Insights into the Cardiac Phenotype in 9p Deletion Syndrome: A Multicenter Italian Experience and Literature Review
by
, , , , , , , ,
Flaminia Pugnaloni
1,2,†,
Roberta Onesimo
3,4,†,
Rita Blandino
5,
Carolina Putotto
2,
Paolo Versacci
2,
Angelica Bibiana Delogu
4,5,
Chiara Leoni
3,4,
Valentina Trevisan
3,
Ileana Croci
6,
Federica Calì
7,
Maria Cristina Digilio
8,
Giuseppe Zampino
3,4,5,
Bruno Marino
2 and
Giulio Calcagni
7,* 1
Medical and Surgical Department of Fetus, Newborn and Infant, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy
2
Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, 00155 Rome, Italy
3
Rare Diseases Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
4
Pediatric Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
5
Catholic University of Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy
6
Multifactorial and Complex Diseases Research Area, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy
7
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiology and Heart and Lung Transplant, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy
8
Medical Genetics Unit, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this paper.
Genes 2023, 14(1), 146; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14010146
Submission received: 7 December 2022
/
Revised: 23 December 2022
/
Accepted: 27 December 2022
/
Published: 5 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Study on Genotypes and Phenotypes of Pediatric Clinical Rare Diseases)
Abstract
:Chromosome 9p deletion syndrome is a rare autosomal dominant disorder presenting with a broad spectrum of clinical features, including congenital heart defects (CHDs). To date, studies focused on a deep characterization of cardiac phenotype and function associated with this condition are lacking. We conducted a multicentric prospective observational study on a cohort of 10 patients with a molecular diagnosis of 9p deletion syndrome, providing a complete cardiological assessment through conventional echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging echo modality. As a result, we were able to demonstrate that patients with 9p deletion syndrome without major CHDs may display subclinical cardiac structural changes and left-ventricle systolic and diastolic dysfunction. Albeit needing validation in a larger cohort, our findings support the idea that a complete cardiac assessment should be performed in patients with 9p deletion syndrome and should be integrated in the context of a long-term follow-up.
1. Introduction
Chromosome 9p deletion syndrome (MIM #158170) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder due to allelic loss of the short arm of chromosome 9 (9p−), with a still uncertain prevalence.
The first report of the syndrome dates back to Alfi and colleagues [1], who described two unrelated patients with partial deletion of the short arm of chromosome 9 sharing common clinical features including trigonocephaly, craniofacial dysmorphisms, and hypertonia.
Since then, several case reports and case series have extended the amount of data regarding phenotype. Clinical features are highly heterogeneous and are mostly represented by developmental delay and intellectual disability (ID) [2,3,4]. Behavioral issues, autism spectrum disorder, and speech and language deficits represent additional features that may be associated with 9p deletion syndrome [2,5,6,7]. Moreover, patients often display hypotonia and craniofacial features including trigonocephaly, hypertelorism, upward-slanting palpebral fissures, midface hypoplasia, epicanthus, low-set ears with ear auricle abnormalities, narrow palate, and short/broad neck. Sex reversal often occurs in patients with this genetic condition, and ambiguous genitalia are present up to 70% of cases. [5,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15].
Cardiac involvement is frequently reported in 9p deletion syndrome, with a prevalence ranging from 35% to 50% of cases [2]. In addition to the commonly encountered clinical features, patients may display congenital heart defects with various degrees of severity [2,3], and cardiac murmur may represent an early clinical sign to arise suspicion of cardiac anomaly. Congenital heart defects (CHDs) have been previously described in several case reports, with ventricular septal defect (VSD), atrial septal defect (ASD), and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) being the most recurrent anomalies [2,3]. The study on the largest cohort of patients with 9p deletion syndrome dates back to 2008, when Swinkels et al. described the clinical phenotype of 13 individuals affected by this condition [2]. Moreover, at the moment, studies assessing a focused characterization of the cardiac phenotype associated with this condition are lacking, and myocardial function evaluation has never been performed before.
With the aim of gaining insight into the cardiac phenotype of 9p deletion syndrome, we report here the largest cohort of patients cytogenetically diagnosed since 2008 along with their cardiac phenotype and cardiac functional evaluation. Furthermore, we delineate the chromosomal breakpoints of each patient as means to identify a potential correlation between the genotype of patients and their cardiac phenotype spectrum. Moreover, to support the cardiac features identified in our study, a narrative literature review, focused on the cardiac features in 9p deletion patients over the last 10 years, is also provided.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Population Cohort
This was a prospective observational study on a cohort of 10 patients with a molecular diagnosis of 9p deletion syndrome, recruited from three Italian centers with reputed expertise in rare diseases and pediatric cardiology disorders: Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Fondazione Policlinico A Gemelli, IRCCS, and Pediatric Cardiology Unit of Sapienza University of Rome.
Patients from all over Italy were referred to these three centers. Demographic data and echocardiographic exams were collected within the study period January 2019–May 2022.
The inclusion criteria for the study were confirmed genetic diagnosis of 9p deletion syndrome with and without associated rearrangements, ability to perform a complete echocardiographic exam including tissue Doppler imaging examination, and acceptance of the informed consent. We excluded all patients without their own or parental consent and without a complete echocardiographic examination.
The Ethical Committee of Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital approved the study protocol, and written informed consent was obtained from patient or legal guardian.
2.2. Control Cohort
The control group consisted of healthy patients admitted to the pediatric cardiology units. Patients in the control group were studied using the same echocardiographic protocol for syndromic patients by a pediatric cardiologist (C.P.), and we included patients with a structurally normal heart and no echocardiographic parameters suggestive for systolic or diastolic dysfunction. Written informed consent was obtained from a patient or legal guardian.
2.3. Clinical Assessment
All patients recruited were assessed by clinical geneticists (C.D.G., G.Z., and V.T.), a pediatrician with expertise in disability (R.O.), and pediatric cardiologists (G.C., P.V., and A.B.D.).
Systematic patient interviews investigated family and personal history of genetic syndromes, metabolic disorders, known congenital heart defects, arrhythmias, systemic hypertension, cardiovascular medications, and previous cardiac surgery procedures.
Physical examination included height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) at the moment of evaluation, and obtained data were compared with normative data [16]. BMI was defined according to recommendations of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on patients between 2 and 20 years old; otherwise, the World Health Organization’s guidelines were used in the definition of BMI of individuals over 20 years old [17].
Body surface area (BSA) was calculated according to Haycock formula [18]. Blood pressure was determined during routine cardiac evaluation by standard methods using an appropriately sized cuff with the patient in the seated position, with the arm and back adequately supported, and after 5 min of rest. Measures were averaged after three evaluations. Results were compared with normative values that were gender-, age-, and height-matched [16].
2.4. Echocardiography
All echocardiographic and Doppler examinations were performed by experienced pediatric cardiologists (P.V., A.B.D., D.L., and A.D.R.) and one sonographer (F.C.).
An Epiq7 or iE33 ultrasound machine (Philips Medical, Andover, MA, USA) with a 1–5 MHz transducer (X5-1) and a 3–8 MHz transducer (S8-3) was used for studying 9p deletion syndrome patients; A GE Vivid 9 (Medical Systems, Oslo, Norway) with M5S-D (bandwidth 1.5–4.5 MHz) and 6S-D (bandwidth 2.4–8.0 MHz) was used for the control group.
Conventional echocardiographic evaluations were performed according to the recommendations of American Society of Echocardiography [19].
Through M-Mode evaluation, echocardiographic data from the long-axis parasternal view included left-ventricle (LV) internal diameter in diastole (LVIDd) and systole (LVIDs), thickness of the interventricular septum in diastole (IVSd) and systole (IVSs), and LV posterior wall thicknesses in systole (PWs) and diastole (PWd).
Ejection fraction (EF) and fractional shortening (FS) of the LV were calculated using Teichholz’s M-mode formula. LV mass was calculated using the Devereux formula [20] and indexed to height 2.7 [21].
The long-axis parasternal view was also used to assess proximal aorta diameters at four levels (aortic annulus, Valsalva sinuses for the aortic root, sinotubular junction, and proximal segment of the ascending aorta) and left atrium to aorta ratio (LA/Ao).
All echocardiographic measures were indexed for BSA.
Pulsed-wave Doppler echocardiography was used to assess transmitral and transtricuspidal flow patterns from the apical four-chamber view with the sample volume placed at the mitral and tricuspid valves leaflets tips. Early (E) and late (A) diastolic velocities, deceleration time (DT), and E/A ratio were measured for mitral valve.
Right-ventricle global systolic function was assessed through tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE).
In addition to the conventional echocardiographic measures, tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) studies were performed from the four-chamber view, with Doppler sample volume placed at the lateral (lateral mitral annulus, LMA) and septal (septal mitral annulus, SMA) myocardial segments of the mitral annulus and at lateral border of the tricuspid annulus (tricuspid lateral annulus, TLA); peak systolic (S’), early (e’) diastolic, and late diastolic (a’) waves were measured for both ventricles from a minimum of three cardiac cycles and averaged.
Isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT), isovolumetric contraction time (IVCT), and ejection time (ET) were measured on LMA, and the LV Tei index was calculated using the following formula: (isovolumic relaxation time + isovolumic contraction time)/ejection time.
E/e′ ratios for the LV (septal and lateral segments) were determined using previously estimated Doppler transmitral values.
The acquired data were analyzed offline using dedicated software (GE Health Care Clinical Systems, EchoPAC—version 113, Horten, Norway, and Philips Lab Cardiac AnalyQsis—version 8 and 10, Philips Heathcare Inc., Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
2.5. Molecular Analysis
The molecular cytogenetic analysis (array-CGH, SNP array) was carried out on DNA extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes for the 10 patients with nomenclature used according to the International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature 2016 (ISCN). Segregation analysis of the molecular defects was performed according to parents’ availability.
Except for the two analyses of SNP array-CGH (patient 7 and 9), array-CGH was performed in all the other cases using the Invitrogen pure link Genomic DNA Mini Kit (patient 2) and Agilent kit 8 × 60K (patients 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9). Data analysis was performed using software CytoSure Interpret Software v.4.10.35 (patient 2) and FE Agilent technologies (Santa Clara, CA, USA) (patient 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9).
SNP array-CGH was performed in patient 7 using CytoSNP-850K (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and analyzed with the Bluegenome Bluefuse Multi Software Edition 4.4 software, while it was performed in patient 10 using the CytoScan HD and chromosome analysis suite v4.0 software.
To evaluate the genomic region involved, the array-CGH and SNP-array data were mapped on Decipher software (https://www.deciphergenomics.org/browser, assessed on 30 September 2022) and the UCSC genome browser (https://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgTracks?db=hg38&position=lastDbPos&pix=1687, accessed on 14 October 2022) to build GrCh38 of the human genome.
Molecular results and genomic data for the 10 unrelated patients are shown in Table 1.
2.6. Statistical Analysis
Stata 17.0 (StataCorp. 2021. Stata Statistical Software: Release 17. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC) was used for the statistical analysis. Continuous variables were expressed as the mean ± SD (range). Qualitative variables were expressed as the frequency and percentage. When two groups were compared for echocardiographic parameters, the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test was performed to identify significant differences. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3. Results
Demographic characteristics of the study cohort (n = 10) and the control group (N = 22) are summarized in Table 2.
The median age of patients in the study cohort was 18.8 years (IQR 5.5–25.5 years), and healthy patients had a median age of 17.0 years (IQR 12–18). There was no statistically significant difference in age, gender, weight, height, BMI, and BSA between the cohort patients and controls.
At the time of evaluation, all patients had normal blood pressure. Moreover, none of them had a family history of CHDs or a personal history of arrhythmias, hypertension, or cardiovascular interventions.
BMI was normal in 6/10 patients, while 3/10 patients were overweight (BMI > 25 kg/m2 or BMI > 85th percentile) and 1/10 was underweight (BMI < 5th percentile).
CHDs were found in 2/10 patients with 9p deletion syndrome (20%). As shown in Table 1, genomic coordinates were available for all patient except for patient 10.
Two septal defects were noted in our cohort. In particular, one patient showed an ASD, whereas the second patient displayed both ASD and VSD. No major CHDs were detected in our population, but 3/10 (30%) showed mild atrioventricular valve insufficiency.
Two-dimensional, M-mode, and pulsed-wave Doppler conventional echocardiographic data of the patients and controls are listed in Table 3, whereas TDI findings are listed in Table 4.
LV mass and LV mass BSA-indexed were significantly smaller in the study group compared with controls (p = 0.040, p = 0.006, respectively). No difference in left-atrial and LV M-mode measurements was detected.
A significant difference in the aortic dimension indexed by BSA was found. In particular, patients with 9p deletion syndrome exhibit greater aortic annulus size/BSA, greater sinotubular junction size/BSA, and greater proximal ascending aorta size/BSA, despite showing normal values when aortic root Z-scores were obtained [22].
LV systolic function assessed through the EF and FS was similar between the two groups, whereas the TDI-derived parameter of LV myocardial systolic function (LMA S′) was significantly lower in the 9p deletion syndrome group.
Moreover, echocardiographic data regarding LV diastolic function such as E/A, LMA e’, and SMA e’ were significantly lower in 9p deletion syndrome group than the controls, whereas E/e’ septal and E/e’ lateral values were similar in the two groups.
Findings related to the systolic and diastolic function of the right ventricle did not differ significantly among the two groups; TAPSE and TLA TDI parameters were completely preserved in all groups.
4. Discussion
We conducted the first Italian case study focused on a global cardiac phenotype assessment in 10 patients with 9p deletion syndrome.
The 9p deletion syndrome is a rare entity mainly characterized by ID and craniofacial abnormalities such as midface hypoplasia, long philtrum and trigonocephaly. Albeit less frequently described, patients may also present more severe malformations such as abdominal wall defects (omphalocele), congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), and CHDs [23].
Location and extension of 9p deletions can vary among affected individuals; therefore, several phenotypic characteristics, such as cardiac defects, are variably expressed [2,3].
While the proximal region (9p23–p22) is considered responsible for the clinical manifestation especially trigonocephaly, the distal region (9p23.3) is associated with autism, ID, delayed speech, behavioral problems, 46,XY reversed sex (female external genitalia), and ambiguous genitalia in both sexes [4].
With regard to non-cardiovascular aspects, deletion of specific genes on chromosome 9p has been related to the onset of well-defined phenotypic traits. According to the literature, CER1 and FREM1 have been suggested as responsible for trigonocephaly, DOCK8 has been proposed as a candidate gene for mental retardation and seizures, FOXD4 has been related to speech and language delay, and DMRT1 may play a role in sex reversal [8,10,24,25,26].
However, no consensus has yet emerged about the critical region associated with CHDs in 9p deletion syndrome.
Previous studies on murine embryos reported KDM4C on 9p24.1 as a gene involved in cardiac differentiation [27,28], whereas CER1 located on 9p22.3 seems to have a role in cardiac myogenesis [29]. Furthermore, mutations of FOXD4 on 9p24.3 are associated with dilated cardiomyopathy [30]. Moreover, DOCK8 is involved in the reorganization of the actin filament system and is expressed in many organs, including heart and brain; therefore, its implication in pathogenesis of CHDs is yet to be defined [10,13].
Variable deletions sizes and heterogenous chromosomal defects are associated with the haploinsufficiency of the 9p region. The critical region involved has been studied by different groups. Christ and colleagues [31] studied the cytogenetic breakpoints in 24 patients with 9p deletion syndrome and identified a critical region of about 8 Mb in 9p23–p22 between D9S286 and D9S285. Later studies [25,32] narrowed the candidate region for 9p deletion syndrome to a 3.5 Mb interval from RP11-933C16 to RP11-725C9, encompassing at least seven genes. In 2008, Swinkels and colleagues [2] further refined the critical region to 300 kb on chromosome 9p22.3.
Although several gene mapping studies within the deleted region have been extensively analyzed, genotype–phenotype correlation has not been established for this condition due to the frequent involvement of additional chromosomal rearrangements, as well as the lack of a consistent molecular characterization. Moreover, the disruption of 29 of the genes mapped in the region can potentially cause an unmasking of recessive traits and contribute to complex presentations [23].
Heart involvement is well known and extensively reported in genetic disorders. Aneuploidies, such as Down syndrome and Turner syndrome, are commonly associated with CHDs [33,34,35]. Similarly, peculiar cardiac phenotypes are associated with genetic conditions caused by single-gene variants including RASopathies, CHARGE, Kabuki, and many other syndromes [36,37,38]. The heart is also largely involved in a consistent number of rare disorders due to copy number variants (deletion or duplication) encompassing multiple genes with highly variable phenotypic expression [39].
Even though the cardiac phenotype, as part of the 9p deletion syndrome spectrum, has been reported since the first description of the syndrome by Alfi et al., the functional cardiac involvement is poorly described. Ref. [1] Since then, CHDs have been reported in several case reports worldwide, as can be appreciated in Table 5, which shows a brief literature review of the last 10 years.
Cardiac features in 9p deletion syndrome are highly heterogeneous and can manifest with a wide range of severity.
In our cohort, septal defects were the prominent features and were present in 20% (2/10) of patients, while an additional 30% (3/10) showed mild atrioventricular valve insufficiency. Our results concerning CHDs were comparable with those reported previously [4], even if, in our cohort, no major CHDs were found.
In detail, the present study showed that 9p deletion syndrome patients have significantly changed LV geometry. LV mass and LV mass indexed for BSA were significantly smaller in the 9p deletion syndrome group when compared to controls. A possible effect of cardiac exercise on these results may be speculated. Recently, Krysztofiak and coauthors, demonstrated that regular physical activity in children and young adolescents leads to progressive heart physiological changes that include increased LV myocardial thickness and LV mass [49].
Even though hypotonia and psychomotor development delay [23] may contribute to the different LV geometry, it is possible to argue that the cardiac phenotype might result by the combination of environmental elements (such reduction of physical exercise) and epistatic effects of genes deleted within the critical region.
Nevertheless, the prognostic significance of our findings remains unclear; in the adult population, higher LV mass/BSA has been proposed as an independent risk factor for sudden cardiac death [50] even though the same results in young adolescents are still controversial. Similarly, a relationship between structural changes in terms of lower LV mass index and myocardial function is unknown.
An additional interesting finding in our cohort is represented by aortic remodeling in terms of increased aortic dimensions when indexed for BSA.
Aortic dilation represents a well-documented entity among patients with specific syndromes (i.e., Marfan syndrome, Turner syndrome, and RASopathies) and has been associated with several CHDs [50], but there is no evidence reporting its presence or extent in patients with 9p deletion syndrome. Probably, we can postulate that our observation results from performing a complete echocardiographic study following a standardized protocol based on ASE guidelines.
Aortic dilatation may be dependent on primary aortic medial degeneration or a secondary result from hemodynamically significant volume overload. Medial degeneration is due to fragmentation of elastic fibers, and it is clinically associated with additional abnormal features of the skeleton and connective tissue systems (joint laxity, scoliosis, pectus excavatum, or pectus carinatum). In our cohort, none of these features were clinically evident, and aortic root measurements were found to be within normal limits when compared to normograms (Z-scores). Greater aortic dimensions/BSA in 9p deletion syndrome patients may be related either to the intrinsic properties of the aortic root or to hemodynamic abnormalities that deserve further investigation.
The clinical significance and potential complications of these results should be assessed through a follow-up program evaluating the possible progression of structural changes within the aortic structure. Nevertheless, we are fully aware that our results need to be validated in a larger sample cohort.
Our study also adds significant information regarding LV functional parameters concerning both systolic and diastolic function.
Recent studies have highlighted the value of cardiac function assessment with different echo modalities (TDI and Speckle tracking echocardiography) in syndromic patients [51]. In this regard, our study provides the first complete functional cardiac assessment in patients with 9p deletion syndrome.
In particular, we identified statistically significant differences in LV systolic and diastolic function compared with healthy controls, whereas RV performance remained normal. Furthermore, when using TDI parameters, 9p deletion syndrome patients showed lower S’ wave velocities for lateral mitral annulus and reduced LV diastolic performance when compared to the control group.
All patients in our cohort are asymptomatic; we should, therefore, speculate a subclinical systolic and diastolic dysfunction which can possibly evolve into progressive and symptomatic heart failure, suggesting the need of a cardiac follow up for these patients.
Commonly, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and altered insulin profile are well established cardiovascular risk factors in young adults [52].
Congenital hyperinsulinism and hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia have been previously reported among patients with 9p deletion syndrome [51,52,53], and a recent study by Banerjee and colleagues refined the critical region for hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia to a 7.2 Mb deletion, even if the genes responsible for this feature within this locus are still not known [46].
There is a well-known close relationship between dysregulated insulin secretion and heart failure [54]; however, in our cohort, insulin abnormalities were excluded. None of our patients were obese or had ever shown dyslipidemia or hypertriglyceridemia on routine laboratory tests. Moreover, all patients in our cohort displayed normal arterial blood pressures when compared to age-, gender-, and weight-matched controls, and none of them had ever suffered from hypertension.
Myocardial strain and strain rate parameters were not assessed in our population due to the poor collaboration of these subjects when a longer exam should be performed. However, we strongly suggest performing these measurements when possible because it may add valuable information about LV dysfunction in this cohort.
In our cohort, the patient with the most severe cardiac phenotype (ASD and VSD) carried the largest 9p deletion (17.9 Mb) among all the patients analyzed. Notably, all the other patients with even mild cardiac involvement (ASD, tricuspid insufficiency, and mitral insufficiency) had a concomitant complex rearrangement involving a second chromosomal region with at least 8 Mb in size.
None of the genes mapped within the deleted region are exclusively associated with myocardial function; therefore, a definite genotype–phenotype correlation is still missing, and a prospective study with larger population is warranted.
We are aware that our study shows some limitations mainly due to the limited sample size of our cohort. Our findings concerning both cardiac morphological and functional aspects have to be interpreted cautiously since such results come from a limited number of echo studies. We firmly believe that results validation in a larger cohort is necessary, and that cardiac assessment should not be underestimated and should be integrated in the context of a long-term follow-up.
Even though the presence of a cardiac phenotype has been consistently associated with the condition since the first report of 9p deletion syndrome (Table 5), the long-term clinical implications of the cardiac defects had not been defined yet. In this regard, our study represents the first report investigating the cardiac characteristics in a highly selected 9p deletion syndrome cohort, highlighting differences in cardiac function that deserve a longitudinal evaluation to assess a potential effect into adulthood.
5. Conclusions
The present study adds valuable information about cardiac features in the context of 9p deletion syndrome and demonstrates that even patients affected by this condition without major CHDs may display subclinical cardiac structural changes and LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction.
Conventional echocardiography- and TDI-derived parameters are clinically useful tools for global cardiac assessment of patients with 9p deletion syndrome, and we suggest that these parameters may be used in the future for personalized clinical assessment and follow-up.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, B.M., G.Z., F.P., R.O. and G.C.; methodology, R.O., P.V., G.C., A.B.D., C.P. and F.C.; formal analysis, F.P.; investigation and data curation, F.P., R.B., P.V. and R.O.; statistical analysis, I.C.; original draft preparation, F.P. and R.O.; revision and editing, R.O., R.B., V.T., C.P., C.L., G.C. and P.V.; supervision, M.C.D., B.M. and G.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital of Rome (Reference No. 2492).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are stored in Hospital database and are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge Flaminia Pugnaloni, who wrote this paper during a PhD study in “Innovative Biomedical Technologies in Clinical Medicine” at “Sapienza” University of Rome.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Alfi, O.; Donnell, G.N.; Crandall, B.F.; Derencsenyi, A.; Menon, R. Deletion of the Short Arm of Chromosome No.9 (46,9p-): A New Deletion Syndrome. Ann. Genet. 1973, 16, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Swinkels, M.E.M.; Simons, A.; Smeets, D.F.; Vissers, L.E.; Veltman, J.A.; Pfundt, R.; de Vries, B.B.A.; Faas, B.H.W.; Schrander-Stumpel, C.T.R.M.; McCann, E.; et al. Clinical and Cytogenetic Characterization of 13 Dutch Patients with Deletion 9p Syndrome: Delineation of the Critical Region for a Consensus Phenotype. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 2008, 146A, 1430–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huret, J.L.; Leonard, C.; Forestier, B.; Rethore, M.O.; Lejeune, J. Eleven New Cases of Del(9p) and Features from 80 Cases. J. Med. Genet. 1988, 25, 741–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mohamed, A.M.; Kamel, A.K.; Eid, M.M.; Eid, O.M.; Mekkawy, M.; Hussein, S.H.; Zaki, M.S.; Esmail, S.; Afifi, H.H.; El-Kamah, G.Y.; et al. Chromosome 9p Terminal Deletion in Nine Egyptian Patients and Narrowing of the Critical Region for Trigonocephaly. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 2021, 9, e1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quinonez, S.C.; Park, J.M.; Rabah, R.; Owens, K.M.; Yashar, B.M.; Glover, T.W.; Keegan, C.E. 9p Partial Monosomy and Disorders of Sex Development: Review and Postulation of a Pathogenetic Mechanism. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 2013, 161, 1882–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yang, Y.; Wang, C.; Wang, F.; Zhu, L.; Liu, H.; He, X. Novel Chromosomal Translocation t(11;9)(P15;P23) Involving Deletion and Duplication of 9p in a Girl Associated with Autism and Mental Retardation. Gene 2012, 502, 154–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ng, J.; Sams, E.; Baldridge, D.; Kremitzki, M.; Wegner, D.J.; Lindsay, T.; Fulton, R.; Cole, F.S.; Turner, T.N. Precise Breakpoint Detection in a Patient with 9p– Syndrome. Cold Spring Harb. Mol. Case Stud. 2020, 6, a005348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hauge, X.; Raca, G.; Cooper, S.; May, K.; Spiro, R.; Adam, M.; Martin, L. Detailed Characterization of and Clinical Correlations in Ten Patients with Distal Deletions of Chromosome 9p. Genet. Med. 2008, 10, 599–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Barbaro, M.; Balsamo, A.; Anderlid, B.M.; Myhre, A.G.; Gennari, M.; Nicoletti, A.; Pittalis, M.C.; Oscarson, M.; Wedell, A. Characterization of Deletions at 9p Affecting the Candidate Regions for Sex Reversal and Deletion 9p Syndrome by MLPA. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, 17, 1439–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Onesimo, R.; Orteschi, D.; Scalzone, M.; Rossodivita, A.; Nanni, L.; Zannoni, G.F.; Marrocco, G.; Battaglia, D.; Fundarò, C.; Neri, G. Chromosome 9p Deletion Syndrome and Sex Reversal: Novel Findings and Redefinition of the Critically Deleted Regions. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 2012, 158A, 2266–2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bennett, C.P.; Docherty, Z.; Robb, S.A.; Ramani, P.; Hawkins, J.R.; Grant, D. Deletion 9p and Sex Reversal. J. Med. Genet. 1993, 30, 518–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Muroya, K.; Okuyama, T.; Goishi, K.; Ogiso, Y.; Fukuda, S.; Kameyama, J.; Sato, H.; Suzuki, Y.; Terasaki, H.; Gomyo, H.; et al. Sex-Determining Gene(s) on Distal 9p: Clinical and Molecular Studies in Six Cases. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000, 85, 7. [Google Scholar]
- Vinci, G.; Chantot-Bastaraud, S.; El Houate, B.; Lortat-Jacob, S.; Brauner, R.; McElreavey, K. Association of Deletion 9p, 46,XY Gonadal Dysgenesis and Autistic Spectrum Disorder. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2007, 13, 685–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mitsui, N.; Shimizu, K.; Nishimoto, H.; Mochizuki, H.; Iida, M.; Ohashi, H. Patient with Terminal 9 Mb Deletion of Chromosome 9p: Refining the Critical Region for 9p Monosomy Syndrome with Trigonocephaly. Congenit. Anom. 2013, 53, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruni, V.; Roppa, K.; Scionti, F.; Apa, R.; Sestito, S.; Martino, M.T.D.; Pensabene, L.; Concolino, D. A 46,XY Female with a 9p24.3p24.1 Deletion and a 8q24.11q24.3 Duplication: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. CGR 2019, 158, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flynn, J.T.; Kaelber, D.C.; Baker-Smith, C.M.; Blowey, D.; Carroll, A.E.; Daniels, S.R.; de Ferranti, S.D.; Dionne, J.M.; Falkner, B.; Flinn, S.K. Clinical Practice Guideline for Screening and Management of High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics 2017, 140, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kuczmarski, R.J.; Ogden, C.L.; Grummer-Strawn, L.M.; Flegal, K.M.; Guo, S.S.; Wei, R.; Mei, Z.; Curtin, L.R.; Roche, A.F.; Johnson, C.L. CDC Growth Charts: United States. Adv. Data 2000, 314, 1–27. [Google Scholar]
- Haycock, G.B.; Schwartz, G.J.; Wisotsky, D.H. Geometric Method for Measuring Body Surface Area: A Height-Weight Formula Validated in Infants, Children, and Adults. J. Pediatrics 1978, 93, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lai, W.W.; Geva, T.; Shirali, G.S.; Frommelt, P.C.; Humes, R.A.; Brook, M.M.; Pignatelli, R.H.; Rychik, J. Guidelines and Standards for Performance of a Pediatric Echocardiogram: A Report from the Task Force of the Pediatric Council of the American Society of Echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2006, 19, 1413–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Devereux, R.B.; Alonso, D.R.; Lutas, E.M.; Gottlieb, G.J.; Campo, E.; Sachs, I.; Reichek, N. Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: Comparison to Necropsy Findings. Am. J. Cardiol. 1986, 57, 450–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Simone, G.; Daniels, S.R.; Devereux, R.B.; Meyer, R.A.; Roman, M.J.; de Divitiis, O.; Alderman, M.H. Left Ventricular Mass and Body Size in Normotensive Children and Adults: Assessment of Allometric Relations and Impact of Overweight. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1992, 20, 1251–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Devereux, R.B.; de Simone, G.; Arnett, D.K.; Best, L.G.; Boerwinkle, E.; Howard, B.V.; Kitzman, D.; Lee, E.T.; Mosley, T.H.; Weder, A.; et al. Normal Limits in Relation to Age, Body Size and Gender of Two-Dimensional Echocardiographic Aortic Root Dimensions in Persons ≥15 Years of Age. Am. J. Cardiol 2012, 110, 1189–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sams, E.I.; Ng, J.K.; Tate, V.; Claire Hou, Y.-C.; Cao, Y.; Antonacci-Fulton, L.; Belhassan, K.; Neidich, J.; Mitra, R.D.; Cole, F.S.; et al. From Karyotypes to Precision Genomics in 9p Deletion and Duplication Syndromes. HGG Adv. 2021, 3, 100081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vissers, L.E.L.M.; Cox, T.C.; Maga, A.M.; Short, K.M.; Wiradjaja, F.; Janssen, I.M.; Jehee, F.; Bertola, D.; Liu, J.; Yagnik, G.; et al. Heterozygous Mutations of FREM1 Are Associated with an Increased Risk of Isolated Metopic Craniosynostosis in Humans and Mice. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7, e1002278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kawara, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Harada, N.; Yoshiura, K.; Niikawa, N.; Nishimura, A.; Mizuguchi, T.; Matsumoto, N. Narrowing Candidate Region for Monosomy 9p Syndrome to a 4.7-Mb Segment at 9p22.2-P23. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2006, 140, 373–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sivasankaran, A.; Kanakavalli, M.K.; Anuradha, D.; Samuel, C.R.; Kandukuri, L.R. Ring Chromosome 9 and Chromosome 9p Deletion Syndrome in a Patient Associated with Developmental Delay: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. CGR 2016, 148, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomaz, R.A.; Harman, J.L.; Karimlou, D.; Weavers, L.; Fritsch, L.; Bou-Kheir, T.; Bell, E.; del Valle Torres, I.; Niakan, K.K.; Fisher, C.; et al. Jmjd2c Facilitates the Assembly of Essential Enhancer-Protein Complexes at the Onset of Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation. Development 2017, 144, 567–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- JMJD8 Regulates Angiogenic Sprouting and Cellular Metabolism by Interacting With Pyruvate Kinase M2 in Endothelial Cells. Available online: http://www.ahajournals.org/doi/epub/10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.307695 (accessed on 2 December 2022).
- Liu, Y.; Kaneda, R.; Leja, T.W.; Subkhankulova, T.; Tolmachov, O.; Minchiotti, G.; Schwartz, R.J.; Barahona, M.; Schneider, M.D. Hhex and Cer1 Mediate the Sox17 Pathway for Cardiac Mesoderm Formation in Embryonic Stem Cells. Stem Cells 2014, 32, 1515–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Minoretti, P.; Arra, M.; Emanuele, E.; Olivieri, V.; Aldeghi, A.; Politi, P.; Martinelli, V.; Pesenti, S.; Falcone, C. A W148R Mutation in the Human FOXD4 Gene Segregating with Dilated Cardiomyopathy, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, and Suicidality. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2007, 19, 369–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Christ, L.A.; Crowe, C.A.; Micale, M.A.; Conroy, J.M.; Schwartz, S. Chromosome Breakage Hotspots and Delineation of the Critical Region for the 9p-Deletion Syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1999, 65, 1387–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Faas, B.H.W.; de Leeuw, N.; Mieloo, H.; Bruinenberg, J.; de Vries, B.B.A. Further Refinement of the Candidate Region for Monosomy 9p Syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 2007, 143A, 2353–2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Versacci, P.; Di Carlo, D.; Digilio, M.C.; Marino, B. Cardiovascular Disease in Down Syndrome. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2018, 30, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morales-Demori, R. Congenital Heart Disease and Cardiac Procedural Outcomes in Patients with Trisomy 21 and Turner Syndrome. Congenit. Heart Dis. 2017, 12, 820–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cardiovascular Health in Turner Syndrome: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Available online: http://www.ahajournals.org/doi/epub/10.1161/HCG.0000000000000048 (accessed on 2 December 2022).
- Leoni, C.; Blandino, R.; Delogu, A.B.; De Rosa, G.; Onesimo, R.; Verusio, V.; Marino, M.V.; Lanza, G.A.; Rigante, D.; Tartaglia, M.; et al. Genotype-Cardiac Phenotype Correlations in a Large Single-Center Cohort of Patients Affected by RASopathies: Clinical Implications and Literature Review. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 2022, 188, 431–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Meisner, J.K.; Martin, D.M. Congenital Heart Defects in CHARGE: The Molecular Role of CHD7 and Effects on Cardiac Phenotype and Clinical Outcomes. Am. J. Med. Genet. C Semin. Med. Genet. 2020, 184, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yuan, S.-M. Congenital Heart Defects in Kabuki Syndrome. Cardiol. J. 2013, 20, 121–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pierpont, M.E.; Brueckner, M.; Chung, W.K.; Garg, V.; Lacro, R.V.; McGuire, A.L.; Mital, S.; Priest, J.R.; Pu, W.T.; Roberts, A.; et al. Genetic Basis for Congenital Heart Disease: Revisited. Circulation 2018, 138, e653–e711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Recalcati, M.P.; Bellini, M.; Norsa, L.; Ballarati, L.; Caselli, R.; Russo, S.; Larizza, L.; Giardino, D. Complex Rearrangement Involving 9p Deletion and Duplication in a Syndromic Patient: Genotype/Phenotype Correlation and Review of the Literature. Gene 2012, 502, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Meloni, V. de F.A.; Piazzon, F.B.; Soares, M. de F. de F.; Takeno, S.S.; Christofolini, D.M.; Kulikowski, L.D.; Brunoni, D.; Melaragno, M.I. Cytogenomic Characterization of an Unexpected 17.6Mb 9p Deletion Associated to a 14.8Mb 20p Duplication in a Dysmorphic Patient with Multiple Congenital Anomalies Presenting a Normal G-Banding Karyotype. Gene, 62. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Spazzapan, P.; Arnaud, E.; Baujat, G.; Nizon, M.; Malan, V.; Brunelle, F.; Di Rocco, F. Clinical and Neuroradiological Features of the 9p Deletion Syndrome. Childs Nerv. Syst. 2016, 32, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Güneş, S.; Ekinci, Ö.; Ekinci, N.; Toros, F. Coexistence of 9p Deletion Syndrome and Autism Spectrum Disorder. J. Autism. Dev. Disord. 2017, 47, 520–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- León-Carlos, N.Y.; García-Delgado, C.; Morales-Jiménez, A.B.; Serrano-Bello, C.; Cervantes, A.; Morán Barroso, V.F. Monosomía 9p24 secundaria a translocación (2;9) en dos pacientes no relacionadas. Arch. Argent Pediatr. 2018, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chai, H.; Ji, W.; Wen, J.; DiAdamo, A.; Grommisch, B.; Hu, Q.; Szekely, A.M.; Li, P. Ring Chromosome Formation by Intra-Strand Repairing of Subtelomeric Double Stand Breaks and Clinico-Cytogenomic Correlations for Ring Chromosome 9. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 2020, 182, 3023–3028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Banerjee, I.; Senniappan, S.; Laver, T.W.; Caswell, R.; Zenker, M.; Mohnike, K.; Cheetham, T.; Wakeling, M.N.; Ismail, D.; Lennerz, B.; et al. Refinement of the Critical Genomic Region for Congenital Hyperinsulinism in the Chromosome 9p Deletion Syndrome. Wellcome Open Res. 2020, 4, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cordes Selby, S.; Iwata-Otsubo, A.; Delk, P.; Nebesio, T.D.; Gohil, A.; Matlock, P.; Torres-Martinez, W.; Vance, G.H. A Brother and Sister with the Same Karyotype: Case Report of Two Siblings with Partial 3p Duplication and Partial 9p Deletion and Sex Reversal. Clin. Case Rep. 2021, 9, e04141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yao, Y.-Y.; Zhang, C.-C.; Bi, H.; Zhu, F. Prenatal Diagnosis of de Novo Isochromosome 4p with an Unbalanced t(4;9) Translocation in a Fetus with Congenital Anomalies: A Case Report and Literature Review. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022, 61, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Krysztofiak, H.; Młyńczak, M.; Folga, A.; Braksator, W.; Małek, Ł.A. Normal Values for Left Ventricular Mass in Relation to Lean Body Mass in Child and Adolescent Athletes. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2019, 40, 204–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Niwa, K. Aortic Dilatation in Complex Congenital Heart Disease. Cardiovasc. Diagn. Ther. 2018, 8, 725–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Firth, H.V.; Richards, S.M.; Bevan, A.P.; Clayton, S.; Corpas, M.; Rajan, D.; Vooren, S.V.; Moreau, Y.; Pettett, R.M.; Carter, N.P. DECIPHER: Database of Chromosomal Imbalance and Phenotype in Humans Using Ensembl Resources. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, 84, 524–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bayat, A.; Kirchhoff, M.; Madsen, C.G.; Kreiborg, S. Neonatal Hyperinsulinemic Hypoglycemia in a Patient with 9p Deletion Syndrome. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2018, 61, 473–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McClure, R.J.; Telford, N.; Newell, S.J. A Mild Phenotype Associated with Der(9)t(3;9) (P25;P23). J. Med. Genet. 1996, 33, 625–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Nakamura, K.; Miyoshi, T.; Yoshida, M.; Akagi, S.; Saito, Y.; Ejiri, K.; Matsuo, N.; Ichikawa, K.; Iwasaki, K.; Naito, T.; et al. Pathophysiology and Treatment of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy and Heart Failure in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1.
Molecular data and cardiac phenotype of study population.
| Patient 1 | Patient 2 | Patient 3 | Patient 4 | Patient 5 | Patient 6 | Patient 7 | Patient 8 | Patient 9 | Patient 10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | female | male | male | male | male | female | female | female | male | female |
| 9p Deletion Coordinates (Grch38) | (271,257–14,270,849) × 1 | (204,090–11,086,066) × 1 | (271,257–4,600,279) × 1 | (271,257–4,210,335) × 1 | (214,367–16,307,944) × 1 | (271,257–3,972,331) × 1 | (46,587–7,250,826) × 1 | NA; 9 (p24.3p23) del | (271,257–15,041,024) × 1 | (203,861–18,114,932) × 1 |
| A-CGH resolution | 75 kb | 200 kb | 75 kb | 75 kb | 75 kb | 82 kb | SNP array: 5 kb | NA | 41 kb | SNP array: 75 kb |
| Deletion size (Mb) | 14 | 11 | 4.5 | 3.9 | 16 | 3.7 | 7.2 | 9.6 | 14.8 | 17.9 |
| Reciprocal duplication | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | None detected | no |
| Segregation analysis | Not available | Not available | Not available | De novo | Not available | Not available | Father: 46, XY, ish t(6;9) (q27-, p24+; p24-, q27+) (RP11-37D8-, RP11-143M15+; RP11-143M15-, RP11-37D8+) | Not available | Not available | Not available |
| Other genetic anomalies | No | No | No | 9 (q22.11) del (68,522,531–68,729,391) × 1 206 Kb | No | 9 (p24.2p21.3) dup (4,051,471–25,205,566) × 3; 21 Mb | 6 (q26q27) dup (161,860,136–170,610,382) × 3; 8.6 Mb | 7 (q36.1q36.3) dup, 7.1 Mb | 16 (q23.2q24.3) dup (80,252,108–90,044,855) × 3; 9.8 Mb | No |
| Current age (eayrs) | 5 | 18 | 21 | 27 | 32 | 19 | 25 | 10 | 4 | 2 |
| Cardiac phenotype | No CHDs | No CHDs | No CHDs | No CHDs | No CHDs | MV and TV insufficiency | MV insufficiency | No CHDs | ASD | OS ASD, VSD |
MV: mitral valve; TV: tricuspid valve; ASD: atrial septal defect; OS ASD: ostium secundum atrial septal defect; VSD: ventricular septal defect.
Table 2.
Demographic characteristics of the study population.
| Patients with Del9p (n = 10) | Control Sample (n = 22) | p | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | ||
| Female | 5 | 50.0 | 9 | 40.9 | 0.631 |
| Age (completed years) | |||||
| Mean (SD) | 16.5 (10.9) | 15.2 (3.3) | 0.403 | ||
| Median (IQR) | 18.8 (5.5–25.5) | 17.0 (12–18) | |||
| Weight (kg) | |||||
| Mean (SD) | 50.6 (25.0) | 50.3 (14.2) | 0.917 | ||
| Median (IQR) | 55.5 (32.0–69.8) | 47.8 (42–60.0) | |||
| Height (cm) | |||||
| Mean (SD) | 147.0 (32.3) | 160.6 (16.1) | 0.791 | ||
| Median (IQR) | 160.0 (136–167) | 160 (150–169) | |||
| Body Surface Area (BSA, m2) | |||||
| Mean (SD) | 1.4 (0.5) | 1.5 (0.3) | 0.907 | ||
| Median (IQR) | 1.4 (1.3–1.7) | 1.5 (1.4–1.7) | |||
Table 3.
Conventional echocardiographic data in the study cohort and controls.
| Patients with Del9p (n = 10) | Control sample (n = 22) | p | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Median | IQR | Mean | SD | Median | IQR | ||
| Left ventricle end-diastolic diameter (LVIDd, mm) | 40.2 | 9.1 | 42.0 | 32.0–46.0 | 45.7 | 4.4 | 43.5 | 43.0–48.0 | 0.076 |
| Left ventricle end-systolic diameter (LVIDs, mm) | 25.4 | 6.9 | 26.5 | 18.0–29.0 | 29.6 | 2.8 | 30.0 | 27.0–31.0 | 0.067 |
| Septal diastolic diameter (IVSd, mm) | 7.1 | 1.7 | 7.3 | 5.4–8.4 | 8.2 | 1.5 | 8.0 | 7.0–9.0 | 0.100 |
| Septal systolic diameter (IVSs, mm) | 10.6 | 2.1 | 10.1 | 9.3–12.5 | 11.7 | 2.0 | 11.0 | 10.0–12.5 | 0.297 |
| Left ventricle posterior wall during diastole (PWd, mm) | 5.8 | 1.2 | 5.6 | 5.1–6.2 | 6.7 | 1.4 | 6.0 | 6.0–8.0 | 0.099 |
| Left ventricle posterior wall during systole (PWs, mm) | 10.8 | 2.2 | 11.0 | 10.6–11.8 | 11.7 | 2.8 | 11.0 | 9.0–13.0 | 0.772 |
| LVIDd/BSA (mm/m2) | 31.7 | 5.5 | 30.8 | 27.7–36.3 | 18.4 | 13.1 | 25.0 | 4.7–28.9 | 0.020 |
| LVIDs/BSA (mm/m2) | 17.8 | 7.0 | 18.9 | 16.7–22.5 | 20.2 | 3.3 | 19.9 | 18.1–21.6 | 0.534 |
| IVSd/BSA (mm/m2) | 5.1 | 1.0 | 4.8 | 4.4–6.0 | 5.5 | 1.0 | 5.5 | 4.7–6.4 | 0.328 |
| PWs/BSA (mm/m2) | 4.3 | 1.1 | 4.1 | 3.6–4.5 | 4.5 | 0.7 | 4.4 | 4.1–5.0 | 0.217 |
| Left atrium/Aorta | 1.2 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 1.0–1.3 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 1.2–1.4 | 0.100 |
| Left Ventricle Mass (LV mass, g) | 84.3 | 47.1 | 81.6 | 53.2–105 | 126.1 | 55.7 | 106.7 | 86.5–141.1 | 0.040 |
| LV mass/BSA (g/m2) | 59.4 | 18.4 | 50.1 | 46.7–74.3 | 83.7 | 21.8 | 81.0 | 65.9–96.8 | 0.006 |
| Aortic Anulus (Ao AN, mm) | 16.6 | 6.5 | 18.5 | 13.2–21.2 | 16.4 | 2.8 | 15.3 | 14.2–18.0 | 0.464 |
| Ao AN/BSA (mm/m2) | 13.4 | 1.9 | 12.3 | 12.0–15.1 | 11.1 | 1.9 | 10.8 | 9.6–12.4 | 0.008 |
| Aortic Bulb (Ao BULB, mm) | 23.5 | 4.9 | 25.0 | 20.0–27.2 | 22.9 | 3.8 | 22.9 | 20.0–24.8 | 0.708 |
| Ao BULB/BSA (mm/m2) | 17.1 | 2.6 | 16.0 | 15.4–18.2 | 15.5 | 2.5 | 15.2 | 13.9–17.5 | 0.086 |
| Sinotubular Junction (ST JUNCTION, mm) | 20.5 | 4.6 | 22.0 | 20.0–22.9 | 18.8 | 3.5 | 18.1 | 16.0–20.0 | 0.214 |
| ST JUNCTION/BSA (mm/m2) | 14.9 | 1.5 | 14.7 | 13.4–15.7 | 12.7 | 2.2 | 12.3 | 11.3–13.9 | 0.007 |
| Proximal Ascending Aorta (PROX AA, mm) | 21.7 | 4.9 | 23.0 | 18.0–25.9 | 20.5 | 2.7 | 20.0 | 18.2–22.0 | 0.339 |
| PROX AA/BSA (mm/m2) | 15.8 | 2.1 | 15.2 | 14.2–16.4 | 13.9 | 1.9 | 13.7 | 12.5–14.6 | 0.016 |
| Left ventricle Ejection fraction (EF, %) | 65.9 | 6.4 | 64.2 | 60.6–71.0 | 64.3 | 3.4 | 64.5 | 63.0–67.0 | 0.787 |
| Left ventricle Fractional Shortening (FS, %) | 37.1 | 4.0 | 37.0 | 33.0–40.3 | 36.2 | 6.9 | 35.5 | 34.0–37.0 | 0.298 |
| Mitral valve: Peak E (cm/s) | 86.6 | 10.6 | 85.3 | 78.9–95.3 | 108.2 | 18.0 | 101.0 | 94.0–117 | 0.002 |
| Mitral valve: Peak A (cm/s) | 59.1 | 7.0 | 60.5 | 59.9–62.4 | 53.4 | 13.3 | 51.0 | 45.0–66.0 | 0.386 |
| Mitral valve: Deceleration Time (DT) | 81.3 | 66.2 | 104.0 | 7.3 –132.5 | 174.9 | 22.5 | 171.0 | 158.0–200 | <0.001 |
| E/A ratio | 1.5 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 1.3–1.7 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 1.7–2.3 | <0.001 |
| Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE, cm) | 2.3 | 0.5 | 2.4 | 1.9–2.7 | 2.2 | 0.3 | 2.3 | 1.9–2.3 | 0.437 |
Table 4.
TDI echocardiographic data in the study cohort and controls.
| Patients with Del9p (n = 10) | Control sample (n = 22) | p | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Median | IQR | Mean | SD | Median | IQR | ||
| Left Ventricle | |||||||||
| LMA S’ (cm/s) | 9.2 | 1.8 | 9.1 | 8.3–9.7 | 23.3 | 36.2 | 12.0 | 12.0–15.0 | <0.001 |
| LMA e’ (cm/s) | 15.5 | 1.4 | 16.0 | 15.3–16.3 | 37.6 | 56.1 | 20.0 | 19.0–25.0 | <0.001 |
| LMA a’ (cm/s) | 8.5 | 2.3 | 7.4 | 7.3–9.3 | 13.0 | 20.2 | 7.0 | 5.0–8.0 | 0.230 |
| SMA S’ (cm/s) | 8.1 | 1.9 | 7.9 | 7.1–8.2 | 8.4 | 1.8 | 9.0 | 8.0–9.0 | 0.060 |
| SMA e’ (cm/s) | 12.7 | 2.3 | 11.9 | 11.0–14.8 | 16.3 | 1.9 | 17.0 | 15.0–18.0 | <0.001 |
| SMA a’ (cm/s) | 7.6 | 1.4 | 7.2 | 6.7–8.5 | 6.7 | 0.9 | 7.0 | 6.0–7.0 | 0.101 |
| LMA E/e’ | 5.6 | 0.6 | 5.5 | 5.2–5.9 | 4.7 | 1.5 | 5.2 | 4.2–5.8 | 0.152 |
| SMA E/e’ | 6.8 | 1.5 | 7.0 | 5.4–8.2 | 6.7 | 1.3 | 6.8 | 5.5–7.2 | 0.792 |
| Isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT, ms) | 59.4 | 19.1 | 61.0 | 53.0 –73.5 | 46.9 | 9.3 | 46.0 | 42.0–58.0 | 0.026 |
| Isovolumetric contraction time (IVCT, ms) | 56.2 | 20.6 | 59.5 | 39.0–70.5 | 50.8 | 11.9 | 47.0 | 42.0–60.0 | 0.337 |
| Left Ventricle Ejection Time (ET) | 298.4 | 88.8 | 282.5 | 255–306 | 308.5 | 22.0 | 312.5 | 292–323 | 0.076 |
| TEI Index | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.4–0.5 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3–0.4 | 0.001 |
| Right Ventricle | |||||||||
| TLA: S’ (cm/s) | 13.7 | 5.0 | 13.0 | 10.1–14.9 | 14.3 | 2.3 | 14.0 | 13.0–16.0 | 0.270 |
| TLA: e’ (cm/s) | 21.2 | 19.4 | 14.9 | 12.4–18.7 | 17.5 | 2.8 | 18.0 | 15.0–19.0 | 0.195 |
| TLA: a’ (cm/s) | 16.3 | 15.1 | 11.4 | 9.2 –14.9 | 9.4 | 3.1 | 9.5 | 7.0–10.0 | 0.195 |
LMA: lateral mitral annulus; SMA: septal mitral annulus; TLA: tricuspid lateral annulus.
Table 5.
Literature review of the cardiac features associated with 9p deletion patients over the last 10 years.
Table 5.
Literature review of the cardiac features associated with 9p deletion patients over the last 10 years.
| Author, Year | Sex | Cardiac Phenotype | Karyotype | Chromosome 9p Deletion | 9p Deletion Size | Other Genetic Anomalies | Technique Used | Reciprocal Duplication |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Onesimo et al., 2012 [10] | M | PDA, bicuspid aortic valve, CoA | 46,XY, del(9)(p24.1) | 9p24.3p24.1 (204,367–6,582,172) | 6.5 Mb | -- | CGH-array | -- |
| Recalcati et al., 2012 [40] | M | ASD type II | 46,XY, der(9)del(9)(p22)dup(9)(p22p11.2).ish dup(9)(p13.2p11.2) | 9p24.3p22.2(194,193–18,341,167) | 18.3 Mb | - dupl(9)(p13.2p11.2) - dupl9p22.2p13.1 | CGH-array | Inverted duplication: - dup(9)(p13.2p11.2)(RP11-3J10++,RP11-108C23++) - 9p22.2p13.1(18,368,491–39,884,938 |
| Meloni et al., 2012 [41] | F | Tricuspid valve insufficiency with right atrium enlargement | Not performed | 9p24.3p22.2(116,890–17,629,981) | 17.6 Mb | - dupl20p13p12.1 (14.8 Mb) | FISH, MLPA, Whole-Genome Microarray | Chr20:8159–14,755,396 |
| Spazzapan et al., 2016 [42] | F | ASD | 46,XY,del(9p22) | Not reported | Not reported | -- | Karyotype, FISH | -- |
| F | VSD | 46,XY,del(9p22) | Not reported | Not reported | -- | Karyotype, FISH | -- | |
| Gunes et al., 2017 [43] | M | VSD | 46,XY,del(9p24) | Not reported | Not reported | -- | Karyotype | -- |
| León-Carlos et al., 2018 [44] | F | VSD | 46,XX,der(9)t(2;9)(q31;p22) | Not reported | Not reported | Balanced translocation | Karyotype GTG-banding | -- |
| Chai et al., 2020 [45] | M | Mildly PVS | 46,XY,del(9)(p24.3) | 204,193–611,620 | 407 Kb | - del9q34.3 (884 Kb) (chr9:140134632- 141018984) - dupl9q33.2q34.11 (5879 Mb) | CGH-array WGS | Chr9:124,664,562–130,543,964 |
| Banerjee et al., 2020 [46] | M | VSD | 46,XY,del(9)(p22.1) | 0–19,200,000 | Not reported | NGS | None detected | |
| F | ASD | 46,XX,del(9) (p22.2) | 0–17,600,000 | Not reported | NGS | None detected | ||
| M | ASD, PDA | 46,XY,der(9)t(9;13)(p24;q22.3) | 0–9,806,011 | Not reported | Unbalanced translocation | NGS | Chr13:75,000,000–115,200,000 | |
| F | ASD, PDA | 46,XX,del(9) (p23).ish del(9)(pter-) | 0–9,330,617 | Not reported | -- | NGS | None detected | |
| F | VSD | 46,XX,der(9)t(8;9) (q24.1;p24) | 0–7,800,000 | Not reported | Unbalanced translocation | NGS | Chr8:117,800,000–146,400,000 | |
| F | PDA, PFO/ASD type II | Not performed | 0–7,200,000 | Not reported | Unbalanced translocation | NGS | Chr7:0–10,000,000 | |
| Cordes Salby et al., 2021 [47] | M | PFO | 46,XY,der(9)t(3;9) (p25.1;p24.3)pat | 203,861–1,373,611 | 1.17 Mb | - dupl3p26.3p25.1 (13.5 Mb) | CMA | Chr3:61,891–13,562,132 |
| F | ASD | 46,XX,der(9)t(3;9) (p25.1;p24.3)pat | 203,861–1,373,611 | 1.17 Mb | - dupl3p26.3p25.1 (13.46 Mb) | CMA | Chr3:61,891–13,562,132 | |
| Mohamed et al., 2021 [4] | M | PDA | 46,XY,del9p24.3p22.2 | 208,454_17,724,146 | 17.7 Mb | - del9p21.3 (1.1 Mb) | CGH-array | -- |
| M | PDA | 46,XY,del9p24.3p22.2 | Not reported | Not reported | -- | CGH-array | ||
| F | ASD | 46,XX,del9p24.3p22.2 | 208,454_16,880,694 | 16.8 Mb | -- | CGH-array | ||
| F | VSD | 46,XY,del9p24.3p22.2 | (9p22) 17,380K 17,770K (9p22–23) 10,350k 10,780k | Not reported | -- | CGH-array | ||
| F | ASD, PDA | 46,XY,del9p24.3p22.2 | (9p22) 17,380K 17,770K (9p22–23) 10,350k 10,780k | 17.770 Mb | -- | CGH-array | ||
| M | CoA | 46,XY,del9)t(8;9)(p21;p23) | 203,861_11,587,302 | 11.587 Mb | - dupl8p23.3p21.3(19 Mb) | CGH-array | Chr8:208048_19,434,723 | |
| Yao et al., 2022 [48] | F | Right ventricular wall thickening, aortic arch narrowing (fetal echocardiography) | 46,XX,idic(4)(q11),der(9)t(4;9)(q11;p23) | 9p24.3p23(208,454–10,039,391) | 9.8 Mb | Unbalanced translocation | Karyotype, SNP-array | 4p16.3p11(68,345–49,089,361) (49 Mb) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Pugnaloni, F.; Onesimo, R.; Blandino, R.; Putotto, C.; Versacci, P.; Delogu, A.B.; Leoni, C.; Trevisan, V.; Croci, I.; Calì, F.; et al. Insights into the Cardiac Phenotype in 9p Deletion Syndrome: A Multicenter Italian Experience and Literature Review. Genes 2023, 14, 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14010146
AMA Style
Pugnaloni F, Onesimo R, Blandino R, Putotto C, Versacci P, Delogu AB, Leoni C, Trevisan V, Croci I, Calì F, et al. Insights into the Cardiac Phenotype in 9p Deletion Syndrome: A Multicenter Italian Experience and Literature Review. Genes. 2023; 14(1):146. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14010146
Chicago/Turabian StylePugnaloni, Flaminia, Roberta Onesimo, Rita Blandino, Carolina Putotto, Paolo Versacci, Angelica Bibiana Delogu, Chiara Leoni, Valentina Trevisan, Ileana Croci, Federica Calì, and et al. 2023. "Insights into the Cardiac Phenotype in 9p Deletion Syndrome: A Multicenter Italian Experience and Literature Review" Genes 14, no. 1: 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14010146
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
