Next Article in Journal
Anionic Exchange Membrane for Photo-Electrolysis Application
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of the Prepolymer Type and Synthesis Parameters on Self-Healing Anticorrosion Properties of Composite Coatings Containing Isophorone Diisocyanate-Loaded Polyurethane Microcapsules
Previous Article in Journal
Conducting Polymer-Based Nanohybrids for Fuel Cell Application
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Global Sensitivity Analysis for the Polymeric Microcapsules in Self-Healing Cementitious Composites

College of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2020, 12(12), 2990; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122990
Submission received: 5 December 2020 / Revised: 12 December 2020 / Accepted: 13 December 2020 / Published: 15 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Self-Healing Polymers, Proteins and Composites)

Abstract

:
Cementitious composites with microencapsulated healing agents are appealing due to the advantages of self-healing. The polymeric shell and polymeric healing agents in microcapsules have been proven effective in self-healing, while these microcapsules decrease the effective elastic properties of cementitious composites before self-healing happens. The reduction of effective elastic properties can be evaluated by micromechanics. The substantial complicacy included in micromechanical models leads to the need of specifying a large number of parameters and inputs. Meanwhile, there are nonlinearities in input–output relationships. Hence, it is a prerequisite to know the sensitivity of the models. A micromechanical model which can evaluate the effective properties of the microcapsule-contained cementitious material is proposed. Subsequently, a quantitative global sensitivity analysis technique, the Extended Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (EFAST), is applied to identify which parameters are required for knowledge improvement to achieve the desired level of confidence in the results. Sensitivity indices for first-order effects are computed. Results show the volume fraction of microcapsules is the most important factor which influences the effective properties of self-healing cementitious composites before self-healing. The influence of interfacial properties cannot be neglected. The research sheds new light on the influence of parameters on microcapsule-contained self-healing composites.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Self-healing is the remarkable ability of living organisms to repair their own damage by themselves. Inspired from nature, the great challenge now is to create and develop composites with high potential for self-healing, offering alternatives to the current options and moving toward materials with extended service lifetime for various applications. Most of these are innovative materials with excellent healing performance, such as ionomers, semiconductors, self-assembling systems, hydrogels, micro- and nanoparticles, coatings, films and membranes, microcapsules, vascular networks, shape memory or stimuli-induced self-healing materials [1,2,3,4,5]. Concretes with microencapsulated healing agents are appealing since they are able to spontaneously repair themselves after damage or degradation, recovering structural integrity and functionality by increasing the rate of healing versus the rate of damage [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. The microcapsule-contained self-healing cementitious composite involves the polymeric healing agent (repairing the cracks), the catalyst (speeding up the polymerization) and the polymeric shell (encapsulating the healing agent), as exhibited in Figure 1. The healing agents can be cyanoacrylates, epoxy, methyl methacrylate and multicompound healing agents, while polyurethane, polyurea resin and formaldehyde resin can be adopted as shells to produce the self-healing microcapsules [13].
Even though microcapsule-contained cementitious composites can achieve self-healing, the elastic properties of the cementitious composite before self-healing happens are influenced because of these soft inclusions based on our previous research [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. The effective elastic properties can be evaluated by micromechanics. There are many theoretical methods to tackle the effective elastic moduli of multiphase composites, such as mathematical lower and upper bounds, the self-consistent method, the differential scheme, the Mori–Tanaka method and the generalized self-consistent method, etc. A new micromechanical model which can reflect the properties of pothole patching material is proposed [25]. However, it does not apply to microcapsule-contained composites directly since it ignores the microstructure of microcapsules. Existing experimental results show that interfaces exist between the microcapsules and the concrete matrix, which significantly affect the mechanical properties of the microcapsule-contained self-healing cementitious composite at the micro and macro level [26]. Hence, the interfaces should be considered to calculate the effective properties of microcapsule-contained cementitious materials. Recently, the effect of interfacial damage on the effective elastic modulus of spherical-particle-reinforced composites has been investigated based on the linear-spring model by Yanase and Ju [27]. Further, many other theoretical models concentrate on the interface between inclusions and the matrix [28,29,30,31,32,33]. The microcapsules have a multilayer microstructure [34,35]. However, a micromechanical model which can consider both the interfacial performance and the structure of microcapsules has not been built.
The substantial complicacy often included in micromechanical models leads to the need for specifying a large number of parameters and inputs. Additionally, there are nonlinearities in input–output relationships. Hence, it is a prerequisite to know the sensitivity of these models. Sensitivity analysis (SA) is a fundamental tool in the building, use and understanding of models of all forms. It provides information about the behavior of the model being evaluated, such as the identification of relevant model inputs, information on the model balance [36], indications for model simplification, model building and identification parts of the model which could be improved. There are two groups of sensitivity analyses: the local sensitivity analysis and the global sensitivity analysis. The local SA checks the local response of the outputs by varying input parameters one at a time and holding other parameters at central values. Hence, the sensitivity index is dependent on the central values chosen by other parameters. The global SA examines the global response of model outputs by exploring a finite region. Hence, the global SA is more precise than the local SA. There are many global SA methods, such as the Morris method, sampling-based methods and variance-based methods, etc. The Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (FAST) and Extended Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (EFAST) belong to the variance-based method. Sensitivity analysis has been applied to many models [36,37,38,39]. The Partial Rank Correlation Coefficient (PRCC) method appears to be the most efficient and reliable among the sampling-based indices [40]. Correlation provides a measure of the strength of a linear association between an input and an output. PRCC is a sampling-based method for nonlinear relationships between an input and an output. It is adopted to validate the results of the EFAST in this paper. Our predictions of the micromechanical model will be strengthened if we can reduce uncertainty and get better estimates on specific parameters of the model.
In this research, a new micromechanical model of the microcapsule-contained self-healing cementitious composite was developed. The sensitivity analysis of the model was conducted using EFAST. The influence of microcapsules before self-healing happens was focused on. An outline of this paper is as follows. In Section 2, the micromechanical model of the microcapsule-contained cementitious composite is proposed, and the influence of the interface can be considered. In Section 3, EFAST is introduced. Moreover, relative parameters of the micromechanical model are presented. In Section 4, the results and discussion are illustrated. Conclusions of the study are drawn in Section 5.

2. A Micromechanical Model for the Microcapsule-Contained Cementitious Composite

2.1. Multilevel Homogenization Scheme for Predicting the Effective Properties

To obtain the effective properties of the microcapsule-contained cementitious composite, the multilevel homogenization method was applied [26]. The two-level homogenization process can be summarized as follows: (1) First, the effective properties of microcapsules, composed of shells and healing agents inside, were obtained by the homogenization of the two-phase composite as illustrated in Figure 2a; (2) second, the effective properties of microcapsule-contained cementitious materials can be estimated by homogenizing the three-phase composite composed of the intrinsic concrete, the interface and the equivalent inclusion, as demonstrated in Figure 2b.

2.2. The First-Level Homogenization

The microcapsules consisted of two parts: the polymeric healing agents inside and the polymeric shell outside. To calculate the effective properties of a coated particle, an analytical solution was derived. The process was similar with that use in previous research [25]. A 2D cylindrical shell was considered under the internal pressure p and the external pressure q. The displacement field, ur, can be expressed as [41]
u r = ( 1 υ ) E ( p a 2 q b 2 ) r b 2 a 2 + ( 1 + υ ) E a 2 b 2 ( p q ) ( b 2 a 2 ) r ,
where E, ν, a and b are Young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio, the radius of the inner ring and the radius of the outer ring, respectively. p and q are the internal and external pressures on the ring. The core–shell ratio is defined as k = a/b.
Then, another outside layer, called the equivalent coated particle, is necessary to obtain the effective properties of the coated particle. The elastic properties are equal to the effective properties of the inner microcapsule, as shown in Figure 3.
According to the displacement continuity conditions on each interface given in Figure 3 and Equation (1), the displacement on each layer can be calculated:
( 1 υ 2 ) E 2 P 2 a = 1 E 1 ( 1 υ 1 ) P 2 a 2 P 1 b 2 a b 2 a 2 + 1 + υ 1 a 2 b 2 P 2 P 1 ( b 2 a 2 ) a , a t r = a
1 E 1 ( 1 υ 1 ) P 2 a 2 P 1 b 2 b b 2 a 2 + 1 + υ 1 a 2 b 2 P 2 P 1 ( b 2 a 2 ) b = 1 E e q ( 1 υ e q ) P 1 b 2 P c 2 b c 2 b 2 + 1 + υ e q b 2 c 2 P 1 P ( c 2 b 2 ) b , a t r = b
( 1 υ e q ) E e q P c = 1 E e q ( 1 υ e q ) P 1 b 2 P c 2 c c 2 b 2 + ( 1 + υ e q ) b 2 c 2 P 1 P ( c 2 b 2 ) c , a t r = c
where Eeq, E1 and E2 denote Young’s moduli of the equivalent particle, the shell and the healing agent, respectively. Further, veq, v1 and v2 mean the Poisson’s ratios of the equivalent particle, the shell and the healing agent, respectively.
By solving above equations, Young’s modulus of the equivalent particle can be expressed as
E e q = E 1 ( 1 a 2 / b 2 ) ( 1 υ e q ) ( a 2 / b 2 ) ( 1 + υ 1 ) + ( 1 υ 1 ) 4 E 2 a 2 / b 2 E 1 ( 1 a 2 / b 2 ) ( 1 υ 2 ) + E 2 ( 1 + υ 1 ) + a 2 / b 2 ( 1 υ 1 )
Meanwhile, νeq can be obtained by [42]
v e q = v 1 f 1 E 1 + v 2 f 2 E 2 f 1 E 1 + f 2 E 2
where f1 and f2 are the volume fraction of the shell and healing agents, respectively.

2.3. The Second-Level Homogenization

Then, the effective properties of cementitious materials are considered. Three traditional solid phases, i.e., mortar, coarse aggregates and their interfaces, are merged into one matrix phase, namely the intrinsic concrete, in the representative volume element [26]. To simplify the model, we consider the effective properties of the intrinsic concrete directly. The interface between the microcapsules and the intrinsic concrete is involved here, as demonstrated in Figure 4.
The effective elastic stiffness tensor of a composite can be obtained [27]
C = r = 0 N ϕ ( r ) C ( r ) T M T ( r ) ϕ ( 0 ) I + r = 1 N ϕ ( r ) C ( r ) 1 + R ( r ) C ( r ) T M T ( r ) 1
where 𝝓(r) and C(r) are the volume fraction and the elastic stiffness tensor of r-th phase, respectively. 0-th represents the intrinsic concrete. I denotes the fourth-order identity tensor. T M T ( r ) and R ( r ) are two tensors relative to interfacial properties, and can be calculated by [27]
T M T ( 0 ) = I
T M T ( 1 ) = I S M D S M D + C ( 1 ) C 0 1 C 0 1
R i j k l = 1 a β α 5 δ i j δ k l + 3 α + 2 β 10 δ i l δ j k + δ i k δ j l
where SMD is the modified Eshelby tensor and can be obtained by the Direct Computation method [27]
S i j k l M D = λ ^ δ i j δ k l + μ ^ δ i l δ j k + δ i k δ j l
λ ^ = 5 5 υ 0 1 3 + 9 υ 0 6 υ 0 2 + 8 α μ 0 1 2 υ 0 2 5 υ 0 4 + 2 β μ 0 1 + 71 υ 0 101 υ 0 2 + 45 υ 0 3 3 + 9 υ 0 6 υ 0 2 + 2 β μ 0 1 + υ 0 2 75 1 υ 0 + 4 μ 0 5 υ 0 4 3 α + 2 β
μ ^ = 5 6 α μ 0 4 β μ 0 4 5 υ 0 75 1 υ 0 + 4 μ 0 5 υ 0 4 3 α + 2 β
α = α b , β = β b
where ɑ and β are related to the interfacial sliding and the interfacial separation, respectively. b represents the radius of microcapsules.
By adopting the above micromechanical model, the effective properties of the microcapsule-contained cementitious composites can be obtained.

3. Global Sensitivity Analysis Method

FAST is one of the most elegant methods for the sensitivity analysis [43]. It can be applied to many nonlinear models. EFAST inherits the advantages of FAST with some modifications. It quantifies the contribution of each input parameter to the total variances of the output by variance-based methods. In this paper, EFAST is applied to carry out the sensitivity analysis. The main idea of EFAST is to explore the multidimensional space by a suitably defined search-curve. If the i-th factor has a strong influence on the output, the amplitude of oscillation of y = f(x) at frequency wi is great. The main process of EFAST is summarized as follows:
In a model with n inputs, y = f(x1, x2,…, xn), with parameters in the domain of unit hypercube
K n = ( x 0 x i 1 ; i = 1 , , n )
Then, a new function is introduced
x i = G i ( s ) , i = 1 , 2 , , n
Gi is a search-curve. There are many forms of xi. Here, we take the transformation proposed by Saltelli et al. [43]
x i = 1 2 + 1 π arcsin ( s i n w i s )
where wi is a set of different, linearly independent of integer frequencies associated with each factor xi. s varies in (−π/2, π/2). By using Fourier transform, the first-order sensitivity index S ^ i can be obtained [43]
S ^ i = D ^ i / D ^
where D ^ and D ^ i are the total variance and the variance caused by the i-th parameter, respectively. The detailed process can be found in previous research [43].
The total variance can be decomposed into the variance caused by a single parameter and combined parameters. Then, the higher-order sensitivity index can be calculated [44]. In this paper, the direct influence of inputs is studied, while the higher-order influence is ignored.
The model outputs—the bulk modulus K and the shear modulus G—were considered in this sensitivity analysis. They were chosen as they are the main parameters to evaluate the elastic properties of a material. There are only two independent elastic constants in isotropic media, such as ordinary concretes and polymers. By using G and K, other elastic parameters can be obtained. Further, the elastic performance of materials can be simulated [23]. Some rational parameters are presented to illustrate the process in Table 1. The elastic properties of some common concretes are listed in Table 2.

4. Results and Discussion

Here, the normalized EFAST first-order effects with respect to the input parameters were investigated. The normalization was conducted by [39]
S n , i = S i / i = 1 6 S i
The first-order sensitivity indices (FSIs) of the bulk modulus in the C30 concrete were obtained by applying the EFAST variance-based sensitivity analysis in Figure 5.
By analyzing the results in Figure 5, the influence of input parameters is known. The volume fraction of microcapsules (f) and the interfacial separation property (β) had the greatest effect (around 57% and 21%, respectively) on the bulk modulus of the C30 concrete. Hence, the volume fraction of microcapsules should be selected carefully to maintain the desired bulk modulus. The interfacial separation property (β) is also a sensitive factor for the microcapsule-contained cementitious materials. The interfacial bonding should be good to avoid weak elastic behaviors. The properties of the shell (i.e., E1, v1 and k) have a medium influence on the outputs. They make up approximately 20% altogether. The interfacial sliding property ɑ only takes up about 0.42% of the influence, which can be neglected. The result was acceptable since the interfacial sliding parameter has little influence on the bulk modulus as illustrated in previous studies [27].
The FSIs of inputs for the shear modulus of the C30 concrete are evaluated in Figure 6. According to Figure 6, the FSI of the volume fraction of microcapsules (f) is the largest (around 63%). Hence, the volume fraction should be given extra attention in order to obtain the desired effective shear properties. The elastic modulus and the core-shell ratio of microcapsules also have a medium influence on the effective properties (approximately 11%). The interfacial sliding property ɑ has a greater impact on the shear modulus (5%) than that on the bulk modulus (0.42%). The results prove that elastic properties may have insensitive parameters in some objective functions and not in others, as illustrated in Figure 5 and Figure 6. It is clear that the two objective functions are sensitive to the volume fraction of microcapsules.
To validate the results, PRCC was applied in this research. Figure 7 shows the overall sensitivity of each parameter of the bulk modulus and the shear modulus in the C30 concrete. The result of PRCC was similar to that obtained by EFAST (see FSI values in Figure 5 and Figure 6). However, there was a slight difference in the ordering of the parameter sensitivities. The order of sensitivity for the bulk modulus by EFAST method was E1 > v1 > k, while PRCC values yielded a slightly different order k > v1 > E1. The other rankings were the same. These results support that the results of EFAST are correct, and PRCC provides a similar identification of sensitive parameters.
The sensitivity of parameters of the micromechanical model may change between different cementitious matrices. However, the difference is not obvious and can be neglected. Let us examine this finding in the case of the bulk modulus. In all three situations in Figure 8 (i.e., the C30 concrete, the C40 concrete and the C50 concrete), the FSI of each parameter is similar. This implies that even though the FSI of each parameter may be varied in different concretes, the general rankings can be summarized. The volume fraction and the interfacial separation property should be paid extra attention to. Considering the properties of concretes, the order of FSIs of parameters is the same in different concretes.
Global sensitivity analysis such as EFAST requires the range of parameter values to be explored. Changing the parameter range may affect the sensitivity index [45]. We investigated the influence of the parameter range of our micromechanical model by repeating the sensitivity analysis with other parameter ranges. The objective function of bulk modulus used for sensitivity analysis was taken to illustrate the influence of the range in the C30 concrete. Here, the range of the volume fraction changed from (1%, 10%) to (1%, 5%). The results are displayed in Figure 9. For the bulk modulus, if the volume-fraction parameter range changes from (1%, 10%) to (1%, 5%), the FSI of the volume fraction decreases by 16.24%. Meanwhile, the elastic modulus, the core–shell ratio and the interfacial separation property become more sensitive. Their FSI values increase up to 4.83%, 6.53% and 3.29%, respectively. Therefore, the analysis confirms that FSI values of parameters can change substantially if the range of the volume fraction of microcapsules changes. However, the volume fraction still has the greatest impact on the elastic properties.

5. Conclusions

The study presents the results of sensitivity analysis using EFAST on the proposed micromechanical model of microcapsule-contained self-healing cementitious composites. The proposed micromechanical model can consider the microstructures and interfaces of microcapsules. EFAST helps to identify which parameters are required for knowledge improvement to achieve the desired level of confidence in the results. The results show that the volume fraction of microcapsules is the most important factor which influences the effective properties of the microcapsule-contained self-healing cementitious composites. The influence of interfacial properties cannot be neglected. The sensitivity analysis is affected by the parameter ranges. Not all elastic properties are sensitive to the same inputs. Even though the properties of the matrix make a difference, the general rankings of FSIs of parameters are the same among different concretes. From the research, the volume fraction of microcapsules should be chosen after a precise design. Meanwhile, the surface treatment should be conducted on the self-healing microcapsules to enhance the interfacial bonding between the microcapsules and the cementitious matrix. The optimal volume fraction of microcapsules is related to the healing probability, the healing ratio, properties of healing agents, the radius of microcapsules, the size of cracks in the matrix, etc. This investigation mainly concentrated on the influence of different parameters on the elastic properties before self-healing. The optimum volume fraction can be obtained using our previous models [20,21,22,23,24]. In the future, a viscoelastic model will be developed based on the present research to extend its application.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.W.; methodology, S.Z.; investigation, Y.J.; writing—original draft preparation, S.Z.; writing—review and editing, S.Z.; supervision, C.W.; project administration, C.W.; funding acquisition, S.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52002040) and the State Key Laboratory of High Performance Civil Engineering Materials (No. 2020CEM004).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Baron, R.I.; Bercea, M.; Avadanei, M.; Lisa, G.; Biliuta, G.; Coseri, S. Green route for the fabrication of self-healable hydrogels based on tricarboxy cellulose and poly(vinyl alcohol). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 123, 744–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bercea, M.; Biliuta, G.; Avadanei, M.; Baron, R.I.; Butnaru, M.; Coseri, S. Self-healing hydrogels of oxidized pullulan and poly(vinyl alcohol). Carbohyd. Polym. 2019, 206, 210–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Morariu, S.; Bercea, M.; Gradinaru, L.M.; Rosca, I.; Avadanei, M. Versatile poly (vinyl alcohol)/clay physical hydrogels with tailorable structure as potential candidates for wound healing applications. Mat. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 109, 110395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nita, L.E.; Chiriac, A.; Rusu, A.G.; Bercea, M.; Ghilan, A.; Dumitriu, R.; Mititelu-Tartau, L. New self-healing hydrogels based on reversible physical interactions and their potential applications. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 118, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rusu, A.; Nita, L.E.; Bercea, M.; Tudorachi, N.; Diaconu, A.; Pamfil, D.; Rusu, D.; Ivan, F.E.; Chiriac, A. Interpenetrated polymer network with modified chitosan in composition and self-healing properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 132, 374–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. White, S.R.; Sottos, N.; Geubelle, P.; Moore, J.; Kessler, M.R.; Sriram, S.; Brown, E.; Viswanathan, S. Autonomic healing of polymer composites. Nature 2001, 409, 794–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Shahabudin, N.; Yahya, R.; Gan, S.N. Microcapsules filled with a palm oil-based alkyd as healing agent for epoxy matrix. Polymers 2016, 8, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Lee, J.; Park, S.J.; Park, C.S.; Kwon, O.S.; Chung, S.Y.; Shim, J.; Lee, C.S.; Bae, J. Effect of a surfactant in microcapsule synthesis on self-healing behavior of capsule embedded polymeric films. Polymers 2018, 10, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Yang, H.J.; Mo, Q.F.; Li, W.Z.; Gu, F.M. Preparation and properties of self-healing and self-lubricating epoxy coatings with polyurethane microcapsules containing bifunctional linseed oil. Polymers 2019, 11, 1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Zheng, N.; Liu, J.; Li, W. TO/TMMP-TMTGE double-healing composite containing a transesterification reversible matrix and tung oil-loaded microcapsules for active self-healing. Polymers 2019, 11, 1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kim, S.; Kim, B.H.; Oh, M.; Park, D.H.; Lee, S. Repeatable crack self-healing by photochemical [2+2] cycloaddition of TCE-co-DCE monomers enclosed in homopolymer microcapsules. Polymers 2019, 11, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Jeoung, H.J.; Kim, K.W.; Chang, Y.J.; Jung, Y.C.; Ku, H.; Oh, K.W.; Choi, H.M.; Chung, J.W. Self-healing EPDM rubbers with highly stable and mechanically-enhanced urea-formaldehyde (UF) microcapsules prepared by multi-step in situ polymerization. Polymers 2020, 12, 1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yang, Z.X.; Hollar, J.; He, X.D.; Shi, X.M. A self-healing cementitious composite using oil core/silica gel shell microcapsules. Cem. Concr. Comp. 2011, 33, 506–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhuang, X.; Zhou, S. The prediction of self-healing capacity of bacteria-based concrete using machine learning approaches. CMC-Comput. Mater. Con. 2019, 1, 57–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Zhuang, X.; Zhou, S. Molecular dynamics study of an amorphous polyethylene/silica interface with shear tests. Materials 2018, 11, 929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Zhou, S.; Vu-Bac, N.; Arash, B.; Zhu, H.; Zhuang, X. Interface characterization between polyethylene/ silica in engineered cementitious composites by molecular dynamics simulation. Molecules 2019, 24, 1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Zhou, S.; Xie, L.; Jia, Y.; Wang, C. Review of cementitious composites containing polyethylene fibers as repairing materials. Polymers 2020, 12, 2624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhou, S.; Zhuang, X. Characterization of loading rate effects on the interactions between crack growth and inclusions in cementitious material. CMC-Comput. Mater. Contin. 2018, 57, 417–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, S.; Zhuang, X. Micromechanical study of loading rate effects between a hole and a crack. Undergr. Space 2019, 4, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhou, S.; Zhu, H.; Ju, J.; Yan, Z.; Chen, Q. Modeling microcapsule-enabled self-healing cementitious composite materials using discrete element method. Int. J. Damage Mech. 2017, 26, 340–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, S.; Zhu, H.; Yan, Z.; Ju, J.; Zhang, L. A micromechanical study of the breakage mechanism of microcapsules in concrete using PFC2D. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 115, 452–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhu, H.; Zhou, S.; Yan, Z.; Ju, J.W.; Chen, Q. A two-dimensional micromechanical damage-healing model on microcrack-induced damage for microcapsule-enabled self-healing cementitious composites under compressive loading. Int. J. Damage Mech. 2016, 25, 727–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhu, H.; Zhou, S.; Yan, Z.; Ju, J.W.; Chen, Q. A two-dimensional micromechanical damage-healing model for microcapsule-enabled self-healing cementitious composites under tensile loading. Int. J. Damage Mech. 2015, 24, 95–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhu, H.; Zhou, S.; Yan, Z.; Ju, J.W.; Chen, Q. A 3D analytical model for the probabilistic characteristics of self-healing model for concrete using spherical microcapsule. Comput. Concr. 2015, 15, 37–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yuan, K.Y.; Ju, J.W.; Yuan, W.; Yang, J.M. Numerical predictions of mechanical behavior of innovative pothole patching materials featuring high toughness, low-viscosity nano-molecular resins. Acta Mech. 2014, 225, 1141–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhu, H.; Chen, Q.; Yan, Z.; Ju, J.W.; Zhou, S. Micromechanical models for saturated concrete repaired by the electrochemical deposition method. Mater. Struct. 2014, 47, 1067–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yanase, K.; Ju, J.W. Effective elastic moduli of spherical particle reinforced composites containing imperfect interfaces. Int. J. Damage Mech. 2012, 21, 97–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, C.; Wang, J.; Dou, F. An estimation approach for the effective elastic modulus of lightweight bulk filling material with compressible inclusions and imperfect interfaces. Materials 2020, 13, 3563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, Q.; Zhu, H.H.; Ju, J.W.; Yan, Z.G.; Jiang, Z.W.; Chen, B.; Wang, Y.Q.; Fan, Z.H. Stochastic micromechanical predictions for the probabilistic behavior of saturated concrete repaired by the electrochemical deposition method. Int. J. Damage Mech. 2020, 29, 435–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, X.; Li, R.; Sun, L.Z. Dynamic magneto-viscoelastic model for magnetorheological nanocomposites with imperfect interface. Int. J. Damage Mech. 2019, 28, 1248–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, Y.; Ju, J.W.; Zhu, H.H.; Yan, Z.G. A novel multi-scale model for predicting the thermal damage of hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete. Int. J. Damage Mech. 2020, 29, 19–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, Q.; Zhu, H.H.; Ju, J.W.; Li, H.X.; Jiang, Z.W.; Yan, Z.G. Stochastic micromechanics-based investigations for the damage healing of unsaturated concrete using electrochemical deposition method. Int. J. Damage Mech. 2020, 29, 1361–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shodja, H.M.; Hashemian, B. Variational bounds and overall shear modulus of nano-composites with interfacial damage in anti-plane couple stress elasticity. Int. J. Damage Mech. 2020, 29, 246–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hong, S.X.; Qin, S.F.; Dong, B.Q.; Xing, F. Corrosion features of the reinforcing bar in concrete with intelligent OH- regulation of microcapsules. Materials 2019, 12, 3966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Zuo, J.D.; Li, H.B.; Zhan, J.; Dong, B.Q.; Wang, L.; Chen, D.Z. Preparation and properties of cement mortar/metal hydroxide microcapsules composites. Cem. Concr. Comp. 2020, 105, 103438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Confalonieri, R. Monte Carlo based sensitivity analysis of two crop simulators and considerations on model balance. Eur. J. Agron. 2010, 33, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Marino, S.; Hogue, I.B.; Ray, C.J.; Kirschner, D.E. A methodology for performing global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in systems biology. J. Theor. Biol. 2008, 254, 178–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Donckels, B.M.R.; Kroll, S.; Van Dorpe, M.; Weemaes, M. Global sensitivity analysis of an in-sewer process model for the study of sulfide-induced corrosion of concrete. Water Sci. Technol. 2014, 69, 647–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Zhao, J.; Tiede, C. Using a variance-based sensitivity analysis for analyzing the relation between measurements and unknown parameters of a physical model. Nonlinear Proc. Geoph. 2011, 18, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Saltelli, A.; Marivoet, J. Non-parametric statistics in sensitivity analysis for model output: A comparison of selected techniques. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 1990, 28, 229–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Timoshenko, S.P.; Goodier, J.N.; Abramson, H.N. Theory of elasticity. J. Appl. Mech. 1970, 37, 888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ahmed, S.; Jones, F. A review of particulate reinforcement theories for polymer composites. J. Mater. Sci. 1990, 25, 4933–4942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Saltelli, A.; Tarantola, S.; Chan, K.S. A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output. Technometrics 1999, 41, 39–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Saltelli, A. Sensitivity analysis for importance assessment. Risk Anal. 2002, 22, 579–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Shin, M.J.; Guillaume, J.H.; Croke, B.F.; Jakeman, A.J. Addressing ten questions about conceptual rainfall–runoff models with global sensitivity analyses in R. J. Hydrol. 2013, 503, 135–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of microcapsule-contained cementitious composites.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of microcapsule-contained cementitious composites.
Polymers 12 02990 g001
Figure 2. The homogenization process: (a) the first level: the homogenization of the shell and healing agents inside, and (b) the second level: the homogenization of the intrinsic concrete, the equivalent inclusion and interfaces.
Figure 2. The homogenization process: (a) the first level: the homogenization of the shell and healing agents inside, and (b) the second level: the homogenization of the intrinsic concrete, the equivalent inclusion and interfaces.
Polymers 12 02990 g002
Figure 3. A multilayer-coated model for self-healing microcapsules.
Figure 3. A multilayer-coated model for self-healing microcapsules.
Polymers 12 02990 g003
Figure 4. A schematic illustration of the interface model.
Figure 4. A schematic illustration of the interface model.
Polymers 12 02990 g004
Figure 5. First-order sensitivity indices (FSIs) computed by the Extended Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (EFAST) for the bulk modulus in the C30 concrete.
Figure 5. First-order sensitivity indices (FSIs) computed by the Extended Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (EFAST) for the bulk modulus in the C30 concrete.
Polymers 12 02990 g005
Figure 6. FSIs computed by the EFAST sensitivity analysis for the shear modulus in the C30 concrete.
Figure 6. FSIs computed by the EFAST sensitivity analysis for the shear modulus in the C30 concrete.
Polymers 12 02990 g006
Figure 7. The Partial Rank Correlation Coefficient (PRCC) sensitivity analysis for the (a) bulk modulus and (b) shear modulus in the C30 concrete.
Figure 7. The Partial Rank Correlation Coefficient (PRCC) sensitivity analysis for the (a) bulk modulus and (b) shear modulus in the C30 concrete.
Polymers 12 02990 g007aPolymers 12 02990 g007b
Figure 8. FSIs computed by the EFAST sensitivity analysis for the bulk modulus of the (a) C30 concrete, (b) the C40 concrete, and (c) the C50 concrete.
Figure 8. FSIs computed by the EFAST sensitivity analysis for the bulk modulus of the (a) C30 concrete, (b) the C40 concrete, and (c) the C50 concrete.
Polymers 12 02990 g008aPolymers 12 02990 g008b
Figure 9. FSI values using an (a) original and (b) adjusted range of the volume fraction of microcapsules for the C30 concretes with the bulk modulus objective function.
Figure 9. FSI values using an (a) original and (b) adjusted range of the volume fraction of microcapsules for the C30 concretes with the bulk modulus objective function.
Polymers 12 02990 g009
Table 1. Parameters used for the sensitivity analysis.
Table 1. Parameters used for the sensitivity analysis.
ParameterDescriptionUnitScope
E1Elastic modulus of the shellGPa(1, 10)
v1Poisson’s ratio of the shell-(0.001, 0.499)
kThe core-shell ratio-(0.1, 0.9)
ɑThe interfacial sliding compliance1/MPa(0.001, 0.01)
βThe interfacial separation compliance1/MPa(0.001, 0.01)
fThe volume fraction of microcapsules-(1%, 10%)
Table 2. Elastic properties of some common concretes.
Table 2. Elastic properties of some common concretes.
TypeElastic ModulusPoisson’s Ratio
C3030 GPa0.2
C4032.5 GPa0.2
C5034.5 GPa0.2
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, S.; Jia, Y.; Wang, C. Global Sensitivity Analysis for the Polymeric Microcapsules in Self-Healing Cementitious Composites. Polymers 2020, 12, 2990. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122990

AMA Style

Zhou S, Jia Y, Wang C. Global Sensitivity Analysis for the Polymeric Microcapsules in Self-Healing Cementitious Composites. Polymers. 2020; 12(12):2990. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122990

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Shuai, Yue Jia, and Chong Wang. 2020. "Global Sensitivity Analysis for the Polymeric Microcapsules in Self-Healing Cementitious Composites" Polymers 12, no. 12: 2990. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122990

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop