Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Maternal Factors that Induce Epigenetic Changes Contribute to Neurological Disorders in Offspring
Previous Article in Journal
The Clinical Course of Patients with Preschool Manifestation of Type 1 Diabetes Is Independent of the HLA DR-DQ Genotype
Previous Article in Special Issue
Epigenetic Regulation of Telomere Maintenance for Therapeutic Interventions in Gliomas
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 8
Issue 6
10.3390/genes8060148
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

CpG and Non-CpG Methylation in Epigenetic Gene Regulation and Brain Function

by
Hyun Sik Jang
,
Woo Jung Shin
,
Jeong Eon Lee
and
Jeong Tae Do
*
Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, KU Institute of Science and Technology, Konkuk University, Seoul 143-701, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2017, 8(6), 148; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8060148
Submission received: 16 February 2017 / Revised: 18 April 2017 / Accepted: 19 May 2017 / Published: 23 May 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Role of Epigenetic Gene Regulation in Brain Function)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
DNA methylation is a major epigenetic mark with important roles in genetic regulation. Methylated cytosines are found primarily at CpG dinucleotides, but are also found at non-CpG sites (CpA, CpT, and CpC). The general functions of CpG and non-CpG methylation include gene silencing or activation depending on the methylated regions. CpG and non-CpG methylation are found throughout the whole genome, including repetitive sequences, enhancers, promoters, and gene bodies. Interestingly, however, non-CpG methylation is restricted to specific cell types, such as pluripotent stem cells, oocytes, neurons, and glial cells. Thus, accumulation of methylation at non-CpG sites and CpG sites in neurons seems to be involved in development and disease etiology. Here, we provide an overview of CpG and non-CpG methylation and their roles in neurological diseases.

1. Introduction

Epigenetic marks include a variety of gene regulatory events, such as chromatin structure remodeling, histone modifications, DNA methylation, and small noncoding RNAs, that do not entail changes in the DNA sequence [1]. Gene expression is directly associated with RNA polymerase and transcription factors that bind to regulatory sequence elements, such as promoters and enhancers. Epigenetic events regulate gene expression at both transcription (histone modification and DNA methylation) and translation (small noncoding RNA) levels. Specifically, epigenetic regulation is involved in genomic imprinting, X chromosome inactivation, and gene silencing. It is thus closely correlated with disease mechanisms [2].
In 1975, two independent research groups suggested that the methylation of cytosine might play a pivotal role as an epigenetic mark in animals [3,4]. DNA methylation was found to occur predominantly on cytosines followed by guanine residues (CpG). This type of methylation is referred to as CpG methylation, and cytosine methylated at the fifth carbon of the pyrimidine ring is called 5-methylcytosine (5mC) (Figure 1A,B). The major function of DNA methylation is the suppression of gene expression. Subsequently, DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), which are specific enzymes that cause methylation at CpG sites, were identified. These enzymes include DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B [5].
DNA methylation is also found at sites other than CpG sequences. This type of methylation is referred to as non-CpG methylation, and includes methylation at cytosines followed by adenine, thymine, or another cytosine (Figure 1B). Non-CpG methylation was initially described in the plant genome [6]. It is suggested to be prevalent in human embryonic stem cells (ES cells) and brain tissue, and comprises 0.02% of total methyl-cytosine in differentiated somatic cells [7,8]. Non-CpG methylation is catalyzed by DNMT3A and DNMT3B [7,9,10,11]. However, the exact mechanisms of non-CpG methylation are as yet poorly understood.
On the other hand, 5mC can also be demethylated via either passive or active DNA demethylation. Passive demethylation is carried out by DNA synthesis without de novo methylation, by which 5mC is diluted following replication. Active demethylation entails the modification of the cytosine base via deamination and/or oxidation [12] (Figure 1C). Deamination of cytosine by activation induced cytidine deaminase (AID)/apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide (APOBEC) yields a uracil, which results in a thymine-guanine mismatch, followed by DNA repair-mediated replacement of thymine with unmethylated cytosine. Active demethylation through oxidation process is carried out by Ten-Eleven-Translocation (TET) proteins, including TET1, TET2, and TET3. TETs oxidize the 5-methyl group of cytosine and convert 5mC into 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC). 5hmC is further oxidized into 5-formylcytosine (5fC) and 5-carboxylcytosine (5caC), which can be excised via glycosylation by thymine DNA glycosylase, followed by base excision repair. This results in unmethylated cytosine [13,14]. Recent studies have revealed that 5hmC is not only an intermediate in the process of active DNA demethylation, but is also a key element in the regulation of gene expression and chromatin structure [15].
In this review, we will provide an overview of CpG and non-CpG methylation and their functions in brain cells, and neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative diseases.

2. CpG and Non-CpG Methylation in Epigenetic Gene Regulation

2.1. DNA Methylation

Epigenetic marks have important roles as regulators of gene expression, which is basically regulated by histone modifications and DNA methylation [16]. DNA methylation is a well-studied epigenetic mechanism that regulates gene expression by adding or removing a methyl group at the fifth carbon of the pyrimidine ring of cytosine to form 5mC [17]. DNA methylation has significant effects on cell development and differentiation [18,19]. In fact, 5mC is a highly conserved epigenetic mark among plants and animal [17]. Most 5mCs are found at CpG sites, where 70–80% of cytosines are methylated. For example, the average methylation rate of Dnmt1 alleles is 62.2% in wild-type mouse ES cells, 66% in mouse liver, and 81.6% in mouse lung [11]. In human brain, 6–8% of CpG islands in genomic DNA are methylated [20].
Most 5mCs are found in repetitive sequences, gene bodies, and intergenic regions [16,17,21,22]. Repetitive sequences comprise more than 40% of the genome and gene body methylation plays a role in regulating gene expression. Some intergenic regions located between genes also control the expression of genes nearby [23]. For instance, if CpG sites located in a gene body are hypermethylated, gene expression is increased [22]. On the other hand, if CpG sites located in promoters or enhancers are hypermethylated, these regions become heterochromatic and are not bound by transcription activators. This leads to transcriptional silencing [8,24,25]. Therefore, CpG methylation is crucial for gene repression and expression. The correlation between DNA methylation at CpG sites and inhibition of gene expression was first shown in a study of CpG islands, which are regions with relatively high frequencies of CpG dinucleotides. CpG islands in promoter regions of active genes were shown to be unmethylated when compared to coding regions [5]. Recent studies have identified regions located near (within 2 kb) of traditional CpG islands, named CpG shores [26,27,28,29]. CpG shores are related to tissue- and cancer-related methylation and age-related hypomethylation changes [30].
DNMTs are enzymes involved in the transfer of methyl groups to cytosines in DNA. Briefly, methyl groups from the cofactor S-adenosylmethionine are transferred to the 5th carbons of cytosines by DNMTs [5]. Dnmt1, Dnmt3a, and Dnmt3b, which are DNMT family members, have N-terminal regulatory domains and C-terminal catalytic domains [31]. Dnmt1 is essential for the maintenance of methylation and chromatin stability [32,33,34], and Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b act as de novo methyltransferases, and are important for DNA methylation in the early embryonic stages [4,35,36]. DNMT1 is especially highly expressed in postmitotic neurons in the central nervous system, and is involved in neuronal differentiation, migration, and central neuronal connections [37]. Mutations in DNMT1 are associated with hereditary sensory neuropathy dementia [37]. DNMT3L does not contain a conserved motif, but is indispensable for genomic imprinting in oocytes (DNMT3L works in association with DNMT3) [38,39]. DNMT1o is a specific enzyme that is expressed in mouse oocytes and is involved in the maintenance of DNA methylation and imprinting [32,33,34,38,39].

2.2. Non-CpG Methylation

In mammals, DNA methylation at CpG dinucleotides is critical for cellular development and differentiation [40,41]. Five-methylcytosines are found primarily at CpG sites, and are found at non-CpG sites, such as CpA, CpT, and CpC. We now know that DNA methylation occurs universally at non-CpG sites, although the function and mechanisms of this type of methylation are not yet elucidated and are still controversial [19,42]. Some researchers believe that non-CpG methylation is a by-product of the hyperactivity of non-specific de novo methylation of CpG sites [19,43]. Others argue that non-CpG methylation is correlated with gene expression and tissue specificity [44,45,46]. For instance, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the promoter of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator 1α (PGC-1 α) gene is more methylated at non-CpG sites than in healthy controls. This results in the downregulation of PGC-1 α [44]. A correlation between non-CpG methylation and transcriptional repression has also been suggested in brain cells [47]. Other reports indicate that non-CpG methylation levels are generally low in promoter regions, although high levels of non-CpG methylation in promoter regions are correlated with gene repression [48,49,50].
Recent studies have revealed that non-CpG methylation is enriched in ES cells [7,8], induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells) [45,46], somatic cell nuclear transfer-derived ES (SCNT-ES) cells [46], oocytes [51,52], neurons, and glial cells [9], although it is rare in most differentiated cell types (Figure 2A). Interestingly, neurons accumulate non-CpG methylation during development [47,49,53]. Non-CpG methylation is nearly absent from adult somatic cells and accounts for only 0.02% of the overall 5mCs in somatic cells. On the other hand, there are differences in non-CpG methylation in human pluripotent cell types: human male ES cells (H1 cell line) are heavily methylated up to approximately 25% at non-CpG sites [7,8], but human female ES cells (H9 cell line) are less methylated compared to H1 ES cells at both CpG and non-CpG sites [7,8,54] (Figure 2A). This phenomenon may be explained by the fact that the expression levels of DNMTs are reduced in female ES cells, which would then lead to a reduction in de novo methylation [54]. In both mice and humans, adult brain tissue displays genome-wide non-CpG methylation [9,47,49,53]. Interestingly, different types of brain cells have different levels of non-CpG methylation. Neurons have considerably higher levels of non-CpG methylation than glial cells [9].
Among the different types of non-CpG methylation (CpA, CpT, and CpC), methylation is most common at CpA sites. For instance, in human iPS cells, 5mCs are found in approximately 68.31%, 7.81%, 1.99%, and 1.05% of CpG, CpA, CpT, and CpC sites, respectively [43]. In addition, methylation of 5’-CAG-3’ sequences predominantly occurs in ES cells. This is referred to as CAG methylation [7,8,43]. In contrast, methylation at 5’-CAC-3’ sequences usually occurs in neurons. This is referred to as CAC methylation [7,9,49]. CAG methylation is also found in oocytes, polar bodies, and pluripotent stem cells, such as ES cells, SCNT-ES cells, and iPS cells [45,46,51]. CAC methylation is found in the frontal cortex, neurons, glial cells, and diverse human tissues [9,49].
In mammals, DNA methylation in somatic cells is carried out by DNMT1, DNMT3a, DNMT3b, and DNMT3L [4,17,38]. Non-CpG methylation is carried out by the de novo methyltransferases DNMT3a and DNMT3b, while the maintenance methyltransferase DNMT1 is not associated with non-CpG methylation patterns [11,55]. In previous reports, Dnmt1 knockout mouse ES cells were shown to retain non-CpG methylation patterns. Compared to Dnmt1 knockout mice, Dnmt3l knockout mice have significantly lower levels of CpA methylation in their prospermatogonia [56]. Furthermore, Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b double knockout ES cells, where Dnmt3l is associated with both Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b expression, have much lower CpA methylation levels [55,57]. Collectively, non-CpG methylation levels are influenced by de novo DNMTs, such as Dnmt3a, Dnmt3b and Dnmt3l. It is certain that de novo DNMTs affect non-CpG methylation, but their functions and mechanisms in establishing non-CpG methylation are as yet completely unknown.

2.3. CpG and Non-CpG Methylation in Brain

According to previous studies, DNA methylation has critical roles in epigenetic regulation of brain development and neurogenesis [58]. DNA methylation may be involved in early brain development and region specification by gene expression [58]. Recently, non-CpG methylation was found at high levels in adult mouse frontal cortex and human brain, while it was rarely detectable in other tissues [9,53]. This fact indicates that extensive de novo DNA methylation occurs during neural maturation in vivo. In fact, mature neurons have significant CpG modifications in response to various stimuli. Non-CpG methylation seems to have different functions in mouse and human brain tissue. Specifically, it is likely to be correlated with gene activity in human brain tissue [8], but is negatively correlated with gene activation in the mouse frontal cortex.
Different neuronal subtypes also have differences in non-CpG methylation patterns in the human brain [59]. The mammalian neocortex contains two major neuronal subtypes: excitatory glutamatergic projection neurons (glutamatergic neurons) and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) ergic interneurons. These neuronal types comprise about 80% and 20% of all neurons, respectively. These two different neuronal subtypes have significantly different DNA methylation patterns, as well as unique gene expression patterns [59]. Kozlenkov and colleagues analyzed genome-wide DNA methylation patterns from in autopsy specimens. They considered glutamatergic neurons (SOX6−/NeuN+), GABAergic interneurons (SOX6−/NeuN+), and glial cells (SOX6−/NeuN−) separately. This genome-wide analysis indicated that the average level of DNA methylation at CpG sites was higher (about 3–4%) in GABAergic interneurons than in glutamatergic neurons and glial cells. DNA hydroxymethyl cytosine, which is an intermediate molecule on the 5mC demethylation pathway, is also higher in glutamatergic neurons than in GABAergic interneurons.
In the in vivo DNA methylome of the adult mouse dentate gyrus, neurons have about 75% CpG methylation and 25% non-CpG methylation [60]. The non-CpG methylation patterns in the mouse brain are conserved in the human brain. In fact, about 83% of non-CpG methylated genes in humans are orthologous genes that are also observed in the mouse brain [60]. Non-CpG methylation is established during postnatal development of the hippocampus and its levels increase over time. Similarly, non-CpG methylation is scarcely detected in human fetal frontal cortex, but is dramatically increased in later life. This increase in non-CpG methylation occurs simultaneously with synaptic development and increases in synaptic density [9]. In contrast, CpG methylation occurs during early development and does not increase over time [47]. In an in vitro differentiation experiment, researchers found that a specific pattern of non-CpG methylation rarely exists in neural progenitor cells (NPCs), but is abundant in neurons. This indicates that new patterns of non-CpG methylation may be established when NPCs differentiate into neurons and glia [9,61]. This phenomenon was also examined during the differentiation of human ES cells to neural cell types [62,63,64] (Figure 2B). ES cells have abundant non-CpG methylation sites. However, during in vitro differentiation into NPCs, genome-wide demethylation is observed at non-CpG sites [62,63,64,65]. When NPCs are further differentiated into neurons and glial cells, non-CpG methylation is reestablished. Interestingly, the primary methylated sites are different in differentiated vs. non-differentiated neurons. CAGs are the primary non-CpG methylation sites in ES cells, while CACs are the most prevalent non-CpG methylation sites in differentiated neural cells. In addition, non-CpG methylation is more abundant in neurons than in non-neural glia [65] (Figure 2B). These data indicate that non-CpG methylation is likely to be related to functional genes characteristic of cells of neural lineage [64].
Transcriptional repression of non-CpG methylation may be mediated by the interaction between DNA-binding proteins and DNA regulatory elements [66]. The methyl-CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2) gene is especially highly expressed in the brain and some other tissues, such as lung and spleen. Similar to 5mCs in CpGs, non-CpG methylation can also be recognized by MeCP2 [47]. In brain, MeCP2 expression is higher in neurons than in glia [67,68], and its protein levels are about 5- to 10-fold higher than in other cell types [69,70]. As MeCP2 is important for brain development and the functions of neurons and glial cells [68], it may act as a bridge between transcription machinery and CpG and/or non-CpG methylation. MeCP2 protein has two domains: the methyl-CpG-binding domain (MBD), which binds to methylated DNA, and a transcriptional repression domain (TBD), which interacts with other transcription factors [71,72]. MeCP2 represses the expression of target genes in collaboration with other cofactor, such as the SIN3 transcription regulator (SIN3A) and histone deacetylases (HDACs), which induce chromatin remodeling and subsequent transcriptional silencing [71,72]. Mutations in MeCP2 lead to neurological diseases, such as Rett syndrome (RTT), in humans.

2.4. 5hmC in Brain and Neural Development

The formation of 5hmC, a 5mC demethylation intermediate, is catalyzed by Fe2+- and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase TETs [13,14]. In mammals, 5hmC is present in all tissues, and has various levels in different tissues. The highest levels are found in the brain (ranging from 0.4% to 0.7% of total cytosine content) [73,74,75,76]. The levels of 5hmC in other tissues (such as kidney, lung, or liver) are lower than 0.2%. Accordingly, all three TETs (TET1, TET2, and TET3) are expressed in brain. Although little is known about the role of 5hmC in specific regions of brain and neural differentiation, observation of phenotypes after knockout or knockdown of TET1, TET2, and TET3 indicate that these enzymes are likely to be associated with neuronal differentiation and neural progenitor cell formation [77,78,79,80]. 5hmC quantification analysis indicates that 5hmC levels in cerebellum, cortex, and hippocampus are much higher than in mouse ES cells [81]. Mature neurons have higher 5hmC content than neural progenitors and young neurons, suggesting that 5hmC increases during the maturation of neurons [82]. Human ES cell-derived neural stem cells also have high 5hmC content, which is maintained during further neuronal differentiation in vitro. However, differentiation towards the oligodendrocyte lineage results in the progressive loss of 5hmC staining, indicating that high 5hmC content may be related to neuronal function [83]. In addition, there is a correlation between 5hmC and neuronal differentiation during neural lineage differentiation of ES cells, as indicated by comparative hydroxymethylated DNA immunoprecipitation [84]. Although reduced 5hmC levels were observed in most exons and promoters, some regions associated with neural system functions had increased 5hmC levels.
Genome-wide studies suggest that 5hmC is enriched in gene bodies, promoters, and distal regulatory regions. Importantly, 5hmC levels are increased and enriched preferentially in gene bodies of neuron-related genes during neuronal differentiation [85]. The level of 5hmC in gene bodies is positively correlated with transcription in the brain and in other tissues [86], but is negatively correlated with activity of enhancers and promoter [87].
Interestingly, MeCP2, a 5mC-binding protein, is also bind to the 5hmC. However, high-affinity binding of MeCP2 is specific to the CpA hydroxymethylation (5hmCpA), but not to the 5hmCpG, 5hmCpC, and 5hmCpT [88]. MeCP2 binding may inhibit conversion of 5mC to 5hmC [82]. Other 5hmC-binding proteins, such as Uhrf2, Wdr76, Hyy28 (Thyn1), and Neil1 have been identified in ES cells and neural progenitor cells [89], suggesting a role for 5hmC as an epigenetic regulator. Ascorbic acid is shown to interact with TETs and induce 5hmC generation [90]. High concentrations of ascorbic acid in neurons may explain the functional role of the ascorbic acid-TET interaction in neurons [91].
Although 5hmC is likely to be a stable epigenetic marker and is abundant in the adult brain, the exact mechanistic involvement of 5hmC with neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative diseases remains unclear. However, many researchers have suggested a potential role of 5hmC in neurological diseases, such as Rett syndrome, autism, Huntington’s disease (HD), and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [92]. Two subsequent derivatives of 5hmC—5fC and 5caC—also transiently accumulate during neuronal and glial differentiation, but their roles in neural differentiation and neurological disease have not been studied much thus far [93].

3. Neurological Disorders Associated with DNA Methylation

DNA methylation has been suggested to play an important role in brain function, especially in memory formation [60,94]. Thus, epigenetic alterations in the mammalian brain result in impairment of brain development and neurodevelopmental disorders [95,96,97]. Recent studies have raised concern regarding the effects of aberrant DNA methylation on the origin and progression of neurodegenerative disorders. As described above, DNA methylation is found in brain, as well as in other tissues. However, specifically high levels of non-CpG methylation have been described in brain.
DNA methylation plays an important role in gene regulation. It is thus not strange that some diseases are caused by abnormal DNA methylation [98]. Mutations in genes coding proteins that recognize DNA methylation or those that are required for normal neural development cause epigenetic disorders. These disorders include RTT, fragile X syndrome (FXS), Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome, Coffin-Lowry syndrome, and alpha-thalassemia mental retardation syndrome. In some cases, changes in histone modification or DNA methylation (hypermethylation or hypomethylation) can cause neurodegenerative disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease (PD), AD, and Huntington’s disease [99,100]. Until recently, mechanistic studies on epigenetic disorders have been focused on CpG methylation, although non-CpG methylation has also been recently studied in neurological diseases [53,65].

3.1. Alzheimer’s Disease

Gene-specific DNA methylation alterations are thought to be related to AD and AD animal models [97]. AD is characterized by progressive deficits in cognition and memory caused by neuronal degeneration and neuron loss. It is largely caused by the intracellular accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau, the extracellular accumulation of β-amyloid protein, and the intraneuronal formation of Lewy bodies (α-synuclein-containing inclusions) [101]. Nicolia et al. examined the DNA methylation status of interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and IL-6 in AD, and found that methylation was increased during the first stages of AD and was decreased thereafter. They also found that the expression of complement C3a receptor 1 (C3ar1) is increased during late-onset AD progression. Only IL-1β had a pattern of DNA methylation that correlated with gene expression levels. It was little correlation between DNA methylation and gene expression levels for IL-6 and C3ar1 [97]. Thus, it may be possible that other epigenetic modifications are more important in controlling AD-related genes.
Sanchez-Mut et al. analyzed 12 distinct brain regions to identify aberrant DNA methylation changes in AD mouse models. These patterns were also shown to be present in patients with AD [102]. They identified three genes that were hypermethylated in both patients with AD and AD mouse models: thromboxane A2 receptor (TBXA2R), sorbin and SH3 domain containing 3 (SORBS3), and spectrin β4 (SPTBN4). These data suggest that AD may be caused by aberrant DNA methylation in genes associated with cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) response element-binding protein (CREB) activation (in TBXA2R), the axon initial segment (in SPTBN4), and synapse formation (in SORBS3).
Intriguingly, a recent report has suggested that there is a relationship between altered mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) methylation and AD [103]. Blanch et al. has shown that CpG and non-CpG sites in the D-loop region of mtDNA are relatively hypermethylated in the entorhinal cortex and substantia nigra in patients with AD. This suggests that epigenetic modulation of mtDNA may also result in neurodegenerative disorders. However, another study indicates that there are methodological limitations to studying human mtDNA, as the methylation levels of mtDNA are much lower (less than 2%) than originally believed [104].
The association between 5hmC and AD is still controversial. Some studies suggest that there is a decrease in 5hmC levels in hippocampal regions of patients with AD [105,106], while other studies suggest that there is an increase in 5hmC levels in gyri of patients with AD [107,108]. The levels of 5hmC vary among different neural subtypes in AD brain. Thus, region- and cell type-specific 5hmC data are required to more precisely understand the mechanisms of AD.

3.2. Rett Syndrome

Rett syndrome is an X-linked neurodevelopmental disorder that usually occurs in girls and has a prevalence of 1 in 10,000 to 15,000 [109,110]. It is characterized by dementia, autism, seizures, microcephaly, progressive motor skill regression, and repetitive hand motions. RTT is commonly caused by a mutation in MeCP2 [59], which is a transcription factor that target genes related to brain and neural development, such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (Bdnf), [33,111], FK506 binding protein 5 [112], distal-less homeobox 5 (Dlx5) [113], Dlx6 [114], ubiquitin-protein ligase E3A [115], and serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase 1 [62,63,112]. As RTT is dominant and MeCP2 is located on the X chromosome, RTT arises mostly in the females and is rare males [116]. The MeCP2 gene is mutated before birth, but RTT features appear 6–18 months after birth. Although the reason for the delayed onset of RTT symptoms remains unclear, it may be related to the interaction between MeCP2 and non-CpG methylation [117]. Chen et al. suggested that binding of MeCP2 to methylated non-CpG sites is necessary for the proper expression of Bdnf, which is a key gene for brain development [117]. It is interesting to note that MeCP2 levels and non-CpG methylation are dramatically increased as the brain matures, and that the symptoms of RTT arise late and become severe during further growth. Interestingly, however, CpG methylation remains almost constant during brain development [64]. MeCP2 binding to methylated CpG before birth does not seems to contribute to the direct regulation of gene expression [117]. These facts may indicate that the delayed onset of RTT is mainly due to the association between non-CpG methylation and MeCP2. Considering that MeCP2, which is associated with Rett syndrome, binds to 5hmC and inhibits the conversion of 5mC to 5hmC [89], the MeCP2-5hmC interaction may be involved in the pathogenesis of Rett syndrome.

3.3. Fragile X Syndrome (FXS)

FXS is a common hereditary neurodevelopmental disorder associated with the X-linked gene FMR1 (fragile X mental retardation-1), which is highly expressed in neurons. FMRP (encoded by FMR1) binds to target mRNA and inhibits translation, which leads to regulation of the formation of dendrites and synapses [118,119]. The features of this syndromes include mental disability, distinct facial features, an aberrantly large head, and behavioral problems, such as hand-flapping and hand-biting [120]. Patients with FXS have smaller cerebellar vermes than normal individuals [121].
The major cause of FXS is the abnormal expansion of CGG repeats in the 5’ untranslated region of the FMR1 gene, which results in histone deacetylation and DNA hypermethylation. These DNA changes then lead to the transcriptional silencing of the FMR1 gene [118,119]. Normal individuals have 6–40 CGG repeats, while individuals with the full mutation have more than 200–230 CGG repeats in the FMR1 gene [122]. Interestingly, transcriptional reactivation can be induced by treating FXS cells with 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC), which is a DNMT inhibitor, but not by treatment with trichostatin A, which is a histone deacetylase inhibitor. This indicates that DNA methylation changes are the major mechanisms underlying FXS [123,124,125]. DNA demethylation following 5-aza-dC treatment is not random, but is rather restricted to genes containing the enriched Gene Ontology (GO) term, which is involved in anatomical structure development, cell differentiation, and cellular protein modification processes [126]. These genes may be the main target genes in epigenetic therapies for FXS.

3.4. Parkinson’s Disease (PD)

PD is universal common neurodegenerative movement disorder [127,128]. The main pathological cause of PD is the loss of dopaminergic (DA) neurons in the substantia nigra of the midbrain and Lewy body formation in neurons. The basic cause of PD is as yet not clear, but it is known that both genetic and environmental factors contribute to the pathology of this disease. Recently, increased α-synuclein levels in DA neurons have been suggested as a precipitating factor for PD [129]. DNA methylation analysis of synuclein-α (SNCA, which encodes for α-synuclein) from peripheral blood obtained from patients with PD patients indicates hypomethylation of SNCA in PD [130]. In addition, α-synuclein levels may be decreased by L-dopa treatment via increased methylation of SNCA.
Global DNA methylation analysis in a number of patients with PD has revealed that multiple genes involved in neurogenesis, including Wnt, are more hypermethylated in PD brain than in normal brain [131]. These hypermethylated genes (Wnt, forkhead box C1, neurogenin 2, sprouty RTK signaling antagonist 1, and catenin beta 1) also have reduced protein expression in midbrain DA neurons. Consistent with this finding, SNCA levels have been shown to be correlated with those of Dnmt1 PD brain [132]. These reports indicate that changes in DNA methylation of Wnt and other neurogenesis-involved genes may be involved in the progression of pathogenesis in PD. An inflammatory cytokine, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), also appears to be linked to the loss of DA neurons in patients with PD [133]. Hypomethylation of the TNF-α promoter, which increases TNF-α expression, may increase susceptibility to TNF-α-mediated inflammation, which may then be followed by apoptosis in neuronal cells. Suppression of TNF-α may be mediated by DNA methylation at critical CpG sites of TNF-α promoters, which modulate the AP2 and specificity protein 1 transcription factors [134].
Similar to AD, PD is associated with mtDNA methylation. However, in contrast to AD (increased DNA methylation), the D-loop region (both CpG and non-CpG sites) of mitochondrial DNA in the substantia nigra has a loss of methylation in patients with PD when compared to control individuals [103]. It remains to be determined whether mtDNA methylation alters nuclear epigenetics and expression levels or global nuclear genomic changes affect mtDNA methylation.

3.5. Huntington’s Disease

HD is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disorder characterized by constant movement and cognitive disability [135]. HD is caused by an expanded CAG triplet repeat in the Huntingtin (Htt) gene, which is located on chromosome 4p16.3 [136]. The Htt gene commonly carries a CAG repeat length of 17–20. Repeat lengths over 35 are considered pathogenic [137]. DNA methylation in cortical tissues may be associated with the age of disease onset [138]. Several studies have shown that changes in DNA methylation are associated with the expression of Htt in different HD models and in human HD brain. [139,140,141,142]. McFarland et al. found that Htt protein directly interacts with MeCP2 in HD mouse and cellular models [143]. Increased interaction between mutant Htt and MeCP2 may alter the expression of Bdnf, which is a gene that is downregulated in HD. This indicates that mutant Htt may induce transcriptional dysregulation of genes implicated in HD pathogenesis.
Wang et al. have suggested that the global loss of 5hmC in brain tissue may be a novel epigenetic marker for HD [141]. They found that the levels of 5hmC were reduced in both the striatum and the cortex in a mouse model of HD. An HD-related gene, Adora2a (Adenosine A2A receptor, A2AR), whose expression is reduced in patients with HD, is regulated by 5hmC levels. This indicates that 5hmC may be involved in the progression of HD by controlling gene expression [139].

3.6. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease that involves motor neuron degeneration in the brain, brainstem, and spinal cord [144,145,146]. It is characterized by muscle abnormalities, including muscle spasticity, cramps, atrophy and fasciculation [147,148]. Most cases of ALS are sporadic and do not have clear causes. Aberrant DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic modifications are involved in neurodegenerative diseases [149]. Recent studies suggest that altered 5mC or 5 hmC can affect neurodegeneration, which may be caused by abnormal function of DNMTs [150,151]. Motor neurons in patients with ALS especially have changes in Dnmt1, Dmnt3a, and 5mC levels. 5mC accumulates in nuclei of motor neurons in the spinal cord and motor cortex when Dnmt1 and Dnmt3a are increased in spinal and cortical motor neurons [150]. Increased Dnmt3a might also play a pro-apoptotic role in a neurodegenerative model associated with caspase-3 and p53 [150]. Patients with ALS may have one of several gene mutations, such as those in superoxide dismutase 1, chromosome 9 open reading frame 72, TAR DNA binding protein, and FUS [152]. The major cause of ALS may be the expansion of a hexanucleotide (GGGGCC) repeat in the intron of the C9orf72 gene [153,154]. There are 2–19 repeats in healthy individuals, although the number of repeats is abnormally expanded to more than 30 copies in patients with ALS. The GGGGCC repeat sequence is located between two CpG islands, which are normally free of DNA methylation in healthy controls, but display abnormal CpG methylation at the repeats in patients with ALS [155]. However, the correlation between hypermethylation in the GGGGCC repeats and ALS is still controversial [155,156,157,158].

4. Conclusions

Research on epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation, and their effects on neurological disorders is a rapidly growing field (Table 1). In fact, DNA methylation has been proven to be useful in understanding various neurological diseases. Thus, specific patterns of DNA methylation may be early biomarkers of disease, and epigenetic drugs, such as DNA demethylation inducers, may be used to treat neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders [100]. As a result, many researchers have tried to find the therapeutics targeting DNA methylation and the changes in the expression levels of genes related to neural function.
Understanding neurological diseases using the epigenetic approach is as yet in its beginning stages. It is thus not easy to obtain reproducible and reliable data regarding DNA methylation from patients with neurological diseases. This is due to the inaccessibility of brain tissue from patients and normal controls. Interestingly, comparison studies using brain tissue and blood have shown that methylation patterns in the brain are very similar to those found in blood [159]. Therefore, blood might be an alternative of brain tissue when analyzing alterations in DNA methylation [160]. A more promising way to study brain tissue might be to use brain organoids, or small brain tissue formations obtained from iPS cells from patients [161,162].

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (grant Nos. 2016M3A9B6946835, 2015R1A2A2A01003604, and 2015R15A1009701), and the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program funded by the Rural Development Administration (grant no. PJ01133802) in the Republic of Korea.

Author Contributions

Hyun Sik Jang, Woo Jung Shin, Jeong Eon Lee, and Jeong Tae Do wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Russo, V.E.; Martienssen, R.A.; Riggs, A.D. Epigenetic Mechanisms of Gene Regulation; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  2. Portela, A.; Esteller, M. Epigenetic modifications and human disease. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 1057–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Riggs, A.D. X inactivation, differentiation, and DNA methylation. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 1975, 14, 9–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Holliday, R.; Pugh, J.E. DNA modification mechanisms and gene activity during development. Science 1975, 187, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Christman, J.K. 5-azacytidine and 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine as inhibitors of DNA methylation: Mechanistic studies and their implications for cancer therapy. Oncogene 2002, 21, 5483–5495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lindroth, A.M.; Cao, X.; Jackson, J.P.; Zilberman, D.; McCallum, C.M.; Henikoff, S.; Jacobsen, S.E. Requirement of chromomethylase3 for maintenance of cpxpg methylation. Science 2001, 292, 2077–2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Laurent, L.; Wong, E.; Li, G.; Huynh, T.; Tsirigos, A.; Ong, C.T.; Low, H.M.; Kin Sung, K.W.; Rigoutsos, I.; Loring, J.; et al. Dynamic changes in the human methylome during differentiation. Genome Res. 2010, 20, 320–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lister, R.; Pelizzola, M.; Dowen, R.H.; Hawkins, R.D.; Hon, G.; Tonti-Filippini, J.; Nery, J.R.; Lee, L.; Ye, Z.; Ngo, Q.M.; et al. Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature 2009, 462, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lister, R.; Mukamel, E.A.; Nery, J.R.; Urich, M.; Puddifoot, C.A.; Johnson, N.D.; Lucero, J.; Huang, Y.; Dwork, A.J.; Schultz, M.D.; et al. Global epigenomic reconfiguration during mammalian brain development. Science 2013, 341, 1237905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gowher, H.; Jeltsch, A. Enzymatic properties of recombinant Dnmt3a DNA methyltransferase from mouse: The enzyme modifies DNA in a non-processive manner and also methylates non-CpG [correction of non-CpA] sites. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 309, 1201–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ramsahoye, B.H.; Biniszkiewicz, D.; Lyko, F.; Clark, V.; Bird, A.P.; Jaenisch, R. Non-cpg methylation is prevalent in embryonic stem cells and may be mediated by DNA methyltransferase 3a. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 5237–5242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Schofield, M.J.; Hsieh, P. DNA mismatch repair: Molecular mechanisms and biological function. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 2003, 57, 579–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ito, S.; Shen, L.; Dai, Q.; Wu, S.C.; Collins, L.B.; Swenberg, J.A.; He, C.; Zhang, Y. Tet proteins can convert 5-methylcytosine to 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine. Science 2011, 333, 1300–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. He, Y.F.; Li, B.Z.; Li, Z.; Liu, P.; Wang, Y.; Tang, Q.; Ding, J.; Jia, Y.; Chen, Z.; Li, L.; et al. Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by tdg in mammalian DNA. Science 2011, 333, 1303–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mellen, M.; Ayata, P.; Dewell, S.; Kriaucionis, S.; Heintz, N. MeCP2 binds to 5hmc enriched within active genes and accessible chromatin in the nervous system. Cell 2012, 151, 1417–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Berger, S.L.; Kouzarides, T.; Shiekhattar, R.; Shilatifard, A. An operational definition of epigenetics. Genes Dev. 2009, 23, 781–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Law, J.A.; Jacobsen, S.E. Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11, 204–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Jaenisch, R.; Bird, A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: How the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat. Genet. 2003, 33, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Smith, Z.D.; Meissner, A. DNA methylation: Roles in mammalian development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013, 14, 204–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Illingworth, R.; Kerr, A.; Desousa, D.; Jorgensen, H.; Ellis, P.; Stalker, J.; Jackson, D.; Clee, C.; Plumb, R.; Rogers, J.; et al. A novel CpG island set identifies tissue-specific methylation at developmental gene loci. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6, e22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Felsenfeld, G. A brief history of epigenetics. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2014, 6, a018200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yang, X.; Han, H.; De Carvalho, D.D.; Lay, F.D.; Jones, P.A.; Liang, G. Gene body methylation can alter gene expression and is a therapeutic target in cancer. Cancer Cell 2014, 26, 577–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jones, P.A. Functions of DNA methylation: Islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13, 484–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chodavarapu, R.K.; Feng, S.; Bernatavichute, Y.V.; Chen, P.Y.; Stroud, H.; Yu, Y.; Hetzel, J.A.; Kuo, F.; Kim, J.; Cokus, S.J.; et al. Relationship between nucleosome positioning and DNA methylation. Nature 2010, 466, 388–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Shukla, S.; Kavak, E.; Gregory, M.; Imashimizu, M.; Shutinoski, B.; Kashlev, M.; Oberdoerffer, P.; Sandberg, R.; Oberdoerffer, S. Ctcf-promoted rna polymerase ii pausing links DNA methylation to splicing. Nature 2011, 479, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Irizarry, R.A.; Ladd-Acosta, C.; Wen, B.; Wu, Z.; Montano, C.; Onyango, P.; Cui, H.; Gabo, K.; Rongione, M.; Webster, M.; et al. The human colon cancer methylome shows similar hypo- and hypermethylation at conserved tissue-specific CpG island shores. Nat. Genet. 2009, 41, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Alisch, R.S.; Barwick, B.G.; Chopra, P.; Myrick, L.K.; Satten, G.A.; Conneely, K.N.; Warren, S.T. Age-associated DNA methylation in pediatric populations. Genome Res. 2012, 22, 623–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Pirazzini, C.; Giuliani, C.; Bacalini, M.G.; Boattini, A.; Capri, M.; Fontanesi, E.; Marasco, E.; Mantovani, V.; Pierini, M.; Pini, E.; et al. Space/population and time/age in DNA methylation variability in humans: A study on igf2/h19 locus in different italian populations and in mono- and di-zygotic twins of different age. Aging 2012, 4, 509–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Heyn, H.; Li, N.; Ferreira, H.J.; Moran, S.; Pisano, D.G.; Gomez, A.; Diez, J.; Sanchez-Mut, J.V.; Setien, F.; Carmona, F.J.; et al. Distinct DNA methylomes of newborns and centenarians. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 10522–10527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Shimoda, N.; Izawa, T.; Yoshizawa, A.; Yokoi, H.; Kikuchi, Y.; Hashimoto, N. Decrease in cytosine methylation at CpG island shores and increase in DNA fragmentation during zebrafish aging. Age 2014, 36, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Yen, R.W.; Vertino, P.M.; Nelkin, B.D.; Yu, J.J.; el-Deiry, W.; Cumaraswamy, A.; Lennon, G.G.; Trask, B.J.; Celano, P.; Baylin, S.B. Isolation and characterization of the cdna encoding human DNA methyltransferase. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20, 2287–2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Feng, J.; Fan, G. The role of DNA methylation in the central nervous system and neuropsychiatric disorders. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2009, 89, 67–84. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Chen, W.G.; Chang, Q.; Lin, Y.; Meissner, A.; West, A.E.; Griffith, E.C.; Jaenisch, R.; Greenberg, M.E. Derepression of Bdnf transcription involves calcium-dependent phosphorylation of MeCP2. Science 2003, 302, 885–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tohgi, H.; Utsugisawa, K.; Nagane, Y.; Yoshimura, M.; Genda, Y.; Ukitsu, M. Reduction with age in methylcytosine in the promoter region -224 approximately -101 of the amyloid precursor protein gene in autopsy human cortex. Mol. Brain Res. 1999, 70, 288–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Okano, M.; Xie, S.; Li, E. Cloning and characterization of a family of novel mammalian DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases. Nat. Genet. 1998, 19, 219–220. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Okano, M.; Bell, D.W.; Haber, D.A.; Li, E. DNA methyltransferases DNMT3A and DNMT3B are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell 1999, 99, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Klein, C.J.; Botuyan, M.V.; Wu, Y.; Ward, C.J.; Nicholson, G.A.; Hammans, S.; Hojo, K.; Yamanishi, H.; Karpf, A.R.; Wallace, D.C.; et al. Mutations in dnmt1 cause hereditary sensory neuropathy with dementia and hearing loss. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43, 595–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Jurkowska, R.Z.; Jurkowski, T.P.; Jeltsch, A. Structure and function of mammalian DNA methyltransferases. ChemBioChem 2011, 12, 206–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Goll, M.G.; Bestor, T.H. Eukaryotic cytosine methyltransferases. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 2005, 74, 481–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Reik, W.; Dean, W.; Walter, J. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Science 2001, 293, 1089–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Reik, W. Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development. Nature 2007, 447, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Patil, V.; Ward, R.L.; Hesson, L.B. The evidence for functional non-CpG methylation in mammalian cells. Epigenetics 2014, 9, 823–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ziller, M.J.; Muller, F.; Liao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Gu, H.; Bock, C.; Boyle, P.; Epstein, C.B.; Bernstein, B.E.; Lengauer, T.; et al. Genomic distribution and inter-sample variation of non-CpG methylation across human cell types. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7, e1002389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Barres, R.; Osler, M.E.; Yan, J.; Rune, A.; Fritz, T.; Caidahl, K.; Krook, A.; Zierath, J.R. Non-cpg methylation of the PGC-1alpha promoter through dnmt3b controls mitochondrial density. Cell Metabol. 2009, 10, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lister, R.; Pelizzola, M.; Kida, Y.S.; Hawkins, R.D.; Nery, J.R.; Hon, G.; Antosiewicz-Bourget, J.; O′Malley, R.; Castanon, R.; Klugman, S.; et al. Hotspots of aberrant epigenomic reprogramming in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2011, 471, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ma, H.; Morey, R.; O′Neil, R.C.; He, Y.; Daughtry, B.; Schultz, M.D.; Hariharan, M.; Nery, J.R.; Castanon, R.; Sabatini, K.; et al. Abnormalities in human pluripotent cells due to reprogramming mechanisms. Nature 2014, 511, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Guo, J.U.; Su, Y.; Shin, J.H.; Shin, J.; Li, H.; Xie, B.; Zhong, C.; Hu, S.; Le, T.; Fan, G.; et al. Distribution, recognition and regulation of non-CpG methylation in the adult mammalian brain. Nat. Neurosci. 2014, 17, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Barres, R.; Kirchner, H.; Rasmussen, M.; Yan, J.; Kantor, F.R.; Krook, A.; Naslund, E.; Zierath, J.R. Weight loss after gastric bypass surgery in human obesity remodels promoter methylation. Cell Rep. 2013, 3, 1020–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Xie, W.; Barr, C.L.; Kim, A.; Yue, F.; Lee, A.Y.; Eubanks, J.; Dempster, E.L.; Ren, B. Base-resolution analyses of sequence and parent-of-origin dependent DNA methylation in the mouse genome. Cell 2012, 148, 816–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Inoue, S.; Oishi, M. Effects of methylation of non-CpG sequence in the promoter region on the expression of human synaptotagmin XI (syt11). Gene 2005, 348, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Guo, H.; Zhu, P.; Yan, L.; Li, R.; Hu, B.; Lian, Y.; Yan, J.; Ren, X.; Lin, S.; Li, J.; et al. The DNA methylation landscape of human early embryos. Nature 2014, 511, 606–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Tomizawa, S.; Kobayashi, H.; Watanabe, T.; Andrews, S.; Hata, K.; Kelsey, G.; Sasaki, H. Dynamic stage-specific changes in imprinted differentially methylated regions during early mammalian development and prevalence of non-CpG methylation in oocytes. Development 2011, 138, 811–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Varley, K.E.; Gertz, J.; Bowling, K.M.; Parker, S.L.; Reddy, T.E.; Pauli-Behn, F.; Cross, M.K.; Williams, B.A.; Stamatoyannopoulos, J.A.; Crawford, G.E.; et al. Dynamic DNA methylation across diverse human cell lines and tissues. Genome Res. 2013, 23, 555–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zvetkova, I.; Apedaile, A.; Ramsahoye, B.; Mermoud, J.E.; Crompton, L.A.; John, R.; Feil, R.; Brockdorff, N. Global hypomethylation of the genome in XX embryonic stem cells. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37, 1274–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Arand, J.; Spieler, D.; Karius, T.; Branco, M.R.; Meilinger, D.; Meissner, A.; Jenuwein, T.; Xu, G.; Leonhardt, H.; Wolf, V.; et al. In vivo control of CpG and non-CpG DNA methylation by DNA methyltransferases. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ichiyanagi, T.; Ichiyanagi, K.; Miyake, M.; Sasaki, H. Accumulation and loss of asymmetric non-CpG methylation during male germ-cell development. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, 738–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Liao, J.; Karnik, R.; Gu, H.; Ziller, M.J.; Clement, K.; Tsankov, A.M.; Akopian, V.; Gifford, C.A.; Donaghey, J.; Galonska, C.; et al. Targeted disruption of DNMT1, DNMT3A and DNMT3B in human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ladd-Acosta, C.; Pevsner, J.; Sabunciyan, S.; Yolken, R.H.; Webster, M.J.; Dinkins, T.; Callinan, P.A.; Fan, J.B.; Potash, J.B.; Feinberg, A.P. DNA methylation signatures within the human brain. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2007, 81, 1304–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kozlenkov, A.; Wang, M.; Roussos, P.; Rudchenko, S.; Barbu, M.; Bibikova, M.; Klotzle, B.; Dwork, A.J.; Zhang, B.; Hurd, Y.L.; et al. Substantial DNA methylation differences between two major neuronal subtypes in human brain. Nucleic acids Res. 2016, 44, 2593–2612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Guo, J.U.; Ma, D.K.; Mo, H.; Ball, M.P.; Jang, M.H.; Bonaguidi, M.A.; Balazer, J.A.; Eaves, H.L.; Xie, B.; Ford, E.; et al. Neuronal activity modifies the DNA methylation landscape in the adult brain. Nat. Neurosci. 2011, 14, 1345–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Xie, W.; Schultz, M.D.; Lister, R.; Hou, Z.; Rajagopal, N.; Ray, P.; Whitaker, J.W.; Tian, S.; Hawkins, R.D.; Leung, D.; et al. Epigenomic analysis of multilineage differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Cell 2013, 153, 1134–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Reubinoff, B.E.; Pera, M.F.; Fong, C.Y.; Trounson, A.; Bongso, A. Embryonic stem cell lines from human blastocysts: Somatic differentiation in vitro. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  63. Zhang, S.C.; Wernig, M.; Duncan, I.D.; Brustle, O.; Thomson, J.A. In vitro differentiation of transplantable neural precursors from human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 1129–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. He, Y.; Ecker, J.R. Non-CG methylation in the human genome. Ann. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 2015, 16, 55–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kozlenkov, A.; Roussos, P.; Timashpolsky, A.; Barbu, M.; Rudchenko, S.; Bibikova, M.; Klotzle, B.; Byne, W.; Lyddon, R.; Di Narzo, A.F.; et al. Differences in DNA methylation between human neuronal and glial cells are concentrated in enhancers and non-CpG sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 109–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Klose, R.J.; Bird, A.P. Genomic DNA methylation: The mark and its mediators. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2006, 31, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Shahbazian, M.D.; Antalffy, B.; Armstrong, D.L.; Zoghbi, H.Y. Insight into rett syndrome: MeCP2 levels display tissue- and cell-specific differences and correlate with neuronal maturation. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2002, 11, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Guy, J.; Cheval, H.; Selfridge, J.; Bird, A. The role of MeCP2 in the brain. Ann. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 27, 631–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Kishi, N.; Macklis, J.D. MeCP2 is progressively expressed in post-migratory neurons and is involved in neuronal maturation rather than cell fate decisions. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2004, 27, 306–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Skene, P.J.; Illingworth, R.S.; Webb, S.; Kerr, A.R.; James, K.D.; Turner, D.J.; Andrews, R.; Bird, A.P. Neuronal MeCP2 is expressed at near histone-octamer levels and globally alters the chromatin state. Mol. Cell 2010, 37, 457–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Nan, X.; Ng, H.H.; Johnson, C.A.; Laherty, C.D.; Turner, B.M.; Eisenman, R.N.; Bird, A. Transcriptional repression by the methyl-cpg-binding protein MeCP2 involves a histone deacetylase complex. Nature 1998, 393, 386–389. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  72. Jones, P.L.; Veenstra, G.J.; Wade, P.A.; Vermaak, D.; Kass, S.U.; Landsberger, N.; Strouboulis, J.; Wolffe, A.P. Methylated DNA and MeCP2 recruit histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Nat. Genet. 1998, 19, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kriaucionis, S.; Heintz, N. The nuclear DNA base 5-hydroxymethylcytosine is present in purkinje neurons and the brain. Science 2009, 324, 929–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Globisch, D.; Munzel, M.; Muller, M.; Michalakis, S.; Wagner, M.; Koch, S.; Bruckl, T.; Biel, M.; Carell, T. Tissue distribution of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and search for active demethylation intermediates. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e15367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Munzel, M.; Globisch, D.; Bruckl, T.; Wagner, M.; Welzmiller, V.; Michalakis, S.; Muller, M.; Biel, M.; Carell, T. Quantification of the sixth DNA base hydroxymethylcytosine in the brain. Angew. Chem. 2010, 49, 5375–5377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Song, C.X.; Szulwach, K.E.; Fu, Y.; Dai, Q.; Yi, C.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Chen, C.H.; Zhang, W.; Jian, X.; et al. Selective chemical labeling reveals the genome-wide distribution of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Dawlaty, M.M.; Ganz, K.; Powell, B.E.; Hu, Y.C.; Markoulaki, S.; Cheng, A.W.; Gao, Q.; Kim, J.; Choi, S.W.; Page, D.C.; et al. TET1 is dispensable for maintaining pluripotency and its loss is compatible with embryonic and postnatal development. Cell Stem Cell 2011, 9, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Hahn, M.A.; Qiu, R.; Wu, X.; Li, A.X.; Zhang, H.; Wang, J.; Jui, J.; Jin, S.G.; Jiang, Y.; Pfeifer, G.P.; et al. Dynamics of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and chromatin marks in mammalian neurogenesis. Cell Rep. 2013, 3, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Zhang, R.R.; Cui, Q.Y.; Murai, K.; Lim, Y.C.; Smith, Z.D.; Jin, S.; Ye, P.; Rosa, L.; Lee, Y.K.; Wu, H.P.; et al. TET1 regulates adult hippocampal neurogenesis and cognition. Cell Stem Cell 2013, 13, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Li, T.; Yang, D.; Li, J.; Tang, Y.; Yang, J.; Le, W. Critical role of tet3 in neural progenitor cell maintenance and terminal differentiation. Mol. Neurobiol. 2015, 51, 142–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Szwagierczak, A.; Bultmann, S.; Schmidt, C.S.; Spada, F.; Leonhardt, H. Sensitive enzymatic quantification of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in genomic DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, e181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Szulwach, K.E.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Song, C.X.; Han, J.W.; Kim, S.; Namburi, S.; Hermetz, K.; Kim, J.J.; Rudd, M.K.; et al. Integrating 5-hydroxymethylcytosine into the epigenomic landscape of human embryonic stem cells. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7, e1002154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ruzov, A.; Tsenkina, Y.; Serio, A.; Dudnakova, T.; Fletcher, J.; Bai, Y.; Chebotareva, T.; Pells, S.; Hannoun, Z.; Sullivan, G.; et al. Lineage-specific distribution of high levels of genomic 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian development. Cell Res. 2011, 21, 1332–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Tan, L.; Xiong, L.; Xu, W.; Wu, F.; Huang, N.; Xu, Y.; Kong, L.; Zheng, L.; Schwartz, L.; Shi, Y.; et al. Genome-wide comparison of DNA hydroxymethylation in mouse embryonic stem cells and neural progenitor cells by a new comparative hmedip-seq method. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, e84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Colquitt, B.M.; Allen, W.E.; Barnea, G.; Lomvardas, S. Alteration of genic 5-hydroxymethylcytosine patterning in olfactory neurons correlates with changes in gene expression and cell identity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 14682–14687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Gan, H.; Wen, L.; Liao, S.; Lin, X.; Ma, T.; Liu, J.; Song, C.X.; Wang, M.; He, C.; Han, C.; et al. Dynamics of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine during mouse spermatogenesis. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Wen, L.; Li, X.; Yan, L.; Tan, Y.; Li, R.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xie, J.; Zhang, Y.; Song, C.; et al. Whole-genome analysis of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and 5-methylcytosine at base resolution in the human brain. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, R49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Gabel, H.W.; Kinde, B.; Stroud, H.; Gilbert, C.S.; Harmin, D.A.; Kastan, N.R.; Hemberg, M.; Ebert, D.H.; Greenberg, M.E. Disruption of DNA-methylation-dependent long gene repression in rett syndrome. Nature 2015, 522, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Spruijt, C.G.; Gnerlich, F.; Smits, A.H.; Pfaffeneder, T.; Jansen, P.W.; Bauer, C.; Munzel, M.; Wagner, M.; Muller, M.; Khan, F.; et al. Dynamic readers for 5-(hydroxy)methylcytosine and its oxidized derivatives. Cell 2013, 152, 1146–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Minor, E.A.; Court, B.L.; Young, J.I.; Wang, G. Ascorbate induces ten-eleven translocation (TET) methylcytosine dioxygenase-mediated generation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 13669–13674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Spector, R.; Johanson, C.E. The nexus of vitamin homeostasis and DNA synthesis and modification in mammalian brain. Mol. Brain 2014, 7, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Sherwani, S.I.; Khan, H.A. Role of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in neurodegeneration. Gene 2015, 570, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Wheldon, L.M.; Abakir, A.; Ferjentsik, Z.; Dudnakova, T.; Strohbuecker, S.; Christie, D.; Dai, N.; Guan, S.; Foster, J.M.; Correa, I.R., Jr.; et al. Transient accumulation of 5-carboxylcytosine indicates involvement of active demethylation in lineage specification of neural stem cells. Cell Rep. 2014, 7, 1353–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Miller, C.A.; Sweatt, J.D. Covalent modification of DNA regulates memory formation. Neuron 2007, 53, 857–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Schanen, N.C. Epigenetics of autism spectrum disorders. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2006, 15, R138–R150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. LaSalle, J.M.; Yasui, D.H. Evolving role of MeCP2 in rett syndrome and autism. Epigenomics 2009, 1, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Nicolia, V.; Cavallaro, R.A.; Lopez-Gonzalez, I.; Maccarrone, M.; Scarpa, S.; Ferrer, I.; Fuso, A. DNA methylation profiles of selected pro-inflammatory cytokines in alzheimer disease. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2017, 76, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Bird, A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 6–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Robertson, K.D.; Wolffe, A.P. DNA methylation in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2000, 1, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Urdinguio, R.G.; Sanchez-Mut, J.V.; Esteller, M. Epigenetic mechanisms in neurological diseases: Genes, syndromes, and therapies. Lancet Neurol. 2009, 8, 1056–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Iqbal, K.; Grundke-Iqbal, I. Alzheimer neurofibrillary degeneration: Significance, etiopathogenesis, therapeutics and prevention. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2008, 12, 38–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Sanchez-Mut, J.V.; Aso, E.; Panayotis, N.; Lott, I.; Dierssen, M.; Rabano, A.; Urdinguio, R.G.; Fernandez, A.F.; Astudillo, A.; Martin-Subero, J.I.; et al. DNA methylation map of mouse and human brain identifies target genes in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 2013, 136, 3018–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Blanch, M.; Mosquera, J.L.; Ansoleaga, B.; Ferrer, I.; Barrachina, M. Altered mitochondrial DNA methylation pattern in Alzheimer disease-related pathology and in parkinson disease. Am. J. Pathol. 2016, 186, 385–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Liu, B.; Du, Q.; Chen, L.; Fu, G.; Li, S.; Fu, L.; Zhang, X.; Ma, C.; Bin, C. Cpg methylation patterns of human mitochondrial DNA. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Chouliaras, L.; Mastroeni, D.; Delvaux, E.; Grover, A.; Kenis, G.; Hof, P.R.; Steinbusch, H.W.; Coleman, P.D.; Rutten, B.P.; van den Hove, D.L. Consistent decrease in global DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in the hippocampus of Alzheimer’s disease patients. Neurobiol. Aging 2013, 34, 2091–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Condliffe, D.; Wong, A.; Troakes, C.; Proitsi, P.; Patel, Y.; Chouliaras, L.; Fernandes, C.; Cooper, J.; Lovestone, S.; Schalkwyk, L. Cross-region reduction in 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in alzheimer’s disease brain. Neurobiol. Aging 2014, 35, 1850–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Coppieters, N.; Dieriks, B.V.; Lill, C.; Faull, R.L.; Curtis, M.A.; Dragunow, M. Global changes in DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in Alzheimer’s disease human brain. Neurobiol. Aging 2014, 35, 1334–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Bradley-Whitman, M.; Lovell, M. Epigenetic changes in the progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2013, 134, 486–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Hagberg, B. Rett’s syndrome: Prevalence and impact on progressive severe mental retardation in girls. Acta Paediatr. Scand. 1985, 74, 405–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Rett, A. On a unusual brain atrophy syndrome in hyperammonemia in childhood. In Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift; Springer: Vienna, Austria, 1966; Volume 116, pp. 723–726. [Google Scholar]
  111. Martinowich, K.; Hattori, D.; Wu, H.; Fouse, S.; He, F.; Hu, Y.; Fan, G.; Sun, Y.E. DNA methylation-related chromatin remodeling in activity-dependent BDNF gene regulation. Science 2003, 302, 890–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Nuber, U.A.; Kriaucionis, S.; Roloff, T.C.; Guy, J.; Selfridge, J.; Steinhoff, C.; Schulz, R.; Lipkowitz, B.; Ropers, H.H.; Holmes, M.C.; et al. Up-regulation of glucocorticoid-regulated genes in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005, 14, 2247–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Horike, S.; Cai, S.; Miyano, M.; Cheng, J.F.; Kohwi-Shigematsu, T. Loss of silent-chromatin looping and impaired imprinting of Dlx5 in Rett syndrome. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Klose, R.J.; Sarraf, S.A.; Schmiedeberg, L.; McDermott, S.M.; Stancheva, I.; Bird, A.P. DNA binding selectivity of MeCP2 due to a requirement for A/T sequences adjacent to methyl-CpG. Mol. Cell 2005, 19, 667–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Makedonski, K.; Abuhatzira, L.; Kaufman, Y.; Razin, A.; Shemer, R. MeCP2 deficiency in Rett syndrome causes epigenetic aberrations at the PWS/AS imprinting center that affects UBE3A expression. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005, 14, 1049–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Amir, R.E.; Van den Veyver, I.B.; Wan, M.; Tran, C.Q.; Francke, U.; Zoghbi, H.Y. Rett syndrome is caused by mutations in X-linked MeCP2, encoding methyl-CpG-binding protein 2. Nat. Genet. 1999, 23, 185–188. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  117. Chen, L.; Chen, K.; Lavery, L.A.; Baker, S.A.; Shaw, C.A.; Li, W.; Zoghbi, H.Y. MeCP2 binds to non-CG methylated DNA as neurons mature, influencing transcription and the timing of onset for Rett syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 5509–5514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Irwin, S.A.; Galvez, R.; Greenough, W.T. Dendritic spine structural anomalies in fragile-X mental retardation syndrome. Cereb. Cortex 2000, 10, 1038–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Huber, K.M.; Gallagher, S.M.; Warren, S.T.; Bear, M.F. Altered synaptic plasticity in a mouse model of fragile X mental retardation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 7746–7750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Garber, K.B.; Visootsak, J.; Warren, S.T. Fragile X syndrome. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2008, 16, 666–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Mostofsky, S.H.; Mazzocco, M.M.; Aakalu, G.; Warsofsky, I.S.; Denckla, M.B.; Reiss, A.L. Decreased cerebellar posterior vermis size in fragile X syndrome: Correlation with neurocognitive performance. Neurology 1998, 50, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Nolin, S.L.; Lewis, F.A., 3rd; Ye, L.L.; Houck, G.E., Jr.; Glicksman, A.E.; Limprasert, P.; Li, S.Y.; Zhong, N.; Ashley, A.E.; Feingold, E.; et al. Familial transmission of the FMR1 CgG repeat. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1996, 59, 1252–1261. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  123. Kremer, E.; Pritchard, M.; Lynch, M.; Yu, S.; Holman, K.; Baker, E.; Warren, S.; Schlessinger, D.; Sutherland, G.; Richards, R. Mapping of DNA instability at the fragile x to a trinucleotide repeat sequence p (CcG) n. Science 1991, 252, 1711–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Oberle, I.; Rousseau, F.; Heitz, D.; Kretz, C.; Devys, D.; Hanauer, A.; Boue, J.; Bertheas, M.F.; Mandel, J.L. Instability of a 550-base pair DNA segment and abnormal methylation in fragile x syndrome. Science 1991, 252, 1097–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Coffee, B.; Zhang, F.; Warren, S.T.; Reines, D. Acetylated histones are associated with fmr1 in normal but not fragile X-syndrome cells. Nat. Genet. 1999, 22, 98–101. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  126. Tabolacci, E.; Palumbo, F.; Nobile, V.; Neri, G. Transcriptional reactivation of the fmr1 gene. A possible approach to the treatment of the fragile X syndrome. Genes 2016, 7, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Lees, A.J.; Hardy, J.; Revesz, T. Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 2009, 373, 2055–2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Volta, M.; Milnerwood, A.J.; Farrer, M.J. Insights from late-onset familial parkinsonism on the pathogenesis of idiopathic parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2015, 14, 1054–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Grundemann, J.; Schlaudraff, F.; Haeckel, O.; Liss, B. Elevated alpha-synuclein mrna levels in individual UV-laser-microdissected dopaminergic substantia nigra neurons in idiopathic parkinson’s disease. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, e38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Schmitt, I.; Kaut, O.; Khazneh, H.; deBoni, L.; Ahmad, A.; Berg, D.; Klein, C.; Frohlich, H.; Wullner, U. L-dopa increases alpha-synuclein DNA methylation in parkinson’s disease patients in vivo and in vitro. Mov. Disord. 2015, 30, 1794–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Zhang, L.; Yuan, Y.; Tong, Q.; Jiang, S.; Xu, Q.; Ding, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, K. Reduced plasma taurine level in parkinson’s disease: Association with motor severity and levodopa treatment. Int. J. Neurosci. 2016, 126, 630–636. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  132. Desplats, P.; Spencer, B.; Coffee, E.; Patel, P.; Michael, S.; Patrick, C.; Adame, A.; Rockenstein, E.; Masliah, E. Alpha-synuclein sequesters DNMT1 from the nucleus: A novel mechanism for epigenetic alterations in lewy body diseases. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 9031–9037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Carvey, P.M.; Chen, E.Y.; Lipton, J.W.; Tong, C.W.; Chang, Q.A.; Ling, Z.D. Intra-parenchymal injection of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin 1-beta produces dopamine neuron loss in the rat. J. Neural Transm. 2005, 112, 601–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Pieper, H.C.; Evert, B.O.; Kaut, O.; Riederer, P.F.; Waha, A.; Wullner, U. Different methylation of the tnf-alpha promoter in cortex and substantia nigra: Implications for selective neuronal vulnerability. Neurobiol. Dis. 2008, 32, 521–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Pringsheim, T.; Wiltshire, K.; Day, L.; Dykeman, J.; Steeves, T.; Jette, N. The incidence and prevalence of Huntington’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mov. Disord. 2012, 27, 1083–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. MacDonald, M.E.; Ambrose, C.M.; Duyao, M.P.; Myers, R.H.; Lin, C.; Srinidhi, L.; Barnes, G.; Taylor, S.A.; James, M.; Groot, N. A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on huntington’s disease chromosomes. Cell 1993, 72, 971–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Kremer, B.; Goldberg, P.; Andrew, S.E.; Theilmann, J.; Telenius, H.; Zeisler, J.; Squitieri, F.; Lin, B.; Bassett, A.; Almqvist, E. A worldwide study of the Huntington’s disease mutation: The sensitivity and specificity of measuring cag repeats. N. Engl. J. Med. 1994, 330, 1401–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. De Souza, R.A.; Islam, S.A.; McEwen, L.M.; Mathelier, A.; Hill, A.; Mah, S.M.; Wasserman, W.W.; Kobor, M.S.; Leavitt, B.R. DNA methylation profiling in human Huntington’s disease brain. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2016, 25, 2013–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Villar-Menéndez, I.; Blanch, M.; Tyebji, S.; Pereira-Veiga, T.; Albasanz, J.L.; Martín, M.; Ferrer, I.; Pérez-Navarro, E.; Barrachina, M. Increased 5-methylcytosine and decreased 5-hydroxymethylcytosine levels are associated with reduced striatal A2AR levels in Huntington’s disease. Neuromol. Med. 2013, 15, 295–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Thomas, B.; Matson, S.; Chopra, V.; Sun, L.; Sharma, S.; Hersch, S.; Rosas, H.D.; Scherzer, C.; Ferrante, R.; Matson, W. A novel method for detecting 7-methyl guanine reveals aberrant methylation levels in Huntington disease. Anal. Biochem. 2013, 436, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Wang, F.; Yang, Y.; Lin, X.; Wang, J.-Q.; Wu, Y.-S.; Xie, W.; Wang, D.; Zhu, S.; Liao, Y.-Q.; Sun, Q. Genome-wide loss of 5-hmC is a novel epigenetic feature of Huntington’s disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2013, 22, 3641–3653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Bai, G.; Cheung, I.; Shulha, H.P.; Coelho, J.E.; Li, P.; Dong, X.; Jakovcevski, M.; Wang, Y.; Grigorenko, A.; Jiang, Y. Epigenetic dysregulation of hairy and enhancer of split 4 (HES4) is associated with striatal degeneration in postmortem Huntington brains. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014, 24, 1441–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. McFarland, K.N.; Huizenga, M.N.; Darnell, S.B.; Sangrey, G.R.; Berezovska, O.; Cha, J.-H.J.; Outeiro, T.F.; Sadri-Vakili, G. MeCP2: A novel huntingtin interactor. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014, 23, 1036–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Rowland, L.P.; Shneider, N.A. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 344, 1688–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Heath, P.R.; Shaw, P.J. Update on the glutamatergic neurotransmitter system and the role of excitotoxicity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerv. 2002, 26, 438–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Martin, L.J. Mitochondrial and cell death mechanisms in neurodegenerative diseases. Pharmaceuticals 2010, 3, 839–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Martin, L.J.; Wong, M. Aberrant regulation of DNA methylation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A new target of disease mechanisms. Neurotherapeutics 2013, 10, 722–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. de Carvalho, M.; Swash, M. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: An update. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2011, 24, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Figueroa-Romero, C.; Hur, J.; Bender, D.E.; Delaney, C.E.; Cataldo, M.D.; Smith, A.L.; Yung, R.; Ruden, D.M.; Callaghan, B.C.; Feldman, E.L. Identification of epigenetically altered genes in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e52672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Chestnut, B.A.; Chang, Q.; Price, A.; Lesuisse, C.; Wong, M.; Martin, L.J. Epigenetic regulation of motor neuron cell death through DNA methylation. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 16619–16636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Bollati, V.; Galimberti, D.; Pergoli, L.; Dalla Valle, E.; Barretta, F.; Cortini, F.; Scarpini, E.; Bertazzi, P.; Baccarelli, A. DNA methylation in repetitive elements and alzheimer disease. Brain Behav. Immun. 2011, 25, 1078–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Paez-Colasante, X.; Figueroa-Romero, C.; Sakowski, S.A.; Goutman, S.A.; Feldman, E.L. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Mechanisms and therapeutics in the epigenomic era. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2015, 11, 266–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. DeJesus-Hernandez, M.; Mackenzie, I.R.; Boeve, B.F.; Boxer, A.L.; Baker, M.; Rutherford, N.J.; Nicholson, A.M.; Finch, N.A.; Flynn, H.; Adamson, J. Expanded GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat in noncoding region of C9orf72 causes chromosome 9p-linked FTD and ALS. Neuron 2011, 72, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Xi, Z.; Zinman, L.; Moreno, D.; Schymick, J.; Liang, Y.; Sato, C.; Zheng, Y.; Ghani, M.; Dib, S.; Keith, J. Hypermethylation of the CpG island near the G 4 C 2 repeat in ALS with A C9orf72 expansion. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2013, 92, 981–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Xi, Z.; Zhang, M.; Bruni, A.C.; Maletta, R.G.; Colao, R.; Fratta, P.; Polke, J.M.; Sweeney, M.G.; Mudanohwo, E.; Nacmias, B.; et al. The C9orf72 repeat expansion itself is methylated in ALS and FTLD patients. Acta Neuropathol. 2015, 129, 715–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Ciura, S.; Lattante, S.; Le Ber, I.; Latouche, M.; Tostivint, H.; Brice, A.; Kabashi, E. Loss of function of C9orf72 causes motor deficits in a zebrafish model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 2013, 74, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Bauer, P.O. Methylation of C9orf72 expansion reduces rna foci formation and dipeptide-repeat proteins expression in cells. Neurosci. Lett. 2016, 612, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Day, J.J.; Roberson, E.D. DNA methylation slows effects of C9orf72 mutations an epigenetic brake on genetic inheritance. Neurology 2015, 84, 1616–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Pihlstrom, L.; Berge, V.; Rengmark, A.; Toft, M. Parkinson’s disease correlates with promoter methylation in the alpha-synuclein gene. Mov. Disord. 2015, 30, 577–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Masliah, E.; Dumaop, W.; Galasko, D.; Desplats, P. Distinctive patterns of DNA methylation associated with parkinson disease: Identification of concordant epigenetic changes in brain and peripheral blood leukocytes. Epigenetics 2013, 8, 1030–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Lancaster, M.A.; Renner, M.; Martin, C.A.; Wenzel, D.; Bicknell, L.S.; Hurles, M.E.; Homfray, T.; Penninger, J.M.; Jackson, A.P.; Knoblich, J.A. Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly. Nature 2013, 501, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Mariani, J.; Coppola, G.; Zhang, P.; Abyzov, A.; Provini, L.; Tomasini, L.; Amenduni, M.; Szekely, A.; Palejev, D.; Wilson, M.; et al. Foxg1-dependent dysregulation of gaba/glutamate neuron differentiation in autism spectrum disorders. Cell 2015, 162, 375–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genes 08 00148 g001 550
Figure 1. DNA methylation and demethylation. (A) DNA methylation occurs at the fifth carbon of cytosine and leads to the formation of 5-methylcytosine (5mC); (B) DNA methylation is predominantly found at CpG sites, and is much less commonly observed at non-CpG sites, such as CpA, CpT, and CpC; and (C) 5mC can be demethylated by passive or active processes. Active DNA demethylation can occur either via oxidation or deamination. The oxidation process is carried out by Ten-Eleven-Translocation (TET) proteins, including TET1, TET2, and TET3. TETs convert 5mC into 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), which is further changed into 5-formylcytosine (5fC) and 5-carboxylcytosine (5caC). 5caC is excised and replaced via base excision repair. 5mC and 5hmC can also be demethylated via deamination by activation induced cytidine deaminase (AID)/apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide (APOBEC).
Figure 1. DNA methylation and demethylation. (A) DNA methylation occurs at the fifth carbon of cytosine and leads to the formation of 5-methylcytosine (5mC); (B) DNA methylation is predominantly found at CpG sites, and is much less commonly observed at non-CpG sites, such as CpA, CpT, and CpC; and (C) 5mC can be demethylated by passive or active processes. Active DNA demethylation can occur either via oxidation or deamination. The oxidation process is carried out by Ten-Eleven-Translocation (TET) proteins, including TET1, TET2, and TET3. TETs convert 5mC into 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), which is further changed into 5-formylcytosine (5fC) and 5-carboxylcytosine (5caC). 5caC is excised and replaced via base excision repair. 5mC and 5hmC can also be demethylated via deamination by activation induced cytidine deaminase (AID)/apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide (APOBEC).
Genes 08 00148 g001
Genes 08 00148 g002 550
Figure 2. Non-CpG methylation levels in different cell types during differentiation of human ES cells. (A) Tissue-specific non-CpG methylation levels. In mammalian somatic cells, neurons have the highest non-CpG methylation levels, although non-CpG methylation is rare in most other differentiated cell types, such as fibroblasts. Non-CpG methylation is also enriched in ES cells. The human male ES cell line (H1) is more highly methylated than the female ES cell line (H9); (B) Dynamics of non-CpG methylation levels during the differentiation of ES cells. Non-CpG methylation levels decrease when ES cells differentiate into neural progenitor cells (NPCs). When NPCs are further differentiated into neurons and glial cells, non-CpG methylation is increased again. Interestingly, non-CpG methylation levels are higher in neurons than in glial cells.
Figure 2. Non-CpG methylation levels in different cell types during differentiation of human ES cells. (A) Tissue-specific non-CpG methylation levels. In mammalian somatic cells, neurons have the highest non-CpG methylation levels, although non-CpG methylation is rare in most other differentiated cell types, such as fibroblasts. Non-CpG methylation is also enriched in ES cells. The human male ES cell line (H1) is more highly methylated than the female ES cell line (H9); (B) Dynamics of non-CpG methylation levels during the differentiation of ES cells. Non-CpG methylation levels decrease when ES cells differentiate into neural progenitor cells (NPCs). When NPCs are further differentiated into neurons and glial cells, non-CpG methylation is increased again. Interestingly, non-CpG methylation levels are higher in neurons than in glial cells.
Genes 08 00148 g002
Table
Table 1. Neurological diseases and implications of DNA methylation.
Table 1. Neurological diseases and implications of DNA methylation.
DiseasePatternsMain FactorsReferences
Alzheimer’s diseaseCpG methylationMethylated interleukin-6[97]
CpG methylationHypermethylated TXBA2R, SORBS3, and SPTBN4[102]
CpG/non-CpG methylationHypermethylated mitochondrial DNA[103]
Rett syndromeMeCp2 mutationMutations in MeCP2 target genes (Bdnf, Fkbp5, Dlx5, Dlx6, UBE3A, and Sgk)[111,112,113,114,115]
Non-CpG methylationBinding of MeCP2 to methylated non-CpG sites[117]
MeCP2-5hmC interactionInhibition of conversion from 5mC to 5hmC[89]
Fragile X syndromeHistone deacetylation and DNA hypermethylationAbnormal expansion of CGG repeat in 5’ UTR of FMR1 gene[121]
Parkinson’s diseaseCpG methylationHypomethylation of SNCA[130]
CpG methylationHypomethylation of TNF-αpromoter[134]
CpG/non-CpG methylationHypomethylation of mitochondrial DNA[102]
Huntington’s diseaseCpG methylationNeurotrophic factors (Bdnf and A2A)[139]
CpG methylationInteraction of mutant Htt with MeCP2[143]
5hmCRegulation of Adora2a expression by 5hmC levels[139]
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosisCpG methylation5mC accumulation in motor neurons[150]
DMNT1 transcriptionIncreased levels of Dnmt3a lead to apoptosis[150]
Genetic mutation Gene mutations in SOD1, C9orf72, TARDBP, and FUS genes[152]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jang, H.S.; Shin, W.J.; Lee, J.E.; Do, J.T. CpG and Non-CpG Methylation in Epigenetic Gene Regulation and Brain Function. Genes 2017, 8, 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8060148

AMA Style

Jang HS, Shin WJ, Lee JE, Do JT. CpG and Non-CpG Methylation in Epigenetic Gene Regulation and Brain Function. Genes. 2017; 8(6):148. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8060148

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jang, Hyun Sik, Woo Jung Shin, Jeong Eon Lee, and Jeong Tae Do. 2017. "CpG and Non-CpG Methylation in Epigenetic Gene Regulation and Brain Function" Genes 8, no. 6: 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8060148

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop