Next Article in Journal
Straightforward and Efficient Deuteration of Terminal Alkynes with Copper Catalysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of MnO2 Crystal Type on the Oxidation of Furfural to Furoic Acid
Previous Article in Journal
Insights into the Three-Component Coupling Reactions of Aldehydes, Alkynes, and Amines Catalyzed by N-heterocyclic Carbene Silver: A DFT Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Catalytic Performance for CO Methanation over Ni/MCM-41 Catalyst in a Slurry-Bed Reactor
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Research Progress of Carbon Deposition on Ni-Based Catalyst for CO2-CH4 Reforming

1
State Key Laboratory of Chemistry and Utilization of Carbon-Based Energy Resources and Key Laboratory of Coal Clean Conversion & Chemical Engineering Process (Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region), School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
2
Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266101, China
3
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Ningxia Normal University, Guyuan 756000, China
4
College of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
5
Xinjiang Yihua Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Changji 831700, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Catalysts 2023, 13(4), 647; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13040647
Submission received: 22 February 2023 / Revised: 11 March 2023 / Accepted: 20 March 2023 / Published: 23 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Trends in Catalysis for Syngas Production and Conversion)

Abstract

:
As we all know, the massive emission of carbon dioxide has become a huge ecological and environmental problem. The extensive exploration, exploitation, transportation, storage, and use of natural gas resources will result in the emittance of a large amount of the greenhouse gas CH4. Therefore, the treatment and utilization of the main greenhouse gases, CO2 and CH4, are extremely urgent. The CH4 + CO2 reaction is usually called the dry methane reforming reaction (CRM/DRM), which can realize the direct conversion and utilization of CH4 and CO2, and it is of great significance for carbon emission reduction and the resource utilization of CO2-rich natural gas. In order to improve the activity, selectivity, and stability of the CO2-CH4 reforming catalyst, the highly active and relatively cheap metal Ni is usually used as the active component of the catalyst. In the CO2-CH4 reforming process, the widely studied Ni-based catalysts are prone to inactivation due to carbon deposition, which limits their large-scale industrial application. Due to the limitation of thermodynamic equilibrium, the CRM reaction needs to obtain high conversion and selectivity at a high temperature. Therefore, how to improve the anti-carbon deposition ability of the Ni-based catalyst, how to improve its stability, and how to eliminate carbon deposition are the main difficulties faced at present.

1. Introduction

With the increasing use of fossil resources, such as coal, oil, and natural gas, the global CO2 emissions will continue to rise. In recent years, some countries have been using renewable energy; however, this trend has not been enough to prevent the climate change, polar ice sheet melting, and hurricane intensification caused by the increase in CO2 emissions. The massive emission of CO2 not only accelerates the deterioration of the greenhouse effect but also wastes valuable carbon resources. Therefore, CO2 reduction and resource utilization have become the most noticeable research issues. According to the proportions of different greenhouse gases in the total greenhouse gas emissions calculated by CO2 equivalent, CH4 accounts for 16% and is therefore the second villain of the greenhouse effect. Although the emission of CH4 is far less than that of CO2, its potential to produce a greenhouse effect is about 20 times more than that of CO2. Therefore, how to convert the above two greenhouse gases into useful chemicals or chemical raw materials has attracted the great attention of governments and scientists around the world [1,2,3].
As early as 1928, Fischer and Tropsch discovered the carbon dioxide reforming of methane reaction, that is, CO2 + CH4 = 2CO + 2H2 (carbon dioxide reforming of methane, CRM, ΔH = 247 kJ/mol), also known as methane dry reforming. CRM can produce synthesis gas; it is a strongly endothermic reaction, and the synthesis gas obtained has a low H2/CO ratio, which is more suitable for the subsequent Fischer–Tropsch synthesis reaction [4]. The ratio of H2/CO in the CRM product is about 1, and it can also be used in chemical reactions such as carbonyl synthesis and hydrocarbon production and to produce clean liquid fuels and high-value chemicals [5,6]. Hence, this reaction can also utilize CO2 and CH4, which are two main greenhouse gases; therefore, it has significant industrial value and ecological and environmental significance. The research on this reaction has been further developed, particularly in the past 30 years [7].
CRM and steam reforming of methane (SRM) are catalytic reactions at a high temperature (about 800 °C). The ΔH of CRM = 247 kJ/mol, which is greater than that of SRM (206 kJ/mol), indicating that both CRM and SRM are strongly endothermic reactions, and the endothermic capacity of CRM is nearly 20% higher than that of SRM. Therefore, the reverse reaction of CRM can theoretically release up to 247 kJ/mol of energy. Therefore, the reaction can be used as a good chemical energy transmission system (CETS) to store energy. On the other hand, CRM can be realized through fossil fuels (such as coal, petroleum, etc.), light energy, or nuclear energy, and the above energy can be stored in the product (synthesis gas); then, the synthesis gas can be transported to the place where it is needed for a reverse reaction to release energy.
Over a long period of time, researchers have conducted many studies on the selection and optimization of CRM catalysts, and have achieved fruitful results, making the research on this reaction increasingly broad and deep. Without loss of generality, the relationship between the chemical reaction itself, the type of active component and carrier, the modification of additives, the carbon deposition, and the catalyst performance have been consistently discussed by many researchers. As far as the CRM process is concerned, the main side reaction is the reverse water gas shift reaction (CO2 + H2 = CO + H2O, reverse water gas shift reaction, RWGS), which consumes the H2 (CH4 = C + 2H2) generated by CH4 cracking and generates a large amount of CO, which can cause carbon deposition on the catalyst through another side reaction—the CO disproportionation reaction (2CO = C + CO2) [8,9]. Thus, the proportion of CO2 can be increased from the perspective of chemical equilibrium to inhibit the formation of carbon deposition (that is, the carbon elimination reaction, C + CO2 = 2CO). Thermodynamic calculation showed that the RWGS reaction can be inhibited or avoided at temperatures above 820 °C, but this needs a lot of energy [10]. Therefore, how to optimize the catalyst structure, match the process conditions, and selectively control the degree of carbon deposition, the reverse water gas shift reaction, carbon elimination, and other chemical reactions involving carbon is of great significance in improving the activity of the CO2-CH4 reforming catalyst, inhibiting catalyst deactivation, and extending the service life of the catalyst.
Pakhare et al. [11] introduced DRM literature on a catalyst based on Rh, Ru, Pt, and Pd metals. This includes the effect of these noble metals on the kinetics, mechanism, and deactivation of these catalysts. The inert support catalysts are more prone to deactivation due to carbon deposition than the acidic or basic supports.
At present, the widely used CO2-CH4 reforming catalyst is still dominated bythe non-noble metal catalyst, especially the Ni-based catalyst. Its activity is equivalent to that of the noble metal, but it is very easily inactivated due to carbon deposition. Therefore, the development of the Ni-based catalyst with high carbon deposition resistance is the key to realizing the industrialization of CO2-CH4 reforming. A large number of studies have shown that carbon deposition in the hydrocarbon conversion process is mainly affected by such factors as the acid–base property of the carrier, the dispersion of the active component, and the interaction between the carrier and the active metal [12,13,14,15,16]. The acid sites on the catalyst surface are not conducive to the adsorption of CO2, resulting in the carbon deposition rate on the catalyst surface being much higher than the carbon elimination. Conversely, the surface basic sites can inhibit the carbon deposition caused by CO disproportionation to a certain extent, thereby improving the stability of the catalyst. It was found that when the particle size of the active component was less than 10 nm, the catalyst could present a high anti-coking performance [14]. In addition, strong metal-support interaction is also beneficial in improving the anti-carbon deposition performance of the catalyst [15,16].
In this paper, the thermodynamics, kinetics, and reaction mechanism of the CO2-CH4 reforming reaction are reviewed. Because Ni-based catalysts exhibit high activity but have the problem of the easy deactivation of carbon deposition, this paper further summarizes the research situation regarding carbon deposition on Ni-based catalysts, including the types of carbon deposition, the amount of carbon deposition, and the elimination of carbon deposition. As to how to improve the anti-carbon deposition ability of the Ni-based catalyst and how to eliminate carbon deposition, this paper focuses on two aspects: one is the resistance of carbon deposition from the perspective of catalyst optimization; the other is the elimination of carbon deposition from the perspective of process condition matching. Finally, how to improve the carbon deposition resistance of Ni-based CRM catalyst is prospected.

2. Thermodynamics of CO2-CH4 Reforming

CO2-CH4 reforming mainly includes the following reactions:
CH4 + CO2 = 2H2 + 2CO, ΔH (298 K) = 247 kJ/mol,
H2 + CO2 = H2O + CO, ΔH (298 K) = 41 kJ/mol,
2CO = CO2 + C, ΔH (298 K) = −172 kJ/mol,
CH4 = C + 2H2, ΔH (298 K) = 75 kJ/mol,
CO + H2 = C + H2O, ΔH (298 K) = −131 kJ/mol,
Zhang et al. [17] obtained the thermodynamic equilibrium constants of the above reactions as a function of temperature through thermodynamic calculations, as shown in Figure 1.
As both methane and carbon dioxide are very stable, CRM is an extremely strong endothermic reaction. Meanwhile, the RWGS reaction is an important side reaction in the CRM process which reduces the H2/CO ratio in the product [18,19]. In the CRM reaction process, high temperature (>1000 K) and low pressure (~1 atm) are usually required to obtain the efficient conversion of methane and carbon dioxide to syngas. At a higher pressure, it can promote the RWGS reaction and reduce the H2/CO ratio. Therefore, the ratio of carbon dioxide and methane in the feed gas has a great influence on the H2/CO ratio. Many experiments showed that the ideal H2/CO ratio of 1 can be achieved when the CO2/CH4 ratio is about 1. With the increase in the CO2/CH4 ratio, the H2/CO ratio decreases. This trend is more obvious at higher pressures (10 atm).
In addition to RWGS, there are two other side reactions, methane decomposition and CO disproportionation, which also occur in the CRM process [11]. These two reactions lead to the formation of carbon deposition, which leads to the deactivation of the catalyst. In order to study the formation of the carbon deposition, Lu et al. [19] calculated the limit temperatures of the two side reactions (where the Gibbs free energy change is zero). The CO2-CH4 reaction can be accompanied by methane cracking at above 640 °C, while the reverse water gas shift reaction starts at above 820 °C, without CO disproportionation (2CO = C + CO2, the Boudouard reaction). In the range of 557–700 °C, carbon is mainly formed by methane cracking or the Boudouard reaction. Under the pressure of 0.01–0.1 atm, the feed ratio of CO2/CH4 = 1 can reach the equilibrium conversion rate. At a fixed temperature, the rate at a low pressure is always higher than that at a high pressure. Under the pressure of 0.01 atm, the rate reached 90% at 550 °C, and did not reach 90% until 700 °C at 0.1 atm. There is an upper temperature limit for carbon deposition, and the temperature increases with the increase in reaction pressure and the decrease in the CO2/CH4 ratio. Therefore, the formation of carbon deposition at a certain temperature can be inhibited by reducing the reaction pressure and increasing the proportion of carbon dioxide in the feed gas.
The main reactions of carbon deposition are methane decomposition and the carbon monoxide disproportionation reaction. Severe carbon deposition will lead to blockage or even deactivation of the catalyst bed. According to thermodynamic analysis, the carbon monoxide disproportionation reaction is a strongly exothermic reaction, which mainly occurs in a relatively low temperature range (<650 °C), and methane cracking reaction is a strongly endothermic reaction, which mainly occurs in a relatively high temperature range. Therefore, low temperature and high pressure are beneficial to carbon monoxide disproportionation, and high temperature and low pressure are beneficial to methane cracking, and the main reaction temperature is in the range of 557–700 °C. When the temperature is higher than 600 °C, the amount of carbon deposition will increase rapidly. However, with the increase in reaction temperature, the disproportionation reaction of carbon monoxide will be inhibited, and methane cracking will become the main reaction of the carbon deposition [11,20,21]. However, a high reaction temperature often leads to both the sintering of the active metal and carbon deposition on the catalyst. Sometimes, the fibrous carbon formed during the reaction process has a high mechanical strength, which will damage the catalyst and lead to rapid deactivation of the catalyst [18,19,22].
Adding O2 to CRM system can remove the carbon deposition formed to promote the regeneration of the catalyst, and the heat released from the reaction can also accelerate the decomposition of the methane. For periodic operation, the addition of oxygen (CO2/O2 ratio of 7/3) during the regeneration process at 750 °C significantly improved the stability and activity of the catalyst. During the stability experiment, the catalytic performance of the Ni/SiO2·MgO catalyst for CRM in the presence of O2 increased with the increase in O2 content and reaction temperature [23]. In addition, the introduction of another auxiliary means, such as light and plasma treatment, can break the energy barrier of the reaction and improve the conversion rate of the reactants. Some researchers used Au as the plasma promoter for the first time to improve the reforming performance of noble metal-based catalysts. The results showed that visible light irradiation could significantly improve the reforming activity of the Rh-Au/SBA-15 catalyst. The maximum CO2 conversion rate under light conditions is 1.7 times higher than that under dark conditions. The test at 400 °C showed that the CO2 conversion rate under light conditions was 2.4 times higher than that under dark conditions. Kinetic measurement showed that the activation energy was reduced by 30% under light conditions [24].

3. Kinetics of CO2-CH4 Reforming (Reaction Mechanism)

With the development of research technology at the micro-level, the perspective of the theoretical research has gradually shifted from thermodynamics to kinetics. The view on the adsorption and dissociation of reactants and products provides an ideal explanation for the kinetics of the CRM reaction.
Presently, the focus of the research on CO2-CH4 reforming has two aspects. On the one hand, it is necessary to find new catalysts and additives to improve the catalyst activity and carbon deposition resistance. On the other hand, it is necessary to study the reaction mechanism in detail by the kinetic method, with the aim of deeply understanding the reforming reaction and designing a new catalyst according to the mechanism. Kinetic study is one of the best methods to reveal the intrinsic activity of the used catalyst. Due to the high activity and low price of Ni in CO2-CH4 reforming, the study of Ni kinetics has attracted more and more attention. Most studies have focused on exploring the rate-determining step in the CO2-CH4 reforming process. Discussing the rate-determining step of the reaction can lead to further understanding of the catalytic reaction mechanism and the design and improvement of the catalyst and reaction conditions. It was found that the kinetic process of CO2-CH4 reforming mainly includes the adsorption and dissociation of the reactants, CH4 and CO2, as well as the formation and desorption of the products, H2 and CO. In order to correctly understand the kinetics and reaction mechanism of the reaction, we should understand the adsorption, desorption, and reaction properties of the reactants and products on the catalyst.
CRM reaction is a complex process. The mechanism of CRM varies greatly according to the difficulty in forming reaction intermediates in different catalyst systems and reaction conditions [25]. Many studies have shown that the key step of CRM is the adsorption and dissociation of CH4 on the catalyst surface.
The reaction mechanism of CO2-CH4 reforming is closely related to the type and composition of the catalyst. At present, there is no uniform conclusion on the reaction mechanism of CO2-CH4 dioxide reforming. Many researchers have explored the mechanisms of different catalysts.
Bodrov et al. [26] first proposed the CO2-CH4 reforming reaction principle on a Ni-based catalyst, including the following basic steps:
CH4+*⟶ CH2* + H2,
CO2+* ⟷ CO + O*,
O* + H2 ⟷ H2O+*,
CH2* + H2O ⟷ CO* + 2H2,
CO* ⟷ CO+*,
In the above formula, “*” represents the active site, (6) represents an irreversible slow reaction, and the other steps are reversible reactions.
Later, Hansen et al. [27] improved the above mechanism and proposed that the dissociation of CH4 on Ni/MgO can be divided into two steps:
CH4+*→CH3* + H*,
CH3* + (3 − x)*→CHx* + (3 − x)H*,
Osaki et al. [28] analyzed the surface pulse reaction rate of a Ni/MgO catalyst and found that the adsorption and dissociation of CH4 can directly generate gaseous H2, namely
CH4+*→CHx* + (4 − x)/2H2*,
It was experimentally concluded that the dissociation of CH4 was the rate-determining step of the CO2-CH4 reforming reaction.
For Ni and Pt-based catalysts, Bradford et al. [29] believed that CH4 first dissociated into CHx* and H2, while CO2 dissociated under the action of H* to form CO* and OH*; then, CHx* reacted with OH* to form CHxO*, and finally, CHxO* decomposed into CO and H2.
Wei et al. [30] studied the kinetics of the CO2-CH4 reaction on a Ni/MgO catalyst by using carbon dioxide and methane isotopes. They observed an obvious isotope effect of CH4 dissociation and speculated that CH4 dissociation was the rate-determining step of the reforming reaction. In the field of theoretical research, Wang et al. [31] used the DFT (density functional theory) method to study the principle of the CO2-CH4 reaction on the surface of perfect Ni(111). The calculation results showed that the principle of CO2-CH4 reforming is:
  • CO2 decomposes to generate O and CO, while CH4 gradually cleaves H on the surface to generate CH and H2;
  • CH is oxidized to obtain CHO;
  • The main product CO is obtained by the dissociation reaction of CHO;
  • H2 and CO are desorbed from Ni(111) to form free H2 and CO.
Although the activation mechanisms of different catalytic systems are quite different, the existing research results show that the dehydrogenation cracking of CH4 on the metal surface is a common and critical process. That is, CH4 is decomposed into surface CHx (x = 1–3) and H (CH4→CH3→CH2→CH). On the other hand, the adsorption and activation mechanism of CO2 is very important for the decarbonization process, because it not only generates the key product CO, but also provides a surface oxygen species for CH4 reforming, which is the core intermediate for the elimination of carbon deposition. CO2 activation consists of two steps: the first step is CO2 chemical adsorption and the formation of an anionic CO2δ- precursor on the surface [32,33]; in the second step, the CO2δ- precursor is dissociated into surface adsorbed CO and O species. Therefore, CO2 is the only source of the oxygen atom in the reaction gas and is the supplier of active oxygen species on the catalyst surface [34,35,36,37,38]. In addition, the activation path of CO2 varies with the acidity and alkalinity of the support, which has a certain effect on the anti-carbon deposition performance of a Ni-based catalyst. Generally, at the interface between the active metal and the support, the acidic support can promote the dissociation of CH4, but the stronger the acidity, the easier it is to produce carbon deposition [39].
It is known that increasing the adsorbed oxygen species over the catalyst surface is really effective in promoting the catalytic activity and restraining the side reaction (RWGS). Simultaneously, the adsorbed oxygen species are effective in suppressing/removing the deposited carbon, thereby alleviating catalyst deactivation [40].
The higher CO2 activity enhanced the oxidation rate of the surface carbon generated from the side reactions, thereby resulting in a higher reforming rate and in the inhibition of the coke formation, especially the detrimental graphitic encapsulating carbon on an active nickel surface [41].
Based on the combined results of catalytic testing and characterization, Ni/Ce0.9Eu0.1O1.95-HT can accelerate the rate of CO2 activation and promote the conversion of CH4 into CO instead of into coke deposition, leading to a relatively good performance for the DRM reaction [42].
Burghaus [43] clarified the correlation between CO2 adsorption kinetics and the surface structure characteristics of various metals and oxides, including metals (Cu, Cr), metal oxides (ZnO, TiO2, CaO), model catalysts (Cu/ZnO, Zn/Cu), and nano-catalysts. The binding energy of CO2 and metal oxides is generally greater than that of metals. When CO2 chemisorption occurs on CaO, the C atom combines with the O site of CaO, and the surface carbonate formed is very stable. Its decomposition and desorption temperature is as high as 1100 K.
Pan et al. [44] used DFT calculation and found that the adsorption and activation of a 3D transition metal dimer (M2/γ-Al2O3, M = Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) supported by γ-Al2O3 were consistent with the experimental results reported in many of the studies. CO2 adsorbed on M2/γ-Al2O3, a negatively charged species is formed, forming a metal dimer; γ-Al2O3 supports could provide electrons to the adsorbed CO2 to activate it, and the most favorable adsorption position was at the interface between the metal dimer and the support; so, the highly dispersed metal particles showed good activity. In addition, the hydroxyl group on the surface of the carrier reduces the amount of charge transferred from the metal dimer to the CO2 and weakened the chemical adsorption of CO2.
The addition of La2O3 to the Ni/γ-Al2O3 catalyst could inhibit the carbon deposition in CO2-CH4 reforming. Some researchers have found that in the CO2-CH4 reaction, La2O3 interacts with CO2 on the Ni/La2O3 catalyst to generate La2O2CO3 [45], and La2O2CO3 decomposes CO and provides oxygen species, and the oxygen species can react with carbon species accumulated after the dissociation of CH4 on Ni grains to generate CO, thus achieving the effect of inhibiting carbon deposition.

4. Carbon Deposition and Elimination on Ni-Based Catalyst

The Ni-based catalyst is widely used in industrial processes because of its high activity, good stability, and low cost, but the biggest problem is that the catalysts are easily inactivated. There are three main ways that deactivation occurs: carbon deposition, sintering, and poisoning. Among them, the most important factor causing catalyst inactivation in the carbon-related reaction process was carbon deposition. Hence, the reaction mechanism of carbon deposition and the inhibition of carbon deposition need to be further studied. The several existing inhibition methods can be divided into two types: one involves the resistance of carbon deposition from the perspective of catalyst optimization, and the other involves the elimination of carbon deposition from the perspective of process condition matching.

4.1. Formation and Type of Carbon Deposition

The deactivation of the Ni-based catalyst is mainly due to carbon deposition on the catalyst surface. The raw materials for the CO2-CH4 reforming reaction are all carbon-containing gases. Methane cracking (CH4 = C + 2H2) and carbon monoxide disproportionation (2CO = C + CO2) will inevitably form carbon on the catalyst surface [11].
According to existing studies, the types of carbon deposition can be divided into amorphous carbon, polymerized carbon, carbon nanotubes, graphitized carbon, and filamentous carbon [46]. Amorphous carbon is composed of carbon atoms adsorbed on the metal active center; these atoms have high reactivity and can be removed by an oxidation reaction (C + O2 = CO2) at about 200 °C. Polymerized carbon composed of partially hydrogenated carbon-carbon chains has low reactivity, but it is still a kind of carbon species that can be oxidized and eliminated under mild conditions or eliminated under appropriate process conditions (such as excessive CO2). Graphitized carbon is a ring structure composed of six carbon atoms and needs higher a reaction temperature to be oxidized and eliminated. It belongs to inert carbon deposition. Filamentous carbon and carbon nanotubes can block the pores of the catalyst and gradually reduce its activity until it is completely deactivated [7,47,48].
Mo et al. [49] studied the effect of reaction time on carbon deposition on a Ni-Al2O3 catalyst. Figure 2 shows the TPH spectra of samples after a reforming reaction at different times. According to the report [50], 200–350 °C is the first type of hydrogenation peak, which belongs to the amorphous α type of carbon species, which is the active intermediate of the decarbonization reaction (CO2 + C = 2CO) and is also the desired type of carbon deposition for a carbon-related reaction. It is easy for this type of carbon to be converted into a slightly less active carbon at a high-temperature β type of carbon species; 350–500 °C is the second type of hydrogenation peak, which belongs to the β1 type carbon species, which do not form a strong interaction with the carrier and are easy to deposit in the catalyst pore, or they enter the catalyst lattice to form carbon nanotubes or filamentous carbon; they have decarbonization reaction activity at higher temperatures but easily become inert when aggregated for a long time at high-temperature γ carbon species; 500–700 °C is the third type of hydrogenation peak, belonging to the γ type of carbon species, such as graphite carbon, whose activity is lower than α carbon and β carbon and is an important reason for the irreversible deactivation of the catalyst due to carbon deposition. The literature also showed that [51], after the CRM reaction occurred on the surface of the Ni-CaO-ZrO2 catalyst for 1 h, the temperature-programmed hydrogenation reaction characterization (TPH) found that the coking hydrogenation peak at about 800 °C was attributable to β2 types of carbon species, namely the fourth type of hydrogenation peak. It can be seen from Figure 2 that in the process of the CO2-CH4 reforming reaction on the Ni-Al2O3 catalyst, the surface hydrogenation peaks of the carbon species generated are all at 200–500 °C, that is, the amorphous carbon Cα and filamentous carbon Cβ1 type exists [52,53]. However, no obvious hydrogenation peak was found at about 600 and 800 °C. Therefore, it can be considered that in the range of 10 h, the CO2-CH4 reforming reaction almost did not form the Cγ and Cβ2 types of carbon species.
According to the degree of difficulty of carbon elimination under the conditions of the reforming reaction, the above carbon deposition can be classified as active carbon deposition (amorphous carbon), transitional carbon deposition (polymeric carbon, carbon nanotubes, and filamentous carbon), and inactive carbon deposition (graphitized carbon).
Mo et al. [49] observed the carbon deposition on the catalyst surface at different reaction times and found that the fibrous carbon deposition began to accumulate after 2 h of reaction, and after 5 h, it was observed that there were many fibrous or rod-shaped morphologies with larger diameters. With the extension of reaction time, the amount of fibrous carbon deposition increased significantly, while the diameter of the carbon fibers decreased significantly, which is probably because of the occurrence of a carbon elimination reaction (C + CO2 = 2CO) in CO2-CH4 reforming (Figure 3). The results also showed that each sample had two hydrogenation peaks, one low-temperature hydrogenation peak and one high-temperature hydrogenation peak, corresponding to two types of carbon deposition species [49]. With the increase in reaction temperature, the high-temperature hydrogenation peak of the carbon deposition moves to a high temperature. The reaction temperature increased from 650 °C to 850 °C, and the peak temperature of the high-temperature hydrogenation peak increased from 425 °C to 455 °C, which may be due to the fact that filamentous carbon is easily converted into graphite carbon at high temperatures, and the hydrogenation reaction needs to be carried out at a higher temperature [54].
Figure 4 showed the morphological characteristics of carbon on the catalyst surface after the reforming reaction. It can be seen from the figure that a large amount of filamentous carbon is formed on the catalyst surface and is even covering the catalyst surface in a large range. It can be speculated that if the carbon deposition continues, it will completely cover the catalyst surface and cause catalyst deactivation [46].

4.2. Resistance and Elimination of Carbon Deposition

In CO2-CH4 reforming, the carbon deposition rate usually depends on its formation rate and elimination rate. When the elimination rate of carbon deposition is higher than the formation, the carbon deposition can be inhibited [55]. According to the cause of carbon deposition in the CO2-CH4 reaction, the carbon deposition can be suppressed by two aspects: catalyst modification and process conditions optimization.
In the process of CO2-CH4 reforming, carbon deposition mainly comes from methane cracking and carbon monoxide disproportionation. The dehydrogenation of CH4 on the metal surface generates carbon species CHx (x = 0–3, CH4→C + 2H2), which do not react with the surface oxygen species generated by the timely adsorption and dissociation of CO2 to generate carbon species of CO (C + CO2→2CO), and the carbon species may accumulate on the metal surface, causing carbon deposition. As the carbon dioxide content in the reactant gas increases, the adsorption rate of methane and its subsequent dissociation rate (i.e., the cracking of methane) decrease. At the same time, the oxidation rate of carbon species on the catalyst surface increases. Therefore, the amount of carbon deposited on the active site is reduced, which can significantly improve the stability of the Ni-based catalyst. In an atmosphere with sufficient CO2, during a long catalytic process, carbon will migrate and accumulate in the center of the Ni crystal, forming a hollow fiber type structure from bottom to top. The process of carbon deposition and carbon elimination on a Ni/CeO2 catalyst is shown in Figure 5 [56].
Kuijpers [57] found the size sensitivity of CH4 activation in the study of Ni-based catalysts, that is, CH4 preferentially dissociates on smaller Ni grains. Osaki et al. [28,58] reported the x value of CHx species on different catalysts: Ni/MgO = 2.7, Ni/ZnO = 2.5, Ni/Al2O3 = 2.4, Ni/TiO2 = 1.9, Ni/SiO2 = 1.0, and Co/Al2O3 = 0.75. It can be seen that for the same metal, the x value of basic carrier is higher, that is, the degree of CH4 dissociation increases with the increase in carrier acidity. On the other hand, the activation of the C-H bond requires electrons from the surface of the Ni; so, the electronic environment around the Ni is also extremely important [59]. For example, the strong metal-support interaction will significantly affect the activity of Ni to dissociate CH4 [60,61].
Horiuchi et al. [7] believe that alkaline metal oxides can enhance the adsorption capacity of CO2 and generate more active oxygen atoms (Oad); Oad can effectively prevent the adsorption of CHx,ad on the active center of Ni metal through the reaction of CHx,ad + Oad→CO + H2, thus avoiding the surface carbon deposition caused by the cracking of CHx,ad. Therefore, adding additives such as alkali or alkaline oxide can enhance the basicity of the carrier surface and the ability to absorb CO2, change the electronic density of the metal active center, effectively improve the catalytic activity of the catalyst, and inhibit the carbon deposition on the catalyst surface [62].

4.2.1. Resistance of Carbon Deposition from the Perspective of Catalyst

Effect of Ni Grain Size on the Deposition of Carbon

Studies have shown that high dispersion of active metal on the surface of the support can reduce the agglomeration size and effectively inhibit carbon deposition [11,63,64]. It has also been shown that only when the size of the active component is larger than a certain critical size (for example, ≥9 nm) can lead the carbon simple substance to form nuclei [7]. The small size and high dispersion of the active component can effectively inhibit the nucleation and growth of carbon whiskers. Therefore, by selecting the appropriate support, additive, and preparation method, the metal dispersion and particle size can be adjusted to effectively inhibit the occurrence of carbon deposition and improve the anti-carbon deposition performance [65]. In addition, the addition of an appropriate additive can also improve the surface alkalinity of the catalyst, strengthen the adsorption of CO2, promote the elimination of deposited carbon species, and enhance the anti-carbon deposition performance of the catalyst.
XU et al. [66] prepared Ni/La2O3/γ-Al2O3 and Ni/La2O3/α-Al2O3 catalysts and found that when the size of the Ni particles was less than 15 nm, the carbon deposition was significantly reduced (Figure 6), which made the catalyst have higher catalytic activity and stability. CRNIVEC et al. [67] found that the catalyst surface with metal active particles less than 6 nm has excellent resistance to carbon deposition. LIU et al. [68] found that when nickel particles were less than 5 nm, they had an obvious inhibition effect on carbon deposition.
Li et al. [69] analyzed the surface carbon on a Ni/MgO catalyst based on density functional theory and found that the size of the active component Ni had a great influence on the anti-carbon deposition performance of the catalyst. The three different sizes of active metals, Ni4, Ni8, and Ni12 were loaded on the surface of MgO, showing significant differences in catalytic activity and stability. Small size Ni4 can reduce the activation energy of the CH4 dissociation adsorption, the CH dissociation, and the Coxidation, thus improving the CO2-CH4 reforming performance.
In their study, Mo et al. [70,71] found that after the reduction in the Ni-based catalyst based on NiAl2O4 spinel, the size of the Ni crystal was small and could effectively prevent the high-temperature sintering of the active component. By increasing the calcination temperature, the proportion of NiAl2O4 spinel (the active component precursor) in the catalyst was increased, and the size of the active component was effectively reduced; the stability of the catalyst was improved, and the amount of carbon deposited on the catalyst was obviously reduced. It was also found that there were two Ni precursors, crystalline NiO (calcinated at lower temperature (≤600 °C) and spinel NiAl2O4 (calcinated at higher temperature (≥700 °C), indicating that the calcination temperature significantly affected the interaction force between the metal and the support. The higher the calcination temperature, the stronger the force, and the more the spinel phase Ni species that formed. This type of Ni species gave a small size of active component after reduction, which could obtain higher CO2 and CH4 conversion and H2 selectivity [72].

Inhibition of Carbon Deposition from the Stability of Ni Component

In general, researchers add some additives to the Ni-based catalyst to improve the dispersion and stability of the nickel, promoting the reforming reaction and inhibiting the formation of carbon deposition, which is a research hotspot in this reaction. The additives commonly used are mainly divided into two categories. The first type of additive is alkaline oxides, including MgO, CaO, K2O, etc. [73,74]. It was found that the addition of alkaline oxides to a Ni-based catalyst can promote dispersion of the Ni and inhibit carbon deposition. On the other hand, the alkaline medium can improve the adsorption performance of CO2 (weak acid gas). Some researchers [74] believed that the addition of alkali metals can inhibit carbon deposition and improve the activity and stability of the catalyst. Mo et al. [75] studied the effect of CaO on the structure, reforming performance, and carbon deposition of the Ni-Al2O3 catalyst. The results showed that the activity of Ni-Ca-4 was higher, with the conversion rate of CH4 and CO2 of 52.0% and 96.7%, respectively. The amount of carbon deposited on the catalyst was lower, and the type of the carbon was attributed to an amorphous one, presenting a good anti-carbon deposition performance.
Another kind of additive is rare earth oxides [73], such as CeO2 and La2O3, which can achieve both high activity and stability for CO2-CH4 reforming. By adding rare earth oxide, the crystal phase, pore structure, and mechanical strength of the catalyst could be significantly changed, thereby improving the activity, stability, and selectivity of the catalyst. For example, the addition of La2O3 to the Ni/γ-Al2O3 catalyst could inhibit the carbon deposition in CO2-CH4 reforming. Some researchers found that in the CO2-CH4 reaction, La2O3 interacts with CO2 on the Ni/La2O3 catalyst to generate La2O2CO3 [52]; La2O2CO3 decomposes CO and provides oxygen species, and the oxygen species can react with the carbon species accumulated after the dissociation of CH4 on Ni grains to generate CO, thus achieving the effect of inhibiting carbon deposition. Other additives, such as metal Cr [76] and mixed oxide CeO2-ZrO2 [77,78], can also improve the activity and stability of the catalyst.
Mo et al. [70] prepared a series of La2O3-NiO-Al2O3 catalysts with different La loading to improve the performance of the Ni-based catalyst for CO2-CH4 reforming. The results showed that the precursor of the active component mainly exists in the form of NiAl2O4 spinel. The “confinement effect” of La2O3 on Ni grains can inhibit the sintering of the active component, prevent carbon deposition, and improve the reforming performance. Mo et al. [79] also prepared a Ni-Al2O3 catalyst with Ca, Co, and Ce as additives by the combustion method. The results showed that the activity order of the catalysts was followed by Co-Ni-Al2O3>Ca-Ni-Al2O3>Ni-Al2O3>Ce-Ni-Al2O3. Carbon deposition analysis showed that Ca-Ni-Al2O3 presented poor carbon deposition resistance, and a certain amount of graphitic carbon was generated on the catalyst. The dry reforming performance of Ni catalysts supported by different supports is shown in Table 1

Application of High-Activity Bimetallic Catalysts

The introduction of a second metal to obtain a bimetallic Ni-based catalyst is also considered to be an effective and practical strategy to improve the performance of the CRM catalyst. The synergistic effect between Ni and the second metal can significantly improve the activity and carbon deposition resistance of the Ni-based catalyst [17,88,89,90,91].
In order to discuss the synergistic effect and the basic principle for improving the performance of the used catalyst, the researchers prepared a series of bimetallic Ni-based CRM catalysts. The results showed that Ni-Pt [92], Ni-Co [93], and Ni-Cu [94] showed better activity and carbon deposition resistance. In general, bimetallic Ni-based CRM catalysts include Ni-noble metals (Pt, Ru, etc.) and Ni-transition metals (Co, Fe, and Cu) [95,96]. Ni-noble metal bimetallic catalysts have three advantages: the promotion of reduction, surface modification, and surface reconstruction. Noble metals usually contribute to the reduction in NiO crystal, thereby increasing the number of active sites [97,98,99,100]. In terms of surface modification, the surface properties of Ni can be changed by adding a trace noble metal. In addition, the surface reconstruction of the bimetallic particles can be caused by temperature or adsorbate [101,102]. GARCIÁ-DIÉGUEZG et al. [103] prepared a Ni-Pt bimetallic catalyst for a CRM reaction. Compared with the Ni catalyst, the Ni-Pt bimetallic catalyst formed a Ni-Pt alloy with higher activity and lower carbon deposition. Although only a small amount of precious metals was added to the Ni-based catalyst, the production cost of the catalyst still increased. Therefore, some researchers doped transition metals such as Co, Fe, and Cu into a Ni-based catalyst to construct a CRM bimetallic catalyst to reduce the industrial production cost [104]. Co, Fe, and Cu have a strong synergistic effect in the bimetallic system. Of course, the specific effects of the three metals are different [105,106,107,108,109]. Some researchers discussed the effect of Ni-Co, Ni-Fe, and Ni-Cu bimetallic catalysts. The introduction of the second active component, Co or Cu, into the Ni-based catalyst helped to improve the catalytic activity and carbon deposition resistance [110].
The Ni-Co bimetallic catalyst shows a stronger synergistic effect [111,112,113]. Additionally, the Ni/Co ratio, which can adjust the surface composition of Ni-Co clusters, plays a crucial role in the Ni-Co bimetallic system [114,115,116,117]. Generally, a small amount of Co can optimize the adjustment process, while excessive Co will cause the catalyst to be oxidized. The promotive effect of Co is mainly due to its strong affinity for oxygen species, enhancing the ability to eliminate carbon deposition on the catalyst [111,118,119]. The Ni-Co/Al2O3 bimetallic catalyst showed high thermal stability at 800 °C and effectively inhibited the side reaction of RWGS [120]. Turap et al. [84] prepared a Ni-Co/CeO2 bimetallic catalyst for CRM reaction and found that the strong oxygen affinity of Co and the strong oxygen storage capacity of CeO2 were helpful in eliminating carbon deposition. As the Co/Ni ratio was up to 0.8, the catalyst presented better activity and stability. Li et al. [121] studied the catalytic performance of a bimetallic Ni-Co/Al2O3 catalyst for CRM and found that the addition of metal Co can form a Ni-Co alloy, increasing the activation energy of CH4 dissociation, thus inhibiting the CH4 cracking activity. At the same time, the addition of Co could improve the oxygen affinity of the catalyst and remove carbon deposition. Liang et al. [122] used a one-pot method to synthesize an attapulgite-derived MFI (ADM) zeolite-coated Ni-Co alloy. The results showed that the Ni-Co alloy existed stably in the CRM process, which was conducive to the formation of electron-rich Ni metal and significantly improved the fracture ability of the C-H bond. At the same time, ADM not only firmly anchors metal sites through pore structure or layered system, but also provides rich CO2 adsorption/activation centers, realizing high CRM reaction activity and improving the anti-carbon deposition performance.
Cu can partly replace Ni to improve catalyst activity and carbon deposition resistance [110]. Song et al. [123] constructed a Ni-Cu bimetallic catalyst. The catalyst with a 0.25–0.50 Cu/Ni ratio showed good activity, stability, and carbon deposition resistance, while the catalyst with higher and lower Cu/Ni ratios would be deactivated due to serious carbon deposition. The excellent performance of the optimized Ni-Cu/Mg(Al)O catalyst was related to the synergistic effect between Ni and Cu. On the one hand, the alloying of Ni and Cu inhibited the deep dissociation of methane, and the carbon species obtained were more easily gasified (carbon eliminated). On the other hand, Cu provided active sites for the dissociation of CO2, leading to the formation of active oxygen species. The alloying of Ni and Cu reduced the decomposition rate of CH4, promoted the dissociation of CO2, and effectively inhibited carbon deposition. Other studies showed that [124], during the CRM reaction, the addition of Cu had a significant effect on the activity and anti-carbon deposition performance of the Ni/CeO2 catalyst, and the formation of a Ni-O-Ce solid solution generated more oxygen vacancies, improving catalytic activity.
Fe has always played a certain role in promoting the CRM reaction. Both Fe and Ni are iron elements with similar element properties, and the two metals can be alloyed in a certain proportion to make a catalyst with good catalytic performance [93,125]. The research from Kim et al. [126] showed that the catalysts supported solely with Ni or Fe presented the problems of fast deactivation and a low conversion rate, respectively, while the bimetallic Ni-Fe catalyst showed good activity and stability in the CRM reaction. By further analysis, it was found that the promotion of Fe in a Ni-Fe alloy was due to the cracking of CH4 on the active metal Ni to produce H2 and carbon. A part of Fe reacts with CO2 to generate FeO, which falls off from the alloy. Additionally, the carbon can react with FeO and be oxidized to generate CO. Then, FeO is reduced to Fe, which is the original Ni-Fe alloy. This decarburization reaction cycle is conducive to the reducing of the surface carbon on the catalyst. The anti-carbon deposition performance of different bimetallic catalysts is shown in Table 2.

Selection of Support

The support is a very important part of a catalyst. In a CO2-CH4 reforming reaction, the commonly used supports are Al2O3, MgO, CeO2, TiO2, SiO2, etc. Although the support itself has no activity in the reaction, it can change the overall performance of the catalyst. The physical and chemical properties of the support, such as surface morphology, pore structure, interaction with active component, and the resulting differences due to the support, such as surface–interface structure, surface composition, grain size, and dispersion of the active component, can affect the existence form of the active component precursor and the catalyst activity, selectivity, stability, and carbon deposition resistance. Many studies have pointed out that strong interaction between the support and the active component is conducive to improving the dispersion and sintering resistance of the active metal, resulting in a high carbon resistance performance.
The stronger the interaction between the support and the metal, the less likely the catalyst will be reduced. If it can be reduced under certain conditions, then the smaller the metal particles, the better the dispersion. The excessive surface acidity of the support leads to catalyst deactivation through methane decomposition. Similarly, excessive surface basicity leads to catalyst deactivation through the Boudouard reaction as well as through the formation of metal oxides [39]. Hao et al. [131] reported that a close combination of Ni and carrier caused by a strong metal-support interaction promoted the transfer of transition species at the interface and the transfer of electrons, leading to the transformation of non-inert carbon species in the reaction process and avoiding the forming of inert carbon deposition. At the same time, strong metal-support interaction can effectively inhibit the sintering and growth of Ni particles under the reaction conditions and can have a certain stabilizing effect on Ni particles, thereby improving the performance of the catalyst. Liu et al. [60] found through their research that Ni/CeO2 was very active in the CRM reaction and that strong metal-support interaction enhanced the dissociation reaction activity of Ni to CH4 and inhibited the formation of carbon deposition. Ruckenstein et al. [132] prepared a Ni/TiO2 catalyst and found that there was a strong interaction between Ni and TiO2, which led to the reduction in the free energy of the system. TiOx can promote the elimination of carbon to a certain extent, but TiOx molecules migrate on the surface during the reduction process, covering the active sites of Ni. A large amount of filamentous carbon was formed on Ni supported on CeO2 and on CeO2 doped with iso-valent Zr, while a negligible amount was formed on Ni supported on CeO2 doped with aliovalent Sm or La (Figure 7). The ceria dopants can change the interaction of Ni with the support [133].
The pore structure of the support has a great influence on the performance of the catalyst and has a limited domain effect on the active component. It has been found that micropores (<2nm) are not conducive to the dispersion of metal particles; mesopores (2–50 nm) can make the catalyst have a large specific surface area; macropores (>50nm) can promote the diffusion of reactant and product molecule, make gas molecules fully contact the catalyst, and increase the number of exposed Ni active sites [134]. Due to the limitation of the mesoporous structure of the support, Ni particles exist in the pores on the catalyst as much as possible, with high dispersion, which is conducive to strong metal-support interaction, thus reducing the formation of carbon deposition [135]. The catalyst with multistage pore structure has higher carbon capacity and a lower carbon deposition deactivation rate due to the addition of different levels of pores [134,136]. Du et al. [137] reported a CRM catalyst of HT-NiMgAl with a multistage pore structure. The multistage pore structure of this catalyst effectively increased the specific surface area of the catalyst, improving the dispersion of Ni particles; it could effectively inhibit carbon deposition due to its role in limiting the region of the active component.
After the reduction in the catalyst, the Ni atoms are easily sintered at high temperature, which leads to the reduction in the dispersion of Ni atoms on the surface and the increase in the concentration difference between the bulk Ni atoms and the surface Ni atoms so that the Ni atoms dissolved in the support will migrate to the surface under the promotion of the concentration gradient, supplementing the dispersion of the surface Ni atoms. Studies showed that the Co/MgO catalyst provides a strong Lewis alkaline environment due to the formation of solid solution CoMgOx, which effectively stabilizes the Co nanoparticles on the surface of the support. Due to the alternating polar nanolayer structure of O2- and Mg2+ and the existence of a large number of O2- Lewis alkaline sites on the surface of MgO(111), the anti-sintering ability and anti-carbon deposition performance of the catalyst have been improved [138,139]. In addition, the support has a Lewis base, which can increase the alkalinity of the catalyst, promote the adsorption and dissociation of CO2, and eliminate carbon deposition in the reaction. At the same time, the alkalinity of the support can inhibit the growth of Ni metal particles at high temperatures, thus improving the activity, stability, and carbon deposition resistance of the catalyst [140]. Jafarbegloo et al. [141] prepared a NiO-MgO catalyst and found that the strong Lewis base of MgO absorbed a large amount of carbon dioxide, improved the conversion rate of carbon dioxide, and eliminated carbon deposition on the catalyst surface.
Li et al. [142] prepared an iron-rich biomass-derived carbon for the CO2-CH4 reforming and found that it had higher activity than non-iron-rich carbon. Before 800 °C, the order of the iron-rich carbon promoting the reforming reaction was followed by Fe-C2 (10% Fe content) > Fe-C3 (20% Fe content) > Fe-C1 (5% Fe content). After 800 °C, Fe-C2 can still achieve the maximum CH4 conversion rate. In addition, the catalytic activity of Fe-C2 to CH4 at 800 °C was better than that of other catalysts at higher temperature. By further measuring the carbon catalyst used, it was found that the weights of iron-rich carbon and non-iron-rich carbon increased by 0.2% and 0.9%, respectively. Therefore, it can be proved that the carbon deposition on the carbon catalyst is less, which effectively eliminates the carbon deposition. After the test, the iron-rich carbon had less carbon deposition, mainly in the form of filamentous carbon, which was more easily removed by carbon removal reaction.
Most biomass carbons are alkaline, and their ash contains a large amount of alkali metals (K, Na) and alkaline earth metals (Ca, Mg), which can promote the formation of alkaline sites, facilitate the adsorption and dissociation of CO2, and inhibit the formation of carbon deposition. It has been reported that alkali/alkaline earth metals are one of the main reasons for biomass carbon to promote CO2-CH4 reforming [142]. Zhang et al. [143] studied the role of alkali/alkaline earth metals in tar reforming. The results showed that alkali/alkaline earth metals promoted the interaction between the active metal Ni and the carrier and inhibited the sintering of Ni. Alkali/alkaline earth metals cause more oxygen to be adsorbed on the surface of the catalyst, which has strong oxidizability. It can react with reaction intermediates or C, avoid the deposition of C on the catalyst, and inhibit carbon deposition [142,143,144]. San et al. [145] studied the role of alkali metal K and speculated that K can promote C gasification reaction and cover some active sites to inhibit CH4 decomposition and reduce carbon deposition, but the coverage of active sites will also have a certain negative impact on the reforming reaction. Wu et al. [146] used CaO as the carrier to theoretically calculate that the presence of CaO adsorbed more CO2 to the participate in the CO2-CH4 reforming and that CO2 dissociated at the interface between Ni and CaO; in addition, the oxygen species produced by dissociation and carbon deposition on the surface of the catalyst generated CO, which extended the service life of the catalyst.

Application of Confined Catalyst

A confined catalyst can effectively confine the active center on the catalyst in different ways, which mainly include lattice limit, pore limit, core-shell limit, surface space limit, and multiple limits.
Lattice confinement can effectively anchor precious metal or non-precious metal on the regularly arranged spatial skeleton and can improve the dispersion of active centers. Ruitenbeek et al. [147] used a catalyst composed of a single iron atom in the lattice confined region; it had high activity and selectivity in the reaction and almost no carbon deposition. The surface confined catalyst had a high specific surface area, highly ordered pore structure, and narrow pore size distribution. Wang et al. [148] used dendritic mesoporous SiO2 (DMS) as a carrier to prepare an alkali metal oxide modified low-temperature carbon deposition-resistant Ni-based catalyst and applied it to a reforming reaction, which showed excellent low-temperature carbon deposition resistance.
Kong et al. [149] prepared microporous molecular sieve S-1 with rich pores and high specific surface area, and effectively embedded the active component Ni in the pores and applied it to CO2-CH4 reforming. The results showed that the catalyst had excellent activity and stability at 650 °C and 0.5 MPa for 100 h. The thermogravimetric test of the catalyst after reaction did not find weight loss and indicated that the S-1-encapsulated Ni-based catalyst had excellent carbon deposition resistance. The main reason was that the catalyst channel effectively restricted the aggregation of Ni particles, which made the Ni disperse uniformly and reduced the size of the Ni.
Core-shell catalysts mainly include two types: one is the close contact type; the other is the eggshell type (the active component is separated from the shell). Zhang et al. [150] wrapped the perovskite LaNiO3 nano-cube in the mesoporous silica shell to form a new core-shell structure catalyst, which was used in the CO2-CH4 reforming and showed excellent carbon deposition resistance. Compared with the eggshell catalyst, the core-shell catalyst had a contact interface between the core and shell, which resulted in enhanced interaction, inhibition of the movement of the active center, and reduction in the particle size. Liu et al. [151] designed a high-performance In-Ni@SiO2 close-contact nanocore-shell catalyst. The In-Ni@SiO2 catalyst had higher activity compared to the Ni@SiO2 catalyst. CO2 and CH4 reacted at 800 °C for 430 h and still maintained 90% conversion. After reaction, compared with the other supported catalyst, they had less carbon deposition, better stability, and anti-carbon deposition performance.
Multiple restriction can limit the active center, reduce its exposure, and improve carbon deposition resistance on the catalyst. Wang et al. [152] prepared a Ni@La2O3/SiO2 catalyst, and the results showed that an amorphous La2O3 layer was coated on the SiO2, while small Ni nanoparticles were encapsulated in the La2O3 layer. As Ni nanoparticles were encapsulated in the La2O3 amorphous layer, it could effectively inhibit the formation of carbon deposition in CO2-CH4 reforming.

4.2.2. Eliminate Carbon Deposition from Process Condition Matching

The conversion rate of carbon dioxide and methane varies with the ratio of reaction gas, space velocity, reactor size, and catalyst dosage.

Selection of Operating Conditions (Temperature, Pressure, etc.)

Nematollahi et al. [153] conducted the same thermodynamic simulation under different pressures and found that the conversion rate of CH4 and CO2 and the amount ratio of the H2/CO substances decreased significantly with the increase in operating pressure. This is due to the fact that the CRM reforming is a reaction with an increase in volume. The lower the pressure, the better the reaction. The high-pressure environment inhibits the conversion of the reactants. Some researchers conducted thermodynamic simulation on the influence of temperature, CH4/CO2 ratio, reaction pressure, and other oxidants on the formation of carbon deposition and proposed that high conversion and less carbon deposition could be obtained by operating at a high temperature, low pressure, and high CH4/CO2 ratio above 850 °C [17,154,155]. Bao et al. [156] prepared a NiCeMgAl double-porous (mesoporous–mesoporous) catalyst. When the space velocity was lower than 96,000 h−1, the larger mesopores provides a fast transport channel for the reactants and product molecules. At a higher space velocity (such as 120,000 h−1), the conversion rate was reduced because the reactants could not fully diffuse to the active center in the catalyst. The thermogravimetric analysis results showed that with the (Ni15CeMgAl) the total weight loss of the dual porous catalyst after reaction was 16.8%, of which amorphous carbon accounted for 2.5%, carbon nanotubes accounted for 9%, graphite-like carbon accounted for 1%, and the others comprised the desorption of adsorbed small molecules. It was further found that carbon nanotubes could act as a carrier to continue the reaction and prolong the service life of the catalyst.

Adjustment and Matching of Reaction Gases

Carbon species deposited on the catalyst surface can usually be eliminated by the oxidation of CO2 through the carbon elimination reaction (CO2 + C→2CO). Therefore, the total amount of carbon deposition on the catalyst depends on the balance between methane cracking, carbon monoxide disproportionation, and the decarburization reaction [63], which can be considered from the two aspects of the inhibition of the carbon deposition reaction and the promotion of the decarburization reaction to improve the anti-carbon deposition performance of the catalyst. Of course, increasing the proportion of CO2 can inhibit the formation of carbon deposition but increasing the proportion of CO2 will promote the occurrence of side reactions and lead to increased separation costs in the later period. Therefore, the determination of the CO2/CH4 ratio should be combined with various factors. Mo et al. [49] found that with the increase in the CO2/CH4 ratio, the amount of carbon deposition on the catalyst surface gradually decreased, and the area and intensity of the high-temperature hydrogenation peak gradually weakened, indicating that low activity β carbon was significantly reduced due to the increase in the proportion of CO2. The results also showed that the addition of CO2 played an important role in preventing the transformation from active carbon to inactive carbon.
Adding steam or oxygen to the reaction for mixed reforming can also reduce carbon deposition on the catalyst. Li et al. [157] prepared a Ni/CeO2-ZrO2-Al2O3 catalyst, carried out a CO2-CH4 reforming reaction with and without steam, and measured the amount of carbon deposition. The results showed that the addition of steam to the reaction gas could significantly reduce the carbon deposition, improving the stability of the catalytic reaction. O’Connor et al. [158] found that the Ni/Al2O3 catalyst had high activity at 550–800 °C under the conditions of CO2 reforming and the partial oxidation of methane. With the increase in the O2 addition, almost no surface carbon deposition was found, but the activity of the catalyst decreased with time.
LI et al. [159] conducted a study employing the action of microwave-irradiated biological semi-coke; the experimental study of CO2/steam-combined CH4 reforming was carried out. The characteristics of the combined reforming reaction were examined, and the effects of the combined reforming reaction on the quality of the syngas, the loss of biochar, the surface characteristics, and the functional groups were discussed. The results showed that the combined reforming reaction could promote the conversion of the reaction gas, causing the the average value of the volume ratio of H2/CO in the syngas to be within 90, the min reaction time to rise to 0.923, and the H2/CO gas volume ratio to be closer to 1.

5. Conclusions and Prospect

CRM reforming not only promotes the utilization of CH4 and CO2 but also plays an important role in mitigating the greenhouse effect and reducing carbon emissions. It is an effective means of achieving carbon peaking and carbon neutralization and has good industrial value and application prospects. The key to the stable operation of the reaction is the construction of the catalyst, and the easy sintering of the active component and carbon deposition on the catalyst in the reaction is the core problem that needs to be solved urgently. As the preferred catalyst for this reaction, the Ni-based catalyst also faces the above problems. This paper briefly introduces the thermodynamics, kinetics, and reaction mechanism of the CRM reaction and focuses on the research progress of carbon deposition and carbon elimination on the used catalysts. The following prospects are put forward in terms of inhibiting carbon deposition in order to improve the activity and stability of the CRM catalyst:
  • More advanced characterization methods should be used to explore the reaction mechanism and carbon deposition mechanism of the CRM reaction on a Ni-based catalyst, and the reaction mechanism and anti-carbon deposition mechanism of the Ni-based catalyst should be further clarified.
  • By introducing different types of additives to regulate the number of alkaline sites on the surface of the catalyst, the adsorption performance of CO2 may be enhanced, and more adsorbed oxygen may be generated; the gasification process of the carbon deposition may also be promoted.
  • By DFT or other calculations, the formation and elimination mechanism of carbon deposition can be discussed in depth, and the catalyst design scheme can correspondingly be optimized to inhibit carbon deposition.

Funding

This work was supported by the natural science foundation of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (2022D01C23), the Ningxia natural science foundation (2022AAC03307), the high quality development special project for science and technology supporting industry from Changji (2022Z04), and the special project for the central government to guide local scientific and technological development (ZYYD2022C16).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, Q.; Wang, S.J.; Zhao, G.M.; Yang, H.Y.; Yuan, M.; An, X.X.; Zhou, H.F.; Qiao, Y.Y.; Tian, Y.Y. CO2 methanation over ordered mesoporous NiRu-doped CaO-Al2O3 nanocomposites with enhanced catalytic performance. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zain, M.M.; Mohamed, A.R. An overview on conversion technologies to produce value added products from CH4 and CO2 as major biogas constituents. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 98, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lougou, B.G.; Shuai, Y.; Chaffa, G.; Xing, H.; Tan, H.P.; Du, H.B. Analysis of CO2 utilization into synthesis gas based on solar thermochemical CH4-reforming. J. Energy Chem. 2019, 28, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Bradford, M.C.J.; Vannice, M.A. Catalytic reforming of methane with carbon dioxide over nickel catalysts II. Reaction kinetics. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 1996, 142, 97–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Oezkara-Aydmoglu, S. Thermodynamic equilibrium analysis of combined carbon dioxide reforming with steam reforming of methane to synthesis gas. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 12821–12828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kang, J.; He, S.; Zhou, W.; Shen, Z.; Li, Y.Y.; Chen, M.S.; Zhang, Q.H.; Wang, Y. Single-pass transformation of syngas into ethanol with high selectivity by triple tandem catalysis. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kawi, S.; Kathiraser, Y.; Ni, J.; Oemar, U.; Li, Z.W.; Saw, E.T. Progress in Synthesis of Highly Active and Stable Nickel-Based Catalysts for Carbon Dioxide Reforming of Methane. ChemSusChem 2015, 8, 3556–3575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Oyama, S.; Hacarlioglu, P.; Gu, Y.; Lee, D. Dry reforming of methane has no future for hydrogen production: Comparison with steam reforming at high pressure in standard and membrane reactors. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 10444–10450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Qin, Z.; Chen, J.; Xie, X.; Luo, X.; Su, T.M.; Ji, H.B. CO2 reforming of CH4 to syngas over nickel-based catalysts. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2020, 18, 997–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abdulrasheed, A.; Jalil, A.A.; Gambo, Y.; Ibrahim, M.; Hambali, H.U.; Hamid, M.Y.S. A review on catalyst development for dry reforming of methane to syngas: Recent advances. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 108, 175–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pakhare, D.; Spivey, J. A review of dry (CO2) reforming of methane over noble metal catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 7813–7837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, W.Y.; Feng, J.; Xie, K.C.; Sun, Q. Study on carbon deposition performance of nickel catalyst for CH4-CO2 reforming reaction. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 1997, 25, 460–464. [Google Scholar]
  13. Li, X.C.; Li, S.G.; Yang, Y.F.; Wu, M.; He, F. Study on Coke Formation and Stability of Nickel-Based Catalysts in CO2 Reforming of CH4. Catal. Lett. 2007, 118, 59–63. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ji, L.; Tang, S.; Zeng, H.C.; Lin, J.; Tan, K.L. CO2 reforming of methane to synthesis gas over sol-gel-made Co/γ-Al2O3 catalysts from organometallic precursors. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2001, 207, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xu, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.Y.; Chang, L.; Zhou, R.Q.; Duan, Z.T. Bound-state Ni species-a superior form in Ni-based catalyst for CO2-CH4 reforming. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2001, 210, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, Y.L.; Xu, H.Y.; Li, W.Z. Pyrolysis and deposition performance of CH4, C2H6 and C2H4 on Ni-based catalysts. Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 2001, 17, 773–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, J.; Wang, H.; Dalai, A.K. Development of stable bimetallic catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming of methane. J. Catal. 2007, 249, 300–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fraenkel, D.; Levitan, R.; Levy, M. A solar thermochemical pipe based on the CO2-CH4 (1:1) system. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 1986, 11, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, S.B.; Lu, G.Q.; Millar, G.J. Carbon Dioxide Reforming of Methane to Produce Synthesis Gas over Metal-Supported Catalysts: State of the Art. Energy Fuels 1996, 10, 896–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Abdullah, B.; Ghani, N.A.A.; Vo, D.-V.N. Recent advances in dry reforming of methane over Ni-based catalysts. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 162, 170–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Al-Fatesh, A.; Singh, S.K.; Kanade, G.S.; Atia, H.; Fakeeha, A.H.; Ibrahim, A.A.; El-Toni, A.M.; Labhasetwar, N.K. Rh promoted and ZrO2/Al2O3 supported Ni/Co based catalysts: High activity for CO2 reforming, steam-CO2 reforming and oxy-CO2 reforming of CH4. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 12069–12080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Oemar, U.; Kathiraser, Y.; Mo, L.; Ho, X.K.; Kawi, S. CO2 reforming of methane over highly active La-promoted Ni supported on SBA-15 catalysts: Mechanism and kinetic modelling. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 1173–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Assabumrungrat, S.; Charoenseri, S.; Laosiripojana, N.; Kiatkittipong, W.; Praserthdam, P. Effect of oxygen addition on catalytic performance of Ni/SiO2·MgO toward carbon dioxide reforming of methane under periodic operation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34, 6211–6220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, Z.J.; Song, H.; Liu, H.; Ye, J. Coupling of Solar Energy and Thermal Energy for Carbon Dioxide Reduction: Status and Prospects. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 8016–8035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Paksoy, A.I.; Caglayan, B.S.; Aksoylu, A.E. An in situ FTIR-DRIFTS study on CDRM over Co-Ce/ZrO2: Active surfaces and mechanistic features. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 12822–12834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bodrov, N.N.; Apelbaum, L.O.; Temkin, M.I. Kinetics of the reaction of methane with steam on the surface of nickel. Kinet. Catal. 1964, 5, 614–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rostrupnielsen, J.R.; Hansen, J.H.B. CO2-Reforming of Methane over Transition Metals. J. Catal. 1993, 144, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Osaki, T.; Masuda, H.; Mori, T. Intermediate hydrocarbon species for the CO2-CH4 reaction on supported Ni catalysts. Catal. Lett. 1994, 29, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bradford, M.C.J.; Vannice, M.A. CO2 reforming of CH4 over supported Pt catalysts. J. Catal. 1998, 173, 157–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wei, J.M.; Iglesia, E. Isotopic and kinetic assessment of the mechanism of reactions of CH4 with CO2 or H2O to form synthesis gas and carbon on nickel catalysts. J. Catal. 2004, 224, 370–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, S.G.; Liao, X.Y.; Jia, H.; Cao, D.B.; Li, Y.W.; Wang, J.; Jiao, H. Kinetic aspect of CO2 reforming of CH4 on Ni(111): A density functional theory calculation. Surf. Sci. 2007, 601, 1271–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, S.G.; Liao, X.Y.; Cao, D.B.; Li, Y.W.; Wang, J.G.; Jiao, H.J. Formation of Carbon Species on Ni(111): Structure and Stability. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 10894–10903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Freund, H.J.; Messmer, R.P. On the bonding and reactivity of CO2 on metal surfaces. Surf. Sci. Lett. 1986, 172, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Muhammad, A.; Tahir, M.; Al-Shahrani, S.S.; Ali, A.M.; Rather, S.U. Template free synthesis of graphitic carbon nitride nanotubes mediated by lanthanum (La/g-CNT) for selective photocatalytic CO2 reduction via dry reforming of methane (DRM) to fuels. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 504, 144177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xie, W.; Liang, D.; Li, L.; Qu, S.J.; Tao, W. Surface chemical ploperties and pore structure of the activated coke and their effects on the denitrification activity of selective catalytic reduction. Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. 2019, 6, 595–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Khavarian, M.; Chai, S.P.; Mohamed, A.R. Direct use of as-synthesized multi-walled carbon nanotubes for carbon dioxide reforming of methane for prodacing synthesis gas. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 257, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. He, L.; Hu, S.; Yin, X.; Jun, X.; Han, H.D.; Li, H.J.; Ren, Q.Q.; Su, S.; Wang, Y.; Xiang, J. Promoting effects of Fe-Ni alloy on co-production of H2 and carbon nanotubes during steam reforming of biomass tar over Ni-Fe/α-Al2O3. Fuel 2020, 276, 118116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ma, Q.X.; Wang, D.; Wu, M.B.; Zhao, T.S.; Yoneyama, Y.; Tsubaki, N. Effect of catalyticsite position: Nickel nanocatalyst selectively loaded inside or outside carbon nanotubes for methane dry reforming. Fuel 2013, 108, 430–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Das, S.; Sengupta, M.; Patel, J.; Bordoloi, A. A study of the synergy between support surface properties and catalyst deactivation for CO2 reforming over supported Ni nanoparticles. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2017, 545, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, M.; Zhang, J.F.; Wu, Y.Q.; Pan, J.X.; Zhang, Q.D.; Tan, Y.S.; Han, Y.Z. Insight into the effects of the oxygen species over Ni/ZrO2 catalyst surface on methane reforming with carbon dioxide. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 244, 427–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jin, B.T.; Li, S.G.; Liang, X.H. Enhanced activity and stability of MgO-promoted Ni/Al2O3 catalyst for dry reforming of methane: Role of MgO. Fuel 2021, 284, 119082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, Y.N.; Zhang, R.J.; Yan, B.H. Ni/Ce0.9Eu0.1O1.95 with enhanced coke resistance for dry reforming of methane. J. Catal. 2022, 407, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Burghaus, U. Surface science perspective of carbon dioxide chemistry-Adsorption kinetics and dynamics of CO2 on selected model surfaces. Catal. Today 2009, 148, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pan, Y.X.; Liu, C.J.; Wiltowski, T.S.; Ge, Q.F. CO2 adsorption and activation over γ-Al2O3-supported transition metal dimers: A density functional study. Catal. Today 2009, 147, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tsipouriari, V.A.; Verykios, X.E. Carbon and Oxygen Reaction Pathways of CO2 Reforming of Methane over Ni/La2O3 and Ni/Al2O3 Catalysts Studied by Isotopic Tracing Techniques. J. Catal. 1999, 187, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Daza, C.E.; Gallego, J.; Mondragon, F.; Moreno, S.; Molina, R. High stability of Ce-promoted Ni/Mg-Al catalysts derived from hydrotalcites in dry reforming of methane. Fuel Guildf. 2010, 89, 592–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, C.J.; Ye, J.Y.; Jiang, J.J.; Pan, Y.X. Progresses in the preparation of coke resistant Ni-based catalyst for steam and CO2 reforming of methane. ChemSusChem 2011, 3, 529–541. [Google Scholar]
  48. Ferreira-Aparicio, P.; Fernandez-Garcia, M.; Guerrero-Ruiz, A.; Rodriguez-Ramos, I. Evaluation of the role of the metal-support interfacial centers in the dry reforming of methane on alumina-supported rhodium catalysts. J. Catal. 2000, 190, 296–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mo, W.L.; Ma, F.Y.; Liu, J.M.; Zhong, M.; Nulahong, A.S. Study on CO2-CH4 reforming reaction carbon deposition on Ni-Al2O3 catalyst based on programmed hydrogenation characterization. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 2019, 47, 549–557. [Google Scholar]
  50. Mo, W.L.; Ma, F.Y.; Liu, Y.E.; Liu, J.M.; Aisha, N. Preparation of porous Al2O3 by template method and its application in Ni-based catalyst for CH4/CO2 reforming to produce syngas. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 16147–16158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, C.Z.; Sun, N.N.; Wei, W.; Zhang, Y.X. Carbon intermediates during CO2 reforming of methane over Ni-CaO-ZrO2 catalysts: Atemperature-programmed surface reaction study. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 19014–19024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bodrov, I.M.; Apelbaum, L.O. Reaction kinetics of methane and carbon dioxide on a nickel surface. Kinet. Catal. 1967, 8, 379. [Google Scholar]
  53. Li, D.L.; Xu, S.P.; Song, K.; Chen, C.Q.; Zhan, Y.Y.; Jiang, L.L. Hydrotalcite-derived Co/Mg(Al)O as a stable and coke-resistant catalystfor low-temperature carbon dioxide reforming of methane. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2018, 552, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, R.; Xu, H.Y.; Liu, X.B.; Ge, Q.J.; Li, W.Z. Role of redox couples of Rh0/Rhδ+and Ce4+/Ce3+in CO2-CH4 reforming over Rh-CeO2/Al2O3 catalyst. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2006, 305, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ruckenstein, E.; Wang, H.Y. Carbon deposition and catalytic deactivation during CO2 reforming of CH4 over Co/γ-Al2O3 catalysts. J. Catal. 2002, 205, 289–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liang, T.Y.; Lin, C.Y.; Chou, F.C.; Wang, M.Q.; Tsai, D.H. Gas-phase synthesis of Ni-CeOx hybrid nanopaticles and their synergistic catalysis for simultaneous reforming of methane and carbon dioxide to syngas. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 11789–11798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kuijpers, E.G.M.; Breedijk, A.K.; Van Der Wal, W.J.J.; Geus, J.W. Chemisorption of Methane on Ni/SiO2 Catalysts and Reactivity of the Chemisorption Products toward Hydrogen. J. Catal. 1983, 81, 429–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Osaki, T.; Masuda, H.; Horiuchi, T.; Mori, T. Highly hydrogen-deficient hydrocarbon species for the CO2-reforming of CH4 on Co/Al2O3 catalyst. Catal. Lett. 1995, 34, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, Y.; Yao, L.; Wang, Y.N.; Wang, S.H.; Zhao, Q.; Mao, D.H.; Hu, C.W. Low-Temperature Catalytic CO2 Dry Reforming of Methane on Ni-Si/ZrO2 Catalyst. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 6495–6506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Liu, Z.Y.; Lustemberg, P.; Gutierrez, R.A.; Carey, J.J.; Palomino, R.M.; Vorokhta, M.; Grinter, D.C.; Ramirez, P.J.; Matolin, V.; Nolan, M.; et al. In situ Investigation of Methane Dry Reforming on M-CeO2(111) {M=Co, Ni, Cu} Surfaces: Metal-Support Interactions and the activation of C-H bonds at Low Temperature. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 13041–13046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Liu, Z.Y.; Grinter, D.C.; Lustemberg, P.G.; Nguyen-Phan, T.-D.; Zhou, Y.H.; Luo, S.; Waluyo, I.; Crumlin, E.J.; Stacchiola, D.J.; Zhou, J.; et al. Dry Reforming of Methane on a Highly-Active Ni-CeO Catalyst: Effects of Metal-Support Interactions on C-H Bond Breaking. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 7455–7459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Horiuchi, T.; Sakuma, K.; Fukui, T.; Kubo, Y.; Osaki, T.; Mori, T. Suppression of carbon deposition in the CO2-reforming of CH4 by adding basic metal oxides to a Ni/Al2O3 catalyst. Appl. Catal. A 1996, 144, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gallego, G.S.; Batiot-Dupeyrat, C.; Barraault, J.; Florez, E.; Mondragon, F. Dry reforming of methane over LaNi1−yByO3±δ (B=Mg, Co) perovskites used as catalyst precursor. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2008, 334, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Garcia-Dieguez, M.; Pieta, I.S.; Herrera, M.C.; Larrubia, M.A.; Malpartida, I.; Alemany, L.J. Transient study of the dry reforming of methane over Pt supported on different γ-Al2O3. Catal. Today 2010, 149, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lucreda, F.; Assafj, M.; Assafe, M. Methane Conversion Reactions on Ni Catalysts Promoted with Rh: Influence of Support. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2011, 400, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Xu, J.K.; Zhou, W.; Wang, J.H.; Li, Z.J.; Ma, J.X. Characterization and analysis of carbon deposited during the dry reforming of methane over Ni/La2O3/Al2O3 catalysts. Chin. J. Catal. 2009, 30, 1076–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Crnivec IG, O.; Djinovic, P.; Erjavec, B.; Pintar, A. Effect of synthesis parameters on morphology and activity of bimetallic catalysts in CO2-CH4 reforming. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 207, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liu, Z.C.; Zhou, J.; Cao, K.; Yang, W.M.; Gao, H.X. Highly dispersed nickel loaded on mesoporous silica: One-spot synthesis strategy and high performance as catalysts for methane reforming with carbon dioxide. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2012, 125, 324–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Guo, Y.P.; Feng, J.; Li, W.Y. Effect of the Ni size on CO2-CH4 reforming over Ni/MgO catalyst: A DFT study. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2017, 25, 1442–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mo, W.L.; Ma, F.Y.; Ma, Y.Y.; Fan, X. The optimization of Ni-Al2O3 catalyst with the addition of La2O3 for CO2-CH4 reforming to produce syngas. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 24510–24524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mo, W.L.; Ma, F.Y.; Liu, Y.E.; Liu, J.M.; Zhong, M.; Nulahong, A.S. Effect of preparation method on the catalytic performance of Ni-Al2O3 catalyst in CO2-CH4 reforming reaction. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 2015, 43, 1083–1091. [Google Scholar]
  72. Mo, W.L.; Ma, F.Y.; Liu, Y.E.; Liu, J.M.; Zhong, M.; Nulahong, A.S. Effect of roasting temperature on the performance of NiO/γ-Al2O3 catalyst for CO2-CH4 reforming syngas. J. Inorg. Mater. 2016, 31, 234–240. [Google Scholar]
  73. Ding, R.G.; Yan, A.F. Structure characterization of the Co and Ni catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming of methane. Catal. Today 2001, 68, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Osaki, T.; Mori, T. Role of Potassium in Carbon-Free CO2 Reforming of Methane on K-Promoted Ni/Al2O3 Catalysts. J. Catal. 2001, 204, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, H.H.; Mo, W.L.; He, X.Q.; Fan, X.; Ma, F.Y.; Liu, S.; Tax, D. Effect of Ca Promoter on the Structure, Performance, and Carbon Deposition of Ni-Al2O3 Catalyst for CO2-CH4 Reforming. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 28955–28964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, J.B.; Kuo, L.E.; Huang, T.J. Study of carbon dioxide reforming of methane over bimetallic Ni-Cr/yttria-doped ceria catalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2003, 249, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Potdar, H.S.; Roh, H.S.; Jun, K.W. Carbon Dioxide Reforming of Methane Over Co-precipitated Ni-CeO2, Ni-ZrO2, Ni-Ce-ZrO2 Catalysts. Catal. Today 2004, 93–95, 39–44. [Google Scholar]
  78. Roh, H.S.; Jun, K.W.; Baek, S.C.; Park, S.E. A Highly Active and Stable Catalyst for Carbon Dioxide Reforming of Methane: Ni/Ce-ZrO2/θ-Al2O3. Catal. 2002, 81, 147–151. [Google Scholar]
  79. Huang, X.J.; Mo, W.L.; He, X.Q.; Fan, X.; Ma, F.Y.; Tax, D. Effects of Promoters on the Structure, Performance, and Carbon Deposition of Ni-Al2O3 Catalysts for CO2-CH4 Reforming. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 16381–16390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wang, N.; Yu, X.P.; Wang, Y.; Chu, W.; Liu, M. A comparison study on methane dry reforming with carbon dioxide over LaNiO3 perovskite catalysts supported on mesoporous SBA-15, MCM-41 and silica carrier. Catal. Today 2013, 212, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rashid, M.U.; Daud, W.M.A.W. Microemulsion based synthesis of Ni/MgO catalyst for dry reforming of methane. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 38277–38289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Adans, Y.F.; Ballarini, A.D.; Martins, A.R.; Coelho, R.E.; Carvalho, L.S. Performance of nickel supported on gamma-Alumina obtained by aluminum recycling for methane dry reforming. Catal. Lett. 2017, 147, 2057–2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Sun, J.W.; Wang, S.; Guo, Y.; Li, M.Z.; Zou, H.K.; Wang, Z.J. Carbon dioxide reforming of methane over nanostructured Ni/Al2O3 catalysts. Catal. Commun. 2018, 104, 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Turap, Y.S.; Wang, I.W.; Fu, T.T.; Wu, Y.M.; Wang, Y.D.; Wang, W. Co-Ni alloy supported on CeO2 as a bimetallic catalyst for dry reforming of methane. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 6538–6548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Huang, X.H.; Ji, Y.J.; Wei, T.; Jia, L.C.; Yan, D.; Li, J. High performance and stable mesoporous MgO-ZrO supported Ni catalysts for dry reforming of methane-ScienceDirect. Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem. 2021, 4, 100183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ibrahim, A.A.; Fakeeha, A.H.; Abasaeed, A.E.; Al-Fatesh, A.S. Dry reforming of methane using Ni catalyst supported on ZrO2, The effect of different sources of Zirconia. Catalysts 2021, 11, 827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhang, M.; Zhang, J.F.; Zhou, Z.L.; Zhang, Q.D.; Tan, Y.S.; Han, Y.Z. Effects of calcination atmosphere on the performance of the co-precipitated Ni/ZrO2 catalyst in dry reforming of methane. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2021, 100, 172–183. [Google Scholar]
  88. Liu, D.P.; Quek, X.Y.; Cheo WN, E.; Lau, R.; Borgna, A.; Yang, Y. MCM-41 supported nickel-based bimetallic catalysts with superior stability during carbon dioxide reforming of methane: Effect of strong metal-support interaction. J. Catal. 2009, 266, 380–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Bian, Z.F.; Das, S.; Wai, M.H.; Hongmanorom, P.; Kawi, S. A Review on Bimetallic Nickel-Based Catalysts for CO2 Reforming of Methane. ChemPhysChem 2017, 18, 3117–3134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Mahboob, S.; Haghighi, M.; Rahmani, F. Sonochemically preparation and characterization of bimetallic Ni-Co/Al2O3-ZrO2 nanocatalyst: Effects of ultrasound irradiation time and power on catalytic properties and activity in dry reforming of CH4. Ultrason. Sonochemistry 2017, 38, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Dam, A.H.; Wang, H.M.; Niri, R.D.; Yu, X.F.; Walmsley, J.C.; Holmen, A.; Yang, J.; Chen, D. Methane Activation on Bimetallic Catalysts: Properties and Functions of Surface Ni-Ag Alloy. ChemCatChem 2019, 11, 3401–3412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Pawelec, B.; Damyanova, S.; Arishtirova, K.; Fierro, J.L.G.; Petrov, L. Structural and surface features of PtNi catalysts for reforming of methane with CO2. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2007, 323, 188–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. San-Jose-Alonso, D.; Juan-Juan, J.; Illan-Gomez, M.J.; Roman-Martinez, M.C. Ni, Co and bimetallic Ni-Co catalysts for the dry reforming of methane. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2009, 371, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wu, T.; Zhang, Q.; Cai, W.Y.; Zhang, P.; Song, X.F.; Sun, Z.; Cao, L. Phyllosilicate evolved hierarchical Ni-and Cu-Ni/SiO2 nanocomposites for methane dry reforming catalysis. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2015, 503, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Liu, H.L.; Nosheen, F.; Wang, X. Noble metal alloy complex nanostructures: Controllable synthesis and their electrochemical property. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 3056–3078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. De, S.; Zhang, J.; Luque, R.; Yan, N. Ni-based bimetallic heterogeneous catalysts for energy and environmental applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 3314–3347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Yu, X.P.; Zhang, F.B.; Wang, N.; Hao, S.X.; Chu, W. Plasma-Treated Bimetallic Ni-Pt Catalysts Derived from Hydrotalcites for the Carbon Dioxide Reforming of Methane. Catal. Lett. 2014, 144, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hou, T.F.; Lei, Y.S.; Zhang, S.Y.; Zhang, J.H.; Cai, W.J. Ethanol dry reforming for syngas production over Ir/CeO2 catalyst. J. Rare Earths 2015, 33, 42–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ma, Q.X.; Sun, J.; Gao, X.H.; Zhang, J.L.; Zhao, T.S.; Yoneyama, Y.; Tsubaki, N. Ordered mesoporous alumina-supported bimetallic Pd-Ni catalysts for methane dry reforming reaction. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 6542–6550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Oemar, U.; Hidajat, K.; Kawi, S. High catalytic stability of Pd-Ni/Y2O3 formed by interfacial Cl for oxy-CO2 reforming of CH4. Catal. Today 2017, 281, 276–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Menning, C.A.; Chen, J.G. Thermodynamics and kinetics of oxygen-induced segregation of 3d metals in Pt-3d-Pt(111) and Pt-3d-Pt(100) bimetallic structures. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 164703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Menning, C.A.; Chen, J.G. General trend for adsorbate-induced segregation of subsurface metal atoms in bimetallic surfaces. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 130, 174709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Garcia-Dieguez, M.; Pieta, I.S.; Herrera, M.C.; Larrubia, M.A.; Alemany, L.J. Nanostructured Pt- and Ni-based catalysts for CO2-reforming of methane. J. Catal. 2010, 270, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Fan, M.S.; Abdullah, A.Z.; Bhatia, S. Utilization of greenhouse gases through carbon dioxide reforming of methane over Ni-Co/MgO-ZrO2: Preparation, characterization and activity studies. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2010, 100, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Qin, Z.Z.; Su, T.M.; Ji, H.B.; Jiang, Y.X.; Liu, R.W.; Chen, J.H. Experimental and theoretical study of the intrinsic kinetics for dimethyl ether synthesis from CO2 over Cu-Fe-Zr/HZSM-5. Aiche J. 2015, 61, 1613–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Su, T.M.; Qin, Z.Z.; Ji, H.B.; Jiang, Y.X.; Huang, G. Recent advances in the photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2016, 14, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Abukhadra, M.R.; Dardir, F.M.; Shaban, M.; Ahmed, E.A.; Soliman, M.F. Spongy Ni/Fe carbonate-fluorapatite catalyst for efficient conversion of cooking oil waste into biodiesel. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2017, 16, 665–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Chen, L.; Huang, X.Y.; Tang, M.; Zhou, D.; Wu, F. Rapid dephosphorylation of glyphosate by Cu-catalyzed sulfite oxidation involving sulfate and hydroxyl radicals. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2018, 16, 1507–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Kumar, N.S.; Reddy, B.V.; Babu, M.S. Rapid synthesis of mono/bimetallic (Zn/Co/Zn-Co) zeolitic imidazolate frameworks at room temperature and evolution of their CO2 uptake capacity. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2019, 17, 447–454. [Google Scholar]
  110. Ray, K.; Sandupatla, A.S.; Deo, G. Activity and stability descriptors of Ni-based alloy catalysts for dry reforming of methane: A density functional theory study. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2021, 121, e26580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Gonzalez-Delcruz, V.M.; Perenigue, R.; Ternero, F.; Holgado, J.P.; Caballero, A. In Situ XAS Study of Synergic Effects on Ni-Co/ZrO2 Methane Reforming Catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 2919–2926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Yu, M.; Zhu, K.; Liu, Z.; Xiao, H.; Deng, W.; Zhou, X. Carbon dioxide reforming of methane over promoted NixMg1-xO(111) platelet catalyst derived from solvothermal synthesis. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 148, 177–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Fan, X.; Liu, Z.; Zhu, Y.A.; Tong, G.S.; Zhang, J.D.; Engelbrekt, C.; Ulstrup, J.; Zhu, K.; Zhou, X.G. Tuning the composition of metastable CoxNiyMg100-x-y(OH)(OCH3) nanoplates for optimizing robust methane dry reforming catalyst. J. Catal. 2015, 330, 106–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ay, H.; Uner, D. Dry reforming of methane over CeO2 supported Ni, Co and Ni-Co catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 179, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Tsoukalou, A.; Imtiaz, Q.; Kim, S.M.; Abdala, P.M.; Yoon, S.; Muller, C.R. Dry-reforming of methane over bimetallic Ni-M/La2O3 (M=Co, Fe): The effect of the rate of La2O2CO3 formation and phase stability on the catalytic activity and stability. J. Catal. 2016, 343, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Gao, X.Y.; Tan, Z.W.; Hidajat, K.; Kawi, S. Highly reactive Ni-Co/SiO2 bimetallic catalyst via complexation with oleylamine/oleic acid organic pair for dry reforming of methane. Catal. Today 2017, 281, 250–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Xu, L.L.; Wang, F.G.; Chen, M.; Fan, X.L.; Yang, H.M.; Nie, D.Y.; Qi, L. Alkaline-promoted Co-Ni bimetal ordered mesoporous catalysts with enhanced coke-resistant performance toward CO2 reforming of CH4. J. CO2 Util. 2017, 18, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Takanabe, K.; Nagaoka, K.; Nariai, K.; Aika, K. Influence of reduction temperature on the catalytic behavior of Co/TiO2 catalysts for CO2-CH4 reforming and its relation with titania bulk crystal structure. J. Catal. 2005, 230, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Takanabe, K.; Nagaoka, K.; Nariai, K.; Aiak, K. Titania-supported cobalt and nickel bimetallic catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming of methane. J. Catal. 2005, 232, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Wu, Z.X.; Yang, B.; Miao, S.; Liu, W.; Xie, J.L.; Lee, S.; Pellin, M.J.; Xiao, D.Q.; Su, D.S.; Ma, D. Lattice strained Ni-Co alloy as high-performance catalyst for catalytic dry-reforming of methane. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 2693–2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Li, B.; Yuan, X.Q.; Li, L.Y.; Wang, X.J.; Li, B.T. Stabilizing Ni-Co alloy on bimodal mesoporous alumina to enhance carbon resistance for dry reforming of methane. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2021, 60, 16874–16886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Liang, D.F.; Wang, Y.S.; Chen, M.Q.; Xie, X.L.; Li, C.; Wang, J.; Yuan, L. Dry reforming of methane for syngas production over attapulgite-derived MFI zeolite encapsulated bimetallic Ni-Co catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2023, 322, 122088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Song, K.; Lu, M.M.; Xu, S.P.; Chen, C.Q.; Zhan, Y.Y.; Li, D.L.; Au, C.; Jiang, L.L.; Tomishige, K. Effect of alloy composition on catalytic performance and coke-resistance property of Ni-Cu/Mg(Al)O catalysts for dry reforming of methane. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 239, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Sagar, T.V.; Padmakar, D.; Lingaiah, N.; Prasad, P.S.S. Influence of Solid Solution Formation on the Activity of CeO2 Supported Ni-Cu Mixed Oxide Catalysts in Dry Reforming of Methane. Catal. Lett. 2019, 149, 2597–2606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Wang, L.; Li, D.L.; Koike, M.; Watanabe, H.; Xu, Y.; Nakagawa, Y.; Tomishige, K. Catalytic performance and characterization of Ni-Co catalysts for the steam reforming of biomass tar to synthesis gas. Fuel 2013, 112, 654–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Kim, S.M.; Abdala, P.M.; Margossian, T.; Hosseini, D.; Foppa, L.; Armutlulu, A.; Beek, W.V.; Comas-Vives, A.; Coperet, C.; Muller, C. Cooperativity and dynamics increase the performance of NiFe dry reforming catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 1937–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Andraos, S.; Abbas-Ghaleb, R.; Chlala, D.; Vita, A.; Italiano, C.; Laganà, M.; Pino, L.; Nakhl, M.; Specchia, S. Production of hydrogen by methane dry reforming over ruthenium-nickel based catalysts deposited on Al2O3, MgAl2O4, and YSZ. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 25706–25716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Song, Z.; Wang, Q.; Guo, C.; Li, S.; Yan, W.; Jiao, W.; Qiu, L.; Yan, X.; Li, R. Improved effect of Fe on the stable NiFe/Al2O3 catalyst in low-temperature dry reforming of methane. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 17250–17258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Chatla, A.; Ghouri, M.M.; El Hassan, O.W.; Mohamed, N.; Prakash, A.V.; Elbashir, N.O. An experimental and first principles DFT investigation on the effect of Cu addition to Ni/Al2O3 catalyst for the dry reforming of methane. Appl. Catal. A 2020, 602, 117699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Aghaali, M.H.; Firoozi, S. Enhancing the catalytic performance of Co substituted NiAl2O4 spinel by ultrasonic spray pyrolysis method for steam and dry reforming of methane. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 357–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Hao, S.H.; Ma, F.Y.; Mo, W.L.; Li, M.F.; Zhu, W.J.; Zhang, J. Effect of additive La on the properties of CH4/CO2 reforming catalyst NiO/γ-Al2O3. Nat. Gas Chem. Ind. 2015, 40, 44–49. [Google Scholar]
  132. Ruckenstein, E.; Hu, Y.H. Role of support in CO2 reforming of CH4 to syngas over Ni catalysts. J. Catal. 1996, 162, 230–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Luisetto, I.; Tuti, S.; Romano, C.; Boaro, M.; Bartolomeo, E.D. Dry reforming of methane over Ni supported on doped CeO2: New insight on the role of dopants for CO2 activation. J. CO2 Util. 2019, 30, 63–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Amin, M.H.; Sudarsanam, P.; Field, M.R.; Patel, J.; Bhargava, S.K. Effect of a Swelling Agent on the Performance of Ni/Porous Silica Catalyst for CH4-CO2 Reforming. ACS Langmuir 2017, 33, 10632–10644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Zhang, Q.L.; Zhang, T.F.; Shi, Y.Z.; Zhao, B.; Wang, M.Z.; Liu, Q.X.; Wang, J.; Long, K.X.; Duany, K.; Ning, P. A sintering and carbon-resistant Ni-SBA-15 catalyst prepared by solid-state grinding method for dry reforming of methane. J. CO2 Util. 2017, 17, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Tanggarnjanavalukul, C.; Donphai, W.; Witoon, T.; Chareonpanich, M.; Limtrakul, J. Deactivation of nickel catalysts in methane cracking reaction: Effect of bimodal mesomacropore structure of silica support. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 262, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Du, X.J.; Zhang, D.S.; Shi, L.Y.; Gao, R.H.; Zhang, J.P. Coke- and sintering-resistant monolithic catalysts derived from in situ supported hydrotalcite-like films on Al wires for dry reforming of methane. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 2659–2663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Zhang, L.M.; Li, L.; Li, J.L.; Zhang, Y.H.; Hu, J.C. Carbon Dioxide Reforming of Methane over Nickel Catalyst Supported on MgO(111) Nanosheets. Top. Catal. 2014, 57, 619–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Grigorkina, G.S.; Ramonova, A.G.; Kibizov, D.D.; Kozyrev, E.N.; Zaalishvili, V.B.; Fukutani, K.; Magkoev, T.T. Probing specific oxides as potential supports for metal/oxide model catalysts: MgO(111) polar film. Solid State Commun. 2017, 257, 16–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Liu, S.G.; Guan, L.X.; Li, J.P.; Zhao, N.; Wei, W.; Sun, Y.H. CO2 reforming of CH4 over stabilized mesoporous Ni-CaO-ZrO2 composites. Fuel 2008, 87, 2477–2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Jafarbegloo, M.; Tarlani, A.; Mesbah, A.W.; Sahebdelfar, S. One-pot synthesis of NiO-MgO nanocatalysts for CO2 reforming of methane: The influence of active metal content on catalytic performance. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2015, 27, 1165–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Li, L.Z.; Yan, K.S.; Chen, J.; Feng, T.; Wang, F.M.; Wang, J.W.; Song, Z.L.; Ma, C.Y. Fe-rich biomass derived char for microwave-assisted methane reforming with carbon dioxide. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 657, 1357–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Zhang, Z.H.; Ou, Z.L.; Qin, C.L.; Ran, J.Y.; Wu, C.F. Roles of alkali/alkaline earth metals in steam reforming of biomass tar for hydrogen production over perovskite supported Ni catalysts. Fuel 2019, 257, 116032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Li, L.; Yang, Z.; Chen, J.; Qin, X.; Jiang, X.; Wang, F.; Song, Z.; Ma, C. Performance of bio-char and energy analysis on CH4 combined reforming by CO2 and H2O into syngas production with assistance of microwave. Fuel 2018, 215, 655–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Jose-Alonso, D.S.; Illan-Gomez, M.J.; Roman-Martinez, M.C. K and Sr promoted Co alumina supported catalysts for the CO2 reforming of methane. Catal. Today 2011, 176, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Wu, P.; Tao, Y.W.; Ling, H.J.; Chen, Z.B.; Ding, J.; Zeng, X.; Liao, X.Z.; Stampfl, C.; Huang, J. Cooperation of Ni and CaO at interface for CO2 reforming of CH4: A combined theoretical and experimental study. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 10060–10069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Ruitenbeek, M.; Weckhuysen, B.M. A Radical twist to the versatile behavior of iron in selective methane activation. Angew. Chem. Intermational Ed. 2014, 53, 11137–11139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Wang, J.; Mao, Y.R.; Zhang, L.Z.; Li, Y.L.; Liu, W.M.; Ma, Q.X.; Wu, D.S.; Peng, H.G. Remarkable basic-metal oxides promoted confinement catalysts for CO2 reforming. Fuel 2022, 315, 123167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Kong, W.; Fu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Shi, L.; Li, S.G.; Vovk, E.; Zhou, X.H.; Si, R.; Pan, B.R.; Yuan, C.K.; et al. Nickel nanoparticles with interfacial confinement mimic noble metal catalyst in methane dry reforming. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 285, 119837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Zhang, L.; Lian, J.; Li, L.; Peng, C.; Liu, W.M.; Xu, X.L.; Fang, X.Z.; Wang, Z.; Wang, X.; Peng, H.E. LaNiO3 nanocube embedded in mesoporous silica for dry reforming of methane with enhanced coking resistance. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2018, 266, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Liu, W.M.; Li, L.; Lin, S.X.; Luo, Y.W.; Bao, Z.H.; Mao, Y.R.; Li, K.Z.; Wu, D.S.; Peng, H.G. Confined Ni-In intermetallic alloy nanocatalyst with excellent coking resistance for methane dry reforming. J. Energy Chem. 2022, 65, 34–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Wang, L.H.; Hu, R.; Liu, H.; Wei, Q.H.; Gong, D.D.; Mo, L.Y.; Tao, H.C.; Zhuang, Z.H. Encapsulated Ni@La2O3/SiO2 catalyst with a one-pot method for the dry reforming of methane. Catalysts 2020, 10, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Nematollahi, B.; Rezaei, M.; Lay, E.N.; Khajenoori, M. Thermodynamic analysis of combined reforming process using Gibbs energy minimization method: In view of solid carbon formation. J. Nat. Gas Chem. 2012, 21, 694–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Jang, W.J.; Jeong, D.W.; Shim, J.O.; Kim, H.M.; Roh, H.S.; Son, I.H.; Lee, S.J. Combined steam and carbon dioxide reforming of methane and side reactions: Thermodynamic equilibrium analysis and experimental application. Appl. Energy 2016, 173, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Nikoo, M.K.; Amin, N.A.S. Thermodynamic analysis of carbon dioxide reforming of methane in view of solid carbon formation. Fuel Process. Technol. 2011, 92, 678–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Bao, Z.H.; Lu, Y.W.; Han, J.; Li, Y.B.; Yu, F. Highly active and stable Ni-based bimodal pore catalyst for dry reforming of methane. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2015, 491, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Li, C.L.; Fu, Y.L.; Meng, M.; Bian, G.Z.; Xie, Y.N.; Hu, T.D.; Zhang, J. EXAFS study on the effect of water vapor addition on the structure of Ni components in the CH4-CO2 reforming catalyst Ni/CeO2-ZrO2-Al2O3. Nucl. Tech. 2002, (10), 879–882. [Google Scholar]
  158. O'Connor, A.M.; Ross, J.R.H. The effect of O2 addition on the carbon dioxide reforming of methane over Pt/ZrO2 catalysts. Catal. Today 1998, 46, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Li, L.Z.; Jiang, X.W.; Wang, H.G.; Song, Z.L.; Ma, C.Y. Combined reforming of CH4 with CO2/steam assisted by microwave. Combust. Sci. Technol. 2017, 23, 293–298. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Equilibrium constants of reactions as a function of temperature during DRM [17].
Figure 1. Equilibrium constants of reactions as a function of temperature during DRM [17].
Catalysts 13 00647 g001
Figure 2. TPH profiles of various spent Ni-Al2O3 catalysts after carrying out the CO2-CH4 reforming reaction for different times [49].
Figure 2. TPH profiles of various spent Ni-Al2O3 catalysts after carrying out the CO2-CH4 reforming reaction for different times [49].
Catalysts 13 00647 g002
Figure 3. TEM photos of different Ni-Al2O3 catalysts after CO2-CH4 reforming reaction for different times [49]. (af) Fresh catalyst and catalyst after reaction for 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, 5 h, and 10 h, respectively.
Figure 3. TEM photos of different Ni-Al2O3 catalysts after CO2-CH4 reforming reaction for different times [49]. (af) Fresh catalyst and catalyst after reaction for 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, 5 h, and 10 h, respectively.
Catalysts 13 00647 g003
Figure 4. SEM of CO2-CH4 reforming reaction after 20 h [46].
Figure 4. SEM of CO2-CH4 reforming reaction after 20 h [46].
Catalysts 13 00647 g004
Figure 5. Carbon deposition and decarbonization on Ni/CeO2 catalyst [56].
Figure 5. Carbon deposition and decarbonization on Ni/CeO2 catalyst [56].
Catalysts 13 00647 g005
Figure 6. TEM images of catalyst after reaction [66]: (a) Ni/La2O3/γ-Al2O3; (b) Ni/La2O3/Al2O3; (c) Ni/La2O3/α-Al2O3.
Figure 6. TEM images of catalyst after reaction [66]: (a) Ni/La2O3/γ-Al2O3; (b) Ni/La2O3/Al2O3; (c) Ni/La2O3/α-Al2O3.
Catalysts 13 00647 g006
Figure 7. Bright field TEM images (ad) [133].
Figure 7. Bright field TEM images (ad) [133].
Catalysts 13 00647 g007
Table 1. Catalytic performance of Ni-based catalysts with different supports.
Table 1. Catalytic performance of Ni-based catalysts with different supports.
Active ComponentSupportMass Fraction of Active Component
/%
Temperature
/°C
Time
/h
SV
/(mL·g−1·h−1)
CH4 Conversion Rate
/%
CO2 Conversion Rate
/%
Carbon Deposition
/%
Reference
LaNiO3SBA-15107006036,00078734.47[80]
LaNiO3MCM-41107006036,00075714.83[80]
LaNiO3SiO2107006036,00068645.67[80]
NiMgO207502.3168,00046.13→34.351.4→37.62.648[81]
NiAl2O3-T10700524,0008090——[82]
NiAl2O3-S10700524,0006879——[82]
NiAl2O310700524,0007275——[82]
Niγ-Al2O3-S10700548,00056.0→52.2————[83]
Niγ-Al2O3-P10700548,00052.2→39.3————[83]
Co-NiCeO2——6001012,0007780——[84]
NiMgO-ZrO2107006016,00084.786.520[85]
NiZrO2-RC-1005700742,00067.4→46.568.4→58.266.3[86]
NiZrO2-ELTN5700742,00042.3→31.952.3→43.925.2[86]
NiZrO2-Z-32155700742,00062.2→45.369.5→58.438.3[86]
NiZrO2(MK)5700742,00051.2→36.356.7→46.446.9[86]
NiZrO2-O2107501024,00078→6486→73——[87]
NiZrO257503624,00083→78————[87]
Table 2. Carbon deposition resistance of bimetallic catalysts in DRM.
Table 2. Carbon deposition resistance of bimetallic catalysts in DRM.
CatalystsSV
/(mL·g−1·h−1)
Feed RatioTemperature
/K
CH4 Conversion Rate
/%
CO2 Conversion Rate
/%
Carbon Deposition
/%
Ru-Ni/Al2O3 [127]60,000 102394.0097.000.32
Co-Ni/CeO2 [84]30,000CH4:CO2 = 1:1107380.1082.2010.00
NiFe/Al2O3 [128]12,000CH4:CO2 = 1:182326.6037.802.30
NiCu/Al2O3 [129]18,000CH4:CO2:He = 1:1:892365.0064.346.40
Ni-Co/Al2O3 [130]54,000CH4:CO2:N2 = 2:2:1102396.1092.201.00
NiPt/Al2O3 [100] CH4:CO2:Ar = 45:45:10102386.0087.007.00
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ren, Y.; Ma, Y.-Y.; Mo, W.-L.; Guo, J.; Liu, Q.; Fan, X.; Zhang, S.-P. Research Progress of Carbon Deposition on Ni-Based Catalyst for CO2-CH4 Reforming. Catalysts 2023, 13, 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13040647

AMA Style

Ren Y, Ma Y-Y, Mo W-L, Guo J, Liu Q, Fan X, Zhang S-P. Research Progress of Carbon Deposition on Ni-Based Catalyst for CO2-CH4 Reforming. Catalysts. 2023; 13(4):647. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13040647

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ren, Yuan, Ya-Ya Ma, Wen-Long Mo, Jing Guo, Qing Liu, Xing Fan, and Shu-Pei Zhang. 2023. "Research Progress of Carbon Deposition on Ni-Based Catalyst for CO2-CH4 Reforming" Catalysts 13, no. 4: 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13040647

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop