Next Article in Journal
The Future Internet
Next Article in Special Issue
Identifying Middlewares for Mashup Personal Learning Environments
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Learning Space Mashups: Combining Web 2.0 Tools to Create Collaborative and Reflective Learning Spaces

Faculty of Education, Rolle Building, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK
Future Internet 2009, 1(1), 3-13;
Submission received: 29 June 2009 / Accepted: 11 July 2009 / Published: 13 July 2009
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Data Mashups)


In this paper, Web 2.0 open content mashups or combinations are explored. Two case studies of recent initial teacher training programmes are reviewed where blogs and wikis were blended to create new virtual learning spaces. In two separate studies, students offer their views about using these tools, and reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of this approach. There is also discussion about aggregation of content and a theorization of how community and personal spaces can create tension and conflict. A new ‘learning spaces’ model will be presented which aids visualization of the processes, domains and territories that are brought into play when content and Web 2.0 tools are mashed up within the same space.

1. Introduction: The Web 2.0 Phenomenon

However we examine the emerging Social Web, we must concede that it is a phenomenon that has experienced exponential growth. Whatever we decide to call it – Web 2.0, the Read/Write Web, the Social Web – it is evident that the Web is evolving into a set of community space and communication tools that are more dynamic and powerful than any other previous medium. All previous communication media - the printing press, telephone, and television – have been absorbed into the Internet. Most of the emerging Web 2.0 services are free and relatively easy to use and together constitute the only media that can simultaneously provide the potential for one-to-many and many-to-many synchronous communications. For the first time, consumers of the media are also able to become producers. User generated content has proliferated to such an extent that vast storehouses of text, images, videos and sound clips are now instantly and freely available as resources to anyone who has access to the Internet. Access has been increased to these resources through the widespread availability of mobile phones.

1.1. Web 2.0 and education

It would be foolish to ignore the tremendous opportunities the Social Web offers to education. Societal growth is profoundly dependent upon the success of teaching and learning. Societies are founded on the propagation and dissemination of knowledge, and formal learning has become the prime gateway to knowledge. Teachers should therefore continue to explore new and dynamic ways of providing excellent pedagogical opportunities, with emerging social software tools assuming greater importance.
I would like to argue here that social software has a significant part to play in the future success of all education sectors. The rapid growth of distance education in all its forms for example, owes much of its recent success to the Internet. Global communication, ubiquitous access to information and knowledge, and quick and easy formation of communities of interest and practice have all benefited from the recently emerging tools and technologies of the Social Web. Business and entertainment have capitalized on Web 2.0 tools, but teachers are only beginning to come to terms with using them in authentic pedagogical contexts.
Some teachers have been using wikis, blogs and other open architecture Web services to encourage student interaction and participation in all sectors of education in recent years [1]. Wikis can promote collaborative learning, and serve as repositories for user generated content [2]. Blogs can encourage greater reflection on learning and enable students to enter into dialogue on specific topics [3]. Wikis form a part of a community space, whilst blogs are situated within an individual’s personal and reflective space. Both learning communities and reflective practice have been identified as important ingredients in successful learning [4]. Interest is growing about how social software tools can provide added value to the learning process, and this is reflected in the growing literature on the topic. Less is known about how wikis, blogs and other Web 2.0 tools might be combined to create dynamic new learning environments.

1.2. Mashups

In this paper I will outline some of the more familiar social web tools, and examine how they have been used to create dynamic and interactive learning experiences. I will then discuss two studies where tools used for different pedagogical purposes were brought together in combinations to create even more dynamic and interactive experiences for learners. I am not articulating a form of data mashup here, but rather a mashup or blending together of spaces – the reflective and collaborative spaces students are becoming familiar with in online learning. This type of ‘mashup’ approach can be achieved through the application of tools that are based upon XML and AJAX, providing opportunities for creative and imaginative new uses of content on the social Web. XML (eXtensible Markup Language) allows the user to define the content of a document independently of its formatting, making it easy to repurpose it and embed it within other applications and within other presentation environments. AJAX (Asynchronous Java Script and XML) makes it possible for web applications to retrieve data from a server without changing the display or interfering with the behaviour of the viewed page. In combination, such software standards enable the mashing up of content into any format or across several presentation formats simultaneously. The tools, wikis and blogs, are now contextualized according to their key pedagogical applications:

1.3. Wikis and collaboration

Wikis are open content collaborative web sites that can be used as easily accessible digital repository of content, an online discussion space for distance learners or simply as a ‘scribble pad’ for collaborative content management. Any registered user of a wiki can create, edit or delete content and they are commonly used for collaborative group work where content is required to be generated and stored over a period of time. Wikis are not the most appropriate tool to apply where quick answers are required, but are useful for long term group activities, where a central community space is required for virtual meetings, discussions and general course management.
Debate continues over the value and validity of user generated content, and criticism has been levelled at content found on open sites such as Wikipedia. Keen believes the separation between amateur and expert should be maintained, and considers lay knowledge is a threat to the integrity of professional knowledge [5]. He contends that user generated content on Web 2.0 spaces is undermining culture and damaging economic structures. Conversely, Tapscott and Williams argue for mass collaboration as a means of challenging the hegemony of commoditized knowledge [6]. They see user generated content as a creative process that is governed through the wisdom of crowds [7]. Notwithstanding the rhetoric, there is growing evidence from the literature that wikis and user generated content can be deployed successfully in a variety of educational contexts.
Research into the use of wikis in formal learning settings reveals that students enjoy using them as they engender a sense of ownership, and they enable students to discuss their ideas in close proximity to the digital artifacts they are creating [1,2]. Students are less keen for others to edit their work, and need encouragement to move from solo engagement to learning as a member of a community [8]. When asked to work in small groups or in pairs, they generally co-operate to develop their ideas constructively. Wikis have been shown to encourage social cohesion within learning groups [9], improvements in academic writing standards [10], and has encouraged students to continue generating, organizing and revising content even after assignments have been graded [11]. Technical constraints can mar the experience where two or more learners are simultaneously attempting to edit the same page [2]. However, wikis are particularly resilient to errors and deliberate sabotage, because all previous versions of pages are stored in memory and can be ‘rolled back’ if required [12].

1.4. Blogs and reflection

Blogs are ostensibly personal web pages designed to enable users to create online diaries. They are used for a variety of purposes, but in most cases, they are owned by individuals, who write, and in most cases, publish their content to the internet for others to read. Ultimately, even though they can be intensely personal in nature, blogs have communication with others as their central purpose [3] because interactive tools such as comment boxes can facilitate dialogue between the blog writer and the blog reader. Blogs thus promote learning through reflection and discussion, incorporating the sharing of knowledge and best practice [13]. Furthermore, Kervin, Mantei and Herrington talk about how blogs can be used by trainee teachers to explore their developing professional identities and to engage with fellow professionals through focused meaningful dialogue [14]. However, student users need time and motivation to subscribe fully to blogging as a learning practice [15] and should not be imposed arbitrarily upon students [16].
Blog posts are presented chronologically on the web page, with the latest entry displayed uppermost. Increasingly bloggers are also incorporating micro-blogging tools such as Twitter into their main blogs, to provide readers with up to the minute ‘snap-shots’ of events, information and views. All blog posts are automatically date and time stamped, and there is usually a hyperlinked archive of previous posts to enable readers to explore the history and progression of the content. Facilities also exist to track back comments from other people about a particular topic, thereby encouraging wider ranging discussions between communities of users.
In formal learning settings, blogs are particularly useful to facilitate reflection on practice, which in turn encourages teachers to challenge their own attitudes or values [17]. Further, reflective practice can encourage students to write imaginatively and has been shown to encourage more accurate and critical methods of articulation [18]. Reports into the use of two-person blogs for the purposes of supporting mentoring and professional dialogue have also shown favourable results [19].

1.5. Combining tools and mashing content

The ability to combine web tools is an innovation that has been previously discussed [12]. Some blogs for example host live microblogging feeds (e.g. Twitter stream incorporated into Blogger) whilst others simply hyperlink to wikis or display ‘blog rolls’ – a list of links to other blogs the owner reads and recommends. Podcasts and VODcasts (Video On Demand) can also be embedded into blogs and wikis. Really Simple Syndication (RSS) feeds are one of the most common methods of aggregating content. RSS pushes or feeds notification of web page updates directly to the subscriber as they occur, usually to their e-mail account. Newer aggregation services such as Twemes operate on the principle of hash tags. The hash tag #obama for example, will allow Twemes to search for (spider) and gather together (aggregate) all digital objects displaying this tag, including Flickr images, Twitter posts and Delicious tags, onto a single web page. Creators of these objects must simply remember to insert appropriate hash tags somewhere within the object, so that Twemes can find it. The pedagogical uses for aggregation tools are not immediately apparent, but Lee, Miller and Newnham offer examples of how RSS feeds can be used to deliver rich, active, social learning experiences that promote high levels of leaner personalization, choice and autonomy [20]. Thus with a little creative thought and planning, distance educators should be able to exploit this tool to generate useful digital repositories for learning and encourage innovative new approaches to learning.
Tool combinations do not always sit easily together though, as the tools are often designed to fulfill different functions. It is far easier to mashup content as is evidenced in the example of Google Maps which is presented as combinations of satellite imagery, mapping and hyperlinked place overlays. The photo sharing site Flickr is another successful example of a mashup, offering the user tools to ‘geo tag’ images in the location they were captured. In this study, instead of combining tools physically, students were required to use tools in concert to perform multiple tasks and combinations of tasks during the classroom sessions. The development of this approach will be to encourage students to perform the same combinational activities remotely, beyond the boundaries of the traditional learning environment.

1.6. Community spaces and personal spaces

The juxtaposition of community and personal spaces is a conceptual proposition that is represented graphically in Figure 1. In reality the boundaries between two such spaces is notional. Students logging onto a shared online space may not be aware that they are leaving a personal space and entering a community space, so behaviour may not necessarily change according to context. Students learn independently and they also learn within a community – the situated context may change, but learning continues nevertheless. The key pedagogical difference between blogs and wikis lies in the means by which users represent themselves within each space. As community spaces, wikis encourage users to contribute ‘what they know’, whereas blogs are more personal spaces, enabling users to represent ‘who they are’. Both spaces enable interaction with other users, but the interaction will be qualitatively different due to the two different representations.
Constraints may include perceptions of social presence, immediacy of interaction and reduction of social cues dependent on the affordances of the tools being used, see for example Short, Williams & Christie [21]. Technological affordances, which derive from user perceptions, are “those fundamental properties that determine just how the thing could possibly be used” [22]. Because they are perceptual, affordances tend to be countered by constraints. The user may see barriers to use that include time limitations, lack of skills and perceptions of threat or risk. If there is a boundary between private and public spheres of activities it is blurred. Yet there remains a need to visualize the territory of social web tools and the manner in which they can be represented, because practice without theory is building without foundation. The model presented below in Figure 1 is an attempt to visualize the learning spheres, the interaction of spaces, and the activities and tools brought into play to support learning in all contexts.
Figure 1. Learning spaces and negotiated meaning.
Figure 1. Learning spaces and negotiated meaning.
Futureinternet 01 00003 g001
We might speculate that meaning will be negotiated between members of a learning community within the nexus and overlap of personal and community spaces. Moreover, learning that is both reflective and collaborative can result from dialogue of this kind. Learners challenge each others’ ideas through discursive activities, and in turn are challenged in their own thinking. The dialectic between thesis and antithesis can lead students to a new synthesis of knowledge, attitudes and beliefs [23] which is a more robust expression of reality. The goal for teachers should thus be to create opportunities for learners to interact at this level, and the selection of appropriate combinations of appropriate online spaces may support this for distributed students and those who meet periodically. The selection of valid discursive tasks should provide the tools to support students as they engage in interaction. This in turn may lead to socially constructed knowledge and the acquisition of new learning.
Kanuka and Anderson make an important distinction between social interchange and socially constructed meaning – social interchange does not generally lead to new knowledge, whereas social construction can result in a change of view or attitude [24]. They reported that in online groups social interchange is more prevalent than socially constructed learning. This may result from superficial discussions and lack of engagement in situated contexts such as problem based learning. Deeper processes such as reflective writing encourage students to create narratives based on their emotional responses to events, relationships and actions. Reflective writing can lead to more concrete experiences, because as Chandler has argued, in the act of writing, we are written [25].
Therefore, to facilitate socially constructed meaning and deeper learning outcomes, teachers should encourage students to reflect more on their learning, and engage in reflective writing to reify their thoughts. Blogs are ideal reflective tools to disseminate individual ideas within the community space, through hyperlinks direct from the wiki. This was the strategy used in the following presented studies.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Study 1: Combining Web 2.0 tools

Over the period of one academic term of 3 months, 28 students from two undergraduate teacher degree programmes created their own blogs and used wikis as collaborative spaces. They responded to a series of questions posted onto the wiki during their course. Upon completion of the programme of study, students were asked to complete an online survey about their views on using Web 2.0 tools for learning. All responses were anonymous. Students were asked to distinguish between their use of the wiki and the blog. The first free form question asked ‘What purpose do you think the blog you have created during this module serves?’
One male student answered: ‘I use the blog as a form of expression, reflection and opportunity to show anything I have found’. Another student thought the blog was essentially a personal tool for capturing her thoughts: ‘The purpose of the blog is to express myself e.g. thoughts and feelings at the time, I haven’t really used it often again it’s something I’m not used to doing so sometimes feels strange but in some ways feels good as it feels I’ve got a lot out that I wanted to say but felt no one wanted to hear so was good to write it down even if you think no one will read it’. Few students thought about the purposes of the tools and activities they engaged in during their studies, but using the blog as a part of their studies patently evoked some reflection for some.
Most students were unsure about the specific purposes of blogging, and some avoided using blogs for a variety of reasons. One female student was reluctant to self disclose: ‘I have not used my blog at all since the lecture we made it, I ... went to write my second entry about my weekend in Dublin and stopped half way through because my mind got a bit deep and meaningful and I thought why am I sharing my life on the internet! I think in educational terms ... a blog would be very useful, it just wasn't for me!’ Some students were reluctant to post subjective or emotional content they felt they might later regret: ‘I feel slightly awkward about posting my thoughts on to a site. It can be too easy sometimes to make a posting and then perhaps regret it afterwards but it is then there for all to see and as a reminder to you too’. The persistence of content (through blog archiving) was an affordance that appeared to militate against authentic use for some students. This was one example where the mashing up of the functionality of personal spaces into community spaces became a barrier to discursive learning.
Some students encountered practical constraints. Several participants in the study cited lack of time or the burden of work as barriers to regular blogging, whilst some students were aware of the risk that their blogging could become a distraction: ‘ is time consuming and I also get diverted with the little precious time I have for study’, whilst one avoided using his because: ‘I don't post that often to my blog, cos if I do I then go on to play about of Facebook etc and get no work done.’ This however may have been an indication that these students failed to appreciate the power of reflective writing as a means of learning, and therefore a good investment in their study time. Other reasons were cited for lack of regular posting to the blog. Some failed to blog regularly due to a lack of confidence in their own skills, or in one student’s perception: ‘I don’t think what I have to say is important or amusing for others to read’ and one felt threatened by the prospect of writing to the web: ‘As for my Blog no I haven't posted on it. Reason for that not really sure that I get it and feel intimidated by it’.
Most students viewed the wiki more as a central, community resource from which they could both glean information and also post comments and questions to the rest of the group. The blog unsurprisingly, was used for more reflective and personal activities in contrast to the wiki which was treated as a community resource or a gathering point similar to a ‘tribal totem’ [26]. One student said: ‘Wiki was used to post comments, ask and answer questions, look up resources. Blog as my personal ravings,’ Another echoed this sentiment: ‘I used the wiki to access resources people had posted and to see what people were discussing, also to see what the lessons would involve, e.g. each week before the lecture I would log on and see what we would be doing so I could see if I would need to do any preparation beforehand. I used the blog when I had something that was on my mind that I wanted to get off my chest, just personal thoughts of what I was feeling and thinking at that particular time’.
All those who regularly posted to their blogs did so predominantly at a distance from their institution, at home or in the workplace, suggesting that blogging is a solitary activity at least in the first instance and can be successfully employed as a distance learning tool. Wikis by contrast, were used mainly during the weekly class based sessions.

2.2. Study 2

Over the period of one academic term, two groups of third year student teachers took part in this small scale study (n=18). The students were engaged in managing their own action research projects around the use of ICT in the primary classroom. Each student was required to select and justify a relevant research question, investigate it through the design of a questionnaire or interview schedule, gather and analyze their data, and report on their findings in a 5000 word essay. For some students this was a challenging prospect, as most had not previously studied in a self-organized manner. To provide appropriate learner support, the tutor set up password protected group blogs, so that students could share their progress reports, discuss their research and generally support each other socially. The tutor was also a member of both blog groups and occasionally responded to individual postings. Toward the end of the project, a survey was posted online to ascertain the views and perceptions of students who had taken part in the group blog project.
Most students acknowledged that the blog facilitated peer support and that this was one of its most valuable features. Students valued the extent of the support that was forthcoming: ‘Because it was a group blog I felt it was more group support. I was helped by a number of people which made the support feel more reliable.’ For some, the blog comments were the only support they received: ‘The majority of support I received was through the blog, and it was beneficial to get comments from peers about ideas and thoughts.’
Tutor support was also facilitated through the blog, and although this was considered qualitatively different to peer support, the immediacy factor was acknowledged as important. One student remarked: ‘[Name of tutor], you were brilliant, always speedily replying to my posts.’ Another considered that gaining any feedback was encouraging: ‘I had a lot of support, every time I posted anything onto the blog I had at least one reply either off a student or [name of tutor].’
The blog also encouraged students to reflect more on their progress and decisions during their research projects. One female student remarked: ‘Honestly I found it quite helpful as I re-read what I had written and it helped clarify my thoughts into what I actually wanted to say.’ This revealed that the persistence of blog content and the ability to revisit it had the potential to be a useful reflection and clarification tool. The same student later said: ‘It allowed me to really look at the different areas of my project and to focus on the steps I needed to complete the project, looking at it in small chunks instead of one large piece of work.’ These remarks suggest that for this student, blogging was useful as a means of organizing and planning during the project.
Social comparison featured as an unexpected outcome of the group blog. Festinger suggested that people have a need to evaluate themselves by comparing their opinions and abilities to others [27]. He suggested a link between comparing oneself to others and an upward drive to develop better abilities. One female student enjoyed the self contained nature of the blog, but also saw its power to motivate: ‘I was able to contact all of the other members of the group through one method, and I was also able to monitor the rate at which they were progressing with their research to make sure I wasn't behind!’ One male student claimed that comparing his progress to others by reading their blog posts encouraged him to sustain his study: ‘It motivated me to work - I could see the progression of others and this made me think either, “I'm ahead I can chill out” or “I'm behind, better get a move on!”’
Perhaps the most important function of the blog as a social comparison tool however, was its capability to build confidence by supporting dialogue between individuals who were experiencing similar problems. One female student found using the blog reassuring in this way: ‘Really helpful, sometimes I used to panic, check the blog and reassure myself that I wasn't the only one in a panic. It also gave me more confidence when people commented on my work, made me feel I was on the right lines.’

3. Conclusions

These studies have shown that although wikis and blogs have distinctly different learning applications, which generally correspond to their functionality, there is evidence that some functionality is interchangeable. Although they were small scale, and conducted with opportunistic samples, the data have provided clear insights into the study life of trainee teachers when they use participative media in combination. The qualitative data yielded some rich sources of personal views, many of which provide us with clearer insight into how students use wiki-blog combinations to interact, collaborate, reflect and engage with learning. Wikis can act as centralized repositories of information and one-stop-shops for group communication, but blogs can fulfill similar functions. For this first study, wikis were used minimally as a shared environment for collaborative writing although they patently suit this purpose. Operational, cultural and pedagogical issues may militate against collaborative use. Blogs by contrast were used as shared reflective devices for students to share their personal thoughts and exchange views. For the second study, the blog replaced the wiki as a central repository of reflections, discussions and as a means for giving and receiving support within the learning community. Blogs were also valued as a social comparison tool to check on personal progress against the progress of other group members – a functionality that would be difficult to replicate through the use of a wiki.
Both tools were used for communication purposes, but the communication modes were qualitatively different and provided different services. It is yet unknown the extent to which the overlap of blogs and wikis can create a climate within which students can negotiate meaning and construct knowledge, but from observation of learner engagement during the classroom teaching sessions, it can be deduced that students did manage a form of collaborative construction of knowledge using the two tools, and were able to support each other socially and emotionally. The negotiation of meaning resulting from use across both tools was varied and specific to the needs of each individual student, as would be expected. The means through which a similar mashup approach of tools and spaces can be achieved to support remote, separated students will be the subject of future research.


  1. Richardson, W. Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts and other Powerful Web Tools for Classrooms; Corwin Press: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wheeler, S.; Yeomans, P.; Wheeler, D. The good, the bad and the wiki: Evaluating Student Generated Content as a Collaborative Learning Tool. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2008, 39, 987–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kop, R. Blogs and Wikis as disruptive technologies: Is it time for a new pedagogy? In The Pedagogy of Lifelong Learning; Osborne, M., Houston, M., Toman, N., Eds.; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wenger, E.; McDermott, R.; Snyder, W.M. Cultivating Communities of Practice; HBS Press: London, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  5. Keen, A. The Cult of the Amateur; Nicholas Brealey: London, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tapscott, D.; Williams, A. D. Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything; Atlantic Books: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  7. Surowiecki, J. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many are Smarter than the Few and how Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies and Nations; Anchor Books: London, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  8. McConnell, D. E-learning Groups and Communities; Open University Press: Maidenhead, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  9. Vratulis, V.; Dobson, T.M. Social negotiations in a wiki environment: a case study with pre-service teachers. Educ. Media Int. 2008, 45, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wheeler, S.; Wheeler, D. Using wikis to promote quality learning in teacher training. Learn., Media Technol. 2009, 34, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ma, W.W.K.; Yuen, A.H.K. News writing using wiki: impacts on learning experience student journalists. Educ. Media Int. 2008, 45, 295–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kamel Boulos, M.N.; Maramba, I.; Wheeler, S. Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Med. Educ. 2006, 6, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ojala, M. Blogging for knowledge sharing, management and dissemination. Bus. Inform. Rev. 2005, 22, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kervin, L.; Mantei, J.; Herrington, A. Blogs as a Social Networking Tool to Build Community. In E-Collaboration: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications; Kock, N, Ed.; IGI Global: London, UK, 2009; Vol. 1. [Google Scholar]
  15. Beuschel, W. Weblogs in Higher Education. In Social Software and Developing Community Ontologies; Hatzipanagos, S., Warburton, S., Eds.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2009; pp. 40–51. [Google Scholar]
  16. Farmer, B.; Yue, A.; Brooks, C. Using blogging for higher order learning in large-cohort university teaching: A case study. In Proceedings of the ASCILITE 2007 Conference; 2007; pp. 262–270. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bolton, G. Reflective Practice, 2nd Ed. ed; Sage Publications: London, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bold, C.; Hutton, P. Supporting students’ critical reflection-on-practice. In Learning, Teaching and Assessing in Higher Education; Campbell, A., Norton, L., Eds.; Learning Matters: Exeter, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wheeler, S.; Lambert-Heggs, W. The MentorBlog Project: Connecting student teachers and their mentors through social software. In Paper presented at the 15th EDEN Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, June 2008.
  20. Lee, M.J.W.; Miller, C.; Newnham, L. RSS and content syndication in higher education: subscribing to a new model of teaching and learning. Educ. Media Int. 2008, 45, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Short, J.; Williams, E.; Christie, B. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications; John Wiley and Sons: London, UK, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  22. Norman, D.A. The Design of Everyday Things; MIT Press: London, UK, 1998; p. 9. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hegel, G.W.F. The Science of Logic; Allen & Unwin: London, UK, 1812; pp. 176–179. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kanuka, H.; Anderson, T. Online Social Interchange, Discord, and Knowledge Construction. J. Distance Educ. 1998, 13, 57–74. [Google Scholar]
  25. Chandler, D. Writing Oneself in Cyberspace 1997. Available online: (Accessed: 7 May 2009).
  26. Wheeler, S. Digital Tribes, Virtual Clans. In Connected Minds, Emerging Cultures: Cybercultures in Online Learning; Wheeler, S., Ed.; Information Age Publishers: Charlotte, NC, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  27. Festinger, L. A theory of social comparison processes. Hum. Relat. 1954, 7, 117–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wheeler, S. Learning Space Mashups: Combining Web 2.0 Tools to Create Collaborative and Reflective Learning Spaces. Future Internet 2009, 1, 3-13.

AMA Style

Wheeler S. Learning Space Mashups: Combining Web 2.0 Tools to Create Collaborative and Reflective Learning Spaces. Future Internet. 2009; 1(1):3-13.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wheeler, Steve. 2009. "Learning Space Mashups: Combining Web 2.0 Tools to Create Collaborative and Reflective Learning Spaces" Future Internet 1, no. 1: 3-13.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop