# Seismo Ionospheric Anomalies around and over the Epicenters of Pakistan Earthquakes

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{4}

^{5}

^{6}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

_{w}7.7 Awaran, where TEC anomalies can be clearly seen within 5–10 days before the seismic day and the subsequent rise in TEC during the 2 days after the main shock. These variations are also evident in GIM maps over the Awaran EQ epicenter. The findings point towards a large emission of EQ energy before and after the main shock during quiet storm days, which aid in the development of lithosphere ionosphere coupling. However, the entire analysis can be expanded to more satellite and ground-based measurements in Pakistan and other countries to reveal the pattern of air ionization from the epicenter through the atmosphere to the ionosphere.

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Materials and Methods

#### 2.1. Materials

_{w}6.8 on 28 September 2013. The affected areas were Awaran, Tirtej, Gashkore, Nok Jo, Parwar, Dandar, and Hoshab. The EQ occurred due to an oblique-strike slip type motion. The tremor occurred in all Pakistan and its neighboring countries: Iran, Afghanistan, and India. A cumulative moment of 5.4 × 10

^{20}Nm was released by this rupture.

_{1}and f

_{2}, the pseudo-range is denoted as L, the delay path of the signal of the carrier phase observations is P, the signal wavelength is λ, and the ray path uncertainty is N. Here, d and b denote the biases of the consequent signal pseudo-range and instrumental carrier phase, and ϵ is the random error in the signal. The STEC is converted to VTEC using the following equation [8].

#### 2.2. Methodology

_{j}·w

_{ij}is produced by multiplying a strength x

_{j}by a weight w

_{ij}. A neural network’s output is represented by the following: y

_{i}= f(x

_{j}w

_{ij}), where i and j are indexes of a neuron in the hidden layer and input, respectively [38].

_{1}, x

_{2}, …, x

_{N}as the training data, and the remaining observations x

_{N+1}, x

_{N+2}, …, x

_{N+m}as the test data. The time series underlying pattern is discovered using lagged observations that correspond to the input nodes (p). The network capability of the prediction or learning is highly affected by the various input nodes [38]. For our analysis, the number of nodes for the input, hidden, and output layers was three, two, and one, respectively. Specifically, each training set contains four observations that constitute one pattern vector, of which three are inputs and one is the output value.

_{N}= f(X

_{N−3,}X

_{N−2,}X

_{N−1}); N = 1, 2, 3….

_{N+m}= f (X

_{N+m−3}, X

_{N+m−2}, X

_{N+m−1})

_{1}, y

_{2}, …, y

_{N}and y

_{N+1}, y

_{N+2}, …, y

_{N+m}are selected as training and test sets, respectively. We can identify the underlying pattern of a time series by counting the lagged observations corresponding to input nodes. Neurons receive observed values from a variety of sources and feed them into the input layer. In this study, the corrected LST values, their accompanying times, and the deviation from the mean LST values are inputs. All neurons in the hidden layer are affected by the weights collected from the previous input layer. An effective combination of hidden neurons engages the transfer function.

_{N}= f(y

_{N−3}, y

_{N−2}, y

_{N−1}, t

_{N−3}, t

_{N−2}, t

_{N−1})

## 3. Results

#### 3.1. Case Study I

#### 3.2. CASE Study II

_{i}) between the actual value (X

_{i}) and the predicted value $(\widehat{{X}_{i}})$ outside the defined bounds.

## 4. Discussion

^{-}in the matrix of O

^{2-}within the rock columns of the sublattice of oxygen. As soon as these p-holes reach the Earth’s surface (lithosphere), they accumulate over the lithosphere at the ground–air interface at different topographic highs to produce electric fields. Furthermore, these electric fields over the epicentral regions are microscopic in nature, but they have the ability to reach and spread around millions of volts per centimeter. This abrupt electric field causes air ionization, mostly O

^{2}and many other molecules over the lithosphere in the nearby air. Over the EQ preparation region, the model of global electric current propagation, Earth electric charge carriers, and ionization of air raised to high altitude by the explanation of Freund et al. [48]. The high altitude of the seismic regions further intensifies the electric field due to its intrinsic nature [49], and the case studies in this paper also occurred in high and heterogeneous regions. Previous reports on various atmosphere and ionosphere precursors also highlighted the variations at different altitudes from satellite observation [50,51]. After the loss of an electron from O

^{2}to the ground state, it came with O

^{2+}as positive ions in the atmosphere. The air with more and more O

^{2+}in the seismic preparation period rose further upward as a result of the condensation of moist particles and latent heat release. The previously discussed moisture condensation further raises anomalous latent heat, and the air ionization causes an increase in air velocity and flow towards the upper atmosphere and ionosphere [52]. The enhancement in air buoyancy generates thermal up gradation, which aids in the transportation of ionized air to high altitudes over the EQ epicenters and culminates in the form of ionospheric anomalies.

## 5. Conclusions

- Ionospheric anomalies occurred before the Mirpur EQ as pre-SIA within 5 days before the main shock, and variations on the Awaran EQ day occurred as a seismic response on the main shock day. Moreover, the intensity of the VTEC anomaly for the Awaran EQ was higher than the Mirpur event due to the magnitude difference.
- The differential GIM maps showed no clear electron cloud over the epicenter of the Mirpur EQ due to the low magnitude of the event. On the other hand, the Awaran EQ induced significant TEC clouds over the epicenter during LT~10–12 h.
- The most apparent anomalies occurred before the Mirpur EQ and on the EQ day of the Awaran event as a pre-SIA and seismic response, respectively. Similarly, no clear post-EQ anomalies occurred in the case of both EQs. These results suggest that abrupt seismic variations triggered by the EQs appeared in the form of the emanation of energy from the EQ-prone region to the ionosphere in the seismic preparation period. In conformity with previous studies and our conclusions, we believe that the seismo-ionospheric and thermal anomalies can positively contribute to the prediction of EQs.
- Machine learning can only assist in enlarging the peak and variations of the existing abnormal VTEC values and can no longer help in finding new VTEC precursors.
- The geomagnetic indices also observed no effect of storms for the same observation period before and after the EQs. Thus, we can conclude that the observed TEC anomalies were triggered by the seismic events.
- The GIMs provide a clear picture of authentic ionosphere anomalies in the case of the Mirpur EQ. They show that low-magnitude EQs cannot propagate energy to ionospheric heights. However, we can monitor the response of TEC to seismic events by integrating observations based on the worldwide impact of such natural phenomena, and it might be utilized as a useful tool to forecast possible seismic activity. Ionosphere-seismic studies are a continuing process and one of the primary drivers of ionosphere variability, and such consequences can be noticed at least a few days before an EQ.

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Institutional Review Board Statement

## Informed Consent Statement

## Data Availability Statement

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Holliday, J.R.; Nanjo, K.; Tiampo, K.; Rundle, J.; Turcotte, D.L. EQ forecasting and its verification. Nonlin. Process. Geophys.
**2005**, 12, 965–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Hafeez, A.; Shah, M.; Ehsan, M.; Jamjareegulgarn, P.; Ahmed, J.; Tariq, M.A.; Iqbal, S.; Naqvi, N.A. Possible atmosphere and ionospheric anomalies of the 2019 Pakistan EQ using statistical and machine learning procedures on MODIS LST, GPS TEC and GIM TEC. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens.
**2021**, 14, 11126–11133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Geller, R.J.; Jackson, D.; Kagan, Y.; Mulargia, F. EQs Cannot Be Predicted. Science
**1997**, 275, 1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Rishbeth, H. Do EQ precursors really exist? Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union
**2007**, 88, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tronin, A.A.; Biagi, P.; Molchanov, O.; Khatkevich, Y.; Gordeev, E.I. Temperature variations related to EQs from simultaneous observation at the ground stations and by satellites in Kamchatka area. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C
**2004**, 29, 501–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pulinets, S.A.; Ouzounov, D.; Karelin, A.; Boyarchuk, K.; Pokhmelnykh, L.A. The physical nature of thermal anomalies observed before strong EQs. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C
**2006**, 31, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Freund, F. Pre-EQ signals: Underlying physical processes. J. Asian Earth Sci.
**2011**, 41, 383–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shah, M. Chapter 28—EQ Ionospheric and Atmospheric Anomalies from GNSS TEC and other Satellites. In Computers in Earth and Environmental Sciences; Pourghasemi, H., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 387–399. [Google Scholar]
- Molchanov, O.A.; Hayakawa, M. Generation of ULF electromagnetic emissions by microfracturing. Geophys. Res. Lett.
**1995**, 22, 3091–3094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pulinets, S.; Davidenko, D. Ionospheric precursors of EQs and Global Electric Circuit. Adv. Space Res.
**2014**, 53, 709–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Freund, F. Stress-activated positive hole charge carriers in rocks and the generation of pre-EQ signals. Electromagn. Phenom. Assoc. EQs
**2009**, 2, 41–96. [Google Scholar] - Kuo, C.L.; Lee, L.; Huba, J.D. An improved coupling model for the lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere system. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.
**2014**, 119, 3189–3205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mehdi, S.; Shah, M.; Naqvi, N.A. Lithosphere atmosphere ionosphere coupling associated with the 2019 Mw 7.1 California EQ using GNSS and multiple satellites. Environ. Monit. Assess.
**2021**, 193, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shah, M.; Ahmed, A.; Ehsan, M.; Khan, M.; Tariq, M.A.; Calabia, A.; Rahman, Z. Total electron content anomalies associated with earthquakes occurred during 1998–2019. Acta Astronaut.
**2020**, 175, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Heki, K. Ionospheric electron enhancement preceding the 2011 Tohoku-Oki EQ. Geophys. Res. Lett.
**2011**, 38, 17. [Google Scholar] - Rahman, Z.U. Possible Seismo Ionospheric Anomalies before the 2016 Mw 7.6 Chile EQ from GPS TEC, GIM TEC and Swarm Satellites. Nat. Appl. Sci. Int. J.
**2020**, 1, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shahzad, F.; Shah, M.; Riaz, S.; Ghaffar, B.; Ullah, I.; Eldin, S.M. Integrated Analysis of LithosphereAtmosphere-Ionospheric Coupling Associated with the 2021 Mw 7.2 Haiti Earthquake. Atmosphere
**2023**, 14, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Adil, M.A.; Şentürk, E.; Shah, M.; Naqvi, N.; Saqib, M.; Abbasi, A.R. Atmospheric and ionospheric disturbances associated with the M > 6 EQs in the East Asian sector: A case study of two consecutive EQs in Taiwan. J. Asian Earth Sci.
**2021**, 220, 104918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ahmed, J.; Shah, M.; Awais, M.; Jin, S.; Zafar, W.A.; Ahmad, N.; Amin, A.; Shah, M.A.; Ali, I. Seismo-ionospheric anomalies before the 2019 Mirpur EQ from ionosonde measurements. Adv. Space Res.
**2021**, 69, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ahmed, J.; Shah, M.; Zafar, W.; Amin, M.; Iqbal, T. Seismoionospheric anomalies associated with EQs from the analysis of the ionosonde data. J. Atmos. Sol. -Terr. Phys.
**2018**, 179, 450–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shah, M.; Aibar, A.; Tariq, M.; Ahmed, J.; Ahmed, A. Possible ionosphere and atmosphere precursory analysis related to Mw > 6.0 EQs in Japan. Remote Sens. Environ.
**2020**, 239, 111620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shah, M.; Ehsan, M.; Abbas, A.; Ahmed, A.; Jamjareegulgarn, P. Possible Thermal Anomalies Associated with Global Terrestrial EQs During 2000-2019 Based on MODIS-LST. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett.
**2021**, 19, 1002705. [Google Scholar] - Shah, M.; Inyurt, S.; Ehsan, M.; Ahmed, A.; Shakir, M.; Ullah, S.; Iqbal, M.S. Seismo ionospheric anomalies in Turkey associated with Mw ≥ 6.0 EQs detected by GPS stations and GIM TEC. Adv. Space Res.
**2020**, 65, 2540–2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shah, M.; Jin, S. Statistical characteristics of seismo-ionospheric GPS TEC disturbances prior to global Mw ≥ 5.0 EQs (1998–2014). J. Geodyn.
**2015**, 92, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Liu, J.; Chen, Y.I.; Huang, C.C.; Parrot, M.; Shen, X.H.; Pulinets, S.A.; Yang, Q.S.; Ho, Y.Y. A spatial analysis on seismo-ionospheric anomalies observed by DEMETER during the 2008 M8.0 Wenchuan EQ. J. Asian Earth Sci.
**2015**, 114, 414–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Oyama, K.I.; Kakinami, Y.; Liu, J.; Abdu, M.; Cheng, C.Z. Latitudinal distribution of anomalous ion density as a precursor of a large EQ. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.
**2011**, 116, A4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Pulinets, S.; Ouzounov, D. Lithosphere–Atmosphere–Ionosphere Coupling (LAIC) model—An unified concept for EQ precursors validation. J. Asian Earth Sci.
**2011**, 41, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Nazir, A.; Ullah, S.; Saqib, Z.A.; Abbas, A.; Ali, A.; Iqbal, M.S.; Hussain, K.; Shakir, M.; Shah, M.; Butt, M.U. Estimation and Forecasting of Rice Yield Using Phenology-Based Algorithm and Linear Regression Model on Sentinel-II Satellite Data. Agriculture
**2021**, 11, 1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shah, M.; Tariq, M.; Ahmad, J.; Naqvi, N.; Jin, S. Seismo ionospheric anomalies before the 2007 M7.7 Chile EQ from GPS TEC and DEMETER. J. Geodyn.
**2019**, 127, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shah, M.; Tariq, M.; Naqvi, N.A. Atmospheric anomalies associated with Mw > 6.0 EQs in Pakistan and Iran during 2010–2017. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys.
**2019**, 191, 105056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shahzad, R.; Shah, M.; Ahmed, A. Comparison of VTEC from GPS and IRI-2007, IRI-2012 and IRI-2016 over Sukkur Pakistan. Astrophys. Space Sci.
**2021**, 366, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Freund, F. Charge generation and propagation in igneous rocks. J. Geodyn.
**2002**, 33, 543–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Ondoh, T. Investigation of precursory phenomena in the ionosphere, atmosphere and groundwater before large EQs of M > 6.5. Adv. Space Res.
**2009**, 43, 214–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tariq, M.A.; Shah, M.; Hernández-Pajares, M.; Iqbal, T. Ionospheric VTEC variations over Pakistan in the descending phase of solar activity during 2016–17. Astrophys. Space Sci.
**2019**, 364, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tariq, M.A.; Shah, M.; Li, Z.; Wang, N.; Shah, M.A.; Iqbal, T.; Liu, L. Lithosphere ionosphere coupling associated with three EQs in Pakistan from GPS and GIM TEC. J. Geodyn.
**2021**, 147, 101860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tariq, M.A.; Yuyan, Y.; Shah, M.; Ali Shah, M.; Iqbal, T.; Liu, L. Ionospheric Thermospheric responses to the May and September 2017 geomagnetic storms over Asian regions. Adv. Space Res.
**2022**, 70, 3731–3744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Khan, A.Q.; Ghaffar, B.; Shah, M.; Ullah, I.; Oliveira-Júnior, J.F.; Eldin, S.M. Possible seismo-ionospheric anomalies associated with the 2016 Mw 6.5 Indonesia earthquake from GPS TEC and Swarm satellites. Front. Astron. Space Sci.
**2022**, 9, 1065453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Khan, M.M.; Ghaffar, B.; Shahzad, R.; Khan, M.R.; Shah, M.; Amin, A.H.; Eldin, S.M.; Naqvi, N.A.; Ali, R. Atmospheric Anomalies Associated with the 2021 Mw 7.2 Haiti Earthquake Using Machine Learning from Multiple Satellites. Sustainability
**2022**, 14, 14782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Monteiro, L.D.S.; Oliveira-Júnior, J.F.D.; Ghaffar, B.; Tariq, A.; Qin, S.; Mumtaz, F.; Correia Filho, W.L.F.; Shah, M.; Jardim, A.M.d.R.F.; Silva, M.V.d.; et al. Rainfall in the Urban Area and Its Impact on Climatology and Population Growth. Atmosphere
**2022**, 13, 1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Calabia, A.; Anoruo, C.; Shah, M.; Amory-Mazaudier, C.; Yasyukevich, Y.; Owolabi, C.; Jin, S. Low-Latitude Ionospheric Responses and Coupling to the February 2014 Multiphase Geomagnetic Storm from GNSS, Magnetometers, and Space Weather Data. Atmosphere
**2022**, 13, 518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ouzounov, D.; Freund, F. Mid-infrared emission prior to strong EQs analyzed by remote sensing data. Adv. Space Res.
**2004**, 33, 268–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Daneshvar, M.R.M.; Freund, F.T. Examination of a relationship between atmospheric blocking and seismic events in the Middle East using a new seismo-climatic index. Swiss J. Geosci.
**2019**, 112, 435–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hussain, A.; Shah, M. Comparison of GPS TEC with IRI models of 2007, 2012, & 2016 over Sukkur, Pakistan. Nat. Appl. Sci. Int. J. (NASIJ)
**2020**, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Namgaladze, A.; Klimenko, M.V.V.; Klimenko, V.; Zakharenkova, I.E. Physical mechanism and mathematical modeling of earthquake ionospheric precursors registered in total electron content. Geomagn. Aeron.
**2009**, 49, 252–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hayakawa, M.; Schekotov, A.; Izutsu, J.; Yang, S.S.; Solovieva, M.; Hobara, Y. Multi-parameter observations of seismogenic phenomena related to the Tokyo earthquake (M = 5.9) on 7 October 2021. Geosciences
**2022**, 12, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kelly, M.C. (Ed.) Atmospheric electricity. In The Earth’s Electric Field; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 29–52. [Google Scholar]
- Satti, M.S.; Ehsan, M.; Abbas, A.; Shah, M.; de Oliveira-Júnior, J.F.; Naqvi, N.A. Atmospheric and ionospheric precursors associated with Mw ≥ 6.5 earthquakes from multiple satellites. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys.
**2022**, 227, 105802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Freund, F.T.; Ouillon, G.; Scoville, J.; Sornette, D. Earthquake precursors in the light of peroxy defects theory: Critical review of systematic observations. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.
**2021**, 230, 7–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pulinets, S.A. The synergy of earthquake precursors. Earthq. Sci.
**2011**, 24, 535–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Liperovsky, V.A.; Meister, C.V.; Liperovskaya, E.V.; Davidov, V.F.; Bogdanov, V.V. On the possible influence of radon and aerosol injection on the atmosphere and ionosphere before earthquakes. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
**2005**, 5, 783–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhang, K.; Feichter, J.; Kazil, J.; Wan, H.; Zhuo, W.; Griffiths, A.D.; Sartorius, H.; Zahorowski, W.; Ramonet, M.; Schmidt, M.; et al. Radon activity in the lower troposphere and its impact on ionization rate: A global estimate using different radon emissions. Atmos. Chem. Phys.
**2011**, 11, 7817–7838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Brothelande, E.; Amelung, F.; Yunjun, Z.; Wdowinski, S. Geodetic evidence for interconnectivity between Aira and Kirishima magmatic systems, Japan. Sci. Rep.
**2018**, 8, 9811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] - Zhou, G.; Bao, X.; Ye, S.; Wang, H.; Yan, H. Selection of Optimal Building Facade Texture Images From UAV-Based Multiple Oblique Image Flows. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.
**2021**, 59, 1534–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhou, G.; Zhou, X.; Song, Y.; Xie, D.; Wang, L.; Yan, G.; Wang, H. Design of supercontinuum laser hyperspectral light detection and ranging (LiDAR) (SCLaHS LiDAR). Int. J. Remote Sens.
**2021**, 42, 3731–3755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhou, G.; Li, W.; Zhou, X.; Tan, Y.; Lin, G.; Li, X.; Deng, R. An innovative echo detection system with STM32 gated and PMT adjustable gain for airborne LiDAR. Int. J. Remote Sens.
**2021**, 42, 9187–9211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Du, Y.; Qin, B.; Zhao, C.; Zhu, Y.; Cao, J.; Ji, Y. A Novel Spatio-Temporal Synchronization Method of Roadside Asynchronous MMW Radar-Camera for Sensor Fusion. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst.
**2021**, 23, 22278–22289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yue, Z.; Zhou, W.; Li, T. Impact of the Indian Ocean Dipole on Evolution of the Subsequent ENSO: Relative Roles of Dynamic and Thermodynamic Processes. J. Clim.
**2021**, 34, 3591–3607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, G.; Zhao, B.; Wu, B.; Wang, M.; Liu, W.; Zhou, H.; Han, Y. Research on the Macro-Mesoscopic Response Mechanism of Multisphere Approximated Heteromorphic Tailing Particles. Lithosphere
**2022**, 2022, 1977890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Li, S.; Wang, F.; Wang, Q.; Ouyang, L.; Chen, X.; Li, J. Numerical Modeling of Branching-Streamer Propagation in Ester-Based Insulating Oil under Positive Lightning Impulse Voltage: Effects from Needle Curvature Radius. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul.
**2022**, 30, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhang, Y.; Luo, J.; Li, J.; Mao, D.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Yang, J. Fast Inverse-Scattering Reconstruction for Airborne High-Squint Radar Imagery Based on Doppler Centroid Compensation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens.
**2021**, 60, 5205517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wu, M.; Ba, Z.; Liang, J. A procedure for 3D simulation of seismic wave propagation considering source-path-site effects: Theory, verification and application. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
**2022**, 51, 2925–2955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhang, Y.; Luo, J.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Cai, X.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Y. Resolution Enhancement for Large-Scale Real Beam Mapping Based on Adaptive Low-Rank Approximation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens.
**2022**, 60, 5116921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, P.; Yu, P.; Lu, J.; Zhang, Y. The mediation effect of land surface temperature in the relationship between land use-cover change and energy consumption under seasonal variations. J. Clean. Prod.
**2022**, 340, 130804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Xie, X.; Xie, B.; Cheng, J.; Chu, Q.; Dooling, T. A simple Monte Carlo method for estimating the chance of a cyclone impact. Nat. Hazards
**2021**, 107, 2573–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Liu, H.; Ding, F.; Li, J.; Meng, X.; Liu, C.; Fang, H. Improved Detection of Buried Elongated Targets by Dual-Polarization GPR. IEEE Geosci. Remote. Sens. Lett.
**2023**, 20, 3501705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Li, R.; Zhang, H.; Chen, Z.; Yu, N.; Kong, W.; Li, T.; Liu, Y. Denoising method of ground-penetrating radar signal based on independent component analysis with multifractal spectrum. Measurement
**2022**, 192, 110886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yin, L.; Wang, L.; Tian, J.; Yin, Z.; Liu, M.; Zheng, W. Atmospheric Density Inversion Based on Swarm-C Satellite Accelerometer. Appl. Sci.
**2023**, 13, 3610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhu, X.; Xu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Liu, M.; Yin, Z.; Yin, L.; Zheng, W. Impact of dam construction on precipitation: A regional perspective. Mar. Freshw. Res.
**2022**, 1, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhao, F.; Song, L.; Peng, Z.; Yang, J.; Luan, G.; Chu, C.; Xie, Z. Night-Time Light Remote Sensing Mapping: Construction and Analysis of Ethnic Minority Development Index. Remote. Sens.
**2021**, 13, 2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhao, F.; Zhang, S.; Du, Q.; Ding, J.; Luan, G.; Xie, Z. Assessment of the sustainable development of rural minority settlements based on multidimensional data and geographical detector method: A case study in Dehong, China. Socio-Economic Plan. Sci.
**2021**, 78, 101066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, N.; Xing, G.; Zhu, T.; Zhou, H.; Shi, Y. Propagating seismic waves in VTI attenuating media using fractional viscoelastic wave equation. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth
**2022**, 127, e2021JB023280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jin, J.; Zhang, X.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Li, S. Study on critical slowdown characteristics and early warning model of damage evolution of sandstone under freeze-thaw cycles. Front. Earth Sci.
**2022**, 10, 1006642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cheng, Y.; Fu, L. Nonlinear seismic inversion by physics-informed Caianiello convolutional neural networks for overpressure prediction of source rocks in the offshore Xihu depression, East China. J. Pet. Sci. Eng.
**2022**, 215, 110654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yang, J.; Fu, L.; Fu, B.; Deng, W.; Han, T. Third-Order Padé Thermoelastic Constants of Solid Rocks. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth
**2022**, 127, e2022JB024517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 1.**Study area map with red stars showing the location of the Awaran EQ (24 September 2013) epicenter and the Mirpur EQ (24 September 2013), while orange lines represent fault lines of Pakistan and green lines represent Pakistan regional boundaries.

**Figure 3.**Spatial variations of TEC from GIMs over the Mirpur EQ epicenter on 22 September 2019 (2 days before the main shock).

**Figure 4.**(

**a**) Comparison between GPS VTEC and NARX-predicted VTEC of Mirpur EQ. (

**b**) Values exceeding the bounds depicting the anomalous behavior. The ‘*’ is for multiplication.

**Figure 5.**(

**a**) Comparison between GPS VTEC and MLP-predicted VTEC of the Mirpur EQ. (

**b**) Values exceeding the bounds depicting the anomalous behavior. The ‘*’ is for multiplication.

**Figure 7.**Spatial variations of TEC from GIMs over the Awaran EQ epicenter on 24 September 2013 (1 day after the main shock).

**Figure 8.**(

**a**) Comparison between GPS VTEC and NARX-predicted VTEC of Awaran EQ. (

**b**) Values exceeding the bounds depicting the anomalous behavior. The ‘*’ is for multiplication.

**Figure 9.**(

**a**) Comparison between GPS VTEC and MLP-predicted VTEC of Awaran EQ. (

**b**) Values exceeding the bounds depicting the anomalous behavior.

**Figure 10.**Geomagnetic indices including Kp, Dst F10.7, and AE around the main shock day, where (

**a**–

**d**) represent Mirpur EQ and (

**a’**–

**d’**) for Awaran EQ.

Method | Pre-EQ Anomalies | Post-EQ Anomalies | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Mirpur | Awaran | Mirpur | Awaran | |||||

Day | Deviation | Day | Deviation | Day | Deviation | Day | Deviation | |

IQR | −2 | 2 TECU | EQ day | 4 TECU | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |

NARX | −5, −2 | 4 TECU | EQ day | 5 TECU | 1–2 | 2 TECU | Nil | Nil |

MLP | −2 | 3.5 TECU | EQ day | 7 TECU | Nil | Nil | 1 & 3 | 3 TECU |

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |

© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Shah, M.; Shahzad, R.; Ehsan, M.; Ghaffar, B.; Ullah, I.; Jamjareegulgarn, P.; Hassan, A.M.
Seismo Ionospheric Anomalies around and over the Epicenters of Pakistan Earthquakes. *Atmosphere* **2023**, *14*, 601.
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14030601

**AMA Style**

Shah M, Shahzad R, Ehsan M, Ghaffar B, Ullah I, Jamjareegulgarn P, Hassan AM.
Seismo Ionospheric Anomalies around and over the Epicenters of Pakistan Earthquakes. *Atmosphere*. 2023; 14(3):601.
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14030601

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Shah, Munawar, Rasim Shahzad, Muhsan Ehsan, Bushra Ghaffar, Irfan Ullah, Punyawi Jamjareegulgarn, and Ahmed M. Hassan.
2023. "Seismo Ionospheric Anomalies around and over the Epicenters of Pakistan Earthquakes" *Atmosphere* 14, no. 3: 601.
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14030601