Next Article in Journal
A Fractional COVID-19 Model with Efficacy of Vaccination
Next Article in Special Issue
Simulation of Marine Debris Path Using Mathematical Model in the Gulf of Thailand
Previous Article in Journal
Feature Selection Methods for Extreme Learning Machines
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Variational Principle and Diverse Wave Structures of the Modified Benjamin-Bona-Mahony Equation Arising in the Optical Illusions Field

School of Physics and Electronic Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China
Axioms 2022, 11(9), 445; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11090445
Submission received: 17 August 2022 / Revised: 24 August 2022 / Accepted: 29 August 2022 / Published: 31 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mathematical Modelling and Applications)

Abstract

:
This study focuses on investigating the modified Benjamin-Bona-Mahony equation that is used to model the long wave in nonlinear dispersive media of the optical illusion field. Two effective techniques, the variational direct method and He’s frequency formulation method, are employed to seek the travelling wave solutions. Using these two techniques, abundant exact solutions such as the bright wave, bright-dark wave, bright-like wave, kinky-bright wave and periodic wave solutions, are obtained. The 3-D contours and 2-D curves are drawn to present the dynamic physical behaviors of the solutions by assigning the proper parameters. It shows that the proposed methods are effective but simple and only need one or two steps to construct the exact solutions, which are expected to provide some new insights to study the travelling wave solutions of the PDEs arising in physics.

1. Introduction

In the field of physics, the mathematical analysis of many physical phenomena is reduced to a special mathematical model [1,2,3,4]. This model is often a nonlinear evolution equation [5,6,7]. The soliton theory plays a very important role in the field of nonlinear science. Its application covers almost the entirety of natural science, among which the problem of finding the exact solution of nonlinear evolution equation is of the most concern. Therefore, the study of the exact solution of the nonlinear evolution equation has become an important task [8,9,10]. At present, there are many ideal methods to find the exact solution of the partial differential equations (PDEs), such as the trial equation method [11,12], sine-Gordon expansion method [13,14], generalized (G′/G)-expansion method [15,16], simplified extended tanh-function method [17,18], extended rational sine-cosine and extended rational sinh-cosh techniques [19,20], exp-function method [21,22,23,24], Sardar subequation method [25,26,27,28] and so on [29,30,31,32]. In this work, we focus on the modified Benjamin-Bona-Mahony equation (MBBME) that reads as follows [33]:
ψ t + ψ x + k ψ 2 ψ x + ψ x x t = 0 ,
where k is an arbitrary constant. Thus far, many famous scholars have made outstanding contributions to solving Equation (1). In [34], the exp-function method is used to construct some new soliton solutions. In [35], the modified simple equation is employed to study the problem. In [36], the extended generalized Riccati equation mapping method is adopted to find the exact solutions. Three different effective methods, the extended simplest equation method, modified Kudryashov method and sech-tanh expansion method, are applied in [37]. In [38], the first integral method is adopted to solve Equation (1). The bifurcation method of dynamical systems is used to study Equation (1) in [39]. In [40], the generalized perturbation reduction method is employed. The exp-expansion method is presented to find the abundant solutions of Equation (1) in [41]. Moreover, the modified Khater method is utilized to find the solutions in [42]. In recent years, the variational direct method (VDM) and He’s frequency formulation method (HFFM) have attracted extensive attention since they can construct the travelling wave solutions (TWSs) only in one or two steps. Thus, in this work, we will study the TWSs by applying these two methods. The rest of this paper is arranged as follows. In Section 2, brief introductions to the algorithms of the two effective methods are presented. In Section 3, the VDM and HFFM are employed to find the desired TWSs. In Section 4, the physical explanations are given. Finally, the conclusions and future recommendations are presented in Section 5.

2. The Two Methods

In this section, we will give a brief introduction to the algorithms of the VDM and HFFM.
Consider the PDE with the form as follows:
F ( u , u x , u x x , u x x x ,   , u t ,   ) = 0 .
We introduce the following transformation:
u ( x , t ) = U ( ξ ) ,   ξ = k x + r t ,
where k , r are arbitrary nonzero constants. Applying the transformation, the PDE can be converted into the following ODE:
F ( U , U ξ , U ξ ξ , U ξ ξ ξ ,   ,   ) = 0 .

2.1. The VDM

Applying the semi-inverse method [43,44,45,46,47,48], the variational principle of Equation (4) can be constructed as
J ( U ) = L ( U , U , U , ) d ξ
We obtain the solutions of Equation (4) with the following different forms:
Form one : U ( ξ ) = H 1 sec h ( ξ ) .
Form two : U ( ξ ) = H 2 sinh ( ξ ) [ cosh ( ξ ) ] 3 2  
Form three : U ( ξ ) = H 3 1 + cosh ( ξ ) .
Form four : U ( ξ ) = H 4 sec h 2 ( ξ ) .
Substituting the above forms into Equation (5), respectively, and applying the Ritz-like method [49] with the stationary conditions, we have
Results one : d J d H 1 = 0 .
Results two : d J d H 2 = 0 .
Results three : d J d H 3 = 0 .
Results four : d J d H 4 = 0 .
On solving them, we can determine the expressions of H 1 , H 2 , H 3 and H 4 .
Note: It can be seen that the VDM is based on the stationary condition, so we can obtain the optimal solution. Moreover, the VDM is very simple and can construct the different solutions in two steps.

2.2. The HFFM

Consider Equation (4) with the form as follows:
U + N ( U ) = 0 ,
where U = d 2 U d ξ 2 , N ( U ) is a function about U . Here, we can assume the periodic solution of Equation (6) as
U = Λ cos ( ϖ ξ ) .
Based on the HFFM [50,51,52,53], the amplitude frequency relationship can be determined in one step as
ϖ = d N d U | U = Λ 2 .
Note: It can be easily found that this method is very simple and can construct the periodic solution in one step.

3. Applications

To find the TWSs, we can adopt the wave variable γ = x c t for Equation (1) and obtain an ODE as follows:
c ψ + ψ + k ψ 2 ψ c ψ = 0 ,
where ψ = d ψ d γ , ψ = d 2 ψ d γ 2 . Integrating Equation (9) once and setting the integration constant to zero yields
c ψ + ψ + 1 3 k ψ 3 c ψ = 0 ,
which is
c ψ + ( c 1 ) ψ 1 3 k ψ 3 = 0 .

3.1. The VDM

On the basis of the VDM, we first set up the variational principle of Equation (11) as follows:
J ( ψ ) = 0 { 1 2 c ( ψ ) 2 + 1 2 ( c 1 ) ψ 2 1 12 k ψ 4 } d γ .
The bright wave solution
We assume that Equation (11) has the solution as follows:
ψ 1 ( γ ) = A 1 sech ( γ ) .
Taking this into Equation (12) yields
J ( A 1 ) = 0 { 1 2 c ( ψ ) 2 + 1 2 ( c 1 ) ψ 2 1 12 k ψ 4 } d γ = 0 { 1 2 c [ A 1 sech ( γ ) tanh ( γ ) ] 2 + 1 2 ( c 1 ) [ A 1 sech ( γ ) ] 2 1 12 k [ A 1 sech ( γ ) ] 4 } d γ . = 1 18 A 1 2 ( 9 + A 1 2 k 6 c )
We compute its stationary condition as
d J ( A 1 ) d A 1 = 0 ,
which gives
1 9 A 1 ( 9 + 2 A 1 2 k 6 c ) = 0 .
On solving Equation (16), there is
A 1 = ± 6 c 9 2 k .
Thus, we have
ψ 1 ± ( x , t ) = ± 6 c 9 2 k sech ( x c t ) .
The bright-dark wave solution
We can also assume the solution of Equation (11) as follows:
ψ 2 ( γ ) = A 2 sinh ( γ ) [ cosh ( γ ) ] 3 2 .
Inserting Equation (19) into Equation (12) gives
J ( A 2 ) = 0 { 1 2 c ( ψ ) 2 + 1 2 ( c 1 ) ψ 2 1 12 k ψ 4 } d γ = 0 { 1 2 c [ A 2 [ cosh ( γ ) ] 1 2 3 A 2 sinh 2 ( γ ) 2 [ cosh ( γ ) ] 5 2 ] 2 + 1 2 ( c 1 ) [ A 2 sinh ( γ ) [ cosh ( γ ) ] 3 2 ] 2 1 12 k [ A 2 sinh ( γ ) [ cosh ( γ ) ] 3 2 ] 4 } d γ . = A 2 2 [ 15 ( 16 5 c ) π + 32 A 2 2 k ] 1920
whose stationary condition is
d J ( A 2 ) d A 2 = 0 ,
which yields
A 2 3 k 15 + A 2 ( 16 + 5 c ) π 64 = 0 .
On solving it, we obtain
A 2 = ± 1 8 15 π ( 5 c 16 ) k .
Then, we have the solution of Equation (1) as follows:
ψ 2 ± ( x , t ) = ± 1 8 15 π ( 5 c 16 ) k sinh ( x c t ) [ cosh ( x c t ) ] 3 2 .
The bright-like wave solution
The solution of Equation (11) can be supposed as follows:
ψ 3 ( γ ) = A 3 1 + cosh ( γ ) .
Inserting it into Equation (12), we have
J ( A 3 ) = 0 { 1 2 c ( ψ ) 2 + 1 2 ( c 1 ) ψ 2 1 12 k ψ 4 } d γ = 0 { 1 2 c [ A 3 sinh ( γ ) [ 1 + cosh ( γ ) ] 2 ] 2 + 1 2 ( c 1 ) [ A 3 1 + cosh ( γ ) ] 2 1 12 k [ A 3 1 + cosh ( γ ) ] 4 } d γ . = A 3 2 ( 35 + A 3 2 k 28 c ) 210
We take its stationary condition as
d J ( A 3 ) d A 3 = 0 .
We have
A 3 ( 35 + 2 A 3 2 k 28 c ) 105 = 0 .
Form Equation (28), there is
A 3 = ± 7 ( 4 c 5 ) 2 k .
Thus, the third solution of Equation (1) is found as follows:
ψ 3 ± ( γ ) = ± 7 ( 4 c 5 ) 2 k 1 1 + cosh ( x c t ) .
The kinky-bright wave solution
We can also assume the solution of Equation (11) as follows:
ψ 4 ( γ ) = A 4 sech 2 ( γ ) .
Substituting Equation (31) into Equation (32) leads to
J ( A 4 ) = 0 { 1 2 c ( ψ ) 2 + 1 2 ( c 1 ) ψ 2 1 12 ψ 4 } d γ = 0 { 1 2 c [ 2 A 4 sech 2 ( γ ) tanh ( γ ) ] 2 + 1 2 ( c 1 ) [ A 4 sech 2 ( γ ) ] 2 1 12 k [ A 4 sech 2 ( γ ) ] 4 } d γ . = 1 105 A 4 2 ( 35 + 4 A 4 2 k 7 c )
Using its stationary condition,
d J ( A 4 ) d A 4 = 0 .
In other words,
2 105 A 4 ( 35 + 8 A 4 2 k 7 c ) = 0 .
Solving the above equation gives
A 4 = ± 1 2 7 ( c 5 ) 2 k .
Then, we attain the fourth solution:
ψ 4 ± ( x , t ) = ± 1 2 7 ( c 5 ) 2 k sech 2 ( x c t ) .

3.2. The HFFM

To apply the HFFM, we first rewrite Equation (11) as
ψ + c 1 c ψ k 3 c ψ 3 = 0 ,
which is
ψ + ( ψ ) = 0 ,
where
( ψ ) = c 1 c ψ k 3 c ψ 3
The periodic wave solution
We assume that the periodic solution of Equation (37) has the following form:
ψ 5 ( γ ) = A 5 cos ( ω γ ) ,   ω > 0 .
In view of the HFFM, the amplitude–frequency relationship can be determined at once as
ω = d d ψ | ψ = A 5 2 ,
which leads to
ω = c 1 c k A 5 2 4 c > 0 .
Then, the periodic wave solution of Equation (1) is obtained as follows:
ψ 5 ( x , t ) = A 5 cos [ c 1 c k A 5 2 4 c ( x c t ) ] .

4. Results and Discussion

The main purpose of this section is to elaborate the physical interpretation of the solutions by assigning proper parameters.
By using k = 1 , c = 6 , the behavior of ψ 1 + ( x , t ) is as presented in Figure 1, where Figure 1a is the 3-D plot and Figure 1b is the 2-D curve for t = 0 . Obviously, we can find that the profile of ψ 1 + ( x , t ) is the bright wave, which represents the bright soliton propagating along the x-axis.
Assigning the same parameters, we illustrate the dynamic characteristics of ψ 2 + ( x , t ) through the 3-D plot and 2-D curve in Figure 2. By observation, it can be seen that the outline of ψ 2 + ( x , t ) is the bright-dark wave.
Figure 3 and Figure 4 plot the behaviors of ψ 3 + ( x , t ) and ψ 4 + ( x , t ) , respectively, with k = 1 , c = 6 . It can be noticed that they are kinky-bright and bright-like waves, respectively, which both have the characteristics of bright solitary waves.
If we choose the parameters as A 5 = 1 , k = 1 , c = 6 , the performance of ψ 5 + ( x , t ) is as described in Figure 5. As predicted, the contour of ψ 5 + ( x , t ) is a perfect periodic wave.
Note: The obtained different wave structures can enable us to better understand the physical characteristics and essential characteristics of the problem studied.

5. Conclusions and Future Recommendations

This work describes a detailed study of the modified Benjamin–Bona–Mahony equation. Two effective techniques, namely the variational direct method and He’s frequency formulation method, are adopted to find the travelling wave solutions, and different forms of the solutions, such as the bright wave, bright-dark wave, bright-like wave, kinky-bright wave and periodic wave solutions, are constructed. It shows that the proposed methods are simple and straightforward, and they can obtain the travelling wave solutions through one or two steps. The results in this paper have potential to open some new horizons in the study of the variational theory and travelling wave solutions of the PDEs in physics.
In recent years, fractal and fractional calculus have attracted extensive attention in various fields [54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62]. The question of how to use the proposed methods to solve fractional PDEs will be our future research direction.

Funding

This work is supported by the Key Programs of Universities in Henan Province of China (22A140006), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Universities of Henan Province (NSFRF210324) and the Program of Henan Polytechnic University (B2018-40).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Sohail, M.; Chu, Y.M.; El-Zahar, E.R.; Nazir, U.; Naseem, T. Contribution of joule heating and viscous dissipation on three dimensional flow of Casson model comprising temperature dependent conductance utilizing shooting method. Phys. Scr. 2021, 96, 085208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Biswas, A. Optical soliton cooling with polynomial law of nonlinear refractive index. J. Opt. 2020, 49, 580–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, K.J.; Liu, J.H. A fast insight into the nonlinear oscillators with coordinate-dependent mass. Results Phys. 2022, 39, 105759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ali, K.K.; Yilmazer, R.; Baskonus, H.M.; Bulut, H. New wave behaviors and stability analysis of the Gilson–Pickering equation in plasma physics. Indian J. Phys. 2021, 95, 1003–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Biswas, A.; Kara, A.H.; Sun, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Yıldırım, Y.; Alshehri, H.M.; Belic, M.R. Conservation laws for pure-cubic optical solitons with complex Ginzburg-Landau equation having several refractive index structures. Results Phys. 2021, 31, 104901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sohail, M.; Nazir, U.; Bazighifan, O.; El-Nabulsi, R.A.; Selim, M.M.; Alrabaiah, H.; Thounthong, P. Significant involvement of double diffusion theories on viscoelastic fluid comprising variable thermophysical properties. Micromachines 2021, 12, 951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Attia, R.A.M.; Baleanu, D.; Lu, D.; Khater, M.M.; Ahmed, E.S. Computational and numerical simulations for the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) model. Discret. Contin. Dyn. Syst. S 2021, 14, 3459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, K.J.; Shi Feng Liu, J.H.; Si, J. Application of the extended F-expansion method for solving the fractional Gardner equation with conformable fractional derivative. Fractals 2022, 30, 2250139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yan, Y.Y.; Liu, W.J. Soliton rectangular pulses and bound states in a dissipative system modeled by the variable-coefficients complex cubic-quintic Ginzburg-Landau equation. Chin. Phys. Lett. 2021, 38, 094201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, K.J. Investigation to the local fractional Fokas system on Cantor set by a novel technology. Fractals 2022, 30, 2250112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gurefe, Y.; Misirli, E.; Sonmezoglu, A.; Ekici, M. Extended trial equation method to generalized nonlinear partial differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 2013, 219, 5253–5260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hu, J.Y.; Feng, X.B.; Yang, Y.F. Optical envelope patterns perturbation with full nonlinearity for Gerdjikov–Ivanov equation by trial equation method. Optik 2021, 240, 166877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Baskonus, H.M.; Bulut, H.; Sulaiman, T.A. New complex hyperbolic structures to the lonngren-wave equation by using sine-gordon expansion method. Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci. 2019, 4, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yel, G.; Baskonus, H.M.; Bulut, H. Novel archetypes of new coupled Konno-Oono equation by using sine-Gordon expansion method. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2017, 49, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Alam, M.N.; Akbar, M.A. Exact traveling wave solutions of the KP-BBM equation by using the new approach of generalized (G′/G)-expansion method. SpringerPlus 2013, 2, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Teymuri Sindi, C.; Manafian, J. Wave solutions for variants of the KdV-Burger and the K (n, n)-Burger equations by the generalized G′/G-expansion method. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2017, 40, 4350–4363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, K.J. Abundant analytical solutions to the new coupled Konno-Oono equation arising in magnetic field. Results Phys. 2021, 31, 104931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zahran, E.H.M.; Khater, M.M.A. Modified extended tanh-function method and its applications to the Bogoyavlenskii equation. Appl. Math. Model. 2016, 40, 1769–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mahak, N.; Akram, G. Exact solitary wave solutions by extended rational sine-cosine and extended rational sinh-cosh techniques. Phys. Scr. 2019, 94, 115212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, K.J.; Liu, J.-H.; Wu, J. Soliton solutions to the Fokas system arising in monomode optical fibers. Optik 2022, 251, 168319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zulfiqar, A.; Ahmad, J. Soliton solutions of fractional modified unstable Schrödinger equation using Exp-function method. Results Phys. 2020, 19, 103476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, K.J. Traveling wave solutions of the Gardner equation in dusty plasmas. Results Phys. 2022, 33, 105207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. He, J.H.; Wu, X.H. Exp-function method for nonlinear wave equations. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2006, 30, 700–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, K.J. Abundant exact soliton solutions to the Fokas system. Optik 2022, 249, 168265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rehman, H.U.; Seadawy, A.R.; Younis, M.; Yasin, S.; Raza, S.T.; Althobaiti, S. Monochromatic optical beam propagation of paraxial dynamical model in Kerr media. Results Phys. 2021, 31, 105015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, K.J.; Liu, J.H. On abundant wave structures of the unsteady korteweg-de vries equation arising in shallow water. J. Ocean. Eng. Sci. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rehman, H.U.; Ullah, N.; Imran, M.A. Exact solutions of Kudryashov–Sinelshchikov equation using two analytical techniques. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2021, 136, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, K.J. Generalized variational principles and new abundant wave structures of the fractal coupled Boussinesq equation. Fractals 2022, 30, 2250152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bilal, M.; Seadawy, A.R.; Younis, M.; Rizvi, S.T.R.; Zahed, H. Dispersive of propagation wave solutions to unidirectional shallow water wave Dullin–Gottwald–Holm system and modulation instability analysis. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2021, 44, 4094–4104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Seadawy, A.R.; Ali, A.; Albarakati, W.A. Analytical wave solutions of the (2+1)-dimensional first integro-differential Kadomtsev-Petviashivili hierarchy equation by using modified mathematical methods. Results Phys. 2019, 15, 102775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Seadawy, A.R.; Iqbal, M.; Lu, D. Application of mathematical methods on the ion sound and Langmuir waves dynamical systems. Pramana J. Phys. 2019, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, K.J. A fast insight into the optical solitons of the generalized third-order nonlinear Schrödinger’s equation. Results Phys. 2022, 40, 105872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gupta, A.K.; Hazarika, J. On the solitary wave solutions of modified Benjamin-Bona-Mahony equation for unidirectional propagation of long waves. Pramana 2020, 94, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Noor, M.A.; Noor, K.I.; Waheed, A.; Al-Said, E.A. Some new solitonary solutions of the modified Benjamin-Bona-Mahony equation. Comput. Math. Appl. 2011, 62, 2126–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Khan, K.; Akbar, M.A.; Alam, M.N. Traveling wave solutions of the nonlinear Drinfel’d–Sokolov–Wilson equation and modified Benjamin-Bona-Mahony equations. J. Egypt. Math. Soc. 2013, 21, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Naher, H.; Abdullah, F.A. The modified Benjamin-Bona-Mahony equation via the extended generalized Riccati equation mapping method. Appl. Math. Sci. 2012, 6, 5495–5512. [Google Scholar]
  37. Khater, M.M.A.; Salama, S.A. Semi-analytical and numerical simulations of the modified Benjamin-Bona-Mahony model. J. Ocean. Eng. Sci. 2022, 7, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Abbasbandy, S.; Shirzadi, A. The first integral method for modified Benjamin-Bona-Mahony equation. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2010, 15, 1759–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Song, M. Nonlinear wave solutions and their relations for the modified Benjamin–Bona–Mahony equation. Nonlinear Dyn. 2015, 80, 431–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tariq, K.U.; Seadawy, A.R. On the soliton solutions to the modified Benjamin-Bona-Mahony and coupled Drinfel’d-Sokolov-Wilson models and its applications. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2020, 32, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Khan, K.; Akbar, M.A. Application of exp-expansion method to find the exact solutions of modified Benjamin-Bona-Mahony equation. World Appl. Sci. J. 2013, 24, 1373–1377. [Google Scholar]
  42. Khater, M.M.; Nofal, T.A.; Abu-Zinadah, H.; Lotayif, M.S.; Lu, D. Novel computational and accurate numerical solutions of the modified Benjamin–Bona–Mahony (BBM) equation arising in the optical illusions field. Alex. Eng. J. 2021, 60, 1797–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. He, J.-H. Semi-Inverse method of establishing generalized variational principles for fluid mechanics with emphasis on turbomachinery aerodynamics. Int. J. Turbo Jet Engines 1997, 14, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. He, J.-H. A family of variational principles for compressible rotational blade-toblade flow using semi-inverse method. Int. J. Turbo Jet Engines 1998, 15, 95–100. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang, K.J.; Shi, F.; Liu, J.H. A fractal modification of the Sharma-Tasso-Olver equation and its fractal generalized variational principle. Fractals 2022, 30, 2250121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, K.L.; Wang, H. Fractal variational principles for two different types of fractal plasma models with variable coefficients. Fractals 2022, 30, 2250043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cao, X.Q.; Hou, S.C.; Guo, Y.N.; Zhang, C.Z.; Peng, K.C. Variational principle for (2+1)-dimensional Broer–Kaup equations with fractal derivatives. Fractals 2020, 28, 2050107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, K.J.; Wang, J.F. Generalized variational principles of the Benney-Lin equation arising in fluid dynamics. Europhys. Lett. 2022, 139, 33006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, K.J.; Si, J. Investigation into the Explicit Solutions of the Integrable (2+1)-Dimensional Maccari System via the Variational Approach. Axioms 2022, 11, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. He, J.H. The simplest approach to nonlinear oscillators. Results Phys. 2019, 15, 102546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, K.J. A fast insight into the nonlinear oscillation of nano-electro mechanical resonators considering the size effect and the van der Waals force. Europhys. Lett. 2022, 139, 23001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. He, J.H. The simpler, the better: Analytical methods for nonlinear oscillators and fractional oscillators. J. Low Freq. Noise Vib. Act. Control. 2019, 38, 1252–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, K.J.; Wang, G.D. Exact traveling wave solutions for the system of the ion sound and Langmuir waves by using three effective methods. Results Phys. 2022, 35, 105390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. He, J.H.; Ji, F.Y. Two-scale mathematics and fractional calculus for thermodynamics. Therm. Sci. 2019, 23, 2131–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, K.J. Exact traveling wave solutions to the local fractional (3+1)-dimensional Jimbo-Miwa equation on Cantor sets. Fractals 2022, 30, 2250102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, K.J. Abundant exact traveling wave solutions to the local fractional (3+1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Manna-Pempinelli equation. Fractals 2022, 30, 2250064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ahmad, S.; Ullah, A.; Al-Mdallal, Q.M.; Khan, H.; Shah, K.; Khan, A. Fractional order mathematical modeling of COVID-19 transmission. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2020, 139, 110256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Singh, J.; Ganbari, B.; Kumar, D.; Baleanu, D. Analysis of fractional model of guava for biological pest control with memory effect. J. Adv. Res. 2021, 32, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, K.L. Novel approach for fractal nonlinear oscillators with discontinuities by Fourier series. Fractals 2022, 30, 2250009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bartolomei, H.; Kumar, M.; Bisognin, R.; Marguerite, A.; Berroir, J.M.; Bocquillon, E.; Placais, B.; Cavanna, A.; Dong, Q.; Gennser, U.; et al. Fractional statistics in anyon collisions. Science 2020, 368, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, K.J.; Si, J. On the non-differentiable exact solutions of the (2+1)-dimensional local fractional breaking soliton equation on Cantor sets. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. He, C.H.; Liu, C.; He, J.H.; Gepreel, K.A. Low frequency property of a fractal vibration model for a concrete beam. Fractals 2021, 29, 2150117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The dynamic characteristics of ψ 1 + ( x , t ) with k = 1 , c = 6 . (a) 3-D plot, (b) 2-D curve for t = 0 .
Figure 1. The dynamic characteristics of ψ 1 + ( x , t ) with k = 1 , c = 6 . (a) 3-D plot, (b) 2-D curve for t = 0 .
Axioms 11 00445 g001
Figure 2. The dynamic characteristics of ψ 2 + ( x , t ) with k = 1 , c = 6 . (a) 3-D plot, (b) 2-D curve for t = 0 .
Figure 2. The dynamic characteristics of ψ 2 + ( x , t ) with k = 1 , c = 6 . (a) 3-D plot, (b) 2-D curve for t = 0 .
Axioms 11 00445 g002
Figure 3. The dynamic characteristics of ψ 3 + ( x , t ) . with k = 1 , c = 6 . (a) 3-D plot, (b) 2-D curve for t = 0 .
Figure 3. The dynamic characteristics of ψ 3 + ( x , t ) . with k = 1 , c = 6 . (a) 3-D plot, (b) 2-D curve for t = 0 .
Axioms 11 00445 g003
Figure 4. The dynamic characteristics of ψ 4 + ( x , t ) with k = 1 , c = 6 . (a) 3-D plot, (b) 2-D curve for t = 0 .
Figure 4. The dynamic characteristics of ψ 4 + ( x , t ) with k = 1 , c = 6 . (a) 3-D plot, (b) 2-D curve for t = 0 .
Axioms 11 00445 g004
Figure 5. The dynamic characteristics of ψ 5 + ( x , t ) with A 5 = 1 , k = 1 , c = 6 . (a) 3-D plot, (b) 2-D curve for t = 0 .
Figure 5. The dynamic characteristics of ψ 5 + ( x , t ) with A 5 = 1 , k = 1 , c = 6 . (a) 3-D plot, (b) 2-D curve for t = 0 .
Axioms 11 00445 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, K.-J. Variational Principle and Diverse Wave Structures of the Modified Benjamin-Bona-Mahony Equation Arising in the Optical Illusions Field. Axioms 2022, 11, 445. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11090445

AMA Style

Wang K-J. Variational Principle and Diverse Wave Structures of the Modified Benjamin-Bona-Mahony Equation Arising in the Optical Illusions Field. Axioms. 2022; 11(9):445. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11090445

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Kang-Jia. 2022. "Variational Principle and Diverse Wave Structures of the Modified Benjamin-Bona-Mahony Equation Arising in the Optical Illusions Field" Axioms 11, no. 9: 445. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11090445

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop