Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of In Vitro Morphogenic Response of Triticum urartu, a Donor of Au Genome of Modern Wheat
Next Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Genetic Diversity, Population Structure and Association Mapping for Late Blight Resistance in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Accessions Using SSR Markers
Previous Article in Journal
A Comparative Study on the Nutrients, Mineral Elements, and Antioxidant Compounds in Different Types of Cruciferous Vegetables
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Characterization of Diverse Wheat Genetic Resources for Resistance to Yellow Rust Pathogen (Puccinia striiformis)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Indian Mustard Genotypes for White Rust Resistance Using BjuWRR1Gene and Their Phenotypic Performance

1
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Central Agricultural University, Imphal 795004, Manipur, India
2
Directorate of Rapeseed-Mustard Research (ICAR), Bharatpur 321303, Rajasthan, India
3
ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Manipur Centre, Imphal 795004, Manipur, India
4
All India Co-ordinated Research Project (Soybean), College of Agriculture, Central Agricultural University, Imphal 795004, Manipur, India
5
All India Co-ordinated Research Project (Groundnut), College of Agriculture, Central Agricultural University, Imphal 795004, Manipur, India
6
Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Central Agricultural University, Imphal 795004, Manipur, India
7
All India Co-ordinated Research Project-Rapeseed-Mustard, College of Agriculture, Central Agricultural University, Imphal 795004, Manipur, India
8
Department of Biochemistry, Physiology, Microbiology and Environmental Science, College of Agriculture, Central Agricultural University, Imphal 795004, Manipur, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2022, 12(12), 3122; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12123122
Submission received: 16 September 2022 / Revised: 28 October 2022 / Accepted: 3 November 2022 / Published: 8 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Molecular Marker Technology in Crop Breeding)

Abstract

:
The present investigation was carried out to identify the potential donors of resistant gene(s)/the source of white rust disease in B. juncea using 30 genotypes, including locally adapted accessions and advanced breeding lines. Out of 30 genotypes, ten lines viz. Bio-YSR, CAULC-1, CAULC-2, CAULC-3, CAULC-4, CAURM-2, CAULR-7, CAURM-4, CAURM 4-1, and CAURM 4-2 exhibited a lower PDI value (lesser than mean 10.83) with a superior agronomic performance related with the disease. The evaluation of these ten genotypes for the presence of the BjuWRR1 gene using a gene-based marker depicted the presence of the functional allele of the BjuWRR1 gene in the five genotypes viz., Bio-YSR, CAULC-1, CAULC-3, CAURM 4-1 and CAURM 4-2. When compared with the sequenced amplicon of these genotypes, it is found to be identical with that of an east European Brassica juncea line, Donskaja-IV, the completely resistant genotype against various isolates of Albugo candida. The findings from the present study suggested that besides Bio-YSR, the local lines of Manipur CAULC-1 (Local Yella of Potshangbam) and CAULC-3 (Local Yella of Kakching Lamjao) can be used as the potential white rust resistance sources/donors in disease resistance breeding programmes for the development of elite B. juncea cultivars in the future. In addition to the local lines, two improved advanced lines, viz. CAURM 4-1 and CAURM 4-2, obtained from a hybridization programme, may be further evaluated for releasing resistant varieties against white rust.

1. Introduction

Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea), belonging to the rapeseed-mustard group of oilseed crops, is a very economically important oilseed crop in India which is presently being cultivated over an acreage of 6.82 mha [1]. It is also becoming a very popular and profit-making oilseed crop of north-eastern India, particularly in the states of Assam, Manipur and Meghalaya. It is being grown worldwide, especially for its oil, and it is also preferred as a condiment or as a green leafy vegetable in some parts of the world [2]. However, a number of biotic and abiotic stresses are affecting the overall production and productivity of this crop. Among the biotic stresses, white rust caused by a biotrophic oomycete, Albugo candida (Pers.) Kuntze, is a serious disease of Indian mustard [3]. Phenotypically, white rust disease is characterized by the presence of white blister or pustules on cotyledon, the abaxial leaf surface, inflorescence, the base of leaf petiole/stem and the formation of the stag head at the later stage of the plant, if a severe infestation occurs in the plant. The infestation of pathogen prefers a cold night with warm days and the additional soil moisture after it has rained. In India, almost all the commercially released mustard varieties are susceptible to white rust disease [4,5]. The yield loss encountered by A. candida in B. juncea ranges from 10 to 70% in India, and sometimes it reaches up to 90% depending upon the severity of disease and the environmental conditions prevailing during the season [6]. Additionally, the Indian gene pool of B. juncea is highly susceptible to A. candida as compared to the east European gene pool [4,5]. As a common disease management practice, use of fungicides has been followed by most of the mustard growers, which ultimately affects the environment. However, it is of a well-known fact that the availability of resistant varieties is one of the cheapest and environmentally friendly options.
The host resistance mechanism is dependent on two defence mechanisms, i.e., first on the cell surface of the host by the recognition of the conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) of the invading pathogen, and the second is the recognition of the pathogen-secreted effectors (Avr) via the intercellular receptors encoded by the R gene (s), called (ETI) mechanism or effector-triggered immunity [7]. The resistance R gene of A. Candida was earlier reported as a dominant monogenic gene in B. juncea [8,9]. Different R genes were studied in the different Brassica species viz. AC-1 [10] and AC-2 [11]. A single major white rust resistance locus ACB1-A4.1 was mapped on the linkage group A04 in Heera (the partially resistant east European line), and the ACB1–A5.1 locus present on the linkage group A05 in Donskaja–IV (fully resistant east European line) of B. juncea [4]. Borhan et al. [12,13] reported three loci RAC1, RAC2 and RAC3 from two accessions, Ksk-1 and Ksk-2, and WRR4 from the accession Col of Arabidopsis thaliana. The WRR4 gene was reported to be a broad-spectrum disease resistance gene against various races of pathogen (race1, race2, race4, race7 and race9) in A. thaliana and showed a complete resistance against race2 while race7 in B. juncea and B. napus, respectively [14]. Apart from the WRR4 gene in Arabidopsis, BjuWRR1 (a constructively expressing gene encoding CC-NB-LRR domain-containing protein) gene provides a complete resistance against A. candida and its allelic diverseness in different Brassica germplasm was also reported [15]. The BjuWRR1 gene was identified from a resistance-conferring locus, earlier mapped as AcB1-A5.1 in the east European gene pool of B. juncea-Donskaja-IV. Additionally, the CNL type of the R gene (BjuA046215/BjuWRR2) was mapped in the B. juncea -Varuna and Turmida F1DH lines [16].
The identification of more stable R gene (s) is a prerequisite practice to improve the disease management efficacy, apart from the white rust-resistant plant varieties that have been developed. The ideal pre-breeding resources may help in Brassica improvement programs and potential parents can be used as the donor line for developing durable disease-resistant plant varieties while maintaining the strong performance traits of elite varieties. So, the exploration of the available genetic resources, the evaluation and the exploitation of the promising disease tolerant lines is a realistic alternative and sustainable way to optimize the crop production without using a chemical approach. It is of the fact that traditionally grown primitive cultivars and the wild relatives of cultivated plants are the basic genetic resources that not only sustained the present-day crop improvement but are also required to meet the aspirations of future generations to face the unforeseen challenges of biotic and abiotic stresses. Therefore, the chief objective of this study was to identify the presence of the R gene (BjuWRR1) as well as to screen the available Indian mustard genotypes, including the locally adapted genotypes against white rust disease with desirable agronomic traits, which is in close relation with the disease.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

The plant material in the present investigation was comprised of 30 genotypes of Indian mustard (24 germplasm accessions/varieties with 6 checks), including 4 local germplasm/accessions collected from different parts of Manipur (CAULC-1, CAULC-2, CAULC-3 and CAULC-4) and 7 fixed advanced lines (CAURM-1, CAURM-2, CAURM-5, CAURM 4-3, CAURM 4-2, CAURM-4 and CAURM-4-1) (Table 1). All the thirty genotypes were screened for the phenotypic expression of white rust disease under natural field conditions during Rabi season 2018–19 at the experimental field of the Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, CAU, Imphal, Manipur. The experiment was conducted in a complete augmented block design (ABD) in 4 blocks with 6 check varieties. Each block was spaced by 1 m. The row-to-row and plant-to-plant distances were maintained at 30 cm and 15 cm, respectively. The six check varieties consisted of BIO-YSR and JM-1 as resistant, Basanti and NRCHB-101 as tolerant and Varuna and NRCDR-2 as susceptible, which were planted at random within every block. The recommended agronomic practices like thinning, weeding, fertilizer application, etc., were followed, but fungicides were avoided during the crop season to provide a maximum disease pressure in the natural field condition.

2.2. Disease Reaction

Observations on the occurrence of the disease for analysing the percent disease index (PDI) were taken from 10 randomly selected plants in each line of each block at 8-day intervals during the vegetative as well as true leaf stage, i.e., 42 days after sowing (DAS), 50 DAS, 58 DAS, 66 DAS and 74 DAS under natural conditions. The disease incidence was recorded following a 0–9 scale of Fox and William [17], as follows:
  • Zero (immune for WR): no lesions on either cotyledon surface.
  • One (HR): non-sporulating pin-point size necrotic spot/a >5% leaf area covered by lesions.
  • Three (R): slightly sporulating minute 1–2 mm diameter necrotic spot/5–10% leaf area covered by lesions.
  • Five (MR): moderately sporulating small pustules of about a 2–4 mm diameter for larger spots/a 11–25% leaf area covered by the spots.
  • Seven (S): moderately sporulating, many large pustules of about a 4–5 mm diameter/a 26–50% leaf area covered by the lesions.
  • Nine (HS): profusely sporulating, large coalescing pustules of a > 6 mm diameter/a > 50% leaf area covered by the lesions without margins.
Average   severity   score =   ( n   X   0 ) + ( n   X   1 ) + ( n   X   3 ) + ( n   X   5 ) + ( n   X   7 ) + ( n   X   9 )     N u m b e r   o f   l e a f   s a m p l e s
PDI   ( % ) =   ( n   X   0 ) + ( n   X   1 ) + ( n   X   3 ) + ( n   X   5 ) + ( n   X   7 ) + ( n   X   9 ) T o t a l   n u m b e r   o f   p l a n t s / l e a v e s   o b s e r v e d   X   M a x i m u m   d i s e a s e   s c o r e   ( 9 )
where n = the number of leaves in the respective score.

2.3. Phenotypic Evaluation

The following observations were recorded to select the better agronomically performing genotype apart from the percent disease index.
  • Days to 50% flowering: The number of days counted from the date of sowing to the date of attainment of a 50% flowering was recorded on plot basis.
  • Days to 80% maturity: The number of days taken from the date of sowing to 80% siliqua turning yellow was recorded on plot basis.
  • 1000 seed weight (g): The mean weight of a 1000 seed weight was recorded from the selected plants.
  • Seed yield/Plant (g): The total yield produced by individual plants were recorded from the selected plants.
  • Oil content (%): The total oil content of the samples was recorded using a pre-calibrated seed grader machine (FOSS InfratecTM1241 Grain Analyzer) of selected plants for each genotype.

Statistical Analysis of the Data

An analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the genetics parameters (PCV-Phenotypic coefficient of variance, GCV-Genotypic coefficient of variance, h2- Heritability at broad sense and GAM-genetic advance as percent mean) of the five phenotypic data were calculated using the R studio software, version 4.2.1.

2.4. Physiological Evaluation (Stomatal Density Analysis)

The leaf samples of 45 days old plants were taken by peeling of the leaf from the lower epidermis. The thin slice of epidermis was treated with a drop of saffranine solution, followed by keeping on the slide, and covered with a coverslip for an observation under a microscope. The stomata were observed under a microscope at 40X with the help of Bio wizard 4.2 image analysis software. The average number of stomata in each leaf was counted from three images per samples.

2.5. Screening of BjuWRR1 Gene

The plant genomic-DNA was isolated from two-week-old seedling using the CTAB method [18]. The extracted genomic-DNA was quantified using a spectrophotometer. For quality checking, the DNA samples were run on 0.8% agarose gel and thereafter documented the gel using Image Lab Software in the Gel DocTM XR+ BIO-RAD (Hercules, CA, USA). The concentrated DNA samples were diluted to 100 ng/μL using 1 X TE buffer and stored at −20 °C for further use. A PCR amplification was carried out using gene-specific primers to determine the presence/absence of the BjuWRR1 gene which is mapped at AcB1–A5.1 on the locus [15] (Table 2). The PCR reaction was carried out in a 20 μL reaction volume containing 2 μL of 10 × Taq buffer, 2.0 μL of 50 mM MgCl2 solution, 1.5 μL of 2.5 mM dNTPs mixture and 0.5 μL of each of the forward and reverse primers at a concentration of 10 pmole/μL, 0.2 μL of 3 U/μL Taq DNA polymerase, 4 μL of diluted genomic DNA (100 ng/μL) and 8.3 μL of nuclease-free water.
The PCR was performed using a thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, 2720 Thermal Cycler) with the following cycle: an initiation denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 55 °C for 1 min and an extension at 72 °C for 1 min and a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. The PCR products were separated on a 3% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide, in a 1X TAE buffer. Thereafter, a gel documentation was followed.

2.6. Multiple Sequence Alignment ofBjuWRR1 Gene

In order to further confirm the sequence similarity of the BjuWRR1 gene (encoding CC–NB–LRR-type proteins) sequence from the different genotypes, a partial sequencing of the PCR-amplified regions using primers (BjuWRR1) was done using a Sanger sequencing technique. The sequences of five genotypes such as CAULC-1, CAULC-3, CAURM4-1, CAURM 4-2 and BIO-YSR were successfully submitted to NCBI. The assembled gene sequence was annotated with the reference gene sequence of BjuWRR1 (available in BRAD database) and compared using BLASTn for the nucleotide sequence in the non-redundant (nr) databases of NCBI. The best blast hit was determined from among the score and E-values of the sequences, producing significant alignments [19].
A dendrogram was generated by using the UPGMA clustering method in MEGA Software, Version 11 [20]. The known gene sequence of A. thaliana (NM104527.4) and B. juncea (MK469977.1) conferring resistance against white rust disease was downloaded from the NCBI or BRAD database. The gene sequence of five genotypes along with Arabidopsis and B. juncea were subjected to multiple sequence alignment (MSA) using the ClustalW algorithm in BioEdit software (http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/BioEdit/bioedit.html; accessed on 12 January 2022), followed by the development of dendrogram analysis using MEGA Software.

3. Results

3.1. Disease Reaction and Phenotypic Evaluation

The phenotypic disease reaction (0–9 scale), collected at 8-day intervals among 30 genotypes of Indian mustard evaluated for a white rust disease reaction under a natural field condition, showed a significant variation (Figure 1 and Figure 2, Table 3). The percent disease index (PDI) of the genotypes calculated from the phenotypically recorded disease reaction ranged from 2.44 to 22.31, with a general mean value of 7.70 (Table 3). A significantly lower PDI value than the general mean as well as the resistant check variety BIO-YSR (9.87) were recorded by the local genotypes collected from various parts of Manipur state, India, such as CAULC-4 (2.44) from Sekmai, followed by CAULC-3 (2.80) from Kakching Lamjao, CAULC-2 (3.73) from Kakching Wairi, CAULC-1 (4.11) from Awang Potshangbam and CAUR-7 (6.42) broad leaf mustard from Imphal. On the other hand, the highest PDI was observed in the genotype Varuna (22.31) (national check susceptible line), followed by RH-30 (21.09). However, no complete immunity against white rust disease was observed among the genotypes studied in the present investigation.
Data on the phenotypic traits viz., the days to a 50% flowering, the days to an 80% maturity, the seed yield/plant (g), the 1000 seed weight (g), the oil content (%), using a FOSS InfratecTM1241 Grain Analyzer, and the number of stomata/mm2 were recorded to support the selection of promising Indian mustard lines. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant variation in most of the traits studied except for the seed yield/plant (infected) and oil content (Table S1). However. the highest seed yield/plant was recorded for the genotype RH-749 (8.80 g in the non-infected and 4.99 g in the infected plants), followed by Urvashi (7.81 g in the non-infected and 5.17 g in the infected plants) and RH-30 (7.69 g in the non-infected and 3.56 g in the infected plants). Out of which, RH-30 showed both a high mean PDI as well as a high seed yield/plant. The genotype PM-28 flowered and matured at the earliest date (46 days and 113 days) as compared to other lines. The highest oil content was found in CAURM-4 (48.91%), followed by CAUMC-28 (46.16%) and CAURM-5 (45.45%).
In general, the phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV) was found to be higher than the genotypic coefficient variation (GCV) in all the traits considered, but with the least difference between the PCV and GCV. The broad sense heritability was highest for the characters 1000 seed weight (98.57%), followed by the days to an 80% maturity (96.78%), days to a 50% flowering (95.99%) and the PDI (85.49%). A low heritability was observed in the seed yield of the infected plants (47.66%), while a high heritability (98.57%) coupled with s high genetic advance at the percent mean (57.59) was observed only for the character 1000 seed weight.

3.2. Stomatal Density with Disease Infection

In plants, A. candida enters into the plant host cell via the stomata. In the case of the preformed resistance system, the stomatal density was examined in order to help in identifying the resistant genotypes. In the present study, no systematic pattern of the increase or decrease value was observed for the character stomatal density as compared with the PDI value. However, the genotypes possessing a moderate to higher number of stomatal densities/mm2 showed a higher PDI viz., Varuna (PDI-22.31), RH-30 (PDI-21.09) and NRCDR-2 (PDI- 12.06) possessed 114.67/mm2, 173.33/mm2 and 168/mm2, respectively. While the genotypes CAULC-4 (PDI-2.44) and CAULC-3 (PDI-2.80) possessed 74.67/mm2 and 69.33/mm2, respectively. (Table 4). Genotypes possessing a lower PDI value viz., CAULC-2 (PDI-3.73), CAULC-1 (PDI-2.19) and CAULR-7 (PDI-6.42) showed a high stomatal density (130.67/mm2), (146.67/mm2) and (117.33/mm2), respectively.

3.3. Validation and Screening of BjuWRR1 Gene

The current study used the previously characterized white rust resistance gene BjuWRR1 which was validated in two check lines, i.e., Varuna (susceptible) and Bio-YSR (resistant), to test the marker efficiency (Figure 3). The amplicon size of both cultivars was similar to the expected amplicon size, as reported in Donskaja-IV [15], which indicated that the selected marker was working to differentiate between the susceptible and resistant lines. In the present study, ten lines exhibited a less than the mean PDI value (10.83) with a desirable phenotypic performance viz., Bio-YSR, CAULC-1 (Awang Potshangbam, Manipur), CAULC-2 (Kakching Wairi, Manipur), CAULC-3 (Kakching Lamjao, Manipur), CAULC-4 (Sekmai, Manipur), CAURM-2, CAULR-7, CAURM-4, CAURM 4-1 (CAULC-1 X Kranti) and CAURM 4-2 (CAULC-1 x Bio-902), which were selected for genotyping using candidate the gene-based marker of the BjuWRR1gene. Out of these 10 lines, only five lines viz., Bio-YSR, CAULC-1, CAULC-3, CAURM 4-1 and CAURM 4-2 exhibited the presence of a positive allele of BjuWRR1(Figure 4).

3.4. Multiple Sequence Alignment of BjuWRR1 Gene

In the present study, the sequencing of BjuWRR1(using NovaSeq 6000-Illumina) amplicons revealed a high level of similarity between the east European line Donskaja-IV, completely resistance against various isolates of A. candida and local lines of Manipur, namely CAULC-1 (Awang Potshangbam, Manipur, India), CAULC-3 (Kakching Lamjao, Manipur, India), CAULC-4, CAURM 4-1, CAURM4-2 and BIO-YSR, respectively (Table S2). The sequence analysis using nucleotide (BLASTn) revealed highest identity with the query sequence was found in CAULC-3 line and followed by CAURM 4-1 and BIO-YSR (Table 4).
The UPGMA (the unweighted pair group method with an arithmetic mean) is a simple and straightforward approach to construct a phylogenetic tree from a distance matrix. Based on a dendrogram, the seven sequence/genotypes separated into two distinct major clusters, I and II (Figure 5A), and amplicon sequences showing the presence of the BjuWRR1 gene are presented in Table S2. In cluster I, there was only A. thaliana indicating the distinctness of the WRR1 of Arabidopsis from B. juncea. On the other hand, the major cluster II consisted of the remaining six sequences of B. juncea. The cluster II was further divided into two sub-clusters (IIA and IIB). The B. juncea lines, CAULC 1 in IIA cluster and other such as CAULC-3, CAURM 4-1, CAURM4-2, BIO-YSR and B. juncea (MK469977.1) in the IIB sub-cluster. The CAULC-3 and B. juncea (MK469977.1) were more similar compared to rest of the genotypes.

4. Discussion

The percent disease index (PDI) of all the 30 genotypes of Indian mustard exhibited a wide variation, ranging from 2.44 to 22.31. The significant differences in the disease infection rate at the same environmental condition among the 30 genotypes of B. juncea indicated a different inherent potentiality of each genotype. The genotypes collected from various parts of Manipur, India viz., CAULC-4 from Sekmai, exhibited the lowest PDI value (2.44), followed by CAULC-3 (2.80) from Kakching Lamjao, CAULC-2 (3.73) from Kakching Wairi, CAULC-1 (4.11) from Awang Potshangbam and CAULR-7 (6.42) from Imphal, in comparison to the national check variety Bio YSR (9.87). This may be due the genetic mechanism of the local genotypes which have been grown for a long time and co-adapted with the environment. Previously, several researchers [9,21,22] have also used the same national resistant check line (BIO-YSR) in their studies on the genetics of white rust resistance. However, complete immunity was not found in the genotypes studied. Similar results were also reported in 74 Indian mustard (B. juncea) germplasm lines for a resistance against white rust disease where none of the genotype was found to be resistant [23]. Awasthi et al. [5] reported that almost all the important varieties of B. juncea being grown in India were susceptible to white rust.
The highest grain yield/plant in RH-749, Urvashi and RH-30 with a high mean PDI value may be due to their genetic mechanism to reduce the disease infection. The phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV) was found to be higher than the genotypic coefficient variation (GCV) in all the traits considered. However, the minimum differences between PCV and GCV indicated little environmental effect, influencing the expression of these characters.
The high magnitude of the heritability for the 1000 seed weight (98.57%) coupled with high genetic advances at the percent mean (57.59) indicated that the character is governed by an additive gene action and, therefore, a direct selection could be performed. Similar results of a high heritability for the seed weight (93.68) were also reported by Yadav et al. (2020) [24]. The highest oil content was found in CAURM-4 (48.91%), followed by CAUMC-28 (46.16%) and CAURM-5 (45.45%), which inferred the use of these genotypes for trait-specific breeding.
In plants, A. candida enters into the plant’s host cell via the stomata. Conversely, the plant’s cell has several mechanisms to protect themselves from the pathogen infection. Preformed resistance (the thickness of cuticle and cell wall, the presence of antimicrobial chemicals and enzyme inhibitors, etc.) is one of the disease defence mechanisms, besides an induced resistance system. In the case of the preformed resistance system, the stomatal density was examined in order to help in identifying the resistant genotypes. Two locally collected germplasm lines viz. CAULC-4 (PDI-2.44) and CAULC-3 (PDI-2.80) possessed 74.67 mm2 and 69.33/mm2 stomatal densities, respectively, thus conferring those lower stomatal densities contributed to the disease resistance. The results of Tateda et al. [25] and Dutton et al. [26] reported that less stomatal density on the leaves shows less disease infection, which may be due to a greater number of stomata providing a primary entry point for the pathogen. However, the line CAULC-2, CAULC-1 and CAULR-7 showed a high stomatal density (130.67/mm2), (146.67/mm2) and (117.33/mm2), with a low PDI value (3.73), (4.11) and (6.42), which may be due to certain physiological/biochemical defence mechanisms.
Based on the above results, it has been observed that the genotypes collected from the Manipur region exhibited more tolerance to the white rust pathogen than the other commercial varieties of Indian mustard under the natural conditions of Manipur. This may be due to the adaptation of these genotypes as these have been cultivated in Manipur for so many years, or the presence of a different candidate gene other than BjuWRR1 located at the Ac. B1-A5.1 locus [15].
The molecular markers that are tightly linked to the desired trait help to select the better parents at any stage of the plant [27]. Out of the 10 selected genotypes for candidate gene validation, only five lines viz., Bio-YSR, CAULC-1, CAULC-3, CAURM 4-1 and CAURM 4-2, exhibited the presence of a positive allele of BjuWRR1. These genotypes may be employed as the potential donors of the BjuWRR1gene in white rust disease resistance breeding programmes. The remaining five lines, which are still expressing a resistance reaction, but do not contain a BjuWRR1 gene such as CAULC-2, CAULC-4, CAURM-2, CAULR-7 and CAURM-4 would be useful for the identification of novel gene(s) for white rust disease resistance. The major disease resistance protein including TIR-NB-LRR, CC-NB-LRR, CC-NBS-LRR, etc. were identified against A. candida in several Brassicaceae species [12,13,15,16].
The sequence analysis showed the highest identity with the query sequence found in the CAULC-3 line, CAURM 4-1 and BIO-YSR. The UPGMA divided all the seven sequence/genotypes into two distinct major clusters (I & II).

5. Conclusions

The present study is the first report of evaluating different B. juncea genotypes against white rust disease in north-eastern India using a candidate gene-based approach. Under natural epiphytotic conditions, the Indian mustard genotypes mostly from Manipur (five local and two fixed advanced lines) exhibited a resistance to A. candida, out of which five were found to have the already characterized gene responsible for white rust resistance in an east European germplasm accession of Indian mustard, i.e., Donskaja-IV. The other five genotypes which were not possessing this gene might have another gene encoding for this resistance mechanism which needs to be explored using genetic mapping studies. The white rust resistant Indian mustard genotypes identified in the present study (Bio-YSR, CAULC-1, CAULC-3, CAURM 4-1 and CAURM 4-2) may be employed as donors in white rust breeding programmes and/or further evaluated for releasing as varieties conferring a resistance against white rust in future research endeavours.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy12123122/s1, Table S1: ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) using Augmented Block Design; Table S2: List of amplicon sequences showing the presence of BjuWRR1 gene.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and research planning, T.R.D.; data curation, data organization, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, writing—original draft. Y.S.D., T.R.D., U.N. and B.S.; methodology and software T.R.D., B.S., Y.S.D. and U.N.; supervision, T.R.D.; original draft, Y.S.D. and T.R.D.; review and editing, P.K., L.K.M., A.K.T., Y.S.D., T.R.D., U.N., N.B.S., B.S., H.N.D. and P.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the College of Agriculture, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, Manipur, India for providing all the facilities to carry out the research investigation. We also thank the Director, ICAR-DRMR, Bharatpur, Rajasthan, India for providing seeds of susceptible and resistant Indian mustard lines.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Government of India. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance; Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Department of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare Directorate of Economics & Statistics: New Delhi, India, 2021.
  2. Sharma, D.; Nanjundan, J.; Singh, L.; Parmar, N.; Singh, K.H.; Verma, K.S.; Thakur, A.K. Genetic diversity and population structure analysis in Indian Mustard germplasm using phenotypic traits and SSR markers. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2022, 40, 579–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kamoun, S.; Furzer, O.; Jones, J.D.; Judelson, H.S.; Ali, G.S.; Dalio, R.J.; Roy, S.G.; Schena, L.; Zambounis, A.; Panabières, F.; et al. The Top 10 oomycete pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2015, 16, 413–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Panjabi-Massand, P.; Yadava, S.K.; Sharma, P.; Kaur, A.; Kumar, A.; Arumugam, N.; Sodhi, Y.S.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Gupta, V.; Pradhan, A.K.; et al. Molecular mapping reveals two independent loci conferring resistance to Albugo candida in the east European germplasm of oilseed mustard Brassica juncea. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2010, 121, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Awasthi, R.P.; Nashaat, N.I.; Kolte, S.J.; Tewari, A.K.; Meena, P.D.; Bhatt, R. Screening of putative resistant sources against Indian and exotic isolates of Albugo candida inciting white rust in rapeseed-mustard. J. Oilseed Brassica 2012, 1, 27–37. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lakra, B.S.; Saharan, G.S. Correlation of leaf and stag head infection intensities of white rust with yield and yield components of mustard. Indian J. Mycol. Plant Pathol. 1989, 19, 279–281. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dodds, P.N.; Rathjen, J.P. Plant immunity: Towards an integrated view of plant–pathogen interactions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vignesh, M.; Yadava, D.K.; Sujata, V.; Mohapatra, T.; Jain, N.; Yadav, A.K.; Malik, D.; Yadav, M.S.; Prabhu, K.V. Genetics of white rust resistance in [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. & Coss.] and allelic relationship between interspecific sources of resistance. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed. 2009, 69, 205–208. [Google Scholar]
  9. Vignesh, M.; Yadava, D.K.; Sujata, V.; Yadav, A.K.; Mohapatra, T.; Prabhu, K.V. Characterization of an Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) indigenous germplasm line Bio-YSR for white rust resistance. Indian J. Plant Genet. Resour. 2011, 24, 40–42. [Google Scholar]
  10. Prabhu, K.V.; Somers, D.J.; Rakow, G.; Gugel, R.K. Molecular markers linked to white rust resistance in mustard Brassica juncea. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1998, 97, 865–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Varshney, A.; Mohapatra, T.; Sharma, R.P. Development and validation of CAPS and AFLP markers for white rust resistance gene in Brassica juncea. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2004, 109, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Borhan, H.M.; Brose, E.; Beynon, J.L.; Holub, E.B. White rust (Albugo candida) resistance loci on three Arabidopsis chromosomes are closely linked to downy mildew (Peronospora parasitica) resistance loci. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2001, 2, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Borhan, M.H.; Gunn, N.; Cooper, A.; Gulden, S.; Tor, M.; Rimmer, S.R.; Holub, E.B. WRR4 encodes a TIR-NB-LRR protein that confers broad-spectrum white rust resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana to four physiological races of Albugo candida. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2008, 21, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Borhan, M.H.; Holub, E.B.; Kindrachuk, C.; Omidi, M.; Bozorgmanesh-Frad, G.; Rimmer, S.R. WRR4, a broad-spectrum TIR-NB-LRR gene from Arabidopsis thaliana that confers white rust resistance in transgenic oilseed brassica crops. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2010, 11, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Arora, H.; Padmaja, K.L.; Paritosh, K.; Mukhi, N.; Tewari, A.K.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Gupta, V.; Pradhan, A.K. BjuWRR1, a CC-NB-LRR gene identified in Brassica juncea, confers resistance to white rust caused by Albugo candida. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2019, 132, 2223–2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bhayana, L.; Paritosh, K.; Arora, H.; Yadava, S.K.; Singh, P.; Nandan, D.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Gupta, V.; Pradhan, A.K.; Pental, D. A Mapped locus on LG A6 of Brassica juncealine Tumida conferring resistance to white rust contains a CNL Type R Gene. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 10, 1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Fox, D.T.; Williams, P.H. Correlation of spore production by Albugo candida in Brassica campestris and a visual rating scale. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 1984, 6, 175–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Doyle, J.J.; Doyle, J.L. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 1990, 12, 13–15. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ashburner, M.; Ball, C.A.; Blake, J.A.; Botstein, D.; Butler, H.; Cherry, J.M.; Davis, A.P.; Dolinski, K.; Dwight, S.S.; Eppig, J.T.; et al. Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kumar, S.; Tamura, K.; Nei, M. MEGA: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software for microcomputers. Bioinformatics 1994, 10, 189–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Yadava, S.K.; Arumugam, N.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Sodhi, Y.S.; Gupta, V.; Pental, D.; Pradhan, A.K. QTL mapping of yield-associated traits in Brassica juncea: Meta-analysis and epistatic interactions using two different crosses between east European and Indian gene pool lines. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2012, 125, 1553–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Singh, B.K.; Nandan, D.; Ambawat, S.; Ram, B.; Kumar, A.; Singh, T.; Meena, H.S.; Kumar, V.; Singh, V.V.; Rai, P.K.; et al. Validation of molecular markers for marker assisted pyramiding of white rust resistance loci in Indian mustard (Brassica junceaL.). Can. J. Plant Sci. 2015, 95, 939–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Yadava, J.S.; Singh, N.B. Strategies to Enhance Yield Potential of Rapeseed-Mustard in India. In Proceedings of the 10th International Rapeseed Congress, Canberra, Australia, 26–29 September 1999; Available online: www.regional.org.au/au/gcirc/6/634.htm-34k (accessed on 12 January 2019).
  24. Yadav, V.K.; Srivastava, K.K.; Mishra, V.K.; Negi, S. Studies on Genetic Variability, Character Association and Genetic Divergence in Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern and Coss.). Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2020, 10, 132–143. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tateda, C.; Obara, K.; Abe, Y.; Sekine, R.; Nekoduka, S.; Hikage, T.; Nishihara, M.; Sekine, K.T.; Fujisaki, K. The host stomatal density determines resistance to Septoria gentianae in Japanese Gentian. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2019, 32, 428–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Dutton, C.; Hõrak, H.; Hepworth, C.; Mitchell, A.; Ton, J.; Hunt, L.; Gray, J.E. Bacterial infection systemically suppresses stomatal density. Plant Cell Environ. 2019, 42, 2411–2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Negi, M.S.; Devic, M.; Delseny, M.; Lakshmikumaran, M. Identification of AFLP fragments linked to seed coat colour in Brassica juncea and conversion to a SCAR marker for rapid selection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2000, 101, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Photographic 0–9 scale of disease reaction for screening of genotypes at true leaf stage.
Figure 1. Photographic 0–9 scale of disease reaction for screening of genotypes at true leaf stage.
Agronomy 12 03122 g001
Figure 2. Deformed plant parts due to A. candida infection.
Figure 2. Deformed plant parts due to A. candida infection.
Agronomy 12 03122 g002
Figure 3. Validation of BjuWRR1-VD marker: 1-Varuna (761 bp), 2-Bio-YSR (366 bp), M-100 bp ladder.
Figure 3. Validation of BjuWRR1-VD marker: 1-Varuna (761 bp), 2-Bio-YSR (366 bp), M-100 bp ladder.
Agronomy 12 03122 g003
Figure 4. Genotyping of 10 B. juncea lines showing less than 10.83% PDI (Percent Disease Index) using marker BjuWRR1-VD marker.
Figure 4. Genotyping of 10 B. juncea lines showing less than 10.83% PDI (Percent Disease Index) using marker BjuWRR1-VD marker.
Agronomy 12 03122 g004
Figure 5. (A) UPGMA phylogenetic tree generated from MEGA Software. (B) Multiple sequence alignment of white rust resistance gene sequence belonging to B. juncea and Arabidopsis thaliana.
Figure 5. (A) UPGMA phylogenetic tree generated from MEGA Software. (B) Multiple sequence alignment of white rust resistance gene sequence belonging to B. juncea and Arabidopsis thaliana.
Agronomy 12 03122 g005
Table 1. List of Indian mustard genotypes used in the present investigation along with their source.
Table 1. List of Indian mustard genotypes used in the present investigation along with their source.
Sl. No.GenotypesSourceSl. No.GenotypesSource
1.CAULC-1Awang Potshangbam, Manipur 16.Pusa Mustard-28DRMR, Bharatpur, Rajasthan
2.CAULC-2Kakching Wairi, Manipur17.LaxmiDRMR, Bharatpur, Rajasthan
3.CAULC-3Kakching Lamjao, Manipur18.Bio-YSRDRMR, Bharatpur, Rajasthan
4.CAULC-4Sekmai, Manipur19.JD-6DRMR, Bharatpur, Rajasthan
5.CAURM-1AICRP (RM) CAU, Imphal Centre20.UrvashiDRMR, Bharatpur, Rajasthan
6.CAURM-2AICRP (RM) CAU, Imphal Centre21.GM-2DRMR, Bharatpur, Rajasthan
7.CAURM-5AICRP (RM) CAU, Imphal Centre22.Rajendra SuflamDRMR, Bharatpur, Rajasthan
8.CAURM 4-3AICRP (RM) CAU, Imphal Centre23.Pusa BoldDRMR, Bharatpur, Rajasthan
9.CAURM 4-2AICRP (RM) CAU, Imphal Centre24.RH-30DRMR, Bharatpur, Rajasthan
10.CAULR-7AICRP (RM) CAU, Imphal Centre25.JM-1DRMR, Bharatpur, Rajasthan
11.BPR-547AICRP (RM) CAU, Imphal Centre26.BasantiDRMR, Bharatpur, Rajasthan
12.CAUMC-28AICRP (RM) CAU, Imphal Centre27.NRCHB-101DRMR, Bharatpur, Rajasthan
13.CAURM-4AICRP (RM) CAU, Imphal Centre28.RH-749DRMR, Bharatpur, Rajasthan
14.CAURM-4-1AICRP (RM) CAU, Imphal Centre29.VarunaDRMR, Bharatpur, Rajasthan
15.JM-2DRMR, Bharatpur, Rajasthan30.NRCDR-2DRMR, Bharatpur, Rajasthan
Table 2. Primer details used in the present investigation.
Table 2. Primer details used in the present investigation.
GenePrimerSequence (5′-3′)Tm
(°C)
Expected Amplicon
Varuna
(Susceptible)
Donskaja-IV
(Resistant)
BjuWRR1F-DVGGCATAGTATTCCCTAGAAGAGAGATAAC58761 bp366 bp
R-DTGTTGATTCTTAGAATGGTAAATCACAG
R-VTTGAAAATCACATGTATACATATGGCTT
Table 3. Mean performance and genetic parameters of 30 Indian mustard genotypes for various agronomic traits.
Table 3. Mean performance and genetic parameters of 30 Indian mustard genotypes for various agronomic traits.
Genotype50% DF80% DMY/P (IN)Y/P (NIP)1000
SW (g)
OC (%)PDI (%)Stomata Density/mm2
G1 (CAULC-1)66.21121.804.62 4.743.2643.844.11 (2.19)146.67
G2 (CAULC-2)65.21122.132.202.262.3838.133.73 (2.11)130.67
G3 (CAULC-3)67.54123.462.392.342.0740.442.80 (1.90)69.33
G4 (CAULC-4)77.37141.633.064.041.6543.962.44 (1.89)74.67
G5 (CAURM-1)57.71119.463.283.154.8843.1115.07 (3.78)136.00
G6 (CAURM-2)59.71120.463.313.574.3445.107.46 (2.92)106.67
G7 (CAURM-5)56.71121.463.874.444.7745.4512.95 (3.74)69.33
G8 (CAURM 4-3)63.37119.122.823.853.2841.1113.15 (3.77)138.67
G9 (CAURM 4-2)64.71118.792.933.524.4845.318.64 (3.12)85.33
G10 (CAULR-7)54.05114.462.352.183.7642.776.42 (2.34)117.33
G11 (BPR-547)56.38118.792.832.844.5344.3013.31 (3.54)109.33
G12 (CAUMC-28)59.37120.302.975.394.8446.1613.95 (3.96)130.67
G13 (CAURM-4)64.37121.793.274.074.3648.916.99 (2.84)88.00
G14 (CAURM-4-1)57.04124.123.694.252.9943.799.22 (3.21)93.33
G15 (JM-2)59.54120.464.064.384.4543.2916.55 (4.04)109.33
G16 (Pusa Mustard-28)46.71113.793.786.063.1643.0511.46 (4.71)80.00
G17 (Laxmi)60.05128.464.066.613.5043.2413.51 (3.56)128.00
G18 (Bio-YSR)61.00120.504.054.753.4841.799.87 (3.17)98.67
G19 (JD-6)55.87117.802.673.793.4943.6211.91 (3.47)120.00
G20 (Urbashi)61.54125.465.177.816.9242.4012.38 (3.20)85.33
G 21 (GM-2)74.71136.633.826.583.9244.0511.24 (3.58)82.67
G 22 (Rajendra Suflam)64.37123.633.016.164.2342.9912.71 (3.72)117.33
G 23 (Pusa Bold)66.04122.964.025.863.5043.5112.18 (3.71)210.67
G 24 (RH-30)62.71127.633.567.694.7343.0421.09 (4.33)173.33
G 25 (JM-1)64.50120.503.424.303.9542.8711.31 (3.43)98.67
G 26 (Basanti)60.71121.793.043.093.8543.9414.22 (2.40)165.33
G 27 (NRCHB-101)53.75124.253.235.395.0443.3514.41 (4.06)157.33
G 28 (RH-749)63.50135.254.998.803.6544.1312.18 (3.81)133.33
G 29 (Varuna)57.50121.753.315.272.7343.4422.31 (4.78)114.67
G 30 (NRCDR-2)64.00126.503.675.443.6144.3612.06 (3.54)168.00
Mean61.54123.303.514.753.8643.547.70 (3.36)117.96
Range46.71–77.37113.79 141.632.2–5.172.26–8.801.65–6.9238.1–48.912.44–22.31
GCV (%)9.994.7117.4426.2928.124.1520.38
PCV (%)10.194.7925.2632.0028.324.6522.04
h2 (%)95.9996.7847.6667.4798.5779.5685.49
GAM (%)20.189.5624.8444.5457.597.6338.87
SE1.9171.6160.9811.3250.2001.3980.431
C.D. (5%)4.0863.445-2.8240.425-0.919
Values in parentheses are √x + 0.5 transformed values. Fifty % DF = days to 50% flowering, 80% DM = days to 80% maturity, IN = infected plants, NIP = non-infected plants, SW = seed weight, OC(%) = oil content, PDI(%) = percent disease index, GCV = genotypic coefficient of variation, PCV = phenotypic coefficient of variation, h2 = broad sense heritability, SE = standard error, C.D.= critical difference at 5% level of probability.
Table 4. BLASTn result with the query and sequenced amplicon.
Table 4. BLASTn result with the query and sequenced amplicon.
Sl. NoGenotype NameCollection PlaceAmplicon
Size
(bp)
Query GeneAccession No.Query
Coverage (%)
Total Score (S)E-ValueMax. Identity (%)
1.CAULC-1Manipur 366BjuWRR1OM243099673722 × 10−9894.65
2.CAULC-3Manipur 366BjuWRR1OM243103975959 × 10−16699.10
3.CAULC-4Manipur366BjuWRR1OM243167895327 × 10−15394.33
4.CAURM 4-1AICRP(R-M), CAU, Imphal Centre366BjuWRR1OM243101975734 × 10−15997.63
5.CAURM 4-2AICRP(R-M), CAU, Imphal Centre366BjuWRR1OM243100965643 × 10−15697.33
6.BIO-YSRDRMR, Bharatpur366BjuWRR1OM243102925497 × 10−15297.53
The S-score is a measure of the similarity of the query to the sequence; the E−value is a measure of the reliability of the S score.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Devi, Y.S.; Devi, T.R.; Thakur, A.K.; Ngangkham, U.; Devi, H.N.; Kh., P.; Sinha, B.; Senjam, P.; Singh, N.B.; Mishra, L.K. Evaluation of Indian Mustard Genotypes for White Rust Resistance Using BjuWRR1Gene and Their Phenotypic Performance. Agronomy 2022, 12, 3122. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12123122

AMA Style

Devi YS, Devi TR, Thakur AK, Ngangkham U, Devi HN, Kh. P, Sinha B, Senjam P, Singh NB, Mishra LK. Evaluation of Indian Mustard Genotypes for White Rust Resistance Using BjuWRR1Gene and Their Phenotypic Performance. Agronomy. 2022; 12(12):3122. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12123122

Chicago/Turabian Style

Devi, Yengkhom Sanatombi, Th. Renuka Devi, Ajay Kumar Thakur, Umakanta Ngangkham, H. Nanita Devi, Pramesh Kh., Bireswar Sinha, Pushparani Senjam, N. Brajendra Singh, and Lokesh Kumar Mishra. 2022. "Evaluation of Indian Mustard Genotypes for White Rust Resistance Using BjuWRR1Gene and Their Phenotypic Performance" Agronomy 12, no. 12: 3122. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12123122

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop