Next Article in Journal
Presence of Concurrent TP53 Mutations Is Necessary to Predict Poor Outcomes within the SMAD4 Mutated Subgroup of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Role of Fe, Transferrin and Transferrin Receptor in Anti-Tumor Effect of Vitamin C
Previous Article in Journal
Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Medullary Thyroid Cancer: What Has Changed in Recent Years?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Association between Hepatic Oxidative Stress Related Factors and Activation of Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling in NAFLD-Induced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Importance of Locations of Iron Ions to Elicit Cytotoxicity Induced by a Fenton-Type Reaction

1
Molecular Cell Biology Laboratory, Department of Bioscience and Engineering, College of Systems Engineering and Science, Shibaura Institute of Technology, Fukasaku 307, Minuma-ku, Saitama 337-8570, Japan
2
Quantitative RedOx Sensing Group, Department of Radiation Regulatory Science Research, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Quantum Life and Medical Science Directorate, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba-shi 263-8555, Japan
3
Quantum RedOx Chemistry Team, Institute for Quantum Life Science, Quantum Life and Medical Science Directorate, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba-shi 263-8555, Japan
4
Human Resources Development Center, Quantum Life and Medical Science Directorate, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba-shi 263-8555, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2022, 14(15), 3642; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153642
Submission received: 14 July 2022 / Accepted: 25 July 2022 / Published: 27 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Iron and Cancer)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The Fenton reaction generates the hydroxyl radical (OH), which is the most reactive and toxic reactive oxygen species and widely recognized as a key player in oxidative stress. To clarify whether this highly reactive molecule travels to its biological target, the effects of the site of the Fenton reaction on cytotoxicity were investigated. Cytotoxicity induced by the Fenton reaction was affected by the distribution of iron ions surrounding and/or being incorporated into cells. Cytotoxicity was enhanced when the Fenton reaction occurred inside cells. Instead of enhancing cytotoxicity, extracellular iron ions exerted protective effects against the cytotoxicity of extracellular hydrogen peroxide in an ion concentration-dependent manner. Distance had a negative impact on the reactivity of extracellular OH and biologically effective targets. Furthermore, an assessment of plasmid DNA breakage showed that the Fenton reaction system did not effectively induce DNA breakage.

Abstract

The impact of the site of the Fenton reaction, i.e., hydroxyl radical (OH) generation, on cytotoxicity was investigated by estimating cell lethality in rat thymocytes. Cells were incubated with ferrous sulfate (FeSO4) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), or pre-incubated with FeSO4 and then H2O2 was added after medium was replaced to remove iron ions or after the medium was not replaced. Cell lethality in rat thymocytes was estimated by measuring cell sizes using flow cytometry. High extracellular concentrations of FeSO4 exerted protective effects against H2O2-induced cell death instead of enhancing cell lethality. The pre-incubation of cells with FeSO4 enhanced cell lethality induced by H2O2, whereas a pre-incubation with a high concentration of FeSO4 exerted protective effects. FeSO4 distributed extracellularly or on the surface of cells neutralized H2O2 outside cells. Cytotoxicity was only enhanced when the Fenton reaction, i.e., the generation of OH, occurred inside cells. An assessment of plasmid DNA breakage showed that OH induced by the Fenton reaction system did not break DNA. Therefore, the main target of intracellularly generated OH does not appear to be DNA.

1. Introduction

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are generated from molecular oxygen (O2) through mitochondrial respiration [1,2,3,4]. O2 is then reduced by four electrons in the mitochondrial electron transport chain [4]. However, some of the O2 (0.1%) used in mitochondria is reduced by one electron, which results in the generation of superoxide (O2•−) [5]. In aqueous environments, such as the cytoplasm, O2•− is equilibrated with the hydroperoxyl radical (HO2), which is a highly oxidative species [6]. To eliminate these reactive species, O2•− is reduced by superoxide dismutase (SOD) to less reactive species, such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and O2 [7]. Although the reactivity of H2O2 is low at micromolar concentrations, the highly reactive hydroxyl radical (OH) is produced via a reaction with H2O2 and transition metal ions, such as Fe2+ and/or Cu+ [8]. To prevent the generation of OH, H2O2 is degenerated by catalase and/or glutathione peroxidase to water [9].
Among ROS, OH is widely recognized as a key player in oxidative stress [10,11,12]. However, since highly reactive molecules, such as OH, cannot travel far in cells due to their reactivity, it currently remains unclear whether they reach their biological target before being canceled by a reaction with other molecules. Radiation-induced OH in water was previously shown to be generated at two different local concentrations, i.e., mmol/L and mol/L levels, with intermolecular distances of 4–7 and <0.8 nm, respectively [13,14,15]. These two OH generated with an intermolecular distance < 0.8 nm react and produce H2O2 in an oxygen-independent manner, whereas those generated with an intermolecular distance of 4–7 nm cannot react with each other due to their distance. A previous study demonstrated that the ratio of mmol/L OH generation was inhibited while that of mol/L OH generation was enhanced by increases in the linear energy transfer (LET) of particle radiation [13]. Therefore, a high LET carbon-ion beam more strongly promotes the oxygen-independent generation of H2O2 over the oxygen-dependent generation of H2O2 [16]. The molecular distance of OH influences its sequential reactions. Therefore, the distance between OH and its target molecule is an important factor affecting OH-induced oxidative stress.
The Fenton reaction is a well-known chemical reaction that is utilized as a source of OH [17]. It involves the reduction in H2O2 by the reduced form of transition metal ions, such as Fe2+ and/or Cu+, which generates OH and the oxidized form of metal ions (Equation (1)). Fenton originally discovered the strong oxidation of tartaric acid following the addition of H2O2 to tartaric acid solution, which contained a trace amount of Fe2+ salt [18,19].
H2O2 + Fe2+/Cu+OH + OH + Fe3+/Cu2+
Haber and Weiss [20] identified the strong oxidant produced by the reaction between H2O2 and Fe2+ as OH. Therefore, this reaction is generally known as the Haber–Weiss reaction and generates OH through the reduction in H2O2 by O2•− (Equation (2)).
H2O2 + O2•−OH + OH + O2
After being reduced, weakly reactive H2O2 becomes highly toxic OH. The site at which the reduction in H2O2 occurs has an important impact on the effects of oxidative stress on living cells.
Thymocytes are immune cells that constitute the thymus. Rodent thymocytes exhibit a characteristic apoptotic response [21,22]. The radiation-induced shrinkage of rodent thymocytes is easily detected and measured using a flow cytometer [23]. The size of irradiated rat thymocytes was previously shown to be significantly reduced due to apoptosis and they were classified into two discrete subpopulations: normal and smaller thymocytes. This classification has been utilized to assess the radio-protective effects of planar catechin analogues [24].
Plasmid DNA breakage has been employed to estimate the extent of biological oxidative damage in vitro [25]. A plasmid is a small circular extrachromosomal double-stranded DNA structure. Plasmid DNA has three different topoisomers: linear, open circular, and supercoiled. The original supercoiled form assumes the open circular form with single-strand breaks and the linear form with more severe double-strand breaks [26].
In the present study, the effects on cytotoxicity of the molecular location at which OH is generated by the Fenton reaction were investigated. The influence of the Fenton reaction system on cytotoxicity was examined by comparing the cell death rate of rat thymocytes. The effectiveness of the Fenton reaction was evaluated based on the extent of plasmid DNA breakage. The potential cytotoxicity of OH generated by the Fenton reaction was discussed based on the sites at which Fe2+ and H2O2 come into contact and react with each other.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

All chemicals used in the present study were of analytical grade. Deionized water (deionization by the Milli-Q system) was used to prepare phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), ferrous sulfate (FeSO4) stock solutions, and H2O2 stock solutions.

2.2. Plasmid DNA

A pBR322 plasmid DNA solution (4361 bp, 0.5 µg/µL) in TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA) was purchased from Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan. pBR322 was precipitated by the addition of 0.1 vol of 3 M sodium acetate and 2.5 vol of ethanol and incubated at –20 °C for 2 h. The plasmid was collected by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm at 4 °C for 15 min in MX-100 (Tomy Seiko, Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), washed with 250 µL of 70% ethanol–water, and collected again by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm at 4 °C for 15 min in MX-100 (Tomy Seiko, Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) followed by removal of the residual solvent. pBR322 was dried at room temperature for 5 min. A stock solution was prepared by dissolving the dry plasmid in 50 µL H2O and leaving it to stand at 4 °C overnight. DNA concentrations were quantified by measuring absorbance at 260 nm (molar extinction coefficient: 50 µg/mL/cm) using the NanoPhotometer N60 (Implen, Munich, Germany).

2.3. Animals

Healthy 8-week-old male Wistar-MS rats were supplied by Japan SLC, Inc. (Shizuoka, Japan). Animals were housed one or two per cage in climate-controlled (23 ± 1 °C and 55 ± 5% humidity), circadian rhythm-adjusted (12-h light–dark cycle) rooms and were allowed food and water ad libitum until experiments were conducted. Rats were used for experimentation at 10–15 weeks old. Experiments were approved by the Animal Use Committee of the National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan.

2.4. Preparation of Thymocytes

Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium (RPMI1640) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The thymus was surgically removed from rats. Thymocytes were squeezed out of the thymus using tweezers, placed in PBS, and passed through a mesh to disassemble single cells. A cell suspension at a density of 10 × 105 cells/mL was prepared by RPMI1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS).

2.5. Assessment of Rat Thymocyte Lethality Induced by OH

Experiment 1: FeSO4 or H2O2 was added to the thymocyte suspension in medium at a final concentration of 100, 500, or 1000 µM. Samples were incubated at room temperature for 5 min, centrifuged at 600× g for 5 min, re-suspended in RPMI1640 medium containing 10% FBS, and incubated at 37 °C for another 4 h.
Experiment 2: Thymocyte suspensions in medium containing FeSO4 (0, 100, or 500 µM as the final concentration) and H2O2 (100, 400, 700, or 1000 µM as the final concentration) were incubated at room temperature for 5 min, centrifuged at 600× g for 5 min, re-suspended in RPMI1640 medium containing 10% FBS, and incubated at 37 °C for another 4 h.
Experiment 3: Thymocyte suspensions in medium containing FeSO4 (0, 50, 500, or 1000 µM as the final concentration) were incubated at room temperature for 30 min and H2O2 was then added to the thymocyte suspension in medium to a final concentration of 100 or 500 µM. Samples were incubated at room temperature for 5 min, centrifuged at 600× g for 5 min, re-suspended in RPMI1640 medium containing 10% FBS, and then incubated at 37 °C for another 4 h.
Experiment 4: Thymocyte suspensions in medium containing FeSO4 (50, 500, or 1000 µM as the final concentration) were incubated at room temperature for 30 min, centrifuged at 600× g for 5 min, and re-suspended in fresh RPMI1640 medium containing 10% FBS with the addition of H2O2 to a final concentration of 100 or 500 µM. Samples were incubated at room temperature for 5 min, centrifuged at 600× g for 5 min, re-suspended in RPMI1640 medium containing 10% FBS, and incubated at 37 °C for another 4 h.
After the 4-h incubation, cell sizes were measured using the flow cytometer FACSCalibur (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The ratio of the number of shrunken cells, i.e., apoptotic cells, to the total cell number was estimated as the cell death rate (%).

2.6. Assessment of Plasmid DNA Breakage Induced by OH

DNA strand breakage was examined by the conversion of supercoiled pBR322 plasmid DNA to the open circular and linear forms. Reactions were performed in 10 µL (total volume) of 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.1 µg pBR322 DNA under experimental conditions 1–4 described below.
Experiment 1: H2O2 (0.1, 1, 10, or 100 mM), FeSO4 (0.1, 1, 10, or 100 mM), and FeCl3 (0.1, 1, 10, or 100 mM) were added to aqueous solution containing plasmid DNA under aerobic or hypoxic conditions at several concentrations.
Experiment 2: H2O2 and FeSO4 were added to aqueous solution containing plasmid DNA under aerobic conditions. The final concentration of FeSO4 was 100 or 1000 µM, and the concentration of H2O2 added was 50%, equal, or two-fold that of FeSO4.
Experiment 3: H2O2 was added to aqueous solution containing plasmid DNA under aerobic conditions. Samples were irradiated with 0.1 or 0.5 J/cm2 of 254 nm UV light using an UV irradiator (CL-1000 Ultraviolet Crosslinker, UVP, LLC, Upland, CA, USA).
Experiment 4: The addition of 1 mM H2O2 and several concentrations of caffeine, DMSO, terephthalate, or sucrose to aqueous solution containing plasmid DNA was performed under aerobic conditions. Samples were irradiated with 0.1 J/cm2 of 254 nm UV light.
After being incubated at room temperature for 10 min, reaction mixtures were then treated with 2 µL of a loading buffer containing 30% glycerol, 0.25% bromophenol blue, 0.25% xylene cyanol, and 1 mM EDTA loaded onto a 1% agarose gel. Gels were run at a constant voltage of 50 V for 2 h in TBE buffer, stained in 0.5 µg/mL ethidium bromide for 1 h, washed with distilled water for 30 min, visualized under a UV transilluminator, and photographed using a digital camera. Gel images were analyzed using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) and the amount of the open circular form was quantified.

2.7. Estimation of the OH yield

Regarding the Fenton reaction, an aliquot of the water solution of DMPO and H2O2 was added to a microtube, followed by an aliquot of the water solution of FeSO4 to start the reaction. The final concentration of DMPO was 100 mM for all experiments, and the final concentrations of H2O2 and FeSO4 were adjusted to 500, 250, or 125 μM depending on the experiment. The time course of DMPO-OH generated in the reaction mixture was measured by an EPR spectrometer at 20-sec intervals for 4 min. Reciprocal values of the concentration of DMPO-OH were plotted versus time after starting the reaction. The initial concentration (C0) of DMPO-OH was estimated by extrapolating the initial linear slope to the Y-axis (t = 0).
Regarding the decomposition of H2O2 by UV irradiation, a reaction mixture containing 100 mM DMPO and 1.0 mM H2O2 was irradiated with 0.1 J/cm2 of 254 nm UV light. The time course of DMPO-OH generated in the reaction mixture was measured by the EPR spectrometer.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Significant differences between values for comparison were estimated using the TTEST function in Microsoft Excel 2010. Suitable ‘tail’ and ‘type’ for the TTEST function were selected as follows. The ‘tail’ was 2 (two-tailed distribution) for stability tests because the difference between the two data groups was simply compared. The ‘type’ was 2 (equal variance) or 3 (unequal variance), which was estimated using the FTEST function, and the Student’s or Welch’s t-test was performed according to the ‘type’. Grades of significance were estimated by p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001.

3. Results and Discussion

The effects of OH induced by the Fenton reaction on living cells were evaluated by a cell survival test using rat thymocytes [23]. Figure 1 shows the results of cytotoxicity induced by exposing cells to FeSO4 or H2O2 alone. The administration of FeSO4 alone was not cytotoxic at a concentration < 1000 μM, whereas H2O2 induced cytotoxicity in a dose-dependent manner.
Lipophilic H2O2 easily entered the intracellular volume through the cell membrane during the 5-min incubation period with an extra 10–15 min for washing, i.e., centrifugation, removing the supernatant, and adding fresh cell culture medium. H2O2 may be decomposed to generate OH by a reaction with intracellular metal ions. However, iron ions may not directly enter the intracellular volume through the cell membrane during the 15–20 min used for the incubation and washing. The incubation period of 15–20 min was too short for the uptake of iron by cells. Iron ions may become cytotoxic when they accumulate at excessive amounts [27]; however, this requires a long period of time. The accumulation of iron ions in cells to a level that promotes lipid peroxidation and induces cell death is called ferroptosis [28,29].
Figure 2 shows the effects of Fenton reaction-induced OH generation on cytotoxicity when FeSO4 and H2O2 were simultaneously added to cell culture samples. The experiment with 0 µM FeSO4 is a repetition of Figure 1B; however, in this separate experiment, the addition of 400 µM H2O2 increased cell lethality (74%), which was similar to that observed with 700 µM H2O2. Cell lethality in rat thymocytes following the addition of H2O2 alone was enhanced at H2O2 concentrations of 400–500 µM and appeared to vary in a manner that was dependent on the total incubation time (15–20 min), which included the processing time for cell washing.
The results of the experiments with 0 and 100 µM FeSO4 were compared, and similar cell lethality was observed at the same H2O2 doses; however, cell lethality was significantly lower (p < 0.01) when 400 µM H2O2 was added to the 100 µM FeSO4 sample than with its addition to the 0 µM FeSO4 sample. The addition of 100 and 400 µM H2O2 with 500 µM FeSO4 to cell culture samples resulted in significantly lower (p < 0.001) cell lethality than that observed in the control. In experiments using the same H2O2 concentration, the sample treated with 500 µM FeSO4 showed significantly lower (p < 0.001) cell lethality than those treated with the other FeSO4 concentrations. Higher concentrations of FeSO4, which may have been distributed in the medium, i.e., outside cells, exerted protective rather than cytotoxic effects. This result is consistent with previous findings [30].
Extracellular Fe2+ ions may react with H2O2 and decompose it to OH before H2O2 reaches cells. OH generated outside cells does not reach cells due to its high reactivity. OH may immediately react with any molecule at the site of its generation and be neutralized before it reaches cells.
Figure 3 shows the effects of a pre-incubation with FeSO4 on Fenton reaction-induced cell death. Solid columns show the results of Experiment 3, i.e., H2O2 was added after a pre-incubation with or without FeSO4. When thymocytes were pre-incubated without FeSO4, the addition of H2O2 induced a higher percentage (approximately 40% for 100 µM and 70% for 500 µM) of cell death than that in the experiment shown in Figure 1B. Pre-incubations with several different concentrations (50, 500, and 1000 µM) of FeSO4 did not change the percentage of cell death induced by the addition of H2O2 from that in samples pre-incubated without (0 µM) FeSO4. The pre-incubation with 500 µM FeSO4 decreased the percentage of cell death to lower than that in samples pre-incubated with 0 or 50 µM FeSO4. The percentage of cell death was similar in samples pre-incubated with 1000 µM FeSO4 and those pre-incubated with 50 µM FeSO4. When 500 µM H2O2 experiments (black solid columns) were compared, the pre-incubation with 1000 µM FeSO4 significantly decreased cell lethality to lower than that in samples pre-incubated without (0 µM) FeSO4. A simultaneous exposure to 500 µM FeSO4 and 100 µM H2O2 resulted in significantly lower cell lethality than in the control (Figure 2), while the pre-incubation with 500 µM FeSO4 and later addition of 100 µM H2O2 significantly increased cell lethality to higher than that in the control (Figure 3). A previous cell incubation with FeSO4 appeared to increase the potential for cell lethality induced by the later addition of H2O2. In contrast, a higher extracellular concentration of FeSO4 exerted protective effects against H2O2-induced cell death.
The striped columns in Figure 3 show the results of Experiment 4, i.e., H2O2 was added after the removal of FeSO4 from pre-incubated samples. When extracellular Fe2+ ions were removed before the addition of H2O2 (striped columns), cell lethality was higher than in samples treated with the same dose of H2O2 with remaining extracellular Fe2+ ions (solid columns). When the results of 100 µM H2O2 experiments (gray striped columns) were compared, cell lethality was found to decrease in a manner that was dependent on the FeSO4 concentrations used in the pre-incubation. When the results of 500 µM H2O2 experiments (black striped columns) were compared, the pre-incubation with 500 µM FeSO4 was found to significantly increase cell lethality over that by 50 µM FeSO4, however; the pre-incubation with 1000 µM FeSO4 significantly decreased cell lethality to lower than that by 500 µM FeSO4. These results suggest that the higher concentration of iron ions remaining on the surface of cells neutralized H2O2 or that iron ions taken into cells at higher concentrations leaked outside cells and reacted with H2O2 before it reached cells.
Cytotoxicity induced by the Fenton reaction was affected by the distribution of iron ions surrounding cells. The available distance for OH to travel in water may be 2 nm or less [31]. In other words, for extracellular OH to induce cell death by a sufficient amount needs to be produced at a site that is within 2 nm of a cell. Therefore, extracellular iron ions, which need to be uniformly distributed in the buffer, may protect cells by neutralizing H2O2 outside cells. However, intracellular iron ions may promote H2O2-triggered cell death. To increase cytotoxicity, the generation of OH by the Fenton reaction must occur inside cells.
To effectively induce cytotoxicity, OH needs to be produced at the intracellular space. Ionizing radiation, such as photon and/or particle-ion beams, ionizes water molecules on their path independently of whether they are located inside or outside cells. Therefore, OH may be generated inside cells by ionizing radiation and may effectively induce cell death. Previous studies reported that 2 Gy of X-ray irradiation achieved approximately 40% cell lethality [23,24]. Since 0.53 µmol/L/Gy of OH was shown to be generated by X-ray irradiation [15], 2 Gy may produce 1.1 µmol/L OH in water. Ionizing radiation generates not only OH but also most types of ROS, such as H2O2, O2•−, and HO2, inside cells directly through water radiolysis and/or sequential reactions [32]. Furthermore, the initial generation of OH by ionizing radiation is localized, with local concentrations in the mmol/L and/or mol/L ranges [15].
Figure 4 shows the results on plasmid DNA breakage induced by exposure to H2O2, Fe2+ ions (FeSO4), or Fe3+ ions (FeCl3). H2O2 alone did not induce plasmid DNA breakage at a concentration lower than 10 mM under aerobic conditions (dark column in Figure 4A). In contrast, 10 mM or higher H2O2 induced DNA breakage under aerobic conditions, even though no significance was observed. However, DNA breakage induced by H2O2 alone was strongly enhanced under hypoxic conditions, and even 1.0 mM H2O2 induced slight DNA breakage under hypoxic conditions (light column in Figure 4A). H2O2 is a more stable and less reactive species than other ROS; nevertheless, it may become more reactive under hypoxic conditions. In contrast, 0.1 or 1.0 mM Fe2+ induced slight DNA breakage under aerobic conditions; however, this was inhibited under hypoxic conditions (Figure 4B). The addition of 10 mM or higher Fe2+ strongly induced DNA breakage under both aerobic and hypoxic conditions as if supercoil form had never existed (Figure 4B). Fe3+ alone did not break DNA under aerobic or hypoxic conditions at concentrations lower than 1.0 mM (Figure 4C). The addition of Fe3+ at a concentration of 10 mM or higher induced the disassembly of DNA under aerobic or hypoxic conditions. H2O2, Fe2+ ions (FeSO4), and Fe3+ ions (FeCl3) did not induce plasmid DNA breakage by themselves at concentrations lower than 0.1 mM, except for 0.1 mM Fe2+, which induced slight plasmid DNA breakage.
Figure 5 shows the results on plasmid DNA breakage caused by Fenton reaction-induced OH under aerobic conditions. Regarding the simultaneous exposure of plasmid DNA to H2O2 and Fe2+, the percentage of DNA breakage only slightly increased when the concentrations of both H2O2 and Fe2+ were 1.0 mM or higher (Figure 5B). H2O2 and Fe2+ ions travel relatively long distances in water, and most reach the target DNA; however, the majority of OH is neutralized at its site of generation and does not reach the target. The intermolecular distances of a compound at concentrations of 0.1 and 1.0 mM in a solution were calculated as 32 and 15 nm, respectively. When 1.0 mM FeSO4 and 1.0 mM H2O2 are reacted in an aqueous plasmid DNA solution, OH is ideally generated with an intermolecular distance of 15 nm. The distance between plasmid DNA and the nearest OH generated may be 0–15 nm. Similarly, the reaction of 0.1 mM FeSO4 and an equal concentration of H2O2 may generate OH with an intermolecular distance of 32 nm. The distance between OH generated and the plasmid DNA molecule may be longer when the concentrations of FeSO4 and H2O2 are lower. Nevertheless, only a very small amount of OH generated reaches plasmid DNA and breaks it.
As already shown in Figure 4, 1.0 mM Fe2+ induced DNA breakage under aerobic conditions, and this was inhibited by the addition of H2O2 (Figure 5B). H2O2 may react with Fe2+ before it reaches DNA, and OH generated by the reaction of H2O2 and Fe2+ also does not reach DNA due to its extremely high reactivity.
H2O2 is a source of OH, and Fe2+ functions as a processor for the induction of highly reactive OH. Although OH is widely recognized as a key player in oxidative stress, its extremely high reactivity limits its traveling distance and reaction efficiency with the target molecule. However, Fe2+/Fe3+ ions and/or H2O2 alone are moderately reactive and may travel long distances to the target molecule.
OH generated by the decomposition of H2O2 under UV irradiation may induce plasmid DNA breakage in a manner that depends on the concentration of H2O2 and UV energy (Figure 6). The irradiation of 0.1 J/cm2 UV to a 10 mM H2O2 sample induced the disassembly of DNA and defied rational analyses. A total of 0.5 J/cm2 UV to 1 mM or higher H2O2 samples also induces the disassembly of DNA. The UV irradiation of a H2O2 solution may induce the generation of two OH (Equation (3)). However, in a dilute H2O2 water solution, the majority of the OH pairs generated may be recombined and return to H2O2 (Equation (4)) due to the lack of any other molecule around the generation site.
UV ~~~> H2O2 → 2 OH
OH + OH → H2O2
Regenerated H2O2 again travels in water close to the target molecule. OH may be generated close to and react with DNA. As a result, the UV irradiation of H2O2 solution may continuously generate two OH in close proximity to DNA molecules. The single OH generated by the Fenton reaction (Equation (1)) may be neutralized by a free electron at its site of production.
Figure 7 shows the effects of the OH scavengers, caffeine, DMSO, terephthalate, and sucrose on the inhibition of DNA breakage by UV irradiation in samples containing H2O2. The addition of a OH scavenger to the reaction mixture suppressed DNA breakage in a concentration-dependent manner. The suppression of DNA breakage by caffeine, DMSO, and sucrose was consistent with their previously reported OH-canceling abilities [33]. The OH-scavenging effects of terephthalate, which has been used as a fluorescent OH detector [34], were similar to those of DMSO. This result suggests that plasmid DNA breakage by UV irradiation in samples containing H2O2 was caused by OH.
OH generated by the UV decomposition of H2O2 is localized and not uniformly distributed in the three-dimensional space of a solvent [35]. The local concentration of OH generated by the UV decomposition of H2O2 was dependent on the concentration of H2O2. Therefore, the UV irradiation of 1 mM H2O2 solution resulted in ~1 mM OH as a local concentration. However, the average concentration of OH generated by the UV decomposition of H2O2 in a large volume was markedly lower. In a previous study [35], 0.72 J/cm2 (=12,000 μW/cm2 for 1 min) of mixed wavelength UVB irradiation to 0.98 mM H2O2 gave 3.2 μM OH as the average concentration in a large volume. In the present study, the average concentration of OH generated by the UV irradiation of 1.0 mM H2O2 at 0.1 J/cm2 254 nm was estimated to be 3.6 ± 0.1 μM (n = 3). The EPR intensity of DMPO-OH induced by UV irradiation to the sample containing 1.0 mM H2O2 and 100 mM DMPO was stable and constant for 10 min or longer and was easily and accurately quantified. Several mM levels of OH scavengers were required to suppress plasmid DNA breakage by UV irradiation in samples containing 1.0 mM H2O2 in Figure 7, which was attributed to the local concentration of OH generated in this experiment being at the mM level.
Inhomogeneous OH generation in the Fenton reaction system was also expected in the same study [35]; however, the rapid decay of DMPO-OH under coexisting Fe2+/Fe3+ ions led to difficulties with the accurate estimation of the OH yield and may have concealed the true results. In the present study, the OH yield in the Fenton reaction system was estimated using lower concentrations of reagents (<500 μM).
As shown in Equation (1), Fe2+ ions and H2O2 react at a ratio of 1:1. Therefore, the amount of OH generated by the Fenton reaction is dependent on a lower concentration of Fe2+ or H2O2. Figure 8 shows the results of the quantification of OH induced by the Fenton reaction. Since the fast decay of DMPO-OH under coexisting iron ions resulted in difficulties with the accurate estimation of initial DMPO-OH concentrations, DMPO-OH, i.e., spin-trapped OH, concentrations in Figure 8 may have been lower than predicted values, i.e., a lower concentration of Fe2+ or H2O2 in the reaction mixture. When the concentration of H2O2 was higher than FeSO4, the estimated DMPO-OH yield was 25 or 18% of the predicted value. When the concentration of H2O2 was the same or lower than FeSO4, the estimated DMPO-OH yield was 82, 76, or 93% of the predicted value. Therefore, approximately 0.5 or 1 mM of OH was expected under the experimental conditions in Figure 5B. However, DNA breakage was negligible. In this experimental Fenton reaction system, the maximum available amount of OH appeared to have been generated and rapidly disappeared. Therefore, most of the OH generated in the experimental Fenton reaction system did not react with other molecules before it was canceled/neutralized.
Experimental Fenton reaction-induced OH did not easily break plasmid DNA, even when 2.0 mM Fe2+ and 1.0 mM H2O2 reacted (Figure 5B). Only 100 µM H2O2 significantly increased cell lethality (Figure 1B). Therefore, the target of OH through the Fenton reaction, H2O2, and/or the Fe2+/Fe3+ redox pair for cell lethality does not appear to be DNA in the cell nucleus. Most notably, the results shown in Figure 4A,B demonstrated that 1 mM or a higher concentration of H2O2 or Fe2+ was required to break DNA under the hypoxic conditions predicted in the intracellular space. The localized generation of OH by the UV decomposition of H2O2 reported in a previous study [34] and the results shown in Figure 5B, Figure 6 and Figure 7 in the present study showed that the continuous production of 1 mM or higher of OH was required to break DNA.
H2O2 is a membrane permeable molecule that travels through cell membranes. Membrane lipids may be other targets of oxidants instead of DNA for the induction of cell death. Ferroptosis is iron-induced lipid peroxidation-dependent cell death that differs from apoptosis and necrosis [36]. Imai et al. [37] reported another type of lipid peroxidation-dependent cell death that was independent of iron, called lipoxytosis. The accumulation of lipid peroxidation in cell membranes may trigger this type of cell death, and catalytic iron, not only Fe2+/Fe3+ ions but also some chelated iron forms, in the intracellular space may enhance lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis [38]. Iron in asbestos, which is a silicate mineral fiber that sticks into cells like needles, may cause carcinogenesis [39]. This type of carcinogenesis may be induced by cells exposed to repeated iron-catalyzed Fenton-type reactions [40]. An evaluation of the effects of lipid peroxidation on cell death induced by the Fenton-type reaction is important in the future.

4. Conclusions

Cytotoxicity induced by the Fenton reaction was modified by the distribution of iron ions surrounding and/or entrapped in cells. The Fenton reaction, i.e., the generation of OH, needs to occur inside a cell in order to effectively induce cytotoxicity. Chemically induced OH in the Fenton reaction system does not easily cause DNA breakage because the distance that OH travels before being neutralized is very limited. Therefore, the main target of OH, which is intracellularly induced from H2O2 or other reactive species, including the Fe2+/Fe3+ redox pair, for the induction of cytotoxicity does not appear to be DNA. Iron ions must be entrapped in cells for the induction of cytotoxicity. Although Fe2+ ions directly induce DNA breakage, they do not have to travel to reach DNA in order to result in cell lethality.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.-i.M.; methodology, K.-i.M.; validation, I.N. and K.-i.M.; formal analysis, K.I., Y.S. and E.S.-S.; investigation, K.I., Y.S., E.S.-S. and M.U.; data curation, K.I., Y.S. and E.S.-S.; writing—original draft preparation, K.I. and K.-i.M.; writing—review and editing, K.-i.M. and I.N.; visualization, K.I., E.S.-S. and K.-i.M.; supervision, I.N. and K.F.; project administration, K.-i.M., I.N. and K.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Animal experiments were performed in compliance with the Animal Use Committee of the National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sastre, J.; Pallardó, F.V.; Viña, J. Mitochondrial oxidative stress plays a key role in aging and apoptosis. IUBMB Life 2000, 49, 427–435. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yamamori, T.; Yasui, H.; Yamazumi, M.; Wada, Y.; Nakamura, Y.; Nakamura, H.; Inanami, O. Ionizing radiation induces mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production accompanied by upregulation of mitochondrial electron transport chain function and mitochondrial content under control of the cell cycle checkpoint. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2012, 53, 260–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Starkov, A.A. The role of mitochondria in reactive oxygen species metabolism and signaling. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1147, 37–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Murphy, M.P. How mitochondria produce reactive oxygen species. Biochem. J. 2009, 417, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Fridovich, I. Mitocondria: Are they the seat of senescence? Aging Cell 2004, 3, 13–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Salvador, A.; Sousa, J.; Pinto, R.E. Hydroperoxyl, superoxide and pH gradients in the mitochondrial matrix: A theoretical assessment. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2001, 31, 1208–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fridovich, I. Superoxide anion radical (O2), superoxide dismutases, and related matters. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 18515–18517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Halliwell, B.; Gutteridge, J.M. Biologically relevant metal ion-dependent hydroxyl radical generation. An update. FEBS Lett. 1992, 307, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Sies, H. Role of metabolic H2O2 generation: Redox signaling and oxidative stress. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 8735–8741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Collin, F. Chemical basis of reactive oxygen species reactivity and involvement in neurodegenerative diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. He, X.; Hahn, P.; Iacovelli, J.; Wong, R.; King, C.; Bhisitkul, R.; Massaro-Giordano, M.; Dunaief, J.L. Iron homeostasis and toxicity in retinal degeneration. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2007, 26, 649–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Nowak, S.; Zukiel, R.; Barciszewska, A.M.; Barciszewski, J. The diagnosis and therapy of brain tumours. Folia Neuropathol. 2005, 43, 193–196. [Google Scholar]
  13. Matsumoto, K.; Ueno, M.; Nakanishi, I.; Anzai, K. Density of hydroxyl radicals generated in an aqueous solution by irradiating carbon-ion beam. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2015, 63, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Matsumoto, K.; Nyui, M.; Ueno, M.; Ogawa, Y.; Nakanishi, I. A quantitative analysis of carbon-ion beam-induced reactive oxygen species and redox reactions. J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr. 2019, 65, 18–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Matsumoto, K.; Ueno, M.; Shoji, Y.; Nakanishi, I. Estimation of the local concentration of the markedly dense hydroxyl radical generation induced by X-rays in water. Molecules 2022, 27, 592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Matsumoto, K.; Nakanishi, I.; Abe, Y.; Sato, S.; Muramatsu, M.; Kohno, R.; Sakata, D.; Mizushima, K.; Lee, S.-H.; Sakama, M.; et al. Effect of loading a longitudinal magnetic field to the linear particle-beam track on yields of reactive oxygen species in water. Free Radic. Res. 2021, 55, 547–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Winterbourn, C.C. Toxicity of iron and hydrogen peroxide: The Fenton reaction. Toxicol. Lett. 1995, 82–83, 969–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fenton, H.J.H. The oxidation of tartaric acid in presence of iron. Proc. Chem. Soc. 1893, 9, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Fenton, H.J.H. Oxidation of tartaric acid in presence of iron. J. Chem. Soc. Trans. 1894, 65, 899–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Haber, F.; Weiss, J. The catalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by iron salts. Proc. R. Soc. A 1934, 147, 332–351. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ohyama, H.; Yamada, T.; Watanabe, I. Cell volume reduction associated with interphase death in rat thymocytes. Radiat. Res. 1981, 85, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yamada, T.; Ohyama, H. Radiation-induced interphase death of rat thymocytes is internally programmed (apoptosis). Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Relat. Stud. Phys. Chem. Med. 1988, 53, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sekine-Suzuki, E.; Nakanishi, I.; Shimokawa, T.; Ueno, M.; Matsumoto, K.; Murakami, T. High-throughput screening of radioprotectors using rat thymocytes. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 7650–7653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sekine-Suzuki, E.; Nakanishi, I.; Imai, K.; Ueno, M.; Shimokawa, T.; Matsumoto, K.; Fukuhra, K. Efficient protective activity of a planar catechin analogue against radiation-induced apoptosis in rat thymocytes. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 10158–19162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Mark, F.; Becker, U.; Herak, J.N.; Schulte-Frohlinde, D. Radiolysis of DNA in aqueous solution in the presence of a scavenger: A kinetic model based on a nonhomogeneous reaction of OH radicals with DNA molecules of spherical or cylindrical shape. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 1989, 28, 81–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Viret, J.F.; Bravo, A.; Alonso, J.C. Recombination-dependent concatemeric plasmid replication. Microbiol. Rev. 1991, 55, 675–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kohgo, Y.; Ikuta, K.; Ohtake, T.; Torimoto, Y.; Kato, J. Body iron metabolism and pathophysiology of iron overload. Int. J. Hematol. 2008, 88, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Zhao, T.; Guo, X.; Sun, Y. Iron accumulation and lipid peroxidation in the aging retina: Implication of ferroptosis in age-related macular degeneration. Aging Dis. 2021, 12, 529–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kuang, F.; Liu, J.; Tang, D.; Kang, R. oxidative damage and antioxidant defense in ferroptosis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 586578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hempel, S.L.; Buettner, G.R.; Wessels, D.A.; Galvan, G.M.; O’Malley, Y.Q. Extracellular iron (II) can protect cells from hydrogen peroxide. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1996, 330, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ward, J.F.; Blakely, W.F.; Joner, E.I. Mammalian cells are not killed by DNA single-strand breaks caused by hydroxyl radicals from hydrogen peroxide. Radiat. Res. 1985, 103, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Riley, P.A. Free radicals in biology: Oxidative stress and the effects of ionizing radiation. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 1994, 65, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ueno, M.; Nakanishi, I.; Matsumoto, K. Method for assessing X-ray-induced hydroxyl radical-scavenging activity of biological compounds/materials. J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr. 2013, 52, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Rajamma, D.B.; Anandan, S.; Yusof, N.S.M.; Pollet, B.G.; Ashokkumar, M. Sonochemical dosimetry: A comparative study of Weissler, Fricke and terephthalic acid methods. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2021, 72, 105413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ueno, M.; Nakanishi, I.; Matsumoto, K. Inhomogeneous generation of hydroxyl radicals in hydrogen peroxide solution induced by ultraviolet irradiation and in a Fenton reaction system. Free Radic. Res. 2021, 55, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dixon, S.J.; Lemberg, K.M.; Lamprecht, M.R.; Skouta, R.; Zaitsev, E.M.; Gleason, C.E.; Patel, D.N.; Bauer, A.J.; Cantley, A.M.; Yang, W.S.; et al. Ferroptosis: An iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell 2012, 149, 1060–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Imai, H.; Matsuoka, M.; Kumagai, T.; Sakamoto, T.; Koumura, T. Lipid peroxidation-dependent cell death regulated by GPx4 and ferroptosis. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2017, 403, 143–170. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hirschhorn, T.; Stockwell, B.R. The development of the concept of ferroptosis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2019, 133, 130–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Toyokuni, S. Iron-induced carcinogenesis: The role of redox regulation. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1996, 20, 553–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Toyokuni, S.; Ito, F.; Yamashita, K.; Okazaki, Y.; Akatsuka, S. Iron and thiol redox signaling in cancer: An exquisite balance ot escape ferroptosis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2017, 108, 610–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Estimation of cytotoxicity induced by the administration of H2O2 or FeSO4 alone. Cell lethality in rat thymocytes after a 5-min incubation with (A) FeSO4 or (B) H2O2. Columns and error bars indicate the average and SD of three experiments. *** indicates a significant difference of p < 0.001.
Figure 1. Estimation of cytotoxicity induced by the administration of H2O2 or FeSO4 alone. Cell lethality in rat thymocytes after a 5-min incubation with (A) FeSO4 or (B) H2O2. Columns and error bars indicate the average and SD of three experiments. *** indicates a significant difference of p < 0.001.
Cancers 14 03642 g001
Figure 2. Cytotoxicity induced by the simultaneous administration of H2O2 and FeSO4. Neither H2O2 nor FeSO4 was added to the control sample, i.e., the cell suspension was just incubated. Columns and error bars indicate the average and SD of three experiments. All columns are significantly different (p < 0.05 or less) from the control. When experiments without FeSO4 were compared, no significance differences were observed between 400 and 700 µM H2O2 or between 700 and 1000 µM H2O2. When experiments with 500 µM FeSO4 were compared, no significant differences were noted between 100 and 400 µM H2O2. Other significant differences are indicated in the figure as ** and ***, which correspond to p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively.
Figure 2. Cytotoxicity induced by the simultaneous administration of H2O2 and FeSO4. Neither H2O2 nor FeSO4 was added to the control sample, i.e., the cell suspension was just incubated. Columns and error bars indicate the average and SD of three experiments. All columns are significantly different (p < 0.05 or less) from the control. When experiments without FeSO4 were compared, no significance differences were observed between 400 and 700 µM H2O2 or between 700 and 1000 µM H2O2. When experiments with 500 µM FeSO4 were compared, no significant differences were noted between 100 and 400 µM H2O2. Other significant differences are indicated in the figure as ** and ***, which correspond to p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively.
Cancers 14 03642 g002
Figure 3. Effects of the pre-incubation of cells with FeSO4 on cytotoxicity induced by the administration of H2O2. Neither H2O2 nor FeSO4 was added to the control sample, i.e., the cell suspension was just incubated. Solid columns show the results of Experiment 3, i.e., H2O2 was added after the pre-incubation with or without FeSO4. Striped columns show the results of Experiment 4, i.e., H2O2 was added after the removal of FeSO4 from pre-incubated samples. Columns and error bars indicate the average and SD of three experiments. Significant differences are indicated in the figure as *, **, and ***, which correspond to p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively.
Figure 3. Effects of the pre-incubation of cells with FeSO4 on cytotoxicity induced by the administration of H2O2. Neither H2O2 nor FeSO4 was added to the control sample, i.e., the cell suspension was just incubated. Solid columns show the results of Experiment 3, i.e., H2O2 was added after the pre-incubation with or without FeSO4. Striped columns show the results of Experiment 4, i.e., H2O2 was added after the removal of FeSO4 from pre-incubated samples. Columns and error bars indicate the average and SD of three experiments. Significant differences are indicated in the figure as *, **, and ***, which correspond to p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively.
Cancers 14 03642 g003
Figure 4. Estimation of plasmid DNA breakage induced by the administration of H2O2, FeSO4, or FeCl3 alone. Ratio of DNA breakage after reacting with (A) H2O2, (B) FeSO4, or (C) FeCl3. Dark and light columns indicate results of aerobic and hypoxic experiments, respectively. Columns and error bars indicate the average and SD of three experiments. Significant differences between different concentrations are indicated in the figure as * and **, which correspond to p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively. # indicates a significant difference of p < 0.05 between aerobic and hypoxic.
Figure 4. Estimation of plasmid DNA breakage induced by the administration of H2O2, FeSO4, or FeCl3 alone. Ratio of DNA breakage after reacting with (A) H2O2, (B) FeSO4, or (C) FeCl3. Dark and light columns indicate results of aerobic and hypoxic experiments, respectively. Columns and error bars indicate the average and SD of three experiments. Significant differences between different concentrations are indicated in the figure as * and **, which correspond to p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively. # indicates a significant difference of p < 0.05 between aerobic and hypoxic.
Cancers 14 03642 g004
Figure 5. Estimation of plasmid DNA breakage induced by the Fenton reaction. (A) Ratio of DNA breakage after reacting 100 µM FeSO4 with several different concentrations of H2O2. (B) Ratio of DNA breakage after reacting 1000 µM FeSO4 with several different concentrations of H2O2. Columns and error bars indicate the average and SD of three experiments. Significant differences between different H2O2 concentrations are indicated in the figure as * and **, which correspond to p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively. Significant differences between different FeSO4 concentrations are indicated in the figure as # and ##, which correspond to p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.
Figure 5. Estimation of plasmid DNA breakage induced by the Fenton reaction. (A) Ratio of DNA breakage after reacting 100 µM FeSO4 with several different concentrations of H2O2. (B) Ratio of DNA breakage after reacting 1000 µM FeSO4 with several different concentrations of H2O2. Columns and error bars indicate the average and SD of three experiments. Significant differences between different H2O2 concentrations are indicated in the figure as * and **, which correspond to p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively. Significant differences between different FeSO4 concentrations are indicated in the figure as # and ##, which correspond to p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.
Cancers 14 03642 g005
Figure 6. Estimation of plasmid DNA breakage induced by the OH generated by the decomposition of H2O2 under UV irradiation. Ratio of DNA breakage after UV irradiation at (A) 0.0, (B) 0.1, and (C) 0.5 J/cm2 with several different concentrations of H2O2. Columns and error bars indicate the average and SD of four experiments. Significant differences between different H2O2 concentrations are indicated in the figure as * and ***, which correspond to p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively.
Figure 6. Estimation of plasmid DNA breakage induced by the OH generated by the decomposition of H2O2 under UV irradiation. Ratio of DNA breakage after UV irradiation at (A) 0.0, (B) 0.1, and (C) 0.5 J/cm2 with several different concentrations of H2O2. Columns and error bars indicate the average and SD of four experiments. Significant differences between different H2O2 concentrations are indicated in the figure as * and ***, which correspond to p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively.
Cancers 14 03642 g006
Figure 7. Effects of OH scavengers on plasmid DNA breakage induced by UV irradiation in samples containing H2O2. The ratio of DNA breakage was suppressed in a concentration-dependent manner by (A) caffeine, (B) DMSO, (C) terephthalate, and (D) sucrose. Columns and error bars indicate the average and SD of 3 experiments.
Figure 7. Effects of OH scavengers on plasmid DNA breakage induced by UV irradiation in samples containing H2O2. The ratio of DNA breakage was suppressed in a concentration-dependent manner by (A) caffeine, (B) DMSO, (C) terephthalate, and (D) sucrose. Columns and error bars indicate the average and SD of 3 experiments.
Cancers 14 03642 g007
Figure 8. Estimation of the initial concentration of OH generated by the Fenton reaction. Columns and error bars indicate the average and SD of 3 experiments.
Figure 8. Estimation of the initial concentration of OH generated by the Fenton reaction. Columns and error bars indicate the average and SD of 3 experiments.
Cancers 14 03642 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Igarashi, K.; Shoji, Y.; Sekine-Suzuki, E.; Ueno, M.; Matsumoto, K.-i.; Nakanishi, I.; Fukui, K. Importance of Locations of Iron Ions to Elicit Cytotoxicity Induced by a Fenton-Type Reaction. Cancers 2022, 14, 3642. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153642

AMA Style

Igarashi K, Shoji Y, Sekine-Suzuki E, Ueno M, Matsumoto K-i, Nakanishi I, Fukui K. Importance of Locations of Iron Ions to Elicit Cytotoxicity Induced by a Fenton-Type Reaction. Cancers. 2022; 14(15):3642. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153642

Chicago/Turabian Style

Igarashi, Kintaro, Yoshimi Shoji, Emiko Sekine-Suzuki, Megumi Ueno, Ken-ichiro Matsumoto, Ikuo Nakanishi, and Koji Fukui. 2022. "Importance of Locations of Iron Ions to Elicit Cytotoxicity Induced by a Fenton-Type Reaction" Cancers 14, no. 15: 3642. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153642

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop