Next Article in Journal
Potential Use of Biological Proteins for Liver Failure Therapy
Next Article in Special Issue
Topical Anti-Nuclear Factor-Kappa B Small Interfering RNA with Functional Peptides Containing Sericin-Based Hydrogel for Atopic Dermatitis
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Screening for Methylated Poly(⌊-histidine) with Various Dimethylimidazolium/Methylimidazole/Imidazole Contents as DNA Carrier
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceutics
Volume 7
Issue 3
10.3390/pharmaceutics7030233
pharmaceutics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of Biodegradable Polycation-Based Inhalable Dry Gene Powders by Spray Freeze Drying

by
Tomoyuki Okuda
1,
Yumiko Suzuki
1,
Yuko Kobayashi
1,
Takehiko Ishii
2,
Satoshi Uchida
3,
Keiji Itaka
3,
Kazunori Kataoka
2,3 and
Hirokazu Okamoto
1,*
1
Faculty of Pharmacy, Meijo University, 150 Yagotoyama, Tempaku-ku, Nagoya 468-8503, Japan
2
Department of Bioengineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
3
Division of Clinical Biotechnology, Center for Disease Biology and Integrative Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2015, 7(3), 233-254; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics7030233
Submission received: 29 May 2015 / Revised: 18 August 2015 / Accepted: 19 August 2015 / Published: 26 August 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Paradigm of Gene Therapy)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, two types of biodegradable polycation (PAsp(DET) homopolymer and PEG-PAsp(DET) copolymer) were applied as vectors for inhalable dry gene powders prepared by spray freeze drying (SFD). The prepared dry gene powders had spherical and porous structures with a 5~10-μm diameter, and the integrity of plasmid DNA could be maintained during powder production. Furthermore, it was clarified that PEG-PAsp(DET)-based dry gene powder could more sufficiently maintain both the physicochemical properties and in vitro gene transfection efficiencies of polyplexes reconstituted after powder production than PAsp(DET)-based dry gene powder. From an in vitro inhalation study using an Andersen cascade impactor, it was demonstrated that the addition of l-leucine could markedly improve the inhalation performance of dry powders prepared by SFD. Following pulmonary delivery to mice, both PAsp(DET)- and PEG-PAsp(DET)-based dry gene powders could achieve higher gene transfection efficiencies in the lungs compared with a chitosan-based dry gene powder previously reported by us.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

A key for successful gene therapy is whether or not therapeutic genes can be effectively delivered and internalized into targeted organs and cells. Clinical trials for gene therapy against several intractable and lethal diseases have actively progressed in the world [1]. However, the approach for gene therapy by systemic administration has some obstacles, including degradation by endonuclease in blood and non-targeted distribution, subsequently leading to poor therapeutic effects and adverse effects, such as the interferon response. Therefore, the approach of local administration, which enables the direct delivery of therapeutic genes into target organs, has been examined [2].
Pulmonary administration is a powerful tool for achieving effective pulmonary gene therapy against several lung diseases, such as cystic fibrosis, α1-antitrypsin deficiency, and lung cancer, which are also the target of our pulmonary gene delivery system, due to direct and noninvasive delivery into deep lung areas through the respiratory tract [3]. Furthermore, viral and non-viral vectors have been applied to pulmonary gene delivery to realize higher gene transfection efficiencies [4]. On the other hand, the development of inhalable aerosol systems for pulmonary gene delivery is critical for clinical use. At present, three aerosol inhalation systems are available for clinical application: nebulizers, pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs), and dry powder inhalers (DPIs) [5]. A nebulizer formulation containing plasmid DNA (pDNA) encoding the therapeutic gene and a cationic liposome, as a vector, was used in a phase I clinical trial of gene therapy against cystic fibrosis [6,7].
Among these systems, DPIs have attracted much attention due to their low cost, the portable device, no propellant, and ease of handling [8]. Although reports on the development of DPIs for pulmonary gene therapy are still limited, some powder production techniques, including spray drying (SD), supercritical fluid precipitation, and lyophilization, might be applicable for a specific formulation or condition [9,10,11]. However, the destabilization of the gene or delivery system caused by several stresses, including heating, freezing, spraying, and shear force, must be considered during powder production [9,12,13,14,15]. Moreover, the morphology and particle size of prepared powders are critical factors affecting their inhalability. In general, aerodynamic particles of 1~5 μm are considered suitable for delivery by inhalation [8]. On the other hand, particles in this range of geometric size generate a strong adhesion force, resulting in poor dispersibility. To overcome the dilemma between aerodynamic and geometric particle sizes in the development of DPIs, recently, some low-density dry powders have been produced, facilitating an increase in the geometric particle size with a suitable aerodynamic particle size for inhalation [8].
Spray freeze drying (SFD) is a recent and simple technique to produce porous dry powders with a low density [16]. Maa et al. revealed that a dry powder produced by SFD could exhibit superior inhalation characteristics compared to that by SD irrespective of having similar geometric particle sizes [17]. In addition, SFD can guarantee the high-level recovery of produced dry powders, even if the initial amount of the formulation is small, which is important for the study of dry gene powders on a laboratory scale since the employed genes are relatively expensive. From these fine characteristics, we have introduced SFD into powder production for gene DPIs. In our previous study, it was demonstrated that dry gene powder could be stably prepared by SFD without the loss of pDNA integrity, and that the powder exhibited a gene expressing effect in the lungs of mice following pulmonary administration [18]. For clinical application, however, a higher gene transfection efficiency in the lungs is necessary.
The choice of suitable vectors for gene DPIs is a critical element determining gene transfection efficiency in the lungs following inhalation. Biodegradable polycations are attractive non-viral vectors for effective gene therapy because of their quick endosomal escape potential and high tolerability in the body [19]. In our previous reports, chitosan, a natural biodegradable polycation, was selected as a vector for inhalable dry gene powder prepared by SFD [18]. Chitosan has been reported to show high tolerability in the body [20]. Unfortunately, on the other hand, it has been reported that the transfection efficiency of chitosan is low compared to that of polyethyleneimine (PEI), a non-biodegradable polycation [21]. As novel biodegradable polycations for higher gene transfection efficiency, we have synthesized poly(aspartamide) derivatives with an ethylenediamine unit as a side chain (poly{N-[N-(2-aminoethyl)-2-aminoethyl]aspartamide} (PAsp(DET)) and their block copolymers with poly(ethylene)glycol (PEG-PAsp(DET)) [22,23]. These polycations have superior transfection efficiencies with minimal cytotoxicity compared to PEI, probably due to effective endosomal escape promoted by a marked shift of protonation between the physiological pH and endosomal acidic pH [24]. In particular, PEG-polycation block copolymers including PEG-PAsp(DET) can form a core-shell type of polyplex micelle composed of (1) the inner complex core constructed from electrostatic interaction between a negatively-charged gene and positively-charged segment in the polymers, and (2) the hydrophilic outer shell constructed from the PEG segment in the polymers, allowing it to escape the degradation of genes by endonuclease and aggregation caused by the interaction with blood components [25,26]. So far, PEG-PAsp(DET) polyplex micelles have successfully achieved the effective in vivo transfection of therapeutic genes into some target sites, such as: (1) vascular lesions via intraarterial administration [27], (2) a bone defect area in skull bone by regulated release from a calcium phosphate cement scaffold locally implanted [28], and (3) the lung via intratracheal administration [29]. These results prompted us to apply these polycations as vectors for effective gene DPIs with higher gene transfection efficiencies.
Thus, in this study, inhalable dry gene powders including PAsp(DET) and PEG-PAsp(DET) were produced by SFD. To improve the inhalable potential of dry powders prepared by SFD, l-leucine was added as a dispersibility enhancer in the formulation. The integrity of pDNA, physicochemical properties, and gene transfection efficiencies of the polyplexes after powder production were evaluated, respectively. Following the pulmonary administration of prepared dry powders to mice, the gene transfection efficiency and adverse effects in the lungs were compared to those of a chitosan-based dry powder developed in our previous study [18].

