Next Article in Journal
Efficiency of Orthogonal Matching Pursuit for Group Sparse Recovery
Previous Article in Journal
Application of the Optimal Homotopy Asymptotic Approach for Solving Two-Point Fuzzy Ordinary Differential Equations of Fractional Order Arising in Physics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Customizing Random Replacement Model and Flexible Warranty Model from the Perspective of Screening Reliability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Numerical Approach of Handling Fractional Stochastic Differential Equations

1
Department of Mathematics, Al Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman 11733, Jordan
2
Nonlinear Dynamics Research Center, Ajman University, Ajman 346, United Arab Emirates
3
Faculty of Computer Studies, Arab Open University, Riyadh 11681, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Axioms 2023, 12(4), 388; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12040388
Submission received: 10 March 2023 / Revised: 13 April 2023 / Accepted: 15 April 2023 / Published: 17 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Stochastic Processes: Theory and Application)

Abstract

:
This work proposes a new numerical approach for dealing with fractional stochastic differential equations. In particular, a novel three-point fractional formula for approximating the Riemann–Liouville integrator is established, and then it is applied to generate approximate solutions for fractional stochastic differential equations. Such a formula is derived with the use of the generalized Taylor theorem coupled with a recent definition of the definite fractional integral. Our approach is compared with the approximate solution generated by the Euler–Maruyama method and the exact solution for the purpose of verifying our findings.

1. Introduction

Due to its superior properties for many problems, solutions to fractional stochastic differential equations (FSDEs) driven by the Brownian motion have recently received much attention from scientific researchers. For instance, the authors in [1] looked at a stochastic viscoelastic wave equation with nonlinear damping and logarithmic nonlinear source terms that established a blow-up result. In [2], the existence and uniqueness of mild solutions for neutral delay Hilfer fractional integrodifferential equations were studied with fractional Brownian motion, and consequently certain sufficient conditions for controllability of neutral delay Hilfer fractional differential equations were established with fractional Brownian motion as well. In [3], noninstantaneous impulsive conformable fractional stochastic delay integrodifferential system driven was studied by Rosenblatt process, and accordingly sufficient conditions for approximate controllability and null controllability were established for the considered problem. More recently, the authors in [4] discussed the essential concept behind the multilevel Monte Carlo approach with the exact coupling via performing several numerical implementations. Through this paper, we aim to study the following formula that represents an FSDE formulated in the Caputo sense with a noisy environment:
D * α X ( t , w ) = f ( t , X ( t , w ) ) d t + g ( t , X ( t , w ) ) d W ( t , w ) ,
where f is the drift coefficient, g is the diffusion coefficient, and W ( t , w ) is the Wiener process, which is also called Brownian motion. For simplicity, we consider X ( t , w ) = X ( t ) and W ( t , w ) = W t . This gives:
D * α X ( t ) = f ( t , X ( t ) ) d t + g ( t , X ( t ) ) d W t ,
where 0 t T . The Wiener process W ( t ) , which is a stochastic process indexed by nonnegative real number t, satisfies the following three conditions:
  • W 0 = 1 .
  • W t W s t s N ( 0 , 1 ) for 0 s < t , where N ( 0 , 1 ) indicates a standard normal distribution.
  • The two increments W t W s and W τ W υ are independent on distinct time intervals for 0 s < t < τ < υ .
Indeed, Equation (1) is an example of an FSDE. Due to the fact that their applications are viewed as stochastic processes, such as those in mechanics, medicine, physics, biology, population dynamics, and finance, these equations are crucial in many areas of business and research [5,6]. In particular, such equations were established based on the fact that the deterministic differential equation can be modified by including a random term. In the same regard, due to the fact that these equations have not frequently exact solutions, numerical methods must be used to approximate their solutions [7,8,9]. The FSDEs are thought of as a natural type of the fractional-order systems that can involve specific random terms because these systems are commonly produced in many real-life models [10,11,12]. However, in order to obtain further insights about some of numerical solutions of stochastic differential equations, the reader may refer to references [13,14,15].
The Euler–Maruyama method is a method for the approximate numerical solution of a stochastic differential equation. It is an extension of the Euler method for ordinary differential equations to stochastic differential equations [16]. It is named after Leonhard Euler and Gisiro Maruyama [13]. As the traditional Euler method, this method is considered unacceptably poor, and requires a too small step size to achieve some serious accuracy [13]. From this point of view, the motivation behind this study is to establish a more efficient novel numerical method than some other existence numerical methods for dealing with FSDEs. This method depends on establishing a new three-point fractional formula for approximating Riemann–Liouville integrator, which is derived with the use of the generalized Taylor theorem coupled with a recent definition of the definite fractional integral.
The organization of this paper is arranged as follows: Section 2 aims to recall some basic facts and definitions connected with stochastic differential equations. Section 3 demonstrates the main results of this work so that it contains an established numerical method for solving the FSDEs with the help of using the so-called modified three-point fractional formula for approximating the Riemann–Liouville fractional integrator. Such a formula will be derived first from one of the fractional calculus’s most important results: the generalized Taylor theorem. Then in Section 4, we will apply the derived formula to solve the FSDEs. Section 5 illustrates numerical results that confirm the theoretical findings of this work, followed by the final section that summarizes the conclusion.

2. Preliminaries

In this section, we recall some preliminaries and basic results related to fractional calculus coupled with some needed concepts connected with stochastic differential equations. For more details about fractional calculus and its applications, the reader may refer to references [17,18,19,20].
Definition 1.
Let α be a real nonnegative number. Then the Riemann–Liouville fractional-order integrator J a α is defined by:
J a α f ( x ) = 1 Γ ( α ) a x ( x t ) α 1 f ( t ) d t , a x b .
In what follows, we recall certain properties of the Riemann–Liouville fractional-order integral operator for completeness [17]:
( 1 ) J a 0 h ( t ) = h ( t ) .
( 2 ) J a μ ( t a ) γ = Γ ( γ + 1 ) Γ ( μ + γ + 1 ) ( t a ) μ + γ , γ 1 .
( 3 ) J a μ J a β h ( t ) = J a β J a μ h ( t ) μ , β 0 .
( 4 ) J a μ J a β h ( t ) = J a μ + β h ( t ) μ , β 0 .
Definition 2.
Let α R + and m = α such that m 1 < α m . Then the Caputo fractional-order differentiator of order α is given by:
D * α f ( x ) = 1 Γ ( m α ) a x ( x t ) m α 1 f ( m ) ( t ) d t , x > a .
In the following content, we list some properties of the Caputo differentiator [17]:
( 1 ) D * μ c = 0 , where c is constant .
( 2 ) D * μ ( t a ) ρ = Γ ( ρ + 1 ) Γ ( ρ μ + 1 ) ( t a ) ρ μ , where ρ > μ 1 .
( 3 ) D * μ ( μ h ( t ) + ω g ( t ) ) = μ D * μ ( h ( t ) ) + ω D * μ ( g ( t ) ) ,
where μ and ω are constant. In the same regard, we report below some other properties related to the composition between the previous two operators [17]:
D * α J 0 α h ( t ) = h ( t ) ,
and
J 0 α D * α h ( t ) = h ( t ) i = 1 n h i ( 0 + ) t i i ! ,
where t > 0 and n 1 < α n such that n N .
Theorem 1
([21] (generalized Taylor’s theorem)). Suppose that D * k α f ( x ) C ( 0 , b ] for k = 0 , 1 , , n + 1 , where 0 < α 1 . Then the function f can be expanded about x = x 0 as:
f ( x ) = i = 0 n x i α Γ ( i α + 1 ) D * i α f ( x 0 ) + x ( n + 1 ) α Γ ( ( n + 1 ) α + 1 ) D * ( n + 1 ) α f ( ξ ) ,
with 0 < ξ < x , x ( 0 , b ] .
Ito’s formula is a key component in the Ito Calculus, used to determine the derivative of a time-dependent function of a stochastic process. For more overview about such formula, the reader may refer to the reference [22].
Theorem 2
([13] (Itô formula)). Let d ξ ( t ) = a d t + b d w ( t ) and let f ( x , t ) be a continuous function in ( x , t ) R 1 × [ 0 , ) with partial derivatives f x , f x x , f t . Then the process f ( ξ ( t ) , t ) has a stochastic differential, given by:
d f ( ξ ( t ) , t ) = [ f t ( ξ ( t ) , t ) + f x ( ξ ( t ) , t ) a ( t ) ) + 1 2 f x x ( ξ ( t ) , t ) b 2 ( t ) ] d t + f x ( ξ ( t ) , t ) b ( t ) d w ( t ) .
Notice that if w ( t ) were continuously differentiable in t, then (by the standard calculus formula for total derivatives) the term 1 2 f x x b 2 d t will not appear.
In Figure 1, we illustrate an elementary simulation of the Brownian motion with a step size Δ t = 0.1 . Such simulation can be performed by using a built-in Matlab function (randn) for representing N ( 0 , 1 ) stochastic variable.
Here, we recall two highly significant results that help us in deriving the main results of this work. The first one referred to M. Ortigueira and J. Machado who established a proper formula to find the exact values of given definite fractional integrals [23], while the other one referred to I. Batiha et al. who provide an approach for the Caputo derivative called the modified three-point fractional formula for approximating Caputo derivative [24].
Definition 3
([23] (Definite Fractional Integral)). The definite fractional integral of the function f of order α is given by:
J a α f ( x ) = a b f ( α + 1 ) ( x ) . d x = a b D * α + 1 f ( x ) d x ,
where < a < b < and α 1 < n α such that n N .
Theorem 3
([24]). Suppose f C 3 [ a , b ] and x 0 , x 1 , x 2 are three distinct points in the interval [ a , b ] such that a = x 0 < x 1 = x 0 + h < x 2 = x 0 + 2 h = b with h > 0 . Then the modified three-point fractional formula for approximating the Caputo first derivative is given by:
D * α f ( x ) = x 2 α h 2 Γ ( 3 α ) f ( x 0 ) 2 f ( x 1 ) + f ( x 2 ) x 1 α 2 h 2 Γ ( 2 α ) f ( x 0 ) ( x 1 + x 2 ) 2 f ( x 1 ) ( x 0 + x 2 ) + f ( x 2 ) ( x 0 + x 1 ) + f ( 3 ) ( ξ ) 6 6 x 3 α Γ ( 4 α ) 2 ( x 0 + x 1 + x 2 ) x 2 α Γ ( 3 α ) + ( x 0 x 1 + x 0 x 2 + x 1 x 2 ) x 1 α Γ ( 2 α ) ,
for each x [ a , b ] , where ξ ( a , b ) .

3. Modified Three-Point Fractional Formula

This parts aims to develop a novel fractional-order version of the classical three-point formula that might be used to approximate integrals. Such formula will be called the modified three-point fractional formula for approximating the Riemann–Liouville fractional integral operator. For this purpose and based on Theorem 3, we can easily deduce the next result that establishes an approximation for the Caputo derivative operator of order 2 α .
Corollary 1.
Under the same assumptions of Theorem 3, the modified three-point fractional formula for approximating the Caputo derivative operator of order 2 α is given by:
D * 2 α f ( x ) = x 2 2 α h 2 Γ ( 3 2 α ) ( f ( x 0 ) 2 f ( x 1 ) + f ( x 2 ) ) + f ( 3 ) ( ξ ) 6 6 x 3 2 α Γ ( 4 2 α ) 2 ( x 0 + x 1 + x 2 ) x 2 2 α Γ ( 3 2 α ) .
In light of the previous discussion and based on the generalized Taylor Theorem 1 coupled with the Definite Fractional Integral Definition 3, we establish the next so-called modified three-point fractional formula for approximating Riemann–Liouville integrator.
Theorem 4.
Let D * 5 α f C 4 [ a , b ] , where α = n m such that n m with n , m Z + and m = 2 k 1 for k Z + . Suppose x 0 , x 1 and x 2 are three distinct points in the interval [ a , b ] such that a = x 0 < x 1 = x 0 + h < x 2 = x 0 + 2 h = b with h > 0 . Then the three-point central fractional formula for approximating Riemann–Liouville integrator is given by:
J a α f ( x ) = 2 h f ( x 1 ) + 2 h 3 α x 1 2 2 α Γ ( 3 α + 1 ) Γ ( 3 2 α ) ( f ( x 0 ) 2 f ( x 1 ) + f ( x 2 ) ) + 2 h 3 α 6 Γ ( 3 α + 1 ) f ( 3 ) ( ξ ) 6 x 1 ( 3 2 α ) Γ ( 4 2 α ) 2 ( x 0 + x 1 + x 2 ) Γ ( 3 2 α ) x 1 ( 2 2 α ) + 2 h 5 α Γ ( 5 α + 1 ) D * 4 α f ( ξ ) .
Proof. 
In order to prove this result, we expand first the generalized Taylor Theorem 1 on f about x = x 1 to obtain:
f ( x ) = f ( x 1 ) + D * α f ( x 1 ) ( x x 1 ) α Γ ( α + 1 ) + D * 2 α f ( x 1 ) ( x x 1 ) 2 α Γ ( 2 α + 1 ) + D * 3 α f ( x 1 ) ( x x 1 ) 3 α Γ ( 3 α + 1 ) + D * 4 α f ( ξ ) ( x x 1 ) 4 α Γ ( 4 α + 1 ) .
By applying a J a α to both sides of the above equality, coupled with using Equation (14) and Definition 3, we obtain:
J a α f ( x ) = 2 h f ( x 1 ) + D * α f ( x 1 ) Γ ( 2 α ) a b ( x x 1 ) 2 α 1 d x + D * 2 α f ( x 1 ) Γ ( 3 α ) a b ( x x 1 ) 3 α 1 d x + D * 3 α f ( x 1 ) Γ ( 4 α ) a b ( x x 1 ) 4 α 1 d x + D * 4 α f ( ξ ) Γ ( 5 α ) a b ( x x 1 ) 5 α 1 d x .
This immediately gives:
J a α f ( x ) = 2 h f ( x 1 ) + D * α f ( x 1 ) Γ ( 2 α + 1 ) ( h ) 2 α ( h ) 2 α + D * 2 α f ( x 1 ) Γ ( 3 α + 1 ) ( h ) 3 α ( h ) 3 α + D * 3 α f ( x 1 ) Γ ( 4 α + 1 ) ( h ) 4 α ( h ) 4 α + D * 4 α f ( ξ ) Γ ( 5 α + 1 ) ( h ) 5 α ( h ) 5 α .
Observe that we can clearly assert that ( h ) 2 α = ( h ) 2 α and ( h ) 4 α = ( h ) 4 α . However, for the other similar terms, we can find where α will be defined by taking ( h ) 3 α = ( h ) 3 α and ( h ) 5 α = ( h ) 5 α . Actually, this is valid for α = n m such that n m , where n , m Z + with m = 2 k 1 for k Z + . In other words and without loss of generality, if α = 1 , then we can have ( h ) 2 α = ( h ) 2 α , ( h ) 3 α = ( h ) 3 α , ( h ) 4 α = ( h ) 4 α , and ( h ) 5 α = ( h ) 5 α . Based on this discussion, we can obtain the following equation:
J a α f ( x ) = 2 h f ( x 1 ) + 2 h 3 α Γ ( 3 α + 1 ) D * 2 α f ( x 1 ) + 2 h 5 α Γ ( 5 α + 1 ) D * 4 α f ( ξ ) .
Now, by substituting (16) into (21), we obtain:
J a α f ( x ) = 2 h f ( x 1 ) + 2 h 3 α Γ ( 3 α + 1 ) x 1 2 2 α Γ ( 3 2 α ) ( f ( x 0 ) 2 f ( x 1 ) + f ( x 2 ) ) + f ( 3 ) ( ξ ) 6 6 x 1 ( 3 2 α ) Γ ( 4 2 α ) 2 ( x 0 + x 1 + x 2 ) Γ ( 3 2 α ) x 1 ( 2 2 α ) + 2 h 5 α Γ ( 5 α + 1 ) D * 4 α f ( ξ ) .
Simplifying the above equation yields:
J a α f ( x ) = 2 h f ( x 1 ) + 2 h 3 α x 1 2 2 α Γ ( 3 α + 1 ) Γ ( 3 2 α ) ( f ( x 0 ) 2 f ( x 1 ) + f ( x 2 ) ) + 2 h 3 α 6 Γ ( 3 α + 1 ) f ( 3 ) ( ξ ) × 6 x 1 ( 3 2 α ) Γ ( 4 2 α ) 2 ( x 0 + x 1 + x 2 ) Γ ( 3 2 α ) x 1 ( 2 2 α ) + 2 h 5 α Γ ( 5 α + 1 ) D * 4 α f ( ξ ) .
Hence, the three-point central fractional formula for approximating Riemann–Liouville integrator is given by:
J a α f ( x ) 2 h f ( x 1 ) + 2 h 3 α x 1 2 2 α Γ ( 3 α + 1 ) Γ ( 3 2 α ) ( f ( x 0 ) 2 f ( x 1 ) + f ( x 2 ) ) ,
which completes the desired result. □

4. Handling FSDE Using the Modified Three-Point Fractional Formula

In this section, we introduce a novel numerical solution for the FSDE by using the modified three-point fractional formula for approximating Riemann–Liouville integrator. To this aim, we reconsider again the FSDE (1) again as follows:
D * α X ( t ) = f ( t , X ( t , w ) ) d t + g ( t , X ( t ) ) d W ( t ) , 0 t T ,
with the initial condition X ( 0 ) = η . Now, by taking J 0 α to the both sides of (25), we obtain:
X ( t ) = η + J 0 α f ( t , X ( t , w ) ) d t + J 0 α g ( t , X ( t ) ) d W ( t ) .
Herein, we suppose that t 0 , t 1 , t 2 , , t n are distinct points in the interval [ 0 , T ] such that 0 = t 0 < t 1 = t 0 + h < t 2 = t 0 + 2 h < < t n = t 0 + n h = T , where h > 0 is the step size of the discretization. Now, by applying (24) into (26), we have then an approximate numerical solution for FSDE (25), which would be:
X ( t i ) η + 2 h f ( t i , X ( t i ) ) + 2 h 3 α t i 2 2 α Γ ( 3 α + 1 ) Γ ( 3 2 α ) × [ f ( t i 1 , X ( t i 1 ) ) 2 f ( t i , X ( t i ) ) + f ( t i + 1 , X ( t i + 1 ) ) ] + 2 h g ( t i , X ( t i ) ) + 2 h 3 α t i 2 2 α Γ ( 3 α + 1 ) Γ ( 3 2 α ) × [ g ( t i 1 , X ( t i 1 ) ) 2 g ( t i , X ( t i ) ) + g ( t i + 1 , X ( t i + 1 ) ) ] ,
for i = 1 , 2 , 3 , , n , where n = T h .

5. Applications

Herein, we intend to test the validation of the approximate numerical solution (27) proposed for the FSDE (25). For this purpose, we list the following examples.
Example 1.
Assume that f ( X ( t ) ) = 10 X ( t ) and g ( X ( t ) ) = 1 with the initial condition X ( 0 ) = 1 , i.e., we have the following nonlinear FSDE [25]:
D * α X ( t ) = 10 X ( t ) d t + d W ( t ) , 0 t 1 ,
subject to the initial condition X ( 0 ) = 1 . Accordingly, by applying the approximate numerical solution given in (27), we obtain:
X ( t i ) 1 + 2 h 10 X ( t i ) + 2 h 3 α t i 2 2 α Γ ( 3 α + 1 ) Γ ( 3 2 α ) × 10 X ( t i 1 ) 2 10 X ( t i ) + 10 X ( t i + 1 ) + 2 h + 2 h 3 α t i 2 2 α Γ ( 3 α + 1 ) Γ ( 3 2 α ) × 1 2 1 + 1 ,
for i = 1 , 2 , 3 , , 10 .
To see how the numerical solution (29) looks according to different values of α, we plot Figure 2. In addition, in order to validate our proposed numerical scheme, we plot once again our numerical solution (29) in Figure 3 and compare it with the exact solution and with another numerical solution generated by Euler–Maruyama method. We also plot the absolute error gained from such a comparison in Figure 4.
We can notice that our proposed approximate solution (29) generated by our numerical method is closer to the exact solution of the FSDE (28) than that of Euler–Maruyama’s solution.
Example 2.
Assume that f ( X ( t ) ) = 3 10 X ( t ) and g ( X ( t ) ) = X 2 10 ( t ) with the initial condition X ( 0 ) = 1 , i.e., we have the following nonlinear FSDE [25]:
D * α X ( t ) = 3 10 X ( t ) d t + X 2 10 ( t ) d W ( t ) , 0 t 1 ,
subject to the initial condition X ( 0 ) = 1 . With the use of the approximate numerical solution given in (27), we obtain:
X ( t i ) 1 + 2 h 3 10 X ( t i ) + 2 h 3 α t i 2 2 α Γ ( 3 α + 1 ) Γ ( 3 2 α ) × 3 10 X ( t i 1 ) 2 3 10 X ( t i ) + 3 10 X ( t i + 1 ) + 2 h X 2 10 ( t i ) + 2 h 3 α t i 2 2 α Γ ( 3 α + 1 ) Γ ( 3 2 α ) × X 2 10 ( t i 1 ) 2 X 2 10 ( t i ) + X 2 10 ( t i + 1 ) ,
for i = 1 , 2 , 3 , , 10 .
In this regard, the numerical solution (31) according to different values of α can be seen in Figure 5. Moreover, we plot once again our numerical solution (31) in Figure 6 and compare it with the exact solution and with another numerical solution generated by Euler–Maruyama method. Furthermore, we also plot the absolute error gained from such a comparison in Figure 7.
We can see here that our proposed approximate solution (31) generated by our numerical method is closer to the exact solution of the FSDE (30) than that of Euler–Maruyama’s solution.
Example 3.
Assume here f ( X ( t ) ) = 2 5 X 3 5 ( t ) + 5 X 4 5 ( t ) and g ( X ( t ) ) = X 4 5 ( t ) with the initial condition X ( 0 ) = 10 , i.e., we have the following nonlinear FSDE [26]:
D * α X ( t ) = 2 5 X 3 5 ( t ) + 5 X 4 5 ( t ) d t + X 4 5 ( t ) d W ( t ) , 0 t 1 ,
subject to the initial condition X ( 0 ) = 10 . Applying the approximate numerical solution given in (27) yields:
X ( t i ) 10 + 2 h 2 5 X 3 5 ( t i ) + 5 X 4 5 ( t i ) + 2 h 3 α t i 2 2 α Γ ( 3 α + 1 ) Γ ( 3 2 α ) × 2 5 X 3 5 ( t i 1 ) + 5 X 4 5 ( t i 1 ) 2 2 5 X 3 5 ( t i ) + 5 X 4 5 ( t i ) + 2 5 X 3 5 ( t i + 1 ) + 5 X 4 5 ( t i + 1 ) + 2 h X 4 5 ( t i ) + 2 h 3 α t i 2 2 α Γ ( 3 α + 1 ) Γ ( 3 2 α ) × X 4 5 ( t i 1 ) 2 X 4 5 ( t i ) + X 4 5 ( t i + 1 ) ,
for i = 1 , 2 , 3 , , 10 .
Herein, Figure 8 depicts the numerical solution (33) according to different values of α. Moreover, Figure 9 demonstrates the validity of our proposed numerical scheme by making a numerical comparison between our numerical solution (33) and the exact solution coupled with Euler–Maruyama’s solution. In the same regard, we also plot the absolute error gained from such a comparison in Figure 10 for completeness.
Obviously, one might undoubtedly observe that our proposed approximate solution (33) generated by our numerical method is closer to the exact solution of the FSDE (32) than that of Euler–Maruyama’s solution.
It should be noted that because the stochastic differential equation consists of a deterministic differential equation coupled with a random term, then the approximate solution for such an equation will be slightly changed from time to time. This is because the random term in that equation is usually programmed by using a built-in Matlab function (called randn) for representing the N ( 0 , 1 ) stochastic variable. This would generate the Brownian motion with a step size of h = 0.1 , which would affect the approximate solution each time the prepared code is run. So, the approximate solution generated by both methods (our method and the Euler–Maruyama method) are not consistent. Despite these changes, our proposed scheme stills presents better results than that of the Euler–Maruyama scheme.

6. Conclusions

In this paper, a numerical solution of the FSDE has been proposed by using a new modification of the classical three-point formula called the modified three-point fractional formula for approximating Riemann–Liouville integrator. The generalized Taylor theorem with the recent definition where the definite fractional integral have been used to derive this formula. Based on several numerical experiments, one can clearly observe that the numerical solution generated by our scheme is closer to the exact solution of the FSDE than that of Euler–Maruyama’s solution.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.M.B. and I.H.J.; methodology, A.A.A.; software, S.B.A.-S.; validation, K.M.; formal analysis, I.M.B.; investigation, A.A.A.; resources, S.B.A.-S.; data curation, I.H.J.; writing—original draft preparation, K.M.; writing—review and editing, I.M.B.; visualization, A.A.A.; supervision, I.H.J.; project administration, S.B.A.-S.; funding acquisition, K.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the Arab Open University for Funding this work through AOU research fund No. (AOURG-2023-008).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Arab Open University and Al-Zaytoonah University for providing the necessary scientific research supplies to implement the research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Benramdane, A.; Mezouar, N.; Alqawba, M.; Boulaaras, S.; Cherif, B. Blow-up for a stochastic viscoelastic lamé equation with logarithmic nonlinearity. J. Funct. Spaces 2021, 2021, 9943969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alnafisah, Y.; Ahmed, H.M. Neutral delay Hilfer fractional integrodifferential equations with fractional brownian motion. Evol. Equations Control Theory 2022, 11, 925–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ahmed, H.M. Noninstantaneous Impulsive Conformable Fractional Stochastic Delay Integro-Differential System with Rosenblatt Process and Control Function. Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst. 2022, 21, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alnafisah, Y. Multilevel MC method for weak approximation of stochastic differential equation with the exact coupling scheme. Open Math. 2022, 20, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, Q.; Peng, H.; Wang, Z. Convergence to nonlinear diffusion waves for a hyperbolic-parabolic chemotaxis system modelling vasculogenesis. J. Differ. Equ. 2022, 314, 251–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xie, X.; Wang, T.; Zhang, W. Existence of solutions for the (p,q)-Laplacian equation with nonlocal Choquard reaction. Appl. Math. Lett. 2023, 135, 108418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Batiha, I.M.; Alshorm, S.; Jebril, I.; Zraiqat, A.; Momani, Z.; Momani, S. Modified 5-point fractional formula with Richardson extrapolation. AIMS Math. 2023, 8, 9520–9534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Albadarneh, R.B.; Batiha, I.M.; Adwai, A.; Tahat, N.; Alomari, A.K. Numerical approach of riemann-liouville fractional derivative operator. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 2021, 11, 5367–5378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Albadarneh, R.B.; Batiha, I.; Alomari, A.K.; Tahat, N. Numerical approach for approximating the Caputo fractional-order derivative operator. AIMS Math. 2021, 6, 12743–12756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ye, R.; Liu, P.; Shi, K.; Yan, B. State Damping Control: A Novel Simple Method of Rotor UAV With High Performance. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 214346–214357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, L.; Wang, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, S. Multi-AUV Dynamic Maneuver Countermeasure Algorithm Based on Interval Information Game and Fractional-Order DE. Fractal Fract. 2022, 6, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Song, M.; Yu, H. Convergence and stability of implicit compensated Euler method for stochastic differential equations with Poisson random measure. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2012, 2012, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kloeden, P.E.; Platen, E. Stochastic Differential Equations; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  14. Farnoosh, R.; Rezazadeh, H.; Sobhani, A.; Behboudi, M. Analytical solutions for stochastic differential equations via martingale processes. Math. Sci. 2015, 9, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Beznea, L.; Deaconu, M.; Lupaşcu-Stamate, O. Numerical approach for stochastic differential equations of fragmentation; application to avalanches. Math. Comput. Simul. 2019, 160, 111–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Milici, C.; Tenreiro Machado, J.; Drăgănescu, G. Application of the Euler and Runge–Kutta Generalized Methods for FDE and Symbolic Packages in the Analysis of Some Fractional Attractors. Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2020, 21, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Diethelm, K. The Analysis of Differential Equations of Fractional Order: An Application-Oriented Exposition Using Differential Operators of Caputo Type; Lecture Notes in Mathematics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; Volume 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Batiha, I.; Alshorm, S.; Jebril, I.; Hammad, M. A Brief Review about Fractional Calculus. Int. J. Open Probl. Comput. Sci. Math. 2022, 15, 39–56. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mhailan, M.; Hammad, M.A.; Horani, M.A.; Khalil, R. On fractional vector analysis. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 2020, 10, 2320–2326. [Google Scholar]
  20. Debnath, P.; Srivastava, H.M.; Kumam, P.; Hazarika, B. Fixed Point Theory and Fractional Calculus: Recent Advances and Applications; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  21. Odibat, Z.M.; Momani, S. An algorithm for the numerical solution of differential equations of fractional order. J. Appl. Math. Inform. 2008, 26, 15–27. [Google Scholar]
  22. Allen, E. Modeling with Itô stochastic differential equations. In Mathematical Modelling Theory and Applications; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; Volume 22. [Google Scholar]
  23. Manuel, O.; Machado, J. Fractional definite integral. Fractal Fract. 2017, 1, 2. [Google Scholar]
  24. Batiha, I.M.; Alshorm, S.; Ouannas, A.; Momani, S.; Ababneh, O.Y.; Albdareen, M. Modified Three-Point Fractional Formulas with Richardson Extrapolation. Mathematics 2022, 10, 3489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rajotte, M. Stochastic Differential Equations and Numerical Applications. Master’s Thesis, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bayram, M.; Partal, T.; Buyukoz, G.O. Numerical methods for simulation of stochastic differential equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2018, 2018, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The Wiener process.
Figure 1. The Wiener process.
Axioms 12 00388 g001
Figure 2. The numerical solution (29) of the FSDE (28) according to different fractional-order values.
Figure 2. The numerical solution (29) of the FSDE (28) according to different fractional-order values.
Axioms 12 00388 g002
Figure 3. Comparison between the numerical solution (29), Euler–Maruyama’s solution, and exact solution of problem (28).
Figure 3. Comparison between the numerical solution (29), Euler–Maruyama’s solution, and exact solution of problem (28).
Axioms 12 00388 g003
Figure 4. Absolute error generated by the numerical solution (29) and Euler–Maruyama’s solution.
Figure 4. Absolute error generated by the numerical solution (29) and Euler–Maruyama’s solution.
Axioms 12 00388 g004
Figure 5. The numerical solution (31) of the FSDE (30) according to different fractional-order values.
Figure 5. The numerical solution (31) of the FSDE (30) according to different fractional-order values.
Axioms 12 00388 g005
Figure 6. Comparison between the numerical solution (31), Euler–Maruyama’s solution and exact solution of problem (30).
Figure 6. Comparison between the numerical solution (31), Euler–Maruyama’s solution and exact solution of problem (30).
Axioms 12 00388 g006
Figure 7. Absolute error generated by the numerical solution (31) and Euler–Maruyama’s solution.
Figure 7. Absolute error generated by the numerical solution (31) and Euler–Maruyama’s solution.
Axioms 12 00388 g007
Figure 8. The numerical solution (33) of the FSDE (32) according to different fractional-order values.
Figure 8. The numerical solution (33) of the FSDE (32) according to different fractional-order values.
Axioms 12 00388 g008
Figure 9. Comparison between the numerical solution (33), Euler–Maruyama’s solution and exact solution of problem (32).
Figure 9. Comparison between the numerical solution (33), Euler–Maruyama’s solution and exact solution of problem (32).
Axioms 12 00388 g009
Figure 10. Absolute error generated by the numerical solution (33) and Euler–Maruyama’s solution.
Figure 10. Absolute error generated by the numerical solution (33) and Euler–Maruyama’s solution.
Axioms 12 00388 g010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Batiha, I.M.; Abubaker, A.A.; Jebril, I.H.; Al-Shaikh, S.B.; Matarneh, K. A Numerical Approach of Handling Fractional Stochastic Differential Equations. Axioms 2023, 12, 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12040388

AMA Style

Batiha IM, Abubaker AA, Jebril IH, Al-Shaikh SB, Matarneh K. A Numerical Approach of Handling Fractional Stochastic Differential Equations. Axioms. 2023; 12(4):388. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12040388

Chicago/Turabian Style

Batiha, Iqbal M., Ahmad A. Abubaker, Iqbal H. Jebril, Suha B. Al-Shaikh, and Khaled Matarneh. 2023. "A Numerical Approach of Handling Fractional Stochastic Differential Equations" Axioms 12, no. 4: 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12040388

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop