Next Article in Journal
Processing Fractional Differential Equations Using ψ-Caputo Derivative
Next Article in Special Issue
On the Splitting Tensor of the Weak f-Contact Structure
Previous Article in Journal
An Improved DCC Model Based on Large-Dimensional Covariance Matrices Estimation and Its Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ptolemy’s Theorem in the Relativistic Model of Analytic Hyperbolic Geometry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Note on Generalized Solitons

by
Amira Ishan
1,† and
Sharief Deshmukh
2,*,†
1
Department of Mathematics, College of Science, Taif University, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Mathematics, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Symmetry 2023, 15(4), 954; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15040954
Submission received: 16 March 2023 / Revised: 12 April 2023 / Accepted: 13 April 2023 / Published: 21 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symmetry and Geometry in Physics II)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we initiate the study of a generalized soliton on a Riemannian manifold, we find a characterization for the Euclidean space, and in the compact case, we find a sufficient condition under which it reduces to a quasi-Einstein manifold. We also find sufficient conditions under which a compact generalized soliton reduces to an Einstein manifold. Note that Ricci solitons being self-similar solutions of the heat flow, this topic is related to the symmetry in the geometry of Riemannian manifolds. Moreover, generalized solitons being generalizations of Ricci solitons are naturally related to symmetry.

1. Introduction

One of the most studied structures on a Riemannian manifold is a Ricci soliton and it is a stable solution of the Ricci flow introduced by Hamilton [1]. Moreover, Ricci solitons are natural generalizations of Einstein metrics [2]. There is another important generalization of Einstein manifolds namely quasi-Einstein manifolds [3], which are important in the Robertson–Walker spacetime. Moreover, an important generalization of Ricci solitons are Ricci almost solitons [4,5]. There are various types of solitons considered in [1,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. It is a natural need to define a most general structure on a Riemannian manifold that should include existing structures such as Ricci solitons, Ricci almost solitons, quasi-Einstein manifolds, etc., as particular cases. A unitary approach of these soliton-types equations is given in the following. For an n-dimensional Riemannian manifold ( M , g ) , a 1-form η and a vector field ξ on M, we consider the following equation
1 2 L ξ g + α R i c = β g + γ η η ,
with α , β , and γ smooth functions on M, L ξ g the Lie derivative of g in the direction of ξ , R i c the Ricci tensor of ( M , g ) , which encompasses most of the concepts of solitons and quasi-Einstein manifold in the Riemannian setting, and we call ( M , g , ξ , α , β , γ ) a generalized soliton.
We shall denote by X ( M ) the set of all smooth vector fields of M. If the vector field ξ in the generalized soliton is of the gradient type, i.e., ξ : = f , for a smooth function f on M, and if we denote by H e s s ( f ) the Hessian of f, by ∇ the Levi-Civita connection of g, and by Q the Ricci operator, i.e.,
g ( Q X , Y ) = R i c ( X , Y ) ,
for X, Y X ( M ) , then L ξ g = 2 H e s s ( f ) , and thus the definition of the generalized soliton takes the form
H e s s ( f ) + α R i c = β g + γ η η ,
with α , β , and γ smooth functions on M, which is equivalent to
A f + α Q = β I + γ η t ,
where A f is the Hessian operator defined by H e s s ( f ) ( X , Y ) = g A f X , Y , t is the dual vector field to the 1-form η , and I is the identity endomorphism on X ( M ) . In this case, we say that ( M , g , f , η , α , β , γ ) defines a gradient generalized soliton on M.
Recall that for α = 1 , β a constant, and γ = 0 , the generalized soliton is a Ricci soliton, and for α = 1 and γ = 0 , it is a Ricci almost soliton. Moreover, for ξ a Killing vector field and α = 1 , the generalized soliton is a quasi-Einstein manifold. It is easy to show that the Euclidean space E n is a gradient generalized soliton E n , , , f , α , β , 0 , where , is the Euclidean inner product and
f ( x ) = β 2 x , x , x E n .
This raises a question: can we characterize the Euclidean space E n using an n-dimensional complete and connected gradient generalized soliton M , g , f , α , β , γ ? We answer this question in Section 3, where we find a characterization of the Euclidean space E n .
Note that, if we allow in the definition of a generalized soliton M , g , ξ , α , β , γ the potential field ξ to be a Killing vector field, and the function α = 1 , then we get
R i c = β g + γ η η ,
that is, the generalized soliton M , g , ξ , α , β , γ is a quasi-Einstein manifold (see [3]). However, the requirements that ξ be a Killing vector field and the function α = 1 are quite strong conditions and naturally one would like to see whether some weaker conditions could be found that would render a generalized soliton M , g , ξ , α , β , γ into a quasi-Einstein manifold. In Section 4, we consider this question and find conditions on a compact generalized soliton M , g , ξ , α , β , γ under which it reduces to a quasi-Einstein manifold. In that section, we also find conditions under which a compact generalized soliton M , g , ξ , α , β , γ becomes an Einstein manifold.
It is worth noting that the generalized Ricci soliton M , g , ξ , α , β , γ generalizes structures such as Ricci solitons, Ricci almost solitons, Einstein manifolds, quasi-Einstein manifolds, therefore the study of generalized solitons has a modest scope. A future study could include questions of finding necessary and sufficient conditions on a generalized Ricci soliton M , g , ξ , α , β , γ to reduce it to a Ricci soliton or a Ricci almost soliton. Note that if the potential field ξ of a generalized Ricci soliton M , g , ξ , α , β , γ is a Killing vector field, and the function α = 1 , then the generalized Ricci soliton becomes a quasi-Einstein manifold. It will be an interesting question to analyze the impact of the restriction on the potential field ξ of a generalized Ricci soliton M , g , ξ , α , β , γ as a conformal vector field.

2. Preliminaries

Let ( M , g , ξ , α , β , γ ) be an n-dimensional generalized soliton and ∇ be the Riemannian connection with respect to metric g. We denote by ω the smooth 1-form dual to the potential field ξ of the generalized soliton ( M , g , ξ , α , β , γ ) and denote by φ the ( 1 , 1 ) skew-symmetric tensor field defined by
1 2 d ω ( X , Y ) = g φ X , Y , X , Y X ( M ) .
Note that
2 g X ξ , Y = g X ξ , Y g Y ξ , X + g X ξ , Y + g Y ξ , X ,
that is,
2 g X ξ , Y = d ω X , Y + £ ξ g X , Y , X , Y X ( M ) ,
where
d ω X , Y = g X ξ , Y g Y ξ , X
and
£ ξ g X , Y g X ξ , Y g Y ξ , X .
Then, using Equations (1.1) and (2.1), we have
X ξ = β X + γ η ( X ) t α Q X + φ X , X X ( M ) .
Using the expression for the scalar curvature τ = t r Q and a local frame v 1 , , v n with the skew-symmetry of φ , and the definition of the divergence
d i v ξ = i = 1 n g v i ξ , v i ,
we have
d i v ξ = i = 1 n g β v i + γ η v i t α Q v i + φ v i , v i ,
that is,
d i v ξ = n β + γ t 2 α τ .
Now, we are in position to state the following:
Lemma 1.
Let ( M , g , ξ , α , β , γ ) be an n-dimensional compact generalized soliton. Then,
M ξ β = M α β τ n β 2 γ β t 2 , M ξ γ = M α γ τ n β γ γ 2 t 2 .
Proof. 
Using Equation (2.3), we have d i v β ξ = ξ β + n β 2 + β γ t 2 α β τ and d i v γ ξ = ξ γ + n β γ + γ 2 t 2 α γ τ . Integrating these equations and using Stokes’s theorem
M d i v X = 0 ,
for a smooth vector field X, we get the results in the Lemma. □
Lemma 2.
Let ( M , g , ξ , α , β , γ ) be an n-dimensional generalized soliton. Then,
α 2 Q τ n I 2 = 2 α γ R i c t , t + ξ 2 n β α n τ 2 γ 2 t 4 2 β γ t 2 φ 2 .
Proof. 
Using Equation (2.2), we have
α Q τ n I ( X ) = β τ n X + γ η ( X ) t + φ X X ξ , X X ( M ) .
Taking a local orthonormal frame v 1 , , v n on M, we have
α 2 Q τ n I 2 = i = 1 n g α Q τ n I ( v i ) , α Q τ n I ( v i ) ,
which, in view of Equation (2.4), implies
α 2 Q τ n I 2 = n β τ n 2 + γ 2 t 4 + φ 2 + ξ 2 + 2 γ β τ n t 2 2 β τ n d i v ξ 2 γ g t ξ , t 2 i = 1 n g v i ξ , φ v i .
Using Equation (2.2), we get
g t ξ , t = β t 2 + γ t 4 α R i c t , t
and
i = 1 n g v i ξ , φ v i = i = 1 n g φ v i , φ v i = φ 2 ,
where we have used the skew-symmetry of φ and the symmetry of Q for concluding t r Q φ = 0 . Inserting Equations (2.3), (2.6), and (2.7) in Equation (2.5), we get the result. □

3. A Characterization of a Euclidean Space

Let ( M , g , ξ , α , β , γ ) be an n-dimensional gradient generalized soliton with ξ = f for some smooth function f. In this section, we prove the following result that gives a characterization for a Euclidean space.
Theorem 1.
Let ( M , g , f , α , β , 0 ) be an n-dimensional complete and connected gradient generalized soliton n 3 with α 0 , β constants. Then, the scalar curvature τ is constant with
α τ n β α τ 0
and n β α τ , if and only if ( M , g , f , α , β , 0 ) is isometric to the Euclidean space.
Proof. 
Let ( M , g , f , α , β , 0 ) be an n-dimensional complete and connected gradient generalized soliton. Then, Equation (1.2) with γ = 0 yields
A f X = β X α Q X , X X ( M ) .
Since α and β are constants, we have
A f ( X , Y ) = X A f Y A f X Y = α Q ( X , Y ) , X , Y X ( M ) .
Now, using the expression for the curvature tensor field
R ( X , Y ) f = A f ( X , Y ) A f ( Y , X )
and Equation (3.2), we conclude that
R ( X , Y ) f = α Q ( Y , X ) Q ( X , Y ) .
Note that the scalar curvature τ is a constant and therefore for a local orthonormal frame v 1 , , v n on M, we have
i = 1 n Q ( v i , v i ) = 1 2 τ = 0 .
Thus, Equation (3.3) on contraction yields
R i c Y , f = α Y τ 1 2 Y τ = 0 ,
that is,
Q f = 0 .
We proceed to compute d i v Q ( f ) as follows:
d i v Q ( f ) = i = 1 n g v i Q f , v i = i = 1 n g Q ( v i , f ) + Q A f v i , v i = i = 1 n g f , Q v i , v i + i = 1 n g A f v i , Q v i .
Using Equations (3.1), (3.4), and (3.5) in the above equation, we conclude
0 = i = 1 n g β v i α Q v i , Q v i ,
which implies β τ α Q 2 = 0 , that is,
α 2 Q 2 = α β τ .
Thus, we have
α 2 Q 2 1 n τ 2 = α β τ 1 n α 2 τ 2 = 1 n α τ n β α τ 0
by virtue of the premise. Using Schwarz’s inequality Q 2 1 n τ 2 in the above inequality, we conclude
α 2 Q 2 1 n τ 2 = 0 .
However, as the constant α 0 , we conclude
Q 2 = 1 n τ 2 ;
this is the equality in Schwarz’s inequality, and it holds if and only if Q = τ n I . Moreover, Equation (3.1) gives A f X = β X 1 n α τ X , that is,
H e s s ( f ) = 1 n n β α τ g = c g ,
where c = 1 n n β α τ 0 by virtue of a condition in the statement. Using the result in [11], we conclude that M is isometric to the n-dimensional Euclidean space E n .
Conversely, on the Euclidean space E n for a nonzero constant β , we define f : E n R by
f ( x ) = β 2 x 2 .
Then, we have f = β I and H e s s ( f ) = β , , where , is the Euclidean inner product. Thus, on the Euclidean space E n , we have
H e s s ( f ) + α R i c = β ,
for a nonzero constant α . Hence, E n , , , f , α , β , 0 is a gradient generalized soliton. □

4. Quasi-Einstein Manifolds

Recall that a Riemannian manifold ( M , g ) is said to be a quasi-Einstein manifold (see [3]) if its Ricci tensor has the form
R i c = λ g + μ ς ς ,
where λ , μ are smooth functions and ς is a smooth 1-form on M. In this section, we are interested in finding conditions under which an n-dimensional generalized soliton ( M , g , ξ , α , β , γ ) is a quasi-Einstein manifold. Note that from the definition of a generalized soliton, it follows that if the potential field ξ is a Killing vector field and the function α = 1 , then ( M , g , ξ , α , β , γ ) is a quasi-Einstein manifold.
Recall that a smooth vector field X on a Riemannian manifold ( N , h ) is said to be Killing if £ X h = 0 , and this condition is equivalent to the fact that the local flow of X consists of local isometries. It is worth pointing out that the presence of Killing vector fields on a Riemannian manifold ( N , h ) severely restricts its geometry as well as the topology of M; for instance, the Ricci curvature of a compact Riemannian manifold ( N , h ) possessing a nonparallel Killing vector field must have a positive Ricci curvature. Thus, asking the potential field ξ of a generalized Ricci soliton M , g , ξ , α , β , γ to be Killing is quite a strong condition.
Theorem 2.
Let ( M , g , ξ , α , β , γ ) be an n-dimensional compact generalized soliton with the function α nowhere zero. If the Ricci curvature R i c ξ , ξ satisfies
R i c ξ , ξ d i v ξ 2 + φ 2 ,
then ( M , g , ξ , α , β , γ ) is a quasi-Einstein manifold.
Proof. 
Suppose ( M , g , ξ , α , β , γ ) is an n-dimensional compact generalized soliton. Then, using a local orthonormal frame v 1 , , v n on M and Equation (1.1), we have
1 4 L ξ g 2 = i , j = 1 n 1 2 L ξ g v i , v j 2 = i , j = 1 n β g v i , v j + γ η v i η v j α R i c v i , v j 2 ,
that is,
1 4 L ξ g 2 = n β 2 + γ 2 t 4 + α 2 Q 2 + 2 β γ t 2 2 α β τ 2 α γ R i c t , t = α 2 Q 2 1 n τ 2 + n β α n τ 2 + γ 2 t 4 + 2 β γ t 2 2 α γ R i c t , t .
Note that
α 2 Q 1 n τ I 2 = α 2 Q 2 1 n τ 2
and the above equation gives
1 4 L ξ g 2 = α 2 Q 1 n τ I 2 + n β α n τ 2 + γ 2 t 4 + 2 β γ t 2 2 α γ R i c t , t .
Thus, we have
2 α γ R i c t , t n β α n τ 2 2 β γ t 2 γ 2 t 4 = α 2 Q 1 n τ I 2 1 4 L ξ g 2 .
Using Lemma 2 with the above equation, we conclude
1 4 L ξ g 2 + ξ 2 φ 2 = 0 .
Now, using Yano’s integral formula (see [14])
M R i c ξ , ξ + 1 2 L ξ g 2 ξ 2 d i v ξ 2 = 0
and Equation (4.1), we have
1 4 M L ξ g 2 = M φ 2 + d i v ξ 2 R i c ξ , ξ .
Now, using the condition in the hypothesis, we conclude
1 4 M L ξ g 2 0 ,
that is, L ξ g = 0 . Consequently, as α is nowhere zero, Equation (1.1) implies
R i c = β α g + γ α η η ,
that is, ( M , g , ξ , α , β , γ ) is a quasi-Einstein manifold. □
Theorem 3.
Let ( M , g , ξ , α , β , γ ) be an n-dimensional ( n > 2 ), compact and connected generalized soliton with the function α nowhere zero. If γ is nonzero and constant along the integral curves of ξ and the following conditions hold
α γ τ n β γ , R i c ξ , ξ φ 2 ,
then ( M , g , ξ , α , β , γ ) is an Einstein manifold.
Proof. 
Suppose ( M , g , ξ , α , β , γ ) is an n-dimensional compact generalized soliton satisfying the conditions in the hypothesis. Then, using ξ ( γ ) = 0 in Lemma 1, we get
M γ 2 t 2 = M α γ τ n β γ ,
which, in view of α γ τ n β γ , implies γ 2 t 2 = 0 . However, as γ 0 and M is connected, we get t = 0 . Using t = 0 in Equation (4.4) and α γ τ n β γ , we conclude γ α τ n β = 0 . Furthermore, owing to the fact that γ 0 , we get
α τ n β = 0 .
Now, using t = 0 and Equation (4.5), we conclude through Equation (2.3) that d i v ξ = 0 . Thus, Equation (4.3) takes the form
1 4 M L ξ g 2 = M φ 2 R i c ξ , ξ .
Using the lower bound on R i c ξ , ξ in the statement, we get L ξ g = 0 . Thus, Equation (1.1) with t = 0 implies
α R i c = β g
and as α is nowhere zero, we conclude R i c = f g , where f = β α 1 = 1 n τ (see Equation (4.5)), that is, Q = f I and
Q ( X , Y ) = X ( f ) Y , X , Y X ( M ) .
Using a local orthonormal frame v 1 , , v n on M in the above equation, we have
i = 1 n Q v i , v i = f = 1 n τ ,
that is
1 2 τ = 1 n τ
and as n > 2 , we conclude τ is a constant and ( M , g , ξ , α , β , γ ) is an Einstein manifold. □
Along similar lines as in the above theorem, using the first part of Lemma 1, we prove the following:
Theorem 4.
Let ( M , g , ξ , α , β , γ ) be an n-dimensional n > 2 , compact and connected generalized soliton with the function α nowhere zero. If β γ > 0 and β is a constant along the integral curves of ξ and the following conditions hold
α β τ n β 2 , R i c ξ , ξ φ 2 ,
then ( M , g , ξ , α , β , γ ) is an Einstein manifold.

5. Examples and Conclusions

First, we discuss a few examples of generalized solitons.
(i) Consider the open subset M = E n 0 . Then, with the Euclidean metric g, M , g is a flat Riemannian manifold. Let
Ψ = i = 1 n x i x i
be the position vector field, which is a nonzero vector field on M. Define
ξ = f Ψ , f = 1 Ψ .
Note that
X ( f ) = 1 Ψ 2 X Ψ = 1 2 Ψ 3 X g Ψ , Ψ = f 2 g ξ , X , X X ( M ) .
Thus, we get
X ξ = f X η ( X ) ξ , X X ( M ) ,
where η X = g ξ , X ; consequently, we have
L ξ g X , Y = 2 f g X , Y 2 f η ( X ) η ( Y ) , X , Y X ( M ) .
Choosing a nonzero function α on M, we get
1 2 L ξ g + α R i c = β g + γ η η ,
where β = f and γ = f . Hence, ( M , g , ξ , α , β , γ ) is an n-dimensional generalized soliton.
(ii) Consider the unit sphere S n with canonical metric g of constant curvature 1. Then, it is well-known that S n possesses a conformal vector field ξ that satisfies (see [2])
L ξ g = 2 σ g ,
where σ is a smooth function on S n . Then, it follows for a smooth function α on S n , we have
1 2 L ξ g + α R i c = β g ,
where β = σ + ( n 1 ) α . Hence, ( S n , g , ξ , α , β , 0 ) is an n-dimensional generalized soliton.
(iii) Let ( M , φ , ξ , η , g ) be a ( 2 n + 1 ) -dimensional Einstein β -Kenmotsu manifold (see [8]). Then, the unit vector field ξ satisfies
X ξ = β X η ( X ) ξ , X X ( M ) ,
where β is a smooth function on M. Since M is an Einstein manifold, we have R i c = λ g for a constant λ . Hence, for a smooth function α on M, we have
1 2 L ξ g + α R i c = β g + γ η η ,
where γ = β . Hence, ( M , g , ξ , α , β , γ ) is a ( 2 n + 1 ) -dimensional generalized soliton.
We saw through Theorem 1 that an n-dimensional complete and connected gradient generalized soliton ( M , g , f , α , β , 0 ) was used to find a characterization of the Euclidean space E n , and example (ii) also showed that ( S n , g , ξ , α , β , 0 ) was an n-dimensional generalized soliton. This naturally raises the question of whether we can find a characterization of the unit sphere S n using an appropriate n-dimensional compact generalized soliton ( M , g , ξ , α , β , 0 ) . This could be an interesting question for future studies on this topic. Moreover, in the results of Section 4, we found conditions under which an n-dimensional generalized soliton ( M , g , ξ , α , β , γ ) was a quasi-Einstein and Einstein manifold, respectively. It will be interesting study to find conditions under which an n-dimensional generalized soliton ( M , g , ξ , α , β , γ ) is a Ricci almost soliton.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.D. and A.I.; formal analysis S.D. and A.I.; investigation, S.D.; resources, S.D.; writing—original draft preparation, A.I.; visualization, S.D.; supervision, S.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The researchers would like to acknowledge the Deanship of Scientific Research, Taif University for funding this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hamilton, R. Three-manifolds with positive Ricci curvature. J. Differ. Geom. 1982, 17, 255–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Besse, A.L. Einstein Manifolds; Classics in Mathematics; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chaki, M.C.; Maity, R.K. On quasi Einstein manifolds. Publ. Math. Debrecen 2000, 57, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Barbosa, A.; Ribeiro, E. Some characterizations for compact almost Ricci solitons. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2012, 140, 213–223. [Google Scholar]
  5. Deshmukh, S.; Al-Sodais, H.; Turki, N. Some Results on Ricci Almost Solitons. Symmetry 2021, 13, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dwivedi, S. Some results on Ricci-Bourguignon solitons and almost solitons. Can. Math. Bull. 2020, 64, 591–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gomes, J.N.; Wang, Q.; Xia, C. On h-almost Ricci soliton. J. Geom. Phys. 2017, 114, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Marrero, J.C. The local structure of trans-Sasakian manifolds. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 1992, 162, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Neto, B.L.; de Oliveira, H.P. Generalized quasi Yamabe gradient solitons. Differ. Geom. Its Appl. 2016, 49, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Petersen, P. Riemannian Geometry, 2nd ed.; Graduate Texts in Mathematics; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006; Volume 171. [Google Scholar]
  11. Pigola, S.; Rigoli, M.; Rimoldi, M.; Setti, A.G. Ricci almost solitons. Ann. Della Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa-Cl. Sci. 2011, 5, 757–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, L.F. On noncompact τ-quasi-Einstein metrics. Pac. J. Math. 2011, 254, 449–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Barbosa, A.; Ribeiro, E. On conformal solutions of the Yamabe flow. Arch. Math. 2013, 101, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yano, K. Integral Formulas in Riemannian Geometry; Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1970. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ishan, A.; Deshmukh, S. A Note on Generalized Solitons. Symmetry 2023, 15, 954. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15040954

AMA Style

Ishan A, Deshmukh S. A Note on Generalized Solitons. Symmetry. 2023; 15(4):954. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15040954

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ishan, Amira, and Sharief Deshmukh. 2023. "A Note on Generalized Solitons" Symmetry 15, no. 4: 954. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15040954

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop