Next Article in Journal
Physics-Informed Neural Network for Flow Prediction Based on Flow Visualization in Bridge Engineering
Previous Article in Journal
Use of Assimilation Analysis in 4D-Var Source Inversion: Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) with GOSAT Methane and Hemispheric CMAQ
Previous Article in Special Issue
The AtmChile Open-Source Interactive Application for Exploring Air Quality and Meteorological Data in Chile
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparisons of Spatial and Temporal Variations in PM2.5-Bound Trace Elements in Urban and Rural Areas of South Korea, and Associated Potential Health Risks

1
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea
2
Division of Climate and Air Quality Research, National Institute of Environmental Research, Chungcheong Region Air Quality Research Center, Seosan 32010, Republic of Korea
3
Division of Climate and Air Quality Research, National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon 22689, Republic of Korea
4
Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea
5
Department of Environment and Energy, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2023, 14(4), 753; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14040753
Submission received: 2 April 2023 / Revised: 18 April 2023 / Accepted: 19 April 2023 / Published: 21 April 2023

Abstract

:
PM2.5-bound trace elements were chosen for health risk assessment because they have been linked to an increased risk of respiratory and cardiovascular illness. Since the Korean national air quality standard for ambient particulate matter is based on PM2.5 mass concentration, there have only been a few measurements of PM2.5 particles together with trace elements that can be utilized to evaluate their effects on air quality and human health. Thus, this study describes the trace elements bound to PM2.5 in Seoul (urban area) and Seosan (rural area) using online nondestructive energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence analysis from December 2020 to January 2021. At both the Seoul and Seosan sites, S, K, Si, Ca, and Fe constituted most of the PM2.5-bound trace elements (~95%); major components such as S, K, and soil (estimatedcalculatedcalculated based on oxides of Si, Fe, Ca, and Ti) were presumably from anthropogenic and crustal sources, as well as favorable meteorological conditions. During winter, synoptic meteorology favored the transport of particles from severely contaminated regions, such as the East Asian outflow and local emissions. The total dry deposition flux for crustal elements was 894.5 ± 320.8 µg m−2 d−1 in Seoul and 1088.8 ± 302.4 µg m−2 d−1 in Seosan. Moreover, potential health risks from the trace elements were estimated. Cancer risk values for carcinogenic trace elements (Cr, As, Ni, and Pb) were within the tolerable limit (1 × 10−6), suggesting that adults and children were not at risk of cancer throughout the study period in Seoul and Seosan. Furthermore, a potential risk assessment of human exposure to remaining carcinogens (Cr, As, Ni, and Pb) and non-carcinogens (Cu, Fe, Zn, V, Mn, and Se) indicated that these trace elements posed no health risks. Nevertheless, trace element monitoring, risk assessment, and mitigation must be strengthened throughout the study area to confirm that trace-element-related health effects remain harmless. Researchers and policymakers can use the database from this study on spatial and temporal variation to establish actions and plans in the future.

1. Introduction

Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) plays a crucial role in determining visibility and affects climate change and human health [1,2,3,4,5]. Furthermore, the chemical components of PM2.5 may be associated with a number of adverse health effects (e.g., respiratory diseases, cardiovascular disease, pregnancy/birth outcomes) [6,7,8].
In recent decades, PM2.5 pollution has become a severe environmental concern in urban and rural areas in Asia [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Field measurements have shown that PM2.5 is a complex mixture of organic materials, inorganic salts, and trace elements [17,18,19,20]. Si, Fe, Ca, K, Ti, Cr, Mn, Zn, Ni, Cu, Pb, As, V, and Ba are significant contributors to PM2.5-bound trace elements [21,22,23,24]. Their sources include regional aerosols, local road traffic, coal combustion, soil, and metal industries [4,10,25]. Due to their long residence time in the atmosphere, trace elements bound to PM2.5 can be transported downwind [26]. Moreover, PM2.5-bound trace metals may be deposited in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems via the processes of dry deposition—which is a consistent and reliable atmospheric cleansing process—or wet deposition [27,28,29].
The health effects of trace elements must be addressed, because their potential carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic effects on human health have raised concerns [30,31,32]. As stated by the International Agency for Research in Cancer, trace metals such as Cd, Ni, Ar, Pb, and Cr can cause cancer in humans and animals [33,34,35,36]. When the CR is 10−4, there is a serious risk of cancer. When the CR is between 10−6 and 10−4, the risk is acceptable. When CR is 10−6, there is less risk or the risk may be ignored [33,34]. Additionally, according to several epidemiological studies, PM2.5 exposure has been associated with substantial health risks [37,38]. The complex characteristics of ambient PM2.5 necessitate knowledge of its sources, sinks, and temporal and spatial variations. Trace elements can be utilized as markers for source apportionment studies of these particles, owing to their distinctive source characteristics.
Few studies on PM2.5 and trace elements have compared urban and rural areas in South Korea [39,40,41]. To fill these gaps in PM2.5 research, we conducted simultaneous PM2.5 monitoring studies at representative sites in the urban (Seoul) and rural (Seosan) regions of South Korea during the winter season. Seoul is affected by local anthropogenic emissions and regional outflows that cause high PM2.5 concentrations [42]. Seosan was chosen based on recent studies that found high PM2.5 concentrations in the area. However, the causes of this are yet to be known [42,43]. In this study, we evaluated the temporal and spatial variability of PM2.5 and trace elements, along with their possible health risks to humans throughout the winter of 2020–2021 at rural and urban sites. The findings concerning trace elements, their sources, and their estimated potential risks to humans in Seoul (urban) and Seosan (rural) will have important implications for controlling air pollution and improving wellbeing. This research strengthens the existing research by estimating potential health risks in the context of comparing two different locations in South Korea and similar locations worldwide.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site

Simultaneous measurements were conducted in Seoul (urban area) and Seosan (rural area) from 15 December 2020 to 15 January 2021. Seoul and Seosan are approximately ~99 km apart. Seoul is a city with a population of approximately 10 million and an area of 605 km2 (Figure S1) [44]. The measurements in Seoul were performed at an air-quality measurement site run by the National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER) in the metropolitan area of Bulgwang-dong, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul (37.61° N, 126.93° E). The site is surrounded by many highly congested roads and residential complexes [44,45,46].
Seosan is a rural area in Chungcheong-do with a population of approximately 0.18 million and an area of 742 km2 (Figure S1) [43,46]. This area is considered an “agro-industrial area”, which combines farms, power plants, and markets. The measurements were conducted at an air-quality monitoring station in the Chungcheong region operated by the NIER (36°78′ N, 126°49′ E).

2.2. Measurements

The concentrations of PM2.5 and PM2.5-bound trace elements were simultaneously quantified hourly at the two sites from 15 December 2020 to 15 January 2021. The β-ray absorption technique was used to measure the mass concentrations of PM2.5 (BAM1020, Met One Instruments Inc., Grants Pass, OR, USA). Si, K, S, Ca, Ti, Fe, V, Mn, Cr, Ni, Cu, As, Zn, Se, Ba, Br, and Pb were quantified using an ambient online nondestructive energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence monitor (Xact625i, Ambient Metal Monitor, COOPER ENVIRONMENTAL, Tigard, OR, USA) [47,48]. The method detection limit (MDL) varied from 1.17 to 17.8 ng m−3 for Si, S, Cl, and K (Table S1), [47,49,50] and from 0.1 to 0.39 ng m−3 for Ba, Ca, Fe, Mn, Pb, V, Cr, Ni, and Br. For Se, Cu, Zn, and As, the MDL ranged from 0.063 to 0.08 ng m−3 [49,50]. A high percentage of samples were below the detection limit for Ba, Ni, and V in Seoul, and for V, Si, and Cr in Seosan (Table 1).

2.2.1. Dry Deposition Calculations

Dry deposition flux (DDF) is calculated by multiplying element concentrations by dry deposition velocities [24,51]. DDFs (µg m−2 d−1) of trace elements were estimated for the Seoul and Seosan sites. Herein, the dry deposition rates of specific species were expected to be 2 cm s−1 for dust-originated elements, 1 cm s−1 for anthropogenic elements, and 0.5 cm s−1 for remaining trace elements; these were selected based on previous research on these species of PM2.5 [24,52,53,54]. In prior works, similar dry deposition rates were estimated using the DDF of atmospheric trace elements [24,55].

2.2.2. Exposure Estimations

Non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risk assessments for trace elements (Figure S4) were conducted using the methods of the Integrated Risk Information System and the United States Environmental Protection Agency database [56,57,58,59]. PM2.5-bound trace elements pose potential health risks to children and adults through dermal contact, inhalation, and ingestion; therefore, the dermal absorbed dose (DAD), chemical daily intake (CDI), and exposure concentration (EC) were assessed [59] (Equations (1)–(3), respectively). The exposure assessment formulae are as follows:
DAD dermal = C × SA × AF × ABS BW × EF × ED AT × CF ,
CDI ingestion = C × IngR BW × EF × ED AT × CF ,
EC inhalation = C × InhR × EF × ED BW × PEF × ATn ,
where C is the concentration (µg m−3). The exposure duration (ED) is 6 y for children and 24 y for adults. IngR is the ingestion rate (mg day−1), and EF is the exposure frequency (180 d y−1 for residents). The ingestion rate is 200 and 100 mg d−1 for children and adults, respectively. Body weight (BW) is 70 and 15 kg for adults and children, respectively; CF (conversion factor) is 10−6 kg mg−1; ET (exposure time) is 24 h d−1; AT (the time average for non-carcinogenic elements) is equal to ED × 365 days, where for carcinogens it is equal to 70 years × 365 days [24,59,60] (Table S2). The average time (ATn) for non-carcinogens is ATn = 365 d × ED × 24 h d−1, while for carcinogenic elements is ATn = 70 y × 24 h × 365 d y−1. AF (the skin adherence factor) is 0.2 mg cm−1 h−1; SA denotes the exposed skin area (3300 and 2800 cm2 for adults and children, respectively). According to the US EPA, the dermal absorption factor (or ABS) is 0.03, 0.1, and 0.01 for As, Pb, and the remaining elements, respectively (Table S2) [24,59,61].

2.2.3. Non-Carcinogenic Risk Characterizations

To calculate non-carcinogenic risks, we used the hazard index (HI = ΣHazard Quotient (HQ). The non-CR caused by PM2.5-bound trace elements (Cr, Mn, Ni, Cu, V, Zn, As, and Pb) was determined utilizing the following equations (Equations (4)–(7)):
HQ ingestion = CDI RfDo   ,
HQ dermal = DAD RfDo GIABS   ,
HQ inhalation = EC R f C i 1000   µ g   mg 1   ,
HI = HQingestion + HQdermal + HQinhalation,
where the oral reference dosage is in mg kg−1 d−1, while the gastrointestinal absorption factor and the inhalation reference concentration are in µg m−3, and they are denoted by RfDo, GIABS, and RfCi, respectively (Table S2). The probable non-cancer consequences were measured using the HI, estimated as the sum of the HQ values [57,60,62]. When the HI values of non-carcinogenic trace elements were below one, they did not pose a risk to adults or children [56]. The potential for non-carcinogenic risks increases if the HI increases above one [59].

2.2.4. Cancer Risk Characterizations

CR is the likelihood of developing cancer due to lifelong contact with carcinogens [10]. Intended for regulatory purposes, the acceptable or tolerable hazard of emerging cancer throughout of a human’s life ranges from 1 × 10−4 to 1 × 10−6 [63]. The CR posed by trace elements (Cr, Ni, As, and Pb) through various paths—including inhalation, ingestion, and dermal contact—was estimated and used to calculate the total cancer hazard (CRrisk) as follows (Equations (8)–(11)) [56,59]:
CR ingestion = CDI SF 0   ,
CR dermal = DAD SF 0 GIABS   ,
CR inhalation = IUR EC   ,
CR risk = CR ingestion + CR dermal + CR inhalation ,
where the inhalation unit risk is in µg m−3, the inhalation reference concentration is in µg m−3, and the oral slope factor is in mg kg−1 d−1, denoted by IUR, RfCi, and SFo, respectively. A CR of greater than 10−4 indicates a severe risk of cancer [64]. In contrast, a CR of less than 10−6 indicates either a low risk or an acceptable risk [64]. Previous research has determined that the concentration proportion of Cr(VI) and Cr(III) is 1:6. As a result, the Cr(VI) concentration used to calculate the CR was adjusted to 1/7 of the total Cr concentration observed [24].

2.2.5. Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

Principal component analysis (PCA) was used in the Origin application (OriginPro, Version 2022, OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA) to identify potential sources of PM2.5-bound trace elements in Seoul and Seosan. PCA was used to identify site-specific sources using winter data by site [65,66]. PCA was performed using a varimax rotation of the data matrix, and the principal components (PCs) or factors (Fs) were extracted in accordance with a set of quality criteria: the number of eigenvalues greater than 1 (Kaiser criterion), with more than 70–85% of cumulative variance explained by the corresponding PCs. The loadings of obvious variables were near one, while those of non-obvious variables were near zero. Variables with a loading of 0.5 were considered to be factor indicators.

2.2.6. Enrichment Factor

The enrichment factors (EFs) were calculated in order to determine the degree of contamination of each element in PM2.5, and to determine whether it primarily came from anthropogenic or natural sources [44,67]. The definition of EF is the ratio of a particular element’s concentration (Xi) to Fe (Xreference, a reference element for crustal dust), normalized to the same ratio in the upper continental crust and calculated as follows using Equation (12) [68]:
Enrichment   Factors   = X i X reference A e r o s o l X i X reference C r u s t
where ()aerosol and ()crust refer to the PM2.5 sample and continental crust, respectively. The reference element used in this study was iron (Fe), which is also supported by previous research in Korea [44].

2.2.7. Potential Source Contribution Function (PSCF)

The PSCF was calculated using PM2.5-bound trace element concentrations, and air-mass back-trajectories were calculated using NOAA’s HYSPLIT4 (Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Trajectory) model with Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS) grid meteorological data to identify the likely locations of the regional sources for long-range transboundary aerosols [69,70]. This calculates the probability that a source exists at latitude i and longitude j. The PSCF for the ijth grid cell, PSCFij, was determined for PM2.5 values as follows:
P S C F i j = m i i j n i j
where nij is the total number of trajectory endpoints that fall into the ijth cell, and mij is the number of endpoints in the same cell corresponding to trajectories associated with concentration values at each receptor site above a predefined criteria value [70]. As a result, cells with a high PSCF value are expected to produce high concentration values at receptor locations and, thus, can be reasonably believed to be potential source areas [69]. The details of the PSCF input parameters are given elsewhere [70].

2.2.8. Tukey’s Test and Paired t-Test

The daily mean concentrations of PM2.5 and PM2.5-bound trace elements between Seoul and Seosan were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s test and paired t-tests [71,72]. These tests were carried out to determine whether there were any significant differences in the mean PM2.5 and PM2.5-bound trace element concentrations between the Seoul and Seosan sites. The paired-sample t-test’s statistical significance level was set at 5%.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Overview of Trace Elements and PM2.5 in Urban and Rural Areas

During the present study, in Seoul, S had the highest median concentration of all trace elements in PM2.5 (1446.9 ng m−3), followed by K (251.1 ng m−3) and Si (237.5 ng m−3); in Seosan, S also had the highest median concentration (1265.2 ng m−3), followed by Si (306.1 ng m−3) and K (294.5 ng m−3) (Table 1). For all elements, the mean concentrations were higher than the median concentrations, indicating the impact of episodic high-concentration events (Table 1). A similar variance in mean and median concentrations has been reported in Bhopal, India, possibly as a result of the impact of episodic high-concentration events [24]. Furthermore, PM2.5 concentrations were higher than 35 µg m−3 during episodic events, owing to high concentrations of S, K, and crustal elements at both study sites (Figure S2). In Seoul, the mean concentrations for Ni and S varied between 0.5 ng m−3 and 1446.9 ng m−3, while those for V and S in Seosan varied between 0.51 ng m−3 and 1265.2 ng m−3. S and crustal elements (Si, Ca, and Fe) were the major components detected in both Seoul and Seosan, which is consistent with the findings of previous studies conducted at these locations during winter [19,39]. The mean S concentration was significantly higher in Seoul than in Seosan, and the opposite trend was true for the concentrations of crustal elements (Si, Fe, Ca, and Ti). The paired t-test revealed that the differences between Seoul and Seosan based on S, K, Ca, and Fe were statistically significant (Tukey’s test and paired t-test, p < 0.05; Table S4). In Seoul, high S concentrations were primarily emitted from burning coal [73]. The higher crustal element concentrations in Seosan compared with those in Seoul may have been due to the characteristics and amounts of resuspended dust. K concentrations were higher in Seosan than in Seoul, which could be attributed to wood burning for cooking and agricultural waste burning to prepare fields for the next harvest.
Anthropogenic elements, such as Zn, Pb, Mn, Cu, and As, were prevalent at both sites. The concentrations of Pb, Cu, V, Ni, Se, and Zn at both sites were similar. Zn and Cu are tracers of brake and tire wear [74]. The primary sources of atmospheric Pb in previous studies have been identified as vehicular and ship emissions, heavy oil combustion, transboundary coal combustion emissions, waste incineration, and recirculation of historic leaded gasoline [74]. Moreover, Fe, Pb, and Zn emissions in China in 2013 were determined to have originated from five main emission sectors: industrial, residential sources, transportation, power generation, and windblown dust [75].
Trace elemental ratios are reliable tracers of pollutants emitted to the atmosphere by coal combustion, oil combustion, waste burning, and industrial emissions [74,76,77]. As tracers for coal and oil combustion, respectively, the V/Pb and V/Ni ratios can be used [78]. In general, coals have a high V content, and a V/Pb ratio greater than 1 suggests coal combustion emissions, while a lower V/Pb ratio implies vehicle exhaust emissions. The waste and emissions from non-coal-burning industries have a V/Pb ratio of <<1. The ratios of V/Pb were found to be 0.03 ± 0.03 in Seoul and 0.03 ± 0.04 in Seosan. The V/Pb ratio was <<1, indicating that these elements may be emitted as a result of industrial activity or the burning of waste. The impurities V and Ni have been widely used as tracers of petroleum combustion, since they are always present in heavy oil [79]. The V/Ni ratio in heavy oil combustion is between 3 and 4, the ratio in ship emissions is between 2.5 and 5, and increased Ni emissions from oil burning result in lower ratios [74,80,81,82]. The V/Ni ratio was found to be 1.33 ± 2.08 in Seoul and 1.04 ± 1.17 in Seosan, suggesting that these elements may be emitted during oil combustion. The V/Ni ratios of above 0.7 suggested that these elements were emitted as a result of oil burning [82].
During the entire monitoring period, the daily mean concentration of PM2.5 in Seosan (31.2 ± 13.3 µgm−3) was higher than that in Seoul (23.0 ± 12.4 µgm−3) [42] (Text S1). During the study period, the daily mean values of temperature (T), relative humidity (RH), and wind speed (WS) were −3.5 ± 6.3 °C, 57 ± 16%, and 2.4 ± 1.1 m s−1 in Seoul, respectively, and −2.6 ± 5.6, 70 ± 17.1%, and 1.8 ± 1.7 m s−1 in Seosan, respectively. In comparison to the Seoul site, Seosan had a higher relative humidity and a lower wind speed. The higher PM2.5 concentrations in Seoul compared to Seosan were mostly attributable to the lower temperature, lower wind speed, and higher relative humidity during the measurement period [42]. According to previous studies, high PM2.5 concentrations result from its accumulation under high RH, low WS, and low T [42,83,84,85].

3.2. Comparison of Variation in the Trace Elements of PM2.5 in Urban and Rural Areas

The diurnal variation in PM2.5-bound trace elements is important because it suggests information about the short-term air quality, sources, and formation characteristics of these components on an hourly basis [26]. Figure 1 displays the diurnal variations in PM2.5 and its trace elements in Seoul (dashed black line) throughout the entire measurement period. The main peak in hourly PM2.5 concentration in Seoul occurred between 9:00 and 14:00 (Figure 1). S displayed a high concentration between 5:00 and 13:00, and a second peak between 15:00 and 20:00. In Seoul, no apparent diurnal variations in K concentrations were observed. The Si, Fe, Ca, and Ti concentrations peaked between 7:00 and 14:00, which may be associated with crustal sources. Because of potential similarities in their sources, Cu, Pb, Zn, and Mn also showed concentration peaks between 7:00 and 14:00. The Br concentration peaked around 10:00 and 19:00 at the Seoul site.
Figure 1 shows the diurnal variation in PM2.5 and its elements in Seosan (red solid line). A bimodal distribution of hourly PM2.5 concentrations was observed, with a major peak between 20:00 and 22:00, and a comparable peak between 8:00 and 13:00 (Figure 1). S showed a high concentration peak between 8:00 and 14:00, followed by modest peaks at 16:00–18:00 and 20:00–23:00. K demonstrated an intense concentration peak between 8:00 and 14:00. Si, Ca, Fe, and Ti all showed high peaks between 9:00 and 14:00, which could be attributed to the similar sources of these elements. Zn, Cu, Pb, and Mn all showed major concentration peaks between similar hours of 9:00 and 14:00, which may also be indicative of similar origins. The Br concentration peaked around 10:00 and 22:00 at the Seosan site.
In general, almost all measured elements’ concentrations increased in the morning and decreased in the afternoon in both the rural and urban areas (Figure 1). The morning peak could be attributed to vehicle emissions during traffic rush hours [86]. The peak concentrations of Cu, Zn, Mn, and Pb might be related to tire and brake-lining wear [87,88,89]. Source apportionment studies of Korea have suggested that Br and Pb may be emitted from vehicular and/or burning (e.g., biomass, waste material, coal, oil) activities [90,91]. However, the nighttime peak may have been due to decreases in T, WS, and planetary boundary layer height (PBLH), along with an increase in relative humidity (RH). At night, the lower PBLH tends to limit the dispersion of PM [92]. The PBLH was typically high during the day, which is suitable for pollution dispersion; thus, PM2.5 and most elements displayed lower concentrations during the afternoon [92,93]. Furthermore, S had higher hourly concentrations in Seoul than in Seosan; however, the remaining trace elements had higher concentrations in Seosan than in Seoul. A more intense morning peak in K concentration was observed in Seosan than in Seoul, possibly due to agricultural burning activities in the rural area [43,94]. At both sites, Cr, As, Ni, V, and Se displayed clear peaks throughout the day, possibly owing to industrial emissions [95].

3.3. Origins of Trace Elements in PM2.5

Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to identify the sources of PM2.5-bound trace elements at the Seoul and Seosan sites (Table 2, Text S2). PCA is widely used in studies to identify the sources of various aerosol components [10,44,96]. The factor loadings (F1 to F4) were determined using a varimax rotation for each element [97]. The number of factors was determined by an eigenvalue of one or more [97]. In this study, the three factors identified in Seoul and four in Seosan are described as follows:
Three factors contributed 85.3% of the total explained variation in the Seoul data. The first factor was anthropogenic activity (e.g., coal burning, industrial, biomass burning, and vehicular activities), with high S, Mn, Ni, Cu, Se, Br, Zn, and Ba loadings. The second factor was related to soil dust resuspension, with a high loading of crustal elements (Si, Ca, Ti, and Fe). The third factor revealed the presence of Pb and As sources, which included metal smelting, crustal sources, coal combustion, and burning of municipal waste [98,99,100].
Four factors contributed approximately 86.8% of the total variance in the Seosan data (Table 2). The first factor was the resuspension of soil dust, which had high loadings of crustal elements (Si, Ca, Ti, and Fe) (Table 2). The second factor had high loadings of S, K, Ni, Se, and Br, which were determined to be associated with coal and biomass burning. The third factor, characterized by high Cr, Mn, Cu, and Zn loadings, was related to traffic and industry. The fourth factor in Seosan was the high loadings of As and Pb. According to the analysis, K was mainly associated with crustal sources in Seoul and combustion sources in Seosan. As previously reported, V and Ni are well-known tracers for oil combustion sources [101]. However, in the PCA results, Ni and V were separate factors. Thus, source apportionment tools, such as positive matrix factorization (PMF), may be required to gain a better understanding of the sources of Ni and V in PM2.5 sources in Seoul and Seosan.
Emissions from anthropogenic sources must be drastically reduced to the greatest extent practicable in comparison to emissions from natural sources. More important information for risk management can be obtained around the sampling site from a thorough assessment of the risk levels of metals from anthropogenic sources than from that of metals from natural sources (Figure 2). If the calculated values of EF for a certain element are close to unity, it means that crustal dust is the predominant source [67,102]. On the other hand, EFs greater than 10 suggest a considerable contribution from anthropogenic sources [67,74,103]. At both the Seoul and Seosan sites, S, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Br, and Pb were identified as anthropogenic elements with EF values greater than 10 (Figure 2). In a previous study conducted in Seoul, Si, Ti, and Fe were suggested as having crustal origins, while S, Zn, and Pb were suggested as anthropogenic elements using EF calculations [39].
To explore the possible source locations of PM2.5 and its elements, the potential source contribution function (PSCF) was used (Figure 3a,b and Text S2). Text S2 in the Supplementary Materials provides information about backward air-mass trajectories and their use for PSCF. The results indicate that Southern China (i.e., Shandong, Anhui, Jiangsu, Henan, and Hebei provinces) was the likely source of PM2.5 arriving at Seoul (Figure 3a), whereas that arriving at Seosan mainly originated from Jiangsu, Henan, and Anhui. Shandong, Anhui, Jiangsu, Henan, and Hebei were probable sulfur source locations for both sites. Industry in China has become more concentrated and agglomerated along the coast in the east, north, and south; Shandong, Anhui, Jiangsu, Henan, and Hebei are notable examples [104,105]. For K, the potential source locations for Seoul included Shandong, Jiangsu, and Hebei, whereas those for Seosan were the Jiangsu, Anhui, and Shanghai metropolitan areas. According to a previous study, the eastern provinces of China (including Shandong, Jiangsu, Hebei, Anhui, and Shanghai) are well known for their high PM2.5 concentrations and biomass burning throughout the winter [106,107]. The fires were visible during the study period in the eastern regions of China (Figure S3). For soil, potential source regions for Seoul included Shandong, Jiangsu, and Hebei, whereas those for Seosan included Inner Mongolia and the coasts of Jiangsu, Anhui, and Zhejiang provinces.

3.4. Estimated dry Deposition Fluxes of Elements in PM2.5 in Urban and Rural Areas

Elements—especially metals that are toxic and deposited on soil and plants—can harm human health and the environment due to their entry and accumulation in food chains [53,108]. The atmospheric deposition of pollutants, which is known as dry deposition, can be measured as DDF and is a vital method for removing contaminants from the air [53,55,109]. Table 3 summarizes the average DDF for each element of PM2.5 at the urban and rural sites. The average DDF values were within similar ranges at the two sites: from 0.5 ± 0.4 (Ni and V) to 1253.8 ± 654.0 μg m−2 d−1 (S) in Seoul, and from 0.3 ± 0.4 (V) to 1096.4 ± 451.6 μg m−2 d−1 (S) in Seosan (Table 3). The DDF values of S and primarily crustal elements (Si, Ca, and Fe) were higher than those of primarily anthropogenic elements (including, but not limited to, Mn, Zn, Cu, and Pb) for all samples at these study sites (Table 3).
The DDF values of crustal elements (such as Si, Ca, Fe, and Ti) were higher than those of anthropogenic elements (such as Zn, Pb, Mn, Cu, and As) at both locations, because crustal elements were generally found in bare soils and contributed to fine PM mass via resuspension during the study period [24,110,111]. According to prior research, even though heavy trace metals form a small fraction of particle mass and have lower DDFs than crustal elements, they are hazardous to both adults and children [12,112]. The standard deviations were comparable to or slightly greater than the mean DDF values, indicating significant daily variability in DDF (Table 3).
The similar dry deposition velocities at the Seoul and Seosan sites demonstrated that the DDF was controlled primarily by element concentrations, and the DDFs of pollutants were affected by their concentrations. Thus, the measured fluxes and concentrations should theoretically exhibit strong correlations [113,114]. In theory, particles with minimal changes in their DDF should have a strong association between their concentration and flux, because changes in concentration mainly affect flux [51,110]. Additionally, the RH was higher in Seosan (mean 70%) than in Seoul (57%), which might have played a role in the higher DDF for major elements in Seosan than for those in Seoul (Table 3). Furthermore, high RH results in increased particle size via hygroscopic growth, which can significantly increase the particle deposition rate [51].

3.5. Health Risk Assessments

3.5.1. Exposure Assessments for Trace Elements

The values for CDI, DAD, and EC correspond to ingestion, dermal contact, and inhalation, respectively, as shown in Figure S4. During the study period, adults and children in Seoul and Seosan were mainly exposed to trace elements through ingestion. The potential exposure of adults and children at both sites to S, K, and Si was higher via all three routes than for the remaining elements. The S and K emissions in Seoul were associated with many different sources, including coal burning, industrial activities, biomass burning, and vehicular activity (Table 2, PCA). In contrast, in Seosan, S and K were mainly associated with coal combustion and biomass burning (Table 2, PCA). At both locations, exposure to Si was primarily due to crustal sources.

3.5.2. Non-Carcinogenic Health Risks

The non-carcinogenic potential health risks due to elements (Pb, Cr, Cu, V, Mn, Ni, Zn, and As) through various exposure pathways (i.e., dermal contact, ingestion, and inhalation) at the Seoul and Seosan sites were estimated via the HQ (Table 4). In Seoul, the HQ values for adults were 1.6 × 10−5, 8.5 × 10−5, and 3.2 × 10−12, while those for children were 1.5 × 10−4, 3.3 × 10−4, and 7.4 × 10−12, through ingestion, dermal, and inhalation contact, respectively. In Seosan, the HQ values for adults were 1.4 × 10−5, 8.4 × 10−5, and 3.8 × 10−12, while those for children were 1.3 × 10−4, 3.3 × 10−4, and 8.8 × 10−12, through ingestion, dermal contact, and inhalation, respectively. At both sites, the HQ values associated with As, Cr, Pb, Ni Cu, Zn, and Mn were primarily attributed to dermal contact in adults (8.46 × 10−5) and children (3.35 × 10−4). Moreover, at both sites, the dermal exposure to Cr had the highest estimated HQ values for both adults (3.67 × 10−5) and children (1.45 × 10−4) (Table 4). The estimated HQ values were higher for children than for adults at both locations for all exposure routes (Table 4).
The estimated HI was higher in Seoul than in Seosan for adults and children (Table 4). In Seoul and Seosan, the HI was higher for children (4.8 × 10−4 and 4.6 × 10−4, respectively) than for adults (1.0 × 10−4 and 9.8 × 10−5, respectively). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test and paired t-tests was used to assess the statistical differences in HI between Seoul and Seosan (Tables S4 and S5). The HIs of the elements at the Seoul and Seosan sites did not reveal any significant differences (p > 0.05). Furthermore, the exposures to PM2.5-bound trace elements were not significantly different between Seoul and Seosan (p > 0.05). The HI was within the permissible limit (HI < 1) at both sites, indicating no potential non-carcinogenic health risks to humans. According to a previous study conducted in the Chinese province of Shandong, the health risks from As and Zn primarily occurred via dermal contact and ingestion [60]. Adults were more likely to be harmed by dermal contact, whereas children were more likely to be harmed by ingestion [115].

3.5.3. Carcinogenic Risk

In Seoul and Seosan, the potential CRs of As, Ni, Cr, and Pb were estimated for inhalation, ingestion, and dermal contact (Figure 4). In Seoul, for both adults and children, the CR values were higher for ingestion (3.2 × 10−9 and 7.5 × 10−9, respectively) than for dermal contact (1.5 × 10−9 and 1.4 × 10−9, respectively) and inhalation (4.2 × 10−18 and 2.4 × 10−18, respectively). At Seosan, for both adults and children, the CR values were also higher for ingestion (3.0 × 10−9 and 6.9 × 10−9, respectively) than for dermal contact (1.47 × 10−9 and 1.46 × 10−9, respectively) and inhalation (5.0 × 10−18 and 2.9 × 10−18, respectively). Furthermore, throughout the research period, the CR values for Cr, Ni, As, and Pb via all exposure routes were higher in Seoul than in Seosan. In Seoul, the highest CR value was for As ingestion by children (CR, 3.9 × 10−9), whereas the highest CR value in Seosan was for Pb ingestion by children (CR, 3.32 × 10−9). The CR values for Cr, As, Ni, and Pb in PM2.5 at both sites were less than 1 × 10−6 for adults and children for all exposure routes; therefore, the risk of developing cancer from these toxic elements would be considered acceptable under most regulatory programs (Figure 4). According to a study conducted in rural and urban areas of northern Zhejiang Province, China, PM2.5-bound elements posed significant non-CRs and CRs to the general public [10].

4. Conclusions

In this study, the trace constituents of PM2.5 in Seoul and Seosan, South Korea, were measured during winter. The most abundant elements at the study sites were S and crustal elements (Si, Ca, Fe, and Ti). Additionally, the morning element concentrations were higher than the afternoon and evening element concentrations, which could be attributed to high traffic volumes and favorable weather conditions (lower T, lower WS, and higher RH). PM2.5 concentrations were higher than 35 µg m−3 during episodic events, primarily due to high concentrations of S, K, and crustal elements at both study sites. Most elements exhibited spatial variation in their average concentration. For example, S was higher in Seoul, whereas crustal elements were higher in Seosan. The DDFs of the crustal elements (Si, Fe, and Ca) were greater than the DDFs of the primarily anthropogenic elements (Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn, Cr) in both Seoul and Seosan. During the winter, children were exposed to more elements by ingestion, dermal contact, and inhalation than adults in Seoul and Seosan. The health risk assessment for element exposure suggested no significant carcinogenic or non-carcinogenic effects in children and adults for either of the study sites. Compared with other elements, As and Pb were found to have higher CR values for adults and children at both study sites. In Seoul, higher CR levels were mostly linked to anthropogenic sources (traffic emissions, coal combustion, and biomass burning), whereas in Seosan they were linked to coal and biomass burning. We also suggest that future scientists and policymakers use these trace element concentration and health risk estimation results with caution, because they are specific to Seoul and Seosan.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/atmos14040753/s1, Text S1: Temporal variation of PM2.5; Text S2: Estimation of the origins of the elements [113,114]; Table S1: Method detection limits (ng m−3) of trace elements analyzed using Xact 605i; Table S2: Values to be used as guidelines for estimating the health risks posed by PM2.5-bound trace elements via various pathways [115,116,117,118]; Table S3: Comparison of PM2.5 (µg/m3) and trace element (ng m−3) concentrations at the study sites with those from other studies [11,28,38,41,60,106,119]; Table S4: One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test and paired t-tests of daily mean PM2.5 and chemical species concentrations in Seoul and Seosan; Table S5: One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test and paired t-tests of health and exposure associated with PM2.5-bound trace elements in Seoul and Seosan; Figure S1: Study sites in South Korea; Figure S2: Daily variation of minor elements in Seoul and Seosan during the winter period; Figure S3: Fire spots in South Korea and neighboring countries during the sampling period. Image retrieved from NASA’s FIRMS VIIRS satellite (https://firms.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/ accessed on 2 April 2023.); Figure S4: PM2.5-bound element exposure assessment over the Seoul (grey box) and Seosan (red box) locations in South Korea during the winter of 2020–2021. The values in this figure show TE exposure assessment based on daily average concentrations. Ingestion: chemical daily intake (CDI), dermal contact: dermal absorbed dose (DAD), and inhalation: exposure concentration (EC) were used to estimate exposure to elements in PM2.5.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.L.; Methodology, K.L. and J.N.; Investigation, J.N.; Data curation, J.N. and J.A.; Writing—original draft, J.N.; Writing—review and editing, K.L., J.N. and M.S.; Visualization, J.N.; Supervision, M.S.; Project administration, J.L. and M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Fine Particle Research Initiative in East Asia Considering National Differences. Project, National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2020M3G1A1114548), Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2022R1I1A1A01066511), the National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER-2021-03-03-002) and Research Base Construction Fund Support Program, Jeonbuk National University (2022).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Fine Particle Research Initiative in East Asia Considering National Differences) Project, National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2020M3G1A1114548), Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2022R1I1A1A01066511) and the National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER-2021-03-03-002). This work was also supported by Research Base Construction Fund Support Program, Jeonbuk National University in 2022.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Cao, J.J.; Wang, Q.Y.; Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Tie, X.X.; Shen, Z.X.; Wang, P.; An, Z.S. Impacts of Aerosol Compositions on Visibility Impairment in Xi’an, China. Atmos. Environ. 2012, 59, 559–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Akhbarizadeh, R.; Dobaradaran, S.; Amouei Torkmahalleh, M.; Saeedi, R.; Aibaghi, R.; Faraji Ghasemi, F. Suspended Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5), Microplastics (MPs), and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Air: Their Possible Relationships and Health Implications. Environ. Res. 2021, 192, 110339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cohen, A.J.; Brauer, M.; Burnett, R.; Anderson, H.R.; Frostad, J.; Estep, K.; Balakrishnan, K.; Brunekreef, B.; Dandona, L.; Dandona, R.; et al. Estimates and 25-Year Trends of the Global Burden of Disease Attributable to Ambient Air Pollution: An Analysis of Data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015. Lancet 2017, 389, 1907–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gu, H.; Yan, W.; Elahi, E.; Cao, Y. Air Pollution Risks Human Mental Health: An Implication of Two-Stages Least Squares Estimation of Interaction Effects. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 2036–2043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kioumourtzoglou, M.A.; Spiegelman, D.; Szpiro, A.A.; Sheppard, L.; Kaufman, J.D.; Yanosky, J.D.; Williams, R.; Laden, F.; Hong, B.; Suh, H. Exposure Measurement Error in PM2.5 Health Effects Studies: A Pooled Analysis of Eight Personal Exposure Validation Studies. Environ. Health A Glob. Access Sci. Source 2014, 13, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lippmann, M. Toxicological and Epidemiological Studies of Cardiovascular Effects of Ambient Air Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) and Its Chemical Components: Coherence and Public Health Implications. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2014, 44, 299–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zheng, Y.; Wen, X.; Bian, J.; Lipkind, H.; Hu, H. Associations between the Chemical Composition of PM2.5 and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Environ. Res. 2021, 198, 110470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jo, Y.S.; Lim, M.N.; Han, Y.J.; Kim, W.J. Epidemiological Study of PM2.5and Risk of COPD-Related Hospital Visits in Association with Particle Constituents in Chuncheon, Korea. Int. J. COPD 2018, 13, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jin, Q.; Gong, L.; Liu, S.; Ren, R. Assessment of Trace Elements Characteristics and Human Health Risk of Exposure to Ambient PM2.5 in Hangzhou, China. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2017, 97, 983–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, J.; Jia, C.; Yu, H.; Xu, H.; Ji, D.; Wang, C.; Xiao, H.; He, J. Characteristics, Sources, and Health Risks of PM2.5-Bound Trace Elements in Representative Areas of Northern Zhejiang Province, China. Chemosphere 2021, 272, 129632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, J.; Zhou, X.; Wang, Z.; Yang, L.; Wang, J.; Wang, W. Science of the Total Environment Trace Elements in PM 2.5 in Shandong Province: Source Identification and Health Risk Assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 621, 558–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, H.; Zhou, H.; Fan, Z.; Lin, M.; Wu, D.; Xia, B. Characteristics, Sources and Health Risk Assessment of Toxic Heavy Metals in PM2.5 at a Megacity of Southwest China. Environ. Geochem. Health 2016, 38, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Park, S.K.; Adar, S.D.; O’Neill, M.S.; Auchincloss, A.H.; Szpiro, A.; Bertoni, A.G.; Navas-Acien, A.; Kaufman, J.D.; Diez-Roux, A.V. Long-Term Exposure to Air Pollution and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in a Multiethnic Cohort. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2015, 181, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Moufarrej, L.; Verdin, A.; Cazier, F.; Ledoux, F.; Courcot, D. Oxidative Stress Response in Pulmonary Cells Exposed to Different Fractions of PM2.5-0.3 from Urban, Traffic and Industrial Sites. Environ. Res. 2023, 216, 114572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tao, Y.; Kou, L.; Chai, Y.; Kwan, M.P. Associations of Co-Exposures to Air Pollution and Noise with Psychological Stress in Space and Time: A Case Study in Beijing, China. Environ. Res. 2021, 196, 110399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gorai, A.K.; Tchounwou, P.B.; Biswal, S.S.; Tuluri, F. Spatio-Temporal Variation of Particulate Matter(PM2.5) Concentrations and Its Health Impacts in a Mega City, Delhi in India. Environ. Health Insights 2018, 12, 1178630218792861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bae, M.S.; Demerjian, K.L.; Schwab, J.J. Seasonal Estimation of Organic Mass to Organic Carbon in PM2.5 at Rural and Urban Locations in New York State. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 7467–7479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Balasubramanian, R.; Qian, W.B.; Decesari, S.; Facchini, M.C.; Fuzzi, S. Comprehensive Characterization of PM2.5 Aerosols in Singapore. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2003, 108, D16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Park, S.M.; Song, I.H.; Park, J.S.; Oh, J.; Moon, K.J.; Shin, H.J.; Ahn, J.Y.; Lee, M.-D.; Kim, J.; Lee, G. Variation of PM2.5 Chemical Compositions and Their Contributions to Light Extinction in Seoul. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2018, 18, 2220–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lu, X.; Zhang, X.; Li, L.Y.; Chen, H. Assessment of Metals Pollution and Health Risk in Dust from Nursery Schools in Xi’an, China. Environ. Res. 2014, 128, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sánchez-Soberón, F.; Rovira, J.; Sierra, J.; Mari, M.; Domingo, J.L.; Schuhmacher, M. Seasonal Characterization and Dosimetry-Assisted Risk Assessment of Indoor Particulate Matter (PM10-2.5, PM2.5-0.25, and PM0.25) Collected in Different Schools. Environ. Res. 2019, 175, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Natsagdorj, A.; Tugsbayan, B.; Battumur, T.; Oyuntsetseg, B.; Lee, J.; Kim, Y.P.; Usuhbayar, B. Seasonal Concentrations of Elements in Both Indoor and Outdoor Housing in PM2.5. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 2021, 252, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Anand, A.; Yadav, S.; Phuleria, H.C. Chemical Characteristics and Oxidative Potential of Indoor and Outdoor PM2.5 in Densely Populated Urban Slums. Environ. Res. 2022, 212, 113562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nirmalkar, J.; Haswani, D.; Singh, A.; Kumar, S.; Sunder Raman, R. Concentrations, Transport Characteristics, and Health Risks of PM2.5-Bound Trace Elements over a National Park in Central India. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 293, 112904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Aggarwal, S.G.; Kumar, S.; Mandal, P.; Sarangi, B.; Singh, K.; Pokhariyal, J.; Mishra, S.K.; Agarwal, S.; Sinha, D.; Singh, S.; et al. Traceability Issue in PM2.5 and PM10 Measurements. Mapan—J. Metrol. Soc. India 2013, 28, 153–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xia, L.; Gao, Y. Characterization of Trace Elements in PM2.5 Aerosols in the Vicinity of Highways in Northeast New Jersey in the U.S. East Coast. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2011, 2, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, Y.; Chang, M.; Ding, S.; Wang, S.; Ni, D.; Hu, H. Monitoring and Source Apportionment of Trace Elements in PM2.5: Implications for Local Air Quality Management. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 196, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hao, Y.; Meng, X.; Yu, X.; Lei, M.; Li, W.; Shi, F.; Yang, W.; Zhang, S.; Xie, S. Characteristics of Trace Elements in PM2.5 and PM10 of Chifeng, Northeast China: Insights into Spatiotemporal Variations and Sources. Atmos. Res. 2018, 213, 550–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tsai, Y.I.; Sopajaree, K.; Kuo, S.C.; Yu, S.P. Potential PM2.5 Impacts of Festival-Related Burning and Other Inputs on Air Quality in an Urban Area of Southern Taiwan. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 527–528, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Reff, A.; Bhave, P.V.; Simon, H.; Pace, T.G.; Pouliot, G.A.; Mobley, J.D.; Houyoux, M. Emissions Inventory of PM2.5 Trace Elements across the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 5790–5796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Baensch-Baltruschat, B.; Kocher, B.; Stock, F.; Reifferscheid, G. Tyre and Road Wear Particles (TRWP)—A Review of Generation, Properties, Emissions, Human Health Risk, Ecotoxicity, and Fate in the Environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 733, 137823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tchounwou, P.B.; Yedjou, C.G.; Patlolla, A.K.; Sutton, D.J. Molecular, Clinical and Environmental Toxicicology Volume 3: Environmental Toxicology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 101, ISBN 978-3-7643-8339-8. [Google Scholar]
  33. Alavanja, M.; Baron, J.A.; Brownson, R.C.; Buffler, P.A.; DeMarini, D.M.; Djordjevic, M.V.; Doll, R.; Fontham, E.T.H.; Gao, Y.T.; Gray, N.; et al. Tobacco Smoke and Involuntary Smoking. IARC Monogr. Eval. Carcinog. Risks Hum. 2004, 83, 1–1413. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mulware, S.J. Trace Elements and Carcinogenicity: A Subject in Review. 3 Biotech 2013, 3, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Domingo, J.L.; Nadal, M. Domestic Waste Composting Facilities: A Review of Human Health Risks. Environ. Int. 2009, 35, 382–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kioumourtzoglou, M.A.; Schwartz, J.D.; Weisskopf, M.G.; Melly, S.J.; Wang, Y.; Dominici, F.; Zanobetti, A. Long-Term PM2.5 Exposure and Neurological Hospital Admissions in the Northeastern United States. Environ. Health Perspect. 2016, 124, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dockery, D.W. Health Effects of Particulate Air Pollution. Ann. Epidemiol. 2009, 19, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, L.; Liu, Y.; Wen, W.; Liang, L.; Ma, X.; Jiao, J.; Guo, K. Source Identification of Trace Elements in PM2.5 at a Rural Site in the North China Plain. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kang, C.M.; Sunwoo, Y.; Lee, H.S.; Kang, B.W.; Lee, S.K. Atmospheric Concentrations of PM2.5 Trace Elements in the Seoul Urban Area of South Korea. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2004, 54, 432–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lee, S.; Han, C.; Ahn, J.; Han, Y.; Lee, A.-h.; Ro, S.; Hong, S. Characterization of Trace Elements and Pb Isotopes in PM2.5 and Isotopic Source Identification during Haze Episodes in Seoul, Korea. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2022, 13, 101442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Won, S.R.; Shim, I.K.; Kim, J.; Ah Ji, H.; Lee, Y.; Lee, J.; Ghim, Y.S. Pm2.5 and Trace Elements in Underground Shopping Districts in the Seoul Metropolitan Area, Korea. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kim, N.K.; Kim, Y.P.; Ghim, Y.S.; Song, M.J.; Kim, C.H.; Jang, K.S.; Lee, K.Y.; Shin, H.J.; Jung, J.S.; Wu, Z.; et al. Spatial Distribution of PM2.5 Chemical Components during Winter at Five Sites in Northeast Asia: High Temporal Resolution Measurement Study. Atmos. Environ. 2022, 290, 119359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Choi, N.R.; Park, S.; Ju, S.; Lim, Y.-B.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, E.; Kim, S.; Shin, H.J.; Kim, Y.P. Contribution of Liquid Water Content Enhancing Aqueous Phase Reaction Forming Ambient Particulate Nitrosamines. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 303, 119142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Rhee, K.A.; Kim, J.K.; Lee, Y.I.; Ulfarsson, G.F. Spatial Regression Analysis of Traffic Crashes in Seoul. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2016, 91, 190–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Park, S.; Son, S.C.; Lee, K.Y. Chemical Characteristics of PM2.5 during Spring and Fall at Two Sites in Chungcheongnam-Do, South Korea; Insight into Fe Solubility and SO42− Formation. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2022, 13, 101350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Services, C.E. Xact ® 625i Multi-Metals Monitoring System. Available online: https://www.ecotech.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Cooper-Environmental-Monitoring-625i-Spec-Sheet.pdf (accessed on 2 April 2023).
  47. Rai, P.; Furger, M.; Slowik, J.G.; Canonaco, F.; Fröhlich, R.; Hüglin, C.; Minguillón, M.C.; Petterson, K.; Baltensperger, U.; Prévôt, A.S.H. Source Apportionment of Highly Time-Resolved Elements during a Firework Episode from a Rural Freeway Site in Switzerland. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2020, 20, 1657–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bhowmik, H.S.; Shukla, A.; Lalchandani, V.; Dave, J.; Rastogi, N.; Kumar, M.; Singh, V.; Tripathi, S.N. Inter-Comparison of Online and Offline Methods for Measuring Ambient Heavy and Trace Elements and Water-Soluble Inorganic Ions (NO3-, SO42-, NH4+, and Cl-) in PM2.5over a Heavily Polluted Megacity, Delhi. Atmos. Meas. Technol. 2022, 15, 2667–2684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Furger, M.; Rai, P.; Slowik, J.G.; Cao, J.; Visser, S.; Baltensperger, U.; Prévôt, A.S.H. Automated Alternating Sampling of PM10 and PM2.5 with an Online XRF Spectrometer. Atmos. Environ. X 2020, 5, 100065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mariraj Mohan, S. An Overview of Particulate Dry Deposition: Measuring Methods, Deposition Velocity and Controlling Factors. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 13, 387–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, Y.; Paytan, A.; Chase, Z.; Measures, C.; Beck, A.J.; Sañudo-Wilhelmy, S.A.; Post, A.F. Sources and Fluxes of Atmospheric Trace Elements to the Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2008, 113, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gao, Y.; Nelson, E.D.; Field, M.P.; Ding, Q.; Li, H.; Sherrell, R.M.; Gigliotti, C.L.; Van Ry, D.A.; Glenn, T.R.; Eisenreich, S.J. Characterization of Atmospheric Trace Elements on PM2.5 Particulate Matter over the New York-New Jersey Harbor Estuary. Atmos. Environ. 2002, 36, 1077–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hsu, S.C.; Wong, G.T.F.; Gong, G.C.; Shiah, F.K.; Huang, Y.T.; Kao, S.J.; Tsai, F.; Candice Lung, S.C.; Lin, F.J.; Lin, I.I.; et al. Sources, Solubility, and Dry Deposition of Aerosol Trace Elements over the East China Sea. Mar. Chem. 2010, 120, 116–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lu, R.; Turco, R.P.; Stolzenbach, K.; Friedlander, S.K.; Xiong, C.; Schiff, K.; Tiefenthaler, L.; Wang, G. Dry Deposition of Airborne Trace Metals on the Los Angeles Basin and Adjacent Coastal Waters. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2003, 108, D2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Cao, S.; Duan, X.; Zhao, X.; Wang, B.; Ma, J.; Fan, D.; Sun, C.; He, B.; Wei, F.; Jiang, G. Health Risk Assessment of Various Metal(Loid)s via Multiple Exposure Pathways on Children Living near a Typical Lead-Acid Battery Plant, China. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 200, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zheng, N.; Liu, J.; Wang, Q.; Liang, Z. Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metal Exposure to Street Dust in the Zinc Smelting District, Northeast of China. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 408, 726–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hu, Y.; Odman, M.T.; Chang, M.E.; Jackson, W.; Lee, S.; Edgerton, E.S.; Baumann, K.; Russell, A.G. Simulation of Air Quality Impacts from Prescribed Fires on an Urban Area. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 3676–3682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. US Environmental Protection Agency Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2011; pp. 1–1466.
  59. Guo, F.; Tang, M.; Wang, X.; Yu, Z.; Wei, F.; Zhang, X.; Jin, M.; Wang, J.; Xu, D.; Chen, Z.; et al. Characteristics, Sources, and Health Risks of Trace Metals in PM2.5. Atmos. Environ. 2022, 289, 119314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Ding, Z.; Wang, T.; Lian, H.; Sun, Y.; Wu, J. Bioaccessibility and Health Risk of Arsenic and Heavy Metals (Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn and Mn) in TSP and PM2.5 in Nanjing, China. Atmos. Environ. 2012, 57, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kogianni, E.; Kouras, A.; Samara, C. Indoor Concentrations of PM2.5 and Associated Water-Soluble and Labile Heavy Metal Fractions in Workplaces: Implications for Inhalation Health Risk Assessment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 58983–58993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. EPA. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A); Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Washington, DC, USA, 1989; Volume I, p. 289.
  63. Lee, S.J.; Lee, H.Y.; Kim, S.J.; Kang, H.J.; Kim, H.; Seo, Y.K.; Shin, H.J.; Ghim, Y.S.; Song, C.K.; Choi, S.D. Pollution Characteristics of PM2.5 during High Concentration Periods in Summer and Winter in Ulsan, the Largest Industrial City in South Korea. Atmos. Environ. 2023, 292, 119418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yuan, C.S.; Wong, K.W.; Tseng, Y.L.; Ceng, J.H.; Lee, C.E.; Lin, C. Chemical Significance and Source Apportionment of Fine Particles (PM2.5) in an Industrial Port Area in East Asia. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2022, 13, 101349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, X.; Eto, Y.; Aikawa, M. Risk Assessment and Management of PM2.5-Bound Heavy Metals in the Urban Area of Kitakyushu, Japan. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 795, 148748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wedepohl, K.H. The Composition of the Continental Crust. Int. Geophys. 1986, 34, 213–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Choi, J.-k.; Heo, J.B.; Ban, S.J.; Yi, S.M.; Zoh, K.D. Source Apportionment of PM2.5 at the Coastal Area in Korea. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 447, 370–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Park, J.; Ryoo, J.; Jee, J.; Song, M. Origins and Distributions of Atmospheric Ammonia in Jeonju during 2019~2020. J. Korean Soc. Atmos. Environ. 2020, 36, 262–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. De La Cruz, A.H.; Roca, Y.B.; Suarez-Salas, L.; Pomalaya, J.; Tolentino, D.A.; Gioda, A. Chemical Characterization of PM 2.5 at Rural and Urban Sites around the Metropolitan Area of Huancayo (Central Andes of Peru). Atmosphere 2019, 10, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sawyer, S.F. Analysis of Variance: The Fundamental Concepts. J. Man. Manip. Ther. 2009, 17, 27E–38E. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kim, Y.; Lee, I.; Farquhar, J.; Kang, J.; Villa, I.M.; Kim, H. Multi Isotope Systematics of Precipitation to Trace the Sources of Air Pollutants in Seoul, Korea. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 286, 117548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ray, I.; Das, R.; Chua, S.L.; Wang, X. Seasonal Variation of Atmospheric Pb Sources in Singapore—Elemental and Lead Isotopic Compositions of PM10 as Source Tracer. Chemosphere 2022, 307, 136029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ying, Q.; Feng, M.; Song, D.; Wu, L.; Hu, J.; Zhang, H.; Kleeman, M.J.; Li, X. Improve Regional Distribution and Source Apportionment of PM 2.5 Trace Elements in China Using Inventory-Observation Constrained Emission Factors. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 624, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kayee, J.; Bureekul, S.; Sompongchaiyakul, P.; Wang, X.; Das, R. Sources of Atmospheric Lead (Pb) after Quarter Century of Phasing out of Leaded Gasoline in Bangkok, Thailand. Atmos. Environ. 2021, 253, 118355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Das, R.; Bin Mohamed Mohtar, A.T.; Rakshit, D.; Shome, D.; Wang, X. Sources of Atmospheric Lead (Pb) in and around an Indian Megacity. Atmos. Environ. 2018, 193, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wu, P.C.; Huang, K.F. Tracing Local Sources and Long-Range Transport of PM10 in Central Taiwan by Using Chemical Characteristics and Pb Isotope Ratios. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Fakhri, N.; Fadel, M.; Öztürk, F.; Keleş, M.; Iakovides, M.; Pikridas, M.; Abdallah, C.; Karam, C.; Sciare, J.; Hayes, P.L.; et al. Comprehensive Chemical Characterization of PM2.5 in the Large East Mediterranean-Middle East City of Beirut, Lebanon. J. Environ. Sci. 2023, 133, 118–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Schauer, J.J.; Majestic, B.J.; Sheesley, R.J.; Shafer, M.M.; Deminter, J.T.; Mieritz, M. HEI Health Review Committee Improved Source Apportionment and Speciation of Low-Volume Particulate Matter Samples. Res. Rep. Health. Eff. Inst. 2010, 3–75, 77–89. [Google Scholar]
  79. Salameh, D.; Detournay, A.; Pey, J.; Pérez, N.; Liguori, F.; Saraga, D.; Bove, M.C.; Brotto, P.; Cassola, F.; Massabò, D.; et al. PM2.5 Chemical Composition in Five European Mediterranean Cities: A 1-Year Study. Atmos. Res. 2015, 155, 102–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mamoudou, I.; Zhang, F.; Chen, Q.; Wang, P.; Chen, Y. Characteristics of PM2.5 from Ship Emissions and Their Impacts on the Ambient Air: A Case Study in Yangshan Harbor, Shanghai. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 640–641, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Luo, Y.; Liu, S.; Che, L.; Yu, Y. Analysis of Temporal Spatial Distribution Characteristics of PM2.5 Pollution and the Influential Meteorological Factors Using Big Data in Harbin, China. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2021, 71, 964–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yang, W.; Wang, G.; Bi, C. Analysis of Long-Range Transport Effects on PM2.5 during a Short Severe Haze in Beijing, China. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2017, 17, 1510–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Pathak, R.K.; Wang, T.; Wu, W.S. Nighttime Enhancement of PM2.5 Nitrate in Ammonia-Poor Atmospheric Conditions in Beijing and Shanghai: Plausible Contributions of Heterogeneous Hydrolysis of N2O5 and HNO3 Partitioning. Atmos. Environ. 2011, 45, 1183–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Chen, R.; Jia, B.; Tian, Y.; Feng, Y. Source-Specific Health Risk Assessment of PM2.5-Bound Heavy Metals Based on High Time-Resolved Measurement in a Chinese Megacity: Insights into Seasonal and Diurnal Variations. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 216, 112167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hou, S.; Zheng, N.; Tang, L.; Ji, X.; Li, Y.; Hua, X. Pollution Characteristics, Sources, and Health Risk Assessment of Human Exposure to Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb Pollution in Urban Street Dust across China between 2009 and 2018. Environ. Int. 2019, 128, 430–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hong, N.; Guan, Y.; Yang, B.; Zhong, J.; Zhu, P.; Ok, Y.S.; Hou, D.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Guan, Y.; Liu, A. Quantitative Source Tracking of Heavy Metals Contained in Urban Road Deposited Sediments. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 393, 122362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Alexakis, D.E. Multielement Contamination of Land in the Margin of Highways. Land 2021, 10, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Park, J.; Kim, H.; Kim, Y.; Heo, J.; Kim, S.W.; Jeon, K.; Yi, S.M.; Hopke, P.K. Source Apportionment of PM2.5 in Seoul, South Korea and Beijing, China Using Dispersion Normalized PMF. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 833, 155056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Park, M.-B.; Lee, T.J.; Lee, E.S.; Kim, D.S. Enhancing Source Identification of Hourly PM2.5 Data in Seoul Based on a Dataset Segmentation Scheme by Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF). Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2019, 10, 1042–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Charron, A.; Harrison, R.M. Matter on a Heavily Trafficked London Highway: Sources and Processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 7768–7776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Pancras, J.P.; Landis, M.S.; Norris, G.A.; Vedantham, R.; Dvonch, J.T. Source Apportionment of Ambient Fine Particulate Matter in Dearborn, Michigan, Using Hourly Resolved PM Chemical Composition Data. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 448, 2–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. One, K.H.; Kim, J.; One, Y.K. A Study on the Factors Affecting the Air Environment in Chungnam Province—Focusing on Cheonan, Dangjin, and Seosan. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop. 2021, 22, 118–127. [Google Scholar]
  93. Huang, H.; Jiang, Y.; Xu, X.; Cao, X. In Vitro Bioaccessibility and Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Atmospheric Particulate Matters from Three Different Functional Areas of Shanghai, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 610–611, 546–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ma, W.; Tai, L.; Qiao, Z.; Zhong, L.; Wang, Z.; Fu, K.; Chen, G. Contamination Source Apportionment and Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Soil around Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator: A Case Study in North China. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 631–632, 348–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Mainka, A.; Zajusz-Zubek, E.; Kaczmarek, K. PM2.5 in Urban and Rural Nursery Schools in Upper Silesia, Poland: Trace Elements Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 7990–8008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Makkonen, U.; Hellén, H.; Anttila, P.; Ferm, M. Size Distribution and Chemical Composition of Airborne Particles in South-Eastern Finland during Different Seasons and Wildfire Episodes in 2006. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 408, 644–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Sánchez De La Campa, A.M.; De La Rosa, J.; González-Castanedo, Y.; Fernández-Camacho, R.; Alastuey, A.; Querol, X.; Stein, A.F.; Ramos, J.L.; Rodríguez, S.; Orellana, I.G.; et al. Levels and Chemical Composition of PM in a City near a Large Cu-Smelter in Spain. J. Environ. Monit. 2011, 13, 1276–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Pant, P.; Harrison, R.M. Critical Review of Receptor Modelling for Particulate Matter: A Case Study of India. Atmos. Environ. 2012, 49, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lee, J.H.; Yoshida, Y.; Turpin, B.J.; Hopke, P.K.; Poirot, R.L.; Lioy, P.J.; Oxley, J.C. Identification of Sources Contributing to Mid-Atlantic Regional Aerosol. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2002, 52, 1186–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Jain, S.; Sharma, S.K.; Vijayan, N.; Mandal, T.K. Seasonal Characteristics of Aerosols (PM2.5 and PM10) and Their Source Apportionment Using PMF: A Four Year Study over Delhi, India. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 262, 114337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Galindo, N.; Yubero, E.; Nicolás, J.F.; Crespo, J.; Varea, M.; Gil-Moltó, J. Regional and Long-Range Transport of Aerosols at Mt. Aitana, Southeastern Spain. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 584–585, 723–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Golley, J. Regional Patterns of Industrial Development during China’s Economic Transition. Econ. Transit. 2002, 10, 761–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, L.; Tang, A.; Goulding, K.; Collett, J.L. Evolution of Secondary Inorganic Aerosols amidst Improving PM2.5 Air Quality in the North China Plain. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 281, 117027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Liang, L.; Engling, G.; Cheng, Y.; Liu, X.; Du, Z.; Ma, Q.; Zhang, X.; Sun, J.; Xu, W.; Liu, C.; et al. Biomass Burning Impacts on Ambient Aerosol at a Background Site in East China: Insights from a Yearlong Study. Atmos. Res. 2020, 231, 104660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Li, X.; Chen, M.; Le, H.P.; Wang, F.; Guo, Z.; Iinuma, Y.; Chen, J.; Herrmann, H. Atmospheric Outflow of PM2.5 Saccharides from Megacity Shanghai to East China Sea: Impact of Biological and Biomass Burning Sources. Atmos. Environ. 2016, 143, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Duan, L.; Song, J.; Xu, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y. The Distribution, Enrichment and Source of Potential Harmful Elements in Surface Sediments of Bohai Bay, North China. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 183, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Pan, Y.P.; Wang, Y.S. Atmospheric Wet and Dry Deposition of Trace Elements at 10 Sites in Northern China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2015, 15, 951–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Yi, S.M.; Shahin, U.; Sivadechathep, J.; Sofuoglu, S.C.; Holsen, T.M. Overall Elemental Dry Deposition Velocities Measured around Lake Michigan. Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 1133–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Tasdemir, Y.; Kural, C.; Cindoruk, S.S.; Vardar, N. Assessment of Trace Element Concentrations and Their Estimated Dry Deposition Fluxes in an Urban Atmosphere. Atmos. Res. 2006, 81, 17–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Jiang, Y.; Shi, L.; Guang, A.-l.; Mu, Z.; Zhan, H.; Wu, Y. Contamination Levels and Human Health Risk Assessment of Toxic Heavy Metals in Street Dust in an Industrial City in Northwest China. Environ. Geochem. Health 2018, 40, 2007–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Zhang, L.; He, J.; Gong, S.; Guo, X.; Zhao, T.; Zhou, C.; Wang, H.; Mo, J.; Gui, K.; Zheng, Y.; et al. Effect of Vegetation Seasonal Cycle Alterations to Aerosol Dry Deposition on PM2.5 Concentrations in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 828, 154211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Qin, J.; Mbululo, Y.; Yang, M.; Yuan, Z.; Nyihirani, F.; Zheng, X. Chemical Composition and Deposition Fluxes of Water-Soluble Inorganic Ions on Dry and Wet Deposition Samples in Wuhan, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Chen, F.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, H.; Gao, J.; Hopke, P.K. Chemical Characteristics of PM2.5 during a 2016 Winter Haze Episode in Shijiazhuang, China. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2017, 17, 368–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Stein, A.F.; Draxler, R.R.; Rolph, G.D.; Stunder, B.J.B.; Cohen, M.D.; Ngan, F. Noaa’s Hysplit Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling System. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2015, 96, 2059–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Human Health Evaluation Manual Part A. 1989. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/risk/risk-assessment-guidance-superfund-rags-part (accessed on 2 April 2023).
  116. US EPA. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. In: Part A: Human Health Evaluation Manual; Part E, Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment; Part F, Supplemental Guidance for Inhalation Risk Assessment, vol. I. 2011. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/risk/risk-assessment-guidance-superfund-rags-part-f (accessed on 2 April 2023).
  117. Khanna, I.; Khare, M.; Gargava, P. Health Risks Associated with Heavy Metals in Fine Particulate Matter: A Case Study in Delhi City, India. J. Geosci. Environ. Prot. 2015, 3, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Liu, X.; Zhai, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, H.; Li, P.; Peng, C.; Xu, B.; Li, C.; Zeng, G. Mass Concentration and Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Size-Segregated Airborne Particulate Matter in Changsha. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 517, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Chen, J.; Tan, M.; Li, Y.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, Y.; Shan, Z.; Zhang, G.; Li, Y. Characteristics of Trace Elements and Lead Isotope Ratios in PM2.5 from Four Sites in Shanghai. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 156, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Hourly variations in concentrations of PM2.5, elements, and meteorological parameters in Seoul (SL) and Seosan (SN) during winter.
Figure 1. Hourly variations in concentrations of PM2.5, elements, and meteorological parameters in Seoul (SL) and Seosan (SN) during winter.
Atmosphere 14 00753 g001
Figure 2. Enrichment factors of elements in PM2.5 at the Seoul and Seosan sites (the variable of the Y-axis is in log10 scale).
Figure 2. Enrichment factors of elements in PM2.5 at the Seoul and Seosan sites (the variable of the Y-axis is in log10 scale).
Atmosphere 14 00753 g002
Figure 3. Potential source contribution function values for PM2.5, S, K, and soil throughout the study period in (a) Seoul and (b) Seosan, South Korea, during winter.
Figure 3. Potential source contribution function values for PM2.5, S, K, and soil throughout the study period in (a) Seoul and (b) Seosan, South Korea, during winter.
Atmosphere 14 00753 g003
Figure 4. Cancer risk (CR) associated with elements in PM2.5 in Seoul and Seosan during the winter of 2020–2021.
Figure 4. Cancer risk (CR) associated with elements in PM2.5 in Seoul and Seosan during the winter of 2020–2021.
Atmosphere 14 00753 g004
Table 1. Summary statistics of trace element concentrations (ng m−3) in PM2.5 quantified in Seoul and Seosan, South Korea, from 15 December 2020 to 15 January 2021.
Table 1. Summary statistics of trace element concentrations (ng m−3) in PM2.5 quantified in Seoul and Seosan, South Korea, from 15 December 2020 to 15 January 2021.
SeoulSeosan
Element Mean ± SD a% BDL bMedianMean ± SD%BDLMedian
Si306 ± 52730101460 ± 76147147
S1444 ± 9080.911681265 ± 6732.31153
K250 ± 1310.9219294 ± 2032.2239
Ca81 ± 1130.947101 ± 1602.253.0
Ti10.6 ± 100.97.812 ± 152.26.6
V0.7 ± 0.5330.50.7 ± 0.7560.4
Cr1.2 ± 1.07.70.91.3 ± 1.4170.8
Mn13 ± 8.20.91116 ± 222.610
Fe183 ± 1351.0142210 ± 2012.2153
Ni0.8 ± 0.7580.70.7 ± 0.812.60.4
Cu4.4 ± 4.00.92.94.1 ± 4.03.43.1
Zn49 ± 850.93751 ± 412.639
As4.7 ± 3.80.93.83.9 ± 3.33.33.1
Se1.0 ± 1.07.40.51.4 ± 1.47.91.0
Br7.3 ± 6.40.94.88.8 ± 6.22.37.5
Ba2.2 ± 1.8611.7-−100-
Pb21 ± 110.91921.0 ± 11.84.319.7
Temperature (°C)−3.5 ± 6.3--−2.64 ± 5.63--
Relative humidity (%)56.9 ± 15.7--70.0 ± 17.1--
Wind speed (m/s)2.38 ± 1.09--1.79 ± 1.67--
Wind direction (degree)205 ± 110.1--146 ± 138--
Rainfall (mm)0.76 ± 0.93--0.33 ± 0.25--
a Standard deviation; b below detection limit.
Table 2. Varimax-rotated principal factor (F) loadings for PM2.5-bound trace elements at the Seoul and Seosan sites during the winter period.
Table 2. Varimax-rotated principal factor (F) loadings for PM2.5-bound trace elements at the Seoul and Seosan sites during the winter period.
SeoulSeosan
F1F2F3F1F2F3F4
Si0.010.98−0.090.980.030.120.02
S0.870.170.20−0.110.880.250.07
K0.550.680.340.580.640.310.10
Ca0.030.98−0.090.940.060.12−0.09
Ti0.090.98−0.030.970.040.160.03
V0.310.91−0.080.830.290.020.23
Cr0.880.360.170.460.520.44−0.20
Mn0.720.560.220.140.200.860.04
Fe0.410.900.000.890.230.37−0.03
Ni0.810.310.160.500.810.05−0.02
Cu0.850.280.030.300.170.77−0.05
Zn0.62−0.010.010.110.290.900.08
As0.02−0.130.950.05−0.180.000.93
Se0.870.270.050.130.880.21−0.17
Br0.950.14−0.070.120.870.31−0.01
Ba0.70−0.250.14No dataNo dataNo dataNo data
Pb0.27−0.010.930.040.330.610.59
Variance9.053.761.697.943.021.781.16
Percentage of variance (%)53.222.19.9549.618.811.17.26
Cumulative (%)53.275.385.349.668.579.686.8
F = factor.
Table 3. Average dry deposition flux (μg m−2 d−1) for PM2.5-bound elements in Seoul and Seosan during the winter period.
Table 3. Average dry deposition flux (μg m−2 d−1) for PM2.5-bound elements in Seoul and Seosan during the winter period.
ElementDry Deposition Velocity (cm s−1)Mean ± SD (Seoul)Mean ± SD (Seosan)
Si2.0411.6 ± 689.9530.5 ± 801.8
S1.01253.8 ± 654.01096.4 ± 451.6
K2.0435.2 ± 169.5510.4 ± 194.8
Ca2.0144.3 ± 172.6175.2 ± 219.8
Ti2.018.6 ± 16.120.0 ± 18.7
V1.00.5 ± 0.30.4 ± 0.4
Cr0.51.0 ± 0.61.0 ± 0.6
Mn1.011.4 ± 5.213.7 ± 10.4
Fe2.0319.9 ± 208.3363.2 ± 242.3
Ni0.50.5 ± 0.40.6 ± 0.4
Cu0.51.9 ± 1.31.8 ± 0.9
Zn0.521.3 ± 11.921.9 ± 9.6
As0.52.0 ± 0.81.7 ± 0.7
Se0.50.4 ± 0.40.6 ± 0.4
Br0.53.2 ± 1.83.8 ± 1.5
Ba0.50.7 ± 0.40.0 ± 0.0
Pb0.59.1 ± 2.79.1 ± 2.5
Table 4. Hazard quotient (HQ) and hazard index (HI) of components in PM2.5 via ingestion (HQing), dermal (HQder), and inhalation (HQinh) for adults and children in rural and urban areas in South Korea during the winter.
Table 4. Hazard quotient (HQ) and hazard index (HI) of components in PM2.5 via ingestion (HQing), dermal (HQder), and inhalation (HQinh) for adults and children in rural and urban areas in South Korea during the winter.
ElementAdultChildren
HQingHQderHQinhHQingHQderHQinh
Seoul
Cr2.8 × 10−073.7 × 10−051.3 × 10−132.6 × 10−061.5 × 10−043.1 × 10−13
Mn2.0 × 10−078.3 × 10−063.0 × 10−121.9 × 10−063.3 × 10−056.9 × 10−12
Ni1.7 × 10−081.1 × 10−077.7 × 10−171.6 × 10−074.2 × 10−071.8 × 10−16
Cu7.8 × 10−081.7 × 10−083.6 × 10−167.3 × 10−076.8 × 10−088.4 × 10−16
V6.1 × 10−081.6 × 10−052.8 × 10−165.7 × 10−076.2 × 10−056.6 × 10−16
Zn1.2 × 10−073.8 × 10−085.3 × 10−161.1 × 10−061.5 × 10−071.2 × 10−15
As1.1 × 10−055.3 × 10−065.0 × 10−141.0 × 10−042.1 × 10−051.2 × 10−13
Pb4.2 × 10−061.9 × 10−051.9 × 10−143.9 × 10−057.4 × 10−054.5 × 10−14
HQ1.6 × 10−058.5 × 10−053.2 × 10−121.5 × 10−043.3 × 10−047.4 × 10−12
HI = ΣHQ1.0 × 10−044.8 × 10−04
Seosan
Cr2.8 × 10−073.8 × 10−051.4 × 10−132.7 × 10−061.5 × 10−043.2 × 10−13
Mn2.4 × 10−071.0 × 10−053.6 × 10−122.3 × 10−064.0 × 10−058.3 × 10−12
Ni2.5 × 10−081.5 × 10−071.1 × 10−162.3 × 10−076.0 × 10−072.6 × 10−16
Cu7.2 × 10−081.6 × 10−083.3 × 10−166.8 × 10−076.3 × 10−087.7 × 10−16
V5.1 × 10−081.3 × 10−052.4 × 10−164.8 × 10−075.2 × 10−055.5 × 10−16
Zn1.2 × 10−073.9 × 10−085.5 × 10−161.1 × 10−061.6 × 10−071.3 × 10−15
As9.0 × 10−064.4 × 10−064.1 × 10−148.4 × 10−051.7 × 10−059.6 × 10−14
Pb4.2 × 10−061.9 × 10−051.9 × 10−143.9 × 10−057.4 × 10−054.5 × 10−14
HQ1.4 × 10−058.4 × 10−053.8 × 10−121.3 × 10−043.3 × 10−048.8 × 10−12
HI = ΣHQ9.8 × 10−054.6 × 10−04
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nirmalkar, J.; Lee, K.; Ahn, J.; Lee, J.; Song, M. Comparisons of Spatial and Temporal Variations in PM2.5-Bound Trace Elements in Urban and Rural Areas of South Korea, and Associated Potential Health Risks. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 753. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14040753

AMA Style

Nirmalkar J, Lee K, Ahn J, Lee J, Song M. Comparisons of Spatial and Temporal Variations in PM2.5-Bound Trace Elements in Urban and Rural Areas of South Korea, and Associated Potential Health Risks. Atmosphere. 2023; 14(4):753. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14040753

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nirmalkar, Jayant, Kwangyul Lee, Junyoung Ahn, Jiyi Lee, and Mijung Song. 2023. "Comparisons of Spatial and Temporal Variations in PM2.5-Bound Trace Elements in Urban and Rural Areas of South Korea, and Associated Potential Health Risks" Atmosphere 14, no. 4: 753. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14040753

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop