# Simulation and Validation of Discrete Element Parameter Calibration for Fine-Grained Iron Tailings

^{1}

^{2}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

_{2}, Al

_{2}O

_{3}, Fe

_{2}O

_{3}, CaO, MgO, etc., as well as a small amount of K

_{2}O, Na

_{2}O and S, P, etc. [5]. The mineral composition of iron tailings varies greatly due to the different origins and processing processes, except for the main mineral composition of quartz, hematite, dolomite and feldspar, and other minerals such as hornblende and chlorite have unequal contents [6].

## 2. Experiments to Calibrate Parameters

#### 2.1. JKR Contact Discrete Element Model

_{JKR}stands for the normal elastic contact force, N; E* for the equivalent Young’s modulus, Pa; R* for the equivalent radius, m; a

_{2}for the contact radius, m; W for the equivalent surface energy of the contact particle, J/m

^{2}; and u for the normal overlap, m.

_{1}and r

_{2}, respectively. The border energy between particle 1 and particle 2 is represented by the number r

_{12}.

_{12}= 0 and r

_{1}= r

_{2}= r. As a result, W = 2r is the equation for the cohesion between similar particle types [17]. In (2) and (3), respectively, the normal elastic contact force JKR and the normal overlap u of the particles are displayed:

_{JKR}normal to the overlap u can be written as follows

_{2}is the radius of the contact surface following the collision of the two particles, r is the surface energy of the contacting particles, E* is the modulus of elasticity and R* is the equivalent contact radius.

#### 2.2. Sizing for Discrete Element Models

_{a}is the particle size, mm; T is the device volume, L; $\overline{\rho}$ is the original particle average size, mm; X

_{n}is the enlarged large particle size, mm; and a

_{n}is the particle radius with different occupancy ratio, mm.

_{a}of the amplified particles is first calculated while performing particle size analysis

_{a}is introduced into Equation (8):

_{n}are finally made:

#### 2.3. Determination of the Angle of Repose

#### 2.4. Particle Modeling with Discrete Elements

## 3. Designing and Analyzing Studies for Parameter Calibration

#### 3.1. Plackett-Burman Experimental Design Importance

^{2}= 0.9922, demonstrating that the regression equation model suited the data well, and was a representative regression equation [30]. Where R

_{adj}= 0.9829, this indicated that the model applies to 98.29% of the effect values. The ANOVA results showed that the results for JKR surface energy coefficient (C), particle-particle static friction coefficient (E) and particle-particle dynamic friction coefficient (F) had a significant effect (p < 0.05) on the particle resting angle (R), while the other factors were not significant.

#### 3.2. Box-Behnken Response Surface Analysis

^{2}= 0.9884; and the corrected coefficient of determination R

^{2}

_{adj}= 0.9736. The predictive coefficient of determination R

^{2}

_{pre}= 0.9064, indicating that the model is a true representation of the actual situation [33]. The test precision Adep Precision = 24.6778, indicating that the model has good accuracy.

^{2}− 698.85000E

^{2}− 7583.75000F

^{2}

#### 3.3. Regression Model Interaction Effect Analysis

^{2}to 0.60 J/m

^{2}. According to the JKR contact model, an increase in the surface energy coefficient causes an increase in the cohesive forces that exist between particles. These forces can cause particles to adhere to one another and form new particle clusters, which causes the angle of repose to increase, as the particles at the top of the angle of repose are adsorbed and difficult to slide off when stacking is done. A strong interaction between the JKR surface energy coefficient C and the static friction coefficient E between the particles can be taken into account in the contour plot of Figure 10b.

## 4. Determination of the Optimal Combination of Parameters and Validation of the Simulation

## 5. Conclusions

- (1)
- The computational performance of the numerical simulation was improved by increasing the discrete element of fine-grained iron tailings’ particle size by 1.959708 mm, with an average particle size of 24.15 um, and using 500,000 particles as the maximum.
- (2)
- The contact characteristics of the amplified particles were calibrated using the JKR contact model in discrete elements. The Plackett-Burman tests were used to determine the factors that significantly affect the resting angle of the amplified particles of microfine-grained iron tailings. These factors included the surface energy JKR coefficient, particle-particle static friction coefficient and particle-particle dynamic friction coefficient.
- (3)
- The Box-Behnken test revealed that, in contrast to the simulated particle rest angle of 44.81° for fine-grained iron tailings particles at 0.459, 0.393 and 0.106, respectively, the relative error of the surface energy JKR coefficient, particle-particle static friction coefficient and particle-particle kinetic friction coefficient in the EDEM discrete element software was only 2.18%; this proves the viability of response surface experiments for the discrete element particle system. It was shown that it was possible to calibrate the particle coefficients for discrete elements.
- (4)
- The best experimentally obtained parameters were entered into discrete element software, where the mean resting angle was calculated to be 45.823°. This was compared to the mean angle from physical experiments, which was 45.119°, and the error was calculated to be 1.56%, which was not significantly different. This proves that the contact parameters obtained from the particle size scaling coefficient calibration trials satisfy the numerical simulation’s requirements, and serve as a reference for the discrete element model used to simulate the numerical behavior of fine-grained iron tailings particles.

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Institutional Review Board Statement

## Informed Consent Statement

## Data Availability Statement

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Hu, J. Discussion on comprehensive utilization technology of tailings. Copp. Eng.
**2021**, 167, 45–47. [Google Scholar] - Shi, X.; Du, G.; Zhang, M.; Du, J.; Gao, J. Problems and suggestions of tailings comprehensive utilization industry. Mod. Min.
**2022**, 38, 38–40+44. [Google Scholar] - Zhang, J.; Zhu, L. Characterization of heavy metal pollution in tin mine tailing ponds. Min. Metall.
**2022**, 31, 122–126. [Google Scholar] - Ren, M.; Xie, X.; Li, B.; Hu, S.; Chen, T.; Zhu, H.; Tong, X. Research progress of comprehensive utilization of iron tailings. Miner. Conserv. Util.
**2022**, 42, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fu, Y.; Hou, Y.; Wang, R.; Wang, Y.; Yang, X.; Dong, Z.; Liu, J.; Man, X.; Yin, W.; Yang, B.; et al. Detailed insights into improved chlorite removal during hematite reverse flotation by sodium alginate. Miner. Eng.
**2021**, 173, 107191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tang, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, Y.; Gao, P.; Han, Y. Pilot-scale extraction of iron from flotation tailings via suspension magnetization roasting in a mixture of CO and H2 followed by magnetic separation. Resour. Conserv. Recycl.
**2021**, 172, 105680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Nakamura, H.; Fujii, H.; Watano, S. Scale-up of high shear mixer-granulator based on discrete element analysis. Powder Technol.
**2013**, 236, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kim, K.C.; Jiang, T.; Kim, N.I.; Kwon, C. Effects of ball-to-powder diameter ratio and powder particle shape on EDEM simulation in a planetary ball mill. J. Indian Chem. Soc.
**2022**, 99, 100300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Han, W.; Wang, S.Z.; Zhang, Q.; Tian, Y.H. Parameter calibration of discrete elements for micron-sized particles based on JKR contact model. China Powder Technol.
**2021**, 27, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Han, Z.; Shi, W.; Xiao, Y.; Li, L. Linear Adhesive Contact Analysis of Rough Cylindrical Surface Based on JKR Model. J. Mech. Eng.
**2016**, 52, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Li, Y.; Li, F.; Xu, X.; Shen, C.; Meng, K.; Chen, J.; Chang, D. Discrete element parameter calibration of wheat flour based on particle scaling. J. Agric. Eng.
**2019**, 35, 320–327. [Google Scholar] - Roessler, T.; Katterfeld, A. Scaling of the angle of repose test and its influence on the calibration of DEM parameters using upscaled particles. Powder Technol.
**2018**, 330, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Marigo, M.; Stitt, E.H. Discrete Element Method (DEM) for Industrial Applications: Comments on Calibration and Validation for the Modelling of Cylindrical Pellets. KONA Powder Part. J.
**2015**, 32, 236–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Ma, G.; Sun, Z.; Ma, H.; Li, P.; Černý, R. Calibration of Contact Parameters for Moist Bulk of Shotcrete Based on EDEM. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng.
**2022**, 2022, 6072303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Saruwatari, M.; Nakamura, H. Coarse-grained discrete element method of particle behavior and heat transfer in a rotary kiln. Chem. Eng. J.
**2022**, 428, 130969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Li, J.W.; Tong, J.; Hu, B.; Wang, H.; Mao, C.; Ma, Y. Calibration of discrete element simulation parameters for the interaction between clayey heavy black soils with different water content and contact soil components. J. Agric. Eng.
**2019**, 35, 130–140. [Google Scholar] - Kishida, N.; Nakamura, H.; Takimoto, H.; Ohsaki, S.; Watano, S. Coarse-grained discrete element simulation of particle flow and mixing in a vertical high-shear mixer. Powder Technol.
**2021**, 390, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Soltanbeigi, B.; Podlozhnyuk, A.; Papanicolopulos, S.A.; Kloss, C.; Pirker, S.; Ooi, J.Y. DEM study of mechanical characteristics of multi-spherical and superquadric particles at micro and macro scales. Powder Technol.
**2018**, 329, 288–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Feng, Y.T.; Owen, D.R.J. Discrete element modelling of large scale particle systems-I: Exact scaling laws. Comput. Part. Mech.
**2014**, 390, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - He, Y.; Xiang, W.; Wu, M.; Quan, W.; Chen, C. Calibration of discrete element parameters for loamy soils based on stacking tests. J. Hunan Agric. Univ.
**2018**, 44, 216–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhao, T.T.; Feng, Y.T. Accurate scaling and coarse-grained discrete element methods for large-scale granular systems. J. Comput. Mech.
**2022**, 39, 365–372. [Google Scholar] - Qiu, Y.; Guo, Z.; Jin, X.; Zhang, P.; Si, S.; Guo, F. Calibration and Verification Test of Cinnamon Soil Simulation Parameters Based on Discrete Element Method. Agriculture
**2022**, 12, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Niu, F.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, J. Three-dimensional Reconstruction of hematite flocs SEM image using MATLAB software. China Min. Ind.
**2021**, 30, 62–67. [Google Scholar] - Luo, S.; Yuan, Q.; Gouda, S.; Yang, L. Parameter calibration of discrete element method for earthworm manure substrate based on JKR bonding model. J. Agric. Mach.
**2018**, 49, 343–350. [Google Scholar] - Ren, J.; Zhou, L.; Han, L.; Zhou, J.; Yan, M. Discrete simulation of vertical screw conveying based on particle scaling theory. J. Process Eng.
**2017**, 17, 936–943. [Google Scholar] - Xin, X.; Zhang, J.; Feng, H. Optimization of selective leaching process of zinc-containing dust and mud by response surface method. Compr. Util. Miner. Resour.
**2021**, volume, 146–151. [Google Scholar] - Weinhart, T.; Labra, C.; Luding, S.; Ooi, J.Y. Influence of coarse-graining parameters on the analysis of DEM simulations of silo flow. Powder Technol.
**2016**, 293, 138–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhang, Y. Study on the vibration characteristics of fluid-solid coupling of vibrating inclined plate thickener. Kunming Univ. Technol.
**2021**, volume, page. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Xia, R.; Li, B.; Wang, X.; Li, T.; Yang, Z. Measurement and calibration of the discrete element parameters of wet bulk coal. Measurement
**2019**, 142, 84–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Huang, Z.H.; Li, D.T. Plackett-Burman test method combined with star point design-response surface method to optimize the purification process of Phellodendron spp. leaves. Chin. Med. Mater.
**2020**, 43, 682–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, W.; Cai, D.; Xie, J.; Zhang, C.; Liu, L.; Chen, L. Calibration of discrete element model parameters for dense forming of corn straw. J. Agric. Mach.
**2021**, 52, 127–134. [Google Scholar] - Xu, X.; Li, F.; Shen, C.; Li, Y.; Chang, D. Optimization design and experiment of isometric screw feeding device for wheat flour. J. Agric. Mach.
**2020**, 51, 150–157. [Google Scholar] - Xu, X.; Li, F.; Li, Y.; Shen, C.; Meng, K.; Chen, J. Design and experiment of fixed-volume variable-pitch spiral structure. J. Agric. Mach.
**2019**, 50, 89–97. [Google Scholar] - Feng, F.; Hu, P.; Tao, X.K. Mulberry leaf polysaccharide extracted by response surface methodolog suppresses the proliferation, invasion and migration of MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Food Sci. Technol.
**2022**, 42, page. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wei, S.Y.; Wei, H.; Saxen, H.; Yu, Y.W. Numerical Analysis of the Relationship between Friction Coefficient and Repose Angle of Blast Furnace Raw Materials by Discrete Element Method. Materials
**2022**, 15, 903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 2.**Theoretical diagram of original particle size distribution (

**a**) and amplified particle size distribution (

**b**).

**Figure 10.**Response surface diagram (

**a**) and contour diagram (

**b**) of the influence of JKR surface energy coefficient and static friction coefficient on repose angle.

**Figure 11.**Influence of JKR surface energy and rolling friction coefficient on angle of repose surface diagram (

**a**) and contour diagram (

**b**).

**Figure 12.**Surface diagram (

**a**) and contour diagram (

**b**) of the influence of JKR surface energy and rolling friction coefficient on repose angle.

Simulation Parameters | Level | ||
---|---|---|---|

Low Level | High Level | ||

Particle Poisson’s ratio | A | 0.3 | 0.5 |

Coefficient of shear elasticity (pa) | B | 2.40 × 10^{9} | 2.40 × 10^{10} |

JKR surface energy coefficient (J/m^{2}) | C | 0.3 | 0.6 |

Collision recovery factor (particles) | D | 0.1 | 0.3 |

Coefficient of static friction (particles) | E | 0.3 | 0.5 |

Coefficient of dynamic friction (particles) | F | 0.08 | 0.12 |

Serial Number | A | B (pa) | C (J/m^{3}) | D | E | F | Repose Angle (°) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

1 | 0.50 | 2.40 × 10^{10} | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.50 | 0.12 | 35.41 |

2 | 0.30 | 2.40 × 10^{10} | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.50 | 0.12 | 40.29 |

3 | 0.50 | 2.40 × 10^{9} | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.30 | 0.12 | 35.53 |

4 | 0.30 | 2.40 × 10^{10} | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.50 | 0.08 | 30.12 |

5 | 0.30 | 2.40 × 10^{9} | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.50 | 0.12 | 40.25 |

6 | 0.30 | 2.40 × 10^{9} | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.30 | 0.12 | 30.94 |

7 | 0.50 | 2.40 × 10^{9} | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.50 | 0.08 | 29.18 |

8 | 0.50 | 2.40 × 10^{10} | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.30 | 0.12 | 27.03 |

9 | 0.50 | 2.40 × 10^{10} | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.30 | 0.08 | 29.18 |

10 | 0.30 | 2.40 × 10^{10} | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.30 | 0.08 | 30.96 |

11 | 0.50 | 2.40 × 10^{9} | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.50 | 0.08 | 37.85 |

12 | 0.30 | 2.40 × 10^{9} | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.30 | 0.08 | 24.35 |

Factors | Sum of Squares | F-Value | p-Value | Effect |
---|---|---|---|---|

Models | 293.48 | 106.54 | <0.0001 | |

A | 0.6211 | 1.35 | 0.2973 | −0.2275 |

B | 2.18 | 4.74 | 0.0814 | −0.425833 |

C | 114.27 | 248.88 | <0.0001 | 3.08583 |

D | 9.24 | 20.13 | 0.0065 | 0.8775 |

E | 102.73 | 223.74 | <0.0001 | 2.92583 |

F | 64.45 | 140.37 | <0.0001 | 2.3175 |

Residual | 2.30 | |||

Total deviation | 295.78 |

Serial Number | C (J/m^{2}) | E | F | Repose Angle (°) |
---|---|---|---|---|

1 | 0.30 | 0.40 | 0.08 | 34.36 |

2 | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.10 | 45.88 |

3 | 0.30 | 0.40 | 0.12 | 34.11 |

4 | 0.45 | 0.30 | 0.08 | 33.32 |

5 | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.10 | 44.13 |

6 | 0.60 | 0.40 | 0.08 | 29.19 |

7 | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.10 | 44.12 |

8 | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.10 | 45.34 |

9 | 0.45 | 0.30 | 0.12 | 39.45 |

10 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.10 | 28.13 |

11 | 0.30 | 0.50 | 0.10 | 30.13 |

12 | 0.60 | 0.40 | 0.12 | 35.13 |

13 | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.10 | 46.34 |

14 | 0.60 | 0.30 | 0.10 | 29.23 |

15 | 0.45 | 0.50 | 0.12 | 34.45 |

16 | 0.60 | 0.50 | 0.10 | 25.19 |

17 | 0.45 | 0.50 | 0.08 | 33.34 |

Source of Variance | Sum of Squares | Freedom | Mean Square | F-Value | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

Models | 637.64 | 9 | 70.85 | 66.47 | <0.0001 |

C | 272.84 | 1 | 272.84 | 255.99 | <0.0001 |

E | 13.47 | 1 | 13.47 | 12.64 | 0.0093 |

F | 18.30 | 1 | 18.30 | 17.17 | 0.0043 |

C × E | 22.09 | 1 | 22.09 | 20.73 | 0.0026 |

C × F | 7.18 | 1 | 7.18 | 6.74 | 0.0356 |

E × F | 6.30 | 1 | 6.30 | 5.91 | 0.0453 |

C^{2} | 29.09 | 1 | 29.09 | 27.29 | 0.0012 |

E^{2} | 205.64 | 1 | 205.64 | 192.94 | <0.0001 |

F^{2} | 38.75 | 1 | 38.75 | 36.35 | 0.0005 |

Residual | 7.46 | 7 | 1.07 | ||

Lack of fit | 3.38 | 3 | 1.13 | 1.10 | 0.4458 |

Pure error | 4.09 | 4 | 1.02 | ||

Sum | 645.10 | 16 | |||

R^{2} = 0.9884 | R^{2}_{adj} = 0.9736 | R^{2}_{pre} = 0.9064 | Adep Precision = 24.6778 |

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |

© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Zhang, J.; Chang, Z.; Niu, F.; Chen, Y.; Wu, J.; Zhang, H.
Simulation and Validation of Discrete Element Parameter Calibration for Fine-Grained Iron Tailings. *Minerals* **2023**, *13*, 58.
https://doi.org/10.3390/min13010058

**AMA Style**

Zhang J, Chang Z, Niu F, Chen Y, Wu J, Zhang H.
Simulation and Validation of Discrete Element Parameter Calibration for Fine-Grained Iron Tailings. *Minerals*. 2023; 13(1):58.
https://doi.org/10.3390/min13010058

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Zhang, Jinxia, Zhenjia Chang, Fusheng Niu, Yuying Chen, Jiahui Wu, and Hongmei Zhang.
2023. "Simulation and Validation of Discrete Element Parameter Calibration for Fine-Grained Iron Tailings" *Minerals* 13, no. 1: 58.
https://doi.org/10.3390/min13010058