Next Article in Journal
An Asymmetric Model Position Dependent Mass: Quantum Mechanical Study
Next Article in Special Issue
New Generalization of Geodesic Convex Function
Previous Article in Journal
Inequalities and Reverse Inequalities for the Joint A-Numerical Radius of Operators
Previous Article in Special Issue
Some Subordination Results Defined by Using the Symmetric q-Differential Operator for Multivalent Functions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Coefficient Bounds for a Family of s-Fold Symmetric Bi-Univalent Functions

1
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan
2
Department of Mathematics, Abbottabad University of Science and Technology, Abbottabad 22500, Pakistan
3
Mathematics Department, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 22452, Riyadh 11495, Saudi Arabia
4
Faculty of Science and Technology, University of the Faroe Islands, Vestarabryggja 15, FO 100 Torshavn, Faroe Islands, Denmark
5
Department of Mathematics, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Campus, Wah Cantt 47040, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Axioms 2023, 12(4), 317; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12040317
Submission received: 8 February 2023 / Revised: 28 February 2023 / Accepted: 7 March 2023 / Published: 23 March 2023

Abstract

:
We present a new family of s-fold symmetrical bi-univalent functions in the open unit disc in this work. We provide estimates for the first two Taylor–Maclaurin series coefficients for these functions. Furthermore, we define the Salagean differential operator and discuss various applications of our main findings using it. A few new and well-known corollaries are studied in order to show the connection between recent and earlier work.

1. Introduction

Let Ω represents the collection of all analytical functions ϝ with the series representation
ϝ ( τ ) = τ + n = 2 α n τ n ,
which are analytic in E = { τ : τ < 1 } . The class S Ω we mean the set of all univalent functions. The inverse function ( ϝ 1 ) of a univalent function ϝ S be presented as:
τ = ϝ 1 ( ϝ ( τ ) ) , τ E
and
η = ϝ ( ϝ 1 ( η ) ) , r 0 ( ϝ ) 1 4 , η < r 0 ( ϝ ) ,
where
g 1 ( η ) = ϝ 1 ( η ) = η α 2 η 2 + ( 2 α 2 2 α 3 ) η 3 ( 5 α 2 3 5 α 2 α 3 + α 4 ) η 4 + .
We speak ϝ a bi-univalent function in E if each of the two functions ϝ and ϝ 1 are univalent in E . The class of all bi-univalent functions is symbolized by Σ . Here are very few examples of bi-univalent functions that are drawn from Srivastava et al. [1] first research.
h 1 ( τ ) = τ 1 τ , h 2 ( τ ) = log ( 1 τ ) , h 3 ( τ ) = 1 2 log 1 + τ 1 τ , τ E .
The famous Koebe function
k ( τ ) = τ 1 τ 2 , τ E ,
is not in the class Σ .
The question of establishing bounds on the coefficients has always been a significant one in geometric function theory. The size of their coefficients can influence a number of features of analytical functions, including univalency, rate of growth, and distortion. Several researchers used various methods to address the aforementioned issues. Just like for univalent functions, determining coefficient estimates for bi-univalent functions has drawn a lot of interest recently. Lewin [2], while studying a subclass of Σ , shown that the bound on the second coefficient of the functions falling under the class Σ is less than one half (i.e., α 2 < 1.5 ). Lewin’s result was improved by Brannan and Clunie [3], where they shown that α 2 2 and then by Netanyahu [4] to α 2 4 3 which is an even greater improvement. In 1984, Tan [5] derived certain initial coefficient estimates for the class Σ , while Brannan and Taha [6] addressed several intriguing characteristics of subfamilies of Σ . In general, over the past few years, mathematicians have been interested in discovering the initial coefficient bounds for functions belonging to Σ . Remarkably, in [1] as well as the references referred therein such as [7,8,9,10,11,12]. reinvigorate the study of coefficient problems pertaining to bi-univalent functions. Many researchers find bounds for α 2 and α 3 , that is for the first and second coefficient in Taylor (Maclatuin) series for diverse subclasses of bi-univalent functions, see [1] including [13,14,15,16,17].
However, such general coefficient estimation concerns were taken into account by numerous writers in some particular bi-univalent functions subclasses by using the expansions of the Lucas, Chebyshev, Legendrae, Horadam, Fibonacci, and Gegenbauer polynomials expansions (see, for example, [18,19,20,21,22,23]). For specific special subfamilies of Σ connected to any of the preceding polynomials, impressive results on initial coefficient estimates were developed in [24,25,26,27]. However for each of the listed below coefficients, α n , ( n N { 1 , 2 , 3 } , N : = 1 , 2 , 3 , ) , the coefficient problem is remains a question.
A domain D is referred to as s-fold symmetric if a rotation of the domain D about the origin with an angle of 2 π s maps D on itself. An analytical function ϝ in a domain E is said to be s-fold symmetric if
ϝ e 2 π i s τ = e 2 π i s ϝ ( τ ) .
where s is a positive integer. For every ϝ S , the function
h ( τ ) = ϝ ( τ s ) s ,
is univalent and maps a region with s-fold symmetry onto the unit disc. We use S s to represent the family of s-fold symmetrical univalent functions in E.
Obviously
S 1 = S .
A series expansion for ϝ S s is provided by
ϝ ( τ ) = τ + k = 1 α s k + 1 τ s k + 1 .
In 2014, Srivastava et al. [28], investigated the natural extension of S s and presented Σ s a set of symmetric s-fold bi-univalent functions. The following is the series expansion for g ( η ) = ϝ 1 ( η )
g ( η ) = ϝ 1 ( η ) = η α s + 1 η s + 1 + ( s + 1 ) α s + 1 2 α 2 s + 1 η 2 s + 1 1 2 ( s + 1 ) ( 3 s + 2 ) α s + 1 3 ( 3 s + 2 ) α s + 1 α 2 s + 1 + α 3 s + 1 η 3 s + 1 .
For s = 1 , the Equations (2) and (5) become equal. Some functions in the family Σ s are given as follows:
ζ 1 ( τ ) = τ s 1 τ s s , ζ 2 ( τ ) = log ( 1 τ s ) 1 s , ζ 3 ( τ ) = log 1 + τ s 1 τ s , τ E
and their corresponding inverse functions are
ζ 1 1 ( τ ) = η s 1 + η s 1 s , ζ 2 1 ( τ ) = e 2 η s 1 e 2 η s + 1 1 s , ζ 3 3 ( τ ) = e η s 1 e η s 1 s .
The study of the family Σ s has recently gained relevance due to the research [29,30] which become base for a significant number of articles on subclasses of Σ s . In a brand new subclass of Σ s Srivastava et al. [31] investigated initial coefficient estimations of the Taylor–Maclaurin series expansion. Moreover Sakar and Tasar [32] presented subclasses of Σ s and developed initial coefficient bounds for the functions included in these families (see also [33,34,35]). The following articles [36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. revealed intriguing findings about the initial coefficient estimations for specific subfamilies of Σ s .
In this part of the article, we presented a few novel subclasses of s–fold symmetric bi-univalent functions and derived initial coefficient bounds α s + 1 and α 2 s + 1 . We have taken motivation from the earlier works of Ma and Minda [40] and Tang et al. [41].
We will assume the following values during this whole paper
τ , η E , ϝ 1 = g , s N , 0 < ϰ 1 , 0 β < 1 , 0 γ 1 , 0 ξ < 1 a n d 0 ϱ < 1 .

1.1. The Class S Σ s ( ϰ , γ , ϱ , ξ )

Definition 1. 
A function ϝ Σ s , is seen as being a member of the class S Σ s ( ϰ , γ , ϱ , ξ ) if the criteria listed below are satisfied:
arg 1 γ 1 ϱ τ ϝ ( τ ) ϝ ( τ ) ϱ + γ 1 ξ 1 ξ + τ ϝ ( τ ) ϝ ( τ ) < ϰ π 2
and
arg 1 γ 1 ϱ η g ( η ) g ( η ) ϱ + γ 1 ξ 1 ξ + η g ( η ) g ( η ) < ϰ π 2 .
Remark 1. 
By taking the different values of the parameter γ , ϱ , ξ , s we can obtain some known subclasses of analytic bi-univalent functions.
(1): S Σ 1 ( ϰ , γ , 0 , 0 ) = S Σ ( ϰ , γ ) introduced by Ali et al. [43].
(2): S Σ s ( ϰ , 0 , 0 , 0 ) = S Σ s ( ϰ ) introduced by Altinkaya and Yalcinn [44].
(3): S Σ 1 ( ϰ , 0 , 0 , 0 ) = S Σ ( ϰ ) introduced by Brannan and Taha [24].

1.2. The Class S Σ s ( β , γ , ϱ , ξ )

Definition 2. 
A function ϝ Σ s , is seen as being a member of the class S Σ s ( β , γ , ϱ , ξ ) if the criteria listed below are satisfied:
R e 1 γ 1 ϱ τ ϝ ( τ ) ϝ ( τ ) ϱ + γ 1 ξ 1 ξ + τ ϝ ( τ ) ϝ ( τ ) > β
and
R e 1 γ 1 ϱ η g ( η ) g ( η ) ϱ + γ 1 ξ 1 ξ + η g ( η ) g ( η ) > β .
Remark 2. 
By taking different values of the parameter γ , ϱ , ξ , s , we can obtain some known subclasses of analytic bi-univalent functions.
(1): S Σ 1 ( β , γ , 0 , 0 ) = S Σ ( β , γ ) introduced by Ali et al. [43].
(2): S Σ s ( β , 0 , 0 , 0 ) = S Σ s ( β ) introduced by Altinkaya and Yalcinn [44].
(3): S Σ 1 ( β , 0 , 0 , 0 ) = S Σ ( β ) introduced by Brannan and Taha [24].
Given below are a few preliminary findings that will be used to produce the main findings.
Lemma 1 
([45]). Let p P , where P is the Caratheodary class of analytic functions p in E satisfying
R e ( p ( τ ) ) > 0
and
p ( τ ) = 1 + c 1 τ + c 2 τ 2 + ,
then
c n 2 , n N .
In Section 2, for functions from the classes S Σ s ( ϰ , γ , ϱ , ξ ) and S Σ s ( β , γ , ϱ , ξ ) , we establish constraints on the first two coefficients in the Taylor–Maclaurin expansion. We also highlight noteworthy cases of our key findings and discuss significant linkages to earlier findings. We investigate the Salagean differential operator in Section 3 and provide two new classes of s–fold symmetric bi-univalent functions. For functions belonging to the classes S Σ s ( ϰ , γ , ϱ , ξ , p ) and S Σ s ( ϰ , γ , ϱ , ξ , p ) , we find bounds on α s + 1 and α 2 s + 1 in the Taylor–Maclaurin expansion.

2. Main Results

Theorem 1. 
If ϝ belongs to the class S Σ s ( ϰ , γ , ϱ , ξ ) and has the series representation described in (4), then
α s + 1 2 ϰ 1 ϱ 1 ξ s 2 T 1 ( s , ϱ , ξ , γ ) 2 ϰ 1 ϱ 1 ξ ( ϰ 1 ) T 1 ( s , ϱ , ξ , γ )
and
α 2 s + 1 ϰ ( 1 ϱ ) 1 ξ s 1 γ 1 ξ + γ ( 1 ϱ ) ( 1 + 2 s ) + 2 ϰ 2 1 ϱ 2 1 ξ 2 ( 1 + s ) s 2 T 1 ( s , ϱ , ξ , γ ) 2 ,
where
T 1 ( s , ϱ , ξ , γ ) = ( 1 γ ) 1 ξ + γ ( 1 + s ) 1 ϱ .
Proof. 
If we assume that ϝ S Σ s ( ϰ , γ , ϱ , ξ ) , then
1 γ 1 ϱ τ ϝ ( τ ) ϝ ( τ ) ϱ + γ 1 ξ 1 ξ + τ ϝ ( τ ) ϝ ( τ ) = p ( τ ) ϰ
moreover, we have for its inverse map g = ϝ 1
1 γ 1 ϱ η g ( η ) g ( η ) ϱ + γ 1 ξ 1 ξ + η g ( η ) g ( η ) = q ( η ) ϰ ,
where p and q are expressed in the following series:
p ( τ ) = 1 + p s τ s + p 2 s τ 2 s + . . .
and
q ( η ) = 1 + q s η s + q 2 s η 2 s + . . . .
So, by analysing the coefficients in (11) and (12) we acquire
s 1 γ 1 ϱ + γ ( 1 + s ) 1 ξ α s + 1 = ϰ p s ,
2 s 1 γ 1 ϱ + γ ( 1 + 2 s ) 1 ξ α 2 s + 1 s 1 γ 1 ϱ + γ ( 1 + s ) 2 1 ξ α s + 1 2 = ϰ p 2 s + ϰ ( ϰ 1 ) 2 p s 2 ,
s 1 γ 1 ϱ + γ ( 1 + s ) 1 ξ α s + 1 = ϰ q s ,
s 1 γ ( 1 + 2 s ) 1 ϱ + γ ( 1 + s ) ( 1 + 3 s ) 1 ξ α s + 1 2 2 s 1 γ 1 ϱ + γ ( 1 + 2 s ) 1 ξ α 2 s + 1 = ϰ q 2 s + ϰ ( ϰ 1 ) 2 q s 2 .
From (15) and (17) we obtain
p s = q s ,
and
2 s 1 γ 1 ϱ + γ ( 1 + s ) 1 ξ 2 α s + 1 2 = ϰ 2 ( p s 2 + q s 2 ) .
Furthermore, form (16), (18), and (20) we have
2 s 2 ( 1 γ ) 1 ϱ + 2 γ s 2 ( 1 + s ) 1 ξ α s + 1 2 = ϰ ( p 2 s + q 2 s ) + ϰ ( ϰ 1 ) 2 ( p s 2 + q s 2 ) = ϰ ( p 2 s + q 2 s ) + s 2 ( ϰ 1 ) ϰ 1 γ 1 ϱ + γ ( 1 + s ) 1 ξ 2 α s + 1 2 .
Therefore we have
α s + 1 2 = ϰ 2 1 ϱ 2 1 ξ 2 ( p 2 s + q 2 s ) s 2 T 1 ( s , ϱ , ξ , γ ) 2 ϰ 1 ϱ 1 ξ ( ϰ 1 ) T 1 ( s , ϱ , ξ , γ ) ,
where
T 1 ( s , ϱ , ξ , γ ) = ( 1 γ ) 1 ξ + γ ( 1 + s ) 1 ϱ .
Lemma 1 in conjuction with Equation (21) produces
α s + 1 2 ϰ 1 ϱ 1 ξ s 2 T 1 ( s , ϱ , ξ , γ ) 2 ϰ 1 ϱ 1 ξ ( ϰ 1 ) T 1 ( s , ϱ , ξ , γ ) .
Next, by subtracting (18) from (16), we can determine the bound on α 2 s + 1 , that is
4 s 1 γ 1 ϱ + γ ( 1 + 2 s ) 1 ξ α 2 s + 1 2 s ( 1 + s ) 1 γ 1 ϱ + γ ( 1 + 2 s ) 1 ξ α s + 1 2 = ϰ ( p 2 s q 2 s ) + ϰ ( ϰ 1 ) 2 ( p s 2 q s 2 ) .
After that, taking into account (19) and (20), and using the Lemma 1, on (23) for p 2 s , q 2 s , p s and q s we have
α 2 s + 1 ϰ ( 1 ϱ ) 1 ξ s 1 γ 1 ξ + γ ( 1 ϱ ) ( 1 + 2 s ) + 2 ϰ 2 1 ϱ 2 1 ξ 2 ( 1 + s ) s 2 T 1 ( s , ϱ , ξ , γ ) 2 .
As a result, the Theorem 1 proof is achieved. □
For s = 1 , in Theorem 1, the additional corollary for the new class S Σ ( ϰ , γ , ϱ , ξ ) is as follows:
Corollary 1. 
If ϝ belongs to the class S Σ ( ϰ , γ , ϱ , ξ ) and has the series representation described in (4), then
α 2 2 ϰ 1 ϱ 1 ξ s 2 T 2 ( ϱ , ξ , γ ) 2 ϰ 1 ϱ 1 ξ ( ϰ 1 ) T 2 ( ϱ , ξ , γ )
and
α 3 ϰ ( 1 ϱ ) 1 ξ 1 γ 1 ξ + 3 γ ( 1 ϱ ) + 4 ϰ 2 1 ϱ 2 1 ξ 2 T 2 ( ϱ , ξ , γ ) 2 ,
where
T 2 ( ϱ , ξ , γ ) = ( 1 γ ) 1 ξ + 2 γ 1 ϱ .
For ϱ = 0 , in Theorem 1, we have the following new corollary for the new class S Σ s ( ϰ , γ , ξ ) .
Corollary 2. 
If ϝ belongs to the class S Σ s ( ϰ , γ , ξ ) and has the series representation described in (4), then
α s + 1 2 ϰ 1 ξ s 2 T 3 ( s , ξ , γ ) 2 ϰ 1 ξ ( ϰ 1 ) T 3 ( s , ξ , γ )
and
α 2 s + 1 ϰ 1 ξ s 1 γ 1 ξ + γ ( 1 + 2 s ) + 2 ϰ 2 1 ξ 2 ( 1 + s ) s 2 T 3 ( s , ξ , γ ) 2 ,
where
T 3 ( s , ξ , γ ) = ( 1 γ ) 1 ξ + γ ( 1 + s ) .
For ξ = 0 , in Theorem 1, we acquire at the new class S Σ s ( ϰ , γ , ϱ ) , and a corollary listed below.
Corollary 3. 
If ϝ belongs to the class S Σ s ( ϰ , γ , ϱ ) and has the series representation described in (4), then
α s + 1 2 ϰ 1 ϱ s 2 T 4 ( s , ϱ , γ ) 2 ϰ 1 ϱ ( ϰ 1 ) T 4 ( s , ϱ , γ )
and
α 2 s + 1 ϰ ( 1 ϱ ) 1 ξ s 1 γ + γ ( 1 ϱ ) ( 1 + 2 s ) + 2 ϰ 2 1 ϱ 2 1 ξ 2 ( 1 + s ) s 2 T 4 ( s , ϱ , γ ) 2 ,
where
T 4 ( s , ϱ , γ ) = ( 1 γ ) + γ ( 1 + s ) 1 ϱ .
The following new corollary for the new class S Σ s ( ϰ , γ ) exists for ϱ = 0 , and ξ = 0 , in Theorem 1.
Corollary 4. 
If ϝ belongs to the class S Σ s ( ϰ , γ ) and has the series representation described in (4), then
α s + 1 2 ϰ 2 s 2 ϰ ( 1 γ ) + γ ( 1 + s ) s 2 ( ϰ 1 ) 1 γ + γ ( 1 + s ) 2 ,
and
α 2 s + 1 ϰ s 1 γ + γ ( 1 + 2 s ) + 2 ϰ 2 1 ϱ 2 1 ξ 2 ( 1 + s ) s 2 1 γ + γ ( 1 + s ) 2 .
For ϱ = 0 , s = 1 and ξ = 0 , in Theorem 1, then we have the result as demonstrated by Ali et al. in [43].
Corollary 5 
([43]). If ϝ belongs to the class S Σ ( ϰ , γ ) and has the series representation described in (4), then
α 2 2 ϰ 1 + γ 2 ϰ ( ϰ 1 ) 1 + γ
and
α 3 ϰ 1 + 2 γ + 4 ϰ 2 1 ϱ 2 1 ξ 2 1 + γ 2 .
For γ = 0 , ϱ = 0 , and ξ = 0 , in Theorem 1, then we have the result as demonstrated by Altinkaya and Yalcinn in [44].
Corollary 6 
([44]). If ϝ belongs to the class S Σ s ( ϰ ) and has the series representation described in (4), then
α s + 1 2 ϰ s ϰ + 1 )
and
α 2 s + 1 ϰ s + 2 ϰ 2 ( 1 + s ) s 2 .
For γ = 0 ,   s = 1 ,   ϱ = 0 , and ξ = 0 , in Theorem 1, then we have the result as demonstrated by Murugusundaramoorthy in [46].
Corollary 7 
([46]). If ϝ belongs to the class S Σ ( ϰ ) and has the series representation described in (4), then
α 2 2 ϰ ϰ + 1
and
α 3 4 ϰ 2 + ϰ .
Theorem 2. 
If ϝ belongs to the class S Σ s ( β , γ , ϱ , ξ ) and has the series representation described in (4), then
α s + 1 2 ( 1 β ) 1 ξ 1 ϱ s 2 T 1 ( s , ϱ , ξ , γ ) ,
and
α 2 s + 1 1 ξ 1 ϱ ( 1 β ) s 1 ξ 1 γ + γ 1 ϱ ( 1 + 2 s ) + 2 ( 1 + s ) ( 1 β ) 2 1 ξ 2 1 ϱ 2 s 2 T 1 ( s , ϱ , ξ , γ ) 2 ,
where T 1 ( s , ϱ , ξ , γ ) is given by (10).
Proof. 
Let ϝ S Σ s ( β , γ , ϱ , ξ ) , then
1 γ 1 ϱ τ ϝ ( τ ) ϝ ( τ ) ϱ + γ 1 ξ 1 ξ + τ ϝ ( τ ) ϝ ( τ ) = β + ( 1 β ) p ( τ )
moreover, we have for its inverse map g = ϝ 1
1 γ 1 ϱ η g ( η ) g ( η ) ϱ + γ 1 ξ 1 ξ + η g ( η ) g ( η ) = β + ( 1 β ) q ( η ) ,
where the expressions for p and q are given in (13) and (14). The coefficients are now equalised in (24) and (25), we arrive at
s 1 γ 1 ϱ + γ ( 1 + s ) 1 ξ α s + 1 = ( 1 β ) p s ,
2 s 1 γ 1 ϱ + γ ( 1 + 2 s ) 1 ξ α 2 s + 1 s 1 γ 1 ϱ + γ ( 1 + s ) 2 1 ξ α s + 1 2 = ( 1 β ) p 2 s ,
s 1 γ 1 ϱ + γ ( 1 + s ) 1 ξ α s + 1 = ( 1 β ) q s ,
s 1 γ ( 1 + 2 s ) 1 ϱ + γ ( 1 + s ) ( 1 + 3 s ) 1 ξ α s + 1 2 2 s 1 γ 1 ϱ + γ ( 1 + 2 s ) 1 ξ α 2 s + 1 = ( 1 β ) q 2 s .
From (26) and (28) we obtain
p s = q s ,
Adding (27) and (29), we have
2 s 2 ( 1 γ ) 1 ϱ + 2 γ s 2 ( 1 + s ) 1 ξ α s + 1 2 = ( 1 β ) ( p 2 s + q 2 s ) ,
therefore we have
α s + 1 2 = ( 1 β ) 1 ξ 1 ϱ ( p 2 s + q 2 s ) 2 s 2 ( 1 γ ) 1 ξ + γ ( 1 + s ) 1 ϱ .
Equation (32) in conjunction with Lemma 1 yields
α s + 1 2 ( 1 β ) 1 ξ 1 ϱ s 2 ( 1 γ ) 1 ξ + γ ( 1 + s ) 1 ϱ .
Next, by subtracting (29) from (27), we can determine the bound on α 2 s + 1 , that is
4 s 1 γ 1 ϱ + γ ( 1 + 2 s ) 1 ξ α 2 s + 1 2 s ( 1 + s ) 1 γ 1 ϱ + γ ( 1 + 2 s ) 1 ξ α s + 1 2 = ( 1 β ) ( p 2 s q 2 s ) ,
4 s 1 γ 1 ϱ + γ ( 1 + 2 s ) 1 ξ α 2 s + 1 = ( 1 β ) ( p 2 s q 2 s ) + 2 s ( 1 + s ) 1 γ 1 ϱ + γ ( 1 + 2 s ) 1 ξ α s + 1 2 ,
After that, taking into account (30) and (31), and using the Lemma 1, on (23) for p 2 s , q 2 s , p s and q s , we arrive at
α 2 s + 1 1 ξ 1 ϱ ( 1 β ) s 1 ξ 1 γ + γ 1 ϱ ( 1 + 2 s ) + 2 ( 1 + s ) ( 1 β ) 2 1 ξ 2 1 ϱ 2 s 2 T 1 ( s , ϱ , ξ , γ ) 2 ,
As a result, the Theorem 2 proof is achieved. □
For s = 1 , in Theorem 2, the subsequent new corollary of new class S Σ ( β , γ , ϱ , ξ ) is produced.
Corollary 8. 
If ϝ belongs to the class S Σ ( β , γ , ϱ , ξ ) and has the series representation described in (4), then
α s + 1 2 ( 1 β ) 1 ξ 1 ϱ 1 ξ 1 γ + 2 γ 1 ϱ ,
and
α 2 s + 1 1 ξ 1 ϱ ( 1 β ) 1 ξ 1 γ + 3 γ 1 ϱ + 4 ( 1 β ) 2 1 ξ 2 1 ϱ 2 1 ξ 1 γ + 2 γ 1 ϱ 2 .
For ϱ = 0 , in Theorem 2, the subsequent new corollary for a class S Σ s ( β , γ , ϱ , ξ ) is produced.
Corollary 9. 
If ϝ belongs to the class S Σ s ( β , γ , ξ ) and has the series representation described in (4), then
α s + 1 2 ( 1 β ) 1 ξ s 2 ( 1 γ ) 1 ξ + γ ( 1 + s ) ,
and
α 2 s + 1 1 ξ ( 1 β ) s 1 ξ 1 γ + γ ( 1 + 2 s ) + 2 ( 1 + s ) ( 1 β ) 2 1 ξ 2 s 2 1 ξ 1 γ + γ ( 1 + s ) 2 .
For ξ = 0 , in Theorem 2, the subsequent new corollary for a class S Σ s ( β , γ , ϱ ) is produced.
Corollary 10. 
If ϝ belongs to the class S Σ s ( β , γ , ϱ ) and has the series representation described in (4), then
α s + 1 2 ( 1 β ) 1 ϱ s 2 ( 1 γ ) + γ ( 1 + s ) 1 ϱ ,
and
α 2 s + 1 1 ϱ ( 1 β ) s 1 γ + γ 1 ϱ ( 1 + 2 s ) + 2 ( 1 + s ) ( 1 β ) 2 1 ϱ 2 s 2 1 γ + γ 1 ϱ ( 1 + s ) 2 .
For ϱ = 0 , and ξ = 0 , in Theorem 2, the subsequent new corollary for a class S Σ s ( β , γ ) is produced.
Corollary 11. 
If ϝ belongs to the class S Σ s ( β , γ ) and has the series representation described in (4), then
α s + 1 2 ( 1 β ) s 2 ( 1 γ ) + γ ( 1 + s ) ,
and
α 2 s + 1 ( 1 β ) s 1 γ + γ ( 1 + 2 s ) + 2 ( 1 + s ) ( 1 β ) 2 s 2 1 γ + γ ( 1 + s ) 2 .
For ϱ = 0 , s = 1 and ξ = 0 , in Theorem 2, the subsequent known result is achieved that was proved by Ali et al. in [43].
Corollary 12 
([43]). If ϝ belongs to the class S Σ ( β , γ ) and has the series representation described in (4), then
α 2 2 ( 1 β ) ( 1 + γ ,
and
α 3 ( 1 β ) 1 + 2 γ + 4 ( 1 β ) 2 1 + γ 2 .
For ϱ = 0 , ξ = 0 , and γ = 0 , in Theorem 2, then we have following known result proved by Altinkaya and Yalcinn [44].
Corollary 13 
([44]). If ϝ belongs to the class S Σ s ( β ) and has the series representation described in (4), then
α s + 1 2 ( 1 β ) s ,
and
α 2 s + 1 ( 1 β ) s + 2 ( 1 + s ) ( 1 β ) 2 s 2 .
For ϱ = 0 , ξ = 0 , s = 1 and γ = 0 , in Theorem 2, then the subsequent known result is achieved that was proved by Murugusundaramoorthy in [46].
Corollary 14 
([46]). If ϝ belongs to the class S Σ ( β ) and has the series representation described in (4), then
α 2 2 ( 1 β ) ,
and
α 3 4 ( 1 β ) 2 + ( 1 β ) .

3. Applications of Salagean Differential Operator

In 1983, Salagean [47] defined the differential operator know as Salagean differential operator for analytic functions. By extending this idea, we define the Salagean differential operator for symmetric functions and discuss some of its applications for our main results.
Definition 3. 
For p N , the Salagean differential operator for ϝ Σ s given in (4) is defined by
S 0 ϝ ( τ ) = ϝ ( τ ) , S 1 ϝ ( τ ) = τ ϝ ( τ ) , , S p ϝ ( τ ) = τ S p 1 ϝ ( τ ) = τ + n = 1 s n + 1 p α s n + 1 τ s n + 1 , = τ + n = 1 s n + 1 p α s n + 1 τ s n + 1 .
Remark 3. 
For s = 1 , we have the Salagean differential operator for analytic functions proved in [47].

3.1. The Class S Σ s ( ϰ , γ , ϱ , ξ , p )

Definition 4. 
A function ϝ Σ s is referred to as belonging to class S Σ s ( ϰ , γ , ϱ , ξ , p ) if the following criteria are met:
arg 1 γ 1 ϱ S p ϝ ( τ ) ϝ ( τ ) ϱ + γ 1 ξ 1 ξ + S p + 1 ϝ ( τ ) S p ϝ ( τ ) < ϰ π 2
and
R e 1 γ 1 ϱ τ S p g ( η ) g ( η ) ϱ + γ 1 ξ 1 ξ + S p + 1 g ( η ) S p g ( η ) < ϰ π 2 .

3.2. The Class S Σ s ( β , γ , ϱ , ξ , p )

Definition 5. 
A function ϝ Σ s is referred to as belonging to class S Σ s ( β , γ , ϱ , ξ , p ) if the following criteria are met:
R e 1 γ 1 ϱ S p ϝ ( τ ) ϝ ( τ ) ϱ + γ 1 ξ 1 ξ + S p + 1 ϝ ( τ ) S p ϝ ( τ ) > β
and
arg 1 γ 1 ϱ S p g ( η ) g ( η ) ϱ + γ 1 ξ 1 ξ + S p + 1 g ( η ) S p g ( η ) > β .
Theorem 3. 
Let ϝ given by (4) be in the class S Σ s ( ϰ , γ , ϱ , ξ , p ) , then
α s + 1 2 ϰ ϰ Q 1 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) + ϰ Q 2 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) ϰ 1 Q 3 ( γ , ϱ , s , p )
and
α 2 s + 1 4 ϰ Q 4 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) + 4 ϰ 2 Q 5 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) Q 4 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) Q 3 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) ,
where,
Q 1 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) = 1 γ 1 ϱ s + 1 1 + 2 s p 1 2 1 + s p 1 ,
Q 2 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) = γ 1 ξ 2 s ( s + 1 ) 1 + 2 s p 2 s 1 + s 2 p ,
Q 3 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) = 1 γ 1 ϱ s + 1 p 1 + γ s ( 1 + s p ) 1 ξ 2 ,
Q 4 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) = 2 1 γ 1 ϱ 1 + 2 s p 1 + 4 γ s ( 1 + 2 s p 1 ξ ,
Q 5 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) = 1 γ 1 ϱ s + 1 1 + 2 s p 1 2 γ s ( s + 1 ) ( 1 + 2 s ) p 1 ξ .
Proof. 
Let ϝ S Σ s ( ϰ , γ , ϱ , ξ , p ) , then
1 γ 1 ϱ S p ϝ ( τ ) ϝ ( τ ) ϱ + γ 1 ξ 1 ξ + S p + 1 ϝ ( τ ) S p ϝ ( τ ) = p ( τ ) ϰ
moreover, we have for its inverse map g = ϝ 1
1 γ 1 ϱ S p g ( η ) g ( η ) ϱ + γ 1 ξ 1 ξ + S p + 1 g ( η ) S p g ( η ) = q ( η ) ϰ ,
where the expressions for p ( τ ) and q ( η ) are given in (13) and (14). The coefficients are now equalised in (40) and (41) we arrive at
1 γ 1 ϱ s + 1 p 1 + γ s ( 1 + s p ) 1 ξ α s + 1 = ϰ r s ,
1 γ 1 ϱ 2 s + 1 p 1 + 2 γ s 1 + 2 s p 1 ξ α 2 s + 1 1 γ 1 ϱ s + 1 p 1 + γ s ( 1 + s 2 p 1 ξ α s + 1 2 = ϰ r 2 s + ϰ ( ϰ 1 ) 2 r s 2 ,
1 γ 1 ϱ s + 1 p 1 + γ s ( 1 + s p ) 1 ξ α s + 1 = ϰ q s ,
1 γ 1 ϱ ( s + 1 ) 1 + 2 s p 1 1 + s p 1 + γ 1 ξ 2 s ( 1 + s ) 2 s + 1 p s s + 1 2 p α s + 1 2 1 γ 1 ϱ 2 s + 1 p 1 + 2 γ s ( 1 + 2 s p ) 1 ξ α 2 s + 1 = ϰ q 2 s + ϰ ( ϰ 1 ) 2 q s 2 .
From (42) and (44) we obtain
r s = q s
and
2 1 γ 1 ϱ s + 1 p 1 + γ s ( 1 + s p ) 1 ξ 2 α s + 1 2 = ϰ 2 ( r s 2 + q s 2 ) .
Furthermore, form (43), (45), and (47) we have
1 γ 1 ϱ s + 1 1 + 2 s p 1 2 1 + s p 1 + γ 1 ξ 2 s ( s + 1 ) 1 + 2 s p 2 s 1 + s 2 p α s + 1 2 = ϰ ( r 2 s + q 2 s ) + ϰ ( ϰ 1 ) 2 ( r s 2 + q s 2 ) = ϰ ( r 2 s + q 2 s ) + ( ϰ 1 ) ϰ 1 γ 1 ϱ s + 1 p 1 + γ s ( 1 + s p ) 1 ξ 2 α s + 1 2 .
This can be written as
Q 1 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) + Q 2 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) α s + 1 2 = ϰ ( r 2 s + q 2 s ) + ϰ 1 ) ϰ Q 3 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) α s + 1 2 , ϰ Q 1 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) + ϰ Q 2 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) ϰ 1 Q 3 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) = ϰ 2 ( r 2 s + q 2 s )
Therefore we have
α s + 1 2 = ϰ 2 ( r 2 s + q 2 s ) ϰ Q 1 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) + ϰ Q 2 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) ϰ 1 Q 3 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) ,
where Q 1 , Q 2 and Q 3 are given by (35)–(37).
Lemma 1 in conjuction with Equation (48) yields
α s + 1 2 ϰ ϰ Q 1 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) + ϰ Q 2 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) ϰ 1 Q 3 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) .
Next, by subtracting (45) from (44), we can determine the bound on α 2 s + 1 , that is
2 1 γ 1 ϱ 1 + 2 s p 1 + 4 γ s ( 1 + 2 s p 1 ξ α 2 s + 1 1 γ 1 ϱ s + 1 1 + 2 s p 1 2 γ s ( s + 1 ) ( 1 + 2 s ) p 1 ξ α s + 1 2 = ϰ ( r 2 s q 2 s ) + ϰ ( ϰ 1 ) 2 ( r s 2 q s 2 ) ,
or
Q 4 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) α 2 s + 1 + Q 5 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) α s + 1 2 = ϰ ( r 2 s q 2 s ) + ϰ ( ϰ 1 ) 2 ( r s 2 q s 2 ) ,
where Q 4 and Q 5 are given in (38) and (39).
After that, taking into account (46), (47) and using Lemma 1, on (49), we arrive at
α 2 s + 1 4 ϰ Q 4 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) + 4 ϰ 2 Q 5 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) Q 4 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) Q 3 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) .
This completes the proof. □
Theorem 4. 
Let ϝ given by (4) be in the class S Σ s ( β , γ , ϱ , ξ , p ) , then
α s + 1 2 ( 1 β ) Q 3 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) ,
and
α 2 s + 1 4 ( 1 β ) Q 4 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) + 4 1 β Q 5 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) Q 3 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) ,
where, Q 1 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) , Q 2 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) , Q 3 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) , Q 4 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) , and Q 5 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) are given by (35)–(39).
Proof. 
Let ϝ S Σ s ( β , γ , ϱ , ξ , p ) , then
1 γ 1 ϱ S p ϝ ( τ ) ϝ ( τ ) ϱ + γ 1 ξ 1 ξ + S p + 1 ϝ ( τ ) S p ϝ ( τ ) = β + ( 1 β ) p ( τ ) ,
moreover, we have for its inverse map g = ϝ 1
1 γ 1 ϱ S p g ( η ) g ( η ) ϱ + γ 1 ξ 1 ξ + S p + 1 g ( η ) S p ( η ) = β + ( 1 β ) q ( η ) ,
where the expressions for p ( τ ) and q ( η ) are given in (13) and (14). The coefficients are now equalised in (50) and (51), we obtain
1 γ 1 ϱ s + 1 p 1 + γ s ( 1 + s p ) 1 ξ α s + 1 = ( 1 β ) r s ,
1 γ 1 ϱ 2 s + 1 p 1 + 2 γ s 1 + 2 s p 1 ξ α 2 s + 1 1 γ 1 ϱ s + 1 p 1 + γ s ( 1 + s 2 p 1 ξ α s + 1 2 = ( 1 β ) r 2 s ,
1 γ 1 ϱ s + 1 p 1 + γ s ( 1 + s p ) 1 ξ α s + 1 = ( 1 β ) q s ,
1 γ 1 ϱ ( s + 1 ) 1 + 2 s p 1 1 + s p 1 + γ 1 ξ 2 s ( 1 + s ) 2 s + 1 p s s + 1 2 p α s + 1 2 1 γ 1 ϱ 2 s + 1 p 1 + 2 γ s ( 1 + 2 s p ) 1 ξ α 2 s + 1 = ( 1 β ) q 2 s .
From (52) and (54) we obtain
r s = q s ,
Adding (53) and (55), we have
2 1 γ 1 ϱ s + 1 p 1 + γ s ( 1 + s p ) 1 ξ 2 α s + 1 2 = ( 1 β ) ( r 2 s + q 2 s ) ,
therefore we have
α s + 1 2 = ( 1 β ) ( r 2 s + q 2 s ) 2 1 γ 1 ϱ s + 1 p 1 + γ s ( 1 + s p ) 1 ξ 2 .
Lemma 1, in conjuction with Equation (58) produced
α s + 1 2 ( 1 β ) Q 3 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) .
Next, by subtracting (55) from (53), we can determine the bound on α 2 s + 1 , that is
Q 4 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) α 2 s + 1 + Q 5 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) α s + 1 2 = ( 1 β ) ( r 2 s q 2 s ) ,
After that, taking into account (56) and (57), and using Lemma 1, on Equation (59), we have
α 2 s + 1 4 ( 1 β ) Q 4 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) + 4 1 β Q 5 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) Q 3 ( γ , ϱ , s , p ) .
As a result, the Theorem 4 proof is achieved. □

4. Conclusions

In the open unit disc E, we introduced a new family of bi-univalent functions that are s-fold symmetric, and we discovered the upper bounds α s + 1 and α 2 s + 1 for the functions falling within the newly defined classes. In Section 3, we also established the coefficient estimates α s + 1 and α 2 s + 1 for a novel family of symmetric bi-univalent functions that are connected with the Salagean differential operator. We examine a number of unique cases from this family, and our findings generalize those from [43,44,48,49,50].
This research glanced at a new family that may lead to further research into a variety of topics, including some unique families of bi-univalent functions using the Hohlov operator connected to the Legendre polynomial [51], the integro-differential operator [52], the q-derivative operator [53], the Fractional q-difference operator [20], the Faber polynomial [41], Modified sigmoid activated function and k-Fibonacci numbers [21], Horadam polynomials involving modified sigmoid [22], Pascal distribution series and Gegenbauer polynomials [23], Gegenbauer polynomial [18], Hankel and Symmetric Toeplitz Determinants for a New Subclass of q-Starlike Functions [54] and so on.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.K.; N.K. and I.A.-s.; methodology, N.K.; S.K. and I.A.-s.; software, S.N.M.; validation, S.N.M. and F.T.; formal analysis, N.K. and F.T.; investigation, S.K.; N.K. and I.A.-s.; resources, S.N.M.; data curation, Q.X. and F.T.; writing—original draft preparation, S.N.M. and N.K.; writing—review and editing, S.N.M. and N.K.; visualization, Q.X. and F.T.; supervision, N.K.; project administration, Q.X.; F.T. and S.N.M.; funding acquisition, F.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the researchers Supporting Project Number (RSP2023R401), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Srivastava, H.M.; Mishra, A.K.; Gochhayat, P. Certain subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions. Appl. Math. Lett. 2010, 23, 1188–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lewin, M. On a coefficient problem for bi-univalent functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1967, 18, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Brannan, D.A.; Clunie, J.G. Aspects of contemporary complex analysis. In Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute Held at the University of Durham; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  4. Netanyahu, E. The minimal distance of the image boundary from the origin and the second coefficient of a univalent function in |z| < 1. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 1969, 32, 100–112. [Google Scholar]
  5. Tan, D.L. Coefficient estimates for bi-univalent functions. Chin. Ann. Math. Ser. A 1984, 5, 559–568. [Google Scholar]
  6. Brannan, D.A.; Taha, T.S. On some classes of bi-univalent functions. Math. Anal. Appl. 1985, 3, 18–21. [Google Scholar]
  7. Khan, M.F.; Al-Shbeil, I.; Aloraini, N.; Khan, N.; Khan, S. Applications of Symmetric Quantum Calculus to the Class of Harmonic Functions. Symmetry 2022, 14, 2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Al-Shbeil, I.; Srivastava, H.M.; Arif, M.; Haq, M.; Khan, N.; Khan, B. Majorization results based upon the Bernardi integral operator. Symmetry 2022, 14, 1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Saliu, A.; Jabeen, K.; Al-Shbeil, I.; Aloraini, N.; Mali, S.N. On q-Limaçon Functions. Symmetry 2022, 14, 2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Al-shbeil, I.; Gong, J.; Shaba, T.G. Coefficients Inequalities for the Bi-Univalent Functions Related to q-Babalola Convolution Operator. Fractal Fract. 2023, 7, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Al-shbeil, N.A.I.; Catas, A.; Srivastava, H.M. Coefficient Estimates of New Families of Analytic Functions Associated with q-Hermite Polynomials. Axioms 2023, 14, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rehman, M.S.U.; Ahmad, Q.Z.; Al-shbeil, I.; Ahmad, S.; Khan, A.; Khan, B.; Gong, J. Coefficient Inequalities for Multivalent Janowski Type q-Starlike Functions Involving Certain Conic Domains. Axioms 2022, 11, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Caglar, M.; Deniz, E.; Srivastava, H.M. Second Hankel determinant for certain subclasses of bi-univalent functions. Turk. J. Math. 2017, 41, 694–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xu, Q.-H.; Xiao, H.-G.; Srivastava, H.M. A certain general subclass of analytic and bi-univalent functions and associated coefficient estimate problems. Appl. Math. Comput. 2012, 218, 11461–11465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Al-Shbeil, I.; Wanas, A.K.; Benali, A.; Cătaş, A. Coefficient Bounds for a Certain Family of Biunivalent Functions Defined by Gegenbauer Polynomials. J. Math. 2022, 2022, 6946424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Al-shbeil, I.; Shaba, T.G.; Catas, A. Second Hankel Determinant for the Subclass of Bi-Univalent Functions Using q-Chebyshev Polynomial and Hohlov Operator. Fractals Fract. 2022, 6, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Al-shbeil, I.; Saliu, A.; Catas, A.; Malik, S.N. Some Geometrical Results Associated with Secant Hyperbolic Functions. Mathematics 2022, 10, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ghazy, A.; Amoush, A.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G. Certain subclasses of -pseudo bi-univalent functions with respect to symmetric points associated with the Gegenbauer polynomial. Afr. Mat. 2023, 34, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yousef, F.; Amourah, A.; Frasin, B.A.; Bulboac, T. An Avant-Garde construction for subclasses of analytic bi-univalent functions. Axioms 2022, 11, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Amini, E.; Omari, S.A.; Nonlaopon, K.; Baleanu, D. Estimates for coefficients of bi-univalent functions associated with a fractional q-difference operator. Symmetry 2022, 14, 879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Saliu, A.; Jabeen, K.; Al-shbeil, I.; Oladejo, S.O. Radius and Differential Subordination Results for Starlikeness Associated with Limaçon Class. J. Funct. Spaces 2022, 2022, 8264693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Swamy, S.R.; Bulut, S.; Sailaja, Y. Some special families of holomorphic and Salagean type bi-univalent functions associated with Horadam polynomials involving modified sigmoid activation function. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 2021, 50, 710–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Amourah, A.; Frasin, B.A.; Ahmad, M.; Yousef, F. Exploiting the Pascal distribution series and Gegenbauer polynomials to construct and study a new subclass of analytic bi-univalent functions. Symmetry 2022, 14, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Brannan, D.A.; Taha, T.S. On some classes of bi-univalent functions. Stud. Univ. Babe Bolyai Math. 1986, 31, 70–77. [Google Scholar]
  25. Srivastava, H.M.; Motamednezhad, A.; Adegani, E.A. Faber polynomial coefficient estimates for bi-univalent functions defined by using differential subordination and a certain fractional derivative operator. Mathematics 2020, 8, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. El-Qadeem, A.H.; Mamon, M.A.; Elshazly, I.S. Application of Einstein function on bi-univalent functions defined on the unit disc. Symmetry 2022, 14, 758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Buyankara, M.; Çaglar, M.; Cotîrla, L.I. New subclasses of bi-univalent functions with respect to the symmetric points defined by Bernoulli polynomials. Axioms 2022, 11, 652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Srivastava, H.M.; Sivasubramanian, S.; Sivakumar, R. Initial coefficient bounds for a subclass of m-fold symmetric bi-univalent functions. Tbilisi Math. J. 2014, 7, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Srivastava, H.M.; Gaboury, S.; Ghanim, F. Coefficients estimate for some subclasses of m-fold symmetric bi-univalent functions. Acta Univ. Apulensis Math. Inform. 2015, 41, 153–164. [Google Scholar]
  30. Srivastava, H.M.; Gaboury, S.; Ghanim, F. Initial coefficients estimate for some subclasses of M-fold symmetric bi-univalent functions. Acta Math. Sci. Ser. B 2016, 36, 863–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Srivastava, H.M.; Zireh, A.; Hajiparvaneh, S. Coefficients estimate for some subclasses of m-fold symmetric bi-univalent functions. Filomat 2018, 32, 3143–3153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sakar, F.M.; Tasar, N. Coefficients bounds for certain subclasses of m-fold symmetric bi-univalent functions. New Trends Math. Sci. 2019, 7, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wanas, A.K.; Páll-Szabó, A.O. Coefficient bounds for new subclasses of analytic and m-fold symmetric bi-univalent functions. Stud. Univ. Babes Bolai Math. 2021, 66, 659–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bulut, S.; Salehian, S.; Motamednezhad, A. Comprehensive subclass of m-fold symmetric biunivalent functions defined by subordination. Afr. Mat. 2021, 32, 531–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Swamy, S.R.; Frasin, B.A.; Aldawish, I. Fekete-Szegö functional problem for a special family of m-fold symmetric bi-univalent functions. Mathematics 2022, 10, 1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Oros, G.I.; Cotîrlă, L.I. Coefficient Estimates and the Fekete–Szegö Problem for new classes of m-fold symmetric bi-univalent functions. Mathematics 2022, 10, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Motamednezhadi, A.; Salehian, S.; Magesh, N. Coefficient estimates for subclass of m-fold symmetric bi-univalent functions. Kragujev. J. Math. 2022, 46, 395–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Aldawish, I.; Swamy, S.R.; Frasin, B.A. A special family of m-fold symmetric bi-univalent functions satisfying subordination condition. Fractal Fract. 2022, 6, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Breaz, D.; Cotîrlă, L.I. The study of coefficient estimates and Fekete–Szegö inequalities for the new classes of m-fold symmetric bi-univalent functions defined using an operator. J. Inequalities Appl. 2023, 2023, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Minda, W.C.; Minda, D. A unified treatment of some special classes of univalent functions. In Proceedings of the Conference on Complex Analysis, Tianjin, China, 19–23 June 1992; Li, T.J., Ren, F., Yang, L., Zhang, S., Eds.; Conference Proceedings and Lecture Notes in Analysis. International Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1994; Volume I, pp. 157–169. [Google Scholar]
  41. Tang, H.; Srivastava, H.M.; Sivasubramanian, S.; Gurusamy, P. Fekete–Szegö functional problems of m-fold symmetric bi-univalent functions. J. Math. Ineq. 2016, 10, 1063–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Motamednezhad, A.; Salehian, S. Certain class of m-fold functions by applying Faber polynomial expansions. Stud. Univ. Babe s-Bolyai Math. 2021, 66, 491–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ali, R.M.; Lee, S.K.; Ravichandran, V.; Supramaniam, S. Coefficient estimates for bi-univalent Ma-Minda starlike and convex functions. Appl. Math. Lett. 2012, 25, 344–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Altinkaya, A.; Yalcinn, S. Coefficient bounds for certain subclasses of m-fold symmetric bi-univalent functions. J. Math. 2015, 2015, 241683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Duren, P.L. Univalent Functions. In Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1983; Volume 259. [Google Scholar]
  46. Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Magesh, N.; Prameela, V. Coefficient bounds for certain subclasses of bi-univalent function. Abst. Appl. Anal. 2013, 2013, 573017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Salagean, G.S. Subclasses of univalent functions. In Complex Analysis, Fifth Romanian–Finnish Seminar, Part 1 (Bucharest, 1981); Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1013; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1983; pp. 362–372. [Google Scholar]
  48. Bulut, S. Coefficient estimates for general subclasses of m-fold symmetric analytic bi-univalent functions. Turk. J. Math. 2016, 40, 1386–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Saliu, A.; Al-Shbeil, I.; Gong, J.; Malik, S.N.; Aloraini, N. Properties of q-Symmetric Starlike Functions of Janowski Type. Symmetry 2022, 14, 1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Al-shbeil, I.; Wanas, A.K.; Saliu, A.; Catas, A. Applications of Beta Negative Binomial Distribution and Laguerre Polynomials on Ozaki Bi-Close-to-Convex Functions. Axioms 2022, 11, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Cotîrla, L.I. Bi-univalent functions of complex order defined by Hohlov operator associated with legendrae polynomial. AIMS Math. 2022, 7, 8733–8750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Páll-Szabó, Á.O.; Oros, G.I. Coefficient related studies for new classes of bi-univalent functions. Mathematics 2020, 8, 1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Srivastava, H.M.; Mostafa, A.O.; Aouf, M.K.; Zayed, H.M. Basic and fractional q-calculus and associated Fekete-Szegö problem for p-valently q-starlike functions and p-valently q-convex functions of complex order. Miskolc. Math. Notes 2019, 20, 489–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Al-shbeil, I.; Gong, J.; Khan, S.; Khan, N.; Khan, A.; Khan, M.F.; Goswami, A. Hankel and Symmetric Toeplitz Determinants for a New Subclass of q-Starlike Functions. Fractals Fract. 2022, 6, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-shbeil, I.; Khan, N.; Tchier, F.; Xin, Q.; Malik, S.N.; Khan, S. Coefficient Bounds for a Family of s-Fold Symmetric Bi-Univalent Functions. Axioms 2023, 12, 317. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12040317

AMA Style

Al-shbeil I, Khan N, Tchier F, Xin Q, Malik SN, Khan S. Coefficient Bounds for a Family of s-Fold Symmetric Bi-Univalent Functions. Axioms. 2023; 12(4):317. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12040317

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al-shbeil, Isra, Nazar Khan, Fairouz Tchier, Qin Xin, Sarfraz Nawaz Malik, and Shahid Khan. 2023. "Coefficient Bounds for a Family of s-Fold Symmetric Bi-Univalent Functions" Axioms 12, no. 4: 317. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12040317

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop