# Common Fixed Point Theorems for Generalized Geraghty (α,ψ,ϕ)-Quasi Contraction Type Mapping in Partially Ordered Metric-Like Spaces

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{*}

^{†}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

**Theorem**

**1.**

**Theorem**

**2.**

**Theorem**

**3.**

## 2. Preliminaries

**Definition**

**1.**

- (σ
_{1}) - $\sigma (u,v)=0\Rightarrow u=v,$
- (σ
_{2}) - $\sigma (u,v)=\sigma (v,u),$
- (σ
_{3}) - $\sigma (u,z)\le \sigma (u,v)+\sigma (v,z).$

**Example**

**1.**

**Remark**

**1.**

**Lemma**

**1.**

**Example**

**2.**

**Definition**

**2.**

**Definition**

**3.**

**Definition**

**4.**

- (1)
- S is α-admissible,
- (2)
- $\alpha (u,z)\ge 1$ and $\alpha (z,v)\ge 1$ imply $\alpha (u,v)\ge 1$.

**Definition**

**5.**

- (1)
- The pair $(S,T)$ is α-admissible,
- (2)
- $\alpha (u,z)\ge 1$ and $\alpha (z,v)\ge 1$ imply $\alpha (u,v)\ge 1$.

- (1)
- $\psi $ is strictly continuous increasing,
- (2)
- $\psi \left(t\right)=0$⇔$t=0.$

**Definition**

**6.**

- (1)
- For all $x,y\in X$ are said to be comparable if $x\u2aafy$ or $y\u2aafx$ holds,
- (2)
- f is said to be nondecreasing if $x\u2aafy$ implies $fx\u2aaffy$,
- (3)
- $f,g$ are called weakly increasing if $fx\u2aafgfx$ and $gx\u2aaffgx$ for all $x\in X,$
- (4)
- f is called weakly increasing if f and I are weakly increasing, where I is denoted to the identity mapping on $X.$

## 3. Main Results

**Definition**

**7.**

**Lemma**

**2.**

**Proof.**

**Lemma**

**3.**

**Proof.**

**Lemma**

**4.**

**Proof.**

**Theorem**

**4.**

- (1)
- $(S,T)$ is triangular α-admissible and there exists an ${x}_{0}\in X$ such that $\alpha ({x}_{0},S{x}_{0})\ge 1$,
- (2)
- the pair $(S,T)$ is weakly increasing,
- (3)
- the pair $(S,T)$ is a generalized Geraghty $(\alpha ,\psi ,\varphi )$-quasi contraction non-self mapping,
- (4)
- S and T are σ-continuous mappings.

**Proof.**

**Theorem**

**5.**

- (1)
- the pair $(S,T)$ is triangular α-admissible,
- (2)
- there exists an ${x}_{0}\in X$ such that $\alpha ({x}_{0},S{x}_{0})\ge 1$,
- (3)
- the pair $(S,T)$ is a generalized Geraghty $(\alpha ,\psi ,\varphi )$-quasi contraction non-self mapping,
- (4)
- the pair $(S,T)$ is weakly increasing,
- (5)
- $\left(\mathcal{C}\right)$ holds.

**Proof.**

**I**: Assume that ${lim}_{l\to \infty}{M}_{{x}_{2{n}_{l}},v}=\sigma (v,Tv).$

**II**: Assume that ${lim}_{l\to \infty}{M}_{{x}_{2{n}_{l}},v}=\sigma (v,Sv).$ Then, arguing like above, we get $v=Sv.$ Thus, $v=Sv=Tv.$ Uniqueness of the fixed point is follows from the Theorem 4. This completes the proof. □

**Corollary**

**1.**

- (1)
- there exists $\psi \in \Psi ,\beta \in \mathfrak{S}$ and a continuous function $\varphi :[0,\infty )\to [0,\infty )$ are continuous functions with $\varphi \left(t\right)<\psi \left(t\right)$ for all $t>0$ such that$$\alpha (x,y)\psi \left(\sigma (Sx,Sy)\right)\le \lambda \beta \left(\psi \left({M}_{x,y}\right)\right)\varphi \left({M}_{x,y}\right),$$
- (2)
- S is triangular α-admissible and there exists an ${x}_{0}\in X$ such that $\alpha ({x}_{0},S{x}_{0})\ge 1$,
- (3)
- $Sx\u2aafS\left(Sx\right)$ for all $x,y\in X,$
- (4)
- T is σ-continuous mappings.

**Corollary**

**2.**

- (1)
- there exists $\psi \in \Psi ,\beta \in \mathfrak{S}$ and a continuous function $\varphi :[0,\infty )\to [0,\infty )$ are continuous functions with $\varphi \left(t\right)<\psi \left(t\right)$ for all $t>0$ such that$$\alpha (x,y)\psi \left(\sigma (Sx,Sy)\right)\le \lambda \beta \left(\psi \left({M}_{x,y}\right)\right)\varphi \left({M}_{x,y}\right),$$
- (2)
- S is triangular α-admissible and there exists an ${x}_{0}\in X$ such that $\alpha ({x}_{0},S{x}_{0})\ge 1$,
- (3)
- $Sx\u2aafS\left(Sx\right)$ for all $x,y\in X,$
- (4)
- $\left(\mathcal{C}\right)$ holds.

**Corollary**

**3.**

- (1)
- there exists $\psi \in \Psi ,\beta \in \mathfrak{S}$ and a continuous function $\varphi :[0,\infty )\to [0,\infty )$ are continuous functions with $\varphi \left(t\right)<\psi \left(t\right)$ for all $t>0$ such that$$\psi \left(\sigma (Sx,Ty)\right)\le \lambda \beta \left(\psi \left({M}_{x,y}\right)\right)\varphi \left({M}_{x,y}\right),$$$${M}_{x,y}=max\{\sigma (x,y),\sigma (x,Sx),\sigma (y,Ty),\sigma (Sx,y),\sigma (x,Ty)\}.$$
- (2)
- the pair $(S,T)$ is weakly increasing,
- (3)
- S and T are σ-continuous mappings.

**Corollary**

**4.**

- (1)
- there exists $\psi \in \Psi ,\beta \in \mathfrak{S}$ and a continuous function $\varphi :[0,\infty )\to [0,\infty )$ are continuous functions with $\varphi \left(t\right)<\psi \left(t\right)$ for all $t>0$ such that$$\psi \left(\sigma (Tx,Ty)\right)\le \lambda \beta \left(\psi \left({M}_{x,y}\right)\right)\varphi \left({M}_{x,y}\right),$$$${M}_{x,y}=max\{\sigma (x,y),\sigma (x,Sx),\sigma (y,Ty),\sigma (Sx,y),\sigma (x,Ty)\},$$
- (2)
- the pair $(S,T)$ is weakly increasing,
- (3)
- the pair $(S,T)$ is a generalized $(\alpha ,\psi ,\varphi )$-quasi contraction non-self,
- (4)
- $\left(\mathcal{C}\right)$ holds.

## 4. Consequences

**Corollary**

**5.**

- (1)
- $(S,T)$ is triangular α-admissible and there exists an ${x}_{0}\in X$ such that $\alpha ({x}_{0},S{x}_{0})\ge 1$,
- (2)
- there exists $\psi \in \Psi ,\beta \in \mathfrak{S}$ and a continuous function $\varphi :[0,\infty )\to [0,\infty )$ are continuous functions with $\varphi \left(t\right)<\psi \left(t\right)$ for all $t>0$ in order that$$\psi \left(\sigma \right(Sx,Ty\left)\right)\le \lambda \beta \left(\psi \right(\sigma (x,y)\left)\varphi \right(\sigma (x,y)),$$
- (3)
- the pair $(S,T)$ is weakly increasing,
- (4)
- the pair $(S,T)$ is σ-continuous mappings.

**Corollary**

**6.**

- (1)
- $(S,T)$ is triangular α-admissible and there exists an ${x}_{0}\in X$ such that $\alpha ({x}_{0},S{x}_{0})\ge 1$,
- (2)
- there exists $\psi \in \Psi ,\beta \in \mathfrak{S}$ and a continuous function $\varphi :[0,\infty )\to [0,\infty )$ are continuous functions with $\varphi \left(t\right)\le \psi \left(t\right)$ for all $t>0$ in order that$$\psi \left(\sigma \right(Sx,Ty\left)\right)\le \lambda \beta \left(\psi \right(\sigma (x,y)\left)\varphi \right(\sigma (x,y)),$$
- (3)
- the pair $(S,T)$ is weakly increasing,
- (4)
- $\left(\mathcal{C}\right)$ holds.

**Corollary**

**7.**

- (1)
- S is triangular α-admissible and there exists an ${x}_{0}\in X$ such that $\alpha ({x}_{0},S{x}_{0})\ge 1$.
- (2)
- there exists $\psi \in \Psi ,\beta \in \mathfrak{S}$ and a continuous function $\varphi :[0,\infty )\to [0,\infty )$ are continuous functions with $\varphi \left(t\right)<\psi \left(t\right)$ for all $t>0$ in order that$$\alpha (x,y)\psi \left(\sigma \right(Sx,Sy\left)\right)\le \lambda \beta \left(\psi \right(\sigma (x,y)\left)\varphi \right(\sigma (x,y)),$$
- (3)
- $S\u2aafS\left(Sx\right)$,
- (4)
- the pair $(S,T)$ is σ-continuous mappings.

**Corollary**

**8.**

- (1)
- S is triangular α-admissible and there exists an ${x}_{0}\in X$ such that $\alpha ({x}_{0},S{x}_{0})\ge 1$,
- (2)
- there exists $\psi \in \Psi ,\beta \in \mathfrak{S}$ and a continuous function $\varphi :[0,\infty )\to [0,\infty )$ are continuous functions with $\varphi \left(t\right)<\psi \left(t\right)$ for all $t>0$ in order that$$\alpha (x,y)\psi \left(\sigma \right(Sx,Sy\left)\right)\le \lambda \beta \left(\psi \right(\sigma (x,y)\left)\varphi \right(\sigma (x,y)),$$
- (3)
- $S\u2aafS\left(Sx\right)$,
- (4)
- $\left(\mathcal{C}\right)$ holds.

**Example**

**3.**

## 5. Application

**Theorem**

**6.**

- (i)
- There exists $\zeta :X\times X\to [0,1)$ such that for all $r\in [0,1]$ and for all $x,y\in X$$$0\le \mid f(r,x(r\left)\right)-f(r,y(r\left)\right)\mid \le \zeta (x,y)\mid x\left(r\right)-y\left(r\right)\mid ,$$
- (ii)
- there exists $\beta :[0,\infty )\to [0,1)$ such that$$\underset{n\to \infty}{lim}\beta \left({t}_{n}\right)=1\phantom{\rule{0.222222em}{0ex}}\Rightarrow \phantom{\rule{0.222222em}{0ex}}\underset{n\to \infty}{lim}{t}_{n}=0,$$$$\parallel {\int}_{0}^{1}P(t,r)\zeta (x,y)dr{\parallel}_{\infty}\le \left(\frac{1}{4}\beta (\parallel x-y{\parallel}_{\infty})\right).$$

**Proof.**

## 6. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Qawaqneh, H.; Noorani, M.S.M.; Shatanawi, W.; Alsamir, H. Common fixed points for pairs of triangular α-admissible mappings. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl.
**2017**, 10, 6192–6204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Qawaqneh, H.; Noorani, M.S.M.; Shatanawi, W.; Abodayeh, K.; Alsamir, H. Fixed point for mappings under contractive condition based on simulation functions and cyclic (α,β)-admissibility. J. Math. Anal.
**2018**, 9, 38–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Qawaqneh, H.; Noorani, M.S.M.; Shatanawi, W. Fixed point for mappings under contractive condition based on simulation functions and cyclic (α,β)-admissibility. J. Math. Anal.
**2018**, 11, 702–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hitzler, P.; Seda, A.K. Dislocated topologies. J. Electr. Eng.
**2000**, 12, 4223–4229. [Google Scholar] - Amini-Harandi, A. Metric-like spaces, partial metric spaces and fixed points. Fixed Point Theory Appl.
**2012**, 2012, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Chen, C.; Dong, J.; Zhu, C. Some fixed point theorems in b-metric-like spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl.
**2015**, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Roshan, J.R.; Parvaneh, V.; Sedghi, S.; Shbkolaei, N.; Shatanawi, W. Common fixed points of almost generalized contractive mappings in ordered b-metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl.
**2013**, 2013, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zoto, K. Some generalizations for (α,ψ,ϕ)-contractions in b-metric-like spaces and an application. Fixed Point Theory Appl.
**2017**, 2017, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Aydi, H.; Felhi, A. Best proximity points for cyclic Kannan-Chatterjea- Ciric non-self contractions on metric-like spaces. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl.
**2016**, 9, 2458–2466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Aydi, H.; Felhi, A.; Sahmim, S. On common fixed points for (α,ψ)-contractions and generalized cyclic contractions in b-metric-like spaces and consequences. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl.
**2016**, 9, 2492–2510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Aydi, H.; Felhi, A. On best proximity points for various α-proximal contractions on metric-like spaces. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl.
**2016**, 9, 5202–5218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Aydi, H.; Felhi, A.; Afshari, H. New Geraghty non-self contractions on metric-like spaces. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl.
**2017**, 10, 780–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Aydi, H.; Felhi, A.; Sahmim, S. Common fixed points via implicit contractions on b-metric-like spaces. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl.
**2017**, 10, 1524–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Alsamir, H.; Noorani, M.S.M.; Shatanawi, W. On fixed points of (η,θ)-quasicontraction mappings in generalized metric spaces. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl.
**2016**, 9, 4651–4658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shatanawi, W.; Nashine, H.K. A generalization of Banachs contraction principle for nonlinear contraction in a partial metric space. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl.
**2012**, 5, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Aydi, H.; Shatanawi, W.; Vetro, C. On generalized weak G-contraction mapping in G-metric spaces. Comput. Math. Appl.
**2011**, 62, 4223–4229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cho, S. Fixed point theorems for generalized weakly contractive mappings in metric spaces with application. Fixed Point Theory Appl.
**2018**, 2018, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zoto, K.; Radenovic, S.; Ansari, A.H. On some fixed point results for (s,p,α)-contractive mappings in b-metric-like spaces and applications to integral equations. Open Math.
**2018**, 16, 235–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mohammadi, B.; Golkarmanesh, F.; Parvaneh, V. Common fixed point results via implicit contractions for multi-valued mappings on b-metric like spaces. Cogent Math. Stat.
**2018**, 5, 1493761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Karapinar, E.; Czerwik, S.; Aydi, H. Meir-Keeler Contraction Mappings in Generalized-Metric Spaces. J. Funct. Spaces
**2018**, 2018, 3264620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Liang, M.; Zhu, C.; Wu, Z.; Chen, C. Some New Coupled Coincidence Point and Coupled Fixed Point Results in Partially Ordered Metric-Like Spaces and an Application. J. Funct. Spaces
**2018**, 2018, 1378379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hussain, N.; Roshan, J.R.; Parvaneh, V.; Kadelburg, Z. Fixed Points of Contractive Mappings in-Metric-Like Spaces. Sci. World J.
**2014**, 2014, 471827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Geraghty, M. On contractive mappings. Proc. Am. Math. Soc.
**1973**, 40, 604–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Karapinar, E. A Discussion on α-ψ-Geraghty Contraction Non-self Mappings. Filomat
**2014**, 28, 761–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Karapinar, E. α-ψ-Geraghty Contraction Non-self Mappings and Some Related Fixed Point Results. Filomat
**2014**, 28, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Karapinar, E.; Pitea, A. On alpha-psi-Geraghty contraction type mappings on quasi-Branciari metric spaces. J. Nonlinear Convex Anal.
**2016**, 17, 1291–1301. [Google Scholar] - Amini-Harandi, A.; Emami, H. A fixed point theorem for contraction non-self maps in partially ordered metric spaces and application to ordinary differential equations. Nonlinear Anal.
**2010**, 72, 2238–2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - karapinar, E.; Alsulami, H.; Noorwali, M. Some extensions for Geragthy non-self contractive mappings. Fixed Point Theory Appl.
**2015**, 2015, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ćiricć, L. A generalization of Banach contraction principle. Proc. Am. Math. Soc.
**1974**, 45, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Isik, H.; Turkoglu, D. Fixed point theorems for weakly contractive mappings in partially ordered metric-like spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl.
**2013**, 2013, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Samet, B.; Vetro, C.; Vetro, P. Fixed point theorems for a α-ψ-contractive non-self mappings. Nonlinear Anal.
**2012**, 75, 2154–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Abdeljawad, T. Meir-Keeler a-contractive fixed and common fixed point theorems. Fixed Point Theory Appl.
**2013**, 2013, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Karapinar, E.; Kumam, P.; Salimi, P. On α-ψ-Meir-Keeler contractive mappings. Fixed Point Theory Appl.
**2013**, 2013, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Alsamir, H.; Noorani, M.S.M.; Shatanawi, W.; Abodayeh, K. Common Fixed Point Results for Generalized (ψ,β)-Geraghty Contraction Non-self Mapping in Partially Ordered Metric-like Spaces with Application. Filomat
**2017**, 31, 5497–5509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Qawaqneh, H.; Noorani, M.; Shatanawi, W.; Alsamir, H.
Common Fixed Point Theorems for Generalized Geraghty (*α*,*ψ*,*ϕ*)-Quasi Contraction Type Mapping in Partially Ordered Metric-Like Spaces. *Axioms* **2018**, *7*, 74.
https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms7040074

**AMA Style**

Qawaqneh H, Noorani M, Shatanawi W, Alsamir H.
Common Fixed Point Theorems for Generalized Geraghty (*α*,*ψ*,*ϕ*)-Quasi Contraction Type Mapping in Partially Ordered Metric-Like Spaces. *Axioms*. 2018; 7(4):74.
https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms7040074

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Qawaqneh, Haitham, Mohd Noorani, Wasfi Shatanawi, and Habes Alsamir.
2018. "Common Fixed Point Theorems for Generalized Geraghty (*α*,*ψ*,*ϕ*)-Quasi Contraction Type Mapping in Partially Ordered Metric-Like Spaces" *Axioms* 7, no. 4: 74.
https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms7040074