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

The pDNA encoding firefly luciferase with CAG promoter (pCAG-Luc) was provided by RIKEN Bioresource Center (Tsukuba, Japan). pCAG-Luc was amplified in the DH5 strain of Escherichia coli, and purified using an EndoFree Plasmid Giga Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). The concentration and purity of pCAG-Luc were determined by measuring UV absorption at 260 nm and the A260/A280 ratio, respectively. d(−)-mannitol (Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd., Osaka, Japan) and l-leucine (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used as an excipient and a dispersibility enhancer for inhalable dry powder, respectively. Chitosan (Mw: 2000~5000, water-soluble, Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd.) was used as a control vector in this study. Fluorescein sodium salt (FLNa; Sigma–Aldrich) and indocyanine green (ICG; Sigma–Aldrich) were selected as fluorescent labels of dry powders for in vitro inhalation and in vivo gene transfection studies, respectively. Luciferin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was used as a substrate of luciferase. Isoflurane (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA) was used for inhalation anesthesia in the measurement of luminescence and fluorescence in mice with an in vivo imaging system (IVIS®; IVIS-SPECTRUM, Caliper Life Sciences, Hopkinton, MA, USA). Lipopolysaccharide (Sigma–Aldrich) was selected as a positive control for evaluating lung injury in vivo. The other reagents and solvents used were of analytical grade.

2.2. Synthesis and Characterization of PAsp(DET) and PEG-PAsp(DET)

PAsp(DET) and PEG-PAsp(DET) were prepared according to a ring-opening polymerization scheme, as previously reported [22,23]. Briefly, the polymerization of β-benzyl-l-aspartate N-carboxy-anhydride (Chuo Kaseihin Co., Inc., Tokyo, Japan) was started from n-butylamine (Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd.) for PAsp(DET) and α-methoxy-ω-amino PEG (Mw: ~12,000, Nippon Oil and Fats, Tokyo, Japan) for PEG-PAsp(DET) to obtain poly(β-benzyl-l-aspartate) (PBLA) and PEG-PBLA, respectively, followed by an aminolysis reaction to introduce diethylenetriamine (DET; Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd.) into the side chain of PBLA. From the 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum, the polymerization degrees of PAsp(DET) and PAsp(DET) segments in PEG-PAsp(DET) were calculated to be 68 and 62, respectively, and the quantitative introduction of DET was confirmed (Figure 1).
Pharmaceutics 07 00233 g001 1024
Figure 1. Chemical structures of (A) PAsp(DET) and (B) PEG-PAsp(DET).
Figure 1. Chemical structures of (A) PAsp(DET) and (B) PEG-PAsp(DET).
Pharmaceutics 07 00233 g001

2.3. Preparation of Dry Powders by SFD

The procedure of powder production by SFD was described in our previous report [18]. A schematic diagram is given in Figure 2. The formulations are listed in Table 1. The total mass of each formulation was adjusted to 50 mg. All formulation compositions for dry powders were dissolved in 2.5 mL of ultra-pure water. The solution was flowed at a rate of 5 mL/min, and atomized into liquid nitrogen at an air flow pressure of 150 kPa using a two-fluid nozzle (0.4 mm in inner diameter) for a spray dryer (SD-1000, TOKYO RIKAKIKAI Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). We flowed water and air into the tubing connected with the nozzle before and after flowing the sample solution. The water flowed before the sample was to fix the flow rate and aid the wetting of the internal surfaces of the tubing and nozzle. The water flowed after the sample was to disperse the sample solutions left in the nozzle. The head of the nozzle was placed approximately 15 cm above the surface of liquid nitrogen. Following atomization, liquid nitrogen including frozen droplets was transferred to a freeze dryer (RLE-52, KYOWA VACUUM ENGINEERING Co., Tokyo, Japan) pre-cooled at a shelf temperature of −40 °C. After liquid nitrogen was evaporated, frozen droplets were dried at a pressure of less than 1 Pa, while the shelf temperature was gradually increased from −40 to 10 °C over a period of 24 h. The formulation names for prepared dry powders and solutions were abbreviated to “DP” and “SL” in each figure and table, respectively. The molecular ratio of amine in each polymer to phosphate in pDNA (N/P) was set to 4 or 8 for PAsp(DET), 40 or 80 for PEG-PAsp(DET), and 10 for chitosan, based on our previous studies [18,22,24,27,29].
Pharmaceutics 07 00233 g002 1024
Figure 2. Diagram of the SFD setup.
Figure 2. Diagram of the SFD setup.
Pharmaceutics 07 00233 g002
Table 1. Composition of (A) several dry powders prepared by SFD and (B) solutions (dosage/body). N/P: molecular ratio of amine in polymer to phosphate in pDNA, pDNA: plasmid DNA, Leu: l-leucine, ICG: indocyanine green, FLNa: fluorescein sodium salt, Man: d(−)-mannitol.
Table
(A) Dry powder
(A) Dry powder
Formulation nameN/PpDNA (μg)Polymer (μg)Leu (μg)ICG or FLNa (μg)Man (μg)Total amount (mg)
Man DP––––1014901.5
Man-Leu DP–––751014151.5
PAsp(DET) DP4
8		9
9		14.9
29.9		75
75		10
10		1391
1376		1.5
1.5
PEG-PAsp(DET) DP40
80		9
9		255
510		75
75		10
10		1151
896		1.5
1.5
Chitosan DP10945751013611.5
Table
(B) Solution
(B) Solution
Formulation nameN/PpDNA (μg)Polymer (μg)Leu (μg)ICG or FLNa (μg)Man (μg)Total amount (mg)Water (μL)
PAsp(DET) SL4914.9751013911.550
PEG-PAsp(DET) SL409255751011511.550

2.4. Morphology and Particle Size of Dry Powders

To examine the morphology of prepared dry powders, the particles were observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Type JSM-6060, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Before the observation, prepared dry powders were dispersed by an appropriate apparatus using pulmonary administration to mice [30]. The particle size distribution of the obtained powder was measured with the laser micron sizer LMS-30 (Seishin Enterprise Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) based on laser diffraction.

2.5. Determination of pDNA Integrity in Dry Powders by Electrophoresis

Prepared dry powders were dissolved in ultra-pure water. We added 2 U of heparin sodium to enhance the dissociation of the complexes. Each sample solution containing 0.1 μg of pDNA was loaded on 0.6% agarose gel. Electrophoresis was carried out with a current of 100 V, 150 mA for 2 h in Tris–acetate–EDTA running buffer. A λ Hind III digest was used as a molecular mass marker, and naked pDNA and digested pDNA (by Hind III) were used as a control, respectively. After the electrophoresis, the gel was soaked in a 0.5 μg/mL ethidium bromide solution to detect pDNA with a fluorescent image analyzer (Typhoon FLA 9000; GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Tokyo, Japan).

2.6. Particle Size and Zeta Potential of Polyplexes

The particle size and zeta potential of the polyplexes formed between pDNA and PAsp(DET) or PEG-PAsp(DET) were assessed using an electrophoretic light scattering spectrophotometer (Zetasizer Nano ZS, Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK) at 25 °C. Polyplex formation was performed in ultra-pure water, keeping it at room temperature for 30 min. Then, the final concentration of pDNA was adjusted to 20 μg/mL using 10 mM HEPES buffer at pH 7.4.

2.7. Cells

Murine colon adenocarcinoma (CT26) cells were kindly provided by Prof. Y. Takakura, Kyoto University. They were cultured in RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin at 37 °C in humidified air containing 5% CO2.

2.8. In Vitro Transfection Study by Polyplexes

CT26 cells were seeded on a 24-well microplate (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) at a concentration of 60,000 cells/600 μL/well. After incubation for 24 h, the growth medium in each well was replaced with OPTI-MEM® (Invitrogen Co., Carlsbad, CA, USA). Each polyplex was formed in ultra-pure water at room temperature for 30 min. Then, 60 μL of the polyplex solution was added to each well at an amount of 3 μg as pDNA. At 4 h after exposure, the OPTI-MEM® containing the polyplex in each well was replaced with new growth medium, followed by incubation for 44 h. After removal of the medium, lysis buffer (0.05 % Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 0.1 M Tris, pH 7.8) was added to each well to lyse cells. Additionally, each lysate was treated with three cycles of freezing and thawing to fully lyse cells. The lysate was centrifuged at 13,000× g for 7 min at 4 °C to collect the supernatant. The luciferase activity and protein concentration in each supernatant were measured by the Picagene® luciferase assay (TOYO INK Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and Bradford protein assay, respectively.

2.9. In Vitro Inhalation Characteristics of Dry Powders

The in vitro inhalation characteristics of the prepared dry powders were evaluated using an 8-stage Andersen cascade impactor (AN-200; SIBATA SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGY Ltd., Saitama, Japan). To prevent dry powder from bouncing off the plates and becoming re-entrained in the air stream, the metal plates for the stages were coated with a thin layer of glycerin. After setting a No. 2 hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) hard capsule (Shionogi Qualicaps Co. Ltd., Nara, Japan) containing 4 mg of each dry powder in a dry powder inhaler (Jethaler® dual type; Hitachi Automotive Systems, Ltd., Isesaki, Japan), inspiration at a flow rate of 28.3 L/min and for a flow time of 5 s was carried out using a vacuum pump. After the inspiration, dry powder deposited in each part (capsule, device, throat, stages, and filter) was washed out by 10 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to measure the concentration of FLNa using a fluorescence microplate reader (GEMINI EM; Molecular Devices LLC., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). From the concentration, the amount of dry powder deposited in each part was calculated. The deposition of dry powder in each part was defined by the following equation:
Deposition (%) = amounts in each part/amounts in total parts × 100
For inhalation indexes, the output efficiency (OE) and fine particle fraction (FPF) were defined by the following equations, respectively:
OE (%) = amounts in throat and lower parts/amounts in total parts × 100
FPF (%) = amounts in stage 3 and lower parts/amounts in throat and lower parts × 100
The cut-off diameter in stage 3 was 4.7 μm. OE means the emission potential from the capsule and device, while FPF means the potential of delivery into the lung. The mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) was determined from each deposition pattern, using special analysis software (AEROSOL particle density analysis system; SIBATA SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGY Ltd.).

2.10. Pulmonary Administration to Mice

All the animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Faculty of Pharmacy, Meijo University on 31 October 2011 (authorization number: Pharm-Exp-5) and conducted in accordance with the Guiding Principles for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Female ICR mice weighing approximately 20 g were anesthetized with pentobarbital (50 mg/kg, i.p.) and a board was secured to their backs during the experiments. The trachea was exposed and 2.5 cm of PE-60 polyethylene tubing (internal diameter: 0.76 mm; Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) was inserted to a depth of 1.0 cm through an incision. Prepared dry powders were administered through the trachea using an appropriate apparatus for mice [30]. The powders (1.5 mg) were put in a disposable tip and dispersed in the trachea by releasing air (0.35 mL) compressed in a syringe by opening a three-way stopcock connecting the disposable tip and syringe. On the other hand, 50 µL of the solution dissolving 1.5 mg of a powder was similarly administered by a liquid aerosol apparatus for mice (MicroSprayer®-Model IA-1C; Penn-Century Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA).

2.11. Detection of Fluorescence and Luminescence in Vivo

Following the pulmonary administration of each formulation to mice, fluorescence and luminescence in mice were detected using IVIS® as in our previous report, respectively [18,31]. The nominal pixel size and minimum detectable radiance of IVIS® were 13.5 μm and 70 photons/s/cm2/sr, respectively. To detect the fluorescence derived from ICG, an excitation filter of 745 nm and an emission filter of 820 nm were used, and the exposure time was set to 1 s. When the luminescence corresponding to luciferase activity was detected, luciferin as a substrate of luciferase was administered (150 mg/kg, i.p.) at 10 min before the detection point, and the exposure time was set to 1 min. During the measurement, the mice were anesthetized with isoflurane on a stage kept at 25 °C. To quantify the fluorescence and luminescence intensities in the lungs of mice, the region of interest (ROI) was adjusted to a rectangle with a width of 3 cm and height of 1 cm.

2.12. Histological Analysis of Excised Lung

For this evaluation, mice were selected with sufficient pulmonary gene expression in the in vivo gene transfection study described above. At 48 h following the pulmonary administration of each formulation to mice, cardiac perfusion from left the ventricle to right atrium with PBS was performed to wash out the blood in the lungs. Then, the lungs were fixed by perfusion with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. The fixed lungs were excised from the bodies and stored in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS at 4 °C for 24 h. Subsequently, they were transferred into 30% sucrose in PBS and stored at 4 °C for 48 h to fully remove paraformaldehyde. Cryosections (10 μm) were cut from the lungs frozen in O.C.T. Compound (Sakura Finetek USA, Inc., Torrance, CA, USA) on dry ice, and stained by hematoxylin & eosin to observe them with a microscope (BIOREVO BZ-9000; KEYENCE, Osaka, Japan).

2.13. Statistical Analysis

Statistical comparisons were made using Aspin-Welch’s t-test for evaluation of the particle size, zeta potential, and in vitro transfection efficiencies of polyplexes formed before and after powder production, and a one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test for the other evaluations. Significant correlations between pulmonary delivery and gene expression in vivo were evaluated based on a test of no correlation. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Morphology and Particle Size of Dry Gene Powders Prepared by SFD

All dry powders could successfully be collected by SFD. The recovery of dry powders was achieved at a rate of more than 60% of the theoretical amount. From Figure 3 and Table 2, it was confirmed that the dry powders had spherical and porous shapes with a diameter of approximately 10 μm. Morphological and size differences were not observed between dry powders of different compositions.
Pharmaceutics 07 00233 g003 1024
Figure 3. Scanning electron micrographs of (A) Man DP, (B) Man-Leu DP, (C) PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 4), and (D) PEG-PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 40).
Figure 3. Scanning electron micrographs of (A) Man DP, (B) Man-Leu DP, (C) PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 4), and (D) PEG-PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 40).
Pharmaceutics 07 00233 g003
Table
Table 2. Geometric particle sizes of Man DP, Man-Leu DP, PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 4), and PEG-PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 40). Each value represents the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). Significant difference compared with Man DP (*, P < 0.05).
Table 2. Geometric particle sizes of Man DP, Man-Leu DP, PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 4), and PEG-PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 40). Each value represents the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). Significant difference compared with Man DP (*, P < 0.05).
Formulation nameCumulative particle size (μm)
d10d50d90
Man DP4.4 ± 0.78.5 ± 1.019.0 ± 3.9
Man-Leu DP4.6 ± 0.410.3 ± 0.527.7 ± 3.7
PAsp(DET) DP3.7 ± 0.27.6 ± 0.314.4 ± 0.4
PEG-PAsp(DET) DP4.7 ± 0.311.7 ± 1.8 *28.4 ± 6.6

3.2. Stability of pDNA during Powder Production by SFD

To evaluate the integrity of pDNA in the prepared dry gene powders, electrophoresis was carried out. As controls, two bands derived from naked pDNA represent the supercoiled and open-circular forms (Figure 4A,H), while that from digested pDNA represents the linear form (Figure 4B,G). In all dry gene powders prepared at different N/P ratios, bands corresponding to the supercoiled and open-circular forms of pDNA could be detected, but that corresponding to the linear form could not (Figure 4D,F,J,L), being similar to the results for sample solutions before powder production by SFD (Figure 4C,E,I,K). These results indicate that the integrity of pDNA could be maintained during powder production by SFD.
Pharmaceutics 07 00233 g004 1024
Figure 4. Integrity of pDNA in PAsp(DET) DP and PEG-PAsp(DET) DP after powder production by SFD. (A,H) naked pDNA, (B,G) pDNA digested with Hind III, (C,D) PAsp(DET) polyplex before and after powder production of PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 4), (E,F) PAsp(DET) polyplex before and after powder production of PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 8), (I,J) PEG-PAsp(DET) polyplex before and after powder production of PEG-PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 40), and (K,L) PEG-PAsp(DET) polyplex before and after powder production of PEG-PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 80). Electrophoresis of the samples for PAsp(DET) DP and PEG-PAsp(DET) DP was separately carried out with the individual gels. In the fluorescent image of each gel, the regions related to this study (shown as solid and dotted lines) were selectively cut off to combine with no modification. The position of each band in the combined images is the same as that in the original ones.
Figure 4. Integrity of pDNA in PAsp(DET) DP and PEG-PAsp(DET) DP after powder production by SFD. (A,H) naked pDNA, (B,G) pDNA digested with Hind III, (C,D) PAsp(DET) polyplex before and after powder production of PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 4), (E,F) PAsp(DET) polyplex before and after powder production of PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 8), (I,J) PEG-PAsp(DET) polyplex before and after powder production of PEG-PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 40), and (K,L) PEG-PAsp(DET) polyplex before and after powder production of PEG-PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 80). Electrophoresis of the samples for PAsp(DET) DP and PEG-PAsp(DET) DP was separately carried out with the individual gels. In the fluorescent image of each gel, the regions related to this study (shown as solid and dotted lines) were selectively cut off to combine with no modification. The position of each band in the combined images is the same as that in the original ones.
Pharmaceutics 07 00233 g004

3.3. Physicochemical Properties and In Vitro Gene Transfection Efficiencies of PAsp(DET) and PEG-PAsp(DET) Polyplexes Reconstituted from Dry Gene Powders Prepared by SFD

Physicochemical properties of a polyplex including the particle size and surface charge are important factors for determining its cellular binding and uptake potentials [32]. Therefore, the particle size and zeta potential of PAsp(DET) and PEG-PAsp(DET) polyplexes reconstituted from dry gene powders were measured and compared with those before powder production (Figure 5). It was clarified that the particle size and zeta potential of PAsp(DET) and PEG-PAsp(DET) polyplexes were not markedly changed after powder production, suggesting preservation of the physicochemical properties of these polyplexes during powder production by SFD. The mean particle sizes of PAsp(DET) and PEG-PAsp(DET) polyplexes ranged from 100 to 150 nm. The zeta potential of the PAsp(DET) polyplex was more positive at a higher N/P, while that of the PEG-PAsp(DET) polyplex remained neutral irrespective of N/P.
Next, the in vitro gene transfection efficiencies of PAsp(DET) and PEG-PAsp(DET) polyplexes reconstituted from dry gene powders were evaluated and compared with those before powder production (Figure 6). Before powder production, it was confirmed that the PAsp(DET) polyplex had a more than 10-fold higher gene transfection efficiency compared with the PEG-PAsp(DET) polyplex. After powder production, however, the efficiencies of PAsp(DET) polyplexes at N/P of 4 and 8 decreased to approximately 9.8% and 0.17% of those before powder production, respectively, indicating the marked losses of their activities during powder production. On the other hand, the efficiencies of PEG-PAsp(DET) polyplexes at N/P of 40 and 80 after powder production were approximately 40% and 55% of those before powder production, respectively, suggesting the higher stability of PEG-PAsp(DET) polyplexes for transfection efficiency in powder production.
Pharmaceutics 07 00233 g005 1024
Figure 5. (A) Particle size and (B) zeta potential of polyplexes formed before and after powder production by SFD. Each powder was dissolved in ultra-pure water to reconstitute the polyplex. Each value represents the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). Significant difference compared with before power production (**, P < 0.01).
Figure 5. (A) Particle size and (B) zeta potential of polyplexes formed before and after powder production by SFD. Each powder was dissolved in ultra-pure water to reconstitute the polyplex. Each value represents the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). Significant difference compared with before power production (**, P < 0.01).
Pharmaceutics 07 00233 g005
Pharmaceutics 07 00233 g006 1024
Figure 6. In vitro gene transfection efficiencies against CT26 cells by polyplexes formed before and after powder production by SFD. Each powder was dissolved in ultra-pure water to reconstitute the polyplex. Each value represents the mean ± S.D. (n = 4). Significant difference compared with before powder production (**, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05).
Figure 6. In vitro gene transfection efficiencies against CT26 cells by polyplexes formed before and after powder production by SFD. Each powder was dissolved in ultra-pure water to reconstitute the polyplex. Each value represents the mean ± S.D. (n = 4). Significant difference compared with before powder production (**, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05).
Pharmaceutics 07 00233 g006

3.4. Inhalation Characteristics of Dry Gene Powders Prepared by SFD

For evaluating the inhalable potential of prepared dry powders, an 8-stage Andersen cascade impactor was used. Following inspiration, most of the Man DP was deposited in the capsule and stage 0, while a larger amount of Man-Leu DP was deposited in stage 3 and lower parts (Figure 7). From a comparison of inhalation indexes for Man DP and Man-Leu DP (Table 3), it was clarified that the addition of l-leucine markedly increased the value of OE from 74% up to 98% and the value of FPF from 6.8% up to 62%, respectively, indicating the enhanced dispersibility and lung deposition potentials. Regarding dry gene powders, the values of OE and FPF in PAsp(DET) DP were 96% and 54%, respectively, which were nearly equal to those in Man-Leu DP. On the other hand, the values of OE and FPF in PEG-PAsp(DET) DP were 80% and 11%, respectively, which were similar to those in Man DP in spite of the addition of l-leucine. MMADs in Man-Leu DP and PAsp(DET) DP were approximately 1~3 μm, being a suitable aerodynamic diameter for lung delivery by DPIs.
Pharmaceutics 07 00233 g007 1024
Figure 7. In vitro deposition patterns of Man DP, Man-Leu DP, PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 4), and PEG-PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 40) in an 8-stage Andersen cascade impactor following inspiration at a flow rate of 28.3 L/min and for a flow time of 5 s. Each value represents the mean ± S.D. (n = 3).
Figure 7. In vitro deposition patterns of Man DP, Man-Leu DP, PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 4), and PEG-PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 40) in an 8-stage Andersen cascade impactor following inspiration at a flow rate of 28.3 L/min and for a flow time of 5 s. Each value represents the mean ± S.D. (n = 3).
Pharmaceutics 07 00233 g007
Table
Table 3. Several inhalation indexes of Man DP, Man-Leu DP, PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 4), and PEG-PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 40), calculated from in vitro deposition patterns. OE: output efficiency, FPF: fine particle fraction, MMAD: mass median aerodynamic diameter. Each value represents the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). Significant difference compared with Man DP (**, P < 0.01).
Table 3. Several inhalation indexes of Man DP, Man-Leu DP, PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 4), and PEG-PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 40), calculated from in vitro deposition patterns. OE: output efficiency, FPF: fine particle fraction, MMAD: mass median aerodynamic diameter. Each value represents the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). Significant difference compared with Man DP (**, P < 0.01).
FormulationOE (%)FPF (%)MMAD (μm)
Man DP74.3 ± 19.26.8 ± 1.315.6 ± 2.5
Man-Leu DP97.8 ± 0.962.3 ± 3.0 **1.2 ± 0.2 **
PAsp(DET) DP95.5 ± 2.954.3 ± 6.2 **2.4 ± 0.5 **
PEG-PAsp(DET) DP79.9 ± 13.211.2 ± 1.68.7 ± 1.5 **

3.5. In Vivo Pulmonary Gene Transfection Efficiencies of Dry Gene Powders Prepared by SFD

To perform in vivo studies of inhalable dry powders including pharmacokinetic and pharmacological studies, in general, the powders are dispersively administered into the lungs of small animals by intratracheal insufflation using some specific apparatuses [30,33]. However, the spontaneous breathing of small animals disturbs the exact dose control of the powders deposited in the lungs, consequently leading to unclear results in in vivo studies. To estimate the in vivo transfection efficiencies by inhalable dry gene powders more precisely, in our previous reports, we clarified the usefulness of a noninvasive dual imaging system for evaluating both pulmonary delivery and gene expression by inhalable dry gene powders in each mouse [18,31]. Fluorescence derived from ICG and luminescence corresponding to luciferase activity in each mouse represent lung delivery and gene expression by a dry gene powder, respectively. In our previous reports, a significant correlation between fluorescence and luminescence intensities in mice was demonstrated. Furthermore, a slope of the regression line gained from the correlation diagram shows the in vivo pulmonary gene transfection efficiency of a dry gene powder, compensated for the scattering of pulmonary delivery in mice.
Using this system, in the present study, the in vivo pulmonary gene transfection efficiencies of novel dry gene powders (PAsp(DET) DP and PEG-PAsp(DET) DP) were compared with the solution formulations (PAsp(DET) SL and PEG-PAsp(DET) SL) and a chitosan-based dry gene powder (Chitosan DP) that we developed previously [18]. In PAsp(DET) DP, PAsp(DET) SL, and Chitosan DP, the maximum luminescence intensities were detected at 6~12 h following pulmonary delivery to mice, while these were at 18~36 h in PEG-PAsp(DET) DP and PEG-PAsp(DET) SL (Figure 8). In Figure 9, the correlation between the fluorescence intensity derived from ICG at 15 min and the maximum luminescence intensity corresponding to luciferase activity in each mouse following pulmonary administration was plotted. A significant correlation was observed in each formulation except PEG-PAsp(DET) SL. By comparison between the slopes of the regression lines, it was demonstrated that all formulations with PAsp(DET) and PEG-PAsp(DET) polyplexes had higher in vivo pulmonary gene transfection efficiencies than Chitosan DP (Table 4). Among them, PAsp(DET) DP had the highest transfection efficiency, being approximately 50-fold higher than Chitosan DP.
Table
Table 4. Indexes for regression lines determined from a correlation diagram between pulmonary delivery and gene expression by PAsp(DET) DP and SL (N/P = 4), PEG-PAsp(DET) DP and SL (N/P = 40), and Chitosan DP. Significant correlation between pulmonary delivery and gene expression was evaluated from a test of no correlation (**, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05).
Table 4. Indexes for regression lines determined from a correlation diagram between pulmonary delivery and gene expression by PAsp(DET) DP and SL (N/P = 4), PEG-PAsp(DET) DP and SL (N/P = 40), and Chitosan DP. Significant correlation between pulmonary delivery and gene expression was evaluated from a test of no correlation (**, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05).
Formulation namenr2Slope
PAsp(DET) DP90.842 **568
PAsp(DET) SL90.959 **23
PEG-PAsp(DET) DP90.719 *49
PEG-PAsp(DET) SL60.50198
Chitosan DP90.861 **11
Pharmaceutics 07 00233 g008 1024
Figure 8. Optical images of pulmonary delivery and gene expression by (A) PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 4), (B) PEG-PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 40), (C) PAsp(DET) SL (N/P = 4), (D) PEG-PAsp(DET) SL (N/P = 40), and (E) Chitosan DP (N/P = 10). The pulmonary delivery and gene expression were evaluated by the detection of fluorescence derived from ICG (Fl) and luminescence corresponding to luciferase activity (Lu) using IVIS® following pulmonary administration to mice, respectively. The color scales are in photons/s/cm2/sr.
Figure 8. Optical images of pulmonary delivery and gene expression by (A) PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 4), (B) PEG-PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 40), (C) PAsp(DET) SL (N/P = 4), (D) PEG-PAsp(DET) SL (N/P = 40), and (E) Chitosan DP (N/P = 10). The pulmonary delivery and gene expression were evaluated by the detection of fluorescence derived from ICG (Fl) and luminescence corresponding to luciferase activity (Lu) using IVIS® following pulmonary administration to mice, respectively. The color scales are in photons/s/cm2/sr.
Pharmaceutics 07 00233 g008
Pharmaceutics 07 00233 g009 1024
Figure 9. Correlation between pulmonary delivery and gene expression by PAsp(DET) DP and SL (N/P = 4), PEG-PAsp(DET) DP and SL (N/P = 40), and Chitosan DP. In the correlation diagram, fluorescence intensity derived from ICG at 15 min and maximum luminescence intensity corresponding to luciferase activity, which were calculated by IVIS®, following pulmonary administration into mice were plotted, respectively. The calculated intensities were corrected using each pre-administered mouse.
Figure 9. Correlation between pulmonary delivery and gene expression by PAsp(DET) DP and SL (N/P = 4), PEG-PAsp(DET) DP and SL (N/P = 40), and Chitosan DP. In the correlation diagram, fluorescence intensity derived from ICG at 15 min and maximum luminescence intensity corresponding to luciferase activity, which were calculated by IVIS®, following pulmonary administration into mice were plotted, respectively. The calculated intensities were corrected using each pre-administered mouse.
Pharmaceutics 07 00233 g009

3.6. In Vivo Toxicities of Dry Gene Powders Prepared by SFD

To assess the toxicities of dry gene powders in the lungs, histological observations were performed using mice with sufficient pulmonary gene expression in the in vivo gene transfection study described above. The alveolar structure of mice treated with PEG-PAsp(DET) DP (Figure 10D) remained intact as did those treated with water (Figure 10A) and Man-Leu DP (Figure 10B), negative controls, suggesting the possibility of its mild irritation. On the other hand, an increase in the filtration of inflammatory cells was observed in the alveolar structure of mice treated with PAsp(DET) DP (Figure 10C), although it was not as marked as that of mice treated with lipopolysaccharide (Figure 10E), a positive control inducing acute lung inflammation [34]. Therefore, these results indicate that PAsp(DET) DP could cause more marked irritation than PEG-PAsp(DET) DP.
Pharmaceutics 07 00233 g010 1024
Figure 10. Histological observation of lungs excised at 48 h following the pulmonary delivery of (C) PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 4) and (D) PEG-PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 40) into mice. (A) Water and (B) Man-Leu DP were administered as negative controls, and (E) lipopolysaccharide (120 mg/kg) was a positive control.
Figure 10. Histological observation of lungs excised at 48 h following the pulmonary delivery of (C) PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 4) and (D) PEG-PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 40) into mice. (A) Water and (B) Man-Leu DP were administered as negative controls, and (E) lipopolysaccharide (120 mg/kg) was a positive control.
Pharmaceutics 07 00233 g010

4. Discussion

A chitosan-based dry gene powder prepared by SFD in our previous report [18] was not sufficient for human clinical application as an inhalant because of the relatively large particle size (approximately 20~40 μm). In this study, therefore, the atomizing pressure in the preparation procedure was increased from 20 to 150 kPa, consequently achieving the production of smaller-sized dry powders (Figure 1 and Table 2). Even in the powder production with more marked atomizing stress, the integrity of pDNA in PAsp(DET) DP and PEG-PAsp(DET) DP was demonstrated to be maintained (Figure 4). Similar results were observed in some gene powder productions containing cationic vectors [9,15]. Thus, the polyplex formation between an anionic gene and a cationic vector in a sample solution for powder production must markedly contribute to avoiding the critical loss caused by some stresses in the procedure of SFD.
In our previous report, we used mouse lung metastasis models, which were prepared by the intravenous injection of CT-26 cells into mice, to examine the in vivo efficacy of a chitosan-interferon-β gene complex powder for inhalation [35]. In the present study, we thus selected CT26 cells in the in vitro gene transfection study, expecting a future in vivo efficacy study with the same mouse lung metastasis models. The decreased in vitro gene transfection efficiency of the PAsp(DET) polyplex after powder production (Figure 6) was considered to be caused by the increased binding affinity of the DET segment with pDNA in the PAsp(DET) polyplex. Ramsy et al. suggested that the binding affinity of a cationic poly(amino acid) vector with a gene is a more essential factor in determining the gene transfection efficiency of the polyplex than its particle size and surface charge [36]. Moreover, Hahn et al. reported that the binding affinity of PEI, a cationic vector, with pDNA was increased in a PEI polyplex reconstituted after powder production by lyophilization [37]. The increased binding affinity interfered with the dissociation of pDNA from the PEI polyplex in the cytosol, consequently leading to a lower gene transfection efficiency. In this study, therefore, a similar phenomenon would occur in the PAsp(DET) polyplex reconstituted from PAsp(DET) DP. On the other hand, the maintained in vitro gene transfection efficiency of the PEG-PAsp(DET) polyplex after powder production (Figure 6) could be explained by the role of the PEG segment in PEG-PAsp(DET). In sample solution for powder production, PEG-PAsp(DET) formed the core-shell type of polyplex micelles, as mentioned above, which would maintain the environment of the inner complex core during powder production to maintain the binding affinity of the DET segment with pDNA in polyplex micelles. Armstrong et al. reported that PEG modification of a cationic liposome could maintain the in vitro gene transfection efficiency of the lipoplex reconstituted after powder production by lyophilization, partly supporting our hypothesis [38].
l-Leucine has been widely used as a dispersant reagent for inhalable dry powders prepared by SD [39,40]. Although the mechanism under enhanced dispersibility by l-leucine has not been fully clarified, l-leucine spontaneously covers the surface of droplets after aerosolization of sample solution due to a surfactant-like property and low solubility in water or other vehicles, which might contribute to lowering the cohesiveness and adhesiveness of prepared dry powders [41]. In this study, therefore, l-leucine was applied to powder production by SFD to further promote inhalation performance. The tap density of Man-Leu DP was 0.0094 g/mL, which was much lower than that of Man DP, 0.035 g/mL. The surface areas of these two particles measured by argon gas adsorption were 26.6 and 17.8 m2, respectively, suggesting that these particles were porous. The water content measured with the Karl Fischer method was 0.89% and 0.86%, respectively. In the prepared dry gene powders, PAsp(DET) DP showed favorable inhalation performance similar to Man-Leu DP, while PEG-PAsp(DET) DP did not in spite of the addition of l-leucine (Figure 7 and Table 3). This result could be easily explained by the difference of polymer occupation in the composition (PAsp(DET) DP; 1%, PEG-PAsp(DET); 17%). In our previous studies, it was clarified that PEG-PAsp(DET) needed larger amounts (i.e., higher N/P) than PAsp(DET) to show effective gene expression, because the outer PEG shell would hamper the cellular uptake and intracellular process of the polyplex [27]. Thus, a high N/P was similarly chosen for PEG-PAsp(DET) DP in this study. However, greater polymer occupation in PEG-PAsp(DET) DP would markedly affect its inhalation performance. This observation strongly indicated that we must select a vector for an effective inhalable dry gene powder in view of not only its gene transfection efficiency but also effective inhalability.
From the slope of the regression line gained from the correlation diagram between pulmonary delivery and gene expression by each formulation (Table 4), it was demonstrated that both PAsp(DET) DP and PEG-PAsp(DET) DP had higher in vivo pulmonary gene transfection efficiencies compared with Chitosan DP, which was in accordance with the higher in vitro gene transfection potentials of these polymers themselves. In the in vitro gene transfection study (before powder production), as shown in Figure 6, both PAsp(DET) and PEG-PAsp(DET) polyplexes showed superior gene-expressing effects (1~10 × 108 RLU/mg protein), while the chitosan polyplex did not (<1 × 104 RLU/mg protein, data not shown). These results suggest that a vector with a higher gene transfection potential should be selected for developing an effective dry gene powder for inhalation.
The much higher in vivo gene transfection efficiency of PAsp(DET) DP than PAsp(DET) SL (Table 4), which was consistent with our previous report about a chitosan-based dry gene powder prepared by supercritical CO2 precipitation [10], surprised us since it was opposite to the results of the in vitro gene transfection study (Figure 6). Although the reasons for this discrepancy between in vivo and in vitro remain unclear, one of them is considered to be the different concentration of the polyplex exposed on the cell surface. On reaching the lungs following pulmonary delivery in vivo, PAsp(DET) DP was dissolved in a small volume of water on the lung epithelial surface to reconstitute a very high concentration of the PAsp(DET) polyplex. The high-concentration exposure might enhance the intracellular uptake of the PAsp(DET) polyplex, contributing to the higher in vivo gene transfection efficiency of PAsp(DET) DP. On the other hand, the difference between in vivo gene transfection efficiencies of PEG-PAsp(DET) DP and PEG-PAsp(DET) SL (Table 4) were in good agreement with the results of the in vitro gene transfection study (Figure 6). It has been reported that PEG modification of lipoplexes and polyplexes interferes with the electrostatic interaction between positively charged complexes and the negatively charged cell membrane, resulting in limited intracellular uptake via endocytosis [42,43]. Possibly, the intracellular uptake of the PEG-PAsp(DET) polyplex might be restricted even at an extremely high concentration of polyplex formation on the lung epithelial surface, consequently leading to similar trends between in vitro and in vivo gene transfection efficiencies of PEG-PAsp(DET) DP and SL. In addition, the PEG segment in PEG-PAsp(DET) must also be related to the delayed gene expression of PEG-PAsp(DET) DP and SL (time of maximum gene expression: 6~12 h in PAsp(DET) DP and SL, 18~36 h in PEG-PAsp(DET) DP and SL), which was consistent with the results of the transfection study using multicellular tumor spheroids, as shown in a previous report [44]. From the comparison between in vitro and in vivo gene transfection efficiencies, it was strongly indicated that the in vivo gene transfection efficiency of an intact dry gene powder cannot be effectively predicted based on the in vitro gene transfection efficiency of its dissolved form.
Although we did not record the emitted dose in this study, it was the case that some powders remained in the tip. Even if all the powder was emitted from the tip, the powder distribution in the lung would vary among animals. To overcome this problem, we employed the dual imaging technique [18,31]. PAsp(DET) DP showed the highest in vivo gene transfection efficiency and higher FPF than PEG-PAsp(DET) DP. However, the in vitro dispersion was conducted with 4 mg powder at 28.3 L/min from Jethaler®. On the other hand, the in vivo dispersion was conducted with 1.5 mg powder from a syringe device. The dispersion conditions and device design were different, and so the results cannot be directly compared. For clinical applications, an Andersen cascade impactor study with an appropriate device containing an optimal amount of powder is required.
Local toxic actions induced by some lipoplexes and polyplexes on the lung epithelial surface have limited clinical application as gene inhalation therapy [45]. In human clinical trials, it was reported that the nebulization of a lipoplex containing GL67, a cationic lipid optimized for pulmonary gene therapy, caused some influenza-like symptoms (myalgia, headache, and a high body temperature) and mild respiratory symptoms (cough, wheeze, and a tight chest) [6,7]. Therefore, a guarantee of safety in the lungs is essential for the clinical application of gene formulations for inhalation. The present study indicated that PEG-PAsp(DET) DP had good tolerability but PAsp(DET) DP could cause more severe irritation in the lungs (Figure 10). Similar trends were observed in our previous reports with their solution formulations [29,46], partly supporting the present results. The cationic surface charge is one of the most important factors related to the toxicities of lipoplexes and polyplexes, which can cause direct membrane damage and aggregation in the body. After the dissolution of PEG-PAsp(DET) DP on the lung epithelial surface, the PEG-PAsp(DET) polyplex would be reconstituted, in which the hydrophilic PEG shell covers the inner cationic core, greatly contributing to its favorable tolerability. Our preliminary study with a pulse oximeter (MouseOx®, STARR Life Sciences, Oakmont, PA, USA) showed no changes in the oxygen saturation, number of breaths, and heartbeat rate of mice 24 and 48 h following the pulmonary administration of each formulation (9 μg as pDNA), suggesting no severe toxic effect of PAsp(DET) and PEG-PAsp(DET) polyplexes in solution and powder (data not shown). Unfortunately, information about the safety of PAsp(DET) DP and PEG-PAsp(DET) DP is limited in the present report, and comprehensive analysis including quantifications of some indicators (e.g., lactate dehydrogenase activity and inflammatory cytokine amounts in bronchoalveolar fluid) will be necessary to confirm their local and systemic safety more precisely. As a future plan to achieve a higher transfection efficiency in the lungs with minimized toxicity, we will try to apply the combination of PAsp(DET) and PEG-PAsp(DET) to the powder formulation for inhalation, whose efficiency was shown in our previous report with the solution formulation [46].
In addition to the local toxicity of the gene complex, that of the carrier material is important. Lactose is commonly used as an additive for inhalable formulations; however, it is usual to use lactose as a carrier which is not expected to be delivered deep into the lungs. In the present study, mannitol was used as a carrier delivered deep into the lungs with the gene complex. Mannitol has been used as a carrier for SFD powders in published reports [47,48]. The in vivo toxicity study showed that Man-Leu was not toxic (Figure 10); however, the selection of a carrier is one of the important issues to be resolved in the future.

5. Conclusions

In this study, novel biodegradable polycation (PAsp(DET) and PEG-PAsp(DET) polymers)-based inhalable dry gene powders could be stably prepared by SFD. It was clarified that the prepared dry powders had porous shapes with an approximately 10-μm diameter, and that the addition of l-leucine could markedly improve the inhalation characteristics of the powders. Moreover, powder production by SFD could maintain the physicochemical properties of PAsp(DET) and PEG-PAsp(DET) polyplexes, but could not do so with the in vitro gene transfection efficiencies. On the other hand, it was demonstrated that PAsp(DET)- and PEG-PAsp(DET)-based dry gene powders had higher in vivo gene transfection efficiencies than a chitosan-based dry gene powder which we developed previously. As for the safety of PAsp(DET) DP and PEG-PAsp(DET) DP in the lungs, it was indicated that PEG-PAsp(DET) DP showed favorable tolerability but PAsp(DET) DP could cause more marked irritation. These results suggest that both PAsp(DET)- and PEG-PAsp(DET)-based dry gene powders prepared by SFD might be good candidates for efficient pulmonary gene therapy.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported in part by the Core Research Program for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) from Japan Science and Technology Corporation (JST). Furthermore, we thank Prof. Y. Takakura, Kyoto University, for providing CT26 cells and thank Dr. K. Kondo and Ms. H. Otake, Meijo University, for measuring the tap density, surface area, and water content of Man DP and Man-Leu DP.

Author Contributions

Tomoyuki Okuda designed the experiment and wrote the manuscript. Yumiko Suzuki and Yuko Kobayashi performed the experimental work. Takehiko Ishii and Satoshi Uchida synthesized PAsp(DET) and PEG-PAsp(DET). Keiji Itaka and Kazunori Kataoka provided many significant ideas about this work. Hirokazu Okamoto supervised this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Edelstein, M.L.; Abedi, M.R.; Wixon, J. Gene therapy clinical trials worldwide to 2007—An update. J. Gene Med. 2007, 9, 833–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kawakami, S.; Higuchi, Y.; Hashida, M. Nonviral approaches for targeted delivery of plasmid DNA and oligonucleotide. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008, 97, 726–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gill, D.R.; Davies, L.A.; Pringle, I.A.; Hyde, S.C. The development of gene therapy for diseases of the lung. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2004, 61, 355–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Geiger, J; Aneja, M.K.; Rudolph, C. Vectors for pulmonary gene therapy. Int. J. Pharm. 2010, 390, 84–88. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhou, Q.T.; Tang, P.; Leung, S.S.; Chan, J.G.; Chan, H.K. Emerging inhalation aerosol devices and strategies: Where are we headed? Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2014, 75, 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Alton, E.W.; Stern, M.; Farley, R.; Jaffe, A.; Chadwick, S.L.; Phillips, J.; Davies, J.; Smith, S.N.; Browning, J.; Davies, M.G.; et al. Cationic lipid-mediated CFTR gene transfer to the lungs and nose of patients with cystic fibrosis: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 1999, 353, 947–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ruiz, F.E.; Clancy, J.P.; Perricone, M.A.; Bebok, Z.; Hong, J.S.; Cheng, S.H.; Meeker, D.P.; Young, K.R.; Schoumacher, R.A.; Weatherly, M.R.; et al. A clinical inflammatory syndrome attributable to aerosolized lipid-DNA administration in cystic fibrosis. Hum. Gene Ther. 2001, 12, 751–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Telko, M.J.; Hickey, A.J. Dry powder inhaler formulation. Respir. Care 2005, 50, 1209–1227. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Seville, P.C.; Kellaway, I.W.; Birchall, J.C. Preparation of dry powder dispersions for non-viral gene delivery by freeze-drying and spray-drying. J. Gene Med. 2002, 4, 428–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Okamoto, H.; Nishida, S.; Todo, H.; Sakakura, Y.; Iida, K.; Danjo, K. Pulmonary gene delivery by chitosan-pDNA complex powder prepared by a supercritical carbon dioxide process. J. Pharm. Sci. 2003, 92, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Pfeifer, C.; Hasenpusch, G.; Uezguen, S.; Aneja, M.K.; Reinhardt, D.; Kirch, J.; Schneider, M.; Claus, S.; Friess, W.; Rudolph, C. Dry powder aerosols of polyethylenimine (PEI)-based gene vectors mediate efficient gene delivery to the lung. J. Control. Release 2011, 154, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lane, M.E.; Brennan, F.S.; Corrigan, O.I. Comparison of post-emulsification freeze drying or spray drying processes for the microencapsulation of plasmid DNA. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2005, 57, 831–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tservistas, M.; Levy, M.S.; Lo-Yim, M.Y.; O'Kennedy, R.D.; York, P.; Humphrey, G.O.; Hoare, M. The formation of plasmid DNA loaded pharmaceutical powders using supercritical fluid technology. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2001, 72, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Quaak, S.G.; Haanen, J.B.; Beijnen, J.H.; Nuijen, B. Naked plasmid DNA formulation: Effect of different disaccharides on stability after lyophilisation. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2010, 11, 344–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kuo, J.H.; Hwang, R. Preparation of DNA dry powder for non-viral gene delivery by spray-freeze drying: Effect of protective agents (polyethyleneimine and sugars) on the stability of DNA. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2004, 56, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chow, A.H.; Tong, H.H.; Chattopadhyay, P.; Shekunov, B.Y. Particle engineering for pulmonary drug delivery. Pharm. Res. 2007, 24, 411–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Maa, Y.F.; Nguyen, P.A.; Sweeney, T.; Shire, S.J.; Hsu, C.C. Protein inhalation powders: Spray drying vs spray freeze drying. Pharm. Res. 1999, 16, 249–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mohri, K.; Okuda, T.; Mori, A.; Danjo, K.; Okamoto, H. Optimized pulmonary gene transfection in mice by spray-freeze dried powder inhalation. J. Control. Release 2010, 144, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mintzer, M.A.; Simanek, E.E. Nonviral vectors for gene delivery. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 259–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Illum, L. Chitosan and its use as a pharmaceutical excipient. Pharm. Res. 1998, 15, 1326–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Köping-Höggård, M.; Tubulekas, I.; Guan, H.; Edwards, K.; Nilsson, M.; Vårum, K.M.; Artursson, P. Chitosan as a nonviral gene delivery system. Structure-property relationships and characteristics compared with polyethylenimine in vitro and after lung administration in vivo. Gene. Ther. 2001, 8, 1108–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kanayama, N.; Fukushima, S.; Nishiyama, N.; Itaka, K.; Jang, W.D.; Miyata, K.; Yamasaki, Y.; Chung, U.I.; Kataoka, K. A PEG-based biocompatible block catiomer with high buffering capacity for the construction of polyplex micelles showing efficient gene transfer toward primary cells. ChemMedChem 2006, 1, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Itaka, K.; Ishii, T.; Hasegawa, Y.; Kataoka, K. Biodegradable polyamino acid-based polycations as safe and effective gene carrier minimizing cumulative toxicity. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 3707–3714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Miyata, K.; Oba, M.; Nakanishi, M.; Fukushima, S.; Yamasaki, Y.; Koyama, H.; Nishiyama, N.; Kataoka, K. Polyplexes from poly(aspartamide) bearing 1,2-diaminoethane side chains induce pH-selective, endosomal membrane destabilization with amplified transfection and negligible cytotoxicity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16287–16294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Itaka, K.; Yamauchi, K.; Harada, A.; Nakamura, K.; Kawaguchi, H.; Kataoka, K. Polyion complex micelles from plasmid DNA and poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(L-lysine) block copolymer as serum-tolerable polyplex system: Physicochemical properties of micelles relevant to gene transfection efficiency. Biomaterials 2003, 24, 4495–4506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nomoto, T.; Matsumoto, Y.; Miyata, K.; Oba, M.; Fukushima, S.; Nishiyama, N.; Yamasoba, T.; Kataoka, K. In situ quantitative monitoring of polyplexes and polyplex micelles in the blood circulation using intravital real-time confocal laser scanning microscopy. J. Control. Release 2011, 151, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Akagi, D.; Oba, M.; Koyama, H.; Nishiyama, N.; Fukushima, S.; Miyata, T.; Nagawa, H.; Kataoka, K. Biocompatible micellar nanovectors achieve efficient gene transfer to vascular lesions without cytotoxicity and thrombus formation. Gene Ther. 2007, 14, 1029–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Itaka, K.; Ohba, S.; Miyata, K.; Kawaguchi, H.; Nakamura, K.; Takato, T.; Chung, U.I.; Kataoka, K. Bone regeneration by regulated in vivo gene transfer using biocompatible polyplex nanomicelles. Mol. Ther. 2007, 15, 1655–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Harada-Shiba, M.; Takamisawa, I.; Miyata, K.; Ishii, T.; Nishiyama, N.; Itaka, K.; Kangawa, K.; Yoshihara, F.; Asada, Y.; Hatakeyama, K.; et al. Intratracheal gene transfer of adrenomedullin using polyplex nanomicelles attenuates monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension in rats. Mol. Ther. 2009, 17, 1180–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Okamoto, H.; Aoki, M.; Danjo, K. A novel apparatus for rat in vivo evaluation of dry powder formulations for pulmonary administration. J. Pharm. Sci. 2000, 89, 1028–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mizuno, T.; Mohri, K.; Nasu, S.; Danjo, K.; Okamoto, H. Dual imaging of pulmonary delivery and gene expression of dry powder inhalant by fluorescence and bioluminescence. J. Control. Release 2009, 134, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Elouahabi, A.; Ruysschaert, J.M. Formation and intracellular trafficking of lipoplexes and polyplexes. Mol. Ther. 2005, 11, 336–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bivas-Benita, M.; Zwier, R.; Junginger, H.E.; Borchard, G. Non-invasive pulmonary aerosol delivery in mice by the endotracheal route. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2005, 61, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Conti, G.; Tambalo, S.; Villetti, G.; Catinella, S.; Carnini, C.; Bassani, F.; Sonato, N.; Sbarbati, A.; Marzola, P. Evaluation of lung inflammation induced by intratracheal administration of LPS in mice: Comparison between MRI and histology. MAGMA 2010, 23, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Okamoto, H.; Shiraki, K.; Yasuda, R.; Danjo, K.; Watanabe, Y. Chitosan-interferon-β gene complex powder for inhalation treatment of lung metastasis in mice. J. Control. Release 2011, 150, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ramsay, E.; Hadgraft, J.; Birchall, J.; Gumbleton, M. Examination of the biophysical interaction between plasmid DNA and the polycations, polylysine and polyornithine, as a basis for their differential gene transfection in vitro. Int. J. Pharm. 2000, 210, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hahn, L.D.; Kong, H.; Mooney, D.J. Polycation structure mediates expression of lyophilized polycation/pDNA complexes. Macromol. Biosci. 2010, 10, 1210–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Armstrong, T.K.; Girouard, L.G.; Anchordoquy, T.J. Effects of PEGylation on the preservation of cationic lipid/DNA complexes during freeze-thawing and lyophilization. J. Pharm. Sci. 2002, 91, 2549–2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chew, N.Y.; Shekunov, B.Y.; Tong, H.H.; Chow, A.H.; Savage, C.; Wu, J.; Chan, H.K. Effect of amino acids on the dispersion of disodium cromoglycate powders. J. Pharm. Sci. 2005, 94, 2289–2300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Rabbani, N.R.; Seville, P.C. The influence of formulation components on the aerosolisation properties of spray-dried powders. J. Control. Release 2005, 110, 130–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Vehring, R. Pharmaceutical particle engineering via spray drying. Pharm. Res. 2008, 25, 999–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Harvie, P.; Wong, F.M.; Bally, M.B. Use of poly(ethylene glycol)-lipid conjugates to regulate the surface attributes and transfection activity of lipid-DNA particles. J. Pharm. Sci. 2000, 89, 652–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ogris, M.; Steinlein, P.; Carotta, S.; Brunner, S.; Wagner, E. DNA/polyethylenimine transfection particles: Influence of ligands, polymer size, and PEGylation on internalization and gene expression. AAPS PharmSci. 2001, 3, E21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Han, M.; Bae, Y.; Nishiyama, N.; Miyata, K.; Oba, M.; Kataoka, K. Transfection study using multicellular tumor spheroids for screening non-viral polymeric gene vectors with low cytotoxicity and high transfection efficiencies. J. Control. Release 2007, 121, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ferrari, S.; Griesenbach, U.; Geddes, D.M.; Alton, E. Immunological hurdles to lung gene therapy. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2003, 132, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Uchida, S.; Itaka, K.; Chen, Q.; Osada, K.; Ishii, T.; Shibata, M.A.; Harada-Shiba, M.; Kataoka, K. PEGylated polyplex with optimized PEG shielding enhances gene introduction in lungs by minimizing inflammatory responses. Mol. Ther. 2012, 20, 1196–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wanning, S.; Süverkrüp, R.; Lamprecht, A. Pharmaceutical spray freeze drying. Int. J. Pharm. 2015, 488, 136–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Liang, W.; Kwok, P.C.; Chow, M.Y.; Tang, P.; Mason, A.J.; Chan, H.K.; Lam, J.K. Formulation of pH responsive peptides as inhalable dry powders for pulmonary delivery of nucleic acids. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2014, 86, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Okuda, T.; Suzuki, Y.; Kobayashi, Y.; Ishii, T.; Uchida, S.; Itaka, K.; Kataoka, K.; Okamoto, H. Development of Biodegradable Polycation-Based Inhalable Dry Gene Powders by Spray Freeze Drying. Pharmaceutics 2015, 7, 233-254. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics7030233

AMA Style

Okuda T, Suzuki Y, Kobayashi Y, Ishii T, Uchida S, Itaka K, Kataoka K, Okamoto H. Development of Biodegradable Polycation-Based Inhalable Dry Gene Powders by Spray Freeze Drying. Pharmaceutics. 2015; 7(3):233-254. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics7030233

Chicago/Turabian Style

Okuda, Tomoyuki, Yumiko Suzuki, Yuko Kobayashi, Takehiko Ishii, Satoshi Uchida, Keiji Itaka, Kazunori Kataoka, and Hirokazu Okamoto. 2015. "Development of Biodegradable Polycation-Based Inhalable Dry Gene Powders by Spray Freeze Drying" Pharmaceutics 7, no. 3: 233-254. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics7030233

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop