Next Article in Journal
Recent Urban Issues Related to Particulate Matter in Ploiesti City, Romania
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigation of Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation during O3 and PM2.5 Episodes in Bangkok, Thailand
Previous Article in Journal
Passive Hydrocarbon Sampling in a Shale Oil and Gas Production Area Shows Spatially Heterogeneous Air Toxics Exposure Based on Type and Proximity to Emission Sources
Previous Article in Special Issue
Statistical PM2.5 Prediction in an Urban Area Using Vertical Meteorological Factors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Phairuang et al. Ambient Nanoparticles (PM0.1) Mapping in Thailand. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 66

by
Worradorn Phairuang
1,2,*,
Suthida Piriyakarnsakul
3,
Muanfun Inerb
4,
Surapa Hongtieab
1,
Thunyapat Thongyen
5,
Jiraporn Chomanee
6,
Yaowatat Boongla
7,
Phuchiwan Suriyawong
8,
Hisam Samae
8,
Phuvasa Chanonmuang
9,
Panwadee Suwattiga
10,
Thaneeya Chetiyanukornkul
11,
Sirima Panyametheekul
12,13,
Muhammad Amin
1,14,
Mitsuhiko Hata
1 and
Masami Furuuchi
1,4
1
Faculty of Geosciences and Civil Engineering, Institute of Science and Engineering, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan
2
Department of Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
3
Office of National Higher Education Science Research and Innovation Policy Council, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
4
Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai 90110, Thailand
5
Department of Environmental Technology and Management, Faculty of Environment, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
6
Department of Basic Science and Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Thaksin University, Songkhla 90000, Thailand
7
Department of Sustainable Development Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University, Rangsit Campus, Pathumtani 12121, Thailand
8
Research Unit for Energy, Economic, and Ecological Management (3E), Science and Technology Research Institute, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
9
Expert Centre of Innovative Clean Energy and Environment, Thailand Institute of Scientific and Technological Research (TISTR), Klong Luang, Pathumtani 12120, Thailand
10
Department of Agro-Industrial, Food and Environmental Technology, Faculty of Applied Science, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok 10800, Thailand
11
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
12
Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
13
HAUS IAQ Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
14
Faculty of Engineering, Maritim University of Raja Ali Haji, Tanjung Pinang, Kepulauan Riau 29115, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2023, 14(4), 745; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14040745
Submission received: 8 February 2023 / Accepted: 23 March 2023 / Published: 20 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Atmospheric Particulate Matter Hazard Mapping)
There were errors in the original article [1]. It was incorrect to state that particulate matter should be abbreviated PM. All abbreviations in the main text should be PM0.1, PM2.5, and PM10.
A correction has been made to the Abstract: PMs0.1 should be PM0.1.
A correction has been made to the Introduction: PMs0.1 should be PM0.1, and PMs2.5 should be PM2.5.
In the original article, there were some mistakes in Table 2 as published. The corrected Table 2 appears below.
A correction has been made to Table 2: reference [52] should be March–April 2016.
In Section 2.4. PM0.1 Derived from Biomass Burning. A correction has been made to “Phairuang et al. (2021) [32], reported on the source apportionment of PM0.1 particles in Bangkok”, the updated one should be “Phairuang et al. (2021) [53], reported on the source apportionment of PM0.1 particles in Bangkok”.
In the original article [1], there was a missing reference 92 in Figure 1. A correction has been made to Figure 1 to show the morphology of ambient nanoparticles in Chiang Mai, Thailand, as observed in the scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis [2]—the newly added reference 92. With this correction, the order of some references has been adjusted accordingly.
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original article has been updated.

References

  1. Phairuang, W.; Piriyakarnsakul, S.; Inerb, M.; Hongtieab, S.; Thongyen, T.; Chomanee, J.; Boongla, Y.; Suriyawong, P.; Samae, H.; Chanonmuang, P.; et al. Ambient Nanoparticles (PM0.1) Mapping in Thailand. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Phairuang, W.; Inerb, M.; Hata, M.; Furuuchi, M. A Review of Ambient Nanoparticles (PM0.1) in South East Asian Cities: Biomass and Fossil Burning Impacts. Available online: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202108.0575/v1 (accessed on 1 December 2022).
Figure 1. SEM images of atmospheric nanoparticles in Chiang Mai, Thailand, in the year 2015 (forest fires dominated as emission sources during the dry season) [92].
Figure 1. SEM images of atmospheric nanoparticles in Chiang Mai, Thailand, in the year 2015 (forest fires dominated as emission sources during the dry season) [92].
Atmosphere 14 00745 g001
Table 2. Ambient PM0.1 concentrations (µg/m3) and PM0.1/PM2.5 ratio at different locations in Thailand.
Table 2. Ambient PM0.1 concentrations (µg/m3) and PM0.1/PM2.5 ratio at different locations in Thailand.
LocationSite
Description
Sampling TimePM0.1PM2.5PM0.1/PM2.5 RatioReferences
Chiang MaiSuburbanSeptember 2014–June 201525.2 ± 4.777.5 ± 23.80.33 ± 0.03[32]
SuburbanMarch–April 201616.5--[52]
PathumtaniSuburbanOctober 2019 (wet)13.5 ± 0.855.1 ± 4.60.25 ± 0.06[24]
January–February 2020 (dry)18.9 ± 4.073.4 ± 16.30.26 ± 0.04
BangkokUrbanJuly 2014–June 201514.5 ± 4.766.4 ± 17.20.23 ± 0.09[32]
UrbanMarch–April 201611.9--[52]
UrbanNovember 2014–October 201515.0 ± 2.4--[53]
UrbanMay 2016–April 201714.8 ± 2.0--[54]
Urban—trafficMarch–April 20167.7--[52]
SongkhlaSuburbanSeptember–October 201514.2 ± 10.073.7 ± 49.80.19[26]
August–October 20171.9 ± 0.612.9 ± 0.80.15
SuburbanMarch–April 201610.9--[52]
SuburbanJanuary–December 201810.2 ± 2.257.8 ± 4.70.18 ± 0.05[55]
SuburbanJanuary–August 201910.4 ± 1.2--[25]
SuburbanJanuary–December 20188.4 ± 1.9--[28]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Phairuang, W.; Piriyakarnsakul, S.; Inerb, M.; Hongtieab, S.; Thongyen, T.; Chomanee, J.; Boongla, Y.; Suriyawong, P.; Samae, H.; Chanonmuang, P.; et al. Correction: Phairuang et al. Ambient Nanoparticles (PM0.1) Mapping in Thailand. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 66. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 745. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14040745

AMA Style

Phairuang W, Piriyakarnsakul S, Inerb M, Hongtieab S, Thongyen T, Chomanee J, Boongla Y, Suriyawong P, Samae H, Chanonmuang P, et al. Correction: Phairuang et al. Ambient Nanoparticles (PM0.1) Mapping in Thailand. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 66. Atmosphere. 2023; 14(4):745. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14040745

Chicago/Turabian Style

Phairuang, Worradorn, Suthida Piriyakarnsakul, Muanfun Inerb, Surapa Hongtieab, Thunyapat Thongyen, Jiraporn Chomanee, Yaowatat Boongla, Phuchiwan Suriyawong, Hisam Samae, Phuvasa Chanonmuang, and et al. 2023. "Correction: Phairuang et al. Ambient Nanoparticles (PM0.1) Mapping in Thailand. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 66" Atmosphere 14, no. 4: 745. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14040745

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop