Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Association Studies of Live Weight at First Breeding at Eight Months of Age and Pregnancy Status of Ewe Lambs
Next Article in Special Issue
Uncovering the Genetics and Physiology behind Optic Neuritis
Previous Article in Journal
Biochemical, Genetic and Clinical Diagnostic Approaches to Autism-Associated Inherited Metabolic Disorders
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reduced OPA1, Mitochondrial Fragmentation and Increased Susceptibility to Apoptosis in Granular Corneal Dystrophy Type 2 Corneal Fibroblasts
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 14
Issue 4
10.3390/genes14040804
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Inflammation and Oxidative Stress Gene Variability in Retinal Detachment Patients with and without Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy

by
Xhevat Lumi
1,2,3,
Filippo Confalonieri
2,3,4,
Metka Ravnik-Glavač
5,
Katja Goričar
5,
Tanja Blagus
5,
Vita Dolžan
5,
Goran Petrovski
2,3,6,
Marko Hawlina
1 and
Damjan Glavač
7,8,*
1
Eye Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
2
Center for Eye Research and Innovative Diagnostics, Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, 0450 Oslo, Norway
3
Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0315 Oslo, Norway
4
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy
5
Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
6
Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Split, University Hospital Centre, 21 000 Split, Croatia
7
Department of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
8
Center for Human Genetics & Pharmacogenomics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2023, 14(4), 804; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14040804
Submission received: 28 February 2023 / Revised: 23 March 2023 / Accepted: 24 March 2023 / Published: 27 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ophthalmic Genetics, Epigenetics, and Disease)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study investigated the association between certain genetic variations and the risk of developing proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) after surgery. The study was conducted on 192 patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) who underwent 3-port pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). The distribution of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in genes involved in inflammation and oxidative stress associated with PVR pathways were analyzed among patients with and without postoperative PVR grade C1 or higher. A total of 7 defined SNPs of 5 genes were selected for genotyping: rs4880 (SOD2); rs1001179 (CAT); rs1050450 (GPX1); rs1143623, rs16944, rs1071676 (IL1B); rs2910164 (MIR146A) using competitive allele-specific polymerase chain reaction. The association of SNPs with PVR risk was evaluated using logistic regression. Furthermore, the possible association of SNPs with postoperative clinical parameters was evaluated using non-parametric tests. The difference between two genotype frequencies between patients with or without PVR grade C1 or higher was found to be statistically significant: SOD2 rs4880 and IL1B rs1071676. Carriers of at least one polymorphic IL1B rs1071676 GG allele appeared to have better postoperative best-corrected visual acuity only in patients without PVR (p = 0.070). Our study suggests that certain genetic variations may play a role in the development of PVR after surgery. These findings may have important implications for identifying patients at higher risk for PVR and developing new treatments.

1. Introduction

Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) represents the proliferation and contraction of fibrocellular membranes over and under the neurosensory retina and within the vitreous cavity in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) [1,2]. It is the main complication following retinal detachment (RD) surgery and the leading cause of failure in the management of RRD [3,4,5,6,7]. It is estimated that PVR occurs in 5–10% of patients with RRD [8,9,10,11]. According to the Retina Society Terminology Committee’s classification, the most severe stage of PVR is grade C, which is characterized by starfolds and contraction of the retina [6].
The processes leading to PVR development are complex. PVR is driven by a wide spectrum of growth factors and cytokines [5,7]. Numerous molecules related to the inflammatory process have been implicated in the PVR’s development, such as growth factors, transforming growth factors, interleukins, chemokines, and tumor necrosis factor [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Among the many inflammatory mediators, transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), interleukin (IL)-6 (IL-6), IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) are thought to be particularly relevant. Other growth factors and cytokines, including basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), IL-1 α, IL-2, IL-3, and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) have also been found to play an important role in the PVR processes [7,14,15,16,17,18,19].
As in many other diseases, in RD and during the process of PVR formation, oxidative stress and inflammation are important factors that lead to disturbed redox signaling and molecular damage [20]. Higher levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which affect many physiological processes, have been described in retinal diseases, including PVR [21]. Oxidative stress in the cellular environment can also lead to dysregulated para-inflammation, which further gives rise to inflammatory processes mediated by pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β [21]. In studies on the neuroretina in mice, it has been shown that the increase of para-inflammatory responses is characterized by a further increase of ROS production in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), microglial activation and subretinal migration, as well as breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier [22,23]. These changes have also been described as occurring during PVR formation [24]. Given the important involvement of oxidative stress in many pathogenic pathways, it has been postulated that antioxidant activity may reduce photoreceptor loss following RD and delay development to PVR [21,25,26,27].
To expand the current knowledge on the association of selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with PVR, we investigated seven selected SNPs located within five genes (SOD2, CAT, GPX1, IL1B, and MIR146A) likely involved in the PVR pathways (oxidative stress and inflammation) in RRD patients with and without postoperative PVR grade C1 or higher.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

A genetic association study was conducted on 192 patients with primary RRD who underwent 3-port pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) at the Eye Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia. The study was approved by the National Medical Ethics Committee of the Republic of Slovenia (Approval No. 91/05/11) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients provided written informed consent and agreed to the genetic analysis of SNPs potentially associated with the PVR formation process.
Only patients after PPV and laser retinopexy for RRD were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were as follows: tractional or posttraumatic RD, RD secondary to a macular hole, cryotherapy performed during PPV, PPV combined with a scleral buckle, diabetic retinopathy, central- or branch-retinal vein occlusion, glaucoma, and age under 16 years.
The PVR stage was graded according to the updated classification of the Retina Society Terminology Committee (1991) [6]. Patients who developed PVR Grade C1 or higher within 3 months after the primary RRD surgery were enrolled as PVR cases, and patients who did not develop PVR Grade C1 or higher were enrolled as controls (or non-PVR cases).
Additional data collected from the patient’s records were: age at the time of surgery, gender, duration of symptoms, Snellen best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), macular status (on/off), intraocular pressure (IOP), and central retinal thickness (CRT). A Topcon swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) was used to obtain the OCT images (SS-OCT, DRI OCT Triton, Topcon, Tokyo, Japan). The horizontal cross-sectional B-scan image was recorded at the postoperative visit 6 months after the surgery. CRT was measured using the software-based measurement tool.

2.2. Definition of Clinical Parameters

To evaluate the association of selected SNPs with clinical phenotypes, the relevant clinical parameters had to be identified first. These were defined as postoperative BCVA, IOP, and CRT. For each of these parameters, the association with SNPs was evaluated in the groups without and with PVR grade C1 separately.

2.3. Blood Collection and DNA Extraction

DNA was extracted from six milliliters of peripheral blood using the QIAamp DNA Blood Midi Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted DNA was stored at −20 °C until used for genotyping.

2.4. Genotyping of PVR Patients

Five candidate genes were selected based on their direct involvement in response to oxidative stress and inflammation pathways. Only common, experimentally confirmed or in silico predicted functional polymorphisms with minor allele frequency above 5% in the European population were included in the study: non-synonymous SNPs located within the coding region or SNPs in the vicinity of selected genes (5′ and 3′ untranslated regions) that could alter expression levels. Seven SNPs fulfilling these criteria were selected for genotyping: rs4880 (SOD2); rs1001179 (CAT); rs1050450 (GPX1); rs1143623, rs16944, rs1071676 (IL1B); and rs2910164 (MIR146A). Genotypes were determined using competitive allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (KASP, LGC Genomics, Hoddesdon, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were described using frequencies, while continuous variables were described with a median and a 25–75% range. Fisher’s exact test and the Mann–Whitney test were used to compare the distribution of categorical and continuous variables between PVR cases and controls, respectively. For all selected SNPs, deviation from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was evaluated using the chi-square test. Both dominant and additive genetic models were used in the analysis. To evaluate the association of SNPs with PVR risk, odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using logistic regression. The Mann–Whitney or Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to evaluate the association of SNPs with continuous clinical parameters. All tests were two-sided. As 7 SNPs were included in the analyses, the Bonferroni correction was used to account for multiple comparisons: p-values below 0.007 were considered statistically significant, while p-values between 0.006 and 0.050 were considered nominally significant. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 27.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

A total of 192 patients with new-onset RD in one eye were enrolled, of whom 116 (60.4%) were males and 76 (39.6%) were females. Macula-off detachments represented 138 (72.3%) and macula-on represented 53 (27.7%) of the cases. Included in total were 112 (58.3%) patients who developed PVR Grade C1 or higher within 3 months after primary surgery for RRD and 80 (41.7%) patients who did not develop PVR. The clinical characteristics of the whole study group and comparison between patients with or without PVR grade C1 or higher are presented in Table 1. In the non-PVR group, there were more males compared to the PVR group, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.052). Patients in the PVR group were also slightly older (65 (55–74) vs. 60 (51–70.8) years) in the non-PVR group (p = 0.081)). The distribution of patients with RRD in the left or right eye was similar between both groups (p = 0.656).
The number of surgeries in the whole cohort ranged from 1 to 5. Most of the patients in the non-PVR group (97.5%) had only one surgery, with only two patients in this group having two surgeries, whereas most patients with PVR grade C1 or higher (71.4%) received more than one surgery (Table 1). The median duration of symptoms in the whole cohort was 14 (7–30) days. In the non-PVR group, the median duration of symptoms was 8 (5–14) days, while it was significantly longer in the PVR group (14 (7–30)) days, p < 0.001).
Preoperative median BCVA in the non-PVR group was 0.1 (0.01–0.5), whereas in patients with PVR grade C1 or higher it was 0.01 (range 0.01–0.2), which was significantly lower (p < 0.001). The same statistically significant difference was maintained postoperatively (0.7 vs. 0.2, respectively, for the non-PVR versus PVR groups, p < 0.001) (Table 1). Patients with PVR grade C1 or higher also had significantly higher CRT measured by OCT (281 µm vs. 245 µm, p = 0.008). Preoperative IOP was slightly lower in patients with PVR grade C1 or higher (p = 0.028), but no differences could be observed postoperatively (Table 1).
Genotype frequencies of 7 selected SNPs located within or in the vicinity of 5 genes involved in the oxidative stress (SOD2, CAT, GPX1) and inflammatory (IL1B, MIR146A) pathways among all patients with RRD are presented in Table 2. The genotype frequencies for all SNPs were in agreement with HWE.
Comparing the genotype frequencies between patients with or without PVR grade C1 or higher, only 2 SNPs were found to be nominally significant: SOD2 rs4880 and IL1B rs1071676 (Table 3). Carriers of the two polymorphic SOD2 rs4880 alleles (TT genotype) were more likely to have higher grade PVR (OR = 2.31, 95% CI = 1.01–5.27, p = 0.046) compared to the CC genotype, even after adjustment for age and gender (OR = 2.74, 95% CI = 1.17–6.42, p = 0.021). In the dominant model, carriers of at least one polymorphic SOD2 rs4880 T allele appeared to have higher-grade PVR only after adjustment for age and gender (OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.00–3.90, p = 0.050). On the other hand, carriers of the single polymorphic IL1B rs1071676 allele (GC genotype) were less likely to have higher grade PVR only after adjustment for age and gender (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.26–0.95, p = 0.034), while no differences could be observed in the univariable analysis or in the dominant model (all p > 0.050) (Table 3). None of the associations reached the threshold for statistical significance after adjustment for multiple comparisons.
The association of selected SNPs with postoperative clinical parameters among the RRD patients with and without PVR grade C1 or higher is shown in Table 4. None of the investigated SNPs were significantly associated with any of the clinical parameters in both groups. However, carriers of at least one polymorphic IL1B rs1071676 GG allele appeared to have better postoperative BCVA only in patients without PVR (p = 0.070), although none of the associations were statistically significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons.

4. Discussion

Several investigations have tried to elucidate the question of whether genetic factors play a key role in the wound healing process and the development of PVR [28]. Some of them have identified specific SNPs located in genes involved in the PVR pathways, which may be involved in the disease pathogenesis and represent potential predictive factors for PVR development [9,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Some genetic association studies performed in the last two decades have also highlighted the potential of various gene polymorphisms of inflammatory mediators and growth factors as new biomarkers in PVR pathogenesis as well as a potential tool in its diagnosis and treatment [9,29,30,32,36,37].
In a previous study, we found differences in genotype distributions between patients with and without PVR at rs1800795 of the IL6 gene, as well as at rs1800871 in the vicinity of the IL10 gene and rs1800471 in the TGFB1 gene [35].
The SOD2 rs4880 T allele and IL1B rs1071676 GC genotypes were nominally associated with increased risk for developing PVR grade C1 or higher, but the associations could not reach statistical significance after adjustment for multiple comparisons. The SOD2 enzyme can be considered to have a potential role in the development of PVR by influencing the oxidant state of the vitreous body [38,39]. The non-synonymous SNP rs4880 has been linked to poor health outcomes and increased risk for breast cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes mellitus [40,41,42], but it has so far not yet been investigated in PVR. The IL1B gene, located on chromosome 2, encodes IL-1β, an important mediator of the inflammatory response, which is involved in a variety of cellular processes, including cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis [43], making it a pivotal mediator for PVR development [44].
Our findings regarding these two SNPs may be indicative of their role in PVR, as both SOD2 and IL1B genes are involved in the inflammatory processes present in PVR, as well as regulation of the inflammatory response or oxidative stress, but further studies are needed to confirm our results at a larger scale. When the groups of patients were compared against their clinical parameters, statistically significant differences were found for the pre- and post-operative BCVA, macula on/off status, the number of surgeries performed, the duration of symptoms, the post-operative CRT, and the pre-operative IOP. However, no associations were observed between the investigated SNPs and the postoperative clinical parameters collected.
In a previous study, we also found a statistically significant difference in the genotype distributions between healthy controls and PVR patients for the rs1800629 in TNF (c.-308G>A) [35]. Previously, the TNF locus, which encodes also for TNF-α, has been investigated in three subsequent studies by a group in Spain and shown to be associated with increased risk of PVR development, including that of rs1800629 [8,9,29]. Previous investigations of the genotype distribution in the Slovenian population have shown a statistically significant difference between patients with and without PVR and a potential association between PVR and SNPs located within the IL-6 and TGFB1 genes, and in the vicinity of the gene for IL-10. However, after adjustment for multiple hypothesis testing, none of the comparisons appeared to be statistically significant [34]. Our previous analysis has shown a wide variation in the prevalence of genotypes among different ethnic groups, with a great limitation being the small groups of patients analyzed [34,35].
Altogether, more than 40 SNPs have been previously associated with PVR [35], but only 17 of them in 12 genes have remained associated with PVR after adjustment for multiple comparisons [14,19,20,21,22,23]. Moreover, several associations between SNP genotypes and the PVR phenotype could not be replicated in studies conducted on groups of different ethnic backgrounds within European populations [34,35]. The likelihood for the detection of false positive results when those are not adjusted properly is high and represents the most obvious problem in gene-disease association studies [45,46,47,48]. To confirm the association between SNPs and a disease, replication among different study populations is crucial, as differences in genotype frequencies might contribute to the results [49].
In the present study, a genetic association and analysis of correlation to clinical parameters was conducted on 192 patients with primary RRD who underwent PPV and revealed 2 genotypic associations to the PVR group in SOD2 rs4880 and IL1B rs1071676 SNPs. When comparing the groups in terms of clinical parameters, we found significant differences between them in most of the analyzed parameters. Our results demonstrate an association between the development of PVR C1 or higher in the SOD2 rs4880 TT genotype compared to the CC genotype, as well as the IL1B rs1071676 GC genotype compared to the GG genotype. To our knowledge, this finding is the first in the analysis of PVR-related gene polymorphisms that links PVR to SOD2 and IL1B gene polymorphisms. Our results suggest that reducing the level of oxidative stress and influencing the cascade of inflammatory responses within the vitreous cavity can possibly change the course of PVR formation. If we further speculate, by manipulating the vitreous antioxidant profile, one could protect the eye from oxidative stress, which is responsible for the exacerbation of the inflammatory response that leads to PVR development [50]. Within the speculation limits, both SNPs may serve as new biomarkers for an unfavorable course of RRD treatment.
This study has some limitations. At this stage, we could not include a true control group of a healthy population. It could be possible to eliminate bias and inaccuracies from such research by comparing RRD patients with healthy controls and expanding the investigation to a larger sample size.

5. Conclusions

We hereby analyzed the potential association of SNPs of certain genes associated with PVR formation. A statistically significant difference between patients with and without PVR was found in SNPs of the SOD2 and IL1B genes. The aim in PVR research, as well as in other human diseases, is to detect genetic associations, which can be replicated in future studies without a significant bias. Our study confirmed that differences in the genotype distributions exist. Due to the limited number of patients enrolled, the present study is based only on a single center-Slovenian population. It is crucial to conduct larger multicenter and possibly population-based studies in the near future to further strengthen our findings and genetic association results.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.L., D.G. and M.H.; Methodology, X.L. and D.G; Software, D.G. and K.G.; Validation, X.L., D.G. and M.H.; Formal Analysis, X.L., F.C., M.R.-G., K.G., T.B., V.D., G.P., M.H. and D.G.; Investigation, X.L., F.C., M.R.-G., K.G., T.B., V.D., G.P., M.H. and D.G.; Resources, X.L., F.C., M.R.-G., K.G., T.B., V.D., G.P., M.H. and D.G.; Data Curation, X.L., F.C., M.R.-G., K.G., T.B., V.D., G.P., M.H. and D.G.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, X.L., F.C. and G.P.; Writing—Review and Editing, X.L., F.C., M.R.-G., K.G., T.B., V.D., G.P., M.H. and D.G.; Visualization, X.L., F.C., M.R.-G., K.G., T.B., V.D., G.P., M.H. and D.G.; Supervision, X.L., D.G. and M.H.; Project Administration, X.L. and D.G.; Funding Acquisition, X.L., D.G. and M.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Slovenian research agency ARRS (research core funding No. P3-0427, No. P1-0170 and No. P3-0333).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the National Medical Ethics Committee of the Republic of Slovenia (Approval No. 91/05/11) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data available upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Idrees, S.; Sridhar, J.; Kuriyan, A.E. Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy: A Review. Int. Ophthalmol. Clin. 2019, 59, 221–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chaudhary, R.; Scott, R.A.H.; Wallace, G.; Berry, M.; Logan, A.; Blanch, R.J. Inflammatory and Fibrogenic Factors in Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy Development. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2020, 9, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kwon, O.W.; Song, J.H.; Roh, M.I. Retinal Detachment and Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy. Dev. Ophthalmol. 2016, 55, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wu, F.; Eliott, D. Molecular Targets for Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy. Semin. Ophthalmol. 2021, 36, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pastor, J.C.; Rojas, J.; Pastor-Idoate, S.; Di Lauro, S.; Gonzalez-Buendia, L.; Delgado-Tirado, S. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy: A new concept of disease pathogenesis and practical consequences. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2016, 51, 125–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Machemer, R.; Aaberg, T.M.; Freeman, H.M.; Irvine, A.R.; Lean, J.S.; Michels, R.M. An updated classification of retinal detachment with proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1991, 112, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Dai, Y.; Dai, C.; Sun, T. Inflammatory mediators of proliferative vitreoretinopathy: Hypothesis and review. Int. Ophthalmol. 2020, 40, 1587–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Rojas, J.; Fernandez, I.; Pastor, J.C.; Maclaren, R.E.; Ramkissoon, Y.; Harsum, S.; Charteris, D.G.; Van Meurs, J.C.; Amarakoon, S.; Ruiz-Moreno, J.M.; et al. A genetic case-control study confirms the implication of SMAD7 and TNF locus in the development of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013, 54, 1665–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Rojas, J.; Fernandez, I.; Pastor, J.C.; Garcia-Gutierrez, M.-T.; Sanabria, R.-M.; Brion, M.; Sobrino, B.; Manzanas, L.; Giraldo, A.; Rodriguez-de la Rua, E.; et al. Development of predictive models of proliferative vitreoretinopathy based on genetic variables: The Retina 4 project. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009, 50, 2384–2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Pennock, S.; Haddock, L.J.; Eliott, D.; Mukai, S.; Kazlauskas, A. Is neutralizing vitreal growth factors a viable strategy to prevent proliferative vitreoretinopathy? Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2014, 40, 16–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lei, H.; Velez, G.; Hovland, P.; Hirose, T.; Gilbertson, D.; Kazlauskas, A. Growth factors outside the PDGF family drive experimental PVR. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009, 50, 3394–3403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sanabria Ruiz-Colmenares, M.R.; Pastor Jimeno, J.C.; Garrote Adrados, J.A.; Telleria Orriols, J.J.; Yugueros Fernández, M.I. Cytokine gene polymorphisms in retinal detachment patients with and without proliferative vitreoretinopathy: A preliminary study. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 2006, 84, 309–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Saika, S.; Yamanaka, O.; Nishikawa-Ishida, I.; Kitano, A.; Flanders, K.C.; Okada, Y.; Ohnishi, Y.; Nakajima, Y.; Ikeda, K. Effect of Smad7 gene overexpression on transforming growth factor β-induced retinal pigment fibrosis in a proliferative vitreoretinopathy mouse model. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2007, 125, 647–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Symeonidis, C.; Papakonstantinou, E.; Androudi, S.; Georgalas, I.; Rotsos, T.; Karakiulakis, G.; Diza, E.; Dimitrakos, S.A. Comparison of interleukin-6 and matrix metalloproteinase expression in the subretinal fluid and the vitreous during proliferative vitreoretinopathy: Correlations with extent, duration of RRD and PVR grade. Cytokine 2014, 67, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ricker, L.J.A.G.; Kijlstra, A.; Kessels, A.G.H.; de Jager, W.; Liem, A.T.A.; Hendrikse, F.; Heji, E.C.L. Interleukin and Growth Factor Levels in Subretinal Fluid in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Case-Control Study. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kon, C.H.; Occleston, N.L.; Aylward, G.W.; Khaw, P.T. Expression of vitreous cytokines in proliferative vitreoretinopathy: A prospective study. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1999, 40, 705–712. [Google Scholar]
  17. Robbins, S.G.; Mixon, R.N.; Wilson, D.J.; Hart, C.E.; Robertson, J.E.; Westra, I.; Planck, S.R.; Rosenbaum, J.T. Platelet-derived growth factor ligands and receptors immunolocalized in proliferative retinal diseases. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1994, 35, 3649–3663. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rasier, R.; Gormus, U.; Artunay, O.; Yuzbasioglu, E.; Oncel, M.; Bahcecioglu, H. Vitreous levels of VEGF, IL-8, and TNF-α in retinal detachment. Curr. Eye Res. 2010, 35, 505–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Limb, G.A.; Alam, A.; Earley, O.; Green, W.; Chignell, A.H.; Dumonde, D.C. Distribution of cytokine proteins within epiretinal membranes in proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Curr. Eye Res. 1994, 13, 791–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sies, H. Oxidative Stress: Concept and Some Practical Aspects. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Santos, F.M.; Mesquita, J.; Castro-de-Sousa, J.P.; Ciordia, S.; Paradela, A.; Tomaz, C.T. Vitreous Humor Proteome: Targeting Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Neurodegeneration in Vitreoretinal Diseases. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, H.; Chen, M.; Forrester, J.V. Para-inflammation in the aging retina. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2009, 28, 348–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ruan, Y.; Jiang, S.; Musayeva, A.; Gericke, A. Oxidative Stress and Vascular Dysfunction in the Retina: Therapeutic Strategies. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mudhar, H.S. A brief review of the histopathology of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR). Eye 2020, 34, 246–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Roh, M.I.; Murakami, Y.; Thanos, A.; Vavvas, D.G.; Miller, J.W. Edaravone, an ROS scavenger, ameliorates photoreceptor cell death after experimental retinal detachment. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 3825–3831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lei, H.; Velez, G.; Cui, J.; Samad, A.; Maberley, D.; Matsubara, J.; Kazlauskas, A. N-acetylcysteine suppresses retinal detachment in an experimental model of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 177, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mantopoulos, D.; Murakami, Y.; Comander, J.; Thanos, A.; Roh, M.; Miller, J.W.; Vavvas, D.G. Tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) protects photoreceptors from cell death after experimental retinal detachment. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e24245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ghasemi Falavarjani, K. Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy and Genetic Profile. J. Ophthalmic. Vis. Res. 2013, 8, 92–93. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rojas, J.; Fernandez, I.; Pastor, J.C.; Garcia-Gutierrez, M.T.; Sanabria, M.R.; Brion, M.; Coco, R.M.; Ruiz-Moreno, J.M.; Garcia-Arumi, J.; Elizalde, J.; et al. A strong genetic association between the tumor necrosis factor locus and proliferative vitreoretinopathy: The retina 4 project. Ophthalmology 2010, 117, e1–e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Pastor-Idoate, S.; Rodríguez-Hernández, I.; Rojas, J.; Fernández, I.; García-Gutierrez, M.-T.; Ruiz-Moreno, J.M.; Rocha-Sousa, A.; Ramkissoon, Y.D.; Harsum, S.; MacLaren, R.E.; et al. BAX and BCL-2 polymorphisms, as predictors of proliferative vitreoretinopathy development in patients suffering retinal detachment: The Retina 4 project. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015, 93, e541–e549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pastor-Idoate, S.; Rodríguez-Hernández, I.; Rojas, J.; Fernández, I.; García-Gutiérrez, M.T.; Ruiz-Moreno, J.M.; Rocha-Sousa, A.; Ramkissoon, Y.; Harsum, S.; MacLaren, R.E.; et al. The T309G MDM2 gene polymorphism is a novel risk factor for proliferative vitreoretinopathy. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e82283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pastor-Idoate, S.; Rodriguez-Hernández, I.; Rojas, J.; Fernández, I.; García-Gutierrez, M.T.; Ruiz-Moreno, J.M.; Rocha-Sousa, A.; Ramkissoon, Y.; Harsum, S.; MacLaren, R.E.; et al. The p53 codon 72 polymorphism (rs1042522) is associated with proliferative vitreoretinopathy: The Retina 4 Project. Ophthalmology 2013, 120, 623–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Rojas, J.; Fernandez, I.; Pastor, J.C.; MacLaren, R.A.; Ramkissoon, Y.; Harsum, S.; Charteris, D.G.; Van Meurs, J.C.; Amarakoon, S.; Garcia-Arumi, J.; et al. Predicting proliferative vitreoretinopathy: Temporal and external validation of models based on genetic and clinical variables. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2015, 99, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lumi, X.; Jelen, M.M.; Zupan, A.; Boštjančič, E.; Ravnik-Glavač, M.; Hawlina, M.; Glavač, D. SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS IN RETINAL DETACHMENT PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT PROLIFERATIVE VITREORETINOPATHY. Retina 2020, 40, 811–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lumi, X.; Jelen, M.M.; Jevšinek Skok, D.; Boštjančič, E.; Ravnik-Glavač, M.; Hawlina, M.; Glavač, D. Comparison of SNP Genotypes Related to Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy (PVR) across Slovenian and European Subpopulations. J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 2018, 8761625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wong, C.W.; Cheung, N.; Ho, C.; Barathi, V.; Storm, G.; Wong, T.T. Characterisation of the inflammatory cytokine and growth factor profile in a rabbit model of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 15419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Quiroz-Casian, N.; Lozano-Giral, D.; Miranda-Duarte, A.; Garcia-Montalvo, I.; Rodriguez-Loaiza, J.L.; Zenteno, J.C. Association study between polymorphisms of the p53 and lymphotoxin α (LTA) genes and the risk of proliferative vitreoretinopathy/retinal detachment in a mexican population. Retina 2018, 38, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Becuwe, P.; Ennen, M.; Klotz, R.; Barbieux, C.; Grandemange, S. Manganese superoxide dismutase in breast cancer: From molecular mechanisms of gene regulation to biological and clinical significance. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2014, 77, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wang, P.; Chin, E.K.; Almeida, D. Antioxidants for the Treatment of Retinal Disease: Summary of Recent Evidence. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2021, 15, 1621–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Bag, A.; Bag, N. Target sequence polymorphism of human manganese superoxide dismutase gene and its association with cancer risk: A review. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2008, 17, 3298–3305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kakko, S.; Päivänsalo, M.; Koistinen, P.; Kesäniemi, Y.A.; Kinnula, V.L.; Savolainen, M.J. The signal sequence polymorphism of the MnSOD gene is associated with the degree of carotid atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 2003, 168, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Giacco, F.; Brownlee, M. Oxidative stress and diabetic complications. Circ. Res. 2010, 107, 1058–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kaneko, N.; Kurata, M.; Yamamoto, T.; Morikawa, S.; Masumoto, J. The role of interleukin-1 in general pathology. Inflamm. Regen. 2019, 39, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Moysidis, S.N.; Thanos, A.; Vavvas, D.G. Mechanisms of Inflammation in Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy: From Bench to Bedside. Mediat. Inflamm. 2012, 2012, 815937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Greene, C.S.; Penrod, N.M.; Williams, S.M.; Moore, J.H. Failure to replicate a genetic association may provide important clues about genetic architecture. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e5639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Garner, C. Upward bias in odds ratio estimates from genome-wide association studies. Genet. Epidemiol. 2007, 31, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Gorroochurn, P.; Hodge, S.E.; Heiman, G.A.; Durner, M.; Greenberg, D.A. Non-replication of association studies: “pseudo-failures” to replicate? Genet. Med. 2007, 9, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Nsengimana, J.; Bishop, D.T. Design considerations for genetic linkage and association studies. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 850, 237–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Attia, J.; Ioannidis, J.P.A.; Thakkinstian, A.; McEvoy, M.; Scott, R.J.; Minelli, C.; Thompson, J.; Infante-Rivard, C.; Guyatt, G. How to use an article about genetic association: B: Are the results of the study valid? JAMA 2009, 301, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ankamah, E.; Sebag, J.; Ng, E.; Nolan, J.M. Vitreous Antioxidants, Degeneration, and Vitreo-Retinopathy: Exploring the Links. Antioxidants 2019, 9, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of the patients with RRD and comparison of the patients with or without PVR.
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of the patients with RRD and comparison of the patients with or without PVR.
Characteristic Total Number of Patients
(N = 192)		Patients without PVR (N = 80)Patients with PVR Grade C
(N = 112)		p
GenderMale, N (%)116 (60.4)55 (68.8)61 (54.5)0.052 a
Female, N (%)76 (39.6)25 (31.3)51 (45.5)
AgeYears, Median (25–75%)64 (53–72)60 (51–70.8)65 (55–74)0.081 b
EyeRight, N (%)109 (57.1) [1]47 (59.5) [1]62 (55.4)0.656 a
Left, N (%)82 (42.9)32 (40.5)50 (44.6)
PVR gradeA, N (%)32 (16.7)32 (40.0)0 (0.0)<0.001 a
B, N (%)48 (25.0)48 (60.0)0 (0.0)
C, N (%)112 (58.3)0 (0.0)112 (100.0)
Preoperative BCVAMedian (25–75%)0.01 (0.01–0.30) [5]0.10 (0.01–0.50) [4]0.01 (0.01–0.20) [1]<0.001 b
Postoperative BCVAMedian (25–75%)0.30 (0.10–0.70) [1]0.70 (0.50–1.00) [1]0.20 (0.01–0.40)<0.001 b
MaculaOff, N (%)138 (72.3) [1]50 (63.3) [1]88 (78.6)0.023 a
On, N (%)53 (27.7)29 (36.7)24 (21.4)
Number of surgeries1, N (%)109 (57.1) [1]77 (97.5) [1]32 (28.6)<0.001 a
2, N (%)42 (22.0)2 (2.5)40 (35.7)
3, N (%)23 (12.0)0 (0.0)23 (20.5)
4, N (%)14 (7.3)0 (0.0)14 (12.5)
5, N (%)3 (1.6)0 (0.0)3 (2.7)
Duration of symptoms Days, Median (25–75%)14 (7–30) [2]8 (5–14) [2]14 (7–30)<0.001 b
OCT-CRTµm, Median (25–75%)262.5 (223.3–321.5) [16]245 (218–286) [5]281 (230.5–389) [11]0.008 b
Preoperative IOPmmHg, Median (25–75%)13 (12–16) [23]14 (12–17.3) [6]13 (10–16) [17]0.028 b
Postoperative IOPmmHg, Median (25–75%)15 (12–17) [5]15 (13–17) [1]14.5 (11–18) [4]0.426 b
The number of missing data is presented in [ ] brackets. a calculated using Fisher’s exact test; b calculated using the Mann–Whitney test. BCVA—best corrected visual acuity; IOP—intraocular pressure; OCT-CRT—optical coherence tomography central retinal thickness; PVR—proliferative vitreoretinopathy; RRD—rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Table
Table 2. Genotype frequencies of selected polymorphisms among all patients with RRD.
Table 2. Genotype frequencies of selected polymorphisms among all patients with RRD.
GenePolymorphismRoleGenotypeN (%)VAFpHWEVAF (1000 G)p *
SOD2rs4880p.Ala16ValCC46 (24.1) [1]51.00.94753.40.365
CT95 (49.7)
TT50 (26.2)
CATrs1001179c.-262C>TCC115 (60.2) [1]22.50.89523.50.657
CT66 (34.6)
TT10 (5.2)
GPX1rs1050450p.Pro198LeuCC105 (54.7)26.80.42233.60.006
CT71 (37.0)
TT16 (8.3)
IL1Brs1143623c.-1560G>CGG102 (53.1)28.00.49928.70.770
GC74 (38.0)
CC17 (8.9)
rs16944c.-598T>CTT30 (15.6) [1]64.10.08765.00.722
TC77 (40.3)
CC84 (44.0)
rs1071676c.*505G>CGG110 (57.3)26.00.06224.90.631
GC64 (33.3)
CC18 (9.4)
MIR146Ars2910164n.60G>CGG122 (63.5)20.30.97223.50.153
GC62 (32.3)
CC8 (4.2)
The number of missing data is presented in [ ] brackets. HWE—Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; VAF—variant allele frequency; RRD—rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. VAF (1000 G): variant allele frequency reported in European population in the 1000 Genomes project in dbSNP. * comparison of variant allele frequency with 1000 Genomes project using the chi-square test.
Table
Table 3. Comparison of genotype frequencies between patients with and without PVR grade C1 or higher at 3 months postoperatively.
Table 3. Comparison of genotype frequencies between patients with and without PVR grade C1 or higher at 3 months postoperatively.
SNPGenotypeCases without PVR Grade C1
N (%)		Cases with PVR Grade C1
N (%)		OR (95% CI)pOR (95% CI)adjpadj
SOD2 rs4880CC25 (54.3)21 (45.7)Reference
CT38 (40)57 (60)1.79 (0.88–3.63)0.1101.67 (0.81–3.46)0.165
TT17 (34)33 (66)2.31 (1.01–5.27)0.0462.74 (1.17–6.42)0.021
CT + TT55 (37.9)90 (62.1)1.95 (1.00–3.81)0.0511.97 (1.00–3.90)0.050
CAT rs1001179CC44 (38.3)71 (61.7)Reference
CT30 (45.5)36 (54.5)0.74 (0.40–1.37)0.3440.74 (0.39–1.38)0.337
TT5 (50)5 (50)0.62 (0.17–2.26)0.4690.66 (0.18–2.44)0.531
CT + TT35 (46.1)41 (53.9)0.73 (0.40–1.31)0.2850.72 (0.40–1.32)0.292
GPX1 rs1050450CC45 (42.9)60 (57.1)Reference
CT28 (39.4)43 (60.6)1.15 (0.62–2.13)0.6511.14 (0.61–2.13)0.673
TT7 (43.8)9 (56.3)0.96 (0.33–2.79)0.9461.07 (0.36–3.15)0.907
CT + TT35 (40.2)52 (59.8)1.11 (0.63–1.98)0.7131.13 (0.63–2.03)0.685
IL1B rs1143623GG43 (42.2)59 (57.8)Reference
GC30 (41.1)43 (58.9)1.04 (0.57–1.92)0.8881.09 (0.58–2.02)0.792
CC7 (41.2)10 (58.8)1.04 (0.37–2.95)0.9401.03 (0.36–2.99)0.950
GC + CC37 (41.1)53 (58.9)1.04 (0.59–1.86)0.8831.08 (0.60–1.93)0.804
IL1B rs16944TT13 (43.3)17 (56.7)Reference
TC36 (46.8)41 (53.2)0.87 (0.37–2.04)0.7500.86 (0.36–2.03)0.729
CC30 (35.7)54 (64.3)1.38 (0.59–3.22)0.4611.34 (0.57–3.17)0.502
TC + CC66 (41)95 (59)1.10(0.50–0.42 pm)0.8111.08 (0.49–2.40)0.852
IL1B rs1071676GG42 (38.2)68 (61.8)Reference
GC34 (53.1)30 (46.9)0.54 (0.29–1.02)0.0560.50 (0.26–0.95)0.034
CC4 (22.2)14 (77.8)2.16 (0.67–7.01)0.1992.47 (0.75–8.19)0.139
GC + CC38 (46.3)44 (53.7)0.72 (0.40–1.28)0.2570.69 (0.38–1.25)0.224
MIR146A rs2910164GG56 (45.9)66 (54.1)Reference
GC21 (33.9)41 (66.1)1.66 (0.88–3.13)0.1191.69 (0.89–3.23)0.110
CC3 (37.5)5 (62.5)1.41 (0.32–6.18)0.6451.45 (0.33–6.41)0.625
GC + CC24 (34.3)46 (65.7)1.63 (0.88–2.99)0.1171.66 (0.90–3.08)0.107
Adj—adjusted for age and gender.
Table
Table 4. Association of selected polymorphisms with postoperative clinical parameters in RRD patients with and without PVR grade C1 or higher.
Table 4. Association of selected polymorphisms with postoperative clinical parameters in RRD patients with and without PVR grade C1 or higher.
Cases without PVRCases with PVR Grade C1 or Higher
SNPGenotypeBCVA
Median (25–75%)		pOCT-CRT
Median (25–75%)		pIOP
Median (25–75%)		pBCVA
Median (25–75%)		pOCT-CRT
Median (25–75%)		pIOP
Median (25–75%)		p
SOD2 rs4880CC0.7 (0.4–1)0.940 a232.5 (200–263.5)0.170 a15 (13–17)0.943 a0.2 (0.04–0.4)0.192 a304 (238.5–516)0.176 a14 (9.5–17)0.600 a
CT0.7 (0.55–0.95) 262.5 (217.3–310.8) 15 (13.5–17) 0.2 (0.03–0.4) 267 (205.5–366) 14 (11–17)
TT0.7 (0.4–1) 248 (233.5–286.5) 15 (12–18) 0.1 (0.01–0.2) 283 (233.5–463.3) 15.5 (10.25–18.75)
CT + TT0.7 (0.5–1)0.801 b262 (218.5–294.5)0.060 b15 (12–17.25)0.831 b0.18 (0.01–0.4)0.500 b281 (225–376)0.191 b15 (11–18)0.550 b
CAT rs1001179CC0.7 (0.4–1)0.474 a240 (211–282)0.248 a15 (13–17)0.999 a0.2 (0.02–0.4)0.441 a285.5 (222.3–373.3)0.796 a14 (11.5–17.5)0.757 a
CT0.75 (0.6–1) 243.5 (221–276.8) 15 (12–17.25) 0.13 (0.01–0.2) 265 (231–433) 14.5 (10.75–19)
TT0.5 (0.16–0.95) 301 (242–400.5) 15 (12–17.5) 0.4 (0.01–0.55) 243 (191–457) 15 (7–19.5)
CT + TT0.7 (0.6–1)0.698 b265 (222–296)0.312 b15 (12–17)1.0 b0.15 (0.01–0.35)0.256 b264 (231–428)0.701 b15 (10–19)0.822 b
GPX1 rs1050450CC0.8 (0.4–1)0.147 a240 (219–277)0.874 a15 (13–17)0.215 a0.2 (0.01–0.4)0.698 a288.5 (231–394.8)0.875 a14.5 (11–18)0.583 a
CT0.7 (0.43–0.9) 252 (217–293.5) 15 (12.5–17.75) 0.15 (0.01–0.3) 262 (223–376) 15 (11–19)
TT1 (0.7–1) 246.5 (209–411.3) 13 (12–15) 0.2 (0.08–0.45) 291 (244.3–389.5) 14 (9.5–16)
CT + TT0.7 (0.5–0.9)0.655 b246.5 (217–298.5)0.615 b15 (12–17)0.583 b0.15 (0.01–0.4)0.793 b267 (226–376)0.853 b14.5 (10.75–18)0.814 b
IL1B rs1143623GG0.7 (0.5–1)0.965 a252.5 (226.3–280.8)0.536 a15 (13–17)0.533 a0.2 (0.05–0.4)0.541 a294 (231–393.8)0.951 a14 (10.5–17.5)0.686 a
GC0.7 (0.4–1) 240 (208–286.5) 15 (12–17) 0.15 (0.01–0.3) 281 (222.8–389.5) 15 (11–18)
CC0.9 (0.6–1) 270 (210.3–378.3) 14.5 (11.75–15.5) 0.06 (0.01–0.45) 259 (210.5–437.5) 15.5 (12.25–17.5)
GC + CC0.7 (0.4–1)0.627 b240 (210–298)0.429 b15 (12–17)0.357 b0.15 (0.01–0.35)0.366 b281 (223.5–385)0.949 b15 (11–18)0.388 b
IL1B rs16944TT0.85 (0.48–1)0.637 a235 (214–321.3)0.551 a14.5 (12–16.75)0.384 a0.2 (0.01–0.4)0.764 a273 (239.8–308.8)0.755 a15 (11.5–18.5)0.722 a
TC0.7 (0.4–1) 240 (209.8–284.3) 15 (12–17) 0.15 (0.01–0.3) 286 (226.5–398) 14 (12–18)
CC0.85 (0.6–1) 264 (224.8–285) 15 (13.75–18) 0.2 (0.02–0.4) 279.5 (227–393.8) 14.5 (10–17.75)
TC + CC0.7 (0.5–1)0.673 b246.5 (218.8–283)0.965 b15 (13–17)0.437 b0.2 (0.02–0.4)0.909 b286 (228–395.5)0.706 b14 (11–18)0.719 b
IL1B rs1071676GG0.8 (0.6–1)0.070 a241 (218.3–286.5)0.923 a15 (12–17)0.754 a0.15 (0.01–0.38)0.468 a281 (230.3–399.3)0.513 a15 (11–17)0.535 a
GC0.7 (0.475–1) 257 (217–291) 15 (12.75–17.25) 0.2 (0.1–0.3) 300 (224–406) 14.5 (11.25–18)
CC0.4 (0.18–0.55) 244.5 (205.3–278.5) 15 (13.5–17.25) 0.3 (0.01–0.7) 247.5 (231.3–310.8) 13 (8.5–16.5)
GC + CC0.65 (0.4–0.93)0.177 b257 (217–286)0.920 b15 (13–17.25)0.457 b0.2 (0.04–0.4)0.261 b286 (228.5–379.5)0.737 b14 (10.5–18)0.675 b
MIR146A rs2910164GG0.75 (0.53–1)0.852 a247 (220.8–288.8)0.627 a15 (13–17)0.410 a0.15 (0.02–0.33)0.377 a285 (231.5–389)0.494 a15 (11–18)0.745 a
GC0.6 (0.43–1) 244 (211.5–286.8) 14 (12–16.5) 0.2 (0.06–0.4) 266 (225.3–375.8) 14 (11.25–17)
CC0.7 (0.5–0.85) 224 (206–224) 15 (14.5–16.0) 0.05 (0.01–0.3) 380.5 (252.3–556.8) 14.5 (9–20)
GC + CC0.6 (0.4–1)0.580 b240 (211–279.5)0.539 b14 (12–17)0.236 b0.2 (0.01–0.4)0.588 b274 (225.3–391.8)0.869 b14 (11–17)0.448 b
a additive model; b dominant model. BCVA—best corrected visual acuity; IOP—intraocular pressure; OCT-CRT—optical coherence tomography central retinal thickness; PVR—proliferative vitreoretinopathy; RRD—rhegmatogenous retinal detachment; SNP—single nucleotide polymorphism.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lumi, X.; Confalonieri, F.; Ravnik-Glavač, M.; Goričar, K.; Blagus, T.; Dolžan, V.; Petrovski, G.; Hawlina, M.; Glavač, D. Inflammation and Oxidative Stress Gene Variability in Retinal Detachment Patients with and without Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy. Genes 2023, 14, 804. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14040804

AMA Style

Lumi X, Confalonieri F, Ravnik-Glavač M, Goričar K, Blagus T, Dolžan V, Petrovski G, Hawlina M, Glavač D. Inflammation and Oxidative Stress Gene Variability in Retinal Detachment Patients with and without Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy. Genes. 2023; 14(4):804. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14040804

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lumi, Xhevat, Filippo Confalonieri, Metka Ravnik-Glavač, Katja Goričar, Tanja Blagus, Vita Dolžan, Goran Petrovski, Marko Hawlina, and Damjan Glavač. 2023. "Inflammation and Oxidative Stress Gene Variability in Retinal Detachment Patients with and without Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy" Genes 14, no. 4: 804. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14040804

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop