Correction: Al-Ashmori et al. “Values, Challenges, and Critical Success Factors” of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Malaysia: Experts Perspective. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3192
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(7), 5935; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075935
Submission received: 13 December 2022
/
Accepted: 27 February 2023
/
Published: 29 March 2023
The authors would like to make the following corrections to the published paper [1]. Authors would like to change all the Support References of the table content, and remove the table footer, so we need to replace the original Tables 5 and 6. The changes are as follows:
(1) Replacing Table 5:
Table 5.
Validity Analysis of BIM Challenges in Building Projects.
| Item | Agree | Disagree | Maybe | CVR | Support Reference | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | % | F | % | F | % | ||||
| CHF1 | Creating demand for BIM projects or prioritizing BIM projects as a marketing brand. | 19 | 73% | 1 | 4% | 6 | 23% | 0.462 | [23,57,59,60] |
| CHF2 | Utilization of current contracts to fulfill BIM project requirements. | 18 | 69% | 1 | 4% | 7 | 27% | 0.385 | [9,55,57,60,61] |
| CHF3 | Development of protocols for BIM standard modeling. | 19 | 73% | 0 | 0% | 7 | 27% | 0.538 | [59] |
| CHF4 | Developing a securing property assurance of BIM project information. | 20 | 77% | 1 | 4% | 5 | 19% | 0.538 | [9,55,56,58] |
| CHF5 | Convincing organizations and individuals to openly share information. | 17 | 65% | 2 | 8% | 7 | 27% | 0.462 | [55,58] |
| CHF6 | Build trust towards BIM technologies and overcome resistance factors. | 21 | 81% | 1 | 4% | 4 | 15% | 0.615 | [23,55,57] |
| CHF7 | Development of execution procedure and legal frameworks for BIM implementation. | 18 | 69% | 0 | 0% | 8 | 31% | 0.462 | [55,57,60] |
| CHF8 | Creating affordable training programs. | 21 | 81% | 0 | 0% | 5 | 19% | 0.615 | [9,23,55,58–61,63,64] |
| CHF9 | Minimizing the initial cost associated with BIM implementation. | 19 | 73% | 1 | 4% | 6 | 23% | 0.538 | [9,23,58,59] |
| CHF10 | Enhancing level of understanding of BIM technology and process implementation. | 20 | 77% | 0 | 0% | 6 | 23% | 0.538 | [23,55,58,60,61] |
| CHF11 | Standardizing BIM process and defining guidelines for its implementation. | 21 | 81% | 1 | 4% | 4 | 15% | 0.615 | [58–60] |
| CHF12 | Provision of comparative analysis between traditional and BIM-based projects as evidence. | 18 | 69% | 0 | 0% | 8 | 31% | 0.462 | [59] |
| CHF13 | Overcoming the constraints of limited BIM software tools and compatibility issues. | 20 | 77% | 1 | 4% | 5 | 19% | 0.538 | [55,58,59] |
| CHF14 | Produce a BIM system guideline for technology implementation. | 5 | 19% | 18 | 69% | 3 | 5 | −0.583 | [58,59,63,64] |
| CHF15 | Building trust among BIM project teams and bridging the gap of work fragmentally. | 21 | 81% | 1 | 4% | 4 | 15% | 0.538 | [55,58,59,63] |
| CF16 | Enhancing the Individual and group motivation to use BIM. | 19 | 73% | 1 | 4% | 6 | 23% | 0.692 | [23,55,57–59,64,65] |
| CF17 | Understand BIM model interoperability mechanism among different BIM software. | 18 | 69% | 3 | 12% | 5 | 19% | 0.538 | [23,55,58–60] |
| CF18 | Creating a platform for a collaborative working environment. | 18 | 69% | 2 | 8% | 6 | 23% | 0.385 | [55,58] |
| CHF19 | Setting up an interoperability mechanism for notification and sharing information. | 8 | 31% | 12 | 46% | 6 | 23% | −0.333 | [55] |
| CF20 | Setting out an efficient mechanism for coordinating BIM models. | 20 | 77% | 2 | 8% | 4 | 15% | 0.385 | [9,55,58,60,62] |
| CF21 | Enhancing communication process among different parties. | 19 | 73% | 1 | 4% | 6 | 23% | 0.462 | [23,55] |
| CF22 | Boosting the decision-making process among stakeholders. | 18 | 69% | 1 | 4% | 7 | 27% | 0.538 | [55,58,62,63] |
| CVR (Critical) for a panel size (N) of 26 is 0.385. | CVI | 0.423 | |||||||
(2) Replacing the Table 6:
Table 6.
Validity Analysis of BIM Enablers in Building Projects.
| Item | Agree | Disagree | Maybe | CVR | Support Reference | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | % | F | % | F | % | ||||
| SF1 | Existence of procedures, frameworks, and guidelines. | 22 | 85% | 1 | 4% | 3 | 12% | 0.692 | [23,55,58,61,64,74,76] |
| SF2 | Develop research to identify changes with BIM implementation. | 21 | 81% | 1 | 4% | 4 | 15% | 0.692 | [58,74] |
| SF3 | Linking current policy with the BIM implementation requirement. | 21 | 81% | 1 | 4% | 4 | 15% | 0.615 | [9,58,60,72,73,77] |
| SF4 | Define team roles and responsibilities. | 23 | 88% | 1 | 4% | 2 | 8% | 0.769 | [72,76] |
| SF5 | Create BIM business opportunities and market support. | 22 | 85% | 2 | 8% | 2 | 8% | 0.692 | [55,59] |
| SF6 | Readiness of government and organization to reward self-development skills in BIM technology implementation. | 19 | 73% | 4 | 15% | 3 | 12% | 0.462 | [23,55,57–59,64,72,73,76] |
| SF7 | Ability to allocate sufficient financial resources to invest in BIM development. | 20 | 77% | 2 | 8% | 4 | 15% | 0.538 | [9,23,55,58,59,64,72–74,76] |
| SF8 | Top management support to implement BIM. | 22 | 85% | 1 | 4% | 3 | 12% | 0.692 | [55,57,59,64,72–74,76,77] |
| SF9 | Ability to accommodate changes and upgrade to a BIM-based system. | 21 | 81% | 2 | 8% | 3 | 12% | 0.615 | [73,75,76] |
| SF10 | Compatibility of BIM systems to support interoperability and collaboration. | 21 | 81% | 1 | 4% | 4 | 15% | 0.615 | [55,58,59,73,74] |
| SF11 | Availability of BIM systems/ tools/ extensions to support BIM implementation. | 21 | 81% | 1 | 4% | 4 | 15% | 0.615 | [75] |
| SF12 | Availability of Securing intellectual property and cyber security of BIM outcomes. | 19 | 73% | 2 | 8% | 5 | 19% | 0.538 | [9,55,56,58] |
| SF13 | Insure continuous development to fulfill technology participant expectations. | 20 | 77% | 1 | 4% | 5 | 19% | 0.615 | [73] |
| SF14 | Knowledge and experience level of “players” in the BIM process and what are their drivers. | 19 | 73% | 1 | 4% | 6 | 23% | 0.462 | [58,59,63,64,72,73,75] |
| SF15 | Collaboration and readiness to share knowledge, risks, and reward. | 17 | 65% | 1 | 4% | 8 | 31% | 0.462 | [9,23,55,56,58,60–63,73,74,76] |
| SF16 | Clear understanding of client requirements when using BIM in the project. | 19 | 73% | 1 | 4% | 6 | 23% | 0.385 | [58,72,73,76,77] |
| SF17 | Early involvement and participation of project teams. | 18 | 69% | 0 | 0% | 8 | 31% | 0.462 | [58,59,63,73,76,77] |
| SF18 | Mutual trust, respect, and personal commitments to cooperation. | 20 | 77% | 1 | 4% | 5 | 19% | 0.538 | [23,55,57,73,76] |
| SF19 | Ability to define external stakeholders’ potential impact on projects. | 19 | 73% | 0 | 0% | 7 | 27% | 0.462 | [9,55,75] |
| SF20 | Ability to understand each stakeholder’s interests. | 17 | 65% | 0 | 0% | 9 | 35% | 0.385 | [9,55,61] |
| SF21 | Ability to define a suitable way to manage stakeholder needs and wants. | 17 | 65% | 0 | 0% | 9 | 35% | 0.385 | [60,64,73] |
| SF22 | Active communication systems with appropriate stakeholders. | 16 | 62% | 1 | 4% | 9 | 35% | 0.462 | [9,23,55,58,60,62,76,77] |
| SF23 | People’s knowledge and awareness of the BIM system and its application. | 20 | 77% | 0 | 0% | 6 | 23% | 0.538 | [56,57,59,61,72,74,77] |
| SF24 | Ability to differentiate between different BIM software systems. | 18 | 69% | 1 | 4% | 7 | 27% | 0.385 | [23,55,59,64] |
| SF25 | Capability to use a BIM software tool. | 19 | 73% | 1 | 4% | 6 | 23% | 0.462 | [75] |
| SF26 | Understanding the mechanism of BIM execution through the project life cycle. | 20 | 77% | 1 | 4% | 5 | 19% | 0.538 | [58,59,63,64] |
| SF27 | Ability to manage information in a structured manner in a 3D environment. | 22 | 85% | 0 | 0% | 4 | 15% | 0.692 | [58,72–74,77] |
| SF28 | Knowing the usage of the multidisciplinary models that promote collaborative processes. | 19 | 73% | 0 | 0% | 7 | 27% | 0.462 | [55,72,73,77] |
| SF29 | Availability of information and technology. | 20 | 77% | 2 | 8% | 4 | 15% | 0.538 | [72,74] |
| SF30 | Early selection of adequate project delivery method. | 21 | 81% | 0 | 0% | 5 | 19% | 0.615 | [58,73,76] |
| SF31 | Early selection of the appropriate BIM tools to perform the task. | 21 | 81% | 1 | 4% | 4 | 15% | 0.615 | [58,72,73] |
| SF32 | Understanding BIM project scope and contract agreement. | 21 | 81% | 0 | 0% | 5 | 19% | 0.692 | [58,73] |
| SF33 | Design BIM coordination strategy among project parties. | 22 | 85% | 0 | 0% | 4 | 15% | 0.692 | [55,72,73,76,77] |
| SF34 | Develop an intelligent 3D model that can be used by other disciplines. | 21 | 81% | 0 | 0% | 5 | 19% | 0.615 | [73,76,77] |
| SF35 | Produce models with different levels of development LOD100-LOD500. | 21 | 81% | 1 | 4% | 4 | 15% | 0.615 | [73,76,77] |
| SF36 | Produce models that can generate auto shop drawings for construction and fabrication. | 19 | 73% | 1 | 4% | 6 | 23% | 0.462 | [73,76,77] |
| SF37 | Visualize layout for site management, supervision, safety management, and quality management. | 21 | 81% | 0 | 0% | 5 | 19% | 0.615 | [73,76] |
| SF38 | Produce accurate model-based documentation through the project lifecycle. | 22 | 85% | 0 | 0% | 4 | 15% | 0.692 | [75] |
| SF39 | To be able to identify risks associated with bidding BIM projects (types, size, teams, and locations). | 23 | 88% | 0 | 0% | 3 | 12% | 0.769 | [58,72,73,76] |
| SF40 | Availability of effective communication methods. | 22 | 85% | 1 | 4% | 3 | 12% | 0.692 | [9,23,55,58,60,62,76,77] |
| SF41 | BIM process re-engineering and decentralized decision-making. | 20 | 77% | 1 | 4% | 5 | 19% | 0.615 | [73] |
| SF42 | An early formulation for collaborative method between stakeholders. | 22 | 85% | 0 | 0% | 4 | 15% | 0.692 | [9,23,55,60–62,75] |
| SF43 | Availability of effective project monitoring processes. | 20 | 77% | 0 | 0% | 6 | 23% | 0.538 | [75,76] |
| SF44 | Identify and produce BIM deliverables at each phase of the project’s life cycle. | 19 | 73% | 0 | 0% | 7 | 27% | 0.462 | [64,73,75] |
| SF45 | Determine and employ innovative ideas for collaborative practices. | 20 | 77% | 0 | 0% | 6 | 23% | 0.538 | [55,58] |
| CVR (Critical) for a panel size (N) of 26 is 0.385. | CVI | 0.571 | |||||||
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Reference
- Al-Ashmori, Y.Y.; Othman, I.; Al-Aidrous, A.-H.M.H. “Values, Challenges, and Critical Success Factors” of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Malaysia: Experts Perspective. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Al-Ashmori, Y.Y.; Othman, I.; Al-Aidrous, A.-H.M.H. Correction: Al-Ashmori et al. “Values, Challenges, and Critical Success Factors” of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Malaysia: Experts Perspective. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3192. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5935. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075935
AMA Style
Al-Ashmori YY, Othman I, Al-Aidrous A-HMH. Correction: Al-Ashmori et al. “Values, Challenges, and Critical Success Factors” of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Malaysia: Experts Perspective. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3192. Sustainability. 2023; 15(7):5935. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075935
Chicago/Turabian StyleAl-Ashmori, Yasser Yahya, Idris Othman, and Al-Hussein M. H. Al-Aidrous. 2023. "Correction: Al-Ashmori et al. “Values, Challenges, and Critical Success Factors” of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Malaysia: Experts Perspective. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3192" Sustainability 15, no. 7: 5935. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075935
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
