Next Article in Journal
Intra-Household Income Management and Couple’s Relative Sharing of Income and Environment Sustainability in Japan
Next Article in Special Issue
Modulation of Antioxidant Defense Mechanisms and Morpho-Physiological Attributes of Wheat through Exogenous Application of Silicon and Melatonin under Water Deficit Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Marketing Sustainable Fashion: Trends and Future Directions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhancing Drought Tolerance in Wheat Cultivars through Nano-ZnO Priming by Improving Leaf Pigments and Antioxidant Activity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Rhizosphere Acidification Determines Phosphorus Availability in Calcareous Soil and Influences Faba Bean (Vicia faba) Tolerance to P Deficiency

by
Basma Baccari
1 and
Abdelmajid Krouma
1,2,*
1
Laboratory of Ecosystems and Biodiversity in Arid Lands, Faculty of Sciences, University of Sfax, Sfax 3000, Tunisia
2
Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Sidi Bouzid, Kairouan University, Kairouan 9100, Tunisia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(7), 6203; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076203
Submission received: 20 December 2022 / Revised: 19 March 2023 / Accepted: 29 March 2023 / Published: 4 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Adaptive Response and Mechanism of Crops to Abiotic Stresses)

Abstract

:
Calcareous soils are known for their alkaline pH-promoting insoluble forms of certain nutrients, including phosphorus (P). Rhizosphere acidification is one of the main physiological mechanisms of phosphorus mobilization by plants. However, specific and genotypic differences in response to P deficiency are often observed, giving some genotypes particular tolerance abilities. This genetic potential gives us a new opportunity to colonize unused lands, improve yield in problematic soils, and install sustainable agrosystems. To this end, a potted experiment was conducted on three faba bean genotypes (Seville, SEV; Aguadulce, AGUA; and Tunisian, TUN) cultivated on calcareous soil (CS), as compared to fertile soil (FS). Measurements are made on plant growth, the SPAD index, photosynthesis, P distribution, rhizosphere acidification, and related interrelationships. Calcareous soil induced specific symptoms of P deficiency, reduced P concentration and decreased SPAD index, net photosynthesis, and plant growth. Rhizosphere acidification was significantly stimulated in CS. This activity determines the genotypic differences in response to P deficiency in faba bean. The genotype TUN was more adapted to calcareous-induced P deficiency than AGUA and SEV by increasing acidification activity, decreasing pH by 0.6 units in the rhizosphere, and having higher biomass production, photosynthesis, P remobilization, and P accumulation. The key functional traits (plant growth, chlorophyll biosynthesis, and photosynthesis) are strictly dependent on P availability, which remains in close relationship with the acidification capacity (AC). The tolerant genotype (TUN) expressed a lower stress index (SI) but higher P use efficiency (PUE), H-ATPase activity, and P uptake and translocation to shoots (PT), allowing it to maintain better metabolic functioning. AC, PT, PUE, and SI are among the main traits of P management in calcareous soils that promote resilient crops.

1. Introduction

With the increased demographic growth, climate change, and malnutrition expansion, crop yield and quality have become global concerns. Deficiencies in minerals such as phosphorus (P) have an issue with food availability and malnutrition. In fact, P is one of the key nutrients that are necessary for plant metabolism, growth, and development. Although abundant in the soil, P availability represents a major constraint for agriculture due to P fixation and precipitation [1,2]. Roots can only absorb dissolved phosphates [3], whereas more than 99% of the total P in the soil is bound in organic P forms or is present as insoluble Ca, Fe, and Al phosphates [4]. In highly acidic soils (pH < 5), phosphorus easily forms complexes with oxides and hydroxides of iron and aluminum, while associating with calcium in alkaline soils (pH > 7). Calcareous soils, which represent more than 1/3rd earth's surface [5] and 45% of the cultivated area in Tunisia [6], are one of these problematic lands. The presence of a high bicarbonate concentration and an alkaline pH renders P in an insoluble form [7]. Hagin and Tucker [7] suggested that CaCO3 concentration is among the significant problems related to agricultural activity in calcareous soils. The CaCO3 mineral present at high levels in calcareous soil fixes P through mineral precipitation [8,9]. Khan et al. [10] explained the low P solubility in calcareous soils by its fixation either with lime or with clay surfaces and precipitation with calcium, aluminum, or iron, depending on the soil pH. Anter et al. [11] showed that a rapid decrease in P uptake occurs at 8% CaCO3 in the soil. Even if added as fertilizer, P is fixed before it is used by the plant [12], and plants benefit only from a small part of the added P [13]. Generally, phosphorus is available in the pH range of 6.5 to 7, and its availability decreased gradually with increased pH [12], mainly due to the formation of insoluble calcium phosphate compounds [8]. Inorganic phosphate (Pi) is one of numerous essential nutrients (zinc and iron) [5,14], known by their low availability for plants and crops because of their relative immobilization in agricultural soils [15]. Thus, reported symptoms of improper mineral nutrition in calcareous soils are necrosis, yellowing, and red and brown discoloration with a specific distribution. Reddish discoloration of mature leaves commonly reported in calcareous soils is known as a P deficiency symptom [11,16]. However, P is known among the most important nutrients affecting plant growth and yield production. Playing a key role in various plant metabolic activities and biological pathways [17,18], P is a constituent of nucleic acids and ATP-producing energy, associated with lipids and proteins (phospholipids and phosphoproteins), and implied in carbon metabolism, including signaling and regulation [19]. Thus, P occupies the crossroads of all metabolic reactions in the plant. Hassan et al. [20] explained the low yield of maize plants by their high demand for phosphorus and the limited availability of this nutrient. Other studies demonstrated that phosphorus could improve the stress resistance of crops [21,22]. Phosphorus application effectively improves the mineral nutrition of plants, strengthens membrane stability, and alleviates dehydration and oxidative stress caused by abiotic stress [23,24]. In the vegetative stage, phosphorus improves plant growth [25], whereas, in the reproductive stage, senescent leaves become the primary source of P for metabolic balance [26].
Recent studies have demonstrated that plant species develop several mechanisms allowing them to improve P bioavailability in the rhizosphere, grow, and accomplish their life cycle in low-P soils [27,28,29]. These mechanisms imply the exudation of organic acids and the modification of root architecture and root properties (development of subapical root hairs, formation of cluster roots, etc.) [30,31,32]. Remobilization of P from senesced leaves and regulation of P reserves are also proposed as adaptive strategies [33]. However, these mechanisms alone cannot explain the process by which plants remobilize P. The involvement of very diversified and more complex processes is almost certain. The genotypic variability of responses to this nutritional constraint, previously highlighted in diverse crops [34,35,36,37], supports this hypothesis. On the other hand, to guarantee a sustainable food supply for the growing population, agriculture has witnessed a massive use of chemical fertilizers, including P enrichment, to improve crop yield and quality. Nevertheless, this strategy has adverse economic and ecological impacts. Alternative sustainable agricultural practices require crops with improved P nutrition in the widespread problematic soils. Thus, it becomes more critical to identify genotypes with high efficiency of nutrient remobilization, uptake, and use, particularly in problematic soils such as calcareous ones. This is why our interests have been oriented toward the rhizosphere acidification, which, if stimulated, will contribute to improving the availability of P for root uptake and thus the subsequent metabolic reactions and functions. To this end, three faba bean genotypes were cultivated on calcareous soil (alkaline P-problematic soil), as compared to fertile soil (the control). The genotypic differences allow us to identify the valuable traits of tolerance-promoting P management in calcareous soils. P remobilization and uptake, P translocation, P use efficiency, plant growth, and key metabolic reactions (chlorophyll biosynthesis and photosynthesis) were analyzed, and respectful relationships were established. A special interest was granted to rhizosphere acidification as the promotor of P remobilization and the genotypic differences in response to this mineral constraint.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Experimental Design

Three faba bean genotypes (AGUA, SEV, and TUN) obtained from the Tunisian Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources were used. The experiment was conducted in potted soil under natural light. Screened and disinfected seeds (2% hypochlorite calcium) were sown individually in 1 kg pots filled with soft and mixed fertile soil (FS) sampled in the region of Gatrana (Sidi Bouzid, 35°9′52.366″ N, 9°40′23.689″ E) or calcareous soil (CS) sampled in the region of Faiedh (Sidi Bouzid, 35°4′38.536″ N, 9°40′32.167″ E). The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design (soil quality X genotypes) with twenty replicates each. No organic or mineral fertilizers were added. The main soil characteristics are given in Table 1. Plant irrigation was performed with tap water near the field capacity. At the beginning of flowering, 45 days after germination, non-destructive measurements (SPAD index and gas exchange) were made, then ten plants were harvested and separated into shoots and roots. Roots were soaked in a 0.01 M CaCl2 solution and washed thoroughly and successively in 3 baths of ultra-pure water to avoid contamination with elements from the soil [38].

2.2. SPAD Index

Measurements on relative chlorophyll content were assessed using a SPAD-502 (Konica Minolta, Japan) before the gas exchange measurements on the median fully expanded leaves. Ten plants for each soil and genotype were used. Values are expressed as SPAD units.

2.3. Gas Exchange

In order to homogenize measurements and obtain significant results, gas exchange parameters were measured on the same fully expanded leaves (of the ten plants per genotype and per soil) using a portable photosynthesis system (CI-340, USA). The induction of photosynthesis was ensured by a saturating light of 1000 μmol m−2 s−1. The other parameters were maintained constant: sample pCO2 at 362 mbar, flow rate at 500 μmol s−1, and temperature at 25 °C [39].

2.4. Phosphorus Analysis

Samples of fresh material were dried at 70 °C for 72 h and ground to a fine powder. After extraction in 0.5% HNO3, the extract was discolored using charcoal and filtered, then a nitro–vanado–molybdic mixture was added. Colorimetric measurements at 436 nm were made according to Fleury and Leclerc [40].

2.5. Rhizosphere Acidification Capacity

Plant acidification capacity (AC) was measured before the final harvest on intact plants removed from fertile and calcareous soils. Roots of ten plants from each genotype and each soil were transferred individually in 200 mL of a continuously aerated solution containing 10 mM KCl + 1 mM CaCl2, adjusted to pH 6.0 with 0.1 N NaOH [32,41]. pH values were measured every 30 mn and the experiment was repeated twice.

2.6. Analysis Criteria

The following acronyms refer to the criteria used for the several analyses performed:
AC: acidification capacity;
AC = pHFS pHCS ;
PUE-An: P use efficiency for photosynthesis, calculated as the ratio of net photosynthesis (µmol CO2 m−2 s−1) to P concentration in shoot (µg g−1 DW)
PUE An = An Pshoots ;
PUE-DW: P use efficiency for plant growth, calculated as the ratio of plant dry weight (g plant−1) to shoot P concentration (µg g−1 DW)
PUE DW = DW Pshoots ;
QP: the total quantity of P calculated in the plant (µg P plant−1)
P = Pshoots × DWshoots + Proots × DWroots ;
SI An: stress index related to net photosynthesis
SI An = 100 × AnCS AnFS AnFS ;
SI-DW: stress index related to plant growth
SI DW = 100 × DWCS DWFS DWFS ;
SI-spad: stress index related to SPAD index
SI Spad = 100 × SpadCS SpadFS SpadFS ;
SI-P: stress index related to P uptake
SI P = 100 × QPCS QPFS QPFS ;
PT: Phosphorus translocation calculated as the ratio of shoot P to plant total P quantities
PT = QPshoots QPplant .

2.7. Statistical Analyses

Data and statistical analyses were performed using the software StatPlus Pro. All data are presented as mean ± standard error. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to check whether the effects of soil quality (FS and CS) on the respective factor were significant. The significance of differences among treatments was determined by Fisher's least significant difference test (LSD) at 5%. Means were declared significantly different when the difference between any two treatments was more important than the LSD value generated from the ANOVA. They are marked by different letters in the figures.

3. Results

3.1. Phenotyping, Growth, and Photosynthesis

The daily monitoring of plant aspects revealed a slight yellow-reddish discoloration characteristic of P deficiency on mature leaves of SEV five weeks after sowing in calcareous soil. The same symptoms appeared consecutively in AGUA and then TUN. No symptoms of P deficiency were observed in fertile soil (Figure 1).
Measurements made on the SPAD index demonstrated a significant decrease in all genotypes, with some differences. The SPAD index decreased by 37% in SEV, 35% in AGUA, and 21% in TUN genotypes cultivated on calcareous compared to fertile soil (Figure 2). When considered in CS, the TUN genotype accumulated 35% and 27% more chlorophyll than SEV and AGUA, respectively.
The quantification of plant biomass demonstrated that cultivating plants on calcareous soil significantly decreased plant growth in all studied genotypes (Figure 3). Nevertheless, some genotypic differences were observed. Dry weight production decreased by 28%, 17%, and 9%, respectively, in SEV, AGUA, and TUN on calcareous soil, compared to fertile soil. The last genotype produced 34% and 24% more biomass than SEV and AGUA on calcareous soil.
To deeply explore these observed genotypic differences, we calculated the stress index based on the SPAD values (SI-Spad) and plant growth (SI-DW, Table 2). Obtained results demonstrated that the cultivation of faba bean on calcareous soil subject plants to severe stress, which differs among genotypes. TUN, which maintained better chlorophyll accumulation and plant growth, expressed the lowest stress index; SEV was the most sensitive; and AGUA described an intermediate behavior (Table 2). Compared to TUN and based on the SPAD index, SEV was 1.8 times and AGUA was 1.7 times more stressed on calcareous soil. When calculated based on biomass production, SEV was 4.3 times and AGUA was 2.5 times more stressed on calcareous soil than TUN.
Figure 4, which illustrates the net photosynthesis (An), shows a significant decrease of this key function when faba bean plants are cultivated on calcareous soil, as compared to fertile soil. An decreased by 37%, 25% and 12%, respectively, in SEV, AGUA, and TUN genotypes cultivated on CS, as compared to FS. However, the TUN genotype remained the least affected by calcareous soil. The An was 1.5 times and 1.3 times higher in TUN than SEV and AGUA, respectively.
In parallel to net photosynthesis, the stomatal conductance decreased in calcareous soil compared to fertile soil. This decrease was estimated to be 19%, 27%, and 15%, respectively, in SEV, AGUA, and TUN genotypes (Figure 5a). The evapotranspiration followed the same schema of variation with a decrease of 21%, 25%, and 10%, respectively, in SEV, AGUA, and TUN on calcareous soil, as compared to fertile soil (Figure 5b).
With respect to the same strategy of exploration of the genotypic differences in the response of faba bean to P deficiency, we calculated the stress index based on net photosynthesis (SI-An, Table 2). The results demonstrated that the genotype TUN remains less stressed than SEV (most stressed) and AGUA. On the other hand, SEV was three times and AGU was two times more stressed than TUN.

3.2. Phosphorus Uptake and Use

Plants cultivated on calcareous soil exhibited a severe decrease in P concentration in plant organs compared to those cultivated on fertile soil. The previously observed genotypic differences were also maintained at this level. Compared to fertile soil, P concentration decreased in shoots by 38%, 33%, and 21%, respectively, in SEV, AGUA, and TUN cultivated on calcareous soil (Figure 6a). In roots, this decrease was estimated to be 38%, 20%, and 25%, respectively, in SEV, AGUA, and TUN genotypes (Figure 6b). Calculating the total quantities of P accumulated in the plant shows a significant decrease in all genotypes cultivated on calcareous soil compared to fertile soil (Table 3). This decrease was estimated to be 55%, 35%, and 28%, respectively, in SEV, AGUA, and TUN genotypes. However, TUN accumulated 42% and 52% more P on calcareous soil than SEV and AGUA, respectively.
P use efficiency (PUE) is another trait that can discriminate among the studied genotypes concerning their interaction with soil quality. For that, we calculated PUE based on plant growth (PUE-DW) and net photosynthesis (PUE-An) in the present study. Obtained results demonstrated an apparent increase in PUE-DW and PUE-An in calcareous soil compared to fertile ones (Table 3). As for the previous results, the Tunisian genotype (TUN) showed the highest values on calcareous soil, as compared to the other ones, with 31% and 23% more photosynthetic efficiency than SEV and AGUA, respectively, and 5% and 34% more growth efficiency than SEV and AGUA, respectively. Otherwise, we calculated P translocation to shoots (PT, Table 3). This parameter reflects not only the P uptake by roots but also the capacity of its allocation to the photosynthetic organs. Table 3 shows that the fraction of shoot P represents 59% of the total plant P in the genotype TUN, 49% in AGUA, and 41% in SEV. Nevertheless, when comparing plants in calcareous soil, the allocated P to shoots was 2.2 times and 1.7 times higher in TUN than SEV and AGUA, respectively.

3.3. Acidification Capacity

Rhizosphere acidification is a daily activity in dicotyledon plants that results from the root membrane H-ATPase functioning and organic acid exudation. This activity is stimulated under certain conditions. In this study, we analyzed this activity in faba bean plants removed from their soil to check its relationship with rhizosphere acidification and P remobilization. Figure 7 shows that plants issued from fertile soil do not show remarkable activity of this enzyme. In contrast, plants taken up from calcareous soil started immediately to decrease the solution’s pH, causing significant rhizosphere acidification. All genotypes reached their maximum acidification capacity (lowest pH value) after 90 mn. The genotype TUN, and to a lesser degree, AGUA, showed the highest activity of rhizosphere acidification, reaching the lowest pH value of 5.42. The calculation of the acidification capacity (AC), expressed as the difference between control pH (fertile soil) and stressed pH (calcareous soil), demonstrated a clear superiority of TUN, which expressed, after 180 mn, AC 2.1 and 1.6 times higher than SEV and AGUA, respectively (numbers in Figure 7).

3.4. Physiological Relationships and Traits Interdependence

To progress in expressing the valuable traits of faba bean response to calcareous-induced P deficiency and explore the previously observed genotypic variability, we established several correlations. Figure 8a, which connects plant growth with P accumulated in the plant, shows no relationship between these two parameters in fertile soil (R2 = 0.09). However, a strict positive relationship was established in calcareous soil (R2 = 0.95, Figure 8b). The TUN genotype was distinguished by its high biomass production and P accumulation in calcareous soil.
The correlation between the critical metabolic reaction in the plant, photosynthesis (An), and P accumulated in the plant shows the same schema of variation, a strict positive relationship in calcareous soil (R2 = 0.95, Figure 9a), and a weak relationship in fertile soil (R2 = 0.10, Figure 9b). TUN maintains its superiority by developing a higher capacity of P accumulation and better photosynthetic activity.
Our results showed an important activity of rhizosphere acidification in calcareous soil that depends on genotypes. To investigate the relationship between this activity and P remobilization, we correlated the acidification activity with the quantities of P accumulated by plants in calcareous soil. Figure 10 shows a high, strict, and close negative relationship between these two parameters. Decreasing rhizosphere pH (acidification) was usually associated with P uptake. In calcareous soil, the genotype TUN expressed the highest AC (2.1 and 1.6 times higher than SEV and AGUA, respectively) and P uptake (51% and 33% higher than SEV and AGUA, respectively).

4. Discussion

With climate change, the growing world population, and the increased global consumption of agricultural products, low-input farming systems that seek to minimize the use of off-farm inputs, escape their environmental and coast issues, overcome the low crop efficiency in problematic soils, and improve yield are strongly encouraged. The identification of new tolerant genotypes and related physiological, biochemical, and molecular traits is one of the most promising approaches to achieving this goal.
In the present study, we investigated the morphophysiological behavior of three faba bean genotypes cultivated on calcareous and fertile soils. The main results emerging from this study are the stressful conditions of calcareous soil regarding P availability, the genotypic differences in faba bean behavior, and the identified physiological traits promoting P nutrition. Symptoms of P deficiency appeared, plant biomass was decreased, net photosynthesis was hampered, and phosphorus uptake disturbed in parallel with a significant stimulation of rhizosphere acidification in CS as compared to FS. Regarding all these parameters, the genotype TUN showed great plasticity, allowing it to express higher capacities of tolerance on CS as compared to AGUA and particularly SEV. Accordingly, other authors (Hagin and Tucker [7], Ferhi et al. [42], Wahba et al. [16], Roriz et al. [43], and Vasconcelos and Grusak [44]) demonstrated that calcareous soils represent the main hamper for agricultural production in the world. Anter et al. [11] reported a sudden decrease in P uptake at only 8% CaCO3. Marschner [5] announced that P and Fe deficiency are the main factors limiting plant growth in calcareous soil. Netzer et al. [19] observed apparent symptoms of P deficiency in poplar through decreased photosynthesis. Other authors explained phosphorus deficiency in the soil by its low content or low availability [45]. Yang et al. [46] demonstrated that P bioavailability is often limited by a number of rhizospheric factors, including soil texture, moisture, organic matter, and pH. In calcareous soils, P interacts with calcium and carbonate to form a complex of calcium carbonate-P that affects P solubility [47]. Weyers et al. [8] reported that calcareous soils contain high Ca and CaCO3 levels that fix P via adsorption or precipitation. Accordingly, Mortvedt et al. [48] reported that phosphate reacts with Ca and Mg at high pH to form phosphate compounds of limited solubility. P adsorption is regulated by Fe/Al oxides in acidic soils [49] and by CaCO3 in calcareous soils [30]. Wahba et al. [16] demonstrated that P availability in calcareous soils is usually restricted and reaches its maximum in the pH range of 6.0 to 7.5. López-Bucio et al. [50] reported that P deficiency hampers the activity of meristematic root cells and primary root growth.
Analysis made on the P concentration in used soils showed significant concentrations, even higher in CS than FS. However, having higher P concentrations does not mean that P is a non-limiting factor. In fact, these concentrations represent the total P, which is mainly insoluble and not available to plants. As previously demonstrated, P in the soil is fixed via adsorption or precipitation with calcium/magnesium carbonates and Fe/Al oxides [51,52,53]. Otherwise, P nutrition decreased significantly in all genotypes cultivated in calcareous soil. Nevertheless, TUN remains the least affected. TUN accumulated 1.5 and 1.4 times more P on calcareous soil than SEV and AGUA, respectively. This specific capacity of P uptake can explain the relative tolerance of TUN. In fact, by correlating plant growth and net photosynthesis with plant P content, we revealed a strict and close relationship. TUN accumulated more P, expressed higher photosynthetic activity, and produced more biomass than SEV and AGUA in calcareous soil. In fact, P is an integral component of the photosynthetic metabolism, having a crucial role in ATP reactions which require inorganic phosphate to be associated with ADP [54]. Unrestricted P availability is thus a critical factor in cell metabolism since P levels affect photophosphorylation, rubisco activity, and the Calvin cycle reactions. The impaired photosynthetic activity in the sensitive genotypes SEV and AGUA, which results from low chlorophyll concentration caused by low P availability, is, therefore, the cause of the total biomass reduction in calcareous soil. The calculated stress index based on biomass production (SI-DW), photosynthesis (SI-An) or plant P content (SI-P) discriminated the used genotypes and confirmed these genotypic differences. Thus, we suggest that SI is a useful trait of tolerance, and the response of faba bean to calcareous-induced P deficiency depends closely on its ability for P remobilization and uptake. The preferential allocation of this nutrient to shoots to support chlorophyll production and photosynthesis remains the main promoter of plant growth. This is confirmed by the higher PT calculated in TUN, as compared to the other genotypes (Table 3). Furthermore, the calculated PUE-An and PUE-DW support the genotypic differences previously observed. TUN genotype turned out as the most efficient, expressing PUE-DW 1.3 times more important than SEV and AGUA, and PUE-An 1.1 and 1.3 times more important than SEV and AGUA, respectively, on calcareous soil. PUE is thus another trait of tolerance useful for screening programs. The calculated AC and PT do not escape this rule. TUN expresses the greatest potentialities of AC and PT, as compared to AGUA and SEV in CS. However, the mechanism by which faba bean remobilize P and give a special performance to the tolerant genotype, TUN, remains the main question to be answered. As previously discussed, P exists but in an unavailable form at alkaline pH. Therefore, our hypothesis was that a genotype able to acidify its rhizosphere will certainly have significant capacities for P remobilization. Previous studies demonstrated that soil pH plays a critical role in soil P retention by altering its adsorption capacity, changing the solubility of secondary minerals (Fe, Al, Ca-P), and affecting the organic P mineralization [55,56]. Other authors suggested that plant roots promote H+ extrusion to solubilize mineral P either directly through proton release or indirectly through organic acid exudation [57,58]. Thus, the adaptation to P-deficiency and the P acquisition ability vary between plant species and cultivars. The present findings do not escape this hypothesis and confirm the close relationship between soil pH and soil-P solubility, giving us a new trait of tolerance to induced P deficiency in calcareous soils. The revealed tolerant genotype, TUN, expressed the capacity of rhizosphere acidification 2.1 times and 1.6 times more important than that of SEV and AGUA and accumulates 51% and 33% more P than SEV and AGUA, respectively, in calcareous soil. In fact, Figure 10 shows the close relationship between P accumulation in the plant and rhizosphere acidification. Thus, the relative tolerance of TUN can be explained, in addition to the previous particularities, by its high activity of rhizosphere acidification, which creates an adequate environment for the transformation of P from an insoluble to a bioavailable form. Recently, Ma et al. [4] reported that Lupine plants acidified the rhizosphere more intensively than maize when subjected to P deficiency. The pH was 1.5 units lower for lupine than for maize. In fact, good plant growth is very important for photosynthesis and all metabolic functions, which ultimately affect yield. The genotype TUN showed higher biomass production (Figure 3), photosynthesis (Figure 4), and P uptake and translocation to shoots (Table 3) compared to other genotypes. This might be due to improved P remobilization and use efficiency with the significantly improved rhizosphere acidification. These results are in line with Ahmed et al. [59], who reported that P levels enhanced plant height and the dry weight of maize. Atkinson et al. [60] reported that rhizosphere acidification influenced P interaction with other cations in the soil and enhanced anion exchange, which increased P availability. The high decrease in soil pH was recorded in all genotypes cultivated on calcareous soil, with a clear superiority in TUN. The findings of the current study suggested that this reduction might be due to the excessive release of protons (H+) due to H-ATPase activity, without neglecting the production of organic acid that might also have contributed to reduced pH.
Although the impact of rhizosphere acidification on the bioavailability of phosphorus in alkaline calcareous soils is not well established, our findings revealed that decreasing soil pH improved the chemical properties of the soil, enhanced P uptake and translocation, and supported chlorophyll biosynthesis, photosynthesis, and plant growth. The key functional traits (plant growth, chlorophyll biosynthesis, and photosynthesis) are strictly dependent on P availability. The latter is demonstrated in relation to the activity of rhizosphere acidification. In addition to P use efficiency for photosynthesis (PUE- An) and plant growth (PUE-DW), AC determines the genotypic differences in the response of faba bean to P deficiency in calcareous soils. A common thread that links the different metabolic reactions involved in the response to calcareous-induced P deficiency was highlighted. Rhizosphere acidification, either through root H-ATPase that release protons or through organic acid exudation, produces a favorable environment for the solubilization of P into a form available for roots. Thus, P uptake and allocation to shoots increased, and all P-dependent metabolic reactions (chlorophyll biosynthesis, photosynthesis, etc.) improved (Figure 11).

5. Conclusions

Calcareous soils, which account for more than 1/3 of land surface, are seriously problematic for crop production because of their high pH and bicarbonate content, which limit the availability of P for plants. The establishment of sustainable agriculture necessarily requires the adoption of an efficient approach based on the valorization of biological resources through the selection of adapted genotypes and the identification of useful traits of tolerance for further screening programs. The present study allowed us to identify the faba bean genotype having effective P management in these soils. The main modulator of this efficiency is the rhizosphere’s acidification capacity (AC). Thus, the tolerance or sensitivity of any genotype or species is primarily determined by the effectiveness of the system (rhizosphere acidification—P remobilization and uptake), which determines the key metabolic reactions (chlorophyll biosynthesis, photosynthesis, plant growth, and associated P-dependent metabolic reactions). The physiological traits investigated in this study, AC, PT, PUE, SI, are useful traits of tolerance that can be used for further programs of tolerant genotype screening.

Author Contributions

Validation, A.K.; Investigation, B.B.; Writing—original draft, B.B.; Project administration, A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research through the research Project DiVicia: Use and management of Vicia species for sustainability and resilience in biodiversity-based farming systems funded by PRIMA (Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank the General Manager of the National Agency for Research Promotion (ANPR) and his Technical and Administrative staff for all facilities and financial management of the Project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

References

  1. Blake, L.; Mercik, S.; Koerschens, M.; Moskal, S.; Poulton, P.R.; Goulding, K.W.T.; Weigel, A.; Powlson, D.S. Phosphorus content in soil, uptake by plants and balance in three European long-term field experiments. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2000, 56, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kamh, M.; Horst, W.J.; Amer, F.; Mostafa, H.; Maier, P. Mobilization of soil and fertilizer phosphate by cover crops. Plant Soil 1999, 211, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Schachtman, D.P.; Reid, R.J.; Ayling, S.M. Phosphorus uptake by plants: From soil to cell. Plant Physiol. 1998, 116, 447–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Ma, X.; Liu, Y.; Shen, W.; Kuzyakov, Y. Phosphatase activity and acidification in lupine and maize rhizosphere depend on phosphorus availability and root properties: Coupling zymography with planar optodes. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2021, 167, 104029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Marschner, H. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mtimet, N.; Guégan, S.; Durand, L.; Mathot, A.G.; Venaille, L.; Leguérinel, I.; Controller, L.; Couvert, O. Effect of pH on Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum DSM 571 growth, spore heat resistance and recovery. Food Microbiol. 2016, 55, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hagin, J.; Tucker, B. Fertilization of dryland and irrigated soils. Springer Sci. Rev. 2012, 22, 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  8. Leytem, A.; Mikkelsen, R. The nature of phosphorus in calcareous soils. Better Crops 2005, 89, 11–13. [Google Scholar]
  9. Weyers, E.; Strawn, D.G.; Peak, D.; Moore, A.; Baker, L.; Cade-Menun, B. Phosphorus speciation in calcareous soils following annual dairy manure amendments. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2016, 80, 1531–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Khan, H.; Ali Akbar, W.; Shah, Z.; Ur Rahim, H.; Taj, A.; Alatalo, J.M. Coupling phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) with inorganic phosphorus fertilizer improves mungbean (Vigna radiata) phosphorus acquisition, nitrogen fixation, and yield in alkaline-calcareous soil. Helyion 2022, 8, e09081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Anter, F.; Hilal, M.H.; El-Damaty, A.H.A. Chemical and biological approach towards the definition of calcareous soils. Plant Soil 1973, 39, 479–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Akanji, M.A.; Ahmad, M.; Al-Wabel, M.I.; Al-Farraj, A.S.F. Soil Phosphorus Fractionation and Bio-Availability in a Calcareous Soil as Affected by Conocarpus Waste Biochar and Its Acidified Derivative. Agriculture 2022, 12, 2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. DeLuca, T.H.; Gundale, M.J.; MacKenzie, M.D.; Jones, D.L. Biochar Effects on Soil Nutrient Transformations. In Biochar for Environmental Management, 2nd ed.; Science, Technology and Implementation; Lehmann, J., Joseph, S., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2015; pp. 453–486. [Google Scholar]
  14. Aras, S.; Arıkan, Ş.; İpek, M.; Eşitken, A.; Pırlak, L.; Dönmez, M.; Turan, M. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria enhanced organic leaf acids, FC-R activity, and Fe nutrition of apple under lime soil conditions. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2018, 40, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. López-Millán, A.F.; Morales, F.; Andaluz, S.; Gogorcena, Y.; Abadıa, A.; Rivas, J.D.L.; Abadıa, J. Responses of sugar beet roots to iron deficiency. Changes in carbon assimilation and oxygen use. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124, 885–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Wahba, M.M.; Fawkia, L.; Zaghloul, A. Management of calcareous soils in arid soil in arid regions. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. Environ. Model. 2019, 2, 248–258. [Google Scholar]
  17. Yaakob, M.A.; Mohamed, R.M.S.R.; Al-Gheethi, A.; Ravishankar, G.A.; Ambati, R.R. Influence of nitrogen and phosphorus on microalgal growth, biomass, lipid, and fatty acid production: An overview. Cells 2021, 10, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Poirier, Y.; Jaskolowski, A.; Clua, J. Phosphate acquisition and metabolism in plants. Curr. Biol. 2022, 32, 623–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Netzer, F.; Pozzi, L.; Dubbert, D.; Herschbach, C. Improved photosynthesis and poplar growth during nitrogen fertilization are accompanied by phosphorus depletion, indicating phosphorus remobilization from older stem tissues. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 162, 421–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hassan, W.; Bashir, S.; Hanif, S.; Sher, A.; Sattar, A.; Wasaya, A.; Atif, H.; Hussain, M. Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria and growth and productivity of mung bean (Vigna radiata). Pak. J. Bot. 2017, 49, 331–336. [Google Scholar]
  21. Noor, I.; Sohail, H.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Hussain, S.; Li, G.; Liu, J. Phosphorus confers tolerance against manganese toxicity in Prunus persica by reducing oxidative stress and improving chloroplast ultrastructure. Chemosphere 2022, 291, 132–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bouain, N.; Krouk, G.; Lacombe, B.; Rouached, H. Getting to the root of plant mineral nutrition: Combinatorial nutrient stresses reveal emergent properties. Trends Plant Sci. 2019, 24, 542–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, H.; Hassan, M.A.; Sun, D.; Wu, Z.; Jiang, G.; Liu, B.B.; Ni, Q.; Yang, W.; Fang, H.; Li, J.; et al. Effects of low-temperature stress on source-sink organs in wheat and phosphorus mitigation strategies. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 807–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huang, H.Y.; Lin, Y.C.D.; Li, J.; Huang, K.Y.; Shrestha, S.; Hong, H.C.; Tang, Y.; Chen, Y.-G.; Jin, C.-N.; Yu, Y.; et al. miRTarBase: Updates to the experimentally validated microRNA–target interaction database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ding, W.; Clode, P.L.; Lambers, H. Effects of pH and bicarbonate on the nutrient status and growth of three Lupinus species. Plant Soil 2020, 447, 9–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ouled Youssef, I.; Krouma, A. Functional dissection of magnesium nutrition and use efficiency in common bean. Agron. J. 2021, 113, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lugli, L.F.; Andersen, K.M.; Aragão, L.E.O.C.; Cordeiro, A.L.; Cunha, H.F.V.; Fuchslueger, L.; Meir, P.; Mercado, L.M.; Oblitas, E.; Quesada, C.A.; et al. Multiple phosphorus acquisition strategies adopted by fine roots in low-fertility soils in Central Amazonia. Plant Soil 2020, 450, 49–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Reichert, T.; Rammig, A.; Fuchslueger, L.; Lugli, L.F.; Quesada, C.A.; Fleischer, K. Plant phosphorus-use and -acquisition strategies in Amazonia. New Phytol. 2022, 234, 1126–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kulmann, M.S.S.; Stefanello, L.O.S.; Schwalbert, R.A.; Berghetti, L.P.; Araujo, M.M.; Piccin, R.; Gatiboni, L.C.; Tiecher, T.; Ferreira, P.A.A.; Brunetto, G. Effects of phosphorus fertilizer application on phosphorus fractions in different organs of Cordia trichotoma. J. For. Res. 2021, 32, 725–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lucena, C.; Romera, F.J.; García, M.J.; Alcántara, E.; Pérez-Vicente, R. Ethylene participates in the regulation of Fe deficiency responses in Strategy I plants and in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Song, L.; Liu, D. Ethylene and plant responses to phosphate deficiency. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Neumann, G. The role of ethylene in plant adaptations for phosphate acquisition in soils–a review. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 6, 1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Plassard, C. Lack of phosphorus reserves and remobilization in grey poplar (Populus × canescens): An exception among deciduous tree species? Tree Physiol. 2018, 38, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Batten, D.S.; Belongia, M.T. The recent decline in agricultural exports: Is the exchange rate the culprit? Fed. Reserve Bank St. Louis Rev. 1984, 66, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Gahoonia, T.S.; Nielsen, N.E. Variation in acquisition of soil phosphorus among wheat and barley genotypes. Plant Soil 1996, 178, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jones, P.D.; Briffa, K.R. Global surface air temperature variations during the twentieth century: Part 1, spatial, temporal and seasonal details. Holocene 1992, 2, 165–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rosa, O.S.; Camargo, C.E.O. Wheat Breeding for Better Efficiency in Phosphorus Use. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Wheat for the Nontraditional Warm Areas, Foz Do Iguaçu, Brazil, 29 July–3 August 1990. [Google Scholar]
  38. Tang, C.; Robson, A.D.; Dilworth, M.J. The role of iron in nodulation and nitrogen fixation in Lupinus angustifolius L. New Phytol. 1990, 114, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Morales, F.; Abadía, A.; Belkhodja, R.; Abadía, J. Iron deficiency-induced changes in the photosynthetic pigment composition of field-grown pear (Pyrus communis L) leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 1994, 17, 1153–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fleury, P.; Leclerc, M. Colorimetric estimation of phosphorus by the nitro-vanado molybdic method of Misson. Its interest in biochemistry. Bull. Soc. Chim. Biol. 1943, 25, 201–205. [Google Scholar]
  41. Vizzotto, G.; Pinton, R.; Bomben, C.; Cesco, S.; Varanini, Z.; Costa, G. Iron reduction in iron-stressed plants of Actinidia deliciosa genotypes: Involvement of PM Fe (lll)-Chelate reductase and H+-ATPase activity. J. Plant Nutr. 1999, 22, 479–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ferhi, J.; Gharsalli, M.; Abdelly, C.; Krouma, A. Potential of the physiological response of pea plants (Pisum sativum L.) to iron deficiency (direct or lime-induced). Biosci. J. 2017, 33, 1208–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Roriz, M.; Carvalho, S.M.; Vasconcelos, M.W. High relative air humidity influencesmineral accumulation and growth iniron-deficient soybean plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Vasconcelos, M.W.; Grusak, M.A. Morpho-physiological parameters affecting iron deficiency chlorosis in soybean (Glycine max L.). Plant Soil 2014, 374, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Ramaekers, L.; Remans, R.; Rao, I.M.; Blair, M.W.; Vanderleyden, J. Strategies for improving phosphorus acquisition efficiency of crop plants. Field Crops Res. 2010, 117, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yang, B.; Kallio, H. Composition and physiological effects of sea buckthorn (Hippophae) lipids. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2002, 13, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. von Wandruszka, R. Phosphorus retention in calcareous soils and the effect of organic Matter on its mobility. Geochem. Trans. 2006, 7, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Mortvedt, J.J. Correcting iron deficiencies in annual and perennial plants: Present technologies and prospects. Plant Soil 1991, 130, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, C.; Meile, C.; Wilmoth, J.; Barcellos, D.; Thompson, A. Influence of pO2 on iron redox cycling and anaerobic organic carbon mineralization in a humid tropical forest soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 7709–7719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. López-Bucio, J.S.; Salmerón-Barrera, G.J.; Ravelo-Ortega, G.; Raya-González, J.; León, P.; Cruz, H.R.; Guevara-García, A.A. Mitogen-activated protein kinase 6 integrates phosphate and iron responses for indeterminate root growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol. Plant. 2019, 250, 1177–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Antonangelo, J.A.; Firmano, R.F.; Zhang, H.; Colzato, M.; Abdala, D.B.; Carvalho, H.W.P.; de Oliveira Junior, A.; Alleoni, L.R.F. Phosphorus speciation by P-XANES in an Oxisol under long-term no-till cultivation. Geoderma 2020, 377, 114580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fan, B.; Ding, J.; Fenton, O.; Daly, K.; Chen, Q. Understanding phosphate sorption characteristics of mineral amendments in relation to stabilising high legacy P calcareous soil. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 261, 114175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gu, C.; Dam, T.; Hart, S.C.; Turner, B.L.; Chadwick, O.A.; Berhe, A.A.; Hu, Y.; Zhu, M. Quantifying uncertainties in sequential chemical extraction of soil phosphorus using XANES spectroscopy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 2257–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Taiz, L.; Zeiger, E. Plant Physiology, 3rd ed.; Sinauer Associates Inc.: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  55. Condron, L.; Goh, K. Effects of long-term phosphatic fertilizer applications on amounts and forms of phosphorus in soils under irrigated pasture in New Zealand. J. Soil Sci. 1989, 40, 383–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sato, S.; Solomon, D.; Hyland, C.; Ketterings, Q.M.; Lehmann, J. Phosphorus speciation in manure and manure-amended soils using XANES spectroscopy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 7485–7491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ryan, P.; Delhaize, E.; Jones, D. Function and mechanism of organic anion exudation from plant roots. Ann. Rev. Plant. Biol. 2001, 52, 527–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Hinsinger, P.; Plassard, C.; Tang, C.; Jaillard, B. Origins of root-mediated pH changes in the rhizosphere and their responses to environmental constraints: A review. Plant Soil 2003, 248, 43–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ahmed, N.; Basit, A.; Bashir, S.; Bibi, I.; Haider, Z.; Ali, M.A.; Aslam, Z.; Aon, M.; Alotaibi, S.S.; El-Shehawi, A.M.; et al. Effect of acidified biochar on soil phosphorus availability and fertilizer use efficiency of maize (Zea mays L.). J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2021, 33, 101635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Atkinson, C.J.; Fitzgerald, J.D.; Hipps, N.A. Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: A review. Plant Soil 2010, 337, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Morphological aspect of faba bean plants cultivated on fertile (FS) and calcareous (CS) soils. TUN: Tunisin, AGUA: Aguadulce, SEV: Seville.
Figure 1. Morphological aspect of faba bean plants cultivated on fertile (FS) and calcareous (CS) soils. TUN: Tunisin, AGUA: Aguadulce, SEV: Seville.
Sustainability 15 06203 g001
Figure 2. SPAD index measured in faba bean genotypes cultivated on fertile soil (FS) and calcareous soil (CS). According to Fisher’s Least Significant Difference, within columns, means with the same letter are not significantly different at α = 0.05. Bars on the columns represent the standard error of the mean (n = 10).
Figure 2. SPAD index measured in faba bean genotypes cultivated on fertile soil (FS) and calcareous soil (CS). According to Fisher’s Least Significant Difference, within columns, means with the same letter are not significantly different at α = 0.05. Bars on the columns represent the standard error of the mean (n = 10).
Sustainability 15 06203 g002
Figure 3. Dry weight production by faba bean plants cultivated on fertile soil (FS) and calcareous soil (CS). According to Fisher's Least Significant Difference, within columns, means with the same letter are not significantly different at α = 0.05. Therefore, the bars on the columns represent the standard error of the mean (n = 10).
Figure 3. Dry weight production by faba bean plants cultivated on fertile soil (FS) and calcareous soil (CS). According to Fisher's Least Significant Difference, within columns, means with the same letter are not significantly different at α = 0.05. Therefore, the bars on the columns represent the standard error of the mean (n = 10).
Sustainability 15 06203 g003
Figure 4. Net photosynthesis activity (An, µmol CO2 m−2 s−1) in faba bean genotypes cultivated on fertile soil (FS) and calcareous soil (CS). According to Fisher’s Least Significant Difference, within columns, means with the same letter are not significantly different at α = 0.05. Bars on the columns represent the standard error of the mean (n = 10).
Figure 4. Net photosynthesis activity (An, µmol CO2 m−2 s−1) in faba bean genotypes cultivated on fertile soil (FS) and calcareous soil (CS). According to Fisher’s Least Significant Difference, within columns, means with the same letter are not significantly different at α = 0.05. Bars on the columns represent the standard error of the mean (n = 10).
Sustainability 15 06203 g004
Figure 5. Stomatal conductance (SC, mol H2O m−2 s−1, (a)) and evapotranspiration (ET, mol H2O m−2 s−1, (b)) in faba bean genotypes cultivated on fertile soil (FS) and calcareous soil (CS). According to Fisher’s Least Significant Difference, within columns, means with the same letter are not significantly different at α = 0.05. Bars on the columns represent the standard error of the mean (n = 10).
Figure 5. Stomatal conductance (SC, mol H2O m−2 s−1, (a)) and evapotranspiration (ET, mol H2O m−2 s−1, (b)) in faba bean genotypes cultivated on fertile soil (FS) and calcareous soil (CS). According to Fisher’s Least Significant Difference, within columns, means with the same letter are not significantly different at α = 0.05. Bars on the columns represent the standard error of the mean (n = 10).
Sustainability 15 06203 g005
Figure 6. Phosphorus (P) concentration in shoots (a) and roots (b) of faba bean plants cultivated on fertile soil (FS) and calcareous soil (CS). According to Fisher’s Least Significant Difference, within columns, means with the same letter are not significantly different at α = 0.05. Bars on the columns represent the standard error of the mean (n = 10).
Figure 6. Phosphorus (P) concentration in shoots (a) and roots (b) of faba bean plants cultivated on fertile soil (FS) and calcareous soil (CS). According to Fisher’s Least Significant Difference, within columns, means with the same letter are not significantly different at α = 0.05. Bars on the columns represent the standard error of the mean (n = 10).
Sustainability 15 06203 g006
Figure 7. Acidification capacity of faba bean plants cultivated in fertile soil (FS) and calcareous soil (CS). Numbers in figure represents the acidification capacity (AC). Vertical bars represent ± standard errors of means of 10 replicates.
Figure 7. Acidification capacity of faba bean plants cultivated in fertile soil (FS) and calcareous soil (CS). Numbers in figure represents the acidification capacity (AC). Vertical bars represent ± standard errors of means of 10 replicates.
Sustainability 15 06203 g007
Figure 8. Relationship between plant growth (g plant−1) and quantities of P (µg plant−1) in plants of Faba bean cultivated in fertile soil (FS, a) and calcareous soil (CS, b). Vertical and horizontal bars represent ± standard errors of means of 10 replicates.
Figure 8. Relationship between plant growth (g plant−1) and quantities of P (µg plant−1) in plants of Faba bean cultivated in fertile soil (FS, a) and calcareous soil (CS, b). Vertical and horizontal bars represent ± standard errors of means of 10 replicates.
Sustainability 15 06203 g008
Figure 9. Relationship between net photosynthesis (An, µmol CO2 m−2 s−1) and quantities of P (µg plant−1) in plants of faba bean cultivated in fertile soil (FS, a) and calcareous soil (CS, b). Vertical and horizontal bars represent ± standard errors of means of 10 replicates.
Figure 9. Relationship between net photosynthesis (An, µmol CO2 m−2 s−1) and quantities of P (µg plant−1) in plants of faba bean cultivated in fertile soil (FS, a) and calcareous soil (CS, b). Vertical and horizontal bars represent ± standard errors of means of 10 replicates.
Sustainability 15 06203 g009
Figure 10. Relationship between the quantities of P measured in plants and their acidification capacity. Vertical and horizontal bars represent ± standard errors of means of 10 replicates.
Figure 10. Relationship between the quantities of P measured in plants and their acidification capacity. Vertical and horizontal bars represent ± standard errors of means of 10 replicates.
Sustainability 15 06203 g010
Figure 11. Schematic representation of rhizosphere acidification promoting P solubilisation in the rhizosphere. This mechanism is effectively expressed in tolerant genotypes. RM: root membrane, OA: organic acid.
Figure 11. Schematic representation of rhizosphere acidification promoting P solubilisation in the rhizosphere. This mechanism is effectively expressed in tolerant genotypes. RM: root membrane, OA: organic acid.
Sustainability 15 06203 g011
Table 1. Main characteristics of the used soils. FS: Fertile soil sampled in the region of Gatrana (Sidi Bouzid, Tunisia, 35°9′52.366″ N 9°40′23.689″ E), CS: calcareous soil tested in the region of Faiedh (Sidi Bouzid, Tunisia, 35°4′38.536″ N 9°40′32.167″ E).
Table 1. Main characteristics of the used soils. FS: Fertile soil sampled in the region of Gatrana (Sidi Bouzid, Tunisia, 35°9′52.366″ N 9°40′23.689″ E), CS: calcareous soil tested in the region of Faiedh (Sidi Bouzid, Tunisia, 35°4′38.536″ N 9°40′32.167″ E).
ParametersFSCS
pH7.0310.05
Organic Matter (%)1.330.59
Active lime (%)5.011.3
Total carbonates (%)6.4828.3
Fe (%)0.510.469
K (%)1.1250.663
Mg (%)0.5990.661
N (%)0.710.45
C (%)0.590.22
P (%)0.1530.212
Table 2. Stress index related to spad (SI-spad), stress index related to plant growth (SI-DW), stress index related to net photosynthesis (SI-An), and stress index related to accumulated P (SI-P) in three faba bean genotypes cultivated on fertile and calcareous soils. According to Fisher’s Least Significant Difference, within columns, means with the same letter are not significantly different at α = 0.05. Standard errors of means of 10 replicates.
Table 2. Stress index related to spad (SI-spad), stress index related to plant growth (SI-DW), stress index related to net photosynthesis (SI-An), and stress index related to accumulated P (SI-P) in three faba bean genotypes cultivated on fertile and calcareous soils. According to Fisher’s Least Significant Difference, within columns, means with the same letter are not significantly different at α = 0.05. Standard errors of means of 10 replicates.
SEVAGUATUN
SI-spad−37.5 a ± 2.8−35.5 a ± 3.2−21.1 b ± 1.9
SI-DW−28.3 a ± 1.9−16.8 b ± 1.3−6.6 c ± 4.6
SI-An−37.0 a ± 2.9−24.9 b ± 2.1−12.4 c ± 1.1
SI-P−55.4 a ± 4.1−42.1 b ± 3.2−28.3 c ± 1.9
Table 3. Quantities of phosphorus accumulated in plants (QP, µg Plant−1); P use efficiency for photosynthesis (PUE-An), P use efficiency for plant growth (PUE-DW) and phosphorus translocation (PT, µg) in three faba bean genotypes cultivated on fertile soil (FS) and calcareous soil (CS). According to Fisher’s Least Significant Difference, within columns, means with the same letter are not significantly different at α = 0.05. Standard errors of means of 10 replicates.
Table 3. Quantities of phosphorus accumulated in plants (QP, µg Plant−1); P use efficiency for photosynthesis (PUE-An), P use efficiency for plant growth (PUE-DW) and phosphorus translocation (PT, µg) in three faba bean genotypes cultivated on fertile soil (FS) and calcareous soil (CS). According to Fisher’s Least Significant Difference, within columns, means with the same letter are not significantly different at α = 0.05. Standard errors of means of 10 replicates.
SEVAGUATUN
FSCSFSCSFSCS
QP2181.96 a
± 121
972.11 f
± 67.7
1714.5 c
± 101.7
1036.2 e
± 89.2
2050.57 b
± 123.9
1470.66 d
± 99.6
PUE-An6.31 d
± 0.51
6.37 d
± 0.57
6.89 bc
± 0.50
6.77 c
± 0.59
7.08 b
± 0.62
8.36 a
± 0.63
PUE-DW7.55 f
± 0.53
8.83 e
± 0.66
9.67 d
± 0.79
11.23 b
± 0.95
10.23 c
± 0.84
11.80 a
± 0.94
PT41 c
± 3.11
41 c
± 3.32
52 b
± 3.67
49 bc
± 4.02
59 a
± 3.98
59 a
± 4.14
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baccari, B.; Krouma, A. Rhizosphere Acidification Determines Phosphorus Availability in Calcareous Soil and Influences Faba Bean (Vicia faba) Tolerance to P Deficiency. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6203. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076203

AMA Style

Baccari B, Krouma A. Rhizosphere Acidification Determines Phosphorus Availability in Calcareous Soil and Influences Faba Bean (Vicia faba) Tolerance to P Deficiency. Sustainability. 2023; 15(7):6203. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076203

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baccari, Basma, and Abdelmajid Krouma. 2023. "Rhizosphere Acidification Determines Phosphorus Availability in Calcareous Soil and Influences Faba Bean (Vicia faba) Tolerance to P Deficiency" Sustainability 15, no. 7: 6203. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076203

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop