Next Article in Journal
Dynamical Analysis of a Modified Epidemic Model with Saturated Incidence Rate and Incomplete Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Approach for Dynamic Parameter Adaptation in the Bird Swarm Algorithm for the Optimization of Fuzzy Medical Classifier
Previous Article in Journal
Total Rainbow Connection Number of Some Graph Operations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Statistically Convergent Sequences in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Metric Spaces
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

On the Generalized Gaussian Fibonacci Numbers and Horadam Hybrid Numbers: A Unified Approach

by
Fatih Yılmaz
1,† and
Mustafa Özkan
2,*,†
1
Department of Mathematics, Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University, Polatlı, Ankara 06900, Turkey
2
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, Gazi University, Yenimahalle, Ankara 06500, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Axioms 2022, 11(6), 255; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11060255
Submission received: 28 March 2022 / Revised: 9 May 2022 / Accepted: 23 May 2022 / Published: 26 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Mathematics and Its Applications)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we consider an approach based on the elementary matrix theory. In other words, we take into account the generalized Gaussian Fibonacci numbers. In this context, we consider a general tridiagonal matrix family. Then, we obtain determinants of the matrix family via the Chebyshev polynomials. Moreover, we consider one type of tridiagonal matrix, whose determinants are Horadam hybrid polynomials, i.e., the most general form of hybrid numbers. Then, we obtain its determinants by means of the Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind. We provided several illustrative examples, as well.

1. Introduction

The second-order homogeneous linear recurrence { w n w n ( a , b ; p , q ) } is defined by A. F. Horadam as below:
w n = p w n 1 q w n 2 , f o r   n 2 ,
with initial conditions
w 0 = a a n d w 1 = b ,
for arbitrary integers a and b (Section 3, [1]). This is one of the possible extensions of some well-known number sequences and some of them have been listed in Table 1.
Recently, by inspiring the Horadam sequence, the generalized Gaussian Fibonacci sequence G f n + 1 ( p , q ; a , b ) is defined by the following way:
G f n + 1 = p G f n + q G f n 1 , G f 0 = a and G f 1 = b ,
where a and b are initial conditions, see [2,3]. Some well-known special kind of the generalized Gaussian type sequences can be given in the Table 2.
In the literature, there are a huge amount of papers that investigate distinct types of the subsequences of the generalized Gaussian Fibonacci numbers. For example, in [4], the authors define the nth generalized complex Fibonacci number and obtain some of their identities. In [5], the authors introduce the concept of the complex Fibonacci numbers and establish some quite general identities concerning them. In [6], the authors define and study the Gaussian Jacobsthal and Gaussian Jacobsthal Lucas polynomials. Moreover, they give the generating function, Binet formula, explicit formula, Q matrix, determinantal representations, and partial derivation of these polynomials. In [7], the authors consider the generalized Gaussian Fibonacci and Lucas sequences and define the Gaussian Pell and Gaussian Pell–Lucas sequences. Moreover they give the generating functions and Binet formulas for them. The authors, in [8], introduce a new class of quaternions associated with the well-known Mersenne numbers. They extend the usual definitions into a wider structure by using arbitrary Mersenne numbers. In [9], the authors extend the Bronze Fibonacci number to the Gaussian Bronze Fibonacci number. Moreover, they obtain Binet formula, generating function and some identities for them. In [10], the authors define generalized k-Mersenne numbers and give a formula of generalized Mersenne polynomials and further they define Gaussian Mersenne numbers and obtain some identities.
Table 3 presents recurrence relations and some values of some kinds of the generalized Gaussian Fibonacci numbers.
On the other hand, the connection between particular cases of the Horadam sequence and the Chebyshev polynomials of the several kinds, has been a topic of research for decades. Note that,
T n = p 1 q 1 q p n × n ,
we have (cf., e.g., [11,12])
det T n = q n U n p 2 q ,
and the first explicit formula to the Horadam sequence in terms of Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind is given below [13]:
w n = q n b q U n 1 p 2 q a U n 1 p 2 q ,
where { U n ( x ) } n 0 are the Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind satisfying the three-term recurrence relations
U n + 1 ( x ) 2 x U n ( x ) + U n 1 ( x ) = 0 , f o r n = 0 , 1 , 2 , ,
with initial conditions U 1 ( x ) = 0 and U 0 ( x ) = 1 . One of the most well-known explicit formulas for these polynomials is
U n ( x ) = sin ( n + 1 ) θ sin θ , w i t h x = cos θ ( 0 θ < π ) ,
for all n = 0 , 1 , 2 . The Chebyshev polynomials of the third kind can be stated by means of the Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind as below:
V n ( x ) = U n ( x ) U n 1 ( x ) .
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we take into account the generalized Gaussian Fibonacci numbers. In this context, we consider a general form of tridiagonal matrix. Then, we obtain their determinants by exploiting the Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind. Subsequently, we give relationships between the determinants of some special forms of these matrices and some types of generalized Gaussian Fibonacci numbers. In Section 3, we consider the Horadam hybrid polynomials which is the most general form of the hybrid numbers. In this circumstance, it is known that the Horadam hybrid polynomials can be obtained by means of the determinants of tridiagonal matrices. By considering these type of matrices, we give the Horadam hybrid polynomials by means of the Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind. In other words, we represent good relationships between tridiagonal matrices, Chebyshev polynomials and the generalized Gaussian Fibonacci numbers and the Horadam hybrid polynomials. Finally, we give some illustrative examples.

2. On Generalized Gaussian Fibonacci Numbers

At this section, we consider the generalized Gaussian Fibonacci numbers. Let us define a tridiagonal matrix in the following form:
T n ( a , b , c ) = 1 a 1 c b 1 c b 1 c .
Here our first aim is to obtain the determinants of the matrix T n ( a , b , c ) by exploiting the Chebyshev polynomials and give its relationship with generalized Gaussian Fibonacci numbers.
Lemma 1
([14]). Let { H n , n = 1 , 2 , } be a sequence of tridiagonal matrices of the form:
H n = h 11 h 12 h 21 h 22 h 23 h 32 h 33 h n 1 , 1 h n , n 1 h n , n .
Then, the successive determinants of H n are given by the recursive formula:
H 1 = h 11 , H 2 = h 11 h 22 h 12 h 21 , H n = h n , n H n 1 h n 1 , n h n , n 1 H n 2 .
Theorem 1.
The determinant of the matrix T n ( a , b , c ) is
d e t T n ( a , b , c ) = ( i b ) n 1 U n 1 i c 2 b + i b U n 2 i c 2 b a b .
Proof. 
Taking into account the Lemma 1 and exploiting some perturbations of tridiagonal matrices, see [11,15,16], the proof can be verified. □
Theorem 2.
For n > 1 ,
G F n = ( i ) n 1 V n 1 i 2 ,
G P n = ( i ) n 1 V n 1 i ,
G B n = ( i ) n 1 V n 1 3 i 2 ,
where V n is the nth Chebyshev polynomial of third kind.
Proof. 
Taking into account (1), (2) and substituting some values for a, b, and c in Theorem 1, one can see the determinants as below:
d e t T n ( i , 1 , 1 ) = ( i ) n 1 U n 1 i 2 U n 2 i 2 = ( i ) n 1 V n 1 i 2 = G F n ,
d e t T n ( i , 1 , 2 ) = ( i ) n 1 U n 1 i U n 2 i = ( i ) n 1 V n 1 i = G P n ,
d e t T n ( i , 1 , 3 ) = ( i ) n 1 U n 1 3 i 2 U n 2 3 i 2 = ( i ) n 1 V n 1 3 i 2 = G B n .
Corollary 1.
For n > 2 ,
d e t T n ( i , 2 , 3 ) = ( 2 ) n 1 U n 1 3 2 2 + i 2 2 U n 2 3 2 2 = G M n ,
d e t T n ( i , 2 , 1 ) = ( i 2 ) n 1 U n 1 i 2 2 1 2 U n 2 i 2 2 = G J n .
Proof. 
It is clear from (1), (2) and Theorem 1. □
As an illustration of the Theorem 2, we analyze some particular cases of the matrix. Let us consider the matrix T n ( i , 1 , 1 ) . In other words, it corresponds the following matrix:
Example 1.
Let us consider T 6 ( i , 1 , 1 ) ,
T 6 ( i , 1 , 1 ) = 1 i 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1
then
det T 6 ( i , 1 , 1 ) = ( i ) 5 V 5 i 2 = 32 i 2 5 16 i 2 4 32 i 2 3 + 12 i 2 2 + 6 i 2 1 = 8 + 5 i = G F 6 ,
where G F 6 denotes the 6th Gaussian Fibonacci number.
Example 2.
Let us consider T 5 ( i , 1 , 2 ) ,
T 5 ( i , 1 , 2 ) = 1 i 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 2
then
det T 5 ( i , 1 , 2 ) = ( i ) 4 V 4 i = 16 i 4 8 i 3 12 i 2 4 i + 1 = 29 + 12 i = G P 5 ,
where G P 5 denotes the 5th Gaussian Pell number.
Example 3.
Let us consider T 5 ( i , 2 , 3 ) ,
T 5 ( i , 2 , 3 ) = 1 i 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 1 3
then
d e t T 5 ( i , 1 , 3 ) = ( i ) 4 V 4 3 i 2 = 16 3 i 2 4 8 3 i 2 3 12 3 i 2 2 4 3 i 2 + 1 = 109 + 33 i = G B 5 ,
where G B 5 denotes the 5th Gaussian Bronze number.

3. A General Identity for Horadam Hybrid Numbers

Recently, the geometric and physical applications of complex, hyperbolic, and dual numbers have been thoroughly studied. In [17], M. Özdemir introduced the hybrid numbers as
Z = a + b i + c ϵ + d h ,
where a , b , c R with i , ϵ , h satisfying
i 2 = 1 , ϵ 2 = 0 , h 2 = 1 , i h = h i = ϵ + i .
Considering this extension, new results have been published in the literature. The reader is referred to [18,19,20,21,22,23,24] and the references therein.
In [25], the nth Horadam hybrid number, denoted by H n , was introduced and several properties discussed. Its definition is
H n = W n + i W n + 1 + ϵ W n + 2 + h W n + 3 ,
where W n is the nth Horadam number.
Finally, in [26], the author introduced the so-called Horadam hybrinomials. For n 1 , the nth Horadam hybrinomial is defined by
H n ( x ) = h n ( x ) + h n + 1 ( x ) i + h n + 2 ( x ) ϵ + h n + 3 ( x ) h .
Moreover, Horadam hybrinomials stated via determinant of matrices, as below:
det M n ( x ) = H n + 1 ( x ) ,
where
M n ( x ) = H 2 ( x ) H 1 ( x ) q p x 1 q p x 1 q p x 1 q p x .
The connection between particular cases of the Horadam sequence and the Chebyshev polynomials are well-known. The reader is referred, for example, to [13,27]. Here, we consider the matrix M n ( x ) , we can represent the Horadam hybrid polynomials, by means of the Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind, as
H n + 1 ( x ) = ( i q ) n 1 U n 1 i p x 2 q H 2 ( x ) + i q U n 2 i p x 2 q H 1 ( x ) ,
where
H 1 ( x ) = a + b x i + ( p b x 2 + q a ) ϵ + ( p 2 b x 3 + [ p q a + q b ] x ) h , H 2 ( x ) = b x + ( p b x 2 + q a ) i + ( p 2 b x 3 + [ p q a + q b ] x ) ϵ + ( [ p 2 b x 3 + ( p q a + q b ) x 2 ] p x + q [ p b x 2 + q a ] ) h .
Some special cases of Horadam hybrinomials are given in the Table 4.
Notice that if x = 1 , then
(i)
F H n ( 1 ) is the nth Fibonacci hybrid number,
(ii)
L H n 1 ( 1 ) is the ( n 1 ) th Lucas hybrid number,
(iii)
P H n ( 1 ) is the nth Pell hybrid number,
(iv)
Q H n 1 ( 1 ) is the ( n 1 ) th Pell-Lucas hybrid number.
As an illustrative example, setting n = 15 , a = 1 , b = 1 , p = 1 , and q = 1 , we obtain the Fibonacci hybrid polynomial F H 15 ( x ) . In other words,
F H 15 ( x ) = H 16 ( x ) = ( i q ) 14 U 14 i p x 2 q H 2 ( x ) + i q U 13 i p x 2 q H 1 ( x ) = ( i ) 14 U 14 i x 2 H 2 ( x ) + i U 13 i x 2 H 1 ( x ) ,
where
H 1 ( x ) = 1 + x i + ( x 2 + 1 ) ϵ + ( x 3 + 2 x ) h , H 2 ( x ) = x + ( x 2 + 1 ) i + ( x 3 + 2 x ) ϵ + ( x 4 + 3 x 2 + 1 ) h .
If we make x = 1 , then the above equation gives the 15th Fibonacci hybrid number. By following the same way, for n = 5 , a = 1 , b = 2 , p = 2 , and q = 1 , the Pell hybrid polynomials are represented by
P H 5 ( x ) = H 6 ( x ) = ( i ) 4 U 4 2 i x 2 H 2 ( x ) + i U 3 2 i x 2 H 1 ( x ) = ( 1 + 20 x 2 + 32 x 4 ) + ( 6 x + 48 x 3 + 64 x 5 ) i + ( 1 + 32 x 2 + 128 x 4 + 128 x 6 ) ϵ + ( 112 x 3 + 8 x + 320 x 5 + 256 x 7 ) h ,
where
H 1 ( x ) = 1 + 2 x i + ( 4 x 2 + 1 ) ϵ + ( 8 x 3 + 4 x ) h , H 2 ( x ) = 2 x + ( 4 x 2 + 1 ) i + ( 8 x 3 + 4 x ) ϵ + ( 16 x 4 + 12 x 2 + 1 ) h .

4. Conclusions

In this paper, we initially focus on general form of tridiagonal matrices and express their determinants by exploiting Chebyshev polynomials of second kind. Then, we consider the most general form of the several Gaussian Fibonacci numbers that is the generalized Gaussian Fibonacci numbers and the most general form of hybrid numbers that is the Horadam hybrid polynomials. Substituting various values into the statements of the matrices T n ( a , b , c ) and M n ( x ) , one can obtain distinct subsequences of the generalized Gaussian Fibonacci numbers and Horadam hybrid numbers. Finally, we give some illustrative examples. To sum up, we obtain relationships between general types of tridiagonal matrices and the generalized Gaussian Fibonacci numbers and the Horadam hybrid polynomials which are the most general forms of their well-known subsequences.

Author Contributions

The authors F.Y. and M.Ö. contributed equally to this work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Horadam, A.F. Generating Functions for Powers of A Certain Generalised Sequence of Numbers. Duke Math. J. 1965, 68, 437–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pethe, S.; Horadam, A.F. Generalized Gaussian Fibonacci Numbers. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 1986, 33, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Arslan, H. Gaussian Pell and Gaussian Pell-Lucas Quaternions. Filomat 2021, 35, 1609–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Horadam, A.F. Complex Fibonacci Numbers and Fibonacci Quaternions. Am. Math. Mon. 1963, 70, 289–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jordan, H. Gaussian Fibonacci and Lucas Numbers. Fibonacci Q. 1965, 3, 315–318. [Google Scholar]
  6. Aşcı, M.; Gürel, E. Gaussian Jacobsthal and Gaussian Jacobsthal-Lucas Numbers. Ars Comb. 2013, 111, 53–63. [Google Scholar]
  7. Halıcı, S.; Oz, S. On Some Gaussian Pell and Pell-Lucas Numbers. Ordu Univ. J. Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 8–18. [Google Scholar]
  8. Daşdemir, A.; Bilgici, G. Gaussian Mersenne Numbers and Generalized Mersenne Quaternions. Notes Number Theory Discret. Math. 2019, 25, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kartal, M.Y. Gaussian Bronze Fibonacci Numbers. EJONS Int. J. Math. Eng. Nat. Sci. 2020, 13, 19–25. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kumari, M.; Tanti, J.; Prasad, K. On Some New Families of k-Mersenne and Generalized k-Gaussian Mersenne Numbers and Their Polynomials. 2021. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.09592 (accessed on 25 January 2022).
  11. Andelic, M.; da Fonseca, C.M.; Yılmaz, F. The bi-Periodic Horadam Sequence and Some Perturbed Tridiagonal 2-Toeplitz Matrices: A Unified Approach. Heliyon 2022, 8, e08863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Da Fonseca, C.M. Unifying Some Pell and Fibonacci Identities. Appl. Math. Comput. 2014, 236, 41–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Udrea, G. A Note on The Sequence (Wn)n≥0 of A.F. Horadam. Port. Math. 1996, 53, 143–155. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cahil, N.D.; D’Errico, J.R.; Spence, J.P. Complex Factorizations of the Fibonacci and Lucas Numbers. Fibonacci Q. 2003, 41, 13–19. [Google Scholar]
  15. Da Fonseca, C.M.; Kouachi, S.; Mazilu, D.A.; Mazilu, I. A Multi-Temperature Kinetic Ising Model and The Eigenvalues of Some Perturbed Jacobi Matrices. Appl. Math. Comput. 2015, 259, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chang, H.-W.; Liu, S.-E.; Burridge, R. Exact Eigensystems for Some Matrices Arising from Discretizations. Linear Algebra Appl. 2009, 430, 999–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Özdemir, M. Introduction to Hybrid Numbers. Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebra 2018, 28, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Szynal-Liana, A.; Włoch, I. On Pell and Pell-Lucas Hybrid Numbers. Comment. Math. 2018, 58, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Szynal-Liana, A.; Włoch, I. The Fibonacci Hybrid Numbers. Utilitas Math. 2019, 110, 3–10. [Google Scholar]
  20. Szynal-Liana, A.; Włoch, I. On Jacosthal and Jacosthal-Lucas Hybrid Numbers. Ann. Math. Silesianae 2019, 33, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Catarino, P. On k-Pell Hybrid Numbers. J. Discret. Math. Sci. Cryptogr. 2019, 22, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mangueira, M.C.S.; Vieira, R.P.M.; Alves, F.R.V.; Catarino, P.M.M.C. The Hybrid Numbers of Padovan and Some Identities. Ann. Math. Silesianae 2020, 34, 256–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mangueira, M.C.S.; Vieira, R.P.M.; Alves, F.R.V.; Catarino, P.M.M.C. The Oresme Sequence: The Generalization of its Matrix Form and its Hybridization Process. Notes Number Theory Discret. Math. 2021, 27, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Akbıyık, M.; Akbıyık, S.Y.; Karaca, E.; Yılmaz, F. De Moivre’s and Euler Formulas for Matrices of Hybrid Numbers. Axioms 2021, 10, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Szynal-Liana, A. The Horadam Hybrid Numbers. Discuss. Math. Gen. Algebra Appl. 2018, 38, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kızılateş, C. A Study on Horadam Hybrinomials. Fundam. J. Math. Appl. 2022, 5, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Buschman, R.G. Fibonacci Numbers, Chebyshev Polynomials Generalizations and Difference Equations. Fibonacci Q. 1963, 1, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. Some subsequences of the Horadam numbers with OEIS Code.
Table 1. Some subsequences of the Horadam numbers with OEIS Code.
p , q a , b SequenceOEIS Code
1,10,1FibonacciA000045
1,12,1LucasA000032
2,10,1Pell (or (2,1)-Fibonacci)A000129
2,12,2Pell-LucasA002203
3,10,1Bronze Fibonacci (or (3,1)-Fibonacci)A006190
3,12,3Bronze LucasA006497
1,20,1Jacobsthal (or (1,2)-Fibonacci)A001045
1,22,1Jacobsthal-LucasA014551
1,31,1Nickel Fibonacci (or (1,3)-Fibonacci)A006130
1,32,1Nickel LucasA075118
Table 2. Some kind of Gaussian type sequences.
Table 2. Some kind of Gaussian type sequences.
NotationabpqNumber
G F n i111Gaussian Fibonacci
G P n i121Gaussian Pell
G J n i / 2 112Gaussian Jacobsthal
G B n i131Gaussian Bronze
G N n i / 3 113Gaussian Nickel
G M n i / 2 13 2 Gaussian Mersenne
G L n 2 i 1 + 2 i 11Gaussian Lucas
G p n 2 2 i 2 + 2 i 21Gaussian Pell-Lucas
G j n 2 i / 2 1 + 2 i 12Gaussian Jacobsthal-Lucas
Table 3. Some recurrences and their values.
Table 3. Some recurrences and their values.
Recurrence Relation01234
G F n = G F n + G F n 1 i1 1 + i 2 + i 3 + 2 i
G L n = G L n + G L n 1 2 i 1 + 2 i 3 + i 4 + 3 i 7 + 4 i
G P n = 2 G P n + G P n 1 i1 2 + i 5 + 2 i 12 + 5 i
G p n = 2 G p n + G p n 1 2 2 i 2 + 2 i 6 + 2 i 14 + 6 i 34 + 14 i
G J n = G J n + 2 G J n 1 i 2 1 1 + i 3 + i 5 + 3 i
G j n = G j n + 2 G j n 1 2 i 2 1 + 2 i 1 + i 3 + i 5 + 3 i
G M n = 3 G M n 2 G M n 1 i 2 1 3 + i 7 + 3 i 15 + 7 i
G B n = 3 G B n + G B n 1 i1 3 + i 10 + 3 i 33 + 10 i
G N n = G N n 1 + 3 G N n 2 i 3 1 1 + i 4 + i 7 + 4 i
Table 4. Some special cases for H n ( x ) .
Table 4. Some special cases for H n ( x ) .
abpq
F H n ( x ) 1111
L H n 1 ( x ) 2111
P H n ( x ) 1221
Q H n 1 ( x ) 2221
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yılmaz, F.; Özkan, M. On the Generalized Gaussian Fibonacci Numbers and Horadam Hybrid Numbers: A Unified Approach. Axioms 2022, 11, 255. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11060255

AMA Style

Yılmaz F, Özkan M. On the Generalized Gaussian Fibonacci Numbers and Horadam Hybrid Numbers: A Unified Approach. Axioms. 2022; 11(6):255. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11060255

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yılmaz, Fatih, and Mustafa Özkan. 2022. "On the Generalized Gaussian Fibonacci Numbers and Horadam Hybrid Numbers: A Unified Approach" Axioms 11, no. 6: 255. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11060255

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop