Next Article in Journal
Potential Cross Talk between Autism Risk Genes and Neurovascular Molecules: A Pilot Study on Impact of Blood Brain Barrier Integrity
Next Article in Special Issue
A Review of the Pharmacological Potential of Spatholobus suberectus Dunn on Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
RELA∙8-Oxoguanine DNA Glycosylase1 Is an Epigenetic Regulatory Complex Coordinating the Hexosamine Biosynthetic Pathway in RSV Infection
Previous Article in Special Issue
Orobanche crenata Forssk. Extract Affects Human Breast Cancer Cell MCF-7 Survival and Viral Replication
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of Natural Products and Their Multitargeted Approach to Treat Solid Cancer

1
Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA
2
G-Bioscience, 9800 Page Ave., St. Louis, MO 63132, USA
3
Department of Child Health, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
4
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
5
Department of Chemistry, Bundelkhand University Jhansi, Jhansi 284128, Uttar Pradesh, India
6
IFFCO Nano Biotechnology Research Center, Kalol 382423, Gujarat, India
7
King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
8
Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
9
Vaccines and Immunotherapy Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
10
Department of Biochemistry, College of Science, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 21959, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cells 2022, 11(14), 2209; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11142209
Submission received: 21 June 2022 / Revised: 8 July 2022 / Accepted: 13 July 2022 / Published: 15 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Plants-Derived Bioactives for Cancer Treatment)

Abstract

:
Natural products play a critical role in the discovery and development of numerous drugs for the treatment of various types of cancer. These phytochemicals have demonstrated anti-carcinogenic properties by interfering with the initiation, development, and progression of cancer through altering various mechanisms such as cellular proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and metastasis. Treating multifactorial diseases, such as cancer with agents targeting a single target, might lead to limited success and, in many cases, unsatisfactory outcomes. Various epidemiological studies have shown that the steady consumption of fruits and vegetables is intensely associated with a reduced risk of cancer. Since ancient period, plants, herbs, and other natural products have been used as healing agents. Likewise, most of the medicinal ingredients accessible today are originated from the natural resources. Regardless of achievements, developing bioactive compounds and drugs from natural products has remained challenging, in part because of the problem associated with large-scale sequestration and mechanistic understanding. With significant progress in the landscape of cancer therapy and the rising use of cutting-edge technologies, we may have come to a crossroads to review approaches to identify the potential natural products and investigate their therapeutic efficacy. In the present review, we summarize the recent developments in natural products-based cancer research and its application in generating novel systemic strategies with a focus on underlying molecular mechanisms in solid cancer.

1. Introduction

Cancer is a not only a genetic but also a challenging disease and, the main cause of mortality globally. In 2020, there have been a projected 18.1 million cancer cases worldwide. According to the prediction, it is likely to record seven out of ten deaths in Central and South America, Africa, and Asia due to cancer [1,2]. This could be a panic situation that most developing countries prerequisite to upgrade and develop more tactical preparation that limits reconnaissance, early recognition, and active treatment for cancer patients. Several factors such as growing populations, aging, and prompt socioeconomic growth are associated with the rise in cancer burden throughout the world. There is a probability that the cancer maladies rise with increase in age due to the accumulated DNA damage and multi-stage carcinogenesis [3,4,5]. In recent years, due to improvements in novel therapeutics not only diagnosis rate has been increased but also over-all life expectancy of cancer patients has improved [6,7].
Presently, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) enlisted 8 categories for treatment of cancer including surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, stem cell transplant, and precision medicine [8]. However, the customary approaches for cancer treatment include surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy [9,10]. Conversely, regardless of the various types of chemotherapeutic drugs utilized for the cancer treatment and the remedial triumph of several management programs, the main therapies have not achieved the desired result [11,12]. Some early targeted therapies have shown a positive clinical response, however, frequent drug resistance was observed after an initial positive response in cancer patients. This alteration in the treatment is known as acquired drug resistance, as contrasting to intrinsic resistance, which occurs earlier to any cancer therapy. Acquired drug resistance is developed due to both cytotoxic chemotherapies and targeted therapies with different molecular mechanisms. In most of the cancer, these molecular mechanisms can incorporate compensatory and redundant molecular signaling, targeting mutations developed during treatment, modulation in the expression of the targeted proteins, inhibition of pro-apoptotic pathways, activation of pro-survival signaling, inactivation of DNA repair mechanisms, and upregulation of tumor cell efflux transporters [13,14]. Despite of the progress, resistance to cancer chemotherapy and common side effects are the main issues in patients who have received first-line treatment. Targeted therapy employs a range of small molecules and inhibitors that play an important role in targeting key signaling pathways, result in development of resistance in a rare instance even from first doses. Drug resistance develops in the patient as a result of tumor or cancer cells being certainly chosen for molecular mechanisms that can compensate for the precisely targeted pathway. In light of this, there is an urgent necessity to pursue more selective and active compounds or natural products that have fewer side effects, have more medicinal elements, cost-effective, and have a least level of disease resistance for the management of cancer. However, less evidence exists in the scientific literature about the utilization of such natural products and their mechanism of action against solid cancers.
Throughout the history, natural products played an important and crucial role in the treatment of human illnesses. Furthermore, traditional remedies, mainly based on native plants, still govern therapeutic practices globally, and natural products cover a huge portion of current-day pharmaceutical tools, especially in the field of antibiotic and cancer therapies. For the management of cancer, timely diagnosis and definitive tumor removal by radiation therapy or surgical resection is the greatest anticipation. Conversely, in case of dealing with malignant and metastatic disease, chemotherapy is usually required. As defined herein, most of the significant improvements that have been recognized for the management of cancer are directly or indirectly associated with the discovery of natural product based chemotherapeutic approach. In past few decades, cumulative evidence has demonstrated the remarkable amplification or utilization of plant-based remedies. As compared with the high cost and side effects of most modern drugs, medical plants have shown significant therapeutic potential with minimal side effects and low cost, such as epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), resveratrol, curcumin, sugiol etc. EGCG is a polyphenol found in green tea [15,16,17,18].

2. Natural Products

Plant-derived natural products are the primary source of biologically active compounds. Moreover, their nontoxic or less toxic nature to normal cells and better toleratation has gained attention from the scientific community and clinicians in the modern drug discovery area [19,20]. The untapped structural diversity of natural compounds is long-lasting importance in drug discovery. It is estimated that the plant kingdom includes at least 250,000 species, of which only 10 percent have been explored for pharmacological applications [21]. Several natural compounds have shown potential activities against metastasis and tumor invasion [16,20,22]. Some plant-derived FDA-approved phytomolecules, such as tetrandrine, lycobetaine, curdione, vincristine, vinblastine, curcumol, monocrotaline, elliptinium, etoposide, gossypol, ipomeanol, taxol, indirubin, 10-hydroxycamptothecin, homoharringtonine, and colchicinamide have shown significant antitumor potential [23]. Approximately more than 600 natural compounds have reported as an anticancer agent. However, keeping in mind the content’s limitation and inability to cover every natural product in a single article, we have briefly discussed some common well-known anticancer compounds such as curcumin, indol-3-carbinol (I3C), resveratrol, kaempferol, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), and genistein (Figure 1).

2.1. Curcumin

Curcumin has been suggested as the most potent natural product among the 600 natural products. It is a yellow spice and a phenolic compound derived from the plant Curcuma longa. Curcumin has shown promising chemopreventive and anticancer activity in different cancer models, such as prostate cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, brain tumors, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [24,25]. The scientific literatures report the modulation in various signaling pathways by curcumin that results into its antitumor activity [24,26]. The active JAK2 / STAT3 signaling pathway plays a vital role in the initiation and development of various cancers [27]. Thus, JAK2/STAT3 pathway is a well-known therapeutic target for curcumin inhibiting tumor initiation. In primary effusion lymphoma cells, curcumin significantly suppresses the JAK/STAT3 pathway in a dose-dependent manner, which inhibits cell proliferation and induces caspase-dependent apoptosis [28]. Furthermore, curcumin is a more potent inhibitor than a selective inhibitor of AG490 a selective inhibitor of STAT3 phosphorylation of the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway in multiple myeloma cells [29]. Scientific studies suggest that curcumin inhibits cell proliferation in numerous cancer cell lines, such as malignant gliomas [30], pancreatic [31,32], hepatocellular [33], ovarian, and endometrial carcinoma [34] by down-regulating the JAK-STAT3 pathway. An in-vivo study reveals that curcumin injected with tumorspheres of lung cancer NCI-H460 cells in nude mice suppressed the tumor growth via repressing the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway [35].

2.2. Indol-3-Carbinol (I3C)

Another natural product, indol-3-carbinol, mainly present in cruciferous vegetables such as cabbage, cauliflower, and broccoli, also exhibit anticancer activity [36]. It has been reported to inhibit cancer cell proliferation by modulating the expression of insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS1) and insulin-like growth factor receptor-1 (IGF1R) [37]. A recent study suggested that I3C induces apoptosis in H1299 cells by activating apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) [38]. Furthermore, I3C has been reported to exert its anticancer effects through a different mechanism that include decreased cell proliferation, increased apoptosis, and reduced mammosphere formation in MCF-10AR-Her2 cells [39]. Nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) is a master regulator of more than five hundred genes. It plays a crucial role in cancer cell survival by mediating the transcription of several antiapoptotic genes such as p53, p21, survivin, Bcl-2, and Bcl-xL [40]. I3C and diindolylmethane (DIM) inhibit the activation of NF-κB in SW480 colon cancer cells [41]. Earlier studies also reported that I3C and DIM inhibit the cell cycle in the G1 phase in breast and prostate cancer cell lines [42,43]. Recently it has been shown that I3C decreases cell proliferation and induces apoptosis in the inflammatory breast cancer model. However, this result could not be adequate to evade the development of tumor embolization and metastasis [44]. A study showed that I3C could induce apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells by upregulating the FOXO3 signaling pathway [45].

2.3. Resveratrol

Resveratrol is a well-known naturally occurring polyphenol and commonly present in grapes, wine, nuts, berries, and many other human diets [46]. Several studies reported a wide range of pharmacological activities associated with resveratrol such as antiviral, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, antiaging, anticancer, and antioxidant effects [46,47]. Resveratrol has shown anticancer effects in renal carcinoma cells such as ACHN and A498. It reduced cell proliferation, migration, and invasion through inhibition or inactivation of the Akt and ERK1/2 signaling pathways in a concentration-dependent manner [48]. It has also been reported to exert anti-cell proliferation effects through modulation in VEGF expression in an osteosarcoma cell line [49]. In colorectal adenocarcinoma cells (CaCo-2), resveratrol has shown significant growth inhibition at 25 μM due to S/G2 phase arrest through the inhibition of ornithine decarboxylase activity [50]. A study reported that a combination of resveratrol and docetaxel treatment induced apoptosis in prostate cancer cells (C4–2B and DU-145) by inhibiting the cell cycle at the G2/M phase and inducing the expression of pro-apoptotic genes, such as Bax, Bid, and Bak [33].

2.4. Kaempferol

Kaempferol, a yellow color compound, is an aglycone type of flavonoid that is made up of glycosides. It contains four hydroxy groups on 3, 5, 7, and 4 positions [51]. The primary sources of kaempferol are fruits, seeds, flowers, leaves, green vegetables, and different plants [52]. It has been reported to be involved in various activities, including anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antitumor, antimicrobial, neuroprotective, and cardioprotective [53]. In addition, kaempferol exerts an anticancer effect in different human cancer cell lines such as SW480, HCT-15, HCT116, HT-29, and LS174-R colon cells [54,55,56]. A study has also shown that treatment of Huh7 cells with kaempferol in hypoxic conditions could inhibit tumor growth through the inactivation of p44/42 MAPK pathways by inhibiting HIF-1α protein [51]. Moreover, kaempferol induced apoptosis in colon cancer cells by activating the upregulation of death receptor 5 and TRAIL receptors [57]. Moreover, a study reported that kaempferol inhibited triclosan and E2-induced breast cancer progression by playing an antagonist role against estrogen receptor and IGF1R signaling [58]. In addition, it also induces apoptosis naturally in MCF-7 cells through the activation of poly ADP-ribose polymerase and via the mitochondrial caspase-9 signaling pathway [58,59]. In vivo study suggests that kaempferol has shown inhibitory activity against metastasis of murine melanoma B16F10 cells and could downregulate the expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and its activity. Therefore it might be a potential anticancer agent for cancer metastasis [60].

2.5. Epigallocatechin Gallate (EGCG)

Green tea is a refreshing drink that is used globally. The green tea catechins such as EGCG and other polyphenols showed anticancer activity in different cancer models. EGCG is the most abundant and well-studied catechin found in green tea [40,61,62]. The anti-carcinogenic properties of green tea include controlling cell proliferation, cell death of tumor cells, induction of apoptosis, induction of proapoptotic genes, inhibition of antiapoptotic genes, rise in ROS production and vascular angiogenesis [63]. These catechins modulate the gene expression by directly affecting the transcription factor or indirectly through epigenetic mechanisms [64]. A study revealed that EGCG (10–100 µM) inhibits the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) and induces NF-kB activity in a murine preosteoclast cell-line RAW 264.7 [65]. Scientific studies have shown significant growth inhibitory potential of EGCG (40–80 µM) in different cancer models, such as prostate, colorectal and liver cancer [66,67,68]. An in vitro study has shown that EGCG and nano-EGCG treatment increases the expression of AMPK phosphorylation in H1299 lung cancer cells [69]. Another study reported the inhibition of cell proliferation and migration in oral cancer cells (H400 and H357) by EGCG treatment through reduced expression of phosphorylated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [70]. The nano-EGCG regulates various biological activities, including suppressing cell proliferation, inhibiting cell migration, colony formation, and invasion by activating the AMPK signaling pathway in H1299 lung cancer cells [69]. Recently, we have also reported the significant anticancer potential of nano-EGCG in prostate cell lines, viz. 22Rv1 and PC3 [71]. Treating rats with (50 mg/kg) catechin exhibits the downregulation of endotoxin-mediated activation of initial signaling molecule NF-κB, TNFα, nitric oxide, and reactive oxygen species due to catechin’s antioxidant effect [72,73]. In addition, studies have reported that EGCG treatment induced the natural killer (NK) cell activity, triggered the proliferation of B-cell and T cells, and increased NK-cell mediated cytotoxicity in murine leukemia and bladder cancer model [74,75].

2.6. Genistein

A naturally occurring compound, genistein is an isoflavone belongs to the flavonoid family. It is derived from legumes such as soybeans, lupin and fava beans [17,76]. The consumption of soybeans, lupin, and fava beans is associated with many beneficial effects including lower incidence of some cancers, such as colon cancer, reduction in the cardiovascular disease risk, protection against osteoporosis, and alleviation of postmenopausal symptoms [77,78]. A study reported that genistein inhibits tumor growth and cell proliferation by downregulating the negative effect of epidermal growth factor (EGF) on the activity of forkhead box O3 (FOXO3) in a colon cancer model [79]. In addition, it is also observed that genistein reduces breast cancer stem cells (CSCs) and mammospheres by downregulating the hedgehog-signaling pathway that subsequently regulates cell proliferation, self-renewal ability, stem cell, and progenitor cell maintenance [80,81]. Based on the scientific studies, it is believed that genistein regulates miRNAs expression to stop cell proliferation and up-regulates miR-200 expression, also regulate the essential targets such as vimentin, zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1), and slug, which help in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process [82,83]. Genistein could inhibit the tumor development in estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) negative breast cancer through remodeling the chromatin structure in the ERα promoter to reactivate the ERα expression [84]. In the below-mentioned section, we have focused various signaling pathways that are affected by these natural products.

3. Cellular Signaling Pathways as a Therapeutic Target for Cancer Therapy

Cellular signaling are multifaceted communication system consist of three-dimensional molecular cascades containing various signaling proteins. The precious molecular mechanism associated with these proteins are very specific to cell type, cell site, and intra-molecular interactions. Modulation in the homeostasis of these proteins leads to the diverse pathological diseased conditions. However, in case of cancer, alternation in cell signaling and cell communication leads to modulation in the expression of various critical genes associated with the normal functioning of the cells [13]. A series of mutation in numerous cancers associated genes, such as tumor-suppressor and oncogenes lead to cancer proliferation [85]. Early discovery of many oncogenes such as RAS, RAF, MYC, and KIT and several other tumor suppressor genes TP53, PTEN, and BRCA1 have led to the identification of several cancer-associated genetic lesions [86,87]. Currently, cellular signaling pathways and its associated molecular networks are documented for their important roles in regulation of pro-survival cellular processes and are thus predominantly involved in the onset of cancer, and in its prospective management. Many signaling pathways are associated with the development of cancer such as VEGF receptor pathway that activate RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway, and the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor pathway that stimulates multiple pathways, including the PI3K/Akt/mTOR, RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and act as signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathways [88,89]. In this review, we have emphasized not only some signaling pathways involved in solid cancer but also highlighted targeted strategies which helps to improve the clinical outcomes. Specifically, two pathways, the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway and Ras/MAPK pathway, are repeatedly activated, or mutated in many solid cancers.
PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway plays an important role in the regulation of several normal cellular activities that are also important for tumorigenesis such as cell survival, migration, cell cycle progression, angiogenesis, and EMT [16,90]. Aberrant regulation or activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR cascade is mainly involved in the development of various human cancers such as acute lymphoma (AML), T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), breast cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, and mantle cell lymphoma [91,92,93,94]. The activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway begins in the response of extracellular stimuli and growth factors leading to the activation of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) that make the autophosphorylation of tyrosine residues and transphosphorylation of adaptor proteins [94]. The phosphatidylinositol (PI)-3-kinase (PI3K) class Ia activation occurs as its Src homology (SH2) domains bind with the p85 regulatory unit to specific phosphotyrosine residues on the activated receptor or associated adaptor proteins, which helps the enzyme to move from cytosol to the plasma membrane and activates the p110 catalytic unit [16,95]. Activated PI3Ks acts as lipid kinase and phosphorylate phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) to produce the phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-triphosphate (PIP3) which further plays a crucial role in the form of second cellular messenger to control the cell growth, proliferation, and cell survival [16,96]. PIP3 starts the Akt activation through the recruitment of PDK-1 and the PKB on the plasma membrane, where PDK-1 makes the phosphorylation at Threonine(T)308 residue of Akt in the activation loop [97,98]. Consequently, Akt gets activated and moves to the cytosol and nucleus where it phosphorylates the different substrate downstream proteins including Bcl-2 associated agonist of cell death (BAD), forkhead box class O (FoxO) and glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3) α/β to support the cell growth, survival, and other cellular effects [99]. Furthermore, Akt indirectly activates its downstream target mTOR by phosphorylating and inhibiting tuberous sclerosis complex 1 and 2 (TSC1/2) at S939 and T1462 residues (Figure 2). Thus, mTOR positively regulates different cellular functions by promoting protein synthesis and inhibition of autophagy by releasing its inhibitory effects on Ras-related GTPase Rheb complex [100,101].
Another signaling pathway, the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) is comprised of different signaling cascade components and has been observed to be deregulated in various human cancer. The hyperactivation of Ras/RAF/MEK/ERK (MAPK) pathways is noted in more than 40% of human cancer cases [102]. A series of activated kinases send the extracellular signals to regulate the various cellular activities, including cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, cell growth, and cell migration. It is reported that abnormal or aberrant activation of RTKs or gain-of-function mutations in the RAS or RAF genes are the leading causes of alteration in RAS-MAPK in human cancer. For these reasons, the RAS-MAPK pathway is a well-established therapeutic target for cancer treatment and its management [103,104]. In resting cells, plasma membrane-associated Ras-GDP remains inactive with RAF, MEK, and ERK in the cytosol. However, in response to the exposure to extracellular stimuli (growth factors, hormones, and cytokines), RTK autophosphorylation begins to generate the binding sites for SHC and GRB2 adaptor molecules that recruit SOS and RasGEF (GTPase exchange factor) to the plasma membrane (Figure 3) to trigger the activation of RAF/MEK/ERK kinase cascade [105]. Furthermore, activated ERKs stay in the cytoplasm or move into the nucleus where they regulate the various physiological processes by phosphorylation of several substates [105,106,107].
These pathways are prominently interconnected in facilitating upstream signals from receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) to intracellular effector proteins and cell cycle regulators [108]. Interestingly, the signals transmitted from the extracellular space into the cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments, the PI3K and MAPK pathways are intensely connected via several positive and negative axis. Additionally, other signaling pathways linked with the process of EGFR activation are phospholipase C-g and the JNK. These molecular pathways participate primarily in processes of cell proliferation, cell migration, and transformation. Together, these signaling pathways regulates gene transcription, cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, survival, adhesion, angiogenesis, and cell migration in solid cancer [102,109]. Various kinases have been observed to be meticulously participate in the processes of tumor cell proliferation and survival [110]. Modulation in the RTK activity is the key mechanism of the tumor cells to escape from physiological controls on survival and growth. Atypical activation of RTK takes place due to receptor over-expression, gene amplification, mutations, and abnormal receptor regulation associated with the development of various forms of cancer in human [111]. In many solid cancers, the family of RTKs has been observed to be deregulated, leading to not only overexpression and amplification of EGFR but also unsuitable cellular stimulation. Receptor overexpression has been associated with a more aggressive clinical outcomes in numerous solid tumor types [112]. Most of the drug resistant and many chemotherapy-naive tumors are characterized by deregulated RTK signaling. Furthermore, pan-cancer analyses have exhibited rearrangements in chromosome due genomic instability, as the initial events in many cancer types like melanoma, glioblastoma, breast, and adenocarcinoma [86]. Moreover, the survival of cancers expressing hormonal receptors, such as prostate, breast, and ovarian cancers essentially depend on the growth signal induced by their relative hormones, such as estrogen and androgen. For the treatment per se of solid cancer a variety of anticancer drugs have been developed. These chemo drugs include the cytotoxic, cytostatic agents, and newer compound that interfere or impede with intracellular processes of solid cancer [113]. Some essential cancer-causing pathways and targets of natural products are presented in Figure 4.

4. Scientific Principles Related with Cancer Chemoprevention

Chemoprevention is the application of pharmacological or natural compounds for the inhibition of invasive cancer. It integrates the concept of delay which infers several years, or decades that might be added to human life cycle. Scientific interest in cancer biology research, especially in the area of chemoprevention has significantly improved with the advancement in the understanding of carcinogenesis and identification of potential molecular targets associated with this process. The process of carcinogenesis has been recognized as a clonal propagation and accumulation of genetic damage over the period. Chemopreventive compounds are potent to interrupt clonal propagation in abnormal cells by delaying DNA damage, impeding, or reversing the malignant phenotype, or promoting apoptosis in the impaired cells of premalignant lesions [114]. The importance of chemoprevention further improved by achieving the control of breast, colon, and prostate cancer. There are more than 10 natural product-based medications are approved by USFDA for the decline in cancer risk [115]. Recently, the concept of chemoprevention was considered as a vital and enthusiastic strategy for controlling solid cancer. It does not only play an essential role in preventing the growth of the invasive and metastatic potential of cancer (neoplasm) but also lowers the cancer prevalence rate. Chemoprevention strategy can be categorized into three parts: (1) primary prevention, impeding the growth of tumors in healthy individuals; (2) secondary prevention, inhibiting the growth of tumors in those individuals with precancerous lesions like invasion; (3) tertiary prevention, inhibiting recurrence or relapse of cancers in target patients [116]. Besides rigorous biomolecular validation, chemopreventive compounds must retain very less or no toxicity because they will be applied by an essentially healthy people at high cancer riskof. Numerous classes of compounds like cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors, retinoids, and sex hormone antagonists are very useful in the prevention of various epithelial cancers [117,118,119]. Similarly, various molecular mechanisms of action have been defined and efforts have been made to broadly classify the chemopreventive compounds according to different stages of carcinogenesis [120]. Nonetheless, it is likely that many compound, mainly derived from dietary ingredient have multi-targeted effects throughout the carcinogenic process. Agents that prevent cancer initiation are customarily termed ‘blocking agents’. They work by reducing the interaction between chemical carcinogens and DNA, thus reducing the level of damage [121]. Once beginning has arisen, chemopreventive compounds might impact on the promotion and progression of initiated cells; such compounds are frequently termed ‘suppressing agents’ [110]. Recent studies demonstrated that intervention in tumor metabolism and energy homoeostasis through AMPK and mTOR signaling pathways may be a striking tool for chemopreventive agents [122].

5. Role of Natural Products in the Management of Cancer

Since ancient times, local communities consume natural products and herbs in health care system for preventing several diseases, including cancer [20]. Approximately 40% of alternative therapies including natural product based herbal medicine were used for preventing various disease in the United States of America (USA). Generally natural products, as part of complementary medicine in the USA, have provided a basis to conduct the research for discovering novel plant-based medicinal agents, and more than half of currently existing drugs are based on natural products [123]. The epidemiological data also suggested that more than 50% of the approved anticancer agents are either natural compounds or natural product derivatives derived from herbal medicine [124,125].
Despite substantial development in the prevention and treatment of cancer, major gaps still exist, and further progresses are still required. Various studies have suggested that substantial application of plant-based therapeutics with ability to regulate physiological functions including flavonoids, phenolics, alkaloids, and organosulfur compounds, have been recognized to inhibit cancer in several in vivo and in vitro cancer models via different mechanisms [126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133]. However, very few evidence-based studies exist in the scientific literature regarding the application of biological natural agents and their associated molecular mechanism against solid cancer. Using modern technology and novel research strategies, more plant-derived components have been discovered for the management of advanced-stage cancer without significant collateral damage.
Natural product acquired from diverse sources indicates the ability to modulate numerous physiological signaling pathways such as apoptosis, metastasis, angiogenesis, and drug resistance (Figure 5), necessary for the treatment of cancer [127,134,135,136].
Therefore, it is imperative to apply various strategies for the management of this deadly diseases by using natural products, especially phytochemicals [137,138]. Various studies suggested the anticancer activity of natural products-based extract and its active ingredients in in-vitro cancer cell line models and pre-clinical animal models of many solid cancers [139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151]. Nature remains to be a rich source of biologically active and diverse chemotypes. Unfortunately, a small percentage of natural products are being developed into clinically (Table 1) effective drugs via exploitation of chemical techniques such as metabolomics, alteration of their biosynthetic pathways, and total or combinatorial fabrication [16,152].
Moreover, recent developments in the formulation strategies of novel biological active compounds may results in the more efficient application of drugs to the cancer patients. There are several tools such as fusion of toxic natural molecules to monoclonal antibodies and polymeric carriers precisely targeting epitopes on the membrane of targeted tumor cell result in the discovery and development of more active antitumor drugs [165]. Additionally, the scientific inputs and multidisciplinary alliances among various researchers around the globe are also required to optimize the most active biological compounds at the molecular level ultimately leading to significant control of cancer progression [147,148,149].

6. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

The high rate of mortality and morbidity in solid cancers remain a primary task for scientific investigation. Still conventional tools, such as surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy are effective in some patients but five-year survival rate in solid cancer patients is usually miserable. In most of the cases chemotherapy causes drug resistance and unwanted toxic side effects in the patients. In last decade, plant-derived natural compounds have been used as a potent candidate for the management of cancer. This review provides a deep understanding about the role of plant derived natural products in the treatment of cancer by modulating various signaling pathways. Natural compounds are evolving as a prospective therapeutic tool in cancer biology research owing to their easy accessibility and cost-effectiveness. Various natural agents are used in preclinical or clinical settings for the management of cancer [75,76]. Several epidemiological data suggest that high nutritional intake of fruits and vegetables reduce the risk of cancer [77]. The scientific evidence described in this article highlight the uninterrupted development and advancement in the field of plants based natural products research, demonstrating that it occupies a critical position in the use of chemopreventive compounds. The discovery and development of anticancer agents have steadily shifted from all those drugs having a single target and robust side effects to natural plant-based drugs with less or no toxicity. Most of the natural medicine typically affects more than one pathway (for instance triggering apoptosis, inhibiting cell proliferation, etc.). The multitarget potential of natural products allows them to efficiently offset the biological complication in cancer and offer favorable resources for cancer chemoprevention. Better understanding of cellular signaling pathways and its regulation may demonstrate a valuable strategy in cancer therapy. To discover the effective treatment approaches with least side effects and low cost, the researchers are encouraged to conduct research on natural resources, exclusively on plants and their active constituents. Therefore, it is essential to enhance the mechanistic and clinical based studies to discover novel and effective natural chemopreventive compounds. We believe that natural antitumor active ingredients and precursor drugs could provide an alternative or adjuvant treatment strategies in clinical medicine for the cure of solid cancer.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, original draft preparation, article writing, visualization, review, and editing, N.M.; software work, validation, data curation, review, and editing, D.U., M.T., H.N., M.A., R.R., S.T., T.A.Z., A.A. and I.J.H.; resources, review and editing, supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition, M.S. and T.A.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research work was funded by the Institutional Fund Projects under grant no. (IFPDP-8-22). Therefore, the authors gratefully acknowledge technical and financial support from Ministry of Education and Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University (KAU), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AktProtein kinase B
ASK1Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1
BADBCL2 associated agonist of cell death
EGFEpidermal growth factor
EGFREpidermal growth factor receptor
ERKExtracellular signal-regulated kinases
4EBP1Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1
FOXO1Forkhead box O1 protein
GAPGTPase-activating protein
IRS1Insulin receptor substrate 1
MEKMAPK/ERK kinase
MMP-9Matrix metalloproteinase-9
NF-κBNuclear Factor-κB
PDK13-Phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1
PKCProtein kinase C
PMAPhorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate
p70S6K1p70 Ribosomal S6 kinase 1
PTENPhosphatase and tensin homolog deleted in chromosome 10
VEGFVascular endothelial growth factor
PIP2Phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-bisphosphate
PI3KPhosphoinositide 3-kinases
mTORMammalian target of rapamycin
RafRapidly accelerated aibrosarcoma
Rheb GDPRas homolog enriched in brain GDP
Rheb GTPRas homolog enriched in brain GTP and.
RTKReceptor tyrosine kinases
RSKRibosomal s6 kinase
TSCTuberous sclerosis complex
ZEB1Zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1

References

  1. World Health Organization. International Agency for Research on Cancer; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. Nagai, H.; Kim, Y.H. Cancer prevention from the perspective of global cancer burden patterns. J. Thorac. Dis. 2017, 9, 448–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cho, W.C. Molecular Connections of Aging and Cancer. Aging Dis. 2017, 8, 685–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Bouvard, V.; Baan, R.; Straif, K.; Grosse, Y.; Secretan, B.; El Ghissassi, F.; Benbrahim-Tallaa, L.; Guha, N.; Freeman, C.; Galichet, L.; et al. A review of human carcinogens--Part B: Biological agents. Lancet Oncol. 2009, 10, 321–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lombard, D.B.; Chua, K.F.; Mostoslavsky, R.; Franco, S.; Gostissa, M.; Alt, F.W. DNA repair, genome stability, and aging. Cell 2005, 120, 497–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Sharifi-Rad, J.; Quispe, C.; Patra, J.K.; Singh, Y.D.; Panda, M.K.; Das, G.; Adetunji, C.O.; Michael, O.S.; Sytar, O.; Polito, L.; et al. Paclitaxel: Application in Modern Oncology and Nanomedicine-Based Cancer Therapy. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 2021, 3687700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Docea, A.O.; Mitruţ, P.; Grigore, D.; Pirici, D.; Călina, D.C.; Gofiţă, E. Immunohistochemical expression of TGF beta (TGF-β), TGF beta receptor 1 (TGFBR1), and Ki67 in intestinal variant of gastric adenocarcinomas. Rom. J. Morphol. Embryol. 2012, 53 (Suppl. S3), 683–692. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Housman, G.; Byler, S.; Heerboth, S.; Lapinska, K.; Longacre, M.; Snyder, N.; Sarkar, S. Drug resistance in cancer: An overview. Cancers 2014, 6, 1769–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome. Nature 2004, 431, 931–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. The ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium. Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes. Nature 2020, 578, 82–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Li, L.; Zhao, G.-D.; Shi, Z.; Qi, L.-L.; Zhou, L.-Y.; Fu, Z.-X. The Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway and its role in the occurrence and development of HCC. Oncol. Lett. 2016, 12, 3045–3050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Farooq, M.; Khan, A.W.; Kim, M.S.; Choi, S. The Role of Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) Signaling in Tissue Repair and Regeneration. Cells 2021, 10, 3242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mendoza, M.C.; Er, E.E.; Blenis, J. The Ras-ERK and PI3K-mTOR pathways: Cross-talk and compensation. Trends Biochem Sci. 2011, 36, 320–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Alharthy, S.A.; Tabrez, S.; Mirza, A.A.; Zughaibi, T.A.; Firoz, C.K.; Dutta, M. Sugiol Suppresses the Proliferation of Human U87 Glioma Cells via Induction of Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Arrest. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2022, 2022, 7658899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zughaibi, T.A.; Suhail, M.; Tarique, M.; Tabrez, S. Targeting PI3K/Akt/mTOR Pathway by Different Flavonoids: A Cancer Chemopreventive Approach. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Badar Ul Islam, n.; Khan, M.S.; Husain, F.M.; Rehman, M.T.; Zughaibi, T.A.; Abuzenadah, A.M.; Urooj, M.; Kamal, M.A.; Tabrez, S. mTOR Targeted Cancer Chemoprevention by Flavonoids. Curr. Med. Chem. 2021, 28, 8068–8082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Islam, B.; Suhail, M.; Khan, M.; Ahmad, A.; Zughaibi, T.; Husain, F.; Rehman, M.T.; Tabrez, S. Flavonoids and PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling cascade: A potential crosstalk in anticancer treatment. Curr. Med. Chem. 2021, 28, 8083–8097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Najmi, A.; Javed, S.A.; Al Bratty, M.; Alhazmi, H.A. Modern Approaches in the Discovery and Development of Plant-Based Natural Products and Their Analogues as Potential Therapeutic Agents. Molecules 2022, 27, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Islam, B.U.; Suhail, M.; Khan, M.K.; Zughaibi, T.A.; Alserihi, R.F.; Zaidi, S.K.; Tabrez, S. Polyphenols as anticancer agents: Toxicological concern to healthy cells. Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 6063–6079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Veeresham, C. Natural products derived from plants as a source of drugs. J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 2012, 3, 200–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bracke, M.E.; Vanhoecke, B.W.A.; Derycke, L.; Bolca, S.; Possemiers, S.; Heyerick, A.; Stevens, C.V.; De Keukeleire, D.; Depypere, H.T.; Verstraete, W.; et al. Plant polyphenolics as anti-invasive cancer agents. Anti-cancer. Agents Med. Chem. 2008, 8, 171–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Singh, S.; Sharma, B.; Kanwar, S.S.; Kumar, A. Lead Phytochemicals for Anticancer Drug Development. Front Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Sultana, S.; Munir, N.; Mahmood, Z.; Riaz, M.; Akram, M.; Rebezov, M.; Kuderinova, N.; Moldabayeva, Z.; Shariati, M.A.; Rauf, A.; et al. Molecular targets for the management of cancer using Curcuma longa Linn. phytoconstituents: A Review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 135, 111078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tomeh, M.A.; Hadianamrei, R.; Zhao, X. A Review of Curcumin and Its Derivatives as Anticancer Agents. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Hoda, N.; Naz, H.; Jameel, E.; Shandilya, A.; Dey, S.; Hassan, M.I.; Ahmad, F.; Jayaram, B. Curcumin specifically binds to the human calcium–calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV: Fluorescence and molecular dynamics simulation studies. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2016, 34, 572–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mengie Ayele, T.; Tilahun Muche, Z.; Behaile Teklemariam, A.; Bogale Kassie, A.; Chekol Abebe, E. Role of JAK2/STAT3 Signaling Pathway in the Tumorigenesis, Chemotherapy Resistance, and Treatment of Solid Tumors: A Systemic Review. J. Inflamm. Res. 2022, 15, 1349–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sun, Y.; Liu, L.; Wang, Y.; He, A.; Hu, H.; Zhang, J.; Han, M.; Huang, Y. Curcumin inhibits the proliferation and invasion of MG-63 cells through inactivation of the p-JAK2/p-STAT3 pathway. Oncol. Targets Ther. 2019, 12, 2011–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zhou, Y.; Sun, Y.; Hou, W.; Ma, L.; Tao, Y.; Li, D.; Xu, C.; Bao, J.; Fan, W. The JAK2/STAT3 pathway inhibitor, AG490, suppresses the abnormal behavior of keloid fibroblasts in vitro. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2020, 46, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pagliuca, A.; Valvo, C.; Fabrizi, E.; di Martino, S.; Biffoni, M.; Runci, D.; Forte, S.; De Maria, R.; Ricci-Vitiani, L. Analysis of the combined action of miR-143 and miR-145 on oncogenic pathways in colorectal cancer cells reveals a coordinate program of gene repression. Oncogene 2013, 32, 4806–4813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Y.; Sun, H.; Makabel, B.; Cui, Q.; Li, J.; Su, C.; Ashby Jr, C.R.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, J. The targeting of non-coding RNAs by curcumin: Facts and hopes for cancer therapy (Review). Oncol. Rep. 2019, 42, 20–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, Y.; Yu, X.; Chen, L.; Zhang, Z.; Feng, S. EZH2 overexpression is associated with poor prognosis in patients with glioma. Oncotarget 2016, 8, 565–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Hashem, S.; Ali, T.A.; Akhtar, S.; Nisar, S.; Sageena, G.; Ali, S.; Al-Mannai, S.; Therachiyil, L.; Mir, R.; Elfaki, I.; et al. Targeting cancer signaling pathways by natural products: Exploring promising anti-cancer agents. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 150, 113054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Adiwidjaja, J.; McLachlan, A.J.; Boddy, A.V. Curcumin as a clinically-promising anti-cancer agent: Pharmacokinetics and drug interactions. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2017, 13, 953–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wu, L.; Guo, L.; Liang, Y.; Liu, X.; Jiang, L.; Wang, L. Curcumin suppresses stem-like traits of lung cancer cells via inhibiting the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. Oncol. Rep. 2015, 34, 3311–3317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Katz, E.; Nisani, S.; Chamovitz, D.A. Indole-3-carbinol: A plant hormone combatting cancer. F1000Res 2018, 7, F1000-Faculty Rev-689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Marconett, C.N.; Singhal, A.K.; Sundar, S.N.; Firestone, G.L. Indole-3-carbinol disrupts estrogen receptor-alpha dependent expression of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor and insulin receptor substrate-1 and proliferation of human breast cancer cells. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2012, 363, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Lim, H.M.; Park, S.-H.; Nam, M.J. Induction of apoptosis in indole-3-carbinol-treated lung cancer H1299 cells via ROS level elevation. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2021, 40, 812–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tin, A.S.; Park, A.H.; Sundar, S.N.; Firestone, G.L. Essential role of the cancer stem/progenitor cell marker nucleostemin for indole-3-carbinol anti-proliferative responsiveness in human breast cancer cells. BMC Biol. 2014, 12, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Suhail, M.; Mohammad, T.; Naoshad, M.; Huma, N.; Abdul, H.; Torki, A.Z.; Mohammad, A.K.; Mohd, R. A Critical Transcription Factor NF-κB as a Cancer Therapeutic Target and its Inhibitors as Cancer Treatment Options. Curr. Med. Chem. 2021, 28, 4117–4132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fadlalla, K.; Elgendy, R.; Gilbreath, E.; Pondugula, S.R.; Yehualaeshet, T.; Mansour, M.; Serbessa, T.; Manne, U.; Samuel, T. 3-(2-Bromoethyl)-indole inhibits the growth of cancer cells and NF-κB activation. Oncol. Rep. 2015, 34, 495–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Hong, C.; Kim, H.A.; Firestone, G.L.; Bjeldanes, L.F. 3,3′-Diindolylmethane (DIM) induces a G1 cell cycle arrest in human breast cancer cells that is accompanied by Sp1-mediated activation of p21WAF1/CIP1 expression. Carcinogenesis 2002, 23, 1297–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Vivar, O.I.; Lin, C.-L.; Firestone, G.L.; Bjeldanes, L.F. 3,3′-Diindolylmethane Induces a G1 Arrest in Human Prostate Cancer Cells Irrespective of Androgen Receptor and p53 Status. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2009, 78, 469–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Martín-Ruiz, A.; Peña, L.; González-Gil, A.; Díez-Córdova, L.T.; Cáceres, S.; Illera, J.C. Effects of indole-3-carbinol on steroid hormone profile and tumor progression in a mice model of canine inflammatory mammarycancer. BMC Cancer 2018, 18, 626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lee, C.M.; Lee, J.; Nam, M.J.; Park, S.-H. Indole-3-Carbinol Induces Apoptosis in Human Osteosarcoma MG-63 and U2OS Cells. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 2018, e7970618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chedea, V.S.; Vicaş, S.I.; Sticozzi, C.; Pessina, F.; Frosini, M.; Maioli, E.; Valacchi, G. Resveratrol: From diet to topical usage. Food Funct. 2017, 8, 3879–3892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nawaz, W.; Zhou, Z.; Deng, S.; Ma, X.; Ma, X.; Li, C.; Shu, X. Therapeutic Versatility of Resveratrol Derivatives. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Zhao, Y.; Tang, H.; Zeng, X.; Ye, D.; Liu, J. Resveratrol inhibits proliferation, migration and invasion via Akt and ERK1/2 signaling pathways in renal cell carcinoma cells. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 98, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, Z.; Li, Y.; Yang, R. Effects of resveratrol on vascular endothelial growth factor expression in osteosarcoma cells and cell proliferation. Oncol. Lett. 2012, 4, 837–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Rauf, A.; Imran, M.; Butt, M.S.; Nadeem, M.; Peters, D.G.; Mubarak, M.S. Resveratrol as an anti-cancer agent: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 1428–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Imran, M.; Salehi, B.; Sharifi-Rad, J.; Aslam Gondal, T.; Saeed, F.; Imran, A.; Shahbaz, M.; Tsouh Fokou, P.V.; Umair Arshad, M.; Khan, H.; et al. Kaempferol: A Key Emphasis to Its Anticancer Potential. Molecules 2019, 24, 2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Sharifi-Rad, M.; Fokou, P.V.T.; Sharopov, F.; Martorell, M.; Ademiluyi, A.O.; Rajkovic, J.; Salehi, B.; Martins, N.; Iriti, M.; Sharifi-Rad, J. Antiulcer Agents: From Plant Extracts to Phytochemicals in Healing Promotion. Molecules 2018, 23, 1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Kashyap, D.; Sharma, A.; Tuli, H.S.; Sak, K.; Punia, S.; Mukherjee, T.K. Kaempferol—A dietary anticancer molecule with multiple mechanisms of action: Recent trends and advancements. J. Funct. Foods 2017, 30, 203–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Riahi-Chebbi, I.; Souid, S.; Othman, H.; Haoues, M.; Karoui, H.; Morel, A.; Srairi-Abid, N.; Essafi, M.; Essafi-Benkhadir, K. The Phenolic compound Kaempferol overcomes 5-fluorouracil resistance in human resistant LS174 colon cancer cells. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Choi, J.-B.; Kim, J.-H.; Lee, H.; Pak, J.-N.; Shim, B.S.; Kim, S.-H. Reactive Oxygen Species and p53 Mediated Activation of p38 and Caspases is Critically Involved in Kaempferol Induced Apoptosis in Colorectal Cancer Cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 9960–9967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lee, H.S.; Cho, H.J.; Yu, R.; Lee, K.W.; Chun, H.S.; Park, J.H.Y. Mechanisms Underlying Apoptosis-Inducing Effects of Kaempferol in HT-29 Human Colon Cancer Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 2722–2737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Yoshida, T.; Konishi, M.; Horinaka, M.; Yasuda, T.; Goda, A.E.; Taniguchi, H.; Yano, K.; Wakada, M.; Sakai, T. Kaempferol sensitizes colon cancer cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 375, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kim, S.-H.; Hwang, K.-A.; Choi, K.-C. Treatment with kaempferol suppresses breast cancer cell growth caused by estrogen and triclosan in cellular and xenograft breast cancer models. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2016, 28, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Tabrez, S.; Hoque, M.; Suhail, M.; Khan, M.I.; Zughaibi, T.A.; Khan, A.U. Identification of anticancer bioactive compounds derived from Ficus sp. by targeting Poly[ADP-ribose]polymerase 1 (PARP-1). J. King Saud Univ.-Sci. 2022, 34, 102079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, C.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, D.; Yu, Y.; Guo, H.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, B.; Yin, X. Inhibitory effects of kaempferol on the invasion of human breast carcinoma cells by downregulating the expression and activity of matrix metalloproteinase-9. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2015, 93, 16–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Suhail, M.; Parveen, A.; Husain, A.; Rehan, M. Exploring Inhibitory Mechanisms of Green Tea Catechins as Inhibitors of a Cancer Therapeutic Target, Nuclear Factor-κB (NF-κB). Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Asia 2019, 16, 715–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Reygaert, W.C. Green Tea Catechins: Their Use in Treating and Preventing Infectious Diseases. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 9105261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Sanna, V.; Singh, C.K.; Jashari, R.; Adhami, V.M.; Chamcheu, J.C.; Rady, I.; Sechi, M.; Mukhtar, H.; Siddiqui, I.A. Targeted nanoparticles encapsulating (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate for prostate cancer prevention and therapy. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Naponelli, V.; Ramazzina, I.; Lenzi, C.; Bettuzzi, S.; Rizzi, F. Green Tea Catechins for Prostate Cancer Prevention: Present Achievements and Future Challenges. Antioxidants 2017, 6, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Lin, R.-W.; Chen, C.-H.; Wang, Y.-H.; Ho, M.-L.; Hung, S.-H.; Chen, I.-S.; Wang, G.-J. (−)-Epigallocatechin gallate inhibition of osteoclastic differentiation via NF-kappaB. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 379, 1033–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Johnson, J.J.; Bailey, H.H.; Mukhtar, H. Green tea polyphenols for prostate cancer chemoprevention: A translational perspective. Phytomedicine 2010, 17, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Wei, R.; Wirkus, J.; Yang, Z.; Machuca, J.; Esparza, Y.; Mackenzie, G.G. EGCG sensitizes chemotherapeutic-induced cytotoxicity by targeting the ERK pathway in multiple cancer cell lines. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2020, 692, 108546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shirakami, Y.; Shimizu, M. Possible Mechanisms of Green Tea and Its Constituents against Cancer. Molecules 2018, 23, 2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Chen, B.-H.; Hsieh, C.-H.; Tsai, S.-Y.; Wang, C.-Y.; Wang, C.-C. Anticancer effects of epigallocatechin-3-gallate nanoemulsion on lung cancer cells through the activation of AMP-activated protein kinase signaling pathway. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Belobrov, S.; Seers, C.; Reynolds, E.; Cirillo, N.; McCullough, M. Functional and molecular effects of a green tea constituent on oral cancer cells. J. Oral. Pathol. Med. 2019, 48, 604–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Alserihi, R.F.; Mohammed, M.R.S.; Kaleem, M.; Khan, M.I.; Sechi, M.; Sanna, V.; Zughaibi, T.A.; Abuzenadah, A.M.; Tabrez, S. Development of (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate-loaded folate receptor-targeted nanoparticles for prostate cancer treatment. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2022, 11, 298–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bharrhan, S.; Koul, A.; Chopra, K.; Rishi, P. Catechin Suppresses an Array of Signalling Molecules and Modulates Alcohol-Induced Endotoxin Mediated Liver Injury in a Rat Model. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e20635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Tang, G.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wang, N.; Li, H.; Feng, Y. Green Tea and Epigallocatechin Gallate (EGCG) for the Management of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Diseases (NAFLD): Insights into the Role of Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Mechanism. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Calgarotto, A.K.; Longhini, A.L.; Pericole de Souza, F.V.; Duarte, A.S.S.; Ferro, K.P.; Santos, I.; Maso, V.; Olalla Saad, S.T.; Torello, C.O. Immunomodulatory Effect of Green Tea Treatment in Combination with Low-dose Chemotherapy in Elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Myelodysplasia-related Changes. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2021, 20, 15347354211002647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Huang, A.-C.; Cheng, H.-Y.; Lin, T.-S.; Chen, W.-H.; Lin, J.-H.; Lin, J.-J.; Lu, C.-C.; Chiang, J.-H.; Hsu, S.-C.; Wu, P.-P.; et al. Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), influences a murine WEHI-3 leukemia model in vivo through enhancing phagocytosis of macrophages and populations of T- and B-cells. In Vivo 2013, 27, 627–634. [Google Scholar]
  76. Tuli, H.S.; Tuorkey, M.J.; Thakral, F.; Sak, K.; Kumar, M.; Sharma, A.K.; Sharma, U.; Jain, A.; Aggarwal, V.; Bishayee, A. Molecular Mechanisms of Action of Genistein in Cancer: Recent Advances. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Goh, Y.X.; Jalil, J.; Lam, K.W.; Husain, K.; Premakumar, C.M. Genistein: A Review on its Anti-Inflammatory Properties. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 820969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Irrera, N.; Pizzino, G.; D’Anna, R.; Vaccaro, M.; Arcoraci, V.; Squadrito, F.; Altavilla, D.; Bitto, A. Dietary Management of Skin Health: The Role of Genistein. Nutrients 2017, 9, 622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Qi, W.; Weber, C.R.; Wasland, K.; Savkovic, S.D. Genistein inhibits proliferation of colon cancer cells by attenuating a negative effect of epidermal growth factor on tumor suppressor FOXO3 activity. BMC Cancer 2011, 11, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Deldar Abad Paskeh, M.; Asadi, S.; Zabolian, A.; Saleki, H.; Khoshbakht, M.A.; Sabet, S.; Naghdi, M.J.; Hashemi, M.; Hushmandi, K.; Ashrafizadeh, M.; et al. Targeting Cancer Stem Cells by Dietary Agents: An Important Therapeutic Strategy against Human Malignancies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Park, S.; Kim, H.; Kim, K.; Roh, S. Sonic hedgehog signalling regulates the self-renewal and proliferation of skin-derived precursor cells in mice. Cell Prolif. 2018, 51, e12500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Javed, Z.; Khan, K.; Herrera-Bravo, J.; Naeem, S.; Iqbal, M.J.; Sadia, H.; Qadri, Q.R.; Raza, S.; Irshad, A.; Akbar, A.; et al. Genistein as a regulator of signaling pathways and microRNAs in different types of cancers. Cancer Cell Int. 2021, 21, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Hsieh, P.-L.; Liao, Y.-W.; Hsieh, C.-W.; Chen, P.-N.; Yu, C.-C. Soy Isoflavone Genistein Impedes Cancer Stemness and Mesenchymal Transition in Head and Neck Cancer through Activating miR-34a/RTCB Axis. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Dehelean, C.A.; Marcovici, I.; Soica, C.; Mioc, M.; Coricovac, D.; Iurciuc, S.; Cretu, O.M.; Pinzaru, I. Plant-Derived Anticancer Compounds as New Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Alternative Therapy. Molecules 2021, 26, 1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Pons-Tostivint, E.; Thibault, B.; Guillermet-Guibert, J. Targeting PI3K Signaling in Combination Cancer Therapy. Trends Cancer 2017, 3, 454–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. van Krieken, J.H.J.M.; Jung, A.; Kirchner, T.; Carneiro, F.; Seruca, R.; Bosman, F.T.; Quirke, P.; Fléjou, J.F.; Plato Hansen, T.; de Hertogh, G.; et al. KRAS mutation testing for predicting response to anti-EGFR therapy for colorectal carcinoma: Proposal for an European quality assurance program. Virchows Arch. 2008, 453, 417–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Rastogi, C.; Rajanna, S.; Puri, N. Current Molecularly Targeted Therapies against EGFR for Cancer. J. Cancer Sci. 2013, 6, e131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Zhang, J.; Yang, P.L.; Gray, N.S. Targeting cancer with small molecule kinase inhibitors. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2009, 9, 28–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hojjat-Farsangi, M. Small-molecule inhibitors of the receptor tyrosine kinases: Promising tools for targeted cancer therapies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 13768–13801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Zeng, L.; Tang, M.; Pi, C.; Zheng, J.; Gao, S.; Chabanne, T.; Chauvin, R.; Cheng, W.; Lin, H.; Xu, R.; et al. Novel Ferrocene Derivatives Induce Apoptosis through Mitochondria-Dependent and Cell Cycle Arrest via PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signaling Pathway in T Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Cancers 2021, 13, 4677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Huang, T.-T.; Lampert, E.J.; Coots, C.; Lee, J.-M. Targeting the PI3K pathway and DNA damage response as a therapeutic strategy in ovarian cancer. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2020, 86, 102021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Owusu-Brackett, N.; Shariati, M.; Meric-Bernstam, F. Role of PI3K/AKT/mTOR in Cancer Signaling. In Predictive Biomarkers in Oncology: Applications in Precision Medicine; Badve, S., Kumar, G.L., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 263–270. [Google Scholar]
  93. Popova, N.V.; Jücker, M. The Role of mTOR Signaling as a Therapeutic Target in Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Miricescu, D.; Totan, A.; Stanescu-Spinu, I.-I.; Badoiu, S.C.; Stefani, C.; Greabu, M. PI3K/AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathway in Breast Cancer: From Molecular Landscape to Clinical Aspects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 22, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Yang, J.; Nie, J.; Ma, X.; Wei, Y.; Peng, Y.; Wei, X. Targeting PI3K in cancer: Mechanisms and advances in clinical trials. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Mandal, K. Review of PIP2 in Cellular Signaling, Functions and Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Toker, A.; Marmiroli, S. Signaling specificity in the Akt pathway in biology and disease. Adv. Biol. Regul. 2014, 55, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Truebestein, L.; Hornegger, H.; Anrather, D.; Hartl, M.; Fleming, K.D.; Stariha, J.T.B.; Pardon, E.; Steyaert, J.; Burke, J.E.; Leonard, T.A. Structure of autoinhibited Akt1 reveals mechanism of PIP3-mediated activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2101496118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Manning, B.D.; Toker, A. AKT/PKB Signaling: Navigating the Network. Cell 2017, 169, 381–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Manning, B.D.; Cantley, L.C. Rheb fills a GAP between TSC and TOR. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2003, 28, 573–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ballesteros-Álvarez, J.; Andersen, J.K. mTORC2: The other mTOR in autophagy regulation. Aging Cell 2021, 20, e13431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Yuan, J.; Dong, X.; Yap, J.; Hu, J. The MAPK and AMPK signalings: Interplay and implication in targeted cancer therapy. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2020, 13, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Santarpia, L.; Lippman, S.M.; El-Naggar, A.K. Targeting the MAPK-RAS-RAF signaling pathway in cancer therapy. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2012, 16, 103–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Lee, S.; Rauch, J.; Kolch, W. Targeting MAPK Signaling in Cancer: Mechanisms of Drug Resistance and Sensitivity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Wojnowski, L.; Stancato, L.F.; Larner, A.C.; Rapp, U.R.; Zimmer, A. Overlapping and specific functions of Braf and Craf-1 proto-oncogenes during mouse embryogenesis. Mech. Dev. 2000, 91, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Kong, T.; Liu, M.; Ji, B.; Bai, B.; Cheng, B.; Wang, C. Role of the Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2 Signaling Pathway in Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Degirmenci, U.; Wang, M.; Hu, J. Targeting Aberrant RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK Signaling for Cancer Therapy. Cells 2020, 9, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Mahipal, A.; Kothari, N.; Gupta, S. Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors: Coming of age. Cancer Control 2014, 21, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Shukla, Y.; Pal, S.K. Dietary Cancer Chemoprevention: An Overview. Int. J. Hum. Genet. 2004, 4, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Vincent, T.L.; Gatenby, R.A. An evolutionary model for initiation, promotion, and progression in carcinogenesis. Int. J. Oncol. 2008, 32, 729–737. [Google Scholar]
  111. Mohan, S.; Epstein, J.B. Carcinogenesis and cyclooxygenase: The potential role of COX-2 inhibition in upper aerodigestive tract cancer. Oral. Oncol. 2003, 39, 537–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Uray, I.P.; Dmitrovsky, E.; Brown, P.H. Retinoids and rexinoids in cancer prevention: From laboratory to clinic. Semin. Oncol. 2016, 43, 49–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Brook, N.; Brook, E.; Dass, C.R.; Chan, A.; Dharmarajan, A. Pigment Epithelium-Derived Factor and Sex Hormone-Responsive Cancers. Cancers 2020, 12, 3483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Abate-Shen, C.; Brown, P.H.; Colburn, N.H.; Gerner, E.W.; Green, J.E.; Lipkin, M.; Nelson, W.G.; Threadgill, D. The untapped potential of genetically engineered mouse models in chemoprevention research: Opportunities and challenges. Cancer Prev. Res. 2008, 1, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Din, F.V.N.; Valanciute, A.; Houde, V.P.; Zibrova, D.; Green, K.A.; Sakamoto, K.; Alessi, D.R.; Dunlop, M.G. Aspirin inhibits mTOR signaling, activates AMP-activated protein kinase, and induces autophagy in colorectal cancer cells. Gastroenterology 2012, 142, 1504–1515.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Gordaliza, M. Natural products as leads to anticancer drugs. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2007, 9, 767–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Karikas, G.A. Anticancer and chemopreventing natural products: Some biochemical and therapeutic aspects. J. BUON 2010, 15, 627–638. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  118. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M.; Snader, K.M. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the period 1981-2002. J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, 1022–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ma, X.; Wang, Z. Anticancer drug discovery in the future: An evolutionary perspective. Drug Discov. Today 2009, 14, 1136–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Widmer, N.; Bardin, C.; Chatelut, E.; Paci, A.; Beijnen, J.; Levêque, D.; Veal, G.; Astier, A. Review of therapeutic drug monitoring of anticancer drugs part two--targeted therapies. Eur. J. Cancer 2014, 50, 2020–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Abuzenadah, A.M.; Al-Sayes, F.; Mahafujul Alam, S.S.; Hoque, M.; Karim, S.; Hussain, I.M.R.; Tabrez, S. Identification of Potential Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1 Inhibitors Derived from Rauwolfia serpentina: Possible Implication in Cancer Therapy. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. Ecam 2022, 2022, 3787162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Wu, X.; Patterson, S.; Hawk, E. Chemoprevention--history and general principles. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2011, 25, 445–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Muhammad, N.; Steele, R.; Isbell, T.S.; Philips, N.; Ray, R.B. Bitter melon extract inhibits breast cancer growth in preclinical model by inducing autophagic cell death. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 66226–66236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Bhattacharya, S.; Muhammad, N.; Steele, R.; Kornbluth, J.; Ray, R.B. Bitter Melon Enhances Natural Killer-Mediated Toxicity against Head and Neck Cancer Cells. Cancer Prev. Res. 2017, 10, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Bhattacharya, S.; Muhammad, N.; Steele, R.; Peng, G.; Ray, R.B. Immunomodulatory role of bitter melon extract in inhibition of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma growth. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 33202–33209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Naz, H.; Tarique, M.; Khan, P.; Luqman, S.; Ahamad, S.; Islam, A.; Ahmad, F.; Hassan, M.I. Evidence of vanillin binding to CAMKIV explains the anti-cancer mechanism in human hepatic carcinoma and neuroblastoma cells. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2018, 438, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Naz, H.; Tarique, M.; Ahamad, S.; Alajmi, M.F.; Hussain, A.; Rehman, M.T.; Luqman, S.; Hassan, M.I. Hesperidin-CAMKIV interaction and its impact on cell proliferation and apoptosis in the human hepatic carcinoma and neuroblastoma cells. J. Cell Biochem. 2019, 120, 15119–15130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Balunas, M.J.; Kinghorn, A.D. Drug discovery from medicinal plants. Life Sci. 2005, 78, 431–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Cragg, G.M.; Newman, D.J. Plants as a source of anti-cancer agents. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 100, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Burns, J.; Yokota, T.; Ashihara, H.; Lean, M.E.J.; Crozier, A. Plant foods and herbal sources of resveratrol. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 3337–3340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Park, S.-H.; Kim, M.; Lee, S.; Jung, W.; Kim, B. Therapeutic Potential of Natural Products in Treatment of Cervical Cancer: A Review. Nutrients 2021, 13, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Li, Y.; Li, S.; Meng, X.; Gan, R.-Y.; Zhang, J.-J.; Li, H.-B. Dietary Natural Products for Prevention and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Nutrients 2017, 9, 728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Khan, N.; Mukhtar, H. Dietary agents for prevention and treatment of lung cancer. Cancer Lett. 2015, 359, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Man, S.; Luo, C.; Yan, M.; Zhao, G.; Ma, L.; Gao, W. Treatment for liver cancer: From sorafenib to natural products. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 224, 113690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Chinembiri, T.N.; du Plessis, L.H.; Gerber, M.; Hamman, J.H.; du Plessis, J. Review of natural compounds for potential skin cancer treatment. Molecules 2014, 19, 11679–11721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Abuzenadah, A.M.; Al-Sayes, F.; Mahafujul Alam, S.S.; Hoque, M.; Karim, S.; Hussain, I.M.R.; Tabrez, S. Elucidating Antiangiogenic Potential of Rauwolfia serpentina: VEGFR-2 Targeting-Based Molecular Docking Study. Evid. Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022, 2022, 6224666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Rajamanickam, S.; Agarwal, R. Natural products and colon cancer: Current status and future prospects. Drug Dev Res 2008, 69, 460–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Cardona-Mendoza, A.; Olivares-Niño, G.; Díaz-Báez, D.; Lafaurie, G.I.; Perdomo, S.J. Chemopreventive and Anti-tumor Potential of Natural Products in Oral Cancer. Nutr. Cancer 2022, 74, 779–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Park, M.N.; Song, H.S.; Kim, M.; Lee, M.-J.; Cho, W.; Lee, H.-J.; Hwang, C.-H.; Kim, S.; Hwang, Y.; Kang, B.; et al. Review of Natural Product-Derived Compounds as Potent Antiglioblastoma Drugs. Biomed. Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 8139848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Hwang, D.; Kim, M.; Park, H.; Jeong, M.I.; Jung, W.; Kim, B. Natural Products and Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Review Highlighting Mechanisms of Action. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Fontana, F.; Raimondi, M.; Marzagalli, M.; Di Domizio, A.; Limonta, P. Natural Compounds in Prostate Cancer Prevention and Treatment: Mechanisms of Action and Molecular Targets. Cells 2020, 9, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Haque, I.; Subramanian, A.; Huang, C.H.; Godwin, A.K.; Van Veldhuizen, P.J.; Banerjee, S.; Banerjee, S.K. The Role of Compounds Derived from Natural Supplement as Anticancer Agents in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 19, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Pistollato, F.; Calderón Iglesias, R.; Ruiz, R.; Aparicio, S.; Crespo, J.; Dzul Lopez, L.; Giampieri, F.; Battino, M. The use of natural compounds for the targeting and chemoprevention of ovarian cancer. Cancer Lett. 2017, 411, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Cragg, G.M.; Grothaus, P.G.; Newman, D.J. Impact of natural products on developing new anti-cancer agents. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 3012–3043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Basmadjian, C.; Zhao, Q.; Bentouhami, E.; Djehal, A.; Nebigil, C.G.; Johnson, R.A.; Serova, M.; de Gramont, A.; Faivre, S.; Raymond, E.; et al. Cancer wars: Natural products strike back. Front. Chem. 2014, 2, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Cragg, G.M.; Newman, D.J. Nature: A vital source of leads for anticancer drug development. Phytochem Rev. 2009, 8, 313–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Cragg, G.M.; Newman, D.J. Natural products: A continuing source of novel drug leads. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1830, 3670–3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  148. Dutta, S.; Sadhukhan, P.; Saha, S.; Sil, P.C. Regulation of Oxidative Stress by Different Naturally Occurring Polyphenolic Compounds: An Emerging Anticancer Therapeutic Approach. React. Oxyg. Species 2017, 3, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Zamora-Ros, R.; Béraud, V.; Franceschi, S.; Cayssials, V.; Tsilidis, K.K.; Boutron-Ruault, M.-C.; Weiderpass, E.; Overvad, K.; Tjønneland, A.; Eriksen, A.K.; et al. Consumption of fruits, vegetables and fruit juices and differentiated thyroid carcinoma risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. Int. J. Cancer 2018, 142, 449–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Wang, J.; Jiang, Y.-F. Natural compounds as anticancer agents: Experimental evidence. World J. Exp. Med. 2012, 2, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Grothaus, P.G.; Cragg, G.M.; Newman, D.J. Plant Natural Products in Anticancer Drug Discovery. Curr. Org. Chem. 2010, 14, 1781–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Tabrez, S.; Khan, A.U.; Mirza, A.A.; Suhail, M.; Jabir, N.R.; Zughaibi, T.A.; Alam, M. Biosynthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles and its therapeutic efficacy against colon cancer. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2022, 11, 1322–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Iriti, M.; Varoni, E.M. Chemopreventive Potential of Flavonoids in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Human Studies. Nutrients 2013, 5, 2564–2576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Shin, D.M.; Nannapaneni, S.; Patel, M.R.; Shi, Q.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Z.; Chen, A.Y.; El-Deiry, M.W.; Beitler, J.J.; Steuer, C.E.; et al. Phase Ib Study of Chemoprevention with Green Tea Polyphenon E and Erlotinib in Patients with Advanced Premalignant Lesions (APL) of the Head and Neck. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2020, 26, 5860–5868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Cruz-Correa, M.; Hylind, L.M.; Marrero, J.H.; Zahurak, M.L.; Murray-Stewart, T.; Casero, R.A.; Montgomery, E.A.; Iacobuzio-Donahue, C.; Brosens, L.A.; Offerhaus, G.J.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of Curcumin in Treatment of Intestinal Adenomas in Patients With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. Gastroenterology 2018, 155, 668–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Luo, Z.; Li, D.; Luo, X.; Li, L.; Gu, S.; Yu, L.; Ma, Y. Curcumin may serve an anticancer role in human osteosarcoma cell line U-2 OS by targeting ITPR1. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 15, 5593–5601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Pastorelli, D.; Fabricio, A.S.C.; Giovanis, P.; D’Ippolito, S.; Fiduccia, P.; Soldà, C.; Buda, A.; Sperti, C.; Bardini, R.; Da Dalt, G.; et al. Phytosome complex of curcumin as complementary therapy of advanced pancreatic cancer improves safety and efficacy of gemcitabine: Results of a prospective phase II trial. Pharmacol. Res. 2018, 132, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Pricci, M.; Girardi, B.; Giorgio, F.; Losurdo, G.; Ierardi, E.; Di Leo, A. Curcumin and Colorectal Cancer: From Basic to Clinical Evidences. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Williams, D.E. Indoles Derived From Glucobrassicin: Cancer Chemoprevention by Indole-3-Carbinol and 3,3’-Diindolylmethane. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Yerushalmi, R.; Bargil, S.; Ber, Y.; Ozlavo, R.; Sivan, T.; Rapson, Y.; Pomerantz, A.; Tsoref, D.; Sharon, E.; Caspi, O.; et al. 3,3-Diindolylmethane (DIM): A nutritional intervention and its impact on breast density in healthy BRCA carriers. A prospective clinical trial. Carcinogenesis 2020, 41, 1395–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Hwang, C.; Sethi, S.; Heilbrun, L.K.; Gupta, N.S.; Chitale, D.A.; Sakr, W.A.; Menon, M.; Peabody, J.O.; Smith, D.W.; Sarkar, F.H.; et al. Anti-androgenic activity of absorption-enhanced 3,3′-diindolylmethane in prostatectomy patients. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2016, 8, 166–176. [Google Scholar]
  162. Messing, E.; Gee, J.R.; Saltzstein, D.R.; Kim, K.; diSant’Agnese, A.; Kolesar, J.; Harris, L.; Faerber, A.; Havighurst, T.; Young, J.M.; et al. A phase 2 cancer chemoprevention biomarker trial of isoflavone G-2535 (genistein) in presurgical bladder cancer patients. Cancer Prev. Res. 2012, 5, 621–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  163. Honari, M.; Shafabakhsh, R.; Reiter, R.J.; Mirzaei, H.; Asemi, Z. Resveratrol is a promising agent for colorectal cancer prevention and treatment: Focus on molecular mechanisms. Cancer Cell Int. 2019, 19, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  164. Seca, A.M.L.; Pinto, D.C.G.A. Plant Secondary Metabolites as Anticancer Agents: Successes in Clinical Trials and Therapeutic Application. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  165. Gowd, V.; Ahmad, A.; Tarique, M.; Suhail, M.; Zughaibi, T.A.; Tabrez, S.; Khan, R. Advancement of cancer immunotherapy using nanoparticles-based nanomedicine. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2022; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of cancer types that could be prevented/managed by natural products (phytochemicals). IC3, Indol-3-carbinol.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of cancer types that could be prevented/managed by natural products (phytochemicals). IC3, Indol-3-carbinol.
Cells 11 02209 g001
Figure 2. Schematic overview of PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. BAD, BCL2 associated agonist of cell death; FOXO1, Forkhead box O1 protein; IRS1, Insulin receptor substrate 1; 4EBP1, Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1; p70S6K1, p70 Ribosomal S6 kinase 1; PIP2, Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate; PTEN, Phosphatase, and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10; PDK1, 3-Phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1; PP2A, Protein phosphatase 2A; Rheb GDP, Ras homolog enriched in brain GDP; Rheb GTP, Ras homolog enriched in brain GTP and TSC, Tuberous sclerosis complex.
Figure 2. Schematic overview of PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. BAD, BCL2 associated agonist of cell death; FOXO1, Forkhead box O1 protein; IRS1, Insulin receptor substrate 1; 4EBP1, Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1; p70S6K1, p70 Ribosomal S6 kinase 1; PIP2, Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate; PTEN, Phosphatase, and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10; PDK1, 3-Phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1; PP2A, Protein phosphatase 2A; Rheb GDP, Ras homolog enriched in brain GDP; Rheb GTP, Ras homolog enriched in brain GTP and TSC, Tuberous sclerosis complex.
Cells 11 02209 g002
Figure 3. Schematic representation of Ras/MAPK pathway. ERK, Extracellular signal-regulated kinase; GAP, GTPase-activating protein; PKC; Protein kinase C; PM, Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; RSK, Ribosomal s6 kinase.
Figure 3. Schematic representation of Ras/MAPK pathway. ERK, Extracellular signal-regulated kinase; GAP, GTPase-activating protein; PKC; Protein kinase C; PM, Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; RSK, Ribosomal s6 kinase.
Cells 11 02209 g003
Figure 4. Depiction of important cellular pathways regulated by natural products that could be utilized for therapeutic purpose in solid cancer.
Figure 4. Depiction of important cellular pathways regulated by natural products that could be utilized for therapeutic purpose in solid cancer.
Cells 11 02209 g004
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of cellular process regulated by different phytochemicals against various cancer forms.
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of cellular process regulated by different phytochemicals against various cancer forms.
Cells 11 02209 g005
Table 1. A list of phytochemicals as anticancer agents for different cancer in clinical trial.
Table 1. A list of phytochemicals as anticancer agents for different cancer in clinical trial.
PhytochemicalsClinical Trial Type and PhaseCancer/Conditions TypeReferences
QuercetinFor prevention, Phase not applicableProstate cancer[84]
For prevention, Phase IISquamous cell carcinoma[84]
Green tea catechinsFor prevention, Phase IIHigh breast density and postmenopausal in women[150]
For treatment, Phase IINeoplasm and multiple myeloma[150]
For treatment, Phase IIOral premalignant lesion[153]
For treatment, Phase IIBladder cancer[150]
For prevention, Phase IITobacco use disorder[150]
For treatment, Phase Ilung carcinoma[150]
Green tea polyphenon E and ErlotinibFor prevention, Phase ILesions of head and neck cancer[154]
CurcuminFor prevention, Phase IIFamilial adenomatous polyposis[155]
For treatment, Phase IAdvanced osteosarcoma[150,156]
For treatment, Phase IIAdvanced pancreatic cancer[157]
For prevention, Phase IColon cancer[150,158]
Indole-3-carbinol/3,3-diindolylmethane (IC3/DIM)For prevention, Phase IIProstate cancer progression[159]
For treatment, Phase IIBreast cancer[150]
For prevention, Phase IWomen carrying BRCA1 mutation[160]
(IC3/DIM) + Radical prostatectomyFor treatment, Phase IProstate cancer[150,161]
GenisteinFor prevention, Phase IIPatients with bladder cancer[162]
ResveratrolFor prevention, Phase IIColorectal cancer[163]
Betulinic acidFor treatment, Phase I/IIDysplastic nevi that can be change into melanoma[164]
Ingenol mebutateFor prevention, phase I/IIHuman non-melanoma skin cancer[164]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Muhammad, N.; Usmani, D.; Tarique, M.; Naz, H.; Ashraf, M.; Raliya, R.; Tabrez, S.; Zughaibi, T.A.; Alsaieedi, A.; Hakeem, I.J.; et al. The Role of Natural Products and Their Multitargeted Approach to Treat Solid Cancer. Cells 2022, 11, 2209. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11142209

AMA Style

Muhammad N, Usmani D, Tarique M, Naz H, Ashraf M, Raliya R, Tabrez S, Zughaibi TA, Alsaieedi A, Hakeem IJ, et al. The Role of Natural Products and Their Multitargeted Approach to Treat Solid Cancer. Cells. 2022; 11(14):2209. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11142209

Chicago/Turabian Style

Muhammad, Naoshad, Darksha Usmani, Mohammad Tarique, Huma Naz, Mohammad Ashraf, Ramesh Raliya, Shams Tabrez, Torki A. Zughaibi, Ahdab Alsaieedi, Israa J. Hakeem, and et al. 2022. "The Role of Natural Products and Their Multitargeted Approach to Treat Solid Cancer" Cells 11, no. 14: 2209. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11142209

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop