Next Article in Journal
Environmentally Friendly Fabrication of High-Efficient Fe-ZnO/Citric Acid-Modified Cellulose Composite and the Enhancement of Photocatalytic Activity in the Presence of H2O2
Next Article in Special Issue
Tetranuclear Copper Complexes with Bulky Aminoalcohol Ligands as Catalysts for Oxidative Phenoxazinone Synthase-like Coupling of Aminophenol: A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study
Previous Article in Journal
Superior Performance of an Iron-Platinum/Vulcan Carbon Fuel Cell Catalyst
Previous Article in Special Issue
Naturally Nano: Magnetically Separable Nanocomposites from Natural Resources for Advanced Catalytic Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

N-Iodosuccinimide as a Precatalyst for C–N Bond-Forming Reactions from Alcohols under Mild Reaction Conditions

1
Department of Physical and Organic Chemistry, Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School, Jamova 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
2
Department of Physical and Organic Chemistry, Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2022, 12(11), 1368; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12111368
Submission received: 14 October 2022 / Revised: 28 October 2022 / Accepted: 2 November 2022 / Published: 4 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Catalysis in Organic and Polymer Chemistry)

Abstract

:
We report an efficient and selective methodology for the direct cross-coupling of alcohols with N-nucleophiles mediated by N-iodosuccinimide (NIS) as the non-metal, commercially available, low-cost, and most effective precatalyst among the N-halosuccinimides (NXSs) under mild reaction conditions enhancing the green chemical profiles of these reactions. The scale-up procedure was accomplished with almost quantitative yield, verifying the presented method’s synthetic applicability and potential for industrial application.

1. Introduction

The development of new methodologies for C–N coupling reactions has attracted significant interest in academia and industry due to their various biological activities and broad scope in the pharmaceutical industry, material science, and drug delivery [1,2,3,4].
Since alcohols are available, inexpensive, and could serve as alkylating agents, their direct cross-coupling with N-nucleophiles could be a desirable strategy from the perspective of green chemistry, as an additional synthetic step for the coupling reaction is avoided and the only by-product resulting from the associated coupling reaction is water.
Catalytic direct activation of alcohols for nucleophilic substitution has become the preferred protocol among researchers; the different catalysts used include metal catalysts [5,6,7,8], Lewis acids [5,9,10], Brønsted acids [5,11], solid acids [12], and other promoters such as molecular iodine [5,13].
Despite being highly effective, these methods require expensive catalysts in many cases, environmentally inappropriate solvents, elevated temperatures, and prolonged reaction time, making such methods less attractive from a sustainability perspective. Regarding the environmental concerns and from an economic point of view, the desirable methodology should include the use of metal-free, low-cost, easily handled, water- and air-tolerant catalysts and solvent-free or safer reaction media, which remains an attractive research challenge in modern synthetic chemistry. Moreover, the methodology should be realizable for a broad substrate scope with high efficiency and selectivity, allowing a scale-up procedure.
Recently, we introduced N-halosuccinimides (NXSs) (chloro, bromo, and iodo), as the mediator for the direct transformation of a hydroxyl functional group, forming new carbon–carbon or carbon–heteroatom bonds [14]. N-Iodosuccinimide (NIS) in substoichiometric amounts was elevated as the most effective and selective precatalyst among the N-halosuccinimides. As part of our continuous research on developing environmentally friendlier synthetic methodologies, herein, we report the expanding role of NIS as a non-metal, accessible, and environmentally friendly precatalyst for direct cross-coupling of various alcohols with N-nucleophiles under mild reaction conditions.

2. Results

Initially, diphenylmethanol 1 was chosen as the model substrate to investigate the efficiency of NIS as a precatalyst of the process and to establish the reaction conditions for alcohol transformation (Scheme 1, Table 1). As shown in Table 1, no reaction occurred in the transformation of diphenylmethanol 1 in the presence of aqueous acetonitrile 2 without NIS as the precatalyst (entry 1, Table 1). In contrast, in the presence of NIS as the precatalyst, the corresponding amidation product 3 in nearly quantitative yield was observed, accompanied by the formation of a small amount of oxidized alcohol 4 (entry 2, Table 1) (entry 1, Table 2). The transformation of diphenylmethanol mediated by NIS in the absence of a nucleophile source under solvent-free reaction conditions (SFRC) provided dimeric ether 5 in quantitative yield [14]
In search of optimal reaction conditions, different parameters, including the loading of the NIS as the precatalyst, reaction temperature, reaction time, and effect of adding water for the reaction of diphenylmethanol 1 with MeCN/H2O 2, were first studied, and the results are given in the Supplementary Materials (Tables S1–S4).
Screening on precatalyst loading, reaction temperature, reaction time, and effect of adding water showed that 6 mol% NIS, 105 °C, 21 h, and 0.5 mmol H2O were the best conditions ensuring complete conversion of 1 into the corresponding amidation product 3 (Scheme 2).
Having established the optimal conditions for amidation products, we next sought to check the scope of this transformation with various alcohols (Scheme 3), and the results are collected in Table 2.
Effective transformation with acetonitrile solution 2, mediated by NIS, was observed in the reaction with additional derivatives of diphenylmethanol bearing electron-donating groups (EDGs) or electron-withdrawing groups (EWGs) on the aromatic rings furnishing the corresponding amidation products in excellent yields. We checked the reaction of phenyl(p-tolyl)methanol 6 with NIS as the mediator in the presence of aqueous acetonitrile 2, and the quantitative formation of the corresponding product 7 was observed, accompanied by a small amount of oxidized alcohol (entry 2, Table 2). Effective transformation with NIS as the mediator was observed in the case of (4-methoxyphenyl)(phenyl)methanol 8, providing corresponding product 9 in good yield accompanied by the formation of dimeric ether and oxidized alcohol (entry 3, Table 2). Amidation of (4-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methanol 10 with aqueous acetonitrile 2, mediated by NIS, afforded the corresponding product 11 in nearly quantitative yield accompanied by a small amount of oxidized alcohol (entry 4, Table 2).
Under the typical reaction conditions, we extended the scope of the transformation to additional classes of secondary benzyl alcohols, including derivatives of 1-phenylethanol carrying EDGs or EWGs on the aromatic rings 12, 14, and 16. These alcohols were quantitatively converted into the corresponding products 13, 15, and 17, accompanied by a small amount of oxidized alcohol (entries 5–7, Table 2). In contrast, in the case of the bulky tertiary benzyl alcohol 18, no product 19 was detected (entry 8, Table 2).
Furthermore, we checked the reactions of primary benzyl alcohols bearing EWGs and EDGs with aqueous acetonitrile 2 in the presence of NIS as the mediator. In the case of unsubstituted benzyl alcohol 20, a low yield of the corresponding product 21 was observed, accompanied by a small amount of dimeric ether and oxidized alcohol (entry 9, Table 2). In the case of p-tolylmethanol 22, the EDG on the aromatic ring enhanced the reaction efficiency providing the corresponding product 23 in good yield, while the EWG of benzyl alcohol 24 decreased the transformation, only a small amount of corresponding product 25 was observed, accompanied by a small amount of dimeric ether and oxidized alcohol due to lower reactivity (entries 10 and 11, Table 2).
Effective transformation was observed in the case of secondary alkyl alcohols under typical reaction conditions. Butan-2-ol 26 was efficiently and selectively converted into the corresponding product 27 (entry 12, Table 2).
Inspired by these results, we further investigated the corresponding reactions of alcohols with other N-nucleophile sources, such as aqueous propionitrile 28. In the case of secondary benzyl alcohols, including derivatives of diphenylmethanol carrying EDGs or EWGs on the aromatic ring 1, 6, and 10, efficient conversion into the corresponding products 29, 30, and 31, accompanied by a small amount of oxidized alcohol were observed (entries 13–15, Table 2). In the case of primary benzyl alcohol bearing an EDG on the aromatic ring 22, the formation of the corresponding product 32 in good yield was observed (entry 16, Table 2). Moreover, the direct coupling of substituted aniline bearing deactivated groups 33 and 35 with phenyl(p-tolyl)methanol 6 mediated by NIS afforded the corresponding products 34 and 36 in moderate to high yield accompanied by a small amount of oxidized alcohol and dimeric ether (entries 17 and 18, Table 2). On the other hand, we performed the reaction of phenyl(p-tolyl)methanol 6 as the model compound under the mentioned reaction conditions, using (trimethylsilyl)isothiocyanate (TMSNCS) 37 as the source of nucleophiles, where isothiocyanate was introduced successfully into organic molecule 38 (entry 19, Table 2). Additionally, no reaction occurred in the transformation of diphenylmethanol 1 as the model compound under the examined reaction conditions, using benzylamine 39 and n-butylamine 41 as the nucleophile sources in the presence of NIS as the precatalyst (entries 20 and 21, Table 2).
On the other hand, the following reaction was performed on the 10 mmol scale to establish the synthetic value of the reported methodology: coupling of phenyl(p-tolyl)methanol 6 with aqueous acetonitrile 2 in the presence of NIS as the mediator, which delivered the desired corresponding product 7 in excellent yield (93%).
To support the assumption that the dimeric ether 5 might be the intermediate of this dehydrative coupling [15], a control reaction was performed (Scheme 4). The dimeric ether 5 [16] was used as a starting material instead of diphenylmethanol 1 in the reaction with aqueous acetonitrile 2, affording the corresponding product 3 in high yield accompanied by the formation of oxidized alcohol.
Based on the above observations, it could be speculated that the dimeric ether 5 might be the intermediate that can generate the benzylic carbocation, which MeCN can attack to release nitrilium ion followed by the presence of traces of H2O providing the amide product 3. Moreover, the direct reaction between carbocation and aqueous acetonitrile could be a possible pathway as well [17,18].
To gain mechanistic insight into the course of the reaction, the reaction of 1 with 2 in the presence of NIS as the precatalyst under the examined reaction conditions was performed, and the pH of the reaction mixture was measured (Table S5). The results show a drop in pH value from 6–7 to as low as 4–2 during the reaction.
Based on the result of the control experiment presented in Scheme 2, the proposed reaction pathway is presented in Scheme 5. It was reported that the R–X bond of organic molecules bearing an active N-halogen as the precatalysts was activated from its reaction with the addition of Lewis base by the interaction of a halogen atom X in one molecule with a negative site in another, such as the lone pair electrons of a Lewis base [19,20] Therefore, it seems plausible that transient halogen bonding could be responsible for the catalytic effect of NIS [21,22]. Rather, halonium (X+) transfer will generate the intermediate and HOX, which further promotes the course of the reaction. HOX decomposes by disproportionation to X2 and HXO3. It is well known that X2 forms HOX and HX in reactions with water, where HOX regenerates for the subsequent catalysis. Conversely, the water resulting as the only by-product of the reaction might function as a supporter in the acceleration of the reaction.
The assumption that NIS is a precatalyst forming HOX, X2, and protons during the process while these species could accelerate nucleophilic substitutions appears to be reasonable [23].
To check the NIS’s thermal stability under reaction conditions, thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) on the NIS precatalyst was performed. It was noticed that the degradation of the precatalyst did not occur at the temperature range 25–200 °C [14].

3. Materials and Methods

All alcohol substrates were commercially available and were used without further purification (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA; Fluka, Seelze, Germany). All reactions were performed in a Mettler-Toledo Easymax 102 Advanced Synthesis Workstation using 25 mL closed reactor tubes at 85–105 °C for 21–24 h. All reactions were monitored by TLC (mobile phase: dichloromethane/hexane 9:1) and visualized using a UV lamp (254 nm, Camag, Muttenz, Switzerland). pH was measured with Whatman Panpeha pH indicator strips (pH range 0–14). Column chromatography (CC) and flash chromatography (FC) were performed using silica gel 60 (particle size: 0.063–0.200 mm), and purification of certain products was accomplished on PLC Kieselgel 60 F254 preparative silica gel glass plates with 2 mm layer thickness. Spectroscopic methods included nuclear magnetic resonance (Varian INOVA 300 NMR instrument, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 300 MHz 1H, 75 MHz 13C, 285 MHz 19F) at 25 C. 1H NMR spectra were obtained as solutions in CDCl3 with TMS as an internal standard. 19F NMR spectra were obtained as solutions in CDCl3 with CFCl3 as an internal standard. Melting points (open capillary tube methodology; uncorrected) were used for identification and structure elucidation employing Buchi-Melting Point M-560 equipment (BUCHI, Flawil, Switzerland).
The general procedure for new carbon–nitrogen bond formation in organic molecules mediated by NIS on a half-millimole scale is as follows:
In 25 mL reactor tubes, a mixture of benzyl alcohol (0.5 mmol), acetonitrile or propionitrile (0.5 mL), water (0.5 mmol), and NIS (6–10 mol%), or a mixture of solid reaction components previously powdered in a mortar, was transferred. The reactor tube was then heated at 85–115 °C for 21–24 h. The progress of the reaction mixture was monitored by TLC. After the completion of the reaction, the crude reaction mixture was cooled down to room temperature; diluted with ethyl acetate (15 mL); washed with Na2S2O3 (6 mL), NaHCO3 (6 mL), and water (10 mL); and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure, and the crude reaction mixture obtained was analyzed by 1H NMR.
The scale-up procedure for the synthesis of N-(phenyl(p-tolyl)methyl)acetamide 7 is as follows: A mixture of phenyl(p-tolyl)methanol 6 (10 mmol, 1.98 g), 6 mol% NIS (135 mg, 0.06 mol), which had been powdered in a mortar, was transferred to a 25 mL reactor tube to which H2O (10 mmol, 180 μL) and MeCN 2 (10 mL) were added, and the mixture was heated at 105 °C for 21 h, stirring at 300 rpm. The progress of the reaction mixture was followed by TLC. Upon completion of the reaction, the mixture was cooled to room temperature. Finally, the crude reaction mixture was purified by column chromatography to obtain a pure product in excellent yield (white solid, 2.2131 g, and 93%).

4. Conclusions

In summary, an efficient, selective, non-metal methodology for the direct C–N bond formation through the direct cross-coupling of secondary alkyl alcohols and benzylic alcohols (primary and secondary) with N-nucleophiles employing NIS as an accessible and environmentally friendly precatalyst has been developed. The synthesis has been performed under mild reaction conditions affording moderate to quantitative product yields. The large-scale synthesis of N-(phenyl(p-tolyl)methyl)acetamide 7 has been accomplished with excellent yield.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/catal12111368/s1, Table S1: The catalytic effect of NIS on the conversion of diphenylmethanol 1 with acetonitrile solution 2 based on temperature 1, Table S2: The effect of loading of NIS as the mediator on the conversion of diphenylmethanol 1 with acetonitrile solution 2 1, Table S3: The catalytic effect of NIS on the conversion of diphenylmethanol 1 with acetonitrile solution 2 based on time 1, Table S4: The catalytic effect of NIS on the conversion of diphenylmethanol 1 with acetonitrile solution 2 based on mmol of water 1, Table S5: The pH measurements on the conversion of diphenylmethanol 1 with acetonitrile solution 2 mediated by NIS, Characterization Data of Isolated Final Products, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and 19F NMR spectra of isolated final products, Thermal Gravimetric (TG) analysis of the NIS. References [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33] are cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S.; formal analysis, N.A. and S.S.; investigation, N.A. and S.S.; methodology, N.A. and S.S.; writing—original draft, N.A.; writing—review and editing, N.A. and S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Slovene Human Resources Development and Scholarship Fund (contract: 11011-9/2011) and the Slovenian Research Agency (contract: Programme P1-0134).

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Slovenian NMR Centre at the National Institute of Chemistry, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Bähn, S.; Imm, S.; Neubert, L.; Zhang, M.; Neumann, H.; Beller, M. The Catalytic Amination of Alcohols. ChemCatChem 2011, 3, 1853–1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Guérinot, A.; Reymond, S.; Cossy, J. Ritter Reaction: Recent Catalytic Developments. EurJOC 2012, 2012, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jiang, D.; He, T.; Ma, L.; Wang, Z. Recent developments in Ritter reaction. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 64936–64946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Afanasyev, O.I.; Kuchuk, E.; Usanov, D.L.; Chusov, D. Reductive Amination in the Synthesis of Pharmaceuticals. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 11857–11911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ajvazi, N.; Stavber, S. Alcohols in direct carbon-carbon and carbon-heteroatom bond-forming reactions: Recent advances. Arkivoc 2018, 2018, 288–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Farzana, R.; Radhika, S.; Saranya, S.; Anilkumar, G. Manganese-catalyzed amination reactions: An overview. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2021, 35, e6421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Valentini, F.; Piermatti, O.; Vaccaro, L. Metal Nanoparticles as Sustainable Tools for C–N Bond Formation via C–H Activation. Molecules 2021, 26, 4106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vaidya, G.N.; Choudhary, R.H.; Nagpure, M.; Lokhande, S.K.; Rana, P.; Kumar, D. ‘In-water’, nickel-catalyzed mild preparation of allylic amines employing alcohols: Application to ‘all-water’ synthesis of pharmaceuticals. Green Chem. 2022, 24, 3977–3984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ueno, M.; Kusaka, R.; Ohmura, S.D.; Miyoshi, N. Environmentally Benign Ritter Reaction Using Bismuth Salts as a Catalyst. EurJOC 2019, 2019, 1796–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xing, H.; Chen, M.; Zhang, D.; Geng, Z.; Xie, P.; Loh, T.-P. Dehydrative Cross-Coupling for C–N Bond Construction under Transition-Metal-Free Conditions. Org. Lett. 2022, 24, 5657–5662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Radtanajiravong, L.; Díez-González, S. Taming Brønsted Acid Reactivity: Nucleophilic Substitutions of Propargylic Alcohols with N-Nucleophiles Mediated by Phosphorus-Based Brønsted Acid Catalysts. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 12300–12307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Nandy, S.; Das, A.K.; Bhar, S. Chemoselective formation of C–N bond in wet acetonitrile using amberlyst®-15(H) as a recyclable catalyst. Synth. Commun. 2020, 50, 3326–3336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jereb, M.; Vražič, D.; Zupan, M. Iodine-catalyzed transformation of molecules containing oxygen functional groups. Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 1355–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ajvazi, N.; Stavber, S. N-Halosuccinimides as Precatalysts for C-, N-, O-, and X-Nucleophilic Substitution Reactions of Alcohols under Mild Reaction Conditions. Catalysts 2020, 10, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chun, S.; Chung, Y.K. Silver/NBS-Catalyzed Synthesis of α-Alkylated Aryl Ketones from Internal Alkynes and Benzyl Alcohols via Ether Intermediates. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 5583–5586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ajvazi, N.; Stavber, S. Direct Cross-Coupling of Alcohols with O-Nucleophiles Mediated by N-Iodosuccinimide as a Precatalyst under Mild Reaction Conditions. Catalysts 2021, 11, 858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Anxionnat, B.; Guérinot, A.; Reymond, S.; Cossy, J. FeCl3-catalyzed Ritter reaction. Synthesis of amides. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 3470–3473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Theerthagiri, P.; Lalitha, A.; Arunachalam, P.N. Iodine-catalyzed one-pot synthesis of amides from nitriles via Ritter reaction. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 2813–2819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Clark, T.; Hennemann, M.; Murray, J.S.; Politzer, P. Halogen bonding: The σ-hole. J. Mol. Model. 2007, 13, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Politzer, P.; Murray, J.S.; Clark, T. Halogen bonding: An electrostatically-driven highly directional noncovalent interaction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 7748–7757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bulfield, D.; Huber, S.M. Halogen Bonding in Organic Synthesis and Organocatalysis. Eur. J. Chem. 2016, 22, 14434–14450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Breugst, M.; von der Heiden, D. Mechanisms in Iodine Catalysis. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 9187–9199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Čebular, K.; Božić, B.Đ.; Stavber, S. 1,3-Dibromo-5,5-dimethylhydantoin as a Precatalyst for Activation of Carbonyl Functionality. Molecules 2019, 24, 2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Ibrahim, N.; Hashmi, A.S.K.; Rominger, F. Gold Catalysis: Alkyl Migration in the Addition of Alcohols to Nitriles. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 461–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Crampton, R.; Woodward, S.; Fox, M. Bis-Sulfamyl Imines: Potent Substrates for Asymmetric Additions of Arylboroxines under Rhodium Catalysis. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 903–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sanz, R.; Martínez, A.; Guilarte, V.; Álvarez-Gutiérrez, J.M.; Rodríguez, F. The Ritter Reaction under Truly Catalytic Brønsted Acid Conditions. EurJOC 2007, 2007, 4642–4645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, G.; Antilla, J.C. Highly Enantioselective Hydrogenation of Enamides Catalyzed by Chiral Phosphoric Acids. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1075–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Yamamoto, Y.; Hasegawa, H.; Yamataka, H. Dynamic Path Bifurcation in the Beckmann Reaction: Support from Kinetic Analyses. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 4652–4660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yagafarov, N.Z.; Muratov, K.M.; Biriukov, K.; Usanov, D.L.; Chusova, O.; Perekalin, D.S.; Chusov, D. Ruthenium-Catalyzed Reductive Amidation without an External Hydrogen Source. EurJOC 2018, 2018, 557–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Singh, K.; Singh, K. N1,N3-Diacyl-3,4-dihydropyrimidin-2(1H)-ones: Neutral acyl group transfer reagents. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 10395–10399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. White, E.H. Complex Salts of Monosubstituted Amides with the Hydrohalic Acids and the Halogens. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 6215–6219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Audiger, L.; Watts, K.; Elmore, S.C.; Robinson, R.I.; Wirth, T. Ritter Reactions in Flow. ChemSusChem 2012, 5, 257–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Awano, T.; Ohmura, T.; Suginome, M. Inversion or Retention? Effects of Acidic Additives on the Stereochemical Course in Enantiospecific Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling of α-(Acetylamino)benzylboronic Esters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 20738–20741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheme 1. The conversion of diphenylmethanol 1 in the presence of acetonitrile solution mediated by NIS.
Scheme 1. The conversion of diphenylmethanol 1 in the presence of acetonitrile solution mediated by NIS.
Catalysts 12 01368 sch001
Scheme 2. Optimal reaction conditions for the conversion of diphenylmethanol 1 into the N-benzhydrylacetamide 3 mediated by NIS.
Scheme 2. Optimal reaction conditions for the conversion of diphenylmethanol 1 into the N-benzhydrylacetamide 3 mediated by NIS.
Catalysts 12 01368 sch002
Scheme 3. Nucleophilic substitution of alcohols mediated by NIS.
Scheme 3. Nucleophilic substitution of alcohols mediated by NIS.
Catalysts 12 01368 sch003
Scheme 4. Control experiment.
Scheme 4. Control experiment.
Catalysts 12 01368 sch004
Scheme 5. Plausible reaction course.
Scheme 5. Plausible reaction course.
Catalysts 12 01368 sch005
Table 1. Optimal reaction conditions for the highest conversion of diphenylmethanol 1 into the N-benzhydrylacetamide 3 mediated by NIS 1.
Table 1. Optimal reaction conditions for the highest conversion of diphenylmethanol 1 into the N-benzhydrylacetamide 3 mediated by NIS 1.
EntryNIS (mol%)Reaction ConditionsConversion 2 (%) of 1Relative Distribution 2 (%)
345
1/MeCN (1/2 mL), H2O (0.5 mmol),
105 °C, 21 h
////
26MeCN (1/2 mL), H2O (0.5 mmol),
105 °C, 21 h
100964/
1 Reaction conditions: diphenylmethanol 1 (0.5 mmol), MeCN 2 (1/2 mL), H2O (0.5 mmol), 105 °C, 21 h. 2 Determined from 1H NMR spectra of isolated crude reaction mixtures.
Table 2. Nucleophilic substitution of alcohols using NIS as a precatalyst a.
Table 2. Nucleophilic substitution of alcohols using NIS as a precatalyst a.
EntryR1, R2, R3NuYProductConversion b (%)
(Yield c (%))
1R1 = R2 = H, R3 = Ph
1
MeCN/H2O
2
Catalysts 12 01368 i001100 d
(94)
2R1 = Me, R2 = H, R3 = Ph
6
MeCN/H2O
2
Catalysts 12 01368 i002100 d
(94)
3R1 = OMe, R2 = H, R3 = Ph
8
MeCN/H2O
2
Catalysts 12 01368 i00392 e
(73)
4R1 = Cl, R2 = H, R3 = Ph
10
MeCN/H2O
2
Catalysts 12 01368 i004100 d
(92)
5R1 = R2 = H, R3 = Ph
12
MeCN/H2O
2
Catalysts 12 01368 i005100 d [14]
(93)
6R1 = Me, R2 = H, R3 = Me
14
MeCN/H2O
2
Catalysts 12 01368 i00693 d,f
(80)
7R1 = Cl, R2 = H, R3 = Me
16
MeCN/H2O
2
Catalysts 12 01368 i00796 d
(86)
8R1 = H, R2 = R3 = Ph
18
MeCN/H2O
2
Catalysts 12 01368 i008-
9R1 = H, R2 = R3 = Ph
20
MeCN/H2O
2
Catalysts 12 01368 i00946 e
10R1 = Me, R2 = R3 = H
22
MeCN/H2O
2
Catalysts 12 01368 i01096 e
(73)
11R1 = Me, R2 = R3 = H
24
MeCN/H2O
2
Catalysts 12 01368 i01130 e
12CH3CH2CHCH3
26
MeCN/H2O
2
Catalysts 12 01368 i01288
(85)
13R1 = R2 = H, R3 = Ph
1
CH3CH2CN/H2O
28
Catalysts 12 01368 i013100 d
(91)
14R1 = Me, R2 = H, R3 = Ph
6
CH3CH2CN/H2O
28
Catalysts 12 01368 i014100 d
(92)
15R1 = Cl, R2 = H, R3 = Ph
10
CH3CH2CN/H2O
28
Catalysts 12 01368 i015100 d
(93)
16R1 = Me, R2 = R3 = H
22
CH3CH2CN/H2O
28
Catalysts 12 01368 i01698 e
(74)
17R1 = Me, R2 = H, R3 = Ph
6
Catalysts 12 01368 i017Catalysts 12 01368 i01871 d
(65)
18R1 = R2 = H, R3 = Ph
1
Catalysts 12 01368 i019Catalysts 12 01368 i02085 d [14]
(79)
19R1 = Me, R2 = H, R3 = Ph
6
TMSNCS
37
Catalysts 12 01368 i021100 [14]
(97)
20R1 = R2 = H, R3 = Ph
1
Catalysts 12 01368 i022Catalysts 12 01368 i023-
21R1 = R2 = H, R3 = Ph
1
n-BuNH2
41
Catalysts 12 01368 i024-
a Reaction conditions: alcohol (0.5 mmol), NuY (0.55 mmol–0.5 mL), H2O (0.5 mmol), NIS (6–10 mol%), 85–115 °C, 21–24 h. b Determined from 1H NMR spectra of the isolated crude reaction mixture. c Purified products. d Oxidized alcohol 2–10%. e Oxidized alcohol and dimeric ether 4–20%. f Eliminated product 8%.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ajvazi, N.; Stavber, S. N-Iodosuccinimide as a Precatalyst for C–N Bond-Forming Reactions from Alcohols under Mild Reaction Conditions. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1368. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12111368

AMA Style

Ajvazi N, Stavber S. N-Iodosuccinimide as a Precatalyst for C–N Bond-Forming Reactions from Alcohols under Mild Reaction Conditions. Catalysts. 2022; 12(11):1368. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12111368

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ajvazi, Njomza, and Stojan Stavber. 2022. "N-Iodosuccinimide as a Precatalyst for C–N Bond-Forming Reactions from Alcohols under Mild Reaction Conditions" Catalysts 12, no. 11: 1368. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12111368

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop