Next Article in Journal
Infinite Series and Logarithmic Integrals Associated to Differentiation with Respect to Parameters of the Whittaker Mκ,μ(x) Function I
Next Article in Special Issue
The Cauchy–Optimal Stability Results for Cauchy–Jensen Additive Mappings in the Fuzzy Banach Space and the Unital Fuzzy Banach Space
Previous Article in Journal
A New Extension of the Kumaraswamy Exponential Model with Modeling of Food Chain Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
New Conditions for Testing the Asymptotic and Oscillatory Behavior of Solutions of Neutral Differential Equations of the Fourth Order
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pascu-Rønning Type Meromorphic Functions Based on Sălăgean-Erdély–Kober Operator

1
Department of Mathematics, College of Science and Arts, Al-Badaya, Qassim University, Buraidah 51911, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Damietta University, New Damietta 34517, Egypt
3
Department of Mathematics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology(VIT), Vellore 632014, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
All authors contributed equally to this work.
Axioms 2023, 12(4), 380; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12040380
Submission received: 3 March 2023 / Revised: 7 April 2023 / Accepted: 13 April 2023 / Published: 16 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mathematical Analysis and Applications IV)

Abstract

:
In the present investigation, we introduce a new class of meromorphic functions defined in the punctured unit disk Δ * : = { ϑ C : 0 < | ϑ | < 1 } by making use of the Erdély–Kober operator I ς , ϱ τ , κ which unifies well-known classes of the meromorphic uniformly convex function with positive coefficients. Coefficient inequalities, growth and distortion inequalities, in addition to closure properties are acquired. We also set up a few outcomes concerning convolution and the partial sums of meromorphic functions in this new class. We additionally state some new subclasses and its characteristic houses through specializing the parameters that are new and no longer studied in association with the Erdély–Kober operator thus far.

1. Introduction and Definitions

Let Σ represent the class of functions f being of the forms given by
f ( ϑ ) = 1 ϑ + n = 1 a n ϑ n ,
defined on the punctured unit disk Δ * : = { ϑ C : 0 < | ϑ | < 1 } with a simple pole at the origin with one residue there. Denote by means of Σ P Σ consisting of the functions of the form
f ( ϑ ) = 1 ϑ + n = 1 a n ϑ n , a n 0 .
The class of meromorphic starlike and meromorphic convex of order ( 0 < 1 ) (see Ref. [1]) are defined as below:
Σ P * ( ) = f Σ P : ϑ f ( ϑ ) f ( ϑ ) > , ϑ Δ : = Δ * { 0 }
and
Σ P K ( ) = f Σ P : ( ϑ f ( ϑ ) ) f ( ϑ ) > , ϑ Δ : = Δ * { 0 }
respectively. Since, to a certain extent, the work in the meromorphic univalent case has paralleled that of a regular univalent case, it is natural to search for a subclass of Σ P that has properties analogous to those of class of analytic univalent functions with negative coefficients [2]. Juneja and Reddy [3] introduced the class Σ P of functions of the form (2) that are meromorphic and univalent in Δ . They showed that the class possesses properties analogous to those of analytic univalent functions with negative coefficients, and also pointed out the subtle differences between the two classes.
For subclasses of analytic and univalent functions given by
A = f A : f ( ϑ ) = ϑ + n = 2 a n ϑ n ϑ U = { ϑ : | ϑ | < 1 } .
Goodman [4,5], defined two new functions’ classes, namely, uniformly starlike and uniformly convex functions. Inspired by this study, in Refs. [6,7], Rønning introduced and studied the following subclasses of A called - starlike functions of order 1 < 1 if
S p ( , ) = f A : ϑ f ( ϑ ) f ( ϑ ) > ϑ f ( ϑ ) f ( ϑ ) 1 , ( 0 ; ϑ U )
and uniformly - convex functions 1 < 1 if
UCV ( , ) = f A : ( ϑ f ( ϑ ) ) f ( ϑ ) > ϑ f ( ϑ ) f ( ϑ ) , ( 0 ; ϑ U ) .
Indeed, it follows from (12) and (5) that
f UCV ( , ) z f S p ( , ) .
The interesting geometric properties of these function classes were extensively studied by Kanas et al. in Refs. [8,9,10,11], and Murugusundaramoorthy et al. [12] and references cited therein studied and investigated interesting properties for the subclass of Rønning-type -starlike functions associated with certain fractional calculus operators, and discussed its coefficient estimate, characteristic properties, partial sums and neighbourhood results. In this article, we made an attempt to discuss the class of Pascu–Ronning-type meromorphic functions based on the Sălăgean-Erdély–Kober operator (SEK).

Erdély–Kober Operator (EK)

The fractional calculus plan has currently acquired filled-intensity attention by way of the applications of fractional derivative operators (FD) in analytical functions [13,14,15,16,17]. In the literature, many studies on fractional derivative operators and fractional differential equations, involving different operators such as Riemann–Liouville, Hadamard, Caputo, the Erdély–Kober fractional operator (EKF), Weyl–Riesz operators, Caputo operators, and Grünwald–Letnikov operators, were designed and implemented during the past three decades with applications in other fields. The Riemann–Liouville fractional operator (RLF) has been most frequently used and intentional for information (see Refs. [13,14,15,16,17,18]). Some requirements and features of EKF operators and FD in the study of analytic functions (Geometric Function Theory) can be found at Refs. [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22].
Now, we recall the Erdély–Kober-type [23] (also see Ref. [24], Ch. 5) integral operator definition, which will be used throughout the paper as below:
Definition 1.
(Erdély–Kober operator-EK): Let for ζ > 0 , τ , κ C , be such that ( κ τ ) 0 , an Erdély–Kober-type integral operator by
V ζ τ , κ : Σ P Σ P
is defined for ( κ τ ) > 0 and ( τ ) > ζ by
V ζ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) = Γ ( κ ζ ) Γ ( τ ζ ) 1 Γ ( κ τ ) 0 1 ( 1 t ) κ τ 1 t τ 1 f ( ϑ t ζ ) d t , ζ > 0 .
For ζ > 0 , ( κ τ ) 0 , ( τ ) > ζ and f Σ P of the form (2), we have
V ζ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) = 1 ϑ + n = 1 Γ ( κ ζ ) Γ ( τ + n ζ ) Γ ( τ ζ ) Γ ( κ + n ζ ) a n ϑ n ( ϑ Δ ) = 1 ϑ + n = 2 Υ ζ τ , κ ( n ) a n ϑ n ( ϑ Δ ) ,
where
Υ ζ τ , κ ( n ) = Γ ( κ ζ ) Γ ( τ + n ζ ) Γ ( τ ζ ) Γ ( κ + n ζ ) .
Note that by fixing κ = τ , we obtain
V ζ τ , τ f ( ϑ ) = f ( ϑ ) .
Due to El-Ashwah (see Refs. [25,26] with p = 1 ) and [23], we recall the following operators:
  • For m Z = { 0 , ± 1 , ± 2 , ± 3 , } ; > 0 ; ϱ > 0 , let
    D , ϱ m : Σ P Σ P
  • by
    D , ϱ m f ( ϑ ) = ϱ ϑ 1 ϱ 0 ϑ t ϱ D , ϱ m + 1 f ( t ) d t ; ϱ 0 , m Z ; ϱ ϑ ϱ d d ϑ ϑ 1 + ϱ D , ϱ m 1 f ( ϑ ) m Z + ; f ( ϑ ) , m = 0 .
Now we define a new linear operator
I ς , ϱ τ , κ : Σ P Σ P
by
I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) = D , ϱ m V ζ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) = V ζ τ , κ D , ϱ m f ( ϑ )
named as the Sălăgean-Erdély–Kober operator (SEK) and is given by the following definition.
Definition 2.
(Sălăgean-Erdély–Kober operator -SEK): For ζ > 0 , ( κ τ ) 0 , ( τ ) > ζ ; m Z ; ς > 0 ; ϱ > 0 and f Σ P of the form (2), we have
I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) = 1 ϑ + n = 2 1 + ϱ ( n + 1 ) ς m Γ ( κ ζ ) Γ ( τ + n ζ ) Γ ( τ ζ ) Γ ( κ + n ζ ) a n ϑ n , ( ϑ Δ ) = 1 ϑ + n = 2 Ξ ς , ϱ τ , κ ( n ) a n ϑ n , ( ϑ Δ )
where
Ξ n = Ξ ς , ϱ τ , κ ( n ) = 1 + ϱ ( n + 1 ) ς m Γ ( κ ζ ) Γ ( τ + n ζ ) Γ ( τ ζ ) Γ ( κ + n ζ ) .
Particularly,
Ξ 1 = Ξ ς , ϱ τ , κ ( 1 ) = 1 + 2 ϱ ς m Γ ( κ ζ ) Γ ( τ + ζ ) Γ ( τ ζ ) Γ ( κ + ζ ) .
Stimulated by means of earlier works on Σ P by means of Kumar et al. [27] and function theorists (see Refs. [1,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]), in this paper, we tried to define a new subclass M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) given in Definition 3, by utilising the generalized operator I ς , ϱ τ , κ unifying well-known classes of meromorphic uniformly convex functions with positive coefficients, and discuss its notable function properties. Throughout this paper, we shall confine our attention to the case of real-valued parameters τ and κ , and we will consider that ϑ Δ .
Definition 3.
For 0 < 1 ; 0 μ < 1 / 2 , and f Σ P as assumed in (2), we let f M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) if it holds
ϑ ( I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) ) + μ ϑ 2 ( I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) ) ( 1 μ ) I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) + μ ϑ ( I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) ) > ϑ ( I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) ) + μ ϑ 2 ( I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) ) ( 1 μ ) I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) + μ ϑ ( I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) ) + 1 +
where I ς , ϱ τ , κ is given by (11).
Further, shortly, we were able to state this condition through
ϑ G ( ϑ ) G ( ϑ ) > ϑ G ( ϑ ) G ( ϑ ) + 1 + ,
where
G ( ϑ ) = ( 1 μ ) F ( ϑ ) + μ ϑ F ( ϑ ) = 1 2 μ ϑ + n = 1 ( n μ μ + 1 ) Ξ n a n ϑ n , a n 0 .
and F ( ϑ ) = I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) .
It is of importance to note that, on specializing the parameters μ , , we can define or deduce Ronning-type meromorphic function classes of Σ P based on the Sălăgean-Erdély–Kober operator. We pointed these out as examples, and they will also play important roles for investigations. For this reason, those (more) special classes will be taken into consideration as revealing various applications of our basic result which have not been studied so far, associating with the Sălăgean-Erdély–Kober operator.
Example 1.
For μ = 0 , we let
M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( 0 , , ) PS ς , ϱ τ , κ ( , ) = f Σ P : ϑ ( I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) ) I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) > ϑ ( I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) ) I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) + 1 +
where I ς , ϱ τ , κ is given by (11).
Example 2.
For μ = 0 , = 0 we let
M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( 0 , 0 , ) MS ς , ϱ τ , κ ( ) = f Σ P : ϑ ( I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) ) I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) >
where I ς , ϱ τ , κ is given by (11).
Example 3.
For μ = 1 , we let
M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( 1 , , ) MK ς , ϱ τ , κ ( , ) = f Σ P : 1 + ϑ ( I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) ) ( I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) ) > ϑ ( I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) ) ( I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) ) +
where I ς , ϱ τ , κ is given by (11).
Example 4.
For μ = 1 , = 0 we let
M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( 1 , 0 , ) K ς , ϱ τ , κ ( ) = f Σ P : 1 + ϑ ( I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) ) ( I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) ) >
where I ς , ϱ τ , κ is given by (11).
Remark 1.
Suitably fixing the parameter in the operator I ς , ϱ τ , κ , we can deduce the following
1. 
For m = α ; ϱ = 1 ; ς = β , and τ = κ we obtain the operator I β , 1 τ , τ f ( ϑ ) = P β α f ( ϑ ) studied by Lashin [35];
2. 
For ϱ = 1 and τ = κ , we obtain the operator I ( m , ς ) f ( ϑ ) studied by Cho et al. [36,37];
3. 
ϱ = 1 , ς = 1 and τ = κ we obtain the operator I 1 , 1 τ , τ f ( ϑ ) = I ( m ) f ( ϑ ) studied by Uralegaddi and Somanatha [38];
4. 
For m = 0 , it gives I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) = I ζ ( τ , κ ) f ( ϑ ) , which was studied by El-Ashwah [23].
In this study, we achieve the coefficient bounds, distortion bounds, in addition to closure results for the class M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) . We additionally discussed a few results regarding the integral operator, convolution, and the partial sums of f M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) . It is noteworthy that the SEK operator defined on meromorphic functions in turn includes various operators illustrated in the Remark 1; thus, our study on the characteristic properties of the function class Σ P unifies the known (or new) results for the meromorphic functions defined in the parabolic region.

2. Coefficient Inequalities

In the light of the conditions created by Dziok et al. [39], we state the following result without providing any proof.
Lemma 1.
Suppose that [ 0 , 1 ) , r ( 0 , 1 ] and H Σ P ( ) is of the form H ( ϑ ) = 1 ϑ + n = 1 b n ϑ n , 0 < | ϑ | < r , with b n 0 ; then
n = 1 ( n + ) b n r n + 1 1 .
In our first theorem, we compose our comprehensive result that is a necessary and sufficient condition for f M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) .
Theorem 1.
Let f Σ P be given by (2). Then f M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) if, and only if
n = 1 [ n ( 1 + ) + ( + ) ] ( n μ μ + 1 ) Ξ n a n ( 1 2 μ ) ( 1 ) .
Equivalently,
n = 1 [ n ( 1 + ) + ( + ) ] ( n , μ ) a n ( 1 ) ,
where
( n , μ ) = ( n μ μ + 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) Ξ n .
Proof. 
If f M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) , then by (17), we have
ϑ ( I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) ) + μ ϑ 2 ( I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) ) ( 1 μ ) I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) + μ ϑ ( I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) ) > ϑ ( I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) ) + μ ϑ 2 ( I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) ) ( 1 μ ) I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) + μ ϑ ( I ς , ϱ τ , κ f ( ϑ ) ) + 1 +
That is,
( 1 + e i θ ) ϑ G ( ϑ ) + e i θ G ( ϑ ) G ( ϑ ) > ,
where G ( ϑ ) is given by (16). When we replace with G ( ϑ ) , G ( ϑ ) and we allow ϑ 1 , we obtain
( 1 2 μ ) ( 1 ) n = 1 [ n ( 1 + ) + ( + ) ] ( n μ μ + 1 ) Ξ n a n ( 1 2 μ ) n = 1 n ( n μ μ + 1 ) Ξ n a n > 0 .
This shows that (22) holds.
On the other hand, suppose that (22) is true. Since ( w ) > | w + 1 | < | w ( 1 2 ) | , it is sufficient to prove that
w + 1 w ( 1 2 ) < 1 and | w ( 1 2 ) | 0 for | ϑ | < r 1 , ϑ Δ .
Using (22), and taking w ( ϑ ) = ( 1 + e i θ ) ϑ G ( ϑ ) + e i θ G ( ϑ ) G ( ϑ ) , we obtain
w + 1 w ( 1 2 ) n = 1 ( n μ μ + 1 ) [ ( n + 1 ) ( 1 + ) ] Ξ n a n 2 ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) n = 1 ( n μ μ + 1 ) [ n ( 1 + ) + ( + 2 1 ) ] Ξ n a n 1 .
Thus, we have f M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) . □
Firstly, throughout this paper, for brevity, we let the notations
Υ n ( μ , , ) : = [ n ( 1 + ) + ( + ) ] ( n μ μ + 1 )
Υ 1 ( μ , , ) = ( 1 + + 2 )
unless specified differently.
Theorem 2
(Coefficient estimate). If f M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) , then
a n ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) Υ n ( μ , , ) Ξ n , n = 1 , 2 , 3 , .
The outcome is precise for
f n ( ϑ ) = 1 ϑ + ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) Υ n ( μ , , ) Ξ n ϑ n , n = 1 , 2 , 3 , .
Theorem 3.
Let us say a positive number
Λ = inf n N Υ n ( μ , α , ) Ξ n
exists. If f M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) , then
1 r ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) Λ r | f ( ϑ ) | 1 r + ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) Λ r , ( | ϑ | = r )
and
1 r 2 ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) Λ | f ( ϑ ) | 1 r 2 + ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) Λ , ( | ϑ | = r ) .
If Λ = Υ 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ 1 = ( 1 + 2 + ) Ξ 1 , then the result is sharp for
f ( ϑ ) = 1 ϑ + ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) ( 1 + + 2 ) Ξ 1 ϑ
where Ξ 1 is given in (13).
Proof. 
Since f ( ϑ ) = 1 ϑ + n = 1 a n ϑ n , we have
| f ( ϑ ) | 1 r + n = 1 a n r n 1 r + r n = 1 a n .
Since
n = 1 a n ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) Λ .
Using this, we have
| f ( ϑ ) | 1 r + ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) Λ r .
Similarly,
| f ( ϑ ) | 1 r ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) Λ r .
Correspondingly, we can prove the other inequality | f ( ϑ ) | . Since
| f ( ϑ ) | 1 r 2 + n = 1 n a n r n 1 1 r 2 + n = 1 a n
again by using n = 1 a n ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) Λ , we obtain the desired inequality. Similarly,
| f ( ϑ ) | 1 r 2 ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) Λ .
The result is sharp for function (27) with Λ = Υ 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ 1 = ( 1 + + 2 ) Ξ 1 . □

3. Radius of Starlikeness

The radius of starlikeness for f M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) where f, as provided by (2), meets the condition (3) in | ϑ | < r , we say that it is meromorphically starlike of order ρ , ( 0 ρ < 1 ) , in | ϑ | < r .
Theorem 4.
Let f given by (2) be in the class M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) . Then, if there exists
r 1 ( , μ , ρ ) = inf n 1 ( 1 ρ ) Υ n ( μ , , ) Ξ n ( n + ρ ) ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) 1 n + 1
and it is sharp, then f is meromorphically starlike of order ρ in | ϑ | < r r 1 ( , μ , ρ ) .
Proof. 
Let f M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) as in (2). If 0 < r r 1 ( , μ , ρ ) , then by (28)
r n + 1 ( 1 ρ ) Υ n ( μ , , ) Ξ n ( n + ρ ) ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) , n N .
From (29), we obtain
n + ρ 1 ρ r n + 1 Υ n ( μ , , ) Ξ n ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) n N .
Thus,
n = 1 n + ρ 1 ρ a n r n + 1 n = 1 Υ n ( μ , , ) Ξ n ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) a n 1 .
because of (22). Hence, from (30) and (21), f is meromorphically starlike of order ρ in | ϑ | < r r 1 ( , μ , ρ ) . □
Suppose that there exists a number r ˜ , r ˜ > r 1 ( , μ , ρ ) such that each f M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) is meromorphically starlike of order ρ in | ϑ | < r ˜ 1 . The function
f ( ϑ ) = 1 ϑ + ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) Υ n ( μ , , ) Ξ n ϑ n
is M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) ; thus, it should satisfy (21) with r ˜ :
n = 1 ( n + ρ ) a n r ˜ n + 1 1 ρ ,
while the left-hand side of (31) becomes
( n + ρ ) ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) Υ n ( μ , , ) Ξ n r ˜ n + 1 > ( n + ρ ) ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) Υ n ( μ , , ) Ξ n ( 1 ρ ) Υ n ( μ , , ) Ξ n ( n + ρ ) ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) = 1 ρ
which contradicts with (31). Thus, the number r 1 ( , μ , ρ ) in Theorem 4 cannot be substituted with a greater number. This means that r 1 ( , μ , ρ ) is the so-called radius of meromorphical starlikeness of order ρ for the class M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) .

4. Integral Operators

In this section, we consider integral transforms of functions in the class M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) .
Theorem 5.
Let in f M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) be given by (2). Then the integral operator
F ( ϑ ) = 𝚥 0 1 u 𝚥 f ( u ϑ ) d u ( 0 < 𝚥 < )
is in M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , δ ) , where
δ n 2 ( 1 + ) + n [ ( + ) + ( 1 + ) ( 1 + 𝚥 ) ] + ( 𝚥 + 1 ) ( + ) + 𝚥 ( 1 ) n 2 ( 1 + ) + n [ ( + ) + ( 1 + 𝚥 ) ( 1 + ) ] + ( 1 + 𝚥 ) ( + ) + 𝚥 ( 1 ) .
The result is sharp for the function f ( ϑ ) = 1 ϑ + ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) ( 1 + + 2 ) Ξ 1 ϑ .
Proof. 
Let f M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) . Then
F ( ϑ ) = 𝚥 0 1 u 𝚥 f ( u ϑ ) d u = 1 ϑ + n = 1 𝚥 𝚥 + n + 1 a n ϑ n .
It is sufficient to show that
n = 1 𝚥 Υ n ( μ , δ , ) Ξ n ( 𝚥 + n + 1 ) ( 1 δ ) ( 1 2 μ ) a n 1 .
Since f M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) , we have
n = 1 Υ n ( μ , , ) Ξ n ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) a n 1 .
Note that (33) is satisfied if
𝚥 Υ n ( μ , δ , ) Ξ n ( 𝚥 + n + 1 ) ( 1 δ ) Υ n ( μ , , ) Ξ n ( 1 ) .
Solving for δ , we have
δ n 2 ( 1 + ) + n [ ( + ) + ( 1 + ) ( 1 + 𝚥 ) ] + ( 𝚥 + 1 ) ( + ) + 𝚥 ( 1 ) n 2 ( 1 + ) + n [ ( + ) + ( 1 + 𝚥 ) ( 1 + ) ] + ( 1 + 𝚥 ) ( + ) + 𝚥 ( 1 ) = Φ ( n ) .
A simple computation will show that Φ ( n ) is increasing and
Φ ( 1 ) = ( 1 + ) + [ ( + ) + ( 1 + ) ( 1 + 𝚥 ) ] + ( 𝚥 + 1 ) ( + ) + 𝚥 ( 1 ) ( 1 + ) + [ ( + ) + ( 1 + 𝚥 ) ( 1 + ) ] + ( 1 + 𝚥 ) ( + ) + 𝚥 ( 1 ) = 1 + ( 2 + 𝚥 ) + ( 𝚥 + 1 ) 1 + ( 2 + 𝚥 ) + + 𝚥 Φ ( n ) < 1 .
Using this, the results follow. □
It is easy to see that if 0 δ δ 1 < 1 , then M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , δ 1 ) M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , δ ) .
Corollary 1.
For the integral (32), we have
F ( M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) )
with
δ 1 + ( 2 + 𝚥 ) + ( 𝚥 + 1 ) 1 + ( 2 + 𝚥 ) + + 𝚥 < 1 .
If we replace the class M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , δ ) in (34) with a smaller class M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , δ 1 ) such that
δ 1 > 1 + ( 2 + 𝚥 ) + ( 𝚥 + 1 ) 1 + ( 2 + 𝚥 ) + + 𝚥 ,
then (34) becomes false.
Proof. 
The inclusion relation (34) follows directly from Theorem 5. For the proof of sharpness (34), notice that for the function f ( ϑ ) = 1 ϑ + ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) ( 1 + + 2 ) Ξ 1 ϑ . satisfies (22) so it is in the class M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) ; moreover, we have
F ( z ) = 1 ϑ + 𝚥 ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) ( 𝚥 + 2 ) ( 1 + + 2 ) Ξ 1 ϑ .
By the condition (22), the above function F is in the class M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , δ 1 ) if and only if
Υ 1 ( μ , δ 1 , ) Ξ 1 ( 1 δ 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) 𝚥 ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) ( 𝚥 + 2 ) ( 1 + + 2 ) Ξ 1 1
or equivalently,
( 1 + δ 1 + 2 ) ( 1 δ 1 ) 𝚥 ( 1 ) ( 𝚥 + 2 ) ( 1 + + 2 ) 1 .
Solving the above inequality with respect to δ 1 , we obtain
δ 1 ( 1 + + 2 ) + 𝚥 ( 1 + ) ( 1 + ) ( 𝚥 + 1 ) + ,
which contradicts with (35). □

5. Results Involving Modified Hadamard Products

The convolution or Hadamard product of f 1 and f 2 when f i ( ϑ ) = 1 ϑ + n = 1 a n , i ϑ n , ( a n , i 0 ) , i = 1 , 2 then
( f 1 f 2 ) ( ϑ ) : = 1 ϑ + n = 1 a n , 1 a n , 2 ϑ n .
Theorem 6.
For functions f j ( ϑ ) ( j = 1 , 2 ) defined by (36), let f 1 ( ϑ ) M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) and f 2 ( ϑ ) M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , δ ) . Then f 1 f 2 M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , η ) where
η = 1 ( 1 ) ( 1 δ ) ( 3 + ) ( 1 + 2 + ) ( 1 + 2 δ + ) ( 1 , μ ) 2 ( 1 ) ( 1 δ )
where
( 1 , μ ) = Ξ 1 1 2 μ = 1 1 2 μ 1 + 2 ϱ ς m Γ ( κ ζ ) Γ ( τ + ζ ) Γ ( τ ζ ) Γ ( κ + ζ ) .
The results are the best possible for
f 1 ( ϑ ) = 1 ϑ + 1 ( 1 + + 2 ) ( 1 , μ ) ϑ , f 2 ( ϑ ) = 1 ϑ + 1 δ ( 1 + δ + 2 ) ( 1 , μ ) ϑ
where ( 1 , μ ) as given by (38).
Proof. 
According to Theorem 1, it suits to show that
n = 1 [ n ( 1 + ) + ( η + ) ] 1 η ( n , μ ) a n , 1 a n , 2 1
where η is defined by (37) under the hypothesis. The Cauchy’s–Schwarz inequality and (22) one leads to the conclusion that
n = 1 ( n , μ ) [ n ( 1 + ) + ( + ) ] [ n ( 1 + ) + ( δ + ) ] ( 1 ) ( 1 δ ) a n , 1 a n , 2 1 .
Hence, we must identify the greatest η such that
n = 1 [ n ( 1 + ) + ( η + ) ] ( 1 η ) ( n , μ ) a n , 1 a n , 2 n = 1 ( n , μ ) [ n ( 1 + ) + ( + ) ] [ n ( 1 + ) + ( δ + ) ] ( 1 ) ( 1 δ ) a n , 1 a n , 2 = 1 .
By asset of (39), it is appropriate to find the largest η such that
1 ( n , μ ) ( 1 ) ( 1 δ ) [ n ( 1 + ) + ( + ) ] [ n ( 1 + ) + ( δ + ) ] 1 2 1 η [ n ( 1 + ) + ( η + ) ] [ n ( 1 + ) + ( + ) ] [ n ( 1 + ) + ( δ + ) ] ( 1 ) ( 1 δ ) 1 2 for n 1
where ( n , μ ) is given by (23), and since ( n , μ ) is a decreasing function of n ( n 1 ) , we have
η = 1 ( 1 ) ( 1 δ ) ( 3 + ) ( 1 + + 2 ) ( 1 + δ + 2 ) ( 1 , μ ) 2 ( 1 ) ( 1 δ )
and ( 1 , μ ) as given by (38). Thus concludes the proof.  □
Theorem 7.
Let f j ( ϑ ) ( j = 1 , 2 ) be defined by (36) and f j M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) . Then, ( f 1 f 2 ) ( ϑ ) M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , η ) where
η = 1 ( 1 ) 2 ( 3 + ) ( 1 + + 2 ) 2 ( 1 , μ ) ( 1 ) 2
with ( 1 , μ ) as given in (38).
Proof. 
By fixing δ = in Theorem 6, the results follow. □
Theorem 8.
(Inclusion property) Let f j ( ϑ ) ( j = 1 , 2 ) be defined by (36) and f j M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) . Then, h defined by
h ( ϑ ) = 1 ϑ + n = 1 ( a n , 1 2 + a n , 2 2 ) ϑ n
is in the class M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , δ ) where
δ 1 4 ( 1 ) 2 ( 1 + ) [ 1 + + 2 ) ] 2 ( 1 , μ ) + 2 ( 1 ) 2 ,
and ( 1 , μ ) , as given in (38).
Proof. 
In light of Theorem 1, it is adequate to show that
n = 2 ( n , μ ) [ n ( 1 + ) + ( δ + ) ] ( 1 δ ) ( a n , 1 2 + a n , 2 2 ) 1
where f j M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) ( j = 1 , 2 ) , from (36) and Theorem 1, we find that
n = 1 ( n , μ ) [ n ( 1 + ) + ( + ) ] 1 2 a n , j 2 n = 1 ( n , μ ) [ n ( 1 + ) + ( + ) ] 1 a n , j 2 = 1
which would yields
n = 2 1 2 ( n , μ ) [ n ( 1 + ) + ( + ) ] 1 2 ( a n , 1 2 + a n , 2 2 ) 1 .
On comparing (41) and (43), it can be perceived that inequity (40) will be satisfied if
( n , μ ) [ n ( 1 + ) + ( δ + ) ] 1 δ ( a n , 1 2 + a n , 2 2 ) 1 2 ( n , μ ) [ n ( 1 + ) + ( + ) ] 1 2 ( a n , 1 2 + a n , 2 2 ) .
That is, if
δ 1 2 ( 1 ) 2 [ ( n + 1 ) ( 1 + ) ] [ n ( 1 + ) + ( + ) ] 2 ( n , μ ) + 2 ( 1 ) 2
where ( n , μ ) is a decreasing function of n , ( n 1 ) and is given by (23), we have (40), which concludes the proof. □

6. Closure Theorems

Let f k ( ϑ ) be expressed by
f k ( ϑ ) = 1 ϑ + n = 1 a n , k ϑ n , k = 1 , 2 , , m .
One can easily prove the following closure theorems for the class M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) on lines similar to the proofs given in [27,30,31]; hence, we state them without proof.
Theorem 9.
Let the function f k ( ϑ ) defined by (45) be in the class M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) for every k = 1 , 2 , , m . Then the function f ( ϑ ) defined by f ( ϑ ) = 1 ϑ + n = 1 a n ϑ n , ( a n 0 ) belongs to the class M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) , where a n = 1 m k = 1 m a n , k ( n = 1 , 2 , . . ) .
Theorem 10.
Let f 0 ( ϑ ) = 1 ϑ and f n ( ϑ ) = 1 ϑ + ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) Υ n ( μ , , ) Ξ n ϑ n for n = 1 , 2 , . Then, f ( ϑ ) M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) if, and only if f ( ϑ ) expressed as f ( ϑ ) = n = 0 η n f n ( ϑ ) where η n 0 and n = 0 η n = 1 .
Theorem 11.
The class M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) is closed under a convex linear combination.

7. Partial Sums

For the real part of the proportions between the normalised starlike or convex functions and their sequences of partial sums, Silverman [40] came up with resolutely sharp lower bounds. One is drawn to search results for meromorphic univalent functions that are similar to those of Silverman as a logical extension. In this section, we will examine the relationship between a function of the type (ref-e1.2) and its series of partial sums, primarily motivated by Silverman [40] and Cho and Owa [41] (also see Refs. [27,42]).
f k ( ϑ ) = 1 ϑ + n = 1 k a n ϑ n
when the coefficients are appropriately small to fulfil the condition comparable to
n = 1 Υ n ( μ , , ) Ξ n a n ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) .
More precisely, we will determine sharp lower bounds for { f ( ϑ ) / f k ( ϑ ) } and { f k ( ϑ ) / f ( ϑ ) } . In this connection, we make use of the well-known results that 1 + w ( ϑ ) 1 w ( ϑ ) > 0 ( ϑ Δ ) if and only if w ( ϑ ) = n = 1 c n ϑ n with | w ( ϑ ) | | ϑ | = 1 .
Theorem 12.
Let f M ς , ϱ τ , κ ( μ , , ) be given by (2), which satisfies condition (22), and suppose that all of its partial sums (46) do not vanish in Δ . Moreover, suppose that
2 2 n = 1 k a n Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) n = k + 1 a n > 0 , f o r a l l k N .
Then,
R e f ( ϑ ) f k ( ϑ ) ( 1 + ) Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) ( 1 + ) Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 ( ϑ Δ )
where
Υ n ( μ , , ) ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) , i f n = 1 , 2 , 3 , , k Υ k + 1 ( μ , . ) Ξ k + 1 , i f n = k + 1 , k + 2 , .
The result (48) is sharp with the function given by
f ( ϑ ) = 1 ϑ + ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 ϑ k + 1 .
Proof. 
Define the function w ( ϑ ) by
1 + w ( ϑ ) 1 w ( ϑ ) = Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) f ( ϑ ) f k ( ϑ ) Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 = 1 + n = 1 k a n ϑ n + 1 + Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) n = k + 1 a n ϑ n + 1 1 + n = 1 k a n ϑ n + 1 .
It suffices to show that w ( ϑ ) 1 . Now, from (55), we can write
w ( ϑ ) = Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) n = k + 1 a n ϑ n + 1 2 + 2 n = 1 k a n ϑ n + 1 + Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) k = n + 1 a n ϑ n + 1 .
Hence we obtain
w ( ϑ ) Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) k = n + 1 a n 2 2 n = 1 k a n Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) n = k + 1 a n .
Now w ( ϑ ) 1 if
2 Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) n = k + 1 a n 2 2 n = 1 k a n .
From (22), it is enough to show that
n = 1 k a n + Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) n = k + 1 a n n = 1 Υ n ( μ , , ) Ξ n ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) a n
which is equivalent to
n = 1 k Υ n ( μ , , ) Ξ n ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) a n + n = k + 1 Υ n ( μ , , ) Ξ n Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) a n 0
To perceive that f specified by (50) gives a sharp result, we see that for ϑ = r e i π / ( k + 2 )
f ( ϑ ) f k ( ϑ ) = 1 + ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 ϑ n 1 ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 = Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 w h e n r 1
which shows the bound (48) is the best possible for each k N .  □
We next determine bounds for f k ( ϑ ) / f ( ϑ ) .
Theorem 13.
If f of the form (2) holds the condition (22), then
R e f k ( ϑ ) f ( ϑ ) Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 + ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) ( ϑ Δ ) ,
where Υ n ( μ , , ) is given by (49). The result (53) is sharp with f, assumed by (50).
Proof. 
As in the previous proof,
1 + w ( ϑ ) 1 w ( ϑ ) = Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 + ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) × f k ( ϑ ) f ( ϑ ) Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 + ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) = 1 + n = 1 k a n ϑ n + 1 Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) n = k + 1 a n ϑ n + 1 1 + n = 1 k a n ϑ n + 1 .
Simple computation yields,
w ( ϑ ) Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 + ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) n = k + 1 a n 2 2 n = 1 k a n Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 + ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) n = k + 1 a n 1 .
This last inequality is equivalent to
n = 1 k a n + Υ k + 1 ( μ , , ) Ξ k + 1 + ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) ( 1 ) ( 1 2 μ ) n = k + 1 a n 1 ,
which immediately leads to the assertion of Theorem 13. □

8. Conclusions

The interaction of geometry and analysis is a crucial component in the study of complex function theory. This rapid expansion is strongly related to the relationship between geometric behaviour and analytical structure. In the current study, we have familiarized a new meromorphic function class which is related to the Sălăgean-Erdély–Kober (SEK) operator. We have also discovered sufficient and necessary criteria for this subclass. We further investigated linear combinations, distortion theory, and other features. One can simply express the conclusions mentioned in this article for the function classes provided in Examples 1 to 4 associated with the SEK operator by suitably specialising the parameter (as in Remark 1). It is worthy to note that they are new and have not been considered so far. For additional research, we may look at specific classes of functions that correspond to fixed second coefficients connected to the SEK operator, and also certain majorization results, neighborhood results, and differential subordination for meromorphic functions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M.E.-D., G.M., K.V. and A.A.; methodology, S.M.E.-D., G.M., K.V. and A.A.; validation, S.M.E.-D., G.M., K.V. and A.A.; formal analysis, S.M.E.-D., G.M., K.V. and A.A.; investigation, S.M.E.-D., G.M., K.V. and A.A.; resources, S.M.E.-D., G.M., K.V. and A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M.E.-D., G.M., K.V. and A.A.; writing—review and editing, S.M.E.-D., G.M., K.V. and A.A.; supervision, S.M.E.-D., G.M., K.V. and A.A.; project administration, S.M.E.-D., G.M., K.V. and A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The researchers would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research, Qassim University, for funding the publication of this project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Uralegaddi, B.A.; Ganigi, M.D. A certain class of meromorphically starlike functions withpositive coefficients. Pure Appl. Math. Sci. 1987, 26, 75–81. [Google Scholar]
  2. Silverman, H. Univalent functions with negative coefficients. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1975, 51, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Juneja, O.P.; Reddy, T.R. Meromorphic starlike univalent functions with positive coefficients. Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie Sklodowska Sect. A 1985, 39, 65–76. [Google Scholar]
  4. Goodman, A.W. On uniformly convex functions. Ann. Polon. Math. 1991, 56, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Goodman, A.W. On uniformly starlike functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1991, 155, 364–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rønning, F. Uniformly convex functions and a corresponding class of starlike functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1993, 118, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rønning, F. Integral representations for bounded starlike functions. Ann. Polon. Math. 1995, 60, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kanas, S.; Wiśniowska, A. Conic regions and k-uniform convexity. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 1999, 105, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kanas, S.; Wiśniowska, A. Conic domains and starlike functions. Rev. Roum. Math. Pures Appl. 2000, 45, 647–657. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kanas, S.; Srivastava, H.M. Linear operators associated with k-uniformly convex functions. Integral Transform Spec. Funct. 2000, 9, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kanas, S.; Yaguchi, T. Subclasses of k-uniformly convex and starlike functions defined by generalized derivative—II. Publ. Inst. Math. 2001, 69, 91–100. [Google Scholar]
  12. Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Rosy, T.; Darus, M. A subclass of uniformly convex functions associated with certain fractional calculus operators. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 2005, 6, 86. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hilfer, R. Applications of Fractional Calculus in Physics; World Scientific Publishing Company: Singapore, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bonilla, B.; Rivero, M.; Rodríguez-Germá, L.; Trujillo, J.J. Fractional differential equations as alternative models to nonlinear differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 2007, 10, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Erdély, A.; Kober, H. Some remarks on Hankel transforms. Q. J. Math. 1940, 11, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gorenflo, R.; Mainardi, F. Fractional calculus: Integral and differential equations of fractional order. In Fractals and Fractional Calculus in Continuum Mechanics; Carpinteri, A., Mainardi, F., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 277–290. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kilbas, A.; Srivastava, H.M.; Trujillo, J.J. Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  18. Podlubny, I. Fractional Differential Equations; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  19. Alburaikan, A.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; El-Deeb, S.M. Certain subclasses of bi-Starlike function of complex order defined by Erdély-Kober-type integral operator. Axioms 2022, 11, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alburaikan, A.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; El-Deeb, S.M. Yamaguchi-Noshiro type bi-univalent functions associated with Salagean-Erdély-Kober operator. Mathematics 2022, 10, 2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Samko, G.; Kilbas, A.; Marichev, O. Fractional Integrals and Derivatives: Theory and Applications; Gordon and Breach: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  22. Srivastava, H.M.; Tomovski, Z. Fractional calculus with an itegral operator containing a generalized Mittag-Leffler function in the kernal. Appl. Math. Comput. 2009, 211, 198–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. El-Ashwah, R.M. Certain class of meromorphic univalent functions defined by an Erdély-Kober type integral operator. Open Sci. J. Math. Appl. 2015, 3, 7–13. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kiryakova, V. Generalized Fractional Calculus and Applications; Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series, 301; Longman Scientific & Technical: Harlow, UK; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  25. El-Ashwah, R.M. A note on certain meromorphic p-valent functions. Appl. Math. Lett. 2009, 22, 1756–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. El-Ashwah, R.M. Properties of certain class of p-valent meromorphic functions associated with new integral operator. Acta Univ. Apulensis 2012, 29, 255–264. [Google Scholar]
  27. Sivaprasad Kumar, S.; Ravichandran, V.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G. Classes of meromorphic p-valent parabolic starlike functions with positive coefficients. Aust. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2005, 2, 3. [Google Scholar]
  28. Aouf, M.K. On a certain class of meromorphic univalent functions with positive coefficients. Rend. Mat. Appl. 1991, 7, 209–219. [Google Scholar]
  29. Auof, M.K.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G. A subclass of uniformly convex functions defined by the Dziok-Srivastava operator. Aust. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2008, 5. [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu, J.-L.; Srivastava, H.M. Classes of meromorphically multivalent functions associated with the generalized hypergeometric function. Math. Comput. Model. 2004, 39, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, J.-L.; Srivastava, H.M. Subclasses of meromorphically multivalent functions associated with a certain linear operator. Math. Comput. Model. 2004, 39, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mogra, M.L.; Reddy, T.R.; Juneja, O.P. Meromorphic univalent functions with positive coefficients. Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 1985, 32, 161–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Owa, S.; Pascu, N.N. Coefficient inequalities for certain classes of meromorphically starlike and meromorphically convex functions. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 2003, 4, 17. [Google Scholar]
  34. Uralegaddi, B.A.; Somanatha, C. Certain differential operators for meromorphic functions. Houston J. Math. 1991, 17, 279–284. [Google Scholar]
  35. Lashin, A.Y. On certain subclass of meromorphic functions associated with certain integral operators. Comput. Math. Appl. 2010, 59, 524–531. [Google Scholar]
  36. Cho, N.E.; Known, O.S.; Srivastava, H.M. Inclusion and argument properties for certain subclasses of meromorphic functions associated with a family of multiplier transformations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2004, 300, 505–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cho, N.E.; Known, O.S.; Srivastava, H.M. Inclusion relationships for certain subclasses of meromorphic functions associated with a family of multiplier transformations. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 2005, 16, 647–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Uralegaddi, B.A.; Somanatha, C. New criteria for meromorphic starlike univalent functions. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 1991, 43, 137–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dziok, J.; Murugusundaramoorthy, J. Sokół, G. On certain class of meromorphic functions with positive coefficients. Acta Math. Sci. 2012, 32, 1376–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Silverman, H. Partial sums of starlike and convex functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1997, 209, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cho, N.E.; Owa, S. Partial sums of certain meromorphic functions. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 2004, 5, 30. Available online: http://jipam.vu.edu.au/ (accessed on 30 March 2004).
  42. Aouf, M.K.; Mostafa, A. Certain inequalities of meromorphic univalent functions associated with the Mittag-Lefer function. J. Appl. Anal. 2019, 25, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

El-Deeb, S.M.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Vijaya, K.; Alburaikan, A. Pascu-Rønning Type Meromorphic Functions Based on Sălăgean-Erdély–Kober Operator. Axioms 2023, 12, 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12040380

AMA Style

El-Deeb SM, Murugusundaramoorthy G, Vijaya K, Alburaikan A. Pascu-Rønning Type Meromorphic Functions Based on Sălăgean-Erdély–Kober Operator. Axioms. 2023; 12(4):380. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12040380

Chicago/Turabian Style

El-Deeb, Sheza M., Gangadharan Murugusundaramoorthy, Kaliappan Vijaya, and Alhanouf Alburaikan. 2023. "Pascu-Rønning Type Meromorphic Functions Based on Sălăgean-Erdély–Kober Operator" Axioms 12, no. 4: 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12040380

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop