According to a different characterization (see [16], p. 18), the same polynomial sequence can be defined by means of the pair ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) , where g ( t ) is an invertible series and f ( t ) is a delta series:
g ( t ) = n = 0 g n t n n ! , ( g 0 0 ) , f ( t ) = n = 0 f n t n n ! , ( f 0 = 0 , f 1 0 ) .
Denoting by f 1 ( t ) the compositional inverse of f ( t ) (i.e., such that f f 1 ( t ) = f 1 f ( t ) = t ), the exponential generating function of the sequence { s n ( x ) } is given by
1 g [ f 1 ( t ) ] exp x f 1 ( t ) = n = 0 s n ( x ) t n n ! ,
so that
A ( t ) = 1 g [ f 1 ( t ) ] , H ( t ) = f 1 ( t ) .
When g ( t ) 1 , the Sheffer sequence corresponding to the pair ( 1 , f ( t ) ) is called the associated Sheffer sequence { σ n ( x ) } for f ( t ) , and its exponential generating function is given by
exp x f 1 ( t ) = n = 0 σ n ( x ) t n n ! .
A list of known Sheffer polynomial sequences and their associated ones can be found in [17].

Shift Operators and Differential Equation

We recall that a polynomial set p n ( x ) is called quasi-monomial if and only if there exist two operators P ^ and M ^ such that
P ^ p n ( x ) = n p n 1 ( x ) , M ^ p n ( x ) = p n + 1 ( x ) , ( n = 1 , 2 , ) .
P ^ is called the derivative operator and M ^ the multiplication operator, as they act in the same way as classical operators on monomials.
This definition traces back to a paper by J.F. Steffensen [18] recently improved by G. Dattoli and widely used in several applications [19,20].
Y. Ben Cheikh proved that every polynomial set is quasi-monomial under the action of suitable derivative and multiplication operators. In particular, in the same article, the following result is proved, as a particular case of Corollary 3.2 in [2]:
Theorem 1.
Let p n ( x ) denote a Sheffer polynomial set, defined by the generating function
A ( t ) exp ( x H ( t ) ) = n = 0 p n ( x ) t n n ! ,
where
A ( t ) = n = 0 a ˜ n t n , ( a ˜ 0 0 ) ,
and
H ( t ) = n = 0 h ˜ n t n + 1 , ( h ˜ 0 0 ) .
Denoting, as before, by f ( t ) the compositional inverse of H ( t ) , the Sheffer polynomial set p n ( x ) is quasi-monomial under the action of the operators
P ^ = f ( D x ) , M ^ = A [ f ( D x ) ] A [ f ( D x ) ] + x H [ f ( D x ) ] ,
where prime denotes the ordinary derivatives with respect to t.
Furthermore, according to the monomiality principle, the quasi-monomial polynomials p n ( x ) satisfy the differential equation
M ^ P ^ p n ( x ) = n p n ( x ) .

3. Differential Equations of Classical Polynomials

3.1. Bernoulli Polynomials

The Bernoulli polynomials are defined by the generating function
G ( t , x ) = t e t 1 e x t ,
so that
A ( t ) = t e t 1 = k = 0 b k t k k ! , G ( t , x ) = k = 0 B k ( x ) t k k ! = k = 0 h = 0 k k h b k h x h t k k ! , B k ( x ) = h = 0 k k h b k h x h ,
where b k are the Bernoulli numbers.

Differential Equation of the B k ( x )

Note that, recalling that B n ( 1 ) = ( 1 ) n b n , the following expansion holds:
t A ( t ) A ( t ) = e t t e t 1 e t 1 = 1 t e t e t 1 = 1 n = 0 B n ( 1 ) t n n ! = = n = 1 ( 1 ) n + 1 b n t n n ! .
The shift operators for the Bernoulli polynomials are given by
P ^ = D x , M ^ = e D x D x e D x 1 D x ( e D x 1 ) .
Therefore, by using the factorization method, we find
Theorem 2.
The Bernoulli polynomials { B n ( x ) } satisfy the differential equation
e D x D x e D x 1 e D x 1 + x D x B n ( x ) = n B n ( x ) ,
that is
k = 1 ( 1 ) k + 1 b k k ! D x k + x D x B n ( x ) = n B n ( x ) ,
or, in equivalent form:
k = 1 n ( 1 ) k + 1 b k k ! D x k + x D x B n ( x ) = n B n ( x ) .
Proof. 
It is sufficient to expand in series the operator (17). Equation (19) follows because, for any fixed n, the series expansion in Equation (18) reduces to a finite sum when applied to a polynomial of degree n. □

3.2. Euler Polynomials

The Euler polynomials are defined by the generating function
G ( t , x ) = 2 e t + 1 e x t ,
so that
A ( t ) = 2 e t + 1 = k = 0 e k t k k ! , G ( t , x ) = k = 0 E k ( x ) t k k ! = k = 0 h = 0 k k h e k h x h t k k ! , E k ( x ) = h = 0 k k h e k h x h ,
where e k are the Euler numbers.

Differential Equation of the E k ( x )

Note that the following expansion holds:
A ( t ) A ( t ) = e t e t + 1 = 1 + 1 e t + 1 = 1 + 1 2 n = 0 e n t n n ! = = 1 2 + 1 2 n = 1 e n t n n ! = n = 0 c n t n n ! ,
where c 0 = 1 / 2 , and c n = e n / 2 .
The shift operators for the Euler polynomials are given by
P ^ = D x , M ^ = e D x e D x + 1 .
Therefore, by using the factorization method, we find
Theorem 3.
The Euler polynomials { E n ( x ) } satisfy the differential equation
e D x D x e D x + 1 + x D x E n ( x ) = n E n ( x ) .
that is
k = 0 c k k ! D x k + 1 + x D x E n ( x ) = n E n ( x ) ,
or, in equivalent form:
k = 0 n 1 c k k ! D x k + 1 + x D x E n ( x ) = n E n ( x ) .
Proof. 
It is sufficient to expand in series the operator (24). Equation (26) follows because, for any fixed n, the series expansion in Equation (25) reduces to a finite sum when applied to a polynomial of degree n. □

3.3. Genocchi Polynomials

The Genocchi polynomials are defined by the generating function
G ( t , x ) = 2 t e t + 1 e x t ,
so that
A ( t ) = 2 t e t + 1 = k = 0 g k t k k ! , G ( t , x ) = k = 0 G k ( x ) t k k ! = k = 0 h = 0 k k h g k h x h t k k ! , G k ( x ) = h = 0 k k h g k h x h ,
where g k are the Genocchi numbers.

Differential Equation of the G k ( x )

Note that the following expansion holds:
t A ( t ) A ( t ) = e t t e t + 1 e t + 1 = 1 t e t e t + 1 = 1 1 2 t + 1 2 n = 2 e n t n + 1 n ! = = n = 0 d n t n n ! ,
where d 0 = 1 , d 1 = 1 / 2 , and d k = e k / 2 , ( k 2 ) .
The shift operators for the Genocchi polynomials are given by
P ^ = D x , M ^ = e D x D x e D x + 1 D x ( e D x + 1 ) ,
so that the Genocchi polynomials satisfy the differential equation
e D x D x e D x + 1 e D x + 1 + x D x G n ( x ) = n G n ( x ) .
Therefore, by using the factorization method, we find
Theorem 4.
The Genocchi polynomials { G n ( x ) } satisfy the differential equation
e D x D x e D x + 1 e D x + 1 + x D x G n ( x ) = n G n ( x ) ,
that is
k = 0 d k k ! D x k + x D x G n ( x ) = n G n ( x ) ,
or, in equivalent form:
k = 0 n d k k ! D x k + x D x G n ( x ) = n G n ( x ) .
Proof. 
It is sufficient to expand in series the operator (32). Equation (34) follows because, for any fixed n, the series expansion in Equation (33) reduces to a finite sum when applied to a polynomial of degree n. □

3.4. The Mittag–Leffler Polynomials

We recall that the Mittag–Leffler polynomials [21] are a special case of associated Sheffer polynomials, defined by the generating function
A ( t ) = 1 , H ( t ) = log 1 + t 1 t , G ( t , x ) = 1 + t 1 t x = exp x log 1 + t 1 t = n = 0 M n ( x ) t n n ! .
Therefore, we have
A ( t ) A ( t ) = 0 , H ( t ) = 2 1 t 2 , H 1 ( t ) = f ( t ) = e t 1 e t + 1 ,
so that, for the Mittag-Leffer polynomials, we find the shift operators:
P ^ = e D x 1 e D x + 1 = tanh D x 2 , M ^ = x ( e D x + 1 ) 2 2 e D x = x 1 + cosh ( D x ) .

3.5. Differential Equation of the M n ( x )

In the present case, according to the identity:
[ 1 + cosh x ] tanh x / 2 = sinh x ,
we can write
M ^ P ^ = x e 2 D x 1 2 e D x = x sinh ( D x ) ,
so that we have the theorem
Theorem 5.
The Mittag–Leffler polynomials { M n ( x ) } satisfy the differential equation
x sinh ( D x ) M n ( x ) = n M n ( x ) ,
that is
x k = 0 D x 2 k + 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) ! M n ( x ) = n M n ( x ) ,
or
x k = 0 n 1 2 D x 2 k + 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) ! M n ( x ) = n M n ( x ) ,
where n 1 2 denotes the integral part of ( n 1 ) / 2 .
Proof. 
It is sufficient to expand in series the operator (39). Equation (41) follows because, for any fixed n, the series expansion in Equation (40) reduces to a finite sum when applied to a polynomial of degree n. □

4. Differential Equations of Non-Classical Polynomials

4.1. Euler-Type Polynomials

Here, we introduce a Sheffer polynomial set connected with the classical Euler polynomials.
Assuming:
A ( t ) = 1 cosh t , H ( t ) = sinh t ,
we consider the Euler-type polynomials E ˜ n ( x ) , defined by the generating function
G ( t , x ) = 1 cosh t exp x sinh t = k = 0 E ˜ k ( x ) t k k ! .
Note that the Euler numbers are recovered, since we have:
G ( t , 0 ) = 2 e t + e t = k = 0 E ˜ k ( 0 ) t k k ! ,
so that E ˜ n ( 0 ) = E n .
In what follows, we use the expansions
sinh t = k = 0 t 2 k + 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) ! = k = 0 1 + ( 1 ) k + 1 2 t k k ! ,
cosh t = k = 0 t 2 k ( 2 k ) ! = k = 0 1 + ( 1 ) k 2 t k k ! .
Note that, in our case, we are dealing with a Sheffer polynomial set, so that, since we have ψ ( t ) = e t , the operator σ defined by Equation (6) simply reduces to the derivative operator D x . Furthermore, we have:
A ( t ) = 1 cosh t , A ( t ) A ( t ) = tanh t , H ( t ) = sinh t = k = 0 t 2 k + 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) ! , h ˜ k = 1 + ( 1 ) k + 1 2 1 k ! , H ( t ) = cosh t , f ( t ) = H 1 ( t ) = log ( t + t 2 + 1 ) ,
so that we have the theorem
Theorem 6.
The Euler-type polynomial set { E ˜ n ( x ) } is quasi-monomial under the action of the operators
P ^ = log ( D x + D x 2 + 1 ) , M ^ = tanh ( a r c s i n h D x ) + x a r c s i n h D x
(by a r c s i n h t = log ( t + t 2 + 1 ) , we denote the inverse of the function sinh t ), i.e.,
P ^ = k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( 2 k ) ! 4 k ( k ! ) 2 ( 2 k + 1 ) D x 2 k + 1 , M ^ = D x 1 + D x 2 + x 1 + D x 2 = ( x D x 2 D x + x ) ( 1 + D x 2 ) 1 / 2 , M ^ = ( x D x 2 D x + x ) k = 0 1 / 2 k D x 2 k .
There is no problem about the convergence of the above series, since they reduce to finite sums when applied to polynomials.

4.2. Differential Equation of the E ˜ n ( x )

In the present case, we have
Theorem 7.
The Euler-type polynomials { E ˜ n ( x ) } satisfy the differential equation
( x D x 2 D x + x ) k = 0 1 / 2 k D x 2 k k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( 2 k ) ! 4 k ( k ! ) 2 ( 2 k + 1 ) D x 2 k + 1 E ˜ n ( x ) = n E ˜ n ( x ) ,
i.e.,
( x D x 2 D x + x ) k = 0 n 1 2 h = 0 k ( 1 ) h 1 / 2 k h ( 2 h ) ! 4 h ( h ! ) 2 ( 2 h + 1 ) D x 2 k + 1 E ˜ n ( x ) = n E ˜ n ( x ) .
Note that, for any fixed n, the Cauchy product of series expansions in Equation (49) reduces to a finite sum, with upper limit n 1 2 , when it is applied to a polynomial of degree n, because the successive addends vanish.
Remark 1.
The first few Euler-type polynomials are as follows:
E ˜ 0 ( x ) = 1 , E ˜ 1 ( x ) = x , E ˜ 2 ( x ) = x 2 1 , E ˜ 3 ( x ) = x 3 2 x , E ˜ 4 ( x ) = x 4 2 x 2 + 5 , E ˜ 5 ( x ) = x 5 + 16 x , E ˜ 6 ( x ) = x 6 + 5 x 4 + 31 x 2 61 , E ˜ 7 ( x ) = x 7 + 14 x 5 + 56 x 3 272 x , E ˜ 8 ( x ) = x 8 + 28 x 6 + 126 x 4 692 x 2 + 1385 , E ˜ 9 ( x ) = x 9 + 48 x 7 + 336 x 5 1280 x 3 + 7936 x , E ˜ 10 ( x ) = x 10 + 75 x 8 + 882 x 6 1490 x 4 + 25,261 x 2 50,521 .

5. Adjointness for Sheffer Polynomial Sequences

According to the above considerations, Sheffer polynomials are characterized both by the ordered couples ( A ( t ) , H ( t ) ) , or by ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) .
Definition 1.
Adjoint Sheffer polynomials are defined by interchanging the ordered couple ( A ( t ) , H ( t ) ) with ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) , when writing the generating function.
Here and in the following the tilde “∼” above the symbol of a polynomial set stands for the adjective “adjoint” (see e.g., [4]).

5.1. Adjoint Hahn Polynomials

Assuming:
A ( t ) = sec t , H ( t ) = tan t ,
we consider the adjoint Hahn R ˜ n ( x ) , defined by the generating function
G ( t , x ) = sec t exp ( x tan t ) = n = 0 R ˜ n ( x ) t n n ! .
It is a Sheffer set.
We have:
G x = 1 cos 3 t exp ( x tan t ) = 1 cos t G ( t , x ) .
Note that, in this case, we have:
A ( t ) = sec t , H ( t ) = tan t , H ( t ) = sec 2 t , f ( t ) = H 1 ( t ) = arctan t , A ( t ) A ( t ) = tan t ,
so that we have the theorem
Theorem 8.
The adjoint Hahn polynomial set { R ˜ n ( x ) } is quasi-monomial under the action of the operators
P ^ = arctan D x , M ^ = tan ( arctan D x ) + x sec 2 ( arctan D x ) ,
i.e.,
P ^ = arctan D x = k = 0 ( 1 ) k 2 k + 1 D x 2 k + 1 , M ^ = D x + x ( 1 + D x 2 ) = x D x 2 + D x + x .

5.2. Differential Equation of the R ˜ n ( x )

In the present case, we have
Theorem 9.
The Sheffer-type adjoint Hahn polynomials { R ˜ n ( x ) } satisfy the differential equation
x D x 2 + D x + x k = 0 n 1 2 ( 1 ) k 2 k + 1 D x 2 k + 1 R ˜ n ( x ) = n R ˜ n ( x ) .
Note that, for any fixed n, in Equation (55), a finite sum appears, with upper limit n 1 2 , instead of a complete series expansion since, when this series is applied to a polynomial of degree n, the subsequent addends vanish.
Remark 2.
The first few values of the adjoint Hahn polynomials are as follows:
R ˜ 0 ( x ) = 1 , R ˜ 1 ( x ) = x , R ˜ 2 ( x ) = x 2 + 1 , R ˜ 3 ( x ) = x 3 + 5 x , R ˜ 4 ( x ) = x 4 + 14 x 2 + 5 , R ˜ 5 ( x ) = x 5 + 30 x 3 + 61 x , R ˜ 6 ( x ) = x 6 + 55 x 4 + 331 x 2 + 61 , R ˜ 7 ( x ) = x 7 + 91 x 5 + 1221 x 3 + 1385 x , R ˜ 8 ( x ) = x 8 + 140 x 6 + 3486 x 4 + 12,284 x 2 + 1385 , R ˜ 9 ( x ) = x 9 + 204 x 7 + 8526 x 5 + 68,060 x 3 + 50,521 x , R ˜ 10 ( x ) = x 10 + 285 x 8 + 18,522 x 6 + 281,210 x 4 + 663,061 x 2 + 50,521 ,
Remark 3.
Table of adjoint Hahn numbers
R ˜ 0 ( 0 ) = 1 R ˜ 1 ( 0 ) = 0 R ˜ 2 ( 0 ) = 1 , R ˜ 3 ( 0 ) = 0 R ˜ 4 ( 0 ) = 5 R ˜ 2 k + 1 ( 0 ) = 0 , k 2 , R ˜ 6 ( 0 ) = 61 R ˜ 8 ( 0 ) = 1385 R ˜ 10 ( 0 ) = 50,521 .
Note that the sequence { 1 , 1 , 5 , 61 , 1385 , 50 , 521 , } appears in the Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences [22] under #A000364—Euler (or secant numbers): a ( n ) = number of downup permutations of [ 2 n ] .
Example 1.
a ( 2 ) = 5 counts 4231, 4132, 3241, 3142, 2143. - David Callan, Nov 21, 2011.

5.3. Adjoint Bernoulli Polynomials of the Second Kind

Assuming
A ( t ) = t e t 1 , H ( t ) = e t 1 ,
we consider the adjoint Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind { b ˜ k ( x ) } , defined by the generating function
G ( t , x ) = t e t 1 exp x ( e t 1 ) = k = 0 b ˜ k ( x ) t k k ! .
Note that, in our case, we are dealing with a Sheffer polynomial set, so that, since we have ψ ( t ) = e t , the operator σ defined by Equation (6) simply reduces to the derivative operator D x . Furthermore, we have
A ( t ) = t e t 1 , H ( t ) = e t 1 = k = 1 t k k ! , h ˜ k = 1 / ( k + 1 ) ! ,
H ( t ) = e t , f ( t ) = H 1 ( t ) = log ( t + 1 ) ,
A ( t ) A ( t ) = e t t e t 1 t ( e t 1 ) = 1 t 1 e t 1 1 .
so that we have the theorem
Theorem 10.
The adjoint Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind { b ˜ n ( x ) } are quasi-monomials under the action of the operators
P ^ = log ( D x + 1 ) , M ^ = 1 log ( D x + 1 ) 1 D x 1 + x ( D x + 1 ) ,
that is
P ^ = log ( D x + 1 ) = k = 1 ( 1 ) k + 1 k D x k , M ^ = 1 log ( D x + 1 ) + x 1 D x ( D x + 1 ) .

5.4. Differential Equation of the b ˜ n ( x )

In the present case, we have
M ^ P ^ = 1 + x 1 D x ( D x + 1 ) log ( D x + 1 ) ,
so that we have the theorem
Theorem 11.
The adjoint Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind { b ˜ n ( x ) } satisfy the differential equation
1 + x 1 D x ( D x + 1 ) log ( D x + 1 ) b ˜ n ( x ) = n b ˜ n ( x ) ,
that is
1 + ( x D x 1 ) ( D x + 1 ) k = 0 n ( 1 ) k k + 1 D x k b ˜ n ( x ) = n b ˜ n ( x ) ,
because, for any fixed n, the series expansion in Equation (61) reduces to a finite sum when it is applied to a polynomial of degree n.
Note that, in this case, due to the presence of the operator D x 1 , it is necessary to consider derivatives up to the order n + 1 .
Remark 4.
The first few values of the adjoint Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind are as follows:
b ˜ 0 ( x ) = 1 , b ˜ 1 ( x ) = x 1 2 , b ˜ 2 ( x ) = x 2 + 1 6 , b ˜ 3 ( x ) = x 3 + 3 2 x 2 , b ˜ 4 ( x ) = x 4 + 4 x 3 + 2 x 2 1 30 , b ˜ 5 ( x ) = x 5 + 15 2 x 4 + 35 3 x 3 + 5 2 x 2 , b ˜ 6 ( x ) = x 6 + 12 x 5 + 75 2 x 4 + 30 x 3 + 3 x 2 + 1 42 , b ˜ 8 ( x ) = x 8 + 24 x 7 + 560 3 x 6 + 560 x 5 + 602 x 4 + 168 x 3 + 4 x 2 1 30 , b ˜ 10 ( x ) = x 10 + 40 x 9 + 1155 2 x 8 + 3780 x 7 + 11,585 x 6 + 15,540 x 5 + 15,125 2 x 4 + 850 x 3 + + 5 x 2 + 5 66 b ˜ 12 ( x ) = x 12 + 60 x 11 + 1386 x 10 + 15,840 x 9 + 191,961 2 x 8 + 307,692 x 7 + 493,460 x 6 + + 349,800 x 5 + 85,503 x 4 + 4092 x 3 + 6 x 2 691 2730
Note that for x = 0 the generating function becomes
G ( t , 0 ) = t e t 1 = n = 0 b ˜ n ( 0 ) t n n ! ,
so that b ˜ n ( 0 ) = B n , namely the nth classical Bernoulli number.

6. Conclusions

In this survey article, it has been shown that the common belonging of some polynomial sets to the Sheffer class allows to construct, in a uniform way, the differential equations they verify. This follows from the fact that it is possible to construct their shift operators, on the basis of general results due to G. Dattoli and Y. Ben Cheikh.
The equations derived in such a way are, in general, of infinite order, but they reduce to finite-order equations when they are applied to polynomials of the considered set. This means that the order of the equation increases with the degree of the polynomial, in a similar way to what happens for the order of the recurrence they verify.
Both classic and other polynomials—the so-called associated Sheffer polynomials—have been examined. In fact, it has been shown that, for the polynomials of the Sheffer class, the differential equation follows from the basic elements of their generating function, in a constructive way, using a simple and general method linked to the monomiality principle.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Dattoli, G. Hermite-Bessel and Laguerre-Bessel functions: A by-product of the monomiality principle. In Advanced Special Functions and Applications, Proceedings of the Melfi School on Advanced Topics in Mathematics and Physics, Melfi, Italy, 9–12 May 1999; Cocolicchio, D., Dattoli, G., Srivastava, H.M., Eds.; Aracne Editrice: Rome, Italy, 2000; pp. 147–164. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cheikh, Y.B. Some results on quasi-monomiality. Appl. Math. Comput. 2003, 141, 63–76. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bretti, G.; Natalini, P.; Ricci, P.E. New sets of Euler-type polynomials. J. Anal. Number Theor. 2018, 6, 51–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Natalini, P.; Bretti, G.; Ricci, P.E. Adjoint Hermite and Bernoulli polynomials. Bull. Allahabad Math. Soc. 2018, 33, 251–264. [Google Scholar]
  5. Natalini, P.; Ricci, P.E. New Bell-Sheffer polynomial sets. Axioms 2018, 7, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Natalini, P.; Ricci, P.E. Bell-Sheffer exponential polynomials of the second kind. Georgian Math. J. 2018. (to appear). [Google Scholar]
  7. Ricci, P.E. Logarithmic-Sheffer polynomials of the second kind. Tbilisi Math. J. 2018, 11, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ricci, P.E. Mittag–Leffler polynomial differential equation. Jñānābha 2018, 48, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  9. Srivastava, H.M.; Ricci, P.E.; Natalini, P. A Family of Complex Appell Polynomial Sets. Real Acad. Sci. Exact. Fis Nat. Ser. A Math. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Costabile, F.A.; Longo, E. An algebraic approach to Sheffer polynomial sequences. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2014, 25, 295–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Costabile, F.A.; Longo, E. An algebraic exposition of Umbral calculus with applications to general interpolation problem. A Survey. Publ. Inst. Math. Nouv. Ser. 2014, 96, 67–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Youn, H.; Yang, Y. Differential equations and recursive formulas of Sheffer polynomial sequences. ISRN Discret. Math. 2011, 2011, 476462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, S.L. Recurrence relation for the Sheffer sequences. Linear Algebra Appl. 2012, 437, 2986–2996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sheffer, I.M. Some properties of polynomials sets of zero type. Duke Math. J. 1939, 5, 590–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Srivastava, H.M.; Manocha, H.L. A Treatise on Generating Functions; Halsted Press (Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester), John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA; Chichester, UK; Brisbane, Australia; Toronto, ON, Canada, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  16. Roman, S.M. The Umbral Calculus; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  17. Boas, R.P.; Buck, R.C. Polynomial Expansions of Analytic Functions; Springer: Berlin/Gottingen/Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 1958. [Google Scholar]
  18. Steffensen, J.F. The poweroid, an extension of the mathematical notion of power. Acta Math. 1941, 73, 333–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dattoli, G.; Ricci, P.E.; Srivastava, H.M. (Eds.) Advanced Special Functions and Related Topics in Probability and in Differential Equations. In Applied Mathematics and Computation, Proceedings of the Melfi School on Advanced Topics in Mathematics and Physics, Melfi, Italy, 24–29 June 2001; Aracne Editrice: Rome, Italy, 2003; Volume 141, pp. 1–230. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dattoli, G.; Germano, B.; Martinelli, M.R.; Ricci, P.E. Monomiality and partial differential equations. Math. Comput. Model. 2009, 50, 1332–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Weisstein, E.W. Mittag–Leffler Polynomial, From MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource. Available online: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Mittag-LefflerPolynomial.html (accessed on 4 February 2019).
  22. Sloane, N.J.A.; Plouffe, S. The Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ricci, P.E. Differential Equations for Classical and Non-Classical Polynomial Sets: A Survey. Axioms 2019, 8, 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms8020050

AMA Style

Ricci PE. Differential Equations for Classical and Non-Classical Polynomial Sets: A Survey. Axioms. 2019; 8(2):50. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms8020050

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ricci, Paolo Emilio. 2019. "Differential Equations for Classical and Non-Classical Polynomial Sets: A Survey" Axioms 8, no. 2: 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms8020050

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop